The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
Democracy in Egypt
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Sometimes one has to wonder whether words have lost their meaning when used by neoconservatives. Yesterday’s Washington Post featured an op ed by Robert Kagan of Brookings and Michelle Dunne of the Carnegie Endowment. Together, the two are co chairs to the Working Group on Egypt. The op ed headline in the printed edition was “What can we do for Egypt – The US can support democracy without directing its course.”

Normally when I see the Kagan byline I move on without reading, but the “without directing its course” caught my attention. The authors wisely reject introducing a “made-in-American democracy” and recommend instead that the focus be on economic assistance, debt forgiveness, and trade agreements. Sounds good, but then the whiff of an agenda emerges: “Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman recent returned from Egypt with a clear message: the Egyptians need and want foreign companies to come and invest in their country.” But it still sounds harmless enough until Kagan and Dunne get to the next recommendation: “Appoint a special Middle East transition czar. To oversee all these efforts the administration is going to need a high powered individual at the White House…”

Let us assume for a moment that Kagan-Dunne-McCain-Lieberman want the Egyptians to establish a successful democracy that does all the right things from their perspective. But the very fact that Kagan and Dunne co-chair a Working Group on Egypt and are writing op eds explaining what must be done suggests that they want to use their superior wisdom to help guide the process. They recognize that a heavy hand will not bring that about, so it seems to me that what we are looking at is a way to use soft power to direct the Egyptians whether they like it or not. If they don’t behave, the investments in their economy will not be forthcoming. It is certainly more subtle than the Bush Doctrine but the proposed appointment of a czar implies that there are certain interests that have to be aggressively protected by the White House. I actually don’t have a problem with recognizing and promoting US interests in the region, but my concern is, inevitably, that it will turn out to be all about Israel yet again given the conjunction of McCain, Lieberman, and Kagan.

Unfortunately there is a long history of US meddling just about everywhere. In an interview a couple of weeks ago, Madeleine Albright stated that the National Endowment for Democracy is already hard at work in Egypt. That will mean more shenanigans similar to the faux color coded democracies that emerged in Eastern Europe after the fall of communism. The Egyptians should rightly be concerned about any American show of support or offer of assistance as they will undoubtedly be agenda driven.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Egypt 
Hide 4 CommentsLeave a Comment
4 Comments to "Democracy in Egypt"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “Middle East Transition Czar” is priceless, a gorgeous, emblematic absurdity, right up there with Marie Antoinette playing milk-maid at Versailles.

    Sure, Mr. Kagan, you be “Middle East Transition Czar” and I’ll be “Grand Overseer of the Earth’s Orbit”. Hillary Clinton is quite happy where she is, pretending to be “Secretary of State”, and little Joe Lieberman would like nothing so much as to wear the snappy robes of “Elder Statesman” in the country whose liberties he has labored so long to destroy, and whose interests he has with superhuman consistency subordinated to those of Israel.

  2. As if it always can’t get worse: another Czar to create the illusion that the imperial city has taken the measure of a problem and will fix it with the appointment of another wise man invested with mystical powers. Just a great idea, don’t ya think, a permanent unaccountable Department of Middle Eastern Affairs, a Czar on top, maybe a Viceroy handling things abroad with offices in Tel Aviv, Cairo, who can say- maybe someday Tripoli, staffs, clubs, baseball fields, birth control clinics for the natives, McDonalds open to everybody, the works.

  3. TomB says:

    “Kagan and Dunne get to the next recommendation: ‘Appoint a special Middle East transition czar. To oversee all these efforts the administration is going to need a high powered individual at the White House…’”

    In other words … give Dennis Ross a new title. After all hasn’t his entire oeuvre over all the past decades and now been that everybody and everything in the Middle East ought to be “transitioned” in one way or another? Except of course Israel other than the extent to which it’s “transitioning” Palestinian land and U.S. funds into its own?

  4. JackO says:

    “Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman recent returned from Egypt with a clear message: the Egyptians need and want foreign companies to come and invest in their country.”

    A joke, and a pretty sick one. The “top Egyptian officials” that McCain and Lieberman conferred with were kicked out of office a few days later they left. The “clear” message to the US was “don’t the let the door hit you on the back”. Neocon presumption, distortions and stupidity continue unabated.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.
Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on the line.