The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
Iraqi Protesters Blame ‘bad Government, Bad Roads, Bad People'
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“The people want an end to the parties,” chanted protesters, adapting a famous slogan of the Arab Spring, as they stormed the governor’s office and the international airport in the Shia holy city of Najaf.

Part of the wave of demonstrations sweeping across central and southern Iraq, they demanded jobs, electricity, water and an end to the mass theft of Iraq’s oil wealth by the political parties.

Beginning on 8 July, the protests are the biggest and most prolonged in a country where anti-government action has usually taken the form of armed insurgency.

The demonstrations are taking place in the heartlands of the Shia majority, reflecting their outrage at living on top of some of the world’s largest oilfields, but seeing their families barely survive in squalor and poverty.

The protests began in Basra, Iraq’s third largest city which is at the centre of 70 per cent of its oil production. A hand-written placard held up by one demonstrator neatly expresses popular frustration. It read:

“2,500,000 barrels daily
Price of each barrel = $70
2,500,000 x $70 = zero !!
Sorry Pythagoras, we are in Basra”

The protests quickly spread to eight other provinces, including Najaf, Kerbala, Nasariya and Amara.

In several places, the offices of the Dawa Party, to which the Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi belongs, were burned or attacked, along with those of parties whom people blame for looting oil revenues worth hundreds of billions of dollars in the 15 years since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

As the situation deteriorated, Mr Abadi flew to Basra on 13 July, promising to make $3bn available to improve services and provide more jobs. After he left, his hotel was invaded by protesters.

The credibility of almost all Iraqi politicians is at a low ebb, the acute feeling of disillusionment illustrated by the low 44.5 per cent turnout in the parliamentary election on 12 May that produced no outright winner.

The poll was unexpectedly topped by the Sairoun movement of the populist nationalist cleric, Muqtada al-Sadr, who has encouraged his followers to start protests against government corruption and lack of services since 2015.

The Sadrists, who emphasised their socially and economically progressive programme by allying themselves with the Iraqi Communist Party in the election, are playing a role in the current protests.

The demonstrations are also backed by the prestigious Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani. At ground level, political activists and tribal leaders have set up a joint committee called “the Coordination Board for Peaceful Protests and Demonstrations in Basra”, its purpose being to produce a list of demands, unite the protest movement, and keep their actions non-violent.

“The ends don’t justify the means,” says the committee in a statement. “Let us, being oppressed, not lead to the oppression of others.”

A list of 17 demands is headed by one asking for a government timetable for supplying water and electricity, both of which are short at a time of year when the temperature sometime exceeds 50C, making it one of the hottest places on earth.

Local people claim that the last time that the port city of Basra, once called the Venice of the Gulf, had an adequate supply of drinking water was in 1982. Iran had been supplying some extra electricity, but has cut this back because of its own needs and failure of Iraq to pay on time.

The second demand of the protesters is for jobs with “priority to the competent sons of Basra”, the discharge of foreign labourers and employment for a quarter of people living in the oilfields.

Lack of jobs is a source of continuing complaint all over Iraq. Much of its oil income already goes on paying 4.5 million state employees, but between 400,000 and 420,000 young people enter the workforce every year with little prospects of employment.

Anger towards the entire political class is intense because it is seen as a kleptocratic group which syphoned off money in return for contracts that existed only on paper and produced no new power plants, bridges or roads.

Political parties are at the centre of this corruption because they choose ministries, according to their share of the vote in elections or their sectarian affiliation, which they then treat as cash cows and sources of patronage and contracts.

Plundering like this and handing out of jobs to unqualified people means that many government institutions have become incapable of performing any useful function.

Radical reform is difficult because the whole system is saturated by corruption and incompetence. Technocrats without party backing who are parachuted into ministries become isolated and ineffective.

One party leader told The Independent that he thought that the best that could be done “would be to insist that the parties appoint properly qualified people to top jobs.”

The defeat of Isis in 2017 with the recapture of Mosul means that Iraqis are no longer absorbed in keeping their families safe so they have they have more time to consider “corruption” – a word they use not just to mean bribery but the parasitic nature of the government system as a whole.

There is a general mood of cynicism and dissatisfaction with the way things are run.

“Bad government, bad roads, bad weather, bad people,” exclaimed one Iraqi friend driving on an ill-maintained road.

Corrupt motives are ascribed to everything that happens: a series of unexplained fires in Baghdad in June were being ascribed to government employees stealing from state depots and then concealing their crime by setting fire to the building and destroying it.

Given that the Iraqi security forces are primarily recruited from the areas in which the protests are taking place, the government will need to be careful about the degree of repression it can use safely.

Some eight protesters have been killed so far by the police, who are using rubber bullets, water cannon and rubber hoses to beat people.

ORDER IT NOW

The armed forces have been placed on high alert. Three regiments of the elite Counter-Terrorism Service, which led the attack on Mosul and is highly regarded and well disciplined, has been ordered south to cope with protests and away from places where there is still residual activity by Isis.

The protests are largely spontaneous, but the Sadrists, whose offices have not been attacked by crowds, want to put pressure on Mr Abadi, Dawa and other parties to form a coalition government with a reform programme.

Many protesters express anti-Tehran slogans, tearing up pictures of Iranian spiritual leaders such as Ayatollah Khomeini and the current Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. They blame Iran for supporting corrupt parties and governments in Iraq.

Protesters have so far escalated their actions slowly, gathering at the entrances to the major oil and gas facilities, but not disrupting the 3.6 million barrel a day production. If this happens, it would affect a significant portion of world crude output.

Iraq’s corrupt and dysfunctional governing system may be too set in its profitable ways to be reformed, but, if the ruling elite wants to survive, it must give ordinary Iraqi a larger share of the oil revenue cake.

Read the first piece in Patrick Cockburn’s latest series, ‘Catastrophic drought threatens Iraq as major dams in surrounding countries cut off water to its great rivers’, here.

Part II, ‘For this Iraqi tribe massacred by Isis, fear of the group’s return is a constant reality’, here

Part III, ‘After series of calamitous defeats, is Isis about to lose its last town?’, here.

Part III, ‘Iraq unrest: Chaos reigns in the country even Saddam Hussein ‘found difficult to rule’, here.

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Iraq 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The ratio of people to cake is too big.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. PJ London says:

    “Oh for the good old days when Saddam was running things.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johann Ricke

    “Oh for the good old days when Saddam was running things.”
     
    Electricity production in Iraq overall is superior to what it was during Saddam's rule. But availability is not 24/365, which is presumably what they're demanding:

    Prewar Baghdad had electricity 16 to 24 hours per day and was favored for distribution. The remainder of Iraq received 4–8 hours of electricity per day.[6] Post war, Baghdad no longer has priority and therefore both Baghdad and the country as a whole received on average 15.5 hours of electricity per day as of February 2010.[7]

     

    If they want some facsimile of Saddam's rule back, they could easily elect the Sunni Arab parties to power. Which they haven't. Demonstrations were rare during Saddam's reign because he killed the opposition and consigned those he did not kill to Abu Ghraib, where they were raped and/or beaten to within an inch of their lives.

    Shiites were unhappy with American occupation because they thought the only thing keeping them from becoming a Shiite version of Saudi Arabia, economically-speaking was an American plot to steal their oil and sow division in the country. After GI's left, they discovered, through ISIS's long record of victories, that Sunni Arabs really, really don't like being ruled by Shiites, and that Iraq's Sunni Arabs really are better at military endeavors than the Shiites or the Kurds. They are fortunate that Uncle Sam came to their rescue, yet again.

    It's becoming clear that the Iraq's Shiite Arabs and Kurds could never have lifted the Sunni Arab foot from their necks by their own efforts. The question is whether their history books will ever reflect this truth.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. @PJ London
    "Oh for the good old days when Saddam was running things."

    “Oh for the good old days when Saddam was running things.”

    Electricity production in Iraq overall is superior to what it was during Saddam’s rule. But availability is not 24/365, which is presumably what they’re demanding:

    Prewar Baghdad had electricity 16 to 24 hours per day and was favored for distribution. The remainder of Iraq received 4–8 hours of electricity per day.[6] Post war, Baghdad no longer has priority and therefore both Baghdad and the country as a whole received on average 15.5 hours of electricity per day as of February 2010.[7]

    If they want some facsimile of Saddam’s rule back, they could easily elect the Sunni Arab parties to power. Which they haven’t. Demonstrations were rare during Saddam’s reign because he killed the opposition and consigned those he did not kill to Abu Ghraib, where they were raped and/or beaten to within an inch of their lives.

    Shiites were unhappy with American occupation because they thought the only thing keeping them from becoming a Shiite version of Saudi Arabia, economically-speaking was an American plot to steal their oil and sow division in the country. After GI’s left, they discovered, through ISIS’s long record of victories, that Sunni Arabs really, really don’t like being ruled by Shiites, and that Iraq’s Sunni Arabs really are better at military endeavors than the Shiites or the Kurds. They are fortunate that Uncle Sam came to their rescue, yet again.

    It’s becoming clear that the Iraq’s Shiite Arabs and Kurds could never have lifted the Sunni Arab foot from their necks by their own efforts. The question is whether their history books will ever reflect this truth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @PJ London
    Two points ;
    You don't get sarcasm.
    Your reply is rubbish.
    After 27 years of American war on Iraq and 16 years of occupation ;
    "As of 2010, despite improved security and billions of dollars in oil revenue, Iraq still generates about half the electricity that customers demand, leading to protests during the hot summer months
    In 2008, Al Jazeera reported $13 billion of Iraqi oil revenues in US care was improperly accounted for, of which $2.6 billion is totally unaccounted for ...
    As of 2011, nearly 3 million Iraqis have been displaced, with 1.3 million within Iraq and 1.6 million in neighbouring countries, mainly Jordan and Syria. More than half of Iraqi Christians have fled the country since the 2003 US-led invasion.
    The UNICEF/WHO report noted that prior to 1990, 97% of the urban dwellers and 71% of the rural population had access to free primary health care; just 2% of hospital beds were privately managed."
    As in all 'liberated' countries, the general quality of life has dropped and will take another generation to recover, only the politicians installed by the occupiers have an 'improved' standard of living.
    There are a hundred examples, Ukraine, Zimbabwe, Afghanistan, Namibia, Libya, South Africa, Germany, Poland, Honduras, Palestine not one of them would have supported the 'take-over' had they known what was to come.
    The Iraq war was simply to grab the oil and to teach the world that the US dollar was the only allowable means of exchange.
    The deaths of millions through sanctions and war was - is of no consequence, except to those who actually died.
    In reply to Lesley Stahl's question "We have heard that half a million children have died. [from sanctions prior to the war] I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" 'I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it.'
    "Hugh, I know I shouldn't even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event—something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough—and slow enough—so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?"

    “History is a set of lies agreed upon.”
    “What then is, generally speaking, the truth of history? A fable agreed upon.” - Napoleon Bonaparte

    Whilst it is true that the services in the Sunni (Baathist) areas were superior to those in the Shia and Kurd areas, nonetheless the there was universal healthcare, education and distribution of food and necessities.
    Your understanding of Arab and middle east is obviously lacking, people vote for their family and tribe and then for their religious leaders. To suggest that they could vote for Sunni is both disingenuous and false. The Sunni Baathist party was destroyed and outlawed by the US and all it's leaders were killed or prosecuted. Any attempt to reconstitute is is put down by the US appointed government. The Kurds are running rampant with the protection of the US, killing and removing Arabs from the north so that the oil firms can steal the revenues. The Sunni centre is deliberately being reduced to poverty firstly by depriving them of any central (oil) benefits and secondly by inserting ISIS into the area and then destroying the infrastructure under the false claim of fighting ISIS.
    Whitewashing the motivations and outcomes of the wars on Iraq will continue for another generation or so and then 100 years from now, the truth will emerge.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. PJ London says:
    @Johann Ricke

    “Oh for the good old days when Saddam was running things.”
     
    Electricity production in Iraq overall is superior to what it was during Saddam's rule. But availability is not 24/365, which is presumably what they're demanding:

    Prewar Baghdad had electricity 16 to 24 hours per day and was favored for distribution. The remainder of Iraq received 4–8 hours of electricity per day.[6] Post war, Baghdad no longer has priority and therefore both Baghdad and the country as a whole received on average 15.5 hours of electricity per day as of February 2010.[7]

     

    If they want some facsimile of Saddam's rule back, they could easily elect the Sunni Arab parties to power. Which they haven't. Demonstrations were rare during Saddam's reign because he killed the opposition and consigned those he did not kill to Abu Ghraib, where they were raped and/or beaten to within an inch of their lives.

    Shiites were unhappy with American occupation because they thought the only thing keeping them from becoming a Shiite version of Saudi Arabia, economically-speaking was an American plot to steal their oil and sow division in the country. After GI's left, they discovered, through ISIS's long record of victories, that Sunni Arabs really, really don't like being ruled by Shiites, and that Iraq's Sunni Arabs really are better at military endeavors than the Shiites or the Kurds. They are fortunate that Uncle Sam came to their rescue, yet again.

    It's becoming clear that the Iraq's Shiite Arabs and Kurds could never have lifted the Sunni Arab foot from their necks by their own efforts. The question is whether their history books will ever reflect this truth.

    Two points ;
    You don’t get sarcasm.
    Your reply is rubbish.
    After 27 years of American war on Iraq and 16 years of occupation ;
    “As of 2010, despite improved security and billions of dollars in oil revenue, Iraq still generates about half the electricity that customers demand, leading to protests during the hot summer months
    In 2008, Al Jazeera reported $13 billion of Iraqi oil revenues in US care was improperly accounted for, of which $2.6 billion is totally unaccounted for …
    As of 2011, nearly 3 million Iraqis have been displaced, with 1.3 million within Iraq and 1.6 million in neighbouring countries, mainly Jordan and Syria. More than half of Iraqi Christians have fled the country since the 2003 US-led invasion.
    The UNICEF/WHO report noted that prior to 1990, 97% of the urban dwellers and 71% of the rural population had access to free primary health care; just 2% of hospital beds were privately managed.”
    As in all ‘liberated’ countries, the general quality of life has dropped and will take another generation to recover, only the politicians installed by the occupiers have an ‘improved’ standard of living.
    There are a hundred examples, Ukraine, Zimbabwe, Afghanistan, Namibia, Libya, South Africa, Germany, Poland, Honduras, Palestine not one of them would have supported the ‘take-over’ had they known what was to come.
    The Iraq war was simply to grab the oil and to teach the world that the US dollar was the only allowable means of exchange.
    The deaths of millions through sanctions and war was – is of no consequence, except to those who actually died.
    In reply to Lesley Stahl’s question “We have heard that half a million children have died. [from sanctions prior to the war] I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?” ‘I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it.’
    “Hugh, I know I shouldn’t even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event—something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough—and slow enough—so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?”

    “History is a set of lies agreed upon.”
    “What then is, generally speaking, the truth of history? A fable agreed upon.” – Napoleon Bonaparte

    Whilst it is true that the services in the Sunni (Baathist) areas were superior to those in the Shia and Kurd areas, nonetheless the there was universal healthcare, education and distribution of food and necessities.
    Your understanding of Arab and middle east is obviously lacking, people vote for their family and tribe and then for their religious leaders. To suggest that they could vote for Sunni is both disingenuous and false. The Sunni Baathist party was destroyed and outlawed by the US and all it’s leaders were killed or prosecuted. Any attempt to reconstitute is is put down by the US appointed government. The Kurds are running rampant with the protection of the US, killing and removing Arabs from the north so that the oil firms can steal the revenues. The Sunni centre is deliberately being reduced to poverty firstly by depriving them of any central (oil) benefits and secondly by inserting ISIS into the area and then destroying the infrastructure under the false claim of fighting ISIS.
    Whitewashing the motivations and outcomes of the wars on Iraq will continue for another generation or so and then 100 years from now, the truth will emerge.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johann Ricke

    As of 2010, despite improved security and billions of dollars in oil revenue, Iraq still generates about half the electricity that customers demand, leading to protests during the hot summer months
     
    They weren't happy under Saddam, but protests would have gotten them shot to death, or worse - tortured to death. Again, they can revert at any moment. Plenty of Sunni Arabs raring to become the ruling caste once again. Saddam was mainly effective at killing anyone who opposed him. Democracy is messy, but the Shiite majority is at least choosing its leaders instead of being sat upon by the Sunni Arabs.

    The Iraq war was simply to grab the oil and to teach the world that the US dollar was the only allowable means of exchange.
     
    There is a single price for oil, adjusted for grades and transportation costs, and Middle Eastern oil isn't mostly what we buy, given that our refineries are geared for heavy sour crude. The Iranians sell their oil for yuan, and it's not like this has had any particular impact on the dollar, which is a floating currency. You can gin up all the fanciful Communist-derived propaganda you want, but nothing will change the fact that Iraq was a basket case country while Saddam ruled, thanks to a combo of corruption and nutty economic policies (many of which are still in place today). Over time, things may improve, but that's up to the will of a majority of Iraqi voters, not the whims of a ruthless and murderous dictator like Saddam.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. @PJ London
    Two points ;
    You don't get sarcasm.
    Your reply is rubbish.
    After 27 years of American war on Iraq and 16 years of occupation ;
    "As of 2010, despite improved security and billions of dollars in oil revenue, Iraq still generates about half the electricity that customers demand, leading to protests during the hot summer months
    In 2008, Al Jazeera reported $13 billion of Iraqi oil revenues in US care was improperly accounted for, of which $2.6 billion is totally unaccounted for ...
    As of 2011, nearly 3 million Iraqis have been displaced, with 1.3 million within Iraq and 1.6 million in neighbouring countries, mainly Jordan and Syria. More than half of Iraqi Christians have fled the country since the 2003 US-led invasion.
    The UNICEF/WHO report noted that prior to 1990, 97% of the urban dwellers and 71% of the rural population had access to free primary health care; just 2% of hospital beds were privately managed."
    As in all 'liberated' countries, the general quality of life has dropped and will take another generation to recover, only the politicians installed by the occupiers have an 'improved' standard of living.
    There are a hundred examples, Ukraine, Zimbabwe, Afghanistan, Namibia, Libya, South Africa, Germany, Poland, Honduras, Palestine not one of them would have supported the 'take-over' had they known what was to come.
    The Iraq war was simply to grab the oil and to teach the world that the US dollar was the only allowable means of exchange.
    The deaths of millions through sanctions and war was - is of no consequence, except to those who actually died.
    In reply to Lesley Stahl's question "We have heard that half a million children have died. [from sanctions prior to the war] I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" 'I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it.'
    "Hugh, I know I shouldn't even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event—something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough—and slow enough—so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?"

    “History is a set of lies agreed upon.”
    “What then is, generally speaking, the truth of history? A fable agreed upon.” - Napoleon Bonaparte

    Whilst it is true that the services in the Sunni (Baathist) areas were superior to those in the Shia and Kurd areas, nonetheless the there was universal healthcare, education and distribution of food and necessities.
    Your understanding of Arab and middle east is obviously lacking, people vote for their family and tribe and then for their religious leaders. To suggest that they could vote for Sunni is both disingenuous and false. The Sunni Baathist party was destroyed and outlawed by the US and all it's leaders were killed or prosecuted. Any attempt to reconstitute is is put down by the US appointed government. The Kurds are running rampant with the protection of the US, killing and removing Arabs from the north so that the oil firms can steal the revenues. The Sunni centre is deliberately being reduced to poverty firstly by depriving them of any central (oil) benefits and secondly by inserting ISIS into the area and then destroying the infrastructure under the false claim of fighting ISIS.
    Whitewashing the motivations and outcomes of the wars on Iraq will continue for another generation or so and then 100 years from now, the truth will emerge.

    As of 2010, despite improved security and billions of dollars in oil revenue, Iraq still generates about half the electricity that customers demand, leading to protests during the hot summer months

    They weren’t happy under Saddam, but protests would have gotten them shot to death, or worse – tortured to death. Again, they can revert at any moment. Plenty of Sunni Arabs raring to become the ruling caste once again. Saddam was mainly effective at killing anyone who opposed him. Democracy is messy, but the Shiite majority is at least choosing its leaders instead of being sat upon by the Sunni Arabs.

    The Iraq war was simply to grab the oil and to teach the world that the US dollar was the only allowable means of exchange.

    There is a single price for oil, adjusted for grades and transportation costs, and Middle Eastern oil isn’t mostly what we buy, given that our refineries are geared for heavy sour crude. The Iranians sell their oil for yuan, and it’s not like this has had any particular impact on the dollar, which is a floating currency. You can gin up all the fanciful Communist-derived propaganda you want, but nothing will change the fact that Iraq was a basket case country while Saddam ruled, thanks to a combo of corruption and nutty economic policies (many of which are still in place today). Over time, things may improve, but that’s up to the will of a majority of Iraqi voters, not the whims of a ruthless and murderous dictator like Saddam.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. PJ London says:

    I guess you are stuck in the 1950s.
    ‘the fanciful Communist-derived propaganda ‘
    Goodbye.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr