The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
The US and Saudi Arabia Could Cause a War in the Middle East
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I was in my room in the Baghdad Hotel on al-Sadoun street last Sunday evening, writing about the chances for stability in Iraq taking hold, when the walls and floor began to shake. They jerked sideways and up and down several times as if my room was the cabin of boat in a rough sea.

My first confused thought was – this being Baghdad – that there must have been some huge bomb explosion, which would explain the rocking motion of everything around me. But almost simultaneously, I realised that I had not heard the sound of an explosion, so a better explanation was that there was an earthquake, though I had never thought of Baghdad as being in an earthquake zone.

The jerking movements of the walls and floor of my room were so spectacular that I wondered if the building was going to collapse. I looked under the desk where I was sitting, but the space was too small for me to crouch in. I got down on my hands and knees and started to crawl towards the bathroom which is meant to be the safest place in the event of a bomb explosion, and I supposed the same must be true of earthquakes.

I had got about half way there when the shaking stopped. The lights were still on which seemed a good sign. I got back on a stool and googled “Baghdad earthquake” on my laptop and read a series of alarmed tweets confirming that was indeed what had just happened.

It was a 7.3 magnitude quake centred 19 miles from Halabja, a small city in Iraqi Kurdistan 150 miles north-east of Baghdad and close to the Iranian border. Nine people had been killed in Iraq, but the catastrophic damage was in Iran where 530 people had died.

In earlier times, an earthquake like this would be taken as an omen: a warning of bad times to come. Shakespeare is full of such grim portents which commonly precede assassinations and defeats in battle. This would be a pity in the case of present day Iraq because, for the first time since Saddam Hussein started his war with Iran in 1980, the prospects look positive.

The central government is stronger than before, defeating Isis in the nine-month long siege of Mosul and ending the move towards secession of Iraqi Kurdistan by peacefully reoccupying Kirkuk and other disputed territories.

Substantial successes these certainly are, but what has really changed the political landscape of Iraq is that there is no longer a community, party or faction fighting the central government with financial and military aid from foreign backers. For once, Iraq has good relations with all the neighbouring states.

The earthquake may not herald more domestically-generated violence in Iraq, but in the real world it is a useful reminder that the country, along with the rest of the Middle East, is vulnerable to unexpected and unpredictable events. Of course, these are always a possibility anywhere, but never more than at present because of the strange character change of two traditionally conservative powers in the region: the US and Saudi Arabia. Previously committed to preserving the political status quo, both have become mercurial and prone to saw off the branch on which they are sitting.

Shortly before the earthquake in Baghdad, I was making the above point about Iraq stabilising to a European diplomat. He said this might be true, but that real danger to peace “comes from a combination of three people: Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Trump’s son-in-law and Middle East envoy Jared Kushner, and Bibi Netanyahu in Israel.”

Probably, the Saudis and the Americans exaggerate the willingness of Netanyahu and Israel to go to war. Netanyahu has always been strong on bellicose rhetoric, but cautious about real military conflict (except in Gaza, which was more massacre than war).

Israel’s military strength tends to be exaggerated and its army has not won a war outright since 1973. Previous engagements with Hezbollah have gone badly. Israeli generals know that the threat of military action can be more effective than its use in maximising Israeli political influence, but that actually going to war means losing control of the situation. They will know the saying of the 19th century German chief of staff, Helmuth Von Moltke, that “no plan survives contact with the enemy”.

But even if the Israelis do not intend to fight Hezbollah or Iran, this does not mean that they would not like somebody else to do so for them. Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi told me in an interview earlier this month that his greatest fear was a US-Iranian confrontation fought out in Iraq. This could happen directly or through proxies, but in either case would end the present fragile peace.

On the optimistic side, US policy in Iraq and Syria is largely run by the Pentagon and not the White House, and has not changed much since President Obama’s days. It has been successful in its aim of destroying Isis and the self-declared caliphate.

The wars in Iraq and Syria already have their winners and losers: President Bashar al-Assad stays in power in Damascus, as does a Shia-dominated government in Baghdad. An Iranian-backed substantially Shia axis in four countries – Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon – stretches from the Afghan border to the Mediterranean. This is the outcome of the wars since 2011, which is not going to be reversed except by a US land invasion – as happened in Iraq in 2003.

The great danger in the Middle East today is that Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman and Jared Kushner appear to have a skewed and unrealistic understanding of the world around them. Inspector Clouseau seems to have a greater influence on Saudi policy than Machiavelli, going by the antics surrounding the forced resignation of Saad Hariri as Prime Minister of Lebanon. This sort of thing is not going to frighten the Iranians or Hezbollah.

ORDER IT NOW

The signs are that Iran has decided to go a long way to avoid confrontation with the US. In Iraq, it is reported that it will support the re-election of Abadi as prime minister which is also what the US wants. Iran knows that it has come out on the winning side in Iraq and Syria and does not need to flaunt its success. It may also believe that the Crown Prince is using anti-Iranian nationalist rhetoric to secure his own power and does not intend to do much about it.

Nobody has much to gain from another war in the Middle East, but wars are usually started by those who miscalculate their own strengths and interests. Both the US and Saudi Arabia have become “wild cards” in the regional pack. The sort of Neo-con and right-wing think tankers, who in 2003 were saying that a war with Iraq would be a doddle, are back in business in Washington, pushing for war with Iran – and are stronger than ever.

The wars in the Middle East should be ending, but they could just be entering a new phase. Leaders in the US and Saudi Arabia may not want a new war, but they might just blunder into one.

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Singh says:

    We’ll know by spring whether Af Pak, Ukraine or Levant theaters will have war. Full of war like people who love battle, so it is what it is.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /pcockburn/the-us-and-saudi-arabia-could-cause-a-war-in-the-middle-east/#comment-2084770
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Talha says:

    Shouldn’t the title be:
    The US and Saudi Arabia Could Cause another War in the Middle East

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    the yemen war/siege doesn't count? besides a few mins on last sunday's 60 mins. it is 100% radio silent in the usa. msm is ignoring it :)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    The US and Saudi Arabia Could Cause a War in the Middle East”

    They aren’t the only ones.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. We need a constitutional amendment banning Jews from any government or near-government position.
    The US would be much tougher on immigration and much less bellicose militarily

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. virgile says:

    If Saddam Hossein had been eliminated before the Gulf war, millions of innocents would have been saved.
    Maybe this is lesson that the world should take to avoid another war in the Middle East.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    Idiot,
    Israel should be eliminated to solve the world problems. If US-Israel are bombed beyond recognition
    then, millions of innocents will be saved. Shame on Russia and China that have not formed a FRONT AGAINST EVIL. Though, his front is shaping form, the sooner, the better.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Didi says:

    Cause? Now that is rich!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @virgile
    If Saddam Hossein had been eliminated before the Gulf war, millions of innocents would have been saved.
    Maybe this is lesson that the world should take to avoid another war in the Middle East.

    Idiot,
    Israel should be eliminated to solve the world problems. If US-Israel are bombed beyond recognition
    then, millions of innocents will be saved. Shame on Russia and China that have not formed a FRONT AGAINST EVIL. Though, his front is shaping form, the sooner, the better.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. MEexpert says:

    The US and Saudi Arabia Could Cause a War in the Middle East

    Hello Cockburn! Have you been asleep for the last fourteen years? The war in Syria is still going on as is the war in Yemen. Gaza still get bombed by Israel on a regular basis. Maybe you meant to say “cause a new war,” say against Iran. Why did you leave out the third part of the axis of evil – Israel? Israel is the real culprit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    Right you are, Israel is the real culprit.

    Surely Cockburn knows "our" politicians are bought-&-paid for by the Israel lobby, and Zionist Jews run the (((media))), (((Hollywood))), (((Wall Street))), & the (((government))):
    -- [ http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column ]

    Surely Cockburn knows ISRAEL DID 9-11 -- (while the (((media))) blamed Muslims:
    -- [ https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it ]

    Surely Cockburn (a regular at his late brother's Counterpunch) knows all about the Oded Yinon plan:
    -- [ http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/04/25/is-the-us-waging-israel-s-wars/ ]

    And surely Cockburn knows front-line journalists (like himself) are more likely to stay alive IF they go easy on the Terrorist Theocracy of Eretz Israel.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. @Talha
    Shouldn’t the title be:
    The US and Saudi Arabia Could Cause another War in the Middle East

    Peace.

    the yemen war/siege doesn’t count? besides a few mins on last sunday’s 60 mins. it is 100% radio silent in the usa. msm is ignoring it :)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. @MEexpert

    The US and Saudi Arabia Could Cause a War in the Middle East
     
    Hello Cockburn! Have you been asleep for the last fourteen years? The war in Syria is still going on as is the war in Yemen. Gaza still get bombed by Israel on a regular basis. Maybe you meant to say "cause a new war," say against Iran. Why did you leave out the third part of the axis of evil - Israel? Israel is the real culprit.

    Right you are, Israel is the real culprit.

    Surely Cockburn knows “our” politicians are bought-&-paid for by the Israel lobby, and Zionist Jews run the (((media))), (((Hollywood))), (((Wall Street))), & the (((government))):
    — (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column ]

    Surely Cockburn knows ISRAEL DID 9-11 — (while the (((media))) blamed Muslims:
    — (https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it ]

    Surely Cockburn (a regular at his late brother’s Counterpunch) knows all about the Oded Yinon plan:
    — (http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/04/25/is-the-us-waging-israel-s-wars/ ]

    And surely Cockburn knows front-line journalists (like himself) are more likely to stay alive IF they go easy on the Terrorist Theocracy of Eretz Israel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr