The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
Do Americans Live In A False Reality Created By Orchestrated Events?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Most people who are aware and capable of thought have given up on what is called the “mainstream media.” The presstitutes have destroyed their credibility by helping Washington to lie—“Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction,” “Iranian nukes,” “Assad’s use of chemical weapons,” “Russian invasion of Ukraine,” and so forth. The “mainstream media” has also destroyed its credibility by its complete acceptance of whatever government authorities say about alleged “terrorist events,” such as 9/11 and Boston Marathon Bombing, or alleged mass shootings such as Sandy Hook and San Bernardino. Despite glaring inconsistencies, contradictions, and security failures that seem too unlikely to be believable, the “mainstream media” never asks questions or investigates. It merely reports as fact whatever authorities say.

The sign of a totalitarian or authoritarian state is a media that feels no responsibility to investigate and to find the truth, accepting the role of propagandist instead. The entire Western media has been in the propaganda mode for a long time. In the US the transformation of journalists into propagandists was completed with the concentration of a diverse and independent media in six mega-corporations that are no longer run by journalists.

As a consequence, thoughtful and aware people increasingly rely on alternative media that does question, marshall facts, and offers analysis in place of an unbelievable official story line.

The prime example is 9/11. Large numbers of experts have destroyed the official story that has no factual evidence in its behalf. However, even without the hard evidence that 9/11 truthers have provided, the official story gives itself away. We are supposed to believe that a few Saudi Arabians with no technology beyond box cutters and no support from any government’s intelligence service were able to outwit the massive surveillance technology created by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and NSA (National Security Agency) and deal the most humiliating blow to a superpower ever delivered in human history. Moreover, they were able to do this without the President of the United States, the US Congress, and the “mainstream media” demanding accountability for such a total failure of the high-tech national security state. Instead of a White House led investigation of such a massive security failure, the White House resisted for more than one year any investigation whatsoever until finally giving in to demands from 9/11 families that could not be bought off and agreeing to a 9/11 Commission.

The Commission did not investigate but merely sat and wrote down the story told to it by the government. Afterwards, the Commission’s chairman, co-chairman, and legal counsel wrote books in which they said that information was withheld from the Commission, that the Commission was lied to by officials of the government, and that the Commission “was set up to fail.” Despite all of this, the presstitutes still repeat the official propaganda, and there remain enough gullible Americans to prevent accountability.

Competent historians know that false flag events are used to bring to fruition agendas that cannot otherwise be achieved. 9/11 gave the neoconservatives, who controlled the George W. Bush administration, the New Pearl Harbor that they said was necessary in order to launch their hegemonic military invasions of Muslim countries. The Boston Marathon Bombing permitted a trial run of the American Police State, complete with shutting down a large American city, putting 10,000 armed troops and SWAT teams on the streets where the troops conducted house to house searches forcing the residents out of their homes at gunpoint. This unprecedented operation was justified as necessary in order to locate one wounded 19 year old man, who clearly was a patsy.

There are so many anomalies in the Sandy Hook story that it has generated a cottage industry of skeptics. I agree that there are anomalies, but I don’t have the time to study the issue and come to my own conclusion. What I have noticed is that we are not given many good explanations of the anomalies. For example, in this video made from the TV news coverage, the video’s creator makes a case that the person who is the grieving father who lost his son is the same person outfitted in SWAT clothes at Sandy Hook following the shooting. The person is identified as a known actor. Now, it seems to me that this is easy to test. The grieving father is known, the actor is known, and the authorities have to know who the SWAT team member is. If these three people, who can pass for one another, can be assembled in one room at the same time, we can dismiss the expose claimed in this one video. However, if three separate people cannot be produced together, then we must ask why this deception, which raises questions about the entire story. You can watch the entire video or just skip to the 9:30 mark and observe what appears to be the same person in two different roles.

The “mainstream media” has the ability to make these simple investigations, but does not. Instead, the “mainstream media” calls skeptics “conspiracy theorists.”

There is a book by Professor Jim Fetzer and Mike Palecek that says Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill to promote gun control and that no one died at Sandy Hook. The book was available on but was suddenly banned. Why ban a book?

Here is a free download of the book: I have not read the book and have no opinion. I do know, however, that the police state that America is becoming certainly has a powerful interest in disarming the public. I also heard today a news report that people said to be parents of the dead children are bringing a lawsuit against the gun manufacturer, which is consistent with Fetzer’s claim.


Here is a Buzzsaw interview with Jim Fetzer: If the information Fetzer provides is correct, clearly the US government has an authoritarian agenda and is using orchestrated events to create a false reality for Americans in order to achieve the agenda.

It seems to me that Fetzer’s facts can be easily checked. If his facts check out, then a real investigation is required. If his facts do not check out, the official story gains credibility as Fetzer is one of the most energetic skeptics.

Fetzer cannot be dismissed as a kook. He graduated magna cum laude from Princeton University, has a Ph.D. from Indiana University and was Distinguished McKnight University Professor at the University of Minnesota until his retirement in 2006. He has had a National Science Foundation fellowship, and he has published more than 100 articles and 20 books on philosophy of science and philosophy of cognitive science. He is an expert in artificial intelligence and computer science and founded the international journal Minds and Machines. In the late 1990s, Fetzer was asked to organize a symposium on philosophy of mind.

For an intelligent person, the official stories of President Kennedy’s assassination and 9/11 are simply not believable, because the official stories are not consistent with the evidence and what we know. Fetzer’s frustration with less capable and less observant people increasingly shows, and this works to his disadvantage.

It seems to me that if the authorities behind the official Sandy Hook story are secure with the official story, they would jump on the opportunity to confront and disprove Fetzer’s facts. Moreover, somewhere there must be photographs of the dead children, but, like the alleged large number of recordings by security cameras of an airliner hitting the Pentagon, no one has ever seen them. At least not that I know of.

What disturbs me is that no one in authority or in the mainstream media has any interest in checking the facts. Instead, those who raise awkward matters are dismissed as conspiracy theorists.

Why this is damning is puzzling. The government’s story of 9/11 is a story of a conspiracy as is the government’s story of the Boston Marathon Bombing. These things happen because of conspiracies. What is at issue is: whose conspiracy? We know from Operation Gladio and Operation Northwoods that governments do engage in murderous conspiracies against their own citizens. Therefore, it is a mistake to conclude that governments do not engage in conspiracies.

One often hears the objection that if 9/11 was a false flag attack, someone would have talked.
Why would they have talked? Only those who organized the conspiracy would know. Why would they undermine their own conspiracy?

Recall William Binney. He developed the surveillance system used by NSA. When he saw that it was being used against the American people, he talked. But he had taken no documents with which to prove his claims, which saved him from successful prosecution but gave him no evidence for his claims. This is why Edward Snowden took the documents and released them. Nevertheless, many see Snowden as a spy who stole national security secrets, not as a whistleblower warning us that the Constitution that protects us is being overthrown.

High level government officials have contradicted parts of the 9/11 official story and the official story that links the invasion of Iraq to 9/11 and to weapons of mass destruction. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta contradicted Vice President Cheney and the official 9/11 story timeline. Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill has said that overthrowing Saddam Hussein was the subject of the first cabinet meeting in the George W. Bush administration long before 9/11. He wrote it in a book and told it on CBS News’ 60 Minutes. CNN and other news stations reported it. But it had no effect.

Whistleblowers pay a high price. Many of them are in prison. Obama has prosecuted and imprisoned a record number. Once they are thrown in prison, the question becomes: “Who would believe a criminal?”

As for 9/11 all sorts of people have talked. Over 100 police, firemen and first responders have
reported hearing and experiencing a large number of explosions in the Twin Towers. Maintanence personnel report experiencing massive explosions in the sub-basements prior to the building being hit by an airplane. None of this testimony has had any effect on the authorities behind the official story or on the presstitutes.

There are 2,300 architects and engineers who have written to Congress requesting a real investigation. Instead of the request being treated with the respect that 2,300 professionals deserve, the professionals are dismissed as “conspiracy theorists.”

An international panel of scientists have reported the presence of reacted and unreacted nanothermite in the dust of the World Trade Centers. They have offered their samples to government agencies and to scientists for confirmation. No one will touch it. The reason is clear. Today science funding is heavily dependent on the federal government and on private companies that have federal contracts. Scientists understand that speaking out about 9/11 means the termination of their career.

The government has us where it wants us—powerless and disinformed. Most Americans are too uneducated to be able to tell the difference between a building falling down from asymetrical damage and one blowing up. Mainstream journalists cannot question and investigate and keep their jobs. Scientists cannot speak out and continue to be funded.

Truth telling has been shoved off into the alternative Internet media where I would wager the government runs sites that proclaim wild conspiracies, the purpose of which is to discredit all skeptics.

(Republished from by permission of author or representative)
Hide 19 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Yup. All true Mr. Roberts. They have us by the balls. If help comes it will be from outside. Pray for Vladimir Putin.

    • Replies: @Truth
  2. “Truth telling has been shoved off into the alternative Internet media where I would wager the government runs sites that proclaim wild conspiracies, the purpose of which is to discredit all skeptics.”

    see: Flat Earth

    Dumbest. Thing. Ever. I actually think they choose that just to test the bounds of human stupidity. In that, they have been wildly successful. As a human, successful isn’t the word I would use. Of course there’s a lot of assumptions in there but I’m fairly certain its a psy-op, whatever the reason.

  3. Priss Factor [AKA "Dominique Francon Society"] says: • Website

    Americans think 25% of the population is homo.

    A deluded people addicted to junk culture.

    • Replies: @Realist
  4. It seems to me that if the authorities behind the official Sandy Hook story are secure with the official story, they would jump on the opportunity to confront and disprove Fetzer’s facts.

    There is no point in arguing with conspiracy theorists. No matter how completely you explode their cranky theories, they simply double down and shout louder. They are never satisfied no matter how strong the evidence against their theories may be, and sooner or later there comes a point when, for the sake of your own sanity and peace of mind, you simply have to turn around and walk away.

    Or, like Buzz Aldrin, punch them in the mouth.

    • Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
  5. Realist says:
    @Priss Factor

    Yes, it is hard to over estimate the stupidity of American people….at least many of them.

  6. Truth says:

    You like the fake “Commie” we have now, so much that you want a real one?

    • Replies: @WorkingClass
  7. alexander says:

    What a great title for an article, Mr Roberts.

    How poignant and how timely.

    It does betray an extraordinary malevolence on the part of “our ” government, as though its task is somehow to keep us powerless and dis-informed.

    Certainly,in rereading the preamble to our constitution, the basic outline for the purpose of our government….
    [ To provide for the common defense,
    promote the general welfare,
    and secure the blessings of liberty..}

    …….does not include keeping us powerless and dis-informed.

    If there is enormous validity to your claims, (which most thinking people would attest to)
    then one can only conclude it is not “our” government which is acting in such a fashion, but one hijacked, by some malevolent entity,… and is acting in its stead.

    Perhaps, Mr Roberts, our government has been….” possessed”…. by some sort of evil demon, or foreign entity, that has recommissioned it, to its own nefarious purposes ?

    Perhaps “our” government is trapped somewhere inside this hijacked one, screaming to get out ?

    What can we all do, Mr Roberts, to free it from this insidious evil that has ensnared it?

    What, Mr Roberts, can we do to help our true government climb its way out of this abuse of power it is trapped in?

    What can we do, to help make our government whole again to the purposes for which it was assigned……..and created ?

    What can we do to free it, and ourselves, of the malignancy that has overwhelmed it, Mr Roberts?

    What, pray tell, can we do ?

  8. Eustace Tilley (not) [AKA "Schiller/Nietzsche"] says:
    @The Plutonium Kid

    Well said, U.S. Government Special Agent Plutonium.

    They didn’t argue with or punch Julian Assange in the mouth. They got their vassals in the fem-government of Sweden to trump up fake “rape” charges against him. He is now sequestered, safely out of the way, in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

  9. @Truth

    Why would you say Putin is a “Commie”?

    • Replies: @Truth
  10. Does the proverbial bear sh*t in the Crimea?

  11. Varenik says:

    I just made myself sit thru the whole first video.
    Mr Roberts, with all due respect, the guy that made it did NOT convince me. At all.
    If anything he left me with this uneasy feeling that I would have to go over dozens and dozens of articles by you that I’ve read over the past few years (while agreeing with most things you were talking about) and re-evaluate the facts.
    I’ll give it a bit of time for the slimy feeling left over by this video and go over other links provided, just to cover all bases and see if they change my mind…

  12. Do Americans Live In A False Reality Created By Orchestrated Events?

    Yes, they do, but some of the examples in the article are a bit extreme and probably not right.

    As someone who NEVER watches TV at home, and has not watched any TV in almost 20 years, other than Peppa Pig cartoons that my children enjoy and a few golf majors, and occasional reruns of something of interest on Youtube, my only exposure to TV is a few times a year in airport departure lounges where CNN seems to rule the roost.

    Whenever I see anything reported on CNN TV news I have a hard time believing a word of it. Part of the reason for this is that it is incredibly dumbed down for mass consumption and maximum sensationalism, but there is also a general lack of reportorial curiosity and a general tendency to parrot government press releases as a cheap way of getting a story.

    Interviewers nearly always fail to ask the questions that I would like to ask, suggesting that interviews are usually pre-rehearsed tableaux carefully orchestrated for the lumpenproletariat.

  13. “Whistleblowers pay a high price. Many of them are in prison. ”

    Some get a bullet, others get attacked and injured by thugs. One example of that is Christopher Bollyn who appears to be a good source of 9/11 and other info. He was attacked and tasered at home and suffered a broken elbow. His articles regarding the “Crown” dynasty are worth studying too.

  14. MarkinLA says:

    Hey Truth,

    Weren’t you the one who alerted us to this racist hoax?

    Oh wait, you actually believed it.

    • Replies: @Truth
  15. tanabear says:

    I haven’t looked at all the events you described in any real detail save 9/11 and the Iraq War. I’ve looked at both of those events in a great deal of detail and can say without hesitation that the official stories are nothing more than a first-rate fraud. It is accepted by many that we were lied to regarding the Iraq War. Trump even mentioned this in one of the Republican debates. However, the truth about 9/11 is much more thorny. The fact that 9/11 was a false flag terror attack is pretty obvious once you go through the evidence and discard the propaganda. But the truth of it is so horrible, so incredible, so preposterous to most people upon first impression that they cannot make the effort to stick with it. But once you understand the evidence the official story becomes completely asinine and fatuous.

    A good general will pick his battles carefully and only fight when he knows he has the advantage. The same principle applies for discussions on what most people consider to be “conspiracy theories.” The evidence against the 9/11 story is rock solid. The official account is not scientifically reproducible and contravenes the known laws of nature. Can anyone demolish a steel-framed high-rise, like World Trade Tower 7, with fire only? Nope, didn’t think so.

    However, when we move on to stuff that just looks “suspicious”, then you are going to lose a lot of people.

  16. MarkinLA says:

    Truth, you can do better than that. You know that the vast majority of these stories are a hoax.
    Why not just admit it instead of trying to use the 1 in a 100 that is real?

  17. Truth says:

    The vast majority of all news stories are a hoax, read Paul Craig Roberts latest column.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS