The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Paul Gottfried ArchiveBlogview
Leftist Rationality
Anti-Trump demonstrations are far from irrational. The opposite is more likely.

Every day I hear exasperated Trump-backers exclaim that the Left has gone crazy. And their complaint seems justified, at least up to a point. The demonstrations against Trump, which now involve such gestures as setting fires, destroying property and beating up suspected Trump backers, look utterly “irrational.” It’s as if the election and subsequent inauguration of Donald Trump released forces of madness that can no longer be contained. Wild accusations are being made against those who voted for Trump, that they yearn to exterminate blacks and gays and put Jews into concentration camps, etc. One of my close acquaintances has turned her home into “a safe space for Jewish children,” so there will be no more Anne Frank-deaths during the terrible persecutions that our “illegitimately appointed, fake head of state” will soon supposedly unleash. I myself have been called by leftist ex-friends a “Holocaust-denier” because I think Trump’s decision to stop the influx of visitors and immigrants from terrorist-laden countries is entirely justified. How this shows that I deny Hitler’s murderous activities is never explained to me, but I’m sure the Trump-haters in Hollywood, CNN and at Berkeley would understand the connection.

Note that I’m not saying that everyone out there making noise or burning property is a model of scientific rationality. Nor am I claiming that the entertainment community makes sense when they scream against the Donald, or that students who recently set fires on the Berkeley campus to protest a speech by Milo Yiannopoulos were engaging in Aristotelian reasoning. What I am asserting is that viewed from the top, this agitation and violence reveal careful thought. In fact, from the vantage point of George Soros and such protest organizers as the Democratic National Committee and the leaders of the grievance culture, noisy demonstrations are a reasonable means toward a predetermined end. Max Weber, Vilfredo Pareto, and other sociologists who understood functional rationality as working systematically toward a desired end would have pointed to these protests as illustrating perfectly rational action, at least on the part of those who organize them.

The useful idiots are all over the place, but that’s exactly what they are, mere stage extras. They are impressionable adolescents, Hollywood airheads, middle-aged women who want to “assert themselves,” perpetually incited racial minorities, and Muslim activists. Many of them can be mobilized at the drop of a pin to “march for tolerance,” however that term is interpreted by those who organize the march and by politicians, like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, who seek to increase their influence through well-prepared displays of “righteous indignation.” Please note that Schumer’s obstructionist tactics in the Senate, blocking or delaying cabinet nominees and threatening to shoot down Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, have been applied to the accompaniment of non-stop anti-Trump protests. Only a fool or unthinking partisan would believe these events are unrelated.

Most of what we see and hear is profoundly hypocritical. Trump is not threatening gays or blacks; he is far from being an exterminationist anti-Semite, he is surrounded by Jewish family members and Jewish advisers and is adored by the population of Israel. He is not an anti-Muslim religious bigot; and the temporary travel restriction that he established last week affects non-Muslims as well as Muslims trying to enter the USA from certain countries. Only 109 travelers were detained last weekend because of the ban; and one may easily surmise that other passengers who were jostled by the loads of screaming, gesticulating demonstrators suffered far more grievously than those who were temporarily detained. Moreover, since Obama imposed a four-month travel ban on passengers from Iraq in 2011, we may assume that even more people during the supposedly sensitive Obama years were inconvenienced. But, strange as it seems, I don’t recall mass demonstrations by our selective humanitarians against Obama’s travel restrictions. Perhaps I didn’t notice them when they were taking place.

I also hear from establishment Republicans, and even from family members who should know better, that Trump is bringing all this on himself because he is too free with his words. If only he could explain himself calmly and read more often from a teleprompter, none of this would be happening. Moreover, if Trump were a nice conciliatory guy, like, say, W, Romney or Kasich, the PC crowd would be pacified—or would stop running riot. This gives me food for thought. Does anyone really believe that the Left was nice to George W. Bush, whom they also smeared as a racist and religious bigot? And is any Republican or Never-Trumper naïve enough to believe that if it had been Ted Cruz rather than Trump naming Neil Gorsuch as his pick to the Supreme Court, there would be no demonstrations against this outstanding non-leftist jurist? Perhaps if the silver-tongued Cruz were defending Gorsuch in Ciceronian accents, Schumer and his friends in the Senate would not be trying to block the confirmation? Come to think of it: Cruz has already endorsed Gorsuch—to no effect.

The only question that should be asked in this matter concerns the end game of those who are organizing the insurrectionary masses. What do they expect to gain from the continuing noise and escalating violence? At the very least they may hope to disempower Trump and his administration–perhaps to render them so powerless that they won’t able to do anything that the Left and the Democratic base (to make a perhaps unnecessary distinction) don’t want them to do. The Democrats are also hoping to take advantage of the chaos to which their fans and operatives have contributed by posing as the true party of order. Only the Democrats, the electorate will be impelled to assume, could end the civil unrest by bringing back the glorious days of the Obama administration.

This transfiguration of the bungling leftist Obama into the guarantor of American order may not be as strange an idea as it first seems. Last week I found myself sitting next to a sixty year old black woman on a train going to Philadelphia; and this traveler began telling me how nice it had been under Obama. At first I reminded her of the growing criminality in our cities during the last few years, but then I noticed she wasn’t talking about crime. Things had been nicer under Obama because back then one didn’t witness daily and even hourly eruptions of organized anger, with the media, entertainment industry, and in varying degrees the Democratic Party egging on the mobs. The woman whom I spoke to wasn’t looking for deeper causes. All she knew was that since Trump had taken office, pandemonium was loosed on the country. And it’s not yet clear that this pandemonium will be blamed on those who are causing it, namely the organizers, the media, and the throngs of useful idiots.

(Reprinted from Front Page Magazine by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Left, Antifa, Donald Trump 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
38 Comments to "Leftist Rationality"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
[Filtered by Reply Thread]
  1. who seek to increase their influence through well-prepared displays of “righteous indignation.”

    I don’t think they are doing it well. It seems to me, they have already wasted their highest volume of hysteria – first on the inauguration, and then on the 90-day visa restrictions. That’s it. I don’t see where they’re going from here “to increase their influence”. How can they escalate, without breaking the law in a serious way? It looks like they’re wasting energy for nothing. And that’s just dumb…

    • Replies: @Alexander Ulizko
    Well, organizers can always escalate.

    Let's take a very brief look at Maidan revolution development in Ukraine:

    1. Relatively peaceful student protests (some minor propriety destruction).
    2. At some point police dispersed throng and did it really rough.
    3. All MSM went wild, they aired carefully picked photo&video day and night. Sympathetic viewers reacts like "They are just kids! Why use violence?! Our police are mindless raging beasts!".
    4. More escalation, more protests, more fights with police and propriety damage.
    5. At some point "unknown snipers" shoot innocent protesters. Of course, MSM accused pro-regiment SpecOps responsible for hundred innocent deaths.
    6. Public raged, international community raged, the legitimately elected President fled the country to escape the angry mob.

    I hope that's not what will happen in USA, that's just one of many possible ways how organizers can escalate.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are only available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also only be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/pgottfried/leftist-rationality/#comment-1757000
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. @Mao Cheng Ji

    who seek to increase their influence through well-prepared displays of “righteous indignation.”
     
    I don't think they are doing it well. It seems to me, they have already wasted their highest volume of hysteria - first on the inauguration, and then on the 90-day visa restrictions. That's it. I don't see where they're going from here "to increase their influence". How can they escalate, without breaking the law in a serious way? It looks like they're wasting energy for nothing. And that's just dumb...

    Well, organizers can always escalate.

    Let’s take a very brief look at Maidan revolution development in Ukraine:

    1. Relatively peaceful student protests (some minor propriety destruction).
    2. At some point police dispersed throng and did it really rough.
    3. All MSM went wild, they aired carefully picked photo&video day and night. Sympathetic viewers reacts like “They are just kids! Why use violence?! Our police are mindless raging beasts!”.
    4. More escalation, more protests, more fights with police and propriety damage.
    5. At some point “unknown snipers” shoot innocent protesters. Of course, MSM accused pro-regiment SpecOps responsible for hundred innocent deaths.
    6. Public raged, international community raged, the legitimately elected President fled the country to escape the angry mob.

    I hope that’s not what will happen in USA, that’s just one of many possible ways how organizers can escalate.

    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji
    You got a point there. And not only at Maidan, I believe this is a relatively common element in most colored revolutions: human sacrifice, where a kid (a student protester, typically) is killed, by the evil authorities, or by self-immolation. You're right, that could be the next stage; I stand corrected.
  3. Well it’s on the Trump administration, Trump supporters of all stripes, thoughtful, responsible American citizens (that maybe aren’t yuge fans), etc., to make sure the blame falls squarely on those that deserve it! It’s pretty obvious what the left and super-rich creeps like Soros are doing. If we let the media spin a false narrative and mentally lazy, irresponsible sheep like the train passenger blame Trump for everything probably including bad weather, well we’re screwed. Non-leftists need get organized and more active or the left and oligarchs like Soros will win because first off they show up to fight for their side. Voting isn’t enough. PS: do not literally mean fight, like in the streets. The President, the AG, etc., need to deal with it.

  4. To add to Trump’s problems we have Insane McCain and his butt-buddy Gramnesty thinking that with only a two person majority in the Senate that they can actually operate as a co-President to Trump as witnessed by their screwing around in Ukraine trying to hem Trump in on action against Russia.

  5. Typical Jooie Hooie. Anyone remember BushTard being “smeared as a racist and a religious bigot” as the author claims? Wishful thinking. More accurately, the KM (kosher media) cheered on the jooie neocons and their bicycle riding “cowboy” butt boy as they destroyed a couple of muzzie countries and murdered hundreds of thousands. Prediction: Trumpster will be transformed by the KM into a much beloved leader as soon as he starts in with the bombing of Iran. You jooies ever wonder about going too far and the majority taking enough umbrage to just toss you out or worse?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Nonsense. Of course he was branded a racist and a religious bigot.

    Ever heard Kanye's rant about Bush hating black people? He may have been more in-your-face about it, but quite a few on the left pushed the same message about Bush after Katrina. Never mind of course that Black folks like everyone else in Katrina's wake, had been told to leave but they chose not to.

    As far a religious bigot goes, pretty much every Conservative president gets that moniker. But his push for a Faith Based Initiative and his restrictions on stem cells got him especially tarred with that one.

  6. @Alexander Ulizko
    Well, organizers can always escalate.

    Let's take a very brief look at Maidan revolution development in Ukraine:

    1. Relatively peaceful student protests (some minor propriety destruction).
    2. At some point police dispersed throng and did it really rough.
    3. All MSM went wild, they aired carefully picked photo&video day and night. Sympathetic viewers reacts like "They are just kids! Why use violence?! Our police are mindless raging beasts!".
    4. More escalation, more protests, more fights with police and propriety damage.
    5. At some point "unknown snipers" shoot innocent protesters. Of course, MSM accused pro-regiment SpecOps responsible for hundred innocent deaths.
    6. Public raged, international community raged, the legitimately elected President fled the country to escape the angry mob.

    I hope that's not what will happen in USA, that's just one of many possible ways how organizers can escalate.

    You got a point there. And not only at Maidan, I believe this is a relatively common element in most colored revolutions: human sacrifice, where a kid (a student protester, typically) is killed, by the evil authorities, or by self-immolation. You’re right, that could be the next stage; I stand corrected.

  7. Ultimately, leftists are irrational on the issue of Muslim immigration. I’ve begged and pleaded with them for years to see how hostile Muslims are to leftists, but they ignore all the evidence I present. For example, I remind them that Muslims destroyed the left in Iran, so it’s reasonable to assume they will attempt to destroy it here as well. This makes no impression on them. I have to conclude they are suicidal.

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    " I have to conclude they are suicidal".

    It goes beyond that : They are nothing but stupid and crazy, and any effort to get through to them with logic or rationality is a gigantic exercise in futility.
    They view themselves as the good guys no matter how much destruction their lunatic actions and concepts cause such as in the situation of Detroit, and there is no possible way to alter their thinking, the only exceptions are the ones who somehow strangely come to their senses without prodding from others.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.
  8. 1) When will come the day when the people, finally, realize, that what the punditocracy (and, after brainwashing, their readership) call as “Left” or “Leftist” is NOT the “Left”. None of these “Adorables” really want to help the masses and the People. None of them wants to transfer the means of production from the Capital to the Workers. It’s the Faux Left, if it wants to keep or “to reform” the capitalism.

    2) When will the Unis start expulsing their unruly students over their illegal actions, that have nothing to do with the process of education? And not just expulsion – get them blacklisted from any chance to get any sort of educational stipend as well.

  9. The Left is fighting the last war.

    They think they can extort the Middle by doing what they did in the 1960′s. The Middle is no longer as fat or delusionally Utopian as were their parents 50 years ago. The Middle has realized things are getting worse for them for at least 17 years.

    This time around, when chaos comes, the reaction will be bad for the agents of chaos.

    This sort of thing may pass in Chicago, LA, Philly, and other urbanized Diversitopias.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4195318/Thugs-randomly-shooting-passes.html

    In most of flyover country, however, the Thugs won’t last five minutes. The USA is frankly awash in guns and ammo, enough to fight several Civil Wars without resupply. Outside of Blue County population density, the Thugs will be at a phenomenal firepower disadvantage.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "This time around, when chaos comes, the reaction will be bad for the agents of chaos."

    Assuming that your brethren are ready to pull the trigger.
  10. Kill a chicken. Let the monkeys watch.

    The Super Bowl was an allegory for the times. You underestimate this team at your peril.

    While Dems dither over whether a Dominican or Muslim is the best face for the party, the 40%, [our political waistline] that determines elections, is growing weary of the riots, misinformation, and cheap shots.

    When Rahm tells dems to chill, he knows sumpin.

    Blacks will never turn out in force again for a white man or woman. Latinos will only vote chain migration for the 600 million brethren left behind. Whites won’t be fooled twice by another focus group “black boy done good” meme.

    Result? Democrats will die on the hill of identity politics.

    Expect a transgender Honduran Imam in 2020. and Trump’s the dummy?

  11. The only question that should be asked in this matter concerns the end game of those who are organizing the insurrectionary masses. What do they expect to gain from the continuing noise and escalating violence? At the very least they may hope to disempower Trump and his administration–perhaps to render them so powerless that they won’t able to do anything that the Left and the Democratic base (to make a perhaps unnecessary distinction) don’t want them to do.

    The aim is to delegitimize Trump and erode his support.

    At first I reminded her of the growing criminality in our cities during the last few years, but then I noticed she wasn’t talking about crime. Things had been nicer under Obama because back then one didn’t witness daily and even hourly eruptions of organized anger, with the media, entertainment industry, and in varying degrees the Democratic Party egging on the mobs.

    Big Brother is angry with you, America. Give us Trump, and we will return you to your regularly scheduled broadcasting. Until then, the unpleasantness will continue.

    Uncle Sugar, the TeeVee tit.

    Personally, I’d have the FBI start building a case against Soros. Keep the whole thing very legit and above-board, and scrupulously document (I’d use video, but that’s just me) everything, but investigate him and make a case, if there’s one to be made. If they find enough evidence, charge him and try him.

    That would send a message. Let the media defend this guy. Let him defend himself, in the light of day.

    1) When will come the day when the people, finally, realize, that what the punditocracy (and, after brainwashing, their readership) call as “Left” or “Leftist” is NOT the “Left”. None of these “Adorables” really want to help the masses and the People. None of them wants to transfer the means of production from the Capital to the Workers. It’s the Faux Left, if it wants to keep or “to reform” the capitalism.

    2) When will the Unis start expulsing their unruly students over their illegal actions, that have nothing to do with the process of education? And not just expulsion – get them blacklisted from any chance to get any sort of educational stipend as well.

    Have you considered the possibility that phony is the best the real left can do? Look how little dissent there is from the “real” left; either the “real” left is so small that it can’t make any noise, or the “real” left is a bunch of phonies, too.

    The truth is, the right is the side being misrepresented, the side where a civil war is brewing.

    • Replies: @Lyttenburgh

    Have you considered the possibility that phony is the best the real left can do?
     
    No, because it is not the Left in the first place. It's a bunch of radical liberals, who just reached the logical conclusion to what the fight for individualistic "Universal Human Rights" should be all about. This doesn't make them left.

    Look how little dissent there is from the “real” left
     
    Because the enitre world = America?
  12. […] take place regardless of any constitutional protections, restrictions, and rights.  So why the absolute hypocrisy from our modern day leftist saintly paragons of […]

  13. @John Pepple
    Ultimately, leftists are irrational on the issue of Muslim immigration. I've begged and pleaded with them for years to see how hostile Muslims are to leftists, but they ignore all the evidence I present. For example, I remind them that Muslims destroyed the left in Iran, so it's reasonable to assume they will attempt to destroy it here as well. This makes no impression on them. I have to conclude they are suicidal.

    ” I have to conclude they are suicidal”.

    It goes beyond that : They are nothing but stupid and crazy, and any effort to get through to them with logic or rationality is a gigantic exercise in futility.
    They view themselves as the good guys no matter how much destruction their lunatic actions and concepts cause such as in the situation of Detroit, and there is no possible way to alter their thinking, the only exceptions are the ones who somehow strangely come to their senses without prodding from others.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

  14. @Svigor

    The only question that should be asked in this matter concerns the end game of those who are organizing the insurrectionary masses. What do they expect to gain from the continuing noise and escalating violence? At the very least they may hope to disempower Trump and his administration–perhaps to render them so powerless that they won’t able to do anything that the Left and the Democratic base (to make a perhaps unnecessary distinction) don’t want them to do.
     
    The aim is to delegitimize Trump and erode his support.

    At first I reminded her of the growing criminality in our cities during the last few years, but then I noticed she wasn’t talking about crime. Things had been nicer under Obama because back then one didn’t witness daily and even hourly eruptions of organized anger, with the media, entertainment industry, and in varying degrees the Democratic Party egging on the mobs.
     
    Big Brother is angry with you, America. Give us Trump, and we will return you to your regularly scheduled broadcasting. Until then, the unpleasantness will continue.

    Uncle Sugar, the TeeVee tit.

    Personally, I'd have the FBI start building a case against Soros. Keep the whole thing very legit and above-board, and scrupulously document (I'd use video, but that's just me) everything, but investigate him and make a case, if there's one to be made. If they find enough evidence, charge him and try him.

    That would send a message. Let the media defend this guy. Let him defend himself, in the light of day.


    1) When will come the day when the people, finally, realize, that what the punditocracy (and, after brainwashing, their readership) call as “Left” or “Leftist” is NOT the “Left”. None of these “Adorables” really want to help the masses and the People. None of them wants to transfer the means of production from the Capital to the Workers. It’s the Faux Left, if it wants to keep or “to reform” the capitalism.

    2) When will the Unis start expulsing their unruly students over their illegal actions, that have nothing to do with the process of education? And not just expulsion – get them blacklisted from any chance to get any sort of educational stipend as well.
     

    Have you considered the possibility that phony is the best the real left can do? Look how little dissent there is from the "real" left; either the "real" left is so small that it can't make any noise, or the "real" left is a bunch of phonies, too.

    The truth is, the right is the side being misrepresented, the side where a civil war is brewing.

    Have you considered the possibility that phony is the best the real left can do?

    No, because it is not the Left in the first place. It’s a bunch of radical liberals, who just reached the logical conclusion to what the fight for individualistic “Universal Human Rights” should be all about. This doesn’t make them left.

    Look how little dissent there is from the “real” left

    Because the enitre world = America?

  15. Exactly, they will go ballistic no matter how polite you are. Hysteria derives ultimately from the Greek hysterikos, meaning “womb”

  16. @dc.sunsets
    The Left is fighting the last war.

    They think they can extort the Middle by doing what they did in the 1960's. The Middle is no longer as fat or delusionally Utopian as were their parents 50 years ago. The Middle has realized things are getting worse for them for at least 17 years.

    This time around, when chaos comes, the reaction will be bad for the agents of chaos.

    This sort of thing may pass in Chicago, LA, Philly, and other urbanized Diversitopias.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4195318/Thugs-randomly-shooting-passes.html

    In most of flyover country, however, the Thugs won't last five minutes. The USA is frankly awash in guns and ammo, enough to fight several Civil Wars without resupply. Outside of Blue County population density, the Thugs will be at a phenomenal firepower disadvantage.

    “This time around, when chaos comes, the reaction will be bad for the agents of chaos.”

    Assuming that your brethren are ready to pull the trigger.

  17. No, because it is not the Left in the first place. It’s a bunch of radical liberals, who just reached the logical conclusion to what the fight for individualistic “Universal Human Rights” should be all about. This doesn’t make them left.

    So, there is no left. Same difference.

    Because the enitre world = America?

    Yes, I’m talking about America.

    • Replies: @Lyttenburgh

    So, there is no left. Same difference.
     
    In the US. Gee, who'd tought that McCartysm and suppression of the Unions would result in the end in White SJW "Guys" whipping themselves on camera and begging forgiveness for being white, straight and male? You yourself approved back then of neutering the True Left - and now you are complaining and do nothing?

    Yes, I’m talking about America.
     
    And I'm not talking about America.
  18. Cory, I can’t speak for others.

    I do, however, see signs that a big chunk of Middle America is spending time at the target range.

    Maybe they’re all just enthusiasts….

    Do me a favor and when the battle lines are drawn, like if there’s a riot or something, you take the morally superior position of standing in the middle, between factions, waving your arms and pleading for peace.

    While you’re waiting for that, go to Englewood, South Chicago, or any of the other Diveritopian neighborhoods of Chicago and work for peace.

    I need some amusement.

  19. @Svigor

    No, because it is not the Left in the first place. It’s a bunch of radical liberals, who just reached the logical conclusion to what the fight for individualistic “Universal Human Rights” should be all about. This doesn’t make them left.
     
    So, there is no left. Same difference.

    Because the enitre world = America?
     
    Yes, I'm talking about America.

    So, there is no left. Same difference.

    In the US. Gee, who’d tought that McCartysm and suppression of the Unions would result in the end in White SJW “Guys” whipping themselves on camera and begging forgiveness for being white, straight and male? You yourself approved back then of neutering the True Left – and now you are complaining and do nothing?

    Yes, I’m talking about America.

    And I’m not talking about America.

  20. The US constitution 9th amendment says the people, not the federals or a central government, define civil rights.

    The US constitution 10th amendment says the state governments, not the federals or a central government, protected the civil rights defined by the people.

    The left demands that the rules of the US constitution be inverted, and that the federals or a central government define and protect civil rights.

    The left has joined with libertarians to make their anti-constitution goals into reality.

    The left is not only seditious, they are totalitarian.

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy. Leftist class supremacy takes the form of selective, central government entitlements for people based on class.

    The left facetiously label their class supremacy schemes as equality and social justice.

    As Orwell stated, leftist class supremacy schemes promote a unctuous leftist brand of equality, where all animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.

    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy.
     
    The left (that's real left, not liberals) simply claims to represent the working class against the class of capitalists.

    What's the problem? Do you have a problem with a socioeconomic class being represented by political parties or movements? Are there any other groups that should be denied representation, in your opinion, or is it just the people who make a living by selling their labor?
    , @Lyttenburgh

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy.
     
    And the right does not? Also - you are misxing up soft and warm. SJWs don't really mix up with the Real Left. They only demand for Finnish-Fillipino MtF pansexual genderfluid AIDs-wracked Asperger-suffering "Adorables" to be made the CEOs of the companies - they have no quarrel with the capitalism as the sistem and has nothing to warrant the dismantling the sistem of capital's dictatorship.
  21. @Joe Franklin
    The US constitution 9th amendment says the people, not the federals or a central government, define civil rights.

    The US constitution 10th amendment says the state governments, not the federals or a central government, protected the civil rights defined by the people.

    The left demands that the rules of the US constitution be inverted, and that the federals or a central government define and protect civil rights.

    The left has joined with libertarians to make their anti-constitution goals into reality.

    The left is not only seditious, they are totalitarian.

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy. Leftist class supremacy takes the form of selective, central government entitlements for people based on class.

    The left facetiously label their class supremacy schemes as equality and social justice.

    As Orwell stated, leftist class supremacy schemes promote a unctuous leftist brand of equality, where all animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy.

    The left (that’s real left, not liberals) simply claims to represent the working class against the class of capitalists.

    What’s the problem? Do you have a problem with a socioeconomic class being represented by political parties or movements? Are there any other groups that should be denied representation, in your opinion, or is it just the people who make a living by selling their labor?

    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    " The real left"
    Okay just where is this "Real left" to be found? Perhaps in the current pandemoneous Venezuela, or maybe in Cuba, or how about in the former East Germany where they were manning machine guns at the border and gunning down anyone who simply wanted to exit the "workers paradise".
    So if these were not the "Real" leftists, who were they then, and where were the "Real" leftists to be found?

    Yeah I know : Each new generation of "leftists", ( communists) claim that the Russians, the Chinese, the Cubans etc, that they were the " wrong" ones, and we the new generation of communists/leftists , we are the "Right" ones, and we will get it "right" this time.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    , @Joe Franklin
    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious.

    If you have to do lobbying for class-based entitlements, do it at the state and local level where it might be legal.

    As for silly equality schemes, both left and liberal activities in the US accomplish the same nonsense - class supremacy.

    Protected class supremacy is a leftist refinement of proletarian class supremacy.

    The 9th and 10th amendments make it clear that leftist class supremacy schemes are illegal and unconstitutional at the federal level.
  22. @Mao Cheng Ji

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy.
     
    The left (that's real left, not liberals) simply claims to represent the working class against the class of capitalists.

    What's the problem? Do you have a problem with a socioeconomic class being represented by political parties or movements? Are there any other groups that should be denied representation, in your opinion, or is it just the people who make a living by selling their labor?

    ” The real left”
    Okay just where is this “Real left” to be found? Perhaps in the current pandemoneous Venezuela, or maybe in Cuba, or how about in the former East Germany where they were manning machine guns at the border and gunning down anyone who simply wanted to exit the “workers paradise”.
    So if these were not the “Real” leftists, who were they then, and where were the “Real” leftists to be found?

    Yeah I know : Each new generation of “leftists”, ( communists) claim that the Russians, the Chinese, the Cubans etc, that they were the ” wrong” ones, and we the new generation of communists/leftists , we are the “Right” ones, and we will get it “right” this time.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji
    Why, any anti-capitalist movement, including all those you mentioned, is real left. You don't like them, but many do. See this, for example: Majority of Eastern Germans Feel Life Better under Communism.
  23. @Mao Cheng Ji

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy.
     
    The left (that's real left, not liberals) simply claims to represent the working class against the class of capitalists.

    What's the problem? Do you have a problem with a socioeconomic class being represented by political parties or movements? Are there any other groups that should be denied representation, in your opinion, or is it just the people who make a living by selling their labor?

    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious.

    If you have to do lobbying for class-based entitlements, do it at the state and local level where it might be legal.

    As for silly equality schemes, both left and liberal activities in the US accomplish the same nonsense – class supremacy.

    Protected class supremacy is a leftist refinement of proletarian class supremacy.

    The 9th and 10th amendments make it clear that leftist class supremacy schemes are illegal and unconstitutional at the federal level.

    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious
     
    Lobbying is not something the left does. Typically, businesses are lobbying for federal entitlements, so that they can get away with paying lower wages.

    Also, if you believe it's illegal, call the police.


    Protected class supremacy is a leftist refinement of proletarian class supremacy.
     
    What does this mean? If you choose to represent interests of a class (working class, for example), then that's what you do. Other classes (capitalists, for example), advance their interests too, and, in capitalist countries, typically much more successfully. Where's this 'supremacy'?
    , @Lyttenburgh

    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious.
     
    [...]

    Oh wait - you are seiorus! Let me laugh even harder!

    BTW, if you missed that, in the Blessed US of A corporations, nowadays, are considered people - with everything it entails when it comes to sponsoring electoral campaigns and all that jazz.

  24. @Authenticjazzman
    " The real left"
    Okay just where is this "Real left" to be found? Perhaps in the current pandemoneous Venezuela, or maybe in Cuba, or how about in the former East Germany where they were manning machine guns at the border and gunning down anyone who simply wanted to exit the "workers paradise".
    So if these were not the "Real" leftists, who were they then, and where were the "Real" leftists to be found?

    Yeah I know : Each new generation of "leftists", ( communists) claim that the Russians, the Chinese, the Cubans etc, that they were the " wrong" ones, and we the new generation of communists/leftists , we are the "Right" ones, and we will get it "right" this time.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    Why, any anti-capitalist movement, including all those you mentioned, is real left. You don’t like them, but many do. See this, for example: Majority of Eastern Germans Feel Life Better under Communism.

  25. @Joe Franklin
    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious.

    If you have to do lobbying for class-based entitlements, do it at the state and local level where it might be legal.

    As for silly equality schemes, both left and liberal activities in the US accomplish the same nonsense - class supremacy.

    Protected class supremacy is a leftist refinement of proletarian class supremacy.

    The 9th and 10th amendments make it clear that leftist class supremacy schemes are illegal and unconstitutional at the federal level.

    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious

    Lobbying is not something the left does. Typically, businesses are lobbying for federal entitlements, so that they can get away with paying lower wages.

    Also, if you believe it’s illegal, call the police.

    Protected class supremacy is a leftist refinement of proletarian class supremacy.

    What does this mean? If you choose to represent interests of a class (working class, for example), then that’s what you do. Other classes (capitalists, for example), advance their interests too, and, in capitalist countries, typically much more successfully. Where’s this ‘supremacy’?

    • Replies: @Joe Franklin

    Lobbying is not something the left does.

     

    Nonsense.

    ACLU, ADL, SPLC, AJC, PFAW, Open Society Foundation, LGOIR, etc. are all left wing lobbies.

    Where’s this ‘supremacy’?
     
    Illicit federal entitlements for protected class people.

    As an example, here's some federal entitlements for Jewish protected class people:

    1. Slavish US military, monetary, diplomatic, political, logistic, and intelligence support for Jewish protected classes in Israel
    2. Jewish groups receive up to 97% of grants from the Homeland Security
    3. Taxpayer bailouts for Jewish Wall Street and Federal Reserve investment businesses
    4. Jewish Holocaust victim cult propaganda in public schools, colleges, museums, and mass media
    5. Federal Laws that prohibit Americans to boycott Israeli goods.
    6. Disproportionate Jewish representation in the US Senate and USSC
    7. Disproportionate Jewish representation of Federal Reserve System Governors (4 of 7)
    8. Federal and state anti-discrimination laws for Jewish people
    9. US Government war mongering and propaganda to impose Jewish protected class supremacy scheme on to foreign nations
    10. Hate speech prosecutions in favor of Jewish people, and other protected classes
    11. Preferential US immigration, citizenship, and asylum policies for Jewish people
    12. Israeli spies not required to register as foreign agents in the US
    13. Jewish privileged protected class scheme promoted as a US Government national domestic and foreign policy
    14. Government tax breaks and grants for Jewish schools and synagogues and NGOs
    15. Jewish monopoly of FCC regulated broadcast media
    16. Official cover-up of Jewish and Israeli terrorism and espionage against the US
    17. Disproportionate number of Jewish people in cushy federal employment
    18. US national Jewish American Heritage Month and Holocaust Remembrance Day
    19. US 2-party system espouses Jewish cultural ideologies - Democrats = secular Judaism, Republicans = conservative Judaism
    20. US Federal Courts ignore 1st amendment separation of Judaism and state
    21. Jewish Bolshevism white-washed in school history books
    22. Relentless Jewish protected class agitprop in FCC licensed TV and Radio and newspapers
    23. US immigration biased for hordes of unskilled protected class people, not for highly skilled people.
    24. Government spyware inside Jewish developed software, including Facebook and Windows kernel and Google
    25. Free health care, social security, public services and automatic suffrage for Jewish immigrants automatically labeled as refugees
    26. Jewish lawyers profit from fascist government prosecution of diversity legislation against private and public organizations
    27. Some 30 laws in Israel specifically privilege protected class Jews, including in the areas of immigration rights, naturalization, access to land and employment.
    28. Freedom of association for Jews respected by the federals, not respected for white gentile people
    29. Revolving door employment for Jewish people between Wall Street, US Treasury, and Federal Reserve Banks.
    30. Israeli Jewish attack US Navy USS Liberty, official cover-up in the US of the atrocity.
    31. Israeli Jewish deploy nuclear weapons, flout non-proliferation laws, and demand no one else in the middle east deploy nuclear weapons. US agrees.
    32. Federal government coerces private businesses to implement Jewish diversity scheme policies, or else suffer federal prosecution, denial of tax breaks and business licenses, and denial of federal contracts.
    33. US laws prohibiting any US federal government employee or contractor from publicly communicating about Israel’s nuclear weapons program under threat of immediate employment loss, fines and imprisonment.
    34. Tax exempt Jewish lobby groups lobby the federal government for more illicit entitlements for all victim cult schemers
    35. Public universities give preferential admission to Jewish students
  26. @Mao Cheng Ji

    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious
     
    Lobbying is not something the left does. Typically, businesses are lobbying for federal entitlements, so that they can get away with paying lower wages.

    Also, if you believe it's illegal, call the police.


    Protected class supremacy is a leftist refinement of proletarian class supremacy.
     
    What does this mean? If you choose to represent interests of a class (working class, for example), then that's what you do. Other classes (capitalists, for example), advance their interests too, and, in capitalist countries, typically much more successfully. Where's this 'supremacy'?

    Lobbying is not something the left does.

    Nonsense.

    ACLU, ADL, SPLC, AJC, PFAW, Open Society Foundation, LGOIR, etc. are all left wing lobbies.

    Where’s this ‘supremacy’?

    Illicit federal entitlements for protected class people.

    As an example, here’s some federal entitlements for Jewish protected class people:

    [MORE]

    1. Slavish US military, monetary, diplomatic, political, logistic, and intelligence support for Jewish protected classes in Israel
    2. Jewish groups receive up to 97% of grants from the Homeland Security
    3. Taxpayer bailouts for Jewish Wall Street and Federal Reserve investment businesses
    4. Jewish Holocaust victim cult propaganda in public schools, colleges, museums, and mass media
    5. Federal Laws that prohibit Americans to boycott Israeli goods.
    6. Disproportionate Jewish representation in the US Senate and USSC
    7. Disproportionate Jewish representation of Federal Reserve System Governors (4 of 7)
    8. Federal and state anti-discrimination laws for Jewish people
    9. US Government war mongering and propaganda to impose Jewish protected class supremacy scheme on to foreign nations
    10. Hate speech prosecutions in favor of Jewish people, and other protected classes
    11. Preferential US immigration, citizenship, and asylum policies for Jewish people
    12. Israeli spies not required to register as foreign agents in the US
    13. Jewish privileged protected class scheme promoted as a US Government national domestic and foreign policy
    14. Government tax breaks and grants for Jewish schools and synagogues and NGOs
    15. Jewish monopoly of FCC regulated broadcast media
    16. Official cover-up of Jewish and Israeli terrorism and espionage against the US
    17. Disproportionate number of Jewish people in cushy federal employment
    18. US national Jewish American Heritage Month and Holocaust Remembrance Day
    19. US 2-party system espouses Jewish cultural ideologies – Democrats = secular Judaism, Republicans = conservative Judaism
    20. US Federal Courts ignore 1st amendment separation of Judaism and state
    21. Jewish Bolshevism white-washed in school history books
    22. Relentless Jewish protected class agitprop in FCC licensed TV and Radio and newspapers
    23. US immigration biased for hordes of unskilled protected class people, not for highly skilled people.
    24. Government spyware inside Jewish developed software, including Facebook and Windows kernel and Google
    25. Free health care, social security, public services and automatic suffrage for Jewish immigrants automatically labeled as refugees
    26. Jewish lawyers profit from fascist government prosecution of diversity legislation against private and public organizations
    27. Some 30 laws in Israel specifically privilege protected class Jews, including in the areas of immigration rights, naturalization, access to land and employment.
    28. Freedom of association for Jews respected by the federals, not respected for white gentile people
    29. Revolving door employment for Jewish people between Wall Street, US Treasury, and Federal Reserve Banks.
    30. Israeli Jewish attack US Navy USS Liberty, official cover-up in the US of the atrocity.
    31. Israeli Jewish deploy nuclear weapons, flout non-proliferation laws, and demand no one else in the middle east deploy nuclear weapons. US agrees.
    32. Federal government coerces private businesses to implement Jewish diversity scheme policies, or else suffer federal prosecution, denial of tax breaks and business licenses, and denial of federal contracts.
    33. US laws prohibiting any US federal government employee or contractor from publicly communicating about Israel’s nuclear weapons program under threat of immediate employment loss, fines and imprisonment.
    34. Tax exempt Jewish lobby groups lobby the federal government for more illicit entitlements for all victim cult schemers
    35. Public universities give preferential admission to Jewish students

    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    Taxpayer bailouts for Jewish Wall Street
     
    I certainly appreciate crackpot drivel as much as the next guy, but why do you have to bring the constitution into it? And what does any of it have to do with the Left? And why so many words? Just say that you hate the Jews, and be done with it, Joe.

    And now please, have the last word.
  27. @Joe Franklin
    The US constitution 9th amendment says the people, not the federals or a central government, define civil rights.

    The US constitution 10th amendment says the state governments, not the federals or a central government, protected the civil rights defined by the people.

    The left demands that the rules of the US constitution be inverted, and that the federals or a central government define and protect civil rights.

    The left has joined with libertarians to make their anti-constitution goals into reality.

    The left is not only seditious, they are totalitarian.

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy. Leftist class supremacy takes the form of selective, central government entitlements for people based on class.

    The left facetiously label their class supremacy schemes as equality and social justice.

    As Orwell stated, leftist class supremacy schemes promote a unctuous leftist brand of equality, where all animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy.

    And the right does not? Also – you are misxing up soft and warm. SJWs don’t really mix up with the Real Left. They only demand for Finnish-Fillipino MtF pansexual genderfluid AIDs-wracked Asperger-suffering “Adorables” to be made the CEOs of the companies – they have no quarrel with the capitalism as the sistem and has nothing to warrant the dismantling the sistem of capital’s dictatorship.

    • Replies: @Joe Franklin
    The US right wing is pro-constitution, not the cartoon character the left portrays.
  28. @Joe Franklin
    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious.

    If you have to do lobbying for class-based entitlements, do it at the state and local level where it might be legal.

    As for silly equality schemes, both left and liberal activities in the US accomplish the same nonsense - class supremacy.

    Protected class supremacy is a leftist refinement of proletarian class supremacy.

    The 9th and 10th amendments make it clear that leftist class supremacy schemes are illegal and unconstitutional at the federal level.

    Lobbying for illicit or unconstitutional federal entitlements, also as a means to buy the votes of whole classes of people, is illegal and seditious.

    [...]

    Oh wait – you are seiorus! Let me laugh even harder!

    BTW, if you missed that, in the Blessed US of A corporations, nowadays, are considered people – with everything it entails when it comes to sponsoring electoral campaigns and all that jazz.

  29. @Lyttenburgh

    The left promotes class supremacy around the world in the form of proletarian class supremacy or protected class supremacy.
     
    And the right does not? Also - you are misxing up soft and warm. SJWs don't really mix up with the Real Left. They only demand for Finnish-Fillipino MtF pansexual genderfluid AIDs-wracked Asperger-suffering "Adorables" to be made the CEOs of the companies - they have no quarrel with the capitalism as the sistem and has nothing to warrant the dismantling the sistem of capital's dictatorship.

    The US right wing is pro-constitution, not the cartoon character the left portrays.

    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    The US right wing is pro-constitution
     
    Hmm. You don't appear to be particularly 'pro-constitution', given that you talk about some 'unconstitutional federal entitlements', while according to the constitution it's not you but the supreme court who decides what is and what isn't constitutional...
    , @Lyttenburgh

    The US right wing is pro-constitution, not the cartoon character the left portrays.
     
    This is utter meaningless phrase, unless you provide real example of:

    1) The US right-wing
    2) Them being "pro-constitution"
    3) Them being above class differences and biases.
  30. This thread is worthless with the moderators heavy censorship.

    I’ll be on other threads with significantly less censorship if you want to continue this conversation.

    • Replies: @Lyttenburgh

    This thread is worthless with the moderators heavy censorship.
     
    What censorship? So far you failed to say anything supported by the facts and instead chose to run away from the discussion blaming everyone but yourself.
  31. @Joe Franklin
    The US right wing is pro-constitution, not the cartoon character the left portrays.

    The US right wing is pro-constitution

    Hmm. You don’t appear to be particularly ‘pro-constitution’, given that you talk about some ‘unconstitutional federal entitlements’, while according to the constitution it’s not you but the supreme court who decides what is and what isn’t constitutional…

    • Replies: @Anon
    It does?


    This is all I could find:

    The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority
     
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii

    I guess that counts, kind of.
  32. @Joe Franklin
    The US right wing is pro-constitution, not the cartoon character the left portrays.

    The US right wing is pro-constitution, not the cartoon character the left portrays.

    This is utter meaningless phrase, unless you provide real example of:

    1) The US right-wing
    2) Them being “pro-constitution”
    3) Them being above class differences and biases.

  33. @Joe Franklin
    This thread is worthless with the moderators heavy censorship.

    I'll be on other threads with significantly less censorship if you want to continue this conversation.

    This thread is worthless with the moderators heavy censorship.

    What censorship? So far you failed to say anything supported by the facts and instead chose to run away from the discussion blaming everyone but yourself.

  34. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    The US right wing is pro-constitution
     
    Hmm. You don't appear to be particularly 'pro-constitution', given that you talk about some 'unconstitutional federal entitlements', while according to the constitution it's not you but the supreme court who decides what is and what isn't constitutional...

    It does?

    This is all I could find:

    The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii

    I guess that counts, kind of.

    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji
    Personally, I don't care much about constitutions, but according to the wikipedia article:

    The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest federal court of the United States. Established pursuant to Article III of the United States Constitution in 1789, it has ultimate (and largely discretionary) appellate jurisdiction over all federal courts and over state court cases involving issues of federal law, plus original jurisdiction over a small range of cases. In the legal system of the United States, the Supreme Court is the final interpreter of federal constitutional law, although it may only act within the context of a case in which it has jurisdiction.
     
    So, Article III, check it out. Let me know, if you care.
  35. @Anon
    It does?


    This is all I could find:

    The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority
     
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii

    I guess that counts, kind of.

    Personally, I don’t care much about constitutions, but according to the wikipedia article:

    The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest federal court of the United States. Established pursuant to Article III of the United States Constitution in 1789, it has ultimate (and largely discretionary) appellate jurisdiction over all federal courts and over state court cases involving issues of federal law, plus original jurisdiction over a small range of cases. In the legal system of the United States, the Supreme Court is the final interpreter of federal constitutional law, although it may only act within the context of a case in which it has jurisdiction.

    So, Article III, check it out. Let me know, if you care.

    • Replies: @Anon
    That was the link, and the quote was the relevant matter. Hence the "articleiii" in the URL address.
  36. @Joe Franklin

    Lobbying is not something the left does.

     

    Nonsense.

    ACLU, ADL, SPLC, AJC, PFAW, Open Society Foundation, LGOIR, etc. are all left wing lobbies.

    Where’s this ‘supremacy’?
     
    Illicit federal entitlements for protected class people.

    As an example, here's some federal entitlements for Jewish protected class people:

    1. Slavish US military, monetary, diplomatic, political, logistic, and intelligence support for Jewish protected classes in Israel
    2. Jewish groups receive up to 97% of grants from the Homeland Security
    3. Taxpayer bailouts for Jewish Wall Street and Federal Reserve investment businesses
    4. Jewish Holocaust victim cult propaganda in public schools, colleges, museums, and mass media
    5. Federal Laws that prohibit Americans to boycott Israeli goods.
    6. Disproportionate Jewish representation in the US Senate and USSC
    7. Disproportionate Jewish representation of Federal Reserve System Governors (4 of 7)
    8. Federal and state anti-discrimination laws for Jewish people
    9. US Government war mongering and propaganda to impose Jewish protected class supremacy scheme on to foreign nations
    10. Hate speech prosecutions in favor of Jewish people, and other protected classes
    11. Preferential US immigration, citizenship, and asylum policies for Jewish people
    12. Israeli spies not required to register as foreign agents in the US
    13. Jewish privileged protected class scheme promoted as a US Government national domestic and foreign policy
    14. Government tax breaks and grants for Jewish schools and synagogues and NGOs
    15. Jewish monopoly of FCC regulated broadcast media
    16. Official cover-up of Jewish and Israeli terrorism and espionage against the US
    17. Disproportionate number of Jewish people in cushy federal employment
    18. US national Jewish American Heritage Month and Holocaust Remembrance Day
    19. US 2-party system espouses Jewish cultural ideologies - Democrats = secular Judaism, Republicans = conservative Judaism
    20. US Federal Courts ignore 1st amendment separation of Judaism and state
    21. Jewish Bolshevism white-washed in school history books
    22. Relentless Jewish protected class agitprop in FCC licensed TV and Radio and newspapers
    23. US immigration biased for hordes of unskilled protected class people, not for highly skilled people.
    24. Government spyware inside Jewish developed software, including Facebook and Windows kernel and Google
    25. Free health care, social security, public services and automatic suffrage for Jewish immigrants automatically labeled as refugees
    26. Jewish lawyers profit from fascist government prosecution of diversity legislation against private and public organizations
    27. Some 30 laws in Israel specifically privilege protected class Jews, including in the areas of immigration rights, naturalization, access to land and employment.
    28. Freedom of association for Jews respected by the federals, not respected for white gentile people
    29. Revolving door employment for Jewish people between Wall Street, US Treasury, and Federal Reserve Banks.
    30. Israeli Jewish attack US Navy USS Liberty, official cover-up in the US of the atrocity.
    31. Israeli Jewish deploy nuclear weapons, flout non-proliferation laws, and demand no one else in the middle east deploy nuclear weapons. US agrees.
    32. Federal government coerces private businesses to implement Jewish diversity scheme policies, or else suffer federal prosecution, denial of tax breaks and business licenses, and denial of federal contracts.
    33. US laws prohibiting any US federal government employee or contractor from publicly communicating about Israel’s nuclear weapons program under threat of immediate employment loss, fines and imprisonment.
    34. Tax exempt Jewish lobby groups lobby the federal government for more illicit entitlements for all victim cult schemers
    35. Public universities give preferential admission to Jewish students

    Taxpayer bailouts for Jewish Wall Street

    I certainly appreciate crackpot drivel as much as the next guy, but why do you have to bring the constitution into it? And what does any of it have to do with the Left? And why so many words? Just say that you hate the Jews, and be done with it, Joe.

    And now please, have the last word.

  37. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Mao Cheng Ji
    Personally, I don't care much about constitutions, but according to the wikipedia article:

    The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest federal court of the United States. Established pursuant to Article III of the United States Constitution in 1789, it has ultimate (and largely discretionary) appellate jurisdiction over all federal courts and over state court cases involving issues of federal law, plus original jurisdiction over a small range of cases. In the legal system of the United States, the Supreme Court is the final interpreter of federal constitutional law, although it may only act within the context of a case in which it has jurisdiction.
     
    So, Article III, check it out. Let me know, if you care.

    That was the link, and the quote was the relevant matter. Hence the “articleiii” in the URL address.

  38. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @nsa
    Typical Jooie Hooie. Anyone remember BushTard being "smeared as a racist and a religious bigot" as the author claims? Wishful thinking. More accurately, the KM (kosher media) cheered on the jooie neocons and their bicycle riding "cowboy" butt boy as they destroyed a couple of muzzie countries and murdered hundreds of thousands. Prediction: Trumpster will be transformed by the KM into a much beloved leader as soon as he starts in with the bombing of Iran. You jooies ever wonder about going too far and the majority taking enough umbrage to just toss you out or worse?

    Nonsense. Of course he was branded a racist and a religious bigot.

    Ever heard Kanye’s rant about Bush hating black people? He may have been more in-your-face about it, but quite a few on the left pushed the same message about Bush after Katrina. Never mind of course that Black folks like everyone else in Katrina’s wake, had been told to leave but they chose not to.

    As far a religious bigot goes, pretty much every Conservative president gets that moniker. But his push for a Faith Based Initiative and his restrictions on stem cells got him especially tarred with that one.

Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Gottfried Comments via RSS