The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Paul Gottfried ArchiveBlogview
Weeping with Dersh
Sometimes the Outreach Becomes Intolerable
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Lately I’ve been watching the blossoming lovefest between the conservative-Republican establishment and those on the Left who are raging over the Obama administration’s reaction to the UN resolution against Israel. Arguably, this resolution was an attempt to take away Israel’s bargaining chips in negotiating with the Palestinians. The UN Security Council, which passed the resolution, made unmistakably clear that Israel is illegally occupying both East Jerusalem and the territory on the West Bank that had been taken during the Six Day War. The resolution may also have the effect of justifying terrorist acts designed to dislodge Israelis from areas that they’re no longer supposed to be occupying. Finally it challenges Israeli claims to East Jerusalem, although there is no chance that the Israeli government will acquiesce in making Jerusalem once again a divided city.

Although some of the reactions coming from Republican publicists and politicians have bordered on the hysterical or histrionic, I won’t disagree that the US might have done better by not lobbying for the troublesome resolution, which it appears is the case. And I wouldn’t question the view of the Israeli Premier that the Trump administration would have handled the resolution differently. Trump undoubtedly would have taken a different course, as he indicated in a tweet. But to move on to other matters: I’m appalled by how Fox-news and other disseminators of GOP party-lines have been fawning on leftist politicians and celebrities who share their “indignation” over the Obama administration’s treatment of the Israeli premier. Since the passage of the fateful resolution, we’ve been inundated by expressions of friendship from GOP celebrities for liberal Democrats who have now turned against Obama. For example, Chuck Schumer, Elliot Engel, and Kirsten Gillibrand are all outraged by how the outgoing president has turned on the “only democracy in the Middle East.” As a sign of the new relationship between us and them, we were treated last week on Fox news to a bathetic interview with a longtime political leftist and a bosom buddy of Obama, Alan Dershowitz. In this memorable interview Dershowitz explained how the President betrayed the Jewish people after assuring him that “I’ll have the back of Israel.” This may have been one of the great acting moment in the life of a seventy-eight year old courtroom performer. And the people in the studio were lapping it up.

Let me point out the obvious. Those who are being celebrated by Fox News, New York Post, and Wall Street Journal are mostly Democratic politicians representing heavily or disproportionately Jewish constituencies. Their reaction to what happened with the UN resolution was as predictable as the fact that North Carolina Senators vote for tobacco subsidies. Alan Dershowitz throughout his career has been a left-leaning Democrat but also a committed Zionist. Only a fool would have expected him not to take the side of Israel, even against a left liberal administration that he has tirelessly defended. Why the interviewer on Fox-news and her colleagues were awash in compassion for Dershowitz as he whined on about how Obama let him down, is something I still can’t get my head around.

Do Republican commentators and TV producers really think they can make pals of liberal Democrats simply because they all oppose the UN resolution on Israel? If that is the case, then these Republicans must be hopeless fools. Once the Obama administration’s failure to veto that resolution fades from the news, Schumer, Dershowitz and the other protestors will become the relentless opponents of the heartless, xenophobic, homophobic, racist Republicans once again. Don’t expect them to assist the Trump administration in replacing Obamacare or support the candidates for the Supreme Court whom President Trump will likely nominate. And because Schumer and the others are accidentally taking the same side on the UN resolution as Evangelical Christians, don’t expect them to respect the religious liberties of those who out of conscience refuse to cater gay weddings. Needless to say, these pro-Israel Democrats will be hot to trot for allowing men who have just changed their gender preference to enter shower facilities previously reserved for young women.

My other reaction to these unseemly overtures on the part of Republicans is that these folks must be desperate for the approval of left liberal politicians. Perhaps they’re trying to show that contrary to what the Left has been saying about them, they’re not anti-Semites after all. GOP luminaries have therefore decided to kiss up (no other phrase will do here) to the pro-Zionist Left by showcasing their solidarity over the Jewish state with Schumer, Dershowitz, etc. Of our two national parties, the Republican Party has been the more effusively pro-Israel, but perhaps its partisans now feels impelled to go further, by demonstrating their fervent Zionist sympathy in the company of solidly leftist allies. Such overcompensating behavior is not unusual for the conservative establishment; I’ve been observing it for decades. Republican publicists and Republican politicians often go all out trying to outdo the Left, for example, in praising Martin Luther King and deploring American incidents involving racial and gender prejudice. The GOP establishment can sometimes bring off such gestures without looking utterly ridiculous. Unfortunately this is not one of those occasions.

 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
82 Comments to "Weeping with Dersh"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Never underestimate the conservative wish to seek validation from liberals. In their heart of hearts, many conservatives see liberals as the natural “party of government,” and are thrilled when liberals validate them by agreement, even if it is an a limited issue such as a (largely meaningless) U.N. Security Council Resolution and an Obama Administration that has two weeks left. I think that conservative tendency is derived from the fact that, especially since the end of the Cold War, conservatives have very little that they’re for. They define themselves in opposition to liberals and get satisfaction from an occasional pat on the head from the real masters.

    Read More
    • Agree: Randal, Ace
    • Replies: @Randal
    I agree that the establishment conservative desire for validation from leftists is limitless in the societies of the modern US sphere.

    My own view is that this reflects the almost complete triumph of leftist ideology and dogmas at the elite level in our societies during the latter years of the C20th, when they succeeded in forging an unholy alliance between big business seeking profitable globalist policies and leftist ideologues seeking battering rams to remove obstacles to their radicalism. They used this to take control of the media and institutional, especially educational, high grounds that allowed them to flood our societies with propaganda and ideological indoctrination.

    We are (collectively) in a very deep hole and even if things like the Brexit vote and Trump victory show glimmers of light, we are still a long long way from climbing out of it.

    , @Quartermaster
    People that seek validation from the left are not conservative in any way.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    //www.unz.com/pgottfried/weeping-with-dersh/#comment-1718359
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. There are strong similarities between post WW2 “Scientific Socialism” and present day Zionism.

    Hayek explained the problem in his 1944 book, “The Road to Serfdom” :

    “The important point is that, if we take the people whose views influence developments, they are now in this country in some measure all socialists. It is no longer fashionable to emphasize that “we are all socialists now”, this is so merely because the fact is too obvious. Scarcely anybody doubts that we must continue to move towards socialism.”

    Substitute the word Zionism for Socialism, and the US elite works the same way , with the interesting aspect that Socialism itself grew out of 19th century Central European Jewish led social unrest culminating in Bolshevik totalitarianism and their Terror (elimination of whole classes of “Deplorables”).

    From this point of view, Socialism/Marxism has morphed into Zionism with many Neo-con family histories actually showing the same radical counter-cultural lineage.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    Superb.

    I'm happy to see that someone finally posted something emphasizing that all this crap is and had been considered "fashionable."

    As such, it's all a bunch of garbage and people are suckers for going along with it.

    The origins of it are explained well by Randolph Bourne in his (unfortunately unfinished draft) masterpiece, The State, which is a must read for all who are interested in politics.


    Psychologists recognize the gregarious impulse as one of the strongest primitive pulls which keeps together the herds of the different species of higher animals. Mankind is no exception. Our pugnacious evolutionary history has prevented the impulse from ever dying out. This gregarious impulse is the tendency to imitate, to conform to coalesce together, and is most powerful when the herd believes itself threatened with attack. Animals crowd together for protection, and men become most conscious of their collectivity at the threat of war.

    -Randolph Bourne left an unfinished, unpaginated draft of The State when he died during the flu pandemic of 1918. The draft was published posthumously, with some material incorrectly ordered, in Untimely Papers (1919).

    http://fair-use.org/randolph-bourne/the-state/

     

    , @Mikhailovich
    You can't "substitute the word Zionism for Socialism". You can may be substitute the word Zionism for National-Socialism, because there are certain similarity. Your observation only demonstrate how wrong is Hayek. It looks he had no clue what Socialism mean.
  3. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “My other reaction to these unseemly overtures on the part of Republicans is that these folks must be desperate for the approval of left liberal politicians.”

    Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power.

    GOP doesn’t seem to care for ‘left-liberals’ among Palestinian-Americans and their allies.

    By the way, the so-called current ‘left’ isn’t leftist. Its homomania, culture of vanity, and decadent follies reveal it to be the product of late consumerist capitalism.

    No true leftist from an Age of True Leftism would recognize today’s insipid Hollywood-MTV style follies as ‘leftist’.

    Lena Dunham a ‘leftist’? Just a spoiled brat. Just like Marie Antoinette played at being a peasant lady, today’s Glob Elites play at being ‘progressive’ with their silly cosplay.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    "An age of true Leftism".

    The "Age of true Leftism", yeah that was when Stalin was ordering the mass shootings, to the back of the neck, of even his staunchest supporters.

    Or perhaps it was the era in which Che' was head prosecutor in Havana and committed thousands of dissidents to political prison from which they never returned.

    Or maybe it was the twentyfive years in which thousands of east Germans were mowed down trying the cross the wall or swim the river separating east from west Germany.

    One could fill tomes with the blessings of "True Leftism", and I am sure yourself, as a "True Leftist" would not get the point.

    Authenticjazzman, "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years.
    , @Karl
    > Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power

    cream rises to the top
    , @Mikhailovich
    You are right, there are lot of confusion nowadays about what is left and what is right in the politics. Left, originally, in time of the first French Revolution meant anti-establishment. Later, when Christian-Socialist movement started in Russia and then was mixed with Marxists, they correctly called it left, because it was radical anti-establishment. Lenin and Trotsky with their World Revolution are definitely left. Later USSR with their support of all the Communist parties in the World is also left. The American Century Project with Multinational Corporations on the top and Full Spectrum Dominance over the rest of the World is definitely the right. The point is: when the financial elite control the political power - it is right; when the political power is accountable to the majority, or rather, to organisation which does represent the interest of majority - it is left. By the way, Lenin described the rule of Multinational Corporations as the last stage of Capitalism.
  4. The ONLY excuse Trump has in so fervently allying with (any) Zionists (at face value) is if he is going to wage total war against the banksters…

    Otherwise we have two options: Anarchism or Nihilism.

    Read More
  5. If it’s occupied, who do they give it back to?

    I agree with Woody Allen, they should sell it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Give it back to those they stole it from.

    Woody Allen is a racist Zionist.

    The Jewish settlements are indeed illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention, and there is not a single government outside Israel that believes they are legitimate.

    Israeli immigration laws specify Jews Only, while rabid Zionists demand mass immigration into the US & Europe. Some 'friends' they are. Imagine US laws which said 'Christians Only'.

  6. The odd thing about this mess is that Israel itself is a normal country with a sane culture and sane government.

    Zionist imperialism takes one political side, and the non-imperialist side is equally functional and strong. Because everyone is a Jew, Israel can and does prosecute Jews for crimes. It even investigates Bibi for corruption. None of that could happen here. Zionist imperialism is the ONLY side, and it’s perfectly unthinkable to arrest or criticize Jews.

    We should be emulating the actual Israel instead of blindly obeying our false one-sided picture of “Israel”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pandos
    We do emulate Israel. Might makes right. All else is just emotional thinking. Problem for Israel is once everyone is on the same page.
    , @Chet Roman
    Yes, Israel is a "normal" racist country especially when Netanyahoo is bombing and slaughtering innocent and defenseless woman and children in Gaza. When this war criminal was bombing Gaza his popularity in Israel was around 95% and Israelis were sitting on hills eating popcorn and cheering as the slaughter of innocents continued. His ratings plummeted only when he stopped the bombing and incremental "final solution" to the Palestinian problem ended. Israel is about as normal as Apartheid South Africa and the Israeli lobby is using its quislings and sayanim in both parties to demonize truthful and rational acts like the U.N. resolution.
    , @jacques sheete

    The odd thing about this mess is that Israel itself is a normal country with a sane culture and sane government.
     
    There are distinctions between a nation or country, a government and a State.

    Israel is not a normal country but it is a normal state. All states are founded on and maintained by lies theft and murder.

    Here's Bourne again.

    The feeling for country would be an uninflatable maximum were it not for the ideas of State and Government which are associated with it. Country is a concept of peace, of tolerance, of living and letting live. But State is essentially a concept of power, of competition: it signifies a group in its aggressive aspects. And we have the misfortune of being born not only into a country but into a State, and as we grow up we learn to mingle the two feelings into a hopeless confusion. (§ 1 ¶ 7)

    Randolph Bourne left an unfinished, unpaginated draft of The State when he died during the flu pandemic of 1918. The draft was published posthumously, with some material incorrectly ordered, in Untimely Papers (1919).
    http://fair-use.org/randolph-bourne/the-state/

     

  7. I’m appalled by how Fox-news and other disseminators of GOP party-lines have been fawning on leftist politicians and celebrities who share their “indignation” over the Obama administration’s treatment of the Israeli premier. Since the passage of the fateful resolution, we’ve been inundated by expressions of friendship from GOP celebrities for liberal Democrats who have now turned against Obama.

    Not the least of the merits of Obama’s action on the UN resolution is the opportunity it provides to watch the Israeli lobby in action, and to see some of the personnel it can count on and the methods by which it exercises its malign lobbyist influence on US politics and foreign policy.

    It’s been a magnificent display of political revenge by a US President, who has been forced to eat unaccustomed crow repeatedly over years by a small foreign nation and been unable to respond because of the power of the aforementioned lobby to punish him politically, and has now acted when they can do him no significant political damage. And around the world, since it simply brought the US position temporarily into line with basic honesty as the rest of the world sees it on the issue in question, and away from the politically manipulated cynical dishonesty of the US regime’s practice of repeated vetoing of resolutions to protect Israel from justified criticism, his reputation is generally enhanced by doing it, outside of the US sphere’s lobby-ridden pro-Israeli amen corner.

    Many senior US politicians have clearly chafed under the humiliating power of said foreign lobby. Few have acted so effectively to give it the finger.

    Read More
  8. @Diversity Heretic
    Never underestimate the conservative wish to seek validation from liberals. In their heart of hearts, many conservatives see liberals as the natural "party of government," and are thrilled when liberals validate them by agreement, even if it is an a limited issue such as a (largely meaningless) U.N. Security Council Resolution and an Obama Administration that has two weeks left. I think that conservative tendency is derived from the fact that, especially since the end of the Cold War, conservatives have very little that they're for. They define themselves in opposition to liberals and get satisfaction from an occasional pat on the head from the real masters.

    I agree that the establishment conservative desire for validation from leftists is limitless in the societies of the modern US sphere.

    My own view is that this reflects the almost complete triumph of leftist ideology and dogmas at the elite level in our societies during the latter years of the C20th, when they succeeded in forging an unholy alliance between big business seeking profitable globalist policies and leftist ideologues seeking battering rams to remove obstacles to their radicalism. They used this to take control of the media and institutional, especially educational, high grounds that allowed them to flood our societies with propaganda and ideological indoctrination.

    We are (collectively) in a very deep hole and even if things like the Brexit vote and Trump victory show glimmers of light, we are still a long long way from climbing out of it.

    Read More
  9. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Fox News is pathetic. And they are pushing the ‘Russia is our enemy’ and ‘Putin is a thug’ bullshit harder than anyone. But Trump’s his own man. He holds pretty Zionist views but no surprise given his past support of Israel. But he doesn’t tout it and during the debates he even took a fair-minded (business negotiator) approach and said he wouldn’t take sides. He was excoriated by the neocon Charlie McCarthy’s Rubio, Cruz, Kasich, et al. But Trump really doesn’t give a shit and doesn’t seek validation from others (especially liberals) of the correctness of his positions/decisions (though on Twitter he is constantly trying to prove he’s right– which is different).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    I agree with you about Fox. But he is going to have a hell of a time getting his appointments through Congress which is full of traitorous assholes.
  10. Ziocons’ use of the US military:

    http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/report_points_to_a_pentagon_plot_to_subvert_obamas_syria_policy_20170105

    The chosen imbeciles (Carter et al) and their faithful minions of opportunists among the brass (Harrigan and such) and presstitutes (the NYT, WP and such) cannot wait to make the world glow in the dark.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Karl
    > Ziocons’ use of the US military

    Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is currently literally propped up by American troops manning its border.

    Our borders are manned by our own people.

    I've never seen annamaria bitch about Jordan.

    And don't EVEN give me no backtalk about the Americans are there to "protect Israel".... they are there because Jordan ==is== Palestine; it is occupied by Hashemites from Saudi; and THAT occupation prevents Jerusalem from engineering a "two state solution".

    Look at the map; compare the area of Jordan to that of Israel-inclusive-ofJudea&Samaria.... then tell me who should give up land to produce a "State of Palestine"


    In the long run, i'm not worried. It would take fewer bullets to end the Hashemite dynasty, than it took to end trhe Romanov dynasty.
  11. @Diversity Heretic
    Never underestimate the conservative wish to seek validation from liberals. In their heart of hearts, many conservatives see liberals as the natural "party of government," and are thrilled when liberals validate them by agreement, even if it is an a limited issue such as a (largely meaningless) U.N. Security Council Resolution and an Obama Administration that has two weeks left. I think that conservative tendency is derived from the fact that, especially since the end of the Cold War, conservatives have very little that they're for. They define themselves in opposition to liberals and get satisfaction from an occasional pat on the head from the real masters.

    People that seek validation from the left are not conservative in any way.

    Read More
  12. Israel is an oppressor. At its core, oppressive Israeli policies are incredibly inconsistent with liberal ideology. Jewish money and influence has papered over that gaping inconsistency for 30+ years. Nothing shocking about the republicans seeking to exploit this moment. It’s a tremendous target marketing opportunity. Kind of a 2 for 1 deal. They can get both increased access to Jewish wealth and influence that have been going to the democrats, and also secure the moral high ground from the traitorous democrats who stabbed the middle east’s only democracy in the back. If you’re looking at this issue from an ideological perspective, you are failing to see what a tremendous business opportunity this is.

    Read More
  13. Polistra is perfectly correct when he says that Israelis are normal, and certainly in comparison to Jewish neocons and their gentile lackeys in the US. I have been to Israel several times and can read modern Hebrew, albeit slowly and with a dictionary. But what I’ve read in Israeli newspapers and what I’ve learned from speaking to many Israelis is that their major concern is peace. The disgusting Zionist jingoism and accusations of anti-Semitism that one encounters in the American “conservative” media and in its Murdoch extension, the Jerusalem Post, are far more characteristic of “Jews in exile” than they are of Jews in their own country. Curiously, a new litmus test for who is an approved “conservative” in the US is screaming at the top of one’s lungs in support of further Israeli settlements on the West Bank.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    than they are of Jews in their own country.

    Be careful Professor, these Jew-haters will strip you of your "righteous" label for less than this statement.

  14. @Anon
    "My other reaction to these unseemly overtures on the part of Republicans is that these folks must be desperate for the approval of left liberal politicians."

    Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power.

    GOP doesn't seem to care for 'left-liberals' among Palestinian-Americans and their allies.

    By the way, the so-called current 'left' isn't leftist. Its homomania, culture of vanity, and decadent follies reveal it to be the product of late consumerist capitalism.

    No true leftist from an Age of True Leftism would recognize today's insipid Hollywood-MTV style follies as 'leftist'.

    Lena Dunham a 'leftist'? Just a spoiled brat. Just like Marie Antoinette played at being a peasant lady, today's Glob Elites play at being 'progressive' with their silly cosplay.

    “An age of true Leftism”.

    The “Age of true Leftism”, yeah that was when Stalin was ordering the mass shootings, to the back of the neck, of even his staunchest supporters.

    Or perhaps it was the era in which Che’ was head prosecutor in Havana and committed thousands of dissidents to political prison from which they never returned.

    Or maybe it was the twentyfive years in which thousands of east Germans were mowed down trying the cross the wall or swim the river separating east from west Germany.

    One could fill tomes with the blessings of “True Leftism”, and I am sure yourself, as a “True Leftist” would not get the point.

    Authenticjazzman, “Mensa” society member of forty-plus years.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Your examples are radical leftism.

    Anything taken too far will lead to disaster.

    Take any religion or ideology. Too much is bad. Jim Jones and Christianity.

    Or exercise. Exercise is good for health but too much will kill you.

    So, radical anything is bad.

    But classic leftism or true leftism of the past had some compelling themes of basic equal rights, social justice, humane treatment of workers, protection of minorities, universal values, etc.

    Today's so-called 'leftism' has no compelling themes.
    It's about celebrating homo vanity, tranny narcissism, fat bitch Dunhamism, rich bitch piggery, cuck debauchery, slut pride, tattoos and piercings, etc.

    And it's not just about tolerance of freaks(which is okay) but mandatory reverence for them, like having to cater to rich homos allied with globo-Jewish oligarchs. The new 'leftism' is about Wall Strret oligarchs flying the homo banner.

    Consider the themes of new cold war with Russia: Putin won't allow homo parades. THAT is reason enough to destroy the Russian economy.

    I mean even the Onion couldn't have come up with something that loopy.

    And the US has its big crimes too.
    While Che Guevara was a nut, his ilk were partly the product of US meddling that led to disasters in places like Guatemala. And remember US treated Cuba as some sodom-and-gomorrah gangster state. Indeed, gangster-run pre-revolutionary Cuba seems almost the template for new 'leftism'. Today's 'leftists' have 'values' that are more in line with casino owners of old Havana.
    The likes of Podesta and La Dolce Vita homo revelers sound like Fredo doing the town.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwFC9QKCzgw

    Now, I'm not defending Castro whose revolution failed. But his leftism did have some truly compelling themes of nation liberation and people power.

    In the 21st century, the 'progressive' US as 'liberal democracy' has been the main force of evil in the world. It has spread filth and decadence all over. Its culture is destroying souls and bodies. It has led to white death on massive scale. It spread wars all over Middle East killing millions and unleashed refugee crisis that is engulfing Europe.

    And it's all about globo-decadence and homomania.

    And it makes no sense. It says 'fight Islamophobia but destroy Muslim nations; respect Islam but promote Lena-Dunhamism all over the world.'
    , @utu
    " the twentyfive years in which thousands of east Germans were mowed down trying the cross the wall or swim the river separating east from west Germany."

    Arbeitsgemeinschaft 13. August: 753
    Zentrale Erfassungsstelle für Regierungs- und Vereinigungskriminalität: 519
  15. @polistra
    The odd thing about this mess is that Israel itself is a normal country with a sane culture and sane government.

    Zionist imperialism takes one political side, and the non-imperialist side is equally functional and strong. Because everyone is a Jew, Israel can and does prosecute Jews for crimes. It even investigates Bibi for corruption. None of that could happen here. Zionist imperialism is the ONLY side, and it's perfectly unthinkable to arrest or criticize Jews.

    We should be emulating the actual Israel instead of blindly obeying our false one-sided picture of "Israel".

    We do emulate Israel. Might makes right. All else is just emotional thinking. Problem for Israel is once everyone is on the same page.

    Read More
  16. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    If it's occupied, who do they give it back to?

    I agree with Woody Allen, they should sell it.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh5y98Yjl44

    Give it back to those they stole it from.

    Woody Allen is a racist Zionist.

    The Jewish settlements are indeed illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention, and there is not a single government outside Israel that believes they are legitimate.

    Israeli immigration laws specify Jews Only, while rabid Zionists demand mass immigration into the US & Europe. Some ‘friends’ they are. Imagine US laws which said ‘Christians Only’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MEexpert
    You are absolutely right. This resolution was drafted and passed just to make a point by President Obama. It was a parting shot at Benjamin Netanyahu. He knows that Israel will ignore it as it has done before.

    Woody Allen is a typical Jew. Steal the land and let us sell it back to make money.
  17. Do Republican commentators and TV producers really think they can make pals of liberal Democrats simply because they all oppose the UN resolution on Israel? If that is the case, then these Republicans must be hopeless fools.

    Please – how can Mr. Gottfried get this so wrong?

    Those personalities at Fox Jews are not fawning over liberals – they are preserving their journalistic livelihood! If they did not attack Obama on this righteous and just long overdue UN vote, they would lose their job and be blacklisted for life.

    Some (I hope most) are acting – but some are weakling Stockholm victims – siding with the Zionist terrorist thugs that surround them at Fox Jews.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
  18. Nov 10, 2016 Rabbi: UNESCO resolution against Israel is NOT anti-semitic

    Rabbi Yisroel dovid Weiss, from Neturei Karta International, speaking to the press in favor of recent UNESCO resolution condemning Israeli violations around Al-Aqsa, November 10, 2016

    Read More
    • Replies: @Connecticut Famer
    One of the reasons why I get tired of people like Sean Hannity is because of their incessant pro-Israel drumbeat. It is sad to see people who oppose the settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank labeled as "anti-Semitic".
  19. “Do Republican commentators and TV producers really think they can make pals of liberal Democrats simply because they all oppose the UN resolution on Israel?”

    They’re joined at the hip. Or rather, the Yhwy -designed, genetically superior Super-DNA that makes up those hips.

    If you still think FOX is any less Jewish than other networks or that the far right and the far left don’t meet at the same synagogues on Saturday, well…….. maybe you’ll understand someday when you become an adult.

    Read More
  20. @polistra
    The odd thing about this mess is that Israel itself is a normal country with a sane culture and sane government.

    Zionist imperialism takes one political side, and the non-imperialist side is equally functional and strong. Because everyone is a Jew, Israel can and does prosecute Jews for crimes. It even investigates Bibi for corruption. None of that could happen here. Zionist imperialism is the ONLY side, and it's perfectly unthinkable to arrest or criticize Jews.

    We should be emulating the actual Israel instead of blindly obeying our false one-sided picture of "Israel".

    Yes, Israel is a “normal” racist country especially when Netanyahoo is bombing and slaughtering innocent and defenseless woman and children in Gaza. When this war criminal was bombing Gaza his popularity in Israel was around 95% and Israelis were sitting on hills eating popcorn and cheering as the slaughter of innocents continued. His ratings plummeted only when he stopped the bombing and incremental “final solution” to the Palestinian problem ended. Israel is about as normal as Apartheid South Africa and the Israeli lobby is using its quislings and sayanim in both parties to demonize truthful and rational acts like the U.N. resolution.

    Read More
  21. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Authenticjazzman
    "An age of true Leftism".

    The "Age of true Leftism", yeah that was when Stalin was ordering the mass shootings, to the back of the neck, of even his staunchest supporters.

    Or perhaps it was the era in which Che' was head prosecutor in Havana and committed thousands of dissidents to political prison from which they never returned.

    Or maybe it was the twentyfive years in which thousands of east Germans were mowed down trying the cross the wall or swim the river separating east from west Germany.

    One could fill tomes with the blessings of "True Leftism", and I am sure yourself, as a "True Leftist" would not get the point.

    Authenticjazzman, "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years.

    Your examples are radical leftism.

    Anything taken too far will lead to disaster.

    Take any religion or ideology. Too much is bad. Jim Jones and Christianity.

    Or exercise. Exercise is good for health but too much will kill you.

    So, radical anything is bad.

    But classic leftism or true leftism of the past had some compelling themes of basic equal rights, social justice, humane treatment of workers, protection of minorities, universal values, etc.

    Today’s so-called ‘leftism’ has no compelling themes.
    It’s about celebrating homo vanity, tranny narcissism, fat bitch Dunhamism, rich bitch piggery, cuck debauchery, slut pride, tattoos and piercings, etc.

    And it’s not just about tolerance of freaks(which is okay) but mandatory reverence for them, like having to cater to rich homos allied with globo-Jewish oligarchs. The new ‘leftism’ is about Wall Strret oligarchs flying the homo banner.

    Consider the themes of new cold war with Russia: Putin won’t allow homo parades. THAT is reason enough to destroy the Russian economy.

    I mean even the Onion couldn’t have come up with something that loopy.

    And the US has its big crimes too.
    While Che Guevara was a nut, his ilk were partly the product of US meddling that led to disasters in places like Guatemala. And remember US treated Cuba as some sodom-and-gomorrah gangster state. Indeed, gangster-run pre-revolutionary Cuba seems almost the template for new ‘leftism’. Today’s ‘leftists’ have ‘values’ that are more in line with casino owners of old Havana.
    The likes of Podesta and La Dolce Vita homo revelers sound like Fredo doing the town.

    Now, I’m not defending Castro whose revolution failed. But his leftism did have some truly compelling themes of nation liberation and people power.

    In the 21st century, the ‘progressive’ US as ‘liberal democracy’ has been the main force of evil in the world. It has spread filth and decadence all over. Its culture is destroying souls and bodies. It has led to white death on massive scale. It spread wars all over Middle East killing millions and unleashed refugee crisis that is engulfing Europe.

    And it’s all about globo-decadence and homomania.

    And it makes no sense. It says ‘fight Islamophobia but destroy Muslim nations; respect Islam but promote Lena-Dunhamism all over the world.’

    Read More
    • Replies: @SMK
    Far more perniciously, the modern post-1965 left is driven and defined by the apotheosis of and obsession with non-whites and non-Europeans, especially blacks but even Muslims, as sacred victim-classes. For nearly all left-liberals, race trumps "gender," i.e., feminism, "gay rights, etc. Thus the invasion of Western Europe by millions of Islamic misogynists, including legions of rapists and terrorists and potential terrorists, from the Middle-East and North Africa
    , @ogunsiron

    And it makes no sense. It says ‘fight Islamophobia but destroy Muslim nations; respect Islam but promote Lena-Dunhamism all over the world.’
     
    The gentile cuck neocon/FreedomTard version of the above insanity goes something like:

    Arrange the killing of massive numbers of "nazislamists" wherever they live, even if they never did anything to us. Allow huge numbers of the children of those we got killed to immigrate to the West, to teach them "Freedom". Do nothing when privately held enemy media teaches them Hate instead, because interfering with propaganda by market actors is not "conservative". Do even less when government schools teach them Revenge, because using government power to protect ourselves is not "conservative". When the revengeful and hateful and now very numerous children of those we killed for no reason start "killing us back", blame ourselves for ''not having taught them Freedom so we deserve it if they overwhelm us".

     

    , @utu
    The theme of "economic justice" was replaced with the theme of "social justice". That was the end of the "true left."

    The Owners always wanted to be this way. The tribe of warriors that was playing the theme of "economic justice" since 19 century became a part of the owner class.

    The definitive break with the true left by Democrats occurred when they proclaimed to be fiscally conservative.
    , @Authenticjazzman
    " Unleashed refugee crisis that is engulfing europe". : This being in part the result of the clueless insane politics of the ex leftist Sec of state HC, and her boss.
    Look you are not ever going to convince me that there is an benefit to be had in the excution of
    "Leftist" policies, as I see "Leftist" concepts as just as crazy as Nazi concepts, period.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member since 1973, and pro jazz artist.
  22. @Agent76
    Nov 10, 2016 Rabbi: UNESCO resolution against Israel is NOT anti-semitic

    Rabbi Yisroel dovid Weiss, from Neturei Karta International, speaking to the press in favor of recent UNESCO resolution condemning Israeli violations around Al-Aqsa, November 10, 2016

    https://youtu.be/uKvCHPNvylE

    One of the reasons why I get tired of people like Sean Hannity is because of their incessant pro-Israel drumbeat. It is sad to see people who oppose the settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank labeled as “anti-Semitic”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Agent76
    Thank you for your time and comment and please enlighten folks with this that was revealed in the Church committee hearings of the 1970's.

    September 1, 2015 THE CIA AND THE MEDIA: 50 FACTS THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW

    Since the end of World War Two the Central Intelligence Agency has been a major force in US and foreign news media, exerting considerable influence over what the public sees, hears and reads on a regular basis. CIA publicists and journalists alike will assert they have few, if any, relationships, yet the seldom acknowledged history of their intimate collaboration indicates a far different story–indeed, one that media historians are reluctant to examine.

    https://www.intellihub.com/the-cia-and-the-media-50-facts-the-world-needs-to-know-2/
  23. Arguably, this resolution was an attempt to take away Israel’s bargaining chips in negotiating with the Palestinians.

    I think it is not an art of the deal situation but rather one in which one side has the backing of the world,long standing official US policy and time on its side, According to Ehud Barak, not to give the West Bank to the Arabs is to leap into the abyss, and most Israelis agree with Kerry .

    The policy of the US is that a (new) Palestinian state is inevitable. Israel’s established leadership have run out of time and ideas amid mounting anger from the US foreign policy establishment. The Barak school of thought calculates that the population movements of 1948 and 67 can’t happen again, and with the West Bank Arabs sitting tight further delay is Messianic progress towards the abyss of Apartheid pariah statu.

    But Barak and company are overthinking it, because on cue there hopeless situation for Israel shows signs of becoming fluid. Firstly, Sunni radicals who don’t fear death, or want their country to be ruled by a family dictatorship until the crack of doom. Second Trump the “unpresidented”who needs to show the world that he can deal with (not make a deal with) the Russians, who have announced yet again, that they are withdrawing their forces from Syria. It is not the job of the US to ensure stability in any country ruled by a family dictatorship and Jordan is no exception to that. Israel will not have to be told what to do, shocking though the denouement will be to the liberals of the Lobby. And then it will be time for an Iron Wall, and not just in Israel, because how can the liberals criticise Trump’s domestic policies after he saves Israel?

    Read More
  24. Ironies. Ironies. Thank you, Mr. Gottfried, for dishing up another sorry example of how Israel–a tiny, intrusive ethnostate–manages to inject its POV into nearly every forum on the American stage.

    Once, this overblown phenomena was uniquely irritating. Then it got uniquely expensive. Now it’s uniquely dangerous. Israel is the lobby that ate Washington.

    So how does Israel plan to control The Narrative going forward?

    Shut down the conversation. Kill the mic. Monitor ‘fake news’. Criminalize speech.

    This is why the ‘Anti-Semitism Awareness Act’ was crafted: suppress dissent. It’s not the wars that must be stopped–but harsh words!

    Fortunately, rebellion is on the rise. As it should be. ‘Anti-Semitism’ (so called) is a normal, rational and appropriate defense mechanism. What’s needed is more of it, not less.

    But the ‘special relationship’ does still endure. Incredibly, Zionists do remain in the driver’s seat. We can thank Dersh and his army of operatives for that.

    Israel and Washington’s shotgun wedding may be the most improbable, arranged marriage in political history. America has become Israel’s prison bride. Pathetic.

    But growing awareness (‘anti-Semitism’) threatens Israel’s special status. As it should.

    Read More
    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @alexander
    Dear Mark,

    I must say, I have taken the time to read nearly all your comments over the past six months.

    You are a very perceptive, intelligent person, who writes extremely well.

    Congratulations for making some very strong arguments.

    But I don't think a renewed "Anti-Semitism" (or "Philo-Semitism" for that matter) is the answer to our problems.

    If there is a problem (and there is) it has been the ease and ability of our nations leaders (and the oligarchs they have largely come to represent) to " defraud us".


    The solution to this problem is reigniting the need for accountability, and even harsh prison sentences, when our leaders are dishonest with us, most especially on the issues of war and peace.

    Fabricating false pretexts to extract trillions of our tax dollars to commit supreme criminal acts is not acceptable behavior and should be dealt with harshly and without remorse.

    if we can do that....... we will be on the right track.
    , @OilcanFloyd
    I think that any non-Jew (especially whites and Christians) that doesn't oppose Jewish power, and view Jews with suspicion, is willfully blind or stupid. The anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-American and destructive character of many individual Jews, Jewish elites, major Jewish organizations and the Jewish community is obvious.
  25. @Miro23
    There are strong similarities between post WW2 "Scientific Socialism" and present day Zionism.

    Hayek explained the problem in his 1944 book, "The Road to Serfdom" :


    "The important point is that, if we take the people whose views influence developments, they are now in this country in some measure all socialists. It is no longer fashionable to emphasize that "we are all socialists now", this is so merely because the fact is too obvious. Scarcely anybody doubts that we must continue to move towards socialism."

     

    Substitute the word Zionism for Socialism, and the US elite works the same way , with the interesting aspect that Socialism itself grew out of 19th century Central European Jewish led social unrest culminating in Bolshevik totalitarianism and their Terror (elimination of whole classes of "Deplorables").

    From this point of view, Socialism/Marxism has morphed into Zionism with many Neo-con family histories actually showing the same radical counter-cultural lineage.

    Superb.

    I’m happy to see that someone finally posted something emphasizing that all this crap is and had been considered “fashionable.”

    As such, it’s all a bunch of garbage and people are suckers for going along with it.

    The origins of it are explained well by Randolph Bourne in his (unfortunately unfinished draft) masterpiece, The State, which is a must read for all who are interested in politics.

    Psychologists recognize the gregarious impulse as one of the strongest primitive pulls which keeps together the herds of the different species of higher animals. Mankind is no exception. Our pugnacious evolutionary history has prevented the impulse from ever dying out. This gregarious impulse is the tendency to imitate, to conform to coalesce together, and is most powerful when the herd believes itself threatened with attack. Animals crowd together for protection, and men become most conscious of their collectivity at the threat of war.

    -Randolph Bourne left an unfinished, unpaginated draft of The State when he died during the flu pandemic of 1918. The draft was published posthumously, with some material incorrectly ordered, in Untimely Papers (1919).

    http://fair-use.org/randolph-bourne/the-state/

    Read More
  26. I’m not sure. If the GOP is moving from a “conservative” party to a “generic American” party, then it would make sense to open channels with the nominal “left”, especially when it comes to protecting and preserving a minor outpost of Western Civilization in the Middle East. I am skeptical about folks like Dershowitz having much influence on future Democratic politics, especially once America hits peak Muslim, and where will they will run if their “allies” turn on them?

    Now perhaps Israel cannot really be seen as “Western Civilization”, and perhaps the friends of Israel in the legislative delegation and the MSM are fair weather friends of Trump. There are certainly plenty of wealthy GOP donors who are staunchly Zionist. This, too, opens a can of worms around Trumpism becoming Neo-Conned. I think an alliance between Trumpism and Zionism holds a fair amount of risk, but I am not sure that it is not pragmatic at the current time.

    Read More
  27. @polistra
    The odd thing about this mess is that Israel itself is a normal country with a sane culture and sane government.

    Zionist imperialism takes one political side, and the non-imperialist side is equally functional and strong. Because everyone is a Jew, Israel can and does prosecute Jews for crimes. It even investigates Bibi for corruption. None of that could happen here. Zionist imperialism is the ONLY side, and it's perfectly unthinkable to arrest or criticize Jews.

    We should be emulating the actual Israel instead of blindly obeying our false one-sided picture of "Israel".

    The odd thing about this mess is that Israel itself is a normal country with a sane culture and sane government.

    There are distinctions between a nation or country, a government and a State.

    Israel is not a normal country but it is a normal state. All states are founded on and maintained by lies theft and murder.

    Here’s Bourne again.

    The feeling for country would be an uninflatable maximum were it not for the ideas of State and Government which are associated with it. Country is a concept of peace, of tolerance, of living and letting live. But State is essentially a concept of power, of competition: it signifies a group in its aggressive aspects. And we have the misfortune of being born not only into a country but into a State, and as we grow up we learn to mingle the two feelings into a hopeless confusion. (§ 1 ¶ 7)

    Randolph Bourne left an unfinished, unpaginated draft of The State when he died during the flu pandemic of 1918. The draft was published posthumously, with some material incorrectly ordered, in Untimely Papers (1919).

    http://fair-use.org/randolph-bourne/the-state/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    Sounds like country is the mode of solidarity, appropriate when interacting with others of our nation, while state is the collective nation responding to other nations. There is no more confusion for most humans than for the social insects who cooperate with group members and on occasion go to war with other hives. Existence is error, but only for intellectuals trapped within a prison of words
  28. “Dersh”…….sounds like someone’s pet jooie. Like maybe some old blue hair’s foo-foo miniature poodle tearing the fringe off a $5k persian foyer rug…..easily forgiven no matter how errant the behavior or expensive the damage.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Decades ago I visited the old dowager aunt of a friend in an old money building in Manhattan. She had been gifted by a very, very famous entertainer with a Japanese Chin dog, which then were trendy and rare. Dog spoiled a small Persian rug and a factotum came out and whisked both away.

    A few weeks later I asked my friend about the dog. He became quiet and then said that his aunt had the animal euthanized and taxidermied few days later, when the man who gave her the dog died himself.

    Apparently they had had an affair in the 1940s and she had secretly despised him for fifty plus years.
  29. @Connecticut Famer
    One of the reasons why I get tired of people like Sean Hannity is because of their incessant pro-Israel drumbeat. It is sad to see people who oppose the settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank labeled as "anti-Semitic".

    Thank you for your time and comment and please enlighten folks with this that was revealed in the Church committee hearings of the 1970′s.

    September 1, 2015 THE CIA AND THE MEDIA: 50 FACTS THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW

    Since the end of World War Two the Central Intelligence Agency has been a major force in US and foreign news media, exerting considerable influence over what the public sees, hears and reads on a regular basis. CIA publicists and journalists alike will assert they have few, if any, relationships, yet the seldom acknowledged history of their intimate collaboration indicates a far different story–indeed, one that media historians are reluctant to examine.

    https://www.intellihub.com/the-cia-and-the-media-50-facts-the-world-needs-to-know-2/

    Read More
  30. @Wally
    Give it back to those they stole it from.

    Woody Allen is a racist Zionist.

    The Jewish settlements are indeed illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention, and there is not a single government outside Israel that believes they are legitimate.

    Israeli immigration laws specify Jews Only, while rabid Zionists demand mass immigration into the US & Europe. Some 'friends' they are. Imagine US laws which said 'Christians Only'.

    You are absolutely right. This resolution was drafted and passed just to make a point by President Obama. It was a parting shot at Benjamin Netanyahu. He knows that Israel will ignore it as it has done before.

    Woody Allen is a typical Jew. Steal the land and let us sell it back to make money.

    Read More
  31. @paul gottfried
    Polistra is perfectly correct when he says that Israelis are normal, and certainly in comparison to Jewish neocons and their gentile lackeys in the US. I have been to Israel several times and can read modern Hebrew, albeit slowly and with a dictionary. But what I've read in Israeli newspapers and what I've learned from speaking to many Israelis is that their major concern is peace. The disgusting Zionist jingoism and accusations of anti-Semitism that one encounters in the American "conservative" media and in its Murdoch extension, the Jerusalem Post, are far more characteristic of "Jews in exile" than they are of Jews in their own country. Curiously, a new litmus test for who is an approved "conservative" in the US is screaming at the top of one's lungs in support of further Israeli settlements on the West Bank.

    than they are of Jews in their own country.

    Be careful Professor, these Jew-haters will strip you of your “righteous” label for less than this statement.

    Read More
  32. This left me puzzled because the author seemed to have switched off his usual rigour. At the end we had the conservative GOP establishment being referred to as if they were the original and main targets of his criticism. Previously he conflated the Republicans generally with the behaviour of people at Fox, the NY Post and the Wall Street Journal. Even his apparent assumption that the motovation of Fox producers and presenters wasn’t predominantly aimed at audience share and profit appears almost naive.

    Read More
  33. “The UN Security Council, which passed the resolution, made unmistakably clear that Israel is illegally occupying both East Jerusalem and the West Bank”

    Not quite.

    The resolution simply condemned Israeli settlement activity in these areas.

    It made zero mention of Israel’s mere presence in these areas as being “illegal” nor did it call for a unilateral Israeli withdrawal nor did it demand that Israel must hand over this territory to anyone.

    Get your facts straight.

    Read More
  34. @Mark Green
    Ironies. Ironies. Thank you, Mr. Gottfried, for dishing up another sorry example of how Israel--a tiny, intrusive ethnostate--manages to inject its POV into nearly every forum on the American stage.

    Once, this overblown phenomena was uniquely irritating. Then it got uniquely expensive. Now it's uniquely dangerous. Israel is the lobby that ate Washington.

    So how does Israel plan to control The Narrative going forward?

    Shut down the conversation. Kill the mic. Monitor 'fake news'. Criminalize speech.

    This is why the 'Anti-Semitism Awareness Act' was crafted: suppress dissent. It's not the wars that must be stopped--but harsh words!

    Fortunately, rebellion is on the rise. As it should be. 'Anti-Semitism' (so called) is a normal, rational and appropriate defense mechanism. What's needed is more of it, not less.

    But the 'special relationship' does still endure. Incredibly, Zionists do remain in the driver's seat. We can thank Dersh and his army of operatives for that.

    Israel and Washington's shotgun wedding may be the most improbable, arranged marriage in political history. America has become Israel's prison bride. Pathetic.

    But growing awareness ('anti-Semitism') threatens Israel's special status. As it should.

    Dear Mark,

    I must say, I have taken the time to read nearly all your comments over the past six months.

    You are a very perceptive, intelligent person, who writes extremely well.

    Congratulations for making some very strong arguments.

    But I don’t think a renewed “Anti-Semitism” (or “Philo-Semitism” for that matter) is the answer to our problems.

    If there is a problem (and there is) it has been the ease and ability of our nations leaders (and the oligarchs they have largely come to represent) to ” defraud us”.

    The solution to this problem is reigniting the need for accountability, and even harsh prison sentences, when our leaders are dishonest with us, most especially on the issues of war and peace.

    Fabricating false pretexts to extract trillions of our tax dollars to commit supreme criminal acts is not acceptable behavior and should be dealt with harshly and without remorse.

    if we can do that……. we will be on the right track.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Green
    Thank you, Alexander. 'Anti-Semitism' is a loaded and nebulous term. I use it purposefully in an effort to deconstruct its manipulative meaning.

    As such, my intention is to send a warning. Non-Jews should be wary. They can trust and work alongside of Jews if they wish. That's wonderful. Let there be peace and harmony. But gentiles must be careful. 'Trust but verify'. (Where have I heard that line before?)

    Non-Jews are being out-foxed by Jewish-Americans who sometimes have hidden and subversive agendas. Have you ever wondered why Jews form so many all-Jewish (or Jewish-lead) political movements and intellectual groups?

    They constantly seek out new avenues in which to alter their existing host culture, often with devastating consequences.

    Various Jewish-lead movements have done real and lasting harm to our communities, our families and our civilization. That fact should be known. Jewish power and influence should be open for discussion and examination. Yet it isn't.

    Contrary to what many Jews claim, 'anti-Semitism' can be a non-violent and legitimate shield of protection against Jewish/Zionist deception. Nothing more.

    Non-violent barriers are a perfectly legitimate tool. Jews and ethnic Chinese, for instance, erect protective barriers for their communities wherever they live. Why are we prohibited from doing the same?

    My endorsement of 'anti-Semitism' is not a call to arms or violence. It is a warning. Jews study non-Jews and concoct tribal strategies continuously to weaken non-Jewish groups in their midst. This process is continuous and underway now. We must simply find a way to resist (non-violently) their stealthy aggression. Awareness is key.

    Jewish organizations are constantly working with one another to advance their collective interests even though this strategy often harms their non-Jewish neighbors. This is an important fact. But stating it is 'anti-Semitic'.

    Non-Jewish America is being exploited by their crafty Jewish overlords. This is a familiar pattern. The serial wars being conducted by various US administrations throughout the Middle East are merely one symptom of this disease. We are being parasitized.

    Therefore, awareness and resistance are essential tools if we are to retain the civilization that we and our forefathers created. This reasonable view, many Jews would allege, is an expression 'anti-Semitism', and therefore illegitimate. Do you agree?

    'Anti-Semitism' is a Jewish concept. What we really have are times of heightened 'anti-Jewishness'. And so what? Considering Jewish theology, Jewish politics and Jewish behavior, there's a lot to worry about. These are not docile, non-aggressive people.

    Thus, 'anti-Semitism' is an invasive term used to disarm us and empower them. It improperly conflates distrust of Jews with mass murder. The term itself is a canard. 'Anti-Semitic' theory is a Trojan Horse. Resist.

    Gentiles should be free to advocate for their collective interests. No more. No less. Borders should be respected. Freedom of association for all.

    We demand for ourselves the same freedoms that Jews everywhere demand for themselves. This is not 'anti-Semitism'. This is justice and freedom.

  35. I always loved Jackie Mason (Rabbi Krustovsky), and was quite dismayed when he unfairly hung the anti-Semite rag on Ron Paul a few years back, but I’m glad to see him jumping on the dump-the-UN wagon now. Better late than never.

    “Why are we supporting these people?” he says. “If you want to spend a fortune of money and keep getting abused every day while you’re doing it, marry a Jewish woman.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/01/06/jackie-mason-destroys-un/

    Read More
    • Replies: @JohnnyD
    @Jeff Albertson,
    Jackie Mason is definitely a hardcore Zionist, but he has been supportive of Trump.


    http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/12/23/jackie-mason-obnoxious-disgusting-trump-hating-celebs-get-pig-bastards-exclusive-video/
    , @utu
    “If you want to spend a fortune of money and keep getting abused every day while you’re doing it, marry a Jewish woman.”

    I thought he talked about the Jewish-Israel lobby.
  36. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “And because Schumer and the others are accidentally taking the same side on the UN resolution as Evangelical Christians, don’t expect them to respect the religious liberties of those who out of conscience refuse to cater gay weddings.”

    This is true and false. On the one hand, homomania does wage war on religion. But, it isn’t really a secular cause. It is neo-religion or neoligion.
    When the homo cause was about tolerance for homos, I would have agreed. Liberal democracy needs to tolerate different kinds of peoples.
    But homos, being so vain, narcissistic, and self-worshiping, prance around like bitchy divas demanding to be praised, feted, revered, and worshiped by the world… like the queen in SNOW WHITE: “mirror mirror on the wall, who’s the fairest of them all.”
    Homos say, “People people of the world, who’s the fairiest of them all? Yoo hoo, Me hoo.”
    Homomania is mandatory worship of a people into self-worship. Homos worship themselves. Especially as we live in a world of artifice and creativity cut off from nature and tradition, homos think they have CREATED the world. The original creation was by God according to religion. God created man, nature, and everything. But humanity lives in a world apart from the raw natural world, and modern mankind lives apart from traditional history. He lives in his own bubble. Since homos played a big part in the style and design of this modern world, they think they have ‘created’ the world. They are like the new gods. They are soooo ‘creative’. Creativity trumps Creation(by God or nature).

    The fact that homomania is neoligion is betrayed by intrusion of homo symbols into churches, even temples and mosques in some cases. If homomania were purely secular, why would homos push that stuff into sacred religious sanctums? The homo rectum is the new sanctum. Rectum Sanctum is what homomania is about. Homos want us to worship gayhovah. If some crazy blacks say god is black and Jesus was black, homos now act like the number one master of the cosmos is a homo. They believe in homosmos.

    So, this so-called ‘war on religious liberty’ is not a secular war. It is a religious war. It is between neoligion and religion. It is about homomania, as supported and funded by anti-Christian Jewish globalists, attacking and subverting Christianity. This is a two-pronged attack. One is direct assault on Christianity itself. Some homos mock God and Jesus and spit on the Bible. But another set of homos play fifth column. They join the church and pretend to serve God and Jesus. But once they enter the inner sanctum, they spread the gospel of the rectum. Communion turns into cum-union. Sacraments become secrete-ments. Instead of bread and wine as flesh and blood of Jesus, it’s all about buns and cream as the bunholes and semen of homos. A lot of homo men become Catholic priests. I’ll bet Poop Francis is a closet queer. As for lesbians, many of them enter mainline Protestant churches and preach little else than dyke-mania.
    This two-pronged attack is like Jewish power in the US. Most Jews were on the Prog side, but some Jews went ‘neocon’ to infiltrate the GOP to make it serve Israel while also caving to many of the shibboleths of Jewish Prog-ism, like acceptance of ‘gay marriage’. The neocons even got to Charles Murray who bent over to ‘gay marriage’. So disgusting.

    This is a religious war. It is between classic religion that worships god and neoligion that favors the faddish narcissism of certain self-worshiping groups.

    We need real separation of church and state, and that means neoligions must not be allowed to influence state policy.

    What a lot of conservatives fail to understand is that something doesn’t have to be traditionally religious to act like a religion. The Constitution should consider as quasi-religious anything that acts like a religion. Ideology, cult, or movement can be quasi-religious. What are the hallmarks of religion? Worship, taboos, faith, ritualism, witch-hunting, and etc. MLK cult is a neologion. So is homomania. We are not allowed to debate them, question them, debunk them, counter them, etc. We must bow our heads in gushy silence and repent before them and beg forgiveness.

    It’s like NYT line on ‘gay marriage’. Debate is over, shut up, and just accept it.

    So-called secular folks are not into free speech and free discourse. They are not into rationalism and empiricism. They are into replacing old taboos with new ones, old holy stuff with new holy stuff.

    After all, when Bruce Jenner said he is a ‘woman’, the MSM told us shhhhhhhh. No jokes!!! Obey and worship!

    If you don’t bake a wedding cake for two men into fecal penetration, you will be DESTROYED and BURNED AT THE STAKE!!!

    This is a religious war. Homomania is proxy of Jewish Power to replace the old church with the new temple.

    Read More
    • Agree: Clyde
    • Replies: @Clyde

    I’ll bet Poop Francis is a closet queer. As for lesbians, many of them enter mainline Protestant churches and preach little else than dyke-mania.
     
    A good summary of the current state of affairs-fairies// Poop Franny indeed!
  37. @Anon
    Your examples are radical leftism.

    Anything taken too far will lead to disaster.

    Take any religion or ideology. Too much is bad. Jim Jones and Christianity.

    Or exercise. Exercise is good for health but too much will kill you.

    So, radical anything is bad.

    But classic leftism or true leftism of the past had some compelling themes of basic equal rights, social justice, humane treatment of workers, protection of minorities, universal values, etc.

    Today's so-called 'leftism' has no compelling themes.
    It's about celebrating homo vanity, tranny narcissism, fat bitch Dunhamism, rich bitch piggery, cuck debauchery, slut pride, tattoos and piercings, etc.

    And it's not just about tolerance of freaks(which is okay) but mandatory reverence for them, like having to cater to rich homos allied with globo-Jewish oligarchs. The new 'leftism' is about Wall Strret oligarchs flying the homo banner.

    Consider the themes of new cold war with Russia: Putin won't allow homo parades. THAT is reason enough to destroy the Russian economy.

    I mean even the Onion couldn't have come up with something that loopy.

    And the US has its big crimes too.
    While Che Guevara was a nut, his ilk were partly the product of US meddling that led to disasters in places like Guatemala. And remember US treated Cuba as some sodom-and-gomorrah gangster state. Indeed, gangster-run pre-revolutionary Cuba seems almost the template for new 'leftism'. Today's 'leftists' have 'values' that are more in line with casino owners of old Havana.
    The likes of Podesta and La Dolce Vita homo revelers sound like Fredo doing the town.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwFC9QKCzgw

    Now, I'm not defending Castro whose revolution failed. But his leftism did have some truly compelling themes of nation liberation and people power.

    In the 21st century, the 'progressive' US as 'liberal democracy' has been the main force of evil in the world. It has spread filth and decadence all over. Its culture is destroying souls and bodies. It has led to white death on massive scale. It spread wars all over Middle East killing millions and unleashed refugee crisis that is engulfing Europe.

    And it's all about globo-decadence and homomania.

    And it makes no sense. It says 'fight Islamophobia but destroy Muslim nations; respect Islam but promote Lena-Dunhamism all over the world.'

    Far more perniciously, the modern post-1965 left is driven and defined by the apotheosis of and obsession with non-whites and non-Europeans, especially blacks but even Muslims, as sacred victim-classes. For nearly all left-liberals, race trumps “gender,” i.e., feminism, “gay rights, etc. Thus the invasion of Western Europe by millions of Islamic misogynists, including legions of rapists and terrorists and potential terrorists, from the Middle-East and North Africa

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "Far more perniciously, the modern post-1965 left is driven and defined by the apotheosis of and obsession with non-whites and non-Europeans, especially blacks but even Muslims, as sacred victim-classes."

    Blacks, yes, Muslims not so much... though it depends on where.

    The rules of holiness seems to vary from nation to nation. Canada, for instance, is far more sensitive to Hindu issues than the US. In the US, hindus are babu on SIMPSONS and funny-accented folks.

    I think UK and its once commonwealth states are more sensitive about Hindus cuz of imperial legacy.

    Oddly, enough much of this 'white guilt' thing is infectious than organic.
    It's not necessarily the case that a people will feel guilt, compassion, or sympathy for another people on the basis of its own history. Rather, they've been infected with the guilt-cult of another people who control the global narrative. Since Hollywood dominates the world, White American Guilt Complex infects even white nations that had NOTHING to do with slavery. Also, black resistance has been made cool via Malcolm X and Black Panthers and rappers. And MLK made black movement seemly grandly bellowish.
    Take the Swedes. Why are they so into guilt-cult about blacks when they never did any wrong to blacks? If Swedes really wanna atone for their 'historical sins', they should remember what the Vikings did to fellow Europeans and others. But instead, Swedes feel no 'guilt' over that and prefer to dream about Noble Negroes.
    Even if a people don't share in the guilt, they feel greater compassion and sympathy for a particular people because they've been 'sacralized' by the globo-media.

    Also, people of color are sometimes used as pawns in the Moral Upmanship Game.

    So, if the US is seen as favoring Zionists and causing undue harm in the Muslim world, the EU might express extra sympathy for the Muslims as an indirect way of anti-Americanism.
  38. @jacques sheete

    The odd thing about this mess is that Israel itself is a normal country with a sane culture and sane government.
     
    There are distinctions between a nation or country, a government and a State.

    Israel is not a normal country but it is a normal state. All states are founded on and maintained by lies theft and murder.

    Here's Bourne again.

    The feeling for country would be an uninflatable maximum were it not for the ideas of State and Government which are associated with it. Country is a concept of peace, of tolerance, of living and letting live. But State is essentially a concept of power, of competition: it signifies a group in its aggressive aspects. And we have the misfortune of being born not only into a country but into a State, and as we grow up we learn to mingle the two feelings into a hopeless confusion. (§ 1 ¶ 7)

    Randolph Bourne left an unfinished, unpaginated draft of The State when he died during the flu pandemic of 1918. The draft was published posthumously, with some material incorrectly ordered, in Untimely Papers (1919).
    http://fair-use.org/randolph-bourne/the-state/

     

    Sounds like country is the mode of solidarity, appropriate when interacting with others of our nation, while state is the collective nation responding to other nations. There is no more confusion for most humans than for the social insects who cooperate with group members and on occasion go to war with other hives. Existence is error, but only for intellectuals trapped within a prison of words

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    while state is the collective nation responding to other nations.
     
    If you read Bourne, the State is a tool of the ruling classes, and since the ruling classes obviously want to maintain themselves, and cannot afford to have any gods before themselves, they use various means of "persuasion" to con the country into doing their bidding and looking to them for "protection."

    Since "existential threats" have often done wonders for maintaining and even amplifying group cohesion, they have to be manufactured continuously by the usual suspects. Hence wars and the rumors of wars, monsters, bogeymen, etc.

    The State, as a putative "protector," has been perverted and I don't see how that will ever change. Basically, it's human nature and that isn't due to change for the better any time soon either, I think.

    Another way to look at it is that all States are mafias and as such are always in conflict, or potential conflict, with something.
  39. @Jeff Albertson
    I always loved Jackie Mason (Rabbi Krustovsky), and was quite dismayed when he unfairly hung the anti-Semite rag on Ron Paul a few years back, but I'm glad to see him jumping on the dump-the-UN wagon now. Better late than never.

    "Why are we supporting these people?” he says. “If you want to spend a fortune of money and keep getting abused every day while you’re doing it, marry a Jewish woman.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/01/06/jackie-mason-destroys-un/
    Read More
  40. @Sean
    Sounds like country is the mode of solidarity, appropriate when interacting with others of our nation, while state is the collective nation responding to other nations. There is no more confusion for most humans than for the social insects who cooperate with group members and on occasion go to war with other hives. Existence is error, but only for intellectuals trapped within a prison of words

    while state is the collective nation responding to other nations.

    If you read Bourne, the State is a tool of the ruling classes, and since the ruling classes obviously want to maintain themselves, and cannot afford to have any gods before themselves, they use various means of “persuasion” to con the country into doing their bidding and looking to them for “protection.”

    Since “existential threats” have often done wonders for maintaining and even amplifying group cohesion, they have to be manufactured continuously by the usual suspects. Hence wars and the rumors of wars, monsters, bogeymen, etc.

    The State, as a putative “protector,” has been perverted and I don’t see how that will ever change. Basically, it’s human nature and that isn’t due to change for the better any time soon either, I think.

    Another way to look at it is that all States are mafias and as such are always in conflict, or potential conflict, with something.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean
    Humans are not the only animals that have hierarchy with group conflict. Bourne sees war as inconclusive and not concerned with scarcity (ie real conflicts of interest) but war is not healthy for the state or ruling class that loses as the Amerindians lost.
  41. @Anon
    "My other reaction to these unseemly overtures on the part of Republicans is that these folks must be desperate for the approval of left liberal politicians."

    Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power.

    GOP doesn't seem to care for 'left-liberals' among Palestinian-Americans and their allies.

    By the way, the so-called current 'left' isn't leftist. Its homomania, culture of vanity, and decadent follies reveal it to be the product of late consumerist capitalism.

    No true leftist from an Age of True Leftism would recognize today's insipid Hollywood-MTV style follies as 'leftist'.

    Lena Dunham a 'leftist'? Just a spoiled brat. Just like Marie Antoinette played at being a peasant lady, today's Glob Elites play at being 'progressive' with their silly cosplay.

    > Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power

    cream rises to the top

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    cream rises to the top

     

    Not all that floats at the top is cream.
    , @Art

    > Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power

    cream rises to the top

     

    Cream???? You mean like in Israel.

    You mean like Netanyahu, torture, nukes, preventive detention, apartheid walls, favoring one religion, a million person open air prison of men, woman, and children - a very very immoral army -- you mean that cream?

    Your cream is poison to mankind.

    Peace --- Art
    , @HdC
    "...cream rises to the top..."

    As do the biggest lumps in the cess pool. HdC
  42. @Anonymous
    Fox News is pathetic. And they are pushing the 'Russia is our enemy' and 'Putin is a thug' bullshit harder than anyone. But Trump's his own man. He holds pretty Zionist views but no surprise given his past support of Israel. But he doesn't tout it and during the debates he even took a fair-minded (business negotiator) approach and said he wouldn't take sides. He was excoriated by the neocon Charlie McCarthy's Rubio, Cruz, Kasich, et al. But Trump really doesn't give a shit and doesn't seek validation from others (especially liberals) of the correctness of his positions/decisions (though on Twitter he is constantly trying to prove he's right-- which is different).

    I agree with you about Fox. But he is going to have a hell of a time getting his appointments through Congress which is full of traitorous assholes.

    Read More
  43. @alexander
    Dear Mark,

    I must say, I have taken the time to read nearly all your comments over the past six months.

    You are a very perceptive, intelligent person, who writes extremely well.

    Congratulations for making some very strong arguments.

    But I don't think a renewed "Anti-Semitism" (or "Philo-Semitism" for that matter) is the answer to our problems.

    If there is a problem (and there is) it has been the ease and ability of our nations leaders (and the oligarchs they have largely come to represent) to " defraud us".


    The solution to this problem is reigniting the need for accountability, and even harsh prison sentences, when our leaders are dishonest with us, most especially on the issues of war and peace.

    Fabricating false pretexts to extract trillions of our tax dollars to commit supreme criminal acts is not acceptable behavior and should be dealt with harshly and without remorse.

    if we can do that....... we will be on the right track.

    Thank you, Alexander. ‘Anti-Semitism’ is a loaded and nebulous term. I use it purposefully in an effort to deconstruct its manipulative meaning.

    As such, my intention is to send a warning. Non-Jews should be wary. They can trust and work alongside of Jews if they wish. That’s wonderful. Let there be peace and harmony. But gentiles must be careful. ‘Trust but verify’. (Where have I heard that line before?)

    Non-Jews are being out-foxed by Jewish-Americans who sometimes have hidden and subversive agendas. Have you ever wondered why Jews form so many all-Jewish (or Jewish-lead) political movements and intellectual groups?

    They constantly seek out new avenues in which to alter their existing host culture, often with devastating consequences.

    Various Jewish-lead movements have done real and lasting harm to our communities, our families and our civilization. That fact should be known. Jewish power and influence should be open for discussion and examination. Yet it isn’t.

    Contrary to what many Jews claim, ‘anti-Semitism’ can be a non-violent and legitimate shield of protection against Jewish/Zionist deception. Nothing more.

    Non-violent barriers are a perfectly legitimate tool. Jews and ethnic Chinese, for instance, erect protective barriers for their communities wherever they live. Why are we prohibited from doing the same?

    My endorsement of ‘anti-Semitism’ is not a call to arms or violence. It is a warning. Jews study non-Jews and concoct tribal strategies continuously to weaken non-Jewish groups in their midst. This process is continuous and underway now. We must simply find a way to resist (non-violently) their stealthy aggression. Awareness is key.

    Jewish organizations are constantly working with one another to advance their collective interests even though this strategy often harms their non-Jewish neighbors. This is an important fact. But stating it is ‘anti-Semitic’.

    Non-Jewish America is being exploited by their crafty Jewish overlords. This is a familiar pattern. The serial wars being conducted by various US administrations throughout the Middle East are merely one symptom of this disease. We are being parasitized.

    Therefore, awareness and resistance are essential tools if we are to retain the civilization that we and our forefathers created. This reasonable view, many Jews would allege, is an expression ‘anti-Semitism’, and therefore illegitimate. Do you agree?

    ‘Anti-Semitism’ is a Jewish concept. What we really have are times of heightened ‘anti-Jewishness’. And so what? Considering Jewish theology, Jewish politics and Jewish behavior, there’s a lot to worry about. These are not docile, non-aggressive people.

    Thus, ‘anti-Semitism’ is an invasive term used to disarm us and empower them. It improperly conflates distrust of Jews with mass murder. The term itself is a canard. ‘Anti-Semitic’ theory is a Trojan Horse. Resist.

    Gentiles should be free to advocate for their collective interests. No more. No less. Borders should be respected. Freedom of association for all.

    We demand for ourselves the same freedoms that Jews everywhere demand for themselves. This is not ‘anti-Semitism’. This is justice and freedom.

    Read More
    • Agree: ogunsiron
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Anti-Semitism’ is a Jewish concept.
     
    The quote below is from a good article that shows not only how crafty Zionists are, but how anti-Semitic they can be as well. It really should not surprise anyone that Zionism is anti-Jew since Jews are largely a religious people to one degree or another while the Zionists who founded Israel are mostly atheists, and are antagonistic to all religions. In fact, they often appear pretty hostile to anyone who disagrees with them including other Zionists! Zionists have also promoted the self serving canard that Jews are a pure ethnic group or race.

    In fact, they promote anti-Semitism so they can play that card at will. By doing that, they make all Jews look bad, and that tends to fan the flames of any anti-Semitism that may already exist.


    The historical record makes plain what should already have been obvious from the present reality—that Israel’s and Zionism’s pretenses regarding Jews and Judaism, and in particular its pretense of being a response to anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution, is a fraud. Indeed quite the opposite, it thrives by exacerbating and capitalizing on these, and has turned them into a cynical, deadly business.

    -Tom Suarez,Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won

    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/01/terrorism-israeli-state/


     

    The article is full of incriminating historical anecdotes as well.
  44. @Karl
    > Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power

    cream rises to the top

    cream rises to the top

    Not all that floats at the top is cream.

    Read More
  45. @Karl
    > Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power

    cream rises to the top

    > Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power

    cream rises to the top

    Cream???? You mean like in Israel.

    You mean like Netanyahu, torture, nukes, preventive detention, apartheid walls, favoring one religion, a million person open air prison of men, woman, and children – a very very immoral army — you mean that cream?

    Your cream is poison to mankind.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
  46. @Mark Green
    Thank you, Alexander. 'Anti-Semitism' is a loaded and nebulous term. I use it purposefully in an effort to deconstruct its manipulative meaning.

    As such, my intention is to send a warning. Non-Jews should be wary. They can trust and work alongside of Jews if they wish. That's wonderful. Let there be peace and harmony. But gentiles must be careful. 'Trust but verify'. (Where have I heard that line before?)

    Non-Jews are being out-foxed by Jewish-Americans who sometimes have hidden and subversive agendas. Have you ever wondered why Jews form so many all-Jewish (or Jewish-lead) political movements and intellectual groups?

    They constantly seek out new avenues in which to alter their existing host culture, often with devastating consequences.

    Various Jewish-lead movements have done real and lasting harm to our communities, our families and our civilization. That fact should be known. Jewish power and influence should be open for discussion and examination. Yet it isn't.

    Contrary to what many Jews claim, 'anti-Semitism' can be a non-violent and legitimate shield of protection against Jewish/Zionist deception. Nothing more.

    Non-violent barriers are a perfectly legitimate tool. Jews and ethnic Chinese, for instance, erect protective barriers for their communities wherever they live. Why are we prohibited from doing the same?

    My endorsement of 'anti-Semitism' is not a call to arms or violence. It is a warning. Jews study non-Jews and concoct tribal strategies continuously to weaken non-Jewish groups in their midst. This process is continuous and underway now. We must simply find a way to resist (non-violently) their stealthy aggression. Awareness is key.

    Jewish organizations are constantly working with one another to advance their collective interests even though this strategy often harms their non-Jewish neighbors. This is an important fact. But stating it is 'anti-Semitic'.

    Non-Jewish America is being exploited by their crafty Jewish overlords. This is a familiar pattern. The serial wars being conducted by various US administrations throughout the Middle East are merely one symptom of this disease. We are being parasitized.

    Therefore, awareness and resistance are essential tools if we are to retain the civilization that we and our forefathers created. This reasonable view, many Jews would allege, is an expression 'anti-Semitism', and therefore illegitimate. Do you agree?

    'Anti-Semitism' is a Jewish concept. What we really have are times of heightened 'anti-Jewishness'. And so what? Considering Jewish theology, Jewish politics and Jewish behavior, there's a lot to worry about. These are not docile, non-aggressive people.

    Thus, 'anti-Semitism' is an invasive term used to disarm us and empower them. It improperly conflates distrust of Jews with mass murder. The term itself is a canard. 'Anti-Semitic' theory is a Trojan Horse. Resist.

    Gentiles should be free to advocate for their collective interests. No more. No less. Borders should be respected. Freedom of association for all.

    We demand for ourselves the same freedoms that Jews everywhere demand for themselves. This is not 'anti-Semitism'. This is justice and freedom.

    Anti-Semitism’ is a Jewish concept.

    The quote below is from a good article that shows not only how crafty Zionists are, but how anti-Semitic they can be as well. It really should not surprise anyone that Zionism is anti-Jew since Jews are largely a religious people to one degree or another while the Zionists who founded Israel are mostly atheists, and are antagonistic to all religions. In fact, they often appear pretty hostile to anyone who disagrees with them including other Zionists! Zionists have also promoted the self serving canard that Jews are a pure ethnic group or race.

    In fact, they promote anti-Semitism so they can play that card at will. By doing that, they make all Jews look bad, and that tends to fan the flames of any anti-Semitism that may already exist.

    The historical record makes plain what should already have been obvious from the present reality—that Israel’s and Zionism’s pretenses regarding Jews and Judaism, and in particular its pretense of being a response to anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution, is a fraud. Indeed quite the opposite, it thrives by exacerbating and capitalizing on these, and has turned them into a cynical, deadly business.

    -Tom Suarez,Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won

    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/01/terrorism-israeli-state/

    The article is full of incriminating historical anecdotes as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    Tee hee.
    , @Skeptikal
    -Tom Suarez,Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won

    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/01/terrorism-israeli-state/

    Totally effing brilliant

    Must-read. I have had various thoughts of this kind drifting incoherently in my head--the cynicism with which Zionists use "anti-semitism," actually create it, same cynicism in their 'use" of the Holocaust and actual historical hostility to Jews. But this speech/essay pulls it all together in powerful language; it is a trip through the actual document record of the cunning, duplicity, cynicism, and heartlessness of these Zionist thugs, from the very beginning.
    I was unaware of the level of arm twisting and totalitarian measures of all sorts undertaken by the Zionist Nazis--yes, I think one can very justifiably call them that.

    So many examples of the double dealing of the Zionists, with their supposed allies and also with their own suffering people still in Europe and on the high seas. Really, monsters.

    I am also getting heartily sick of the ongoing celebration of their Judaism in constant op-eds etc. in my local community. Even the Xmas edition of the local weekly had an op-ed by a top local navel gazer about being Jewish during the Xmas season. Who gives a flying F about your navel-gazing obsession with your Judiasm. Thank heaven my own German Jewish forebears had some common sense and saw the Zionist project for the counterproductive and destructive thing it was.

    Britain has a hell of a lot to answer for, and I agree that this centennial year of the Balfour Declaration, in which British imperial power was abused and misused to hand away another people's land to the Jews (BTW, the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine also had nationalist aspirations of their own, for their own country in their own territory), is the time to put some kind of pressure on Britain.
    How about some well-placed stink bombs of the type used to spray Palestinians' residential areas?

    Maybe from now on perhaps everyone should just refer to Israel/Israelis as Palestine/Palestinians. They live in Palestine. End of Story.
    That will piss them off!

  47. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @SMK
    Far more perniciously, the modern post-1965 left is driven and defined by the apotheosis of and obsession with non-whites and non-Europeans, especially blacks but even Muslims, as sacred victim-classes. For nearly all left-liberals, race trumps "gender," i.e., feminism, "gay rights, etc. Thus the invasion of Western Europe by millions of Islamic misogynists, including legions of rapists and terrorists and potential terrorists, from the Middle-East and North Africa

    “Far more perniciously, the modern post-1965 left is driven and defined by the apotheosis of and obsession with non-whites and non-Europeans, especially blacks but even Muslims, as sacred victim-classes.”

    Blacks, yes, Muslims not so much… though it depends on where.

    The rules of holiness seems to vary from nation to nation. Canada, for instance, is far more sensitive to Hindu issues than the US. In the US, hindus are babu on SIMPSONS and funny-accented folks.

    I think UK and its once commonwealth states are more sensitive about Hindus cuz of imperial legacy.

    Oddly, enough much of this ‘white guilt’ thing is infectious than organic.
    It’s not necessarily the case that a people will feel guilt, compassion, or sympathy for another people on the basis of its own history. Rather, they’ve been infected with the guilt-cult of another people who control the global narrative. Since Hollywood dominates the world, White American Guilt Complex infects even white nations that had NOTHING to do with slavery. Also, black resistance has been made cool via Malcolm X and Black Panthers and rappers. And MLK made black movement seemly grandly bellowish.
    Take the Swedes. Why are they so into guilt-cult about blacks when they never did any wrong to blacks? If Swedes really wanna atone for their ‘historical sins’, they should remember what the Vikings did to fellow Europeans and others. But instead, Swedes feel no ‘guilt’ over that and prefer to dream about Noble Negroes.
    Even if a people don’t share in the guilt, they feel greater compassion and sympathy for a particular people because they’ve been ‘sacralized’ by the globo-media.

    Also, people of color are sometimes used as pawns in the Moral Upmanship Game.

    So, if the US is seen as favoring Zionists and causing undue harm in the Muslim world, the EU might express extra sympathy for the Muslims as an indirect way of anti-Americanism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ogunsiron

    Since Hollywood dominates the world, White American Guilt Complex infects even white nations that had NOTHING to do with slavery
     
    It also leads to absurdities like africans from slave trading tribes bellyaching about spending "400 years in slavery", on italian tv.
  48. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @nsa
    "Dersh".......sounds like someone's pet jooie. Like maybe some old blue hair's foo-foo miniature poodle tearing the fringe off a $5k persian foyer rug.....easily forgiven no matter how errant the behavior or expensive the damage.

    Decades ago I visited the old dowager aunt of a friend in an old money building in Manhattan. She had been gifted by a very, very famous entertainer with a Japanese Chin dog, which then were trendy and rare. Dog spoiled a small Persian rug and a factotum came out and whisked both away.

    A few weeks later I asked my friend about the dog. He became quiet and then said that his aunt had the animal euthanized and taxidermied few days later, when the man who gave her the dog died himself.

    Apparently they had had an affair in the 1940s and she had secretly despised him for fifty plus years.

    Read More
  49. @Anon
    Your examples are radical leftism.

    Anything taken too far will lead to disaster.

    Take any religion or ideology. Too much is bad. Jim Jones and Christianity.

    Or exercise. Exercise is good for health but too much will kill you.

    So, radical anything is bad.

    But classic leftism or true leftism of the past had some compelling themes of basic equal rights, social justice, humane treatment of workers, protection of minorities, universal values, etc.

    Today's so-called 'leftism' has no compelling themes.
    It's about celebrating homo vanity, tranny narcissism, fat bitch Dunhamism, rich bitch piggery, cuck debauchery, slut pride, tattoos and piercings, etc.

    And it's not just about tolerance of freaks(which is okay) but mandatory reverence for them, like having to cater to rich homos allied with globo-Jewish oligarchs. The new 'leftism' is about Wall Strret oligarchs flying the homo banner.

    Consider the themes of new cold war with Russia: Putin won't allow homo parades. THAT is reason enough to destroy the Russian economy.

    I mean even the Onion couldn't have come up with something that loopy.

    And the US has its big crimes too.
    While Che Guevara was a nut, his ilk were partly the product of US meddling that led to disasters in places like Guatemala. And remember US treated Cuba as some sodom-and-gomorrah gangster state. Indeed, gangster-run pre-revolutionary Cuba seems almost the template for new 'leftism'. Today's 'leftists' have 'values' that are more in line with casino owners of old Havana.
    The likes of Podesta and La Dolce Vita homo revelers sound like Fredo doing the town.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwFC9QKCzgw

    Now, I'm not defending Castro whose revolution failed. But his leftism did have some truly compelling themes of nation liberation and people power.

    In the 21st century, the 'progressive' US as 'liberal democracy' has been the main force of evil in the world. It has spread filth and decadence all over. Its culture is destroying souls and bodies. It has led to white death on massive scale. It spread wars all over Middle East killing millions and unleashed refugee crisis that is engulfing Europe.

    And it's all about globo-decadence and homomania.

    And it makes no sense. It says 'fight Islamophobia but destroy Muslim nations; respect Islam but promote Lena-Dunhamism all over the world.'

    And it makes no sense. It says ‘fight Islamophobia but destroy Muslim nations; respect Islam but promote Lena-Dunhamism all over the world.’

    The gentile cuck neocon/FreedomTard version of the above insanity goes something like:

    Arrange the killing of massive numbers of “nazislamists” wherever they live, even if they never did anything to us. Allow huge numbers of the children of those we got killed to immigrate to the West, to teach them “Freedom”. Do nothing when privately held enemy media teaches them Hate instead, because interfering with propaganda by market actors is not “conservative”. Do even less when government schools teach them Revenge, because using government power to protect ourselves is not “conservative”. When the revengeful and hateful and now very numerous children of those we killed for no reason start “killing us back”, blame ourselves for ”not having taught them Freedom so we deserve it if they overwhelm us”.

    Read More
  50. @Anon
    "Far more perniciously, the modern post-1965 left is driven and defined by the apotheosis of and obsession with non-whites and non-Europeans, especially blacks but even Muslims, as sacred victim-classes."

    Blacks, yes, Muslims not so much... though it depends on where.

    The rules of holiness seems to vary from nation to nation. Canada, for instance, is far more sensitive to Hindu issues than the US. In the US, hindus are babu on SIMPSONS and funny-accented folks.

    I think UK and its once commonwealth states are more sensitive about Hindus cuz of imperial legacy.

    Oddly, enough much of this 'white guilt' thing is infectious than organic.
    It's not necessarily the case that a people will feel guilt, compassion, or sympathy for another people on the basis of its own history. Rather, they've been infected with the guilt-cult of another people who control the global narrative. Since Hollywood dominates the world, White American Guilt Complex infects even white nations that had NOTHING to do with slavery. Also, black resistance has been made cool via Malcolm X and Black Panthers and rappers. And MLK made black movement seemly grandly bellowish.
    Take the Swedes. Why are they so into guilt-cult about blacks when they never did any wrong to blacks? If Swedes really wanna atone for their 'historical sins', they should remember what the Vikings did to fellow Europeans and others. But instead, Swedes feel no 'guilt' over that and prefer to dream about Noble Negroes.
    Even if a people don't share in the guilt, they feel greater compassion and sympathy for a particular people because they've been 'sacralized' by the globo-media.

    Also, people of color are sometimes used as pawns in the Moral Upmanship Game.

    So, if the US is seen as favoring Zionists and causing undue harm in the Muslim world, the EU might express extra sympathy for the Muslims as an indirect way of anti-Americanism.

    Since Hollywood dominates the world, White American Guilt Complex infects even white nations that had NOTHING to do with slavery

    It also leads to absurdities like africans from slave trading tribes bellyaching about spending “400 years in slavery”, on italian tv.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    True. On the other hand, it has also led to 'black guilt' among some African nations.

    This 'black guilt' didn't exist until Africa came under Western moral influence.

    For the longest time, black Africa dealt in slaves without worry. And never felt sorry about what they did.

    But because American globalism dominates World Conscience, some African nations have expressed guilt and remorse not unlike 'white guilt'.

    So, it goes to show that 'white guilt' also affected some blacks in Africa. It was through white conscience that some black African nations also found their own sense of guilt.

    http://takimag.com/article/did_africans_sell_africans_into_slavery_lets_ask_some_africans_jim_goad/print#axzz4V2zFhfCW
  51. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @ogunsiron

    Since Hollywood dominates the world, White American Guilt Complex infects even white nations that had NOTHING to do with slavery
     
    It also leads to absurdities like africans from slave trading tribes bellyaching about spending "400 years in slavery", on italian tv.

    True. On the other hand, it has also led to ‘black guilt’ among some African nations.

    This ‘black guilt’ didn’t exist until Africa came under Western moral influence.

    For the longest time, black Africa dealt in slaves without worry. And never felt sorry about what they did.

    But because American globalism dominates World Conscience, some African nations have expressed guilt and remorse not unlike ‘white guilt’.

    So, it goes to show that ‘white guilt’ also affected some blacks in Africa. It was through white conscience that some black African nations also found their own sense of guilt.

    http://takimag.com/article/did_africans_sell_africans_into_slavery_lets_ask_some_africans_jim_goad/print#axzz4V2zFhfCW

    Read More
  52. @Authenticjazzman
    "An age of true Leftism".

    The "Age of true Leftism", yeah that was when Stalin was ordering the mass shootings, to the back of the neck, of even his staunchest supporters.

    Or perhaps it was the era in which Che' was head prosecutor in Havana and committed thousands of dissidents to political prison from which they never returned.

    Or maybe it was the twentyfive years in which thousands of east Germans were mowed down trying the cross the wall or swim the river separating east from west Germany.

    One could fill tomes with the blessings of "True Leftism", and I am sure yourself, as a "True Leftist" would not get the point.

    Authenticjazzman, "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years.

    ” the twentyfive years in which thousands of east Germans were mowed down trying the cross the wall or swim the river separating east from west Germany.”

    Arbeitsgemeinschaft 13. August: 753
    Zentrale Erfassungsstelle für Regierungs- und Vereinigungskriminalität: 519

    Read More
  53. @Anon
    Your examples are radical leftism.

    Anything taken too far will lead to disaster.

    Take any religion or ideology. Too much is bad. Jim Jones and Christianity.

    Or exercise. Exercise is good for health but too much will kill you.

    So, radical anything is bad.

    But classic leftism or true leftism of the past had some compelling themes of basic equal rights, social justice, humane treatment of workers, protection of minorities, universal values, etc.

    Today's so-called 'leftism' has no compelling themes.
    It's about celebrating homo vanity, tranny narcissism, fat bitch Dunhamism, rich bitch piggery, cuck debauchery, slut pride, tattoos and piercings, etc.

    And it's not just about tolerance of freaks(which is okay) but mandatory reverence for them, like having to cater to rich homos allied with globo-Jewish oligarchs. The new 'leftism' is about Wall Strret oligarchs flying the homo banner.

    Consider the themes of new cold war with Russia: Putin won't allow homo parades. THAT is reason enough to destroy the Russian economy.

    I mean even the Onion couldn't have come up with something that loopy.

    And the US has its big crimes too.
    While Che Guevara was a nut, his ilk were partly the product of US meddling that led to disasters in places like Guatemala. And remember US treated Cuba as some sodom-and-gomorrah gangster state. Indeed, gangster-run pre-revolutionary Cuba seems almost the template for new 'leftism'. Today's 'leftists' have 'values' that are more in line with casino owners of old Havana.
    The likes of Podesta and La Dolce Vita homo revelers sound like Fredo doing the town.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwFC9QKCzgw

    Now, I'm not defending Castro whose revolution failed. But his leftism did have some truly compelling themes of nation liberation and people power.

    In the 21st century, the 'progressive' US as 'liberal democracy' has been the main force of evil in the world. It has spread filth and decadence all over. Its culture is destroying souls and bodies. It has led to white death on massive scale. It spread wars all over Middle East killing millions and unleashed refugee crisis that is engulfing Europe.

    And it's all about globo-decadence and homomania.

    And it makes no sense. It says 'fight Islamophobia but destroy Muslim nations; respect Islam but promote Lena-Dunhamism all over the world.'

    The theme of “economic justice” was replaced with the theme of “social justice”. That was the end of the “true left.”

    The Owners always wanted to be this way. The tribe of warriors that was playing the theme of “economic justice” since 19 century became a part of the owner class.

    The definitive break with the true left by Democrats occurred when they proclaimed to be fiscally conservative.

    Read More
  54. @Jeff Albertson
    I always loved Jackie Mason (Rabbi Krustovsky), and was quite dismayed when he unfairly hung the anti-Semite rag on Ron Paul a few years back, but I'm glad to see him jumping on the dump-the-UN wagon now. Better late than never.

    "Why are we supporting these people?” he says. “If you want to spend a fortune of money and keep getting abused every day while you’re doing it, marry a Jewish woman.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/01/06/jackie-mason-destroys-un/

    “If you want to spend a fortune of money and keep getting abused every day while you’re doing it, marry a Jewish woman.”

    I thought he talked about the Jewish-Israel lobby.

    Read More
  55. @annamaria
    Ziocons' use of the US military:
    http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/report_points_to_a_pentagon_plot_to_subvert_obamas_syria_policy_20170105
    The chosen imbeciles (Carter et al) and their faithful minions of opportunists among the brass (Harrigan and such) and presstitutes (the NYT, WP and such) cannot wait to make the world glow in the dark.

    > Ziocons’ use of the US military

    Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is currently literally propped up by American troops manning its border.

    Our borders are manned by our own people.

    I’ve never seen annamaria bitch about Jordan.

    And don’t EVEN give me no backtalk about the Americans are there to “protect Israel”…. they are there because Jordan ==is== Palestine; it is occupied by Hashemites from Saudi; and THAT occupation prevents Jerusalem from engineering a “two state solution”.

    Look at the map; compare the area of Jordan to that of Israel-inclusive-ofJudea&Samaria…. then tell me who should give up land to produce a “State of Palestine”

    In the long run, i’m not worried. It would take fewer bullets to end the Hashemite dynasty, than it took to end trhe Romanov dynasty.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art

    In the long run, i’m not worried. It would take fewer bullets to end the Hashemite dynasty, than it took to end trhe Romanov dynasty.
     
    Do it the Jew way -- bullets!

    As is demonstrated - Jews love force - it is always their answer to problems - it is make a forceful law or use bullets.

    Jews are not Westerners.

    Peace --- Art
  56. @Anon
    Your examples are radical leftism.

    Anything taken too far will lead to disaster.

    Take any religion or ideology. Too much is bad. Jim Jones and Christianity.

    Or exercise. Exercise is good for health but too much will kill you.

    So, radical anything is bad.

    But classic leftism or true leftism of the past had some compelling themes of basic equal rights, social justice, humane treatment of workers, protection of minorities, universal values, etc.

    Today's so-called 'leftism' has no compelling themes.
    It's about celebrating homo vanity, tranny narcissism, fat bitch Dunhamism, rich bitch piggery, cuck debauchery, slut pride, tattoos and piercings, etc.

    And it's not just about tolerance of freaks(which is okay) but mandatory reverence for them, like having to cater to rich homos allied with globo-Jewish oligarchs. The new 'leftism' is about Wall Strret oligarchs flying the homo banner.

    Consider the themes of new cold war with Russia: Putin won't allow homo parades. THAT is reason enough to destroy the Russian economy.

    I mean even the Onion couldn't have come up with something that loopy.

    And the US has its big crimes too.
    While Che Guevara was a nut, his ilk were partly the product of US meddling that led to disasters in places like Guatemala. And remember US treated Cuba as some sodom-and-gomorrah gangster state. Indeed, gangster-run pre-revolutionary Cuba seems almost the template for new 'leftism'. Today's 'leftists' have 'values' that are more in line with casino owners of old Havana.
    The likes of Podesta and La Dolce Vita homo revelers sound like Fredo doing the town.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwFC9QKCzgw

    Now, I'm not defending Castro whose revolution failed. But his leftism did have some truly compelling themes of nation liberation and people power.

    In the 21st century, the 'progressive' US as 'liberal democracy' has been the main force of evil in the world. It has spread filth and decadence all over. Its culture is destroying souls and bodies. It has led to white death on massive scale. It spread wars all over Middle East killing millions and unleashed refugee crisis that is engulfing Europe.

    And it's all about globo-decadence and homomania.

    And it makes no sense. It says 'fight Islamophobia but destroy Muslim nations; respect Islam but promote Lena-Dunhamism all over the world.'

    ” Unleashed refugee crisis that is engulfing europe”. : This being in part the result of the clueless insane politics of the ex leftist Sec of state HC, and her boss.
    Look you are not ever going to convince me that there is an benefit to be had in the excution of
    “Leftist” policies, as I see “Leftist” concepts as just as crazy as Nazi concepts, period.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” society member since 1973, and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
  57. @Anon
    "And because Schumer and the others are accidentally taking the same side on the UN resolution as Evangelical Christians, don’t expect them to respect the religious liberties of those who out of conscience refuse to cater gay weddings."

    This is true and false. On the one hand, homomania does wage war on religion. But, it isn't really a secular cause. It is neo-religion or neoligion.
    When the homo cause was about tolerance for homos, I would have agreed. Liberal democracy needs to tolerate different kinds of peoples.
    But homos, being so vain, narcissistic, and self-worshiping, prance around like bitchy divas demanding to be praised, feted, revered, and worshiped by the world... like the queen in SNOW WHITE: "mirror mirror on the wall, who's the fairest of them all."
    Homos say, "People people of the world, who's the fairiest of them all? Yoo hoo, Me hoo."
    Homomania is mandatory worship of a people into self-worship. Homos worship themselves. Especially as we live in a world of artifice and creativity cut off from nature and tradition, homos think they have CREATED the world. The original creation was by God according to religion. God created man, nature, and everything. But humanity lives in a world apart from the raw natural world, and modern mankind lives apart from traditional history. He lives in his own bubble. Since homos played a big part in the style and design of this modern world, they think they have 'created' the world. They are like the new gods. They are soooo 'creative'. Creativity trumps Creation(by God or nature).

    The fact that homomania is neoligion is betrayed by intrusion of homo symbols into churches, even temples and mosques in some cases. If homomania were purely secular, why would homos push that stuff into sacred religious sanctums? The homo rectum is the new sanctum. Rectum Sanctum is what homomania is about. Homos want us to worship gayhovah. If some crazy blacks say god is black and Jesus was black, homos now act like the number one master of the cosmos is a homo. They believe in homosmos.

    So, this so-called 'war on religious liberty' is not a secular war. It is a religious war. It is between neoligion and religion. It is about homomania, as supported and funded by anti-Christian Jewish globalists, attacking and subverting Christianity. This is a two-pronged attack. One is direct assault on Christianity itself. Some homos mock God and Jesus and spit on the Bible. But another set of homos play fifth column. They join the church and pretend to serve God and Jesus. But once they enter the inner sanctum, they spread the gospel of the rectum. Communion turns into cum-union. Sacraments become secrete-ments. Instead of bread and wine as flesh and blood of Jesus, it's all about buns and cream as the bunholes and semen of homos. A lot of homo men become Catholic priests. I'll bet Poop Francis is a closet queer. As for lesbians, many of them enter mainline Protestant churches and preach little else than dyke-mania.
    This two-pronged attack is like Jewish power in the US. Most Jews were on the Prog side, but some Jews went 'neocon' to infiltrate the GOP to make it serve Israel while also caving to many of the shibboleths of Jewish Prog-ism, like acceptance of 'gay marriage'. The neocons even got to Charles Murray who bent over to 'gay marriage'. So disgusting.

    This is a religious war. It is between classic religion that worships god and neoligion that favors the faddish narcissism of certain self-worshiping groups.

    We need real separation of church and state, and that means neoligions must not be allowed to influence state policy.

    What a lot of conservatives fail to understand is that something doesn't have to be traditionally religious to act like a religion. The Constitution should consider as quasi-religious anything that acts like a religion. Ideology, cult, or movement can be quasi-religious. What are the hallmarks of religion? Worship, taboos, faith, ritualism, witch-hunting, and etc. MLK cult is a neologion. So is homomania. We are not allowed to debate them, question them, debunk them, counter them, etc. We must bow our heads in gushy silence and repent before them and beg forgiveness.

    It's like NYT line on 'gay marriage'. Debate is over, shut up, and just accept it.

    So-called secular folks are not into free speech and free discourse. They are not into rationalism and empiricism. They are into replacing old taboos with new ones, old holy stuff with new holy stuff.

    After all, when Bruce Jenner said he is a 'woman', the MSM told us shhhhhhhh. No jokes!!! Obey and worship!

    If you don't bake a wedding cake for two men into fecal penetration, you will be DESTROYED and BURNED AT THE STAKE!!!

    This is a religious war. Homomania is proxy of Jewish Power to replace the old church with the new temple.

    I’ll bet Poop Francis is a closet queer. As for lesbians, many of them enter mainline Protestant churches and preach little else than dyke-mania.

    A good summary of the current state of affairs-fairies// Poop Franny indeed!

    Read More
  58. @Karl
    > Ziocons’ use of the US military

    Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is currently literally propped up by American troops manning its border.

    Our borders are manned by our own people.

    I've never seen annamaria bitch about Jordan.

    And don't EVEN give me no backtalk about the Americans are there to "protect Israel".... they are there because Jordan ==is== Palestine; it is occupied by Hashemites from Saudi; and THAT occupation prevents Jerusalem from engineering a "two state solution".

    Look at the map; compare the area of Jordan to that of Israel-inclusive-ofJudea&Samaria.... then tell me who should give up land to produce a "State of Palestine"


    In the long run, i'm not worried. It would take fewer bullets to end the Hashemite dynasty, than it took to end trhe Romanov dynasty.

    In the long run, i’m not worried. It would take fewer bullets to end the Hashemite dynasty, than it took to end trhe Romanov dynasty.

    Do it the Jew way — bullets!

    As is demonstrated – Jews love force – it is always their answer to problems – it is make a forceful law or use bullets.

    Jews are not Westerners.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
  59. @Karl
    > Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power

    cream rises to the top

    “…cream rises to the top…”

    As do the biggest lumps in the cess pool. HdC

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    There is an old French saying that refutes cream rises to the top.

    Society is like a stew, the scum rises to the top, the dregs fall to the bottom and in between are the good meat and vegetables.

    Of course in America the scum and the dregs are united against the middle.

  60. @Mark Green
    Ironies. Ironies. Thank you, Mr. Gottfried, for dishing up another sorry example of how Israel--a tiny, intrusive ethnostate--manages to inject its POV into nearly every forum on the American stage.

    Once, this overblown phenomena was uniquely irritating. Then it got uniquely expensive. Now it's uniquely dangerous. Israel is the lobby that ate Washington.

    So how does Israel plan to control The Narrative going forward?

    Shut down the conversation. Kill the mic. Monitor 'fake news'. Criminalize speech.

    This is why the 'Anti-Semitism Awareness Act' was crafted: suppress dissent. It's not the wars that must be stopped--but harsh words!

    Fortunately, rebellion is on the rise. As it should be. 'Anti-Semitism' (so called) is a normal, rational and appropriate defense mechanism. What's needed is more of it, not less.

    But the 'special relationship' does still endure. Incredibly, Zionists do remain in the driver's seat. We can thank Dersh and his army of operatives for that.

    Israel and Washington's shotgun wedding may be the most improbable, arranged marriage in political history. America has become Israel's prison bride. Pathetic.

    But growing awareness ('anti-Semitism') threatens Israel's special status. As it should.

    I think that any non-Jew (especially whites and Christians) that doesn’t oppose Jewish power, and view Jews with suspicion, is willfully blind or stupid. The anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-American and destructive character of many individual Jews, Jewish elites, major Jewish organizations and the Jewish community is obvious.

    Read More
  61. Kagans clan is busy with converting the state of Cyprus into a protectorate. The Cypriots have not been asked about this plan. Here is Mrs. Nuland-Kagan coming again to Europe, with her favorite F–k Western civilization: http://www.voltairenet.org/article194876.html

    “She wants to solve this conflict by transforming a second member of the EU, after Greece, into a protectorate…. In the same time she wants to get Turkey admitted immediately to the EU, by the window of the “Cypriot settlement”.
    the rule of majority (democracy) will be formally abolished … the new “state” will be governed by foreign judges, concentrating upon themselves, three centuries after Montesqieu, all powers.”
    Take not that the Kagans’ project of “converting the state of Cyprus in a protectorate” does not include any referendum; the Cypriots are treated as if they were some voiceless vassals. Compare the total silence of the “progressives” on the unceremonious treatment of Cyprus citizenry with the deafening squealing of the same “progressives” on a transfer of Crimea back to RF, after the referendum in 2014.

    Read More
  62. @jacques sheete

    while state is the collective nation responding to other nations.
     
    If you read Bourne, the State is a tool of the ruling classes, and since the ruling classes obviously want to maintain themselves, and cannot afford to have any gods before themselves, they use various means of "persuasion" to con the country into doing their bidding and looking to them for "protection."

    Since "existential threats" have often done wonders for maintaining and even amplifying group cohesion, they have to be manufactured continuously by the usual suspects. Hence wars and the rumors of wars, monsters, bogeymen, etc.

    The State, as a putative "protector," has been perverted and I don't see how that will ever change. Basically, it's human nature and that isn't due to change for the better any time soon either, I think.

    Another way to look at it is that all States are mafias and as such are always in conflict, or potential conflict, with something.

    Humans are not the only animals that have hierarchy with group conflict. Bourne sees war as inconclusive and not concerned with scarcity (ie real conflicts of interest) but war is not healthy for the state or ruling class that loses as the Amerindians lost.

    Read More
  63. @HdC
    "...cream rises to the top..."

    As do the biggest lumps in the cess pool. HdC

    There is an old French saying that refutes cream rises to the top.

    Society is like a stew, the scum rises to the top, the dregs fall to the bottom and in between are the good meat and vegetables.

    Of course in America the scum and the dregs are united against the middle.

    Read More
  64. the pro-Zionist Left

    This is an oxymoron. Faux-leftist Zionists, is what they are, and it all traces back to their very un-leftist Jewish ethnocentrism.

    Fortunately, rebellion is on the rise. As it should be. ‘Anti-Semitism’ (so called) is a normal, rational and appropriate defense mechanism. What’s needed is more of it, not less.

    Very true. The current zeitgeist is astoundingly “philosemitic.” It’s not healthy at all.

    cream rises to the top

    Like the Nazis did in Germany?

    Read More
  65. @Miro23
    There are strong similarities between post WW2 "Scientific Socialism" and present day Zionism.

    Hayek explained the problem in his 1944 book, "The Road to Serfdom" :


    "The important point is that, if we take the people whose views influence developments, they are now in this country in some measure all socialists. It is no longer fashionable to emphasize that "we are all socialists now", this is so merely because the fact is too obvious. Scarcely anybody doubts that we must continue to move towards socialism."

     

    Substitute the word Zionism for Socialism, and the US elite works the same way , with the interesting aspect that Socialism itself grew out of 19th century Central European Jewish led social unrest culminating in Bolshevik totalitarianism and their Terror (elimination of whole classes of "Deplorables").

    From this point of view, Socialism/Marxism has morphed into Zionism with many Neo-con family histories actually showing the same radical counter-cultural lineage.

    You can’t “substitute the word Zionism for Socialism”. You can may be substitute the word Zionism for National-Socialism, because there are certain similarity. Your observation only demonstrate how wrong is Hayek. It looks he had no clue what Socialism mean.

    Read More
  66. @Anon
    "My other reaction to these unseemly overtures on the part of Republicans is that these folks must be desperate for the approval of left liberal politicians."

    Only Jewish ones as Jews got the power.

    GOP doesn't seem to care for 'left-liberals' among Palestinian-Americans and their allies.

    By the way, the so-called current 'left' isn't leftist. Its homomania, culture of vanity, and decadent follies reveal it to be the product of late consumerist capitalism.

    No true leftist from an Age of True Leftism would recognize today's insipid Hollywood-MTV style follies as 'leftist'.

    Lena Dunham a 'leftist'? Just a spoiled brat. Just like Marie Antoinette played at being a peasant lady, today's Glob Elites play at being 'progressive' with their silly cosplay.

    You are right, there are lot of confusion nowadays about what is left and what is right in the politics. Left, originally, in time of the first French Revolution meant anti-establishment. Later, when Christian-Socialist movement started in Russia and then was mixed with Marxists, they correctly called it left, because it was radical anti-establishment. Lenin and Trotsky with their World Revolution are definitely left. Later USSR with their support of all the Communist parties in the World is also left. The American Century Project with Multinational Corporations on the top and Full Spectrum Dominance over the rest of the World is definitely the right. The point is: when the financial elite control the political power – it is right; when the political power is accountable to the majority, or rather, to organisation which does represent the interest of majority – it is left. By the way, Lenin described the rule of Multinational Corporations as the last stage of Capitalism.

    Read More
  67. Your concepts are full of holes/falsehoods :

    ” When the financial elite control the political power – it is “right” :

    The financial elite, starting with GS, surrounding HC and her comrades are most definitely not “right”, rather they are pursuing and forcing leftist goals = PC, gender mania, and myriads of other leftist ideas onto a hapless society.

    “When the political power is accountable to the majority, or rather to organisation which does represent the the interest of majority” :

    The political powers within leftist situations : UDSSR, China, Cuba, were never accountable to the majority of their subjects, rather they were the oppressors thereof.

    Of course each new generation of communists claim that the Russians, Chinese, Cubans, etc, were the “wrong” ones and we the new generation of leftists/communists, we are the “right” ones and the Russians, Chinese, Cubans did not understand or did not really want to implement true communism, and we, the new generation of communists, we will get it right this time.

    And I really don’t give a damn about what Lenin, or any of his buddies had to say, as they were malevolent bloody fools, and had no clue as to the nature of human beings.

    Authenticjazzman, “Mensa” Society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
  68. Allow me to respond to a commentator who warns American Christians that their Jewish fellow-citizens harbor secret Jewish agendas that go against American interests. I think this is a foolish over-generalization. Most Jews of my acquaintance don’t harbor any secret agendas. They are simply jerked around by Jewish organizations that stir up paranoia and try to convince American Jews that only a Jewish state and support for the Left will protect them against the raging threat of Christian anti-Semitism. I’ve heard the same nonsense for the last sixty years and it doesn’t seem likely to stop permeating Jewish society . I would also note that what my friend Jack Kerwick calls the “alternative Left,” namely the neocon manipulators of our bogus conservative movement, push an over-the-top imperialistic form of Jewish nationalism, which they manage to present as a global democratic crusade led by two “exceptional democracies, the US and Israel.” (I heard John Bolton use this phrase on Fox-news last week.) But I wouldn’t identify the views propagated by neocons and their hirelings as those positions held by most Jews. Nor do they belong to a “secret” agenda, if the commentator and I are both aware of what the agenda consists of.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    I think this is a foolish over-generalization. Most Jews of my acquaintance don’t harbor any secret agendas.

    Whoa! You are playing fast and loose with your righteous label.
    , @Mark Green
    "The best deceivers are self-deceivers." - Kevin MacDonald

    Secret agendas can sometimes be hidden even from those who advance them.

    Consider the endless 'peace process' between Israel and the Palestinians. It's a hoax now and it's always been a hoax--under both Labor and Likud.

