The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
The Anthrax Coverup Exposed
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Graeme MacQueen’s 2014 book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy, has been vindicated by the head of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation.

Four and one-half months ago I posted a review of MacQueen’s book. The hired government apologists, the despicable presstitute media, and the usual gullible patriots greeted the book with screams of “conspiracy theory.” In fact, MacQueen’s book was a carefully researched project that established that there indeed was a conspiracy–a conspiracy inside the government.

MacQueen’s conclusion stands vindicated by Richard Lambert, the agent in charge of the FBI anthrax investigation who has turned whistleblower.

It was obvious to any person familiar with the techniques that governments use to erode liberty by destroying the protection given to citizens by law that the purpose of the anthrax letters, especially the letters to senators Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle, was to raise the fear level in order to guarantee the passage of the tyrannical PATRIOT Act.

The PATRIOT Act was a decisive blow against American liberty. The act has served to negate the US Constitution in the 21st century and to endow the federal government with unaccountable and tyrannical powers.

In a court filing, Richard Lambert says that as the agent in charge of the investigation he was obstructed and impeded in his investigation for four years by the FBI’s Washington Field Office, by apathy and error from the FBI Laboratory, by erroneous legal decisions, and by politically motivated communication embargoes from FBI Headquarters.

As Lambert has filed a case in US District Court, it will be difficult for Washington to have him assassinated. However, Washington can still use its presstitutes against him.

Lambert says that there was far more exculpatory evidence in Bruce Ivins behalf than there was orchestrated circumstantial evidence against him. Ivins was Washington’s scapegoat after the orchestrated case against Steven Hatfill fell apart and Washington had to pay Hatfill $4.6 million for defamation. Lambert says the evidence was not sufficient for a court conviction of Ivins, who conveniently died or was murdered, and thus could be blamed without conviction.

Scientists have conclusively proven that the anthrax in the letters was advanced bio-weapons technology to which Ivins had no access.

Lambert’s accusations filed in federal court have the capability of exposing the entire
9/11 deception. It will be interesting to see if Washington can again prevail over law and truth and whether the American public will remain insouciant and content in their Matrix existence.

(Republished from by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Media, Anthrax, Terrorism 
Hide 7 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Interesting stuff PCR. The almost certain problem Lambert faces now is, it would appear the judiciary is bought off or co-opted at the top of the pyramid:

    ^ Pardon the satirical nature of the short assessment but the point is clear

  2. Hersh says:

    I wonder how much the politicians fear. If a non-establishment type, say Rand Paul or Ted Cruz, gets the Republican nomination, how would he feel about picking an establishment approved VP, say Rubio or Cotton? He’d have to be mindful of the attempted assassination of President Reagan with establishment politician GHW Bush waiting in the wings. These shadowy types are not above murder, for sure.

  3. Let me get this clear. What do you mean by “the entire 9/11 deception”? [Ron, perhaps uou could answer for him if you have copied his blog article where he may not see comments]. Is there, btw, a distinction to be made in this context between “deception” and “conspiracy”?
    You see I take it as clear enough that a conspiracy of Arab Muslims, a lot of them Saudis with the same anger against the US-Saudi alliance as motivated Osama bun Laden, put together and executed the plan to strike several US targets with US civilian aircraft. The part played by FBI, CIA, local police forces etc. was largely to fail to interpret clues properly and connect the dots. Incompetence sure but no deliberate contribution to the 9/11 disaster by people in high places.
    And there is not the slightest evidence that someone the CIA or FBI or other organ if government would want to cover up for knew enough detail of the conspirators’ plans (even including which floors – approx – of the Twin Towers would be hit) to be able to pack the right amount of explosive material in at the right places to bring the Towers down. Or do you differ on the basis that some such fantastic view follows from your not accepting any of the earliest or most recent or past detailed explanations as to how the physical destruction could occur and did occur?

    You would need to answer these questions:
    1. Who could have thought it necessary to their purposes to actually destroy the whole of the Towers rather than just the top few floors and a lot of NY business?
    2. Who would have been so reckless as to pack in explosives which might be found unexploded in the event that one or both planes didn’t strike their targets?

  4. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    9/11 was no deception. It was a Saudi-backed operation and Israel probably had some or more knowledge (Israel “Art Students”, etc.). I believe it is possible the anthrax attacks were orchestrated by Mossad in order to instigate a U.S. attack against Iraq. In hindsight it wasn’t even necessary. But they were sure to use an anthrax strain linked to Saddam and targeted a magazine photo editor for a publication which published photos of Arabs cheering the 9/11 attacks. The writing on the envelopes was slanted so the writer would be assumed to naturally write from right to left (i.e., Arabic).

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  5. Kiza says:

    It is my firm personal belief that 911 was a joint Israel-US-Saudi operation. My conviction comes from the use of highly-sophisticated explosive thermite, which is exactly the link that PCR highlights (for the Wizard of Oz). Just like the Anthrax in the Antrax Deception came from highly sophisticated labs, so did thermite used on 911. Both are like a signature left behind by the perpetrators. Neither the sophisticated anthrax, nor the sophisticated thermite could have been acquired by terrorists, then only by some organization at the high level of the US Government. This ticks at every level, including the most important one: Cui Bono. That is, how do you get US citizens to support (even demand) wasting more blood and treasure for the benefit of Israel? Without 911 there would have been no attack on Iraq and Syria.

    This is all so elementary that you need a brain examination by a good doctor if you think otherwise. There is not a single fact which opposes this “conspiracy theory”.

    Thus, the conclusion is that the US Government belongs to Israel, not to US citizens, the US citizens only pay taxes and die for Israel.

  6. “All governments lie,” as the late I. F. Stone once said. The U.S. and Israeli governments are the biggest liars on the planet.

    The anthrax case is just another U.S. Government hoax. . . .

  7. @Anonymous

    ” . . . It was a Saudi-backed operation and Israel probably had some or more knowledge (Israel “Art Students,” etc.). I believe it is possible the anthrax attacks were orchestrated by Mossad in order to instigate a U.S. attack on Iraq. . . .”

    A plausible theory.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS