The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Who Dies, Who Pays
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

A recent news item made me think about the changing face of the CIA and long for the days when there was at least some minimal clarity on who or what constituted an enemy and what the proper role and deportment of an intelligence officer operating overseas might be. The loss of more than forty human intelligence sources in Lebanon and Iran has been attributed to egregious security errors on the part of the American officers involved, to include repeated meetings with local agents in the Beirut Pizza Hut. They called it operation “PIZZA.”

“Espionage is a risky business. Many risks lead to wins, but some result in occasional setbacks,” said one US official to ABC news in discussing the loss of the two major clandestine networks. A second official added that “Collecting sensitive information on adversaries who are aggressively trying to uncover spies in their midst will always be fraught with risk.”

Pardon me, but whose risks are we talking about here? This is a lot like the neocons cooptees (Madeleine Albright and Condi Rice) talking about how killing Iraqi and Lebanese kids would be worth it because there would be the dawn of a new age in the Middle East. Some pear shaped bureaucrat in Washington who parses risks on an actuarial scale and refers to spying as a business hardly represents a poor bastard in Beirut who is putting his life on the line and hoping that the American guy munching on the pizza across the table knows what he is doing and will insure his safety. It took a former intelligence officer, also interviewed for the article, to get a bit closer to the truth, “We’ve lost the tradition of espionage. Officers take short cuts and no one is held accountable.”

That is a convenient explanation, but it doesn’t end there. An intelligence operation should be initiated if it is the only way to get information that is vital to national security. A foreign agent is not a piece of dirt and working for CIA doesn’t necessarily mean that you check your ethics at the door. When a Case Officer recruits a foreigner to undertake a dangerous mission for the United States government it is in the nature of a sacred commitment to fulfill all obligations and do everything possible to keep that person safe. In fact CIA training, recognizing the close and protective relationship between Case Officer and agent, traditionally warned against “falling in love with your agent.” Metaphorically speaking, of course.

Unfortunately today the same cavalier “us and them” attitude that has produced a mindset where torture is okay and drone strikes that blow up wedding parties and school outings are regarded as an exemplary “tool” to use against terrorists apparently has also led some intelligence officers to see the local people who help them as disposable items. So upwards of forty Lebanese and Iranians who thought they were helping the US are now dead, which I guess by the Washington accounting of such things is no big deal. I wonder if anyone will be punished for the unnecessary
deaths of the Lebanese and Iranians? I think I already know the answer to that
one.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: CIA 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
6 Comments to "Who Dies, Who Pays"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. query says:

    Excellent piece, Phil. I get the critique respecting attitudes toward local recruits, especially in places like Lebanon. But what do you say to the proposition that the CIA – like a lot of the post-9/11 defense establishment – has been hiring promiscuously, that newer case officers aren’t up to standards in effect prior to 9/11f?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Old timers of my acquaintance were also area specialists who were keen on the language and culture they operated within. I think this ability to think like a local and to appreciate the people led to much better trade craft.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. Mario says:

    And this comes despite the billions wasted on National security.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Sheldon says:

    Thanks, Philip. The episode is a sickening outrage. It’s a wonder we get anyone to cooperate with us at all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Thank you, Phil. This is especially poignant because as former CIA you know what you are talking about. watching the Republican debate last night I fear things can only get worse since these — ahem, candidates — don’t know what they are talking about, and seem positively giddy that a war with Iran and Syria might well be at hand.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Thanksgiving 2011: Thanks be to God, and thanks to American Conservative for publishing courageous writers like Phil Giraldi, Kelley Vlahos and Paul Gottfried (to choose a mere three of the many gifted and courageous writers on this site).

    You give us hope.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.
Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on the line.