The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPhilip Giraldi Archive
A Letter from Langley
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Investigative journalist Ronald Suskind’s allegation that the White House had the CIA forge a letter linking 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta to Saddam Hussein and also reviving the claim that Iraq had sought Niger yellowcake has been denied by former Agency officers, but in curiously nuanced language.

Per Suskind, in the fall of 2003, after it became clear that there were no WMD, the White House ordered the CIA to carry out the deception, creating a handwritten letter providing the relevant details dated July 2001 ostensibly coming from intelligence chief Tahir Jalil Habbush to Saddam. The forged letter surfaced in Baghdad in December 2003, convincing even veteran journalists like Tom Brokaw that it was authentic.

Two senior Agency officers named as having carried out the deception – John Maguire and Robert Richer – deny involvement in an e-mail they sent to The Washington Post, though the language they have used is peculiar, something like Bill Clinton claiming that “There is no sex with that woman.” Richer wrote “I never received direction from George Tenet or anyone else in my chain of command to fabricate a document from Habbush as outlined in Mr. Suskind’s book.” Maguire added, “I have no knowledge to the origins of the letter.” Lots of wiggle room in both disclaimers, one notes.

The Agency does, of course, have the ability to forge documents and has done so frequently in the past in support of various objectives. It would almost certainly respond to a request from the White House to produce a false document. It would, however, be illegal to forge a document intending that it be replayed in the US media. In this case, as the story surfaced in Iraq, it might just be possible to deny any intention to deceive the American media and public.

(Republished from The American Conservative by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: CIA, Yellowcake Forgery 
Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Philip Giraldi Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
A Modern Guernica Enabled by Washington
Pressuring Candidates Even Before They Are Nominated
But is it even a friend?
The gagged whistleblower goes on the record.
Today’s CIA serves contractors and bureaucrats—not the nation.
Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on the line.