The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
This Wasn’t A Vote, It Was An Uprising
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Dear Readers: The article below has come to me. I am unable to ascertain if it is a published statement or one of those items sent around the Internet. Nevertheless, I do believe that it captures the attitude of those Americans who in the vast majority of the states gave their vote to Donald Trump.

The optimism expessed in the article might be unrealistic. In order to prevail over the Oligarchy, President Trump will need a government as strong as he appears to be. He cannot find the strength he needs for his government among the usual Washington, Wall Street, and corporate sources. If he selects from these people, he will be impotent.

The question is: who is his transition team? Are they focused on making nice with the Oligachs? If so, there will be no change.

The Democratic Party failed America for the eight years of the Clinton Regime, which committed war crimes and overthrew a sovereign government on the basis of lies. The George W. Bush Regime originated the Middle East wars entirely on the basis of lies. These wars have resulted in the deaths, maiming, and dislocation of millions of peoples who have sought refuge from America’s aggression in Europe. The corrupt Obama Regime has continued and expanded Bush’s illegal wars and stupidly brought the US into conflict with Russia and China, either one of which can destroy the United States of America.

Now we have the psychopath George Soros funding hired protesters, who are bussed from protest to protest, in an effort to delegitimize the Trump presidency. This is an act of treason, but oligarchs such as Soros are above the law. They are never held accounable. Trump should arrest Soros and put him on trial.

Trump says that he wants to bring the oligarchs under the law. If he fails, America fails with him.



This wasn’t an election. It was a revolution.

By Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center

It was midnight in America. The day of the election millions Americans got up and stood in front of the Machine, the great iron wheel that had been grinding them down. They stood there even though the media told them it was useless. They took their stand even while all the chattering classes laughed and taunted them as white trash racists.

They were fathers who couldn’t feed their families anymore. They were mothers who couldn’t afford health care. They were workers whose jobs had been given to foreigners in foreign countries so that the incomes of oligarchs could rise. They were sons who didn’t see a future for themselves. They were daughters afraid of being raped by the undocumented illegals flooding into their towns. They took a deep breath and they stood.

They held up their hands and the great iron wheel stopped.

Blue America crumbled. The Blue States fell one by one. Ohio. Wisconsin. Pennsylvania. Iowa. The white working class that had been overlooked and trampled on for so long got to its feet. It rose up against its oppressors. The rest of the nation, between the West coast and the North East coast–the fly-over zone– rose up with it.

They fought back against their jobs being shipped overseas while their towns filled with migrants that got everything while they got nothing. They fought back against a system in which they could go to jail for a trifle while the elites could violate the law and still stroll through a presidential election.

They fought back against being told that they had to watch what they say.

They fought back against being held in contempt because they wanted to work for a living, take care of their families, and protect the sanctity of marriage.

And they won.

This wasn’t a vote. It was an uprising.

Like the ordinary men chipping away at the Berlin Wall, they tore down an unnatural thing that had towered over them. And as they watched it fall, they marveled at how weak and fragile it had always been. And how much stronger they were than they had ever known.

Who were these people? They were the neglected in the fly-over country that is the heart of America. They didn’t have univeristy degrees, and they had never set foot in a Starbucks to pay $5 for a cup of coffee. They were the white working class. They didn’t talk right or think right. They had the wrong ideas, the wrong clothes and the ridiculous idea that they still mattered.

They were told they were wrong about everything. Illegal immigration. Black Lives Matter, but not jobs for the oppressed middle class. Manufacturing is unnecessary for an economy in which financial profits are all important. Transgendered bathrooms. Same gender marriages. Americans were supposed to bow down and surrender to a handful of perverts.

Told that the future belongs to the metrosexual dot com transgendered globalist, and not to the guy who once had a good job before the globalist corporations with Washington’s blessings sent it to China or Mexico, real Americans revolted.

White trash American couldn’t change anything, declared the pundits. But instead of adapting to the inevitable future of America’s demise, they got in their pickup trucks and drove out to vote.

And they changed everything.

Barack Hussein Obama boasted that he had changed America. And he did for the worse. A billion regulations, millions of immigrants, a hundred thousand lies and it was no longer our America.

White Trash America voted and sent Obama to Hell. They walked through him and through the Democratic Party like the wet paper bag that they are. Voters abandoned the party that had sold out the American people. More black Americans voted for Trump than voted for Romney.

The election repudiated the Obamas, the Clintons, the celebrities, and the media. Americans turned the One Percent’s world upside down.

ORDER IT NOW

CNN is weeping. MSNBC is wailing. ABC calls it a tantrum. NBC damns it. It wasn’t supposed to happen. The same machine that crushed the American people for six straight terms, the mass of neoconned government, globalist corporations and oligarch-financed non-profits that ran the country, was set to win. Or so they thought.

Instead the people stood in front of the Machine. They blocked it with their votes even though the media told them Hillary was the certain winner. They mailed in their absentee ballots even while Hillary Clinton was planning her fireworks victory celebration. They looked at the empty factories and barren farms. They drove through the early cold. They waited in line. They came home to their children to tell them that they had done their best for their future. They bet on America. And they won.

They sre tired of the absence of affordable health care and recognize the fraud of Obamacare. They are tired of unemployment and of being lied to. They are tired of watching their sons come back in coffins so that the military/security complex could continue to loot America with their wars. They are tired of being called names and watching the theft of their country.

They understood that Trump was right. The election was their last hope, their last chance to save themselves and their country. And they did.

This election was not about who gets to use the female toilet. It wasn’t about whether it is racist to enforce the immigration laws. It wasn’t about how men, however uncouthly, express their sexual interest in women.

It was about suffering Americans, whose names no one except a server and the NSA will ever know, fighting back against their oppression. It was about the homeless woman guarding Trump’s star. It was about the betrayed Democrats searching for someone to represent them in Ohio and Pennsylvania. It was about the union men who refused to sell out their futures and vote for a Democrat who is an agent of the One Percent.

The media will never interview those men and women. We will never see their faces. But they are us and we are them. They came to the aid of a nation in peril. They did what real Americans have always done. They did the impossible.

(Republished from PaulCraigRoberts.org by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2016 Election, Donald Trump 
Hide 49 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Er, Señor Roberts, are you quite all right? One would hate to lose your superfine analysis of US government economic statistics.

    May one point out that Señor Greenfield is a Neo-Con?

    Just thought you’d like to know.

  2. Miro23 says:

    This is probably right, but the interesting point is that Trump focused the zeitgeist in a constructive way.

    He’s not an anarchist, and wants to deal with the “Establishment”, so it’s to their advantage to engage with him and do the deals. If he sells out his base (or the Establishment removes him), the zeitgeist could be focused in a much more destructive way.

    The best move for the Establishment would surely be to accept a partial loss of power and give up their future gains (outsourcing, Dem. voter immigration, QE insider gifts and Israel serving wars) while holding onto their present enormous wealth.

    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith
  3. While Greenfield may buy too much into the anti-immigrant rhetoric, he is definitely not a neocon, since he mentions the useless wars, etc. The neocons are the ones supporting the harpy. It is already apparent that change for the better is in the air in Syria as a result of the harpy’s political demise. The salient fact is that war with Russia is no longer on the agenda, and this dwarfs all other considerations. The demonstrations, as craigslist documents posted on theduran.com reveal, are being financed and carried out by Soros-controlled organisations at the core of them. These are useful idiots defending the parasitic dangerous oligarchy which was vanquished. The disgrace was all of the people of good will who looked the other way despite the evidence of corruption, war crimes and war mongering which the Clintons represented. There were also plenty of reports of voting machines wanting to switch from Trump to Clinton but none going the other way. Soros apparently had an interest in many of the voting machines. It is quite likely that the popular vote lead enjoyed by the harpy was itself the result of fraud which did not quite succeed because, though there was widespread cheating in certain areas, including Pennsylvania, the Trump tide was too large in too many areas for her to succeed. It is also cynical in the extreme for the lamestream press and their acolytes to complain about the legitimacy of the election when they scored Trump for not being sure things would be fair despite the machinations of Robert Creamer, Foval and others revealed by the O’Keefe videos during the election campaign.

  4. “Trump says that he wants to bring the oligarchs under the law. If he fails, America fails with him.”

    There are a number of practical benefits to Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin making nicey-nicey with one another, inter alia, avoiding WW-III, finally jointly taking out ISIL snd Terrorism instead of wasting time trying to justify supporting “moderate” rebels who invariably end up being the next wave of terrorists, saving a few bucks by getting the EU freeloaders to pay for their own defence or, better, bringing Russia into NATO because we both face an even larger series of threats, or better still, pulling back from NATO altogether.

    But the most practical benefit of this relationship might just be the knowledge exchange on how to deal with intractable oligarchs; Mr. Putin has hung on to the reins of power despite the existential threats of powerful Russian and EU oligarchs, and perhaps can give Mr. Trump a pointer or two on how to deal with ours.

  5. There was no “uprising.” Trump garnered 1m votes less than Romney. He won only because Hillary garnered 6m votes less than Obama did in 2012 (and 10m less than Obama in 2010).

    The personnel for the new administration will be drawn from the ranks of the same old hacks of previous administrations. PCR himself indicated the virtual inevitability of this in a post around a year back.

  6. @E. A. Costa

    Not so fast, Señor Speedy Gonzalez. 40 minutes after you posted, there came this riff from exiled off main street: ” . . . Greenfield . . . is definitely not a neocon, since he mentions the useless wars, etc. The neocons are the ones supporting the harpy. It is already apparent that change for the better is in the air in Syria as a result of the harpy’s political demise. The salient fact is that war with Russia is no longer on the agenda, and this dwarfs all other considerations.” Got his points about “useless wars,” a favorite neocon activity, and that things beginning to go better in Syria (now that the harpy has croaked – thanks to no pneumonia) and that her war (mongering) with Russia is no longer on the agenda? By definition, Greenfield is not a neocon, Works for me. How about you, Señor Speedy?

    • Replies: @E. A. Costa
  7. @E. A. Costa

    I don’t know who this guy Greenfield is. But a neocon who can write this is certainly a traitor to the neocon cause:

    They are tired of watching their sons come back in coffins so that the military/security complex could continue to loot America with their wars.

  8. I wouldn’t say it was an uprising, Dr Roberts. An uprising would have resulted in Bill Clinton being pitchforked to death and Hillary Clinton burnt at the stake.
    However, I do believe that Donald Trump would have won overwhelmingly but for 2 things. The wrecking campaigns of Gary Dopehead and Kosher Egg McMuffin accounted for nearly 3.5% of the vote, nearly all of which came from Republicans. Secondly, the illegal vote rigging as practised by the Democrats for decades – they even got the Mafia to rig the 1960 election – resulted in many illegal votes for Clinton. With proper voting enforcement, I’m sure millions of votes for Clinton would have been discounted.

    • Replies: @The Grate Deign
  9. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    It is my opinion, which I can’t prove, that Soros is in actuality acting as a front for some part of the US government. That way it doesn’t have it’s fingerprints on anything and Soros is the flak catcher. He’s been in finance for many years and so is probably subject to blackmail and coercion. If they can’t find some violation of law that he’s committed in the past thirty years then they could certainly frame him up or find skeletons in his closet. He makes the perfect front man, an eccentric billionaire egotist with money to blow on his pet projects around the world; being obviously very rich makes people not question where the money is really coming from. Spreading chaos, instability, conflict and divisiveness is part of the worldwide ‘color revolutions’, overseas as well as domestically, being promulgated wherever deemed useful. Using fronts is par for the course.

    • Replies: @dcite
    , @Anonymous
  10. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Count me as unimpressed with Mr. Greenfield’s faux-Churchillian rhetoric. Fred Reed’s latest installment nailed it far better, including rhetoric-wise.

    I suspect Ortega y Gasset is watching Trump’s stunt and smirking.

  11. Diogenes says:

    Let’s correct the widely misused term oligarchy and use the correct term for the US power structure a plutocracy.

    Plutocracy: a class or group ruling, or exercising power or influence, by virtue of its wealth.

    Oligarchy: a form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique; government by the few.

    The US is in effect a plutocracy because the wealthy propertied class, in which there are many billionaires, have bought off the professional political class, of which there are many.

    More importantly this means the US government is corrupted or corrupt.

    Donald Trump is a plutocrat, he is a peripheral member of the US plutocracy.

    George Soros is a plutocrat who makes it his business to fund “color revolutions” [peasant revolts] in order to overthrow pro Russian regimes like Trump’s professed pro Putin inclinations.

    How can a peasants revolt [down trodden white man’s “upraising”] which supports a plutocrat over throw a plutocratic US regime?

    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith
  12. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @Miro23

    The best move for the Establishment would surely be to accept a partial loss of power and give up their future gains (outsourcing, Dem. voter immigration, QE insider gifts and Israel serving wars) while holding onto their present enormous wealth.

    Perhaps you do not understand economic power. The “Establishment” is what the 1% want it to be, no more, no less. If they wanted to manifest and present the working class as the “Establishment”, they would.

    The 1% hold such a large percentage (90%+) of global wealth that they cannot be denied their wishes. Frankly, once they achieved 60% — back in ’82 — the process was inevitable.

    They have to be killed, Miro, for mankind to become civilized. Those with money and power must be shown that power must be used wisely, and for the benefit of the majority, not the few. Certainly, not all of them must be killed, but the worst of the bunch must go to the gallows on some fine sunny day in some fine and future June.

    For now, they are not dead, not jailed, not hanged in the public square. They still have money; they still have all the power, and nothing has changed.

    • Replies: @woodNfish
  13. Svigor says:

    There was no “uprising.” Trump garnered 1m votes less than Romney. He won only because Hillary garnered 6m votes less than Obama did in 2012 (and 10m less than Obama in 2010).

    The personnel for the new administration will be drawn from the ranks of the same old hacks of previous administrations. PCR himself indicated the virtual inevitability of this in a post around a year back.

    Popular vote is meaningless. It’s like saying you won the battle for control of the game clock, or out-rebounded your opponent, when you lost the game by the metric that matters: points scored.

    It’s basically trying to change the way victory is defined, after the game has been played and lost.

    Victory conditions are always set before the game begins.

    If you can’t see the elements of uprising in Trump’s victory over cankles, you may be obtuse.

  14. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @Diogenes

    More importantly this means the US government is corrupted or corrupt.
    Donald Trump is a plutocrat, he is a peripheral member of the US plutocracy.

    Gee, ya think?

    IMO, Trump saw some useful writing on a wall, and leveraged what it bespoke. Leveraged it clumsily, I might add, as any true expression of intent to “un-corrupt” the corruption would have won by a much larger margin.

    There is no reason to trust Trump — no reason at all. Wait and watch before you decide.

    • Replies: @dcite
  15. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @E. A. Costa

    May one point out that Señor Greenfield is a Neo-Con?

    LOL. May one point out that what he wrote is NOT “neocon” cant? May one point out that YOU, by innuendo, make a transparent attempt to discredit what Greenfield wrote? Therefore, it would appear that YOU are the “neocon”?

  16. @Verymuchalive

    Yes!

    I wonder what the actual vote count would have been if Democrat cheating could have been eliminated.

  17. Richard Nixon must have thought the same in 1960 when the Kennedys rigged the vote. But he gritted his teeth and accepted it stoically.
    It’s interesting to speculate what would have happened if Nixon had been President in 1960. Probably much better for white Americans.

  18. geokat62 says:

    E. A. Costa – “May one point out that Señor Greenfield is a Neo-Con?”

    Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften – “Greenfield . . . is definitely not a neocon, since he mentions the useless wars, etc.”

    The Great Deign – “I don’t know who this guy Greenfield is. But a neocon who can write this is certainly a traitor to the neocon cause…”

    Kip Russell – “LOL. May one point out that what he wrote is NOT “neocon” cant?”

    It looks like its 3 to 1 in favour of Mr. Greenfeild not being a neocon. Given this difference of opinion, I decided to do a little research, because like most people, I’ve never heard of Daniel Greenfield before… and it turns out Mr. Greenfeild is in the employ of David Horowitz.

    As most are well aware, David Horowitz is the founder and current president of the think tank the David Horowitz Freedom Center and editor of the Center’s publication, FrontPage Magazine. Mr. Greenfield is a regular contributor to FrontPage Magazine.

    A little backgrounder on David Horowitz:

    David Horowitz is a member of the neocon intelligentsia… Of course, we have to take into consideration that Horowitz’s main obsession is attacking people he was once associated with as a Marxist, so knowledge about the facts surrounding 9/11 come in at best as a distant second. He is also an enemy of libertarians and especially Ron Paul because Paul is opposed to the total warfare state and the neocon mass murder campaigns in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/neocon-david-horowitz-blindsided-by-we-are-change.html

    And here is what Horowitz had to say on the 10th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq:

    Just before American and British troops entered Iraq to remove the regime of Saddam Hussein, a videotape of Osama bin Laden was aired on Al-Jazeera TV. The tape was aired on February 12, 2003, and in it bin Laden said: “The interests of Muslims and the interests of the socialists coincide in the war against the crusaders.”

    Bin Laden was referring to the fact that four weeks earlier, millions of leftists had poured into the streets of European capitals and of Washington, San Francisco and New York to protest the removal of Saddam Hussein. Their goal was to prevent the United States and Britain from toppling Saddam and ending one of the cruelest and most repressive regimes in modern times. The protesters chanted “no blood for oil;” they called the United States “the world’s greatest terrorist state;” they called America’s democratic government an “Axis of Evil;” and they compared America’s president to Adolph Hitler.

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/182477/why-we-were-iraq-david-horowitz

    So it appears that PCR decided to cite a letter written by someone who most Americans never heard of. According to his very terse wiki entry, Daniel Greenfield is “a journalist and conservative blogger who is critical of Islam. He was born in Israel and today lives in New York City.”

    Now, to get a better understanding of what may have motivated Mr. Greenfeild to write that letter, all you have to do is read the following article he recently posted on frontage at.com, ISRAELI CONSERVATIVES CELEBRATE TRUMP WIN.

    Here are a few interesting excerpts:

    Israel Chairman of Republicans overseas Marc Zell gave thanks at the Western Wall Wednesday for Donald J. Trump’s election as US president.

    Wearing suit and tie and a white “Make America Great Again” baseball cap, the co-chair of Republicans Overseas Israel donned phylacteries, danced with ultra-Orthodox worshipers and recited verses of thanksgiving from Psalms. He also wrote a note, apparently containing a wish, and placed it into the ancient stones of the wall…

    “I am in the clouds, really,” he said, visibly moved at Trump’s surprising victory. “I believed it would happen, but when it actually came true, I didn’t understand what’s going on here. It’s something supernatural.”Furthermore, the US needs to start implementing a “policy of not getting involved again in internal affairs of the State of Israel, including building in its capital Jerusalem and in Judea and Samaria and the Golan,” he said, using a biblical term for the West Bank…

    I’m in another universe,” said Marc Zell, co-chair of lobby group Republican Overseas Israel who lives in an Israeli settlement inside the West Bank. “It’s beyond my wildest expectations.”

    Bayit Yehudi chairman and Education Minister Naftali Bennett said “the era of a Palestinian state is over.”

    “Trump’s victory is an opportunity for Israel to immediately retract the notion of a Palestinian state in the center of the country, which would hurt our security and just cause. This is the position of the President-elect, as written in his platform, and it should be our policy, plain and simple,” he wrote.

    Bennett’s statement came in the aftermath of MK Bezalel Smotrich’s (Bayit Yehudi) statement earlier on Wednesday. Smotrich seized on Trump’s abandonment of the two-state solution during the US presidential campaign. He said the idea of an independent Palestinian state was now “shelved immediately.”

    “It appears that the American people are tired of hypocrisy and political correctness and prefer straight talk,” Glick said, Wednesday morning.

    There’s also positive notes from Trump’s adviser on Israel. And likely ambassador.

    Israelis are going to have a friend in President-elect Donald Trump the likes of which the Jewish state has “never seen before,” David Friedman, Trump’s adviser on Jewish and Israeli matters, told The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday.

    Speaking shortly after Trump delivered his victory speech in New York, Friedman – co-chair of the President-elect’s Israel Advisory Committee – said that the hostility which existed between Washington DC and Jerusalem under President Barack Obama would completely disappear under Trump’s leadership.

    “The level of friendship between the US and Israel is going to grow like never before and it will be better than ever, even the way it was under Republican administrations in the past,” Friedman told the Post.

    Friedman is said to be a leading candidate to become the US’s new ambassador to Israel under Trump.

    https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/264777/israeli-conservatives-celebrate-trump-win-daniel-greenfield

    So why would PCR reference a letter written by someone who most have never heard of, without providing us a hint as to his background and political views? A little backgrounder on Paul Craig Roberts. Soon after 9/11, I was drawn to PCR because of his apparent willingness to speak truth to power in his articles. After reading many of them on a regular basis, however, I began to detect a clear pattern. In many of them, while Mr. Roberts was willing to hit hard and identify the people and the policies responsible for America’s domestic woes, he was reluctant doing so when it came to foreign policy. Even in this article he prefers to use the term “oligarchs” rather than use the term neocons/Israel firsters when it comes to identifying those responsible for the disastrous effects of US foreign policy.

    So, in the final analysis, I think E.A. Costa, aka Mr. Speedy Gonzales, got it right.

  19. dcite says:
    @anonymous

    It is my opinion, which I can’t prove, that Soros is in actuality acting as a front for some part of the US government.

    That makes sense. I have tried to fathom that reptile’s motives and means, especially with regard to what is happening in this country, and they elude me. Blaming it on his ethnicity doesn’t explain it.

  20. dcite says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    Yes, he’s very, very rich and knows where the bodies are buried metaphorically speaking; but he’s also risking his life. Did he expect that?
    Trump does manifest courage. Everyone is against him. He and his campaign have been compared to Reagan and the 1980 campaign frequently. That’s the previous president he does resemble ideologically, and even in some personal traits (slim on charm though); but his situation reminds one more of Kennedy in 1960. Popular with many, but truly hated by others. He has few political friends in high places (or anywhere in the power structure), has a facility for making enemies, and actually thinks he is the President in more than title. He might also end up putting a relative in a key position, because who else can you trust.

  21. Avery says:
    @geokat62

    Good background research.

    Looks like PCR got snookered.

  22. Avery says:
    @dcite

    Comparisons with Reagan or Kennedy are not valid.
    Both Reagan and Kennedy had their respective political machines 100% behind them.

    Aside from the MSM and the Democratic party machine, Trump was 100% opposed by the Republican Establishment. And they were quite open about it. Has there been any other election where the Speaker of the House of the given party openly worked against the candidate who _won_ nomination? I am not aware of any.

    Trump election was as populist as it gets (in the American electoral system).
    A historic event.

    • Replies: @dcite
  23. dcite says:
    @Avery

    The Trump election was historic and unique, no argument there; that’s why it was surprising how often people referred to the campaign as being like Reagan’s. Reagan got ok press, and was not vilified like Trump. I was focusing more on the presidency than the campaign, but maybe things will improve. Most people who think they hate him, never listened to him more than a sound bit.

    Yes, the political machine was behind JFK as it was not behind Trump. Certainly JFK got better press and was considered to have won a debate he probably really lost; but at the end of the day, imo, the situations are similar. That political machine does not promise friends and loyalty once the person is in power. Any assistance that political machine provided during the campaign was history within 6 months.

  24. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @geokat62

    Jesus Mother-Humping Christ!! Bullshit by the truckload does not smell sweeter than bullshit by the shovelful. Will you fucking contain yourself?

    What Greenfield wrote was not neocon phlegm. That’s all. No more, no less. Based on what Costa SAID, Greenfield did not write as a neocon. He may BE one, sure. He may NOT be one. Knock it off with the bullshit, huh?

    Eschew surplusage.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  25. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @Avery

    Good background research.
    Looks like PCR got snookered.

    You are an idiot. If Attila the Hun had written the Greenfield piece, it still would have been good copy.

    You right-wing wackos are you own worst enemies. Shit, can you BE any more hard-headed doctrinaire? So stupid.

    • Replies: @Avery
  26. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @dcite

    Yes, he’s very, very rich and knows where the bodies are buried metaphorically speaking; but he’s also risking his life.

    Unlikely. He has friends in Jewish places. Can’t get much safer than that.

  27. Corvinus says:

    A 50-50 split in the popular vote is hardly an uprising.

    Trump won not because of white identity politics, but because of ideology. He won because of a seismic shift in the blue-collar vote i.e. Reagan Democrats. This same group that voted twice for Obama.

    Look at Wisconsin. Here, Trump was just as despised as Hillary Clinton,was far less popular than the president he railed against, and underperformed in that state’s biggest counties and in his own party’s suburban Milwaukee base. Moreover, half of “non-college whites” had an unfavorable opinion of him, according to exit poll data provided by Edison Research. Yet, of those blue-collar voters who did not likeTrump, almost a third (29%) voted for him.

    Ideology trumps identity.

    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith
  28. Avery says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    {You are an idiot. }

    No, you are.

    {You right-wing wackos…}

    You anti-American, anti-Christian, left-wing neo-Nazi, Fascist scum are the real wackos.

    Over to you, neo-Nazi, Fascist, left-wing wacko scum.

    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith
  29. Hibernian says:
    @dcite

    After RFK was confirmed as AG in 1961, an anti-nepotism law was passed.

  30. geokat62 says:
    @Avery

    Good background research.

    Thanks, Avery.

    I managed to dig up some more goodies re this newly minted American patriot:

    Gates of Vienna [an Islamophobia blog] has a pro Israel focus… A cynic may suspect there are ulterior motives at play here. The connection between Zionism and organized Islamophobia is clear and comes as no surprise now. Fear Inc. a six month study by the Centre for American Progress, details how an Islamophobia industry is being funded and peddled by a small minority of conservatives. What is popularly known as ‘Islamism’ has its Zionist counterpart, as explored in a recent LoonWatch series ‘Why Religious Zionism, Not Judaism, Is The Problem‘.

    Indeed Dymphna regularly does the rounds at right wing Zionist websites posting comments moaning about their poverty. One such blog is the rabidly anti Palestinian and Islam hating blog ‘Sultan Knish‘ run by Daniel Greenfield an Israeli sabra living in New York, who is a fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Centre the same organisation that sponsors Jihad Watch. Daniel is obsessed with a pathological hatred for Muslims and a delusion that the US military exists to carry out his fantasy of a war on Islam. Daniel’s postings regularly dehumanise Muslims, and are filled with anti Islam screeds which he fabricates on whim, not unlike Ned May. He also has a Torah Parsha blog and this video shows him in a debate about New Media. In a common theme amongst neo cons, Daniel complains there is a plot to destroy the US military by Obama. In one blog post ‘Winning the War on Terror‘ he suggests genocide:

    We would have to be willing to kill millions, directly or indirectly, while maintaining an alliance that would defy Russia, China and the First World nations that would accuse us of genocide. The real name for this war might well turn out to be World War III. It would take a Churchill or a Roosevelt to launch something like that, and while the world would be radically different afterward, it might well turn out to be radioactively different too.’

    Whilst Daniel’s crowd propagate that Muslims are out to destroy the USA, the truth is these very neo conservatives bankrupted the US economy by leading it into trillion dollar wars on fake premises and fabricated evidence. As Julian Borger reported in The Guardian, the evidence for the Iraq war was fabricated by the now defunct ‘The Office of Special Plans‘ affiliated with hard line Likudniks.

    http://www.loonwatch.com/2011/10/fjordman-back-at-gates-of-vienna-whose-tipsters-include-caroline-glick/

    Looks like PCR got snookered.

    Looks like he’s not the only one.

    • Replies: @Avery
  31. Avery says:
    @geokat62

    {‘We would have to be willing to kill millions, directly or indirectly,… that would accuse us of genocide.}

    Wow.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  32. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    “It is my opinion, which I can’t prove, that Soros is in actuality acting as a front for some part of the US government.”

    Seems to be the other way around, actually. He gives his money to support campaigns of candidates, to organizations like BLM, etc. He claims to do it for charitable/noble reasons but makes lots of money fiddling around with the markets, including causing destabilization of currency. He made billions off of squeezing the British pound.

  33. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @Corvinus

    Ideology trumps identity.

    Not entirely. Ideology springs from identity, for the most part. Trump won because the lies could no longer convince. There’s only so many times people will be believe “Oh, that pore messican!” every time their pockets are picked.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  34. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @Avery

    Call. I’ve got “thumbsucker” and “cheat”.

    • Replies: @Avery
  35. Corvinus says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    “Not entirely. Ideology springs from identity, for the most part. Trump won because the lies could no longer convince.”

    And so goes the Alt Right narrative, much like the MSM one. Trump won because a key demographic, non-college degreed whites, voted for his message. This same group voted for Obama because of his message.

    Trump better deliver the goods, because even those within that group who voted for him held negative attitudes toward a New York elitist. If they get hoodwinked, it’s back to the Democrats, so long as their candidate seeks to address their issues. Again, its ideology.

    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith
  36. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @Corvinus

    You are using “ideology” in replacement of the correct term, “propaganda”.

    Feel free — not my option to do anything but take note — but the usage is incorrect.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  37. woodNfish says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    They have to be killed

    As I have repeated many times, and the ones who escape need to be hunted down and executed and their estates confiscated. It may even be necessary to eliminate their families. Soros will be near the top of the list.

    We have to give Trump time. He may be the person to convince the elitist scum that they need to change their evil ways or get a date with a guillotine.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  38. geokat62 says:
    @Avery

    Wow.

    Yeah, he’s clearly not a neocon.

  39. Avery says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    Raise: nincompoop, birdbrain, dolt, imbecile, delusional, uneducated, ignorant, comprehension-challenged, dumb, pea-brain, suffering from Stupidity Enhanced Personality Syndrome (SEPS), simpleton, suffering from Long Term KoolAid Exposure Damaged Brain Syndrome (LTKAEDB).

    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith
  40. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @Avery

    Call: poopyhead.

    I win.

  41. John Jeremiah Smith [AKA "Kip Russell"] says:
    @geokat62

    Is that you, iffen?

    Could be. Do you have new information for Tel Aviv? Do you have the updated cipher? Caution is the watchword. The bird flies at midnight. Over and out.

  42. Corvinus says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    “You are using “ideology” in replacement of the correct term, “propaganda”. Feel free — not my option to do anything but take note — but the usage is incorrect.”

    You’re going to have to better than merely “disqualify, disqualify, disqualify”. That is, make an argument how I am incorrectly using the term.

    “They have to be killed, Miro, for mankind to become civilized. Those with money and power must be shown that power must be used wisely, and for the benefit of the majority, not the few. Certainly, not all of them must be killed, but the worst of the bunch must go to the gallows on some fine sunny day in some fine and future June.”

    So, are you the modern day Robespierre? Are you willing to murder innocent infants as well?

  43. Corvinus says:
    @woodNfish

    “As I have repeated many times, and the ones who escape need to be hunted down and executed and their estates confiscated. It may even be necessary to eliminate their families. Soros will be near the top of the list.”

    Of course, this is Internet tough guy talk. You would never even carry out your plan, you don’t have the guts. Besides, that would require you to actually kill innocent babies in the process.

    Are you that savage? Have you no respect for human life?

    • Replies: @woodNfish
  44. woodNfish says:
    @Corvinus

    Have you no respect for human life?

    That depends on a lot of things, doesn’t it? Would you have executed Hitler? Stalin? Pol Pot? How about L. H. Oswald, or Ted Bundy? Did you support the Iraq or Afghanistan wars? How about Korea, Viet Nam, or even Columbia and tiny Granada? How about the torture and mass murder of the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas? If you answer yes to any of them, ask yourself the same question you asked me.

    You can call it tough guy talk all you want, but I consider it a necessary part of the strategy to win our war with the elites and the Left, and I do believe we are at war. We just haven’t started shooting yet… well, the Left has, and the elites slaughter us with immunity in their unconstitutional police actions around the world while they sell out their own country.

    It will take bloodshed to change our current path whether you agree or not. The Left owns the media and all the government and educational institutions. We’re done. As much as I support him, Trump is just a breather, and I don’t think it will change any other way. If you think it can be different please tell me why because I don’t really look forward to what I see coming, I just don’t see it happening any other way.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  45. Corvinus says:
    @woodNfish

    “That depends on a lot of things, doesn’t it? Would you have executed Hitler? Stalin? Pol Pot? How about L. H. Oswald, or Ted Bundy? Did you support the Iraq or Afghanistan wars? How about Korea, Viet Nam, or even Columbia and tiny Granada? How about the torture and mass murder of the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas? If you answer yes to any of them, ask yourself the same question you asked me.”

    Except you are equating the Establishment as being similar to these individuals in size and scope of their destruction of a society. In essence, you cavalierly label this group as “pure evil” that ought to be put down.

    “You can call it tough guy talk all you want, but I consider it a necessary part of the strategy to win our war with the elites and the Left, and I do believe we are at war. We just haven’t started shooting yet… well, the Left has, and the elites slaughter us with immunity in their unconstitutional police actions around the world while they sell out their own country.”

    You are in the minority when you label the situation as “a war”. White people in particular are not going to come running merely because you lament how “dangerous” are the elites and the Left.

    “It will take bloodshed to change our current path whether you agree or not.”

    Again, start the war, rather than talk about it. Remember Anders Breivik.

    “The Left owns the media and all the government and educational institutions.”

    The people own the media, the government, and educational institutions. And if you think “you’re done”, that things “can’t be different”, then I can’t help those who perpetually look at matters from a half-glass empty perspective.

    Now, let’s get back to the real question–Are you willing to kill innocent babies whose parents are part of the elites or members of the Left in the process? Are you that savage? Have you no respect for human life?

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS