The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
Is the Syria Ceasefire Deal Important… and Will the Truce Hold?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Is the agreement important?

It is very significant inside and outside Syria because it is between the US and Russia, the most powerful players in the Syrian conflict, who can put pressure on their allies and proxies to comply. It is important too because it is the sign of a change in the international political landscape: Russia is back as a superpower – certainly in the Middle East and perhaps globally – for the first time since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. The intention of US and Russia to closely cooperate in a joint air campaign against Isis and Jabhat al-Nusra, the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda now relabelled as Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, is unprecedented.

Will the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad keep the ceasefire?

Yes, because it has said it will and is dependent on Russian air support and weapons supply. But, equally important, it is in its interests to do so because the US and Russia will be targeting al-Nusra, the Salafi-jihadi movement which is the main fighting arm of the non-Isis rebel movement. It has been in the forefront of all successful rebel offensives. If the armed opposition no longer contains al-Nusra and Isis, then it will be substantially neutered when it comes to fighting the Syrian Army and its allies. This is a big gain for Assad.

More immediately, a ceasefire which freezes the present battle lines in place is also in his interests because his forces have once again encircled rebel-held east Aleppo, taken over the rebel stronghold of Daraya in Damascus and are advancing on other fronts. The Syrian Army probably feels that it can do with a period of consolidation and will be able to focus its forces against a weakening Isis and make territorial gains in east Aleppo.

Could Iran, Hezbollah and the Shia axis play a spoiling role?

The Iranians have welcomed the agreement and, since their main aim is to keep Assad in power, it is in their interests, as it is in his, to go along with the agreement.

So who loses out in this agreement and is there anything they can do about it?

It is bad news for Isis because the coalition against it will get even bigger. But already there are more planes and drones in the sky in Syria and Iraq than there are targets to attack. The military onslaught from the air against Isis may not be that much heavier, but the Syrian army will be freer to attack it east of Aleppo and elsewhere. There is not much Isis can do about this.

How will al-Nusra react to being targeted along with Isis?


Here is one the weaknesses of the agreement. The non-Isis armed opposition in Syria has long been dominated by Islamists, but the Islamists fighting groups are dominated by Nusra. Its discipline, high morale, experience, popularity and, perhaps most important, ability to deploy suicide bombers in large numbers, make it the backbone of armed opposition. But the US and Russia envisage the “moderate” opposition distancing itself geographically from al-Nusra which will then be bombed by the US and Russians. But why should al-Nusra wait for this to happen? For them, the peace plan agreed in Geneva is a war plan directed against themselves. In other words, they have no incentive to cease firing and, even when backed by US and Russian airstrikes, there is no moderate opposition fighting force strong enough to replace them. Some al-Nusra leaders may well feel that if they are going to be treated like Isis, they might as well think about establishing better links with that organisation – though it will be difficult for them to forget the inter-jihadi civil war of 2013-14.

Will the UN aid convoys get through to besieged cities?

Yes, this is an essential part of the agreement – particularly aid for rebel-held east Aleppo. In the murky whirlpool of competing crises that make up the Syrian crisis, one aspect that has made an impression on the outside world is people starving while encircled by their enemies. This is certainly happening, but not on the scale that people imagine. The 250,000 to 275,000 people in east Aleppo have not run out of food yet – though it is expensive – because the UN has prepositioned supplies there that are being run down, but they need to be topped up. The other big rebel enclave, Eastern Ghouta east of Damascus, has many shortages such as seeds and agricultural machinery, but it is a fertile area that grows much of its food. But there are rebel areas where people are literally starving such as Madaya and Moadamiya. All these are likely to be relieved, but there may be difficulties over Kefraya and Foua, two pro-government Shia villages west of Aleppo whose fate is linked to the rebel-held Madaya and Zabadani west of Damascus.

Will the bombing of civilian areas by the Syrian air force stop?

Yes, because public opinion abroad is very conscious of this and the Syrian air force will not be allowed to operate over these areas. In any case, the barrel bombing of civilian areas never did the Damascus government much good militarily. Its main purpose was to force a mass exodus of people from any area held by the opposition.

Will the war end?

No, because the US-Russian agreement contains a peace plan and a war plan. The war is to be waged against Isis and Nusra, but it is not clear where the ground troops to do will come from.

Could the whole agreement come unstuck?

Yes, because not everybody acts in their own interests – this is a good deal for Russia, Iran and the Syrian government – but a damaging one for the opposition. Put simply, it does not have a credible military force capable of replacing al-Nusra and Isis as opponents of the Syrian government.

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Russia, Syria 
Hide 3 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. I think it is a rosy picture.
    The US have been able to have Russia signing an agreement relative to the Syria’s war against the terrorists.
    Today in Daraya, Assad said that the army will fight until the whole country is free from the terrorists and foreign occupation. He is offering reconciliation to the opposition as long they lay down their weapons. He was not saying that the Syrian army would stop fighting tonight.
    In the north, Turkey has invaded his country and in the south, Israel is bombing the Syrian army to help another terrorists aggression.
    This agreement is not requesting Turkey or Israel to go home. It does not require KSA and Qatar to stop supporting the terrorists either : so it is a bias agreement. It is a trick to put apart Syria, to achieve in Syria what has been done in Libya.
    I understand that Russia want to get out of that mess and is afraid of being trapped as the Soviet-Union was in Afghanistan but it is a sign of weakness which will confort the hawks in the US that will keep on boxing Russia in a corner.
    For me this agreement is a mistake for Russia and some kind of victory for Obama.

  2. Andrei Martyanov [AKA "SmoothieX12"] says: • Website

    I understand that Russia want to get out of that mess and is afraid of being trapped as the Soviet-Union was in Afghanistan

    I understand that ignorant propaganda cliches are invincible in the conditions of being completely ignorant on what and how Russia thinks about Syrian Civil War, the same goes for invocations of Soviet-Afghan War, but at least some effort could be made in trying to avoid such a blatant BS. Not only Russia doesn’t “want to get out of that mess”(c), but Russia is in “that mess” on a completely rational and well-calculated bases which lay in the foundation of Russian geopolitical thinking. Russia “trapped” herself in this war completely on her own volition and by doing so dealt a very serious defeat to US global ambitions which are damaging both to US and, especially so, outside world.

    • Replies: @Jean de Peyrelongue
  3. @Andrei Martyanov

    You are kidding.
    When Iran told Russia that Assad was loosing this war, Russia realized that they were going to loose Tartus.
    They had saved already once Syria when they US wanted to bomb Syria following the supposed used of chemical weapons by Assad ( similar lie to the wmd of Hussein).
    By their military intervention, they saved another time Syria but actually Russia has not espoused the motivation of the resistance to Israel, the main motivation of Iran, the Hezbollah,the Palestine and Syria.
    Russia still wants to get along with Turkey, KSA, Qatar and Israel which are the arch ennemies of the resistance to Israel.
    Furthermore Russia is still ready to get along with the US and the EU provided that both become less insulting. Russia is being assaulted by the Anglo-zionist Empire and Russia is on a defensive mode. Most of the Russian economy is under the control of men belonging to the Anglo-zionist Empire. The Empire is boxing Russia in a corner waiting Putin’s departure knowing that Putin will not start a war and by doing so and waiting the end of Putin, they will force Russia to submit.
    By signing this agreement, the Empire is conforted in its tatics as Russia is showing its weakness.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr