The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Philip Giraldi ArchiveBlogview
Is Politically Correct or Jingoistic Reporting Fake News?
Americans need to learn what is really going on both at home and abroad
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
russia-hackers
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

When the Washington Post reports about violent crime online or in its print Metro Section it generally does not include descriptions of the alleged perpetrator even when that individual is still on the loose and continuing to pose a threat to the general public. This omission is conspicuous, particularly when the story itself makes it very clear that the presumed victim got a very good look at his or her assailant and would be able to provide a detailed physical description together with an account of what the attacker was wearing. One might even suggest that the Post is doing the general public no favor when it censors its account, making anyone who might cross the path of the miscreant more vulnerable to also becoming a victim.

The Post edits its coverage because it clearly does not want to associate violent crime with any particular race even though, as every Washingtonian knows full well, nearly all violent crime in the city is carried out by young black males. Rather than providing a public service by identifying the perpetrator the Post chooses to say nothing to avoid having to identify the assailant as black. But the reader, aware of that reticence, consequently automatically assumes that the perpetrator is black anyway, making the paper’s attempt to avoid any identification of criminals by race instead create the presumption in the reader’s mind that every single one of the violent acts that occur in the District of Columbia is done by people of color. What is intended to shield blacks hardly does them any favors, quite the contrary.

Partially reporting straightforward stories for politically correct reasons is in my mind equivalent to the fake news that everyone has been lamenting. The general perception that the news is slanted or manipulated has fed the lack of trust in the veracity of what is being reported and is a major contributor to the decline in newspaper readership. The Post, which also recently featured largely phony major stories about alternative news sites being tools of Russia as well as a wildly inflated tale about Russian hacking a utility in Vermont, is particularly much given to making up its coverage as it goes along. Every page in the news section is in reality an editorial as the paper assiduously mixes fact with fiction together with a heavy dose of opinion. It is Orwellian newspeak at its finest.

Inured to the Post’s p.c. coverage of racial issues, I was nevertheless shocked by some of the recent reporting on an incident in Chicago in which four teenagers videoed themselves and broadcast what they were doing live on Facebook as they beat a mentally impaired man. An early media account of the incident appeared on Reuters but is no longer available. It was written by Timothy McLaughlin and had, as its second paragraph, “At least one of the attackers on the video mentioned president elect Donald Trump as he taunted the man but police stopped short of calling the beating politically motivated and said they are still investigating.”

From that, I assumed that the journalist was implying that the attackers were Trump supporters since there has been so much reporting lately of incidents at schools where white bullies allegedly cite Trump as they torment their black or brown classmates. Many of those stories would themselves appear to be extremely improbable fake news since the schools in question frequently appear to have highly vulnerable white minorities in the student bodies, but white-on-black violence is not intrinsically unthinkable so the story appeared to be at least credible.

But reading on, the article seemingly reluctantly produced some additional information. The victim, who was tied, gagged and beaten, “appeared to be white” while one of the assailants “appeared to be African-American” and was heard making comments about “white people.” The story did not link to the Facebook video, but BBC, among other sites, showed the video and was unambiguous in its labelling the four assailants as black and the victim as white, which anyone viewing the recording would have clearly appreciated. Subsequent news stories made clear that the expressions that were being shouted by the attackers included “F**k Trump” and “F**k white people.” The victim was reportedly beaten for six hours, cursed at, cut and otherwise abused. The live broadcast of the beating went viral before Facebook deleted it.

The media and Chicago police both struggled with whether or not the abduction and beating constituted a hate crime. In fact, they seemed eager to mitigate and even explain the impact of what everyone who watched the video could clearly see. One cop explained “Kids make stupid mistakes, I shouldn’t call them kids, they are legally adults, but they are young adults and the make stupid decisions… That certainly will be part of whether or not we seek a hate crime, determine whether or not this is sincere or stupid ranting and raving.” Another cop said “I think part of it is just stupidity. People ranting about something they think might make a headline.”

The New York Times dodged the bullet on what kind of crime it might be by describing it as an attack on disabled people without any racial or political overtones at all. So it was maybe just kids having fun and since it was black on white Wolf Blitzer won’t be flying in tomorrow morning to pontificate on what is wrong with Donald Trump’s America.

From my point of view, quite frankly who cares if the incident is or was motivated by hate as kidnapping and torture should be enough and the designation hate crime is essentially phony anyway. If an assailant hates his victim does that make the brutality worse? If you kill me because you are bored and are looking for something to do should you spend less time in prison than if you do so because you hate me?

Once the story was essentially agreed upon by the media and police, comments posted on the beating universally expressed outrage over what had occurred. Many of those posting their observations were themselves black, some expressing their desire that the perpetrators be imprisoned “forever” for having carried out such a horrific crime.

Reading my way through the comments, it occurred to me that the media and police department’s apparent reticence to report black on white crime with the same horror that it reports white on black serves no one, as it creates the impression that black criminals are somehow being protected or coddled even when it is clear that that is not the case. Decent, law abiding African-Americans, the vast majority, know that the end result of the politically correct news coverage of black crime is to make many white Americans even more suspicious of black behavior. So is it both fake news and highly damaging when the Washington Post and Reuters refuse to report a crime story honestly? It almost certainly is.

I grin daily upon rising when I hear the CBS Morning News proclaiming that it is providing “real news.” Charlie Rose and company are prime examples of America’s enslaved corporate media and wouldn’t know real news if it hit them in the ass. The news team has been leading off each day, for example, with a series of uncritical recaps of the various half-truths being promoted by the White House to indict Donald Trump’s relationship with Moscow, the biggest fake news story currently making the rounds. Professor Michael Brenner of the University of Pittsburgh has called the Russian hack the “most surreal and passionate work of fiction of the 21st century.” In the stories featured in the mainstream media there is a consistent presumption that the United States is somehow the victim and Russia the perpetrator of a horrific crime, meaning that the media has considerable difficulty in dealing with real situations that challenge the Establishment consensus. It finds considering the viewpoints of other countries objectively as problematical as it does in dealing with the issue of black crime.

What Russia’s crime consisted of, by the most damaging interpretation, was hacking into a private server belonging to a political party and possibly allowing the admittedly factual but embarrassing material obtained to make its way into the media. Excuse me, but that is what intelligence agencies do routinely to justify their multiple billion dollar budgets. The United States is the world leader in such activity as revealed by Jim Bamford’s books on the subject and also through the revelations obtained in the Snowden papers. Now Russia is being condemned for possibly doing some of the same, though no evidence is being provided, and the story is being framed as if we are by definition the good guys and Vladimir Putin is the devil incarnate.

What I am saying is that the United States mainstream media is the primary source of fake news due to its inbuilt biases on what is acceptable and what is not. It actually hurts black people by its attempts to be protective and its unwillingness to consider a news story through the eyes of the other party for chauvinistic reasons means that Americans are particularly uninformed about what is going on in the world. To suggest that all of this is particularly dangerous, both in terms of domestic tranquility and possible foreign threats, would be an understatement.

 
    []
  1. And when I look at the expensive skyscrapers housing these big media digs, it’s not hard to fix the purpose for the Fake News. Or when I see the big foundations who underwrite “public” radio and television, bearing the names of the founders of America’s most gigantic corporate oligarchies.

    Follow the big money to understand what is being here purchased, the manufacture of public opinion, following on from the ownership of the other end of public accountability, bought up government.

    Read More
    • Replies: @cucksworth
    public media should be fully funded by the government. well funded, too, maybe with elected board of directors? thank god TV is finally dying.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /pgiraldi/is-politically-correct-or-jingoistic-reporting-fake-news/#comment-1730373
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Mark Green says: • Website

    Excellent article. Fake news is rampant and it is nothing new. Even the meaning and significance now being ascribed to the Russian ‘hacking’ incident is fake.

    All that’s happened in these so-called hacking incidents were embarrassing disclosures. But the news was genuine. Real–and scandalous–information made various US government officials look terrible. And properly so. Accurate information that was unauthorized ended up damaging candidate Clinton and the Democrats. Nothing more. Trump was smeared briefly but it looks as if the entire story was a hoax. Not so with the other disclosures. Mrs. Clinton and the Dems got tarred with their own feces. Why? The shit was real.

    Since when are leaks diabolical anyway? They’re legitimate news. Often scandalous news. And hidden. But real. So since when is ‘truth’–involving political conduct, that is–scurrilous?

    When Daniel Ellsberg leaked unlawfully-obtained, government documents about the VietNam war he was widely hailed as a hero–even though many government officials got caught with their pants down. Washington’s hand-wringing about these ‘Russian’ hacks is basically all about whose ox is being gored. These hate-driven, political snowflakes are actually hopeless hypocrites. Many should be in jail.

    Americans have been fed half-truths, propaganda, distorted ‘facts’ and hasbara for decades. We can thank the partisan army of embedded, media activists for this vast and unending fraud. This is why Trump is being roasted continuously and treated like a criminal–though he’s harmed no one.

    Hopefully, Trump will be able to resist the ubiquitous, media-driven hysteria. This will not be easy however. These operatives still have the power to shape the narrative and mold the American psyche. This is why Trump–not Hillary–is being bombarded relentlessly with accusations and innuendo.

    Both the Big Government and Big Media establishments hate Trump because he–unlike Obama and Hillary–genuinely threaten their prestige, credibility and power. Trump could impose real change in the global and domestic pecking order. This is hope and change that the Deep State does not want and will resist furiously.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    Well what about the RNC hacks that didn't get exposed? Remember that stupid claim. There was an unsubstantiated but wildly held belief that the Republicans just had to be doing the same thing and it wasn't fair that only Hillary's dirty laundry was being aired. If you truly believe the Republicans were racists then you would have no trouble believing there was an e-mail inviting you to the next Klan rally at the Trump Tower.

    What they forget was that Trump had a very small staff. In fact, it was constantly cited as the reason he was going to lose - no ground game. Well the smaller your staff, the less likely you are to have people send off-color jokes or make comments about the people you need but don't like.
    , @george strong
    This article is false. Law-abiding backs do NOT want the suspects' race noted. And they are NOT a vast majority of blacks, either.
  3. Lit Dog says:

    Phil’s always been top-notch on foreign policy, but now it’s almost a red-pilling on domestic policy as well. To nit-pick a bit, the media doesn’t hold back on race when they know a White committed the crime. In fact, Ann Coulter, VDARE, AmRen et al have provided many examples of the double standard.

    Also, the media and gov’t worked hand-in-glove on a few occasions to blame Whites when they had no idea who the criminal was. Remember the DC sniper? The gov’t trotted out idiot experts who told us the killer fit the profile of a White man. The media even made a hero of some Black LE official who — if the tables were turned — would have been denounced as a racist.

    It’s interesting that Trump’s now in a spat with Rep. John Lewis. Trump has never been a friend of violent criminals, but he’s always tried to stay on the right side of PC while denouncing the crime. But with Lewis playing the race card, and Trump dog whistling about where crime is rampant, maybe there’s hope for change as soon as Hope and Change surrenders control of Justice.

    As Phil has documented in previous columns, Trump’s disappointing comments since the election seem to indicate there’s very little hope for a new Middle East policy. This is especially troubling because America First was a cornerstone of his campaign. Maybe we need to put it in terms Trump best understands: America’s getting a bad deal with Israel. We’re losing. Let’s start winning. We want to win so much with Israel we get tired of it.

    On a related note, here’s a stanza from my poem Ironman:

    America First would finish off
    A century’s parasitic trend.
    But Pollard, Lavon and Liberty—
    He calls our greatest friend.

    http://www.DukeDougherty.com/mixed-genre

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @utu
    "Remember the DC sniper? The gov’t trotted out idiot experts who told us the killer fit the profile of a White man. " - Perhaps what they really meant was a man with military shady background...

    The most important was the timing of the "DC sniper operation". Congress was debating whether to give Bush green light for war with Iraq. Year later anthrax letters had similar purpose.
  4. What is really lacking is investigative journalism. Remember Project Veritas video exposing Hillary Campaign and the DNC links to a group that organized and incited violence at Trump rallies through a process they called “bird dogging.”

    If it wasn’t for investigative reporting by project veritas, nobody would have known who was behind the violence at Trump rallies.

    It doesn’t matter Black or White.

    Anti-Trump Protesters Are Tools of the Oligarchy — Paul Craig Roberts

    http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2016/11/12/1010985-anti-trump-protesters-are-tools-of-the-oligarchy-paul-craig-roberts/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Yep.

    Undercover video shows Democrat operatives admitting they incited violence at Trump rallies
    https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/10/undercover-video-shows-democrat-operatives-admitting-they-incited-violence-at-trump-rallies
  5. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    You know what is surreal?

    All those TV news where the criminals and thugs are lowlife Negro scum…. but then you are treated to some clean-cut Negro or Negress to report the news to assure you that THERE ARE NICE NEGROES TOO.

    Tons of such news in Colin Flaherty’s reports.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw/videos

    Bringing blacks out of Africa was the biggest mistake humanity ever made.

    It’s like taking King Kong from the Jungle Island.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gene Su
    I really can't care for Anon's racist comments (and how many Anon's are there on this blog? It seems that there is a right wing Anon and a left-wing lower case anon). However, Gary North did an excellent essay 15 years ago on black crime. He wrote it after a riot in Cincinnati. Here is the only link to it:

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/05/gary-north/white-liberals-and-bull-conner/

    I should have posted this in Ron Unz's Pravda series on race and crime. Gary North makes the following points.

    1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals.
    2. During the 60's, the crooks who dominated the black community began to take advantage of their new-found freedoms by rioting and committing more crime. The leftist media dismissed this as their reaction to "societal oppression." That is why the media plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime.
  6. This is what I like about getting news about the U.S. from outside sources. New Zealand and Australia for instance ran stories about how young backpackers form those countries were among the few white people stranded in the New Orleans Superdome after Hurricane Katrina struck.

    Why? because they were among the few white people in the city who had any means or connections to get out via an automobile.

    The amount of verbal abuse they endured and the tension all around them made them a priority to be removed as quickly as possible, and the reports made no effort to conceal the fact that it was blacks who were hurling at them all the abuse, threats of rape, etc. “good on them” as they say.

    Better looking women over there too.

    http://www.worldtinderwomen.com/tinder-women-gold-coast-australia-bikini-attire/

    Read More
  7. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    When I see Wolf Blitzer and Charlie Rose pontificating on the screen, I simply move on without a moment’s hesitation. Add the likes of David Brooks and all the other MSM bigwigs including the print media and one wonders who pays attention to these clowns. No wonder their credibility with most Americans is approaching nil. The sooner they find their way to financial bankruptcy, the better for America.

    Read More
  8. One cop explained “Kids make stupid mistakes, I shouldn’t call them kids, they are legally adults, but they are young adults and the make stupid decisions…

    Heh. This reminds me of the story with neo-nazi battalions in former Ukraine. First, the media were flatly denying that the neo-nazis are Kiev regime’s base of support (‘Kremlin propaganda’). But then some journo spent time there and wrote a story. In the story he describes pro-Kiev-regime fighters with swastikas tattooed all over their bodies, screaming ‘sieg heil’ at every occasion; concluding the piece with: ‘hey, they are just kids, and of course they don’t really understand what it all means’…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Yawn.
    You are proof of the propaganda nature of government 'schools'. You probably think you're being profound. Laughable.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers.’
     
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Must reads:
    Holocaust Handbooks & Documentaries
    http://holocausthandbooks.com
    and:
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

  9. I contend that fake news has been de rigueur since pretty much always. Thomas Jefferson said so several times and there is a fairly endless supply of evidence to support the claim. The wonder is that anyone believes it at all these days.

    “You know well that [the British] government always kept a kind of standing army of news writers who without any regard to truth, or to what should be like truth, invented & put into the papers whatever might serve the minister. This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper.”

    Thomas Jefferson, letter to G. K. van Hogendorp, Paris, Oct. 13, 1785

    “… it is not right what I have done in the past, to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do, and have done in the past, because they are bribed to betray the people not only in Germany, all over Europe…there [are] always people who push for war, and this is not only politicians, it is journalists too. … We have betrayed our readers, just to push for war. … I don’t want this anymore; I’m fed up with this propaganda. We live in a banana republic, and not in a democratic country where we have press freedom.”

    Dr Udo Ulfkotte, the former German newspaper editor whose bestselling book exposed how the CIA controls German media, who has been found dead. At 56 as quoted by
    Baxter Dmitry in Former Newspaper Editor Who Exposed CIA Found Dead, January 15, 2017

    http://yournewswire.com/german-newspaper-editor-exposed-cia-dead/

    Where do people get their faith?

    Read More
    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Dr Udo Ulfkotte, the former German newspaper editor whose bestselling book exposed how the CIA controls German media, who has been found dead. At 56
     
    oh no!

    this is very sad, and it makes me angry.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp-Wh77wt1o

    he was of the best of us ~ God rest his heroic soul. A martyr now and patron saint to all that is good in the human spirit

    Gary Webb, Michael Hastings, Seth Rich, and now Udo Ulfkotte

    they want to send a message that if you take on the Fiend, they will kill you

    why else do we have laws like the NDAA?

    I suppose you're right to be pessimistic Jacques.
  10. What I am saying is that the United States mainstream media is the primary source of fake news due to its inbuilt biases on what is acceptable and what is not.

    “Mainstream?” Ever ask yourself who benefits from the use of that term?

    Why not use the more accurate terms, “corporate media” or “mass media” instead?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Zionist controlled media is better, and factual.
  11. utu says:
    @Lit Dog
    Phil’s always been top-notch on foreign policy, but now it’s almost a red-pilling on domestic policy as well. To nit-pick a bit, the media doesn’t hold back on race when they know a White committed the crime. In fact, Ann Coulter, VDARE, AmRen et al have provided many examples of the double standard.

    Also, the media and gov’t worked hand-in-glove on a few occasions to blame Whites when they had no idea who the criminal was. Remember the DC sniper? The gov’t trotted out idiot experts who told us the killer fit the profile of a White man. The media even made a hero of some Black LE official who — if the tables were turned — would have been denounced as a racist.

    It’s interesting that Trump’s now in a spat with Rep. John Lewis. Trump has never been a friend of violent criminals, but he’s always tried to stay on the right side of PC while denouncing the crime. But with Lewis playing the race card, and Trump dog whistling about where crime is rampant, maybe there’s hope for change as soon as Hope and Change surrenders control of Justice.

    As Phil has documented in previous columns, Trump’s disappointing comments since the election seem to indicate there’s very little hope for a new Middle East policy. This is especially troubling because America First was a cornerstone of his campaign. Maybe we need to put it in terms Trump best understands: America’s getting a bad deal with Israel. We’re losing. Let’s start winning. We want to win so much with Israel we get tired of it.

    On a related note, here’s a stanza from my poem Ironman:

    America First would finish off
    A century’s parasitic trend.
    But Pollard, Lavon and Liberty—
    He calls our greatest friend.

    www.DukeDougherty.com/mixed-genre

    “Remember the DC sniper? The gov’t trotted out idiot experts who told us the killer fit the profile of a White man. ” – Perhaps what they really meant was a man with military shady background…

    The most important was the timing of the “DC sniper operation”. Congress was debating whether to give Bush green light for war with Iraq. Year later anthrax letters had similar purpose.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Remember who finally found the snipers. He was a civilian, a White truck driver who saw them sleeping in their car at a highway rest stop.
    I remember so well the affirmative action moron in charge of the investigation, a Maryland sheriff Morse I believe his name was. White man in a white van was the mantra for weeks; also a disgruntled White veteran. Well, he was a veteran.
    And that sheriff Morse got a book deal out of it
    It was disgusting, all those press conferences with affirmative action black moron law enforcement reciting their lines.
    Eye witness reports claimed the shooters used a dark 4 door car, but the affirmative action morons abd the anti White press insisted it was a White man in a white van.

    I realized how biased the press is against Whites and in favor of black criminals back in the 1960s when I became a probation officer. Whenever I read an article about events with which I was familiar, the papers twisted the story to denigrate police and excuse black criminals.

    Remember the heterosexual AIDS epidemic that was supposed to kill millions? It never happened and if any of those writers had bothered to consult one chapter of a standard anatomy book they would have learned why it is easy to transmit AIDS thru anal sex and almost impossible to transmit AIDS thru vaginal sex.

    I've known about press bias for 50 years.

    I just don't believe anything in the MSM. Usually the truth is the opposite of the MSM propaganda. I assumed global warming was a fraud from the first, simply because the MSM propagated the myth.

    The only people who read newspapers are liberals over the age of 60. And who watches the endless blathering news shows. They are hard to follow anyway. The interruptions by advertising and breaking news and upcoming news make it difficult to follow the news stories.

    And for the last 70 years Whites who live near and around blacks have known what black crime, noise and disfunctional is. And we read the exact opposite in the media.
  12. From my point of view, quite frankly who cares if the incident is or was motivated by hate as kidnapping and torture should be enough and the designation hate crime is essentially phony anyway.

    Exactly. A ‘hate’ crime is really a thought crime.

    Read More
  13. To nit-pick a bit, the media doesn’t hold back on race when they know a White committed the crime.

    Unless they’re big time corporate, mafia or war criminals, in which case they more often than not “forget” to report the crimes or even worse, apologize and lobby for them.

    But then that applies to the current half wit half white as well.

    Read More
  14. Agent76 says:

    Dec 12, 2016 Georgia Official Says Homeland Security Tried To Hack Their State’s Voter Database

    While most of the country frets over Russia’s role in the 2016 election, the state of Georgia has come forward saying that they’ve traced an IP from a hack of their voter database right back to the offices of the Department of Homeland Security. Apparently we need to focus on protecting our vote from our own government.

    Read More
  15. Agent76 says:

    Jan 16, 2017 US military–industrial complex is willing to risk nuclear war with Russia

    Author and activist David Swanson discusses the anti-Russian media frenzy, attributing it to the Democrats’ desire to explain why Donald Trump won the presidential election without blaming the Democratic Party or the political establishment as a whole. He also addresses the geopolitical animosity toward Russia, spurred by war-profiteers.

    Read More
  16. Ballyhoo says:

    Up in Boston, Howie Carr (opinion columnist for the ‘Boston Herald’) reported earlier this month that the present editor of the liberal PC ‘Boston Globe’ declared to staffers in a New Year’s memo that the ‘Globe’ would no longer be a paper of record but now instead was to be a ‘paper of interest’ and exhorted staffers to come up with interesting stories.

    One wonders: interesting and of-interest to whom?

    The present WAPO editor is the former ‘Globe’ editor; the ‘Globe’ had been bought by the ‘New York Times’ which then had to sell it a few years back at a loss of about 90 cents on the dollar.

    Read More
  17. utu says:

    Few month (4 days before election) before the alleged Vermont power grid penetration by Russia this was the headline in The Independent:

    Nov 4, 2016

    US government hackers ‘penetrate’ Russian electric grid and communication lines to be ‘ready’ in case of election day interference

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-government-military-hackers-dnc-homeland-security-nsa-clinton-election-day-a7398881.html

    Read More
  18. Wally says: • Website
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    One cop explained “Kids make stupid mistakes, I shouldn’t call them kids, they are legally adults, but they are young adults and the make stupid decisions…
     
    Heh. This reminds me of the story with neo-nazi battalions in former Ukraine. First, the media were flatly denying that the neo-nazis are Kiev regime's base of support ('Kremlin propaganda'). But then some journo spent time there and wrote a story. In the story he describes pro-Kiev-regime fighters with swastikas tattooed all over their bodies, screaming 'sieg heil' at every occasion; concluding the piece with: 'hey, they are just kids, and of course they don't really understand what it all means'...

    Yawn.
    You are proof of the propaganda nature of government ‘schools’. You probably think you’re being profound. Laughable.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers.’

    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Must reads:
    Holocaust Handbooks & Documentaries

    http://holocausthandbooks.com

    and:

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    Read More
  19. Wally says:
    @jacques sheete

    What I am saying is that the United States mainstream media is the primary source of fake news due to its inbuilt biases on what is acceptable and what is not.
     
    "Mainstream?" Ever ask yourself who benefits from the use of that term?

    Why not use the more accurate terms, "corporate media" or "mass media" instead?

    Zionist controlled media is better, and factual.

    Read More
  20. Wally says:
    @Debbie Menon
    What is really lacking is investigative journalism. Remember Project Veritas video exposing Hillary Campaign and the DNC links to a group that organized and incited violence at Trump rallies through a process they called “bird dogging.”

    If it wasn't for investigative reporting by project veritas, nobody would have known who was behind the violence at Trump rallies.

    It doesn't matter Black or White.

    Anti-Trump Protesters Are Tools of the Oligarchy — Paul Craig Roberts

    http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2016/11/12/1010985-anti-trump-protesters-are-tools-of-the-oligarchy-paul-craig-roberts/

    Yep.

    Undercover video shows Democrat operatives admitting they incited violence at Trump rallies

    https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/10/undercover-video-shows-democrat-operatives-admitting-they-incited-violence-at-trump-rallies

    Read More
  21. woodNfish says:

    What I am saying is that the United States mainstream media is the primary source of fake news…

    Yeah, we know that. You are preaching to the choir and unless you can get your article published where grubers might actually read it (but not necessarily comprehend it), it might have some effect, but not here.

    Although, it is good to have you re-affirm what we already know.

    Read More
  22. One benefit of growing up reading the Washington Post is a considerable skill in “reading between the lines”. A particular example is from when the Post dropped racial descriptions from its accounts; a body found by the side of the Suitland Parkway was described as wearing a blond wig, purple sweatshirt, and yellow pants, leaving it to the reader to do the math.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chuck Orloski
    "... benefit of growing up reading Washington Post is a consid0rable skil in "reding between the lines."

    Terrific point, Jeff A.

    Today I read Richard Cohen's column "LBJ haunts Trump" published January 16, 2017, in The Washington Post. In the column, he stated that "an air of legitimacy clung to him (LBJ) like an odor." ( Eleven years old during that awful day in Dallas, I could smell it)

    Regarding our era's Corporate Media and its clever admiration & manipulation of Fake News, the following is what Richard Cohen wrote about the shady dealing Texan: " (the odor) thickened as opposition to the Vietnam War became more and more furious and it peaked, in my estimation with a HOAX (1967) by Paul Krassner in the counterculture magazine "The Realist." Tongue in cheek, it reported that LBJ had climbed into Kennedy's casket and there did unspeakable things (necrophilia). The story was abominable, tasteless and destroyed any other insult you could throw at it , but some people believed it. I know. I heard it."

    A secular Jewish Yuppie at the time, Paul Krassner wrote his "abominable" article, titled "The Part That Were Left Out" in reaction to William Manchester's approved biography of JFK. With a higher purpose in mind, Krassner believed "the satire broke through the notion that war in Vietnam was being fought by SANE men." Below is Truthmove.org (Forum) "information" which posits that members of the late-1960s press actually believed Krassner's story... and allegedly, so did Daniel Ellsberg!

    http://www.truthmove.org/forum/topic/1661

    There's a mighty taboo in the (approved) Zionist-U.S. Arts Caricature Department where "no one gets out employed" after raising non-conformant questions about the sanity of fraudulent men who run The War Against Terror. Speaking plainly & dirty could get you "renditioned" to Azerbaijan and get boogered inside a surplus Abu Ghraib casket.

    Are you out there Paul Krassner?
  23. Alden says:
    @utu
    "Remember the DC sniper? The gov’t trotted out idiot experts who told us the killer fit the profile of a White man. " - Perhaps what they really meant was a man with military shady background...

    The most important was the timing of the "DC sniper operation". Congress was debating whether to give Bush green light for war with Iraq. Year later anthrax letters had similar purpose.

    Remember who finally found the snipers. He was a civilian, a White truck driver who saw them sleeping in their car at a highway rest stop.
    I remember so well the affirmative action moron in charge of the investigation, a Maryland sheriff Morse I believe his name was. White man in a white van was the mantra for weeks; also a disgruntled White veteran. Well, he was a veteran.
    And that sheriff Morse got a book deal out of it
    It was disgusting, all those press conferences with affirmative action black moron law enforcement reciting their lines.
    Eye witness reports claimed the shooters used a dark 4 door car, but the affirmative action morons abd the anti White press insisted it was a White man in a white van.

    I realized how biased the press is against Whites and in favor of black criminals back in the 1960s when I became a probation officer. Whenever I read an article about events with which I was familiar, the papers twisted the story to denigrate police and excuse black criminals.

    Remember the heterosexual AIDS epidemic that was supposed to kill millions? It never happened and if any of those writers had bothered to consult one chapter of a standard anatomy book they would have learned why it is easy to transmit AIDS thru anal sex and almost impossible to transmit AIDS thru vaginal sex.

    I’ve known about press bias for 50 years.

    I just don’t believe anything in the MSM. Usually the truth is the opposite of the MSM propaganda. I assumed global warming was a fraud from the first, simply because the MSM propagated the myth.

    The only people who read newspapers are liberals over the age of 60. And who watches the endless blathering news shows. They are hard to follow anyway. The interruptions by advertising and breaking news and upcoming news make it difficult to follow the news stories.

    And for the last 70 years Whites who live near and around blacks have known what black crime, noise and disfunctional is. And we read the exact opposite in the media.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    It is really irrelevant who the snipers were. The only important question is why and who ordered it. If you waste all you energy on the fact that they were black or that the black sheriff was stupid you are where they want you to be.

    The slavery was the gift that keeps on giving to large extent because of people like you who are so easily sidetracked.

    , @Art
    Why do these media people obviously lie? Why do they pit black against white? What’s in it for them?

    The answer is they have to do what they do – if they do not, they will lose their jobs and their position in the media hierarchy – they are coerced into doing what they do. Jew owners and managers hire and fire.

    A divided America is good for Jew political power – that is 100% why the media is the way it is – PERIOD.

    Because they bring in so much money, Bill O’Reilly and a few others at Fox Jews can buck the prevailing black/white story and voice white outrage. That just hardens white attitudes.

    On all sides – what we hear is division and conflict between people – Jews do not give America the chance to heal itself.

    Peace --- Art
    , @Mis(ter)Anthrope
    From what I have read, it is very difficult for a man to get the HIV virus from a women from vaginal sex, but it not so difficult for a woman to get it from a man.

    That is one reason why I never believed that Magic Johnson got the virus from a woman. Another reason is that he was rumored to be bi-sexual even before it was reported that he had the virus. He and Eddie Murphy (the comedian with a thing for transvestite hookers) were good buddies.

  24. edNels says:

    What is Fake News? It must be counterfeit. The real news is Managed News. Managed news to manage the populace.

    When it comes to the PC cleaning up details of race in everyday violent crimes, that needs looking at because, though blacks get the shaft of oppression big time everybody knows, but what they aren’t thinking about is that the blacks are managed, and are used to manage whites from the underside.

    Ubiquitous oppression of blacks, causes tremendous hatred which needs to be continuously managed and channeled. Not to get lost in definitions, I’ll just cite the phenomenon of White Flight to the suburbs to get away from blacks, who god bless em, they do act up when oppressed, as they are. The whole thing is carefully orchestrated by sociologists from hell/maybe some of the original Eugenicists that taught and inspired Nazis developed the techniques over 400 yrs. ago of controlling one group (lower class/income whites, and include middle income too,) with another group that is completely under a shadow. Black is a convenient marker, it’s indelible, undeniable, serves its function, (serving to put a base line containment of the whites, who must then hustle a little bit to stay ahead of the ghetto, where they get routinely trounced).

    So the fake news, and the other fake news. What about the fake propaganda? who’s on first?

    Read More
  25. All news is fake news up to some extent. If a soccer match takes place and Real Madrid beat Barcelona 1-0, the scoreline, the time of the goal, and the name of the scorer are all factual, but beyond that questions such as whose fault the goal was, whether Madrid deserved to win, and so on are all matters of opinion.

    Anyone who has ever been the subject of a news report will know that there is always a huge gap between what you think actually happened and what the press version of the story seems to be conveying happened.

    My favorite news story relates to Jimmy Carter’s visit to Haiti when he reported “”Mrs. Cedras was impressive, powerful and forceful,” he said. “And attractive. She was slim and very attractive.”

    Read More
  26. utu says:
    @Alden
    Remember who finally found the snipers. He was a civilian, a White truck driver who saw them sleeping in their car at a highway rest stop.
    I remember so well the affirmative action moron in charge of the investigation, a Maryland sheriff Morse I believe his name was. White man in a white van was the mantra for weeks; also a disgruntled White veteran. Well, he was a veteran.
    And that sheriff Morse got a book deal out of it
    It was disgusting, all those press conferences with affirmative action black moron law enforcement reciting their lines.
    Eye witness reports claimed the shooters used a dark 4 door car, but the affirmative action morons abd the anti White press insisted it was a White man in a white van.

    I realized how biased the press is against Whites and in favor of black criminals back in the 1960s when I became a probation officer. Whenever I read an article about events with which I was familiar, the papers twisted the story to denigrate police and excuse black criminals.

    Remember the heterosexual AIDS epidemic that was supposed to kill millions? It never happened and if any of those writers had bothered to consult one chapter of a standard anatomy book they would have learned why it is easy to transmit AIDS thru anal sex and almost impossible to transmit AIDS thru vaginal sex.

    I've known about press bias for 50 years.

    I just don't believe anything in the MSM. Usually the truth is the opposite of the MSM propaganda. I assumed global warming was a fraud from the first, simply because the MSM propagated the myth.

    The only people who read newspapers are liberals over the age of 60. And who watches the endless blathering news shows. They are hard to follow anyway. The interruptions by advertising and breaking news and upcoming news make it difficult to follow the news stories.

    And for the last 70 years Whites who live near and around blacks have known what black crime, noise and disfunctional is. And we read the exact opposite in the media.

    It is really irrelevant who the snipers were. The only important question is why and who ordered it. If you waste all you energy on the fact that they were black or that the black sheriff was stupid you are where they want you to be.

    The slavery was the gift that keeps on giving to large extent because of people like you who are so easily sidetracked.

    Read More
  27. Art says:
    @Alden
    Remember who finally found the snipers. He was a civilian, a White truck driver who saw them sleeping in their car at a highway rest stop.
    I remember so well the affirmative action moron in charge of the investigation, a Maryland sheriff Morse I believe his name was. White man in a white van was the mantra for weeks; also a disgruntled White veteran. Well, he was a veteran.
    And that sheriff Morse got a book deal out of it
    It was disgusting, all those press conferences with affirmative action black moron law enforcement reciting their lines.
    Eye witness reports claimed the shooters used a dark 4 door car, but the affirmative action morons abd the anti White press insisted it was a White man in a white van.

    I realized how biased the press is against Whites and in favor of black criminals back in the 1960s when I became a probation officer. Whenever I read an article about events with which I was familiar, the papers twisted the story to denigrate police and excuse black criminals.

    Remember the heterosexual AIDS epidemic that was supposed to kill millions? It never happened and if any of those writers had bothered to consult one chapter of a standard anatomy book they would have learned why it is easy to transmit AIDS thru anal sex and almost impossible to transmit AIDS thru vaginal sex.

    I've known about press bias for 50 years.

    I just don't believe anything in the MSM. Usually the truth is the opposite of the MSM propaganda. I assumed global warming was a fraud from the first, simply because the MSM propagated the myth.

    The only people who read newspapers are liberals over the age of 60. And who watches the endless blathering news shows. They are hard to follow anyway. The interruptions by advertising and breaking news and upcoming news make it difficult to follow the news stories.

    And for the last 70 years Whites who live near and around blacks have known what black crime, noise and disfunctional is. And we read the exact opposite in the media.

    Why do these media people obviously lie? Why do they pit black against white? What’s in it for them?

    The answer is they have to do what they do – if they do not, they will lose their jobs and their position in the media hierarchy – they are coerced into doing what they do. Jew owners and managers hire and fire.

    A divided America is good for Jew political power – that is 100% why the media is the way it is – PERIOD.

    Because they bring in so much money, Bill O’Reilly and a few others at Fox Jews can buck the prevailing black/white story and voice white outrage. That just hardens white attitudes.

    On all sides – what we hear is division and conflict between people – Jews do not give America the chance to heal itself.

    Peace — Art

    Read More
  28. Rurik says:
    @jacques sheete
    I contend that fake news has been de rigueur since pretty much always. Thomas Jefferson said so several times and there is a fairly endless supply of evidence to support the claim. The wonder is that anyone believes it at all these days.

    “You know well that [the British] government always kept a kind of standing army of news writers who without any regard to truth, or to what should be like truth, invented & put into the papers whatever might serve the minister. This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper.”

    Thomas Jefferson, letter to G. K. van Hogendorp, Paris, Oct. 13, 1785
     


    “… it is not right what I have done in the past, to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do, and have done in the past, because they are bribed to betray the people not only in Germany, all over Europe…there [are] always people who push for war, and this is not only politicians, it is journalists too. … We have betrayed our readers, just to push for war. … I don’t want this anymore; I’m fed up with this propaganda. We live in a banana republic, and not in a democratic country where we have press freedom.”

    Dr Udo Ulfkotte, the former German newspaper editor whose bestselling book exposed how the CIA controls German media, who has been found dead. At 56 as quoted by
    Baxter Dmitry in Former Newspaper Editor Who Exposed CIA Found Dead, January 15, 2017


    http://yournewswire.com/german-newspaper-editor-exposed-cia-dead/
     
    Where do people get their faith?

    Dr Udo Ulfkotte, the former German newspaper editor whose bestselling book exposed how the CIA controls German media, who has been found dead. At 56

    oh no!

    this is very sad, and it makes me angry.

    he was of the best of us ~ God rest his heroic soul. A martyr now and patron saint to all that is good in the human spirit

    Gary Webb, Michael Hastings, Seth Rich, and now Udo Ulfkotte

    they want to send a message that if you take on the Fiend, they will kill you

    why else do we have laws like the NDAA?

    I suppose you’re right to be pessimistic Jacques.

    Read More
  29. RobinG says:

    SAMANTHA POWER’S “NEW SPEAK” PARTING SHOT AT RUSSIA –
    Up is Down, Black is White, War is Peace….
    “MINISTRY OF TRUTH” Preview…

    Speaking at the imperialist think-tank Atlantic Council, Power stressed need for government funded internal Propaganda Ministry – to make sure Americans aren’t subjected to ‘fake’ news. [Watch out, Ron Unz! You're on the LIST!]

    Literally everything Power said (about Ukraine, Syria, Russian hacking, etc.) was the opposite of the truth, with one exception: that Russia is opposed to the existing world order, which I believe is quite true. I.E., Russia is opposed to US control of all news and opinion, and opposed to US hegemony in general (monetary, military, etc.).

    If you’ve got the stomach, watch for yourself -

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?422065-1/un-ambassador-samantha-power-criticizes-russia-final-speech

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Fortunately there are some good tweets like these at #Russiafactor -

    "US Ambassador to UN Samantha Power dedicates her final speech to fear-mongering about Putin in attempt to start war w/ Russia"

    "Officials from the outgoing Obama admin are whining about the #RussiaFactor fable in attempt to whip up WW3 before Friday. Sad!!!"
    , @edNels
    Her style of speaking is similar to Obama's. Lacks a warm up, frame of what will be the focus, beginning or an end, just a rambling laundry list, with well pronounced words, overly in earnest.

    ["This is my last major speech..."] wouldn't it be better to say: This will by my last opportunity to say a few words... Let posterity determine if it was a SPEECH or not.

    Get a haircut too, As powerful woman don't need to spend valuable taxpayers time endlessly caring for luxurious long hair. Even if it is sensational.

    "Oh Really!"
  30. @Fran Macadam
    And when I look at the expensive skyscrapers housing these big media digs, it's not hard to fix the purpose for the Fake News. Or when I see the big foundations who underwrite "public" radio and television, bearing the names of the founders of America's most gigantic corporate oligarchies.

    Follow the big money to understand what is being here purchased, the manufacture of public opinion, following on from the ownership of the other end of public accountability, bought up government.

    public media should be fully funded by the government. well funded, too, maybe with elected board of directors? thank god TV is finally dying.

    Read More
  31. @Alden
    Remember who finally found the snipers. He was a civilian, a White truck driver who saw them sleeping in their car at a highway rest stop.
    I remember so well the affirmative action moron in charge of the investigation, a Maryland sheriff Morse I believe his name was. White man in a white van was the mantra for weeks; also a disgruntled White veteran. Well, he was a veteran.
    And that sheriff Morse got a book deal out of it
    It was disgusting, all those press conferences with affirmative action black moron law enforcement reciting their lines.
    Eye witness reports claimed the shooters used a dark 4 door car, but the affirmative action morons abd the anti White press insisted it was a White man in a white van.

    I realized how biased the press is against Whites and in favor of black criminals back in the 1960s when I became a probation officer. Whenever I read an article about events with which I was familiar, the papers twisted the story to denigrate police and excuse black criminals.

    Remember the heterosexual AIDS epidemic that was supposed to kill millions? It never happened and if any of those writers had bothered to consult one chapter of a standard anatomy book they would have learned why it is easy to transmit AIDS thru anal sex and almost impossible to transmit AIDS thru vaginal sex.

    I've known about press bias for 50 years.

    I just don't believe anything in the MSM. Usually the truth is the opposite of the MSM propaganda. I assumed global warming was a fraud from the first, simply because the MSM propagated the myth.

    The only people who read newspapers are liberals over the age of 60. And who watches the endless blathering news shows. They are hard to follow anyway. The interruptions by advertising and breaking news and upcoming news make it difficult to follow the news stories.

    And for the last 70 years Whites who live near and around blacks have known what black crime, noise and disfunctional is. And we read the exact opposite in the media.

    From what I have read, it is very difficult for a man to get the HIV virus from a women from vaginal sex, but it not so difficult for a woman to get it from a man.

    That is one reason why I never believed that Magic Johnson got the virus from a woman. Another reason is that he was rumored to be bi-sexual even before it was reported that he had the virus. He and Eddie Murphy (the comedian with a thing for transvestite hookers) were good buddies.

    Read More
  32. RobinG says:
    @RobinG
    SAMANTHA POWER'S "NEW SPEAK" PARTING SHOT AT RUSSIA --
    Up is Down, Black is White, War is Peace....
    "MINISTRY OF TRUTH" Preview...


    Speaking at the imperialist think-tank Atlantic Council, Power stressed need for government funded internal Propaganda Ministry - to make sure Americans aren't subjected to 'fake' news. [Watch out, Ron Unz! You're on the LIST!]

    Literally everything Power said (about Ukraine, Syria, Russian hacking, etc.) was the opposite of the truth, with one exception: that Russia is opposed to the existing world order, which I believe is quite true. I.E., Russia is opposed to US control of all news and opinion, and opposed to US hegemony in general (monetary, military, etc.).

    If you've got the stomach, watch for yourself -
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?422065-1/un-ambassador-samantha-power-criticizes-russia-final-speech

    Fortunately there are some good tweets like these at #Russiafactor -

    “US Ambassador to UN Samantha Power dedicates her final speech to fear-mongering about Putin in attempt to start war w/ Russia”

    “Officials from the outgoing Obama admin are whining about the #RussiaFactor fable in attempt to whip up WW3 before Friday. Sad!!!”

    Read More
  33. edNels says:
    @RobinG
    SAMANTHA POWER'S "NEW SPEAK" PARTING SHOT AT RUSSIA --
    Up is Down, Black is White, War is Peace....
    "MINISTRY OF TRUTH" Preview...


    Speaking at the imperialist think-tank Atlantic Council, Power stressed need for government funded internal Propaganda Ministry - to make sure Americans aren't subjected to 'fake' news. [Watch out, Ron Unz! You're on the LIST!]

    Literally everything Power said (about Ukraine, Syria, Russian hacking, etc.) was the opposite of the truth, with one exception: that Russia is opposed to the existing world order, which I believe is quite true. I.E., Russia is opposed to US control of all news and opinion, and opposed to US hegemony in general (monetary, military, etc.).

    If you've got the stomach, watch for yourself -
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?422065-1/un-ambassador-samantha-power-criticizes-russia-final-speech

    Her style of speaking is similar to Obama’s. Lacks a warm up, frame of what will be the focus, beginning or an end, just a rambling laundry list, with well pronounced words, overly in earnest.

    ["This is my last major speech..."] wouldn’t it be better to say: This will by my last opportunity to say a few words… Let posterity determine if it was a SPEECH or not.

    Get a haircut too, As powerful woman don’t need to spend valuable taxpayers time endlessly caring for luxurious long hair. Even if it is sensational.

    “Oh Really!”

    Read More
  34. V. Uil says:

    1,000 thumbs up for the article.

    Of course the MSM is the real fake news – to coin an oxymoron – always reporting one side, bad things by whites to blacks with enthusiasm and alacrity. Never or minimally reporting black on white and black on black crime.

    A martian would conclude viewing the MSM that blacks are saints and whites are devils. But the rest of us living in the real world know different.

    The greatest fake news though it that which is never printed or published or broadcast. MSM lie and fake news by omission. They simply don’t tell you about anything that contradicts their lefty narrative.

    But now the Internet has exposed and destroyed their scheme. All is lost for the MSM. About time too.

    Read More
  35. KenH says:

    The media has no absolutely reservations about mentioning the race of a crime suspect if they are white and usually put “white male” in all caps. But if they are black they like to keep us guessing and since they know most people are on to their use of “youths” and “teens” they’ve shifted to characterizing rampaging, criminal blacks as “young people”.

    Many of those posting their observations were themselves black, some expressing their desire that the perpetrators be imprisoned “forever” for having carried out such a horrific crime.

    There really couldn’t be that many blacks who condemn this act. I’ve had several personal experiences where blacks are indifferent at best or laugh and gloat at worst when one of theirs does something bad to white people.

    Read More
  36. HA, I wonder why people like to jump to conclusions one way or to other.

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/anonymous-to-donald-trump-we-know-what-you-did-last-summer-511904.shtml

    “This isn’t the 80′s any longer, information doesn’t vanish, it is all out there. You are going to regret the next 4 years. We could care less about Democrats attacking you @realDonaldTrump, the fact of the matter is, you are implicated in some really heavy s**t. Roy Cohen and your daddy aren’t here to protect you anymore. Oh and please tell your interns not to waste money hitting us with your Moldavian bot farm, stay frosty @realDonaldTrump.”

    just follow this “fake” news thing, it is gonna be huge :)

    Read More
  37. MarkinLA says:
    @Mark Green
    Excellent article. Fake news is rampant and it is nothing new. Even the meaning and significance now being ascribed to the Russian 'hacking' incident is fake.

    All that's happened in these so-called hacking incidents were embarrassing disclosures. But the news was genuine. Real--and scandalous--information made various US government officials look terrible. And properly so. Accurate information that was unauthorized ended up damaging candidate Clinton and the Democrats. Nothing more. Trump was smeared briefly but it looks as if the entire story was a hoax. Not so with the other disclosures. Mrs. Clinton and the Dems got tarred with their own feces. Why? The shit was real.

    Since when are leaks diabolical anyway? They're legitimate news. Often scandalous news. And hidden. But real. So since when is 'truth'--involving political conduct, that is--scurrilous?

    When Daniel Ellsberg leaked unlawfully-obtained, government documents about the VietNam war he was widely hailed as a hero--even though many government officials got caught with their pants down. Washington's hand-wringing about these 'Russian' hacks is basically all about whose ox is being gored. These hate-driven, political snowflakes are actually hopeless hypocrites. Many should be in jail.

    Americans have been fed half-truths, propaganda, distorted 'facts' and hasbara for decades. We can thank the partisan army of embedded, media activists for this vast and unending fraud. This is why Trump is being roasted continuously and treated like a criminal--though he's harmed no one.

    Hopefully, Trump will be able to resist the ubiquitous, media-driven hysteria. This will not be easy however. These operatives still have the power to shape the narrative and mold the American psyche. This is why Trump--not Hillary--is being bombarded relentlessly with accusations and innuendo.

    Both the Big Government and Big Media establishments hate Trump because he--unlike Obama and Hillary--genuinely threaten their prestige, credibility and power. Trump could impose real change in the global and domestic pecking order. This is hope and change that the Deep State does not want and will resist furiously.

    Well what about the RNC hacks that didn’t get exposed? Remember that stupid claim. There was an unsubstantiated but wildly held belief that the Republicans just had to be doing the same thing and it wasn’t fair that only Hillary’s dirty laundry was being aired. If you truly believe the Republicans were racists then you would have no trouble believing there was an e-mail inviting you to the next Klan rally at the Trump Tower.

    What they forget was that Trump had a very small staff. In fact, it was constantly cited as the reason he was going to lose – no ground game. Well the smaller your staff, the less likely you are to have people send off-color jokes or make comments about the people you need but don’t like.

    Read More
  38. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Americans need to learn what is really going on both at home and abroad

    Not going to be easy.
    As someone who must have known them well, a Dr. Day who worked for Planned Parenthood and who is a figure of great interest, used to say of Americans: They are too trusting. They don’t ask the right questions.

    Read More
  39. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Reading my way through the comments, it occurred to me that the media and police department’s apparent reticence to report black on white crime with the same horror that it reports white on black serves no one

    It wouldn’t be done by every one if it served no one

    Read More
  40. Gene Su says:
    @Anon
    You know what is surreal?

    All those TV news where the criminals and thugs are lowlife Negro scum.... but then you are treated to some clean-cut Negro or Negress to report the news to assure you that THERE ARE NICE NEGROES TOO.

    Tons of such news in Colin Flaherty's reports.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw/videos

    Bringing blacks out of Africa was the biggest mistake humanity ever made.

    It's like taking King Kong from the Jungle Island.

    I really can’t care for Anon’s racist comments (and how many Anon’s are there on this blog? It seems that there is a right wing Anon and a left-wing lower case anon). However, Gary North did an excellent essay 15 years ago on black crime. He wrote it after a riot in Cincinnati. Here is the only link to it:

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/05/gary-north/white-liberals-and-bull-conner/

    I should have posted this in Ron Unz’s Pravda series on race and crime. Gary North makes the following points.

    1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals.
    2. During the 60′s, the crooks who dominated the black community began to take advantage of their new-found freedoms by rioting and committing more crime. The leftist media dismissed this as their reaction to “societal oppression.” That is why the media plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "I really can’t care for Anon’s racist comments"

    I can't care for Gene Su's dorky comments, but yes, I am a race-ist. Ism means belief, and I believe in the existence of races and racial differences. Blacks are different from whites in dangerous ways. They are more muscular, more aggressive, more impulsive, and tougher. This combination of aggression and knowledge that they can whup whitey has made blacks very dangerous. But then, it's not just about black rage at past discrimination because blacks attack everyone.

    "1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals."

    Maybe much earlier? You mean whites allowed black slaves to go around with knives and guns to kill one another? You gotta be kidding me.

    Now, I don't know about white policy on the black community, but free blacks, at least within their own community, could have organized to enforce law and order.

    Also, with blacks, it's damned if you do, damned if you don't. In recent times, the police did do a lot to maintain law and order in the black community with increased policing? What is the Negro response? BLM that blames dead blacks on whites when, in fact, the problem is blacks killing blacks and blacks killing non-blacks.
    When cops retreat, blacks bitch about how the police ain't doing enough. If police step up, blacks bitch that police be doing too much. Negro mentality is to talk big, never be self-critical, and always blame others. Indeed, this is why blacks always be killing one another. They are always trash-talking about other blacks and never reflect on their own faults. It's 'yo mama' and 'yo MAMA'.

    Another thing. Suppose whites had enslaved Chinese and brought them here. Suppose whites, after end of Chinese slavery, hadn't been very stringent in enforcing laws in Chinese community on Chinese-on-Chinese issues. Would freed Chinese have turned into criminals like blacks? No. Chinese can be violent and hideous, but they aren't as naturally violent and aggressive as blacks are.

    Gene Su sounds like some dorky yellow boy, and we know how servile these types are. It seems Su read some stuff and believes in them 100%. And he's been instilled with MLK-ism where we are not supposed to say critical things about blacks. Instead, blame everything on everyone else.

    So, blame all black problems after Reconstruction on whites. And blame all black problems since 60s on whites. Blacks don't have agency and are never to blame.

    But then, what Su seems to be implying is that blacks go especially nuts when they are given agency. After Civil War and end of slavery, blacks got agency, and they began to act wild and criminal. Blacks aren't good at using freedom. Look at Detroit, Haiti, and all of black Africa.
    So, things got bad, so whites stepped in to restore order in the South and took away some freedom from wild blacks. So, that restored some order.
    But then, 60s happened and blacks got total freedom and were allowed to do as please, and all hell broke loose. So, again, blacks + freedom is like mixing oil and water. Things go nuts.

    If Su had real sense, he would ask, "how come blacks can't do nothing on their own? and how come PC tags the blame for black problems on everyone but blacks?"

    But Su is too PC in yellow dorky way to see the light. He just spouts the same crap. He may be less PC cuz of his libertarian streak, but he's PC at the core because he rejects race-ism.
    But even as he denounces race-ism, his argument is actually race-ist. It is premised on the notion that blacks are wild and cannot handle freedom well. They have to be controlled and watched more tightly. Su's argument seems that blacks, being wild, needs to be policed very hard. Well, aint that race-ist?

    , @iffen
    essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime.

    This is not completely accurate.

    Black on black crime was treated differently insofar as investigation, prosecution and sentencing and you could generalize and say that it was much more dismissive and lenient.

    Also relevant are the differences between the black communities' and black families' responses to a criminal actor. By that I mean that the white family and the white community will expel and separate from a criminal actor much more quickly and more often than the black community and black family.

    The solution to the anon and anonymous problem is to CTI all of them.
    , @woodNfish

    The leftist media dismissed this as their reaction to “societal oppression.” That is why the media plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime.
     
    No, the reason the lying LSM plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime is because leftists are racists. This isn't just rhetoric, it is a proven fact. The Democrat Party created the KKK, Jim Crow laws and Segregation. The Democrat Party IS the party of slavery and racism and Obama is their Head Plantation Nigger.

    This says it all:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/17/former-black-panther-illegitimate-congressman-john-lewis-presided-destruction-black-people/
  41. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Gene Su
    I really can't care for Anon's racist comments (and how many Anon's are there on this blog? It seems that there is a right wing Anon and a left-wing lower case anon). However, Gary North did an excellent essay 15 years ago on black crime. He wrote it after a riot in Cincinnati. Here is the only link to it:

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/05/gary-north/white-liberals-and-bull-conner/

    I should have posted this in Ron Unz's Pravda series on race and crime. Gary North makes the following points.

    1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals.
    2. During the 60's, the crooks who dominated the black community began to take advantage of their new-found freedoms by rioting and committing more crime. The leftist media dismissed this as their reaction to "societal oppression." That is why the media plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime.

    “I really can’t care for Anon’s racist comments”

    I can’t care for Gene Su’s dorky comments, but yes, I am a race-ist. Ism means belief, and I believe in the existence of races and racial differences. Blacks are different from whites in dangerous ways. They are more muscular, more aggressive, more impulsive, and tougher. This combination of aggression and knowledge that they can whup whitey has made blacks very dangerous. But then, it’s not just about black rage at past discrimination because blacks attack everyone.

    “1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals.”

    Maybe much earlier? You mean whites allowed black slaves to go around with knives and guns to kill one another? You gotta be kidding me.

    Now, I don’t know about white policy on the black community, but free blacks, at least within their own community, could have organized to enforce law and order.

    Also, with blacks, it’s damned if you do, damned if you don’t. In recent times, the police did do a lot to maintain law and order in the black community with increased policing? What is the Negro response? BLM that blames dead blacks on whites when, in fact, the problem is blacks killing blacks and blacks killing non-blacks.
    When cops retreat, blacks bitch about how the police ain’t doing enough. If police step up, blacks bitch that police be doing too much. Negro mentality is to talk big, never be self-critical, and always blame others. Indeed, this is why blacks always be killing one another. They are always trash-talking about other blacks and never reflect on their own faults. It’s ‘yo mama’ and ‘yo MAMA’.

    Another thing. Suppose whites had enslaved Chinese and brought them here. Suppose whites, after end of Chinese slavery, hadn’t been very stringent in enforcing laws in Chinese community on Chinese-on-Chinese issues. Would freed Chinese have turned into criminals like blacks? No. Chinese can be violent and hideous, but they aren’t as naturally violent and aggressive as blacks are.

    Gene Su sounds like some dorky yellow boy, and we know how servile these types are. It seems Su read some stuff and believes in them 100%. And he’s been instilled with MLK-ism where we are not supposed to say critical things about blacks. Instead, blame everything on everyone else.

    So, blame all black problems after Reconstruction on whites. And blame all black problems since 60s on whites. Blacks don’t have agency and are never to blame.

    But then, what Su seems to be implying is that blacks go especially nuts when they are given agency. After Civil War and end of slavery, blacks got agency, and they began to act wild and criminal. Blacks aren’t good at using freedom. Look at Detroit, Haiti, and all of black Africa.
    So, things got bad, so whites stepped in to restore order in the South and took away some freedom from wild blacks. So, that restored some order.
    But then, 60s happened and blacks got total freedom and were allowed to do as please, and all hell broke loose. So, again, blacks + freedom is like mixing oil and water. Things go nuts.

    If Su had real sense, he would ask, “how come blacks can’t do nothing on their own? and how come PC tags the blame for black problems on everyone but blacks?”

    But Su is too PC in yellow dorky way to see the light. He just spouts the same crap. He may be less PC cuz of his libertarian streak, but he’s PC at the core because he rejects race-ism.
    But even as he denounces race-ism, his argument is actually race-ist. It is premised on the notion that blacks are wild and cannot handle freedom well. They have to be controlled and watched more tightly. Su’s argument seems that blacks, being wild, needs to be policed very hard. Well, aint that race-ist?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gene Su
    Yikes, a ranter! And more mud slinging.

    You are right, Anon. I am not a racialist. I am a culturalist - a cultural realist. I believe that intelligence and destiny is not written in our genes. I believe that it is written in our culture, attitudes, worldviews, and beliefs. Racialists believe that it takes eons for people to evolve genetically and nothing can be done to alter them. Culturalists believe that it is also mostly futile to alter people but evolution of cultures takes centuries, not eons.

    I have asked on this blog why is it whenever a wannabe gangsta shoots some innocent black child the BLM crowd never gets half as upset as when a cop shoots a black.

    I also think the statement that blacks are more violent then whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud.
    , @KenH

    When cops retreat, blacks bitch about how the police ain’t doing enough
     
    I knew this would happen. Just two weeks ago on the 60 Minutes segment about the dramatic rise in Chicago shootings, black residents were crying that "Da po-leece ain't helping us" but when the police do try to help reduce crime in black hoods, which sometimes involves being a little rough with savage black criminals and stretching the bill of rights, they get lambasted for racism and brutality. The Barney Fife model of policing would not work and get cops killed in black hoods.

    We simply can't live together and it's time whites are allowed their own segregated communities and let the ignorant blacks stew in their own juices, kill each other off and leave whitey out of it.

  42. In the UK a great deal of narrative can be created just by whose outrage is considered to be the important story. Most BBC headlines in the last year seem to have started “Donald Trump has come under fierce criticism after he …”.

    Today we had a different one, after Boris Johnson (Brit Foreign Secretary) said that the EU shouldn’t subject Britain to “a regime of punishment beatings as if it’s some WW2 film” – the BBC’s main point was “Boris upsets Germany and France – mentions the war!”.

    “the reader, aware of that reticence, consequently automatically assumes that the perpetrator is black anyway”

    If they’ve been around a bit, perhaps. If their life experience is their education and their media consumption, maybe not. The late Hannah Graham was 18 (and drunk) when total stranger Jesse Matthew accosted her in the street and took her to a bar. Not everyone was as innocent as Hannah.

    http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Hannah-Graham-Jesse-Matthew-search-court-docs-timeline-365002661.html

    “A witness who says she saw Virginia college student Hannah Graham and murder suspect Jesse Matthew together in a bar on the night that Graham vanished reportedly told a friend, “He’s gonna f— her up.””

    Read More
  43. iffen says:
    @Gene Su
    I really can't care for Anon's racist comments (and how many Anon's are there on this blog? It seems that there is a right wing Anon and a left-wing lower case anon). However, Gary North did an excellent essay 15 years ago on black crime. He wrote it after a riot in Cincinnati. Here is the only link to it:

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/05/gary-north/white-liberals-and-bull-conner/

    I should have posted this in Ron Unz's Pravda series on race and crime. Gary North makes the following points.

    1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals.
    2. During the 60's, the crooks who dominated the black community began to take advantage of their new-found freedoms by rioting and committing more crime. The leftist media dismissed this as their reaction to "societal oppression." That is why the media plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime.

    essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime.

    This is not completely accurate.

    Black on black crime was treated differently insofar as investigation, prosecution and sentencing and you could generalize and say that it was much more dismissive and lenient.

    Also relevant are the differences between the black communities’ and black families’ responses to a criminal actor. By that I mean that the white family and the white community will expel and separate from a criminal actor much more quickly and more often than the black community and black family.

    The solution to the anon and anonymous problem is to CTI all of them.

    Read More
  44. @Jeff Albertson
    One benefit of growing up reading the Washington Post is a considerable skill in "reading between the lines". A particular example is from when the Post dropped racial descriptions from its accounts; a body found by the side of the Suitland Parkway was described as wearing a blond wig, purple sweatshirt, and yellow pants, leaving it to the reader to do the math.

    “… benefit of growing up reading Washington Post is a consid0rable skil in “reding between the lines.”

    Terrific point, Jeff A.

    Today I read Richard Cohen’s column “LBJ haunts Trump” published January 16, 2017, in The Washington Post. In the column, he stated that “an air of legitimacy clung to him (LBJ) like an odor.” ( Eleven years old during that awful day in Dallas, I could smell it)

    Regarding our era’s Corporate Media and its clever admiration & manipulation of Fake News, the following is what Richard Cohen wrote about the shady dealing Texan: ” (the odor) thickened as opposition to the Vietnam War became more and more furious and it peaked, in my estimation with a HOAX (1967) by Paul Krassner in the counterculture magazine “The Realist.” Tongue in cheek, it reported that LBJ had climbed into Kennedy’s casket and there did unspeakable things (necrophilia). The story was abominable, tasteless and destroyed any other insult you could throw at it , but some people believed it. I know. I heard it.”

    A secular Jewish Yuppie at the time, Paul Krassner wrote his “abominable” article, titled “The Part That Were Left Out” in reaction to William Manchester’s approved biography of JFK. With a higher purpose in mind, Krassner believed “the satire broke through the notion that war in Vietnam was being fought by SANE men.” Below is Truthmove.org (Forum) “information” which posits that members of the late-1960s press actually believed Krassner’s story… and allegedly, so did Daniel Ellsberg!

    http://www.truthmove.org/forum/topic/1661

    There’s a mighty taboo in the (approved) Zionist-U.S. Arts Caricature Department where “no one gets out employed” after raising non-conformant questions about the sanity of fraudulent men who run The War Against Terror. Speaking plainly & dirty could get you “renditioned” to Azerbaijan and get boogered inside a surplus Abu Ghraib casket.

    Are you out there Paul Krassner?

    Read More
  45. Gene Su says:
    @Anon
    "I really can’t care for Anon’s racist comments"

    I can't care for Gene Su's dorky comments, but yes, I am a race-ist. Ism means belief, and I believe in the existence of races and racial differences. Blacks are different from whites in dangerous ways. They are more muscular, more aggressive, more impulsive, and tougher. This combination of aggression and knowledge that they can whup whitey has made blacks very dangerous. But then, it's not just about black rage at past discrimination because blacks attack everyone.

    "1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals."

    Maybe much earlier? You mean whites allowed black slaves to go around with knives and guns to kill one another? You gotta be kidding me.

    Now, I don't know about white policy on the black community, but free blacks, at least within their own community, could have organized to enforce law and order.

    Also, with blacks, it's damned if you do, damned if you don't. In recent times, the police did do a lot to maintain law and order in the black community with increased policing? What is the Negro response? BLM that blames dead blacks on whites when, in fact, the problem is blacks killing blacks and blacks killing non-blacks.
    When cops retreat, blacks bitch about how the police ain't doing enough. If police step up, blacks bitch that police be doing too much. Negro mentality is to talk big, never be self-critical, and always blame others. Indeed, this is why blacks always be killing one another. They are always trash-talking about other blacks and never reflect on their own faults. It's 'yo mama' and 'yo MAMA'.

    Another thing. Suppose whites had enslaved Chinese and brought them here. Suppose whites, after end of Chinese slavery, hadn't been very stringent in enforcing laws in Chinese community on Chinese-on-Chinese issues. Would freed Chinese have turned into criminals like blacks? No. Chinese can be violent and hideous, but they aren't as naturally violent and aggressive as blacks are.

    Gene Su sounds like some dorky yellow boy, and we know how servile these types are. It seems Su read some stuff and believes in them 100%. And he's been instilled with MLK-ism where we are not supposed to say critical things about blacks. Instead, blame everything on everyone else.

    So, blame all black problems after Reconstruction on whites. And blame all black problems since 60s on whites. Blacks don't have agency and are never to blame.

    But then, what Su seems to be implying is that blacks go especially nuts when they are given agency. After Civil War and end of slavery, blacks got agency, and they began to act wild and criminal. Blacks aren't good at using freedom. Look at Detroit, Haiti, and all of black Africa.
    So, things got bad, so whites stepped in to restore order in the South and took away some freedom from wild blacks. So, that restored some order.
    But then, 60s happened and blacks got total freedom and were allowed to do as please, and all hell broke loose. So, again, blacks + freedom is like mixing oil and water. Things go nuts.

    If Su had real sense, he would ask, "how come blacks can't do nothing on their own? and how come PC tags the blame for black problems on everyone but blacks?"

    But Su is too PC in yellow dorky way to see the light. He just spouts the same crap. He may be less PC cuz of his libertarian streak, but he's PC at the core because he rejects race-ism.
    But even as he denounces race-ism, his argument is actually race-ist. It is premised on the notion that blacks are wild and cannot handle freedom well. They have to be controlled and watched more tightly. Su's argument seems that blacks, being wild, needs to be policed very hard. Well, aint that race-ist?

    Yikes, a ranter! And more mud slinging.

    You are right, Anon. I am not a racialist. I am a culturalist – a cultural realist. I believe that intelligence and destiny is not written in our genes. I believe that it is written in our culture, attitudes, worldviews, and beliefs. Racialists believe that it takes eons for people to evolve genetically and nothing can be done to alter them. Culturalists believe that it is also mostly futile to alter people but evolution of cultures takes centuries, not eons.

    I have asked on this blog why is it whenever a wannabe gangsta shoots some innocent black child the BLM crowd never gets half as upset as when a cop shoots a black.

    I also think the statement that blacks are more violent then whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    I also think the statement that blacks are more violent than whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud.
     
    Differences in racial temperament are not the issue here.

    Blacks Africans are "cowardly and passive" in Africa precisely because they live under dictators and warlords. The Russians were also "cowardly and passive" under Stalin, where any whisper of criticism of the Leader would get them arrested or lose their job at a minimum.

    Violent Blacks in the US are not afraid. They have learnt that they are exempt from the normal rules of Law and Order and that the MSM and White Liberals have their back.
    , @Anon
    Hey, Eugene Chop Suey

    " I am not a racialist. I am a culturalist – a cultural realist. I believe that intelligence and destiny is not written in our genes. I believe that it is written in our culture, attitudes, worldviews, and beliefs. Racialists believe that it takes eons for people to evolve genetically and nothing can be done to alter them. Culturalists believe that it is also mostly futile to alter people but evolution of cultures takes centuries, not eons."

    What are you, a dammy? I'm not denying the role of culture. Culture is very important, but there are limits to what culture can achieve. Take sports. Suppose there are two identical peoples in two communities. In one community, there is the Culture of Health, good eating, and exercise. In the other community, there is the culture of laziness, excess, wantonness, piggery, and fatassedness.
    Obviously, those in the Culture of Health will be healthier because their culture prioritizes self-control, restraint, exercise, and good habits. In contrast, many people in the other community will be lardasses, fatsoes, tubaroons, flabsters, and bubble-butts.
    So, culture does matter.

    However, there are limits to what culture can achieve. In the past, Chinese looked down on exercise. Confucian scholars saw that stuff as low. And well-educated people looked down on physical activity as no good. But in modern China, there is much emphasis on sports and exercise. So, China has even produced world class athletes in many fields. BUT, there are genetic barriers, and that is why China wins few medals in track and field. And it hasn't won a single medal in basketball despite its 1.3 billion population.
    So, culture is important but it has its limits.

    Culture can change and influence behavior. After all, blacks don't all act the same all over the world. Blacks act differently in Nigeria, Angola, Detroit, Haiti, Cuba, and etc. Why? They have different cultures. Some are more modern, some are more traditional. Some are controlled by village elders. Some are controlled by street punks into rap. But, we do see general patterns among blacks all over the world regardless of culture. Generally, blacks tend to be more impulsive, wild, aggressive, and jiving. They are more likely to go off like George Jefferson, Al Sharpton, or some rapper. So, generally speaking, blacks are more prone to violence and bad behavior.

    "I also think the statement that blacks are more violent then whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud."

    I read that book too, but I think you're confusing African realities with Asian ones. African dictatorships were never like those in Vietnam, North Korea, Red China, and etc. Asian tyranny can be orderly. Very orderly, too orderly.

    In contrast, African tyranny is just thugs running around endlessly. It's not a case of African obedience and servility(like Asians tend to be servile). Rather, black thugs with big guns whupping black thugs with no guns. It's a riot, like the war in Liberia. I mean compare the rule of Asian tyrants with Idi Amin. Yes, Ugabugandans were afraid of Amin, but there was no order. It was just everyone looting everyone. Those with bigger guns got to loot more.

    So, you see, genetics even shape the nature of tyranny. In North Korea and Communist Vietnam, tyranny meant the masses quietly going about their business under the eye of totalitarian state.
    In Africa, it meant thugs with biggest guns and machetes running around looting and raping, and it meant those getting looted and raped hollering for help but then looking to loot and rape other peoples.

    While better culture can certainly improve the lot of blacks, there is a limit to what culture can do for Africans. Of course, there are INDIVIDUAL blacks of high IQ and self-control who can do remarkable things. But there is a general tendency among Negroes to beat on bongo drums. Also, given black genetics, the center of their cultural sensibility is in their butts and dongs. African evolved to be hunters and sexual creatures. Why do black women have bouncy butts? Because they bounced their butts in front of their men to win the attention of the men. So, black ho's with the bounciest butts were shaking their booties to attract the men. And evolution came to favor the bounciest asses among the Negresses because bouncy-ass ho's attracted the men and had more children. Why is the recent black contribution to culture 'twerking'? And why do Negro men got the biggest dongs? It's because they were half-naked savages in Africa swinging their dongs around to attract the ho's. Why did blacks come up with dances like bumping-and-grinding? Even 'jazz' and 'rock n roll' are code-words for effing.

    Negro world wasn't much different from this:

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1d/a9/2e/1da92e08c3d42cc45bc2d9d2f4ad49de.jpg

    Now, I'm not saying Negroes have to be shucking, fuc*ing, and jiving all the time.
    They CAN come under the control of culture. But because of their nature, there has to be more pressure on them to restrain themselves and be sane and use their minds than their fists, dongs, and butts.
    And such pressures did exist in the past when whites had control over the Negroes.
    But whites lost that control for two reasons. Due to Civil Rights narrative, blacks got moral advantage over whites. So, whites are not allowed to even offer mild criticism of black behavior. Even when blacks act like wild apes and bump and grind and twerk, we are supposed to see that as positive contribution to society.
    Also, America admires the winner in a culture that is mostly about sports and pop music. Since blacks win in sports and dominate much of rap culture, the attitude of white America is, 'well, you can fuc* my daughter'.
    Also, the fact that blacks dominate sports and funky music means they are wilder and stronger. And blacks know this, and whites know this. So, blacks have no respect for slow weak white boy mofos. Blacks prize everything in terms of 'who can whup whose ass', and they don't respect anything 'weak'. And whites are scared half to death of blacks to offer any criticism. This is why whites prefer immigrant labor to black labor. I mean who wants to tell Omar Thorton, "Hey Negro, you should stop stealing colt 45 beer." The crazy ass mofo might beat up whitey. Or worse, he might get a colt 45 the gun and shoot whitey.

    A nation without Negroes is truly a blessed nation.

    But history and morality aside, there is also the role of hedonism in all this, especially in our globalized world where pop culture is the only thing that matters. And pop culture, dominated by the US, is increasingly merging mainstream with pornography. Look at Miley Cyrus. Whom does Cyrus imitate? Black ho's. People want pleasure, and many white men find great pleasure in watching black athletes. White women get pleasure from jungle fever. And blacks take great pride that white folks worship black booties and black dongs. White women now even get surgeries to make their butts negro-like. And white women go to Cuba and Africa for sex with blacks. And cucked out white boys worship Negro men and even invite them to hump their white wives.

    So, your idea of culture is quaint. While you're hoping that culture of civility and restraint will improve the Negroes, the global trend is more African invasion of Europe(and then elsewhere), more jungle fever, more sex-charged music, more worship of athletic black thugs with tattoos, more rap music, more neo-savagery.
    That is the only culture that matters in our age. So, what makes you think blacks can ever improve their game in the civilization mode?

    I would like to see sane black families too, like the one in GOOD TIMES.
    But we are now living in a world when whites themselves are becoming ni**erized. Just look at the cultural rot all around. It's mondo trasho.

    And I think it's gonna hit Japan too. I mean why did Japan have half-blacks on their Olympic team? Because Japanese women with jungle fever went ALL THE WAY to have sex with Jamaican men. And they brought these kids back to Japan.
    Imagine that. These women rejected all the men in Japan and went ALL THE WAY to Jamaica to have kid with Negroes.
    , @Mao Cheng Ji

    I have asked on this blog why is it whenever a wannabe gangsta shoots some innocent black child the BLM crowd never gets half as upset as when a cop shoots a black.
     
    All due respect to self-proclaimed 'realists', but is this really such a big mystery? Cops aren't supposed to kill people; every time they do it's a system's failure. Do you know the saying: 'dog bites man' is not news, but 'man bites dog' is?
  46. KenH says:
    @Anon
    "I really can’t care for Anon’s racist comments"

    I can't care for Gene Su's dorky comments, but yes, I am a race-ist. Ism means belief, and I believe in the existence of races and racial differences. Blacks are different from whites in dangerous ways. They are more muscular, more aggressive, more impulsive, and tougher. This combination of aggression and knowledge that they can whup whitey has made blacks very dangerous. But then, it's not just about black rage at past discrimination because blacks attack everyone.

    "1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals."

    Maybe much earlier? You mean whites allowed black slaves to go around with knives and guns to kill one another? You gotta be kidding me.

    Now, I don't know about white policy on the black community, but free blacks, at least within their own community, could have organized to enforce law and order.

    Also, with blacks, it's damned if you do, damned if you don't. In recent times, the police did do a lot to maintain law and order in the black community with increased policing? What is the Negro response? BLM that blames dead blacks on whites when, in fact, the problem is blacks killing blacks and blacks killing non-blacks.
    When cops retreat, blacks bitch about how the police ain't doing enough. If police step up, blacks bitch that police be doing too much. Negro mentality is to talk big, never be self-critical, and always blame others. Indeed, this is why blacks always be killing one another. They are always trash-talking about other blacks and never reflect on their own faults. It's 'yo mama' and 'yo MAMA'.

    Another thing. Suppose whites had enslaved Chinese and brought them here. Suppose whites, after end of Chinese slavery, hadn't been very stringent in enforcing laws in Chinese community on Chinese-on-Chinese issues. Would freed Chinese have turned into criminals like blacks? No. Chinese can be violent and hideous, but they aren't as naturally violent and aggressive as blacks are.

    Gene Su sounds like some dorky yellow boy, and we know how servile these types are. It seems Su read some stuff and believes in them 100%. And he's been instilled with MLK-ism where we are not supposed to say critical things about blacks. Instead, blame everything on everyone else.

    So, blame all black problems after Reconstruction on whites. And blame all black problems since 60s on whites. Blacks don't have agency and are never to blame.

    But then, what Su seems to be implying is that blacks go especially nuts when they are given agency. After Civil War and end of slavery, blacks got agency, and they began to act wild and criminal. Blacks aren't good at using freedom. Look at Detroit, Haiti, and all of black Africa.
    So, things got bad, so whites stepped in to restore order in the South and took away some freedom from wild blacks. So, that restored some order.
    But then, 60s happened and blacks got total freedom and were allowed to do as please, and all hell broke loose. So, again, blacks + freedom is like mixing oil and water. Things go nuts.

    If Su had real sense, he would ask, "how come blacks can't do nothing on their own? and how come PC tags the blame for black problems on everyone but blacks?"

    But Su is too PC in yellow dorky way to see the light. He just spouts the same crap. He may be less PC cuz of his libertarian streak, but he's PC at the core because he rejects race-ism.
    But even as he denounces race-ism, his argument is actually race-ist. It is premised on the notion that blacks are wild and cannot handle freedom well. They have to be controlled and watched more tightly. Su's argument seems that blacks, being wild, needs to be policed very hard. Well, aint that race-ist?

    When cops retreat, blacks bitch about how the police ain’t doing enough

    I knew this would happen. Just two weeks ago on the 60 Minutes segment about the dramatic rise in Chicago shootings, black residents were crying that “Da po-leece ain’t helping us” but when the police do try to help reduce crime in black hoods, which sometimes involves being a little rough with savage black criminals and stretching the bill of rights, they get lambasted for racism and brutality. The Barney Fife model of policing would not work and get cops killed in black hoods.

    We simply can’t live together and it’s time whites are allowed their own segregated communities and let the ignorant blacks stew in their own juices, kill each other off and leave whitey out of it.

    Read More
  47. Russian spokesman speaks to CBS News about American Hysteria. An interview worth watching… the Russian spokesman is pretty sharp and he speaks in English.

    He knows he’s talking to fake news…he tells the American journalists to go to Crimea and get the facts. See who the little green men are, who invaded Kiev and toppled the government.

    http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2017/01/17/full-interview-with-kremlin-do-you-welcome-donald-trump/

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Debbie, that was intense! So, this aired on network TV? I wonder how many Americans were able to watch and comprehend. I fear most are so indoctrinated that the cognitive dissonance can't be overcome.
  48. Miro23 says:
    @Gene Su
    Yikes, a ranter! And more mud slinging.

    You are right, Anon. I am not a racialist. I am a culturalist - a cultural realist. I believe that intelligence and destiny is not written in our genes. I believe that it is written in our culture, attitudes, worldviews, and beliefs. Racialists believe that it takes eons for people to evolve genetically and nothing can be done to alter them. Culturalists believe that it is also mostly futile to alter people but evolution of cultures takes centuries, not eons.

    I have asked on this blog why is it whenever a wannabe gangsta shoots some innocent black child the BLM crowd never gets half as upset as when a cop shoots a black.

    I also think the statement that blacks are more violent then whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud.

    I also think the statement that blacks are more violent than whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud.

    Differences in racial temperament are not the issue here.

    Blacks Africans are “cowardly and passive” in Africa precisely because they live under dictators and warlords. The Russians were also “cowardly and passive” under Stalin, where any whisper of criticism of the Leader would get them arrested or lose their job at a minimum.

    Violent Blacks in the US are not afraid. They have learnt that they are exempt from the normal rules of Law and Order and that the MSM and White Liberals have their back.

    Read More
  49. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Gene Su
    Yikes, a ranter! And more mud slinging.

    You are right, Anon. I am not a racialist. I am a culturalist - a cultural realist. I believe that intelligence and destiny is not written in our genes. I believe that it is written in our culture, attitudes, worldviews, and beliefs. Racialists believe that it takes eons for people to evolve genetically and nothing can be done to alter them. Culturalists believe that it is also mostly futile to alter people but evolution of cultures takes centuries, not eons.

    I have asked on this blog why is it whenever a wannabe gangsta shoots some innocent black child the BLM crowd never gets half as upset as when a cop shoots a black.

    I also think the statement that blacks are more violent then whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud.

    Hey, Eugene Chop Suey

    ” I am not a racialist. I am a culturalist – a cultural realist. I believe that intelligence and destiny is not written in our genes. I believe that it is written in our culture, attitudes, worldviews, and beliefs. Racialists believe that it takes eons for people to evolve genetically and nothing can be done to alter them. Culturalists believe that it is also mostly futile to alter people but evolution of cultures takes centuries, not eons.”

    What are you, a dammy? I’m not denying the role of culture. Culture is very important, but there are limits to what culture can achieve. Take sports. Suppose there are two identical peoples in two communities. In one community, there is the Culture of Health, good eating, and exercise. In the other community, there is the culture of laziness, excess, wantonness, piggery, and fatassedness.
    Obviously, those in the Culture of Health will be healthier because their culture prioritizes self-control, restraint, exercise, and good habits. In contrast, many people in the other community will be lardasses, fatsoes, tubaroons, flabsters, and bubble-butts.
    So, culture does matter.

    However, there are limits to what culture can achieve. In the past, Chinese looked down on exercise. Confucian scholars saw that stuff as low. And well-educated people looked down on physical activity as no good. But in modern China, there is much emphasis on sports and exercise. So, China has even produced world class athletes in many fields. BUT, there are genetic barriers, and that is why China wins few medals in track and field. And it hasn’t won a single medal in basketball despite its 1.3 billion population.
    So, culture is important but it has its limits.

    Culture can change and influence behavior. After all, blacks don’t all act the same all over the world. Blacks act differently in Nigeria, Angola, Detroit, Haiti, Cuba, and etc. Why? They have different cultures. Some are more modern, some are more traditional. Some are controlled by village elders. Some are controlled by street punks into rap. But, we do see general patterns among blacks all over the world regardless of culture. Generally, blacks tend to be more impulsive, wild, aggressive, and jiving. They are more likely to go off like George Jefferson, Al Sharpton, or some rapper. So, generally speaking, blacks are more prone to violence and bad behavior.

    “I also think the statement that blacks are more violent then whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud.”

    I read that book too, but I think you’re confusing African realities with Asian ones. African dictatorships were never like those in Vietnam, North Korea, Red China, and etc. Asian tyranny can be orderly. Very orderly, too orderly.

    In contrast, African tyranny is just thugs running around endlessly. It’s not a case of African obedience and servility(like Asians tend to be servile). Rather, black thugs with big guns whupping black thugs with no guns. It’s a riot, like the war in Liberia. I mean compare the rule of Asian tyrants with Idi Amin. Yes, Ugabugandans were afraid of Amin, but there was no order. It was just everyone looting everyone. Those with bigger guns got to loot more.

    So, you see, genetics even shape the nature of tyranny. In North Korea and Communist Vietnam, tyranny meant the masses quietly going about their business under the eye of totalitarian state.
    In Africa, it meant thugs with biggest guns and machetes running around looting and raping, and it meant those getting looted and raped hollering for help but then looking to loot and rape other peoples.

    While better culture can certainly improve the lot of blacks, there is a limit to what culture can do for Africans. Of course, there are INDIVIDUAL blacks of high IQ and self-control who can do remarkable things. But there is a general tendency among Negroes to beat on bongo drums. Also, given black genetics, the center of their cultural sensibility is in their butts and dongs. African evolved to be hunters and sexual creatures. Why do black women have bouncy butts? Because they bounced their butts in front of their men to win the attention of the men. So, black ho’s with the bounciest butts were shaking their booties to attract the men. And evolution came to favor the bounciest asses among the Negresses because bouncy-ass ho’s attracted the men and had more children. Why is the recent black contribution to culture ‘twerking’? And why do Negro men got the biggest dongs? It’s because they were half-naked savages in Africa swinging their dongs around to attract the ho’s. Why did blacks come up with dances like bumping-and-grinding? Even ‘jazz’ and ‘rock n roll’ are code-words for effing.

    [MORE]

    Negro world wasn’t much different from this:

    Now, I’m not saying Negroes have to be shucking, fuc*ing, and jiving all the time.
    They CAN come under the control of culture. But because of their nature, there has to be more pressure on them to restrain themselves and be sane and use their minds than their fists, dongs, and butts.
    And such pressures did exist in the past when whites had control over the Negroes.
    But whites lost that control for two reasons. Due to Civil Rights narrative, blacks got moral advantage over whites. So, whites are not allowed to even offer mild criticism of black behavior. Even when blacks act like wild apes and bump and grind and twerk, we are supposed to see that as positive contribution to society.
    Also, America admires the winner in a culture that is mostly about sports and pop music. Since blacks win in sports and dominate much of rap culture, the attitude of white America is, ‘well, you can fuc* my daughter’.
    Also, the fact that blacks dominate sports and funky music means they are wilder and stronger. And blacks know this, and whites know this. So, blacks have no respect for slow weak white boy mofos. Blacks prize everything in terms of ‘who can whup whose ass’, and they don’t respect anything ‘weak’. And whites are scared half to death of blacks to offer any criticism. This is why whites prefer immigrant labor to black labor. I mean who wants to tell Omar Thorton, “Hey Negro, you should stop stealing colt 45 beer.” The crazy ass mofo might beat up whitey. Or worse, he might get a colt 45 the gun and shoot whitey.

    A nation without Negroes is truly a blessed nation.

    But history and morality aside, there is also the role of hedonism in all this, especially in our globalized world where pop culture is the only thing that matters. And pop culture, dominated by the US, is increasingly merging mainstream with pornography. Look at Miley Cyrus. Whom does Cyrus imitate? Black ho’s. People want pleasure, and many white men find great pleasure in watching black athletes. White women get pleasure from jungle fever. And blacks take great pride that white folks worship black booties and black dongs. White women now even get surgeries to make their butts negro-like. And white women go to Cuba and Africa for sex with blacks. And cucked out white boys worship Negro men and even invite them to hump their white wives.

    So, your idea of culture is quaint. While you’re hoping that culture of civility and restraint will improve the Negroes, the global trend is more African invasion of Europe(and then elsewhere), more jungle fever, more sex-charged music, more worship of athletic black thugs with tattoos, more rap music, more neo-savagery.
    That is the only culture that matters in our age. So, what makes you think blacks can ever improve their game in the civilization mode?

    I would like to see sane black families too, like the one in GOOD TIMES.
    But we are now living in a world when whites themselves are becoming ni**erized. Just look at the cultural rot all around. It’s mondo trasho.

    And I think it’s gonna hit Japan too. I mean why did Japan have half-blacks on their Olympic team? Because Japanese women with jungle fever went ALL THE WAY to have sex with Jamaican men. And they brought these kids back to Japan.
    Imagine that. These women rejected all the men in Japan and went ALL THE WAY to Jamaica to have kid with Negroes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Green
    I believe I recognize this prose. Always interesting. Always entertaining.
  50. Mark Green says: • Website
    @Anon
    Hey, Eugene Chop Suey

    " I am not a racialist. I am a culturalist – a cultural realist. I believe that intelligence and destiny is not written in our genes. I believe that it is written in our culture, attitudes, worldviews, and beliefs. Racialists believe that it takes eons for people to evolve genetically and nothing can be done to alter them. Culturalists believe that it is also mostly futile to alter people but evolution of cultures takes centuries, not eons."

    What are you, a dammy? I'm not denying the role of culture. Culture is very important, but there are limits to what culture can achieve. Take sports. Suppose there are two identical peoples in two communities. In one community, there is the Culture of Health, good eating, and exercise. In the other community, there is the culture of laziness, excess, wantonness, piggery, and fatassedness.
    Obviously, those in the Culture of Health will be healthier because their culture prioritizes self-control, restraint, exercise, and good habits. In contrast, many people in the other community will be lardasses, fatsoes, tubaroons, flabsters, and bubble-butts.
    So, culture does matter.

    However, there are limits to what culture can achieve. In the past, Chinese looked down on exercise. Confucian scholars saw that stuff as low. And well-educated people looked down on physical activity as no good. But in modern China, there is much emphasis on sports and exercise. So, China has even produced world class athletes in many fields. BUT, there are genetic barriers, and that is why China wins few medals in track and field. And it hasn't won a single medal in basketball despite its 1.3 billion population.
    So, culture is important but it has its limits.

    Culture can change and influence behavior. After all, blacks don't all act the same all over the world. Blacks act differently in Nigeria, Angola, Detroit, Haiti, Cuba, and etc. Why? They have different cultures. Some are more modern, some are more traditional. Some are controlled by village elders. Some are controlled by street punks into rap. But, we do see general patterns among blacks all over the world regardless of culture. Generally, blacks tend to be more impulsive, wild, aggressive, and jiving. They are more likely to go off like George Jefferson, Al Sharpton, or some rapper. So, generally speaking, blacks are more prone to violence and bad behavior.

    "I also think the statement that blacks are more violent then whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud."

    I read that book too, but I think you're confusing African realities with Asian ones. African dictatorships were never like those in Vietnam, North Korea, Red China, and etc. Asian tyranny can be orderly. Very orderly, too orderly.

    In contrast, African tyranny is just thugs running around endlessly. It's not a case of African obedience and servility(like Asians tend to be servile). Rather, black thugs with big guns whupping black thugs with no guns. It's a riot, like the war in Liberia. I mean compare the rule of Asian tyrants with Idi Amin. Yes, Ugabugandans were afraid of Amin, but there was no order. It was just everyone looting everyone. Those with bigger guns got to loot more.

    So, you see, genetics even shape the nature of tyranny. In North Korea and Communist Vietnam, tyranny meant the masses quietly going about their business under the eye of totalitarian state.
    In Africa, it meant thugs with biggest guns and machetes running around looting and raping, and it meant those getting looted and raped hollering for help but then looking to loot and rape other peoples.

    While better culture can certainly improve the lot of blacks, there is a limit to what culture can do for Africans. Of course, there are INDIVIDUAL blacks of high IQ and self-control who can do remarkable things. But there is a general tendency among Negroes to beat on bongo drums. Also, given black genetics, the center of their cultural sensibility is in their butts and dongs. African evolved to be hunters and sexual creatures. Why do black women have bouncy butts? Because they bounced their butts in front of their men to win the attention of the men. So, black ho's with the bounciest butts were shaking their booties to attract the men. And evolution came to favor the bounciest asses among the Negresses because bouncy-ass ho's attracted the men and had more children. Why is the recent black contribution to culture 'twerking'? And why do Negro men got the biggest dongs? It's because they were half-naked savages in Africa swinging their dongs around to attract the ho's. Why did blacks come up with dances like bumping-and-grinding? Even 'jazz' and 'rock n roll' are code-words for effing.

    Negro world wasn't much different from this:

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1d/a9/2e/1da92e08c3d42cc45bc2d9d2f4ad49de.jpg

    Now, I'm not saying Negroes have to be shucking, fuc*ing, and jiving all the time.
    They CAN come under the control of culture. But because of their nature, there has to be more pressure on them to restrain themselves and be sane and use their minds than their fists, dongs, and butts.
    And such pressures did exist in the past when whites had control over the Negroes.
    But whites lost that control for two reasons. Due to Civil Rights narrative, blacks got moral advantage over whites. So, whites are not allowed to even offer mild criticism of black behavior. Even when blacks act like wild apes and bump and grind and twerk, we are supposed to see that as positive contribution to society.
    Also, America admires the winner in a culture that is mostly about sports and pop music. Since blacks win in sports and dominate much of rap culture, the attitude of white America is, 'well, you can fuc* my daughter'.
    Also, the fact that blacks dominate sports and funky music means they are wilder and stronger. And blacks know this, and whites know this. So, blacks have no respect for slow weak white boy mofos. Blacks prize everything in terms of 'who can whup whose ass', and they don't respect anything 'weak'. And whites are scared half to death of blacks to offer any criticism. This is why whites prefer immigrant labor to black labor. I mean who wants to tell Omar Thorton, "Hey Negro, you should stop stealing colt 45 beer." The crazy ass mofo might beat up whitey. Or worse, he might get a colt 45 the gun and shoot whitey.

    A nation without Negroes is truly a blessed nation.

    But history and morality aside, there is also the role of hedonism in all this, especially in our globalized world where pop culture is the only thing that matters. And pop culture, dominated by the US, is increasingly merging mainstream with pornography. Look at Miley Cyrus. Whom does Cyrus imitate? Black ho's. People want pleasure, and many white men find great pleasure in watching black athletes. White women get pleasure from jungle fever. And blacks take great pride that white folks worship black booties and black dongs. White women now even get surgeries to make their butts negro-like. And white women go to Cuba and Africa for sex with blacks. And cucked out white boys worship Negro men and even invite them to hump their white wives.

    So, your idea of culture is quaint. While you're hoping that culture of civility and restraint will improve the Negroes, the global trend is more African invasion of Europe(and then elsewhere), more jungle fever, more sex-charged music, more worship of athletic black thugs with tattoos, more rap music, more neo-savagery.
    That is the only culture that matters in our age. So, what makes you think blacks can ever improve their game in the civilization mode?

    I would like to see sane black families too, like the one in GOOD TIMES.
    But we are now living in a world when whites themselves are becoming ni**erized. Just look at the cultural rot all around. It's mondo trasho.

    And I think it's gonna hit Japan too. I mean why did Japan have half-blacks on their Olympic team? Because Japanese women with jungle fever went ALL THE WAY to have sex with Jamaican men. And they brought these kids back to Japan.
    Imagine that. These women rejected all the men in Japan and went ALL THE WAY to Jamaica to have kid with Negroes.

    I believe I recognize this prose. Always interesting. Always entertaining.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Are you referring to the Priss Factory? I forget his/her real name and other pseudonyms.
    , @RobinG
    Piss Factor. Always a waste of time. Fine, if you've got it.
  51. @Gene Su
    Yikes, a ranter! And more mud slinging.

    You are right, Anon. I am not a racialist. I am a culturalist - a cultural realist. I believe that intelligence and destiny is not written in our genes. I believe that it is written in our culture, attitudes, worldviews, and beliefs. Racialists believe that it takes eons for people to evolve genetically and nothing can be done to alter them. Culturalists believe that it is also mostly futile to alter people but evolution of cultures takes centuries, not eons.

    I have asked on this blog why is it whenever a wannabe gangsta shoots some innocent black child the BLM crowd never gets half as upset as when a cop shoots a black.

    I also think the statement that blacks are more violent then whites is a bit of an over-generalization. Keith Richburg, in Out of America, noted that black Africans have a habit of letting their dictators and warlords walk all over them. I wonder what that is about. It seems that blacks behave quite cowardly and passive when they are faced with thugs of their own race. Its only when confronted with whites that they start to get loud.

    I have asked on this blog why is it whenever a wannabe gangsta shoots some innocent black child the BLM crowd never gets half as upset as when a cop shoots a black.

    All due respect to self-proclaimed ‘realists’, but is this really such a big mystery? Cops aren’t supposed to kill people; every time they do it’s a system’s failure. Do you know the saying: ‘dog bites man’ is not news, but ‘man bites dog’ is?

    Read More
  52. “cops aren’t supposed to kill people; every time they do it it’s a system failure”.

    Okay I get it : When someone armed with a gun comes at a cop, the policeman is supposed to let himself be killed in order to not allow a “System failure” to occur, right?

    Authenticjazzman, “Mensa” society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
  53. @Mark Green
    I believe I recognize this prose. Always interesting. Always entertaining.

    Are you referring to the Priss Factory? I forget his/her real name and other pseudonyms.

    Read More
  54. RobinG says:
    @Mark Green
    I believe I recognize this prose. Always interesting. Always entertaining.

    Piss Factor. Always a waste of time. Fine, if you’ve got it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Green
    The colorful and irrepressible Priss is still with us.
  55. woodNfish says:
    @Gene Su
    I really can't care for Anon's racist comments (and how many Anon's are there on this blog? It seems that there is a right wing Anon and a left-wing lower case anon). However, Gary North did an excellent essay 15 years ago on black crime. He wrote it after a riot in Cincinnati. Here is the only link to it:

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2001/05/gary-north/white-liberals-and-bull-conner/

    I should have posted this in Ron Unz's Pravda series on race and crime. Gary North makes the following points.

    1. Starting from Reconstruction (and maybe much earlier), white American law enforcement essentially turned a blind eye to black-on-black crime. This encompassed capital crimes like murder and armed robbery. This turned the black community into a sanctuary for criminals.
    2. During the 60's, the crooks who dominated the black community began to take advantage of their new-found freedoms by rioting and committing more crime. The leftist media dismissed this as their reaction to "societal oppression." That is why the media plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime.

    The leftist media dismissed this as their reaction to “societal oppression.” That is why the media plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime.

    No, the reason the lying LSM plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime is because leftists are racists. This isn’t just rhetoric, it is a proven fact. The Democrat Party created the KKK, Jim Crow laws and Segregation. The Democrat Party IS the party of slavery and racism and Obama is their Head Plantation Nigger.

    This says it all:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/17/former-black-panther-illegitimate-congressman-john-lewis-presided-destruction-black-people/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Debbie Menon
    The Democratic Party, has unfortunately devolved, into the most successful hate group. They have tried to teach poor people to hate rich people, black people to hate white people, gay people to hate straight people, feminists to hate men, and a lot of bratty college kids to hate their parents. And Journalists who hate Republicans, who therefore work tirelessly to convince the public that they should vote for Democrats. Talk about when they go low, we rise high, Michelle Obama, the hypocrisy is stunning!
  56. @Mark Green
    Excellent article. Fake news is rampant and it is nothing new. Even the meaning and significance now being ascribed to the Russian 'hacking' incident is fake.

    All that's happened in these so-called hacking incidents were embarrassing disclosures. But the news was genuine. Real--and scandalous--information made various US government officials look terrible. And properly so. Accurate information that was unauthorized ended up damaging candidate Clinton and the Democrats. Nothing more. Trump was smeared briefly but it looks as if the entire story was a hoax. Not so with the other disclosures. Mrs. Clinton and the Dems got tarred with their own feces. Why? The shit was real.

    Since when are leaks diabolical anyway? They're legitimate news. Often scandalous news. And hidden. But real. So since when is 'truth'--involving political conduct, that is--scurrilous?

    When Daniel Ellsberg leaked unlawfully-obtained, government documents about the VietNam war he was widely hailed as a hero--even though many government officials got caught with their pants down. Washington's hand-wringing about these 'Russian' hacks is basically all about whose ox is being gored. These hate-driven, political snowflakes are actually hopeless hypocrites. Many should be in jail.

    Americans have been fed half-truths, propaganda, distorted 'facts' and hasbara for decades. We can thank the partisan army of embedded, media activists for this vast and unending fraud. This is why Trump is being roasted continuously and treated like a criminal--though he's harmed no one.

    Hopefully, Trump will be able to resist the ubiquitous, media-driven hysteria. This will not be easy however. These operatives still have the power to shape the narrative and mold the American psyche. This is why Trump--not Hillary--is being bombarded relentlessly with accusations and innuendo.

    Both the Big Government and Big Media establishments hate Trump because he--unlike Obama and Hillary--genuinely threaten their prestige, credibility and power. Trump could impose real change in the global and domestic pecking order. This is hope and change that the Deep State does not want and will resist furiously.

    This article is false. Law-abiding backs do NOT want the suspects’ race noted. And they are NOT a vast majority of blacks, either.

    Read More
  57. RobinG says:
    @Debbie Menon
    Russian spokesman speaks to CBS News about American Hysteria. An interview worth watching... the Russian spokesman is pretty sharp and he speaks in English.

    He knows he's talking to fake news...he tells the American journalists to go to Crimea and get the facts. See who the little green men are, who invaded Kiev and toppled the government.

    http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2017/01/17/full-interview-with-kremlin-do-you-welcome-donald-trump/

    Debbie, that was intense! So, this aired on network TV? I wonder how many Americans were able to watch and comprehend. I fear most are so indoctrinated that the cognitive dissonance can’t be overcome.

    Read More
  58. @woodNfish

    The leftist media dismissed this as their reaction to “societal oppression.” That is why the media plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime.
     
    No, the reason the lying LSM plays up white on black crime while being silent on black on white crime is because leftists are racists. This isn't just rhetoric, it is a proven fact. The Democrat Party created the KKK, Jim Crow laws and Segregation. The Democrat Party IS the party of slavery and racism and Obama is their Head Plantation Nigger.

    This says it all:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/17/former-black-panther-illegitimate-congressman-john-lewis-presided-destruction-black-people/

    The Democratic Party, has unfortunately devolved, into the most successful hate group. They have tried to teach poor people to hate rich people, black people to hate white people, gay people to hate straight people, feminists to hate men, and a lot of bratty college kids to hate their parents. And Journalists who hate Republicans, who therefore work tirelessly to convince the public that they should vote for Democrats. Talk about when they go low, we rise high, Michelle Obama, the hypocrisy is stunning!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    " And journalists who hate Republicans"

    One of the strangest political phenomena today being the hatred of the entire nation of Germany for US Republicans, the hysteria and mass insanity in Germany regarding the the US repubs is at the breaking point , and this also, strangely enough, being shared and expressed by their so-called conservative parties.
    The german media has lost it's collective mind regarding DT and the outright hope expressed within german academia that he will meet the fate of JFK is published without reservation or shame on a daily basis throughout their news outlets.
    They, the nutty Germans, have always held an inexplicable dislike for the US repubs, inspite of the fact that it was the democrats Roosevelt and Truman who fire-bombed their major cities and you simply cannot reach them with any logical, rational argumentation.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

  59. Mark Green says: • Website
    @RobinG
    Piss Factor. Always a waste of time. Fine, if you've got it.

    The colorful and irrepressible Priss is still with us.

    Read More
  60. @Debbie Menon
    The Democratic Party, has unfortunately devolved, into the most successful hate group. They have tried to teach poor people to hate rich people, black people to hate white people, gay people to hate straight people, feminists to hate men, and a lot of bratty college kids to hate their parents. And Journalists who hate Republicans, who therefore work tirelessly to convince the public that they should vote for Democrats. Talk about when they go low, we rise high, Michelle Obama, the hypocrisy is stunning!

    ” And journalists who hate Republicans”

    One of the strangest political phenomena today being the hatred of the entire nation of Germany for US Republicans, the hysteria and mass insanity in Germany regarding the the US repubs is at the breaking point , and this also, strangely enough, being shared and expressed by their so-called conservative parties.
    The german media has lost it’s collective mind regarding DT and the outright hope expressed within german academia that he will meet the fate of JFK is published without reservation or shame on a daily basis throughout their news outlets.
    They, the nutty Germans, have always held an inexplicable dislike for the US repubs, inspite of the fact that it was the democrats Roosevelt and Truman who fire-bombed their major cities and you simply cannot reach them with any logical, rational argumentation.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pater Tenebrarum
    Particularly the anti-Trump propaganda in Germany's MSM (and Austria's for that matter) is absolutely breathtaking in terms of unanimity and hyperbole. It really puts what is happening in the US media in the shade. Not a single dissenting voice is detectable as far as I could ascertain. Most citizens have a completely distorted view of DT as a result (most of them have also never heard anything about Hillary Clinton's assorted scandals; they basically think of her as someone akin to a run-of-the-mill European social democrat). In the the comment sections of web editions of major newspapers one usually sees only a tiny minority taking Trump's side, mainly people who evidently distrust the German MSM and read English language alternative media as well. Reportage on Russia and Putin is similarly one-sided, but tends to get more pushback from readers - probably because Russia is extensively discussed in German alternative media. When Udo Ulfkotte died, obituaries in the German press essentially painted him as a nutcase of the "disgruntled ex-employee" type. And yet, when one reads German MSM reports on Trump, Putin, Syria, etc., the impression that the the CIA tells them what to write doesn't appear all that far-fetched. Dislike of Republicans in general is widespread, but it is not as unanimous as the contempt reserved for DT.
  61. @Authenticjazzman
    " And journalists who hate Republicans"

    One of the strangest political phenomena today being the hatred of the entire nation of Germany for US Republicans, the hysteria and mass insanity in Germany regarding the the US repubs is at the breaking point , and this also, strangely enough, being shared and expressed by their so-called conservative parties.
    The german media has lost it's collective mind regarding DT and the outright hope expressed within german academia that he will meet the fate of JFK is published without reservation or shame on a daily basis throughout their news outlets.
    They, the nutty Germans, have always held an inexplicable dislike for the US repubs, inspite of the fact that it was the democrats Roosevelt and Truman who fire-bombed their major cities and you simply cannot reach them with any logical, rational argumentation.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    Particularly the anti-Trump propaganda in Germany’s MSM (and Austria’s for that matter) is absolutely breathtaking in terms of unanimity and hyperbole. It really puts what is happening in the US media in the shade. Not a single dissenting voice is detectable as far as I could ascertain. Most citizens have a completely distorted view of DT as a result (most of them have also never heard anything about Hillary Clinton’s assorted scandals; they basically think of her as someone akin to a run-of-the-mill European social democrat). In the the comment sections of web editions of major newspapers one usually sees only a tiny minority taking Trump’s side, mainly people who evidently distrust the German MSM and read English language alternative media as well. Reportage on Russia and Putin is similarly one-sided, but tends to get more pushback from readers – probably because Russia is extensively discussed in German alternative media. When Udo Ulfkotte died, obituaries in the German press essentially painted him as a nutcase of the “disgruntled ex-employee” type. And yet, when one reads German MSM reports on Trump, Putin, Syria, etc., the impression that the the CIA tells them what to write doesn’t appear all that far-fetched. Dislike of Republicans in general is widespread, but it is not as unanimous as the contempt reserved for DT.

    Read More
    • Agree: Miro23
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    "Dislike of Republicans is widespread, but it is not as unanimous as the contempt reserved for DT"

    Actually the Germans have harbored an insane unfounded hatred for US Republicans since the fifties, and any attempt to a bring degree of rationality into their thinking is a hopeless undertaking.
    You can can state that the democrats Roosevelt and Truman were responsible for the firebombing of Dresden and Hamburg, Pforzheim etc and it simply goes in one ear and out the other.
    The Germans hated the Viet Nam war and they worshiped the democrat JFK, and they don't give a shit about his or the democrat's role in the war.
    They are huge advocates of women's issues and they now are fully aware of the democrat BC's abuse of uncounted numbers of women and they don't give a shit, they love him anyway.
    They blather on about BO's deadly drone campaign on one side of their mouth and on the other side they lavish him with unlimited praise as the most intelligent, eloquent, educated, "social" pres in US history, and they worship the ground he walks upon.
    They say HC "does things" for women but if you ask them to be specific they simply reply "She fights for women" whatever that means.
    They say HC meant war as US president, but she is better than DT anyway, meaning they prefer war to DT in the white house.
    They are so tangled up and confused that it simply defies any description.
    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

  62. @Pater Tenebrarum
    Particularly the anti-Trump propaganda in Germany's MSM (and Austria's for that matter) is absolutely breathtaking in terms of unanimity and hyperbole. It really puts what is happening in the US media in the shade. Not a single dissenting voice is detectable as far as I could ascertain. Most citizens have a completely distorted view of DT as a result (most of them have also never heard anything about Hillary Clinton's assorted scandals; they basically think of her as someone akin to a run-of-the-mill European social democrat). In the the comment sections of web editions of major newspapers one usually sees only a tiny minority taking Trump's side, mainly people who evidently distrust the German MSM and read English language alternative media as well. Reportage on Russia and Putin is similarly one-sided, but tends to get more pushback from readers - probably because Russia is extensively discussed in German alternative media. When Udo Ulfkotte died, obituaries in the German press essentially painted him as a nutcase of the "disgruntled ex-employee" type. And yet, when one reads German MSM reports on Trump, Putin, Syria, etc., the impression that the the CIA tells them what to write doesn't appear all that far-fetched. Dislike of Republicans in general is widespread, but it is not as unanimous as the contempt reserved for DT.

    “Dislike of Republicans is widespread, but it is not as unanimous as the contempt reserved for DT”

    Actually the Germans have harbored an insane unfounded hatred for US Republicans since the fifties, and any attempt to a bring degree of rationality into their thinking is a hopeless undertaking.
    You can can state that the democrats Roosevelt and Truman were responsible for the firebombing of Dresden and Hamburg, Pforzheim etc and it simply goes in one ear and out the other.
    The Germans hated the Viet Nam war and they worshiped the democrat JFK, and they don’t give a shit about his or the democrat’s role in the war.
    They are huge advocates of women’s issues and they now are fully aware of the democrat BC’s abuse of uncounted numbers of women and they don’t give a shit, they love him anyway.
    They blather on about BO’s deadly drone campaign on one side of their mouth and on the other side they lavish him with unlimited praise as the most intelligent, eloquent, educated, “social” pres in US history, and they worship the ground he walks upon.
    They say HC “does things” for women but if you ask them to be specific they simply reply “She fights for women” whatever that means.
    They say HC meant war as US president, but she is better than DT anyway, meaning they prefer war to DT in the white house.
    They are so tangled up and confused that it simply defies any description.
    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.
Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on the line.