The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
Why Autocrats Are Replacing Democrats
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“If you look at Trump in America and Bolsonaro in Brazil, you see that people want politicians that do what they promise,” said Spanish businessman Juan Carlos Perez Carreno.

The Spaniard was explaining to The New York Times what lay behind the rise of Vox, which the Times calls “Spain’s first far-right party since the end of the Franco dictatorship in 1975.”

Indeed, the growing impatience of peoples with elected leaders and legislators who cannot or will not act decisively explains two realities of our time: the eclipse of Congress and the rise of autocracy worldwide.

In condemning President Donald Trump’s decision to declare a national emergency and use Pentagon funds to build his wall, Beltway elites have charged the president with a multitude of sins against the Constitution.

He has usurped the “power of the purse” that the Founding Fathers invested in Congress. He has disregarded the “checks and balances” of Madisonian democracy. He is acting like an imperial president.

Yet the decline of Congress is not a recent phenomenon. And the principal collaborator in its fall from grace, from being “the first branch of government” to the least esteemed, has been Congress itself, its own timidity and cowardice.

Contrast, if you will, the now-inveterate torpor and inaction of Congress with how presidents, declared by historians to be great or near great, have acted.

Thomas Jefferson seized upon Napoleon’s sudden offer to sell the vast Louisiana territory for $15 million in an act of dubious constitutionality by Jefferson’s own judgment. History has validated his decision.

Andrew Jackson — “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!” — shoved aside a Supreme Court ruling denying him the right to transfer the Indians of Florida to the middle of the country.

Abraham Lincoln arrested Maryland legislators to prevent a secessionist-minded legislature from meeting, violated the habeas corpus rights of thousands, ordered Chief Justice Roger Taney arrested, shut down newspapers, and, in January 1863, declared free all the slaves of every state still in rebellion against the Union.

“I took Panama!” said Theodore Roosevelt, whose agents helped rebels shear off the province from Colombia to build his canal.

FDR ordered some 110,000 Japanese, 75,000 of them U.S. citizens, into detention camps in 1942 for the duration of the war.

Without authorization from Congress, Harry Truman ordered U.S. troops into South Korea in 1950 to resist the invasion by North Korea, calling it a police action.

Though a Republican House voted against attacking Serbia in 1998, Bill Clinton continued his 78-day bombing campaign until Belgrade yielded up its cradle province of Kosovo.

Yet while presidents have acted decisively, without congressional authorization and sometimes unconstitutionally, Congress has failed to defend, and even surrendered, its legitimate constitutional powers.

Congress’s authority “to regulate commerce with foreign nations” has been largely ceded to the executive branch, with Congress agreeing to confine itself to a “yeah” or “nay” vote on whatever trade treaty the White House negotiates and sends to the Hill.

Congress’s authority to “coin money” and “regulate the value thereof” was long ago transferred to the Federal Reserve.

Congress’s power to declare war has been ignored by presidents since Truman. Authorizations for the use of military force have replaced declarations of war, with presidents deciding how broadly they may be interpreted.

In declaring the national emergency Friday, Trump rested his case on authority given the president by Congress in the National Emergencies Act of 1976.

The Supreme Court has usurped Congress’ powers with impunity.

While the civil rights acts of the 1960s were enacted by Congress, the desegregation of America’s public schools was simply ordered by the Warren Court in 1954.

In the ’60s and ’70s, Congress sat indolent as busing for racial balance was imposed on countless school districts by federal judges.

As the Supreme Court, for decades, exploited the establishment clause of the First Amendment to de-Christianize all public schools and public places, Congress did nothing. A triumphant court then moved on to declare abortion and same-sex marriage constitutional rights.

Yet Congress had the latent power, in Article III, Section 2, to restrict the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and every other federal court. But the big stick the founders left for Congress to corral a runaway Supreme Court was never picked up, never used.

High among the reasons Trump was elected was that, for all his flaws and failings, he was seen as a doer, a man who “gets things done.”

ORDER IT NOW

And high among the reasons that autocrats are on the rise is that the centrist parties being shoved aside are perceived as having failed the people in their most basic demands — fewer migrants, more secure borders, preservation of national identity, putting their own people and their country own first.

Whatever may be said of the autocrats, be it Trump, Putin or Xi Jinping, they are not talkers but doers. They act.

And they may very well own the future.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2019 Creators.com.

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Constitutional Theory, Donald Trump 
Hide 54 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. peterAUS says:

    ….high among the reasons that autocrats are on the rise is that the centrist parties being shoved aside are perceived as having failed the people in their most basic demands — fewer migrants, more secure borders, preservation of national identity, putting their own people and their country own first.

    Whatever may be said of the autocrats, be it Trump, Putin or Xi Jinping, they are not talkers but doers. They act.

    And they may very well own the future.

    Pretty much.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  2. Whatever may be said of the autocrats, be it Trump, Putin or Xi Jinping, they are not talkers but doers. They act.

    Trump acts alright, like a damn fool though, not to complete his campaign promises. This national emergency thing will go nowhere, just like all the rest of his talk on the stopping of the immigration invasion.

    There have been something like 32 national emergencies already, as Peak Stupidity explains (mostly pointing to a James Fulford VDare article). No one gives a crap about most of them, many of which are still in place. OMG!

    I’d be very happy if something got built on the border that really made a difference, but I’m not at all hopeful, as even Charlie Brown can eventually learn to get a new place-kick setter.

    The duly elected “autocrats” in Brazil and Hungary seem to be doing the job a whole lot better than our supposed “autocrat”.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @follyofwar
    , @MBlanc46
  3. My Trump rant over with, I will say that Mr. Buchanan has a pretty good understanding of the US Constitution. He’s right that lots of those example of Presidents’ exceeding Constitutional authority were never checked by congress as they should have. Lincoln’s tyranny was especially egregious, and he should have been impeached.

    I really don’t know though, if it’s Constitutional for the US Congress to hand powers over the Executive branch with a vote, as done with that National Emergencies Act.

    Of course, if the 9 fools on the US Supreme Court ever did their actual prescribed job, then they should have ruled against any President using the National Emergencies Act … 32 damn times. I guess it’s been up to a Ron Paul type to have brought it up. With a coupla hundred Ron Pauls, this former Republic could have been saved.

    • Agree: PhysicistDave
  4. Cyrano says:

    The presidential position in “authoritarian” states is personality driven, while in “democratic” states it’s deep state driven.

    Personality driven presidency is more riskier – a bad president can have devastating consequences for the country (Yeltsin), but at the same time, a good president can make a huge difference for the better (Putin).

    Deep state driven presidency is safer, more stable, but when the change is desperately needed, the president doesn’t have the power to deliver that change. Sure, Russia has a deep state too, but the president there has much more power and can go Khodorkovsky on any or all of them. Good luck with a US president pulling off the same feat.

    The biggest drawback of deep state driven presidency is that no matter how you vote – you can’t vote the deep state out of office. Neither can the president. In “authoritarian” states, at least the president has the power to vote the deep state out of office.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Curmudgeon
  5. Anonymous[184] • Disclaimer says:

    The Great White Trump represents Heritage America. Congress, especially with the foreign/deviant House, represents fake America. Demographics trump any forms of government.

  6. Autocrats like Xi Jinping?

    Xi has one vote among six, did not select his fellow board members, cannot dismiss them and must submit all legislation and senior appointments to a public vote of 3,000 representatives elected under the Carter Center’s vigilant gaze–none of whom he chose or can dismiss.

    Characterizing democratic but disobedient foreign leaders as ‘dictators’ and ‘autocrats’ is MSM stock in trade and unworthy of someone as sophisticated as Pat.

  7. Wally says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Ever hear of Trump’s National Emergency for the express purpose of building a wall?
    Then of course:

    Complete List of President Trump’s Accomplishments in the Two Years Since His Historic 2016 Election Win: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/11/here-it-is-complete-list-of-president-trumps-accomplishments-in-the-two-years-since-his-historic-2016-election-win/
    and:
    Trump’s 60-point accomplishment list : https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/media-blackout-trumps-60-point-accomplishment-list-of-american-greatness
    and
    Giving Trump’s accomplishments their due : https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/6/giving-trumps-accomplishments-their-due/

    Not bad considering the roadblocks placed in front of him and only 2 years in office.

    Now just imagine Hillary as President.

    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
    , @nsa
  8. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:

    When has a “diversity activist” ever campaigned to bring white people to any global place or institution that is non white?

    ”Diversity” is entirely one way: taking white institutions and populations and turning them non white.

    Open borders is the real white ‘Privilege’

    Its G –

  9. Realist says:

    Whatever may be said of the autocrats, be it Trump, Putin or Xi Jinping, they are not talkers but doers. They act.

    Trump is not a autocrat, he is a member of the Deep State playing a charade.

  10. KenH says:

    “If you look at Trump in America and Bolsonaro in Brazil, you see that people want politicians that do what they promise,”

    Well still no wall. Trump vowed to lower H1B and H2B visas, end chain migration and lower legal immigration but now seeks “the largest number of immigrants in our nation’s history.” At this stage immigration restriction seems to be a low priority and far behind Israel uber alles and lowering the black and hispanic unemployment rate.

    Trump billed himself as the law and order president but eagerly signed the First Step Act, a (((Jared Kushner))) brainchild.

    On illegal immigration and phony asylum claims, Trump has tried to do what he can executively to bring things under control, so I give him credit for that.

    People need to stop pointing to “wins” on the economy thinking they can rest their case. The economy has improved but now the robust economy could bring us more “legal” immigrants and put large numbers of H1B’s on a path to citizenship thanks to Trump’s recent turnabout. So Trump is signing on to demographic warfare against his own voters and betraying their trust.

    Republicans thought that by focusing on economic prosperity it would lead to the windfall support of the population irrespective of the nation’s demographics. The Jewish led left focused on demography and taking over the culture. The latter has succeeded in pushing conservatives left on all of their signature issues save for a couple, a process that is still ongoing, and combined with demography is giving us the prospect of a far left wing dictatorship and elective despotism in the very near future.

  11. @Wally

    Many of those “accomplishments” consist of (1) opinions; (2) spin; (3) deep state objectives and propaganda, and (4) rely upon deep state / progressive “numbers” if they are to be believed.

  12. Stick says:

    You can either have a border or your first civil war. I think Trump understands the existential quality of what got him elected.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  13. Anon[391] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    “Why Autocrats Are Replacing Democrats”

    No. It should be “Why National-democrats are replacing Globohomocrats”.

    After all, they came to power through national free elections.

    • Agree: Stick
  14. And the principal collaborator in its fall from grace, . . . has been Congress itself, its own timidity and cowardice.

    You could add cynical gamesmanship, venal corruption and overt prostitution.

  15. @peterAUS

    I don’t understand how Pat could claim that Trump is an autocrat. He may talk like one, but sure hasn’t acted like one. If he had, the Wall, his signature campaign promise, would have been built in his first two years, when his party had control of Congress. He would have shut down Mueller’s Witch Hunt in its infancy. And he still hasn’t fired Rod Rosenstein, who plotted a coup against him, which is an act of Treason.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  16. peterAUS says:
    @follyofwar

    He isn’t, but, during election time he looked as one. People believed he was the type.
    Mistake, obviously.
    It is what it is. People do make mistakes. That’s how we learn and improve.

    Which raises important questions:
    1. Have people realized Trump isn’t the guy? Not quite.
    2. More importantly, have people figured out how to get the one this time ? My take: definitely not.

    All roads lead to one place, really: people who voted for Trump still live too well to start thinking hard.
    It’s quite possible that when they start living badly enough to start thinking hard it will be too late.

    Simple as that.

  17. Rurik says:

    Congress’s authority to “coin money” and “regulate the value thereof” was long ago transferred to the Federal Reserve.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  18. @Achmed E. Newman

    Viktor Orban, the PM of Hungary, has saved his country from the migrant invasion, in spite of the outrage from the EU. His wall works, though admittedly Hungary is a much small country.

    He’s also solving the fertility problem plaguing white countries. Once a married woman (marriage being the key word) has 4 children, she is exempt from taxes for life. If only Trump was as tough.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  19. @follyofwar

    He’s upped the value of previously fertile postmenopausal women. A hell of a lot of small businesses are going to change ownership.

  20. Anon[364] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Congress is filled with small fish politicians funded by big donors. Big donors are now Super-Jews who want open borders, free trade, and Israel-Israel-Israel. Congressional whores play along.

    A nation where elected politicians, courts, deep state, and big media are all against border security is no longer a nation.

    • Agree: densa
    • Replies: @follyofwar
  21. @Rurik

    Powerful images, Rurik.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  22. @Cyrano

    The question that no one wants answered is why does there need to be a deep state driven process at all? Every “Western Liberal democracy” suffers from the same condition, irrespective of the form of government (I don’t include Switzerland which actually is a democracy). All of the corksucker representatives are filtered before by a party apparatus before they can even run. There is no room for “maverick” politicians any longer. Ron Paul would never be allowed to get the Republican nomination if he were starting out today.
    Look carefully at the party apparatus, and you will see the connections between the parties. Elections in “Western liberal democracies” means “government by jews’ rules”.

    • Replies: @Cyrano
  23. Corvinus says:

    “Andrew Jackson — “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!” — shoved aside a Supreme Court ruling denying him the right to transfer the Indians of Florida to the middle of the country.”

    Georgia, not Florida. And Jackson’s action clearly overstepped his boundary. There was an existing treaty between the Cherokee and Georgia. The Supreme Court properly laid out that this deal must be respected by the state and federal government.

    You would think an alleged man of history would comprehend basis rule of law stuff. Clearly, Buchanan fumbled the ball here.

    “The Supreme Court has usurped Congress’ powers with impunity.”

    Corrected for accuracy–The Supreme Court has properly checked Congressional authority.

    “While the civil rights acts of the 1960s were enacted by Congress, the desegregation of America’s public schools was simply ordered by the Warren Court in 1954.”

    Not ordered, ruled upon. You can thank the Southrons who failed miserably to honor the “separate but equal” doctrine found in Plessy. Clearly, the state legislative actions in the South usurped the rights of a specific group of people, as demonstrated by the lawyers in the Brown case.

    “In the ’60s and ’70s, Congress sat indolent as busing for racial balance was imposed on countless school districts by federal judges.”

    Which was based upon federal laws that northern and southern states and cities had outright refused to implement.

    “As the Supreme Court, for decades, exploited the establishment clause of the First Amendment to de-Christianize all public schools and public places.”

    No exploitation, just the proper correction. The Founding Fathers clearly indicated freedom of religion. Having only one type of religion in school violates the spirit of the First Amendment.

    “Why Autocrats Are Replacing Democrats”

    Code for “I do not like the decisions made by past politicians, specifically Democrats, so I am going to falsely label them as being autocratic in nature”.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
  24. Corvinus says:
    @Stick

    “You can either have a border or your first civil war.”

    So we can expect you to be at the front lines, right? Or is that just your inner armchair warrior talking?

  25. Cyrano says:
    @Curmudgeon

    I agree with almost everything you said – except the part about the Jews. Jews never invent the rules and they are never in charge – it just appears that way. People who show exaggerated enthusiasm for unpopular rules are more annoying than people who invent those rules. Rules were invented by the Anglo-elites. Jews just follow those rules with exaggerated enthusiasm. In other words, Jews are some of the most talented butt-kissers this planet has ever seen. And it’s not a bad talent to have. You can get very far in life just on that talent alone.

  26. @Corvinus

    “The Supreme Court has usurped Congress’ powers with impunity.”

    Corrected for accuracy–The Supreme Court has properly checked Congressional authority.

    In some instances perhaps, but in many others vis à vis both the Congress and the Executive, SCOTUS and, more offendingly, the inferior Federal Courts have acted ultra vires and have not been effectively challenged by either of those institutions.

    Andrew Jackson may have been wrong in that particular case, but his sentiment was dead right with respect to protecting the Executive’s prerogatives: At some point the Trump Administration needs to tell the Courts to stuff it when they rule ultra vires rather than crawling into a fetal position under the POTUS’ desk in the Oval and meekly tweeting, “Oh yeah?!? We’ll see what a higher court says.”

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  27. Corvinus says:
    @The Alarmist

    “In some instances perhaps, but in many others vis à vis both the Congress and the Executive, SCOTUS and, more offendingly, the inferior Federal Courts have acted ultra vires and have not been effectively challenged by either of those institutions.”

    No. The Supreme Court and the lower federal courts are there for a reason, to act within their constitutional scope when it comes to the rule of law. It is typical of those on the left and the right to make this “argument” that the nine Justices overstep their bounds, especially if the decision was not in their favor. Moreover, Congress and the president have indeed “challenged” the Supreme Court when it comes to their rulings, whether it be executive orders or changing the law. Should those two branches choose NOT to take on the Supreme Court, that would be more on them.

    “Andrew Jackson may have been wrong in that particular case, but his sentiment was dead right with respect to protecting the Executive’s prerogatives”

    No, the sentiment was dead wrong. His role was to abide by the ruling, i.e. enforce the law of the land. He let his personal beliefs interfere with his constitutional authority.

    “At some point the Trump Administration needs to tell the Courts to stuff it when they rule ultra vires rather than crawling into a fetal position under the POTUS’ desk in the Oval and meekly tweeting, “Oh yeah?!? We’ll see what a higher court says.””

    And in doing so he would be in violation, which is the norm for him, of his constitutional authority. Willfully ignoring a Supreme Court decision would be career suicide in this day and age.

  28. @Corvinus

    You describe a Federal Court system that goes well beyond the role enshrined by the Framers. The Courts, particularly the inferior Federal Courts, are in no way superior to the Congress and the Executive, and the Constitution doesn’t even really suggest that SCOTUS is co-equal beyond rulings of laws enacted by Congress and the POTUS. Judicial review is useful, but always subject to being tamed by the people’s branches.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  29. Rurik says:
    @ThreeCranes

    Thanks ThreeCranes,

    It happened so quickly!

    As soon as Woodrow Wilson handed (((them))) the keys to the US Treasury, almost immediately America was at war with Germany. And used treachery and guile (and a strange willingness to send hundreds of thousands of its best and brightest young men into the maw of slaughter) – all to bolster the prospects of Israel. [see Declaration, Balfour]

    At this point, there can be no doubt ((who)) was behind the push for WWII, and the genocidal burning of German cities.

    Just as with 9/11, and all the Eternal Wars (for Israel).

    But I had to leave so much out!

    the hundreds of thousands of Europa’s and Russia’s souls whose lives were crushed out by the iron boot of Bolshevik/Soviet communism/Jewish supremacism.

    The unimaginable suffering of the Palestinians.

    The cultural sewage the West has marinated in since ((they)) now own Hollywood and our media, in absolute terms.

    The destruction of our once glorious cities.

    There seems to be no dearth of depraved iniquity that hasn’t been visited upon us by Woodrow Wilson’s epic and Western civilization-desolating betrayal.

    ‘Let’s let the world’s most avaricious, hatred-consumed and sinister men be in charge of printing our money!

    Weeeee! What could possibly go wrong?

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  30. Corvinus says:
    @The Alarmist

    “You describe a Federal Court system that goes well beyond the role enshrined by the Framers.”

    As our society morphed from agricultural to industrial, from rural to urban, from simple to complex technology, the role of the Courts, as envisioned by the Framers, was to ensure the rule of law. Remember, people make laws and they also interpret them. They are guided by the Constitution, their legal philosophy, and their own principles when making interpretations about the law.

    “The Courts, particularly the inferior Federal Courts, are in no way superior to the Congress and the Executive…”

    All equal branches. Those who believe that a “superior” branch exists as a result of action or inaction primarily does so because they oppose or disagree with that action or inaction.

    “and the Constitution doesn’t even really suggest that SCOTUS is co-equal beyond rulings of laws enacted by Congress and the POTUS. ”

    You assume that the Courts are extra-legal, or act in that manner in repeated fashion.

    “Judicial review is useful, but always subject to being tamed by the people’s branches”

    Judicial review is necessary, as evidence by hundreds, nay thousands, of decisions throughout our history.

  31. Asagirian says: • Website

    We need Social-Nationalism. It would say only nationalists and patriots get to practice capitalism. Globalists must be taxed to oblivion; they get full dose of socialism.

    Why should nationalists and patriots get capitalist rights? Because nationalism is intrinsically socialist. Nationalism tempers capitalism with socialism because it protects the bargaining power of the national work force. Globalism means companies can just ship jobs overseas or bring in tons of foreign scabs to undermine national workers. Globalism hands all the cards to the capitalists.
    But because nationalism forces capitalists to favor national folk over all others, there is a socialist element in national capitalism.

  32. @Anon

    Indeed, when did the Nation End?

    The first time it ended was when Lincoln shredded the Constitution by engaging in near genocide against the South, when all they wanted to do was to peacefully leave the Union.

    The second time was with the signing of the Hart-Celler Act of 1965, which opened the floodgates to Third World migrants en masse and destroyed the historic white nation.

    The Nation may have recovered from the first, but it will not from the second.

  33. @Rurik

    Unless an American had heard from a member of the “Greatest Generation” about what American cities were like in the 1940’s it is impossible to form a clear understanding of just what we’ve lost. Prior to black migration from the South and the disastrous forced integration policies instituted in the 1960’s, American cities such as St. Louis, Baltimore and Patterson were as livable as European cities are today (or were before open borders for refugees).

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    , @Rurik
    , @follyofwar
  34. peterAUS says:

    We need Social-Nationalism.

    Oh my…..

    The TABOO is so strong, for an average Westerner, let alone Russian, that it will take, if ever, a highly traumatic experience to go through it. The psychological block is total there.
    Nicely done by TPTBs, for sure.

    And, then, the most important: what EXACTLY that Na…I mean, “Social-Nationalism” is? Or would be?
    Rhetorical question, mind you. At this stage we can contemplate that as we could..say…..ah, yes, “how many angels can dance on the point of a needle”. Or similar.
    Again, nice work by our betters. Smart guys. Which makes us…anyway.

  35. KenH says:

    Trump is no autocrat for declaring a national emergency over the porous Southern border which is long overdue. But to save the founding stock in this nation we need an autocrat with the power to act unilaterally to enact a moratorium on legal immigration, mass deport illegal aliens, end affirmative action, fire activist left wing judges, summarily arrest many treasonous congressman and senators, deep state operatives, left wing radicals and SJW sympathizers ensconced throughout the federal agencies and bureaucracies, etc.

    Democracy is failing white people and it’s only going to get worse as our numbers decline further and there’s more AOC’s, Rashida Tlaib’s and Stacy Abrams’ as political representatives.

  36. KenH says:

    Now that Trump will declare a national emergency down on the border all of the leftard talking heads have channeled their inner Antonin Scalia and are citing articles and sections of the Constitution to prove their case. Any other time they tell us that it’s a living document subject to interpretation by members of the leftist priesthood and/or irrelevant because it was written by white males.

  37. MBlanc46 says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    You’ve pretty much nailed the Trump: Talk big and then collapse (when he doesn’t do the opposite of what he said he was going to do). I never had high hopes for the guy accomplishing much, given the hostility toward him in the rest of the government, but I thought he would at least look as if he were trying to do what he promised. Yes, he delayed the final triumph of the Left for four years, but I can’t get rid of the bad taste he’s left in my mouth.

  38. MBlanc46 says:
    @ThreeCranes

    I still have some memories of Chicago in the early 1950s. My great uncle lived on South Drexel. I used to play on the parkway when we visited. A white person would be taking his/her life into his/her hands to walk down that block today. I get that something had to be done with all the black farm laborers in the South after the mechanization of cotton culture, but surely a better solution could have been devised. I don’t want to talk about the hordes of Mexicans, Africans, Indians, Chinese, Middle Easterners, and the rest.

  39. Jason Liu says:

    Autocracy is the normal state of governance. Liberal democracy only came to be under very specific circumstances, which probably won’t again happen anytime soon.

  40. Tony says:

    The unimaginable suffering of the Palestinians.

    Yeah get your violin out for the palestinians. Do we even give a crap. Do they even give a crap about White Christian America or Europe. Hell no. They’d like to see us destroyed.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  41. The West is lost because she has lost her God.
    Culture sustains society; religion
    Culture. Traded her soul for a golden bawd.
    Her house burnt down while she was reading Darwin.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
  42. nsa says:
    @Wally

    “Now imagine Hillary as President”.
    Hey, Wally. You don’t have to imagine anything…….you elected Hillary in an orange wig. You forgot to mention Trumpstein’s awesome GoboHomo initiative making the world safe for wholesome healthy homosex. And releasing all those large scale drug peddling federal felons should enrich the society immensely. But at least she delivered on at least one promise and built that wall……of, wait, it didn’t get built? You must mean the wall along the Izzie-Pal border. How long before Trumpstein and the Koshners are wearing rainbow MAGA hats and marching at the head of a Gay Pride parade?

    • Replies: @KenH
  43. KenH says:
    @nsa

    Don’t forget “opportunity zones” for black ghettos, the coming paid family maternity leave of princess Ivanka, moving the embassy to Jerusalem, pending increases and a pathway to citizenship for H1B visa holders courtesy of (((Jared))) and regime change in Venezuela which will give us hundreds of thousands of refugees.

    I don’t recall the deplorables clamoring for any of this shit. Hillary is smiling and cackling like a witch.

  44. Rurik says:
    @ThreeCranes

    Prior to black migration from the South and the disastrous forced integration policies instituted in the 1960’s, American cities such as St. Louis, Baltimore and Patterson were as livable as European cities are today (or were before open borders for refugees).

    My mom was born and raised in Detroit. She used to ride her bicycle around the city when she was a little girl.

    It wasn’t just the black migrations, it was also the malignant narrative (imposed from above by our (((cultural elites))), of the blacks as perpetual victims of ‘White racism’, that eviscerated the soul of black America and created an underclass of hatred and resentment.

    Combine that with a program of paying poor, inner-city black teenage girls to have as many babies as was feasible to get on the freebie bandwagon, and you have a recipe for destroying city after city.

    And, it was all done deliberately. Just as the destruction of Europe is deliberate.

  45. Rurik says:
    @Tony

    Do they even give a crap about White Christian America or Europe. Hell no. They’d like to see us destroyed.

    it is tragically true that when Palestinian Americans get exalted to positions of power in the ZUS, (like Justin Amash or Rashida Tlaib), that rather than protecting the American people from Jewish supremacist imposed ethnic cleansing, that they revert to their anti-White tribal demons and wish harm to the people who voted them into power in the first place.

    Yet for all the vile anti-White hatred of our Palestinian politicians, I still feel that no one, no matter of what race or tribe, deserves to be as abused and humiliated as the Palestinians are in Palestine.

    The Jewish supremacists shoot their children from rooftops for fun. They murder them and steal their lands and property with impunity. I don’t care who or what you are, that is just rotten and wrong.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
    , @Tony
  46. @ThreeCranes

    The “Greatest Generation” is a Tom Brokaw created myth. OK, they defeated the Japanese, but any generation could have done it. There was nothing special in their DNA.

    And these WWII heroes went on, thru their infernal hubris, to create American Hegemony, which has murdered millions worldwide, and for which taxpayers will be paying for eternity. And they created LBJ’s disastrous “Great Society,” which destroyed the black family and encouraged illegitimacy. And let’s not forget that that generation, again thru bottomless hubris, went on to pass the nation destroying Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. It sure wasn’t the Boomers who did it, as the oldest ones, born in 1946, were only 19 years old.

    Far from being the greatest generation, they set in motion inexorable forces which have doomed all subsequent generations of US-born white citizens. We Boomers turned out to be weak-kneed and greedy money-grubbers, and perhaps we could have reversed the damage some, but we didn’t start the fire.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  47. @Rurik

    Why did you lump Republican Justin Amash with Far-Left Rashida Tlaib? I didn’t know his background so looked it up. He was born in Grand Rapids, Michigan of a Palestinian Christian father and a Syrian Christian mother. That makes him an American, just as much as a natural-born citizen with Polish parents.

    Moreover, he is one of the very few in Congress who is consistently against US wars of aggression, which can’t make him much of a friend of the Zionists. How is he not one of the rare good guys who inhabit the Beltway?

    • Replies: @Rurik
  48. Rurik says:
    @follyofwar

    How is he not one of the rare good guys who inhabit the Beltway?

    I grew up in Michigan

    under a devastated economy annihilated by the stupidity, greed and hubris of the Auto Executives and the Auto Unions.

    But worst of all was the Affirmative Action that brutalized young white men trying desperately to find some kind of job. ANY job.

    And to see this POS advocating millions more Affirmative Action beneficiaries to fuck over the working white men of Michigan, makes me want to puke my guts on his face.

    2) Expanding legal immigration, with a special eye toward encouraging highly-skilled workers educated here to remain here, expanding opportunities for entrepreneurs who want to come here, and providing an adequate legal migrant worker system to help serve our agricultural and tourism industries; and

    3) Finding a way to reasonably address the reportedly 11 million people who came here knowingly and illegally – in a way that is best for all Americans. This means protecting the rights of those who are seeking and continue to seek to come here legally. But it also may mean providing a legal status, upon certain conditions and that may not include full rights of citizenship, to people who are currently here.

    https://amash.house.gov/press-release/amash-sends-letter-sen-paul-immigration

    https://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2017/01/rep_justin_amash_trumps_unlawf.html

    There are other things he’s done to betray the people of Michigan over the years. I used to pay attention to him because I used to think there was hope for him. But alas, he’s just another rotten anti-White POS.

    • Replies: @KenH
  49. KenH says:
    @Rurik

    The Justin Amash fanboys either don’t know or don’t care that he’s an advocate for race replacement of the white population. So who really cares that he opposes our wars when he’s totally indifferent to the race of people who founded, built and sustain the nation that he and his slithered into and enjoy living in so much and who they’ve successfully lived among?

    People are falling head over heels in love with Tulsi and Justin over one issue. As far as I can tell neither are exactly friends of the founding stock’s interests. Their position is invite the world, but just don’t invade the world.

    Not all members of the founding stock are great either. Rand Paul is is great on foreign policy but sucks on immigration and offered to have a town hall meeting with BLM back in 2015 or 2016.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  50. Tony says:
    @Rurik

    I still dont care. They hate us, rape European women, so f em.

  51. Rurik says:
    @KenH

    People are falling head over heels in love with Tulsi and Justin over one issue. As far as I can tell neither are exactly friends of the founding stock’s interests. Their position is invite the world, but just don’t invade the world.

    Hilary light I suppose

    Rand Paul is is great on foreign policy but sucks on immigration

    And Steve King is being savaged by the ((media)) with obviously dishonest smears.

    Why don’t they just come out and say it?!

    ‘We despise Western civilization and its people and want to see both of them dead and in their graves’.

    Because that is the issue at heart in the debate over what King had actually said.

    If they want to condemn Western civilization, why not just come out and say so?

    Why the veiled and oblique smears about some vague ‘white supremacy’ boogey man?

    It’d be much more honest and dignified if they’d just say ‘we hate your white guts, we hate your white culture, and we’d like to see your women raped and your men castrated’.

    I suspect that if the progressive left and their armies of diversity could muster the cojones to say those words out loud, that they’d find the experience extremely liberating. Because they live their entire lives obsessed with all that raging bile in their souls, and never really allow themselves to articulate it.

    • Agree: Monotonous Languor
  52. @Corvinus

    You’ve got a lot of assertions there, chuck-0, but very little to back it up other than the ratchet effect of judicial usurpation. In your leftist kritarchy, there is absolutely nothing the courts are not allowed, as long as they couch it in the proper penumbras and emanations.

    Leftists would never have been able to prevail in this country if voting preferences by the people had been allowed to stand. However, the leftist long game expropriated the justice system to overturn it all in their favor.

    A good rationalization can always be devised for every evil under the sun, and you leftists use every single one.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.