The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
Erdogan Is Strengthened by the Failed Coup, But Turkey Is the Loser
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The failed military coup is a disaster for Turkey, but its success would have been a far greater calamity. If the plotters had killed or captured President Recep Tayyip Erdogan then other parts of the armed forces might have joined them, but a civil war would have been inevitable as the security forces split and Erdogan’s supporters fought back.

The disaster is that it will now be much more difficult for Turks to resist Erdogan establishing a monopoly of power. By resisting the coup as the leader of a democratically-elected government, he has enhanced his legitimacy. Moreover, all opposition to his rule can be labelled as support for terrorism and punished as such.

“Human rights and democracy will be weaker and they were already in a bad way before the coup,” says a critic of Erdogan, who does not want his name published, adding that it is difficult for him to criticise Erdogan today while he is under threat from military conspirators. He has no doubt that the attempted putsch was carried out by the followers of Fethullah Gulen, who has lived in the US since 1999. Leaving aside the confessions of the plotters, which may have been forced, only the Gulenists had a network of adherents capable of staging an uprising in so many units of the security forces.
“Fethullah did not help us, he killed us,” says the Turkish commentator bitterly. “He left us totally in the hands of Erdogan.”
He says that the Gulenists operate in two different ways: they have a moderate public face with schools, universities, media and business associations, but they also have always had a secret organisation devoted to taking positions of power within the military, police and security services. As long ago as 1987, the movement was being investigated for infiltrating military colleges. It is now being compared to the Roman Catholic organisation Opus Dei, notorious for its links to Franco and other right wing governments, though a better analogy might be a secretive cult with a charismatic leader.

The coup went off half-cock. It was staged prematurely because of fear of an imminent purge of Gulenists in the military. Analysts have been explaining how badly organised the attempt was and how it could never have succeeded.

But the initial response of the government to the putsch was equally cack-handed, with Erdogan saying that he first heard something was amiss from his brother-in-law who phoned him between 4 and 4.30pm on 15 July to say that soldiers were stopping cars next to the Beylerbeyi Palace in Istanbul.

Erdogan’s account of what happened next is worth quoting in order to convey the atmosphere of confusion in the first hours of the abortive takeover.

He says that his brother-in-law “was telling me that soldiers were actually cutting off streets, and they were not allowing cars to proceed to take to the bridge. When I got the news, initially I did not believe that this was happening and I called the head of national security, the head of national intelligence, I could not reach him. I called the chief of staff of the armed forces, I could not reach him, they were not in a position to be able to answer their phones… Then I tried to contact the prime minister, and although with some difficulty, we were able to get into contact.”

It was only almost four hours later, at 8 pm, that Erdogan made plans to act by contacting the media – quite long enough for the pro-coup forces to have eliminated him. If victory goes to the side that makes the least mistakes, then it was a close run thing.

Aside from their organisational failings, the plotters made a miscalculation in imagining that, because Turks are deeply divided between supporters and opponents of Erdogan, the latter night side with anybody trying to get rid of him by physical force.

In the event, the plotters found no support because people felt, as one Kurdish activist was quoted as saying, that “the worst politician is better than the best general.”

Much now depends on the extent to which Erdogan sees the failure of the coup as a heaven-sent excuse to remove all who do not obey him. The temptation is clearly there: some 60,000 soldiers, judges, prosecutors, civil servants and teachers have been detained, arrested or sacked.

All 3.3m civil servants in Turkey have been told to stay in their jobs, presumably so they can be investigated. The crackdown under the State of Emergency appears to be spreading well beyond the circle of those implicated in the coup or connected to the Gulenists.

Overreaction by the state may be deliberately contrived in order to benefit from the crisis, but there is also real fear mixed with paranoia that the coup is not entirely over.

Supporters of the Government tweeted yesterday that there might be a second attempt and some military units have been confined to their bases. Meanwhile the coup is being presented as a symbol of evil as was Guy Fawkes and the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 in English political tradition. Public demonstrations of anti-coup feeling are being demanded by the state, with people asked to attend daily demonstrations and actors in Istanbul being asked to produce an anti-coup video.

The next few weeks will tell if Erdogan is going target all dissent and further divide a deeply divided country. He may have a difficulty in pursuing the war against Kurdish guerrillas in south-east Turkey and, at the same time, purging the Second Army that is meant to be fighting them and whose commanding general is under arrest. It might be sensible to conciliate the Kurds, with whom Erdogan was negotiating not so long ago, but his combative political instincts are more likely to lead him to opt for continuing confrontation.


Islamic State will benefit from the new political landscape because security forces will be tracking Gulenist sleepers rather than Isis cells. Isis will gain from the anti-American mood in Turkey post-coup because the Government and much of the population are convinced that the US was implicated in the attempt. Whatever happens to the Turkish demand that the US hand over Gulen, Turks are convinced of a US role, citing as evidence Mr Gulen’s long presence outside Philadelphia. Isis will seek the support of a widening anti-US constituency in Turkey. Relations between Ankara and Washington were not good before; they are about to get worse.

Erdogan emerges politically stronger from the crisis, but he rules a weakened Turkish state. The army and state institutions are being hollowed out by purges and loyalty, not competence, becomes the test for advancement. Turkish involvement in Syria has produced only failure: sectarian and ethnic warfare between Sunni and Shia, Kurd and non-Kurd is infecting Turkey.

Erdogan could use the coup to unite Turks or, alternatively, exploit it in a way that will further divide them. It is difficult to feel optimistic.

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Erdogan, Turkey 
Hide 12 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anon • Disclaimer says:

    So it looks like Turkey will become another Muslim country that is not free or democratic.

    What else is new?

  2. Jason Liu says:

    I honestly don’t see what the problem is.

    Erdogan is a conservative strongman who oversaw most of Turkey’s modernization. As with Asian leaders like Park Chung-hee, Erdogan knew not to destabilize the country by caving in to the idealistic youth during his nation’s growth phase. His purges, even if not specifically against leftists, sets a good example for Western nations, who can use that precedent to purge leftists.

    The man is essentially a model for what most of Europe needs, except Muslim. Sure, religious conservatism is not as good as ideological nationalism, but it’s still much better than the suicidal leftism Europe has now. His critics on the western right should not be so quick to condemn him simply because he is an Islamist, but instead realize that Erdogan’s success is a win for the global right.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Randal
  3. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website

    I wonder… would the ‘West’ have preferred a coup?

    Is the Turkish military truly nationalist or is it globalist?

    If latter, even shi*head Terdogan is better.

    Looks sort of like Stalin’s mass purge of the military.

    Turkish military developed as the bastion of the secularists. But with purges and Islamic entry into its ranks, it seems to be turning into an Islamic institution.

    Turks used to get Christian boys to serve Islam as Janissaries.

    Since WWI, Turkish military was of Muslims who served the western secular model.

    Now, it’s gonna be Muslims serving Islam.
    Maybe that is most natural.

  4. polistra says:


    Any country that gets rid of Soros and Goldman influence is a WINNER, not a loser. Russia got rid of Goldman when Yeltsin went down, and Russia has been pushing Soros NGOs out lately. Now it’s Turkey’s turn. Gulen is Goldman and Soros. The surgery will be painful, but Turkey will be free to run its own affairs. That’s a WIN.

  5. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website
    @Jason Liu

    You stupido, Erdogan went from national leader to global aspirant, messing up Syria royally in the process.

  6. Parbes says:

    “By resisting the coup as the leader of a democratically-elected government, he has enhanced his legitimacy.”

    There was nothing democratic about the elections held in Turkey under Erdogan.

    • Replies: @Divine Right
  7. anon • Disclaimer says:

    All I know is that democracy and Islam are basically incompatible. This largely explains why there has never been one single free democratic country in the entire Arab world, which has been under Islam’s oppressive influence the longest.

    • Replies: @Brooklyn Dave
    , @Anonymous
  8. Randal says:
    @Jason Liu

    His critics on the western right should not be so quick to condemn him simply because he is an Islamist, but instead realize that Erdogan’s success is a win for the global right.

    Yes, that’s pretty much true, provided, as seems to perhaps be the case, he now intends to back away from supporting the regime change effort in Syria.

  9. @Parbes

    “There was nothing democratic about the elections held in Turkey under Erdogan.”

    Just because ‘Murica doesn’t like the result, doesn’t make it illegitimate. The vote was widely regarded as accurate.

  10. The aim seems always the same in all countries which are ruled by the three top classes: priestly, elite, and money people classes.

    Their main [or only] aim is to make sure that ‘lower’ classes never have a say who runs and how the country is run.
    US structure of society and governance is the best or one of the best proving that that is as i say it is.
    Once you know but this only, you’d know all you need to know what priests, elite, and money people are after.
    It’s total rule over the masses!

  11. @anon

    Yes they are–but if Turkey rids itself of the NWO stranglehold and possibly says screw NATO, it maybe might get Washington to pull its head out of its own ass (a little). A serious Turkish pivot toward Russia would be mind blowing. But Erdogan still sees himself as a new Ottoman sultan — not realistic. Maybe Pooty Poot and Erdogan can have a picnic or two over some girl scout cookies and vodka (just joking) — and Pooty can convince Erdy of a few things.

  12. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    not all arabs are muslims (the baathist party was founded by a christian)
    a vast majority of muslims are not arabs.

    you may notice if you glace back at history arab democracies did not die because islam killed them, they died because the west killed their democrats.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr