The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Paul Gottfried ArchiveBlogview
Jack Kerwick On Barack Obama and the Ideology of Blackism
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

small_american_offensive_largeJack Kerwick, who holds a doctorate in philosophy from Temple University and teaches at various colleges in the Philadelphia area, is a talented polemicist as well as learned academic. For those who want to sample the unleashed Jack Kerwick, I recommend his recent anthology The American Offensive, available in Kindle or paperback.

Jack is a commentator on multiple websites, and (unlike myself) is allowed to post on the GOP Establishment forum Townhall.com. As I read over his pieces there, I sometimes gape in disbelief. Jack is one of the few commentators on Townhall who pushes the anti-PC envelope. (Pat Buchanan and Ann Coulter do too, but both of these celebrities are far better connected than Jack—and no doubt harder to get rid of).

Not surprisingly, not all of Jack’s pieces are accepted by Townhall or by the neoconservative FrontpageMag, which is also one of his outlets. Those of his commentaries that seem (to use his term) “too insensitive” for Conservatism, Inc. go on to his BeliefNet page, and from there at least some of them have found their way into The American Offensive.

Jack covers lots of topics, including theology (he is a traditional, practicing Catholic); the growing epidemic of PC on American campuses; and the “reality” of race. Jack rarely discusses the media, the two institutionalized parties and his fellow academics without going for the jugular. He is tough-as-nails on the anti-white rage of “civil rights spokespersons” (What else would one expect from a white Catholic ethnic from Trenton, N.J.?). But reserves his harshest invective for whites who excuse blacks for their astronomic crime rates.

One truly fascinating commentary is his analysis of “blackism” as the recognizable worldview of our president. In contrast to the representatives of Conservatism, Inc., Jack does not view Obama as first and foremost a “socialist” without a foreign policy. Rather he sees him as a blackist who “affirms an explicitly—and thoroughly—racial conception of history.” Bam’s socialism does not drive his ideology.

As a “proponent of blackism,” Obama embraces socialism, because he believes, rightly or wrongly, that it will benefit his race. Blackists further believe, Kerwick says, that

…white racism is endemic…Whatever gains black Americans and formerly colonized peoples of color in other parts of the world have made over the decades, white racism remains as formidable, and destructive, a force as it has ever been.

Blackism also requires from “all of its adherents in good standing” that they “express some measure of indignation or rage regarding the historical injustice suffered by blacks and the persistent omnipresence of—what else?—white racism.” Blackists “unabashedly heed the call for ‘social’ or ‘racial justice’” for this means, in effect that ”a robust and activist government…will possess the power necessary to compensate blacks for the past harms that had been visited upon them by white racism.”

Finally in what Jack describes as “the Cliff’s Note” of blackist ideology, obviously absorbed by President Obama and his black supporters, “is the idea of ‘racial authenticity.’ Racial authenticity can be achieved, it promises, by way of the very simple act of affirming blackism!”

Jack quotes Malcolm X on the cultural implications of blackism, particularly the exhibition of revulsion for Christianity as the religion of white colonists and the association of America’s founding with anti-black racism. In the words of Malcolm X, blacks “didn’t land on Plymouth Rock” but “Plymouth Rock landed” on blacks.

Jack acknowledges that Obama, who in the last election won 38% of the white vote, has had to cloak his blackism. But he cites Obama’s speeches and comments to show that the same ideology and resentments that were found in Malcolm X periodically surface in the current occupant of the Oval Office.

Jack argues that it’s perfectly compatible with “blackism” that Obama, in his National Prayer Breakfast reminder of Christian iniquities in what was supposed to be a criticism of ISIS violence, turned his remarks in a blackist direction: “In one and the same breath he speaks of both a white segregationist’s refusal to associate with blacks and an Islamic fanatic’s refusal to grant mercy to a person he cages and eventually burns to death.”

It is not just Obama’s “historical illiteracy” and “moral idiocy” that account for these rhetorical eccentricities. There is an anti-white, anti-Western ideology that drives it. Thus when “he talks of ‘we’ in implying moral parity between Islamic violence and the violence perpetrated by Christians in the past,” “what he is really saying is that you—all of you white Christians—must not shed any of that white guilt that’s paid off so well for the Barack Obamas of the world.”

Jack is even tougher on those white scribblers who seem to be truckling to “blackists,” particularly faux conservatives whom he takes apart with obvious delectation. For example, in the wake of the Michael Brown shooting, Kevin Williamson of National Review took to his high horse to complain about the “militarized police” in Ferguson, ,Missouri and across the US. This for Jack exemplifies his charge that when the Left complains about racism, Conservatism, Inc. respectfully dissents, but also puts itself at a safe distance from the real Right.

As further evidence of this, Jack cites National Review’s Reihan Salaam, who also writes regularly for the left-wing publication Slate, on the outrage of “intra-racial dating.” Salaam expresses shock that so many people (presumably it’s the white ones he’s talking about) manifest strong“same-race preferences” on dating sites like OKCupid. “One assumes”, Salaam opines, “that many people who do have such preferences would either choose not to disclose them publicly or choose to skip the question entirely.” [Is It Racist to Date Only People of Your Own Race? Yes., Slate, April 22 2014] Jack shows that Salaam, and at least implicitly his employer, believes that there is a positive duty to miscegenate.

ORDER IT NOW

Although Salaam would probably be pleased to use government to bring this about, such a project (alas) does not seem feasible. He therefore urges for starters that all social and educational institutions encourage interracial dining. Not one to deny deserved credit, Salaam insists: “The rural white Southerner who dines with nonwhites as a matter of course is doing more to tackle stigma than the urbane white hipster who hardly ever does the same.”

Jack ends his comments on Salaam’s homily by observing that what should be treated as a bad college freshman essay has been “published in a widely-read venue (however much of a rag).” And this “is a truly scandalous commentary on the intellectual and moral state of our culture.”

But Jack has barely scratched the surface of the kind of leftist claptrap t hat “conservative” publications now fill their pages with. Thus he quotes the longtime, nationally syndicated “conservative” columnist Paul Greenberg waxing orgasmic “over President Obama’s decision to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.” Like Obama (and AEI- fixture Linda Chavez), Greenberg insists that not legalizing illegals is incompatible “with the America we know and still want to believe in.”

Apparently the America that Greenberg and other neoconservatives wish us “to believe in” bears a striking similarity to President Obama’s.

Jack Kerwick’s America does not.

Paul Gottfried [ email him ] is a retired Professor of Humanities at Elizabethtown College, PA. He is the author of Multiculturalism and the Politics of Guilt and The Strange Death of Marxism His most recent book is Leo Strauss and the Conservative Movement in America.

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Barack Obama, Blacks, VDare Archives 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
    []
  1. OPEN-BORDER PAUL GREENBERG A HEBREW = HABIRU/APIRU = CUT THROAT BANDITS WHO STOLE LAND AND SOLD WOMEN.

    I read this article with great interest and admire Kerwick standing up for the white race. Thanks to you both.

    Salaam’s demand that white women date colored men is like a bank robber saying that banks have a duty to leave their doors open at night so they can rob them more easily. Shame on him for talking like a beggar.

    On the contrary, we have an affirmative duty to warn white women about the risks of dating blacks (violent deaths, dark/ugly looking children, lower IQ children, more crime ridden society, more backward society, higher risk of STD’s, etc. etc.) In fact, it would be ok to promote laws banning malcegenation, not only to save the white race, but to save society.

    Amazingly, then you mentioned the Hebrew/Apiru Greenberg promoting the alien invasion and “open borders” and lying about it.

    Well, that reminds me of the Habiru/Apiru, the ancient names of the Hebrews who fabricated the old testament myths that Greenberg is probably deluded by and probably believes he is their descendant, has become an alienist, as a result To understand Greenberg, let’s take a look at the Habiru/Apiru, who scholars and archeologists have determined were basically the most despicable “bandits” and “cut throats” who camped outside cities and attacked the peaceful citizens thereof, and wanted “open borders” so they can prey on civilization and steal land and women. They were despised as crooks and criminals by all their more civilized neighbors, from the Egyptians to the Assyrians to the Sumerians. It is all here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru

    http://www.newenglishreview.org/Robert_Wolfe/From_Habiru_to_Hebrews%3A_The_Roots_of_the_Jewish_Tradition/

    Their patriarchs such as Abraham open-bordered his own sister Sarai by lying to her and even sold her to the negro Pharaoh so he could open-border her also, by lying to him too. They would lie, lie and lie, just like Paul Greenberg continues to do so to this day. Like Abraham sold Issac’s mother, Greenberg wants to sell his motherland.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
    Tom R's Jew-hate is really unreasonable. The open-borders Judeo-globalists and their invasive ethnic stormtroopers intend to breed-down, then outright exterminate the Whites because Jews don't wish to be porgom'd, ghetto'd, or holocaust'd. Ever. Again. Certainly, from the Jewish viewpoint, a sound policy. Is this also a sound policy from the White viewpoint? So far, other than a few ronery websites and keyboard commandos, this appears to be the case
    , @puffdaddy
    Why is there an implicit assumption that all non white people hanker to date and procreate with whites? Doesn't that contradict everything these same people say about black, hispanic, etc, supremacy? Why would they want to muddy their own superior waters? Hmmmm……maybe they DO know about HBD!
    , @Tom_R
    CORRECTION:

    THE TERM HABIRU/APIRU MEANS BANDITS AND CUT-THROATS.

    I am sorry I did not clarify the fact that the term Habiru itself means bandits and cut-throats. That is the etymology of the term Apiru/Habiru/Hebrew.

    As per Wikipedia:

    "SA.GAZ 'murderer, robber', literally 'one who smashes sinews', is an original Sumerian nominal compound attested as early as ca. 2500 BC. It is later equated with Akkadian habbātu 'plunderer, bandit' and šaggāšu 'murderer'.

    "Abdi-Heba, the Egyptian vassal ruler of Jerusalem in the Amarna period (mid-1330s BC), wrote a series of letters to the Egyptian king in which he complained about the activities of the "Habiru", who were plundering the king's lands."

    Hebrews still plundering lands, nowadays by bribing politicians and inciting the alien invasion. It has been several thousand years and the barbarians have not yet become civilized.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/pgottfried/jack-kerwick-on-barack-obama-and-the-ideology-of-blackism/#comment-1293008
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. There’s quite a psychological barrier to coming to this belief, but really, just start noticing the names of the people pushing the most extreme forms of immigration and white race denigration – ‘white wounding’, and so forth. Jews. Learn to recognize the names. Sure not all Jews are that way but, for being 2% of the population they make an outsized contribution in their extremism and volume. Sure they’re the most talented and intellectual and thus the most inclined to idealism, but, it’s to the same effect. But over and above that I think what allows them to be so extreme is that it isn’t as self-destructive as it appears, their Jewish identity is more core, giving them an Archimedian point from which to denigrate plain ‘white’ identity. Plus, historically being excluded from white identity (and also excluding themselves), they have an interest in being just one of many ethnicities, rather than outside a strong central one that isn’t them. My opinion. I’ve been persuaded on ‘the Jewish Question’.

    Read More
  3. @Tom_R
    OPEN-BORDER PAUL GREENBERG A HEBREW = HABIRU/APIRU = CUT THROAT BANDITS WHO STOLE LAND AND SOLD WOMEN.

    I read this article with great interest and admire Kerwick standing up for the white race. Thanks to you both.

    Salaam’s demand that white women date colored men is like a bank robber saying that banks have a duty to leave their doors open at night so they can rob them more easily. Shame on him for talking like a beggar.

    On the contrary, we have an affirmative duty to warn white women about the risks of dating blacks (violent deaths, dark/ugly looking children, lower IQ children, more crime ridden society, more backward society, higher risk of STD’s, etc. etc.) In fact, it would be ok to promote laws banning malcegenation, not only to save the white race, but to save society.

    Amazingly, then you mentioned the Hebrew/Apiru Greenberg promoting the alien invasion and “open borders” and lying about it.

    Well, that reminds me of the Habiru/Apiru, the ancient names of the Hebrews who fabricated the old testament myths that Greenberg is probably deluded by and probably believes he is their descendant, has become an alienist, as a result To understand Greenberg, let’s take a look at the Habiru/Apiru, who scholars and archeologists have determined were basically the most despicable “bandits” and “cut throats” who camped outside cities and attacked the peaceful citizens thereof, and wanted “open borders” so they can prey on civilization and steal land and women. They were despised as crooks and criminals by all their more civilized neighbors, from the Egyptians to the Assyrians to the Sumerians. It is all here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru

    http://www.newenglishreview.org/Robert_Wolfe/From_Habiru_to_Hebrews%3A_The_Roots_of_the_Jewish_Tradition/

    Their patriarchs such as Abraham open-bordered his own sister Sarai by lying to her and even sold her to the negro Pharaoh so he could open-border her also, by lying to him too. They would lie, lie and lie, just like Paul Greenberg continues to do so to this day. Like Abraham sold Issac's mother, Greenberg wants to sell his motherland.

    Tom R’s Jew-hate is really unreasonable. The open-borders Judeo-globalists and their invasive ethnic stormtroopers intend to breed-down, then outright exterminate the Whites because Jews don’t wish to be porgom’d, ghetto’d, or holocaust’d. Ever. Again. Certainly, from the Jewish viewpoint, a sound policy. Is this also a sound policy from the White viewpoint? So far, other than a few ronery websites and keyboard commandos, this appears to be the case

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ozymandias
    "Tom R’s Jew-hate is really unreasonable."

    Yes, he is completely consumed, and consequently defeated, by it. I rarely bother with his psychotic ranting. It's not delusional ranting, though; much of what he says is based on truth. Abraham did pimp his wife/sister to a pharaoh (not The Pharaoh) not once but twice. Each time there was a scandal when it was discovered she was married; each time they were paid very, very well to make it and themselves go away. Seed money for the dynasty.

    "Certainly, from the Jewish viewpoint, a sound policy."

    Not if you get caught it isn't. Because if you get caught, you may well bring about the very thing you were trying to avoid.
  4. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Is Obama a black man? What is the definition of ‘black’. Truly these articles about blacks, blackism (whatever the hell that is) are quite silly and grownup men should have something better to write about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country
    Are you one of those "I don't see color" types?

    I love you guys. You can be just as racist as the rest of us - living in white neighborhoods, sending your kids to white schools, etc. - and then condemn anyone for noticing your behavior simply by saying, "I can't believe you even noticed that my neighborhood is white. Why, I don't even see race. Shame on you!"

    It's brilliant.

    Reminds of this scene from South Park:

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xiy2ry_south-park-compares-student-athletes-to-slaves_news
    , @HerewardMW
    Was Trayvon Martin a "black man" or Michael Brown? If you can't give me a definition of black from first principles then how can we know?

    All this talk of "black" lives mattering is silly and grownup men should find something better to complain about.
  5. Anyone who is published at David Horowitz’s FrontPage magazine is 101% member of Israel Hasbara Committee, and is not worth wasting one’s time unless he is a White Supremacist or a Zionist. Horowitz is among the “America’s top 12 Dirty Islamophobes” selected by his fellow Jews at the ‘Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR)’ in October 2008.

    Barack Ben Obama is not Black – his mother was White American Christian CIA operative, and his father was a non-practicing Muslim from Kenya. During his 8-years in the White House, Obama has all energies in the interests of Israel and the Wall Street – while throwing country’s 16% Black population under bus.

    “I think when it is all over, people are going to say that Barack Obama is the first Jewish president,” – Abner Mikvaner, former Chicago’s Zionist Congressman, a Federal Judge and White House counsel to former president Bill Clinton……

    http://rehmat1.com/2008/12/13/obama-the-first-jewish-president/

    Read More
  6. “It is not just Obama’s “historical illiteracy” and “moral idiocy” that account for these rhetorical eccentricities.”

    Made my day, ha!

    If I put on my filter for ‘Israel at all costs’ and ‘Muslim’s are unconditionally evil’, I find FrontpageMag has some great articles.

    Read More
  7. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Groovy Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Paul Gottfried

    Don’t hyper-intellectualize everything. There is only one thing that we should be talking about, and it is this:The passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act and how it emerged, and why it was passed in the context of the Cold War. The Cold War is the fundamental issue. Barak Obama is a creature of the Cold War…he was born into this world as a direct consequence of The Cold War.

    Read More
  8. @Haxo Angmark
    Tom R's Jew-hate is really unreasonable. The open-borders Judeo-globalists and their invasive ethnic stormtroopers intend to breed-down, then outright exterminate the Whites because Jews don't wish to be porgom'd, ghetto'd, or holocaust'd. Ever. Again. Certainly, from the Jewish viewpoint, a sound policy. Is this also a sound policy from the White viewpoint? So far, other than a few ronery websites and keyboard commandos, this appears to be the case

    “Tom R’s Jew-hate is really unreasonable.”

    Yes, he is completely consumed, and consequently defeated, by it. I rarely bother with his psychotic ranting. It’s not delusional ranting, though; much of what he says is based on truth. Abraham did pimp his wife/sister to a pharaoh (not The Pharaoh) not once but twice. Each time there was a scandal when it was discovered she was married; each time they were paid very, very well to make it and themselves go away. Seed money for the dynasty.

    “Certainly, from the Jewish viewpoint, a sound policy.”

    Not if you get caught it isn’t. Because if you get caught, you may well bring about the very thing you were trying to avoid.

    Read More
  9. Poor Obama, not Black enough to win the Illinois’s 1st Congressional District, yet too Black to be President (in the eyes of some).

    If there is one thing that stands out in Obama’s career, it is a Chameleon-like capacity to appear as others want him to appear. You can watch his speeches to Black audiences versus non-Black audiences if you want to see what I mean. Speculations on whether he is “really Black” or “really White” must be suspended, he is like someone who speaks 25 accents flawlessly.

    No, Obama’s not driven by “Blackism” but that multi-racial philosophy of “Opportunism” combined with an actor’s instinct for the role of some multi-racial West Wing pol of the new America. If substance were only the same as style . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    "Poor Obama...too Black to be President (in the eyes of some)"

    Not very many, apparently. I wouldn't pity him on that account, anyway. Without the specter of anti-black racism I'd doubt he'd have the motivation to be president. Certainly social justice, spreading the wealth, world peace (after all the bombing), or whatever else it is he thinks fuels him don't cut it.
  10. Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn’t considered sexist. There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don’t think all the diversity training in the world can change this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Asher
    Accusing people of "sexism" for discriminating in dating on the basis of physical sex is coming down the pike.
    , @guest
    I imagine there are people who think only dating one sex is "sexist" (or however they'd put it). That kind of non-discrimination won't become de rigueur--or possibly a hate crime--so long as gays are in the catbird seat. For now we have to pretend bisexuals barely exist, and that everyone's born either gay or straight.
    , @Stan D Mute

    There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don’t think all the diversity training in the world can change this.
     
    Some part of this is surely predicated on how strongly one associates "dating" (sex) with procreation. For myself, the thought of a mulatto child or of a mestizo child is so disturbing that I could never consider dating any nonwhite female. Obviously my awareness of this has increased with age, but even in my most mindless youth I never had the slightest interest in nonwhite females.
    , @Truth

    Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn’t considered sexist.
     
    Give it time.
  11. Whether we call it “Cultural Marxism” or “Multiculturalism” or “Diversity” or “One-Worldism” or “Globalism”, it is not some sinister plot that elected pols are pushing on the Country. It is the narrative of the day, and if you want to be a fish today, you have to swim in it, just as you have better be up on your Marxism if you wanted to get anywhere in the Brezhnev regime.

    I am sure certain elements of the media and the Academy are pushing this stuff (you can look at all the “diversity initiatives” at college campuses, and shows like Transparent, which have their own ideological editors), but elected polls are simply trying to cobble together 50.4% of the vote, and will say whatever they think will get them that 50.4%.

    I’m sure Obama choose the Democratic Party because he was Black and he lived in Chicago, and so there was no opportunity as a Republican. I’m sure Obama stayed with the Democratic Party because he saw it as a ticket to national power (which it was). I’m sure Obama will continue to speak the Democratic Party rhetoric, until he leaves office. Further, if he gets a job in some cushy non-profit doing “humanitarian” work, do not doubt he will waiver. On the other hand, if he goes to Wall Street or lobbies for business, I imagine he will opt for less hope and more change.

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    Obama wasn't born in Chicago. He chose to go to one of the blackest places in the country and run against the blackiest of Black candidates in the blackest of districts in front of Black-tastic voters.
  12. @Tom_R
    OPEN-BORDER PAUL GREENBERG A HEBREW = HABIRU/APIRU = CUT THROAT BANDITS WHO STOLE LAND AND SOLD WOMEN.

    I read this article with great interest and admire Kerwick standing up for the white race. Thanks to you both.

    Salaam’s demand that white women date colored men is like a bank robber saying that banks have a duty to leave their doors open at night so they can rob them more easily. Shame on him for talking like a beggar.

    On the contrary, we have an affirmative duty to warn white women about the risks of dating blacks (violent deaths, dark/ugly looking children, lower IQ children, more crime ridden society, more backward society, higher risk of STD’s, etc. etc.) In fact, it would be ok to promote laws banning malcegenation, not only to save the white race, but to save society.

    Amazingly, then you mentioned the Hebrew/Apiru Greenberg promoting the alien invasion and “open borders” and lying about it.

    Well, that reminds me of the Habiru/Apiru, the ancient names of the Hebrews who fabricated the old testament myths that Greenberg is probably deluded by and probably believes he is their descendant, has become an alienist, as a result To understand Greenberg, let’s take a look at the Habiru/Apiru, who scholars and archeologists have determined were basically the most despicable “bandits” and “cut throats” who camped outside cities and attacked the peaceful citizens thereof, and wanted “open borders” so they can prey on civilization and steal land and women. They were despised as crooks and criminals by all their more civilized neighbors, from the Egyptians to the Assyrians to the Sumerians. It is all here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru

    http://www.newenglishreview.org/Robert_Wolfe/From_Habiru_to_Hebrews%3A_The_Roots_of_the_Jewish_Tradition/

    Their patriarchs such as Abraham open-bordered his own sister Sarai by lying to her and even sold her to the negro Pharaoh so he could open-border her also, by lying to him too. They would lie, lie and lie, just like Paul Greenberg continues to do so to this day. Like Abraham sold Issac's mother, Greenberg wants to sell his motherland.

    Why is there an implicit assumption that all non white people hanker to date and procreate with whites? Doesn’t that contradict everything these same people say about black, hispanic, etc, supremacy? Why would they want to muddy their own superior waters? Hmmmm……maybe they DO know about HBD!

    Read More
  13. I think the tactical mistake encouraged by essays like this one from Dr. Gottfried is that politicians are not only driving the bus, but building the bus. This is the Religious Right error, elect politicians that support our values, get them to enact laws that support our values. . . then have them overturned by the Supreme Court. It is control over the education system and control over the media that builds the bus, not politicians and not enacted laws.

    Read More
  14. @Anonymous
    Is Obama a black man? What is the definition of 'black'. Truly these articles about blacks, blackism (whatever the hell that is) are quite silly and grownup men should have something better to write about.

    Are you one of those “I don’t see color” types?

    I love you guys. You can be just as racist as the rest of us – living in white neighborhoods, sending your kids to white schools, etc. – and then condemn anyone for noticing your behavior simply by saying, “I can’t believe you even noticed that my neighborhood is white. Why, I don’t even see race. Shame on you!”

    It’s brilliant.

    Reminds of this scene from South Park:

    Read More
  15. As far as miscegenation goes, there does seem to be a pronounced preference on the part of White males for Asian females. If anything, this trends right not left. If (hypothetically) you raised a generation of entitled cows, I wouldn’t see much in the way of an alternative to miscegenation. After all, the Black males still like the White females.

    The “miscegenation problem” gets to the root of the problems of White Nationalism. If there is a “White” culture, it is post-racial, post-religious, hyper-individualistic, materialistic, narcissistic and entitled. If there are any authentically “white people” left, you can find them among the women at the Hillary Clinton campaign rallies with the coat hanger signs. This is also the problem with “conservatism”–conserving what? If anything, what is called for is a post-White Nationalism of the post-white makers against the takers and the fakers.

    Read More
  16. @JEGG
    Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn't considered sexist. There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don't think all the diversity training in the world can change this.

    Accusing people of “sexism” for discriminating in dating on the basis of physical sex is coming down the pike.

    Read More
  17. Here is what I am talking about:

    http://jezebel.com/5960099/why-the-end-of-white-men-is-good-for-actually-good-for-white-men

    Marry an Asian, a traditional Hispanic, a Slav or an African, and pump out children. Adopt Confucianism and meld it with the Old Time Religion. Asian Values. The end of white men is actually good for white men. When the Left finally gets around to lining up all the deracinated White Protestants as a final act of “racial reconciliation”, your children won’t be among them.

    Leave the white women with a pool of potential mates in which OJ Simpson and Bill Cosby constitute “catches” relative to their compatriots.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    Have you ever thought about why European cities have world's highest numbers of brothels and LGBT, but lowest birth rates?

    A 2009 study, titled The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness, conducted by professors Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers (University of Pennsylvania) for the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) – concluded that though American women were better off economically since 1970s – socially they feel more miserable than before….. The women who have been to a women shelter (there are 300 of those in Canada as compared to none for the men) – will tell you how callously they are treated by the hags employed there. Distressed women are pressured to end their marriages and are offered help and resources to do so. Feminists are not interested in the welfare of women. They rely on domestic violence for their cushy jobs and to emasculate men – by portraying them as abusers….”

    http://rehmat1.com/2009/10/17/study-american-women-are-not-happy/
  18. Only in the last few decades has the perfectly normal human trait to want to associate with others of similar ethnicity and background come to be considered racist. When, for example, the Irish, Italians and Jews who settled in our Eastern cities in the late 19th and early 20th centuries coalesced into relatively homogeneous communities, no one thought that odd or reprehensible–much less “racist.” These groups obviously shared cultures, histories, attitudes and (often) religions, and thus their members felt comfortable and compatible with one another. No doubt there were individual Irish, Italians and Jews for whom these factors were not important and who as a result chose to live outside the “ghetto.” Nor were these communities hermetically sealed. Certainly, non-Jews ventured into the lower East Side of Manhattan for business or social reasons and were treated with dignity and respect.

    What is wrong with this? Why shouldn’t I as an individual, resident, or small businessperson be free to associate with whom I choose, provided that all races are treated equally under the law? If someone wants to put out an “Irish need not apply” sign, that’s his problem. There are always other jobs available, and in any event such attitudes tend to diminish over time. Can anyone imagine a business even wanting to post such a sign today?

    Read More
  19. I link to the Jezebel article not as an endorsement.

    Unsurprisingly, the author has a long history of mental illness and drug abuse, has at least one murder-suicide attempt with an ex-girlfriend, has been married four times and was driven out of the Academy due to his abuse of narcotics and his practice of sleeping with students.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Schwyzer

    There is only one way out of this hole, and it is not blaming Jews or Blacks for the mess we are in, it is acknowledging Anglo-American Civilization is in irredeemable decline, and re-integrating those healthy (traditional) aspects of Anglo-American culture with peoples and philosophies that are fundamentally “life-affirming”.

    Read More
  20. @Tulip
    Poor Obama, not Black enough to win the Illinois's 1st Congressional District, yet too Black to be President (in the eyes of some).

    If there is one thing that stands out in Obama's career, it is a Chameleon-like capacity to appear as others want him to appear. You can watch his speeches to Black audiences versus non-Black audiences if you want to see what I mean. Speculations on whether he is "really Black" or "really White" must be suspended, he is like someone who speaks 25 accents flawlessly.

    No, Obama's not driven by "Blackism" but that multi-racial philosophy of "Opportunism" combined with an actor's instinct for the role of some multi-racial West Wing pol of the new America. If substance were only the same as style . . .

    “Poor Obama…too Black to be President (in the eyes of some)”

    Not very many, apparently. I wouldn’t pity him on that account, anyway. Without the specter of anti-black racism I’d doubt he’d have the motivation to be president. Certainly social justice, spreading the wealth, world peace (after all the bombing), or whatever else it is he thinks fuels him don’t cut it.

    Read More
  21. @Tom_R
    OPEN-BORDER PAUL GREENBERG A HEBREW = HABIRU/APIRU = CUT THROAT BANDITS WHO STOLE LAND AND SOLD WOMEN.

    I read this article with great interest and admire Kerwick standing up for the white race. Thanks to you both.

    Salaam’s demand that white women date colored men is like a bank robber saying that banks have a duty to leave their doors open at night so they can rob them more easily. Shame on him for talking like a beggar.

    On the contrary, we have an affirmative duty to warn white women about the risks of dating blacks (violent deaths, dark/ugly looking children, lower IQ children, more crime ridden society, more backward society, higher risk of STD’s, etc. etc.) In fact, it would be ok to promote laws banning malcegenation, not only to save the white race, but to save society.

    Amazingly, then you mentioned the Hebrew/Apiru Greenberg promoting the alien invasion and “open borders” and lying about it.

    Well, that reminds me of the Habiru/Apiru, the ancient names of the Hebrews who fabricated the old testament myths that Greenberg is probably deluded by and probably believes he is their descendant, has become an alienist, as a result To understand Greenberg, let’s take a look at the Habiru/Apiru, who scholars and archeologists have determined were basically the most despicable “bandits” and “cut throats” who camped outside cities and attacked the peaceful citizens thereof, and wanted “open borders” so they can prey on civilization and steal land and women. They were despised as crooks and criminals by all their more civilized neighbors, from the Egyptians to the Assyrians to the Sumerians. It is all here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru

    http://www.newenglishreview.org/Robert_Wolfe/From_Habiru_to_Hebrews%3A_The_Roots_of_the_Jewish_Tradition/

    Their patriarchs such as Abraham open-bordered his own sister Sarai by lying to her and even sold her to the negro Pharaoh so he could open-border her also, by lying to him too. They would lie, lie and lie, just like Paul Greenberg continues to do so to this day. Like Abraham sold Issac's mother, Greenberg wants to sell his motherland.

    CORRECTION:

    THE TERM HABIRU/APIRU MEANS BANDITS AND CUT-THROATS.

    I am sorry I did not clarify the fact that the term Habiru itself means bandits and cut-throats. That is the etymology of the term Apiru/Habiru/Hebrew.

    As per Wikipedia:

    “SA.GAZ ‘murderer, robber’, literally ‘one who smashes sinews’, is an original Sumerian nominal compound attested as early as ca. 2500 BC. It is later equated with Akkadian habbātu ‘plunderer, bandit’ and šaggāšu ‘murderer’.

    “Abdi-Heba, the Egyptian vassal ruler of Jerusalem in the Amarna period (mid-1330s BC), wrote a series of letters to the Egyptian king in which he complained about the activities of the “Habiru”, who were plundering the king’s lands.”

    Hebrews still plundering lands, nowadays by bribing politicians and inciting the alien invasion. It has been several thousand years and the barbarians have not yet become civilized.

    Read More
  22. @JEGG
    Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn't considered sexist. There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don't think all the diversity training in the world can change this.

    I imagine there are people who think only dating one sex is “sexist” (or however they’d put it). That kind of non-discrimination won’t become de rigueur–or possibly a hate crime–so long as gays are in the catbird seat. For now we have to pretend bisexuals barely exist, and that everyone’s born either gay or straight.

    Read More
  23. @Tulip
    Whether we call it "Cultural Marxism" or "Multiculturalism" or "Diversity" or "One-Worldism" or "Globalism", it is not some sinister plot that elected pols are pushing on the Country. It is the narrative of the day, and if you want to be a fish today, you have to swim in it, just as you have better be up on your Marxism if you wanted to get anywhere in the Brezhnev regime.

    I am sure certain elements of the media and the Academy are pushing this stuff (you can look at all the "diversity initiatives" at college campuses, and shows like Transparent, which have their own ideological editors), but elected polls are simply trying to cobble together 50.4% of the vote, and will say whatever they think will get them that 50.4%.

    I'm sure Obama choose the Democratic Party because he was Black and he lived in Chicago, and so there was no opportunity as a Republican. I'm sure Obama stayed with the Democratic Party because he saw it as a ticket to national power (which it was). I'm sure Obama will continue to speak the Democratic Party rhetoric, until he leaves office. Further, if he gets a job in some cushy non-profit doing "humanitarian" work, do not doubt he will waiver. On the other hand, if he goes to Wall Street or lobbies for business, I imagine he will opt for less hope and more change.

    Obama wasn’t born in Chicago. He chose to go to one of the blackest places in the country and run against the blackiest of Black candidates in the blackest of districts in front of Black-tastic voters.

    Read More
  24. @Anonymous
    Is Obama a black man? What is the definition of 'black'. Truly these articles about blacks, blackism (whatever the hell that is) are quite silly and grownup men should have something better to write about.

    Was Trayvon Martin a “black man” or Michael Brown? If you can’t give me a definition of black from first principles then how can we know?

    All this talk of “black” lives mattering is silly and grownup men should find something better to complain about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Quercusalba
    You know nothing about me and have made a lot of assumptions and you are wrong about all of them. As for South Park, I've never seen it and I didn't bother to watch the link you posted as I'm not interested. I read my comment again and saw nothing in there about Blacks Lives Matter and frankly I'm not interested in that either. Surprised. You should be because as I said you've made assumptions about me and you couldn't be more wrong.
    , @guest
    "If you can't give me a definition of black from first principles then how can we know?"

    What are you, a logical positivist? Why should we need an essential definition of blackness? If we can't all agree on who is black or what determines blackness, so what? We all know the two basic criteria: 1). you are black if you look black, and 2) you are black if you identify as being black. Right away we run into problems, because who looks black, and to whom? And what if you identify as being black and no one else agrees (like Rachel Dolezal)? These are minor problems.

    If you're looking for a 2+2=4 sort of definition of blackness, sorry. But don't let that stop the rest of us from pretending such a thing exists, even if we can't pin it down precisely.
  25. With the Civil Rights Act now more than 50 years in the rear view mirror and the last vestiges of de jure and de facto segregation legally prohibited almost as long the problem is now… reality.

    White ‘racism’ is not the cause of black failure. It has existed always and everywhere in the world where blacks have come into contact with other races. It matters not the opinions or attitudes of others about blacks be they good or bad. Black failure is pre0rdained. Under these circumstances ‘Blackism’ or whatever other term for whinging you choose to use is the only ‘strategy’ left. You cannot rise up and topple the existing civilization nor secede from it without falling even deeper into squalor and ignorance. Inflicting yourself on the superior population and insisting they are responsible is the only route to survival!

    Read More
  26. I was a stanford student in days when the old classics were being thrown out for the freako works, Aristotle for Baldwin, etc… I had a radical Native American girlfriend (it was the punk rock thing to do), and hung out with Cory Book.er a bit via a football player friend.

    This radical Indian girlfriend was very critical of my Classics degree, as “That is exactly what we are trying to destroy”, presumably referring, on the one hand, to Western Culture in the objective and the college radicals in the subjective, of whom Booker was most definitely a member.

    My friends and self happened upon, one day, a protest of these radicals, where a bunch of ‘Blackists’ staged a sit in at the President Kennedy’s office. They were finally carried off in a bus,though I doubt they came to any harm as stanford is quite protective of its students. My cadre, members of a campus punk rock band, mockingly shouted repeatedly during the event the stock protester motto, “Hell no we won’t go” as the whole thing seemed quite anarchic and was hence suitable and pleasing, and we felt it our duty to add a bit of humour and chaos to this festival of anarchy.

    Years later (post-Anarchist) I surf Booker’s facebook page from time to time and notice that he has definitely become a major Blackist. He advocates economic intervention to bring about financial equality of blacks with, I guess, everyone else. This sort of seems socialist at first, but, as this article points out, it is much more just racial supremism.

    Contemplating on these phenomena, I have to see parallels with early Christianity. It fascinates me how Christianity spread like wildfire in the Hellenistic period and after. Eusebius makes claims that there were Christians prior to Christ, then came Christ, and the flame was ignited, not to be quenched for millennia.

    I conceive of Political Correctness, Blackism, Cultural Marxism, the whole mish mash of the leftist ideology as similar to this early Christianity. And Barak is the Messiah, the Blakhrist, if you will. And the speed at which this ideology has progressed from America, through Europe is very similar to the early spread of Christianity.

    Unfortunately, however, all ideologies are not created equal. The infant Christianity was held under the waters of Martyrdom and survived, proving its fitness. Political correctness, however, is a sickly infant and will not survive its predilection for self-hatred. In a way this is comforting, but the question is really just how much damage it will do before it takes its last gurgling breath?

    Read More
  27. @HerewardMW
    Was Trayvon Martin a "black man" or Michael Brown? If you can't give me a definition of black from first principles then how can we know?

    All this talk of "black" lives mattering is silly and grownup men should find something better to complain about.

    You know nothing about me and have made a lot of assumptions and you are wrong about all of them. As for South Park, I’ve never seen it and I didn’t bother to watch the link you posted as I’m not interested. I read my comment again and saw nothing in there about Blacks Lives Matter and frankly I’m not interested in that either. Surprised. You should be because as I said you’ve made assumptions about me and you couldn’t be more wrong.

    Read More
  28. But reserves his harshest invective for whites who excuse blacks for their astronomic crime rates.

    As it should be, though I’d use “pathology” in lieu of “crime rates.”

    …white racism is endemic…Whatever gains black Americans and formerly colonized peoples of color in other parts of the world have made over the decades, white racism remains as formidable, and destructive, a force as it has ever been.

    Even in a race as inclined away from introspection as blacks, this position has got to be a cynical one for a great many. It’s got to occur to some of them that this is a convenient fig leaf for black pathology and incompetence, that it doesn’t map to facts on the ground.

    ”a robust and activist government…will possess the power necessary to compensate blacks for the past harms that had been visited upon them by white racism.”

    Here we enter The Paradox; how can such a hideously white gov’t be anything but a formidable, destructive force for white racism, how can a gov’t that isn’t so hideously white be guilted into paying up, and how can a non-white gov’t afford to pay up?

    Any black with an IQ over 115 has got to have trouble avoiding the fact that YT is the best thing that ever happened to blacks.

    “In one and the same breath he speaks of both a white segregationist’s refusal to associate with blacks and an Islamic fanatic’s refusal to grant mercy to a person he cages and eventually burns to death.”

    Why would anyone who was not trying to cast white segregationists in a good light speak of those things in the same breath?

    There’s quite a psychological barrier to coming to this belief, but really, just start noticing the names of the people pushing the most extreme forms of immigration and white race denigration – ‘white wounding’, and so forth. Jews.

    Indeed. Just look at this article. A white Catholic good guy calling out a black guy, a subcontinental, and a Jew.

    Of course, ’twas a Righteous Jew who brought us the article here. Paul’s a mensch.

    Sure they’re the most talented and intellectual and thus the most inclined to idealism, but, it’s to the same effect.

    Here I have to disagree. Jews aren’t idealists. Jews are pragmatists who make a big show of being idealists. But their idealism manages not to impinge on their ethnic homeland, Apartheid Israel. But Apartheid Israel is precisely where their supposed idealism should fall hardest. Instead, we see the opposite; pragmatic right-wing self-interest rules in Israel. And diaspora Jewry is Apartheid Israel’s BFF.

    Tom R’s Jew-hate is really unreasonable. The open-borders Judeo-globalists and their invasive ethnic stormtroopers intend to breed-down, then outright exterminate the Whites because Jews don’t wish to be porgom’d, ghetto’d, or holocaust’d. Ever. Again. Certainly, from the Jewish viewpoint, a sound policy. Is this also a sound policy from the White viewpoint? So far, other than a few ronery websites and keyboard commandos, this appears to be the case

    Seems like a comment from an insane person.

    Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn’t considered sexist. There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don’t think all the diversity training in the world can change this.

    Please explain to me why I should tolerate having reality framed like this. Your point is a good one, but the framing is more suited to Facebook or whatever.

    The “miscegenation problem” gets to the root of the problems of White Nationalism. If there is a “White” culture, it is post-racial, post-religious, hyper-individualistic, materialistic, narcissistic and entitled. If there are any authentically “white people” left, you can find them among the women at the Hillary Clinton campaign rallies with the coat hanger signs. This is also the problem with “conservatism”–conserving what? If anything, what is called for is a post-White Nationalism of the post-white makers against the takers and the fakers.

    I’m sure there were people in the west the early 80′s writing similar things about the Soviet Union, communism, and the root of the problems of capitalism. As it turned out, everybody Loved the Party, until they didn’t. You might as well write about the invincibility of communist beliefs in the absence of an alternative. White Americans believe what they are told because the vast majority have never heard any alternatives. You’re probably young, I’m guessing? People tend to wisen up as they get older, and you’ll notice it in your cohort.

    Marry an Asian, a traditional Hispanic, a Slav or an African, and pump out children. Adopt Confucianism and meld it with the Old Time Religion. Asian Values. The end of white men is actually good for white men. When the Left finally gets around to lining up all the deracinated White Protestants as a final act of “racial reconciliation”, your children won’t be among them.

    Or maybe you’re just a nut.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Whites produced this culture. Whites freed the slaves. Whites ended Jim Crow. Whites enacted comprehensive civil rights legislation. Whites opened the borders to everyone. The Whites want everyone regardless of your race, creed, color to come here. Whites don't even care if you are capable of working or whether you will just live off the dole, the Whites want you here. Whites (mostly) elected Obama. There is nothing whiter than "anti-racism" around, hell, Whites had to make up a bunch of sexual identities just so Whites could play victim in campus Cowboys-and-Indian games too!

    Whites are responsible for the Enlightenment, they invented capitalism, socialism, communism, liberalism, secularism, environmentalism, feminism you name it.

    Who wants to play the Lone Ranger? Whites do. Who wants to play Robin Hood? Whites do.

    These are White stories. I don't know of any other culture where there is a story of someone in the in-group going around protecting members of the out-group from ignorant and bigoted members of the in-group.

    Nothing in contemporary American society is some radical foreign idea, all of it mostly grew out of Anglo-Protestantism and Anglo-secularism and the Enlightenment.

    Rene Guenon was coming at things from a different angle, but perhaps what is required in the end is simply submission to the Other. . . or at least adopt.

  29. White Americans believe what they are told because the vast majority have never heard any alternatives.

    Oh, and they speak what they are told because they are under pain of punishment.

    Read More
  30. @JEGG
    Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn't considered sexist. There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don't think all the diversity training in the world can change this.

    There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don’t think all the diversity training in the world can change this.

    Some part of this is surely predicated on how strongly one associates “dating” (sex) with procreation. For myself, the thought of a mulatto child or of a mestizo child is so disturbing that I could never consider dating any nonwhite female. Obviously my awareness of this has increased with age, but even in my most mindless youth I never had the slightest interest in nonwhite females.

    Read More
  31. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Svigor

    But reserves his harshest invective for whites who excuse blacks for their astronomic crime rates.
     
    As it should be, though I'd use "pathology" in lieu of "crime rates."

    …white racism is endemic…Whatever gains black Americans and formerly colonized peoples of color in other parts of the world have made over the decades, white racism remains as formidable, and destructive, a force as it has ever been.
     
    Even in a race as inclined away from introspection as blacks, this position has got to be a cynical one for a great many. It's got to occur to some of them that this is a convenient fig leaf for black pathology and incompetence, that it doesn't map to facts on the ground.

    ”a robust and activist government…will possess the power necessary to compensate blacks for the past harms that had been visited upon them by white racism.”
     
    Here we enter The Paradox; how can such a hideously white gov't be anything but a formidable, destructive force for white racism, how can a gov't that isn't so hideously white be guilted into paying up, and how can a non-white gov't afford to pay up?

    Any black with an IQ over 115 has got to have trouble avoiding the fact that YT is the best thing that ever happened to blacks.

    “In one and the same breath he speaks of both a white segregationist’s refusal to associate with blacks and an Islamic fanatic’s refusal to grant mercy to a person he cages and eventually burns to death.”
     
    Why would anyone who was not trying to cast white segregationists in a good light speak of those things in the same breath?

    There’s quite a psychological barrier to coming to this belief, but really, just start noticing the names of the people pushing the most extreme forms of immigration and white race denigration – ‘white wounding’, and so forth. Jews.
     
    Indeed. Just look at this article. A white Catholic good guy calling out a black guy, a subcontinental, and a Jew.

    Of course, 'twas a Righteous Jew who brought us the article here. Paul's a mensch.

    Sure they’re the most talented and intellectual and thus the most inclined to idealism, but, it’s to the same effect.
     
    Here I have to disagree. Jews aren't idealists. Jews are pragmatists who make a big show of being idealists. But their idealism manages not to impinge on their ethnic homeland, Apartheid Israel. But Apartheid Israel is precisely where their supposed idealism should fall hardest. Instead, we see the opposite; pragmatic right-wing self-interest rules in Israel. And diaspora Jewry is Apartheid Israel's BFF.

    Tom R’s Jew-hate is really unreasonable. The open-borders Judeo-globalists and their invasive ethnic stormtroopers intend to breed-down, then outright exterminate the Whites because Jews don’t wish to be porgom’d, ghetto’d, or holocaust’d. Ever. Again. Certainly, from the Jewish viewpoint, a sound policy. Is this also a sound policy from the White viewpoint? So far, other than a few ronery websites and keyboard commandos, this appears to be the case
     
    Seems like a comment from an insane person.

    Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn’t considered sexist. There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don’t think all the diversity training in the world can change this.
     
    Please explain to me why I should tolerate having reality framed like this. Your point is a good one, but the framing is more suited to Facebook or whatever.

    The “miscegenation problem” gets to the root of the problems of White Nationalism. If there is a “White” culture, it is post-racial, post-religious, hyper-individualistic, materialistic, narcissistic and entitled. If there are any authentically “white people” left, you can find them among the women at the Hillary Clinton campaign rallies with the coat hanger signs. This is also the problem with “conservatism”–conserving what? If anything, what is called for is a post-White Nationalism of the post-white makers against the takers and the fakers.
     
    I'm sure there were people in the west the early 80's writing similar things about the Soviet Union, communism, and the root of the problems of capitalism. As it turned out, everybody Loved the Party, until they didn't. You might as well write about the invincibility of communist beliefs in the absence of an alternative. White Americans believe what they are told because the vast majority have never heard any alternatives. You're probably young, I'm guessing? People tend to wisen up as they get older, and you'll notice it in your cohort.

    Marry an Asian, a traditional Hispanic, a Slav or an African, and pump out children. Adopt Confucianism and meld it with the Old Time Religion. Asian Values. The end of white men is actually good for white men. When the Left finally gets around to lining up all the deracinated White Protestants as a final act of “racial reconciliation”, your children won’t be among them.
     
    Or maybe you're just a nut.

    Whites produced this culture. Whites freed the slaves. Whites ended Jim Crow. Whites enacted comprehensive civil rights legislation. Whites opened the borders to everyone. The Whites want everyone regardless of your race, creed, color to come here. Whites don’t even care if you are capable of working or whether you will just live off the dole, the Whites want you here. Whites (mostly) elected Obama. There is nothing whiter than “anti-racism” around, hell, Whites had to make up a bunch of sexual identities just so Whites could play victim in campus Cowboys-and-Indian games too!

    Whites are responsible for the Enlightenment, they invented capitalism, socialism, communism, liberalism, secularism, environmentalism, feminism you name it.

    Who wants to play the Lone Ranger? Whites do. Who wants to play Robin Hood? Whites do.

    These are White stories. I don’t know of any other culture where there is a story of someone in the in-group going around protecting members of the out-group from ignorant and bigoted members of the in-group.

    Nothing in contemporary American society is some radical foreign idea, all of it mostly grew out of Anglo-Protestantism and Anglo-secularism and the Enlightenment.

    Rene Guenon was coming at things from a different angle, but perhaps what is required in the end is simply submission to the Other. . . or at least adopt.

    Read More
  32. @Tulip
    Here is what I am talking about:

    http://jezebel.com/5960099/why-the-end-of-white-men-is-good-for-actually-good-for-white-men

    Marry an Asian, a traditional Hispanic, a Slav or an African, and pump out children. Adopt Confucianism and meld it with the Old Time Religion. Asian Values. The end of white men is actually good for white men. When the Left finally gets around to lining up all the deracinated White Protestants as a final act of "racial reconciliation", your children won't be among them.

    Leave the white women with a pool of potential mates in which OJ Simpson and Bill Cosby constitute "catches" relative to their compatriots.

    Have you ever thought about why European cities have world’s highest numbers of brothels and LGBT, but lowest birth rates?

    A 2009 study, titled The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness, conducted by professors Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers (University of Pennsylvania) for the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) – concluded that though American women were better off economically since 1970s – socially they feel more miserable than before….. The women who have been to a women shelter (there are 300 of those in Canada as compared to none for the men) – will tell you how callously they are treated by the hags employed there. Distressed women are pressured to end their marriages and are offered help and resources to do so. Feminists are not interested in the welfare of women. They rely on domestic violence for their cushy jobs and to emasculate men – by portraying them as abusers….”

    http://rehmat1.com/2009/10/17/study-american-women-are-not-happy/

    Read More
    • Replies: @guest
    How does that constitute a "paradox?" As if money and happiness are supposed to go together. While starving in a ditch can obviously be correlated with unhappiness, and economic well being has some connection with being happy, that's beside the point. It's as if the idiots who wrote the title to that study have never read A Christmas Carol, or been exposed to the billions of things in our culture that let us in on the non-secret that you can't buy happiness. Either that, or they think we're idiots.
  33. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Obama as leader of blackism?

    I don’t buy it.

    This might be true of some black leaders, but I think the main appeal of Obama to Jews, homos, and white urban gentry is that he is their Negro.

    Black issues were not the priorities under Obama.

    And if Obama frames issues in anti-white manner, it is in line with the Jewish agenda.
    After all, Jews want to keep white nationalism and white passions in check because such might threaten Jewish power.
    Hollywood isn’t owned by blacks but by Jews, and Jews have been guilt-baiting whites on slavery and ‘Jim Crow’ forever. In invoking the KKK, Obama is playing the Jewish game.
    Now, Obama the Negro and Jews have a common interest in checking the rise of white power. But Obama wouldn’t be in the white house if not for Jewish money, media support, and grooming. Both Jews and Obama know that guilt-baiting whites is an effective way to keep whites groveling and whimpering like dogs.
    This is how Jews and Obama want whites to be:

    Also, white Libs have a way of seeing whiteness in two colors. There is blue white and red white. Blue white is cool, hip, ‘more evolved’, and wonderful. It is hip with all the cool powerful people like Jews and homos. And such whites work closely with cool blacks in sports, music, TV shows, and etc.
    So, for white Libs, anti-white means only anti-red-white.

    But then, blacks have the same view of blackness. There is authentic blackness and there is uncle tom blackness, usually associated with ‘conservative blacks’.
    So, being anti-uncle-tom-black is okay.

    Obama is somewhat vulnerable in the black community. Sure, he’s a Democrat and all that, but he’s been far closer to Jews, homos, and fancy light-skinned mulattos than to Negroes. Notice Obama’s silence about Rahm over the Chicago Police scandal. Obama sides with the Jew over angry blacks. Obama failed to connect with blacks, and his rise owes to connecting with whites and sucking up to Jews. Obama got the new cold war started against Russia because Jews see Russian ban on ‘gay parade’ as resistance of Jewish globalist supremacism.

    Obama is essentially a cuckgro who sucks up to Jews and homos. And his policies have been generally good for the urban white Lib gentry. After all, Section 8 means sending more urban blacks out to small towns and suburbs.
    And Obama hasn’t said anything about stop-and-frisk and all the troubles in NY. He only picks on ‘red whites’ or small potato whites in places like Ferguson.

    As long as white Libs are into moral signaling — we are ‘good whites’ while Conservatives are ‘bad whites’ — , they don’t see Obama’s rhetoric about whites as hostile. If anything, they feel flattered cuz they see themselves as ‘good whites’ working so hard to help the Negroes while the ‘bad whites’ just wanna keep everything to themselves. Just consider Quentin Tarantino and Michael Moore.
    Of course, most of this is just rhetoric as your average urban Lib white gentry wants privilege, wealth, connections, and etc. Indeed, moral signaling betrays a desire for upward social mobility to rise above ‘white trash’ and ‘redneck hicks’, especially those in the South where people still have Confed flags.

    If Obama is really a blackist, why did he try to spread homo agenda in Africa? I mean most authentic black Africans are freaked out by that stuff.
    (Joke: If Jews have aspergers, what do homos have? Ass-buggers.)

    Obama was working for Jews and homos when he tried to boof Africa in the ass with the homo agenda.
    Some say Obama is a Islamist, but he sure made a hellish mess of the Middle East. While Obama pretends to care about Moos over there, his policies has led to massive deaths and displacement of Moos over there.

    Obama is essentially a narcissist. When he called himself a citizen of the world or some such, he meant he is a self-serving chameleon who will say, do, and serve anything as long he gets a slice of the cake too. He has no true loyalty. He will serve those with the most power and privilege as long as they promote his brown ass too.
    If Jews and society were adamantly opposed to ‘gay marriage’, Obama would have strongly opposed it too. Obama is a hollow man. He has no strong convictions about anything except serving himself.

    He is part Negro, and a lot of Negroes are sociopathic in that manner cuz they evolved in crazy Africa. The other side of Obama is Ann Dunham, a sociopathic bitch into self-righteousness and self-glory. She betrayed her race by taking the seeds of a vile Negro. And then, she married some loopy Indonesian. She abandoned her own child and made her parents raise the kid. Both of Obama’s parents were self-centered a-holes. His father was a drunkard and boozer like MLK. (If MLK had not been killed, he likely would have drunk hisself to death.) So, Obama got the DNA from two supremely self-centered monsters. Both Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham were not only self-centered careerists but self-righteous pricks. They lacked the integrity to take care of their own children, but they were berating the world for not being socially just.
    Obama’s one good side he stuck by Michelle(a feat in and of itself) and his two daughters.

    As Obama was abandoned by pa and ma and then grew up in Hawaii with mostly non-blacks, he never had a sure position in the world. He was zeligish in his youth and could make himself into ‘black’, ‘white’, ‘asian’, ‘muslim’, ‘homo’, or etc.

    As the ‘first black president’, Obama has to win some points as an authentic Negro, so he makes the usual noise about ‘racism’.

    But if Obama were truly blackist, he wouldn’t only be anti-white but anti-Jewish, anti-Asian, anti-Mexican, anti-homo, anti-Muslim, and etc.

    He should say, “You Jews owned slaves too, and you Jews also took part in Western imperialism. And you Jews exploited black musicians and athletes. And Jewish Israel was a very close ally of apartheid South Africa.”

    But we never hear that from Obama.

    Or he can say, “You Asians come here and take our jobs and take over universities when not enough blacks are attending schools. It’s our turn, but you Asians are getting in front of the line.”

    But we don’t hear Obama say that.

    Or he can say, “You Mexican mofos come here in huge numbers and drive my black brothers out of LA and other cities. You take jobs from poor blacks who be left to live on welfare.”

    But we don’t hear Obama say that.

    Or he can say, “you fruiters have made a mockery of the civil rights movement. It used to be about noble blacks marching equal rights, but now the new civil rights is about the nation cheering a white man getting a fake pussy and calling it a real pussy. What’s up with that?”

    But we don’t hear him say that. (A lot of blacks are unhappy with the tooter movement.)

    Or he can say, “you Muslims traded in African slaves, and it’s about time oil rich Arab nations paid reparations for enslaving all them Negroes in the past.”

    But we don’t hear him say that.

    Obama’s so-called anti-white rhetoric has been carefully crafted to exploit ‘white guilt’. Jews love it cuz Jews fear white consciousness as possible challenge to Jewish power. (Look at how Trump makes some Jews nervous.)
    And blue city whites love it cuz they divide whiteness into good blue whiteness and bad red whiteness. So, they feel flattered by Obama’s anti-white rhetoric cuz it means the OTHER whites, not themselves.

    Anyway, in order to understand Obama, we have to understand the nature of the Negro and the nature of whites. Obama is genetically 50/50 black and white, and he got his genes from an especially sociopathic Negro and an especially sociopathic white ho.

    We need to understand that the true animating spirit behind the Negro is the Jafro.
    Chinese speak of the Tao. Hindus speak of Dharma. American Indians speak of the How.
    What animates the soul of Negroes is the Jafro. Negroes may take on different religions like Islam or Christianity, but their root spirit is always the Jafro.
    So, even as Christians, Negroes gotta dance and boogie duz the spirit of the Jafro overrides the spirit of Jesus. So, Negro Christians may be Christian in mind and even heart, but they got the spirit of Jafro running through their veins.
    Negro cannot get away from the Jafro. It’s like a Negro can shave his hair or make it straight with some chemicals, but deep inside his blackass head, the hair will always grow out nappy.
    Likewise, Negroes can consciously try to be of a certain ideology or religion, but the true animating spirit of their personality and social nature is the Jafro.

    And Obama got this Jafro spirit from his pa.

    If Negroes got the Jafro — you can see its essence in the Umbrella video by Rihanna the nasty sizzling hot ho who should be slapped upside her head by Aunt Esther for being such a heathen — , white folks are animated by the Anemo. Anemo is an anemic spirit. The advantage is it makes white folks more rational and calculating, but it leaves them feeling hollow and empty of fire and passion. It is no wonder that so many whites gravitate to the heat of the Jafro emanating from the Negro though, to be sure, when they can get burned or melt if they get to close.
    It’s like Frosty the Snowman. To save the girl, he takes her to a warm place, but he melts. The bad side of Anemo is iciness.

    Obama is 50% Jafro and 50% Anemo. He has the nasty-ass African character but it’s chilled by cold reptilian Anemo he got from his race traitor white mama.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tulip
    Obama's political success derives from the fact that while his skin is dark, he was raised by White people, and can relate to White people.

    White people all want to have one Black friend so they can say they are not racist, but they can't really deal with most Blacks, particularly someone like Louis Farrakhan, who for all his flaws, cannot be criticized for selling out his people. White people are in love with the IDEA of Black people (why they like Black entertainment), but don't actually like to live around or associate with real Black people (at least, the Good Whites, it has something to do with the school district I think).

    Ergo, Obama is perfect, because you can actually hang out with Obama, you don't feel like you are in the presence of someone threatening (like a real Black Nationalist). Obama is not a "Blackist" but rather very good at pandering to the "anti-racist" Left's idea of what a good Black man should act like in progressive Amerika. If you could clone him and figure out a way to weed out the defectives, replacing the IDEA for the actuality, the race problem would be solved from the Good White perspective.

  34. Hey guys, one of you (who’s heart goes pitter-pat when he sees a picture of Putin) is going to have to explain the meaning of the word “Communist” to your Commie President…

    http://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/#2715e4857a0b3610606120bc

    Read More
  35. This post is Obama hardly a column. Not even a blog. It is a rant. Within the rant there are three themes that are interwoven.
    1. An attempt to getr into the head Obama. A bright fucked-up kid who tried without much social support to bridge the gaps between his two heritages. I personally believe that his hook-up with his wife, who was comfortable within her heritage he found acceptance. Since the Black community accepts hybrids in a way that main stream white community does not.
    Sure he brought his own shit into the Presidency. But unlike any president since Truman, he had an awareness of this and has tried to transcend it.
    Compare this with Bush-baby who used the military force of the US to avenge the attempted assassination of Bush Sr.
    2. reference to hybidization of the races. A dim understanding of two competing biological urges. First the “selfish-gene” urge to maintain ones own heritage. Second and urge to hybridize to gain genetic diversity. This second is known as sex.
    3. And most interesting to me is an awareness that Blackness exists. There is a black culture which is independent of white culture. The black experience is like a Sci-Fi story. Random people were picked up by aliens and transported to technologically advanced society. Where they were enslaved and used for menial labor. Suddenly another society came, freed them and then left them. They have spent the last 100+ plus years trying to form a coherent culture based on preserved knowledge and parts of the dominant culture. Black culture has firmed up. Now we the dominants are faced with interacting with a coherent somewhat alien embedded culture.
    art of the US to call their own
    There are no good answers. Our time to make things nice was at Reconstruction. And we blew it.
    What we can do my list
    We respect each other and live side by side
    We can pretend there are no differences
    We can have the good old answer of forced assimilation Kill all the men hybridize all the women by rape.
    Relocate them to a “reservation” somewhere in the Old South.
    Relocate them to Africa with a pension

    Read More
  36. @JEGG
    Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn't considered sexist. There are people who are only turned on by a certain racial group and I don't think all the diversity training in the world can change this.

    Perhaps someone can explain to me why only wanting to date a particular racial group is considered racist when only wanting to date a particular gender isn’t considered sexist.

    Give it time.

    Read More
  37. @Priss Factor
    Obama as leader of blackism?

    I don't buy it.

    This might be true of some black leaders, but I think the main appeal of Obama to Jews, homos, and white urban gentry is that he is their Negro.

    Black issues were not the priorities under Obama.

    And if Obama frames issues in anti-white manner, it is in line with the Jewish agenda.
    After all, Jews want to keep white nationalism and white passions in check because such might threaten Jewish power.
    Hollywood isn't owned by blacks but by Jews, and Jews have been guilt-baiting whites on slavery and 'Jim Crow' forever. In invoking the KKK, Obama is playing the Jewish game.
    Now, Obama the Negro and Jews have a common interest in checking the rise of white power. But Obama wouldn't be in the white house if not for Jewish money, media support, and grooming. Both Jews and Obama know that guilt-baiting whites is an effective way to keep whites groveling and whimpering like dogs.
    This is how Jews and Obama want whites to be:
    https://youtu.be/wsgsQ_1QFBs?t=1s

    Also, white Libs have a way of seeing whiteness in two colors. There is blue white and red white. Blue white is cool, hip, 'more evolved', and wonderful. It is hip with all the cool powerful people like Jews and homos. And such whites work closely with cool blacks in sports, music, TV shows, and etc.
    So, for white Libs, anti-white means only anti-red-white.

    But then, blacks have the same view of blackness. There is authentic blackness and there is uncle tom blackness, usually associated with 'conservative blacks'.
    So, being anti-uncle-tom-black is okay.

    Obama is somewhat vulnerable in the black community. Sure, he's a Democrat and all that, but he's been far closer to Jews, homos, and fancy light-skinned mulattos than to Negroes. Notice Obama's silence about Rahm over the Chicago Police scandal. Obama sides with the Jew over angry blacks. Obama failed to connect with blacks, and his rise owes to connecting with whites and sucking up to Jews. Obama got the new cold war started against Russia because Jews see Russian ban on 'gay parade' as resistance of Jewish globalist supremacism.

    Obama is essentially a cuckgro who sucks up to Jews and homos. And his policies have been generally good for the urban white Lib gentry. After all, Section 8 means sending more urban blacks out to small towns and suburbs.
    And Obama hasn't said anything about stop-and-frisk and all the troubles in NY. He only picks on 'red whites' or small potato whites in places like Ferguson.

    As long as white Libs are into moral signaling --- we are 'good whites' while Conservatives are 'bad whites' --- , they don't see Obama's rhetoric about whites as hostile. If anything, they feel flattered cuz they see themselves as 'good whites' working so hard to help the Negroes while the 'bad whites' just wanna keep everything to themselves. Just consider Quentin Tarantino and Michael Moore.
    Of course, most of this is just rhetoric as your average urban Lib white gentry wants privilege, wealth, connections, and etc. Indeed, moral signaling betrays a desire for upward social mobility to rise above 'white trash' and 'redneck hicks', especially those in the South where people still have Confed flags.

    If Obama is really a blackist, why did he try to spread homo agenda in Africa? I mean most authentic black Africans are freaked out by that stuff.
    (Joke: If Jews have aspergers, what do homos have? Ass-buggers.)

    Obama was working for Jews and homos when he tried to boof Africa in the ass with the homo agenda.
    Some say Obama is a Islamist, but he sure made a hellish mess of the Middle East. While Obama pretends to care about Moos over there, his policies has led to massive deaths and displacement of Moos over there.

    Obama is essentially a narcissist. When he called himself a citizen of the world or some such, he meant he is a self-serving chameleon who will say, do, and serve anything as long he gets a slice of the cake too. He has no true loyalty. He will serve those with the most power and privilege as long as they promote his brown ass too.
    If Jews and society were adamantly opposed to 'gay marriage', Obama would have strongly opposed it too. Obama is a hollow man. He has no strong convictions about anything except serving himself.

    He is part Negro, and a lot of Negroes are sociopathic in that manner cuz they evolved in crazy Africa. The other side of Obama is Ann Dunham, a sociopathic bitch into self-righteousness and self-glory. She betrayed her race by taking the seeds of a vile Negro. And then, she married some loopy Indonesian. She abandoned her own child and made her parents raise the kid. Both of Obama's parents were self-centered a-holes. His father was a drunkard and boozer like MLK. (If MLK had not been killed, he likely would have drunk hisself to death.) So, Obama got the DNA from two supremely self-centered monsters. Both Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham were not only self-centered careerists but self-righteous pricks. They lacked the integrity to take care of their own children, but they were berating the world for not being socially just.
    Obama's one good side he stuck by Michelle(a feat in and of itself) and his two daughters.

    As Obama was abandoned by pa and ma and then grew up in Hawaii with mostly non-blacks, he never had a sure position in the world. He was zeligish in his youth and could make himself into 'black', 'white', 'asian', 'muslim', 'homo', or etc.

    As the 'first black president', Obama has to win some points as an authentic Negro, so he makes the usual noise about 'racism'.

    But if Obama were truly blackist, he wouldn't only be anti-white but anti-Jewish, anti-Asian, anti-Mexican, anti-homo, anti-Muslim, and etc.

    He should say, "You Jews owned slaves too, and you Jews also took part in Western imperialism. And you Jews exploited black musicians and athletes. And Jewish Israel was a very close ally of apartheid South Africa."

    But we never hear that from Obama.

    Or he can say, "You Asians come here and take our jobs and take over universities when not enough blacks are attending schools. It's our turn, but you Asians are getting in front of the line."

    But we don't hear Obama say that.

    Or he can say, "You Mexican mofos come here in huge numbers and drive my black brothers out of LA and other cities. You take jobs from poor blacks who be left to live on welfare."

    But we don't hear Obama say that.

    Or he can say, "you fruiters have made a mockery of the civil rights movement. It used to be about noble blacks marching equal rights, but now the new civil rights is about the nation cheering a white man getting a fake pussy and calling it a real pussy. What's up with that?"

    But we don't hear him say that. (A lot of blacks are unhappy with the tooter movement.)

    Or he can say, "you Muslims traded in African slaves, and it's about time oil rich Arab nations paid reparations for enslaving all them Negroes in the past."

    But we don't hear him say that.

    Obama's so-called anti-white rhetoric has been carefully crafted to exploit 'white guilt'. Jews love it cuz Jews fear white consciousness as possible challenge to Jewish power. (Look at how Trump makes some Jews nervous.)
    And blue city whites love it cuz they divide whiteness into good blue whiteness and bad red whiteness. So, they feel flattered by Obama's anti-white rhetoric cuz it means the OTHER whites, not themselves.

    Anyway, in order to understand Obama, we have to understand the nature of the Negro and the nature of whites. Obama is genetically 50/50 black and white, and he got his genes from an especially sociopathic Negro and an especially sociopathic white ho.

    We need to understand that the true animating spirit behind the Negro is the Jafro.
    Chinese speak of the Tao. Hindus speak of Dharma. American Indians speak of the How.
    What animates the soul of Negroes is the Jafro. Negroes may take on different religions like Islam or Christianity, but their root spirit is always the Jafro.
    So, even as Christians, Negroes gotta dance and boogie duz the spirit of the Jafro overrides the spirit of Jesus. So, Negro Christians may be Christian in mind and even heart, but they got the spirit of Jafro running through their veins.
    Negro cannot get away from the Jafro. It's like a Negro can shave his hair or make it straight with some chemicals, but deep inside his blackass head, the hair will always grow out nappy.
    Likewise, Negroes can consciously try to be of a certain ideology or religion, but the true animating spirit of their personality and social nature is the Jafro.

    And Obama got this Jafro spirit from his pa.

    If Negroes got the Jafro --- you can see its essence in the Umbrella video by Rihanna the nasty sizzling hot ho who should be slapped upside her head by Aunt Esther for being such a heathen --- , white folks are animated by the Anemo. Anemo is an anemic spirit. The advantage is it makes white folks more rational and calculating, but it leaves them feeling hollow and empty of fire and passion. It is no wonder that so many whites gravitate to the heat of the Jafro emanating from the Negro though, to be sure, when they can get burned or melt if they get to close.
    It's like Frosty the Snowman. To save the girl, he takes her to a warm place, but he melts. The bad side of Anemo is iciness.

    Obama is 50% Jafro and 50% Anemo. He has the nasty-ass African character but it's chilled by cold reptilian Anemo he got from his race traitor white mama.

    Obama’s political success derives from the fact that while his skin is dark, he was raised by White people, and can relate to White people.

    White people all want to have one Black friend so they can say they are not racist, but they can’t really deal with most Blacks, particularly someone like Louis Farrakhan, who for all his flaws, cannot be criticized for selling out his people. White people are in love with the IDEA of Black people (why they like Black entertainment), but don’t actually like to live around or associate with real Black people (at least, the Good Whites, it has something to do with the school district I think).

    Ergo, Obama is perfect, because you can actually hang out with Obama, you don’t feel like you are in the presence of someone threatening (like a real Black Nationalist). Obama is not a “Blackist” but rather very good at pandering to the “anti-racist” Left’s idea of what a good Black man should act like in progressive Amerika. If you could clone him and figure out a way to weed out the defectives, replacing the IDEA for the actuality, the race problem would be solved from the Good White perspective.

    Read More
  38. Barack Obama is a (capital w) White man. Probably what bugs people who read here the most (and they’ll never admit it) is Obama’s mom gave herself up to a Black African. Get over it.

    Obama’s just as white as a half white would be following the logic someone being half black would make someone black. Except he was raised by a single white mother and then by his white grandparents, so actually he’s more white than black, culturally speaking. So he’s a white liberal that sucks. So what. There’s plenty of those to go around. Again, get over it.

    In any case, what’s so special about Kerwick being a practicing Catholic?

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/01/11/who-punked-the-cardinal/

    ^

    Read More
  39. @HerewardMW
    Was Trayvon Martin a "black man" or Michael Brown? If you can't give me a definition of black from first principles then how can we know?

    All this talk of "black" lives mattering is silly and grownup men should find something better to complain about.

    “If you can’t give me a definition of black from first principles then how can we know?”

    What are you, a logical positivist? Why should we need an essential definition of blackness? If we can’t all agree on who is black or what determines blackness, so what? We all know the two basic criteria: 1). you are black if you look black, and 2) you are black if you identify as being black. Right away we run into problems, because who looks black, and to whom? And what if you identify as being black and no one else agrees (like Rachel Dolezal)? These are minor problems.

    If you’re looking for a 2+2=4 sort of definition of blackness, sorry. But don’t let that stop the rest of us from pretending such a thing exists, even if we can’t pin it down precisely.

    Read More
  40. That’s what I’m saying, if you find you one of ‘em high IQ Igbo’s, first or second generation, she probably still knows how to cook and your kid can be a basketball or football star and still get a real degree from college.

    Read More
  41. @Rehmat
    Have you ever thought about why European cities have world's highest numbers of brothels and LGBT, but lowest birth rates?

    A 2009 study, titled The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness, conducted by professors Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers (University of Pennsylvania) for the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) – concluded that though American women were better off economically since 1970s – socially they feel more miserable than before….. The women who have been to a women shelter (there are 300 of those in Canada as compared to none for the men) – will tell you how callously they are treated by the hags employed there. Distressed women are pressured to end their marriages and are offered help and resources to do so. Feminists are not interested in the welfare of women. They rely on domestic violence for their cushy jobs and to emasculate men – by portraying them as abusers….”

    http://rehmat1.com/2009/10/17/study-american-women-are-not-happy/

    How does that constitute a “paradox?” As if money and happiness are supposed to go together. While starving in a ditch can obviously be correlated with unhappiness, and economic well being has some connection with being happy, that’s beside the point. It’s as if the idiots who wrote the title to that study have never read A Christmas Carol, or been exposed to the billions of things in our culture that let us in on the non-secret that you can’t buy happiness. Either that, or they think we’re idiots.

    Read More
  42. Is Spanglish English or Spanish? If you can’t tell me, then clearly neither English or Spanish exist, or if they do exist they are “culturally constructed”–the same way a TVA dam makes our streams and rivers “culturally constructed”.

    Black in America means your ancestors were ported over here, forced to work as slaves, Christianized, taught English, endured Jim Crow and the rest of it, and developed a distinct ethnic identity, one that is not shared by other people with a similar racial background, e.g. immigrants from the Dominican Republic, Somalis, etc. Although there is no definable Black culture (it wouldn’t be very Black if you could), Blackness certainly exists, and some Blacks are more Black than others. Obama was raised White, and had to learn how to act Black, primarily because the general culture distinguishes on race (or perhaps color) more than culture. Obama is Black to White People and Polynesians, so he had to move somewhere with Black people so he could get elected, who unfortunately (fortunately?) did not think he was Black enough despite his wife. He certainly has governed closer to Wall Street lobbyists, the open borders crowd, the alphabet parade, and the White academics than he has governed in the interests of working Black Americans. What has he done for Blacks, except modestly defend a system of race-based privilege that already exists, and that mostly benefits the children of Black elites who have already made it?

    Read More
  43. Obama derives his power from appearing Black to White people, and being more Black than the alternative to Black people, and at least not a White Gringo to the Hispanics. But if everyone were blind, they would “see” that Obama is just another White Liberal, promising socialism but carrying water for global capitalism, like Kennedy, LBJ, Carter and Clinton before him.

    Read More
  44. Kerwick’s thesis that Obama’s politics are informed by a sense of racial grievance is pure horseshit. If anything, the sense of racial grievance where Obama is concerned flows the other way – fostered in no small part by the likes of Kerwick. Obama knows he’s one of the elite and he enjoys it. The main manifestation of “blackness” Obama has is his occasional use of his personna to lend a veneer of coolness to his ideas and policies that are pure vanilla in substance.

    Read More
  45. Since OKCupid and other dating sites have some statistics that indicate white men prefer Asian women to white women, and Asian women prefer white men to Asian men, how does this sit with the Race Peddlers? In fact, aren’t East Asians a glaring problem, since they seem to be more racist than whitey while, at the same time, showing a preference for whites over non-Asian colored folk? Why is it that most of the non-whites seem to dislike each other more than whites, even when they’re preaching about the White Devil at te behest of their ‘community organizers’?

    Read More
    • Replies: @IA

    Why is it that most of the non-whites seem to dislike each other more than whites, even when they’re preaching about the White Devil at te behest of their ‘community organizers’?
     
    Envy?
  46. In fact, aren’t East Asians a glaring problem, since they seem to be more racist than whitey while, at the same time, showing a preference for whites over non-Asian colored folk?

    The most racist ones tend to stay on the other side of the Pacific. The language barrier keeps first generation immigrants insular. First and second generation immigrants tend to form their opinions of other groups based on their experiences. In the case of blacks and to a lesser extent Hispanics, that experience tends to be overwhelmingly negative. Disassociating from those groups isn’t a matter of prejudice, it’s a matter of concern for one’s own well-being.

    Why is it that most of the non-whites seem to dislike each other more than whites, even when they’re preaching about the White Devil at te behest of their ‘community organizers’?

    You really think Black Muslims are that influential?

    Read More
  47. @Elrond Hubbard
    Since OKCupid and other dating sites have some statistics that indicate white men prefer Asian women to white women, and Asian women prefer white men to Asian men, how does this sit with the Race Peddlers? In fact, aren't East Asians a glaring problem, since they seem to be more racist than whitey while, at the same time, showing a preference for whites over non-Asian colored folk? Why is it that most of the non-whites seem to dislike each other more than whites, even when they're preaching about the White Devil at te behest of their 'community organizers'?

    Why is it that most of the non-whites seem to dislike each other more than whites, even when they’re preaching about the White Devil at te behest of their ‘community organizers’?

    Envy?

    Read More
  48. Obama is not a Socialist. If he were there would be single payer not Obamacare. Some people with money went into a room with Obama and came out with Obamacare. Obama is a white opportunist and a talented politician who got his dream job as overseer for the Plutocracy. Neither his words nor his policies are his own. If there is such a thing as blackism it is not attributable to Obama. Obsession with color seems to afflict people who don’t think at all and people who think too much.

    Read More
  49. I think it is unwise to throw away the concept of “blackness” without taking a look at it,
    Kenneth Clark et.al. in arguing “Brown vs the Board of Education” to SCOTUS extended the “melting pot” notion embedded in the American psyche. That notion as far as I can see had about equality of opportunity. Differences in outcome (of success) were caused by differences in innate ability. That is the American experience provided equal Nurture and that difference in outcome were differences in Nature.
    Early in the 20th Century John Watson’s notion of Behavior seemed to strike a chord in that Society and was rapidly accepted. Behaviorism questioned a monolithic Nurture experience. Rather it was a variable that could be manipulated to manipulate outcome. Nature was almost irrelevant.
    Clark et.al. took the next step. They took the Behaviorism argument of if (we perform some Nurture activity) then (we get a certain outcome). And reversed it. Since we have a different outcome we can rightfully infer different Nurture activities. But to produce it as a Scientific Truth Clark et.al. had to kow-tow to the basic Scientific assumption. That all other things were held equal. To do that they had to axiom-ize the notion that Nature was not a variable. That All Men are created Genetically equal.
    So we have been stuck with this Bullshit assumption ever since as the kingpin of Affirmative Action.
    It seems that to hold on to a bullshit assumption other distortions have to become more elaborate. The Idea of a Platonic universe in the middle ages, for example had the unquestioned subsumption of planets rotating in perfect circles. When faced with observational data Platonists were forced to add movement in inner little circles or epicycles.
    Well the way Clark imagined the world would work has not happened. And those who still hold to his argument-call then Clarkists have had to increasing add epicycular distortions. Corporate Boards willing to hurt tier bottom line by passing over better qualified Blacks; dredging up and adapting a discredited Freudian notion of Unconscious Racism. And finally all the way back to basics to Old Persian Dualism of Good and Evil.
    The idea that Africans have the innate inheritance of Goodness and Whites the innate inheritance of Evil goes way back IIRC to Marcus Garvey and certainly to the Black Moslem movement. But it is now mainstream and part of the weird PC Catechism. We have switched from Reason to Religion
    But in-so-far as we can continue a discussion based on Reason these differnces violates the basic Clarkian axiom. It is no longer if there is are differences in innate inheritances but what they are.

    Read More
  50. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Jack Kerwick is a terrible author, a worse prognosticator and devoid of normal thought process. Don’t waste your time, set a tire fire, it will be more informational than Jack Kerwick. Suck it Jack.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Gottfried Comments via RSS