The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
The Unpardonable Heresy of Tucker Carlson
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Our diversity is our greatest strength.

After playing clips of Democratic politicians reciting that truth of modern liberalism, Tucker Carlson asked, “How, precisely, is diversity our strength? Since you’ve made this our new national motto, please be specific.”

Reaction to Carlson’s question, with some declaring him a racist for having raised it, suggests that what we are dealing with here is not a demonstrable truth but a creed not subject to debate.

Yet the question remains valid: Where is the scientific, historic or empirical evidence that the greater the racial, ethnic, cultural and religious diversity of a nation, the stronger it becomes?

From recent decades, it seems more true to say the reverse: The more diverse a nation, the greater the danger of its disintegration.

Ethnic diversity, after all, tore apart our mighty Cold War rival, splintering the Soviet Union into 15 nations, three of which — Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia — have since split further along ethnic lines.

Russia had to fight two wars to hold onto Chechnya and prevent the diverse peoples of the North Caucasus from splitting off on ethnic grounds, as Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan had done.

Ethnic diversity then shattered Yugoslavia into seven separate nations.

And even as we proclaim diversity to be our greatest strength, nations everywhere are recoiling from it.

The rise of populism and nationalism across Europe is a reaction to the new diversity represented by the Arab, Asian and African millions who have lately come, and the tens of millions desperate to enter.

Center-left and center-right parties are losing ground in European elections because they are seen as feckless in meeting what more and more indigenous Europeans believe to be an existential threat — mass migration from across the Med.

Japan’s population has ceased to grow, and each year brings fewer toddlers into its schools. Yet Tokyo resists the racial and ethnic diversity greater immigration would bring. Why, if diversity is a strength?

What South Koreans dream of is uniting again with the 22 million separated members of their national family who live in the North, but share the same history and blood.

This summer, in its Basic Law, Israel declared itself an ethnonational state and national home of the Jewish people. African migrants crossing the Sinai to seek sanctuary in Israel are unwelcome.

Consider China, which seeks this century to surpass America as the first power on earth. Does Xi Jinping welcome a greater racial, ethnic and cultural diversity within his county as, say, Barack Obama does in ours?

In his western province of Xinjiang, Xi has set up an archipelago of detention camps. Purpose: Re-educate his country’s Uighurs and Kazakhs by purging them of their religious and tribal identities, and making them and their children more like Han Chinese in allegiance to the Communist Party and Chinese nation.

Xi fears that the 10 million Uighurs of Xinjiang, as an ethnic and religious minority, predominantly Muslim, wish to break away and establish an East Turkestan, a nation of their own, out of China. And he is correct.

What China is doing is brutalitarian. But what China is saying with its ruthless policy is that diversity — religious, racial, cultural — can break us apart as it did the USSR. And we are not going to let that happen.

Do the Buddhists of Myanmar cherish the religious diversity that the Muslim Rohingya of Rakhine State bring to their country?

America has always been more than an idea, an ideology or a propositional nation. It is a country that belongs to a separate and identifiable people with its own history, heroes, holidays, symbols, songs, myths, mores — its own culture.

Again, where is the evidence that the more Americans who can trace their roots to the Third World, and not to Europe, the stronger we will be?

Is the Britain of Theresa May, with its new racial, religious and ethnic diversity, a stronger nation than was the U.K. of Lloyd George, which ruled a fourth of mankind in 1920?

Was it not the unity Bismarck forged among the diverse Germanic peoples, bringing them into a single nation under the Kaiser in 1871, that made Germany a far stronger and more formidable power in Europe?

Empires, confederations and alliances are multiethnic and multicultural. And, inevitably, their diversity pulls them apart.

The British Empire was the greatest in modern history. What tore it apart? Tribalism, the demands of diverse peoples, rooted in blood and soil, to be rid of foreign rule and to have their own place in the sun.

And who are loudest in preaching that our diversity is our strength?

ORDER IT NOW

Are they not the same people who told us that democracy was the destiny of all mankind and that, as the world’s “exceptional nation,” we must seize the opportunity of our global preeminence to impose its blessings on the less enlightened tribes of the Middle East and Hindu Kush?

If the establishment is proven wrong about greater diversity bringing greater strength to America, there will be no do-over for the USA.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of a new book, “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2018 Creators.com.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Media, Diversity 
Hide 149 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    DIVERSITY IS DIRTY, DIVERSITY IS CANCER.

    Thanks for the great article, Sir. You are so right.

    Tell the liberals that if diversity is good, next time they eat plain vanilla ice-cream, they must add some bird droppings in it. The diversified ice-cream should be much better than plain ice-cream.

    Ask the liberal what do they do they do when they drop coke or chocolate milk on their white shirt on the way to work. They will say they wash it or change it, of course. Tell them not to do that, because diversity is good. A dirty shirt is better. A dirty shirt is “strength”, compared to a clean white shirt.

    These liberals do not realize that PURITY is a virtue. Impurities are pollutants that cause pollution.

    Diversity is cancer. When cells lose their true nature, and grow in random ways, it is called CANCER.

    • Disagree: Buckwheat
    • Replies: @Buckwheat
    , @buckwheat
  2. Robert Puttnam, Harvard liberal, did a well funded study regarding diversity and found that diversity destroys social trust, ruins cohesion and cooperation, causes alienation, balkanization, fear, drug use, higher suicide rates, crime, chaos, misery, and civil strife.
    Puttnam didn’t want to release his findings because it didn’t fit the marxist narrative, but eventually he had to come out with it.
    And it’s really just common sense, just as Tucker said in his monologue.

  3. Xi fears that the 10 million Uighurs of Xinjiang, as an ethnic and religious minority, predominantly Muslim, wish to break away and establish an East Turkestan, a nation of their own, out of China. And he is correct.

    Uighurs uobble, but they don’t fall down.

    Do the Buddhists of Myanmar cherish the religious diversity that the Muslim Rohingya of Rakhine State bring to their country?

    Do they relish their country competing with “Mumbai” and “Moldova” for the worst renaming in the English language? But it’s futile– “Czechia” would be the hands-down winner, should they be so benighted.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  4. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    We live in a post fact America. If the left were really basing their opinions on fact and not on subtle racism, they could dispassionately and reasonably respond to Mr. Carlson’s question. The fact that they can’t even mount a basic retort that doesn’t involve either a personal attack or a mischaracterization of the argument says everything you need to know about the strength and motivations of their beliefs.

    Personally, I think it is time to partition the country as it is beyond saving in its current form. Pat Buchanan is a patriot whom I have respected for a long time. I hope that before he goes to meet Mr. McCain, he does the right thing and publishes an opinion piece broaching the subject of partition; saving the historic American nation and its values is more important than saving its present geography. If he brought up the subject as a reasonable course of action, many would listen. Perhaps a Red State secession is in order?

    Post Trump, the brakes could come off this great experiment – unlimited immigration, unaccountable democrat judges, religious freedom revoked, hate speech laws, gun rights destroyed by left wing courts, conservatives deplatformed and censored everywhere in society, war on Russia, and a never-ending stream of late night and Hollywood propaganda. Things are already pretty bad: Amazon is book burning while Google/YouTube are censored by the SPLC and ADL of conservative opinions; conservatives are black-listed in Hollywood; financial services like PayPal ban many conservatives; big tech monopolies crush alternative tech sites like Gab and remove them from their app stores; the news channels are mostly democrat party propaganda, run by democrats for the benefit of their pocketbooks and ideology; the left has committed terrorist attacks on our culture, our monuments, and our right to peacefully assemble; many radical antifa types get away without being prosecuted because they are “on the right side of history”; and many movies, television shows, video games, and comic books are now infused with left wing propaganda of some sort. But it could get a lot worse very soon.

    Imagine the enormous political and racial repression that could come with a president Kamala Harris; the SJWs are going to want bloody revenge on Trump voters because, in their minds, their opposition isn’t just wrong, they are hateful Nazis who deserve to be punched, kicked, attacked with acid, deplatformed, fired, and publicly destroyed. Perhaps it is time to start considering a plan B before it gets any worse.

    Who really wants to stay in a country with these people anyway? The left had a chance for reconciliation after Trump’s victory; for just a moment, it was looking like they might go that route. They could have stopped their terrorist attacks against our monuments, they could have stopped immigration, they could have reflected more…but they chose to double down, instead. They have made their choice. The ball is in our court now. Will we have the courage to respond? Any true patriot loyal to his people, loyal to freedom and fraternity, would understand that and cast aside the old symbols, the old chains and embrace a new future where we are safe from our oppressors. Isn’t that what a country is anyway? A safe space for a group of people.

  5. Deschutes says:

    Buchanan asks-

    Yet the question remains valid: Where is the scientific, historic or empirical evidence that the greater the racial, ethnic, cultural and religious diversity of a nation, the stronger it becomes?

    Okay that’s an easy one: the USA, unlike Europe is a relatively new country made up entirely of immigrants. First the European colonists killed off the much more homogenized Native Americans, then millions of immigrants and slaves came in to populate the country. English, French, German, Dutch, Irish, Scottish, Italian, African, Chinese, Japanese, Arab, Mexican, etc all came in waves to the New World. Talented immigrants like Nikola Tesla, Einstein, Brin, Fermi, Bose, Edison, Ford, etc all helped to make the USA a rising power on the world stage. It was in fact the diversity of the immigrants to USA, with each person contributing to their ability that made the USA rise above other countries in economic output, intellectual talent, and military might. If the USA had not allowed waves of immigrants to come to its shores over the past 3 centuries it would still be a sleepy backwater banana republic.

    Maybe that’s what Carlson and Buchanan would have preferred? It doesn’t sound that bad to be honest, like a big Sweden or Norway! :-D

  6. The racial divide between black and white has haunted our nation since its founding. It helped produce a cataclysmic war between the states. But the division between black and white reamins. And black-majority inner cities throughout America have become uninhabitable.

    As waves of refugees from failed states continue to pour into America, the political tensions and resentments inside America grow.

    Are we not sewing the seeds of our own demise?

    ‘Diversity’ may prove to be our civilization’s greatest weakness.

    Ironically, we will only discover whether or not this is true when it’s too late to do anything about it.

    The changes of today could become tomorrow’s irreversible nightmare.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  7. “You believe diversity is our strength. I! GET! THAT! Now please, just answer the question, is the Emperor wearing any clothes?” [/Tucker Carlson]

  8. CalDre says:

    I wonder what Pat knows about the Uyghurs. He seems to be agreeing with the NY Times that China is interring millions of Uyghurs to “re-educate” them to be “good Communists” subject to Han rule. China is claiming it is only re-programming a few thousand of Wahhabist extremists indoctrinated by the Saudis to deprogram their extreme intolerance.

    Is he basing this conclusion solely on the (( NY Times)) report? Frankly I don’t trust a thing they write. Anyone else have insight into the Uyghur situation (other than rank propaganda)?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  9. And who are loudest in preaching that our diversity is our strength?

    The Jews.

    ● Charles Silberman, quoted in The Culture of Critique [PDF, p247]: ‘American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups.’

    Pinchas Goldschmidt, Chief Rabbi of Moscow: ‘When there is tolerance for other languages, other cultures, religions, traditions, we Jews feel more accepted.’

    Allison Kaplan Sommer, commenting on Stephen Miller’s misgivings about mass immigration: ‘Miller, on the other hand, wholeheartedly embraces and embodies an ideology that many American Jews see as a threat to their own well-being, given that it promotes a vision of America as a white Christian nation.’

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @FLgeezer
  10. KenH says:

    This summer, in its Basic Law, Israel declared itself an ethnonational state and national home of the Jewish people.

    While their diaspora brethren turn America and much of the West into multiracial states that are welcoming to every non European racial and ethnic group except the white people who founded and built them with the ultimate aim of exterminating a racial competitor and sometimes nemesis via racial mixture with the third world colonists and childlessness.

    Again, where is the evidence that the more Americans who can trace their roots to the Third World, and not to Europe, the stronger we will be?

    The left and cucked right can’t answer this question unless by the usual platitudes which is why it’s easier to organize hate fests, label the people asking the question “Nazis” deplatforming, shadow banning and pressuring credit card and other companies not to do business with the offenders.

  11. Patrick Buchanan is an anachronism. He thinks and argues systematically and logically.This is a process which is much derided today, where the ruling motto is “don’t confuse me with facts”.

    Western civilization may well founder on the rocks of stupidity and misguided hysteria.

  12. Anonymous[795] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in [[[Rabbi Jewsus']]] sight.

    Why do White Americans let Jewsus’ shove this diversity crap down their childrens’ throats in Sunday School?

    Sunday School = Kiked.com for kiddies.

  13. Arioch says:

    > Was it not the unity Bismarck forged among the diverse Germanic peoples, bringing them into a single nation under the Kaiser in 1871, that made Germany a far stronger and more formidable power in Europe?

    Isn’t it an example of SUCCESSFULL use of diversity ?

    For example one can say that American president X would just have to “forge unity” upon Mexican-Asian-African-European USA “peoples” to make USA “a far stronger and more formidable”

  14. “What China is doing is brutalitarian. But what China is saying with its ruthless policy ”

    Bullshit. Even the b.s., NED-funded ‘human rights’ front, CHRDC, that made the original allegations claimed to have spoken to eight villagers in a particularly backward part of south Xinjiang AND the fearsome ‘re-education camps’ are day-school only, and locals attend for 2-4 hours a day then go home.

    Like many people infected by Wahabbism, they need to be filled in about the larger world. That’s it.

    • Replies: @Da Wei
  15. Anonymous[412] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Perhaps a Red State secession is in order? No way, that’s conceding defeat, and giving up strategically important port cities. Even the “blue” states aren’t all that blue, except in the ‘diversity sanctuary” cities, i.e., the enemy invasion beachheads. Instead, we must re-conquer the Blue Hillary Archipelago. Hell, nuke the sanctuary cities for all I care. Use an airburst mode, minimize fallout, diversity sanctuary problem solved. Genocide is our real strength, ask the Injuns.

    • A Civilization is a dominant community that imposes its beliefs upon all other communities by violence, which must involve the use of genocide; so any community that recoils from inflicting genocide will suffer genocide.Philip Atkinson

    • Genocide is as human as art or prayer. — John Gray (Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals, 2002)

    It’s either us or them.

    My fellow Americans, I’m pleased to tell you today that I’ve signed legislation that will outlaw Diversity forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.

  16. @Anon

    That was a great coment #425. I have only one question: Why do think Pat Buchanan will go to hell? I find that highly unlikely.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  17. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    “Ethnic diversity then shattered Yugoslavia into seven separate nations.” Well, with a little help from Uncle Sam aka NATO.

  18. Anonymous[893] • Disclaimer says:

    Beginning with recorded history (and probably before) diversity has been a consistent source of bitter strife and ruthless slaughter, i.e., the written record shows the constant, desperate, deadly, struggle between racial, ethnic, tribal, religious, and ideological groups to manipulate, undermine, and dominate each other.

    Simply put, proposals for unlimited immigration through open borders is yet another (probably intuitive, perhaps conscious and deliberate) divide and rule maneuver and will exacerbate the historic norm.

    For evidence of the continuing battle there is no need to look beyond your TV, and no, it will not be different this time merely because Christian Western values prevail here at this juncture.

  19. The real question is how much longer will the men behind the curtains allow Carlson to continue his Socratic red pill questioning on The Leggs Network?

  20. @Arioch

    “For example one can say that American president X would just have to “forge unity” upon Mexican-Asian-African-European USA “peoples” to make USA “a far stronger and more formidable”

    The root cultural divides among the various Germantic and Scandanavian peoples in Europe was and still is trivial compared to what we have in the US today.

    Any particular reason you left the sub-Saharan “peoples” out of your “strong and formidable” stew?

  21. FLgeezer says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    To repeat what was posted somewhere earlier by a perspicacious Unz reader:

    “A year after Omnipotent Government, the American Jewish Committee published Jews in the Post-War World, which, on page 85, recommends the establishment of ‘multi-national states’ in the West:

    ‘Proof that Jewish minorities, on the whole, have received better treatment in the multi-national states has been established by outstanding Jewish historians. The federative system, composed, as it would be, of different nationalities, large and small, is likely by its very nature to discourage exclusive nationalism with its characteristic policies of intolerance towards minorities. In a federative system, national group differences would no longer be primarily political and nationalistic, but cultural, linguistic, and religious.’ “

    • Replies: @Johnny Rottenborough
  22. Anonymous[306] • Disclaimer says:
    @CalDre

    China is interring millions of Uyghurs to “re-educate” them

    ROFL. That’ll show ‘em! You can’t get much more “re-educated” than premature burial.

    [I'm not going to tell you the right word. Go find it. And sin no more!]

    • Replies: @CalDre
  23. Buckwheat says:
    @Rational

    What the hell I don’t disagree, Rational is 100% right on.

  24. Anon[861] • Disclaimer says:

    “Okay that’s an easy one: the USA, unlike Europe is a relatively new country made up entirely of immigrants.”

    It’s not really as easy as you seem to think. The US in 1960 was approximately 90% white; virtually all of those immigrants were white Europeans who fed into the established, dominant, racial majority at the time. 90% is pretty homogeneous. What Carlson means is racial diversity to the point where there is no majority. That obviously leads to trouble nearly everywhere it has been tried throughout history. It amazes me that people miss – or purposely ignore – that basic logic as it is self-evident. Even on this thread there are posters who’ve cited studies proving this.

    But one does not need to cite studies. Look at any diverse prison (or neighborhood or school lunchroom or house of worship) in the US and you’ll see just how well different racial groups get along. Transforming your country into San Quentin’s prison yard doesn’t strike me as a wise long-term policy. How stable is any country like that going to be over time? 90% Han China is still here. Whatever happened to most of the “diverse” empires throughout history?

    “English, French, German, Dutch, Irish, Scottish, Italian, African, Chinese, Japanese, Arab, Mexican, etc all came in waves to the New World.”

    But some more than others. As I pointed out above, the US in 1960 was about 90% white, so it is not fair to characterize the nation of that era as diverse in the current sense of the word, because it wasn’t. Before about 1965, there were relatively few Japanese, Arab, and Mexican immigrants compared with the rest of the population as a whole. In the 1950s, Eisenhower deported nearly a million Mexicans.

    “Talented immigrants like Nikola Tesla, Einstein, Brin, Fermi, Bose, Edison, Ford, etc all helped to make the USA a rising power on the world stage.”

    Those people are not really very representative of the argument as those men were all white European. Some “diversity.” As stated above, those people contributed well because they were part of the dominant majority. Dumping 100 Haitis into the US will hardly yield the same results. More likely, if we did that, racial tensions would skyrocket and the nation would dissolve into infighting just as Zimbabwe did and South Africa almost did this year as its racist government contemplated stealing white farm lands without compensation.

    “It was in fact the diversity of the immigrants to USA, with each person contributing to their ability that made the USA rise above other countries in economic output, intellectual talent, and military might.”

    What “diversity of immigrants?” The vast majority of all immigrants before 1965 were European. Your argument only works here because those groups were easily able to blend into the existing dominant racial group who also maintained their majority throughout; let’s not pretend the US was founded on racial groups that were barely present until after 1965. Racial diversity where there are heavily divided populations is self-evidently bad. Do I really need to recite the dozens of examples from around the world? Even in the US “diversity” is clearly bad. Take a look at nearly any election and you’ll see that the biggest factor determining the outcome is the racial composition of the district or its proximity to other racial groups.

    “If the USA had not allowed waves of immigrants to come to its shores over the past 3 centuries it would still be a sleepy backwater banana republic.”

    If the US had stopped immigration in 1960, we’d still be a powerful nation and better off in almost every way – no racial animus, no hopelessness, no affirmative action, better housing prices, a lower suicide rate, fewer protests, and no race-based election results.

    “Maybe that’s what Carlson and Buchanan would have preferred? It doesn’t sound that bad to be honest, like a big Sweden or Norway! :-D

    1. Nordic European countries are regularly ranked as some of the best and happiest places in the world…mostly because they are (or were) some of the most homogeneous countries in the world. Only with recent “diversity” have those places started to see political upheavals – a negative result of “diversity” unfolding in real time but yet leftists are blind to it.

    2. American immigration policy discriminates AGAINST white European immigrants. When are you guys just going to admit that the only “diversity” you like is the kind that doesn’t vote Republican?

    3. But maybe that’s what you guys want. Just admit it. We can all be one big happy…Soviet Union or…Roman Empire. Gee. Great prospects there. Just don’t count on things like democracy or rule of law working in that society.

  25. Anon[220] • Disclaimer says:

    “Any particular reason you left the sub-Saharan “peoples” out of your “strong and formidable” stew?”

    Because that would obviously disprove his argument. Leftists 1. have little life experience; therefore, zero common sense 2. lie about everything 3. aren’t very smart.

  26. buckwheat says:
    @Rational

    I agree with Rational 100%. I clicked agree and that damn thing says disagree. Diversity is akin to putting feces on your breakfast cereal and calling it post toasties….

  27. Anon[220] • Disclaimer says:

    “The real question is how much longer will the men behind the curtains allow Carlson to continue his Socratic red pill questioning…”

    For that matter, how much longer will there even be a Fox News? How old is Rupert now? Do we really want to live in a country that has only MSNBC and CNN + a host of biased NYC-based broadcasters? Perhaps it is time to consider a divorce.

  28. Anonymous[306] • Disclaimer says:

    Perhaps a Red State secession is in order? No way, that’s conceding defeat, and giving up strategically important port cities. Even the “blue” states aren’t all that blue, except in the ‘diversity sanctuary” cities, i.e., the enemy invasion beachheads.

    The concentrations of diversity sickness are few, and easily bottled-up.

    Los Angeles and points south are write-offs — best handled with tactical nukes so you can retrieve the ports in a few years. Ditto the NYC – Boston corridor, and north New Jersey. Tacs for Seattle and Portland, as well. Occupy San Francisco and kill locals until they figure out the new deal.

    That leaves FL from Lauderdale south, and no significant loss of ports — simply put up a fence and lay a minefield.

    Chicago? Triangulate with three W87 warheads. Same for Denver and Minneapolis.

  29. @Deschutes

    LOL. We are, if anything, a nation of EUROPEAN immigrants. You snuck in “Arab”, “Mexican”, “Japanese” et al, in you screed, but the fact remains that the U.S. was >90% non-hispanic white as little as 50 years ago–with most of that 10% being blacks who never should have been brought here. Asians and “hispanics” were a rounding error 50-60 years ago, and “Arabs” even fewer.

    Those non-European people who were here back then did next to nothing for this country in the grand scheme of things, The ones who have invaded since then have done far more harm than good (a la blacks)-except for maybe north Asians, they have been a net negative, who found a stupid weak host and clamped on it to be parasites on it. We’d have been far better with out them, all in all.

    • Replies: @Deschutes
  30. Anon[220] • Disclaimer says:

    “Beginning with recorded history (and probably before) diversity has been a consistent source of bitter strife and ruthless slaughter…”

    Isn’t it funny that leftists used exactly that argument against religion (Christianity specifically) in the 1990s and early 2000s but somehow can’t see the obvious parallel with mass racial/ethnic/religious diversity in the present? Their 90s argument = religion is divisive and, therefore, causes trouble…so, wouldn’t the obvious parallel = racial diversity is divisive, and, therefore causes trouble? It’s almost like their motives weren’t pure or based on reason back then but were merely a means of attacking rural whites.

  31. Anon[220] • Disclaimer says:

    “That was a great comment #425. I have only one question: Why do think Pat Buchanan will go to hell? I find that highly unlikely.”

    I was being charitable. There are some well-meaning people who aren’t ready to hear the truth about certain things just yet. The first step is to get people thinking, not fighting. That’s why I hope Buchanan bites the bullet and credibly suggests a partition in an upcoming column or book. He garners respect enough that at least a few people would listen if he endorsed it; Buchanan is an American patriot after all, so if he suggests it, other people who consider themselves patriotic might give it some thought.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  32. Rurik says:

    Again, where is the evidence that the more Americans who can trace their roots to the Third World, and not to Europe, the stronger we will be?

    Well Pat, put in that context, the evidence is weak, to say the least. But if you’ll allow me to tweak your query, the evidence becomes evident.

    Again, where is the evidence that the more Americans who can trace their roots to the Third World, and not to Europe, the stronger (((we))) will be?

    Now it makes perfect sense!

    The more diverse and cut off from any heritage or collective identity that the host population is, the better it is to ravage and exploit and ultimately enslave and genocide them.

    So the mantra ‘Diversity is our strength!’

    is very much a truism, just so long as you keep in mind the meaning of those words.

    ‘Diversity is (((our))) strength!’

    (Except in Israel of course), where ethnic cleansing and religio-psychopathic ‘master-race’ oppression and Apartheid are the order of the day)

    If the establishment is proven wrong about greater diversity bringing greater strength to America, there will be no do-over for the USA.

    well, the ((establishment)) is not wrong about greater diversity being their strength, but for White America, time has run out.

    Perhaps those European states like Austria and Sweden can save themselves with their recent elections for sane government, but the ZUS is too far along on the path to ‘diversity’ = White genocide, ethic cleansing and further marginalization.

    The Germans have taken to the streets to protest when the orc army (that has descended upon that ancient nation in recent years) stabbed a German man trying to protect German women from sexual and ethic humiliation by these orcs, so at least they still have some mettle lingering in their blood.

    Not so the Americanus Bovinus, who proved his ‘mettle’ recently by hailing the orc army soldiers, because even if they rape and murder his daughter, and leave her body to rot in a field, just consider the Mexican food the invasion has brought!

    What is the life of a beautiful young daughter, who met her horrific end in depraved brutality, when compared to tacos?!!!

    • LOL: Digital Samizdat
    • Replies: @Rurik
  33. Anon[120] • Disclaimer says:

    “Perhaps a Red State secession is in order? No way, that’s conceding defeat, and giving up strategically important port cities.”

    But you really need to know when to quit, though. Napoleon was offered peace terms before the events leading up to Waterloo that he could have only dreamed of just before or after. He should have taken the deal, cashed out while he was ahead…but he got greedy and gambled it all. You red pill guys are going to have us fighting until we are utterly routed. We need to quit while we have the ability to. The South also did the same thing leading up to the Civil War and it was a huge disaster. Had they seceded 10 years prior, it would have worked; instead, they foolishly waited until the point where their enemy was far stronger, ensuring maximum bloodshed. Let’s learn from history not make their mistakes. The time to start thinking about this is now, BEFORE the democrats beat Trump in 2020; which they certainly will due to demographics and negative media coverage.

    Besides, there is nothing stopping us from leasing their ports in a post break up EU-style deal or just building/expanding our own. We do have our own ports, and future friends of our country like Japan, Russia, the EU, or China could help us in that regard, anyway.

  34. Anonymous[306] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    That’s why I hope Buchanan bites the bullet and credibly suggests a partition in an upcoming column or book.

    Several years ago, someone put out a reasonably well-researched proposal for dividing the US into six new sovereign states. I’ve done a lot of Gooble searches, and can’t find it. It mostly followed state lines, which produces some problems of economic centers, industrial production and necessary agricultural production.

    Got anything like that handy?

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
    , @Marat
  35. anonymous[135] • Disclaimer says:

    Never forget that “Diversity is Our Strength” was first coined by the idiot Republican hack Dannie Quayle

  36. Anon[267] • Disclaimer says:

    “Got anything like that handy?”

    I have a few ideas. The important thing is to first get people to accept the premise. We need more of that. Afterwards, we can get to the details. Perhaps an open thread on the subject would help since people seem to be interested in the topic?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @TTSSYF
  37. Anon[381] • Disclaimer says:

    “Several years ago, someone put out a reasonably well-researched proposal for dividing the US into six new sovereign states.”

    My suggestion is a little more reasonable (and realistic): one or more Red States secede in an upcoming ballot initiative timed to a midterm election when Republican turnout will be high (say in 2022 under President Kamala Harris); several other Red States leave the Union over the course of time and join up with us; there are population transfers for a number of years between the different nations; Red States attract Blue State support by promising conservatives in those states that they and their children will be allowed to move there if they want at any time in the future if they publicly support the partition (this mirrors Israel); we promote the Red State secession along with popular policies such as constitutional reform, anti-corruption laws, immigration restriction, anti-political correctness, free speech and free expression aims, patriotism and fraternity/culture/identity/belonging (a sense of belonging is what ales white men these days, thus the skyrocketing suicide rate…so lets give them a tribe to belong to again), along with the idea that our new nation is a safe space from SJW oppression (like Israel, this would give conservatives everywhere something to support), etc.

  38. @FLgeezer

    FLgeezer—Yes, Jews freely admit their love of diversity but they usually take care to pretend that diversity is the highest form of civilization. Only on rare occasions do they accidentally let slip the true reason for diversity: the eradication of the West.

    • Replies: @FLgeezer
  39. Anonymous[306] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    I have a few ideas. The important thing is to first get people to accept the premise. We need more of that. Afterwards, we can get to the details.

    Yes, that is the plan. Movements to secede, to separate from the sepsis that is Media-Controlled America, need to get some traction. In the long run, that might save lives and critical infrastructure. IMO, partitioning that does not follow existing state lines runs better interference against the “Civil War II” dishwater the controlling media would immediately throw on the fire.

    The proposal I remember contained a map of the new partitions. Certainly, there would be disagreement over the drawing of lines, but the purpose is to get discussion started by providing a central concept for development.

    Wish I could find it. I’m running out of search words. Also, better to use duckduckgo.com, since Gooble filters keywords, and round-files the “subversive” stuff.

    • Replies: @Patricus
    , @anonymous
  40. There’s two views on human nature. One doesn’t believe in human’s ability to look out for themselves at all. The other believes that overall, humans do a pretty good job of seeking out and working towards what benefits them. The first group, of course, having little faith in the common man’s (or woman’s) ability to determine what’s good for themselves, delegates to itself the task of leading humanity on towards the promised land. Bolshevik communism is as good an instance of this type of thinking as any. And Lincoln’s “You can fool some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all the people all of the time” is a good instance of the latter.

    Now Thomas Frank wrote the book Wasamatta with Kansas fer cryin out loud? and in it he chides Kansanians for their apparently bizarre support for political and economic policies which ultimately amount to shooting themselves in the foot. So he falls into the first camp.

    Let’s take a look at something that could put some flesh on these bones.

    Consider driving. Now we all drive cars, and in doing so, we are self directed. Not only do we choose our destination but our route and the manner in which we drive. Overall it seems we do a pretty respectable job. Traffic accidents are remarkably few. Deadly ones even less so. So, taken as a whole, we could say that in light of the evidence, people do a pretty good job when they are trusted with determining their self interest.

    Yet our glorious leaders, such as Paul Krugman, think that when considering such issues as open borders and unrestricted free trade, people stumble; they can’t seem to wrap their heads around the subtlety of the concepts involved and see that the agenda is good for them. That they benefit! Wassamatter with them?

    The stubborn yokels resist. They don’t see it. Comes now the emperor’s new clothes moment. “Show us how we benefit” demand those on the losing end of out sourcing. And Krugman replies “It’s too complicated. You wouldn’t understand. Tables and graphs, matrices and regressions. Just trust us. You benefit”.

    But there’s one key difference between the examples of our driving versus our understanding our economy. And that is that our system of roads and the traffic laws that append thereunto ARE RATIONAL. They were designed to move traffic. They were not for the benefit any specific group but served the Commonweal. Being the product of rational minds which acknowledged the self interest of the users for whom the system was designed, drivers could anticipate how to best move through the maze that is daily life. Because of this transparency of intent the system can be readily read and understood and because of that, it works. Everyone, even dummies, drive with reasonable ability to seek and secure what is in their own self interest.

    On the other hand, a system designed by a self selected elite whose goal is not to serve a larger general purpose but rather the selfish ends of its creators eg. the United States banking system, will appear as opaque to a population because that population assumes that the system it struggles to understand is the product of a rational mind put in service of rational goals.

    Of course they will be duped! They assumed that the system was set up to serve them in the same manner the system of roads and laws were! They trusted their leaders and they were betrayed! Can now the Krugmans and Franks of the world hold them responsible for turning away from the very people who pulled a fast one on them the last time they trusted them?

    • Agree: TTSSYF
  41. Rurik says:
    @mark green

    Hey Mark,

    Are we not sewing the seeds of our own demise?

    The (White) voters of Arizona could reliably be counted on to re-elect McStain indefinitely

    Knowing what an open-borders POS he always was. (not to mention the war mongering, treasonous, Goldman Sachs lickspittle POS he also was ; )

    Venality and moral cowardice among our own ranks, will be our demise.

    Politicians like McStain and Lindsey, et al.. are reelected because they can ‘bring home the bacon’.

    Country, neighbors, hope for their offspring.. be damned.

    What, if not craven, sniveling, drooling venality, motivates all the GOP whores opposing The Great Wall today?

    What, if not an ubiquitous moral cowardice, enforces the pall over any honest discussion of race today?

    The only reason the left has been so ascendant for so long, is due more to the worm-like obeisance of White people, than to any strength of argument or character on their side. They don’t even have an argument, except that ‘whitey is racist, and must pay/die’.

    Just try to get your neighbor to entertain the idea that Jews control our media, or foreign policy, and watch as his face contorts in indignation and alarm as he slowly realizes that his own neighbor! is one of those Nazi white supremacists that he’s heard about!

    I remember once hearing a joke about a black man flying into a rage for being asked if he wanted a job.

    But it isn’t a joke that the most egregious transgression you can commit against most white people, is asking them to think.

    Better to put a crucifix in a bucket of piss and pass it off as “art”.

    Better to swindle the global economy with packaged up ‘sub-prime’ turds, sold as AAA rated investments for your pension funds. And then bail out the swindlers when the massive fraud blows up. (As it surely will again, and again, and again… ; )

    Better to be an apologist for the orc (and his invading hoards) that just raped and murdered your daughter..

    than to question the ‘wisdom’ of allowing massive immigration of hostile minorities, (especially alienated and angry, military age young men) than to question that wisdom- even as your own flesh and blood met her end in at the hands of a fiend- who should not have been here.

    The men Charles ‘The Hammer’ rallied to stave off the teeming orc hoards of his day, were a thousand times the men that Americanus Bovinus is today. They were willing to die in battle with blood-spattered axes and fury, rather than allow their progeny to suffer the ravages of invading orcs.

    Today the orcs are celebrated by white Americanus Bovinus, even as they rape and murder their daughters..

    so long as they also bring tacos and burritos with them on their invasion.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  42. Equally to the point, while there have been successful, ethnically diverse states in the past, they have also been decidedly non-egalitarian states. The Spanish Empire was quite successful for several centuries, and the pecking order was very clear: Peninsula-born whites-colonial whites-Mestizos-Indian or black slaves. In the Ottoman empire there were religious and ethnic groups aplenty, and it all ran well for close on to five hundred years: Sunni Muslims on top, of course.

    Conversely, you can have an egalitarian state: Switzerland, or America circa 1850. However, please: no diversity. Black slaves were the great exception in ante-bellum America, and in fact, many free states barred any black immigrants outright.

    You can have diversity, or you can have equality. There’s no example of anyone getting to have both for long.

    We’ll have to pick. Worse, we are picking. One reason prosperous white progressives find continued immigration attractive is that they genuinely like their docile, suitably grateful Hispanic maids, gardeners, and nannies. From their colonial and post-colonial past, they’re even conditioned to accept white masters and look up to them. Ah, nothing like being top dog in an ethnically-stratified society…

    Diversity is wonderful; depending on what you want America to become, of course.

    • Replies: @Talha
    , @KenH
    , @Avery
  43. bjondo says:
    @Deschutes

    Google’s existence, if that is why Brin’s name is listed, has more to do with DoD, meaning deplorables’ tax dollars. Google dies today don’t think there will a vacuum for long if at all.

    Brin is a serious problem. Listened to him on the recent video release by breitbart? (1st visit to b-bart. too Zionist)

    https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/12/leaked-video-google-leaderships-dismayed-reaction-to-trump-election/

    Send him, his family back to where ever there are high walls no doors. Toss out Page, Wolfowitz and Bloomberg and Rubio and a Randhawa, add a Zakheim to the outgoing trash along with Rahm Emmanuel. Who needed E. Lazarus’s unnecessary poem unwisely attached to the Statue of Liberty. Liberty not Statue of Invitation.

    Without just these few, USA a better place. Go into the past and delete Lincoln, Warburg, Schiff, Goldman, Sachs, Rockefeller, the Hollywood pervs,Capone, Luciano, Lansky, USA could really be a decent place.

    So many immigrants so much human trash or as Emma wrote, “wretched refuse”.

  44. Patricus says:
    @Arioch

    Just how diverse were the German people who Bismarck forged into a nation? They all spoke German and were of the Germanic race. Not a good comparison to a land of different races, Languages and cultures.

  45. Anonymous[503] • Disclaimer says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    The underworld abode of Loki’s half-dead daughter Hell isn’t a bad place. It’s Babes, Beer, and Bratwurst for all comers! Don’t let the Jewish Rabbi Jewsus fool ya about their garish Jewheaven of pearly gates and golden streets. Knowing what Jewish developers are like, it’ll look like crap, and you’ll still have to show up for the mandatory singing 23 hours a day around the Jewthrone. And, if you are worried about climate more than a healthy Nordic society, then do realize that heaven is hotter than hell. Don’t let the Jews and the Jew-worshiping cult members scaremonger ye about climate change.

  46. Patricus says:
    @Anonymous

    Possibly the book you were thinking of is The Nine Nations of North America by Joel Gareaux. It was written in the early 1980s.

  47. Anonymous[286] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    well böhmen was not on, so czechia seems perfectly respectable

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  48. Cyrano says:

    In US everything is about capitalism. Every war that they fought was to preserve it (not democracy), and also diversity was intended to extend capitalism’s life – but in the end – it will probably end it.

    “Diversity” main mantra “we are all equal” is a socialist idea – but not just any socialist idea, more specifically it’s a phony socialist idea.

    All inequality comes from economic inequality, the prime example of it is slavery – if slaves were paid – they wouldn’t be slaves and there wouldn’t be economic inequality.

    Now days they preach the nonsense propaganda that “we are all equal” and “diversity is our strength”. How are we all equal? Did the hordes of 3rd world immigrants managed to make even a dent in the fortunes of the ruling elites in the west? I didn’t think so.

    That’s exactly why diversity was invented – so they can keep their money while pretending to be great humanists. Diversity was designed to fool the domestic dummies, so they wouldn’t ask for more real, meaningful equality between them and their ruling elites.

    In other words, diversity was intended to prevent socialist revolution, by pretending that it already introduced enough socialist elements that eliminate the necessity for full blown socialism. It’s a stupid trick, but so far – it’s working.

  49. “Is the Britain of Theresa May, with its new racial, religious and ethnic diversity, a stronger nation than was the U.K. of Lloyd George, which ruled a fourth of mankind in 1920?”

    The Britain of Theresa May is still 85% non-diverse and is being torn apart by a fraction of the 15%.

    “Was it not the unity Bismarck forged among the diverse Germanic peoples, bringing them into a single nation under the Kaiser in 1871, that made Germany a far stronger and more formidable power in Europe?”

    One of the interesting background factoids to the “We can do this” comment about the 2015 migrant wave was that Germany had absorbed tens of millions of refugees after WW2 … what seems to have been forgotten was that nearly all of those were ethnic German Christians, so while it was a challenge to absorb that many people, the integration and assimilation challenges were nowhere near as daunting as the more recent waves of very different peoples.

  50. Deschutes says:
    @Peter Gozinya

    You say-

    LOL. We are, if anything, a nation of EUROPEAN immigrants

    Erm…the Chinese immigrants built the first railroads in the USA which connected the west and east coasts of the USA . It was a big deal! You conveniently left that out, or more likely didn’t know about it.

    You say-

    Those non-European people who were here back then did next to nothing for this country in the grand scheme of things

    What about all the black people who came here in the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries? You know, the the slave trade? They pretty much build the Old South. You somehow forgot about them. There would have been no Dixie without them building it, and doing pretty much ALL OF THE WORK while the slave owners sat on their lazy asses the whole time. Go and watch ’12 Years a Slave’ or something. Or better yet read the original autobiography by Solomon Northrup of the same title.

    You don’t know the basic history.

  51. FLgeezer says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    > Only on rare occasions do they accidentally let slip the true reason for diversity: the eradication of the West.

    In the old days they were more up-front about it. In the 1960′s I remember the radical “students” at Berkeley imprisoning the various Department Heads, trashing the campus, and reciting “Hey, hey, ho ho, Western civ has got to go”. Most were (( )) .

  52. anonymous[819] • Disclaimer says:

    Do the Buddhists of Myanmar cherish the religious diversity that the Muslim Rohingya of Rakhine State bring to their country?

    Is that a subtle endorsement of the genocide of the wretched Rohingya? Yeah, Mr.White Supremacist Degenerate?

    It is because of people like you I take pleasure in the lament of the fading racist scum-of-the-earth.

    https://www.gq.com/story/sperm-count-zero

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  53. Rurik says:
    @Deschutes

    Go and watch ’12 Years a Slave’ or something.

    it’s well known by now that they didn’t just build the south, but everything of consequence, before white racists stole it all from them and everyone else.

    Civilization itself was created by black Africans. We all know that civilization began in Africa, some five thousand years ago when Europeans were cannibals grunting in the mud and sleeping in their own dung.

    It was blacks that civilized them, and then the racist whites stole the technology for gun powder from China and blacksmithing and metallurgy from the Amerindians – so they could enslave all the rest of the races that were all highly civilized until the racist whites came and stole everything they built and then made slaves of them all. At least the ones they didn’t genocide outright.

    Then they just claimed to have invented it all by themselves, as they continue to use their ill-gotten weapons to oppress and marginalize blacks (and browns and everyone else) even to this day!

    From the wheel to the written word to civilization itself, everything noble and helpful to mankind has been created by blacks and then stolen by racist whites and used against blacks (and homos and women and everyone else) by racist, sexist white men, who couldn’t count to 20 without taking off their Doc Martins.

  54. @Anon

    Does China get to park its Navy in San Diego?…Does the IDF get to claim of piece of California…NYS….for Israel?

    When Kamala Harris is elected POTUS….her Attorney General will be the racist Hindu Preet Bharara who will go after the Alt Right…….The Historic Native Born White American Working Class Majority must refuse to consent to be governed by the Hindu-Jamaican Kamala Harris and the Hindu Brahmans….I think we should nuke India…..

    • Replies: @JoaoAlfaiate
  55. @Anonymous

    Bohemia and Moravia are lovely names.

    If “Czechia” is so great, why don’t they use it in their own language? If that isn’t proof that it sucks, I don’t know what will convince you.

  56. Pat Buchanan is the perfect example of the Caucasian cuck RCC male who is destroying the West. He scribbles about how diversity has destroyed or destroying societies, countries. However, he refuses to deal with the fact that it is the Roman Catholic Church with its universal church doctrine that is problem. Buchanan is a practicing RCCer, so if there are black/Asian priests-bishops in his church, he will bow down to them. He would accept a black/Asian pope. Until he deals with the fact that the RCC is the number one problem in the world, we will not be able to solve our problems in the West.

    He babbles about so many different ethnicities within racial groups and their divisions, but he would never support a Western nationalist movement. When he ran for the presidency on a party he created, he chose a black woman for his vice-president. I saw through this coward at that time and have despised him ever since. He was the original cuck.

    He would have to deal with the fact that the West is not black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim and that these groups would either have to be repatriated or segregated. Such a movement would come into direct conflict with the RCC. He will never deal with the IQ issue and its relation to race. He will never accept the fact that the communion wafer cannot help blacks/Asians.

    Buchanan would have to choose between the West and the RCC. He would choose the RCC.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  57. Historia says:
    @Arioch

    Was it not the unity Bismarck forged among the diverse Germanic peoples, bringing them into a single nation under the Kaiser in 1871, that made Germany a far stronger and more formidable power in Europe?

    Isn’t it an example of SUCCESSFULL use of diversity ?

    Unless you’re trying to be ironic, for years I’ve used Bismarck as my major argument AGAINST diversity. Certainly, his peculiar brilliance of holding and growing diverse groups was remarkable, until he lost power, and the diverse populations grew along with the inevitable social tensions to deliver us WWI, and WWII all wrapped up in a pretty little bow.

    Matter of fact, I’m astounded that anyone with a dillitante’s grasp of the history of our world wars could possibly imagine unchecked diversity as anything less than the poison of modern civilization.

    Just keep repeating, “unchecked diversity is poison,” until it gives birth to a tiny shred of human decency in your heart. You don’t want to die as a horrible person, do you?

  58. @Deschutes

    Talented immigrants like Nikola Tesla, Einstein, Brin, Fermi, Bose, Edison, Ford, etc all helped to make the USA a rising power on the world stage.

    Not only were Tesla, Einstein, Brin, Fermi, and Bose quite unrepresentative of immigrants in general, Edison (born in Milan, Ohio) and Ford (born in Greenfield Township, Michigan) were not immigrants.

    • Replies: @CalDre
  59. Anonymous[259] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    The Roman Catholic Church with its universal church doctrine that is problem, indeed, starting with its Jewish Rabbi founder.

    John 3:16-17 “For Jewgod so loved the universe [kosmos]…that the universe [kosmos] through him might be saved.”

    Jew Testament says the communion wafer can help blacks/Asians, with the apostles recruiting blacks early (Acts 8:26-40 ) and quickly elevating blacks to leadership roles (Acts 13:1).

    Biblical Christianity is a Jewish universalist cult that accepts blacks. In your dishonesty, you have yet to acknowledge these simple facts.

  60. @Deschutes

    What about all the black people who came here in the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries? You know, the the slave trade? They pretty much build [sic] the Old South. You somehow forgot about them. There would have been no Dixie without them building it, and doing pretty much ALL OF THE WORK while the slave owners sat on their lazy asses the whole time.

    It wasn’t who did the physical labor but who drew up the plans that mattered. How would a people that had never constructed anything more than mud huts have built Monticello without a tasteful and educated white man like Jefferson to direct their efforts? And even then, Jefferson had to engage free white craftsmen to produce what slaves could not, e.g., the woodwork of the carver and gilder William Strachan, the plasterwork done by the master stuccador Thomas Clayton, and many of the household furnishings brought from France or purchased in New York.

    The great plantations, and the elegant mansions their owners bought, were the product of European cultural and technical development transplanted to the New World. Africans provided only tge muscle power, which has proven dispensable since then; cotton does not “rot in the fields” because white Southerners eventually figured out how to replace black stoop labor with machinery.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  61. I agree with much of what Pat says, but the stuff about the Uighurs in China makes no sense. Here is what MOA has to say about it:
    http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/09/this-anti-china-foreign-policy-piece-makes-no-sense.html

    • Replies: @CalDre
  62. @Anon

    The united States (plural term) was designed by the founding fathers as a divided nation consisting of sovereign states, with each State making it’s own laws in accordance with the wishes and desires of it’s inhabitants. While, at the same time, presenting those not agreeing with the majority in one State the freedom of moving to a different State with laws more to their liking.

  63. Anon[543] • Disclaimer says:

    “What about all the black people who came here in the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries? You know, the the slave trade?”

    Well, they weren’t immigrants, that’s for sure. They also couldn’t vote and were only about 10% of the population by 1960; their presence was also fairly confined to one part of the country until the Great Depression.

    In fact, the presence of this group in large numbers essentially proves my assertion correct. Unlike the white immigrant Europeans who easily blended in, blacks never did. Therefore, we’ve experienced tremendous racial animus and tension throughout America’s history. With that experience in hand, what sense does it then make to exacerbate or replicate that tension by immigrating more diversity?

    Did diversity of this nature turn out well for Yugoslavia? Does it in South Africa where the racist government almost stole white farms and where a prominent political leader told a reporter “we are not calling for the genocide of whites…yet”? What about all those post-Soviet block countries that broke up along ethnic lines? Or Singapore, which is a police state due to this kind of diversity? Or India where there are massive, even violent, tensions between Hindus and Muslims? …. The kind of diversity promoted by the religious left – yeah, this is a religion to them – is self-evidently a bad idea and may ultimately destroy the United States. I’m already seeing the beginning of calls for partition on the internet. Maybe this is something that should be considered.

    “There would have been no Dixie without them building it, and doing pretty much ALL OF THE WORK while the slave owners sat on their lazy asses the whole time.”

    Not only wrong but stupid. Most people didn’t have slaves, so most of the work was done by non-slaves. Further, they didn’t “build” anything as most of what was built was built afterward by whites – the laws, the customs, the buildings, the roads, the culture, the courts, the government, the technology, etc.

    As you can see, these kinds of people don’t have a legitimate argument to make. All they can do is point and sputter, and assert that you’re a racist/bad person if you don’t believe in their dogma. But you need not be a racist to embrace common sense. Pointing out that diversity was bad for Yugoslavia does not mean I hate Muslims; pointing out that Japan is a wonderful country because it doesn’t have “diversity” doesn’t mean I hate Koreans. Facts are facts.

    • Agree: densa
  64. tanabear says:

    Constantine VII, a 10th Century Byzantine Emperor wrote the following:

    “For each nation has different customs and divergent laws and institutions, and should consolidate those things that are proper to it, and should form and develop out of the same nation the associations for the fusion of its life. For just as each animal mates with its own tribe, so it is right that each nation should marry and cohabit not with those of other race and tongue but of the same tribe and speech. For hence arise naturally harmony of thought and intercourse among one another and friendly converse and living together; but alien customs and divergent laws are likely on the contrary to engender enmities and quarrels and hatreds and broils, which tend to beget not friendship and association but spite and division.”

    In short, he did not believe that diversity was a strength.

  65. CalDre says:
    @Anonymous

    Oh, there’s a typo in a comment post on a blog. Let’s make a whole post over that! /sad

  66. CalDre says:
    @Crawfurdmuir

    Brin? LMFAO. That treasonous Jew is busy trying to destroy America, when he’s not busy using America as a tool of the Tribe.

  67. Anon[202] • Disclaimer says:

    “The united States (plural term) was designed by the founding fathers as a divided nation consisting of sovereign states, with each State making it’s own laws in accordance with the wishes and desires of it’s inhabitants.”

    It certainly isn’t’ that way anymore. States are merely administrative vassals of the federal government. And whatever controls that government, controls the states and their peoples (and their rights, or lack thereof).

    The democrats are using mass immigration as a means of overthrowing democracy and establishing themselves as the permanent government, something the Founders never imagined happening. This has broken the social contract, requiring a new one with a new nation. As the Declaration of Independence states, “When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them…” Any true patriot loyal to his countrymen and freedoms would understand that and place that kind of loyalty over superficial loyalty to a piece of cloth and ink on a page.

    Is there really anyone here that would genuinely want to stay in a country where they are discriminated against and locked out of power permanently? Do you really think this one party country is going to let you keep your freedom of speech (redefined as hate speech) or gun rights? Hell, they are already banning books from Amazon and deplatforming dissidents from the internet (Alex Jones). Back when left wing terrorists were attacking our monuments, Slate wrote an article entitled “Let’s Blow Up Mount Rushmore.” There are whole left wing websites dedicated to doxxing protesters and getting them fired (so much for the right to assemble). We live in a police state that collects dirt on potential critics every time they use their mobile phone or connect to the internet. Every time you step out of your house now you risk being made a pariah in front of the whole world thanks to mobile phone cameras – one wrong word said in anger, one slip of the tongue, one dissenting view, and it’s off to the social gulag, life destroyed.

    Who thinks THAT is their country any more? I can’t even begin to list all of our grievances here – from affirmative action discrimination, monument attacks, illegal deplatforming, doxxing and lawfare used against critics to being bombarded with endless television propaganda and endless overseas wars…there’s so much wrong here that it’d take me days just to list it all. The left has made it clear what they are going to do when they are in charge. And that “what” is going to be very, very bad for us.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
    , @Them Guys
  68. Anon[622] • Disclaimer says:

    “Is that a subtle endorsement of the genocide of the wretched Rohingya? Yeah, Mr.White Supremacist Degenerate?”

    No, Mr. Low IQ SJW fart sniffer. The poster was pointing out, using a real world example, that extreme diversity is more detriment than benefit. That should have been obvious to anyone with basic reading comprehension skills and a modicum of honesty (since SJWs always lie, it stands to reason that you correctly interpreted his comment but decided to lie about it anyway).

    There are countless such examples in the real world today. Some of us live there – the real world – and not in a Xanax-induced haze in your room mate’s living room barking about Trump and “muh white supremacy” until the parents call with your share of the rent.

    “It is because of people like you I take pleasure in the lament of the fading racist scum-of-the-earth.”

    Point and sputter by a psychopath. That’s why we need separate countries. I don’t want them living in my nation. They need to go.

  69. Anon[631] • Disclaimer says:

    “Wish I could find it. I’m running out of search words.”

    I may come back here in a few days or weeks and publish my own plan on this thread or another one when the opportunity presents. Ron Unz seems to be publishing a lot of conspiratorial stuff these days. I’m hoping this is the ground work for a partition suggestion. I mean, that would be the logical outcome if you care about antiwar efforts, the deep state, or intellectual freedom; busting up the chains that bind might prove productive.

    “You can have diversity, or you can have equality. There’s no example of anyone getting to have both for long. We’ll have to pick. Worse, we are picking.”

    Well, the deep state will certainly try to have both – for nonwhites, that is. They’ll accomplish this by stripping us of our freedoms – no more freedom of speech (redefined as hate speech), no more questioning authority (dissenters deplatformed), no more fairness in job openings or college admissions, and no more gun rights. They will try to assure equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity, meaning that whites and Asians will be heavily discriminated against. It will fail miserably in the face of overwhelming Chinese meritocracy, though.

    “Brin is a serious problem.”

    More so when you consider that Google is structured so that this man can make nearly any decision he wants without input from others. If he wants to steal your domain name and drive you off the internet, then he can do just that with absolutely no accountability whatsoever. He might as well be chairman of the FCC.

    “However, he refuses to deal with the fact that it is the Roman Catholic Church with its universal church doctrine that is problem.”

    Europe is overwhelmingly secular but has still embraced mass immigration, nonetheless. Wouldn’t that debunk your theory? And wasn’t America majority protestant for most of its history? You know, back during all that immigration and universal suffrage stuff.

    “Does China get to park its Navy in San Diego?…Does the IDF get to claim of piece of California…NYS….for Israel?”

    I don’t care what happens in “Blue” areas. The only thing that matters is freedom – freedom from oppression – for our people. That means partition.

    “When Kamala Harris is elected POTUS….her Attorney General will be the racist … who will go after the Alt Right”

    Yes. That’s why the partition effort needs to start now.

    “The Historic Native Born White American Working Class Majority must refuse to consent to be governed by…”

    And the best way to do that is partition, Red State secession…call it whatever you like.

    “I think we should nuke India…..”

    Not very productive. Besides, the Indians probably don’t want to be nuked. However, along with the Russians and the Chinese, the Indians might be tempted to help us out in our struggle under the right circumstances. Indians generally like Trump.

  70. siamdave says: • Website

    Tucker has a lot of good ideas, but also a lot of pretty stupid ones, and this is very much the latter category – what they all do is take some normal idea, and run it to the extreme of one side or another, and start asking why you believe in that extreme view. Diversity is strength in biology, and the natural world, and so it should be in a modern community or society – but a cohesive diversity such as is found in nature, with a great interdependence of all species large and small, not a diversity of everyone fighting everyone else. Christians and Muslims and atheists can live together easily, as long as one of the groups does not demand the others become subservient in some way. Blacks and whites and reds and yellows can live together easily, and cultural histories of each group create a much richer society for all – if the groups decide they can get along rather than fight. The modern rulers are very well aware of one of the great war strategies – divide and conquer, and are stirring up animosity between everyone and everyone else, on every grounds possible, in order to stop us all from working together to dethrone the great evil power ruling us all, the NWO or deep state or whatever you want to call it, those who rule through war and fear. And until ‘we the people’ become smart enough to understand this, they’re going to continue ruling.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
    , @bjondo
    , @Them Guys
  71. CalDre says:
    @Arioch

    There is “diversity” and then there is “diversity”. Cultural diversity can be overcome, esp. if people are willing. Thus the various European nations were a “melting pot”. The groups that did not “melt”: Jews (not because they couldn’t, since the vast majority of them are White, but because they are obscenely ethnocentric), blacks, Chinese and Native Americans.

    That is biological diversity (aside from Jews, which is just extreme racism/tribalism).

    Nowadays most Whites don’t care if the person they are dating came from Sweden or Italy. But Sweden or Korea? Italy or Kenya? Big diff.

    Fact is, animals like things which are “like them”. That’s why pigs find other pigs, cows find other cows, sheep find other sheep, and Whites find other Whites. It’s rather biological.

    The problem with Leftists is they think fundamental biological realities are merely social programming that they can, as Gods, reprogram, and make society in their image. Even assuming their image were a good one (it’s actually a complete dystopia), that’s not how humans are built. There’s a lot of hardware that just won’t bend to the Liberal (Communist) Manifesto.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  72. CalDre says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    That was posted by “b”, the same Chinese propagandist who posted this similar piece: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/09/the-strategic-aspect-of-bashing-chinas-re-education-of-uyghurs.html

    Moon of Alabama – what is the difference between that and World Socialist Website (https://www.wsws.org/)?

  73. Da Wei says:
    @Godfree Roberts

    Right you are.

    The Chinese government seeks to entice the fringe to its center through infrastructure and appeasement, not brutality. The long bridge from Hong Kong to Jiu Hai (on mainland) is an example. Now you can drive it, so don’t fight it.

    For years now, Buddhists in Tibet who want to study Buddhism but not work at a job, have received money stipends, free laptops, food and dormatory housing from the government. If the student wants to get married, the money gets bigger and they throw in a separate house and a car, to live in privacy and commute to the shrines. This ain’t suppression. A few years ago when media showed a Buddhist uprising in Tibet, the word in China was that there were far more orange robes than monks, meaning CIA. Chinese are subdued and you had to know them to get that much out of them.

    North of Tibet, in Zinjiang Province where the Muslim Uighurs come from, the Chinese government has initiated development projects to provide work and improve infrastructure, but also to bring in Han Chinese workers. At least 90% of all Chinese identify with the Han ethnicity and I have heard grumbling among them about how the government favors minorities. I’m not talking insurrection, I’m talking winespeak over dinner. What the Chinese are doing is what happened in Texas, when it was still Mexico, and so many Americans moved in (with the Governor’s blessing) that they thought the place was their own.

    The point is that this is not brutality. It’s politics and economics, executed with patience and strategy, and it’s all done to keep the country unified.

  74. Anonymous[116] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Unless the USA experiences complete economic collapse and defeat in a major foreign war, the elites who control it will not allow it to be partitioned, even in the aftermath of a civil war. They look only to add territory to their growing empire, hence the drive to expand NATO beyond rational limits, including not only every state and statelet in Europe but also targeting South American countries. (Really, membership for Columbia has been pushed. They WERE dependable suppliers in the Iran-Contra days, plus they’ve got a convenient ongoing feud with Venezuela.) In the minds of these empire builders, membership in NATO is tantamount to being annexed by Washington. Even thoroughly spanked and fleeced Serbia is initiating steps to join this great big happy family in thrall to the exceptional ones. The only difference is that these new members are only given dictates by Washington, not any real voice or freedom of action. No “states’ rights” for them. If Donetsk and Luhansk don’t need them, neither does your shithole 117th state in the Union. In the end, all peoples on earth will be singing the Star Spangled Banner and chanting USA, USA! So, everybody will be a winner! So simple and easy peasy.

  75. KenH says:

    If the establishment is proven wrong about greater diversity bringing greater strength to America, there will be no do-over for the USA.

    And there may be no do-over for white Americans depending on when this wacky experiment in racial diversity blows up.

  76. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Rurik

    Pretty good overview. I sense that you are seething with rage.

    I agree with your assessment. We are spiraling downwards and the majority of the American people are completely out to lunch on what is happening to them. Give them a cold beer and a football game to watch and they are happy.

    I go into restaurants and notice all the fat out of shape braggarts wearing stupid t shirts that state “the price of freedom is eternal vigilance” and wonder how many of these people realize that the country they believe they live in is gone.

    And you are right about the resistance of the people to actually THINK about what is happening. The narrative about 911 is so obviously false that one wonders how anyone could ever have believed such a fiction in the first place?? How did three buildings fall to the gound on the same day because of fires?? This had never happened before for any one building and yet it happened to three on the same day!! But still we believe the fiction and not a word anywhere from the MSM about this transparent fiction.

    We are a dumbed down people.

    The first thing the Bolsheviks did when they took power is to kill the head–kill the people who had enough sense to see these bastards for who and what they were. What was left behind were the vast majority of people who never had an original thought in their head ever. Perfect people to manipulate and control.

    In a real sense that has happened to us.

    The serious people with any sense may not be getting killed off, but they are cut off from the discussion. They are marginalized and their ideas are seen as wacky. And the elites try to destroy their ability to make a living. And these people are, by and large, the best and the brightest. The writers at the conventional houses of lies are mediocrities at best. The truth is meaningless to them.

    We are in a mess. We are truly living in a type of matrix. I see the face of that bastard McCain splattered over all the publications in the stores and wonder how sick our society has become. Even professional organizations like the Medical Societies are in mourning over his loss, celebrating the “hero.” And now we are itching for a fight with Iran, because, exactly, why? Could it have anything to do with Israel? Do not ask such a question. Instead wave the flag and convince yourself that you live in a free society.

    I am used to the dumb expression on the face of someone when you ask them to think about an issue in a little different way. They look at you like you are clearly unbalanced.

    Living off the grid is the only moral way to live today. If you are a functioning part of the collective you have to, at some level, embrace lies. This behavior will damage your mind and your soul.

    But the fight has to continue. Despite being treated poorly by friends and family for asking them to think a little deeper about things I will continue the effort.

    I have no other choice.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  77. KenH says:
    @Colin Wright

    Both the Spanish and Ottoman empires eventually collapsed and broke apart like all empires. You’ll notice that diverse empires don’t last in perpetuity and partly or largely because sooner or later the diverse racial and ethnic groups yearn for autonomy and independence.

    As you said both empires only were able to work as long as they did because there was a pecking order of racial and ethnic groups or religious orders, but there was also the specter of brute/lethal force if any lower group challenged the dominant group or stepped too far out of line.

    In America that pecking order was destroyed by Jews and white renegades and there is no specter of retaliation and violence against blacks or other groups who raise their hand against whites as there used to be prior to 1965. Reestablishing a pecking order with whites on top while granting non-whites only limited legal rights and status would bring a semblance of order to the mobocracy we have now but not amity.

  78. Michael7 says:

    After the Roman Empire allowed the barbarians in, trust between them both began to crumble and the latter began pillaging and plundering. As word got out about the latter’s success, more and more immigrants began to trickle in and eventually the barbarians’ rage against the Romans got to the point where the Roman military could not mount a successful defense against them. The Empire was sacked and destroyed, not by a military conquest from another nation or empire but from a hostile alien force within.

    Such is the true strength of diversity.

  79. Anonymous[347] • Disclaimer says:
    @CalDre

    The whole Jew Testament promotes the notion that Christians can, as Gods helpers, reprogram, and make society in their image.

    Romans 12:2 Be ye tranny-formed by the renewing of your mind.

    Globalist liberals are the only true Christian missionaries remaining, as they still believe in the universal efficacy of the redemptive Magical Jew. Or Magical Soil. Or Magical something.

    [T]he narrative of redemption that sustains secular humanists everywhere – is a hollowed-out version of a theistic myth.

    What scares the new atheists, by John Gray https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/what-scares-the-new-atheists

    Nationalist right-wingers don’t really believe in basic Christian tenets of magical transformation anymore, as they now adhere to Evolution, i.e., human biological diversity. Nigs gonna nog, and Jewsus can’t save them from themselves.

  80. TTSSYF says:
    @Anon

    I’ve said it a few times in prior posts, but I’ll say it again: Start suggesting a Constitutional Convention. Call the Lefties’ bluff while at the same time getting traditionalist Americans to start warming to the idea. And watch how many Lefties start sputtering and sounding alarmed.

  81. TTSSYF says:
    @anonymous

    So…where do you live? And what do you do for a living?

  82. TTSSYF says:
    @Anon

    Yes, it is frightening to think of what the Left will do if / when they return to power.

  83. TTSSYF says:
    @siamdave

    Yes, and while we’re at it, lets all sing “Kumbaya”. A male lion will kill cubs sired by a different male to bring the lioness back into heat. Obviously, they didn’t get the memo that “diversity is their strength.”

    • Replies: @siamdave
  84. bjondo says:
    @siamdave

    Diversity for the planet earth not for a human section, eg USA, Sweden, gives strength to EARTH. Each human type is well suited/acclimated/experienced to an area. Unifying, cohesive cultures develop.

    Wolves are wolves. Not too many disrupting trannies, bears hang with that group. Vice versa. All better off. Now the planet does OK with each in its place.

    Current use of diversity is to destroy except for the one group pushing diversity as a strength for every other group themselves excluded – Yids.

    Dan Quayles’ remark was nothing more than propaganda. Someone obese saying to a slim person that 400 lbs of excess fat is their strength

    • Replies: @anonymous
  85. siamdave says: • Website
    @TTSSYF

    obviously the notion of ‘big picture diversity’ is well beyond your tribal perspective

  86. TTSSYF says:

    Not at all. I understand the concept of hybrid vigor. But that’s a false analogy.

    Name for me one majority Muslim country where Muslims live peacefully with Christians and atheists and grant them equal status (i.e., without treating them as dhimmis or slaves), and maybe I’ll reconsider what you’re saying.

    • Replies: @Per/Norway
  87. TTSSYF says:

    So should we model our diverse society after Iran, where they live under the iron fist of the mullahs and have public hangings via crane in the town square for such crimes as homosexuality or adultery, and one of the world’s foremost sponsors of terrorism again infidels and Sunni Muslims outside their borders? I guess that explains Obama’s fondness for Iran.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  88. I honestly haven’t seen the Tucker C episode, but I’m pretty certain he didn’t talk any about our govt., MIC, or Wall St capitalist class being behind the diversity thing.
    Who benefits/profits from mass immigration? Who creates refugees? Who writes the laws/policies that allows mass immigration?
    I don’t agree that bringing in all of these different people is a good thing. Especially with the (((media))) we have here that loves to stir up hate and division, its a recipe for war.
    But we shouldn’t ignore the cause of mass immigration/refugees if we want to solve the problem. The Wall St demand for more and more profit by way of cheap labor and the endless war the MIC and CIA push for in every corner of the world, also tied to Wall St capitalists, is the root cause of the “diversity”.

    Just blaming leftists or democrats won’t get you anywhere cause all of DC is controlled by the parasites and warmongers. By fighting with fellow slaves you’re doing exactly what they intended, keep your focus on the people at the top, the ones causing this, not the people being used, they’re no different than me and you, the people at the top don’t consider you any better than those third worlders they’re bringing in, actually you mean less to them because you’re not as profitable.

  89. @Anonymous

    Several years ago, someone put out a reasonably well-researched proposal for dividing the US into six new sovereign states.

    I’m not sure if this is what you’re referring to, but I remember reading something in the WSJ about a Russian analyst named Igor Panarin, who predicted the disintegration of the US into four regions:

    “In the summer of 1998, based on classified data about the state of the U.S. economy and society supplied to him by fellow analysts at FAPSI, Panarin forecast the probable disintegration of the US into six parts in 2010 (at the end of June – start of July 2010, as he specified on 10 December 2008), following a civil war triggered by mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation. He forecast financial and demographic changes provoking a political crisis in which wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government, effectively seceding from the Union, leading to social unrest, civil war, national division, and intervention of foreign powers. Panarin sees the task of the world elite as not letting the USA follow the Yugoslavian model of disintegration; it is desirable that it follows the Czechoslovakian model of disintegration so that everything goes calmly and peacefully.”

    I can’t find the WSJ article because it’s behind a paywall, so the above quotation came from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Panarin#Prediction_of_the_United_States_collapse_in_2010

  90. Avery says:
    @Colin Wright

    { The Spanish Empire was quite successful for several centuries, and the pecking order was very clear: Peninsula-born whites-colonial whites-Mestizos-Indian or black slaves}

    Interestingly, event today, Mexico’s ruling class is white, non-Mestizo/Aztek (e.g. former president Vincente Fox). There are pictures of Mexico’s congress and senate on the web: pretty much every member looks European.

    And it is quite hilarious that Jorge Ramos, a blue-eyed, light complexion, wealthy (net worth $12 million) dual US-Mexican citizen, sings the praises of an open border between US and Mexico. It makes perfect sense for Mexico’s ruling classes. An open border to US is a great pressure release valve.

    Mexico’s ‘whites’ have a great life, and they don’t want to lose it to a revolution of the non-’white’ impoverished masses. So…..send them to US.

  91. @Deschutes

    African chinese japanese mexican? Huge historical revisionism fail, give it another try maybe

  92. @Deschutes

    Just like they are rebuilding detroit, e st louis, compton, camden, etc

  93. Rurik says:
    @lavoisier

    I sense that you are seething with rage.

    Naw lavoisier, not at all

    Just very wry and cynical, these days..

    I strongly agree with every one of your points. Your analysis is spot on, and the fate of the West looks gloomy.

    But there are also reasons for optimism. The people are revolting against our Manchurian sleep-walk into that ‘gentle goodnight’.

    Brexit, Trump, Italy, Sweden, Austria, Poland, Hungary, Russia, are all encouraging signs.

    I suspect that the recent tech crack-down on free speech is also a good sign, because these (((people))) know that they’re losing the debate, and have to shut it down, or else.

    What will they do next? Start putting people in prison for saying things they don’t like?

    What will the American people do when they tell us they’re going to start jailing 90 year old grandmothers – like they do in Germany, who’ve never committed a crime or harmed a soul in their entire lives, but will be sent to prison for questioning some of the Orwellian lies we’re all ordered to believe?

    Will Americanus Bovinus finally pause his cud-chewing (burrito slurping) long enough to protest?

    For myself, I’ve given up on the ZUSA. (and Canada)

    My frontiers and destiny are elsewhere. And that helps me with my outlook.

    If there were no where else to go, then perhaps I would be less optimistic about life’s horizons.

    Cheers

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  94. anonymous[202] • Disclaimer says:
    @bjondo

    Evolution is wrong, because the Supernatural Jew who created humans can transform any human being, even Africans, into acting like a White Christian with gentlemanly manners. Says so right in the Bible. And if Yids wrote it, it has to be true. Q.E.D.

  95. Rurik says:
    @TTSSYF

    public hangings via crane in the town square for such crimes as homosexuality or adultery

    They don’t hang people for being homosexuals. They hang them for rape. As they should.

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/696733/Anger-Iran-hangs-gay-teenager-Amnesty-International

    whereas in the moral sewer of the zio-west, they make apologies for the rapists of their children.

    A 10-year-old boy was so brutally raped by an Iraqi migrant in a swimming pool cubicle that he had to be hospitalized for his injuries.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3434708/Iraqi-migrant-raped-10-year-old-boy-swimming-pool-Vienna-told-police-sexual-emergency-hadn-t-sex-months.html

    The boy’s mother says he routinely screams at night, and will likely never recover.

    But the Austrian high court says it may have been consensual ! (IOW, it was a white boy = Nazi- who was raped, and a diversity man = numinous victim of eternally racist and guilty Austrians – who was the real victim here).

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/iraqi-refugee-raped-10-year-old-boy-swimming-pool-vienna-austria-sentence-conviction-overturned-a7377491.html

    So when you ask if we should model our society after Iran, well in some ways, Hell yes!

    Any society, (or any parent) who would countenance the rape of their children, are unworthy of existing. But when they go so far as to condone the brutal rape of little boys, by hostile invading hoards of orcs, just because those orcs happen to have darker skin than Austrians.. and are therefor sacrosanct, and victims, no matter what..

    Then something has gone insanely wrong with your (((their))) society.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  96. Rurik says:
    @Rurik

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/14/illegal-immigrant-charged-in-stabbing-death-16-year-old-girl-report-says.html

    sure, she was just sixteen, with her whole life ahead of her..

    but really, what is her life when compared to the joys of Mexican (or Guatemalan food)!

    Not to mention that all white people are guilty for stealing Texas and California from Mexicans, so perhaps there’s a bit of karma at work here..

    Huh Fred Reed?

    just look at these people morning the slaughter of that teenage girl -

    https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2018/09/13/PAPP/6d17e6de-8e66-4837-8059-2ab1a6082848-ASB_0912_LB_Vigil-3605.jpg?crop=2999,1687,x1,y133&width=3200&height=1680&fit=bounds

    irredeemable, deplorable racists every single one!

    (well, almost. I do see a couple of non-racists there, but just look at most of them! Working class, salt of the earth, white Americans = Deplorable, Trump-voting racists!!!!)

    why the hell should people feel sympathy for racists?!

    • Replies: @Rurik
  97. Them Guys says:
    @Anon

    Very well stated and so true. Basically, we have reached the point where….”.America is at that awkward stage….It is far too late to work within the system, yet a bit too soon to, begin Shooting the Bastards!”

    Claire Wolfe, 2000.

    Tic-Toc….Tic-Toc, Bastards.

  98. Them Guys says:
    @siamdave

    “IF” This, and “IF” That, and… “If” that, “IF” could or would, Just stand, Stiff.

  99. Rurik says:
    @Rurik

    that’s right Sergey, they’re not just racists, but fascists too!

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6162889/Leaked-Google-conference-video-shows-founder-comparing-Trump-voters-extremists.html

    and by fascists, we all know what that world means>!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  100. Wally says:
    @Deschutes

    Chinese provided some of the manual labor, they “built” nothing. Too much TeeVee for you. LOL

    US slaves would never have existed unless Black Africans offered for sale their own stock.
    African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade
    Nigerian civil rights group says tribal leaders’ ancestors sold people to slavers and should say sorry

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade

    “African chiefs were the ones waging war on each other and capturing their own people and selling them. If anyone should apologise it should be the African chiefs. We still have those traitors here even today.”

    Slaves were held by very few people in the South, slaves “built” nothing. They were certainly to stupid to do much more than what little they did do.
    Jews bought, sold & owned the lions share of slaves.
    Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let’s us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade

    And leave it to a Zionist to recommend a ‘Hollywood movie‘. LOL

    • Replies: @anonymous
  101. Iberiano says:

    Can’t say we didn’t see it coming:

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/black-female-democrats-call-changes-party-042840335–election.html

    Now the question is, will the new, new new new, Republican party, permit the boat people (white libs) to migrate to the Repubs from 2020 forward? (My guess is they will). We will suddenly see an infiltration into the right-of-centers of basically white women (and the remaining cucky white men) who have been sent to the back of the bus in the DNC.

    It was bound to happen. White women have been living off the corn feed of early feminists and the laws of diversity are just now catching up to those “Becky” types too. I’ve seen tons of posts on YT with blacks and latinas talking about getting rid of white women in poz of authority. That’s why I give no chance to Warren.

  102. @Anon

    Partition=being surrounded by Greater China and Greater India up to borders of Montanna and Idaho…..a better option would be to expel the Chinese and Hindus off of historic NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN LIVING AND BREEDING SPACE……Just think how exciting, fun, and character building this would be for White Males…..

    • Replies: @Thomm
  103. gcdugas says:
    @Anon

    Pat Buchanan will be going to a better abode than John McCain. They shall never meet again.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  104. Thomm says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Jesus Christ, you are a dumb wigger.

    The native peoples of the Americas are Native Americans, not whites. White are native to Europe and settled North America.

    Chinese and Indians are just 1% of the population each. But that is enough to make them live inside your head.

    Since you have no thoughts beyond crude ‘muh tribe, muh tribe!!!’ ooga booga chants, you are more like a black person than a functional white person (like me). That is why you are accurately described as a Wigger.

  105. TTSSYF says:
    @Rurik

    Of course, in “some ways”, we should model our society after theirs. As they say, a broken clock is right twice a day. It doesn’t change the fact that Iran is ruled by religious fanatics and are State sponsors of terrorism.

    And why do you think it’s (((my society)))? I despise a lot of what goes on in American society. That’s why I come to this website.

    You are come across as someone so crazed with anger that you can’t engage in a rational discussion, even with those of us who essentially agree with you.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  106. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    Go back to your SJW coloring books, halfwit. Facts rules the day here.

    First Americans were European
    Live Science https://www.livescience.com/7043-americans-european.html

  107. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:
    @gcdugas

    They’re going to the same place as a dead dinosaur, as are all we animals. Bible says so:

    Ecclesiastes 9:5-10 For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing; they have no further reward, and even their name is forgotten…in the realm of the dead, where you are going, there is neither working nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom.

    Ecclesiastes 3:19-21 Surely the fate of human beings is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both: As one dies, so dies the other. All have the same breath; humans have no advantage over animals. All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return. Who knows if the human spirit rises upward and if the spirit of the animal goes down into the earth?”

    But you are correct, they’ll never meet again. Afterlife narratives are just fantasies to ameliorate mortality salience for people who can’t handle the nature of reality.

  108. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rurik

    It’s OK to be White.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  109. @Thomm

    One doesn’t have to “physically” occupy land in order to lord over the populace. I thought you were better than this you super high IQ indiot!

    (((they))) are barely 2% of the US populace and most of us (including yours truly) are afraid to even write about their identity here on the hallowed halls on the internets. You still think they did that by their sheer number? You think the hindoo lobby wouldn’t want to learn from (((them)))? America being the oligarchy it is, the hindoo lobby just needs to acquire the right levers of power and boy, before you know, openly mocking ganeshas like yourself would also become just as harming.

    Already the hindoo lobby is gaining strength on the hill due to it’s very fat wallets which is why these entitled bastards have now the gall and the gumption to consider suing the US government when their H4 visa scam is being scrapped. Their government is also challenging our DC puppets at the WTO because H1B is getting negative press and might be considered for removal. What the hell??

    I’ve worked with the likes of you in the bay area (out of that shithole now) but your brethren are fast spreading to the DFW metroplex as well as Atlanta and boy do they consider us lowly whites as so much chaff? For them blacks are no better than apes yet they play the victim all the time. If the insidious hindoo menace isn’t nipped in the bud, white americans can look forward to living like semi-dalits in the same land which their forefathers shed blood for

  110. @Anonymous

    He’s a hindoo pretending to be white but I think he truly believes he really is white. He’s not a SJW but more like a hypocrite make believe “based man” pretending to be from the “alt right”. His bluff has been called so many times here on UR but he just wouldn’t give it up.

    However, I can bet my ass that he is on the hard right when he’s home in India (the upper caste hindoo must always run the place and others need to be kept on a tight leash with ethnic riots and stuff). I’ve been around a lot of them at work during my initial years and they are quite two faced when it comes to immigration. They want to flood our shores with their brethren and wouldn’t mind completely dominating all the white collared jobs and small businesses. Back home they (naturally) want the upper caste hindoo men to run the place.

    They think most whites are stupid and incompetent and they feel quite entitled to come here. Just check out the comments section on any video on YT criticizing H1B or H4 EAD etc. They descend like a swarm of locusts and take the discussion to a very different place using deflection, outright tomfoolery or their typical passive aggressive talk . Some sensible ones try to talk sense into them but most are having none of it. They talk like they are soon going to own our asses (their wet dream). And you bet their elite is literally trying for that.

    My impression of Indians and India has gone from a land of Ghandi and Yoga to a land of sly and cunning pretentious snobs with passive aggressive tendencies when I spent some years around them at work. I was the lone non Indian (more like the lone non-colored person) that managed to survive in a hostile environment and they were visibly frustrated got that. I left when I couldn’t take it anymore and move to a different more rural area but I’m afraid their brethren might show up here too in short time.

    • Replies: @Thomm
  111. @War for Blair Mountain

    “Does the IDF get to claim of piece of California…NYS….for Israel?”

    This is probably not a good example as the Zionist enterprise does seem to have “claimed” a great deal of power in the USA, esp in NYS where I’m guessing large parts of the population put israel and its welfare ahead of the USA-to say nothing of Congress, the Treasury Dept, etc., etc.

  112. @Crawfurdmuir

    “Africans provided only tge muscle power, which has proven dispensable since then…” We need to find some task for which they are indispensable.

    Today, China complains that the recycling products sent to them by the United States is basically “garbage”. They are threatening to cut us off. The problem is that, for example, some plastics can be readily recycled while others cannot and many persons who believe that they are doing good by indiscriminately throwing plastics in their bins are not, since they are often mixing the useless with the useful.

    50% of young black men in America’s inner cities are unemployed. Putting them to work separating recycled products would be useful both for them and for the health of the planet. It’s the Green Solution. It wouldn’t be too hard to design conveyor belts where, as recycled stuff streamed by, young, strong black men would separate out the good from the bad. To incentivize them, and get them out of their comfort-zone, ghetto neighborhoods, all food and monetary aid would be cut off. They could work or starve.

    Not only would this utilize black talent in a most optimal way, but it would also provide a rudimentary education for these youths. They would become acquainted with the difference between polypropylene and polyethylene and so on. This could perhaps stimulate one of them to maximize his potential by enrolling in night courses and becoming a chemist.

    If Trayvon or Michael Brown had had this opportunity for advancement they may have avoided the fate that deprived us of their company.

  113. @Anonymous

    The Leftist….Liberal….Libertarian worldview:Europeans conquered a continent and created a vast powerful White Nation……..hit them with the sewage about the First Americans…the Real Native Americans….nonstop for decades……Demand that Native Born White Americans hand America over to the Hindus….Sihks…..Chinese…..Iranians….Pakistanis…..Whitey gets voted into a White racial foreigner within the borders of America….America gets handed over to the Chinese….Hindus….Sihks….Pakistanis……Iranians…….Never a word ever again about the lowly American Injun………the post-1965 Asians in American are enthusiastically encouraged to enjoy the very great benefits of the European conquest of North America…..Whitey forced to clean the Hindu Brahman’s toilet bowels…..just like the Dalits do in India……………..A race war is justified to prevent this from ever happening…………….

    • Replies: @Them Guys
  114. Thomm=biology textbook definition of cuckholdery……..

    • Replies: @Thomm
  115. @JoaoAlfaiate

    You didn’t answer my question….

    The IDF has recruiting centers in California…….An IDF cargo jet flew into Houston with an IDF search and rescue crew……I wouldn’t put it past the Sicilian Andrew Cuomo to call in the IDF when the Native Born White American Working Class Insurrection finally occurs…..

    Larger point:Partition means new Nation State borders within the former America….Force and Violence would have to be used to enforce these news borders…..or be back to square one again…..but if Force and Violence are going to be used by both sides to enforce the new borders…….Why shouldn’t Force and Vioence be used to reclaim the old borders of The Historic Native Born White American Nation…..This will of course require mass expulsions………

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  116. Anonymous[168] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    The native peoples of the Americas are Native Americans, not whites. White are native to Europe and settled North America.

    Don’t fall for the narrative drummed out by the media. The media has one purpose: to deliver your scraggly ass into the clutches of Israel.

    My ancestors migrated to North America by sailing ship, almost 400 years ago. I am a native, native-born resident of North America, of English and German bloodlines.

    And I don’t give two shits what the “Mohicans” want to make of it.

  117. Anonymous[168] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    It’s OK to be White.

    I favor the “Why do you hate white people?” meme over the chickenshit of “It’s OK to be white.”, which sounds like a Crest toothpaste commercial out-take.

    Or, hell, kick it up a notch. “White people are better.” Why concede any rhetorical advantage? Spit it out and kick some ass.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Them Guys
  118. Anonymous[168] • Disclaimer says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Why shouldn’t Force and Vioence be used to reclaim the old borders of The Historic Native Born White American Nation…..This will of course require mass expulsions………

    Why? Because the ability to expel undesirables is a function of the degree of control over some finite area, and whether that area is urban, suburban, or rural.

  119. Rurik says:
    @TTSSYF

    It doesn’t change the fact that Iran is ruled by religious fanatics and are State sponsors of terrorism.

    how are they ‘state sponsors of terrorism’?

    there is exactly zero evidence that they carried out the Marine barracks bombing. Zero.

    And all I’ve seen Iran do in the last few decades is fight the very real terrorists that the ZUSA and Saudi Arabia have been funding and arming in order to do a ‘Libya’ on Syria.

    Fighting against stone age, head-slicing sub-human orcs – is not state-sponsored terrorism, but quite the opposite.

    Iran has suffered terribly from the intrigues, treachery, atrocities and oppression of the zio-west for decades now. We imposed the brutal Shah. We foisted a war using CIA, Rumsfeld asset Saddam , to slaughter untold Iranians with horrific, ZUS provided weapons.

    If any nation has a right to hold very real grievances against the ZUSA, it is Iran.

    And the world’s most criminal purveyor and sponsor of terrorism – is the ZUSA, in case you hadn’t noticed.

    And why do you think it’s (((my society)))?

    I don’t. That’s not what I said. I said (((theirs))). Meaning Zionist Jewish supremacists. Duh.

    You are come across as someone so crazed with anger that you can’t engage in a rational discussion, even with those of us who essentially agree with you.

    we all have our peccadillos ;)

  120. Rurik says:
    @Anonymous

    It’s OK to be White.

    the reason that simple meme is so powerful, is because of the reaction to it.

    ‘No it’s NOT!’

    is their kneejerk, Pavlovian vomitus reflex

    these innocuous little notes are driving them insane with rage

    and that is the point.

    It allows the lemmingry to see behind the thinly veiled, psychotic racial hatred the progressive left has for all ‘bad’ (unapologetic) White folks.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  121. DB Cooper says:

    “What China is doing is brutalitarian. But what China is saying with its ruthless policy is that diversity — religious, racial, cultural — can break us apart as it did the USSR. ”

    I always find it interesting that people who have a healthy skeptisim of the MSM nonsense like Pat have no trouble drinking the MSM kool-aid when it comes to other issues. The MSM certainly has an agenda when it comes to China ‘reporting’ and should be taken as a grain of salt. So how are Uighurs people doing in Xinjiang? Seems pretty happy to me in this youtube clip. Should you dismiss it as a piece of Chinese government propaganda? You be the judge.

  122. Thomm says:
    @CrazedIndiot

    He’s a hindoo pretending to be white but I think he truly believes he really is white.

    Wrong again, you stupid wigger. Then again, you idiots also think Thorfinsson and DB Cooper are Indian. If you took off your gimp suit and went outside once in a while, you might actually have a clue about the outside world.

    Remember, you are not a member of the functional white race. You are just where the wastematter collects for efficient removal, as decided by Mother Nature. This is why we keep you out of respectable white society.

    Get off my lawn, faggot!

    Heh heh heh heh

  123. Thomm says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    The only thought a 50-IQ wigger like ‘War for Blair Mountain’ is capable of is projection.

    He is stupid even relative to the other WN wiggers here.

    For one thing, basic, third-grade grammar is above this idiot’s IQ level.

    Sux to be you…..

  124. Them Guys says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    As a One final chance to avoid blood shed in America. Whiteys need to assemble a multi-million member team of, Stout Snout Smackers. SSS for short….With each White man and women armed with a four to five foot long, 2×2 wood furring strip as their main Snout Smacker tool/weapon. And be dispersed into every sector of America that are inhabited by the various, lefty type Marxists and radical militant Negros, etc. Especially wherever huge Dem party rallies and speech events are held at.

    Then each 2×2 wooden armed Snout Smacker White simply needs to listen and observe, and whenever they detect such lefty agitators and nation traitors spewing their lies, and anti-whitey putrid stench. Then simply administer a Stout, Snout Smack Via four/five foot long wooden 2×2. Just one good solid smack upon the snout and such lefty clowns will see stars, and realize they will no longer be tolerated, period. Plus, before such snout smack actions are taken, it would be also good to have a helicopter fly above and over lefty crowds, and drop leaflets that describe why it is best for all lefty’s to quit being traitors and anti-whiteys, or exit the country asap fast. For if they refuse to heed this warning, and if several hard snout smacks do not get the job done…

    Then the Patriot Whiteys shall be forced to replace every 2×2 wooden snout smacker tool, with a nice fully loaded, AR-15, or an, MIA-308 and deal with naysayer lefty’s in a most prudent and proper way. Ie:…..Quit lefty crap, or Leave America for good, or…Blammo! heheheh..

  125. Thomm says:

    I have not posted my song for WNs in several months. I request permission to post it here for easy access, given how much they enjoy the song, but have difficulty finding it in the archives.

    It is a song I wrote so as to provide the White Trashionalists with a theme to rally around. The lyrics fit into the beat of ‘Mean Green Mother’ from the film ‘Little Shop of Horrors’ :

    [MORE]

    Now, here it is. The theme song for WN wiggers :

    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    And I am mad.
    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    And it looks like I’ve been haaaaad.
    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    Smarter whites always put me back in my place,
    I’m envious and green!
    And I look……BAD!

    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    My IQ does lag.
    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    And I want others to hold the baaaaag…
    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    I smear the jizz of other men all ova mah face,
    I’m a meany queeeen!
    And I am a….. FAG!

    _________________________________________

    This is a superb song that encapsulates everything that WN wiggers are about. They gladly use this as their theme song with pride!

    Heh heh heh heh

  126. Thomm says:

    Thank you! This makes it easy for those who need the song to access it quickly.

    Thanks again!

  127. Them Guys says:
    @Anonymous

    Picture how, Rabidly Foam at Mouth Insane the nationwide reactions would be if…A Vast majority of front lawns in the usa had a lawn sign displayed for all to see, that stated…”Whites & Blacks, Demand an End to….Anti-Gentilism!”…..”No more, Anti-Goyim, Anti-Gentilism!” Or any of below example slogans.

    Help STOP: All forms of Radical Jewish Racism and Jewish Separatism!

    It’s Time for, Jew’s to End their Vast, Massive Hatred of White gentile’s!

    Nobody should, nor need Feel as a Lesser person compared to a Jew! Stop Jewish Hatred against Gentile’s!

    Perhaps a mixture of all above sign slogans dispersed all over American front lawns, eh?

    It is 100% Legal, 100% Your own private property and business. Ergo, Jews can whine and cry all they desire to, and Nobody need pay any Jews any Heed and Keep signs Posted up in well viewed areas.

    Maybe even for the very daring Whiteys, a large sign that simply states…”FUCK You JewBoy!

    • Replies: @Them Guys
    , @Anonymous
  128. Them Guys says:
    @Them Guys

    PS: The Same lawn signs agenda can be used for Voters. Such as a Huge Lawn sign that states.

    “I will ONLY Cast My Vote For: A Pro-White Candidit that Represent’s My White Interest’s, Issues, and Concern’s!”

    “Atten! Voting Whitey’s….Refuse to Vote for, Anybody who does not Care about American White’s!”

    “Atten! White Voter’s…You represent a Vast 2/3rd’s Majority of USA Voter’s! Make Good Use of this and Elect ONLY Pro-White Officials!”

    It would stir up some massive attention from Officials wishing to get elected or re-elected, eh. And every MSM TV talker head who speaks against it, will fast be seen as another, Anti-White, Racist! and hate Monger Nazi!

    Fight, Fire, With Fire. Turn the lefts and Jews/Negro methods back against, Them.

  129. Thomm=nincompoop….

    • Replies: @Thomm
  130. Thomm says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    What incredible wit!!! I am floored! Did you come up with that all by yourself??

    Look, I realize that your life sucks due to your extremely low IQ and extreme wigger tendencies. Sorry, but nature designates some bottom-tier member of our race to be wastebaskets through which genetic waste matter is expelled.

    The other 80% of us are awesome *because* you wiggers are where the wastematter goes, enabling the rest of us to exhibit such excellence. You perform an important natural function, even as we keep you out of respectable white society. Remember, the females of your race become the fat bluehaired feminists.

    Heh heh heh heh

  131. Anonymous[155] • Disclaimer says:
    @Them Guys

    Anti-Gentilism like Jewsus’? Jewsus openly and explicitly denounces Gentiles in Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, and Luke 22:25.

    Christianity is anti-White; it’s time you face up to reality.

    “Christianity, sprung from Jewish roots and comprehensible only as a growth on this soil, represents the counter-movement to any morality of breeding, of race, privilege: it is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence. Christianity—the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of chandala values, the gospel preached to the poor and base, the general revolt of all the downtrodden, the wretched, the failures, the less favored, against ‘race:’ the undying chandala hatred is disguised as a religion of love.”

    Friedrich Nietzsche
    Twilight of the Idols

    • Replies: @Svigor
  132. Svigor says:
    @Deschutes

    What kind of babbling bullshit is this?

    • Replies: @densa
  133. Svigor says:
    @Anonymous

    Jews (like you) are anti-white; it’s why they hate Christianity so much.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  134. Anonymous[342] • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor

    Svigor, you’ve levied that false accusation that I’m a Jew before. Not only are you a habitual liar, it appears that you project.

    For it is we [Christians] who are the Circumcision. Phillipians 3:3

    Yep, you’re the Jew if the Bible is right, or at least a pathetic Jew-wannabee. What sort of mewling lowlife would ever want to identify as “the Circumcision?” LOL You, apparently. Do you think sucking baby dicks and mutilating genitals is fun?

    Some time you’ll have to face the reality inside the Jew Testament instead of lashing out so ineptly.

  135. anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Found this one but it only took a second which means you’d have found it too. Plus it’s more than a little goofy and avoids the real issues involved.

    https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-aac51136242bc5fff7567a030061b057

    Here’s an example of such an issue (though it neglects Albany, Buffalo etc)

    The real problem is that we’re way too mixed up geographically. But I actually agree that separation is essential. Get enough people together and if Ron doesn’t want to open a thread on the topic I’ll donate some of my web space.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  136. Anonymous[384] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    The real problem is that we’re way too mixed up geographically. But I actually agree that separation is essential. Get enough people together and if Ron doesn’t want to open a thread on the topic I’ll donate some of my web space.

    The demographic map (basically, that’s what it is) of NY shows why state lines must be ignored, should any partitioning ever become possible. As you know, most, if not all, states show blue concentrations in heavily-urban areas (where the non-productive and non-citizens congregate to defraud the productive of benefit of their own tax revenues).

    Frankly, I suspect that government corruption is more punitive upon the productive than any other identifiable entity (ies), but partitioning along productive/unproductive border lines might produce some improvement in that category as well.

    The change of Anonymous(Number) is a product of not saving cookies. Sorry about that.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  137. Anonymous[175] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Should any partitioning ever become possible, NYC will first have to install a couple of Luke Skywalker’s vaporators.

    Meaning, no partitioning of rural areas from urban areas is possible. The urban areas must either be conquered by the rurals, or the rurals will be conquered by the urbanites. And looking at the history of civilization, rural peoples always loose.

    Always. Ask the Injuns or the Vikings or the Hmong. Degenerate cities win.

  138. When I just finished reading Pat’s column it seemed a copy of the column written by Mona Charen in today’s Austin American-Statesman. She writes for Creators Syndicate and her column was entitled “The unpardonable heresy of perhaps being correct.”

  139. Pat is one of the three founders of The American Conservative (2002) and – even though TAC has become year-by-year, more-and-more a globalist-minded, often liberal watering hole – Pat’s twice-weekly column has until now always appeared.

    However, Pat’s Sept 14th “The Unpardonable Heresy of Tucker Carlson” has not yet appeared at The American Conservative. I have written to ask TAC what the problem is, but have not yet (Monday, Sept 17th, 3:30 pm) received an explanation. I’m hoping that the explanation is an innocent one.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  140. Rurik says:
    @Kurt Gayle

    The American Cuckservative is a den of cowards and whores.

    There’s more integrity in my dog’s poop that the entire editorial staff of the Cuckservative.

    There is in this land and beyond, an enforced pall over any speech or thought that violates the strict parameters of acceptable opinions enforced by the politically correct priests of discourse, and the American Cuckservative are venal and sanctimonious purveyors of that Orwellian doublethink.

    Are Zionist Jewish supremacists subverting out foreign policy and ‘defense’ institutions to benefit Israel at the expense of the American people?

    HOW DARE YOU ASK SUCH VERBOTEN QUESTIONS YOU ANTI-SEMITE!!!!

    - They fulminate.

    They’re like a Lindsey Graham or Paul Ryan wannabe. Envious of the lucre and status of those whores of Zion. But if Graham and co. can amass shekels in their way, the Cuck figures it can do it with Yellow whournalism their way.

    Why anyone would bother with that cowardly rag after they canned Phil Giraldi, is quite beyond me.

    More here:

    http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-american-cuckservative/

    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
  141. @Rurik

    Thank you for the link.

    Did you notice that there was no caption to accompany the photo of Sean Hannity with David Webb?

    My guess is that Hannity loves black conservatives, like Webb, who peddle the safe cuckservative dogma that “its not whitey’s fault, its liberalism that is to blame.”

    • Replies: @Josep
  142. anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Good post. TeeVee (and what it represents) is at the core of all our ills.

  143. densa says:
    @Svigor

    It’s your public school tax dollars at work.

  144. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Rurik

    Prague is a nice place.

    And I think many Eastern European people, who have an unhappy familiarity with the Bolsheviks and their evil ways, are relatively immune from the destructive impulses of far too many members of the Tribe.

  145. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Rurik

    The subtlety is what makes it so powerful.

    It would not work if it was something like “white is great.”

  146. Josep says:
    @Liberty Mike

    “its not whitey’s fault, its liberalism that is to blame.”

    Wait… if they say it’s not the fault of white man and that liberalism is the culprit, then how is this “cuckservative”?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.