The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Patrick Cockburn ArchiveBlogview
We Shouldn't Feel Too Optimistic if Isis Are Defeated in Mosul

After Isis captured Mosul in June 2014, people in Baghdad waited in terror to see if its fighters would go on to storm the capital. There was very little to stop them as the Iraqi army in northern Iraq broke up and fled south. Many government ministers and MPs rushed to the airport and took refuge in Jordan. When an American military delegation arrived to review the defences of Baghdad, they were told by a senior Iraq official “to look to see which ministers had put fresh sandbags around their ministries. Those that have done so like myself will stay and fight; where you see old sandbags it means the minister doesn’t care because he is intending to run.”

Two and a half years later, it is Isis fighters who are battling street-to-street to hold onto west Mosul, their last big stronghold in Iraq, in the face of multiple assaults by a revived Iraqi army backed by US airpower. The last road out of the city to the west was cut by Iraqi government forces on 1 March and they have also captured one of the half-ruined bridges over the Tigris River that bisects Mosul, which they are planning to repair using US-supplied pontoons. Iraqi military units backed by some 50 US airstrikes a day are getting close to the complex of buildings that used to house the government headquarters in the centre of the city.

Iraqi officials and officers announce only advances and victories, reports that often turn out to be premature or untrue. But there is no doubt that the Iraqi security services are winning the struggle for Mosul, though fighting could go on for a long time amid the close-packed buildings and narrow, twisting alleyways. Already shelling and airstrikes are causing heavy casualties among families sheltering in cellars or beneath the stairs in their houses.

The battle will probably continue for a long time, but the capture of Mosul looks inevitable and will be a calamitous defeat for Isis. When its few thousand fighters seized the city and defeated a government garrison of 60,000 in 2014, it portrayed its victory as a sign that God was on its side. But the same logic works in reverse and today all Isis can offer its followers is a series of hard-fought defeats and withdrawals.

The crucial question concerns whether or not the fall of Mosul means the effective end of the caliphate declared by its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. The caliphate’s significance was that at one time it ruled territory with a population of five or six million people in Iraq and Syria, where it sought to establish a truly Islamic State. It is this dream – or nightmare – that is now being shattered. Isis may still control some territory in Iraq and more in Syria, but it has nothing like the human and material resources it enjoyed at the height of its power when it controlled territory stretching from the Iranian border almost to the Mediterranean coast.

Isis still has some strengths, including experienced and skilful commanders leading a core of fanatical fighters numbering as many as 4,000 in west Mosul alone. They have already killed 500 and wounded 3,000 of the Iraqi security service’s best soldiers in the struggle for east Mosul, which was meant to last a few weeks and instead took three months. There is a no reason the same thing should not happen in the west of the city where the warren of streets gives the defence an advantage. Foreign fighters know they cannot blend into the population and escape, so they have no choice but to fight to the death.

Other factors work in favour of Isis: it is fighting a vast array of enemies forced into an unwilling coalition against Isis because they fear and hate it just a little bit more than they hate and fear each other. As Isis weakens and becomes less of a threat, the edgy détente between different anti-Isis forces, such as the Iraqi government and the Iraqi Kurds, will begin to fray. People in Baghdad recall that the Kurds took advantage of the defeat of the Iraqi army in 2014 to grab extensive lands long disputed between themselves and the Arabs. Once freed of the menace of Isis, non-Kurdish Iraqis will want these territories back.

In Syria, there is an even more complicated three-cornered fight between the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian Kurds and Turkey for the areas from which Isis is retreating. Turkish troops and their local proxies have just taken al-Bab, northeast of Aleppo, from Isis after a hard fought siege, and have started attacking the town of Manbij nearby, which was taken from Isis after a long battle late last year by the Syrian Kurdish People’s Mobilisation Units (YPG) and its Arab allies. As Isis is driven out, the YPG and Turkish-backed forces are left facing each other in what might be the beginning of a new Kurdish-Turkish war waged across northern Syria.

Even those familiar with the complexities and shifting alliances of the Syrian civil war are baffled by the likely outcome as the different players in Syria position themselves to take advantage of a likely attack on Raqqa, the de facto Syrian capital of Isis. Will the US continue to use the devastating firepower of its air force to support a YPG-led ground offensive? Or could the US administration under Trump take a more pro-Turkish stance and, if it did so, would the Syrian Kurds look for an alternative military alliance with Assad and his Russian backers?

ORDER IT NOW

The answers to such questions will decide if we are really getting towards the end of the terrible wars in Iraq and Syria that have ravaged the region since 2003 or if we are only seeing an end to a phase in the conflict. In Iraq, the government has survived the disasters of 2014 and is about to defeat Isis in Mosul, though the Baghdad administration remains spectacularly corrupt, sectarian and dysfunctional. Assad in Syria has already won a crucial victory by capturing east Aleppo, the last big urban stronghold of the armed opposition in Syria, and is evidently intending to win back the whole country.

These successes give an exaggerated idea of the real power of the Iraqi army, which owes the reversal in the military tide to the support of foreign powers and, above all, to US airpower. The same is true of the Syrian army in its reliance on Russia and Russian airstrikes. So far, the mix of cooperation and rivalry between the US and Russia in Syria that developed under President Obama has not changed much under Donald Trump.

Yet the war is not quite over. Isis has a tradition of responding to defeats on the battlefield by carrying out terrorist attacks in the region, Europe, Turkey or other parts of the world. Some spectacular atrocities would enable it once again to dominate the news agenda and show it is not beaten.

Isis may want to test the Trump administration and see if it can provoke it into an overreaction by some act of terror, just as al-Qaeda was able to do at the time of 9/11.

(Reprinted from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Iraq, ISIS 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
[]
  1. In any case, isn’t this the third or fourth time we have taken Mosul? The salient question isn’t why we lose it over and over again, rather why we bother to take it at all. Ring off the region, and starve them to perfidy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are only available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also only be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/pcockburn/we-shouldnt-feel-too-optimistic-if-isis-are-defeated-in-mosul/#comment-1786082
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. It is taking the Iraqi “Army” , if that is what we want to call it, longer to take Mosul than it took the Russians to conquer Berlin. The Russians were at least facing large numbers of German soldiers if poorly supplied and equipped.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    On the other hand, it's taking them a lot shorter than it took the Greeks to conquer Troy ...
  3. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @unit472
    It is taking the Iraqi "Army" , if that is what we want to call it, longer to take Mosul than it took the Russians to conquer Berlin. The Russians were at least facing large numbers of German soldiers if poorly supplied and equipped.

    On the other hand, it’s taking them a lot shorter than it took the Greeks to conquer Troy …

    Read More
  4. […] Patrick Cockburn explains what may happen as ISIS loses Mosul. [Link] […]

    Read More
  5. We Shouldn’t Feel Too Optimistic if Isis Are Defeated in Mosul

    I wouldn’t worry about that. As a nation we seem to be slow learners, but we’ve figured that out.

    If we got a real mad on we could lay waste to the whole ME, but why? We no longer have the stomach for that kind of wholesale killing, and most have figured out that “world police” is not a fun job.

    But just because we no longer have whatever it takes to mete out that level of personal violence does not mean that people are not going to die.

    Read More
  6. The headline of this article is spot on. Unfortunately the analysis is too short-term.
    The idea of a caliphate will not die but continue on, probably in different and less extreme forms. The announcement of the current ISIL caliphate sent waves of optimism and even support through the Middle East: finally we will get rid of this neo-colonialism with our own unity and strength.
    This is not the first time that a union of Middle Eastern countries was tried after WW2. Nasser’s was the first although that was not a caliphate but a modern association with Egypt at its political center.
    The more the West bombs, kills, and maims the stronger will grow the idea of setting religious differences aside and uniting in some form.
    If a Syrian, Libyan, Iraqi, Yemenite, Somalian, Gazan looks at Iran he or she cannot fail to notice that there is no civil war in Iran and that all attempts by outsiders at regime change have failed. That is why the anti-Iran and other Midlle Eastern policies of previous administrations and the current one are unintentionally promoting the formation of another union.
    The correct policy with regards to the countries involved is a return to Nasserism in the form of a Levantine Economic Union including Israel and a real Palestine state. That cannot happen overnight but it should be our objective. Stop dividing. Help unity.

    Read More
  7. We have a problem with our own virtue signaling. What is ISIS? A collection of swarming Salafi cults, held together by a few competent military leaders crom Saddam era, a small army of Saudi preachers in charge of religion, money and food distribution. Beyond that — who is in charge of strategy, military gear, telecom, transportation — all a combination of Saudi, US, Jordanian, etc secret services. Just look at the six of them captured after Aleppo was liberated. Six foreign intelligence officers, names and identifications given to UN in a lublic speach by Syrian UN rep. And Aleppo was NOT, repeat NOT “rebel” defended, but was kept hostage by Al-Qaeda and their affiliates. Our propaganda is nauseating, all with fake humanitarian White Helmets. In the plain view of UN transport organizers — they took hostages with them. Up until today — only foreign press interviewed the rescued citizens from Aleppo, and tens of thousands of their horror stories have not reached Sestern audiences that are still ced the same garbage about good Al-Nusra. Once we set propaganda in motion, we stick to it — no matter how deadly fraudullent.

    No wonder we cannot figure out life past ISIS. OF COURSE. For ISIS to disappear — it must be treated as all cults. First –SPONSORS MUST CEASE AND DESIST. Second, must be defeated militarily, and third — all the Salafi preachers remived, and prople returned to mainstream religious institututions, and the process of teaching against cults must be out in place. Prosecutions, as well as mental health issues must be dealt with. ISIS cannot reconstitute without money and arms supplies. Nor can it function without translort snd telecom. The REAL question is — will US stop tfying to control and dirct governments in Iraq and Syria. With so ereign governments in charge — order will be established. If state institutions remain feeble, managed from outside – we will see repeated weaknesses. For as long as occupations remain — we will see attempts of manipulation and the rise of other violent groups — forcing governments to beg us for help. How about just getting out, stop funding our proxies against the governments — and stop the no borders globalizing projects at taxpayers expense. This is why our good for nothing Congress just writes checks — and is not asking any questions.

    Since we the taxpayers have no say in wars, but have to pay — where foes it leave our armed forces? They are on missions and in locations authorized by nobody — and apparently run by secret service groups — not always talking to each other. ISIS will be gone. Once we decide to get out of all efforts of managing foreign governments.

    Read More
  8. ISIS is on it’s last legs. So is the EU. So is Imperial Washington. Positive developments for the human race in my view. But I don’t see what it has to do with optimism.

    Read More
  9. We must be mad than because we have about laid waste the middle east . and it does not sound like we are dobe yet

    Read More
  10. If ISIS should some how be defeated and they come back as Al Nursra , AlQaida they will still be the same irresponsible radical actors .There are hundreds if not thousand of like minded organizational names these people can go under to fight . Defeating ISIS still leaves ISIL or 999 other names to defeat. Islam has only been temporally set back now and than for the last 1400 years . If we are not smart enough to catch on to the various name changes with the same Islamic agenda that will be just our tough luck . We really won’t be able to defeat them .

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr