The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Pat Buchanan ArchiveBlogview
Comey & the Saturday Night Massacre
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

History repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce, said Marx.

On publication day of my memoir of Richard Nixon’s White House, President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey. Instantly, the media cried “Nixonian,” comparing it to the 1973 Saturday Night Massacre.

Yet, the differences are stark.

The resignations of Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General Bill Ruckelshaus and the firing of Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox came in the middle of an East-West crisis.

On Oct. 6, 1973, the high holy day of Yom Kippur, in a surprise attack, Egyptian troops crossed the Suez Canal and breached Israel’s Bar Lev Line. Syria attacked on the Golan Heights.

Within days, 1,000 Israeli soldiers were dead, hundreds of tanks destroyed, dozens of planes downed by Soviet surface-to-air missiles. As Egypt’s army broke through in the Sinai, there came reports that Moshe Dayan was arming Israeli F-4s with nuclear weapons.

“This is the end of the Third Temple,” Dayan was quoted.

Nixon ordered every U.S. transport that could fly to deliver tanks and planes to Israel. Gen. Ariel Sharon crossed the Canal to the west and rolled north to cut off and kill the Egyptian 3rd army in Sinai.

The Gulf Arabs declared an oil embargo of the United States.

We got reports that nuclear-capable Russian ships were moving through the Dardanelles and Soviet airborne divisions were moving to airfields. U.S. nuclear forces were put on heightened alert.

On Oct. 10, another blow had befallen Nixon’s White House. Vice President Agnew pleaded nolo contendere to tax evasion and resigned.

Nixon immediately named Gerald Ford to replace him.

It was in this environment, with Henry Kissinger in Moscow trying to negotiate a ceasefire in the Mideast, that Cox refused to accept a compromise deal that would give him verified summaries of Nixon’s tapes, but not actual tapes. Democrat Senators Sam Ervin and John Stennis had accepted this compromise, as had Richardson, or so we believed.

Nixon had no choice. As he told me, he could not, in this Cold War crisis, have Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev see him back down in the face of defiance by one of his own Cabinet appointees.

If he had to, Nixon told me, he would reach down to a GS-7 at Justice to fire Cox: “We can’t have that viper sleeping in the bed with us.”

That Saturday night, I told friends, next week will bring resolutions of impeachment in the House. And so it did.

How do Nixon and Trump’s actions differ?

Where Nixon decapitated his Justice Department and shut down the special prosecutor’s office, Trump simply fired an FBI director who agreed that Trump had every right to do so.

By October 1973, with two dozen Nixon White House, Cabinet and campaign officers convicted or facing indictment and trial, we were steeped in the worst political scandal in U.S. history.

Nothing comparable exists today.

But if President Trump is enraged, he has every right to be.

Since July, the FBI has been investigating alleged Trump campaign collusion with Putin’s Russia to hack the DNC and John Podesta’s email accounts — and produced zilch. As of January, ex-CIA Director Mike Morell and ex-DNI James Clapper said no collusion had been found.

Yet every day we hear Democrats and the media bray about a Putin-Trump connection and Russian “control” of the president.

In the early 1950s, they had a term for this. It was called McCarthyism, and its greatest practitioners invariably turned out to be those who had invented the term.

“Justice delayed is justice denied!” applies to presidents, too.

Trump has been under a cloud of a “Russian connection” to him and his campaign for nearly a year. Yet no hard evidence of Trump-Russia collusion in the election has been produced.

Is not the endless airing of unproven allegations inherently un-American?

In 1973, NBC’s John Chancellor suggested the ouster of Richardson, Ruckelshaus and Cox was the “most serious constitutional crisis” in U.S. history, passing over the secession of 11 Southern states and a Civil War that cost 620,000 lives. One London reporter said that “the whiff of the Gestapo was in the clear October air.”

We see a similar hysteria rising today.

Yet that was not a constitutional crisis then, and the mandated early retirement of Jim Comey is not a constitutional crisis now.

And that the mainstream media are equating “Russia-gate” and Watergate tells you what is afoot.

Trump is hated by this city, which gave him 4 percent of its votes, as much as Nixon was. And the deep-state determination to bring him down is as great as it was with Nixon.

By 1968, the liberal establishment had lost the mandate it had held since 1933, but not lost its ability to wound and kill presidents.

Though Nixon won 49 states, that establishment took him down. Though Ronald Reagan won 49 states, that establishment almost took him down in the Iran-Contra affair.

And that is the end they have in mind for President Trump.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of a new book, “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2017 Creators.com.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Donald Trump, Russia 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Had Nixon fired Kissinger USA might not be run by Israel firsters who are orchestrating Trump hysteria.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Kissinger was not an Israeli Firster. He was a Reality Firster.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    //www.unz.com/pbuchanan/comey-the-saturday-night-massacre/#comment-1873343
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. The so-called liberal political and media establishment try everything in its power to take Trump down. The whole Russian spin is made up. They have not produced a single piece of evidence, just “zilch.” But they still keep the ball rolling because they have not yet gotten over their crushing defeat. Instead of poking about in the fog, the media should get their hands on the criminal machinations of Hillary, Bill, Podesta and the other crooks within the Democratic Party. If Trump remains level-headed, the made-up stories will go poof.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eagle Eye

    ... the criminal machinations of Hillary, Bill, Podesta and the other crooks
     
    Pizzagate is real, that's why it has been made to disappear so thoroughly down the memory hole. It reaches FAR beyond the Podestas.
  3. “Nixon ordered every U.S. transport that could fly to deliver tanks and planes to Israel.”

    When added to the list of siding with China over Taiwan and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, it’s hard not to see that Nixon made choices with terrible consequences for not just the U.S. but the world as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    When added to the list of siding with China over Taiwan and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, it’s hard not to see that Nixon made choices with terrible consequences for not just the U.S. but the world as well.

    Pretending that Taiwan represented China was turning into an international joke.

    Also, despite the symbolism, the US never gave up on Taiwan.
    , @Anon
    Don't forget cancelling the construction of follow on Saturn V rockets to extend the Apollo program to an orbital mission around Venus with Apollo 19-20 and a Mars landing around Apollo 25.

    Even worse, after refusing to support funding an additional ten Saturn Vs to take us to the red planet in the 1970s, he pressured NASA to squander the precious remaining Saturn Vs on bullshit Apollo Soyuz missions.

    Nixon, more than any man, is responsible for the stillbirth of human space exploration. All his other foolish decisions (IE Gold Standard, Affirmative Action, EPA, etc) inflicted grievous harm on the United States, but his decision to kill Saturn V production, and shut down Apollo may prove to be the choice that precluded human survival at some point in the future.
    , @Anonymous
    "When added to the list of siding with China over Taiwan and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, it’s hard not to see that Nixon made choices with terrible consequences for not just the U.S. but the world as well."

    Nixon indeed had his share of terrible choices- Affirmative action via the Philadelphia Order and taking us off of the gold standard come to mind. That allowed the parasite class to rob us through the invisible tax of inflation. Not to mention the other allowing another parasite class to rob us out of our jobs. I doubt too many people in those vaunted 49 states who voted against the growing liberal state thought they were voting for these things. So maybe he has that in common with Trump as well. Not too many people who voted against Hillary thought we'd be diving into wars in Syria and fishing for one with N Korea right now.

  4. On the word massacre, the fact that these deep staters can act with impunity is the real problem. Firing Comey is simply not good enough, he should be executed for treason, so should Clapper, Brennan, their various senior editor mouthpieces, etc. I am being dead serious here, until these vile people are giving the punishment they properly deserve they will simply continue with subverting government.

    Read More
    • Replies: @dc.sunsets

    Firing Comey is simply not good enough, he should be executed for treason, so should Clapper, Brennan, their various senior editor mouthpieces, etc.
     
    There isn't the landfill space to bury all those whose treason is openly practiced, much less the cultists who tear at their own clothes and weep in angst over the fact that the world couldn't continue to spin left forever.
  5. With stocks still bumping the ceiling today, Trump’s position is secure no matter how deafening are the screams at ABCNNBCBS et.al. That those firms are owned by leftists is impossible to ignore; the Russian Gambit is an obvious fabrication that works only on those whose premises turn in only one direction.

    Nixon was re-elected in a landslide during a major stock rally; he was driven from office after a major stock market decline. Those who think this is a coincidence lack a stock chart and a history book.

    The real test will be when this stock rally flames out. In terms of amplitude and duration, the rally since the 2009 lows is overbaked by every measure. It will not continue forever.

    The entire period from 1982 to today occurred amidst the largest build-up of credit & debt in human history. It was fueled by a social mood mania of historic proportion, and the entire world economy was warped in favor of expanding to serve debt-fueled demand. Debt fuel only lasted as long as old debts could be rolled over at lower interest rates, a trend that ended several years ago, and the market (and world economy) today look like a jet plane on full afterburner, vertically rising even as the fuel gauge moves toward E.

    When the mood rolls over, and stocks fall this time, what follows should make Nixon’s second term look like sipping mint juleps at an antebellum estate near Atlanta.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Neil Templeton
    So maybe like drinking Hamm's by a birch fire in North Idaho?
  6. @neutral
    On the word massacre, the fact that these deep staters can act with impunity is the real problem. Firing Comey is simply not good enough, he should be executed for treason, so should Clapper, Brennan, their various senior editor mouthpieces, etc. I am being dead serious here, until these vile people are giving the punishment they properly deserve they will simply continue with subverting government.

    Firing Comey is simply not good enough, he should be executed for treason, so should Clapper, Brennan, their various senior editor mouthpieces, etc.

    There isn’t the landfill space to bury all those whose treason is openly practiced, much less the cultists who tear at their own clothes and weep in angst over the fact that the world couldn’t continue to spin left forever.

    Read More
  7. If they dare move to coup, Trump has surrounded himself with generals for a reason.

    It’s Deep State versus U.S. Military.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    Military won't help him if it is a palace coup headed by Pence persuading Trump to sign the letter of resignation on account poor health.
    , @neutral
    Probably more basic than that, there would be an outright civil war. Problem for the deep staters is that their headquarters are well known and would be the first targets to be reduced to rubble.
  8. @whorefinder
    If they dare move to coup, Trump has surrounded himself with generals for a reason.

    It's Deep State versus U.S. Military.

    Military won’t help him if it is a palace coup headed by Pence persuading Trump to sign the letter of resignation on account poor health.

    Read More
  9. Ironically, it’s a different foreign power–Israel– that manipulates and controls our government and is steering our civilization towards disaster. Yet no one dares point out this obvious fact.

    All this hokum about Russia ‘interfering’ in America’s election is coming to us via Zionist-controlled media outlets, written by Zionist editors, and cheered on by politicians whose very presence in Washington relies on Zionist money and support by Zionist-controlled political parties.

    Russia is a bit player in all this. Israel, not Russia, is the false centerpiece of American public life.

    We are living in a Twilight Zone of gross distortion and mass deception.

    Read More
  10. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Though Ronald Reagan won 49 states, that establishment almost took him down in the Iran-Contra affair.

    They could have taken him down on that one but spared him because they wanted to restore trust in government. 80s were a different time.

    Read More
  11. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Johnny Smoggins
    "Nixon ordered every U.S. transport that could fly to deliver tanks and planes to Israel."

    When added to the list of siding with China over Taiwan and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, it's hard not to see that Nixon made choices with terrible consequences for not just the U.S. but the world as well.

    When added to the list of siding with China over Taiwan and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, it’s hard not to see that Nixon made choices with terrible consequences for not just the U.S. but the world as well.

    Pretending that Taiwan represented China was turning into an international joke.

    Also, despite the symbolism, the US never gave up on Taiwan.

    Read More
  12. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @anonymous
    Had Nixon fired Kissinger USA might not be run by Israel firsters who are orchestrating Trump hysteria.

    Kissinger was not an Israeli Firster. He was a Reality Firster.

    Read More
  13. @whorefinder
    If they dare move to coup, Trump has surrounded himself with generals for a reason.

    It's Deep State versus U.S. Military.

    Probably more basic than that, there would be an outright civil war. Problem for the deep staters is that their headquarters are well known and would be the first targets to be reduced to rubble.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Not so sure that would happen, with large numbers of heavily armed, armored, and trained troops sent to guard the White House, Congress, Supreme Court, NSA facilities, FBI offices, CIA, etc.
  14. @Anon
    Kissinger was not an Israeli Firster. He was a Reality Firster.

    with Israel on top of reality

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    He wasn't always Israel-first in his recommendations.

    Also, things were different back then.

    Now, with US as lone super power, it can throw its weight around in the Middle East.

    Back then, US had to contend with the USSR as the other superpower. So, Arab states hostile to Israel has far greater leverage. So, Kissinger wanted a more cautions approach to the Middle East. He was no neocon, at least back then.
  15. Yet every day we hear Democrats and the media bray about a Putin-Trump connection and Russian “control” of the president.

    US is fast becoming a mad house, the version of 1984. It is both fascinating and painful to observe–a complete nuttery on the road to self-destruction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @for-the-record

    It is both fascinating and painful to observe–a complete nuttery on the road to self-destruction.
     
    Hopefully it's only self-destruction.
  16. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @bjondo
    with Israel on top of reality

    He wasn’t always Israel-first in his recommendations.

    Also, things were different back then.

    Now, with US as lone super power, it can throw its weight around in the Middle East.

    Back then, US had to contend with the USSR as the other superpower. So, Arab states hostile to Israel has far greater leverage. So, Kissinger wanted a more cautions approach to the Middle East. He was no neocon, at least back then.

    Read More
  17. something I posted on another thread:

    on Drudge right now regarding Seth Rich and the fact that it was never the Russians and they all knew it..

    DEAD DNC STAFFER ‘HAD CONTACT’ WITH WIKILEAKS…

    ‘Sent 44,053 Internal Emails’…

    Police told to ‘stand down’…

    of course we all knew all the bs about “Russia did it!” was a crock, but this is now getting out there. Could be very inconvenient for the deepstate scoundrels/war pigs and assorted scum who’ve been shrieking hysterically now for months that “Russia did it!” / ‘Trump works for Putin!!’ / ‘Kellyanne hates Donald!’

    I just heard them say on NPR that Trump said things to Lavrov that ‘he didn’t get permission’ to say. I wondered, permission from whom? He’s the president. I guess he’s supposed to phone Tel Aviv before he says anything

    Read More
  18. In 1973, NBC’s John Chancellor suggested the ouster of Richardson, Ruckelshaus and Cox was the “most serious constitutional crisis” in U.S. history, passing over the secession of 11 Southern states and a Civil War that cost 620,000 lives.

    LOL

    Read More
  19. @neutral
    Probably more basic than that, there would be an outright civil war. Problem for the deep staters is that their headquarters are well known and would be the first targets to be reduced to rubble.

    Not so sure that would happen, with large numbers of heavily armed, armored, and trained troops sent to guard the White House, Congress, Supreme Court, NSA facilities, FBI offices, CIA, etc.

    Read More
  20. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    It’s like killing the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO.

    The old man wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take it that far. And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that ‘there is no going back’.
    Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and economic desperation. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.

    Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Jewish-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.

    Globalism’s power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism’s aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it.

    So, why does globalism have such a great influence around the world?
    One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that will comply. So, if the US promises sweet deals for nations if they cave to homomania, they often do.
    Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.

    Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren’t particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma and cliches and spout them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.

    But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that ‘globalism’ has negative connotations. Also, even in the world center of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn’t good for the world or for most Americans. It’s only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a something for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by ‘New Europeans’ from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as ‘far right’, ‘extreme’, and ‘white supremacist’ by globalism.
    Also, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn’t about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of ‘values’ such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies.

    Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to immigrate to richer white nations. If not for that option, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women.
    I mean Muslims have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS the non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.

    Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it’s so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism it will demographically displace them? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they’ve been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating ‘white racism’. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed ‘racist’.

    Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC’s diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for ‘civic nationalism’ and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed Diversity is such a wonderful thing, one is naturally relegated to moral inferiority IF one wants less of it. Since even the Conservatives chanted the mantra of ‘diversity is our strength’ over and over, they’ve fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that will increase wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than ‘white racism’. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a ‘far right’ and ‘racist’.

    Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador gentile elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews.

    Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely no meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII and the Holocaust, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity?
    It’s because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to Jewish corruption and abuses, and over times, whites will grow angry and become ‘antisemitic’ once again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won’t be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can’t resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, ‘antisemitism’ is mostly likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish Domination.

    Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.

    How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as “Russia’s sphere of influence”.
    But Russia slipped out of the fingers of Jews. To be sure, it’s still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn’t apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire.
    But Russia won’t be having ‘gay pride month’ and ‘black history month’ anytime soon. While Russia isn’t racialist in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don’t believe that Russians primarily exist to serve non-Russians, which is contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies.

    In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans… but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst also as outsiders. Also, the die has been cast already to the point where it’s difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it’s now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, it’s hard to moderate your position.
    It’s like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to the invasion. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and mutual recognition of the other’s legitimacy. But once Hitler went all out and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast.
    There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, both pushing for more diversity and mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the wind, and go ALL OUT in their war on whiteness. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.

    http://i.huffpost.com/gen/854726/original.jpg

    So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don’t believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It’s all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous example for white gentile nations. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
    Now, why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depends on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fear repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who got too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia aren’t so assured of their position as rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have the Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish powers and its agents.

    But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there’s no telling what he might really do. He’s not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve.
    Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means US control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Less US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination. And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more national-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.

    This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Big Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive with Russia. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy.
    So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It’s about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.

    But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as ‘going easy on communism’. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the deal by accusing Reagan of going senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.

    It’s like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in NIXON.

    EHRLICHMAN
    Excuse me … Are you talking about
    recognizing China, Mr. President?
    That would cost us our strongest
    support.

    NIXON
    No … I can do this because I’ve
    spent my whole career building anti
    Communist credentials.

    HALDEMAN
    If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they’d
    have crucified them, and rightfully
    so!

    MITCHELL
    It’s damned risky, Mr. President. Why
    don’t we wait till the second term?

    Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and altering the ties.
    As Jewish Power put everything in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews.
    Now, Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time beign against the more problematic Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right aspect of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Neil Templeton
    Anon, your comments now exceed the length of NYT editorials. More substance, perhaps, but still....
    , @Miro23

    Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn’t apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations.
     
    I think that the arrest of Khodorkovsky was the key event here. It sent an earthquake through the Zio/Glob world and triggered the present situation.

    What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction.
     
    True, and as you say, they have committed to the end game. Hitler launched Barbarossa against Russia and they have fully committed to a Barbarossa II against White Europeans in Europe and North America.
    , @Joe Levantine
    "What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. "
    That would explain the root cause of WWII and the vicious, unprecedented destruction of Germany succeeded by a de facto new war guilt clause by inventing the story of the holocaust.

    "why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever"
    Well Mr. Anon, you have nailed it bullseye. Supremacism, Jewish or other, has been the backbone of the world's misery and the driving force towards imperial conquests and the current vilification of nationalism as a source of evil. Nationalism devoid of supremacism should lead to a better world where nation states can live in cooperation rather than in blind and ruthless competition over hegemony and the right to control resources.

    Overall, this is a great analysis that is worthy of being archived for future generations if we ever get the chance to escape the final embrace of the hand of the Zionist juggernaut that will banish any such independent analysis to the memory hole of Orwell's Ministry of Truth and to Aldos Huxley's ' Brave New World' where living with one controlled truth will be the assured end of the dialectical society.
    , @Joe Levantine
    Many thanks for your Herculean effort at producing this great analysis.
    , @geokat62
    Brava/o, brilliant analysis!
    , @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Anon, even by your standard, this is rather a lengthy one... So the gist of your formula is basically: Jews=Homosexual=Money=Evil=Anti-White-Christian=Pro Islam=World Domination. But then what? What would they do with all that wherewithal? One can suppose they would eat the best and most number of lobsters (well, some of them don't eat crustaceans but you get the point), have the best hand bags made by a million tiny white baby hands of the best materials and perhaps, go to the Moon and Mars for vacations very frequently at the expense of the rest of the humanity. But then what? What do they plan to do with us (those remaining after the massive pogroms to satisfy their G-D, which you didn't mention but I imagine you thinking about it)? You seem to know the puzzle, hence, you must provide the answer. What is to become of us, Yoda?
  21. The new corroboration of the Seth Rich story, which includes the likelihood that the FBI helped in the coverup means that Comey’s role should be the subject of a full investigation if a new head of the FBI can somehow be appointed. Treason and sedition are now serious issues, and Trump’s opponents, not Trump, are the prime suspects.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    The new corroboration of the Seth Rich story, which includes the likelihood that the FBI helped in the coverup means that Comey’s role should be the subject of a full investigation if a new head of the FBI can somehow be appointed. Treason and sedition are now serious issues, and Trump’s opponents, not Trump, are the prime suspects.
     
    This is really interesting.

    It seems that some FBI insider has revealed that the FBI knew all along that it was Seth Rich who supplied the DNC emails to WikiLeaks - and that he was murdered for doing it.

    So at a minimum, Comey was involved in blocking a murder investigation (police ordered to stand down) and covering up the true source of the leak by promoting the "Russian hacking/Trump" collusion story.

    No wonder Trump sacked him, he should really be under arrest.
  22. @dc.sunsets
    With stocks still bumping the ceiling today, Trump's position is secure no matter how deafening are the screams at ABCNNBCBS et.al. That those firms are owned by leftists is impossible to ignore; the Russian Gambit is an obvious fabrication that works only on those whose premises turn in only one direction.

    Nixon was re-elected in a landslide during a major stock rally; he was driven from office after a major stock market decline. Those who think this is a coincidence lack a stock chart and a history book.

    The real test will be when this stock rally flames out. In terms of amplitude and duration, the rally since the 2009 lows is overbaked by every measure. It will not continue forever.

    The entire period from 1982 to today occurred amidst the largest build-up of credit & debt in human history. It was fueled by a social mood mania of historic proportion, and the entire world economy was warped in favor of expanding to serve debt-fueled demand. Debt fuel only lasted as long as old debts could be rolled over at lower interest rates, a trend that ended several years ago, and the market (and world economy) today look like a jet plane on full afterburner, vertically rising even as the fuel gauge moves toward E.

    When the mood rolls over, and stocks fall this time, what follows should make Nixon's second term look like sipping mint juleps at an antebellum estate near Atlanta.

    So maybe like drinking Hamm’s by a birch fire in North Idaho?

    Read More
  23. @Anon
    It's like killing the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO.

    The old man wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take it that far. And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that 'there is no going back'.
    Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and economic desperation. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.

    Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Jewish-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.

    Globalism's power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism's aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it.

    So, why does globalism have such a great influence around the world?
    One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that will comply. So, if the US promises sweet deals for nations if they cave to homomania, they often do.
    Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.

    Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren't particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma and cliches and spout them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.

    But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that 'globalism' has negative connotations. Also, even in the world center of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn't good for the world or for most Americans. It's only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a something for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by 'New Europeans' from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as 'far right', 'extreme', and 'white supremacist' by globalism.
    Also, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn't about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of 'values' such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies.

    Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to immigrate to richer white nations. If not for that option, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women.
    I mean Muslims have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS the non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.

    Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it's so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism it will demographically displace them? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they've been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating 'white racism'. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed 'racist'.

    Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC's diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for 'civic nationalism' and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed Diversity is such a wonderful thing, one is naturally relegated to moral inferiority IF one wants less of it. Since even the Conservatives chanted the mantra of 'diversity is our strength' over and over, they've fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that will increase wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than 'white racism'. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a 'far right' and 'racist'.

    Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador gentile elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews.

    Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely no meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII and the Holocaust, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity?
    It's because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to Jewish corruption and abuses, and over times, whites will grow angry and become 'antisemitic' once again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won't be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can't resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, 'antisemitism' is mostly likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won't be able to unite against Jewish Domination.

    Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.

    How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as "Russia's sphere of influence".
    But Russia slipped out of the fingers of Jews. To be sure, it's still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn't apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire.
    But Russia won't be having 'gay pride month' and 'black history month' anytime soon. While Russia isn't racialist in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don't believe that Russians primarily exist to serve non-Russians, which is contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies.

    In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans... but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst also as outsiders. Also, the die has been cast already to the point where it's difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it's now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, it's hard to moderate your position.
    It's like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to the invasion. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and mutual recognition of the other's legitimacy. But once Hitler went all out and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast.
    There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, both pushing for more diversity and mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the wind, and go ALL OUT in their war on whiteness. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.

    http://i.huffpost.com/gen/854726/original.jpg

    So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don't believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It's all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous example for white gentile nations. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
    Now, why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depends on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fear repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who got too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia aren't so assured of their position as rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have the Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish powers and its agents.

    But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there's no telling what he might really do. He's not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve.
    Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means US control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Less US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination. And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more national-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.

    This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Big Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive with Russia. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy.
    So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It's about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.

    But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as 'going easy on communism'. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the deal by accusing Reagan of going senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.

    It's like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in NIXON.

    EHRLICHMAN
    Excuse me ... Are you talking about
    recognizing China, Mr. President?
    That would cost us our strongest
    support.


    NIXON
    No ... I can do this because I've
    spent my whole career building anti
    Communist credentials.


    HALDEMAN
    If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they'd
    have crucified them, and rightfully
    so!


    MITCHELL
    It's damned risky, Mr. President. Why
    don't we wait till the second term?


    Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and altering the ties.
    As Jewish Power put everything in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews.
    Now, Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time beign against the more problematic Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right aspect of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance.

    Anon, your comments now exceed the length of NYT editorials. More substance, perhaps, but still….

    Read More
  24. @Anon
    It's like killing the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO.

    The old man wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take it that far. And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that 'there is no going back'.
    Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and economic desperation. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.

    Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Jewish-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.

    Globalism's power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism's aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it.

    So, why does globalism have such a great influence around the world?
    One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that will comply. So, if the US promises sweet deals for nations if they cave to homomania, they often do.
    Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.

    Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren't particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma and cliches and spout them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.

    But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that 'globalism' has negative connotations. Also, even in the world center of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn't good for the world or for most Americans. It's only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a something for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by 'New Europeans' from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as 'far right', 'extreme', and 'white supremacist' by globalism.
    Also, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn't about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of 'values' such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies.

    Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to immigrate to richer white nations. If not for that option, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women.
    I mean Muslims have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS the non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.

    Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it's so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism it will demographically displace them? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they've been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating 'white racism'. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed 'racist'.

    Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC's diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for 'civic nationalism' and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed Diversity is such a wonderful thing, one is naturally relegated to moral inferiority IF one wants less of it. Since even the Conservatives chanted the mantra of 'diversity is our strength' over and over, they've fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that will increase wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than 'white racism'. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a 'far right' and 'racist'.

    Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador gentile elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews.

    Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely no meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII and the Holocaust, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity?
    It's because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to Jewish corruption and abuses, and over times, whites will grow angry and become 'antisemitic' once again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won't be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can't resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, 'antisemitism' is mostly likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won't be able to unite against Jewish Domination.

    Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.

    How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as "Russia's sphere of influence".
    But Russia slipped out of the fingers of Jews. To be sure, it's still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn't apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire.
    But Russia won't be having 'gay pride month' and 'black history month' anytime soon. While Russia isn't racialist in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don't believe that Russians primarily exist to serve non-Russians, which is contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies.

    In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans... but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst also as outsiders. Also, the die has been cast already to the point where it's difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it's now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, it's hard to moderate your position.
    It's like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to the invasion. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and mutual recognition of the other's legitimacy. But once Hitler went all out and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast.
    There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, both pushing for more diversity and mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the wind, and go ALL OUT in their war on whiteness. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.

    http://i.huffpost.com/gen/854726/original.jpg

    So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don't believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It's all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous example for white gentile nations. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
    Now, why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depends on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fear repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who got too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia aren't so assured of their position as rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have the Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish powers and its agents.

    But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there's no telling what he might really do. He's not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve.
    Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means US control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Less US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination. And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more national-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.

    This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Big Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive with Russia. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy.
    So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It's about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.

    But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as 'going easy on communism'. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the deal by accusing Reagan of going senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.

    It's like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in NIXON.

    EHRLICHMAN
    Excuse me ... Are you talking about
    recognizing China, Mr. President?
    That would cost us our strongest
    support.


    NIXON
    No ... I can do this because I've
    spent my whole career building anti
    Communist credentials.


    HALDEMAN
    If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they'd
    have crucified them, and rightfully
    so!


    MITCHELL
    It's damned risky, Mr. President. Why
    don't we wait till the second term?


    Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and altering the ties.
    As Jewish Power put everything in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews.
    Now, Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time beign against the more problematic Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right aspect of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance.

    Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn’t apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations.

    I think that the arrest of Khodorkovsky was the key event here. It sent an earthquake through the Zio/Glob world and triggered the present situation.

    What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction.

    True, and as you say, they have committed to the end game. Hitler launched Barbarossa against Russia and they have fully committed to a Barbarossa II against White Europeans in Europe and North America.

    Read More
  25. @exiled off mainstreet
    The new corroboration of the Seth Rich story, which includes the likelihood that the FBI helped in the coverup means that Comey's role should be the subject of a full investigation if a new head of the FBI can somehow be appointed. Treason and sedition are now serious issues, and Trump's opponents, not Trump, are the prime suspects.

    The new corroboration of the Seth Rich story, which includes the likelihood that the FBI helped in the coverup means that Comey’s role should be the subject of a full investigation if a new head of the FBI can somehow be appointed. Treason and sedition are now serious issues, and Trump’s opponents, not Trump, are the prime suspects.

    This is really interesting.

    It seems that some FBI insider has revealed that the FBI knew all along that it was Seth Rich who supplied the DNC emails to WikiLeaks – and that he was murdered for doing it.

    So at a minimum, Comey was involved in blocking a murder investigation (police ordered to stand down) and covering up the true source of the leak by promoting the “Russian hacking/Trump” collusion story.

    No wonder Trump sacked him, he should really be under arrest.

    Read More
  26. @Anon
    It's like killing the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO.

    The old man wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take it that far. And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that 'there is no going back'.
    Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and economic desperation. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.

    Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Jewish-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.

    Globalism's power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism's aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it.

    So, why does globalism have such a great influence around the world?
    One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that will comply. So, if the US promises sweet deals for nations if they cave to homomania, they often do.
    Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.

    Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren't particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma and cliches and spout them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.

    But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that 'globalism' has negative connotations. Also, even in the world center of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn't good for the world or for most Americans. It's only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a something for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by 'New Europeans' from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as 'far right', 'extreme', and 'white supremacist' by globalism.
    Also, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn't about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of 'values' such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies.

    Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to immigrate to richer white nations. If not for that option, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women.
    I mean Muslims have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS the non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.

    Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it's so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism it will demographically displace them? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they've been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating 'white racism'. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed 'racist'.

    Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC's diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for 'civic nationalism' and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed Diversity is such a wonderful thing, one is naturally relegated to moral inferiority IF one wants less of it. Since even the Conservatives chanted the mantra of 'diversity is our strength' over and over, they've fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that will increase wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than 'white racism'. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a 'far right' and 'racist'.

    Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador gentile elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews.

    Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely no meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII and the Holocaust, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity?
    It's because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to Jewish corruption and abuses, and over times, whites will grow angry and become 'antisemitic' once again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won't be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can't resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, 'antisemitism' is mostly likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won't be able to unite against Jewish Domination.

    Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.

    How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as "Russia's sphere of influence".
    But Russia slipped out of the fingers of Jews. To be sure, it's still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn't apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire.
    But Russia won't be having 'gay pride month' and 'black history month' anytime soon. While Russia isn't racialist in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don't believe that Russians primarily exist to serve non-Russians, which is contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies.

    In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans... but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst also as outsiders. Also, the die has been cast already to the point where it's difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it's now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, it's hard to moderate your position.
    It's like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to the invasion. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and mutual recognition of the other's legitimacy. But once Hitler went all out and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast.
    There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, both pushing for more diversity and mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the wind, and go ALL OUT in their war on whiteness. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.

    http://i.huffpost.com/gen/854726/original.jpg

    So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don't believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It's all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous example for white gentile nations. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
    Now, why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depends on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fear repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who got too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia aren't so assured of their position as rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have the Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish powers and its agents.

    But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there's no telling what he might really do. He's not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve.
    Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means US control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Less US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination. And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more national-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.

    This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Big Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive with Russia. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy.
    So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It's about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.

    But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as 'going easy on communism'. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the deal by accusing Reagan of going senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.

    It's like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in NIXON.

    EHRLICHMAN
    Excuse me ... Are you talking about
    recognizing China, Mr. President?
    That would cost us our strongest
    support.


    NIXON
    No ... I can do this because I've
    spent my whole career building anti
    Communist credentials.


    HALDEMAN
    If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they'd
    have crucified them, and rightfully
    so!


    MITCHELL
    It's damned risky, Mr. President. Why
    don't we wait till the second term?


    Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and altering the ties.
    As Jewish Power put everything in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews.
    Now, Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time beign against the more problematic Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right aspect of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance.

    “What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. ”
    That would explain the root cause of WWII and the vicious, unprecedented destruction of Germany succeeded by a de facto new war guilt clause by inventing the story of the holocaust.

    “why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever”
    Well Mr. Anon, you have nailed it bullseye. Supremacism, Jewish or other, has been the backbone of the world’s misery and the driving force towards imperial conquests and the current vilification of nationalism as a source of evil. Nationalism devoid of supremacism should lead to a better world where nation states can live in cooperation rather than in blind and ruthless competition over hegemony and the right to control resources.

    Overall, this is a great analysis that is worthy of being archived for future generations if we ever get the chance to escape the final embrace of the hand of the Zionist juggernaut that will banish any such independent analysis to the memory hole of Orwell’s Ministry of Truth and to Aldos Huxley’s ‘ Brave New World’ where living with one controlled truth will be the assured end of the dialectical society.

    Read More
  27. @Anon
    It's like killing the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO.

    The old man wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take it that far. And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that 'there is no going back'.
    Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and economic desperation. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.

    Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Jewish-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.

    Globalism's power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism's aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it.

    So, why does globalism have such a great influence around the world?
    One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that will comply. So, if the US promises sweet deals for nations if they cave to homomania, they often do.
    Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.

    Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren't particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma and cliches and spout them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.

    But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that 'globalism' has negative connotations. Also, even in the world center of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn't good for the world or for most Americans. It's only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a something for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by 'New Europeans' from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as 'far right', 'extreme', and 'white supremacist' by globalism.
    Also, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn't about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of 'values' such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies.

    Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to immigrate to richer white nations. If not for that option, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women.
    I mean Muslims have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS the non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.

    Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it's so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism it will demographically displace them? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they've been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating 'white racism'. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed 'racist'.

    Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC's diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for 'civic nationalism' and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed Diversity is such a wonderful thing, one is naturally relegated to moral inferiority IF one wants less of it. Since even the Conservatives chanted the mantra of 'diversity is our strength' over and over, they've fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that will increase wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than 'white racism'. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a 'far right' and 'racist'.

    Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador gentile elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews.

    Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely no meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII and the Holocaust, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity?
    It's because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to Jewish corruption and abuses, and over times, whites will grow angry and become 'antisemitic' once again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won't be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can't resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, 'antisemitism' is mostly likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won't be able to unite against Jewish Domination.

    Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.

    How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as "Russia's sphere of influence".
    But Russia slipped out of the fingers of Jews. To be sure, it's still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn't apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire.
    But Russia won't be having 'gay pride month' and 'black history month' anytime soon. While Russia isn't racialist in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don't believe that Russians primarily exist to serve non-Russians, which is contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies.

    In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans... but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst also as outsiders. Also, the die has been cast already to the point where it's difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it's now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, it's hard to moderate your position.
    It's like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to the invasion. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and mutual recognition of the other's legitimacy. But once Hitler went all out and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast.
    There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, both pushing for more diversity and mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the wind, and go ALL OUT in their war on whiteness. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.

    http://i.huffpost.com/gen/854726/original.jpg

    So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don't believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It's all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous example for white gentile nations. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
    Now, why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depends on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fear repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who got too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia aren't so assured of their position as rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have the Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish powers and its agents.

    But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there's no telling what he might really do. He's not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve.
    Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means US control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Less US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination. And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more national-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.

    This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Big Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive with Russia. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy.
    So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It's about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.

    But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as 'going easy on communism'. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the deal by accusing Reagan of going senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.

    It's like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in NIXON.

    EHRLICHMAN
    Excuse me ... Are you talking about
    recognizing China, Mr. President?
    That would cost us our strongest
    support.


    NIXON
    No ... I can do this because I've
    spent my whole career building anti
    Communist credentials.


    HALDEMAN
    If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they'd
    have crucified them, and rightfully
    so!


    MITCHELL
    It's damned risky, Mr. President. Why
    don't we wait till the second term?


    Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and altering the ties.
    As Jewish Power put everything in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews.
    Now, Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time beign against the more problematic Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right aspect of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance.

    Many thanks for your Herculean effort at producing this great analysis.

    Read More
  28. @Anon
    It's like killing the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO.

    The old man wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take it that far. And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that 'there is no going back'.
    Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and economic desperation. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.

    Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Jewish-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.

    Globalism's power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism's aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it.

    So, why does globalism have such a great influence around the world?
    One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that will comply. So, if the US promises sweet deals for nations if they cave to homomania, they often do.
    Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.

    Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren't particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma and cliches and spout them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.

    But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that 'globalism' has negative connotations. Also, even in the world center of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn't good for the world or for most Americans. It's only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a something for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by 'New Europeans' from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as 'far right', 'extreme', and 'white supremacist' by globalism.
    Also, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn't about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of 'values' such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies.

    Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to immigrate to richer white nations. If not for that option, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women.
    I mean Muslims have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS the non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.

    Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it's so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism it will demographically displace them? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they've been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating 'white racism'. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed 'racist'.

    Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC's diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for 'civic nationalism' and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed Diversity is such a wonderful thing, one is naturally relegated to moral inferiority IF one wants less of it. Since even the Conservatives chanted the mantra of 'diversity is our strength' over and over, they've fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that will increase wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than 'white racism'. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a 'far right' and 'racist'.

    Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador gentile elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews.

    Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely no meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII and the Holocaust, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity?
    It's because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to Jewish corruption and abuses, and over times, whites will grow angry and become 'antisemitic' once again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won't be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can't resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, 'antisemitism' is mostly likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won't be able to unite against Jewish Domination.

    Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.

    How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as "Russia's sphere of influence".
    But Russia slipped out of the fingers of Jews. To be sure, it's still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn't apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire.
    But Russia won't be having 'gay pride month' and 'black history month' anytime soon. While Russia isn't racialist in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don't believe that Russians primarily exist to serve non-Russians, which is contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies.

    In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans... but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst also as outsiders. Also, the die has been cast already to the point where it's difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it's now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, it's hard to moderate your position.
    It's like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to the invasion. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and mutual recognition of the other's legitimacy. But once Hitler went all out and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast.
    There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, both pushing for more diversity and mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the wind, and go ALL OUT in their war on whiteness. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.

    http://i.huffpost.com/gen/854726/original.jpg

    So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don't believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It's all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous example for white gentile nations. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
    Now, why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depends on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fear repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who got too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia aren't so assured of their position as rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have the Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish powers and its agents.

    But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there's no telling what he might really do. He's not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve.
    Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means US control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Less US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination. And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more national-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.

    This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Big Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive with Russia. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy.
    So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It's about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.

    But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as 'going easy on communism'. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the deal by accusing Reagan of going senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.

    It's like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in NIXON.

    EHRLICHMAN
    Excuse me ... Are you talking about
    recognizing China, Mr. President?
    That would cost us our strongest
    support.


    NIXON
    No ... I can do this because I've
    spent my whole career building anti
    Communist credentials.


    HALDEMAN
    If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they'd
    have crucified them, and rightfully
    so!


    MITCHELL
    It's damned risky, Mr. President. Why
    don't we wait till the second term?


    Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and altering the ties.
    As Jewish Power put everything in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews.
    Now, Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time beign against the more problematic Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right aspect of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance.

    Brava/o, brilliant analysis!

    Read More
  29. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Trump needs to move fast to get the people on his side. He needs to give them things that could conceivably be withdrawn by the elites if he is removed, thus giving them motivation to prevent that. Unfortunately, Trump doesn’t seem willing or able. Here are some things that might neutralize his enemies:

    1. Renounce GOP healthcare disaster; support single payer-health plan. This healthcare thing is the single biggest reason for his poll numbers.

    2. Publicly call for increasing the minimum wage to ~$11-12/hr.

    3. Withdraw from NAFTA (it can be done by executive order). Just go for it, consequences be damned.

    4. Fire the Goldman economic guys surrounding him. They are an albatross that working-class people have noticed and hate.

    5. Put Kushner on a plane back to NYC.

    6. Fire his FCC guy and support net neutrality.

    7. Direct Jeff Sessions to end marijuana prosecutions.

    8. Offer plan for free college.

    9. Direct the government to start going after media company monopolies like Time Warner and Comcast with the aim of breaking them up. Consumers hate internet and cable companies.

    10. Renounce current tax reform plan and announce that he’s considering a new one.

    Those are things, which if done tomorrow, would immediately boost Trump while dramatically harming his enemies (they are all fantastically popular). Trump is in a knife fight for his life but draws blanks. The hell. This is no time to stick to GOP dogma.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    11. A free massage and happy ending for all able-bodied men who have way too much time on their hands and don't know what to do with it.
    , @RadicalCenter
    Agreed on most of that, both as good policy and as good politics.

    As for NAFTA, though, I'd probably like to see Trump withdraw us only from the agreement with Mexico, if that is legally possible. No big problem that I can see with keeping the Canadian part of NAFTA, given that Canada has a much smaller population, a much higher average income, and more stringent/costly environmental and worker-safety laws than Mexico does.

    As for a higher minimum wage, I'd support even a gradually MUCH higher minimum wage BUT ONLY IF it were coupled with a dramatic reduction in the income-tax rates paid by the small businesspeople who would be so badly hurt otherwise by such an increase in their wage costs.
    , @RadicalCenter
    What if Trump proposed that the federal government impose a substantial tax on foreign remittances and use the revenue to fund good medical insurance for all U.S. Citizens? (not legal residents, just citizens)

    Let the leftists argue that U.S. citizens shouldn't get universal healthcare because it's more important to let foreigners in the USA send back whatever money they want without paying any taxes.

    , @Anonymous
    While a few seem like good ideas, some of these things smack of liberal foolishness, others of libertarian extremism. To say he harms his enemies by doing those is like saying he'd shut down Black Lives Matter by issuing an executive order to sterilize white men.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    Agreed on healthcare. I've (rarely) used single payer in both the UK and Australia. Fantastic, easily doable and moral.

    Invest in VA hospitals, expand them to serve also as public hospitals.
    Follow the Cuban methods in many practical and cost-effective ways such as indentured training for exceptional students and where very doctor is also a teacher.
    The new graduates continue to serve for a few years in order to repay the investment made.
    In house production of medications.
    Let people who can pay enjoy the private system and those who cannot receive assistance from the public. More jobs, healthier citizens and a better America.
  30. Feb 1, 2017 Secrets Of The FBI Finally Revealed and Leaked

    In this video, we go over the latest FBI leak of thousands of documents to the intercept that revealed their secret rule book and operations. We go over what was found in those documents and the dangers of these powers that the FBI has.

    Read More
  31. @Anon
    It's like killing the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO.

    The old man wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take it that far. And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that 'there is no going back'.
    Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and economic desperation. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.

    Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Jewish-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.

    Globalism's power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism's aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it.

    So, why does globalism have such a great influence around the world?
    One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that will comply. So, if the US promises sweet deals for nations if they cave to homomania, they often do.
    Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.

    Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren't particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma and cliches and spout them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.

    But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that 'globalism' has negative connotations. Also, even in the world center of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn't good for the world or for most Americans. It's only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a something for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by 'New Europeans' from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as 'far right', 'extreme', and 'white supremacist' by globalism.
    Also, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn't about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of 'values' such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies.

    Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to immigrate to richer white nations. If not for that option, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women.
    I mean Muslims have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS the non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.

    Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it's so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism it will demographically displace them? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they've been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating 'white racism'. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed 'racist'.

    Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC's diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for 'civic nationalism' and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed Diversity is such a wonderful thing, one is naturally relegated to moral inferiority IF one wants less of it. Since even the Conservatives chanted the mantra of 'diversity is our strength' over and over, they've fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that will increase wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than 'white racism'. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a 'far right' and 'racist'.

    Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador gentile elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews.

    Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely no meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII and the Holocaust, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity?
    It's because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to Jewish corruption and abuses, and over times, whites will grow angry and become 'antisemitic' once again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won't be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can't resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, 'antisemitism' is mostly likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won't be able to unite against Jewish Domination.

    Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.

    How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as "Russia's sphere of influence".
    But Russia slipped out of the fingers of Jews. To be sure, it's still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that makes Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn't apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire.
    But Russia won't be having 'gay pride month' and 'black history month' anytime soon. While Russia isn't racialist in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don't believe that Russians primarily exist to serve non-Russians, which is contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies.

    In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans... but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst also as outsiders. Also, the die has been cast already to the point where it's difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it's now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, it's hard to moderate your position.
    It's like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to the invasion. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and mutual recognition of the other's legitimacy. But once Hitler went all out and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast.
    There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, both pushing for more diversity and mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the wind, and go ALL OUT in their war on whiteness. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.

    http://i.huffpost.com/gen/854726/original.jpg

    So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don't believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It's all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous example for white gentile nations. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
    Now, why should Jews worry about rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? Because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depends on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fear repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who got too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia aren't so assured of their position as rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have the Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish powers and its agents.

    But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there's no telling what he might really do. He's not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve.
    Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means US control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Less US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination. And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more national-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.

    This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Big Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive with Russia. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy.
    So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It's about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.

    But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as 'going easy on communism'. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the deal by accusing Reagan of going senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.

    It's like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in NIXON.

    EHRLICHMAN
    Excuse me ... Are you talking about
    recognizing China, Mr. President?
    That would cost us our strongest
    support.


    NIXON
    No ... I can do this because I've
    spent my whole career building anti
    Communist credentials.


    HALDEMAN
    If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they'd
    have crucified them, and rightfully
    so!


    MITCHELL
    It's damned risky, Mr. President. Why
    don't we wait till the second term?


    Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and altering the ties.
    As Jewish Power put everything in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews.
    Now, Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time beign against the more problematic Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right aspect of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance.

    Anon, even by your standard, this is rather a lengthy one… So the gist of your formula is basically: Jews=Homosexual=Money=Evil=Anti-White-Christian=Pro Islam=World Domination. But then what? What would they do with all that wherewithal? One can suppose they would eat the best and most number of lobsters (well, some of them don’t eat crustaceans but you get the point), have the best hand bags made by a million tiny white baby hands of the best materials and perhaps, go to the Moon and Mars for vacations very frequently at the expense of the rest of the humanity. But then what? What do they plan to do with us (those remaining after the massive pogroms to satisfy their G-D, which you didn’t mention but I imagine you thinking about it)? You seem to know the puzzle, hence, you must provide the answer. What is to become of us, Yoda?

    Read More
  32. @Andrei Martyanov

    Yet every day we hear Democrats and the media bray about a Putin-Trump connection and Russian “control” of the president.
     
    US is fast becoming a mad house, the version of 1984. It is both fascinating and painful to observe--a complete nuttery on the road to self-destruction.

    It is both fascinating and painful to observe–a complete nuttery on the road to self-destruction.

    Hopefully it’s only self-destruction.

    Read More
  33. @Anon
    Trump needs to move fast to get the people on his side. He needs to give them things that could conceivably be withdrawn by the elites if he is removed, thus giving them motivation to prevent that. Unfortunately, Trump doesn't seem willing or able. Here are some things that might neutralize his enemies:

    1. Renounce GOP healthcare disaster; support single payer-health plan. This healthcare thing is the single biggest reason for his poll numbers.

    2. Publicly call for increasing the minimum wage to ~$11-12/hr.

    3. Withdraw from NAFTA (it can be done by executive order). Just go for it, consequences be damned.

    4. Fire the Goldman economic guys surrounding him. They are an albatross that working-class people have noticed and hate.

    5. Put Kushner on a plane back to NYC.

    6. Fire his FCC guy and support net neutrality.

    7. Direct Jeff Sessions to end marijuana prosecutions.

    8. Offer plan for free college.

    9. Direct the government to start going after media company monopolies like Time Warner and Comcast with the aim of breaking them up. Consumers hate internet and cable companies.

    10. Renounce current tax reform plan and announce that he's considering a new one.

    Those are things, which if done tomorrow, would immediately boost Trump while dramatically harming his enemies (they are all fantastically popular). Trump is in a knife fight for his life but draws blanks. The hell. This is no time to stick to GOP dogma.

    11. A free massage and happy ending for all able-bodied men who have way too much time on their hands and don’t know what to do with it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "11. A free massage and happy ending for all able-bodied men who have way too much time on their hands and don’t know what to do with it."

    Troll. I guess I could have spent the 1 minute 23 seconds it took to write that doing something productive like...ignoring the world around me.

  34. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Johnny Smoggins
    "Nixon ordered every U.S. transport that could fly to deliver tanks and planes to Israel."

    When added to the list of siding with China over Taiwan and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, it's hard not to see that Nixon made choices with terrible consequences for not just the U.S. but the world as well.

    Don’t forget cancelling the construction of follow on Saturn V rockets to extend the Apollo program to an orbital mission around Venus with Apollo 19-20 and a Mars landing around Apollo 25.

    Even worse, after refusing to support funding an additional ten Saturn Vs to take us to the red planet in the 1970s, he pressured NASA to squander the precious remaining Saturn Vs on bullshit Apollo Soyuz missions.

    Nixon, more than any man, is responsible for the stillbirth of human space exploration. All his other foolish decisions (IE Gold Standard, Affirmative Action, EPA, etc) inflicted grievous harm on the United States, but his decision to kill Saturn V production, and shut down Apollo may prove to be the choice that precluded human survival at some point in the future.

    Read More
  35. @Ludwig Watzal
    The so-called liberal political and media establishment try everything in its power to take Trump down. The whole Russian spin is made up. They have not produced a single piece of evidence, just "zilch." But they still keep the ball rolling because they have not yet gotten over their crushing defeat. Instead of poking about in the fog, the media should get their hands on the criminal machinations of Hillary, Bill, Podesta and the other crooks within the Democratic Party. If Trump remains level-headed, the made-up stories will go poof.

    … the criminal machinations of Hillary, Bill, Podesta and the other crooks

    Pizzagate is real, that’s why it has been made to disappear so thoroughly down the memory hole. It reaches FAR beyond the Podestas.

    Read More
  36. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    11. A free massage and happy ending for all able-bodied men who have way too much time on their hands and don't know what to do with it.

    “11. A free massage and happy ending for all able-bodied men who have way too much time on their hands and don’t know what to do with it.”

    Troll. I guess I could have spent the 1 minute 23 seconds it took to write that doing something productive like…ignoring the world around me.

    Read More
  37. @Anon
    Trump needs to move fast to get the people on his side. He needs to give them things that could conceivably be withdrawn by the elites if he is removed, thus giving them motivation to prevent that. Unfortunately, Trump doesn't seem willing or able. Here are some things that might neutralize his enemies:

    1. Renounce GOP healthcare disaster; support single payer-health plan. This healthcare thing is the single biggest reason for his poll numbers.

    2. Publicly call for increasing the minimum wage to ~$11-12/hr.

    3. Withdraw from NAFTA (it can be done by executive order). Just go for it, consequences be damned.

    4. Fire the Goldman economic guys surrounding him. They are an albatross that working-class people have noticed and hate.

    5. Put Kushner on a plane back to NYC.

    6. Fire his FCC guy and support net neutrality.

    7. Direct Jeff Sessions to end marijuana prosecutions.

    8. Offer plan for free college.

    9. Direct the government to start going after media company monopolies like Time Warner and Comcast with the aim of breaking them up. Consumers hate internet and cable companies.

    10. Renounce current tax reform plan and announce that he's considering a new one.

    Those are things, which if done tomorrow, would immediately boost Trump while dramatically harming his enemies (they are all fantastically popular). Trump is in a knife fight for his life but draws blanks. The hell. This is no time to stick to GOP dogma.

    Agreed on most of that, both as good policy and as good politics.

    As for NAFTA, though, I’d probably like to see Trump withdraw us only from the agreement with Mexico, if that is legally possible. No big problem that I can see with keeping the Canadian part of NAFTA, given that Canada has a much smaller population, a much higher average income, and more stringent/costly environmental and worker-safety laws than Mexico does.

    As for a higher minimum wage, I’d support even a gradually MUCH higher minimum wage BUT ONLY IF it were coupled with a dramatic reduction in the income-tax rates paid by the small businesspeople who would be so badly hurt otherwise by such an increase in their wage costs.

    Read More
  38. @Anon
    Trump needs to move fast to get the people on his side. He needs to give them things that could conceivably be withdrawn by the elites if he is removed, thus giving them motivation to prevent that. Unfortunately, Trump doesn't seem willing or able. Here are some things that might neutralize his enemies:

    1. Renounce GOP healthcare disaster; support single payer-health plan. This healthcare thing is the single biggest reason for his poll numbers.

    2. Publicly call for increasing the minimum wage to ~$11-12/hr.

    3. Withdraw from NAFTA (it can be done by executive order). Just go for it, consequences be damned.

    4. Fire the Goldman economic guys surrounding him. They are an albatross that working-class people have noticed and hate.

    5. Put Kushner on a plane back to NYC.

    6. Fire his FCC guy and support net neutrality.

    7. Direct Jeff Sessions to end marijuana prosecutions.

    8. Offer plan for free college.

    9. Direct the government to start going after media company monopolies like Time Warner and Comcast with the aim of breaking them up. Consumers hate internet and cable companies.

    10. Renounce current tax reform plan and announce that he's considering a new one.

    Those are things, which if done tomorrow, would immediately boost Trump while dramatically harming his enemies (they are all fantastically popular). Trump is in a knife fight for his life but draws blanks. The hell. This is no time to stick to GOP dogma.

    What if Trump proposed that the federal government impose a substantial tax on foreign remittances and use the revenue to fund good medical insurance for all U.S. Citizens? (not legal residents, just citizens)

    Let the leftists argue that U.S. citizens shouldn’t get universal healthcare because it’s more important to let foreigners in the USA send back whatever money they want without paying any taxes.

    Read More
  39. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Johnny Smoggins
    "Nixon ordered every U.S. transport that could fly to deliver tanks and planes to Israel."

    When added to the list of siding with China over Taiwan and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, it's hard not to see that Nixon made choices with terrible consequences for not just the U.S. but the world as well.

    “When added to the list of siding with China over Taiwan and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, it’s hard not to see that Nixon made choices with terrible consequences for not just the U.S. but the world as well.”

    Nixon indeed had his share of terrible choices- Affirmative action via the Philadelphia Order and taking us off of the gold standard come to mind. That allowed the parasite class to rob us through the invisible tax of inflation. Not to mention the other allowing another parasite class to rob us out of our jobs. I doubt too many people in those vaunted 49 states who voted against the growing liberal state thought they were voting for these things. So maybe he has that in common with Trump as well. Not too many people who voted against Hillary thought we’d be diving into wars in Syria and fishing for one with N Korea right now.

    Read More
  40. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anon
    Trump needs to move fast to get the people on his side. He needs to give them things that could conceivably be withdrawn by the elites if he is removed, thus giving them motivation to prevent that. Unfortunately, Trump doesn't seem willing or able. Here are some things that might neutralize his enemies:

    1. Renounce GOP healthcare disaster; support single payer-health plan. This healthcare thing is the single biggest reason for his poll numbers.

    2. Publicly call for increasing the minimum wage to ~$11-12/hr.

    3. Withdraw from NAFTA (it can be done by executive order). Just go for it, consequences be damned.

    4. Fire the Goldman economic guys surrounding him. They are an albatross that working-class people have noticed and hate.

    5. Put Kushner on a plane back to NYC.

    6. Fire his FCC guy and support net neutrality.

    7. Direct Jeff Sessions to end marijuana prosecutions.

    8. Offer plan for free college.

    9. Direct the government to start going after media company monopolies like Time Warner and Comcast with the aim of breaking them up. Consumers hate internet and cable companies.

    10. Renounce current tax reform plan and announce that he's considering a new one.

    Those are things, which if done tomorrow, would immediately boost Trump while dramatically harming his enemies (they are all fantastically popular). Trump is in a knife fight for his life but draws blanks. The hell. This is no time to stick to GOP dogma.

    While a few seem like good ideas, some of these things smack of liberal foolishness, others of libertarian extremism. To say he harms his enemies by doing those is like saying he’d shut down Black Lives Matter by issuing an executive order to sterilize white men.

    Read More
  41. First, let me state that I right in the middle of the Israel crisis – I was on the first or second C-5 into Lod airport.

    Regarding Comey, we need to be reminded that he has a very close connection to Chuck Shumer, and he doesn’t have a reputation for being the straight-shooter he has represented himself to be. He’s actually a snake-in-the-grass who resorts to whatever it takes to get his way. I strongly suspect that he, Shumer, John Brennan and James Clapper are engaged in a conspiracy to bring down Donald Trump. Adam Schiff and Mark Warner are also involved. This has actually been apparent for some time. Tbe Brennan-contrived “intelligence report” about “Russian meddling” is a joke. Their main point was that the Russians used RT to spread propaganda, but they failed to acknowledge that the only place in the US where RT has a presence is in Washington, DC. I doubt it .1 of 1 percent of Trump voters had ever heard of RT, much less seen any of their reports.

    Read More
  42. @Anon
    Trump needs to move fast to get the people on his side. He needs to give them things that could conceivably be withdrawn by the elites if he is removed, thus giving them motivation to prevent that. Unfortunately, Trump doesn't seem willing or able. Here are some things that might neutralize his enemies:

    1. Renounce GOP healthcare disaster; support single payer-health plan. This healthcare thing is the single biggest reason for his poll numbers.

    2. Publicly call for increasing the minimum wage to ~$11-12/hr.

    3. Withdraw from NAFTA (it can be done by executive order). Just go for it, consequences be damned.

    4. Fire the Goldman economic guys surrounding him. They are an albatross that working-class people have noticed and hate.

    5. Put Kushner on a plane back to NYC.

    6. Fire his FCC guy and support net neutrality.

    7. Direct Jeff Sessions to end marijuana prosecutions.

    8. Offer plan for free college.

    9. Direct the government to start going after media company monopolies like Time Warner and Comcast with the aim of breaking them up. Consumers hate internet and cable companies.

    10. Renounce current tax reform plan and announce that he's considering a new one.

    Those are things, which if done tomorrow, would immediately boost Trump while dramatically harming his enemies (they are all fantastically popular). Trump is in a knife fight for his life but draws blanks. The hell. This is no time to stick to GOP dogma.

    Agreed on healthcare. I’ve (rarely) used single payer in both the UK and Australia. Fantastic, easily doable and moral.

    Invest in VA hospitals, expand them to serve also as public hospitals.
    Follow the Cuban methods in many practical and cost-effective ways such as indentured training for exceptional students and where very doctor is also a teacher.
    The new graduates continue to serve for a few years in order to repay the investment made.
    In house production of medications.
    Let people who can pay enjoy the private system and those who cannot receive assistance from the public. More jobs, healthier citizens and a better America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23
    Agreed that a well designed single payer system gives the best combination of service/price. I've seen it working in France and Spain and it's very good.

    The French also have an excellent idea where every citizen gets a medical card with an embedded chip holding all their medical history. Doctors have card readers and can quickly access the information (and update it), cutting down on a load of expensive filing and administration.
  43. @NoseytheDuke
    Agreed on healthcare. I've (rarely) used single payer in both the UK and Australia. Fantastic, easily doable and moral.

    Invest in VA hospitals, expand them to serve also as public hospitals.
    Follow the Cuban methods in many practical and cost-effective ways such as indentured training for exceptional students and where very doctor is also a teacher.
    The new graduates continue to serve for a few years in order to repay the investment made.
    In house production of medications.
    Let people who can pay enjoy the private system and those who cannot receive assistance from the public. More jobs, healthier citizens and a better America.

    Agreed that a well designed single payer system gives the best combination of service/price. I’ve seen it working in France and Spain and it’s very good.

    The French also have an excellent idea where every citizen gets a medical card with an embedded chip holding all their medical history. Doctors have card readers and can quickly access the information (and update it), cutting down on a load of expensive filing and administration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    Iran developed home health methods that the people of Mississippi have modeled:

    https://www.fic.nih.gov/NEWS/GLOBALHEALTHMATTERS/Pages/1209_health-house.aspx
    "In Iran, preventive care is a priority and special attention is paid to high-risk groups such as mothers and children. Health care workers are chosen and trained within each community. Preventive and curative programs are integrated seamlessly. The system is decentralized, which encourages regional facilities to become self-sufficient and empowers local communities. "
     
    and

    What Can Mississippi Learn From Iran?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/magazine/what-can-mississippis-health-care-system-learn-from-iran.html
  44. @Miro23
    Agreed that a well designed single payer system gives the best combination of service/price. I've seen it working in France and Spain and it's very good.

    The French also have an excellent idea where every citizen gets a medical card with an embedded chip holding all their medical history. Doctors have card readers and can quickly access the information (and update it), cutting down on a load of expensive filing and administration.

    Iran developed home health methods that the people of Mississippi have modeled:

    https://www.fic.nih.gov/NEWS/GLOBALHEALTHMATTERS/Pages/1209_health-house.aspx
    “In Iran, preventive care is a priority and special attention is paid to high-risk groups such as mothers and children. Health care workers are chosen and trained within each community. Preventive and curative programs are integrated seamlessly. The system is decentralized, which encourages regional facilities to become self-sufficient and empowers local communities. “

    and

    What Can Mississippi Learn From Iran?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/magazine/what-can-mississippis-health-care-system-learn-from-iran.html

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
While other top brass played press agents for the administration’s war, William Odom told the truth about Iraq—though few listened.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?