The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPeter Lee Archive
Is the Nine Dash Line Dead?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In the context of the PRC charm offensive at ASEAN (leavened by a sharp slap at Philippine’s President Aquino), the Beijing Review has published a detailed explanation of “core interests” that also provides some pretty significant looking and novel interpretations of China’s South China Sea claims.

In the article, dated August 26, China’s declaration of key interests misinterpreted, the anonymous author rehashes the evolution of the “core interest” concept since 2005, including “territorial sovereignty” as a bedrock value that cannot be compromised and must be defended by any and all means including armed force if necessary.

But then…

However, some media, think tanks and military officers have misinterpreted China’s announcement of its core interests as a regional policy shift and an external show of strength. Their inaccurate portrayals have undoubtedly influenced Washington’s China policy.In July 2010, the Japanese and U.S. media quoted an anonymous American expert as saying that China has included the South China Sea in the country’s core national interests, adding that the United States, Japan and India should join hands to contend against China on the issue.However, no internal or public Chinese document or declaration at the time made claim to the entirety of the South China Sea—it has merely asserted its sovereignty over certain islands and islets in South China Sea, and stated that it will engage in negotiations and dialogues when disputes arise. China is committed to the Declaration on the Code of Conduct on the South China Sea and respects and will maintain the freedom of navigation on the sea….

The false rumors have spread from the United States, Japan and some Southeast Asian countries that China has laid claim to the entirety of the South China Sea and will commit to an area denial strategy in the region. It is believed that these inaccuracies aim to escalate maritime disputes between China and its neighboring countries around the South China Sea, creating tensions that intend to justify the U.S. “pivot to Asia.”

If this position holds, it seems the PRC is shifting away from the anachronistic nine dash line to a more UNCLOS-friendly restatement of its South China Sea claims as stemming from its sovereignty over specific above water features.

Source for map illustration: http://globalbalita.com/2013/04/20/no-useable-oil-in-disputed-areas-us/

(Republished from China Matters by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: China, Nine-dash Line, South China Sea, UNCLOS 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Lee Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?