The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
Is America's Racial Divide Permanent?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

For Roseanne Barr, star of ABC’s hit show “Roseanne,” there would be no appeal. When her tweet hit, she was gone.

“Roseanne’s Twitter statement, is abhorrent, repugnant and inconsistent with our values, and we have decided to cancel her show,” declaimed Channing Dungey, the black president of ABC Entertainment.

Targeting Valerie Jarrett, a confidante and aide of President Barack Obama, Roseanne had tweeted: If the “muslim brotherhood & the planet of the apes had a baby=vj.”

Offensive, juvenile, crude, but was that not pretty much the job description ABC had in mind for the role of Roseanne in the show?

Roseanne also tweeted that George Soros, 87-year-old radical-liberal billionaire, had been a Nazi “who turned in his fellow Jews 2 be murdered in German concentration camps and stole their wealth.”

The Soros slur seems far more savage than the dumb racial joke about Jarrett, but it was the latter that got Roseanne canned.

Her firing came the same day that 175,000 employees of 8,000 Starbucks’s stores were undergoing four hours of instruction to heighten their racial sensitivities.

These training sessions, said The Washington Post, “marked the start of Starbucks’ years-long commitment to new diversity and sensitivity programs after two African-Americans were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks on April 12.”

The Philly Starbucks manager, a woman, had called the cops when the two black men she took to be loiterers refused to leave.

Rachel Siegel of the Post describes the four-hour session:

“At first the employees are prompted to find differences. They watched a video in which (Starbucks head) Howard Schultz talks about his vision for a more inclusive company and country. They reflected what a place of belonging means to them. And they examine their own biases.

“Each group viewed a documentary underwritten by Starbucks and directed by Stanley Nelson. In the film people of color talk about experiences of being followed in stores. Footage from the civil rights movement quickly progresses to 21st-century cellphone videos capturing people being dragged off a plane, threatened in a New York deli and choked at a North Carolina Waffle House.”

On reading this, the terms “Orwellian” and “re-education camp” come to mind.

Earlier in May, the NFL issued a rule saying players who refuse to stand for the national anthem must remain in the locker room. If they take a knee on the field this coming season, they can be punished and the team fined.

Great was the outrage when this ruling came. The First Amendment rights of black players were being brutally trampled upon.

Yet the NFL has always had restrictions on behavior, from evicting players from the game for unsportsmanlike conduct to curtailing end-zone dances.

What is the common thread that runs through these social clashes from just this last month?

It is race. Each episode fits neatly into the great media narrative of an irredeemably racist America of white oppressors and black victims.

Had it been two white guys hanging out in that Philly Starbucks, who were told by the manager to buy a cup of coffee or get out, the spat would never have become a national story.

These incidents, coming as they do 50 years after the historic advances in civil rights, induce a deep pessimism that this country will ever escape from the endlessly boiling cauldron of racial conflict.

Today, because of cellphone videos, social media, 24-hour cable and the subsequent nationalization of even the most trivial incidents, our national conversation is more suffused than ever with matters of race.

For many, race has become a constant preoccupation.

And in each of these incidents and disputes, the country divides along the familiar fault lines, and the accusations and arguments go on and on until a new incident engenders a new argument.

The America of the 1960s, with its civil rights clashes and “long hot summers,” was a far more segregated society than today. Yet the toxic charge of “racist” is far more common now.

And how much do these conversations correspond to the real crisis of black America? Here is a sentence culled from another Post story this week: “Three fatal shootings …over the Memorial Day weekend brought the (Ward 8 total) to 30 homicides so far this year.”

Are white cops really the problem in Ward 8, Anacostia, when 30 people in that black community have been shot or stabbed to death in the first five months of 2018?

ORDER IT NOW

Washington, D.C., spends more per student than almost any other school district. Yet the test scores of vast numbers of black kids have already fallen below “proficiency” levels by the time they reach fourth and eighth grade, and the high school truancies have reached scandalous levels.

How does ABC’s cashiering of “Roseanne,” or apologies to the two guys at Starbucks, or restrictions on the rights of millionaire NFL players to kneel during our national anthem address the real crisis?

Is white America really black America’s biggest problem?

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of a new book, “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2018 Creators.com.

 
• Category: Ideology, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Blacks, Political Correctness 
Hide 128 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Many places in the real world don’t have a racial divide. Believe it or not, different races can live together just fine. The media just has to play it up to distract.

  2. The Soros slur seems far more savage

    Yeh Pat, white knight for that kike scum soros…

    You know damn well that quote is directly attributed to the traitor.

    • Replies: @pyrrhus
  3. Mishra says:

    When and if the Ruling Tribe wants racial amity in America, we’ll have it.

    Don’t hold your breath.

  4. It’s not permanent if one race finally exterminates the other, as predicted by this guy:

    “Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites, ten thousand recollections by the blacks of the injuries they have sustained, new provocations, the real distinctions which nature has made, and many other circumstances will divide us into parties and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race.”

    Thomas Jefferson
    Notes on Virgina (1782)

    Basically the same opinion, different fellow:

    “A Civilization is a dominant community that imposes its beliefs upon all other communities by violence, which must involve the use of genocide; so any community that recoils from inflicting genocide will suffer genocide.”

    Philip Atkinson
    http://www.ourcivilisation.com/

    Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

    Now we prey.

    “Genocide is as human as art or prayer.”

    John Gray
    Professor of European Thought at the London School of Economics and Political Science

    So let’s get going. There’s no other choice. God willing, we will prevail in peace and freedom from fear and in true health through the purity and essence of our natural fluids. God bless you all.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @anonymous
  5. RVBlake says:

    I would wager that those 175,000 Starbucks employees have had their racial sensitivities heightened, but not in the way their groveling CEO intended.

  6. Way to be bold, Pat.

    I know it, you know it, we all know what’s going on with racial genetics regulating IQ, impulse control, every behavioral instinct. And we all know who’s behind this increasing propaganda blitzkrieg to balkanize traditional Christian America.

    Yet all you’re able to do is ask a series of questions. God forbid you name the Jew. Maybe that’s why our problems continue to accelerate, every pundit’s only comfortable dropping hints and oblique suggestions.

  7. Does anyone really think that ABC entertainment’s black president Channing Dungey was hired because she was the best candidate for the job?

    As for blacks themselves, even in countries that never had slavery like the UK, France and Canada, the same problems persist. They’re simply unable to function in a civilized society.

  8. @Joel Walbert

    What ever you are smoking is too strong.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Joel Walbert
  9. nickels says:

    Sensitivity training like this has nothing to do with its stated aims-it is aimed solely at displaying hegemony. It reports to people of European descent that you have no power, you can be humiliated or fired arbitrarily for any perceived or manufactured slight, no matter how unreasonable.
    And it isn’t necessarily about black hegemony, but, more, about Jewish hegemony, and the fact that people like Schultz can move you (and the blacks) around like pawns, whenever he likes.

    Schultz would like you to take this bait and go to war against people of color, but a more immediate goal should be stringing people like him up from the lampposts.

  10. expat47 says:

    Blacks have a casual approach to violence.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    , @TTSSYF
  11. Corvinus says:
    @Chris Mallory

    Joel is absolutely correct here.

  12. Corvinus says:
    @Echoes of History

    “So let’s get going. There’s no other choice. God willing, we will prevail in peace and freedom from fear and in true health through the purity and essence of our natural fluids. God bless you all.”

    I will assume that you are trolling here, as in what you are promoting is pure evil. Now, IF you are actually serious about the matter, why don’t YOU get going? Thankfully, we know you won’t, as you are only blowing off steam and lack the guile and gumption to engage in this inhumane action.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  13. @Corvinus

    Shortest post you’ve ever written … yet still wrong.

  14. Tiny Duck says:

    No, white people just need to do better

    • Replies: @Wally
  15. Is America’s racial divide permanent?

    Let’s hope so. But this ‘divide’ needn’t be toxic.

    Racial boundaries and identities can exist only so long as people are given the choice and opportunity to remain distinct and separate.

    Big Government and (((Big Media))) however want to amalgamate the races. They keep telling us that there are no important human differences involving race. Millions believe otherwise. This makes them ‘racist’.

    But human divisions involving race are universal. Universal.

    Even in countries as genetically mixed as Brazil or in hyper-diverse cities like SF and Miami, humans self-segregate along an array of characteristics; this includes language, age, ethnicity, class, education, appearance, race and sexual orientation. This separation is normal and natural. It needn’t produce violence or war.

    Racial cohesion and racial continuity needn’t be toxic or even problematic. Racial boundaries reflect history. Genetic history. They are expressions of unique isolation and natural selection. Again, this is normal and natural.

    Race is the expression of family-clan-kin writ large. Nothing more. It is an indelible part of human identity. And we see genetic boundaries of this sort expressed everywhere in nature.

    Does this surprise you? It shouldn’t.

    Race will matter as long as physical appearances matter. This will be for eternity.

    • Replies: @Wally
  16. @expat47

    I grew up in a predominately black neighborhood. The amount of casual violence I witnessed was pretty shocking.

  17. @Corvinus

    Separate but equal with space between to meet and mingle is the only solution. Otherwise there will be continued conflict, both hot and cold.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  18. Some 50,000 years of separate evolution in profoundly different environments, with some ten thousand years of that evolution fueled by increasingly intense cultural selection for those on the Eurasian land mass, have created large and significant differences in aggregate genotype and phenotype between populations of sub-Saharan ancestry and populations of European, and particularly northern European, ancestry. These differences express themselves at the aggregate level in profound differences in intelligence and personality, characteristics critical in determining what type of cultural, social, political, and economic system will best suit a particular population.

    Although there is a large overlap in individual character traits and many Negroes will function well and be well-served in societies created and best suited for Whites, most Negroes will never adapt to nor be entirely comfortable in such societies. The same observation applies to Whites in Negro dominated societies. I cannot think of a current or historical country whose population is mostly divided between those of European and those of sub-Saharan ancestry, with neither race absolutely predominating, that is not racked by constant violence, racial conflict, and other forms of social discord. Among such societies, in those cases where Negroes ultimately obtain the upper hand, the society degenerates in ways that are inimical to White survival, e.g., among other examples, the recent ones of Zimbabwe and South Africa.

    Unfortunately, the current Negro community in the USA, most particularly the large proportion uniquely unsuited by inherited characteristics to thrive in and benefit a society designed by and for Whites, is to a large degree composed of persons whose ancestors were forced to be here. Their disruptive presence is none of their doing. The only possible eventual solution to the USA’s current racial problems, i.e., the separation of Whites and Negroes into two separate nations and increasingly divergent societies, can only be accomplished in a moral fashion if the Negro minority (about 12% of the population or 30 to 40 million people) is granted an equitable distribution of the country’s current land mass and resources. If we do not start seriously considering this possibility and how it might be accomplished, we’ll see either an endless recycling of the nation’s racial disorders or the worst genocide in human history.

    One final point is that the current push by the USA’s establishment and elites to add further significant racial and ethnic divisions to this already disastrously dysfunctional situation can only make matters worse and perhaps make a reasonable and moral solution impossible.

  19. @Truth

    Reparations will provide black Americans with the funding to create their own space, away from white racism and supremacy. A true separate but equal regime will work best for both blacks and whites. I believe the vast majority of blacks and whites would favor such a scheme. White liberals, of course, would be against it.

    • Replies: @Anon
  20. @Corvinus

    How is it “pure evil” to ensure the survival of your nation? Are you taking the side of the Leftists against the American nation’s genocide of the “merciless Indian savages” as they’re called in the Declaration of Independence? Ward Churchill, is that you?

    Deliver our nation from immigration.
    Deliver our people from invasion.
    Deliver us from Arab, Black, and Asian.

    St. Breivik, pray for us.

    The Swede’s Prayer

    P.S. Starting with prayer isn’t just “blowing off steam,” unless you’re an atheist. I think you’re some kind of deviated prevert.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @TomSchmidt
  21. anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Echoes of History

    Hasn’t your satanic kind already been practising what you preach?

    Of course, there are plenty ways by which genocide is made to look otherwise… you know, like, “humanitarianism.”

    Your evil kind are masters at that disguise.

    God bless you all.

    LOL! Good luck with that!

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
    , @Ians
  22. @Truth

    Though short as one can get, your comment here deserves a reply (unlike Corvinus, who will keep replying with the same stuff without ever answering a logical argument).

    I don’t disagree, Truth, that the Lyin’ Press and other media have worsened the racial problems in this country. They thrive on any kind of controversy; it’s 24 x 7 infotainment. However, I don’t agree that different races mixed together will get along just fine otherwise.

    Mark Green above (#16) said it better than I can, but just to add to that: It’s the forcing of races and ethnic groups to live together that’s the problem. As is almost always the case, Big Gov’t is the cause of the problems. As a Libertarian, I see no reason children of different races should be forced to go to the same schools, or that schools should be forced to let in any children they don’t want, so long as the school is not taxpayer-supported. This basic freedom has been lost – “freedom of association.”

    As a Conservative, I think it’s OK to NOTICE differences among groups and to act accordingly. Unless you want to look all the way back to the slave-traders (of VARIOUS races), it’s the US Feral Gov’t that has created this racial shit show, with the “Great Society” welfare programs AND “civil rites” programs about at the same time just > 50 years back. It is kind of interesting that it all started around the same time… hmmmmm…. oh, and feminism too… one couldn’t have planned it better if one were a die-hard Communist infiltrator, dead set on destroying American culture … hmmmm, again ….

    • Replies: @Truth
  23. Mulegino1 says:

    Race must be a dividing factor, since, in a cultural sense, many or most Americans of Christian European descent have been negrified, even with little actual intermarriage or interbreeding, yet that has only lead to a greater chasm between the races:

    The US has been compared, not without justification, to a melting-pot. It actually presents us with a case in which a human type was formed, with characteristics that are to a large extent uniform and constant, from out of a highly heterogeneous raw material. Emigrating to America, men of the most diverse peoples receive the same imprint; after two generations, except in rare cases, they lose almost all of their original characteristics, reproducing a fairly homogeneous unit in terms of mentality, sensibility, and behavior: the American type.

    In this regard, theories such as those formulated by Frobenius and Spengler, who have asserted that there is a close relationship between the forms of a given culture and a kind of “soul” bound to the natural environment, to the “landscape” and the original population, do not seem applicable. Otherwise, an essential part of American culture would have been possessed by the indigenous element, which consists of Amerindians, the redskins. The red Indians were proud races with their own style, their own dignity, sensibility and forms of religiosity; not without justification, a traditionalist writer, F. Schuon, spoke of the presence in their being, of something “aquiline and solar.” And we will not hesitate to assert that had it been their spirit that to an appreciable extent had imbued – in its best aspects and on an appropriate plane – the human material thrown into the “American melting pot,” the level of American civilization would probably be higher.[2]

    Instead, besides its Puritan-Protestant component (which, in turn, as a result of its fetishistic emphasis on the Old Testament, possesses many judaized, degenerate traits), it seems that it is precisely the negro element, in its primitivism, that has set the tone in important aspects of the American psyche. It is already characteristic that when speaking of American folklore, it is to the Negroes one is referring, as if they were the original inhabitants of the country. Thus, the famous Porgy and Bess by the Jew Gershwin, which deals exclusively with blacks, is considered in the US to be a classic work inspired by “American folklore.” The composer has declared that he lived for some time among American blacks in preparation for this work.

    But the phenomenon of popular and dance music is even more conspicuous and general. Fitzgerald was not wrong when he said that in one of its main aspects, American civilization can be called a civilization of jazz, i.e., of a negrified music and dance. In this domain, very singular “elective affinities” have led America, by way of a process of regression and primitivization, to imitate the Negroes. Assuming there would be a need for frenzied rhythms and forms as a legitimate compensation for the mechanical and materialistic soullessness of modern civilization, one would have done much better to look to the many sources available in Europe: we have elsewhere mentioned, for example, the dance rhythms of South Eastern Europe, which often have something truly Dionysian. But America has chosen to imitate the blacks and the Afro-Cubans, and then from America the contagion has gradually spread to all other countries.

    Julius Evola

    The loss of our own dignity due to this process has actually created resentment towards blacks, in my opinion. The degradation of our own tastes in deference to the subterranean aesthetics and culture of the ghetto and our inability as a people to compete with blacks in things in which they excel, and to lower the standards in the things that we in turn excel at, has lead to a kind of inferiority complex among us. The blacks are certainly not to blame for this- we did it to ourselves and our children. The cuckoisie among us, egged on by the Jews as stage managers of the spectacle, traded in our own great and proud cultural and civilizational heritage for the pottage of spectator sports, rap, the embrace of the concept of “white privilege”, and the idea of the eternally righteous black victim and the eternally guilty white perpetrator- thereby justifying the high crime and recidivist rate in the black community. No society can survive for very long on such ethno-masochistic self-hatred and disavowal of its ancestral culture.

    Insofar as we go our own separate ways and return to our own authentic cultural heritage and spirituality, there will be much improvement in relations between the races.

    • Replies: @joe webb
  24. @Chris Mallory

    @Chris Mallory

    No such thing as too strong, but that has nothing to do with it. No racial tensions in the city I live in.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  25. @anonymous

    You’ve just furthered racial divides. You say “your kind,” i.e., my kin, my blood relatives, family relations, a recognition of different races or breeds in humans. Then you insult them with a mean-spirited epithet, causing division.

    Of course you realize, this means war.

  26. @Joel Walbert

    Science says otherwise, here is a large (and growing) reference list of studies finding strong and accumulating evidence that Diversity™ + Proximity = War. http://heartiste.wordpress.com/diversity-proximity-war-the-reference-list/

  27. Corvinus says:
    @SunBakedSuburb

    “Separate but equal with space between to meet and mingle is the only solution.”

    Already been done with astounding failure. Southrons couldn’t even adhere to the Plessy ruling–separate but equal. They foolishly prohibited blacks from exercising their liberties and under penalty of social ostracism, at best, and the noose, at worst, southern white men and women from marrying and procreating with blacks. Fortunately, Southrons got their legal comeuppance, compliments of freedom minded citizens.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  28. Corvinus says:
    @Echoes of History

    “How is it “pure evil” to ensure the survival of your nation?”

    Except it’s not “your” nation, it is “our” nation. And you are only ensuring the survival of those whom you deem to be “your kind” at the expense of anyone who gets in your way. Which, we all know, you are not going to follow through with your murderous crime spree.

    “Are you taking the side of the Leftists against the American nation’s genocide of the “merciless Indian savages” as they’re called in the Declaration of Independence?”

    It wasn’t “Leftists” who genocided Native Americans, it was Europeans.

    “St. Breivik, pray for us.”

    He was no saint. He was the deviated pervert.

    “Of course you realize, this means war.”

    Spoken like an armchair warrior. You are not going to do anything of the kind.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  29. Wally says:
    @Joel Walbert

    said:
    ” The media just has to play it up to distract.”

    Who is “the media”?

  30. Wally says:
    @Tiny Duck

    Yeah boy, especially all those”white people” in shithole Africa.

  31. Wally says:
    @mark green

    Except “Big Government” supports strict Israeli immigration laws which mandate JEWS ONLY, while demanding massive low IQ, 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe.

  32. joe webb says:
    @Mulegino1

    this is more anti-genetics and anti-Darwin and antipathy to the results of the identical twin studies that prove that genetics trumps environment a hundred to zip.

    Evola is a nut-case, a spiritualist, a magical thinker, a word freak. Say the magic word and win an essay contest, like liberals and jews and college admissions essays.

    This stuff is all ideology, as in the original sense of false consciousness. False consciousness for the marxists was class based. False consciousness for religions types is devil based. Etc. False consciousness for the college educated liberal-arts is Race Equality….Feel -Goodism, Global Rights for all.

    False consciousness for biologically oriented people is altruistically based, or stupidity based, or opportunism based. All of the dopiness of true believers ultimately goes up in smoke, these days soon to come, in civil war.

    two thirds of folks now in the US , per a good poll, see race as a huge problem. a year or two ago it was like about a third.

    It is going to blow-up soon. It is going to blow-up because the 60s white liberal/rad folks like myself thought the black folks were equal to us white folks. (Did I know any blacks? Nope.)
    Probably most black folks did not think they were really equal. Ditto now, except that there is money and prestige in mau-mauing whites.

    Likewise, the economism of marxism failed almost as quickly as the Black Miracle. Both have proven to be duds and we are in the Hit-the-Wall period now. A big crash. Nothing works. derangement, not only the Trump kind, but the alphabet soup type of all the Oppression types.

    Whites have not been blackened by black anti-culture. As in Brazil, only the lowest quintile of whites can hangout in black culture and be negrified to some degreee, especially when rejected as white trash by conservative whites. These folks were always more or less Marx’s low-rent lumpens. useless.

    Right now a large part of the membership of the Dem Party is rejecting the black and liberal crazies of their own party. These blue-collar and lower-middle types do not care for the loony ones. Only the upper middle Dems, and limousine liberals, and Silicon Va. like to snap their fingers to the jive .

    I find that liberals around where I live do not LIKE the blacks, chinese especially, and Mexicans, but offer Excuses for the bad behavior. They recognize what good behavior is yet entertain illusions about how Change! can come. I talked to two of these types today, They agreed with my general racialism but still “hoped” that things could be better. I told then to stop hoping and start thinking.

    IN short, the whites who luv the blacks are few, and gutter trash anyway, with no projects but sex and rock and roll, etc. Low life.

    We will survive the blacks and beaners. The chinese and the jews are another story.

    Biology always wins. I have suggested that we are Melville’s White Whale…the Force of Nature, that will kill all the puffed-up liberals, as well as their totem animals. All the teddy bears baring real teeth and coming to life.

    Joe Webb

  33. The irony is that Valerie Jarrett does look a little like a character from Planet of the Apes. Take a look.

    • Replies: @gustafus
  34. Realist says:
    @Joel Walbert

    Many places in the real world don’t have a racial divide.

    That’s because many places are mono racial.

  35. Renoman says:

    I laughed when I read her Tweet, the Country has lost it’s sense of humor but worry not, she’ll make money on this. The blacks bring it on themselves by acting like a bunch of jerks.

  36. @Corvinus

    You don’t even know what the word “nation” means. Nation stems from the L. natal, meaning related to birth. A nat-ion is a people related by birth, i.e., kin, relations, race, and implies a people who speak the same language and have the same customs. Just like, you know, that strange book called the dictionary says.

    A large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular state or territory.
    oxforddictionaries.com/definition/nation

    And those not of our nation have to go back. I’ve already acted, voting for the fair haired God Emperor of the White Nation of America. And yes, voting the way we “deplorables” did is war on the invasion of foreign immigrants, as NPR, Wash Post, NYT, etal have all written. The war will also intensify.

    Choose your side carefully in this war, because traitors to their nation like you have no place to go back. Well what did you expect in an opera? A happy ending?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  37. Ians says:
    @anonymous

    This deranged clown – ‘Echoes..’ – used to post on Takimag as ‘Attila’and was responsible, along with a few other nutjobs, in having the site shut down its Comments facility.
    His worship of the insane mass-murderer, Breivik, is the tell. He’s a poisonous POC.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  38. The recent uptick in white identity politics is amusing evidence of the human tendency to react too slowly to emergent trends. We tend to respond to slowly growing threats only after these trends have become irreversible. It’s the course we are taking with climate change and it’s funny to note that, this usually malign propensity, has actually been beneficial with regard to white identity politics.

    The question setting the tone for american politics in the short term is whether republicans will be able to pull away white democrats more quickly than the overall share of the white population in the country shrinks.

    In the long term, however, none of this really matters because whites are irreversibly headed for minority status. There will come a time when they can vote for the republicans in percentages approaching those by which blacks currently support the democrats, and not make a difference in election outcomes. This, in essence, will be the inevitable South Africa-ization of the country’s politics. Trump’s election certainly doesn’t bode well for the treatment white folks can expect when that phase of American society comes to pass.

    As a non-white person, I’m baffled that you would pick this moment in history to throw in your lot with the Trumpists and pick a fight. It seems imprudent to have abandoned a long standing commitment to rule of law and egalitarianism just when you are on the verge of demographic defeat and would have the most to suffer from the new norms you are establishing. But then again, democratic constituencies do not think strategically.

  39. TTSSYF says:
    @expat47

    I think many of them enjoy it. They seem to enjoy chaos and anarchy.

  40. TTSSYF says:
    @Corvinus

    Please, tell us Southrons again how you do it up North, in such shining examples as Chicago, Baltimore, Philly, Newark, just to name a few?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @TheJester
  41. @ElitistSettler

    Seems like you’re advocating for a race war.

    • Replies: @ElitistSettler
  42. @Ians

    Breivik was found not criminally insane in 2012. So who’s the deranged clown now? What is insane is destroying a nation via immigration and not expecting consequences.

    Breivik’s action was also quite effective in changing politics in Norway, because Norwegians agree with his beef, and don’t want to such actions to become necessary in their country. Are Norwegians deranged clowns too?

    Breivik wasn’t a madman. He simply put into action on what many Norwegians were thinking and his murderous actions were a warning sign of what was to come if the current program of mass immigration was maintained.

    The Norwegian people have turned against mass immigration precisely because they do not want more Breiviks.

    Breivik sets the political trend
    voxday.blogspot.com/2013/09/breivik-sets-political-trend.html

    You Hillary muffmunchers think everybody is a “deplorable” POC who doesn’t want mass immigration into their nation.

  43. @SunBakedSuburb

    Let’s not forget that the Native Americans fought a long race war for this continent. Such an eventuality would certainly not be unprecedented in human, or even regional, history.

    I’m of the opinion that whites will not be inclined to a race war until they can lose one.

    In other words, they will continue to advance their interests via political means (in the process radicalizing non-whites with presidents like Trump) until their demographic decline makes this impossible. At that point, however, a race war will have become unwinnable (numbers of eligible voters are a trailing indicator of demographics. The average white male Fox viewer is elderly and not fit for military service.) Manpower/Age distribution is one issue, the other is the rise of a hegemonic Chinese superpower that will not hesitate to support the non-white faction.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
    , @attilathehen
  44. Corvinus says:
    @Echoes of History

    “You don’t even know what the word “nation” means. Nation stems from the L. natal, meaning related to birth. A nation is a people related by birth, i.e., kin, relations, race, and implies a people who speak the same language and have the same customs. Just like, you know, that strange book called the dictionary says.”

    America is a mutt nation originally consisting of peoples from several European nations, as well as imported Africans, as well as Native Americans. It was only homogenous from the standpoint that it was “European”, but those who settled our great land did not view themselves as a “common” people who spoke the same language and had the same customs. Nay, they forged communities based on their ethnic and religious affiliations.

    Moreover, posterity to the founding fathers meant the creation of an independent nation, with a vigorous and adaptable form of government, with a body of liberties that were malleable to the times. Thomas Jefferson bore witness to the new government as a unique combination of the freest elements of English law and political custom. While he was concerned that unrestricted immigration of peoples from lands unacquainted with the principle of representative government MIGHT undo the careful work of our Founding Fathers, he said prophetically, “from such we are to expect the greatest number of immigrants”. Indeed, American economic growth required a massive influx of foreign labor.

    The concept does NOT refer exclusively to one’s own children. In particular, “Novus Ordo Seclorum” reflects the intention of the Founding Fathers to install political checks and balances to safeguard against tyranny REGARDLESS of one’s racial or ethnic background. It is other than accurate to state that the Founding Fathers sought to exclusively preserve a genetic legacy, i.e. Anglo-America, since there is no racial or gender criteria to adhere to the universal principles of “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” which are embedded in our representative form of government. Recall that Congress has the power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization….” By definition, naturalization extends citizenship, and all the rights and duties related to it, to those other than the “original” settlers and immigrants. The proposition remains that immigrants must meet the criteria as established by Congress to enter our shores.

    “And those not of our nation have to go back.”

    Interestingly enough, Vox Day makes these arguments…

    “As you probably know, my argument is that the Posterity for whom the Constitution is intended to defend the Blessings of Liberty consists solely of the genetic descendants of the People of the several and United States. Posterity does not include immigrants, descendants of immigrants, invaders, conquerers, tourists, students, Americans born in Portugal, or anyone else who happens to subsequently reside in the same geographic location, or share the same civic ideals, as the original We the People.”

    “Many, if not most, descendants of immigrants are not the Posterity of the then-People of the United States. Neither are people living in Mexico, Germany, Israel, or even Great Britain. The U.S. Constitution was not written for them, nor was it ever intended to secure the Blessings of Liberty for them. The idea that the Constitution was intended to do anything at all for immigrants, resident aliens, or foreigners is as absurd as the idea that its emanations and penumbras provide them with an unalienable right to an abortion. The fact that courts have declared otherwise is totally irrelevant.”

    In other words, YOU must prove that your ancestors are directly related to British settlers, otherwise you must go back.

    “I’ve already acted, voting for the fair haired God Emperor of the White Nation of America.”

    Trump is not an God Emperor. Should you be a Christian, there is but only one God…God Himself. You are committing blasphemy.

    “And yes, voting the way we “deplorables” did is war on the invasion of foreign immigrants, as NPR, Wash Post, NYT, etal have all written. The war will also intensify.”

    Except you are other than capable of being this “soldier”. You are impotent. You pretend to be strong, yet you are decidedly weak. Everyone knows you are not going to do anything violent. Everyone knows you are not going to pull a “St. Breivik”. You just continue to embarrass yourself.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
    , @ians
  45. Corvinus says:
    @TTSSYF

    It was generally segregation by custom in the North. But white people here for the most part were not going to face a lynch mob for having relations outside of their race.

  46. Mulegino1 says:
    @joe webb

    I would respectfully disagree with you. The “negro” anti-culture, i.e., the childish pursuit of bling and shiny objects, baubles, triviality, the stimulation of the lower instincts with beat music the obsession with sex and the glorification of what Evola referred to as the “merely priapic male” is the cultural model that the Jew desires his white shabbos goy to adopt, and which a plurality of those of Christian European descent are at least hip deep in.

    The Jews control the pop “music” business and are responsible for bringing the packaged merde that is rap to the masses. I would say that the Jews were also instrumental in elevating professional spectator sports- particularly those in which blacks excel- to a level which absorbs the collective imagination in a stultifying smog of superficiality and spectacle. What else is our national spectacle, the “Stupor Bowl” if not a supreme symbiosis of idolatry of the priapic black and utterly crass, culturally poisonous Jewish commercialism masquerading as entertainment?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  47. TheJester says:
    @TTSSYF

    As I recall history, the post-Reconstruction “Jim Crow” laws in the South that are now used as examples of southern racial oppression were indeed modeled after practices already in place and/or laws on the books in the North.

    I grew up in 1950/1960 Kansas. On my wife and my first trip through Georgia and South Carolina circa 1969, we could not believe the degree of racial integration in the South compared to Kansas. We were incredulous when we went to a Holiday Inn restaurant to eat … and saw that the maitre d’ was a young black woman. Not possible in Kansas in that era. These kinds of “incredulous” experiences continued as we frequented the South in the 1970s for military schools.

    The South has always gotten a “bum rap” from the Northern-controlled MSM. But, then, what would you expect from the self-define urbane yet radically Puritanical culture of New York City that has been openly hostile to the South since the Civil War?

    Def: Hypocrisy = the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one’s own behavior does not conform; pretense.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  48. @Corvinus

    You get your jollies calling White, European Americans “mutts” as much as Hillary does calling deplorable Americans “irredeemable.” After that opening line, there is no use in reading any more of a spergy wall-of-text from a poor soul suffering in the throes of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

    Your side lost; White, European “mutt” America won. Don’t mess with the big dog. Woof, woof!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  49. Corvinus says:
    @Echoes of History

    You have not learned Vox Day’s lesson–when dialectic is employed, you must respond in kind, rather than offer a gamma-inspired SJW retort.

    Face reality. You are blowing off steam on a blog. In the end, you are not going to engage in any violent reprisals.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Echoes of History
  50. Corvinus says:
    @TheJester

    “As I recall history, the post-Reconstruction “Jim Crow” laws in the South that are now used as examples of southern racial oppression were indeed modeled after practices already in place and/or laws on the books in the North.”

    Here is the history. Black codes were passed by southern states; there were inspired by the myriad of slave laws that had define the master-slave relationship. These laws had the intent and the effect of restricting the liberties of black freedom and compelling them to work in a labor economy based on low wages or debt. In addition, southern states had passed laws that discriminated against free blacks, which prohibited them from voting, bearing arms, gathering in groups for worship, and learning to read and write. Historian C. Vann Woodward noted in his seminal work that black codes passed by southern legislatures right after the Civil War were the precursors to Jim Crow and facilitated aggression toward blacks and white supremacy without reservation. Woodward’s thesis centers around the absence of laws mandating segregation; however, de facto segregation was present much earlier, was firmly in place during Reconstruction, and was dependent upon the extent of communities enforcing it. Moreover, even Woodward admitted the early and rigid appearance of segregation during Reconstruction in was found in southern public education, religion, and social welfare institutions. Of course, there was segregation by custom in the North, but each community was different in how they enforced it.

    I grew up in 1950/1960 Kansas. On my wife and my first trip through Georgia and South Carolina circa 1969, we could not believe the degree of racial integration in the South compared to Kansas. We were incredulous when we went to a Holiday Inn restaurant to eat … and saw that the maitre d’ was a young black woman. Not possible in Kansas in that era. These kinds of “incredulous” experiences continued as we frequented the South in the 1970s for military schools.

    “The South has always gotten a “bum rap” from the Northern-controlled MSM. But, then, what would you expect from the self-define urbane yet radically Puritanical culture of New York City that has been openly hostile to the South since the Civil War?”

    Openly hostile to Southrons, not Southerners. Big difference, boy.

  51. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    TROLL FIGHT!!!

  52. @Corvinus

    Insulting White European Americans as “mutts” is dialectic? Well, I’ve been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that’s the stupidest thing I ever heard.

    I thought I made it perfectly clear why I was not going to engage in any violent reprisals, in comment #43. I’ll reiterate, with bold text to help you see through those problem glasses:

    The Norwegian people have turned against mass immigration precisely because they do not want more Breiviks.

    Breivik sets the political trend
    voxday.blogspot.com/2013/09/breivik-sets-political-trend.html

    We irredeemable deplorable Whites who voted for the God Emperor are a quiet, peaceful lot. If you didn’t vote for Trump—and sending Fake Americans back—then you obviously do desire more Breiviks.

    • Replies: @KenH
    , @Corvinus
  53. Them Guys says:
    @ElitistSettler

    Careful what non Whites wish for. While African blacks wreck and ruin cities. And jews wreck whole nations…..It may take Whites a while longer to react or act…However when they do act, it is entire continents which go up in smoke.

  54. @ElitistSettler

    “…because whites are irreversibly headed for minority status…”

    The trend is hardly irreversible. If we close the borders to immigration and establish population controls. Neither of these is difficult. The first is trivial and requires only long term political commitment. The second can be accomplished without much more difficulty, although it would probably require amending the Constitution. A first subsequent step would then be to eliminate our insane subsidies for bastards, most of which go to useless breeders in the underclass. A second step would be to implement and enforce laws against bastardy. A third step would be to impose a tax on childbearing and eliminate subsidies of the same so individuals in the underclass are forced to pay for their currently unrestrained and heavily subsidized breeding.

    Whites in this country will be the plurality for a long time. For that long time, they could control the political process by forming appropriate alliances with chosen smaller minorities. To that extent the White majority/plurality will still control the country. But this can happen only if the current establishment and elites are removed from power, a truly daunting task.

    You are right to the extent that, if the actions I mention above are not taken, the USA will descend into a disastrous dysfunctional state resembling that of Brazil, Mexico, or any one of a large number of other semi-shit-holes I could mention. Why you would rejoice at that prospect is beyond my understanding. It will make things much worse for all current US citizens.

  55. KenH says:

    Is America’s racial divide permanent? A resounding yes, it is, and I think things will continue to worsen when you have a (((media))) filled little Elya Eherenbergs and a political party in the Jewish controlled and funded Democrats who are rabidly anti-white. The radical and rapid demographic changes ensures the racial divide remains permanent.

    Race relations wouldn’t be quite so toxic if Jewish power and influence didn’t loom so large over this nation, but people are deluding themselves if they think it would be kumbaya otherwise. There was plenty of conflict and race riots between blacks and whites even when Jews had little political clout and influence over the culture.

    Unless we’re allowed the freedom to associate and disassociate with other racial groups and grow a spine to start repatriating people then life in the near future in the disunited states will be more like an inmate in Pelican Bay prison with its hostile racial encampments, periodic race riots and mini race wars.

  56. @Corvinus

    As a lifetime native of Boston, the descendant of ancestors who’ve been here for several centuries, and some of whom fought for the wrong (federal) side, in the Civil War, and an ardent student of my region’s and ancestors’ histories, I say you are full of horse manure. Segregation of Negroes in the North goes back to colonial times. It was sometimes voluntary although more often not, sometimes more and sometimes less strictly enforced, but it was always there. From the 1920s up through the 1960s it was an acknowledged fact of life in Boston. The forced desegregation of Boston schools by the dictatorial ass, Judge Garrity, permanently destroyed the Boston public school system and caused endless amounts of unnecessary violence by forcing an open recognition of what everyone already knew. Other than that, Garrity didn’t change all that much except for the worse.

  57. KenH says:
    @Echoes of History

    We irredeemable deplorable Whites who voted for the God Emperor are a quiet, peaceful lot.

    At about 61% and shrinking we no longer have that luxury. If we remain a “quite and peaceful lot” we will be displaced by peoples who are ruder and more warlike. History proves that quiet and peaceful people often get subjugated by barbarians.

  58. @Echos of History
    @Realist

    I don’t care what the blog says, and I am not speaking of areas that are mono-racial. I am speaking from my 42 years living in this city I am from. We have literally one of each, in significant numbers. And I say this with no trace of doubt, there is zero racial tension on any scale that could be quantified in any way. And while there are certain areas that are distinctly one group mostly, overall, all the neighborhoods, (other than the wealthy end of town), are very mixed. Some people have better things to worry about than engineered tensions. So say what you want, but I have witnessed first hand a city of close to 200000 not have race issues. The only time anything like that was an issue was in the 80s & 90s we had a Neo-NAZI/White Power skin head problem. So ironically, our own kind were the only ones in my life time to commit violence over race in the city and surrounding area I am from. Stop buying into this crap. Its part of the Dark Ones’ agenda. Snap out of it.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  59. @Wally

    Yes, The Dark Ones and their agenda are a big part of the point I am trying to make.

  60. @joe webb

    Whites have not been blackened by black anti-culture

    The hell they haven’t.

    Banjo lips Jayz and that slut Beyonce pack the white idiots in every July 4th here in Philly.

    The culture of brain- raped college faggots is hip- hop.

    • Replies: @joe webb
  61. Corvinus says:
    @Echoes of History

    “Insulting White European Americans as “mutts” is dialectic?”

    Nice strawman there. I never directly nor implied it. It’s called context. White European Americans are “Mutts”–it became accepted for European ethnic groups to intermarry in the United States. That is, the majority of Americans have at least 5 or more European ethnic groups in their ancestries.

    ”Intermarriage rates have risen dramatically in recent decades, at least for the groups of European ancestry,” said Dr. Alba, whose research on ethnic identity is continuing under a research grant from the National Science Foundation. He added: ”We are seeing the marriage of more and more people of mixed ancestry, who are more and more likely to marry people who share mixed ancestry with them.” The census data analyzed by Dr. Alba was based on a representative sample of 226,000 of the 43.8 million American married couples in which both partners were native-born.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/1985/02/11/style/the-family-a-new-look-at-intermarriage-in-the-us.html

    “I thought I made it perfectly clear why I was not going to engage in any violent reprisals…”

    Only until now have made it known.

    “The Norwegian people have turned against mass immigration precisely because they do not want more Breiviks.”

    Vox and you are giving WAY too much credit to Breivik. There are a number of reasons that play a role in why Norwegians are against mass immigration.

    “who voted for the God Emperor…”

    Again, if you are a Christian, you are committing blasphemy here. There is but one God, and Trump is a mortal.

    “and sending Fake Americans back…”

    Are you able to directly trace your ancestors to the British? If no, you have to go back.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  62. Truth says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    However, I don’t agree that different races mixed together will get along just fine otherwise.

    Europe wasn’t comprised of different races until the turn of the 21st century, they still had a war every 20 years back to the Greek empire.

    China has always been comprised of the same people, how many did Mao assassinate?

    How man Russians died promoting “unity” during Stalin’s administration?

    Strife is, was and always will be part of human nature, skin color is of no real consequence.

  63. @Joel Walbert

    I don’t care much about your anecdotal account of zero racial tension on any scale that could be quantified in any way when the statistically significant data from scientific studies show that you’re wrong.

    But wait, you did have race relation problems — but only with (((drumroll))) White Power NAZIs!

    I’m going to make a guess you’re psychologically projecting, and actually a self-hating Nazi who hates dark ones.

    Joel: “…Dark Ones’ agenda.”

    Oh, Darkies are bad? What’s the right shade of morality? Do the Darkies need skin-lightening treatments?

    A perfect life from perfect skin – but only for those of the right shade – is the message and mindset that’s being passed down.
    http://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/sep/04/dark-is-beautiful-battle-to-end-worlds-obsession-with-lighter-skin

    No wonder you’re trying to cover-up racial tensions in your area; you’re the anti-Darkie, White-Power NAZI causing them all!

    Welcome to the party, pal.

  64. @Corvinus

    I did not read past your doubling-down on insulting we White European Americans as “mutts.” It’s certainly not dialectic when nobody is dialoguing with you and your contempt of Americans. If you have an argument, make one.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  65. @Corvinus

    But white people here for the most part were not going to face a lynch mob for having relations outside of their race.

    Whites were the only Virginians under the Loving law that were prohibited from marrying outside their own race. Other races were free to intermarry, as long as it wasn’t with a white partner.

    So the law was stricter on whites.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  66. @Mulegino1

    The Jews control the pop “music” business and are responsible for bringing the packaged merde that is rap to the masses.

    I didn’t realize that Elvis and Colonel Tom were Jewish. But the Colonel’s original surname is pronounced “van kike”, more or less, so maybe you’re on to something there.

    • Replies: @Joel Walbert
  67. @Echos of History

    You are more than welcome to feel the way you do. All I am saying, and I made sure to emphasize that this is based on my own experience only, is that this racial BS is not widespread and rampant as the media & race-baiters will have you believe. If it is the reality of my hometown, it apparently is similar in other places as well. Allentown isn’t some magical society. In fact, as of last census, whites may be a minority population in the city. No anti-white violence and anything of the sort going on.

    Now for the skins, I never said I had a problem with them. I said they were the only group in my lifetime that acted out of racial animus.

    Lastly, you are seriously mistaken as to whom the Dark Ones I speak of are. Maybe this will help. ((The Dark Ones)). Nothing to do with skin color. And no, I am not a NAZI, not even close. Please keep your ignorant and erroneous assumptions on who and what I am to yourself. You will be wrong every time.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  68. @Joel Walbert

    Oh, those (((dark ones.))) You’re more Nazi than Normie; fash guys use the echoes.

    The use of triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), is an AnTiSeMiTiC symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background.
    wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_parentheses

    And you’d do well to stop namefagging.

  69. @Echoes of History

    How many Arabs, Blacks, and Asians did “St. Breivik” kill?

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  70. pyrrhus says:
    @Stonehands

    Indeed, Soros ratted himself out in an interview. And when Buchanan talks about “historic” progress in civil rights, he gives himself away as well….what progress, Pat?

  71. @TomSchmidt

    Saint Breivik killed 69 enemy traitors who were collaborating with Arab, Black, and Asian invaders. Bill Clinton’s Rules of Engagement are a bitch. More so than even his wife.

    Second, please recall Bill Clinton’s rules of engagement as applied to the Serbs in 1999, wherein he decided that the political leaders, bureaucratic support structure, media infrastructure and intellectual underpinnings of his enemies’ war effort were legitimate targets of war.

    A reminder about the shape of the battlefield (legal and otherwise) and Bill Clinton’s Rules of Engagement.
    http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2010/03/man-bites-dog-dogs-get-pissed-off.html

    Need any more simple questions answered?

  72. lavoisier says: • Website
    @joe webb

    Two thirds of folks now in the US , per a good poll, see race as a huge problem. a year or two ago it was like about a third.

    It is hard to believe that so many people could believe that race was not a HUGE problem in the United States.

    Anyone living close to a major city has to be aware of the problems created by the massive black underclass.

    One has to live in a bubble to be unaware of the racial divide in this country.

    The solution is to treat individuals as individuals, stop the race baiting, stop lying about black criminality, and stop blaming white racism for black failure.

  73. Corvinus says:
    @Echoes of History

    “your contempt of Americans…”

    Yet another strawman on your part. Exactly why you are part of the C team over at Vox Day.

    “we White European Americans as “mutts.””

    I offered the proper context. Apparently you easily offended. Really need to toughen up, Sparky.

    Generally speaking, in Europe prior to the 20th century, marriage between the different ethnic groups was not particularly desired and perhaps even verboten–unless one was nobility, then it was considered politically and economically viable. Like kept with like. It wasn’t about the “white race”, it was about ethnicity.

    For example, “in 1875, citizens throughout the recently formed German nation were for the first time allowed to marry without conversion…This law made civil marriage mandatory for all marriages in Germany, removing a long-standing barrier to marriage between Jewish Germans and non-Jewish Germans.”

    https://fsu.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fsu:182181/datastream/PDF/view

    But eventually, and especially in America, as different ethnic groups mingled, the children of immigrants began in increasing numbers to marry other than their heritage. Exactly why Americans are “mutts”–our background typically consists of several ethnic groups. It is NOT meant to be a term of revulsion and derision. You are being way too SJW sensitive here.

  74. Corvinus says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    “Other races were free to intermarry, as long as it wasn’t with a white partner.”

    Try again.

    “In many states, anti-miscegenation laws also criminalized cohabitation and sex between whites and non-whites. In addition, the state of Oklahoma in 1908 banned marriage “between a person of African descent” and “any person not of African descent”; Louisiana in 1920 banned marriage between Native Americans and African Americans (and from 1920–1942, concubinage as well); and Maryland in 1935 banned marriages between blacks and Filipinos. While anti-miscegenation laws are often regarded as a Southern phenomenon, most western and plains states also enacted them.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-miscegenation_laws_in_the_United_States

    “So the law was stricter on whites.”

    No, it was strict on ALL people, including whites, especially those who sought to exercise their liberty to date, mate, and procreate.

    • Replies: @KenH
    , @Reg Cæsar
  75. @Corvinus

    You are impotent. You pretend to be strong, yet you are decidedly weak. Everyone knows you are not going to do anything violent.

    So – you nailed it right there.
    So why do you keep engaging him?

    He, and his ilk, is weak and will go on pounding sand. At that point maybe light a candle and plant a seed and maybe at some point in the future if there’s fertile soil he’ll think it was his own idea and grow up, assume responsibility for his own life and choices and fate, and move on, but there’s no profit to be made by arguing with him. Save your breath.

    • Replies: @Anon
  76. joe webb says:
    @Stonehands

    the issue is this: numbers. How many , what proportion, have been blackened in terms of their music , and so on?

    Got any numbers? As I have stated before, only the lowest quintile of Brazilian whites marry mulattos and blacks in Brazil. This is from a book about 12 years ago written by a SJW type academic.

    I guess that the lowest quintile of Whites here in the US share the same IQ as Blacks and because of that do not find them strange.

    Where I live, near Menlo Park and Palo Alto (paly alto in Ebonics) the liberals I talk to pretty much see the problem, but keep their mouths shut to keep their jobs.

    • Replies: @gustafus
  77. “Hands off you damned dirty Apes!” That is my favorite Charleton Heston quote from the Planet of the Apes movie. Yes Pat, you nailed it again. It appears that we are being thrust into hyper drive to political and social reconditioning when fellow cadre are being canned in Tinsel town for outing their own operatives.

  78. ians says:
    @Corvinus

    The execrable Echoes claims to be English, living in America, though hates his own birth-people. Sicko keeps praising Breivik.

  79. gustafus says:
    @Colin Wright

    Jarrett looks EXACTLY like a chimpanzee. It’s the bones around her mouth.

    Zira is better looking actually…. but I will only refer to Jarrett in the future as Zira Jarrett.

    It’s ON, folks… we can lament the increased tensions – as they pick us off at the margins – but we must stick to gether and defend our tribe.

    Mexicans are treated as a tribe. They are polled for their tribal preferences. It’s a GIVEN. the only group demonized for tribal interests is white.

    I’m over it. I just spent a week in OH SO liberal Club Med – I was a terror after the Barr story. In every casual conversation – I just declared my resolve. I am a racist. Period.

    I said I root for Ebola [highly ineffective] I thank Heaven above for AIDS

    And Planned Parenthood is a god send… every minority baby aborted is one less to come for my grand kids.

    There is no escape there because we are forced to sit in groups… and of course the commies, marxists and post modernists couldn’t contain their glee… so I let em have it. Full barrel.

    Those of us who don’t have “exposure” should take the front lines – protecting those who must still keep their jobs to provide for their families. I know many many retirees who think like I do.

    there were even a few at Club Med….. NO SURRENDER …. the White Race created Western Civilization … the black race debases it — they run, jump, and toss balls, – and do a fine job of killing each other off in inner cities.

    I would never allow one to clean my home unsupervised… but hey, maybe they can serve food [under surveillance]

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  80. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    Save your breath.

    It’s hilarious that this can actually be said to Corvinus, but it is actually, surprisingly, appropriate here.

  81. gustafus says:
    @joe webb

    Jordan Peterson says low IQ is terminal. The black race lost the genetic lottery and there is no rehabilitation for the condition – BUT FOR INTER BREEDING with whites and asians … Ashkanazi jews at the top of the IQ pyramid know better than to breed with them.. [or us]

    That is the only solution – AND is the reasoning behind forced immigration and integration.

    Wealth and privilege can protect some at the top of the dominance hierarchy…. but the rest of us will be slaughtered in our homes if we remain in black or brown majority neighborhoods or countries.

    Amazingly enough … Chileans know this and speak of it routinely in polite company. It’s a given. Self Evident. They look at their Black and Indian neighboring countries as threats to the corner of civilization they’ve carved out of that strip of real estate. AND they brag that they killed off the native population so long ago, they have few to contain and maintain.

    I was on an airplane tour of the Andes for investors in a new ski area – when the fellow from some agency for Development and overseas Investment [can't remember the exact name] was PROUD of the progress made in Chile to contain the spread of “indigenous”

    the Indians are considered irredeemable.

    • Replies: @joe webb
  82. @Joel Walbert

    ‘Many places in the real world don’t have a racial divide. Believe it or not, different races can live together just fine. The media just has to play it up to distract.’

    ? Where are these lands?

    I’ve seen how whites look at blacks in Western Europe — and vice-versa. We lived in Hawaii for a year — much to be said for it, but society is very much divided along ethnic lines. The US Northeast in particular is apartheid-land. Most of the rest of the world is mono-ethnic.

    Where are these places without ethnic divides? I’ve traveled extensively — close to thirty countries, I believe — but I’m drawing a blank. I think you’re simply fantasizing. You’re substituting the reality you wish existed for the one that does exist.

    • Replies: @Joel Walbert
  83. @gustafus

    That’s really funny how you support Planned Parenthood in the way you do, “Agreeing with Liberals for All the Wrong Reasons” and express your love for Ebola-chan.

    You’re correct, there is a large undercurrent now of white guys with ZFG. It’s spreading perceptively. I think I would have been banned 6 months ago posting about Breivik. Now? The mod(s) seem more ZFG too.

    It would be a pleasure to chat with you at ClubMed as you stirred the Liberal’s pot.

    P.S. I’ll confess to you, I quoted comedy sources in several comments above that got taken ever so seriously by Libtards. Cornywuss jumped all over me when I quoted General Jack D. Ripper of Dr. Strangelove fame in my first comment, and later jumped me again quoting Bugs Bunny. (I even left an easter-egg punctuation link to Mel Blanc’s voice.) Funniest though was when he had to correct Col. Bat Guano’s deviated prevert. Libtards never get humor, they’re so damned Puritanical. Anyway, Gustafus, I love you, man!

    • Replies: @Joel Walbert
  84. bj says:

    Well…you must not be paying attention to the local news.

  85. bj says:
    @Joel Walbert

    What happens when blacks gain political control of a previously white controlled society……

    • Replies: @Joel Walbert
  86. KenH says:
    @Corvinus

    Oh Corvy……over on another thread I happened to see that bleating autist and your fellow troll “Thomm”, who sits two cubes down from you at SPLC headquarters, saying that you were an Indian. Originally you refused to disclose your lineage before you settled on claiming to be Polish which I doubt since American whites are “mutts” (in your words) which includes you.

    So what are you? Come clean for once. The truth will set you free.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  87. @ElitistSettler

    China is not going to be a superpower. They are the fastest aging country in the world. They have lifted the number of children couples can have, but people in China want small families. They performed over 400 million abortions in the past 40 years. China never was and never will be great again.

  88. “Is white America really black America’s biggest problem?” The RCC cuck Buchanan is scribbling stupidity again. He keeps writing stupid columns that don’t address the problems facing the West. The worst problem is the RCC. This universal church is destroying Western Europe. Buchanan is old so he either can’t or won’t deal with the problems the RCC is causing. Universal brotherhood is the other oxymoronic belief. I laugh when anyone talks about Buchanan and his 1992 presidential bid. They put him in the same league with the idiot Ron Paul. Buchanan chose a black woman to be his vice-presidential running mate. Ron Paul never addressed the immigration issue. Buchanan is tied down by his Roman faith. Ron Paul was a blithering idiot. Separation, deportation, repatriation are the answers for the West

    As I have consistently stated, it is the Caucasian RCC male who accepts black-Asian priests-popes as the problem. The Zioevangizer male who believes Jews are the chosen is the problem. The gentile Freemason who believes in universal brotherhood is the problem. Buchanan is near the end so soon his scribblings will end. However, we need to deal with younger RCC cuck males.

    E. Michael Jones is an RCC cuck who accepts black/Asian priests-popes. He blames all problems on the Jews. He babbles about logos and philosophy. He goes to Iran to deliver his anti-Jewish schtick. I watch his youtubes to keep up with his rantings. His latest one is a doozy. He just got back from Iran and babbled about their freedoms. He wants to go to Pakistan to talk about logos and philosophy. Pakistan is an Asian country (avg. IQ 84) and Muslim. Jones has never stated that Islam is a Christian heresy. He goes to Iran and supposedly has conversations about logos and philosophy. Iran is an Asian country (avg. IQ 84) and Muslim. He would never have a conversation with a 90+ IQ Western woman who could prove to him how wrong he is about what he believes. He doesn’t even try to have conversations with other people in the West. It’s basically, go to a Muslim country and blame the Jews. He doesn’t realize that today’s “Jews” have moved on. They have their country with their capital. How about if we reclaim the West for Westerners? How about if we define what the West is not and begin to take action. Jones would never have anything to do with such a movement.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
    , @ians
  89. joe webb says:
    @gustafus

    right. Argentina did the same thing @ 1900.

    Mexico’s elite Spaniards say the same thing with regard to their Indians, but have allowed for the half-breeds cuz they have to. It is not inconceivable that even the half breeds could go for their machetes, but they are pretty well integrated and know what the result would be…chaos and starvation and maybe yanqui armies. Before that happened, the @ 60 per cent half-breeds would kill off the 30 % Indians.

    Spaniards are about 9 per cent as I recall.

    Mexico is still a disaster waiting to happen, like Venezuela now.

    Ask Fred about his Indian servants…and does he keep a gun under his pillow?

    JW

  90. @attilathehen

    This universal church is destroying Western Europe – true.

    This universal church was began by the Globalist/Internationalist Rabbi Jesus, who said “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations.” (Matthew 28:19) Immediately, blacks were recruited. (Acts 8:26-40) Then blacks quickly rose to leadership positions. (Acts 13:1) Of course, just as now, Internationalist Jews think the best policy is “The Jew First” (Romans 1:16) and second-rater Goy are supposed to send all your shekels to Jerusalem. (Romans 15:27)

    Declare your independence from the Rabbi Jesus character. The Rabbi hated patriotic, pro-family Whites. (Luke 14:26, Matthew 19:27-30) Hate him back.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Joel Walbert
  91. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    The problem is not the Divide. It is the racial union via Jungle Fever.

  92. ians says:
    @attilathehen

    Replying to yourself now? Trying to get this Comments page shut down like you did at Takimag?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
    , @Truth
  93. Corvinus says:
    @KenH

    “”Thomm”, who sits two cubes down from you at SPLC headquarters, saying that you were an Indian.”

    You are delusional. I’m not Indian (native or red dot). Rather, I’m an American mutt–German, Dutch, and Polish. How dare my ancestors intermingle! Ethnic traitors!

  94. Anon[193] • Disclaimer says:
    @SunBakedSuburb

    > “Reparations will provide black Americans with the funding to create their own space…”

    Not. Gonna. Happen.

    Reparations have already been paid, many times over.

    First by 620,000 dead white males during the Civil War. Then welfare, affirmative action, set-asides, EBT, huge police departments, Section-8 housing, immense investments in education, WIC, free health insurance, free cellphones, quotas, and so on.

    Been there, dindu that.

    It’s up to blacks alone now to detoxify their culture.

    • Replies: @Truth
  95. @ians

    WOW!!! I’m flattered that you think a petit poulet like me has such “power.” I got Takimag to shut down their comments? No. Takimag cucked. I’ve read some other commentators who said that they think it was a decision by Taki’s daughter and Jim Goad. Taki’s daughter Mandolyna voted for Obummer. She wrote an article about this. She is trash for doing this. Jim Goad writes tough, but he went to jail for assaulting a woman so I read his stuff, but keep his background in mind.

    People cannot deal with the truth. I tell the truth. I have consistently stated that the most objective, important truth is IQ. IQ is related to race. I have stated that the West is not black/Asian/Muslim/Jewish. This clashes with negrophiliacs like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck. A couple of weeks ago, he wet himself from excitement when he found about Susan Rice’s black cuck son is president of the Stanford GOP club. Beck can’t do anything without including ‘groids. I

    I have pointed out that the RCC is the most dangerous institution destroying the West. I left the RCC because I don’t accept black/Asian priests-popes. I’m still a Christian but we have to have a church for the West. Blacks/Asians must have their own churches.

    I’ve pointed out that many of the male commentators are gentile/Jewish males involved with Asian women and are thus incapable of making judgments about the West. Another commentator was such a racial purist almost no Caucasian qualified to be a member of the West. I’ve been attacked for being a woman.

    I do know that I’m the first to point out these things and make all the correct connections. I’m seeing my comments quoted obliquely among some podcasters and in other articles. Of course, the 3 types of men I have blamed for the problems of the West are either running away and hiding or attacking me. These 3 types are: the Caucasian RCC male who accepts black/Asian priests-popes; the Zioevangizer who believes Jews are the chosen; and the gentile Freemason who believes in universal brotherhood.

    If anyone is causing comments sections to be shut down, it is the above 3 male types and the gentile/Jewish males involved with Asian women. Which type are you ians?

    • Replies: @joe webb
    , @Truth
    , @Reg Cæsar
  96. joe webb says:
    @attilathehen

    if you are going to tell the truth, you better make your audience laugh, or they will kill you.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  97. @Corvinus

    “So let’s get going. There’s no other choice. God willing, we will prevail in peace and freedom from fear and in true health through the purity and essence of our natural fluids. God bless you all.”

    Corvinus, you do realize that the above text (from Echoes of History’s post #4 above) is just a quote from the movie Dr. Strangelove right?

  98. @joe webb

    I speak the truth where I live, a “diverse, vibrating” area. My audience understands what I say. They don’t need humor. They deal with reality.

    • Replies: @joe webb
  99. KenH says:

    LOL, whatever. I didn’t think you were for what it’s worth, but wanted to get your side of the story. Looks like you have a little buddy spreading misinformation about you.

  100. Art says:

    It is the upper political level that is the most racially black/white divided. Most whites want the divide to go away. Whites elected Obama twice.

    It is the Jews who politically prosper from black/white division.

    We will know no racial peace, while the Jews dominate our political culture.

    Think Peace — Art

  101. @Corvinus

    I was referring specifically to the Virginia law in the Loving case, which my “MSM” sources say only applied to prospective marriages which included one white person. If you have conflicting information, please post it.

    A few weeks ago, when I suggested that statutory rape was really four different crimes, depending on the sexes of those involved, you said that a society has a right to choose its own standards. (I didn’t deny this, saying only that the standard chosen was wrong, and the older, “double”, one more realistic.)

    Now you’re making the opposite claim– a society does not have the right to set its own standards. So which is it?

    If people have the right to “date, mate, and procreate” as they see fit, why is polygamy universally illegal? (In the West, that is.) Both miscegenation bans and bigamy bans interfere with the purported right of adults to marry other consenting adults. Why is one right and the other wrong?

    In both cases, the society puts its collective welfare above the desires of the individual. Isn’t that what “social justice” is about?

    And if you’ve been reading Steve long enough, you know that the biggest losers in the free-love, excuse me, freed0m-to-marry revolution were black women. Do you get some perverse enjoyment from their suffering? Or is feeling morally superior to the rest of us more important?

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Corvinus
  102. Truth says:
    @Echoes of History

    What if Matthew, and the rest WERE black and the disciples they chose were white?

    Just thinking out loud, Sport…

  103. Truth says:
    @ians

    LMFAO!

    Did you really do that all by your lonesome, Tillie?

    I like you more and more every day…

  104. Truth says:
    @Anon

    First by 620,000 dead white males during the Civil War. Then welfare, affirmative action, set-asides, EBT, huge police departments, Section-8 housing, immense investments in education, WIC, free health insurance, free cellphones, quotas,

    You didn’t even mention basketball..

  105. Truth says:
    @attilathehen

    This clashes with negrophiliacs like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck.

    Rush Limbaugh is a “negrophiliac” now? Damn, what does that make, like, white liberals?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  106. Truth says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    And if you’ve been reading Steve long enough, you know that the biggest losers in the free-love, excuse me, freed0m-to-marry revolution were black women.

    I don’t know Old Boy, white nerds who are fat, underachieving, not-very-interesting, and whiny seem not to have benefited much by it either…

    Read this blog for a few weeks…

  107. Corvinus says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    “I was referring specifically to the Virginia law in the Loving case, which my “MSM” sources say only applied to prospective marriages which included one white person. If you have conflicting information, please post it.”

    Based on this source, it would appear that interracial marriages in Virginia were banned between a non-white and another non-white.

    “The Racial Integrity Act was introduced in the General Assembly as Senate Bill No. 219 on February 1, 1924, and House Bill No. 311 on February 15. In its original form, it required that all Virginians fill out a certificate of racial composition to be approved by the Bureau of Vital Statistics. This certificate would be necessary in order to marry in Virginia, and it would be against the law for a white person to marry anyone but a white person. Although interracial marriage had been banned previously in Virginia, this was the first time that marriage between whites and Asians—or other people who were legally neither “colored” nor white—was prohibited.

    “In an editorial published on November 20, 1924, the Richmond Times-Dispatch urged the state to appeal the Sorrells decision, but the attorney general decided against it. Plecker, meanwhile, decided to target Virginia Indians, seeing them as obstacles to a pure white race. He made efforts to prove that all Indians were actually African Americans and attempted, unsuccessfully, to persuade the director of the federal census to not recognize Indians in Virginia. George Major Cook, chief of the Pamunkey Indians, wrote a strongly worded defense of the Virginia tribes to the Richmond News Leader on July 8, 1925, and in a letter dated December 1, Governor Trinkle admonished Plecker “to be conservative and reasonable and not create any ill feeling if it can be avoided between the Indians and the State government.”

    https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Racial_Integrity_Laws_of_the_1920s#its2

    “A few weeks ago, when I suggested that statutory rape was really four different crimes, depending on the sexes of those involved, you said that a society has a right to choose its own standards. (I didn’t deny this, saying only that the standard chosen was wrong, and the older, “double”, one more realistic.)”

    Statutory rape is four different crimes? Don’t think so. Statutory rape refers to sexual relations involving someone below the “age of consent.” People below the age of consent cannot legally consent to having sex. Now, it may involve different SCENARIOS–a 20-year-old heterosexual man and a 15-year-old heterosexual woman, or a 38-year-old gay man and a 13-year-old gay man, or a 42-year-old heterosexual woman and a 16-year-old heterosexual man–who are charged with statutory rape.

    “Now you’re making the opposite claim– a society does not have the right to set its own standards.”

    That would be your strawman. The citizens of a society have the liberty to set standards of behavior by way of law, with those standards then subsequently scrutinized by courts. Then, that society through their legislatures may seek to bypass those decisions by way of constitutional amendment.

    “If people have the right to “date, mate, and procreate” as they see fit, why is polygamy universally illegal? (In the West, that is.)”

    Because, as you stated, a society has the right to set its own standards.

    “Both miscegenation bans and bigamy bans interfere with the purported right of adults to marry other consenting adults. Why is one right and the other wrong?”

    Because, as you stated, a society has the right to set its own standards. Interestingly enough, miscegenation and bigamy are interrelated. The ban on bigamy (and polygamy) grew out of the view by Americans in the 1800′s that Mormons committed political treason by creating a separatist theocracy and social treason by adopting a barbaric marital form, one suited for “Africans and Asians”. In essence, the Mormons were (wrongly) viewed as a degenerative race–it would be fair to say they were “blackened”. That is, polygamy was other than natural for Americans of European descent. The next logical step was a prohibition of whites and blacks from marrying, as it also illustrated the larger culture’s demotion of non-whites from unadulterated citizenship. Today, however, there still remains revulsion among the general American population about men having more than one wife and decidedly more acceptance when it comes to the mixing of the races. People perhaps feel that way since monogamy seems more contractual in nature and miscegenation appears to be more personal in nature.

    “And if you’ve been reading Steve long enough, you know that the biggest losers in the free-love, excuse me, freed0m-to-marry revolution were black women.”

    Indeed, black men are twice as likely as black women to intermarry, but one must account for the difference here in educational levels. Among newly married black men and women, higher education is clearly associated with higher intermarriage rates. Also consider that black women who have a degree remain unmarried because they tend to seek to only wed a black man who has a similar educational background. But if you want to say that black women are the “biggest losers” here for people exercising their liberty to select their own mates, be my guest.

    “Do you get some perverse enjoyment from their suffering?”

    Assuming that black women are indeed suffering as a result.

    “Or is feeling morally superior to the rest of us more important?”

    That would be you. Projection, I will admit, is your strong suit. Although it is very unbecoming. Perhaps you should tone it down a bit.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  108. joe webb says:
    @attilathehen

    good for you…where do you live? I guess that line which is not original with me, is for dealing with white liberals, etc.

    I am reading Pierce stuff from the article here on Unz.

    Interesting that Pierce, with his technical/scientific background, takes the path he takes.
    It is as if there is a technical solution to our problems. As in get your guns.

    The Jews are far more clever…they see that the political approach is the correct one.

    They keep on keeping on with propaganda. No guns please , for them. Except with regard to Israel.

    We got a political problem, not a technical problem.

    The jews are the mascots, living relics, of Christianity. Our problem is therefore also religious…with the Fundamentalists in particular. Protestant and Catholic Churches have readings from the OT and the NT. That is the fundamental fount, foul as it is, of our Jewish Question. It is strange that more people, like Kevin MacDonald, don’t get it.

    Our enemies can only be beaten with politics, not guns. When the shooting starts in the coming Second Civil War, that is another matter. The Trump peasantry is awakening. Fox Jews has this problem….Israel, etc.

    Tucker Carlson gets closer and closer to the Third Rail. He had a military guy on a couple weeks ago. Tucker asked him Why? the war drums are beating. Military guy said, Tel Aviv and Ryad (sp?). Tucker said nothing more.

    Tucker also has his race-equality problem. He is doing a little ju-jitsu with it by calling all the Dem anti-white yak…racism. funny.

    So Pierce and so many WN types don’t get it…politics, not utopian or revenge fantasies please.

    Joe Webb

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  109. LOL!!! I like having all this “power”.

  110. @joe webb

    I live in a blue state.

    “The jews are the mascots, living relics, of Christianity. Our problem is therefore also religious…with the Fundamentalists in particular. Protestant and Catholic Churches have readings from the OT and the NT. That is the fundamental fount, foul as it is, of our Jewish Question.” No. Today’s Jews are not related to the Jews of Jesus’ time. This is why I see the JQ as a distraction. Today’s Jews are a mixed black/Asian/some European people. They are not Western. I support Israel because that is where these “Jews” belong. I start with simple premises: IQ and its relation to race; what the West is not – black/Asian/Jewish/Muslim.

    You have a point in that our problems are political, but until we deal with “universal brotherhood” we will not get anywhere. This is why I blame our problems on the RCC/Zioevangizers/Freemasons. These are univeralist organizations and need to be taken apart. We need to deal with our problems not just politically, but also religiously.

  111. @Truth

    “White liberals” are mostly Jewish. Jews always ally with blacks and marry them.

    Limbaugh has always been a negrophiliac. He must be going crazy because of what black football players are doing. He’s also a gay lover. I look at his transcript daily to see what degeneracy he’s promoting. Yesterday he had a section on “gay conservatives.” This cuck is deranged. Homos have destroyed the RCC. He’s babbled about MLK, Jr. He believes blacks can be conservatives.

    Glen Beck swoons over MLK, Jr. He will do nothing unless there is a black along.

    Ann Coulter is another negrophiliac. She does good work on immigration, but when she starts babbling about black slavery and how “we” owe blacks, she disgusts me. I and my family had nothing to do with any kind of slavery over the centuries.

    The new trinity of the West is the homo/groid/gloid. It’s the cucks who want us to worship this triangle.

    • Replies: @Truth
  112. Truth says:
    @attilathehen

    Ann Coulter is another negrophiliac.

    Yeah, now that one I can believe…

    https://people.com/celebrity/ann-coulter-dating-jimmie-walker-says-norman-lear/

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  113. @Corvinus

    “Moral superiority” is the deadly sin of Pride. It’s the first thing to come out in the confessional, or should be.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  114. @attilathehen

    I was unaware that there were any black Popes. There hasn’t been an African pontiff since the fifth century.

    They’ve even turned away from Poles and Germans to go back to Italians, albeit a transoceanic Italian.

    I’ve been attacked for being a woman

    You certainly provide solid evidence for the view that the priesthood must remain male.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  115. @Truth

    Ann is beyond her childbearing years, so the point is moot anyway.

    Did you know that the black English pop singer Linda Lewis offered to carry Elton John’s baby back in the 1970s, using a bottle if necessary? He was distraught about never having children, and she wanted to ease his pain. He turned her down.

    Imagine that Reg with a mulatto child pushing 50.

    • Replies: @Truth
  116. @Reg Cæsar

    There has never been a black pope, i.e., sub-Saharan African. The “African” popes of the first centuries in the RCC were North African Caucasians. St. Augustine is an example of this ethnicity. There has never been an Asian pope. Now that the RCC is majority black/Asian the papacy will need to be moved to the Congo or the Philippines. This will not be problem. At one time the papacy was in Avignon.

    You provide solid evidence that you will OSCULUM INFAME black/Asian priests-popes.

  117. Corvinus says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    ““Moral superiority” is the deadly sin of Pride. It’s the first thing to come out in the confessional, or should be”

    And as proof of your short response, you have realized the err of your ways. The conversations with your priest has finally borne fruit. Congratulations.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  118. Truth says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    She never had child-bearing years. And if anyone was going to carry a baby between Linda Lewis and EJ, it would have been the rocket “man.”

  119. Apparently some sins, don’t go away as consequence one just has to deal with them.

    Our constant reminder of our imperfection to us humble. I would say before the lord, but I a, not sure the lord matters as much as he once did.

  120. @Echoes of History

    @Echoes of History

    You can call me what you want. I never claimed to be anything. I was just offering my perspective on this topic. My apologies for writing something apparently offensive.

  121. @bj

    @bj

    And who says they are going to gain political control here? And I don’t believe that has anything to do with what I said. Just giving my perspective on this matter.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  122. @Colin Wright

    @Colin Wright

    Like I said, my city is not the only place where this is not an issue. Its statistically impossible. I was stating my perspective on this matter. Never said it is not an issue anywhere. I’m sure it is. I am also sure here in America it is hyper-exaggerated by the media. I cannot speak for elsewhere. But here it blown out of proportion. As for Europe, again, I am not there so I don’t know anything first-hand going on. And frankly, I don’t care. Everything that is happening to them is mostly of their own doing. Not my problem.

  123. @Echoes of History

    @Echoes of History

    For the record, the Dark Ones are much more than just the Judaics. And merely stating the facts does not make one a NAZI, but if applying that label to me makes you fell comfortable, so be it. Its the neocons in the Republican party. It is the neo-Bolsheviks in the Democrat party. It is all those that worship the evil that is Israel as if they were God on Earth. The enemy is within, and it isn’t other civilians. Its the traitors in our own government that have sold us out to the Dark Ones. So you worry about dark skin all you want, that is merely a distraction.

    Oh, as for the parentheses, got you you to understand the implication, didn’t it? I don’t care who uses what or not, I have much better things to do than keep up on the latest do & don’t of the internet. Your labels are irrelevant to me. My goal was not to appease you. I am really uncertain why you feel the need to attack me. Its kinda funny that sharing my personal experience in matters of race relations triggered such an emotional response from you. And quite irrational. My initial comment should make it clear that I don’t have issue with other races. Then you proceed to call me a racist and NAZI???? Love it.

  124. @Corvinus

    You’re the one who said you come here to “educate and inform”. The rest of us come here to learn. We’re commenters.

    The button says “Leave a comment”, not “educate” nor “inform”.

    If you want to “educate”, get your own blog. But we all know why you don’t.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  125. @Joel Walbert

    And who says they are going to gain political control here?

    Blacks will never gain political control here. They’re being swamped by Latin Americans.

    They do have a few redoubts of their own, though– Baltimore, Anacostia, East St Louis. No one else will go there.

  126. Corvinus says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    “The button says “Leave a comment”, not “educate” nor “inform”.”

    And from the comments one can become educated and informed, i.e. learn from other commenters how they think about matters. When one comments on a topic, the reader may find out more about it. They may begin to question their own line of thinking, or they may become even more hardened in their position. “Educating” and “informing” is an inherent part of the blogging and commenting process. The bloggers here, as well as the commenters, generally desire to “educate” those whom they believe have been bamboozled by the MSM or by Jews. They seek to “red pill” the masses. In this manner, people can “learn” what they believe is “truth”.

    Confession is that way, Reg.

  127. @Reg Cæsar

    @Reg Cæsar

    Again, nothing to do with what I was saying. True, but irrelevant to my point.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.