The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
Brexit: What Is It About?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If you read the presstitute media, Brexit—the referendum tomorrow on the UK’s exit from the
EU— is about racism. According to the story line, angry rightwing racists of violent inclinations want to leave the EU to avoid having to accept more dark-skinned immigrants into England.

Despite the constant propaganda against exit, polls indicated that more favored leaving the EU than remaining until a female member of Parliament, Jo Cox, was killed by a man that a witness said shouted “Brexit.” Cox was an opponent of leaving the EU.

The UK government and presstitute media used Cox’s murder to drive home the propaganda that violent racists were behind Brexit. However, other witnesses gave a different report. The Guardian, which led with the propaganda line, did report later in its account that “Other witnesses said the attack was launched after the MP became involved in an altercation involving two men near where she held her weekly surgery.” Of course, we will never know, because Cox’s murder is too valuable of a weapon against Brexit.

There is no doubt that many in the UK are disturbed at the transformation of their country. One doesn’t have to be a racist to feel that one’s country is being stolen from them by people of alien cultures. The British have a long history of fighting off invaders, and many believe they are experiencing an invasion, although not an armed one. An armed one, of course, would not have the government’s and media’s support.

When British people hear pundits pronounce that immigrants contribute more to the UK than they absorb in social payments, what they hear is inconsistent with their experience. Moreover,
many British are tired of having to avoid entire sections of their cities, including London, because of safety concerns.

It is a propaganda choice to call these concerns racism rather than cultural defense, and the UK political establishment has made that propaganda choice. Little wonder so many British citizens no longer believe that the British Establishment represents Britain.

But let’s give the propagandists the benefit of the doubt and for sake of argument assume that Brexit is about racism. What is the opposition to Brexit really about? Most certainly it is not about helping the refugees from Washington’s wars that the UK government has enabled. If the British establishment cared so much for the Muslims seeking refuge from America’s invasions, bombs, and drones, the British establishment would not have supported Washington’s attacks on these people.

Opposition to Brexit is based on two powerful interests of Washington.

One is the interests of the New York banks and Wall Street to eliminate the UK as a financial center competitor. This blatant fact has escaped the notice of the City and the Bank of England.


The British have forgotten that they only have one foot in the EU, because the UK was permitted to keep its own currency. The UK does not use the euro and, thus, retains the power to finance the British government. Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, France, Germany, etc., do not have this capability. They are dependent on private banks for financing.

In order to trick the UK into joining the EU, the British were given special privileges. However, these privileges cannot last forever. The EU process is one of political integration. As I reported years ago, Jean-Claude Trichet, at that time the president of the European Central Bank, said that to complete the political integration of Europe, the fiscal policies of member states would be centralized. It is impossible to centralize fiscal policies if the UK is an independent financial center with its own central bank and currency.

Wall Street understands that the defeat of Brexit means a shortened lifespan for London as a financial center, as it is impossible to be a financial center unless a country has its own currency and central bank. As it is impossible for the UK to be a member of the EU and not operate under the European Central Bank, once the Brexit referendum is defeated, the process of gradually forcing the UK into the euro will begin.

The other powerful interest is the interest of Washington to prevent one country’s exit from
leading to the exit of other countries. As CIA documents found in the US National Archives make clear, the EU was a CIA initiative, the purpose of which is to make it easy for Washington to exercise political control over Europe. It is much easier for Washington to control the EU than 28 separate countries. Moreover, if the EU unravels, so likely would NATO, which is the necessary cover for Washington’s aggression.

The EU serves Washington and the One Percent. It serves no one else. The EU is a murderer of sovereignty and peoples. The intent is for the British, French, Germans, Italians, Greeks, Spanish, and all the rest to disappear as peoples. Brexit is the last chance to defeat this hidden agenda, and apparently the British will vote tomorrow without having a clue as to what is at stake and what the vote is about.

(Republished from by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Brexit, Britain, EU 
Hide 16 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. The UK ain’t going anywhere. The .01% will not allow the rabble to decide the issue. Hold an election. Steal the election (if fear mongering fails). Tell the people the majority has spoken.

    • Replies: @WorkingClass
  2. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    “When British people hear pundits pronounce that immigrants contribute more to the UK than they absorb in social payments, what they hear is inconsistent with their experience.”

    This is what happens when economism takes over a nation.

    Even if EVERY IMMIGRANT were a good decent hardworker who pays taxes, mass immigration must be opposed because profound demographic changes alter the character of a nation.

    Take Finland. Suppose 20 million Chinese were to arrive and everyone of them is law-abiding, hard-working, and tax-paying. Suppose the GDP is doubled or tripled with the arrival of the Chiners. So, is that good for Finland?

    NO!!! Finland will no longer be Finland. It will be Little China.

    Chinese have China. Pakkers have Pakistan. Blacks have Africa, which is more than 200 times bigger than UK. White Britons must own UK, their homeland. British elites are supposed to be leaders, representatives, and defenders of their own people, not servants of globalist-supremacists who order them to betray their own nation and people for special favors and privileges.

    As things now stand, EU is under colonial occupation of the Zio-Globalists. So-called ‘leaders’ like Cameron and Merkel serve the GLOB, not their own nations and peoples.
    (Sadly, even the masses have been brainwashed to hate their own kind. Majority of British millennials welcome invasion and destruction of UK, the land of their forefathers, in their mindless worship of Diversity.)

    A nation is a racial-territorial-historical entity before an economic one. Economy is important, but it is not the central core of what a nation is.
    Look at Israel. Suppose it could be proven that the arrival of 6 million Iranians will do wonders for the economy. But will it remain a Jewish state?

    Another argument for mass immigration is National Numberism.

    Numberism associates a nation with a number.
    So, if Japanese population is currently 120 million and poised to go down to 80 million in the future, the pro-immigration folks say that Japan must maintain the magic 120 million number to ‘survive’.

    But Japan is Japan whether it has 120 million, 100 million, 80 million, 50 million, etc as long as most people are Japanese. Even if Japan has only 20 million, it is still Japan.

    After all, Russia lost huge numbers in WWII but still remained Russian cuz it had Russians in Russia.

    Suppose Japanese population were to go down to 60 million. It is still Japan.
    But suppose Japanese take the numberist route and decide that Japan MUST MAINTAIN the population of 120 million to remain Japanese.
    So, while the native numbers go down to 60 million, Japan imports 60 million black Africans or Asian Indians. Well, Japan has 120 million people, but is it Japan anymore? No, it is little Africa or little India.

    “It is a propaganda choice to call these concerns racism rather than cultural defense…”

    The PC use of the term ‘racism’ must be rejected. Ism means belief. So, race + ism should mean belief in races & racial differences(which are real enough) and/or racial consciousness of identity. Ism means belief or consciousness, not supremacist hatred.

    It’s a mind-trick to use ‘racism’ or race-ism as a pejorative.

    Imagine if we used Judaism to mean ‘Jewish supremacist hatred against gentiles’.

    But Juda-ism only means belief in Jewish faith, religion, and identity. While a Jew or Judaist can be a radical, he doesn’t have to be one. So, why should Judaism necessarily mean Jewish supremacist hatred against Gentiles?

    By making ‘racism’ into a bad word, Jewish globalists have fooled us into thinking that ANY racial idea or racial consciousness among whites is tantamount to Nazism. It is hooey.

    Race-ism is cultural defense and totally justified.

    If Brexit is race-ist, it is great.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
  3. Cyrano says:

    Whichever way the vote turns out, I doubt it that it will make too much difference for Great Britain in one crucial segment – it’s relation to US. The only difference the vote will make is whether Great Britain continues to be subservient to US via Brussel or directly and without any intermediary.

    That has to be one of the ultimate indignities – to become a colony of your former colony – the situation that GB is now in relation to US. But then again, pretty much the whole Europe is in the same boat. The unwanted Euro trash that they exported for centuries to the New World has now come a full circle – to dominate Europe economically, politically and militarily and to be masters of their destiny the way Europe once used to be a master of the destinies of the millions of those unwanted impoverished former citizens that they let emigrate to the New World without shedding a tear over their departure.

  4. @Priss Factor

    “When British people hear pundits pronounce that immigrants contribute more to the UK than they absorb in social payments, what they hear is inconsistent with their experience.”

    So I was getting the quarterly briefing from the chief economists of one of the larger institutions in the City today, and his take was something along the lines of, “Say what you will about Brexit, but we need the workers.” I had just checked out of one of the nicer hotels, staffed almost entirely with foreigners, and wondered why there are no longer any Brits capable of staffing a font desk or housekeeping functions, despite relatively high unemployment, but what do I know?

    I guess they really do need to stay in the EU.

    • Replies: @Expletive Deleted
  5. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    Diversitism or Diversupremacism will prove to be worse than communism.

    Communism only held Europe back.

    Diverisitism will wipe Europe off the map.


  6. Sean2007 says:

    In a surprising display of honesty, the Pig fucker stated that Britain must remain in the EU to defend Israel against BDS, combat terrorism, and “stand up” to Russia and Iran. Standard boilerplate neocon tool. If Brexit is bad for Israel, the referendum will be rigged acordingly.

  7. Realist says:

    PCR, excellent points.

  8. Rehmat says:

    On Monday, British prime minister David Cameron in a speech at a Jewish charity gala urged country’s 300,000 Jewish community to vote ‘Remain’ on Thursday in Brexit (a nifty portmanteau combining the words: Britain and Exit) referendum because UK can protect Israel’s vital interests by staying inside European Union.

    “When Europe is discussing its attitude to Israel, do you want Britain – Israel’s greatest friend – in there opposing boycotts, opposing the campaign for divestment and sanctions, or do you want us outside the room, powerless to affect the discussion that takes place?” Cameron said.

    According to Jewish Chronicle though the US and Israeli governments are not saying in public – they both wants UK to stay in the European Union to counter anti-Israel views among some of the EU member states.

    UK’s opposition Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn, who had criticized the EU for its blind support for the Zionist regime in the past, now says, he is voting for the UK to stay in the EU.

    London Mayor Sadiq Khan has urged Londoners to vote for UK staying in the EU, because it’s “important for our way of life”.

    Last week, the anti-Muslim GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump said that Britain would be ‘better off’ without European Union.

    Jewish-controlled media has thrown its full support to make ‘UK in EU’ a religious duty for every patriotic British citizen even though a recent poll shows that 45% of Brits want to leave the EU as compared to 44% to stay within the EU.

    EU has always been on Israel’s side – both politically and economically. Israel enjoys a special trading status with the EU and co-operates on research and development worth hundreds of millions of euros annually. No wonder some Europeans have called the European Union as a Jewish Club.

    EU, though provides some funds to pro-Israel Mahmoud Abbas’ rule over the West Bank and some anti-Israel NGOs working inside Occupied Palestine – it has long classified both Hamas and Hizbullah as terrorist organizations.

  9. @The Alarmist

    wondered why there are no longer any Brits capable of staffing a font desk or housekeeping functions, despite relatively high unemployment

    Wage Arbitrage; or the Curious Fact
    that means six months of living ten to a rented room (“hot-bedding” is de riguer, dontchaknow) can earn a keen young former communist enough to buy a farm, and even a 2nd hand Merc or stolen Beemer for himself and his 12-year old Slavic/Balkan hotwife, plus their aged parents, back in the Old Country. On which they can raise a vast family of sturdy peasant brats, paid for by The UK’s insanely munificent child benefit system (also available as unquestioned remittances to Bratwurtislavastanvukic. In Sterling, none of yer poxy Euros).
    Whereas the equivalent Brit slacker, marooned on the offshore rocks, can’t even afford a bottle of strong cider to console himself with after his date with Fat Maggie outside the chipshop goes tits because his rented room took all his pay and he doesn’t even have the busfare, never mind a car. Why doesn’t he just get fucking motivated eh? Nothing succeeds like success etc.

    Arbitrage. Race to the Bottom. Beggar thy Neighbour. No-one likes a Scab. I’m sure you’ve heard it all before. Like in the 1920s and ’30s or something.

  10. Cyrano says:

    For the first time in many (MANY!) years, Britain has done the right thing. To paraphrase Churchill: This is not the end, It’s not even the end of the beginning, but it’s perhaps the beginning of the end of the monstrosity called EU.

    Now US has to find other ways to “unify” Europe. The only remaining tool for “unification” remains NATO. Maybe follow the example of other great “unifiers” of Europe like Napoleon and Hitler. Unifiers, occupiers – it’s all just semantics, the creators of EU know exactly what the plan was for Europe and whose interests it was supposed to serve.

  11. Not without irony, the ones celebrating Brexit here in this very place are making the same arguments as the “presstitute”…

    • Replies: @Rurik
  12. @WorkingClass

    Happy to be wrong. The referendum however is not binding. Wait and see.

  13. helena says:

    England is now officially, ‘the rest of the UK’.

    Simple solution – relocate London to Scotland. Wengland can start again. Potential for massive annual Stonehenge festival £££.

  14. Rurik says:
    @Berta Arnason

    Not without irony, the ones celebrating Brexit here in this very place are making the same arguments as the “presstitute”…


    here’s a little something I wrote on another forum :

    it’s nothing less than existential

    it’s the dying West’s last gasps before the Orwellian boot is locked firmly on its neck

    and it looks like they want to live free rather than die as raped slaves under Soros’ cold heel

    this is a very bad day for Rothschild and the Oligarchs (and all their useful idiots, some of whom we know ; )

    First the Carbon Tax world slavery scheme is defeated by some teenage hackers who expose its sinister ruse

    then the British parliament refuses to approve of the bombing of Syria

    then Putin slaps down the Fiend in the Levant

    then a populist emerges in the US who’s not under the thrall of the Fiend

    now England has shown the will to escape the ravages of the Fiend

    here, Soros (Rothschild) is being expelled from the (spiritual) king of England..

    at 2:16 he says “it I go, [England] dies”

    this is Soros right now trying to short the Pound and make England pay for the folly of freeing itself from the Fiend’s spell

    then, at 2:29 he says “[England] is mine”

    what a perfect analogy for Rothschild !

    at 3:40 the king is told by Gandalf (Trump) to ‘breath the free air again, my friend’

    this is England today, waking from their collective nightmare

    at the end of the video, you see David Cameron shuttering at what has just happened

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS