The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPeter Lee Archive
Tianjin’s Big Bang
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Videos of the August 13 explosion at Tianjin are terrifying and amazing. Based on the seismic record, the second explosion was equivalent to the detonation of 21 tons of TNT.

It’s not difficult to understand why Xi Jinping might have, as Willie Lam alleges, entertained the notion that this was some sort of sabotage strike against his rule.

Xi Dada can probably strike the USAF off his list.

Remarkably, the argument against a military attack is that the explosion was just too darn big. It would have taken two dozen JDAMs or 50 cruise missiles to generate that kind of blast. It would take two MOABs dropped from a lumbering C-130 turboprop. So conspiracy theorists had to scramble to attribute the catastrophe to an exotic space-based or nuke-type attack.

Long story short, something on the ground blew up.

But what’s really amazing is that the titanic blast isn’t even that titanic by industrial accident standards.

In fact, it doesn’t even make Wikipedia’s Top Ten largest man-made explosions.

The tragedy—and initial reports that perhaps firemen had sprayed water on calcium carbide, thereby generating acetylene, which might have detonated stores of ammonium nitrate, a common fertilizer as well as the raw material for Timothy McVeigh’s Oklahoma City bomb–immediately put me in mind of the Texas City disaster of 1947.

In Texas City, a freighter loaded with ammonium nitrate, the SS Grandcamp, caught fire. Take it away,Wikipedia!

April 16, 1947, around 8:00 a.m. smoke was spotted in the cargo hold of theGrandcamp while she was still moored. Over the next hour, attempts to extinguish the fire or bring it under control failed as a red glow returned after each effort to douse the fire.

Shortly before 9:00 a.m., the captain ordered his men to steam the hold, a firefighting method where steam is piped in to put out fires, in the hope of preserving the cargo. This action was unlikely to have been effective as ammonium nitrate produces its own oxygen, thereby neutralizing the extinguishing properties of the steam. The steam may have even contributed to the fire by converting the ammonium nitrate to nitrous oxide, while augmenting the already intense heat in the ship’s hold.

At 9:12 a.m., the ammonium nitrate reached an explosive threshold from the combination of heat and pressure; the vessel then detonated, causing great destruction and damage throughout the port. The tremendous blast sent a 15-foot (4.5 m) wave that was detectable nearly 100 miles (160 km) off the Texas shoreline. The blast leveled nearly 1,000 buildings on land. The Grandcampexplosion destroyed the Monsanto Chemical Company plant and resulted in ignition of refineries and chemical tanks on the waterfront. Falling bales of burning twine from the ship’s cargo added to the damage while theGrandcamp’s anchor was hurled across the city. Two sightseeing airplanes flying nearby had their wings shorn off, forcing them out of the sky. 10 miles (16 km) away, people in Galveston were forced to their knees. People felt the shock 250 miles (400 km) away in Louisiana. The explosion blew almost 6,350 short tons (5,760 metric tons) of the ship’s steel into the air, some at supersonic speed. Official casualty estimates came to a total of 567, including all the crewmen who remained on board the Grandcamp. All but one member of the 29-man Texas City volunteer fire department were killed in the initial explosion on the docks while fighting the shipboard fire, and with the fires raging throughout Texas City, first responders from other areas were initially unable to reach the site of the disaster.

The energy released during the Grandcamp explosion is estimated at around 3 KT of TNT.

Let me write that out. 3000 tons of TNT.

The Tianjin explosion. 21 tons of TNT.

Thank goodness the Tianjin blast was a relative piker.

Here’s an interesting sidebar for legal eagles, by the way.

Ammonium nitrate, when handled properly, is a stable, high-energy source of explosive chemical energy and, in fact, has superseded TNT as a primary raw material for conventional explosives. The ammonium nitrate fertilizer on the SS Grandcamp was destined for Europe as part of a postwar aid program, and had been produced in ordnance factories repurposed at the order of the federal government. It appeared that the federal government was liable, not only in a general “it was the government’s fertilizer” kind of way, but also because of specific episodes of negligence.

Therefore, survivors and families of victims filed suit against the government under the FCTA, the Federal Tort Claims Act. This Act was designed to compensate the general public for damages inflicted by the government like, you know, flying a bomber into the Empire State Building, which happened in 1943 and was the impetus for getting the FCTA enacted.

However, the US government apparently had little appetite for compensating thousands of plaintiffs for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. At the end of a very long day (actually three years) the Supreme Court ruled that the US government was entitled to “discretion” a.k.a. not consider itself bound by ordinary ideas, practices, and caution when pursuing policies pertaining to “the national interest”.

The fertilizer was meant to succor European farmers and wean them from potentially Communist sympathies, ergo national interest/discretion.

Congress did exercise its legislative discretion to provide about $17 million to the victims and President Eisenhower signed the bill.

The entire affair is described in Bill Minutaglio’s 2003 book, City on Fire: The Explosion That Devastated a Texas Town and Ignited a Historic Legal Battle.

I find this noteworthy because the US government uses the same rationale to deny any executive branch legal liability for “downwinders” (residents of Nevada and Utah claiming illness and damages as result of the US nuclear testing program) and stricken nuclear workers, while the Congress has stepped up to legislate relief.

I touched on this issue in my CounterPunch piece on the radiation contamination of the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan during the Fukushima crisis. Only three bucks! A bargain!

By the way, after a suspiciously long layover at a dockyard in Washington State (rumored to involve an epic decontamination effort) and a complex crew switch between three aircraft carriers (so that unhappy crew can be switched to another boat?) the Ronald Reagan is sailing for Japan to set up shop at Yokosuka (where the Abe government, now discretely discharging radioactive water into Fukushima Bay, will no doubt be happy to declare the vessel “clean as a whistle”).

(Republished from China Matters by permission of author or representative)
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Kiza says:

    Well, this article is not really much about China. Personally, I did not believe that this explosion was a sabotage, there is enough industrial sloppiness in every society and it is so easy to blame “enemies” for the disasters. Do not we all like to blame someone else?

    One can only hope that people and governments are capable of learning from the terrible mistakes.

  2. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website

    The thing is something like this would be inconceivable in US and EU today.

    But that it happens in China is something Chiners need to really think about… instead of running up old data about how the West used to have big accidents too.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Lee Comments via RSS
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?