The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPat Buchanan Archive
A Fascist Right -- or a Hysterical Left?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If Trump’s supporters are truly “a basket of deplorables … racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic” and “irredeemable,” as Hillary Clinton described them to an LGBT crowd, is not shunning and shaming the proper way to deal with them?

So a growing slice of the American left has come to believe.

Friday, gay waiters at the Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia, appalled that White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was being served, had the chef call the owner. All decided to ask Sanders’ party to leave.

When news reached the left coast, Congresswoman Maxine Waters was ecstatic, yelling to a crowd, “God is on our side!”

Maxine’s raving went on: “And so, let’s stay the course. Let’s make sure we show up wherever … you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”

Apparently, the left had been issued its marching orders.

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was heckled and booed at a Mexican restaurant last week, and then hassled by a mob outside her home. White House aide Steven Miller was called out as a “fascist” while dining in D.C. Florida

Attorney General Pam Bondi was driven from a movie theater.

Last June, the uglier side of leftist politics turned lethal. James Hodgkinson, 66-year-old volunteer in Bernie Sanders’ campaign, opened fire on GOP congressmen practicing for their annual baseball game with the Democrats.

House Majority Whip Steve Scalise was wounded, almost mortally. Had it not been for Scalise’s security detail, Hodgkinson might have carried out a mass atrocity.

And the cultural atmosphere is becoming toxic.

Actor Robert De Niro brings a Hollywood crowd to its feet with cries of “F— Trump!” Peter Fonda says that 12-year-old Barron Trump should be locked up with pedophiles. Comedienne Kathy Griffin holds up a picture of the decapitated head of the president.

To suggest what may be happening to the separated children of illegal migrants, ex-CIA Director Michael Hayden puts on social media a photo of the entrance to the Nazi camp at Auschwitz-Birkenau.

What does this tell us about America in 2018?

The left, to the point of irrationality, despises a triumphant Trumpian right and believes that to equate it with fascists is not only legitimate, but a sign that the accusers are the real moral, righteous and courageous dissenters in these terrible times.

Historians are calling the outbursts of hate unprecedented. They are not.

In 1968, mobs cursed Lyndon Johnson, who had passed all the civil rights laws, howling, “Hey, hey, LBJ: How many kids did you kill today!”

ORDER IT NOW

After Dr. King’s assassination, a hundred cities, including the capital, were looted and burned. Scores died. U.S. troops and the National Guard were called out to restore order. Soldiers returning from Vietnam were spat upon. Cops were gunned down by urban terrorists. Bombings and bomb attempts were everyday occurrences. Campuses were closed down. In May 1971, tens of thousands of radicals went on a rampage to shut down D.C.

A cautionary note to progressives: Extremism is how the left lost the future to Nixon and Reagan.

But though our media may act like this is 1968, we are not there, yet. That was history; this is still largely farce.

The comparisons with Nazi Germany are absurd. Does anyone truly believe that the centers where the children of illegal migrants are being held, run as they are by liberal bureaucrats from the Department of Health and Human Services, are like Stalin’s Gulag or Hitler’s camps?

This is hyperbole born of hysteria and hate.

Consider. Two million Americans are in jails and prisons, all torn from their families and children. How many TV hours have been devoted to showing what those kids are going through?

Thirty percent of all American children grow up with only one parent.

How many TV specials have been devoted to kids separated for months, sometimes years, sometimes forever, from fathers and mothers serving in the military and doing tours of duty overseas in our endless wars?

Because of U.S. support for the UAE-Saudi war against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, hundreds of thousands of children face the threat of famine. Those Yemeni kids are not being served burgers in day care centers.

How many Western TV cameras are recording their suffering?

When it comes to the rhetoric of hate, the cursing of politicians, the shouting down of speakers, the right is not innocent, but the left is infinitely more guilty. It was to the Donald Trump rallies, not the Bernie Sanders rallies, that the provocateurs came to start the fights.

Why? Because if you have been told and believe your opponents are fascists, then their gatherings are deserving not of respect but of disruption.

And, as was true in the 1960s, if you manifest your contempt, you will receive the indulgence of a media that will celebrate your superior morality.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of a new book, “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Copyright 2018 Creators.com.

 
Hide 82 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The qualitative difference between the right and the left is this: Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL.

    If one is mistaken, he can be reached with factual information and sound logic, at least in theory. If one is evil, then the only correct course is to destroy him.

    Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    The election of Donald Trump has flushed out into the open what was more or less concealed all along. Progressives absolutely hate all normal, straight white males both past and present, and are determined to ensure that they have no future.

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn’t do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.

    Read More
    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Realist

    Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN.
     
    Not me I think they're stupid.
    , @Corvinus
    "Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The radicals on the left and on the right believe their opponents are evil personified.

    "Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas."

    Corrected for accuracy --> A great deal of radical lefties and righties focus on their political beliefs, and it is becomes their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    Now, Patrick...

    "Historians are calling the outbursts of hate unprecedented. They are not."

    Actually, they are, given the erosion of civility. For example, moderates are reviled by the Coalition of the Fringes Right and Left.

    "Last June, the uglier side of leftist politics turned lethal. James Hodgkinson, 66-year-old volunteer in Bernie Sanders’ campaign, opened fire on GOP congressmen practicing for their annual baseball game with the Democrats."

    Patrick, you are getting caught up in the hysteria by painting a broad brush stroke.
    , @Joseph Farnsworth
    Indeed, in Jonathan Haidt's excellent book The Righteous Mind, self-described liberals who were given psychological test questionnaires to answer were statistically very likely to impugn the motivations of conservatives as evil. When asked to fill out a questionnaire as a conservative was likely to do, they were way off, grossly exaggerating stereotypical characterizations.

    On the other hand, self-described conservatives were much more open to liberals having good albeit unrealistic motivations. They were also markedly more accurate at filling out a questionnaire as a liberal would likely do.

    Indeed, as cruel as Capitalist Henry Ford was at limiting coffee breaks, he was not responsible for the deaths of over 65 million people as were Lenin, Stalin, Mao Tse Tong, Pol Pot, etc, etc of the caring, kind, compassionate left.

    , @Jason Liu
    That's not true, I believe the left is both mistaken AND evil.

    The trouble with the west is that most of its conservatives are only conservative and not right wing.
    , @Reg Cæsar

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn’t do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.
     
    True, but Nixon and Reagan did the same before him, and we have little to show for that.
    , @MBlanc46
    There’s something to what you say, but I think that a lot of Leftists are simply evil.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. boomer Pat is living in the past:

    counting Jews as what they are – ashkenaz out of Asia –

    ‘Murka is now 42% non-White

    and – real numbers not jew.gov – will be majority non-White by 2030.

    so, absent collapse of the (((Central Bank)))-run debtPonzi’conomy,

    the (((White-haters))), along with their ethnic orc invasives and culture-of-death pervs, can do about what they want with little fear of the future.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist

    boomer Pat is living in the past:
     
    Pat sure as hell is not a boomer...born long before 1946....8 years to be exact.
    , @DWright
    Not all old people are Boomers. I know that old and Boomer are interchangeable to a lot of people but bone up on your terms.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Riggs says:

    There’s not going to be some Reagan like “Morning in America” where people try and come together Pat. These fault lines are racial, permanent and most likely going to lead to a 2nd civil war.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark P Miller
    " These fault lines are racial, permanent and most likely going to lead to a 2nd civil war."

    Better that than to fold over like a bunch of Swedes.

    Frankly, I'm starting to look forward to it. I have a fairly high tolerance for discomfort and hardship and would like nothing more than to finally start separating the wheat from the chaff.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. ‘…Why? Because if you have been told and believe your opponents are fascists, then their gatherings are deserving not of respect but of disruption…’

    The irony of this is that violently disrupting the meetings of political opponents is itself a hallmark of fascism. One of the most characteristic elements of fascism is an unwillingness to tolerate dissent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Realist says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost
    The qualitative difference between the right and the left is this: Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL.

    If one is mistaken, he can be reached with factual information and sound logic, at least in theory. If one is evil, then the only correct course is to destroy him.

    Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    The election of Donald Trump has flushed out into the open what was more or less concealed all along. Progressives absolutely hate all normal, straight white males both past and present, and are determined to ensure that they have no future.

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn't do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.

    Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN.

    Not me I think they’re stupid.

    Read More
    • Replies: @36 ulster
    In my opinion, they're ignorant--AND evil. No compassion or empathy for those bastards.
    , @Reg Cæsar


    Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN.
     
    Not me I think they’re stupid.
     
    Get it right: they're evil. So calling us evil is just projection.
    , @Mark P Miller
    Good. Normally I don't interrupt an enemy when they're making a mistake, but the Left is too far gone to recognize the warning signs as they drive right over the cliff.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Realist says:
    @Haxo Angmark
    boomer Pat is living in the past:

    counting Jews as what they are - ashkenaz out of Asia -

    'Murka is now 42% non-White

    and - real numbers not jew.gov - will be majority non-White by 2030.

    so, absent collapse of the (((Central Bank)))-run debtPonzi'conomy,

    the (((White-haters))), along with their ethnic orc invasives and culture-of-death pervs, can do about what they want with little fear of the future.

    boomer Pat is living in the past:

    Pat sure as hell is not a boomer…born long before 1946….8 years to be exact.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
    Buchanan 1938

    is a premature boomer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. KenH says:

    A cautionary note to progressives: Extremism is how the left lost the future to Nixon and Reagan

    America was 86% white under Nixon and about 82% white when Reagan was first elected. Today we’re about 61% and falling like a rock with deaths exceeding births in 26 states for the first time.

    What we’re seeing is a third worldization of U.S. politics and as the third world portion of the population continues to increase (and whites decrease) the future belongs to both they and the Jewish led radical Democrats, not the Republican party who continues cuck & jive, surrender and move to the left. Whites who don’t hate themselves and America have virtually no political representation in 2018.

    The comparisons with Nazi Germany are absurd.

    Only if you’re a sentient and rational being which disqualifies the majority of leftists. To them, any white person who doesn’t hate their race, culture and history and wish to see it wiped away is a Nazi. Enforcing immigration laws is white supremacist. Sadly this is no longer a fringe belief.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark P Miller
    We're too far gone for reconciliation.

    Only amputation and cauterization will do now.
    , @Wally
    Nazi Germany did nothing that was not being down by many countries the at the time, well, they did present a threat to the banking cartel.

    See my post no. 47 here for a take down of the preposterous 'gas chambers'.

    Also note that not a single British Bletchley Park intercept of secret German messages to and from Auschwitz and the so called 'death camps' ever mention gas chambers, killing Jews, or anything holocaust-like. There are many which do mention transporting large numbers of Jews out of these labor camps. Also note that the outbound train records which were kept have disappeared while the inbound records have not.

    The fake '6M', who benefits?

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. 36 ulster says:
    @Realist

    Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN.
     
    Not me I think they're stupid.

    In my opinion, they’re ignorant–AND evil. No compassion or empathy for those bastards.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    You're too generous...they're stupid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    “In 1968, mobs cursed Lyndon Johnson, who had passed all the civil rights laws, howling, “Hey, hey, LBJ: How many kids did you kill today!””

    Weird association here. Is the assumption that those who were anti-war would and should have been appreciative of the “Great Society” aka supervening national governance?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Realist says:
    @36 ulster
    In my opinion, they're ignorant--AND evil. No compassion or empathy for those bastards.

    You’re too generous…they’re stupid.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Quartermaster
    They are evil in their stupidity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Anonymous[135] • Disclaimer says:

    Nothing new. Take a look at the behavior of South-hating fanatics 1850s–1870s. The same unjustified hatred and misrepresentation. This is a real side of the Yankee national character that breaks out about every third generation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. Corvinus says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost
    The qualitative difference between the right and the left is this: Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL.

    If one is mistaken, he can be reached with factual information and sound logic, at least in theory. If one is evil, then the only correct course is to destroy him.

    Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    The election of Donald Trump has flushed out into the open what was more or less concealed all along. Progressives absolutely hate all normal, straight white males both past and present, and are determined to ensure that they have no future.

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn't do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.

    “Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL.”

    Corrected for accuracy –> The radicals on the left and on the right believe their opponents are evil personified.

    “Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.”

    Corrected for accuracy –> A great deal of radical lefties and righties focus on their political beliefs, and it is becomes their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    Now, Patrick…

    “Historians are calling the outbursts of hate unprecedented. They are not.”

    Actually, they are, given the erosion of civility. For example, moderates are reviled by the Coalition of the Fringes Right and Left.

    “Last June, the uglier side of leftist politics turned lethal. James Hodgkinson, 66-year-old volunteer in Bernie Sanders’ campaign, opened fire on GOP congressmen practicing for their annual baseball game with the Democrats.”

    Patrick, you are getting caught up in the hysteria by painting a broad brush stroke.

    Read More
    • Agree: byrresheim
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    You’re annoying enough on iSteve, Corvinus. Do you really have to stalk Buchanan?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. @Realist
    You're too generous...they're stupid.

    They are evil in their stupidity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. After what Patrick Buchanan has so well described and what Hamlet’s Ghost has so succinctly and aptly summed up in “Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL”, there is very little to add of value. Nevertheless, here is my two bit.

    It is for a reason that the words “neoliberals”, “libtards”, and “left loonies” have been born in our times. All three of these capture the total fanaticism, immunity to facts and reason, and the total detachment from reality that these guys represent. If you are utterly and unshakeably convinced that 2 and 2 add up to 3, you go around trying to shoot down reality and never re-examine your beliefs in the face of reality and opposition.

    I hope and pray that these lunatics will self-destruct by taking on bigger and bigger battles with reality and reason. Let them keep banging their deranged heads against the wall of reality, their skulls will undoubtedly rip apart and the rotten slime ooze out for all to see.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. @Hamlet's Ghost
    The qualitative difference between the right and the left is this: Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL.

    If one is mistaken, he can be reached with factual information and sound logic, at least in theory. If one is evil, then the only correct course is to destroy him.

    Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    The election of Donald Trump has flushed out into the open what was more or less concealed all along. Progressives absolutely hate all normal, straight white males both past and present, and are determined to ensure that they have no future.

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn't do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.

    Indeed, in Jonathan Haidt’s excellent book The Righteous Mind, self-described liberals who were given psychological test questionnaires to answer were statistically very likely to impugn the motivations of conservatives as evil. When asked to fill out a questionnaire as a conservative was likely to do, they were way off, grossly exaggerating stereotypical characterizations.

    On the other hand, self-described conservatives were much more open to liberals having good albeit unrealistic motivations. They were also markedly more accurate at filling out a questionnaire as a liberal would likely do.

    Indeed, as cruel as Capitalist Henry Ford was at limiting coffee breaks, he was not responsible for the deaths of over 65 million people as were Lenin, Stalin, Mao Tse Tong, Pol Pot, etc, etc of the caring, kind, compassionate left.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Resorting to Godwin is not an exclusively Democrat party phenomenon; to the contrary, it is a device to which resort is had by the conservative / Neo-Cohen branch of progressivism.

    Take Sean Hannity. How many times has he regurgitated “its Munich” or “its Munich all over again” or some variation on that theme?

    How about ((( Bill Kristol )))? How often has he invoked Munich?

    How about any number of Neo-Cohens who have, in pavlovian fashion, shouted “Munich” whenever another person contends that America should not make the world safe for democracy?

    Read More
    • Replies: @byrresheim
    I'd like to see the answers as well.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Rurik says:

    A cautionary note to progressives: Extremism is how the left lost the future to Nixon and Reagan.

    Pat!!

    [ssshhhhhh!!]

    Maxine Waters for 2020!

    as Hamlet’s ghost and Ken and others have pointed out, they’re motivated by blind, irrational enmity, but we should have all seen this coming.

    I too grew up in this country. I too watched All In The Family, with the racist buffoon Archie Bunker as the archetypical American White, male, Christian conservative. With his brow-beaten and submissive wife. ‘Stifle yourself!’

    Then we all watched Roots and all the other subtle and not-so-subtle indoctrinations and programming coming out of Frankfurt School West = ((Hollywood / Madison Ave)).

    what this has all been building up to, is a general meme ~

    and that is, from the beginning of time, going back to ancient Rome, evil white men have menaced the world.

    First they dispersed God’s people and sacked the temple, then they put all non-whites to the sword with their racist crusades, then they enslaved the planet with their Christianity.

    Was not Christopher Columbus a slaver and murderer and of course, racist?

    Was not the Inquisition just more White Christians doing what White Christians do?

    Torturing and murdering and genociding everyone around who wasn’t White and Christian?

    This is what they subtly teach in the government schools. It seethes from between the lines on our televisions and movie screens.

    White men are racists and oppressors, and always have been.

    They genocided the numinous Amerindians, living in harmony with nature and each other.

    They enslaved the blacks and anyone else they could, raping and whipping and chaining all and sundry.

    They kept women barefoot and in the kitchen, only allowing them to out to be taken advantage of in the bedroom.

    They oppressed the LGBT community then, just as they do today, refusing even to bake a cake!

    From sacking the temple, to dropping nukes on Japanese cities to napalm on little Vietnamese girls, the White man is a racist and scourge on the world’s stage.

    And that meme has been hammered into the sub-conscience of every person living in the West and beyond.

    That is why the Jewish supremacists in Hollywood, and their armies of shitlibs and orcs are apoplectic, because they all believe that narrative is true.

    And that what we’ve all been living with lo these many years, has been the correction of human civilization from the evils of White men, (Roman patriarchs, Crusaders, Nazis, Confederate slavers, rapists and religious thugs) into a world without evil White men anymore, as they were perfectly slated for the trash heap of history. Their nations overrun, their women alienated, their culture in decline, with hope for a non-white utopia just on the horizon! With Obama as the One.

    And then comes Trump.

    And his Deplorable racist, White men are ascendant again.

    It’s simply more than they can bear.

    our collective narrative has been carefully constructed over generations by the Jewish supremacists who control our central banks, and therefor everything else of consequence. Especially the media.

    Even shitlib Ted Turner had to hand over CNN, once it became clear it would be of consequence.

    Today there isn’t a newspaper of any significance that would dare print the truth about events like the USS Liberty, or black crime, or illegal wars of aggression waged against myriad nations who have not harmed us one whit…

    .. unless it’s to blame all of those things on racist White men like Dubya, who they’ll even talk about 9/11, but only if it’s to blame Dubya, and by extension all White [racist is redundant] men.

    So they’re sincere, but they’re also hopelessly duped. And understandably so, when you consider that the media masters are not stupid. They know what they’re doing.

    you don’t have to watch the whole thing, the point is that it’s all very scientific. They understand human nature. Pavlov’s dog’s were just the beginning. BF Skinner also showed them the methods.

    But thankfully it’s not all down to ‘nurture’. There’s still a lot of ‘nature’ in us, and that is what is driving them mad.

    It’s wasn’t just the shitlibs who were demanding an end to White men. We too were supposed to be marching over the cliffs by now. It worked on many of them,

    but not all.

    Read More
    • Agree: Liberty Mike, Druid
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    From sacking the temple, to dropping nukes on Japanese cities to napalm on little Vietnamese girls, the White man is a racist and scourge on the world’s stage.
     
    Hey, it was white progressives who pulled that crap. Don't let them off the hook.

    You have to go quite a ways down the list of America's crimes till you get to the first one carried out by a Republican administration.
    , @MBlanc46
    Nicely put all round, Rurik.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. What is the word(s) for contending two+ opposite ideas often mutually exclusionary that repelled each other??? The left is pro peace and now is prowar(Hillary, Obamas wars), the left is pro working class now supports Free traders, banking bailouts, dems support illegal labor and decimated the unions and killed the American middle class, specially blacks. The left is about Nonviolent civil disobedience now its calling for GUN violence to target Trump supporters, mass killings, bombings (Birmingham), the left is prowomen but calls for Trump(women) to be raped, calling them cunts, etc. The left is pro civil rights but calls for discriminatory practices against Trump base. And while goldmanSachs, Dicks Sports Stores, RDNiro, BMaher, NFL Kneelers ALL benefit from Trumps tax cuts they take the MONEY but they vilified the president. Adhorred the immigration migrant crisis but never will never consider housing a migrant child…Completely Incomprehensible…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. Jason Liu says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost
    The qualitative difference between the right and the left is this: Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL.

    If one is mistaken, he can be reached with factual information and sound logic, at least in theory. If one is evil, then the only correct course is to destroy him.

    Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    The election of Donald Trump has flushed out into the open what was more or less concealed all along. Progressives absolutely hate all normal, straight white males both past and present, and are determined to ensure that they have no future.

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn't do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.

    That’s not true, I believe the left is both mistaken AND evil.

    The trouble with the west is that most of its conservatives are only conservative and not right wing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Buchanan is clearly wrong in his remebrances of the late 60s. As someone who participated actively in the late 60s I have this to say to the much older than me Pat Buchanan:

    You remember things wrong based on your bias. We revolted against the militarism of that day. No one ever spit on a veteran–it is an urban myth.

    Today, in my old age, I like much of that Pat has to say. But this he says is utter bullshit. It wasn’t like that, Pat. Maybe, to you, hidden in your Washington DC nest of Nixonian idiocy, it was. But Nixon promised a “secret plan” to end Vietnam in 1968, possibly to counter the Democrats led by Bobby Kennedy that promised an end to the stupidity of Vietnam. And then when Nixon got elected….?

    He did nothing. His secret plan was bullshit.

    Now, since then, there has been some evidence that there was substantial pressure put on Nixon to keep Vietnam going, to the extent that even when he finally pulled out–4 year and thousands of American lives later–that the Deep State wanted to avenge and took him down (via Watergate).

    Maybe. Nevertheless, Pat? Your lover or buddy or whatever he was, Richard Nixon? He was a dick. He promised us to end it in 68. And he broke that promise.

    Pat? Fuck Nixon. And fuck you if you defend his indefensible actions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ozymandias
    "Now, since then, there has been some evidence that there was substantial pressure put on Nixon to keep Vietnam going"

    One could say there was substantial pressure put on the Kennedys as well. Nixon's tactics seem to have met with more success.
    , @SunBakedSuburb
    "As someone who participated actively in the late 60s ... "

    And now you're just an old guy who litters his post with foul language.

    "We revolted against the militarism of that day."

    And the militarism of that day continues to this day. The energy of the Weathermen types was primarily focused on race; ending the war in Vietnam was secondary to the plight of the negro. That New Left negrophilia continues to this day: identity politics trumps the more pressing issues of continued militarism and profitable wars. Your ideological descendants are even more clueless than your generation. Thanks, foul-mouthed hippie!
    , @Vietnam Vet
    restless94110: Bullshit. I am a Vietnam vet and I saw it and experienced it. I think you may be an urban myth.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. @restless94110
    Buchanan is clearly wrong in his remebrances of the late 60s. As someone who participated actively in the late 60s I have this to say to the much older than me Pat Buchanan:

    You remember things wrong based on your bias. We revolted against the militarism of that day. No one ever spit on a veteran--it is an urban myth.

    Today, in my old age, I like much of that Pat has to say. But this he says is utter bullshit. It wasn't like that, Pat. Maybe, to you, hidden in your Washington DC nest of Nixonian idiocy, it was. But Nixon promised a "secret plan" to end Vietnam in 1968, possibly to counter the Democrats led by Bobby Kennedy that promised an end to the stupidity of Vietnam. And then when Nixon got elected....?

    He did nothing. His secret plan was bullshit.

    Now, since then, there has been some evidence that there was substantial pressure put on Nixon to keep Vietnam going, to the extent that even when he finally pulled out--4 year and thousands of American lives later--that the Deep State wanted to avenge and took him down (via Watergate).

    Maybe. Nevertheless, Pat? Your lover or buddy or whatever he was, Richard Nixon? He was a dick. He promised us to end it in 68. And he broke that promise.

    Pat? Fuck Nixon. And fuck you if you defend his indefensible actions.

    “Now, since then, there has been some evidence that there was substantial pressure put on Nixon to keep Vietnam going”

    One could say there was substantial pressure put on the Kennedys as well. Nixon’s tactics seem to have met with more success.

    Read More
    • Replies: @restless94110
    Define success.

    Do you define it as not being assassinated? Then yes, Nixon met with more success. He was not assassinated.

    Instead, according to the theory that I put forth (that I had heard about), Nixon was deposed.

    He lived for at least another decade in total disgrace.

    So, in your view? That was success?

    Define success.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. @Realist

    boomer Pat is living in the past:
     
    Pat sure as hell is not a boomer...born long before 1946....8 years to be exact.

    Buchanan 1938

    is a premature boomer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:

    Fascism or at least Neo-Fascism is good.

    It allows us to be free. Why be stuck to one single -Ism? In fact, both capitalism and socialism have value. Both modernity and tradition have value.

    Fascists tried to work with all ideologies. They were pragmatic and sensible… but their one failing was the Cult of the godlike leader. That led to blind obedience of Mussolini and Hitler, a psycho.

    So, we need neo-fascism without the cult worship of some demagogue.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:

    The thing about PC is it’s a quasi-religious mindset.

    You can debate someone rationally about ideas and facts.

    But you can’t debate someone who worships something as holy-shmoly.

    Just like Christians regarded non-believers as cursed and wicked heathens, the PC progs see their enemies as evil and cursed.

    A Christian cannot sit down and rationally debate a satan-worshiper because Satan is simply evil in Christian eyes.

    Well, progs believe in their PC as holy writ. And so, those who disbelieve are not just wrong but cursed and possessed by evil spirits.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    Just like Christians regarded non-believers as cursed and wicked heathens, the PC progs see their enemies as evil and cursed.
     
    But Christians believe non-Christians should be forgiven and can be saved whereas American leftists, like their Bolshevik forbears, believe their opposition is innately evil and wicked with no redeeming qualities and who must be utterly destroyed.

    Lefties and progs believe in the innate purity and goodness of everyone but they draw the line at non-prog white people who they see as Nazis and congenitally evil.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Bliss says:

    Maxine Waters’ over the top belligerence definitely smacks of a personal vendetta. Trump has been calling her a “very low IQ person”. That stung. She waited for this moment when Trump seemed to be on the defensive, to unleash her vicious counterattack. Trump coldly responds with the blunt threat: “Be careful what you wish for”. Is the shit about to hit the fan or what? Probably not. Surely cooler heads will prevail.

    But if, God forbid, Civil War II breaks out, how will it unfold?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. @Realist

    Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN.
     
    Not me I think they're stupid.

    Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN.

    Not me I think they’re stupid.

    Get it right: they’re evil. So calling us evil is just projection.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @Hamlet's Ghost
    The qualitative difference between the right and the left is this: Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL.

    If one is mistaken, he can be reached with factual information and sound logic, at least in theory. If one is evil, then the only correct course is to destroy him.

    Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    The election of Donald Trump has flushed out into the open what was more or less concealed all along. Progressives absolutely hate all normal, straight white males both past and present, and are determined to ensure that they have no future.

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn't do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn’t do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.

    True, but Nixon and Reagan did the same before him, and we have little to show for that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Rurik

    A cautionary note to progressives: Extremism is how the left lost the future to Nixon and Reagan.
     
    Pat!!

    [ssshhhhhh!!]

    Maxine Waters for 2020!

    as Hamlet's ghost and Ken and others have pointed out, they're motivated by blind, irrational enmity, but we should have all seen this coming.

    I too grew up in this country. I too watched All In The Family, with the racist buffoon Archie Bunker as the archetypical American White, male, Christian conservative. With his brow-beaten and submissive wife. 'Stifle yourself!'

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZOTszoKbE4

    Then we all watched Roots and all the other subtle and not-so-subtle indoctrinations and programming coming out of Frankfurt School West = ((Hollywood / Madison Ave)).

    what this has all been building up to, is a general meme ~

    and that is, from the beginning of time, going back to ancient Rome, evil white men have menaced the world.

    First they dispersed God's people and sacked the temple, then they put all non-whites to the sword with their racist crusades, then they enslaved the planet with their Christianity.

    Was not Christopher Columbus a slaver and murderer and of course, racist?

    Was not the Inquisition just more White Christians doing what White Christians do?

    Torturing and murdering and genociding everyone around who wasn't White and Christian?

    This is what they subtly teach in the government schools. It seethes from between the lines on our televisions and movie screens.

    White men are racists and oppressors, and always have been.

    They genocided the numinous Amerindians, living in harmony with nature and each other.

    They enslaved the blacks and anyone else they could, raping and whipping and chaining all and sundry.

    They kept women barefoot and in the kitchen, only allowing them to out to be taken advantage of in the bedroom.

    They oppressed the LGBT community then, just as they do today, refusing even to bake a cake!

    From sacking the temple, to dropping nukes on Japanese cities to napalm on little Vietnamese girls, the White man is a racist and scourge on the world's stage.

    And that meme has been hammered into the sub-conscience of every person living in the West and beyond.

    That is why the Jewish supremacists in Hollywood, and their armies of shitlibs and orcs are apoplectic, because they all believe that narrative is true.

    And that what we've all been living with lo these many years, has been the correction of human civilization from the evils of White men, (Roman patriarchs, Crusaders, Nazis, Confederate slavers, rapists and religious thugs) into a world without evil White men anymore, as they were perfectly slated for the trash heap of history. Their nations overrun, their women alienated, their culture in decline, with hope for a non-white utopia just on the horizon! With Obama as the One.

    And then comes Trump.

    And his Deplorable racist, White men are ascendant again.

    It's simply more than they can bear.

    our collective narrative has been carefully constructed over generations by the Jewish supremacists who control our central banks, and therefor everything else of consequence. Especially the media.

    Even shitlib Ted Turner had to hand over CNN, once it became clear it would be of consequence.

    Today there isn't a newspaper of any significance that would dare print the truth about events like the USS Liberty, or black crime, or illegal wars of aggression waged against myriad nations who have not harmed us one whit...

    .. unless it's to blame all of those things on racist White men like Dubya, who they'll even talk about 9/11, but only if it's to blame Dubya, and by extension all White [racist is redundant] men.

    So they're sincere, but they're also hopelessly duped. And understandably so, when you consider that the media masters are not stupid. They know what they're doing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44I3pMouCnM

    you don't have to watch the whole thing, the point is that it's all very scientific. They understand human nature. Pavlov's dog's were just the beginning. BF Skinner also showed them the methods.

    But thankfully it's not all down to 'nurture'. There's still a lot of 'nature' in us, and that is what is driving them mad.

    It's wasn't just the shitlibs who were demanding an end to White men. We too were supposed to be marching over the cliffs by now. It worked on many of them,

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFhIp6pU0AA8oa4.jpg

    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GDzqEsIL2_U/WWBIFQZw7nI/AAAAAAACjNY/94vs56Jpgsgjduc6xkQjOOoOeywa0VBFQCLcBGAs/s1600/%2521%2BtWEETSpture%2B%25281%2529.JPG

    but not all.

    From sacking the temple, to dropping nukes on Japanese cities to napalm on little Vietnamese girls, the White man is a racist and scourge on the world’s stage.

    Hey, it was white progressives who pulled that crap. Don’t let them off the hook.

    You have to go quite a ways down the list of America’s crimes till you get to the first one carried out by a Republican administration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Hey, it was white progressives who pulled that crap. Don’t let them off the hook.
     
    I'm letting them all 'off the hook;

    none of those things are definitively evil or wrong when considering the context..

    I suspect, all lies notwithstanding, that the Crusades were waged due to unspeakable atrocities committed in the 'Holy Land' against Christians. The so-called 'temple' was probably a slave-trading auction house for Whites captured all over the world.

    'sacking the temple' takes on a new meaning, if so, and I'd consider it perfectly characteristic of those people in those times.

    If it weren't for deadly consequences, what would the Jews and the Muslims do today if they had unfettered access to White slaves?

    In a way they do, in economically ravaged Eastern Europe, many of the young women from those places are trafficked into Israel to work in brothels as abject slaves. One can only imagine the horrors meted out as punishment for being White and (putatively) Christian, for all the "crimes" "they've" committed over the centuries. I shiver at the very thought of it.

    Christopher Columbus was a visionary and great explorer. That he took slaves was simply what people did back then. What do people think the Incas and Aztecs and Mayans were doing? When they weren't sacrificing men by the tens of thousands, sometime in one day alone.

    The Inquisition came after centuries of African, Muslim- Moorish occupation, slavery and domination of White, Christian lands. The Spanish could have just killed all the Jews and Muslims, but instead they tried to weed out the good ones from the bad ones. If we had our civil war right now, and we Deplorables won, would we want to go on a killing spree for anyone who didn't look like a Deplorable? No, we'd want to figure out who is friend and who is foe. We'd question those we weren't sure about. The civil war will be bloody and horrific, nothing we'd want to repeat. So we'd ask people like Mickey Rourke, for insance... 'Did you say you hated us Deplorables because you're a deranged scumfuck? Or were you just placating your ((bosses)), so you could continue to get work?

    You see? That's why they used stringent methods, because it was the Jews who betrayed the Christians of Spain to the Moorish invaders in the first place, just as they're doing today. And so Torquemada (a loyal Jew himself) wanted to be sure that the people rebuilding Spain were not going to betray her yet again.

    The Amerindians weren't living in harmony with each other. They were hacking each other to grizzly deaths, and stealing and enslaving the rival tribe's women. This was going on from the beginning of time. Just as slavery had been going on since the beginning of time, and still goes on in the African continent. All the plantation owners did was use the black slaves the Jews sold them, instead of white ones, because they were easier to spot if they ran off. Whites were enslaving whites for centuries, and everyone was enslaving everyone back in those days. The significant thing is that White people were the ones to end the ancient institution.

    Women weren't kept in the kitchen or bedroom. They were there because that's where they wanted to be. My gal loves to cook. My mom loved being a homemaker. She also wrote, and was even published, but no one ever forced her to be a homemaker. She was a teacher for a while when it suited her, but that was mostly to get by the hard times, and when dad was doing better, she went back to the life she loved, raising her family.

    The whole radical feminist bullshit is just more agenda-driven lies from the tribe to destroy Western society. Duh.

    Does anyone on the planet (who's not insane) believe people should be forced to bake cakes in celebration of sodomite "weddings"?

    The Nazis had a right to decide who was allowed to live in their lands. I don't believe the stories of gas chambers, soap and lampshades. If they were evil White people, then so too were their enemies, which cancels out their evil.

    Dropping nuclear bombs on Japanese cities is somewhat more dubious, as far as justifications, but my dad was in the Pacific theater at the time, and I know they didn't relish a street fight in every Japanese town and city to force an unilateral, unconditional surrender from a people of whom it was said- had no word for it.

    Their culture was one of fighting to the death. So perhaps the bombs were a way of saving untold American lives, otherwise wasted on a bitter, and long drawn out struggle.

    IDK, that one's iffy.

    Vietnam was an atrocity, but I certainly don't blame Whitey, but rather the insatiable greed of the MIC, and a throng of treasonous politicians, of which there seems to be an infinite supply, male, female, white, black, brown and yellow.

    for the record..

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. HBM says:

    PC is Marxism, is Judaism-by-goy-proxy: the hysteria; the endless compunction-free reflexive lying and propaganda; the financially insulated self-styled “elite” practitioners; the hyperbolic outrage and moralistic howling; the hatred of ethnic homogeneity as inherently evil; the hatred of the healthy nation-state and family; the nonstop midrashic deconstruction of everything normative; the desired end of White dispossession as ultimate moral good. This is not “Liberal.” This is Jewish. Both the Left and the Right are infected.

    After decades of brainwashing through the media and through schools, Whites have internalized this Jewish hatred relentlessly projected at them from behind the mask of supreme moral arbiter. Brown people everywhere are of course on-board, too; they eagerly participate in this Jewish narrative that says White displacement and the handing-over of the West to their saintly selves is a grand and inevitable good; that the moral arc of the Universe bends towards White Genocide.

    For the Jews, who have a deep-seated and insane ethnomythological beef with “colonizers,” the United States has never been anything more than another evil colonial power to be justifiably exploited and finally destroyed; just another Assyria or Greece or Rome.

    The howling is of course itself a strategy; they still have enough power to make open defense of White ethnic interests verboten. This leaves us with an equally doomed Civic Nationalism as the best outcome we goyim could hope for.

    And, of course, it’s Jews’ own insane recalcitrance that finally turns normal people into “Nazis,” at which point the Jews will howl: “We told you so.”

    Are we headed towards Civil War? I sure hope so, because that is the only thing that offers a possible victory for us, even if it is limited in scope.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. “Extremism is how the left lost the future to Nixon and Reagan.”

    And yet the Left survived to storm the gates of our civilisation, and this time they brought worse barbarians with them.

    If the Right in the US were the Nazis they are made out to be, there wouldn’t be a Left in the process of destroying America today.

    This is going to end in genocide: The question is, who wants more to survive.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. Fasces are simply the symbol, borrowed from the Roman Empire, of how white society organizes as a bound-together band of brothers.

    The Founders recognized that fact, which is why fascist symbols are found throughout American institutions. http://infogalactic.com/info/Fasces#Fasces_in_the_United_States

    Note that Christianity was the original anti-fa movement against Whites, complete with Bolshevist propaganda against Gentile-Fascist-White political organization (Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, Luke 22:25) and for common property (Acts 4:32) and wealth distribution. (Acts 4:35, Acts 6:1) If you worship the magic sand-kike and hate Pilate for not taking sides in Jewish infighting, you’re a race traitor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. Marcus says:

    Fascism was downright humane compared to contemporary leftist revolutionary situations in Russia and Mexico, all the while taking and improving on some leftist concepts, so don’t accept their puerile “fascism=evil” formulation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:

    Somewhat OT, but we need to drop the constant reflexive fascism-hate. While vaguely Marxist in origin, fascism in Italy and the other quasi-fascist countries was relatively mild and humane, especially compared to the excesses of Nazis (yes, I know I’ll get pushback here on this one) or Communists. But since prewar Leftism had framed itself as “antifascism” and the Left dominated the immediate postwar period, “fascism” became the ultimate evil in Anglo-American political discourse.

    It’s not the ’30s anymore and we are neither Stalinites nor Trotskyites, so can we not just reflexively apply their political categories? Please?

    edit: I’ve been scooped. I agree with this guy:

    Fascism was downright humane compared to contemporary leftist revolutionary situations in Russia and Mexico, all the while taking and improving on some leftist concepts, so don’t accept their puerile “fascism=evil” formulation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Mussolini even wanted to maintain friendly relations with his former comrades, orthodox Marxists (Italy was the second country to recognize the USSR), but I think the latter got jealous at what they saw as a more successful spinoff. Sadly, he and all the other pseudo-fascist leaders in Europe except for Franco and Salazar, aligned with Hitler after the UK's betrayal over Abyssinia. I think Anglos are probably too individualistic for fascism, but it was a good idea in its place and time, as Churchill noted. The revolutionary movements in the third world were more fascist than Marxist as well IMO.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. KenH says:
    @Anon
    The thing about PC is it's a quasi-religious mindset.

    You can debate someone rationally about ideas and facts.

    But you can't debate someone who worships something as holy-shmoly.

    Just like Christians regarded non-believers as cursed and wicked heathens, the PC progs see their enemies as evil and cursed.

    A Christian cannot sit down and rationally debate a satan-worshiper because Satan is simply evil in Christian eyes.

    Well, progs believe in their PC as holy writ. And so, those who disbelieve are not just wrong but cursed and possessed by evil spirits.

    Just like Christians regarded non-believers as cursed and wicked heathens, the PC progs see their enemies as evil and cursed.

    But Christians believe non-Christians should be forgiven and can be saved whereas American leftists, like their Bolshevik forbears, believe their opposition is innately evil and wicked with no redeeming qualities and who must be utterly destroyed.

    Lefties and progs believe in the innate purity and goodness of everyone but they draw the line at non-prog white people who they see as Nazis and congenitally evil.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    But Christians believe non-Christians should be forgiven and can be saved whereas American leftists, like their Bolshevik forbears, believe their opposition is innately evil and wicked with no redeeming qualities and who must be utterly destroyed.

    No, that'd be the Nazis. To the Nazis, Jews and Slavs couldn't do anything to redeem themselves. They were racially tainted and targeted.

    Communists, in contrast, could forgive and embrace former enemies IF the latter surrendered and repented. After the dust settled, Soviets saw East Germans(now communists) as comrades.

    Christians were the same way in the Middle Ages and later. They could kill lots of people and burn witches. But the accused could be spared IF they repented and sought forgiveness for their sins.

    PC allows that too. If you declare that you've seen the light, accept PC, and are willing to totally cuck, the PC-lords will accept you. Look at Robert Byrd. He was of the KKK but became a good stooge of globalism, so all was forgiven.

    Christian forgiveness was conditional. You had to surrender your heart to the one True Faith. PC works the same way.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Marcus says:
    @Anon
    Somewhat OT, but we need to drop the constant reflexive fascism-hate. While vaguely Marxist in origin, fascism in Italy and the other quasi-fascist countries was relatively mild and humane, especially compared to the excesses of Nazis (yes, I know I'll get pushback here on this one) or Communists. But since prewar Leftism had framed itself as "antifascism" and the Left dominated the immediate postwar period, "fascism" became the ultimate evil in Anglo-American political discourse.

    It's not the '30s anymore and we are neither Stalinites nor Trotskyites, so can we not just reflexively apply their political categories? Please?

    edit: I've been scooped. I agree with this guy:

    Fascism was downright humane compared to contemporary leftist revolutionary situations in Russia and Mexico, all the while taking and improving on some leftist concepts, so don’t accept their puerile “fascism=evil” formulation.

     

    Mussolini even wanted to maintain friendly relations with his former comrades, orthodox Marxists (Italy was the second country to recognize the USSR), but I think the latter got jealous at what they saw as a more successful spinoff. Sadly, he and all the other pseudo-fascist leaders in Europe except for Franco and Salazar, aligned with Hitler after the UK’s betrayal over Abyssinia. I think Anglos are probably too individualistic for fascism, but it was a good idea in its place and time, as Churchill noted. The revolutionary movements in the third world were more fascist than Marxist as well IMO.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Anon[953] • Disclaimer says:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. @Ozymandias
    "Now, since then, there has been some evidence that there was substantial pressure put on Nixon to keep Vietnam going"

    One could say there was substantial pressure put on the Kennedys as well. Nixon's tactics seem to have met with more success.

    Define success.

    Do you define it as not being assassinated? Then yes, Nixon met with more success. He was not assassinated.

    Instead, according to the theory that I put forth (that I had heard about), Nixon was deposed.

    He lived for at least another decade in total disgrace.

    So, in your view? That was success?

    Define success.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ozymandias
    In the context of the conversation you had already defined success as bringing an end to the war.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Riggs
    There’s not going to be some Reagan like “Morning in America” where people try and come together Pat. These fault lines are racial, permanent and most likely going to lead to a 2nd civil war.

    ” These fault lines are racial, permanent and most likely going to lead to a 2nd civil war.”

    Better that than to fold over like a bunch of Swedes.

    Frankly, I’m starting to look forward to it. I have a fairly high tolerance for discomfort and hardship and would like nothing more than to finally start separating the wheat from the chaff.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bartok

    Frankly, I’m starting to look forward to it.
     
    You're thinking of a race-war, which would be easy like Koreans on LA rooftops keeping orcs at bay with rifles.
    But any civil war worth a damn would be white vs. white. That's a lot tougher, evidenced by the white vs. white conflicts of the past 200 years.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. @KenH

    A cautionary note to progressives: Extremism is how the left lost the future to Nixon and Reagan
     
    America was 86% white under Nixon and about 82% white when Reagan was first elected. Today we're about 61% and falling like a rock with deaths exceeding births in 26 states for the first time.

    What we're seeing is a third worldization of U.S. politics and as the third world portion of the population continues to increase (and whites decrease) the future belongs to both they and the Jewish led radical Democrats, not the Republican party who continues cuck & jive, surrender and move to the left. Whites who don't hate themselves and America have virtually no political representation in 2018.

    The comparisons with Nazi Germany are absurd.
     
    Only if you're a sentient and rational being which disqualifies the majority of leftists. To them, any white person who doesn't hate their race, culture and history and wish to see it wiped away is a Nazi. Enforcing immigration laws is white supremacist. Sadly this is no longer a fringe belief.

    We’re too far gone for reconciliation.

    Only amputation and cauterization will do now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. @Realist

    Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN.
     
    Not me I think they're stupid.

    Good. Normally I don’t interrupt an enemy when they’re making a mistake, but the Left is too far gone to recognize the warning signs as they drive right over the cliff.

    Read More
    • Agree: Realist
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Anon[207] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m sick of liberal lies!

    >”Trump’s supporters…racist”

    True, some DO like dog/horse races. So what?

    >”sexist”

    True again. Most like sex.

    >”homophobic”

    Wrong. Few are afraid of their homes.

    >”xenophobic”

    Wrong again. Many LOVE Xena, that warrior princess.

    > “irredeemable”

    Wrong yet again. Most redeem their empty bottles at recycling centers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Dude, that's funny stuff. I must correct you on the one line:

    >”xenophobic”

    Wrong again. Many LOVE Xena, that warrior princess.

     
    People, listen, xenophobia is not about Princess Xena! It's about people who hate people who fuc... the noble gases, especially the element known as "atomic number 54".

    I defend myself against all who slander me with this moniker: I AM NOT A XENOPHOBE!

    .
    .
    .

    Full disclaimer: Yes, in the past I have set fire to some of the alkali metals, but this was before my sensitivity training struggle sessions. I'm all better now.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Anon[207] • Disclaimer says:

    So Nazis WERE right, after all?

    They believed Jews were rats infecting the state, so used a pesticide to kill them…a pesticide created in a chemical institute founded to honor a Jewish WWI hero.

    Oh, the irony!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Except the laughably absurd gassings never happened.
    It's really, 'Oh the lies & propaganda'

    In fact, the alleged 'gas chamber' were scientifically impossible.
    real science, real history here, from Master Chemist Germar Rudolf:

    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau
    https://youtu.be/SUc6Y_E5zb0

    The Rudolf Report / Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
    http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html

    'Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the 'Gas Chambers' of Auschwitz and Birkenau'
    by Master Chemist Germar Rudolf
    http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html

    Lectures on the Holocaust / Controversial Issues Cross Examined
    https://codoh.com/library/document/1196/?lang=en

    Dissecting the Holocaust—The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @restless94110
    Define success.

    Do you define it as not being assassinated? Then yes, Nixon met with more success. He was not assassinated.

    Instead, according to the theory that I put forth (that I had heard about), Nixon was deposed.

    He lived for at least another decade in total disgrace.

    So, in your view? That was success?

    Define success.

    In the context of the conversation you had already defined success as bringing an end to the war.

    Read More
    • Replies: @restless94110
    I don't recall defining success in that way. But thanks for defining it. However, Bobby Kennedy didn't get the chance to end the war, which seems to be clearly indicated that he would have. Johnson had declined to run due to the strong protests against the war.

    Nixon had to promise that he had a plan to end the war. Only it was secret. Then when he successfully was elected, his secret plan was to escalate the war. Talk about feeling betrayed. That's what we all felt. Lied to.

    But Nixon had to placate the military/industrial complex and the war hawks, and it seems likely that he was concerned with John Kennedy's fate when he tried to buck the Deep State and seek peace. So I don't hold Nixon as much to account as I used to.

    I now think that they hated Nixon for ending the war 4 years too late and that may have been the reason that Deep Throat suddenlty started talking to Woodward and Bernstein. Their jounalism seems less good reporting and more like hidden forces dropping a dime on Nixon.

    Yeah, Nixon was successful alright. Thanks for defining success.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. @Anon
    I'm sick of liberal lies!

    >"Trump’s supporters...racist"

    True, some DO like dog/horse races. So what?

    >"sexist"

    True again. Most like sex.

    >"homophobic"

    Wrong. Few are afraid of their homes.

    >"xenophobic"

    Wrong again. Many LOVE Xena, that warrior princess.

    > “irredeemable”

    Wrong yet again. Most redeem their empty bottles at recycling centers.

    Dude, that’s funny stuff. I must correct you on the one line:

    >”xenophobic”

    Wrong again. Many LOVE Xena, that warrior princess.

    People, listen, xenophobia is not about Princess Xena! It’s about people who hate people who fuc… the noble gases, especially the element known as “atomic number 54″.

    I defend myself against all who slander me with this moniker: I AM NOT A XENOPHOBE!

    .
    .
    .

    Full disclaimer: Yes, in the past I have set fire to some of the alkali metals, but this was before my sensitivity training struggle sessions. I’m all better now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. The right has no will to fight the way the left does.

    Let’s contrast the gay wedding cake/Christian baker incident with Sanders being kicked out of the Red Hen. The left sent out a couple of soldiers to a Christian bakery to deliberately ask them to do something they knew they would refuse to do, just so they could sue them and destroy them, and in the process rub everyone else’s noses in the revolting farce of “gay marriage”

    Sanders merely went to dinner at this restaurant with her family and not only was kicked out, but then followed across the street to continue the abuse. And the response of the right? ……..bad, made up reviews on Yelp.

    Imagine if some high ranking leftist went to a conservative run restaurant and the same thing happened? That restaurant would’ve burned down that night and the lives of the owners would be in grave danger. Bad reviews on Yelp would be the least of their worries.

    Until the right is willing to fight dirty and violently the way the left does, things will just keep getting worse.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    AGREED!

    There's a lot to be learned from the 1960's. There's battle lines being drawn (continued here, here, here, here, and here).
    , @Rurik
    It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late,
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy -- willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the Deplorable began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low.
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd.
    It was not taught by the state.
    No man spoke it aloud
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    It was not suddently bred.
    It will not swiftly abate.
    Through the chilled years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the Deplorable began to hate.

    with apologies to Rudyard Kipling

    the real one is here

    http://www.europeanamericansunited.org/school1/Fiction/kipling/awakened.htm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Johnny Smoggins
    The right has no will to fight the way the left does.

    Let's contrast the gay wedding cake/Christian baker incident with Sanders being kicked out of the Red Hen. The left sent out a couple of soldiers to a Christian bakery to deliberately ask them to do something they knew they would refuse to do, just so they could sue them and destroy them, and in the process rub everyone else's noses in the revolting farce of "gay marriage"

    Sanders merely went to dinner at this restaurant with her family and not only was kicked out, but then followed across the street to continue the abuse. And the response of the right? ........bad, made up reviews on Yelp.

    Imagine if some high ranking leftist went to a conservative run restaurant and the same thing happened? That restaurant would've burned down that night and the lives of the owners would be in grave danger. Bad reviews on Yelp would be the least of their worries.

    Until the right is willing to fight dirty and violently the way the left does, things will just keep getting worse.

    AGREED!

    There’s a lot to be learned from the 1960′s. There’s battle lines being drawn (continued here, here, here, here, and here).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Rurik says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    From sacking the temple, to dropping nukes on Japanese cities to napalm on little Vietnamese girls, the White man is a racist and scourge on the world’s stage.
     
    Hey, it was white progressives who pulled that crap. Don't let them off the hook.

    You have to go quite a ways down the list of America's crimes till you get to the first one carried out by a Republican administration.

    Hey, it was white progressives who pulled that crap. Don’t let them off the hook.

    I’m letting them all ‘off the hook;

    none of those things are definitively evil or wrong when considering the context..

    I suspect, all lies notwithstanding, that the Crusades were waged due to unspeakable atrocities committed in the ‘Holy Land’ against Christians. The so-called ‘temple’ was probably a slave-trading auction house for Whites captured all over the world.

    ‘sacking the temple’ takes on a new meaning, if so, and I’d consider it perfectly characteristic of those people in those times.

    If it weren’t for deadly consequences, what would the Jews and the Muslims do today if they had unfettered access to White slaves?

    In a way they do, in economically ravaged Eastern Europe, many of the young women from those places are trafficked into Israel to work in brothels as abject slaves. One can only imagine the horrors meted out as punishment for being White and (putatively) Christian, for all the “crimes” “they’ve” committed over the centuries. I shiver at the very thought of it.

    Christopher Columbus was a visionary and great explorer. That he took slaves was simply what people did back then. What do people think the Incas and Aztecs and Mayans were doing? When they weren’t sacrificing men by the tens of thousands, sometime in one day alone.

    The Inquisition came after centuries of African, Muslim- Moorish occupation, slavery and domination of White, Christian lands. The Spanish could have just killed all the Jews and Muslims, but instead they tried to weed out the good ones from the bad ones. If we had our civil war right now, and we Deplorables won, would we want to go on a killing spree for anyone who didn’t look like a Deplorable? No, we’d want to figure out who is friend and who is foe. We’d question those we weren’t sure about. The civil war will be bloody and horrific, nothing we’d want to repeat. So we’d ask people like Mickey Rourke, for insance… ‘Did you say you hated us Deplorables because you’re a deranged scumfuck? Or were you just placating your ((bosses)), so you could continue to get work?

    You see? That’s why they used stringent methods, because it was the Jews who betrayed the Christians of Spain to the Moorish invaders in the first place, just as they’re doing today. And so Torquemada (a loyal Jew himself) wanted to be sure that the people rebuilding Spain were not going to betray her yet again.

    The Amerindians weren’t living in harmony with each other. They were hacking each other to grizzly deaths, and stealing and enslaving the rival tribe’s women. This was going on from the beginning of time. Just as slavery had been going on since the beginning of time, and still goes on in the African continent. All the plantation owners did was use the black slaves the Jews sold them, instead of white ones, because they were easier to spot if they ran off. Whites were enslaving whites for centuries, and everyone was enslaving everyone back in those days. The significant thing is that White people were the ones to end the ancient institution.

    Women weren’t kept in the kitchen or bedroom. They were there because that’s where they wanted to be. My gal loves to cook. My mom loved being a homemaker. She also wrote, and was even published, but no one ever forced her to be a homemaker. She was a teacher for a while when it suited her, but that was mostly to get by the hard times, and when dad was doing better, she went back to the life she loved, raising her family.

    The whole radical feminist bullshit is just more agenda-driven lies from the tribe to destroy Western society. Duh.

    Does anyone on the planet (who’s not insane) believe people should be forced to bake cakes in celebration of sodomite “weddings”?

    The Nazis had a right to decide who was allowed to live in their lands. I don’t believe the stories of gas chambers, soap and lampshades. If they were evil White people, then so too were their enemies, which cancels out their evil.

    Dropping nuclear bombs on Japanese cities is somewhat more dubious, as far as justifications, but my dad was in the Pacific theater at the time, and I know they didn’t relish a street fight in every Japanese town and city to force an unilateral, unconditional surrender from a people of whom it was said- had no word for it.

    Their culture was one of fighting to the death. So perhaps the bombs were a way of saving untold American lives, otherwise wasted on a bitter, and long drawn out struggle.

    IDK, that one’s iffy.

    Vietnam was an atrocity, but I certainly don’t blame Whitey, but rather the insatiable greed of the MIC, and a throng of treasonous politicians, of which there seems to be an infinite supply, male, female, white, black, brown and yellow.

    for the record..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Their culture was one of fighting to the death. So perhaps the bombs were a way of saving untold American lives, otherwise wasted on a bitter, and long drawn out struggle.
     
    They'd have collapsed just as fast had those bombs been dropped several miles away, with minimal civilian casualties. The "conventional" bombs killed many more, but that didn't encourage surrender. Why would a mere 100,000 more deaths?

    The fighting-in-the-streets stuff is just hokum. This was Japan. Even the samurai class was prohibited possession of guns. They'd hold us off with what? Garden hoes?

    As for the rest of your list, it's totally irrelevant, as I was discussing the crimes of US Democrats. They weren't around for the Crusades.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. Wally says:
    @Anon
    So Nazis WERE right, after all?

    They believed Jews were rats infecting the state, so used a pesticide to kill them...a pesticide created in a chemical institute founded to honor a Jewish WWI hero.

    Oh, the irony!

    Except the laughably absurd gassings never happened.
    It’s really, ‘Oh the lies & propaganda’

    In fact, the alleged ‘gas chamber’ were scientifically impossible.
    real science, real history here, from Master Chemist Germar Rudolf:

    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau

    The Rudolf Report / Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz

    http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html

    ‘Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau’
    by Master Chemist Germar Rudolf

    http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html

    Lectures on the Holocaust / Controversial Issues Cross Examined

    https://codoh.com/library/document/1196/?lang=en

    Dissecting the Holocaust—The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Wally says:
    @KenH

    A cautionary note to progressives: Extremism is how the left lost the future to Nixon and Reagan
     
    America was 86% white under Nixon and about 82% white when Reagan was first elected. Today we're about 61% and falling like a rock with deaths exceeding births in 26 states for the first time.

    What we're seeing is a third worldization of U.S. politics and as the third world portion of the population continues to increase (and whites decrease) the future belongs to both they and the Jewish led radical Democrats, not the Republican party who continues cuck & jive, surrender and move to the left. Whites who don't hate themselves and America have virtually no political representation in 2018.

    The comparisons with Nazi Germany are absurd.
     
    Only if you're a sentient and rational being which disqualifies the majority of leftists. To them, any white person who doesn't hate their race, culture and history and wish to see it wiped away is a Nazi. Enforcing immigration laws is white supremacist. Sadly this is no longer a fringe belief.

    Nazi Germany did nothing that was not being down by many countries the at the time, well, they did present a threat to the banking cartel.

    See my post no. 47 here for a take down of the preposterous ‘gas chambers’.

    Also note that not a single British Bletchley Park intercept of secret German messages to and from Auschwitz and the so called ‘death camps’ ever mention gas chambers, killing Jews, or anything holocaust-like. There are many which do mention transporting large numbers of Jews out of these labor camps. Also note that the outbound train records which were kept have disappeared while the inbound records have not.

    The fake ’6M’, who benefits?

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH
    I do not believe in six million dead Jews using gas chambers but this myth is much too important to Jewish identity to ever die. It's also useful to guilt trip witless and ignorant white goyim when they get uppity about demographic changes or wars for Israel.

    Even if the gas chamber fairy tales were true it's probably on of the most quick and painless ways to die. If I had a choice between firing squad, hanging, electric chair and being gassed I'll take the gas chamber.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Rurik says:
    @Johnny Smoggins
    The right has no will to fight the way the left does.

    Let's contrast the gay wedding cake/Christian baker incident with Sanders being kicked out of the Red Hen. The left sent out a couple of soldiers to a Christian bakery to deliberately ask them to do something they knew they would refuse to do, just so they could sue them and destroy them, and in the process rub everyone else's noses in the revolting farce of "gay marriage"

    Sanders merely went to dinner at this restaurant with her family and not only was kicked out, but then followed across the street to continue the abuse. And the response of the right? ........bad, made up reviews on Yelp.

    Imagine if some high ranking leftist went to a conservative run restaurant and the same thing happened? That restaurant would've burned down that night and the lives of the owners would be in grave danger. Bad reviews on Yelp would be the least of their worries.

    Until the right is willing to fight dirty and violently the way the left does, things will just keep getting worse.

    It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late,
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy — willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the Deplorable began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low.
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd.
    It was not taught by the state.
    No man spoke it aloud
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    It was not suddently bred.
    It will not swiftly abate.
    Through the chilled years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the Deplorable began to hate.

    with apologies to Rudyard Kipling

    the real one is here

    http://www.europeanamericansunited.org/school1/Fiction/kipling/awakened.htm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johnny Smoggins
    How many Rotherhams is it going to take for the Saxon to begin to hate?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. KenH says:
    @Wally
    Nazi Germany did nothing that was not being down by many countries the at the time, well, they did present a threat to the banking cartel.

    See my post no. 47 here for a take down of the preposterous 'gas chambers'.

    Also note that not a single British Bletchley Park intercept of secret German messages to and from Auschwitz and the so called 'death camps' ever mention gas chambers, killing Jews, or anything holocaust-like. There are many which do mention transporting large numbers of Jews out of these labor camps. Also note that the outbound train records which were kept have disappeared while the inbound records have not.

    The fake '6M', who benefits?

    www.codoh.com

    I do not believe in six million dead Jews using gas chambers but this myth is much too important to Jewish identity to ever die. It’s also useful to guilt trip witless and ignorant white goyim when they get uppity about demographic changes or wars for Israel.

    Even if the gas chamber fairy tales were true it’s probably on of the most quick and painless ways to die. If I had a choice between firing squad, hanging, electric chair and being gassed I’ll take the gas chamber.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Cheers, Ken.

    The entire Big Lie about the preposterous 'gas chambers' makes no sense even from a purely practical perspective.

    Why go to the expense, use valuable war time resources, manpower, troops, fuel and incredibly critical trains, etc, to ship Jews to laughably alleged 'extermination camps' just to kill them with a pesticide in alleged 'gas chambers' which could not have worked as alleged when penny apiece bullet would have done the job at much closer locations.

    And look at the locations of the alleged 'death camps'. Right next to major towns which would seen what was going on, IF the impossible narrative was factual.

    And that's just a part of the debunking of The Big Lie.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. @Rurik

    Hey, it was white progressives who pulled that crap. Don’t let them off the hook.
     
    I'm letting them all 'off the hook;

    none of those things are definitively evil or wrong when considering the context..

    I suspect, all lies notwithstanding, that the Crusades were waged due to unspeakable atrocities committed in the 'Holy Land' against Christians. The so-called 'temple' was probably a slave-trading auction house for Whites captured all over the world.

    'sacking the temple' takes on a new meaning, if so, and I'd consider it perfectly characteristic of those people in those times.

    If it weren't for deadly consequences, what would the Jews and the Muslims do today if they had unfettered access to White slaves?

    In a way they do, in economically ravaged Eastern Europe, many of the young women from those places are trafficked into Israel to work in brothels as abject slaves. One can only imagine the horrors meted out as punishment for being White and (putatively) Christian, for all the "crimes" "they've" committed over the centuries. I shiver at the very thought of it.

    Christopher Columbus was a visionary and great explorer. That he took slaves was simply what people did back then. What do people think the Incas and Aztecs and Mayans were doing? When they weren't sacrificing men by the tens of thousands, sometime in one day alone.

    The Inquisition came after centuries of African, Muslim- Moorish occupation, slavery and domination of White, Christian lands. The Spanish could have just killed all the Jews and Muslims, but instead they tried to weed out the good ones from the bad ones. If we had our civil war right now, and we Deplorables won, would we want to go on a killing spree for anyone who didn't look like a Deplorable? No, we'd want to figure out who is friend and who is foe. We'd question those we weren't sure about. The civil war will be bloody and horrific, nothing we'd want to repeat. So we'd ask people like Mickey Rourke, for insance... 'Did you say you hated us Deplorables because you're a deranged scumfuck? Or were you just placating your ((bosses)), so you could continue to get work?

    You see? That's why they used stringent methods, because it was the Jews who betrayed the Christians of Spain to the Moorish invaders in the first place, just as they're doing today. And so Torquemada (a loyal Jew himself) wanted to be sure that the people rebuilding Spain were not going to betray her yet again.

    The Amerindians weren't living in harmony with each other. They were hacking each other to grizzly deaths, and stealing and enslaving the rival tribe's women. This was going on from the beginning of time. Just as slavery had been going on since the beginning of time, and still goes on in the African continent. All the plantation owners did was use the black slaves the Jews sold them, instead of white ones, because they were easier to spot if they ran off. Whites were enslaving whites for centuries, and everyone was enslaving everyone back in those days. The significant thing is that White people were the ones to end the ancient institution.

    Women weren't kept in the kitchen or bedroom. They were there because that's where they wanted to be. My gal loves to cook. My mom loved being a homemaker. She also wrote, and was even published, but no one ever forced her to be a homemaker. She was a teacher for a while when it suited her, but that was mostly to get by the hard times, and when dad was doing better, she went back to the life she loved, raising her family.

    The whole radical feminist bullshit is just more agenda-driven lies from the tribe to destroy Western society. Duh.

    Does anyone on the planet (who's not insane) believe people should be forced to bake cakes in celebration of sodomite "weddings"?

    The Nazis had a right to decide who was allowed to live in their lands. I don't believe the stories of gas chambers, soap and lampshades. If they were evil White people, then so too were their enemies, which cancels out their evil.

    Dropping nuclear bombs on Japanese cities is somewhat more dubious, as far as justifications, but my dad was in the Pacific theater at the time, and I know they didn't relish a street fight in every Japanese town and city to force an unilateral, unconditional surrender from a people of whom it was said- had no word for it.

    Their culture was one of fighting to the death. So perhaps the bombs were a way of saving untold American lives, otherwise wasted on a bitter, and long drawn out struggle.

    IDK, that one's iffy.

    Vietnam was an atrocity, but I certainly don't blame Whitey, but rather the insatiable greed of the MIC, and a throng of treasonous politicians, of which there seems to be an infinite supply, male, female, white, black, brown and yellow.

    for the record..

    Their culture was one of fighting to the death. So perhaps the bombs were a way of saving untold American lives, otherwise wasted on a bitter, and long drawn out struggle.

    They’d have collapsed just as fast had those bombs been dropped several miles away, with minimal civilian casualties. The “conventional” bombs killed many more, but that didn’t encourage surrender. Why would a mere 100,000 more deaths?

    The fighting-in-the-streets stuff is just hokum. This was Japan. Even the samurai class was prohibited possession of guns. They’d hold us off with what? Garden hoes?

    As for the rest of your list, it’s totally irrelevant, as I was discussing the crimes of US Democrats. They weren’t around for the Crusades.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    They’d have collapsed just as fast had those bombs been dropped several miles away, with minimal civilian casualties. The “conventional” bombs killed many more, but that didn’t encourage surrender. Why would a mere 100,000 more deaths?
     
    what you write is full of contradictions.

    you say it would have worked the same if they'd have simply threatened to drop a nuke, and then you say no amount of bombing would have done the trick, and then you pointedly ignore that is was the nukes and their 100,000 more deaths that did, in fact bring about surrender.

    The fighting-in-the-streets stuff is just hokum. This was Japan. Even the samurai class was prohibited possession of guns. They’d hold us off with what? Garden hoes?
     
    this is preposterous

    are you suggesting that during war, the Japanese wouldn't have been allowed to use their rifles to defend their own cities?!

    As for the rest of your list, it’s totally irrelevant, as I was discussing the crimes of US Democrats. They weren’t around for the Crusades.
     
    it's irrelevant because you missed the entire point.

    the point was that as long as I've been alive, we've been barraged with bullshit about the 'evils of the white man'. The evils of his Christianity, the evils of slavery, blah, blah, fucking blah.

    but you're too ideologically myopic to see beyond your narrow partisan blinders.

    What I wrote had zero, zilch, nada .. to do with partisanism.

    it was a litany of blood libels and smears intended to marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular, and to sew self-doubt and hopefully, self-loathing. As a method for destroying White society so that its rival; Zionism- could built its temple on the grave of White, Western civilization. Duh.

    Which is, BTW, the calling card of the GOP, Cuckservative Inc.

    [see Ryan, Paul. McStain, John, Polesmoker, Lindsey, Cheney, Dickhead, Bush crime family, etcs..]

    It wasn't until Trump came around that the Republican brand had any credibility at all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    Just like Christians regarded non-believers as cursed and wicked heathens, the PC progs see their enemies as evil and cursed.
     
    But Christians believe non-Christians should be forgiven and can be saved whereas American leftists, like their Bolshevik forbears, believe their opposition is innately evil and wicked with no redeeming qualities and who must be utterly destroyed.

    Lefties and progs believe in the innate purity and goodness of everyone but they draw the line at non-prog white people who they see as Nazis and congenitally evil.

    But Christians believe non-Christians should be forgiven and can be saved whereas American leftists, like their Bolshevik forbears, believe their opposition is innately evil and wicked with no redeeming qualities and who must be utterly destroyed.

    No, that’d be the Nazis. To the Nazis, Jews and Slavs couldn’t do anything to redeem themselves. They were racially tainted and targeted.

    Communists, in contrast, could forgive and embrace former enemies IF the latter surrendered and repented. After the dust settled, Soviets saw East Germans(now communists) as comrades.

    Christians were the same way in the Middle Ages and later. They could kill lots of people and burn witches. But the accused could be spared IF they repented and sought forgiveness for their sins.

    PC allows that too. If you declare that you’ve seen the light, accept PC, and are willing to totally cuck, the PC-lords will accept you. Look at Robert Byrd. He was of the KKK but became a good stooge of globalism, so all was forgiven.

    Christian forgiveness was conditional. You had to surrender your heart to the one True Faith. PC works the same way.

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    No, that’d be the Nazis. To the Nazis, Jews and Slavs couldn’t do anything to redeem themselves. They were racially tainted and targeted.
     
    You're conflating Hitler and the National Socialist party's acknowledgement of racial and ethnic differences with a desire for mass murder. It was the supposedly forgiving Soviets who brutally murdered 15-20K Polish officers at Katyn Forest, not the Germans. It was the Soviets who deported over one million Polish intellectuals and members of the middle class to Siberian Gulags, not the Germans.

    Communists, in contrast, could forgive and embrace former enemies IF the latter surrendered and repented. After the dust settled, Soviets saw East Germans(now communists) as comrades.
     
    After Jewish Bolshevik Ilya Ehrenberg exhorted the Russian hordes to “Do not count the days, do not count the miles. Count only the Germans you have killed." and "Kill the Germans wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on the women, children or aged! Kill every German - wipe them out!"

    Tens of thousands of Germans didn't get to repent and were hauled off to Soviet Gulags as slave laborers.

    And the embrace was conditional as the Stasi spied on people 24/7 to make sure nobody relapsed into anti-communism and Nazism so this comradeship came at the cost of freedom and dignity. If they were merely suspected of anti-communism they were judged guilty.

    Lenin his Bolsheviks hated the bourgeoisie who to them represented all that was wrong with society and murdered them by the millions. The hapless bourgeoisie didn't get to repent either.

    Members and descendants of the South Vietnamese army didn't get to repent. Many died in post war re-education centers and the ones that survived permanently occupy a lower rung in society.

    Then we have Bill Ayres and other notable leftists expressing a desire to murder 25-30 million Americans in "re-education centers" so that socialism can triumph. Little opportunity to repent.
    , @Wally
    said:
    " To the Nazis, Jews and Slavs couldn’t do anything to redeem themselves. They were racially tainted and targeted. "

    If you mean Jews were put into labor camps, a la Japanese-Americans into US concentration camps & Christians into Communist concentration camps, yep, it happened. War is hell.

    As for Slavs, it's absolute nonsense that you to weirdly cling to. But indeed, everyone wants 'victim statu$'.

    Most important, however, is that you have no prof that either were 'exterminated' by the Germans. None. If you had such proof you would have posted it long ago.
    Give up your curious & unhealthy wishful thinking.

    recommended:
    The Rudolf Report
    Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz

    http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html

    [i]The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”
    An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers[/i]
    By Jürgen Graf , Carlo Mattogno , Thomas Kues
    https://codoh.com/library/document/3052/?lang=en

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @Ozymandias
    In the context of the conversation you had already defined success as bringing an end to the war.

    I don’t recall defining success in that way. But thanks for defining it. However, Bobby Kennedy didn’t get the chance to end the war, which seems to be clearly indicated that he would have. Johnson had declined to run due to the strong protests against the war.

    Nixon had to promise that he had a plan to end the war. Only it was secret. Then when he successfully was elected, his secret plan was to escalate the war. Talk about feeling betrayed. That’s what we all felt. Lied to.

    But Nixon had to placate the military/industrial complex and the war hawks, and it seems likely that he was concerned with John Kennedy’s fate when he tried to buck the Deep State and seek peace. So I don’t hold Nixon as much to account as I used to.

    I now think that they hated Nixon for ending the war 4 years too late and that may have been the reason that Deep Throat suddenlty started talking to Woodward and Bernstein. Their jounalism seems less good reporting and more like hidden forces dropping a dime on Nixon.

    Yeah, Nixon was successful alright. Thanks for defining success.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ozymandias
    I didn't define it that way, you did. It was what the conversation was about when it began. Christ's sake man, pay attention to what you're saying.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. bartok says:
    @Mark P Miller
    " These fault lines are racial, permanent and most likely going to lead to a 2nd civil war."

    Better that than to fold over like a bunch of Swedes.

    Frankly, I'm starting to look forward to it. I have a fairly high tolerance for discomfort and hardship and would like nothing more than to finally start separating the wheat from the chaff.

    Frankly, I’m starting to look forward to it.

    You’re thinking of a race-war, which would be easy like Koreans on LA rooftops keeping orcs at bay with rifles.
    But any civil war worth a damn would be white vs. white. That’s a lot tougher, evidenced by the white vs. white conflicts of the past 200 years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. @Liberty Mike
    Resorting to Godwin is not an exclusively Democrat party phenomenon; to the contrary, it is a device to which resort is had by the conservative / Neo-Cohen branch of progressivism.

    Take Sean Hannity. How many times has he regurgitated "its Munich" or "its Munich all over again" or some variation on that theme?

    How about ((( Bill Kristol )))? How often has he invoked Munich?

    How about any number of Neo-Cohens who have, in pavlovian fashion, shouted "Munich" whenever another person contends that America should not make the world safe for democracy?

    I’d like to see the answers as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. KenH says:
    @Anon
    But Christians believe non-Christians should be forgiven and can be saved whereas American leftists, like their Bolshevik forbears, believe their opposition is innately evil and wicked with no redeeming qualities and who must be utterly destroyed.

    No, that'd be the Nazis. To the Nazis, Jews and Slavs couldn't do anything to redeem themselves. They were racially tainted and targeted.

    Communists, in contrast, could forgive and embrace former enemies IF the latter surrendered and repented. After the dust settled, Soviets saw East Germans(now communists) as comrades.

    Christians were the same way in the Middle Ages and later. They could kill lots of people and burn witches. But the accused could be spared IF they repented and sought forgiveness for their sins.

    PC allows that too. If you declare that you've seen the light, accept PC, and are willing to totally cuck, the PC-lords will accept you. Look at Robert Byrd. He was of the KKK but became a good stooge of globalism, so all was forgiven.

    Christian forgiveness was conditional. You had to surrender your heart to the one True Faith. PC works the same way.

    No, that’d be the Nazis. To the Nazis, Jews and Slavs couldn’t do anything to redeem themselves. They were racially tainted and targeted.

    You’re conflating Hitler and the National Socialist party’s acknowledgement of racial and ethnic differences with a desire for mass murder. It was the supposedly forgiving Soviets who brutally murdered 15-20K Polish officers at Katyn Forest, not the Germans. It was the Soviets who deported over one million Polish intellectuals and members of the middle class to Siberian Gulags, not the Germans.

    Communists, in contrast, could forgive and embrace former enemies IF the latter surrendered and repented. After the dust settled, Soviets saw East Germans(now communists) as comrades.

    After Jewish Bolshevik Ilya Ehrenberg exhorted the Russian hordes to “Do not count the days, do not count the miles. Count only the Germans you have killed.” and “Kill the Germans wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on the women, children or aged! Kill every German – wipe them out!”

    Tens of thousands of Germans didn’t get to repent and were hauled off to Soviet Gulags as slave laborers.

    And the embrace was conditional as the Stasi spied on people 24/7 to make sure nobody relapsed into anti-communism and Nazism so this comradeship came at the cost of freedom and dignity. If they were merely suspected of anti-communism they were judged guilty.

    Lenin his Bolsheviks hated the bourgeoisie who to them represented all that was wrong with society and murdered them by the millions. The hapless bourgeoisie didn’t get to repent either.

    Members and descendants of the South Vietnamese army didn’t get to repent. Many died in post war re-education centers and the ones that survived permanently occupy a lower rung in society.

    Then we have Bill Ayres and other notable leftists expressing a desire to murder 25-30 million Americans in “re-education centers” so that socialism can triumph. Little opportunity to repent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @restless94110
    I don't recall defining success in that way. But thanks for defining it. However, Bobby Kennedy didn't get the chance to end the war, which seems to be clearly indicated that he would have. Johnson had declined to run due to the strong protests against the war.

    Nixon had to promise that he had a plan to end the war. Only it was secret. Then when he successfully was elected, his secret plan was to escalate the war. Talk about feeling betrayed. That's what we all felt. Lied to.

    But Nixon had to placate the military/industrial complex and the war hawks, and it seems likely that he was concerned with John Kennedy's fate when he tried to buck the Deep State and seek peace. So I don't hold Nixon as much to account as I used to.

    I now think that they hated Nixon for ending the war 4 years too late and that may have been the reason that Deep Throat suddenlty started talking to Woodward and Bernstein. Their jounalism seems less good reporting and more like hidden forces dropping a dime on Nixon.

    Yeah, Nixon was successful alright. Thanks for defining success.

    I didn’t define it that way, you did. It was what the conversation was about when it began. Christ’s sake man, pay attention to what you’re saying.

    Read More
    • Replies: @restless94110
    Sorry, booby, I only define things when they are defined by me, not you.

    And who cares? What I've said is what it was. Fuck Nixon. Fuck Vietnam. It was a waste of money and American lives. There was nothing at all ever good about it.

    Nixon should have ended it upon election in 68. Like Bobby would have.

    Instead, because he was a coward, he prolonged it for 4 more years.

    And his cowardice still didn't save him. He was taken down.

    But that's what cowards don't understand: you back off and cower to the Deep State, you still get taken down.

    Nixon was a total failure and a total disgrace. Buchanan had a role in that and he continues to re-write history or attempt to. No, Pat, Nixon was a complete utter failure and a disgrace as a President of the United States.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @Rurik
    It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late,
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy -- willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the Deplorable began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low.
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd.
    It was not taught by the state.
    No man spoke it aloud
    When the Deplorable began to hate.

    It was not suddently bred.
    It will not swiftly abate.
    Through the chilled years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the Deplorable began to hate.

    with apologies to Rudyard Kipling

    the real one is here

    http://www.europeanamericansunited.org/school1/Fiction/kipling/awakened.htm

    How many Rotherhams is it going to take for the Saxon to begin to hate?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Rotherham is in South Yorkshire, so the Englishmen there would be Angles/Vikings, not Saxons, despite wiki describing it as a "Saxon market town" (do they mean Anglo-Saxon?).
    , @Rurik

    How many Rotherhams is it going to take for the Saxon to begin to hate?
     
    Brexit was an inkling

    But I fear the Brits are too far gone to lead any kind of reinvigoration of the Western spirit.

    How tragic it must have been for a man like Enoch Powell to bear witness to the self-abasement of his once-proud race.

    I'm sure there are lots and lots of British men who bristle at the emasculation and humiliation of their former nation. But it seems they're just too few. Frumpy, middle aged British women want the dusky young men around. The youngsters are lobotomized by the '((Telly')), or social media, and dream of being a rapper. Fags and pedophiles run rampant in disgraced Merry Olde.

    The recent wedding was a laughable farce. Did you see the Negro jiving and gesticulating there in Westminster Hall?

    Even the Bard would have been aghast.

    Brexit perhaps gives me some small shred of hope that England isn't completely doomed, but the shred is ever so wafer thin.

    I guess maybe the wars took too much of the 'best of the Gentiles' out of their gene pool.

    Such a deal!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johnny Smoggins
    How many Rotherhams is it going to take for the Saxon to begin to hate?

    Rotherham is in South Yorkshire, so the Englishmen there would be Angles/Vikings, not Saxons, despite wiki describing it as a “Saxon market town” (do they mean Anglo-Saxon?).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @restless94110
    Buchanan is clearly wrong in his remebrances of the late 60s. As someone who participated actively in the late 60s I have this to say to the much older than me Pat Buchanan:

    You remember things wrong based on your bias. We revolted against the militarism of that day. No one ever spit on a veteran--it is an urban myth.

    Today, in my old age, I like much of that Pat has to say. But this he says is utter bullshit. It wasn't like that, Pat. Maybe, to you, hidden in your Washington DC nest of Nixonian idiocy, it was. But Nixon promised a "secret plan" to end Vietnam in 1968, possibly to counter the Democrats led by Bobby Kennedy that promised an end to the stupidity of Vietnam. And then when Nixon got elected....?

    He did nothing. His secret plan was bullshit.

    Now, since then, there has been some evidence that there was substantial pressure put on Nixon to keep Vietnam going, to the extent that even when he finally pulled out--4 year and thousands of American lives later--that the Deep State wanted to avenge and took him down (via Watergate).

    Maybe. Nevertheless, Pat? Your lover or buddy or whatever he was, Richard Nixon? He was a dick. He promised us to end it in 68. And he broke that promise.

    Pat? Fuck Nixon. And fuck you if you defend his indefensible actions.

    “As someone who participated actively in the late 60s … ”

    And now you’re just an old guy who litters his post with foul language.

    “We revolted against the militarism of that day.”

    And the militarism of that day continues to this day. The energy of the Weathermen types was primarily focused on race; ending the war in Vietnam was secondary to the plight of the negro. That New Left negrophilia continues to this day: identity politics trumps the more pressing issues of continued militarism and profitable wars. Your ideological descendants are even more clueless than your generation. Thanks, foul-mouthed hippie!

    Read More
    • Replies: @restless94110

    And now you’re just an old guy who litters his post with foul language.
     
    Hey SunBaked. Blow me, you ageist punk

    Soy boys complain about foul language. Ageists talk about old guys.

    And no, soy boy, in that age the main focus was not on race. It was on the fucking lost senseless bullshit war in Vietnam.

    You are an ideological retard who has no idea what it was like to live through those times. So shut the fuck up, soy boy bitch.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Wally says:
    @KenH
    I do not believe in six million dead Jews using gas chambers but this myth is much too important to Jewish identity to ever die. It's also useful to guilt trip witless and ignorant white goyim when they get uppity about demographic changes or wars for Israel.

    Even if the gas chamber fairy tales were true it's probably on of the most quick and painless ways to die. If I had a choice between firing squad, hanging, electric chair and being gassed I'll take the gas chamber.

    Cheers, Ken.

    The entire Big Lie about the preposterous ‘gas chambers’ makes no sense even from a purely practical perspective.

    Why go to the expense, use valuable war time resources, manpower, troops, fuel and incredibly critical trains, etc, to ship Jews to laughably alleged ‘extermination camps’ just to kill them with a pesticide in alleged ‘gas chambers’ which could not have worked as alleged when penny apiece bullet would have done the job at much closer locations.

    And look at the locations of the alleged ‘death camps’. Right next to major towns which would seen what was going on, IF the impossible narrative was factual.

    And that’s just a part of the debunking of The Big Lie.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. @restless94110
    Buchanan is clearly wrong in his remebrances of the late 60s. As someone who participated actively in the late 60s I have this to say to the much older than me Pat Buchanan:

    You remember things wrong based on your bias. We revolted against the militarism of that day. No one ever spit on a veteran--it is an urban myth.

    Today, in my old age, I like much of that Pat has to say. But this he says is utter bullshit. It wasn't like that, Pat. Maybe, to you, hidden in your Washington DC nest of Nixonian idiocy, it was. But Nixon promised a "secret plan" to end Vietnam in 1968, possibly to counter the Democrats led by Bobby Kennedy that promised an end to the stupidity of Vietnam. And then when Nixon got elected....?

    He did nothing. His secret plan was bullshit.

    Now, since then, there has been some evidence that there was substantial pressure put on Nixon to keep Vietnam going, to the extent that even when he finally pulled out--4 year and thousands of American lives later--that the Deep State wanted to avenge and took him down (via Watergate).

    Maybe. Nevertheless, Pat? Your lover or buddy or whatever he was, Richard Nixon? He was a dick. He promised us to end it in 68. And he broke that promise.

    Pat? Fuck Nixon. And fuck you if you defend his indefensible actions.

    restless94110: Bullshit. I am a Vietnam vet and I saw it and experienced it. I think you may be an urban myth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @restless94110
    What part is bullshit, Vet? You saw what and experienced what? The War in Vietnam? So what? You know you wasted your life in that sad sick war and now what?

    I am so glad I was smart enough to refuse to go into that war. I saved my life as I saw all the people who did go into that war either die there or die later as the years move on. Vietnam War vets are still even to this day killing themselves at record numbers every month.

    No one spit on a vet. It's been disproven over and over again. In fact, they even found tbe genesis if that urban myth: some article in a Philadelphia paper that some war monger wrote in order to start shit. They succeeded.

    We have idiots still screaming as if it's true. It's not. No one ever spit on you, Vet. And if they had done, are you saying you--the brave soldier just back from the war--would have let them??????

    Why would you have let someone spit on you, you fucking moron? Are you saying you are a coward and didn't fight back from that disrespect?

    No you're not saying that. Becuase you were never spit on. And no other soldier was either.

    We were smart enough in those days even to know that the guys that went to the war were just like us...only we decided it wasn't worth it. And we were right. And we didn't disrespect those that did go into that War. We only felt pity not repugnance.

    May God bless you and bring you light into your mind and life all these years later.

    You surely sound like you didn't learn a damn thing from your experiences in life.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Wally says:
    @Anon
    But Christians believe non-Christians should be forgiven and can be saved whereas American leftists, like their Bolshevik forbears, believe their opposition is innately evil and wicked with no redeeming qualities and who must be utterly destroyed.

    No, that'd be the Nazis. To the Nazis, Jews and Slavs couldn't do anything to redeem themselves. They were racially tainted and targeted.

    Communists, in contrast, could forgive and embrace former enemies IF the latter surrendered and repented. After the dust settled, Soviets saw East Germans(now communists) as comrades.

    Christians were the same way in the Middle Ages and later. They could kill lots of people and burn witches. But the accused could be spared IF they repented and sought forgiveness for their sins.

    PC allows that too. If you declare that you've seen the light, accept PC, and are willing to totally cuck, the PC-lords will accept you. Look at Robert Byrd. He was of the KKK but became a good stooge of globalism, so all was forgiven.

    Christian forgiveness was conditional. You had to surrender your heart to the one True Faith. PC works the same way.

    said:
    ” To the Nazis, Jews and Slavs couldn’t do anything to redeem themselves. They were racially tainted and targeted. ”

    If you mean Jews were put into labor camps, a la Japanese-Americans into US concentration camps & Christians into Communist concentration camps, yep, it happened. War is hell.

    As for Slavs, it’s absolute nonsense that you to weirdly cling to. But indeed, everyone wants ‘victim statu$’.

    Most important, however, is that you have no prof that either were ‘exterminated’ by the Germans. None. If you had such proof you would have posted it long ago.
    Give up your curious & unhealthy wishful thinking.

    recommended:
    The Rudolf Report
    Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz

    http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html

    [i]The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”
    An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers[/i]
    By Jürgen Graf , Carlo Mattogno , Thomas Kues

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3052/?lang=en

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Rurik says:
    @Johnny Smoggins
    How many Rotherhams is it going to take for the Saxon to begin to hate?

    How many Rotherhams is it going to take for the Saxon to begin to hate?

    Brexit was an inkling

    But I fear the Brits are too far gone to lead any kind of reinvigoration of the Western spirit.

    How tragic it must have been for a man like Enoch Powell to bear witness to the self-abasement of his once-proud race.

    I’m sure there are lots and lots of British men who bristle at the emasculation and humiliation of their former nation. But it seems they’re just too few. Frumpy, middle aged British women want the dusky young men around. The youngsters are lobotomized by the ‘((Telly’)), or social media, and dream of being a rapper. Fags and pedophiles run rampant in disgraced Merry Olde.

    The recent wedding was a laughable farce. Did you see the Negro jiving and gesticulating there in Westminster Hall?

    Even the Bard would have been aghast.

    Brexit perhaps gives me some small shred of hope that England isn’t completely doomed, but the shred is ever so wafer thin.

    I guess maybe the wars took too much of the ‘best of the Gentiles’ out of their gene pool.

    Such a deal!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Johnny Smoggins
    I think the wedding of Prince Harry to the mulatto, like the appointment of the current pope, was a globalist project.

    I don't know what's happened to the men of England. Where are all the fearsome skinheads and football hooligans of yesteryear? I guess they're getting high and playing computer games while their sisters are getting pimped out by pakis.

    What a damn shame.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Rurik says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Their culture was one of fighting to the death. So perhaps the bombs were a way of saving untold American lives, otherwise wasted on a bitter, and long drawn out struggle.
     
    They'd have collapsed just as fast had those bombs been dropped several miles away, with minimal civilian casualties. The "conventional" bombs killed many more, but that didn't encourage surrender. Why would a mere 100,000 more deaths?

    The fighting-in-the-streets stuff is just hokum. This was Japan. Even the samurai class was prohibited possession of guns. They'd hold us off with what? Garden hoes?

    As for the rest of your list, it's totally irrelevant, as I was discussing the crimes of US Democrats. They weren't around for the Crusades.

    They’d have collapsed just as fast had those bombs been dropped several miles away, with minimal civilian casualties. The “conventional” bombs killed many more, but that didn’t encourage surrender. Why would a mere 100,000 more deaths?

    what you write is full of contradictions.

    you say it would have worked the same if they’d have simply threatened to drop a nuke, and then you say no amount of bombing would have done the trick, and then you pointedly ignore that is was the nukes and their 100,000 more deaths that did, in fact bring about surrender.

    The fighting-in-the-streets stuff is just hokum. This was Japan. Even the samurai class was prohibited possession of guns. They’d hold us off with what? Garden hoes?

    this is preposterous

    are you suggesting that during war, the Japanese wouldn’t have been allowed to use their rifles to defend their own cities?!

    As for the rest of your list, it’s totally irrelevant, as I was discussing the crimes of US Democrats. They weren’t around for the Crusades.

    it’s irrelevant because you missed the entire point.

    the point was that as long as I’ve been alive, we’ve been barraged with bullshit about the ‘evils of the white man’. The evils of his Christianity, the evils of slavery, blah, blah, fucking blah.

    but you’re too ideologically myopic to see beyond your narrow partisan blinders.

    What I wrote had zero, zilch, nada .. to do with partisanism.

    it was a litany of blood libels and smears intended to marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular, and to sew self-doubt and hopefully, self-loathing. As a method for destroying White society so that its rival; Zionism- could built its temple on the grave of White, Western civilization. Duh.

    Which is, BTW, the calling card of the GOP, Cuckservative Inc.

    [see Ryan, Paul. McStain, John, Polesmoker, Lindsey, Cheney, Dickhead, Bush crime family, etcs..]

    It wasn’t until Trump came around that the Republican brand had any credibility at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    As I recall, which may not be entirely correct, the Japanese were willing to consider a negotiated surrender, but Washington wanted an unconditional surrender, which Tokyo was not inclined to accept.
    , @Echoes of History
    Correction: Christianity isn't from the white man; white man is a second-rater in Christianity, which the Jew Testament makes very clear: "THE JEW FIRST." (((Romans 1:16)))

    Marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular? That is exactly what antifa Jesus did when he denounced White patriarchy in Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, and Luke 22:25.

    "Saint" Paul was also an antifa activist, whining like a pussy about the Law and Order of Roman civilization, just like the leftist black-bloc does today.

    Verse 25. - Thrice was I beaten with rods. This alludes to scourgings inflicted by Gentile magistrates with the vitis, or vine stick, of soldiers, or with the fasces of lictors.

    Pulpit Commentary
    http://biblehub.com/commentaries/pulpit/2_corinthians/11.htm
     
    Christianity is the original Jewish Antifa League against White patriarchy. Some things never change, even after 2000 years.

    http://fuhrerious88blog.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/img_7220.jpg
    , @Reg Cæsar

    [see Ryan, Paul. McStain, John, Polesmoker, Lindsey, Cheney, Dickhead, Bush crime family, etcs..]
     
    Name one of these guys who doesn't, just like you, defend our nuking of women and children.


    it was a litany of blood libels and smears intended to marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular
     
    "Just war" is a Western value. One of the highest.

    you say it would have worked the same if they’d have simply threatened to drop a nuke, and then you say no amount of bombing would have done the trick
     
    No, I said dropping the nukes within sight of, but not directly on, cities would have done the trick. What quality was so special about the extra 100,000 deaths that the million that preceded it didn't have?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rurik

    They’d have collapsed just as fast had those bombs been dropped several miles away, with minimal civilian casualties. The “conventional” bombs killed many more, but that didn’t encourage surrender. Why would a mere 100,000 more deaths?
     
    what you write is full of contradictions.

    you say it would have worked the same if they'd have simply threatened to drop a nuke, and then you say no amount of bombing would have done the trick, and then you pointedly ignore that is was the nukes and their 100,000 more deaths that did, in fact bring about surrender.

    The fighting-in-the-streets stuff is just hokum. This was Japan. Even the samurai class was prohibited possession of guns. They’d hold us off with what? Garden hoes?
     
    this is preposterous

    are you suggesting that during war, the Japanese wouldn't have been allowed to use their rifles to defend their own cities?!

    As for the rest of your list, it’s totally irrelevant, as I was discussing the crimes of US Democrats. They weren’t around for the Crusades.
     
    it's irrelevant because you missed the entire point.

    the point was that as long as I've been alive, we've been barraged with bullshit about the 'evils of the white man'. The evils of his Christianity, the evils of slavery, blah, blah, fucking blah.

    but you're too ideologically myopic to see beyond your narrow partisan blinders.

    What I wrote had zero, zilch, nada .. to do with partisanism.

    it was a litany of blood libels and smears intended to marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular, and to sew self-doubt and hopefully, self-loathing. As a method for destroying White society so that its rival; Zionism- could built its temple on the grave of White, Western civilization. Duh.

    Which is, BTW, the calling card of the GOP, Cuckservative Inc.

    [see Ryan, Paul. McStain, John, Polesmoker, Lindsey, Cheney, Dickhead, Bush crime family, etcs..]

    It wasn't until Trump came around that the Republican brand had any credibility at all.

    As I recall, which may not be entirely correct, the Japanese were willing to consider a negotiated surrender, but Washington wanted an unconditional surrender, which Tokyo was not inclined to accept.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Japanese were willing to consider a negotiated surrender, but Washington wanted an unconditional surrender,
     
    same with Germany

    that's why the fighting was so bitter, the Germans knew (unlike the Japanese) that they were slated for horrors beyond belief if they were ever at the mercy of the Fiend. And they were right.

    The Japanese were treated much better, being as there was no racial hatred for them.

    More Germans died in the years following the war than died during the war.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. DWright says:
    @Haxo Angmark
    boomer Pat is living in the past:

    counting Jews as what they are - ashkenaz out of Asia -

    'Murka is now 42% non-White

    and - real numbers not jew.gov - will be majority non-White by 2030.

    so, absent collapse of the (((Central Bank)))-run debtPonzi'conomy,

    the (((White-haters))), along with their ethnic orc invasives and culture-of-death pervs, can do about what they want with little fear of the future.

    Not all old people are Boomers. I know that old and Boomer are interchangeable to a lot of people but bone up on your terms.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @Rurik

    How many Rotherhams is it going to take for the Saxon to begin to hate?
     
    Brexit was an inkling

    But I fear the Brits are too far gone to lead any kind of reinvigoration of the Western spirit.

    How tragic it must have been for a man like Enoch Powell to bear witness to the self-abasement of his once-proud race.

    I'm sure there are lots and lots of British men who bristle at the emasculation and humiliation of their former nation. But it seems they're just too few. Frumpy, middle aged British women want the dusky young men around. The youngsters are lobotomized by the '((Telly')), or social media, and dream of being a rapper. Fags and pedophiles run rampant in disgraced Merry Olde.

    The recent wedding was a laughable farce. Did you see the Negro jiving and gesticulating there in Westminster Hall?

    Even the Bard would have been aghast.

    Brexit perhaps gives me some small shred of hope that England isn't completely doomed, but the shred is ever so wafer thin.

    I guess maybe the wars took too much of the 'best of the Gentiles' out of their gene pool.

    Such a deal!

    I think the wedding of Prince Harry to the mulatto, like the appointment of the current pope, was a globalist project.

    I don’t know what’s happened to the men of England. Where are all the fearsome skinheads and football hooligans of yesteryear? I guess they’re getting high and playing computer games while their sisters are getting pimped out by pakis.

    What a damn shame.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    I don’t know what’s happened to the men of England.
     
    There are people here who call Tommy Robinson a Zionist 'thug', and say he deserves to rot in prison because he didn't respect the British judicial system.

    That's the same British judicial system that protects serial pedophiles, facilitates the mass-rape of England's school girls, and harasses anyone who complains.

    This guy Robinson may not be a perfect man, but at least his ordeal is calling attention to the rot at the top of England's power-structure. There should be a hue and cry until he's released.

    For what he did, he should receive a slap on the wrist, and a heroes welcome in every hamlet of England.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @Ozymandias
    I didn't define it that way, you did. It was what the conversation was about when it began. Christ's sake man, pay attention to what you're saying.

    Sorry, booby, I only define things when they are defined by me, not you.

    And who cares? What I’ve said is what it was. Fuck Nixon. Fuck Vietnam. It was a waste of money and American lives. There was nothing at all ever good about it.

    Nixon should have ended it upon election in 68. Like Bobby would have.

    Instead, because he was a coward, he prolonged it for 4 more years.

    And his cowardice still didn’t save him. He was taken down.

    But that’s what cowards don’t understand: you back off and cower to the Deep State, you still get taken down.

    Nixon was a total failure and a total disgrace. Buchanan had a role in that and he continues to re-write history or attempt to. No, Pat, Nixon was a complete utter failure and a disgrace as a President of the United States.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. H. S. says:

    Thirty percent of all American children grow up with only one parent.

    How many TV specials have been devoted to kids separated for months, sometimes years, sometimes forever, from fathers and mothers serving in the military and doing tours of duty overseas in our endless wars?

    Because of U.S. support for the UAE-Saudi war against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, hundreds of thousands of children face the threat of famine. Those Yemeni kids are not being served burgers in day care centers.

    How many Western TV cameras are recording their suffering?


    Episode 090 – Our Leaders Are Psychopaths

    - Psychopaths have no shame.

    - Psychopaths are natural born liars.

    - Psychopaths have no sympathy whatsoever for the lives of others.

    - A book presenting the decades of research by Dr. Andrew Lobaczewski about psychopathy and the nature of evil.

    - Clinical diagnosis (PCLR) of personality of corporation by Dr. Robert Hare, founder of the psychopathy diagnostic test.

    - The society is adopting the psychopathic traits of our leaders.

    - + homepage of the world’s foremost expert on psychopathy

    https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-090-our-leaders-are-psychopaths/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. @Rurik

    They’d have collapsed just as fast had those bombs been dropped several miles away, with minimal civilian casualties. The “conventional” bombs killed many more, but that didn’t encourage surrender. Why would a mere 100,000 more deaths?
     
    what you write is full of contradictions.

    you say it would have worked the same if they'd have simply threatened to drop a nuke, and then you say no amount of bombing would have done the trick, and then you pointedly ignore that is was the nukes and their 100,000 more deaths that did, in fact bring about surrender.

    The fighting-in-the-streets stuff is just hokum. This was Japan. Even the samurai class was prohibited possession of guns. They’d hold us off with what? Garden hoes?
     
    this is preposterous

    are you suggesting that during war, the Japanese wouldn't have been allowed to use their rifles to defend their own cities?!

    As for the rest of your list, it’s totally irrelevant, as I was discussing the crimes of US Democrats. They weren’t around for the Crusades.
     
    it's irrelevant because you missed the entire point.

    the point was that as long as I've been alive, we've been barraged with bullshit about the 'evils of the white man'. The evils of his Christianity, the evils of slavery, blah, blah, fucking blah.

    but you're too ideologically myopic to see beyond your narrow partisan blinders.

    What I wrote had zero, zilch, nada .. to do with partisanism.

    it was a litany of blood libels and smears intended to marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular, and to sew self-doubt and hopefully, self-loathing. As a method for destroying White society so that its rival; Zionism- could built its temple on the grave of White, Western civilization. Duh.

    Which is, BTW, the calling card of the GOP, Cuckservative Inc.

    [see Ryan, Paul. McStain, John, Polesmoker, Lindsey, Cheney, Dickhead, Bush crime family, etcs..]

    It wasn't until Trump came around that the Republican brand had any credibility at all.

    Correction: Christianity isn’t from the white man; white man is a second-rater in Christianity, which the Jew Testament makes very clear: “THE JEW FIRST.” (((Romans 1:16)))

    Marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular? That is exactly what antifa Jesus did when he denounced White patriarchy in Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, and Luke 22:25.

    “Saint” Paul was also an antifa activist, whining like a pussy about the Law and Order of Roman civilization, just like the leftist black-bloc does today.

    Verse 25. – Thrice was I beaten with rods. This alludes to scourgings inflicted by Gentile magistrates with the vitis, or vine stick, of soldiers, or with the fasces of lictors.

    Pulpit Commentary

    http://biblehub.com/commentaries/pulpit/2_corinthians/11.htm

    Christianity is the original Jewish Antifa League against White patriarchy. Some things never change, even after 2000 years.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Correction: Christianity isn’t from the white man; white man is a second-rater in Christianity, which the Jew Testament makes very clear: “THE JEW FIRST.” (((Romans 1:16)))
     
    Christianity was imposed on the West.

    It's a religion that has as its god, a Jew. I remember reading how Benjamin Disraeli was so enamored of the fact that all these goyim went around worshiping a Jewish man - as God.

    I suspect this 'Jew as God' religion was imposed on people by fatuous kings fighting over some trifle with their neighboring monarch, and needed money from 'the Jews' to prevail. And as a consequence, 'the Jews' were able to impose their monotheistic religion (with a Jewish man as God) upon the Pagan people of Europe.

    It was just too tempting to the kings of ancient Europe, who were told of the advantages of subjects who would learn the tenets of this new religion, where obedience was tantamount. And disobedience earned eternity in Hell.

    'don't you want your subjects to obey you in all things? To kneel when you say kneel, and bow when you say bow, and live their lives in abject terror of a vengeful God who's all too willing and eager to punish them for defiance?

    For sheople, the difference between a monarch or ruler, and divine leader, is nearly invisible. Once you're the anointed leader, it's a short leap for you to convince them of your God-ordained right to rule. And if they fear their God, then so too will they fear, (and obey) you!

    Such people make perfect subjects, because they live in terror of authority. And are exhorted to kneel down and obey! - by God Himself. A Jewish man.

    It's not for me, but I respect most of the Christians I know (almost my entire extended family) as eminently decent people. I love them, Christianity or not. But I lament their sheep-like obedience.

    Occasionally I'll listen to the Christian preachers on the radio, or whatnot. And universally, when they say the word 'Israel', it's always with a fawning reverence. It's as if they conflate the Israel of the Bible with the Satanic entity, (genociding Christians out of the Holy Land) even as the preachers and Pope abase themselves to this blood-stained abomination.

    But then again, it all boils down to shekels.

    So, there are many things in the Bible that ring true. The story of Judas perhaps most poignantly and tragically.

    In my very humble opinion. I respect all people's right to believe what ever they want to, and am not pooh-poohing Christianity or Christians, but simply wondering if they're being taken for a ride.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Rurik says:
    @Anon
    As I recall, which may not be entirely correct, the Japanese were willing to consider a negotiated surrender, but Washington wanted an unconditional surrender, which Tokyo was not inclined to accept.

    Japanese were willing to consider a negotiated surrender, but Washington wanted an unconditional surrender,

    same with Germany

    that’s why the fighting was so bitter, the Germans knew (unlike the Japanese) that they were slated for horrors beyond belief if they were ever at the mercy of the Fiend. And they were right.

    The Japanese were treated much better, being as there was no racial hatred for them.

    More Germans died in the years following the war than died during the war.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Rurik says:
    @Johnny Smoggins
    I think the wedding of Prince Harry to the mulatto, like the appointment of the current pope, was a globalist project.

    I don't know what's happened to the men of England. Where are all the fearsome skinheads and football hooligans of yesteryear? I guess they're getting high and playing computer games while their sisters are getting pimped out by pakis.

    What a damn shame.

    I don’t know what’s happened to the men of England.

    There are people here who call Tommy Robinson a Zionist ‘thug’, and say he deserves to rot in prison because he didn’t respect the British judicial system.

    That’s the same British judicial system that protects serial pedophiles, facilitates the mass-rape of England’s school girls, and harasses anyone who complains.

    This guy Robinson may not be a perfect man, but at least his ordeal is calling attention to the rot at the top of England’s power-structure. There should be a hue and cry until he’s released.

    For what he did, he should receive a slap on the wrist, and a heroes welcome in every hamlet of England.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    There should be a hue and cry until the British regain control of their nation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Rurik says:
    @Echoes of History
    Correction: Christianity isn't from the white man; white man is a second-rater in Christianity, which the Jew Testament makes very clear: "THE JEW FIRST." (((Romans 1:16)))

    Marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular? That is exactly what antifa Jesus did when he denounced White patriarchy in Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, and Luke 22:25.

    "Saint" Paul was also an antifa activist, whining like a pussy about the Law and Order of Roman civilization, just like the leftist black-bloc does today.

    Verse 25. - Thrice was I beaten with rods. This alludes to scourgings inflicted by Gentile magistrates with the vitis, or vine stick, of soldiers, or with the fasces of lictors.

    Pulpit Commentary
    http://biblehub.com/commentaries/pulpit/2_corinthians/11.htm
     
    Christianity is the original Jewish Antifa League against White patriarchy. Some things never change, even after 2000 years.

    http://fuhrerious88blog.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/img_7220.jpg

    Correction: Christianity isn’t from the white man; white man is a second-rater in Christianity, which the Jew Testament makes very clear: “THE JEW FIRST.” (((Romans 1:16)))

    Christianity was imposed on the West.

    It’s a religion that has as its god, a Jew. I remember reading how Benjamin Disraeli was so enamored of the fact that all these goyim went around worshiping a Jewish man – as God.

    I suspect this ‘Jew as God’ religion was imposed on people by fatuous kings fighting over some trifle with their neighboring monarch, and needed money from ‘the Jews’ to prevail. And as a consequence, ‘the Jews’ were able to impose their monotheistic religion (with a Jewish man as God) upon the Pagan people of Europe.

    It was just too tempting to the kings of ancient Europe, who were told of the advantages of subjects who would learn the tenets of this new religion, where obedience was tantamount. And disobedience earned eternity in Hell.

    ‘don’t you want your subjects to obey you in all things? To kneel when you say kneel, and bow when you say bow, and live their lives in abject terror of a vengeful God who’s all too willing and eager to punish them for defiance?

    For sheople, the difference between a monarch or ruler, and divine leader, is nearly invisible. Once you’re the anointed leader, it’s a short leap for you to convince them of your God-ordained right to rule. And if they fear their God, then so too will they fear, (and obey) you!

    Such people make perfect subjects, because they live in terror of authority. And are exhorted to kneel down and obey! – by God Himself. A Jewish man.

    It’s not for me, but I respect most of the Christians I know (almost my entire extended family) as eminently decent people. I love them, Christianity or not. But I lament their sheep-like obedience.

    Occasionally I’ll listen to the Christian preachers on the radio, or whatnot. And universally, when they say the word ‘Israel’, it’s always with a fawning reverence. It’s as if they conflate the Israel of the Bible with the Satanic entity, (genociding Christians out of the Holy Land) even as the preachers and Pope abase themselves to this blood-stained abomination.

    But then again, it all boils down to shekels.

    So, there are many things in the Bible that ring true. The story of Judas perhaps most poignantly and tragically.

    In my very humble opinion. I respect all people’s right to believe what ever they want to, and am not pooh-poohing Christianity or Christians, but simply wondering if they’re being taken for a ride.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @SunBakedSuburb
    "As someone who participated actively in the late 60s ... "

    And now you're just an old guy who litters his post with foul language.

    "We revolted against the militarism of that day."

    And the militarism of that day continues to this day. The energy of the Weathermen types was primarily focused on race; ending the war in Vietnam was secondary to the plight of the negro. That New Left negrophilia continues to this day: identity politics trumps the more pressing issues of continued militarism and profitable wars. Your ideological descendants are even more clueless than your generation. Thanks, foul-mouthed hippie!

    And now you’re just an old guy who litters his post with foul language.

    Hey SunBaked. Blow me, you ageist punk

    Soy boys complain about foul language. Ageists talk about old guys.

    And no, soy boy, in that age the main focus was not on race. It was on the fucking lost senseless bullshit war in Vietnam.

    You are an ideological retard who has no idea what it was like to live through those times. So shut the fuck up, soy boy bitch.

    Read More
    • Troll: MBlanc46
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @Vietnam Vet
    restless94110: Bullshit. I am a Vietnam vet and I saw it and experienced it. I think you may be an urban myth.

    What part is bullshit, Vet? You saw what and experienced what? The War in Vietnam? So what? You know you wasted your life in that sad sick war and now what?

    I am so glad I was smart enough to refuse to go into that war. I saved my life as I saw all the people who did go into that war either die there or die later as the years move on. Vietnam War vets are still even to this day killing themselves at record numbers every month.

    No one spit on a vet. It’s been disproven over and over again. In fact, they even found tbe genesis if that urban myth: some article in a Philadelphia paper that some war monger wrote in order to start shit. They succeeded.

    We have idiots still screaming as if it’s true. It’s not. No one ever spit on you, Vet. And if they had done, are you saying you–the brave soldier just back from the war–would have let them??????

    Why would you have let someone spit on you, you fucking moron? Are you saying you are a coward and didn’t fight back from that disrespect?

    No you’re not saying that. Becuase you were never spit on. And no other soldier was either.

    We were smart enough in those days even to know that the guys that went to the war were just like us…only we decided it wasn’t worth it. And we were right. And we didn’t disrespect those that did go into that War. We only felt pity not repugnance.

    May God bless you and bring you light into your mind and life all these years later.

    You surely sound like you didn’t learn a damn thing from your experiences in life.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @Rurik

    They’d have collapsed just as fast had those bombs been dropped several miles away, with minimal civilian casualties. The “conventional” bombs killed many more, but that didn’t encourage surrender. Why would a mere 100,000 more deaths?
     
    what you write is full of contradictions.

    you say it would have worked the same if they'd have simply threatened to drop a nuke, and then you say no amount of bombing would have done the trick, and then you pointedly ignore that is was the nukes and their 100,000 more deaths that did, in fact bring about surrender.

    The fighting-in-the-streets stuff is just hokum. This was Japan. Even the samurai class was prohibited possession of guns. They’d hold us off with what? Garden hoes?
     
    this is preposterous

    are you suggesting that during war, the Japanese wouldn't have been allowed to use their rifles to defend their own cities?!

    As for the rest of your list, it’s totally irrelevant, as I was discussing the crimes of US Democrats. They weren’t around for the Crusades.
     
    it's irrelevant because you missed the entire point.

    the point was that as long as I've been alive, we've been barraged with bullshit about the 'evils of the white man'. The evils of his Christianity, the evils of slavery, blah, blah, fucking blah.

    but you're too ideologically myopic to see beyond your narrow partisan blinders.

    What I wrote had zero, zilch, nada .. to do with partisanism.

    it was a litany of blood libels and smears intended to marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular, and to sew self-doubt and hopefully, self-loathing. As a method for destroying White society so that its rival; Zionism- could built its temple on the grave of White, Western civilization. Duh.

    Which is, BTW, the calling card of the GOP, Cuckservative Inc.

    [see Ryan, Paul. McStain, John, Polesmoker, Lindsey, Cheney, Dickhead, Bush crime family, etcs..]

    It wasn't until Trump came around that the Republican brand had any credibility at all.

    [see Ryan, Paul. McStain, John, Polesmoker, Lindsey, Cheney, Dickhead, Bush crime family, etcs..]

    Name one of these guys who doesn’t, just like you, defend our nuking of women and children.

    it was a litany of blood libels and smears intended to marginalize Western values and society and White men in particular

    “Just war” is a Western value. One of the highest.

    you say it would have worked the same if they’d have simply threatened to drop a nuke, and then you say no amount of bombing would have done the trick

    No, I said dropping the nukes within sight of, but not directly on, cities would have done the trick. What quality was so special about the extra 100,000 deaths that the million that preceded it didn’t have?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. MBlanc46 says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost
    The qualitative difference between the right and the left is this: Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL.

    If one is mistaken, he can be reached with factual information and sound logic, at least in theory. If one is evil, then the only correct course is to destroy him.

    Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    The election of Donald Trump has flushed out into the open what was more or less concealed all along. Progressives absolutely hate all normal, straight white males both past and present, and are determined to ensure that they have no future.

    Whatever other things Trump does or doesn't do, his uncloaking of the lefties and their spittle-flecked hatred of Western man and his civilization deserves our gratitude.

    There’s something to what you say, but I think that a lot of Leftists are simply evil.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. MBlanc46 says:
    @Corvinus
    "Rightists believe their opponents are MISTAKEN. Leftists believe their opponents are EVIL."

    Corrected for accuracy --> The radicals on the left and on the right believe their opponents are evil personified.

    "Since so many lefties pride themselves on their secular, modern outlook, their political beliefs become their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas."

    Corrected for accuracy --> A great deal of radical lefties and righties focus on their political beliefs, and it is becomes their de facto ersatz religion, with it unquestionable dogmas, catechisms, and anathemas.

    Now, Patrick...

    "Historians are calling the outbursts of hate unprecedented. They are not."

    Actually, they are, given the erosion of civility. For example, moderates are reviled by the Coalition of the Fringes Right and Left.

    "Last June, the uglier side of leftist politics turned lethal. James Hodgkinson, 66-year-old volunteer in Bernie Sanders’ campaign, opened fire on GOP congressmen practicing for their annual baseball game with the Democrats."

    Patrick, you are getting caught up in the hysteria by painting a broad brush stroke.

    You’re annoying enough on iSteve, Corvinus. Do you really have to stalk Buchanan?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. MBlanc46 says:
    @Rurik

    A cautionary note to progressives: Extremism is how the left lost the future to Nixon and Reagan.
     
    Pat!!

    [ssshhhhhh!!]

    Maxine Waters for 2020!

    as Hamlet's ghost and Ken and others have pointed out, they're motivated by blind, irrational enmity, but we should have all seen this coming.

    I too grew up in this country. I too watched All In The Family, with the racist buffoon Archie Bunker as the archetypical American White, male, Christian conservative. With his brow-beaten and submissive wife. 'Stifle yourself!'

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZOTszoKbE4

    Then we all watched Roots and all the other subtle and not-so-subtle indoctrinations and programming coming out of Frankfurt School West = ((Hollywood / Madison Ave)).

    what this has all been building up to, is a general meme ~

    and that is, from the beginning of time, going back to ancient Rome, evil white men have menaced the world.

    First they dispersed God's people and sacked the temple, then they put all non-whites to the sword with their racist crusades, then they enslaved the planet with their Christianity.

    Was not Christopher Columbus a slaver and murderer and of course, racist?

    Was not the Inquisition just more White Christians doing what White Christians do?

    Torturing and murdering and genociding everyone around who wasn't White and Christian?

    This is what they subtly teach in the government schools. It seethes from between the lines on our televisions and movie screens.

    White men are racists and oppressors, and always have been.

    They genocided the numinous Amerindians, living in harmony with nature and each other.

    They enslaved the blacks and anyone else they could, raping and whipping and chaining all and sundry.

    They kept women barefoot and in the kitchen, only allowing them to out to be taken advantage of in the bedroom.

    They oppressed the LGBT community then, just as they do today, refusing even to bake a cake!

    From sacking the temple, to dropping nukes on Japanese cities to napalm on little Vietnamese girls, the White man is a racist and scourge on the world's stage.

    And that meme has been hammered into the sub-conscience of every person living in the West and beyond.

    That is why the Jewish supremacists in Hollywood, and their armies of shitlibs and orcs are apoplectic, because they all believe that narrative is true.

    And that what we've all been living with lo these many years, has been the correction of human civilization from the evils of White men, (Roman patriarchs, Crusaders, Nazis, Confederate slavers, rapists and religious thugs) into a world without evil White men anymore, as they were perfectly slated for the trash heap of history. Their nations overrun, their women alienated, their culture in decline, with hope for a non-white utopia just on the horizon! With Obama as the One.

    And then comes Trump.

    And his Deplorable racist, White men are ascendant again.

    It's simply more than they can bear.

    our collective narrative has been carefully constructed over generations by the Jewish supremacists who control our central banks, and therefor everything else of consequence. Especially the media.

    Even shitlib Ted Turner had to hand over CNN, once it became clear it would be of consequence.

    Today there isn't a newspaper of any significance that would dare print the truth about events like the USS Liberty, or black crime, or illegal wars of aggression waged against myriad nations who have not harmed us one whit...

    .. unless it's to blame all of those things on racist White men like Dubya, who they'll even talk about 9/11, but only if it's to blame Dubya, and by extension all White [racist is redundant] men.

    So they're sincere, but they're also hopelessly duped. And understandably so, when you consider that the media masters are not stupid. They know what they're doing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44I3pMouCnM

    you don't have to watch the whole thing, the point is that it's all very scientific. They understand human nature. Pavlov's dog's were just the beginning. BF Skinner also showed them the methods.

    But thankfully it's not all down to 'nurture'. There's still a lot of 'nature' in us, and that is what is driving them mad.

    It's wasn't just the shitlibs who were demanding an end to White men. We too were supposed to be marching over the cliffs by now. It worked on many of them,

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFhIp6pU0AA8oa4.jpg

    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GDzqEsIL2_U/WWBIFQZw7nI/AAAAAAACjNY/94vs56Jpgsgjduc6xkQjOOoOeywa0VBFQCLcBGAs/s1600/%2521%2BtWEETSpture%2B%25281%2529.JPG

    but not all.

    Nicely put all round, Rurik.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. MBlanc46 says:
    @Rurik

    I don’t know what’s happened to the men of England.
     
    There are people here who call Tommy Robinson a Zionist 'thug', and say he deserves to rot in prison because he didn't respect the British judicial system.

    That's the same British judicial system that protects serial pedophiles, facilitates the mass-rape of England's school girls, and harasses anyone who complains.

    This guy Robinson may not be a perfect man, but at least his ordeal is calling attention to the rot at the top of England's power-structure. There should be a hue and cry until he's released.

    For what he did, he should receive a slap on the wrist, and a heroes welcome in every hamlet of England.

    There should be a hue and cry until the British regain control of their nation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pat Buchanan Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?