The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
London Attack Bears Hallmarks of Isis Trying to Show It's Still Deadly
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The indiscriminate slaughter of ordinary members of the public on London Bridge and in Borough Market on Saturday night is fully in keeping with the operational methods of Isis. They have yet to claim responsibility, but it is extremely likely that they were ultimately behind an attack that bears so many Isis hallmarks.

The killings were probably triggered by a pre-arranged instruction to a cell or individual in Britain, the order coming from within the Isis apparatus, and not in response to a more generalised call to its sympathisers to make attacks in Europe and elsewhere. Isis is more professionally organised than is generally supposed, going by its track record over the last five years; its military and terrorist tactics traditionally involve those in charge deciding overall objectives and timings, but leaving local operatives to determine everything else.

Mass murder by Isis of defenceless civilians is frequently carried out in well-known or iconic places to ensure maximum publicity and to spread as much fear as possible. The perpetrators, for the most part, die along with their victims or soon afterwards, making a deliberate public demonstration of their religious commitment. The latest killings in London have all these characteristics, and are very similar in this respect to previous atrocities on Westminster Bridge carried out by Khalid Masood, and in the Manchester Arena by Salman Abedi.

The timing of these three acts of terrorism is most likely connected to Isis setbacks and retreats on the battlefield in Iraq, Syria and Libya. Its fighters have lost most of Mosul – the centre of the self-declared Caliphate since Isis captured the city in 2014 – which Iraqi security forces have been assaulting for seven months. The US-backed Syrian Kurds and their Arab allies have said in the last few days that they are about to storm Raqqa, the isolated Isis de facto Syrian capital on the Euphrates River.

Isis uses terrorism in a deliberately sadistic and attention-grabbing way to counter-balance any perception that it is weakening or is fought out. In return for minimum expenditure of men and resources on its part, it can demonstrate to the world that it is still in business despite its loss of territory. It welcomes denunciations because its savagery is geared to topping the news agenda. For this purpose, Isis films its own massacres, ritually decapitates journalists, burns captives alive or drowns them in cages. Last week, a bomb exploded outside an ice cream shop thronged with children in Baghdad killing at least 15, with some reports saying 30 people were killed and dozens more injured.

ORDER IT NOW

It has been suggested that the Western mass media plays into the hands of Isis or al-Qaeda by the wall-to-wall coverage of their crimes. But self-censorship is unrealistic since there is overwhelming and understandable public demand for information about terrorists and terrorism which needs to be satisfied. Where authoritarian governments censor or play down Isis and al-Qaeda acts and capabilities, as they do in much of the Middle East, the result is simply to create a vacuum of news and to discredit any media outlet that is silent.

The terrorist tactics used by the three men shot dead in Borough Market in the midst of their killing spree, have been developed by Salafi-jihadi movements over the last 20 years. The most notorious example of a suicidal terrorist attack of this nature was 9/11, when the World Trade Centre was destroyed, but they were used on a mass scale from beginning of the war in Iraq in 2003, though they were not pervasive in Afghanistan until later.

The effectiveness of this sort of terrorism is that the entire population is the target and cannot all be defended. Fanaticism but no great amount of military expertise is necessary, so Isis is not depleting its limited number of experienced fighters. Many of the untrained Isis supporters who arrived in Syria and Iraq in recent years, who did not speak Arabic and had no other useful skills, were deployed as suicide bombers, with more than 600 being dispatched, often in vehicles packed with explosives, in the first weeks of the Iraqi security forces’ advance into Mosul last year.

A further aim of the suicide bombings in Iraq and Syria is to spread out the security forces and to discredit the government in the eyes of its own people, on the grounds that it cannot defend them. In these countries, the ability of bombers to pass through numerous checkpoints without being stopped is often blamed on corruption, but, even when they are stopped, they can cause heavy casualties by blowing themselves up at a crowded security post.

The emphasis in Britain on seeking to stop Isis attacks by monitoring and neutralising some 23,000 Salafi-jihadi suspects can never be more than partially successful. Only five people are known to have been directly involved in the Westminster, Manchester and London Bridge killings, and these may have been selected, or self-selected, because they were not on a list of prime suspects. But the real key to preventing terrorist attacks lies not in Britain at all, but in eliminating Isis sanctuaries in Iraq and Syria which remain the inspiration and guiding hand for Isis worldwide.

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Britain, ISIS, Terrorism, TomDispatch Archives 
Hide 8 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. KenH says:

    But the real key to preventing terrorist attacks lies not in Britain at all, but in eliminating Isis sanctuaries in Iraq and Syria which remain the inspiration and guiding hand for Isis worldwide.

    And what about all the ISIS sanctuaries springing up in the ghettos of Paris and other European capitals? As the fortunes of war turn against them in the Levant a sizable number of them will flee to Europe as “refugees”. Actually, they have a much better chance of surviving in Europe since the feckless W. Europeans not only won’t turn them back, but won’t lift a finger to stop them (or kill them). After all, that would be Islamophobic and hearken back to the bad old days when white Europeans used to mercilessly kill invaders and we’re much too civilized for that.

    Western Muslims are becoming radicalized all the time. I read where seven million more Muslims are trying to enter Europe and if Merkel gets her way they’ll all get in. So ISIS could lose all its territory, but it’s ideology will live on and the highly evolved Europeans think it’s better to die than to fight back protecting their kith and kin since that’s tantamount to Nazism and gassing Jews.

    RIP W. Europe. And we can probably add the U.K. and Sweden to that list.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /pcockburn/london-attack-bears-hallmarks-of-isis-trying-to-show-its-still-deadly/#comment-1895416
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Seraphim says:

    And of course, that has ‘nothing to do with Islam’, the religion of ‘peace’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. EDITORS:
    Please stop referring to this international band of murderers as ISIS: Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (or, alternatively, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant). And, by the way, Isis (as it’s spelled in this article) is an Egyptian deity and has nothing to do with ISIS.

    This depraved group is in no way a “state” and has no license or authority to call itself a “state.” It consists of murderous thugs who only have illusory pretensions to statehood (“the Islamic caliphate”). Why give them the legitimacy that they so desperately want and need by referring to them as a “state”?

    They are no more a “state” than the Black Panthers, the Baader-Meinhof Gang, the Manson family, or the Khmer Rouge. Like these groups, they must and will be wiped off the face of planet Earth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kyle a
    If the international band of murders consists of a complacent population of hundreds of millions...it's more than a "state", it's a continent. The editors need to drag their arses through coals even more aggressively. You shouldn't worry yourself with semantics.
    , @Talha
    Hey Beryl Green,

    Good point. This is similar to what Prof. Juan Cole said about the organization; that people should refer to it as "Daesh" - meaning "trample or crush". This is what the people of the Middle East do to rob them of a sense of legitimacy. If I remember correctly, this pisses the group off so much that you could lose your tongue for calling them this to their face.

    Peace.
    , @Bill Jones
    The Baader-Meinhof Gang were in fact organs of the State, it was all a part of Operation Gladio.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Kyle a says:
    @Beryl Green
    EDITORS:
    Please stop referring to this international band of murderers as ISIS: Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (or, alternatively, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant). And, by the way, Isis (as it's spelled in this article) is an Egyptian deity and has nothing to do with ISIS.

    This depraved group is in no way a "state" and has no license or authority to call itself a "state." It consists of murderous thugs who only have illusory pretensions to statehood ("the Islamic caliphate"). Why give them the legitimacy that they so desperately want and need by referring to them as a "state"?

    They are no more a "state" than the Black Panthers, the Baader-Meinhof Gang, the Manson family, or the Khmer Rouge. Like these groups, they must and will be wiped off the face of planet Earth.

    If the international band of murders consists of a complacent population of hundreds of millions…it’s more than a “state”, it’s a continent. The editors need to drag their arses through coals even more aggressively. You shouldn’t worry yourself with semantics.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Talha says:
    @Beryl Green
    EDITORS:
    Please stop referring to this international band of murderers as ISIS: Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (or, alternatively, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant). And, by the way, Isis (as it's spelled in this article) is an Egyptian deity and has nothing to do with ISIS.

    This depraved group is in no way a "state" and has no license or authority to call itself a "state." It consists of murderous thugs who only have illusory pretensions to statehood ("the Islamic caliphate"). Why give them the legitimacy that they so desperately want and need by referring to them as a "state"?

    They are no more a "state" than the Black Panthers, the Baader-Meinhof Gang, the Manson family, or the Khmer Rouge. Like these groups, they must and will be wiped off the face of planet Earth.

    Hey Beryl Green,

    Good point. This is similar to what Prof. Juan Cole said about the organization; that people should refer to it as “Daesh” – meaning “trample or crush”. This is what the people of the Middle East do to rob them of a sense of legitimacy. If I remember correctly, this pisses the group off so much that you could lose your tongue for calling them this to their face.

    Peace.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. RodW says:

    Calling them ‘Islamic State’ is a good way to remind ourselves of what sort of polity can result from adherence to Islam. I’d rather call them Islamic State and thereby discomfit the other states that are also Islamic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. @Beryl Green
    EDITORS:
    Please stop referring to this international band of murderers as ISIS: Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (or, alternatively, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant). And, by the way, Isis (as it's spelled in this article) is an Egyptian deity and has nothing to do with ISIS.

    This depraved group is in no way a "state" and has no license or authority to call itself a "state." It consists of murderous thugs who only have illusory pretensions to statehood ("the Islamic caliphate"). Why give them the legitimacy that they so desperately want and need by referring to them as a "state"?

    They are no more a "state" than the Black Panthers, the Baader-Meinhof Gang, the Manson family, or the Khmer Rouge. Like these groups, they must and will be wiped off the face of planet Earth.

    The Baader-Meinhof Gang were in fact organs of the State, it was all a part of Operation Gladio.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. This is what we are dealing with

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-16201961

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr