The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPatrick Cockburn Archive
Battle to Liberate Raqqa from Isis 'Will be Over Quicker Than Mosul'
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“I do not think the siege of Raqqa will be as long as Mosul,” says Awad, an Arab fighter in the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), who belongs to a military unit attacking Raqqa, the de facto capital of Isis in Syria. In an exclusive interview with The Independent, he says that “we are advancing quickly and the geographical nature of Raqqa is different from Mosul”.

The SDF has launched the crucial battle for Raqqa, a city with a population of 300,000 on the north bank of the Euphrates, after a long delay imposed by threats of military intervention by Turkey, which denounces the 45,000-strong SDF as “terrorists” dominated by the Syrian Kurds. The Turkish priority is to prevent the consolidation of a quasi-independent Kurdish statelet in northern Syria. Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim today hinted strongly at Turkish military intervention, saying that “we will immediately give the necessary response if we come across a situation in Raqqa … that threatens our security”.

Awad, 32, comes from Raqqa but fled to Tabqa to the west of the city last year before it was captured by the SDF and four months ago joined the SDF, which the US says has 13,000 Arab fighters in its ranks. In a phone interview, he gives a vivid description of conditions on the front line, which the SDF Raqqa Operations Room says is 3km away from Raqqa to the west and north and 1km away to the east. The US estimates that there are between 3,000 and 4,000 Isis fighters in Raqqa, who are isolated there because US coalition air strikes on 3 February destroyed the last two bridges linking it to the south bank of the Euphrates. The fighters can only cross the river by boats, but they would then be vulnerable to air attack.

“They [Isis] are mostly withdrawing [into Raqqa], though some are fighting fiercely and do not leave their positions until they are killed,” says Awad. “We killed dozens when we liberated al-Mansoura [west of Raqqa] and Baath Dam [on the Euphrates, renamed Freedom Dam by the SDF]. In addition, we repelled many counter-attacks by Isis since the Tabqa battle until now.”

The SDF captured the Tabqa Dam, the largest in Syria at the southern end of Lake Assad, and the nearby town of Tabqa, 25 miles west of Raqqa, on 10 May, ending a stalemate that had lasted for several weeks. The US decided in May to give the SDF additional military assistance including armoured cars, anti-tanks weapons, mortars and heavy machine guns, despite strong opposition from Turkey. The Turkish government had claimed that its proxy forces inside Syria, backed by the Turkish army, could replace the SDF as the main US military ally in Syria against Isis, but the US did not consider this a realistic option.

Though Isis units have been retreating in the face of SDF advances and US-led air strikes, the jihadis are still resisting strongly. Awad says that “last week, Isis fighters attacked us from behind in a village called Abu Qebab, east of Raqqa. They were hiding in a tunnel that had not been checked yet by our comrades. In that attack, we surrounded them from two sides and killed about 10 of them.”

The state of play in late May, as the SDF closed in on Raqqa from the north, east and west. Baath Dam has since been captured and the SDF says it is within 1km of the city to the east (GraphicNews)
The state of play in late May, as the SDF closed in on Raqqa from the north, east and west. Baath Dam has since been captured and the SDF says it is within 1km of the city to the east (GraphicNews)

It should become clear in the next few days if Isis will try to defend Raqqa strongly and risk losing many of its experienced fighters. In Mosul, Isis has fought skillfully using an innovative mix of urban guerrilla tactics that has withstood Iraqi government forces for seven months. When Isis was previously fighting for two other big cities, Ramadi and Fallujah, in Anbar province west of Baghdad, it resisted most strongly in the villages and countryside around them, but not in the built-up areas in the city centres.

But in Mosul, where the siege began on 17 October last year, Isis fighters have reversed this approach, holding the periphery of the city lightly and concentrating its fighters in the centre. It tries to avoid its positions being identified from the air and destroyed, by using a mixture of mobile sniper teams, swiftly changing their positions by means of holes cut in the walls of houses, along with suicide bombers in vehicles, mines, booby traps and mortars. This has succeeded in slowing down and inflicting heavy casualties on the advancing Iraqi security forces.

Isis may use the same tactics in Raqqa and seek to draw out the siege, but the city is a geographically smaller and less populous than Mosul which had a population of 1.3 million before the siege. Awad does not believe that the siege of Raqqa will be as prolonged as in Mosul and suspects that the determination of the Isis defenders may not be as high as in Iraq. He says that “the SDF made two calls last month for Isis to surrender, but those that did so were locals. No foreigners have surrendered so far.”

Some of the Isis units are composed of foreigners who cannot blend into the local population, or expect much mercy, if they surrender. “I have been told by our officers that all the Isis snipers killed by our forces are foreigners,” says Awad. “We lost some of our commanders because of these snipers and a few days ago one of our snipers killed an Isis sniper when we fought in Mansoura, west of Raqqa.”

The firepower and military expertise of the SDF is much enhanced by US support: “The US-led coalition air strikes and forces are working efficiently with us, we have many American experts who train our commanders and officers and instruct them in using new technical devices. We also have heavy weapons and armoured vehicles. Every week we receive many weapons on the three fronts around Raqqa.” This supply of modern weapons, and expertise on how to use them, will determine not only the fate of Raqqa but the future ability of the Syrian Kurds to stand up to Turkish military intervention or action by President Bashar al-Assad’s forces, which are advancing into Isis-held eastern Syria.


The offensive by the SDF, whose military punching power comes primarily from the combat experienced YPG Kurdish militia backed by US air strikes, will determine who in the long term holds northern Syria. If Turkish troops cross the border into Kurdish held territory in Syria, then the Kurds have made clear that the attack on Raqqa would cease. An alternative strategy for Turkey would be wait before intervening in the hope that the SDF will become entangled in a long struggle for Raqqa in which it suffers serious casualties. The Turks may also calculate that once the SDF and the Syrian Kurds have defeated Isis, the US will have no more use for them and will return to its traditional alliance with Turkey.

(Republished from The Independent by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: ISIS, Syria 
Hide 3 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. shagggy says:

    Our fervent supporter of US and it’s ZioWahhabi “alliance” war in Syria in general and all things Yinon plan in particular, Cocky Cockburn, is jumping up and down as he smell some sort of endgame in the Syrian gambit.

    And if you ask him privately he may say that “israel” has been lurking for too long in the shadows, only allowing itself a minor part every now and then in a futile attempt to rise the moral among it’s cutthroat proxies. Because “israel” is, as impatiently as cocky one would assume, waiting to collect it’s prize which would be the rest of the Golan, cement it and occupy a large chunk next to Damascus as a “buffer zone “.

    Next ideal outcome for him, the US and it’s ZioWahhabi “alliance” would be for US to declare “mission accomplished!” in Raqqa (after giving their isis proxies a free pass to Government controlled areas). Cut Syria in half and keep the oil rich east to itself and it’s local clients, hence US’s open attack on Syrian forces near it’s occupation of the dusty toll station area of al Thanf next to Iraq.

    There are a few problems that Cocky have brushed aside (for now) though and one of them is that SAA, Russia, Iranian militias, Hezbollah and Shia-Iraqi militias are winning on every front, especially in Deir Ezzor, effectively blocking US’s death squads in al Thanf from marching up north. South of said town in Iraq, the Shia-Iraqi militia is moving in coordination to take them on.

    Problem 2: Turkey will not accept any kind of “Kurdistan” in it’s vicinity. The Kurds, double crossed and stabbed in the back twice by the US already, is supposed to occupy the northern part of Syria for Uncle Schlomo and govern the local Arab tribes, native to the area . These people and their defence militias will of course not accept it, neither will Syria so that occupation will not last for long.

    Problem 3: US is planning to occupy a number of air bases and “Forts” in Syria but is forgetting that they are immensely hated by everyone in this area, even it’s “allies”.

    They should be wise to remember last time they were thrown out of the Levant by Hezbolla in Lebanon to the tune of over 200 eliminated murderous thugs and rapists, also known as “Marines” killed by a bomb aka the “barrack bombings”. BTW, US just killed a number of Hezbollah soldiers in the anti-terrorist alliance in al Thanf yesterday so US can just ask their Frankenstein monster it holds on constant life support in occupied Palestine who lost the 2006 war against a minor Hezbollah force, what it’s like to fight them.

  2. Tell me again why I’m supposed to care which group of Islamic/Kurdish/Turkish/Shia/Sunni/ Wahhabists is on top at the moment over there? U.S. involvement serves no purpose other than providing the military-industrial complex with more sales outlets. (Although sometimes my geopolitical fantasies involve always arming the side that’s losing, so that the fighting will go on as long as possible.)

  3. Wishful thinking.

    ISIS will not waste all of their resources in Raqqa but they will not give up their capital without a fight. They will use the Mosul strategy. Even if the siege is half as long as Mosul it will still be a bloody.

    We might come close to leveling Raqqa in order to speed things up. Our MSM will just repeat that we ‘tried our best’ to avoid civilian casualties regardless of what we actually do, so I do not see any disincentive based on media exposure. Our MSM died after Desert Storm.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Cockburn Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Full Story of the Taliban's Amazing Jailbreak
"They Can't Even Protect Themselves, So What Can They Do For Me?"
"All Hell is Breaking Loose with Muqtada" Warlord: the Rise of Muqtada al-Sadr