The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
Can the American People Defeat the Oligarchy That Rules Them?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I am surprised that Hillary and the presstitutes haven’t blamed Putin for FBI director Comey’s reopening of the Hillary email case. But they have done the next best thing for Hillary. They have made Comey the issue, not Hillary.

According to US Senator Harry Reid and the presstitutes, we don’t need to worry about Hillary’s crimes. After all, she is only a political woman feathering her nest, like political men have been doing for ages. Why all this misogynist talk about Hillary? It is Comey’s alleged crime that is important. This woman-hating Republican violated the Hatch Act by telling Congress that the investigation he said was closed was reopened. A very strange interpretation of the Hatch Act. It is OK to tell that a candidate for president is cleared duing an election but not to say that a candidate is under investigation.

Comey violated the Hatch Act when he, on orders from the corrupt Obama Attorney General, announced Hillary clean, and thereby used the prestige of federal clearance of Hillary’s violation of national security protocols to boost her standing in the election polls.

Actually, Hillary’s standing in the polls is based on the pollsters over-weighting Hillary supporters in the polls. It is easy to produce a favorite if you overweight their supporters in the poll questions. If you look at the crowds attending the two candidate’s public appearances, it is clear that the American people prefer Donald Trump, who is opposed to war with Russia and China. The election settles no greater issue.

This has the ruling American Oligarcy, for which Hillary is the total servant, concerned. What are they going to do about Trump? Will his fate be the same as John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, George Wallace? Time will tell. Or will a hotal maid appear at the last minute in the way that the Oligarchy got rid of Dominic Strauss-Kahn?

All of the American and Western feminists, progressives, and left-wing remnant fell for the obvious frame-up of Strauss-Kahn. After Strauss-Kahn was blocked from the Presidency of France and resigned as Director of the IMF, the New York authorities had to drop all charges against Strauss-Kahn. But Washington had succeeded in putting its French vassal, Sarkozy, in the presidency of France.

This is how the American Oligarchy destroys those it suspects might not serve its interests. The corrupt self-sereving Oligarchy makes sure that it owns the government and the media, the think tanks and increasingly all of the major universities, and, of course, through the presstitutes, Americans’ minds.

The Oligarchs are now hard-pressed to rescue Hillary as US president, so let’s see if the Oligarchs can once again deceive the insouciant American people.

ORDER IT NOW

While we wait, let’s concern outselves with another important issue. The Clinton crime syndicate in the closing years of the 20th century allowed a small handful of mega-corporations to consolidate the US media in a few hands. This vast increase in the power of the Oligarchy was accomplished despite US anti-trust law and the American tradition of a dispersed and independent media.

But really, what does federal law mean to the One Percent. Nothing whatsoever. They are immune to it. Hillary’s crimes might cost her the election, but she won’t go to jail.

Not content with 90% control of the US media, the Oligarchy wants more concentration and more control. Looks like they will be getting it, thanks to the totally corrupt US government.

The Federal Trade Commission is supposed to enforce US anti-trust law. Instead, the corrupt federal agency routinely violates US anti-trust law by permitting monopoly concentrations of business interests.

Because of the failure of the federal government to enforce federal law, we now have “banks too big to fail,” unregulated Internet monopoly, and the evisceration of a dispersed and independent media.

There formerly was a field of economics known as anti-trust. Ph.D. candidates specialized in and wrote dissertations about public control of monopoly power. I assume that this field of
economics, like the America of my youth, no longer exists.

http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2016/10/22/just-what-the-hell-does-the-federal-trade-commission-antitrust-division-do-anymore/

(Republished from PaulCraigRoberts.org by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2016 Election, Antitrust, Hillary Clinton 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Defeat the oligarchy? Past performance is no guarantor of future results, but it’s the strongest indicator there is.

  2. “Or will a hotal maid appear at the last minute in the way that the Oligarchy got rid of Dominic Strauss-Kahn?”

    Wasn’t the first three weeks of October and the dozen or so women who came foward to accuse Trump of various lecherous advances just that?

  3. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    From Anna Karenina: on “people”:

    [MORE]

    “There is no question here of a declaration of war, but simply the expression of human Christian feeling. Our brothers, one with us in religion and in race, are being massacred. Even supposing they were not our brothers nor fellow-Christians, but simply children, women, old people, feeling is aroused and Russians go eagerly to help in stopping these atrocities. Fancy, if you were going along the street and saw drunken men beating a woman or a child – I imagine you would not stop to inquire whether war had been declared on the men, but would throw yourself on them, and protect the victim.”
    To which,Sergei Ivanovich adds: “The people have heard of the sufferings of their brethren and have spoken.”
    Leven casts the first stone against this blanket assertion:
    “Perhaps so,” said Levin evasively, “but I don’t see it . I’m one of the people myself, and I don’t feel it.”
    The old prince Shcherbatsky drives home the point:
    “I’ve been staying abroad and reading the papers, and I must own, up to the time of the Bulgarian atrocities, I couldn’t make out why it was all the Russians were all of a sudden so fond of their Slavonic brethren, while I didn’t feel the slightest affection for them. I was very much upset, thought I was a monster, or that it was the influence of Carlsbad on me. But since I have been here, my mind’s been set at rest. I see that there are people besides me who’re only interested in the yoke of Russia, and not in their Slavonic brethren.”
    They ask a peasant standing by, Mihalich, about his views on the subject. Of course, Mihalich has no views, deferring to whatever position the tsar may hold, and Leven presses on:
    ““That word ‘people’ is so vague,” said Levin. “Parish clerks, teachers, and one in a thousand of the peasants, maybe, know what it’s all about. The rest of the eighty millions, like Mihalich, far from expressing their will, haven’t the faintest idea what there is for them to express their will about. What right have we to say that this is the people’s will?”
    To this, Sergei Ivanovich responds in a way that lays bare what “public opinion” is all about. I ask the reader’s forbearance as I quote below the exchange of opinions in this salon discussion with only minor cuts, because, I insist, they have direct relevance to where we, in American society, find ourselves today over the prosecution of our ‘human intervention’ and ‘values guided’ foreign policy in Syria at a moment when a great hue and cry has gone up over the killing in East Aleppo:
    Sergey Ivanovitch:  “…let us look at society…All the most diverse sections of the educated public, hostile before, are merged in one. Every division is at an end, all the public organs say the same thing over and over again, all feel the mighty torrent that has overtaken them and is carrying them in one direction.”
    “Yes, all the newspapers do say the same thing,” said the prince.
    “That’s true. But so it is the same thing that all the frogs croak before a storm. One can hear nothing for them.”
    “Frogs or no frogs, I’m not the editor of a paper and I don’t want to defend them, but I am speaking of the unanimity in the intellectual world,” said Sergey Ivanovitch, addressing his brother.
     “Well, about that unanimity, that’s another thing, one may say,” said the prince.
    [he continues] “So it is with the unanimity of the press. That’s been explained to me: as soon as there’s a war their incomes are doubled. How can they help believing in the destinies of the people and the Slavonic races..and all that?”

    [..]

    “I would only make one condition,” pursued the old prince. “Alphonse Karr said a capital thing before the war with Prussia. ‘You consider war to be inevitable? Very good. Let everyone who advocates war be enrolled in a special regiment of advance guards, for the front of every storm, of every attack, to lead them all!”
    “A nice lot the editors would make!” said Katavasov, with a loud roar, as he pictured the editors he knew in this picked legion.”
    “I would only make one condition,” pursued the old prince. “Alphonse Karr said a capital thing before the war with Prussia. ‘You consider war to be inevitable? Very good. Let everyone who advocates war be enrolled in a special regiment of advance guards, for the front of every storm, of every attack, to lead them all!”
    “A nice lot the editors would make!” said Katavasov, with a loud roar, as he pictured the editors he knew in this picked legion.”

  4. The US rebellion was about a group of oligarchs who didn’t want to pay taxes but did want access to Native American land. The US was created to be ruled by oligarchs. The Senate doesn’t represent them any more. It should then there would be Open Government. There was much to be said for the House of Lords; still us.

  5. Anything is possible, Paul, but the American people must first matriculate from their insouciance.

  6. What you call the oligarchs, I call the Ruling Tribe. And what you call the 1%, I call the 2%. But these are quibbles, because they control the production of “truth” and to the vast majority of the populace that is all that matters.

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
  7. nickels says:

    The internet’s days are numbered.

    Pesky Balkanization of information.

  8. @Kyle McKenna

    Washington and Jefferson had no tribal connections. Just land deals to make.

  9. Rehmat says:

    I’m afraid Americans are too brainwashed to do that as American politics, media, CIA, FBI, Supreme Court, DHS, etc. are all controlled by the oligarchs majority of whom are Zionist Jews (according to Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz).

    But then Americans are not alone in such pathetic state. Russians are not better off either. Vladimir Putin is surrounded by six Jewish oligarchs – and he just honored former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger, a war criminal, and American Hollywood actor Steven Seagal, a friend of Israel.

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/11/03/putin-honors-war-criminal-henry-kissinger/

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS