The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPeter Frost Archive
A Nice Place to Raise Your Kids
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The English town of Rotherham has been in the news. Between 1997 and 2013, at least 1,400 school-age girls were “groomed” for prostitution—a process that begins with seduction and ends with confinement, trafficking, and serial rape. The girls were white. The groomers were older men of Pakistani origin, except for a few Afghans and Roma.

This in a town of some 250,000 people. And that figure of 1,400 is “conservative.” It’s hard to avoid concluding that many of Rotherham’s white families have been affected, perhaps one in ten.

Grooming may have even left a dent in the census data. In Western countries, boys outnumber girls at birth, and this gender gap gradually shrinks through the higher mortality of boys until it is gone by the age of 20. This trend holds true in Rotherham up to the 15-19 age group, at which point the gender gap strangely widens. There seem to be around 500 girls unaccounted for. Evidently, this figure would capture only the final “confinement” stage of grooming and would exclude earlier stages when the girl is voluntarily living with her Pakistani boyfriend (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, 2013, p.5. Figure 1.5).

What do the academics have to say?

Not much. British academia has either ignored the issue or cast aspersions on anyone who brings it up, as seen in this paper:

The implications of the current fixation with grooming and ‘Asian sex gangs’ are examined and shown to further a political agendum and legitimise thinly veiled racism, ultimately doing victims a disservice.(Cockbain, 2013)

Cockbain cites two official studies to show that this fixation has no scientific basis:

Widespread concern around grooming resulted in two large-scale government studies: the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre’s (CEOP) assessment of ‘localised grooming’, and the Office of the Children’s Commissioner for England’s (OCCE) study on ‘child sexual exploitation in gangs and groups’.

[...] Like The Times, CEOP focused on community-based CSE, specifically excluding familial, peer-on-peer, professional or primarily online abuse. Unlike The Times, CEOP removed limitations on victims’ age and gender and covered both solo and group offenders. Of the 31 per cent (N = 753) of suspects for whom race was known, 49 per cent (N = 367) were white and 46 per cent (N = 346) Asian. Meanwhile, the OCCE included all forms of CSE in England, both online and offline, but was restricted to offenders acting in groups of two or more, the exclusion of solo offenders seriously undermining its claim to provide the ‘most thorough and comprehensive collection of information’ on CSE to date. The statistics presented in the report are often confused and incoherent, exacerbating methodological shortcomings and understandable data deficiencies. What can be disentangled is that only a minority of submissions to the call for evidence included any information on suspects. Of a total of 1,514 suspects thus identified, race data were available for 84 per cent (N = 1266). For those suspects where race was known, 43 per cent (N = 545) were white and 33 per cent (N = 415) Asian.

Almost half the suspects were homegrown whites? That figure seems far removed from the picture one gets in the British press. It also seems far removed from the picture one gets in a Dutch study of Amsterdam “lover boys”:

The young men were all between 21 and 24 years of age. Some of them were the children of Moroccan and Turkish guest labourers who had come to the Netherlands in the 1970s. Others had migrated at a young age with their parents from Surinam or Curacao, or were born in the Netherlands. (Van San and Bovenkerk, 2013)

Is seduction for profit more of a white boy thing in the UK than in the Netherlands? Or is the difference due to some bias in data gathering? The second explanation is suggested by the incompleteness of the British data. Only 31% of the CEOP files had information on the suspect’s race, and only a minority of the CSE files had any information at all on the suspect.

This incompleteness can be traced to two biases in data gathering, which, curiously enough, reflected a desire to avoid “bias”:

1. Fear of harming community relations

First, there was a fear that evidence of Asian sex gangs, if publicized, could damage community relations and hinder investigative work:

For example, ever since projects for sexually exploited children were first opened by Barnardo’s there have been reports of Asian gangs at work. This information was, very sensibly, not publicised by Barnardo’s because they knew that their workers depend on the goodwill and support of the local population — also largely Asian — to gather information about the girls so they can help them. Publicly highlighting the racial profile of the perpetrators would inevitably turn the community against them. (Linehan, 2011)

Cockbain (2013) similarly evokes a fear of “fuelling racist rhetoric, distorting policy and practice and exacerbating community tensions.”

These fears seem to have shaped public policy, as confirmed by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham:

Several councillors interviewed believed that by opening up these issues they could be ‘giving oxygen’ to racist perspectives that might in turn attract extremist political groups and threaten community cohesion. To some extent this concern was valid, with the apparent targeting of the town by groups such as the English Defence League.(Jay, 2014, p. 93)

2. Fear of seeming racist

Another reason, cited in the Inquiry, was simply a fear of seeming racist:

Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so. (Jay, 2014, p. 2)

[...] there was a widespread perception that messages conveyed by some senior people in the Council and also the Police, were to ‘downplay’ the ethnic dimensions of CSE. Unsurprisingly, frontline staff appeared to be confused as to what they were supposed to say and do and what would be interpreted as ‘racist’. (Jay, 2014, p. 91)

She also reported in 2006 that young people in Rotherham believed at that time that the Police dared not act against Asian youths for fear of allegations of racism. This perception was echoed at the present time by some young people we met during the Inquiry, but was not supported by specific examples. (Jay, 2014, p. 92)

Those who had involvement in CSE were acutely aware of these [ethnic] issues and recalled a general nervousness in the earlier years about discussing them, for fear of being thought racist. (Jay, 2014, p. 93)

 

A systematic bias

Because of these fears of either harming community relations or seeming racist, there was a systematic bias toward underreporting of Pakistani involvement in grooming. This bias in data gathering led to a distorted view of reality among public officials:

Within social care, the scale and seriousness of the problem was underplayed by senior managers. At an operational level, the Police gave no priority to CSE, regarding many child victims with contempt and failing to act on their abuse as a crime. Further stark evidence came in 2002, 2003 and 2006 with three reports known to the Police and the Council, which could not have been clearer in their description of the situation in Rotherham. The first of these reports was effectively suppressed because some senior officers disbelieved the data it contained. This had led to suggestions of cover-up. The other two reports set out the links between child sexual exploitation and drugs, guns and criminality in the Borough. These reports were ignored and no action was taken to deal with the issues that were identified in them.

In the early 2000s, a small group of professionals from key agencies met and monitored large numbers of children known to be involved in CSE or at risk but their managers gave little help or support to their efforts. Some at a senior level in the Police and children’s social care continued to think the extent of the problem, as described by youth workers, was exaggerated, and seemed intent on reducing the official numbers of children categorised as CSE. (Jay, 2014, p.1)

In a BBC interview, a researcher described how an official reacted to one of the reports: “She said you must never refer to that again. You must never refer to Asian men. And her other response was to book me on a two-day ethnicity and diversity course to raise my awareness of ethnic issues” (Brooks-Pollock, 2014).

It makes sense that public officials had trouble believing the evidence being brought to their attention. After all, it ran counter to the findings of the authoritative CEOP and CSE studies. The situation is not unlike that of the old Soviet Union, where official statistics said one thing and reality quite another.

 

How could this have happened?

The answer is easy. We live in a society where “racism” is viewed as a major evil. Once this view had gained the full backing of moral authority, it was just a matter of time before everyone fell into line … and acted accordingly. The average social worker became reluctant to report evidence of sex crimes if the suspects were non-white and non-Christian. The average police officer became reluctant to lay charges or pursue them if already laid. The average politician became reluctant to bring the matter up in council or parliament.

The result? Underreporting on a massive scale. This all could happen in broad daylight and no one would see a thing.

This massive underreporting then distorted the findings of official reports, which in turn convinced people in authority that the whole thing had been greatly exaggerated, undoubtedly for mischievous purposes. There was thus growing pressure from above to root out racist politicians, racist police officers, and racist social workers …

Antiracism is self-validating. On the one hand, it leads people to dismiss evidence that may undermine its view of reality. On the other, it strengthens its view of reality by encouraging people to create supporting evidence. There is no conspiracy. There is only the madness of ideology.

References

Brooks-Pollock, T. (2014). Rotherham researcher ‘sent on diversity course’ after raising alarm, The Telegraph, September 2
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11069178/Rotherham-researcher-sent-on-diversity-course-after-raising-alarm.html

Cockbain, E. (2013). Grooming and the ‘Asian sex gang predator’: the construction of a racial crime threat, Race & Class, 54, 22-32.
http://rac.sagepub.com/content/54/4/22.short

Linehan, T. (2011). Child sexual exploitation in the UK is all too common. But notions of gangs and grooming are a distraction and hinder our efforts to combat the problem.
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39920/1/blogs_lse_ac_uk-Child_sexual_exploitation_in_the_UK_is_all_too_common_But_notions_of_gangs_and_grooming_are_a_distrac.pdf

Jay, A. (2014). Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham 1997-2013
http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council. (2013). Demographic Profile of Rotherham,
http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/jsna/downloads/file/38/rotherham_demographic_profile_-_2013

Van San, M. and F. Bovenkerk. (2013). Secret seducers. True tale of pimps in the red light district of Amsterdam, Crime, Law and Social Change, 60, 67-80.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10611-013-9436-z

(Republished from Evo and Proud by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 35 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Gabriel says:

    Great rundown, first decent thing I’ve read about the scandal. Except for the Telegraph the Brit media seems to be ignoring the story entirely or grossly distorting it (The Guardian’s coverage is especially grotesque). Imagine the media’s hysteria had it been white Brits abusing Pakistani girls…

    • Replies: @Stone Garden
  2. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Too bad Enoch Powell wasn’t listened to. Britain would be a much happier place today – for the British.

  3. Cahokia says:

    Did these white girls have any autonomy? Any ability to make their own decisions?

    In the U.S. anyway, whenever juveniles beyond a certain age commit certain acts we’re willing to judge them as adults.

    White nationalists seem to view their girls as infant-like creatures, entirely susceptible to the wiles of dark-skinned men.

  4. ktwop says: • Website

    Creating a society of the future with a common culture as the glue has been sacrificed in a quest for some imagined God of Many Cultures.
    Multi-ethnicity – especially – requires a mono-culture to be a society at all. Multi-ethnic and multi-cultural is separatism and serves to ensure that a single society will never be established.
    Hence Rotherham and Bradford or Kreuzberg or Rosengård or Les Bosquets,

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    ktwop said:

    Creating a society of the future with a common culture as the glue has been sacrificed in a quest for some imagined God of Many Cultures.
    Multi-ethnicity – especially – requires a mono-culture to be a society at all. Multi-ethnic and multi-cultural is separatism and serves to ensure that a single society will never be established.
    Hence Rotherham and Bradford or Kreuzberg or Rosengård or Les Bosquets

    It will only function– if you can call it that– until the prosperity runs out. Then you will see a societal breakdown and inter-ethnic clusterf**k like nothing before in history. The idea (secretly held by the 1%?) that having wealth will preserve you from the overall socio-economic collapse in Europe/West is naïve at best. Things like gated and guarded communities, diversified and global investments, multiple income sources, etc., will mean nothing when the fiat currency and trust in commerce go south.

    And you can’t just start over. People see the examples of the last few decades of people preserving themselves, removing themselves and living out a cushy existence (even gated off) because they had money. But this has all been when you have had a functioning global economy, with a functioning and prosperous country which backed the reserve currency. The number of people supported by welfare in the U.S. is 72% of the entire population of the U.S. during the Great Depression. And that figure is growing significantly in relation to those not on welfare, i.e., the producing class.

  6. Ian says:

    Good article by Peter Frost.

    Cahokia asks rhetorically: “Did these white girls have any autonomy? Any ability to make their own decisions?”

    The girls were led into those dreadful situations under false pretences. Do you really think they were told at the outset what was in store for them? They were subject to intimidation, aimed at themselves and their families, backed up with beatings and other attacks.

    A healthy society protects its people from predators.

  7. @Cahokia

    All these girls were headed for a life of sexual dysfunction. Rotherham is a perfect storm of welfare-statism and feminism which demonizes biological fathers and replaces them with the managerial State. These teenagers were all low-hanging fruit for opportunistic, dark-skinned Others.

  8. @Cahokia

    You are talking about eleven-year-olds, FFS. I also haven’t seen any evidence that Peter Frost is a white nationalist.

    The girls probably did have some control over the course of their lives. It’s likely that if a girl refused to even talk to those older Pakistani, Afghan, Gypsy etc. men, they went on to search for easier prey. But you cannot know it for sure, especially because there came a point for each of the girls when they wanted to quit, but the men prevented it by use of violence. With some girls it might have already started out violently at the outset. Not very likely, but not totally impossible either.

    It’s also not the girls’ fault that they were raised in a society where nonwhite men are often seen as the epitome of masculinity, and also which allowed Pakistani pimps to have relatively high status (even if their non-whiteness was not a factor), e.g. driving BMWs, not to mention terrorizing neighborhoods and “grooming” girls with total impunity. (Only a high-status individual can terrorize others without consequences.)

    Let’s also mention the fact that these very young girls committed no crimes, quite unlike their slaveholders who gang-raped them.

  9. #3 cahokia: Did these white girls have any autonomy? Any ability to make their own decisions?

    Yeah – to the extent that any 12 year old of any race or either sex possesses a limited, but as yet underdeveloped, ability to make decisions.

    Are you just playing dumb or are you implying that there is something uniquely precocial about “white girls” that eliminates the need for that certain level of adult guidance and protection still required by other classes of young human teenagers?

    In the U.S. anyway, whenever juveniles beyond a certain age commit certain acts we’re willing to judge them as adults.

    Impressive! First time I’ve seen these prosecutorial standards – applied to particularly nasty 16 or 17 year olds accused of particularly nasty crimes – invoked to exculpate adult dirtbags who gang-bang and pimp out young teenagers.

    White nationalists seem to view their girls as infant-like creatures, entirely susceptible to the wiles of dark-skinned men.

    Only perverts or loons insist that, when it comes to sex, the onus should be on the 12 year old to be the adult in the room. Greasy-handed peddling of phrases like “white nationalists” and “wiles of dark-skinned men” indicates either pervert or loon. Or both.

  10. Curle says:
    @Cahokia

    “White nationalists seem to view their girls as infant-like creatures, entirely susceptible to the wiles of dark-skinned men.” ——————————–

    White nationalists as opposed to whom exactly? White liberals? Any evidence, or reason to suppose, white nationalists are more prone to this fear, fear of their children being susceptible to manipulating men, than other groups, say Asian fathers, Mexican fathers, Arab fathers? Years ago, as an Anglo, living in an area with a high concentration of Mexicans, I was advised to keep away from the girls. That the brothers would cut you if they found you hitting on them (the advice was directed to Anglo men). And then there is the story line of West Side Story. I don’t recall Maria’s brother being particularly enamored of Tony.

  11. Carl says:
    @Cahokia

    Infant-like creatures – you mean children?

  12. Sean says:

    Yes the anti racists believe they have a total monopoly of the truth, while anyone who does not put diversity above all else is irrational and has a mental problem (“phobia”, “hysteria”, “paranoia”). In the Soviet Union if you dared disagree with the official ideology you got diagnosed with ‘creeping schizophrenia’ and put in mental hospital for ‘treatment’ (a chemical lobotomy).

  13. rec1man says:

    The perp are not Asian- they are Pakistani / Punjabi Muslims

    Hindu and Sikh girls have also been targeted for 15 years or more by them

    This is called Love Jihad

    Their motivation comes from Koran, which encourages – Right Hand Possession rule- meaning, OK to rape Kafir Infidel women

  14. @Cahokia

    Anyone who is around young teens knows that most are naive, lack wisdom and are more impulsive than adults, have a drive to be defiant to their parents, and will dangerously follow older teens and young adults, will do anything to be ‘cool’- which for many 12 year old girls, in this day and age of liberal dominant culture is to have an older boyfriend (with bonus points for being ‘down with the swirl’), to use drugs, etc. Also, as the article makes clear, whites aren’t permitted to have a voice, to question what is going on. The older men are exploiting all of this.

    There’s a reason why we have laws such that 12 year olds are not the culpable party when sex between the 12 year old and an adult occurs. If you’d bother to notice, you’d see that those laws the way they are written, at least, are colorblind.

    When western governments give less of a damn about serious abuses like gang rape to thousands of its most vulnerable white citizens than it gives about delusional microaggressions to individual minorities, then yes, white nationalists have a good reason to be wary.

  15. @Cahokia

    We just can’t have ANY negativity against the Muslims. None. So … let’s blame the victims. The crimes described above don’t fit the multy culty religion and its ideology of “we are all the same.” So … anything that proves we are not all the same is attacked.

  16. Sean says:

    Disappearance of Charlene Downes, a 14 year girl whose body is supposed to have been disposed of by using it to make kebabs. Police treated it as a missing persons case (ie as if she had run away). Then another girl disappeared, and they treated that as a missing person case too. The article has repeatedly been deleted from Wikipedia. What is going on right now in Britain is anyone’s guess.

    The authorities are trained to target whites as racists, and they do. The elite have complete contempt for “Britain’s white left-behinds”, ‘a polyp of hard-up, .. grumpy people’ that are 30% of the population.

    Here is the Economist magazine articulating the mindset of the elite: “Its residents seem to fear everything—including muggers, drug-pushers, paedophiles, air pollution and rising damp, also of being taken for fools by the politicians they once voted for and the tabloid newspapers they once read. “My son’s 31 and he won’t go out after 8pm because he doesn’t know who’s about,” shivered one. Tilbury is a rough place; but these exaggerated fears are of the world itself—“Everything’s gone downhill,” Bagehot was told several times, and then beseeched, “Hasn’t it?”

    Why has this slab of British society, representing a third of the population, proved so unable to adapt?

    Some of the ill will was generated by the usual autochthonous meanness—especially over the immigrants’ equal right to public housing. Yet mainly it arose from a deep and justified sense of inferiority. [...] It is a shame; but no pandering or populism…”

  17. What is shocking, but not surprising is how the names of those doing the cover up are never published

    an official reacted to one of the reports: “She said you must never refer to that again.”

    “The first of these reports was effectively suppressed because some senior officers
    disbelieved the data it contained”

    Until the names, and preferably the addresses and where their kids go to school, are published, this bullshit will continue.

  18. george says:

    The naivety of this article is kind of funny. I wonder why the cops did not do their jobs? Could it be they didn’t want to? Could it be the deadly sin of sloth? Nope, not the hard working Protestant work ethic cops of Rotherham I tell you. It must have been something else. Oh they were afraid of being called racist if they got up off their butts and did their jobs.

    But perhaps it was not sloth but pride. They were too good to do something as pointless as policing the bimbos of Rotherham. Spending years as a cop in Rotherham picking up the drunk collapsed christian white youth up off the sidewalks probably gave some cops the idea that they were all hopeless bimbos. Why bother policing their sexuality? A pointless exercise to say the least.

  19. dave37 says:

    The fact that people get angry about this and start calling other people names just seems to be natural maybe even healthy, morality at last, except for the fact if there had been no Asian gangs some of these girls may have ended up in the same place, minus the asian enforcement methods, and then where is the morality outrage.

  20. Gene says:

    Lets face it, there are tribes and cultures with a none empathic evil streak in them. Is killing them the solution? Or does that lead to more killing?

    It appears that those who lead the US government around by the nose want us to kill.

    A distressing truth – those same people who say we are not a Christian nation – are leading us to be more and more like the bad guys.

    p.s. If 1% of everyone is evil – can we ever find peace – or will politics forever keep us killing?

  21. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Gene said:

    Lets face it, there are tribes and cultures with a none empathic evil streak in them. Is killing them the solution? Or does that lead to more killing?

    It appears that those who lead the US government around by the nose want us to kill.

    A distressing truth – those same people who say we are not a Christian nation – are leading us to be more and more like the bad guys.

    p.s. If 1% of everyone is evil – can we ever find peace – or will politics forever keep us killing?

    Why not just take the approach several Nobel Prize-winning scientists (from physics to medicine) have suggested? Namely, sterilization. It’s kind of late in the game, granted, but it’s either that or accelerating descent into barbarity. And I don’t believe it is strictly an IQ issue. I am inclined to believe that places are the way they are because the people who inhabit those lands are the way they are. And maybe that is why they are attracted to Islam? Kind of like a lot of the converts, who are violent and destructive by nature and usually learned about Islam while in prison for a violent crime. As opposed to the higher IQ and less violent people in East Asia, who are attracted to either Buddhism or Christianity.

    • Replies: @Hare Krishna
  22. @Anonymous

    You’re right that IQ has nothing to do with why they are how they are, but Islam is the major, major factor in why they are how they are. The type of Islam also matters a great deal. The traditionally relatively moderate Islamic traditions of Turkey are a whole different phenomenon from the bloody Wahhabism of the Arabian desert or the Deobandi tradition of Pakistan (itself merged with Wahhabism)

  23. Tregon says:

    Note that the Member of Parliament for Rotherham while all this vibrancy took place was a Denis MacShane, born Denis Matyjaszek, and rumoured to be the son of a Jewish KGB agent who enriched Britain from Poland after the war. MacShane / Matyjaszek was jailed for fraud last year. When he was sentenced, he was saluted like this by Britain’s most important community:

    A year ago, I wrote in these pages that the Jewish community needed to decide if it wished to stand by one of its greatest champions after he resigned as MP for Rotherham. His disgrace is greater now and there is every reason to feel disappointed in Denis and even let down. There are those who will suggest that the causes he espoused are somehow morally poisoned by the crimes to which he has admitted. But, for now, others must enter the rather large space he vacates fighting racism and totalitarianism. His causes are pure, even if Denis MacShane is less so. Why we should mourn Denis MacShane’s fall from grace, The Jewish Chronicle, November 22, 2013

    Meanwhile, Sue Berelowitz, the “deputy children’s commissioner”, is warning us that we mustn’t think any particular group is more inclined to such vibrancy than any other:

    On a recent field visit to a police force, Berelowitz was surprised to learn that the officers’ top search on their internal computer profiling system was “Asian male”. When she asked what would happen if the perpetrators were not Asian, the officer in charge replied that the force was “not looking for those”. “I was astonished. I said: ‘I think you better start looking.’” ‘Culture of denial’ leaving UK children at risk of serious abuse, The Guardian, August 27 2014.

    With MPs like Mr Matyjaszek and children’s commissioners like Ms Berelowitz, is it any wonder Britain is so vibrant compared with, say, the country to which Mr M and Ms B have an automatic right of return?

    Number of Infiltrators Leaving Israel Skyrockets in August

  24. Sean says:

    It seems we have some people who think pre teen girls who have been drugged, tortured and gang raped are “bimbos” or “may have ended up in the same place” anyway. But if that is why the police did nothing, why were they so pro-active in threatening the fathers of the girls with arrest? And carrying out their threat; several of the fathers were arrested .

    McShane had no ethnic motivation, he was just out for himself, and sticking it to poor whites is the royal road of personal aggrandisement. But it is interesting that Jewish groups actually seem to assume that whites who volunteer to stick it to their own people must be principled; how can anyone believe that Western society is being run by racially motivated whites?

  25. “There is no conspiracy. There is only the madness of ideology.”

    Conspiracy implies intent. Intent is easy to deny. Results are not. Accusations of intent simply give those at fault ammunition to smear their detractors.

    The intent of the liberal welfare programs was to help poor communities. The result was it destroyed them and then spread like cancer. We must start looking at results and ignore all the conspiracy nonsense.

  26. Peter Frost says: • Website

    “White nationalists seem to view their girls as infant-like creatures, entirely susceptible to the wiles of dark-skinned men.”

    Cahokia,

    I’m not a white nationalist. In any case, the “dark-skinned men” seem to share this view of themselves and their victims:

    “The men were sly and cunning and knew how to work selectively. They went for
    unstable girls with low self-esteem. ‘First you look at the girl. How smart is she?
    Because there are girls who are dangerous. They might go to the police or do
    something like that. It is better if they are on the stupid side. Really not much more
    than a body.’ They told us that it was easy to tell whether a girl could be manipulated
    into prostitution because their victims shared a similar characteristic: they had all
    sorts of problems at home, as a result of which they were unstable enough to be easily
    influenced. In the study of victimology circumstances such as these are referred to as
    victim proneness [7]. Some people run a higher risk of becoming victims of crime
    than others. It would appear that these young men had developed a sixth sense for
    detecting vulnerable girls. As one of them told us: ‘Listen, these are mostly problem
    girls. They have problems with their parents or they have debts; a long-term relationship
    has recently ended or they just broke up with their boyfriend. They’re at an
    all-time low, and then a loverboy comes along. Someone with a lot of money, who
    takes her out to all the right places, pays for everything, spoils her or what have you.
    Eventually, there comes a time when the girl who gets everything from her man is
    expected to do something for him in return, but they often don’t know how. Sooner or
    later these girls are simply going to be manipulated’.”

    Van San, M. and F. Bovenkerk. (2013). Secret seducers. True tale of pimps in the red light district of Amsterdam, Crime, Law and Social Change, 60, 67-80.

    http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10611-013-9436-z

    “You’re right that IQ has nothing to do with why they are how they are, but Islam is the major, major factor in why they are how they are.”

    HBD is crap (that’s your moniker, not my opinion),

    Islam seems to play a secondary and often indirect role. In Great Britain, most “groomers” are of Muslim origin, but there are also many West Indians and Roma. In the Netherlands, they seem to split half and half between Muslims (Moroccans, Turks) and West Indians.

    There are two main reasons why groomers target white girls:

    1. White girls are worth more on the sex market.

    2. White girls are easier targets.

    The second point came out in the Van San and Bovenkerk study:

    “Their tactics worked best with white Dutch girls. They had a lot more trouble with
    the daughters of immigrants, ‘because those families have respect for each other.’ In
    their view, this was not the case with Dutch girls: ‘Dutch girls really are the easiest.
    (…) Nowadays, there are girls of thirteen or fourteen years old who have already lost
    their virginity. They go to clubs and discos and stay away from home for a whole
    weekend.”

    I don’t want to minimize the role of religion because it does come out as a factor in that study:

    “One pimp told us that it was not only easier to get Dutch girls into prostitution,
    but that they were worth less than other girls and therefore deserved to end up as
    prostitutes. ‘Culturally and religiously, a Dutch girl is little more than a pig to a
    loverboy. She’s nothing, she’s of no value. When that’s what you’re thinking, you can
    completely block out your emotions.’ As mentioned, most loverboys were reluctant
    to manipulate the daughters of immigrants into prostitution, especially when it came
    to girls leading a pious life. ‘We are obligated to treat Moroccan girls as we would
    treat our own sisters; we can’t treat them as rags. You can’t just make a Moroccan girl
    work for you. (…) Listen, when a Moroccan girl wants to do it, that’s different. But if
    she goes to school and wears a headscarf, it’s just not right’.”

  27. IBC says:
    @Cahokia

    See the first comment and answer honestly.

  28. “500 girls unaccounted for.
    this figure would capture only the final “confinement” stage of grooming…”

    You mean slavery? Are you implying they are sex slaves in the UK or exported to a Muslim country?

    Or do you mean presumed murdered, like Charlene Downes and Paige Chivers?

  29. Here’s the most extensive blog I’ve seen on grooming, rape jihad and Muslim crimes.

    http://kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/

    Check out interactive map and blogroll.

    PS: May I suggest you change this column’s title to Rotherham: A Nice Place to Raise Kids

  30. @Gabriel

    Imagine the media’s hysteria had it been white Brits abusing Pakistani girls…

    I could clearly see the media hysteria when the Police turned a blind eye (and still do) when Hindu and Sikh girls were abused by Muslims.

    I could clearly see the media hysteria when it’s Brits and their ethnic kindred abusing girls in Thailand and Cambodia and….

    I could clearly see the media hysteria when white soldiers, who raped/murdered an Iraqi and massacred her entire family in Haditha, were virtually let off scot free.

    Can you even imagine what would happen if the victims were white??? Should I give some counter-examples?

    And oh, BTW, did it occur to anyone that Political Incorrectness is REALLY Reverse Political Correctness?

    • Replies: @Sean
  31. Sean says:
    @Stone Garden

    If we are talking about what happens in foreign countries, the ideology of whites is evenly applied, for instance: the Western politicians and media who are outraged by Buddhists who agitate against the growing Muslim immigrant community in the only Buddhist country on earth. The west backed Aung Sun Suu Kyi, but is outraged when she does not call those who oppose Muslim immigrants as evil.

    Rotherham is a city in England where the white police and white social workers and white local media and the white local politicians turned a blind eye to what was happening to white girls. And told anyone who complained to shut up. These whites saw nothing, not because they were white, but because an ideology had blinded them. The reigning white ideology makes Buddhism look like National Socialism. The reigning white ideology is that their own default is animus toward non whites. Everything is viewed through that ideological prism.

  32. Here’s a money quote from a Moroccan (Muslim) pimp in Peter Frost’s link above (comment 26):

    ‘Culturally and religiously, a Dutch girl is little more than a pig to a loverboy (Loverboy = Moroccan Muslim “boyfriend” pimp). She’s nothing, she’s of no value. When that’s what you’re thinking, you can completely block out your emotions.’

    So… Dutch white, Christian girl is little more than a pig. A pig with three holes to sell.
    Wonder if Pakistanis in UK think the same of British white girls?

    I case the link dies, this is the research paper’s title: “Secret seducers True tales of pimps in the red light district of Amsterdam”
    Authors are Marion van San & Frank Bovenkerk

  33. KenH says:

    This case is unbelievable and the behavior of the white authorities in England is truly Orwellian. They refused to investigate or protect these innocent white girls since that would be “racist” and cast a pall over the Pakistani community. I never thought I would see the white West sink low in my lifetime and I’ll probably live for another several decades. If English (the real, white English) were any kind of men they would be meting out vigilante justice against the Pakistani Muslim offenders since the authorities are too cowed to do anything.

    The Pakistanis males who committed these offenses are simply animals who deserve no sympathy or no quarter. If the English government wasn’t under the spell of multiculturalism then they would be creating the legal framework for the mass expulsion of Pakistanis and other third world groups and the destruction of all mosques.

  34. Is there any evidence suggesting girls have been smuggled to other countries as slaves?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Frost Comments via RSS