The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Paul Craig Roberts ArchiveBlogview
American Democracy: A Dead Man Walking
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Trump’s “sell-out,” as it is called, coming on top of Obama’s eight-year “sell-out,” is instructive. We have now had a Democratic president who sold out the people who elected him and a Republican president who has done the same thing. This is a very interesting point, the meaning of which most people miss.

But not Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin. At the Valdai discussion club, Putin summed up Western democracy, which I paraphrase as follows:

In the West, voters cannot change policies through elections, because the ruling elites control whoever is elected. Elections give the appearance of democracy, but voting does not change the policies that favor war and the elites. Therefore, the will of the people is impotent.

People are experiencing that they and their votes have no influence on the conduct of affairs of the country. This makes them afraid, frusrated, and angry, a combination of emotions that is dangerous to the ruling elite, who in response organize the powers of the state against the people, while urging them with propaganda to support more wars.

Obama promised to get out of Afghanistan or Iraq or perhaps it was both. He promised to reverse the police state created by the George W. Bush regime. He promised to focus American resources on American domestic problems, such as health care.

But what did he do? He expanded the wars and launched new ones, destroyed Libya and attempted to destroy Syria, but was stopped by British non-participation and Russian objection. Obama overthrew democratic governments in Honduras and Ukraine. He expanded the police state. He began the demonization of Russia and Putin. He betrayed the American people again by allowing the private insurance industry to write his health care plan known as Obamacare. The private interests wrote a plan that diverts public monies from health care to their profits.

All of this is forgotten when the ruling elites and the presstitutes that serve only them refocused the demonization on Trump. Suddenly, it was the president-elect of the United States who was the main danger to the US and the American people. Trump was a Russian agent. He had conspired with Putin to steal the US election from Hillary Clinton and make the White House a partner of Putin’s alleged reconsruction of the Soviet Empire.

The nonsense was hot and furious, and it was effective. Trump succumbed to pressure and sacrificed his National Secuity Advisior, who was supportive of Trump’s promise to normalize relations with Russia. Trump replaced him with a Russophobic idiot who apparantly cannot wait to see mushroom clouds over cities all over the Western world.

Why did two presidents in succession completely sell out the people who voted for them?

The answer is that presidents are not as powerful as the interest groups who make the decisions.

Trump was going to get us out of Syria, so he committed an unambigious war crime by gratuitously attacking Syria with Tomahawk missiles.

Trump was going to normalize relations with Russia, so his Secretary of State announces that US economic sanctions will stay on Russia until Russia hands over to Ukraine the Russian Crimean naval base on the Black Sea.

It is impossible to normalize relations when the cost to the other party of the normalization is national suicide.

ORDER IT NOW

Despite Trump’s complete surrender to the powers that be, today (May 2) on NPR I heard raw propaganda dressed up as “expert opinion” that Trump is biased against the media, when what all of us have seen is massive media bias against Trump, including the program to which I was listening.

For example, NPR had accumulated “experts” who said that Trump had slandered Obama by accusing him of intercepting his comunications. NPR said nothing about the Obama regime’s charge that Trump conspired with Putin to steal the election from Hillary Clinton.

If anything was slander, this was, but all the talk was about how Obama could sue Trump.

But, of course, both are public figures, and neither can sue the other.

I wonder why NPR’s “expert” didn’t get around to this point.

Why is the ruling oligarchy still using its presstitutes to campaign against a president who has surrendered to them?

Perhaps the answer is that the real powers that be are going to make an example out of Trump so that never again does a person running for elected office make a populist appeal to the electorate.

(Republished from PaulCraigRoberts.org by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Media, Deep State, Donald Trump 
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Realist says:

    “American Democracy: A Dead Man Walking”

    The way of all democracies.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /proberts/american-democracy-a-dead-man-walking/#comment-1858807
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Cyrano says:

    The reason why so many ME countries were invaded by the US is because they are not democracies. As Margaret Thatcher so eloquently explained (she was a very eloquent woman) – no 2 democracies have ever gone to war with one another. So, clearly US are exploiting a legal loophole which allows “democratic” countries to invade non-democratic ones.

    This should be a warning to all non-democratic countries to hurry up and adopt democracy, because only then they can enjoy the full benefits of belonging to the sacred brotherhood of democracies. Of course, one thing that Thatcher failed to mention was that it wasn’t the democracy that prevented wars between 2 adherents to this sacred political ideology from going to war. It was the fact that most “democracies” are under the US thumb, thus eliminating the need for US to further democratize them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dearieme
    "no 2 democracies have ever gone to war with one another": come now. In 1812 the USA attacked Britain while the latter was rather busy with The Corsican.
    , @Seamus Padraig
    I guess it all depends on how 'democracy' is defined. In 1914, Britain and Germany went to war with each other. Now, were they monarchies? Or were they democracies? Both had monarchs, and yet both had parliaments. Hmmm. I suspect that, in this case, Old Mags would have tried to argue that Britain was then a 'true' democracy, whereas Germany was not. But without any meaningful definition of the word 'democracy', such no-true-scotsman debates could go on forever.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
  3. MEexpert says:

    A very astute reading of the American democracy. Mr. Putin is a real genius.

    Read More
  4. Realist says:

    “Trump succumbed to pressure and sacrificed his National Secuity Advisior, who was supportive of Trump’s promise to normalize relations with Russia.”

    Gators got’m.

    Read More
  5. dearieme says:
    @Cyrano
    The reason why so many ME countries were invaded by the US is because they are not democracies. As Margaret Thatcher so eloquently explained (she was a very eloquent woman) – no 2 democracies have ever gone to war with one another. So, clearly US are exploiting a legal loophole which allows “democratic” countries to invade non-democratic ones.

    This should be a warning to all non-democratic countries to hurry up and adopt democracy, because only then they can enjoy the full benefits of belonging to the sacred brotherhood of democracies. Of course, one thing that Thatcher failed to mention was that it wasn’t the democracy that prevented wars between 2 adherents to this sacred political ideology from going to war. It was the fact that most “democracies” are under the US thumb, thus eliminating the need for US to further democratize them.

    “no 2 democracies have ever gone to war with one another”: come now. In 1812 the USA attacked Britain while the latter was rather busy with The Corsican.

    Read More
  6. @Cyrano
    The reason why so many ME countries were invaded by the US is because they are not democracies. As Margaret Thatcher so eloquently explained (she was a very eloquent woman) – no 2 democracies have ever gone to war with one another. So, clearly US are exploiting a legal loophole which allows “democratic” countries to invade non-democratic ones.

    This should be a warning to all non-democratic countries to hurry up and adopt democracy, because only then they can enjoy the full benefits of belonging to the sacred brotherhood of democracies. Of course, one thing that Thatcher failed to mention was that it wasn’t the democracy that prevented wars between 2 adherents to this sacred political ideology from going to war. It was the fact that most “democracies” are under the US thumb, thus eliminating the need for US to further democratize them.

    I guess it all depends on how ‘democracy’ is defined. In 1914, Britain and Germany went to war with each other. Now, were they monarchies? Or were they democracies? Both had monarchs, and yet both had parliaments. Hmmm. I suspect that, in this case, Old Mags would have tried to argue that Britain was then a ‘true’ democracy, whereas Germany was not. But without any meaningful definition of the word ‘democracy’, such no-true-scotsman debates could go on forever.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cyrano
    Democracy is like the KFC secret recipe - only the US has the right combination, all the rest are just pale imitations.
  7. anarchyst says:

    We were never a “democracy”, but are properly defined as a “representative republic”…

    Read More
  8. Cyrano says:
    @Seamus Padraig
    I guess it all depends on how 'democracy' is defined. In 1914, Britain and Germany went to war with each other. Now, were they monarchies? Or were they democracies? Both had monarchs, and yet both had parliaments. Hmmm. I suspect that, in this case, Old Mags would have tried to argue that Britain was then a 'true' democracy, whereas Germany was not. But without any meaningful definition of the word 'democracy', such no-true-scotsman debates could go on forever.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

    Democracy is like the KFC secret recipe – only the US has the right combination, all the rest are just pale imitations.

    Read More
  9. @Cyrano
    Democracy is like the KFC secret recipe - only the US has the right combination, all the rest are just pale imitations.

    Kentucky Fried Democracy. Hilarious!

    Read More

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS