The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Neo-Obamacons Anyone?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I know I am not the only one to notice the recent wave of neocon attacks on Sarah Palin coming from David Frum, David Brooks, and Charles Krauthammer. They all make essentially the same point, i.e. that she is not experienced enough to become president. Brooks predictably has the most sophisticated argument, that experience is needed to condition one to act prudently in a crisis situation. That assertion may or may not be true, but it enables the neocons to overtly support Palin while simultaneously undermining her.

If it were anyone but the neocons one might think that the three pundits are speaking up for the good of the nation, suggesting that Palin might actually be a bad choice. But as neocons characteristically are always selling a carefully coordinated and calibrated message that is intended to further their group interest, something else must be at work here. McCain is and always has been their man and Palin reportedly has been receiving intensive briefings both from the neocons on the McCain staff and also from the stalwarts at the American Enterprise Institute. It has been suggested that the neocons have been unhappy with some of Palin’s responses in the briefing sessions on foreign policy issues and there is some concern that she might not be “reliable” if something were to happen to McCain. There have been behind closed doors meetings at AEI involving foreign policy heavies like Pletka and Brooks discussing what to do about the Palin problem.

Does that mean the neocons are covering both bets in the upcoming elections? Possibly. Bill Kristol is still praising Palin but The Weekly Standard and Wall Street Journal have been somewhat less than enthusiastic. Recall also that Kristol was finding a lot to like in Democratic hawk Hillary some months back and that the neocons in general don’t really care about social or domestic issues like abortion or immigration. They might be quite comfortable with an Obama administration in which Democratic hawk Biden is calling the shots on foreign policy guided by the likes of Dennis Ross, neocon-lite. The neocons might now believe that a Democratic administration is their best bet for a sustainable foreign policy that they would be comfortable with and which would allow them to continue to play a major role.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Neocons, Sarah Palin 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.
Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on the line.