    Israel wants that land for Jews. Only Jews. Others need not apply.

    All this American palaver about returning land that G-d gave the Jews (!) has been a kosher canard from the start. Who knew? Not Carter. Not Bush.

    Bibi knew. Sharon knew. Begin knew.

    Will Israelis share Jerusalem to achieve peace? Ha! That's just a bunch of UN BS. No wonder Obama and Kerry are suddenly villains.

    Will the non-Jews who were driven from the lands of their birth by Zionists be allowed to return? Never. Demographics matter profoundly in Israel. And properly so. Not America. That's racism! Israel, yes. Jews are special.

    So Israel's plan was to 'negotiate' until the surviving Palestinians refugees simply die off. That's one solution. And we're mostly there.

    Israel didn't preemptively attacked the Arabs in 1967 so that G-d's plan for the Jewish people could be thwarted. Stealth is a supreme and celebrated Jewish skill. Please consult your Torah. And separation is a core Israeli value. Jewish continuity requires it.

    But Jews cannot advertise this fact in multi-racial America, especially while they glamorize black/white miscegenation on TV and in American film. Yet these double standard do persist and do endure because powerful Jews and highly-coordinated Jewish organizations want it so. Their cronies in the mainstream media play a pivotal supportive role. It's one big team effort.

    In order to advance disparate and conflicting agendas, stealth is necessary. Double standards require artful and deceptive advertising and maneuvering. This is where Zionists shine.

    Do you disagree?

    Indeed, countless Jews and Israelis cling publicly to the idea that peace (and 'two states') between Israel and the Palestinians collapsed because the Israeli had "no partner" in the peace process. One familiar line was: 'The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity", or, "if only the Palestinians loved their children as much as they hate Jews". That's a really good one!

    But the overriding fact is that the Jews in Israel don't want these non-Jews in their precious Jewish homeland or nearby in lands that G-d promised exclusively to the Jewish people. Unfortunately, this particularist view cannot be openly marketed as such in the US. It's just too over-the-top supremacist. This is where hasbara comes in.

    As for the 'peace process', it's always been the more-powerful Israelis who demanded 'face to face' (and secret) negotiations with the Palestinians. Another ruse.

    Secret negotiations. Why so secret? Why not discuss the end game openly? Can Americans offer an opinion?

    Who gets what? Where are the borders? What about UN resolution 242? It's not to
    comprehend.

    But the Zions didn't and don't want the world to see the pathetic crumbs that they are offering to the conquered gentiles. So the strategy was to continuously push back the confidence-building 'goal posts' on Palestinians who were forever frustrated. The strategy worked. Palestinian independence and autonomous is not gonna happen. Why? Israel intends to keep the 'disputed territories' for Jews.

    Surprised?

    Meanwhile, Israel has altered critical 'facts on the ground' via Jews Only settlements.

    As far as I know, they never advertised this stealthy maneuver in advance. Am I wrong?

    Indeed, the Israelis always avoid discussing the end game (of where the borders would eventually be) so they could further undermine Palestinian control and thereby destroy Palestinian leverage and aspirations.

    But they never forgot to send us the bill.

    Shocked?

    To this day, Israel still refuses to declare its exact borders. Why? They don't want the world to know that all the agreements, accords and declarations are non-binding and headed to the trash bin.

    Israel plans further expansion. Haven't you heard?

    The 'peace process' was designed to come up short since 'success' would require the delivery of 'Jewish land' to Arabs. Unacceptable. But there's more.

    Israel must still find a way to 'transfer' the native goyim out of the land that G-d gave the Jews. That's the agenda. Is it 'secret'? You decide.

    This unsavory objective will take us all on a long and bloody road. There will be pain. Many innocents will suffer and die. The Zionist conquest of the Holy land is far from finished. And here's another not-so-secret part of the Israeli agenda:

    American power and prestige will be harnessed to accomplish these Zionist goals. The capture of Washington remains a vital element within Israel's 'secret' plan.

    Do you disagree?

    Jews: always blameless.

    Jews: always plotting.

    Don't believe me?

    Fact: right now the Zions are 1) plotting to find a way to bring down Iran, 2) trying to figure out a way to purge Israel of the too-numerous non-Jews in their midst, and 3) still maneuvering ISIS towards destabilizing Assad's Syria, 4) looking to weaken Trump's 'America First' platform since it could possibly undermine Israel''s long-term goals, all of which require UNCONDITIONAL American support for Israel now and forever.

    These various agendas may not be entirely 'secret', but they are extremely malevolent mostly unknown.

  69. @paul gottfried
    Allow me to respond to a commentator who warns American Christians that their Jewish fellow-citizens harbor secret Jewish agendas that go against American interests. I think this is a foolish over-generalization. Most Jews of my acquaintance don't harbor any secret agendas. They are simply jerked around by Jewish organizations that stir up paranoia and try to convince American Jews that only a Jewish state and support for the Left will protect them against the raging threat of Christian anti-Semitism. I've heard the same nonsense for the last sixty years and it doesn't seem likely to stop permeating Jewish society . I would also note that what my friend Jack Kerwick calls the "alternative Left," namely the neocon manipulators of our bogus conservative movement, push an over-the-top imperialistic form of Jewish nationalism, which they manage to present as a global democratic crusade led by two "exceptional democracies, the US and Israel." (I heard John Bolton use this phrase on Fox-news last week.) But I wouldn't identify the views propagated by neocons and their hirelings as those positions held by most Jews. Nor do they belong to a "secret" agenda, if the commentator and I are both aware of what the agenda consists of.

    I think this is a foolish over-generalization. Most Jews of my acquaintance don’t harbor any secret agendas.

    Whoa! You are playing fast and loose with your righteous label.

    Read More
  70. @paul gottfried
    Allow me to respond to a commentator who warns American Christians that their Jewish fellow-citizens harbor secret Jewish agendas that go against American interests. I think this is a foolish over-generalization. Most Jews of my acquaintance don't harbor any secret agendas. They are simply jerked around by Jewish organizations that stir up paranoia and try to convince American Jews that only a Jewish state and support for the Left will protect them against the raging threat of Christian anti-Semitism. I've heard the same nonsense for the last sixty years and it doesn't seem likely to stop permeating Jewish society . I would also note that what my friend Jack Kerwick calls the "alternative Left," namely the neocon manipulators of our bogus conservative movement, push an over-the-top imperialistic form of Jewish nationalism, which they manage to present as a global democratic crusade led by two "exceptional democracies, the US and Israel." (I heard John Bolton use this phrase on Fox-news last week.) But I wouldn't identify the views propagated by neocons and their hirelings as those positions held by most Jews. Nor do they belong to a "secret" agenda, if the commentator and I are both aware of what the agenda consists of.

    “The best deceivers are self-deceivers.” – Kevin MacDonald

    Secret agendas can sometimes be hidden even from those who advance them.

    Consider the endless ‘peace process’ between Israel and the Palestinians. It’s a hoax now and it’s always been a hoax–under both Labor and Likud.

    Israel wants that land for Jews. Only Jews. Others need not apply.

    All this American palaver about returning land that G-d gave the Jews (!) has been a kosher canard from the start. Who knew? Not Carter. Not Bush.

    Bibi knew. Sharon knew. Begin knew.

    Will Israelis share Jerusalem to achieve peace? Ha! That’s just a bunch of UN BS. No wonder Obama and Kerry are suddenly villains.

    Will the non-Jews who were driven from the lands of their birth by Zionists be allowed to return? Never. Demographics matter profoundly in Israel. And properly so. Not America. That’s racism! Israel, yes. Jews are special.

    So Israel’s plan was to ‘negotiate’ until the surviving Palestinians refugees simply die off. That’s one solution. And we’re mostly there.

    Israel didn’t preemptively attacked the Arabs in 1967 so that G-d’s plan for the Jewish people could be thwarted. Stealth is a supreme and celebrated Jewish skill. Please consult your Torah. And separation is a core Israeli value. Jewish continuity requires it.

    But Jews cannot advertise this fact in multi-racial America, especially while they glamorize black/white miscegenation on TV and in American film. Yet these double standard do persist and do endure because powerful Jews and highly-coordinated Jewish organizations want it so. Their cronies in the mainstream media play a pivotal supportive role. It’s one big team effort.

    In order to advance disparate and conflicting agendas, stealth is necessary. Double standards require artful and deceptive advertising and maneuvering. This is where Zionists shine.

    Do you disagree?

    Indeed, countless Jews and Israelis cling publicly to the idea that peace (and ‘two states’) between Israel and the Palestinians collapsed because the Israeli had “no partner” in the peace process. One familiar line was: ‘The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity”, or, “if only the Palestinians loved their children as much as they hate Jews”. That’s a really good one!

    But the overriding fact is that the Jews in Israel don’t want these non-Jews in their precious Jewish homeland or nearby in lands that G-d promised exclusively to the Jewish people. Unfortunately, this particularist view cannot be openly marketed as such in the US. It’s just too over-the-top supremacist. This is where hasbara comes in.

    As for the ‘peace process’, it’s always been the more-powerful Israelis who demanded ‘face to face’ (and secret) negotiations with the Palestinians. Another ruse.

    Secret negotiations. Why so secret? Why not discuss the end game openly? Can Americans offer an opinion?

    Who gets what? Where are the borders? What about UN resolution 242? It’s not to
    comprehend.

    But the Zions didn’t and don’t want the world to see the pathetic crumbs that they are offering to the conquered gentiles. So the strategy was to continuously push back the confidence-building ‘goal posts’ on Palestinians who were forever frustrated. The strategy worked. Palestinian independence and autonomous is not gonna happen. Why? Israel intends to keep the ‘disputed territories’ for Jews.

    Surprised?

    Meanwhile, Israel has altered critical ‘facts on the ground’ via Jews Only settlements.

    As far as I know, they never advertised this stealthy maneuver in advance. Am I wrong?

    Indeed, the Israelis always avoid discussing the end game (of where the borders would eventually be) so they could further undermine Palestinian control and thereby destroy Palestinian leverage and aspirations.

    But they never forgot to send us the bill.

    Shocked?

    To this day, Israel still refuses to declare its exact borders. Why? They don’t want the world to know that all the agreements, accords and declarations are non-binding and headed to the trash bin.

    Israel plans further expansion. Haven’t you heard?

    The ‘peace process’ was designed to come up short since ‘success’ would require the delivery of ‘Jewish land’ to Arabs. Unacceptable. But there’s more.

    Israel must still find a way to ‘transfer’ the native goyim out of the land that G-d gave the Jews. That’s the agenda. Is it ‘secret’? You decide.

    This unsavory objective will take us all on a long and bloody road. There will be pain. Many innocents will suffer and die. The Zionist conquest of the Holy land is far from finished. And here’s another not-so-secret part of the Israeli agenda:

    American power and prestige will be harnessed to accomplish these Zionist goals. The capture of Washington remains a vital element within Israel’s ‘secret’ plan.

    Do you disagree?

    Jews: always blameless.

    Jews: always plotting.

    Don’t believe me?

    Fact: right now the Zions are 1) plotting to find a way to bring down Iran, 2) trying to figure out a way to purge Israel of the too-numerous non-Jews in their midst, and 3) still maneuvering ISIS towards destabilizing Assad’s Syria, 4) looking to weaken Trump’s ‘America First’ platform since it could possibly undermine Israel”s long-term goals, all of which require UNCONDITIONAL American support for Israel now and forever.

    These various agendas may not be entirely ‘secret’, but they are extremely malevolent mostly unknown.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sean

    Israel plans further expansion. Haven’t you heard?
     
    How explain Ehud Barak offering most of the West Bank to the Arabs who live there as a new, further (in addition to Jordan) Palestinian state?


    Jews are not flooding into Israel, while the Arabs within, having turned down a not entirely bad deal at Camp David, are are sitting tight for the long haul, apparently convinced time is on their side . Israel doesn't know what to do; it needs more crazy Arabs within newly occupied territory like a back door in the head.

    , @Miro23

    Fact: right now the Zions are 1) plotting to find a way to bring down Iran, 2) trying to figure out a way to purge Israel of the too-numerous non-Jews in their midst, and 3) still maneuvering ISIS towards destabilizing Assad’s Syria, 4) looking to weaken Trump’s ‘America First’ platform since it could possibly undermine Israel's long-term goals, all of which require UNCONDITIONAL American support for Israel now and forever.
     
    It's international troublemaking, but points 1), 2) and 3) are really Israeli Likud/ Zionist business and nothing to do with the US.

    The problem is point 4). The US is a Democracy that is 98% Gentile and majority Christian, with a system of government based on a Constitution derived from Anglo-European principles, that doesn't generate any natural affinity for Israel's concept of an ethnically pure state and aggressive frontier expansion/ settlement building.

    Americans know that they were tricked into the Iraq war with the fake WMD story, and they also know that the Jewish owned media lied to them with a Soviet style propaganda smear campaign against Donald Trump.

    Gentile journalists, Congressmen and academics are familiar with the Establishment Party Line regarding Israel, and they are bribed and threatened to hold to it or lose their jobs, with MSM journalists also obliged to come up with a constant stream of Counter Cultural PC stories.

    The result is that White Anglo-European Americans have to fight a non-stop defensive battle to prove that they are not racists, white-supremacists, xenophobes, trailer trash, misogynists, fascists, anti-Semitic, KKK supporters, and that they feel a deep guilt about US history, oppose Christian symbols in public places, oppose "hate speech", celebrate gay marriage (and adoption ), celebrate Black culture, diversity, multiculturalism and mass immigration and want transgender toilets and reject racist stuff like patriotism, "America First" and the Constitution (written by old White racists).

    Maybe the trashing of Anglos and Anglo culture is a good Jewish joke and very profitable for Israel but there is the risk that Anglo-America decides to stop playing defense in favour of counter-attack. This would be explicitly anti-Jewish and genuinely racist and would be bad news for everyone in the US including all Jews, not just Zionists.

    To avoid this catastrophe, Zionist Jews need to come out into the open, admit that they have a first loyalty to Israel and emigrate there (they get automatic nationality). This would save the US a great deal of trouble and let Gentiles and Non-Zionist Jews get on with trying to be Americans first on a level playing field - without the racial activism.
  71. Jewish attitudes towards whites and Christians are no secret. They are out in the open! Jewish politics is just an extension. I can’t think of a single Jewish organization that doesn’t have a reflexively hostile position towards whites, Christianity and traditional America. If there is a silent majority of Jews who oppose the major Jewish orgs, media and Hollywood Jews, I wish they would speak up. I don’t believe those people exist in large numbers.

    I also don’t believe that anywhere near a majority of American Jews would allow Israel to suffer or detach from Israel to benefit America, no matter what phony anti-Zionists say.

    Very little Jewish money or energy goes towards preserving traditional America. Tons of both go towards its destruction.

    Read More
  72. @Mark Green
    "The best deceivers are self-deceivers." - Kevin MacDonald

    Secret agendas can sometimes be hidden even from those who advance them.

    Consider the endless 'peace process' between Israel and the Palestinians. It's a hoax now and it's always been a hoax--under both Labor and Likud.

    Israel wants that land for Jews. Only Jews. Others need not apply.

    All this American palaver about returning land that G-d gave the Jews (!) has been a kosher canard from the start. Who knew? Not Carter. Not Bush.

    Bibi knew. Sharon knew. Begin knew.

    Will Israelis share Jerusalem to achieve peace? Ha! That's just a bunch of UN BS. No wonder Obama and Kerry are suddenly villains.

    Will the non-Jews who were driven from the lands of their birth by Zionists be allowed to return? Never. Demographics matter profoundly in Israel. And properly so. Not America. That's racism! Israel, yes. Jews are special.

    So Israel's plan was to 'negotiate' until the surviving Palestinians refugees simply die off. That's one solution. And we're mostly there.

    Israel didn't preemptively attacked the Arabs in 1967 so that G-d's plan for the Jewish people could be thwarted. Stealth is a supreme and celebrated Jewish skill. Please consult your Torah. And separation is a core Israeli value. Jewish continuity requires it.

    But Jews cannot advertise this fact in multi-racial America, especially while they glamorize black/white miscegenation on TV and in American film. Yet these double standard do persist and do endure because powerful Jews and highly-coordinated Jewish organizations want it so. Their cronies in the mainstream media play a pivotal supportive role. It's one big team effort.

    In order to advance disparate and conflicting agendas, stealth is necessary. Double standards require artful and deceptive advertising and maneuvering. This is where Zionists shine.

    Do you disagree?

    Indeed, countless Jews and Israelis cling publicly to the idea that peace (and 'two states') between Israel and the Palestinians collapsed because the Israeli had "no partner" in the peace process. One familiar line was: 'The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity", or, "if only the Palestinians loved their children as much as they hate Jews". That's a really good one!

    But the overriding fact is that the Jews in Israel don't want these non-Jews in their precious Jewish homeland or nearby in lands that G-d promised exclusively to the Jewish people. Unfortunately, this particularist view cannot be openly marketed as such in the US. It's just too over-the-top supremacist. This is where hasbara comes in.

    As for the 'peace process', it's always been the more-powerful Israelis who demanded 'face to face' (and secret) negotiations with the Palestinians. Another ruse.

    Secret negotiations. Why so secret? Why not discuss the end game openly? Can Americans offer an opinion?

    Who gets what? Where are the borders? What about UN resolution 242? It's not to
    comprehend.

    But the Zions didn't and don't want the world to see the pathetic crumbs that they are offering to the conquered gentiles. So the strategy was to continuously push back the confidence-building 'goal posts' on Palestinians who were forever frustrated. The strategy worked. Palestinian independence and autonomous is not gonna happen. Why? Israel intends to keep the 'disputed territories' for Jews.

    Surprised?

    Meanwhile, Israel has altered critical 'facts on the ground' via Jews Only settlements.

    As far as I know, they never advertised this stealthy maneuver in advance. Am I wrong?

    Indeed, the Israelis always avoid discussing the end game (of where the borders would eventually be) so they could further undermine Palestinian control and thereby destroy Palestinian leverage and aspirations.

    But they never forgot to send us the bill.

    Shocked?

    To this day, Israel still refuses to declare its exact borders. Why? They don't want the world to know that all the agreements, accords and declarations are non-binding and headed to the trash bin.

    Israel plans further expansion. Haven't you heard?

    The 'peace process' was designed to come up short since 'success' would require the delivery of 'Jewish land' to Arabs. Unacceptable. But there's more.

    Israel must still find a way to 'transfer' the native goyim out of the land that G-d gave the Jews. That's the agenda. Is it 'secret'? You decide.

    This unsavory objective will take us all on a long and bloody road. There will be pain. Many innocents will suffer and die. The Zionist conquest of the Holy land is far from finished. And here's another not-so-secret part of the Israeli agenda:

    American power and prestige will be harnessed to accomplish these Zionist goals. The capture of Washington remains a vital element within Israel's 'secret' plan.

    Do you disagree?

    Jews: always blameless.

    Jews: always plotting.

    Don't believe me?

    Fact: right now the Zions are 1) plotting to find a way to bring down Iran, 2) trying to figure out a way to purge Israel of the too-numerous non-Jews in their midst, and 3) still maneuvering ISIS towards destabilizing Assad's Syria, 4) looking to weaken Trump's 'America First' platform since it could possibly undermine Israel''s long-term goals, all of which require UNCONDITIONAL American support for Israel now and forever.

    These various agendas may not be entirely 'secret', but they are extremely malevolent mostly unknown.

    Israel plans further expansion. Haven’t you heard?

    How explain Ehud Barak offering most of the West Bank to the Arabs who live there as a new, further (in addition to Jordan) Palestinian state?

    Jews are not flooding into Israel, while the Arabs within, having turned down a not entirely bad deal at Camp David, are are sitting tight for the long haul, apparently convinced time is on their side . Israel doesn’t know what to do; it needs more crazy Arabs within newly occupied territory like a back door in the head.

    Read More
  73. @Mark Green
    "The best deceivers are self-deceivers." - Kevin MacDonald

    Secret agendas can sometimes be hidden even from those who advance them.

    Consider the endless 'peace process' between Israel and the Palestinians. It's a hoax now and it's always been a hoax--under both Labor and Likud.

    Israel wants that land for Jews. Only Jews. Others need not apply.

    All this American palaver about returning land that G-d gave the Jews (!) has been a kosher canard from the start. Who knew? Not Carter. Not Bush.

    Bibi knew. Sharon knew. Begin knew.

    Will Israelis share Jerusalem to achieve peace? Ha! That's just a bunch of UN BS. No wonder Obama and Kerry are suddenly villains.

    Will the non-Jews who were driven from the lands of their birth by Zionists be allowed to return? Never. Demographics matter profoundly in Israel. And properly so. Not America. That's racism! Israel, yes. Jews are special.

    So Israel's plan was to 'negotiate' until the surviving Palestinians refugees simply die off. That's one solution. And we're mostly there.

    Israel didn't preemptively attacked the Arabs in 1967 so that G-d's plan for the Jewish people could be thwarted. Stealth is a supreme and celebrated Jewish skill. Please consult your Torah. And separation is a core Israeli value. Jewish continuity requires it.

    But Jews cannot advertise this fact in multi-racial America, especially while they glamorize black/white miscegenation on TV and in American film. Yet these double standard do persist and do endure because powerful Jews and highly-coordinated Jewish organizations want it so. Their cronies in the mainstream media play a pivotal supportive role. It's one big team effort.

    In order to advance disparate and conflicting agendas, stealth is necessary. Double standards require artful and deceptive advertising and maneuvering. This is where Zionists shine.

    Do you disagree?

    Indeed, countless Jews and Israelis cling publicly to the idea that peace (and 'two states') between Israel and the Palestinians collapsed because the Israeli had "no partner" in the peace process. One familiar line was: 'The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity", or, "if only the Palestinians loved their children as much as they hate Jews". That's a really good one!

    But the overriding fact is that the Jews in Israel don't want these non-Jews in their precious Jewish homeland or nearby in lands that G-d promised exclusively to the Jewish people. Unfortunately, this particularist view cannot be openly marketed as such in the US. It's just too over-the-top supremacist. This is where hasbara comes in.

    As for the 'peace process', it's always been the more-powerful Israelis who demanded 'face to face' (and secret) negotiations with the Palestinians. Another ruse.

    Secret negotiations. Why so secret? Why not discuss the end game openly? Can Americans offer an opinion?

    Who gets what? Where are the borders? What about UN resolution 242? It's not to
    comprehend.

    But the Zions didn't and don't want the world to see the pathetic crumbs that they are offering to the conquered gentiles. So the strategy was to continuously push back the confidence-building 'goal posts' on Palestinians who were forever frustrated. The strategy worked. Palestinian independence and autonomous is not gonna happen. Why? Israel intends to keep the 'disputed territories' for Jews.

    Surprised?

    Meanwhile, Israel has altered critical 'facts on the ground' via Jews Only settlements.

    As far as I know, they never advertised this stealthy maneuver in advance. Am I wrong?

    Indeed, the Israelis always avoid discussing the end game (of where the borders would eventually be) so they could further undermine Palestinian control and thereby destroy Palestinian leverage and aspirations.

    But they never forgot to send us the bill.

    Shocked?

    To this day, Israel still refuses to declare its exact borders. Why? They don't want the world to know that all the agreements, accords and declarations are non-binding and headed to the trash bin.

    Israel plans further expansion. Haven't you heard?

    The 'peace process' was designed to come up short since 'success' would require the delivery of 'Jewish land' to Arabs. Unacceptable. But there's more.

    Israel must still find a way to 'transfer' the native goyim out of the land that G-d gave the Jews. That's the agenda. Is it 'secret'? You decide.

    This unsavory objective will take us all on a long and bloody road. There will be pain. Many innocents will suffer and die. The Zionist conquest of the Holy land is far from finished. And here's another not-so-secret part of the Israeli agenda:

    American power and prestige will be harnessed to accomplish these Zionist goals. The capture of Washington remains a vital element within Israel's 'secret' plan.

    Do you disagree?

    Jews: always blameless.

    Jews: always plotting.

    Don't believe me?

    Fact: right now the Zions are 1) plotting to find a way to bring down Iran, 2) trying to figure out a way to purge Israel of the too-numerous non-Jews in their midst, and 3) still maneuvering ISIS towards destabilizing Assad's Syria, 4) looking to weaken Trump's 'America First' platform since it could possibly undermine Israel''s long-term goals, all of which require UNCONDITIONAL American support for Israel now and forever.

    These various agendas may not be entirely 'secret', but they are extremely malevolent mostly unknown.

    Fact: right now the Zions are 1) plotting to find a way to bring down Iran, 2) trying to figure out a way to purge Israel of the too-numerous non-Jews in their midst, and 3) still maneuvering ISIS towards destabilizing Assad’s Syria, 4) looking to weaken Trump’s ‘America First’ platform since it could possibly undermine Israel’s long-term goals, all of which require UNCONDITIONAL American support for Israel now and forever.

    It’s international troublemaking, but points 1), 2) and 3) are really Israeli Likud/ Zionist business and nothing to do with the US.

    The problem is point 4). The US is a Democracy that is 98% Gentile and majority Christian, with a system of government based on a Constitution derived from Anglo-European principles, that doesn’t generate any natural affinity for Israel’s concept of an ethnically pure state and aggressive frontier expansion/ settlement building.

    Americans know that they were tricked into the Iraq war with the fake WMD story, and they also know that the Jewish owned media lied to them with a Soviet style propaganda smear campaign against Donald Trump.

    Gentile journalists, Congressmen and academics are familiar with the Establishment Party Line regarding Israel, and they are bribed and threatened to hold to it or lose their jobs, with MSM journalists also obliged to come up with a constant stream of Counter Cultural PC stories.

    The result is that White Anglo-European Americans have to fight a non-stop defensive battle to prove that they are not racists, white-supremacists, xenophobes, trailer trash, misogynists, fascists, anti-Semitic, KKK supporters, and that they feel a deep guilt about US history, oppose Christian symbols in public places, oppose “hate speech”, celebrate gay marriage (and adoption ), celebrate Black culture, diversity, multiculturalism and mass immigration and want transgender toilets and reject racist stuff like patriotism, “America First” and the Constitution (written by old White racists).

    Maybe the trashing of Anglos and Anglo culture is a good Jewish joke and very profitable for Israel but there is the risk that Anglo-America decides to stop playing defense in favour of counter-attack. This would be explicitly anti-Jewish and genuinely racist and would be bad news for everyone in the US including all Jews, not just Zionists.

    To avoid this catastrophe, Zionist Jews need to come out into the open, admit that they have a first loyalty to Israel and emigrate there (they get automatic nationality). This would save the US a great deal of trouble and let Gentiles and Non-Zionist Jews get on with trying to be Americans first on a level playing field – without the racial activism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    What do we do with the SJW Jews who claim to oppose Israel, but are far more corrosive and radical than Zionist Jews? They are the bigger problem in the U.S.? Do we just deport if they have no desire to live in Israel?
  74. @Miro23

    Fact: right now the Zions are 1) plotting to find a way to bring down Iran, 2) trying to figure out a way to purge Israel of the too-numerous non-Jews in their midst, and 3) still maneuvering ISIS towards destabilizing Assad’s Syria, 4) looking to weaken Trump’s ‘America First’ platform since it could possibly undermine Israel's long-term goals, all of which require UNCONDITIONAL American support for Israel now and forever.
     
    It's international troublemaking, but points 1), 2) and 3) are really Israeli Likud/ Zionist business and nothing to do with the US.

    The problem is point 4). The US is a Democracy that is 98% Gentile and majority Christian, with a system of government based on a Constitution derived from Anglo-European principles, that doesn't generate any natural affinity for Israel's concept of an ethnically pure state and aggressive frontier expansion/ settlement building.

    Americans know that they were tricked into the Iraq war with the fake WMD story, and they also know that the Jewish owned media lied to them with a Soviet style propaganda smear campaign against Donald Trump.

    Gentile journalists, Congressmen and academics are familiar with the Establishment Party Line regarding Israel, and they are bribed and threatened to hold to it or lose their jobs, with MSM journalists also obliged to come up with a constant stream of Counter Cultural PC stories.

    The result is that White Anglo-European Americans have to fight a non-stop defensive battle to prove that they are not racists, white-supremacists, xenophobes, trailer trash, misogynists, fascists, anti-Semitic, KKK supporters, and that they feel a deep guilt about US history, oppose Christian symbols in public places, oppose "hate speech", celebrate gay marriage (and adoption ), celebrate Black culture, diversity, multiculturalism and mass immigration and want transgender toilets and reject racist stuff like patriotism, "America First" and the Constitution (written by old White racists).

    Maybe the trashing of Anglos and Anglo culture is a good Jewish joke and very profitable for Israel but there is the risk that Anglo-America decides to stop playing defense in favour of counter-attack. This would be explicitly anti-Jewish and genuinely racist and would be bad news for everyone in the US including all Jews, not just Zionists.

    To avoid this catastrophe, Zionist Jews need to come out into the open, admit that they have a first loyalty to Israel and emigrate there (they get automatic nationality). This would save the US a great deal of trouble and let Gentiles and Non-Zionist Jews get on with trying to be Americans first on a level playing field - without the racial activism.

    What do we do with the SJW Jews who claim to oppose Israel, but are far more corrosive and radical than Zionist Jews? They are the bigger problem in the U.S.? Do we just deport if they have no desire to live in Israel?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    What do we do with the SJW Jews who claim to oppose Israel, but are far more corrosive and radical than Zionist Jews? They are the bigger problem in the U.S.? Do we just deport if they have no desire to live in Israel?
     
    Get the US to function Democratically, instead of being dictated to by a small elite.

    This means rediscovering the 10th Amendment and getting 80-90% of taxation raised and spend at the local level (County/State) with local debate and decision making and obligatory participation of the public with a secret vote on each issue.

    The Federal government, Congress and the President become irrelevant in power terms, the FED no longer exists and a carefully supervised joint state run office matches the money supply to economic activity.

    SJW Jews then have one vote, the same as everyone else and no back door access to anybody.
  75. “I’ll have the back of Israel!” is right up there with “You can trust me!” in the con man’s repertoire.

    Anyone who has to SAY that he “has your back” is planning on stabbing you in the back.

    Read More
  76. @jacques sheete

    Anti-Semitism’ is a Jewish concept.
     
    The quote below is from a good article that shows not only how crafty Zionists are, but how anti-Semitic they can be as well. It really should not surprise anyone that Zionism is anti-Jew since Jews are largely a religious people to one degree or another while the Zionists who founded Israel are mostly atheists, and are antagonistic to all religions. In fact, they often appear pretty hostile to anyone who disagrees with them including other Zionists! Zionists have also promoted the self serving canard that Jews are a pure ethnic group or race.

    In fact, they promote anti-Semitism so they can play that card at will. By doing that, they make all Jews look bad, and that tends to fan the flames of any anti-Semitism that may already exist.


    The historical record makes plain what should already have been obvious from the present reality—that Israel’s and Zionism’s pretenses regarding Jews and Judaism, and in particular its pretense of being a response to anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution, is a fraud. Indeed quite the opposite, it thrives by exacerbating and capitalizing on these, and has turned them into a cynical, deadly business.

    -Tom Suarez,Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won

    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/01/terrorism-israeli-state/


     

    The article is full of incriminating historical anecdotes as well.

    Tee hee.

    Read More
  77. @jacques sheete

    Anti-Semitism’ is a Jewish concept.
     
    The quote below is from a good article that shows not only how crafty Zionists are, but how anti-Semitic they can be as well. It really should not surprise anyone that Zionism is anti-Jew since Jews are largely a religious people to one degree or another while the Zionists who founded Israel are mostly atheists, and are antagonistic to all religions. In fact, they often appear pretty hostile to anyone who disagrees with them including other Zionists! Zionists have also promoted the self serving canard that Jews are a pure ethnic group or race.

    In fact, they promote anti-Semitism so they can play that card at will. By doing that, they make all Jews look bad, and that tends to fan the flames of any anti-Semitism that may already exist.


    The historical record makes plain what should already have been obvious from the present reality—that Israel’s and Zionism’s pretenses regarding Jews and Judaism, and in particular its pretense of being a response to anti-Semitism and Jewish persecution, is a fraud. Indeed quite the opposite, it thrives by exacerbating and capitalizing on these, and has turned them into a cynical, deadly business.

    -Tom Suarez,Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won

    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/01/terrorism-israeli-state/


     

    The article is full of incriminating historical anecdotes as well.

    -Tom Suarez,Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won

    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/01/terrorism-israeli-state/

    Totally effing brilliant

    Must-read. I have had various thoughts of this kind drifting incoherently in my head–the cynicism with which Zionists use “anti-semitism,” actually create it, same cynicism in their ‘use” of the Holocaust and actual historical hostility to Jews. But this speech/essay pulls it all together in powerful language; it is a trip through the actual document record of the cunning, duplicity, cynicism, and heartlessness of these Zionist thugs, from the very beginning.
    I was unaware of the level of arm twisting and totalitarian measures of all sorts undertaken by the Zionist Nazis–yes, I think one can very justifiably call them that.

    So many examples of the double dealing of the Zionists, with their supposed allies and also with their own suffering people still in Europe and on the high seas. Really, monsters.

    I am also getting heartily sick of the ongoing celebration of their Judaism in constant op-eds etc. in my local community. Even the Xmas edition of the local weekly had an op-ed by a top local navel gazer about being Jewish during the Xmas season. Who gives a flying F about your navel-gazing obsession with your Judiasm. Thank heaven my own German Jewish forebears had some common sense and saw the Zionist project for the counterproductive and destructive thing it was.

    Britain has a hell of a lot to answer for, and I agree that this centennial year of the Balfour Declaration, in which British imperial power was abused and misused to hand away another people’s land to the Jews (BTW, the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine also had nationalist aspirations of their own, for their own country in their own territory), is the time to put some kind of pressure on Britain.
    How about some well-placed stink bombs of the type used to spray Palestinians’ residential areas?

    Maybe from now on perhaps everyone should just refer to Israel/Israelis as Palestine/Palestinians. They live in Palestine. End of Story.
    That will piss them off!

    Read More
  78. @OilcanFloyd
    What do we do with the SJW Jews who claim to oppose Israel, but are far more corrosive and radical than Zionist Jews? They are the bigger problem in the U.S.? Do we just deport if they have no desire to live in Israel?

    What do we do with the SJW Jews who claim to oppose Israel, but are far more corrosive and radical than Zionist Jews? They are the bigger problem in the U.S.? Do we just deport if they have no desire to live in Israel?

    Get the US to function Democratically, instead of being dictated to by a small elite.

    This means rediscovering the 10th Amendment and getting 80-90% of taxation raised and spend at the local level (County/State) with local debate and decision making and obligatory participation of the public with a secret vote on each issue.

    The Federal government, Congress and the President become irrelevant in power terms, the FED no longer exists and a carefully supervised joint state run office matches the money supply to economic activity.

    SJW Jews then have one vote, the same as everyone else and no back door access to anybody.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Gottfried Comments via RSS