The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
More "Conservative" Praise for Obama
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In today’s Washington Post former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson joined the song of praise being raised by neocons and faux-conservatives alike lauding Barack Obama’s cabinet for its “moderation” and “centrism.” What that really means, of course, is that they are all recognizing that Obama will preserve the Bush status quo when it comes to foreign policy, a heady mix of American exceptionalism combined with muscular democracy promotion and interventionism.

The Israeli media is reporting that Daniel Kurtzer is in line to become Obama’s special envoy to the Middle East. Kurtzer worked for Dennis Ross under Bill Clinton and was ambassador to Israel from 2001 through 2005 for George W. Bush. He has close ties to AIPAC and reportedly helped Obama draft his speech to that organization in June 2008 in which the candidate performed his walk to Canossa to neutralize the Israel lobby’s concerns about his views on the Middle East. Kurtzer would join Hillary Clinton, Rahm Emanuel, and Joseph Biden, all of whom have frequently expressed their passion for Israel. Other uncritical supporters of Israel are also in the wings, awaiting the presidential nod. Jane Harman is still being spoken of as CIA Director and Dennis Ross is reportedly also waiting for a senior appointment, possibly at the NSC, enabling him to again become a focal point for Middle Eastern policy.

This massive tilt towards Israel among the administration’s top officials, exceeding even that of George W. Bush, could mean one of two things. It could mean that Obama is covering his back by employing prominent Israel firsters in his foreign policy team because he intends to force Israel to make the necessary concessions that would lead to a viable Palestinian state. Or it could mean that Obama has recognized that he is outgunned on the issue by AIPAC and its friends in congress and he will basically take the path of least resistance by pursuing the pro-Israel policies that have characterized both the Clinton and Bush White Houses. If it is the latter, it would also mean that war with Iran is a virtual certainty.

I think it is the latter, that Obama will continue Washington’s unquestioning support for Israel, but I hope I will be proven wrong. Obama does not exactly have a lot of room to maneuver for breakthroughs in foreign policy. He will spend much his political capital over the next two years dealing with the economy. Foreign policy will be a side issue with the status quo essentially continuing, which is why the neocons in particular are so happy with what they are seeing.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Israel, Neocons 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Doug says:

    Well, if you can win the praise of faux conservatives, that’s enough for a consensus.

  2. Jack Ross says:

    I think it is the former, and I’m still skeptical about Ross and Harman, Obama has if nothing else sidelined the most egregious Democratic hawks like Holbrooke, Pollack, O’Hanlon, and Talbott. As if we could afford a war with Iran right now.

    The reason the neocons are going on the way they are isn’t because they believe what they’re saying at all. They desperately want to keep their reputations salvaged so they spin it as best they can.

  3. Corie says:

    This whole unconditional support for Israel situation is so damaging … and what bothers me the most, is that you’re apparently an anti-semite if you suggest that supporting Israel without question is a problem.

    Hmmmm. I guess that means I hate Jewish people … Despite the fact that half of my heritage is rooted in the religion.

    This is where political correctness really boggles the mind. If you want to fight terror and prevent attacks on American soil, why the entangling alliance with Israel? Is that not a red flag for most rational people? It’s a very disturbing state of affairs.

  4. […] Krey on December 3, 2008 – 5:06 pm – From former CIA Officer, and traditional conservative, Phillip Giraldi: In today’s Washington Post former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson joined the song of praise […]

  5. Jason says: • Website

    I think that the resurfacing of Samantha Powers suggests that Obama is not going “to take the path of least resistance” with his Israel policy.
    http://rightklik.blogspot.com/

  6. eep says:

    In my mind the question is why did Bush not attack Iran? It is said Bush denied Israel the technology to attack Iran. I’ve read an Israeli attack wouldn’t work because the targets were too deep underground. Where did this pacifism come from all of a sudden? In what circumstances would “Joe the Dictator” decide to attack Iran? The Military is overstretched and the economy is entering recession.

    I’m trying to figure out why some (or all) of those people have such disdain for civil liberties and favor authoritarianism. Is it so the kleptocrats can keep tabs on dissent?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.
Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on the line.