The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
Trump: In Immigration Debate, Race Matters
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

President Trump “said things which were hate-filled, vile and racist. … I cannot believe … any president has ever spoken the words that I … heard our president speak yesterday.”

So wailed Sen. Dick Durbin after departing the White House.

And what caused the minority leader to almost faint dead away?

Trump called Haiti a “s—hole country,” said Durbin, and then asked why we don’t have more immigrants from neat places “like Norway.”

With that, there erupted one of the great media firestorms of the Trump era. On Martin Luther King Day, it was still blazing.

Trump concedes he may have disparaged Haiti, which, at last check, was not listed among “Best Places to Live” in the Western Hemisphere. Yet Trump insists he did not demean the Haitian people.

Still, by contrasting Norway as a desirable source of immigrants, as opposed to Haiti, El Salvador and Africa, Trump tabled a question that is roiling the West, the answer to which will decide its fate.

Trump is saying with words, as he has with policies, that in taking in a million people a year, race, religion and national origin matter, if we are to preserve our national unity and national character.

Moreover, on deciding who comes, and who does not, Americans have the sovereign right to discriminate in favor of some continents, countries and cultures, and against others.

Moreover, in stating his own preferences, Trump is in a tradition as old as the Republic.

The original Colonies did not want Catholics here. Ben Franklin feared Pennsylvania was being overrun by stupid Germans:

“Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion.”

Just as anti-immigrant parties have arisen in Europe to stem the flood of refugees from the Mideast and Africa, an American Party (“Know-Nothings”) was formed to halt the surge of Irish immigrants during the Potato Famine of 1845-1849.
Lincoln wanted slaves repatriated to Africa. In the 19th and 20th centuries, we had Chinese and Japanese exclusion acts.

“Californians have properly objected” to Japanese migrants, said V.P. nominee FDR “on the sound basic ground that … the mingling of Asiatic blood with European or American blood produces, in nine cases out of ten, the most unfortunate results.”

After the Great Migration of Italians, Poles, Jews and East Europeans, from 1890 to 1920, the Immigration Act of 1925 established quotas based on the national origins of the American people in 1890, thus favoring Brits, Scots-Irish, Irish and Germans.

Civil rights leader A. Philip Randolph, a major figure in Dr. King’s March on Washington, said of the Harding-Coolidge restrictive quotas:

“We favor reducing immigration to nothing … shutting out the Germans … Italians … Hindus … Chinese and even the Negroes from the West Indies. The country is suffering from immigration indigestion.”

The Senate floor leader of the 1965 Immigration Act addressed what were then regarded as valid concerns about the future racial and ethnic composition of the country. Sen. Edward Kennedy pledged:

“Our cities win not be flooded with a million immigrants annually … the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. … S. 500 will not inundate America with immigrants from … the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia.”

What Kennedy assured America would not happen, did happen.

Today, issues of immigration and race are tearing countries and continents apart. There are anti-immigrant parties in every nation in Europe. Turkey is being bribed to keep Syrian refugees out of Europe.

Boatloads of Africans from Libya are being turned back in the Med. After building a wall to keep them out, Bibi Netanyahu has told “illegal aliens” from Africa: Get out of Israel by March, or go to jail.

Angela Merkel’s Party may have suffered irreparable damage when she let a million Mideast refugees in. The larger concentrations of Arabs, Africans and Turks in Britain, France and Germany are not assimilating. Central European nations are sealing borders.

Europe fears a future in which the continent, with its shrinking numbers of native-born, is swamped by peoples from the Third World.

Yet the future alarmed Europeans are resisting is a future U.S. elites have embraced. Among the reasons, endless mass migration here means the demographic death of the GOP.

In U.S. presidential elections, persons of color whose roots are in Asia, Africa and Latin America vote 4-1 Democratic, and against the candidates favored by American’s vanishing white majority. Not for the first time, liberal ideology comports precisely with liberal interests.

Mass immigration means an America in 2050 with no core majority, made up of minorities of every race, color, religion and culture on earth, a continent-wide replica of the wonderful diversity we see today in the U.N. General Assembly.

Such a country has never existed before. Are we on the Yellow Brick Road to the new Utopia — or on the path to national suicide?

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of a new book, “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2018

• Category: Ideology • Tags: Donald Trump, Immigration 
Hide 33 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Dr. Doom says:

    This concept of “monopoly of force” is an interesting fiction. There are 40 to 50 million gun owners that can make that fiction seem stupid fairly quickly. There are some that say that the modern US Military would make short work of millions of gun owners. Give it a try swamp thing.
    Those freeloaders from shitholistan don’t stand for anything. They are worthless bums that came here to eat. Do not expect them to fight for swamp creatures with delusions of grandeur.

    • Replies: @jbwilson24
  2. @Dr. Doom

    Depends. One could argue that nuclear and biological weaponry makes standard light arms obsolete. Do you think the Israeli dual-citizens who run the govt would hesitate to nuke a US city that established itself as a center of resistance to the government? I don’t.

    • Replies: @Weaver1
  3. Yet the future alarmed Europeans are resisting is a future U.S. elites have embraced. Among the reasons, endless mass migration here means the demographic death of the GOP.

    The D’s and R’s are two sides of the same coin. Siamese twins. Neither can exist without the other. The GOP is not the target. White people are the target. Self respecting white people that is. Self hating whites will be allowed at the back of the bus.

    • Replies: @MBlanc46
  4. Randal says:

    Sen. Edward Kennedy pledged:

    “Our cities win not be flooded with a million immigrants annually … the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. … S. 500 will not inundate America with immigrants from … the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia.”

    What Kennedy assured America would not happen, did happen.

    Leftists lying about the intent behind and the consequences of their proposed policies seems to be as commonplace a fact of human existence as the same leftists using the racism smear to suppress resistance to their policies.

    Here’s another example, from Britain’s experience of the Blair regime opening the mass immigration floodgates after taking office in 1997:

    ‘Dishonest’ Blair and Straw accused over secret plan for multicultural UK

    How Labour let in 3 million immigrants, in defiance of the overwhelming wishes of the British people

    • Replies: @anon
  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    My best guess is that 90% of the white people in this country have no idea what awaits them as minorities in their own country. How could they know, when the owners of the MSM have been on a full-tilt rampage 24/7/365 to ensure that they never get the faintest idea, and that when they do, they believe that they’ll deserve it? It’s being justified full-time in every ‘Establishment’ institution including schools, churches, businesses, media, internet conglomerates, everywhere. But it’s never named outright.

    For what awaits them is slavery.

    • Replies: @Realist
  6. Renoman says:

    When admitting people into your Country the one critical question that never gets asked is “what’s in it for us”? Is this person educated, does he have skills that we need, are they intelligent, do they belong to any undesirable religious group or have radical beliefs, does their race have a good track record of assimilating into other cultures?
    Not many rocket scientists lately it’s going to be very hard to find work in the future let’s get the good ones.

  7. KenH says:

    According to some in that meeting Trump didn’t exactly say “shithole”, but whatever. What wasn’t mentioned is that shithole nations are full of people with shithole DNA. Nations are only as good as the genetic qualities of their people.

    It’s time to dispense with the Marxist blank slate theory of man and the magic dirt theory of America once and for all.

    The people who rush to defend the nations so characterized by Trump would never ever live in those places and third world people living in the West who are indignant over Trump’s remarks refuse to return to their native lands. Case closed.

    • Replies: @SMK
    , @KenH
  8. TG says:

    With respect, Mr. Buchanan is wrong.

    Race doesn’t matter.

    Money matters. This is all about cheap labor.

    Look at the plots of the fraction of GNP going to wages, and you will see that it suddenly diverges from productivity in the early 1970’s, when the current wave of third-world refugees really began to impact the labor force. The rich need constant infusions of new bodies to make sure that there remains a surplus of workers, and that’s what this is all about.

    The last major wave of cheap-labor immigration was mostly from europe, because at the time there were a lot of poor europeans with which to flood the labor market. The reason for bringing in all these non-europeans this time is simply because, right now, there just aren’t enough desperately poor europeans to do the job of creating mass poverty.

    South Africa is importing massive numbers of black refugees from poorer countries in Africa, to keep wages low and profits high – and protesting native black South Africans are being branded as ‘racist.’ You think? Nah, it’s an old story. Follow the money. It’s all about cheap labor. All else is detail or distraction.

  9. SMK says: • Website

    Rather than contrasting the GDP’s and per-capita GDP of Haiti and Norway and noting that the average IQ of Haitians is 67 and that of Norwegians is 100 and stating that the latter reality explains the former and much else about Haiti and Norway, Trump declares not only that “I’m not a racist” but also that he’s “the least racist person I know.” He can say this every day for the rest of his presidency, and he’ll still be vilified as a “racist” by blacks and left-liberals. He’s been vilified as a “racist” and even a “Nazi” long before his alleged “S-hole” remarks, of course, even before noting the fact that many illegal aliens are rapists and criminals.

    • Replies: @KenH
    , @MBlanc46
  10. Randal says:

    Race doesn’t matter.

    Money matters. This is all about cheap labor.

    No, this is childishly simplistic.

    There can be no doubt that the desire on the part of some of the wealth elites for an influx of cheap labour, to undercut the wages and political power of indigenous labour, is a major reason why so much money and power backs the pro-immigrationist line (and the anti-racist dogmas and taboos that suppress resistance to it).

    But to pretend that other factors aren’t also hugely important, and arguably just as important, is to deny the clear evidence before our eyes.

    The triumph of immigrationism required an unholy alliance of big capital with the political “progressive” left, mediated by influential lobbyists from groups who had their own group motives for promoting mass immigration. Neither could have swung it alone. Race and the political impact of the anti-segregation years (in the US), and the WW2 taboos (in the UK and Europe), were integral parts of the war.

    And in the other sense, as well, “race matters”, in that while the harm caused by mass immigration is always a numbers game, person for person that harm is exacerbated the more culturally and racially (the two usually go together) distinct the immigrants are from the victim culture.

    Why you personally feel the need to trot out such an obvious falsehood as “race doesn’t matter”, only you can know. Usually those who do it are motivated by the same antiracist dogmas that the big money and other backers of mass immigration have used for decades to smear and suppress popular resistance to their policies, but are just too stupid to realise that they are helping the very same big money capitalists that they claim to be criticising.

    • Replies: @Weaver1
    , @Achmed E. Newman
  11. Weaver1 says:

    The US wouldn’t ruin its own territory. No one else could use it. At the least, we’re all safe from being nuked. Maybe biotech/chem will unleash future horrors.

    It’s often said that Neocons view all supporters of the empire as American, all opponents as enemies. And they ruthlessly attack foreigners. So, if viewing those same foreigners as essentially “American”, then no, they wouldn’t have issue with harming American citizens.

    But nevertheless, powers do balance even in an Orwellian state like the US. Currently, there’d be no attack on US citizens even if Neocons wouldn’t mind such use of force.

    I wish the meddlesome self-proclaimed geniuses would leave the US alone, leave the world alone as well. They can’t resist “helping” (destroying) the world. Everywhere we see the US stoking terrorism, spreading chaos, though Trump at least has reversed that trend somewhat.

  12. Weaver1 says:

    Sometimes it’s useful to highlight, even isolate, one aspect or another of a political issue, because it helps our human minds to more fully comprehend a matter.

    You’re certainly correct, but we humans have difficulty with such complexity. You’ve clearly been working at this matter for some time, hence your high level, but I just say most won’t be driven to fully grasp what you’re explaining.

    Even at the “woke” unPC websites, most posters only grasp component parts. The human mind is limited, and it takes even the dedicated some time to reach your level. And I say, nice post also.

  13. KenH says:

    If Haiti and Norway swapped populations Haiti would become what Norway is today and vice versa. The Norwegians would turn Haiti into thriving nation and top vacation hot spot for Americans and Canadians while Norway would descend into the literal hell hole that Haiti is today.*

    No magic dirt. Only magic DNA.

    * This assumes the Norwegians leave their Muslim population behind for the Haitians. New Haiti (formerly Norway) will need some diversity.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  14. KenH says:

    Trump declares not only that “I’m not a racist” but also that he’s “the least racist person I know.”

    Trump cucked on us. His tweet response was defensive in tone instead of his normal aggressive and offensive. When people called Obama a racist (towards whites) he didn’t acknowledge or dignify the charges and neither should Trump but our side never seems to learn.

    Besides, the only way Trump could redeem himself as a good white is to constantly disparage fellow whites, our history and icons and sign mass amnesty. And even then he would still be on probation with the foaming at the mouth left.

  15. anon • Disclaimer says:

    “…a future US elites have embraced.”

    Those “US elites” are actually Jewish elites. The critical role of Jews in opening America (and the west) to non-white immigration can not be understated.

  16. anon • Disclaimer says:

    And yet the British people continue to vote Labour instead of UKIP or BNP.

    • Replies: @Malla
  17. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The Washington Episcopal diocese held a seminar on Anti Racism, where participants (i.e. Whites) were urged by Facilitators (i.e. Blacks) to beat their chests in repentance for slavery, in a building with banners outside that said “WELCOME IMMIGRANTS.”

    Immigrants are the new slave laborers.

    Maybe the Facilitators didn’t understand the absurdity because Episcopalians never held slaves.

    — oh, wait . . .

  18. Realist says:

    “My best guess is that 90% of the white people in this country have no idea what awaits them as minorities in their own country. ”

    I think 90% is too high….but the actual number is not good.

  19. @KenH

    Absolutely right, Ken. BTW, I don’t think the Norwegians have been as completely stupid as the Swedes in terms of letting the … how should I put it … goat-luv crowd into their country in mass quantities.

  20. Trump concedes he may have disparaged Haiti, which, at last check, was not listed among “Best Places to Live” in the Western Hemisphere. Yet Trump insists he did not demean the Haitian people.

    Hey, it’s hard to remember to hit all the points.

    Anyway, it doesn’t mean that one should demean any Haitian individual, but yeah, the people obviously suck as a whole, to have killed all the white people on the island and, in the 200 years since, not created anything but a shithole.

    A shithole is as shitholes do, per a paraphrase of a quote from a famous retard’s Mom.

    • Replies: @SMK
  21. @Randal

    You are correct that it is simplistic, Randy. It IS easy to figure that this whole invasion is just due to, yes, the R’s wanting the cheap labor due to their donor’s wishes, and the D’s just wanting the votes (and they all know what kind of people vote what way).

    Behind it all, it is more sinister. It’s not some evil plan made from a guy with his pinky in his mouth, but more like just a lot of high-powered globalist elites in governments, academics, media, etc, who all think fairly alike on this. They HATE HATE HATE middle-class (especially) white people who think for themselves, make enough discretionary income to push for justice and freedom, and form associations of all sorts.

    These people need to be replaced ASAP in the minds of the Globalists. More here.

    Peak Stupidity on the Western world committing demographic soo-eee-cide:

    Part 1
    Part 2
    Part 3

    • Replies: @Malla
  22. SMK says: • Website
    @Achmed E. Newman

    In discussing race, it’s imperative to distinguish between groups and individuals. Individual Haitians are “good people,” what percentage of them I have no idea, but Haitians as a group are dreadful. Individual Haitians are educated and intelligent, but Haitians as a group have an IQ of 67 and that’s why Haiti is the worst nation in the Western Hemisphere. But if one tells the truth about Haitians as a group and about Haiti as a country, one is reviled by the left and many “cucks” as saying that all Haitians, as individuals, are stupid, violent, criminal, illiterate, etc. And so, too, with “African-Americans” and the Negros of Sub-Saharan Africa and other Caribbean and Latin American countries, and Muslims and Mestizos/Amerindians.

  23. With that, there erupted one of the great media firestorms of the Trump era.

    Was it really? How can you tell? I just thought it was days ending in ‘y’.

  24. MBlanc46 says:

    That pretty much sums it up. I hope that many whites are waking up to that.

  25. MBlanc46 says:

    For the corporate element of the open-borders crowd, what you say may be correct. For the ideological element—academics, the scribbling class, professional activists—it’s all about race.

  26. MBlanc46 says:

    It’s pointless for him to try to rebut them. As you say, they tried and convicted him long ago. He’d gain more by addressing all of us who long ago stopped caring about being called “racist” or any of their other -ists.

  27. Malla says:

    Blacks from the rest of Africa are moving to South Africa via their own free will as South Africa has a better standard of living. Indeed other Africans have been moving into South Africa from Apartheid days. It is just that unlike guilt ridden Europeans/North Americans, the blacks in South Africa actually had the balls (due to lack of guilt) to act against the outsiders taking away their jobs or exploiting them in a mercantile fashion (mostly from Somalia or from India/Pakistan/Bangladesh who have migrated after 1994).

  28. Malla says:

    The power of propaganda. There has been trillions of pounds spent on media propaganda to brain wash the people to have a knee jerk fear and disgust of the BNP and also the people have been brain washed to believe that rejecting ‘racists’ makes them morally superior. And you have loads of British people who pose their moral superiority all the way to their collective graves. They are the butt of jokes of non White immigrants who rather than respecting their tolerance actually look at the natives as a weak people who rightfully deserve to be screwed. Remember that in the third world, the vast majority only respect strength. I wonder if I secret take videos of conversations about the British I have had with non Whites like Arabs and Indians and show it to native Britons, will it finally wake them up. But native British libtards have been brain washed good and have emotionally invested into the official narrative.

    I have been watching travel shows from childhood and a lot of them on BBC World. And I always thought that Rio De Janeiro is paradise. Except when a Brazilian guy told me that Rio is a very dangerous city and most Brazilians from other parts tend to avoid it if they could. Man I was shocked. But it goes to show you, how dangerous it is to depend on the mainstream media for your understanding of the world.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  29. Malla says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Thanks for the link, but the West’s decline had started a long time ago. People with the foresight had seen this coming decades ago. The West committed harakari in WW2 itself or maybe even as back as WW1.
    From a Cultural standpoint, the Second World War consisted of three organically separable wars. The first of these was an intra-Cultural war: England versus Germany. In the terminology of Ideas, it was a war of Capitalism versus Socialism. But as these two great outlooks have an organic relation to each other, it was actually a struggle between the Past and the Future, for Capitalism belongs to the Past, Authoritarian Ethical Socialism to the Future. Since the Past can never overcome the fact of the Future, except in semblance, this intra-Cultural war had only two possible results: Victory of the Idea of Ethical Socialism or Chaos within the entire Western organism.

    Well it seems chaos won.

    More on that here
    6 part series


    The very superiority of men who approach our racial ideal makes it easy for a parasitic race or our own criminal elements to rouse against us the inferior’s resentment of superiority and to excite envy and malice in proletarian herds, thus disrupting our society in what Ortega y Gasset calls, “the revolt of the underman.” And artful appeals to our sense of fairness and compassion can excite, especially in females, the irrational sentimentality that ignores the fact that a cohesive society is an organism and, like all organisms, can live only by excreting its waste products–the grim fact that, by the unalterable laws of biology, we, like all mammals, bring to birth biological tares and misfits, which must be eliminated, if the species is not to degenerate to eventual extinction. And what the struggle for life does automatically for other mammals, our species, being capable of reason and purposeful social organization, must do deliberately–or perish.


    So the good work was entrusted, in Germany as in other Aryan nations, to the demoralizing and disintegrating effects of what Yockey calls “culture-distortion”: “democracy” (i.e., government by organized crime), “education” (i.e., sabotage of children’s minds), usury, financial piracy, drug-addiction, promiscuity, miscegenation, mongrelization, promotion of superstition and irrationality, and the other blessings Americans now enjoy. That is working very well in Germany.


    The British, no less than the other Aryan nations, are driven by the death-wish that has been so deeply and perhaps ineradicably implanted in their subconscious minds. Not content with liquidating their empire, they began to import into their already overcrowded and overpopulated island hordes of anthropoid vermin from all over the world, from black savages to turban-wearing Asiatics. Any rational man could have predicted from the very first the inevitable consequence of the wholesale importation of racial enemies, but now, as well-organized mobs, directed by portable radios, surge through large quarters of British cities, burning and looting and killing, the Anglo-Saxon and Celtic boobs are astonished and listen, open-mouthed, to their government betrayers as they chatter about “unemployment” and, with almost incredible effrontery, claim that there are no “racial overtones” to race riots. The solution, of course, will be to surfeit the vermin with yet more blood sucked from the veins of the tax-paying serfs, who do not seem even to remember that they once had a country of their own. No one, so far as I have heard, has even dared to suggest what should be obvious even to schoolboys: the architects of the policy that imported the racial enemies and the loud-mouthed holy men and “humanitarians” who approved and endorsed that policy are either (a) conscious traitors, who intended the consequences of their acts, or (b) so feckless and feeble-minded that they must henceforth be excluded from influencing national policy in any way.

  30. Austrian -Hungary empire could not hold their multi ethnic empire together during WW1. The multi ethnic empire had no glue, no core beliefs, to keeping the nation together. They couldn’t even defeat off tiny Serbia. No wonder they were toast after WW1. Is there any doubt the U.S. will soon become unglued like Austria -Hungary? The globalist elite do have a plan, use immigration and politically correct anti white fascism/communism to unseat the western democracy, and those who love God, family and love of their nation.

    The illuminati began in the 1770s, as an idea of university professors that loathed love of nation states, princes and religion. They sought to use the universities as their breeding ground of atheism, and do away with God and nation states. The illuminati caused the French revolution, Russian revolution and the globalist elite inspired revolution by the globalist media…The coming American revolution. The illuminati borderless world is coming into fruition today, thanks to endless wars, war refugees, revolution and massive immigration to the west. The globalist illuminati bankers control the U.N., most governments, the world’s money, the media and universities.

    Europe is nearly toast. Due to the great Muslim invasion. Expect the globalists to push Trump toward a war in Syria, to create more refugees and immigrants for the western world. And more money for the war profiteers. War means massive debt to the globalist bankers, but this debt is guaranteed by U.S. taxpayers to the Fed. This will enforced by slavery to the Fed, by the global elite.. The media is in on this great conspiracy. Me thinks they purposely got Trump elected to show right wing is racist in order to foment the coming American revolution pushed by the globalists and their propaganda arm, the media.

  31. The surest way to have a comment deleted fron Liberal rags like the Guardian is to use a phrase like “Native European” or “Native Englishman”.

    Native American is, of course fine.

  32. @Malla

    When I was Bankering I hit Rio a few times.

    There were two worlds. The guys I dealt with and the Fevelas.

  33. Miro23 says:

    Racism can get pretty ugly – that’s why races live on their own patches of the Earth (countries) and try to respect and cooperate with each other from a distance.

    And races know who they are. A Nigerian knows that he’s not Japanese, and he lives in Nigeria among other Nigerians, in a culture that his ancestors have created. In fact, they have lived there for so long that they’ve physically adapted to the climate, so there’s no question that Nigeria is their home.

    For a relatively short time (1800 – 1960) Nigeria was part of the British Empire and it was ruled from London with a small community of resident British colonial administrators, who actually did a good job with education, a legal system etc. They banned the slave trade (1807), stopped inter-tribal warfare and brought Pax-Britannica to the place (the same as they did with most of the rest of the Empire).

    But still, Nigeria was the home of the Nigerians, and they legitimately wanted (and got) independence along with a quick return to the previous chaos, corruption and inter-tribal warfare.

    Nigerians know who they are, the same as the Japanese, the Chinese, the Poles, the Russians and the Jews.

    However, the Jews didn’t have a country (until recently) so they were obliged to survive in other people’s countries with varying levels of tension between themselves and the ethnic majority. The principal survival tactic was to blend in by taking local names, gaining technical protection (through professional qualifications – if they were allowed to), gain dominance in some commercial activities, and tightly connect with local elites while leveraging Jews into key positions of power.

    The best environment to do this was a tolerant multiethnic/multicultural one with the classic examples being the old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the late Austro-Hungarian Empire.

    A German-Jewish writer who moved to pre WW1 Vienna from the German Reich, stated that, “….all public life was dominated by Jews. The banks, the press, the theater, literature, social organizations, all lay in the hands of the Jews…. The aristocracy would have nothing to do with such things…. The small number of untitled patrician families imitated the aristocracy; the original upper-middle class had disappeared….. The court, the lower middle class and the Jews gave the city its stamp. And that the Jews, as the most mobile group, kept all the others in continual motion is, on the whole, not surprising.” (quoted in Albert Lindemann, ” Esau’s Tears: Modern Ant-Semitism and the rise of the Jews”).

    Another foreigner, resident in Vienna at the time, later reflected on Jewish influence, “Although the Jew has seized the levers of control in the Anglo-Saxon world (the press, the cinema, the radio, economic life), and although in the United States he is the entire inspiration of the populace, especially of the negroes, the bourgeois of the two countries with the rope already around their necks, tremble at the idea of rebelling against him, even timidly. What is happening now in the Anglo-Saxon world is absolutely identical with what we experienced here (Austria-Hungary and Germany) in 1918.” Hitler’s Table Talk, Conversation Nº 180 4th April 1942.

    On this reading, the United States and Western Europe are being turned into a new version of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth or the Austro-Hungarian Empire, probably with the same result – break up and collapse.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?