A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
Patrick Cockburn Columns
Israel-Gaza Conflict: What Has Israel Achieved in 26 Bloody Days?
Hamas is stronger, the Jewish state looks shifty and heartless – and the world's eyes are on Gaza

As Gaza is devastated by a new paroxysm of violence, what has Israel achieved by its 26-day bombardment and ground intervention? The outcome so far is similar to that of past Israeli wars in Lebanon and Gaza: massive firepower is used to inflict heavy losses on the other side, the great majority of the casualties being civilians. But, as the war goes on, Israeli leaders find that Israel’s military superiority is failing to produce comparable political gains.

Worse, from the Israeli point of view, it is the Palestinians and, in this case, Hamas, who are in a stronger position than they were a month ago. By its actions, Israel has put the Palestinian issue firmly back on the international agenda from which it had largely disappeared since the Arab uprisings of 2011. Only a few months ago, a friend sympathetic to the Palestinians lamented to me that, in his travels in the US, Europe and the Arab world, he had seldom heard the words “Palestine” or “Palestinians”. Gaza, at horrendous cost to its people, has changed all that.

Usually, the sufferings of the four million Palestinians penned into Gaza and the West Bank are invisible to people in the rest of the world. But over the past month we have seen, night after night, pictures of Palestinian families, with their maimed and terrified children, vainly seeking safety amid shattered houses and hospitals. Israeli spokesmen sound shifty and heartless as they claim that there is no proof of Israel’s culpability for the shelling of a UN hospital or a children’s playground, suggesting that a Hamas rocket might have fallen short. These denials and evasions might work in a short war but, by the time 264 Palestinian children had been killed, as of Friday, they only serve to convince people that Israelis do not care how many Palestinians they kill.

Of course, we have been here many times before, the most notorious Israeli intervention being the invasion of Lebanon in 1982. I was in the Sabra and Shatila camps just after the massacre of 1,700 Palestinians by Christian militiamen who would not have been there but for Israeli actions. When I see pictures of the dead in Gaza, I feel I can still smell the sickly sweet stench of the dead bodies as they began to rot in the hot September sun. I remember the poverty of the dead, with their ragged clothes and plastic shoes, as they lay in the doorways of tiny shops or heaped up in alleyways. Out in the open, a donkey was lying dead between the shafts of a small cart carrying a barrel of water, and corpses were half-buried in a bank of sand, as if somebody had wanted to conceal them but had given up half-way through because there were too many bodies to bury.

Not everything is the same today in Gaza as it was in Lebanon in 1982 or in Gaza in 2008. A crucial difference is that, at those points, the countries neighbouring Israel were relatively stable, or at least had governments in firm control. Nothing could be less true this summer, as Syria and Iraq are convulsed by civil war, and Jordan and Lebanon look more and more unstable. Egypt has a leadership installed by a military coup and confirmed by a dubious election; the Libyan state has collapsed into anarchy, presided over by predatory militias. The Gaza war adds to the sense of general crisis.

A reason for Israel launching these mini-conflicts, for there has not been an all-out war since the invasion of Lebanon, is to demonstrate its raw military power. But, each time round, it simultaneously shows the limitations of that power to get anywhere in ending Israel’s long confrontation with the Palestinians. For all the devastating firepower of Israel’s air force, tanks and artillery deployed against a few thousand Hamas gunmen, it is unlikely to permanently eliminate them and thus win a military victory. And, even if it did, the victory would not be conclusive since the Palestinian sense of oppression is so great that some other armed group, possibly in the shape of Isis (the self-tagged Islamic State), would soon take its place.

When I was a correspondent in Jerusalem between 1995 and 1999, I came to believe that there was another reason, to do with the political psychology of Israelis, which explained why they fought these bloody but futile wars. This was put well by Uri Avnery, the Israeli writer and peace activist, who wrote that the Israeli army is filled with “teenagers who are indoctrinated from the age of three in the spirit of Jewish victimhood and superiority”. The same is true of much of the rest of Israeli society. Israelis genuinely feel they are the main victims deserving international sympathy, even when 1,400 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli shells and bombs compared with just three Israeli civilians and one Thai worker killed by Hamas’s rockets and mortars.

Every opponent of Israel, however puny, is treated by Israeli governments and much of the Israeli media as representing an existential threat. Any retaliatory violence is therefore justified, whether the targets are Palestinians, Lebanese or the 10 Turks killed on board the flotilla of boats trying to bring aid to Gaza in 2010. This sense of permanent persecution, born of pogroms and the Holocaust, is understandable but makes Israelis peculiarly vulnerable to demagogues manipulating their sense of threat. Israeli spokesmen have triumphantly pointed to polls showing that 90 per cent of Israelis currently support Operation Protective Edge in Gaza, but this lack of contrary opinion about a venture so unlikely to do Israel much good is, in reality, a sign of weakness in a nation.

Paradoxically, deliberate threat inflation by the Israeli government redounds to the advantage of Hamas. Its military wing fires rockets into Israel to cause fear among the general population by killing or wounding people; its attacks are largely ineffectual because Israel has the Iron Dome defensive system that intercepts the rockets. But Israeli leaders then do Hamas’s work for it by telling their people that Hamas is a threat to their very existence. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks of the “tunnels of terror” as if they undermined every home in Israel. A story spread on the internet claims that thousands of Hamas fighters dressed in Israeli army uniforms had been planning to surge through the tunnels into Israel in a sort of underground D-Day landing.

A great weakness of Israel is that Israelis believe so much of their own propaganda. Dr Arbuthnot, the 18th-century writer and satirist, said that “all political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies”. The same is true of nations when they see the world around them only through a lens distorted by the myths of their own propagandists. Israelis are diverted from the simple fact, proven so often since the war of 1967, that they are not going to enjoy permanent peace so long as they occupy the West Bank and besiege Gaza. The Israeli historian Tom Segev says: “It is not easy to understand why so many Israelis still believe that a large Israel without peace is better than a small Israel with peace.”


(Reprinted from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Gaza, Israel/Palestine 
Hide 5 Comments
Options
Commenters to Skip

5 Comments to "Israel-Gaza Conflict: What Has Israel Achieved in 26 Bloody Days?"

[Filtered by Reply Thread]
  1. tadzio308
    says:
         Show Comment

    “Terror tunnels”. If they are, they are useless. All that effort and over the last ten years just one success story – Shalit. No, the tunnels are for commerce. Given that the Palestinians could not afford the capital investment and would not have the construction materials it is likely that the tunnels are built by Israelis. What would be the purpose? To divert international aid to Palestine by inflating the price of goods in order for Israel to reap economic benefit. To enrich investors and corrupt IDF higher ups. To alleviate the stringent blockade.

    Tunnels are like doors that swing both ways. While the underpaid laborers digging may be Arabs those directing the operation and reaping exorbitant profits likely live in the posh high rises of Tel Aviv. The idea that the tightly controlled Israeli economy allows for such a large investment and trade to go undetected by the authorities is risible. Those tunnels are not avenues of terrorism they are a parasite’s needle sucking humanitarian aid to Gaza into the coffers of the Zionist elite.

    Israel has always known the what and the where of the tunnels. When their trumped up propaganda value has faded, after the latest genocidal massacres, the damage will be repaired and the shekel spigot will be turned on. The humanitarian aid extracted from a compassionate world to help the helpless of Gaza will again flow to the IDF generals and their political allies.

    • Replies:
    Reply This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Anonymous
    says:
         Show Comment

    {Only a few months ago, a friend sympathetic to the Palestinians lamented to me that, in his travels in the US, Europe and the Arab world, he had seldom heard the words “Palestine” or “Palestinians”. }

    The person must have been only to brothel houses not hearing Palestine or Palestinians. This is a biased view of the embedded journalists of the empire.

    Palestine and Quds days is know to billions of people all over the world and they participated in Quds day every single year to expose the crimes of zionist tribe and its embedded journalists.

    Long live Palestin and death to its enemeis.

    Reply This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. KA
    says:
         Show Comment

    Think you for the perspective . It explains he Zio role in the money without earring it . Stealing is so easy when the poor gentile does all the dirty works literally . It also explains the blockade .

    Reply This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. KA
    says:
         Show Comment

    The history does not bode well for Palestinians. The world opinion is something that Zionist knows it can ignore . It has always succeeded by ignoring the interests of other parties by working from inside which meant pressure,threat,blackmail,and plain bribing in the past to both American and British political leaders from the days of Balfour government ( public and private pressures on PM,Parliament in UK, President and both Houses in US ) to the time of Truman and threat to countries like France Haiti,Liberia,Philippines and Chile in times of UN vote despite facts,realities,violence,and illogicalities evident in the demands of Zio . Zio has systematically undermined the Mandate the UK was supposed to uphold Zio has undercut the directives of the League of Nation . It has interfered with the British duties ,responsibilities to Palestine as required by various papers submitted to UK and by the League of Nation violently and treasonously . It did same to US and later to UN. It has continued despite the horrors it has caused to Lebanon,Syria,Palestine , Iraq, and lately Iran. It has bombed Libya,Tunisia,Sudan and has attacked UN buildings, and forged passports , it has carried out assassinations ,it has spied egregiously , it has threatened lives of foreign leaders , it has killed legitimate leaders ,it has issued statements for preemptive wars , for ethnic cleansing, it has stolen trade secrets and spread radioactive materials on US soil, and interfered with the election in other countries .
    Nothing has happened. This one also will pass .

    Reply This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Anonymous
    says:
         Show Comment

    Israel is the porject of the West, Rothschild family and its extension to control the entire region and help the West . As the following quote shows.

    a quote from The Bannerman Report written in 1907 by the Prime Minister of Great Britain, Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, and, as it was strategically important it was suppressed and was never released to the public until many years later:

    “There are people (the Arabs, Editor’s Note) who control spacious territories teeming with manifest and hidden resources. They dominate the intersections of world routes. Their lands were the cradles of human civilizations and religions. These people have one faith, one language, one history and the same aspirations. No natural barriers can isolate these people from one another … if, per chance, this nation were to be unified into one state, it would then take the fate of the world into its hands and would separate Europe from the rest of the world. Taking these considerations seriously, a foreign body should be planted in the heart of this nation to prevent the convergence of its wings in such a way that it could exhaust its powers in never-ending wars. It could also serve as a springboard for the West to gain its coveted objects.”

    Down with the criminal west.

    Reply This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My Information
 Email Replies to my Comment


Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal
Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr