The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewNorman Finkelstein Archive
Israel's Current Head of State Is an Obnoxious Loudmouth Jewish Supremacist
Is There a New "New Anti-Semitism"? Part 10
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Although it might not be the only epitome of human suffering in the contemporary world, Palestine surely qualifies as a “worthy” candidate.

The historical record shows that Israel’s rights have not been prejudiced but in fact privileged by the international community. It has been not the victim but the beneficiary of a global double standard. Therefore, the thesis that a primal hatred of Jews accounts for its current pariah status cannot be sustained. Still, hasn’t Israel been unfairly targeted? Many more innocents (it is said) have been killed by Arabs in Syria and Darfur, while Tibetans, Kashmiris, and Kurds have also suffered under the incubus of foreign occupations. Nonetheless, public opinion fixates on Israel’s sins. How else to account for this discrepancy except anti-Semitism? But, although South Africa also bemoaned its pariah status, and in some technical sense it perhaps was unfairly singled out, it would have been ludicrous to argue that anti-White-ism figured as a corrupting factor in the international community’s moral calculus. The system of apartheid incarnated an essence so flagrantly antithetical and repugnant to the epochal zeitgeist, that the expostulations of its adherents fell—Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher excepting—on deaf ears.

Precisely why a particular local struggle metamorphoses into an international cause célèbre is not subject to mathematical demonstration. How does one prove that one people’s suffering is the worst? But surely the Palestine struggle possesses sufficient appalling features in its own right such that anti-Semitism need not be dragged in as a critical, let alone the overarching, explanatory factor. If you eliminate the “terrorism” background noise, it’s hard to come up with a more pristine instance of injustice. “What crime did Palestinians commit,” my late mother (who knew something about human suffering) once rhetorically asked, “except to be born in Palestine?”[1]My late mother was a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto, Maidanek concentration camp, and two slave labor camps. Every other member of her family was exterminated. The longevity of the conflict puts it in an “elite” class: if its inception is dated from the Balfour Declaration, nearly a century has elapsed; from the Nakba, seven decades; from the West Bank/Gaza occupation, still, five decades. Its various phases and facets embrace the gamut of human misery: ethnic cleansing, foreign occupation, and siege; massacre, torture, and humiliation. Its inequity endows the conflict with a biblical resonance: is it not David versus Goliath when a tiny battered people does battle with the regional superpower backed by the global superpower? The sheer cruelty and heartlessness bewilders and boggles: in the past decade, Israel has unleashed the full force of its high-tech killing machine on the “giant open-air prison in Gaza” (British Prime Minister David Cameron) not less than eight times: “Operation Rainbow” (2004), “Operation Days of Penitence” (2004), “Operation Summer Rains” (2006), “Operation Autumn Clouds” (2006), “Operation Hot Winter” (2008), “Operation Cast Lead” (2008-9), “Operation Pillar of Defense” (2012), “Operation Protective Edge” (2014). The incommensurability of the suffering makes mockery of affectations of “balance”: during Israel’s last “operation” in Gaza, 550 Palestinian children were killed while one Israeli child was killed, 19,000 Gazan homes were destroyed while one Israeli home was destroyed.

Although it might not be the only epitome of human suffering in the contemporary world, Palestine surely qualifies as a “worthy” candidate. What is more, whereas so much of the world yearns to “Give peace a chance,” Israel conspicuously yearns to “Give war a chance, and another chance, and another chance” (is there a day that goes by without Israel contemplating yet another attack on Gaza, Lebanon, Iran?); Israel flouts the global consensus supporting a two-state solution by appropriating and incorporating the last remnants of Palestine; Israel’s current head of state is an obnoxious loudmouth Jewish supremacist, while the Israeli people “shoot and cry,” “love themselves to death and pity themselves ad nauseam” (Gideon Levy)[2]Gideon Levy, “Yair Lapid, Israel’s New Propaganda Minister,” Haaretz (22 February 2015).—don’t Israel’s singular warmongering, brazenness and self-righteous arrogance themselves accentuate the conflict’s image as one of pure good versus pure evil?

If Palestine has become the emblematic cause of our time, it’s not because of a new “New Anti-Semitism,” although no doubt some anti-Semites have infiltrated its ranks. It’s because the martyrdom of Palestine and the meanness of Israel are so wrong.

[1] My late mother was a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto, Maidanek concentration camp, and two slave labor camps. Every other member of her family was exterminated.

[2] Gideon Levy, “Yair Lapid, Israel’s New Propaganda Minister,” Haaretz (22 February 2015).

(Republished from Byline.com by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Israel, Israel/Palestine 
Hide 48 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. “Israel’s current head of state is an obnoxious loudmouth Jewish supremacist……”

    You are much to kind.

    I’m fine and dandy with Jews, Muslims and Christians. But the government of the State of Israel is a steaming heap of shit. My own government in Washington is a much larger heap of exactly the same material.

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies: @Realist
    "You are much to kind."

    You are truly 'Working Class'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /nfinkelstein/israels-current-head-of-state-is-an-obnoxious-loudmouth-jewish-supremacist/#comment-1311646
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Which of Israel’s prime ministers was not “an Obnoxious Loudmouth Jewish Supremacist?”

    1. David Ben-Gurion: 1948-1954
    2. Moshe Sharett: 1954-1955
    3. David Ben-Gurion: 1955-1963
    4. Levi Eshkol: 1963-1969 (died in office)
    5. Golda Meir: 1969-1974
    6. Yitzhak Rabin: 1974-1977
    7. Menachem Begin: 1977-1983
    8. Yizthak Shamir: 1983-1984
    9. Shimon Peres: 1984-1986 –
    10. Yitzhak Shamir: 1986-1992 -
    11. Yitzhak Rabin: 1992-1995 (murdered in office)
    12. Shimon Peres: 1995-1996 -
    13. Benjamin Netanyahu: 1996-1999 –
    14. Ehud Barak: 1999-2001 –
    15. Ariel Sharon: 2001-2006 –
    16. Ehud Olmert: 2006-2009 –
    17. Benjamin Netanyahu: 2009- current

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    And many were or are convicted criminals,by their own govt.What a hoot.
    If we actually knew the suffering of these people,to walk in thier shoes for a few days,to actually experience what they go through daily,we might have the impetus to change all this crap.
    The Zionist MSM shows nada,and the print arm just frames the violence as all Palestinian perpetrated,with poor Israeli victims.
    , @Dave Pinsen
    Israel's head of state (like Italy's) is its president. Netanyahu and most of the rest of those were prime ministers (heads of government).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Tom_R says:

    RUSSIANS GLORIFY OBAMA AS A KILLER; NETENYAHU NEXT?

    Thanks for the article, Sir. The Russians have glorified Netenyahu’s puppet Obama as a “Killer”—his greatest achievement in his almost 8 years under the neo-cons/Zionists. See:

    http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/russians-pay-tribute-americas-favorite-nobel-peace-prize-winner/ri12504

    It is time the master is given the same award.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Surely, there is redundancy in the title.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Realist says:
    @WorkingClass
    "Israel’s current head of state is an obnoxious loudmouth Jewish supremacist......"

    You are much to kind.

    I'm fine and dandy with Jews, Muslims and Christians. But the government of the State of Israel is a steaming heap of shit. My own government in Washington is a much larger heap of exactly the same material.

    “You are much to kind.”

    You are truly ‘Working Class’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WorkingClass
    After Clinton sent my good union machinist job to Mexico I took what I could get. A job selling residential real estate. I had a dream in which I found myself in jail. One of the inmates asked me what I was in for. "Impersonating a business man" I said.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Mark Green says: • Website

    Bold statements. Uncompromising. Thank you, Norman, for invoking the appropriate term–’Jewish Supremacism’–to describe the animating force that drives so much Israeli policy. This dark force has also contaminated much of the modern world.

    Jewish supremacism has steered America towards aggressive warfare and occupation. A unique ‘special relationship’ between Israel and the US has allowed this cancer to harden and spread. As a result, whole nations have been destroyed. Countless lives have been ruined or annihilated. And there’s probably more mayhem on the way.

    So please put aside this ‘anti-Semitism’ nonsense. It’s distracting and manipulative.

    Who is doing the killing? Anti-Semites? Where?

    Who is orchestrating the serial warfare? ‘Anti-Semites’? Who?

    Don’t let your demons get the best of you.

    ‘Anti-Semitism’ has become a Jewish obsession that actually serves today’s Jewish supremacists. You must put it aside for the good of humanity. The anti-Semitic boogeyman is invoked to keep non-Jews quiet, feeling ‘guilty’ and on the sidelines. Sadly, it’s worked all too well.

    Non-Jews however are getting fed up with all-Zionist debating societies, not to mention the endless array of compromised ‘experts’ who are quick to explain what’s wrong with the world (particularly in the Middle East) while advocating for US policies that elevate and fortify the Jewish State. This is a charade.

    Yes, many of these Zionists enjoy massive Christian support but it’s the Jewish community that establishes the ground rules, the boundaries of discourse, the shape of the ‘special relationship’, and its overall objectives.

    Thus, prominent (Jewish) leaders in America can openly advocate for preemptive war (mass murder) but if you tie their hate speech to their Jewishness, then–and only then–does the political shit really hit the fan.

    It’s anti-Semitic! (Nazi references to follow).

    This moral canard has it exactly backwards. Controversial assertions get criminalized while warmongering (and war) get a pass. Absurd. I blame organized Jewry for these insidious taboos and double-standards. Does saying this render me an anti-Semite? Probably.

    Let’s face it: our kosher warlords in Washington have a conflict-of-interest the size of Brooklyn. Most should therefore recuse themselves from public service when Israel is involved. Indeed, many politically-active Zionists in America have failed in their self-appointed mission to chart a prudent course for our nation in the Middle East. This fact deserves to be widely known. But it isn’t. Free Speech has been sabotaged.

    In Washington, entrenched pro-Zionist machinations go back over 100 years. Alison Weir revealed this pattern of betrayal in her concise and heavily-researched book, ‘Against Our Better Judgement’.

    In the meantime, reckless charges of ‘anti-Semitism’ have helped squelch non-Jewish dissent vis-a-vis Israel at every turn. Unfortunately, just the accusation of anti-Semitism can derail the noble efforts (and careers) of good people who instinctively reject unfairness, aggression and greed. Can we talk about it? No.

    Unacknowledged Jewish privilege represents a triumph for Jewish supremacists who live off moral and political double-standards. This is unfair to the rest of humanity. Does saying this make me an anti-Semite? Yes.

    The case can be made that most Zionist activists have too much personal and emotional involvement in Israel to serve as disinterested architects of America’s Mideast policies. Crypto-Israelis should therefore step aside–or at the very least allow a proportionate number of non-Jews to participate in charting US policies in the Middle East. But don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen. Why? Jews don’t trust the goyim. We’re just too ‘anti-Semitic’. So the cycle repeats.

    Alas, it’s the Jewish sense of (collective) greatness along with the Jewish commitment to remaining a distinct (separate) ‘people’ that stokes so much recurring discord. OK, irrational hostility to Jews (anti-Semitism) has been there, too, I suppose. But it’s far more complex than advertised.

    Unfortunately, the ‘values’ which exalt Jewish separateness goes back to G-d’s covenants with the Jewish people. It’s in the Torah and the Talmud. (But let’s skip that for now.)

    It’s time instead to address urgent, ongoing political deeds–not Norman’s (or anyone’s) fanatical obsession with Adolf Hitler, long dead and thoroughly discredited.

    Is America’s political posture out of balance? If not, then why would the world’s foremost superpower be picking lethal fights with small and very distant nations who pose no threat to us?–and most of these countries could be trading partners. Who benefits from these Mideast wars?

    I see Zionist fingerprints everywhere. Am I wrong about this?

    Enabling the series of recent disasters in Iraq, Libya, Palestine and elsewhere is a Jewish sense of entitlement and superiority. This is a problem for friend and foe alike. Resist their agenda too strenuously and you can be declared an ‘anti-Semite’. So think good thoughts!

    Jewish narcissism and Jewish psychopathy are real and living threats to the non-Jewish world. Smearing me and others who share this perspective will not gainsay its truth.

    Read More
    • Agree: SolontoCroesus
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    Mark,

    Having toggled Agreement with your comment, I'd like now to discuss this statement:

    It’s time instead to address urgent, ongoing political deeds–not Norman’s (or anyone’s) fanatical obsession with Adolf Hitler, long dead and thoroughly discredited.
     
    Absolutely Agree that it is essential to address urgent, ongoing political deeds -- or, even less abstractly, to stop killing and attempting to economically destroy innocent people and sovereign states.

    But I do not agree that the history book on Adolf Hitler and much of that era between 1871 and 1945 and even beyond is closed; I don't think the entire story has been told with the degree of truth that is required in a form of government that relies on a "well-informed public" for whom "knowledge will forever govern ignorance."

    I maintain, obnoxiously and loudmouthedly, that discovering and disseminating far and wide truths both inconvenient and less-so about zionism, Weimar, Jewish supremacism, the evangelical Christian missionary impulse; the Allies, NSDAP, Hitler, Stalin, Churchill, and Franklin Roosevelt is the equivalent of taking that last heavily-armored bunker, and that shattering it will open a pathway to a more rationally explicable history upon which sound foreign policy can be based.

    Many of those whose efforts in this field I greatly admire are appalled at my persistence in pursuing this agenda; I've gotten their message and understand their concern. What I haven't been able to do is figure out where the game ends up if the false narrative we have been force-fed is not corrected.
    , @dahoit
    The antisemite slur is because everything they spew is BS.
    You are only antiBS.
    The Jews have been universally loved throughout history.
    I can spew too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Israel’s rights have not been prejudiced but in fact privileged by the international community. It has been not the victim but the beneficiary of a global double standard. Therefore, the thesis that a primal hatred of Jews accounts for its current pariah status cannot be sustained. Still, hasn’t Israel been unfairly targeted? Many more innocents (it is said) have been killed by Arabs in Syria and Darfur, while Tibetans, Kashmiris, and Kurds have also suffered under the incubus of foreign occupations. Nonetheless, public opinion fixates on Israel’s sins.

    Zionists’ argument that they’re the least oppressive state in SWANA is like bragging that you won the gold in the special olympics.

    Do we give Syria billions in aid every year? Do we bring our diplomatic influence to bear in protecting them from the world’s opprobrium? Do our politicians line up in kneepads to do the Syrian lobby’s bidding?

    How about for Darfur? China? India? Turkey?

    Does public opinion fixate on Israeli Apartheid the way it fixated on South African Apartheid? Do we boycott or sanction Israel the way we did South Africa? Do we make movies with Israeli Supremacists as two-dimensional villains, the way we did with South African Supremacists?

    Did the South African gov’t shell black neighborhoods?

    How else to account for this discrepancy except anti-Semitism?

    How else to account for this discrepancy except a double standard in favor of the Jews?

    the Israeli people “shoot and cry,” “love themselves to death and pity themselves ad nauseam”

    Indeed. There’s an old saying; the Jew cries out in pain while he beats you.

    don’t Israel’s singular warmongering, brazenness and self-righteous arrogance themselves accentuate the conflict’s image as one of pure good versus pure evil?

    All of this is so precisely because there is a prevailing double standard favoring the Jews (and their money and power).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Svigor says:

    Israel’s rights have not been prejudiced but in fact privileged by the international community. It has been not the victim but the beneficiary of a global double standard. Therefore, the thesis that a primal hatred of Jews accounts for its current pariah status cannot be sustained. Still, hasn’t Israel been unfairly targeted? Many more innocents (it is said) have been killed by Arabs in Syria and Darfur, while Tibetans, Kashmiris, and Kurds have also suffered under the incubus of foreign occupations. Nonetheless, public opinion fixates on Israel’s sins.

    Zionists’ argument that they’re the least oppressive state in SWANA is like bragging that you won the gold in the special olympics.

    Do we give Syria billions in aid every year? Do we bring our diplomatic influence to bear in protecting them from the world’s opprobrium? Do our politicians line up in kneepads to do the Syrian lobby’s bidding?

    How about for Darfur? China? India? Turkey?

    Does public opinion fixate on Israeli Apartheid the way it fixated on South African Apartheid? Do we boycott or sanction Israel the way we did South Africa? Do we make movies with Israeli Supremacists as two-dimensional villains, the way we did with South African Supremacists?

    Did the South African gov’t shell black neighborhoods?

    How else to account for this discrepancy except anti-Semitism?

    How else to account for this discrepancy except a double standard in favor of the Jews?

    the Israeli people “shoot and cry,” “love themselves to death and pity themselves ad nauseam”

    Indeed. There’s an old saying; the Jew cries out in pain while he beats you.

    don’t Israel’s singular warmongering, brazenness and self-righteous arrogance themselves accentuate the conflict’s image as one of pure good versus pure evil?

    All of this is so precisely because there is a prevailing double standard favoring the Jews (and their money and power).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. Svigor says:

    Did we occupy or destroy every regime surrounding Apartheid South Africa?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. @Mark Green
    Bold statements. Uncompromising. Thank you, Norman, for invoking the appropriate term--'Jewish Supremacism'--to describe the animating force that drives so much Israeli policy. This dark force has also contaminated much of the modern world.

    Jewish supremacism has steered America towards aggressive warfare and occupation. A unique 'special relationship' between Israel and the US has allowed this cancer to harden and spread. As a result, whole nations have been destroyed. Countless lives have been ruined or annihilated. And there's probably more mayhem on the way.

    So please put aside this 'anti-Semitism' nonsense. It's distracting and manipulative.

    Who is doing the killing? Anti-Semites? Where?

    Who is orchestrating the serial warfare? 'Anti-Semites'? Who?

    Don't let your demons get the best of you.

    'Anti-Semitism' has become a Jewish obsession that actually serves today's Jewish supremacists. You must put it aside for the good of humanity. The anti-Semitic boogeyman is invoked to keep non-Jews quiet, feeling 'guilty' and on the sidelines. Sadly, it's worked all too well.

    Non-Jews however are getting fed up with all-Zionist debating societies, not to mention the endless array of compromised 'experts' who are quick to explain what's wrong with the world (particularly in the Middle East) while advocating for US policies that elevate and fortify the Jewish State. This is a charade.

    Yes, many of these Zionists enjoy massive Christian support but it's the Jewish community that establishes the ground rules, the boundaries of discourse, the shape of the 'special relationship', and its overall objectives.

    Thus, prominent (Jewish) leaders in America can openly advocate for preemptive war (mass murder) but if you tie their hate speech to their Jewishness, then--and only then--does the political shit really hit the fan.

    It's anti-Semitic! (Nazi references to follow).

    This moral canard has it exactly backwards. Controversial assertions get criminalized while warmongering (and war) get a pass. Absurd. I blame organized Jewry for these insidious taboos and double-standards. Does saying this render me an anti-Semite? Probably.

    Let's face it: our kosher warlords in Washington have a conflict-of-interest the size of Brooklyn. Most should therefore recuse themselves from public service when Israel is involved. Indeed, many politically-active Zionists in America have failed in their self-appointed mission to chart a prudent course for our nation in the Middle East. This fact deserves to be widely known. But it isn't. Free Speech has been sabotaged.

    In Washington, entrenched pro-Zionist machinations go back over 100 years. Alison Weir revealed this pattern of betrayal in her concise and heavily-researched book, 'Against Our Better Judgement'.

    In the meantime, reckless charges of 'anti-Semitism' have helped squelch non-Jewish dissent vis-a-vis Israel at every turn. Unfortunately, just the accusation of anti-Semitism can derail the noble efforts (and careers) of good people who instinctively reject unfairness, aggression and greed. Can we talk about it? No.

    Unacknowledged Jewish privilege represents a triumph for Jewish supremacists who live off moral and political double-standards. This is unfair to the rest of humanity. Does saying this make me an anti-Semite? Yes.

    The case can be made that most Zionist activists have too much personal and emotional involvement in Israel to serve as disinterested architects of America's Mideast policies. Crypto-Israelis should therefore step aside--or at the very least allow a proportionate number of non-Jews to participate in charting US policies in the Middle East. But don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen. Why? Jews don't trust the goyim. We're just too 'anti-Semitic'. So the cycle repeats.

    Alas, it's the Jewish sense of (collective) greatness along with the Jewish commitment to remaining a distinct (separate) 'people' that stokes so much recurring discord. OK, irrational hostility to Jews (anti-Semitism) has been there, too, I suppose. But it's far more complex than advertised.

    Unfortunately, the 'values' which exalt Jewish separateness goes back to G-d's covenants with the Jewish people. It's in the Torah and the Talmud. (But let's skip that for now.)

    It's time instead to address urgent, ongoing political deeds--not Norman's (or anyone's) fanatical obsession with Adolf Hitler, long dead and thoroughly discredited.

    Is America's political posture out of balance? If not, then why would the world's foremost superpower be picking lethal fights with small and very distant nations who pose no threat to us?--and most of these countries could be trading partners. Who benefits from these Mideast wars?

    I see Zionist fingerprints everywhere. Am I wrong about this?

    Enabling the series of recent disasters in Iraq, Libya, Palestine and elsewhere is a Jewish sense of entitlement and superiority. This is a problem for friend and foe alike. Resist their agenda too strenuously and you can be declared an 'anti-Semite'. So think good thoughts!

    Jewish narcissism and Jewish psychopathy are real and living threats to the non-Jewish world. Smearing me and others who share this perspective will not gainsay its truth.

    Mark,

    Having toggled Agreement with your comment, I’d like now to discuss this statement:

    It’s time instead to address urgent, ongoing political deeds–not Norman’s (or anyone’s) fanatical obsession with Adolf Hitler, long dead and thoroughly discredited.

    Absolutely Agree that it is essential to address urgent, ongoing political deeds — or, even less abstractly, to stop killing and attempting to economically destroy innocent people and sovereign states.

    But I do not agree that the history book on Adolf Hitler and much of that era between 1871 and 1945 and even beyond is closed; I don’t think the entire story has been told with the degree of truth that is required in a form of government that relies on a “well-informed public” for whom “knowledge will forever govern ignorance.”

    I maintain, obnoxiously and loudmouthedly, that discovering and disseminating far and wide truths both inconvenient and less-so about zionism, Weimar, Jewish supremacism, the evangelical Christian missionary impulse; the Allies, NSDAP, Hitler, Stalin, Churchill, and Franklin Roosevelt is the equivalent of taking that last heavily-armored bunker, and that shattering it will open a pathway to a more rationally explicable history upon which sound foreign policy can be based.

    Many of those whose efforts in this field I greatly admire are appalled at my persistence in pursuing this agenda; I’ve gotten their message and understand their concern. What I haven’t been able to do is figure out where the game ends up if the false narrative we have been force-fed is not corrected.

    Read More
    • Agree: Mark Green
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. My late mother was a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto, Maidanek concentration camp, and two slave labor camps. Every other member of her family was exterminated.

    It’s your article and freedom to write as you please, but I’d prefer you said murdered or killed. Exterminated is what happens to cockroaches.

    Read More
    • Replies: @HdC
    How does the good Dr know they were exterminated? How does he know that they did not die of disease, starvation, murder by their "brethren" for whatever trumped-up reason?

    Since the Germans were so short of labour it is beyond belief to think that they would kill en masse worthwhile labourers.

    And the age of survivors between 70 and 90+ belies the claim that the Germans killed all the Jews they could lay their hands on.

    I think the good Dr owes us an explanation regarding his claim of extermination. Not holding my breath, though. HdC
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. @Realist
    "You are much to kind."

    You are truly 'Working Class'.

    After Clinton sent my good union machinist job to Mexico I took what I could get. A job selling residential real estate. I had a dream in which I found myself in jail. One of the inmates asked me what I was in for. “Impersonating a business man” I said.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. HdC says:
    @TomSchmidt
    My late mother was a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto, Maidanek concentration camp, and two slave labor camps. Every other member of her family was exterminated.

    It's your article and freedom to write as you please, but I'd prefer you said murdered or killed. Exterminated is what happens to cockroaches.

    How does the good Dr know they were exterminated? How does he know that they did not die of disease, starvation, murder by their “brethren” for whatever trumped-up reason?

    Since the Germans were so short of labour it is beyond belief to think that they would kill en masse worthwhile labourers.

    And the age of survivors between 70 and 90+ belies the claim that the Germans killed all the Jews they could lay their hands on.

    I think the good Dr owes us an explanation regarding his claim of extermination. Not holding my breath, though. HdC

    Read More
    • Replies: @dahoit
    Well,the serial liars(not DR.F) say exterminated,belied by the uncounted,or unreported by MSM number of survivors.The Germans were efficient if nothing else,if they wanted to kill all the Jews in their hands they would have.Did many many many die.Yes.
    The Gas Chamber stuff doesn't wash either.The grapevine would have let any person on the trains heading there,or at the camps itself,know that the showers were gas.Riots.Nah,doesn't pass muster.They could have easily murdered the persons on the trains by lining them and shooting them.The whole tale is one from the fairies.Zyklon B was a bug spray to kill lice etc..I think it possible some were aphyxiated?: and from there the gas tales spread.Who emptied the chambers of the dead?Serial liars lie serially,and to believe any of their stories is problematic at the least.Why would the Weasel run with his German captors,the exterminators,from the Russians.Doesn't wash one bit.
    And the fact of Hitler,facing the whole worlds military might,would have had to put his mortal enemies in camps for his own security,is never addressed.He tried to deport some to Palestine,I've read.Where else could he have,no one would take them,its fact.
    Just pointing out reality,not endorsing it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Svigor says:

    How does the good Dr know they were exterminated? How does he know that they did not die of disease, starvation, murder by their “brethren” for whatever trumped-up reason?

    He doesn’t. The supposed total lack of fog of war surrounding anything to do with “the” holocaust is one of the more insulting aspects of The Narrative. Not that I blame Finklestein for this, of course – he’s a Righteous Jew, and is just speaking in the shorthand we all engage in because life is short.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. Mark Caplan says: • Website

    In a nutshell, author Finkelstein condemns Israeli Jews because they refuse to hand over their country to a people singularly devoted to their annihilation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. biz says:

    What crime did Palestinians commit

    How about inventing an entire ethnicity in the 1960s for the sole purpose of destroying another peoples’ country? How about switching on a dime from claiming that this new ethnicity’s homeland was solely pre-’67 Israel to claiming that its homeland was all of post-’67 Israel the second that Jordan ceased to control parts of it? How about all of the antisemitic and a-historical claims such as that the second temple never existed, that Jews are Khazar converts, and that Jesus was a Palestinian (especially strange since nobody was a “Palestinian” before 1960).

    How about inventing airline terrorism? Thank the “Palestinians” next time you are molested in an airport. How about receiving $100 billion in US, EU, and international aid in the past 20 years without a functioning economy to show for it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @HdC
    "How about receiving $100 billion in US, EU, and international aid in the past 20 years without a functioning economy to show for it?..."

    Because Israel goes in and bombs everything to smitherees every now-and-again? To keep the uppity Palestinians in line? HdC
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. HdC says:
    @biz

    What crime did Palestinians commit
     
    How about inventing an entire ethnicity in the 1960s for the sole purpose of destroying another peoples' country? How about switching on a dime from claiming that this new ethnicity's homeland was solely pre-'67 Israel to claiming that its homeland was all of post-'67 Israel the second that Jordan ceased to control parts of it? How about all of the antisemitic and a-historical claims such as that the second temple never existed, that Jews are Khazar converts, and that Jesus was a Palestinian (especially strange since nobody was a "Palestinian" before 1960).

    How about inventing airline terrorism? Thank the "Palestinians" next time you are molested in an airport. How about receiving $100 billion in US, EU, and international aid in the past 20 years without a functioning economy to show for it?

    “How about receiving $100 billion in US, EU, and international aid in the past 20 years without a functioning economy to show for it?…”

    Because Israel goes in and bombs everything to smitherees every now-and-again? To keep the uppity Palestinians in line? HdC

    Read More
    • Replies: @fizziks
    Except Israel does not bomb everything to smithereens. Without even getting into the extent of destruction in Gaza during the wars that Hamas started, Israel has not bombed the West Bank - where the majority of "Palestinians" live, at all. So that can't explain where all the money went.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Rehmat says:

    The best portrait of Benjamin Netanyahu came from Israeli professor Neve Gordon. He called Netanyahu, “Spook, Terrorist and Criminal,: based on Netanyahu’s record in United States where he studied and worked as a dual citizen.

    “Netanyahu’s Israeli files differ from those of most U.S. citizens. The Israeli weekly Ha’ir reports that four requests for credit approval appear in U.S. social security file number 020-36-4537. Under each request one finds a different name: Benjamin Netanyahu, Benjamin Nitai, John Jay Sullivan and John Jay Sullivan Jr.—one man, four names,” wrote Gordon.

    In November 2015, Rep. Jim McGovern, a blind supporter of ‘Israel’s right to exist’ called upon Netanyahu to negotiate a peace deal with Hamas instead of Mahmoud Abbas, saying: “Only Hamas can guarantee Israel’s security”.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/11/28/rep-mcgovern-only-hamas-can-guarantee-israels-security/

    Read More
    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. fizziks says:
    @HdC
    "How about receiving $100 billion in US, EU, and international aid in the past 20 years without a functioning economy to show for it?..."

    Because Israel goes in and bombs everything to smitherees every now-and-again? To keep the uppity Palestinians in line? HdC

    Except Israel does not bomb everything to smithereens. Without even getting into the extent of destruction in Gaza during the wars that Hamas started, Israel has not bombed the West Bank – where the majority of “Palestinians” live, at all. So that can’t explain where all the money went.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rehmat
    Which money are you talking darling?

    Israel receives more than 46% of all annual USAID. Since 1970s, Israel has sucked over $3 trillion from the US taxpayers. The US pays 25% of Israel's annual military budget.

    In spite of all that and $93 billion from Germany for not killing enough Jews during WWII - Ha'aretz reported in 2006 that on in every three Israeli Jewish child live in poverty. Only if Gaza's 1.7 million Palestinian receive 10% of Israel's foreign aid - they could be as rich as people in Brunei.

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/06/13/sultan-of-brunei-and-the-jewish-lobby/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Rehmat says:
    @fizziks
    Except Israel does not bomb everything to smithereens. Without even getting into the extent of destruction in Gaza during the wars that Hamas started, Israel has not bombed the West Bank - where the majority of "Palestinians" live, at all. So that can't explain where all the money went.

    Which money are you talking darling?

    Israel receives more than 46% of all annual USAID. Since 1970s, Israel has sucked over $3 trillion from the US taxpayers. The US pays 25% of Israel’s annual military budget.

    In spite of all that and $93 billion from Germany for not killing enough Jews during WWII – Ha’aretz reported in 2006 that on in every three Israeli Jewish child live in poverty. Only if Gaza’s 1.7 million Palestinian receive 10% of Israel’s foreign aid – they could be as rich as people in Brunei.

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/06/13/sultan-of-brunei-and-the-jewish-lobby/

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz

    Israel receives more than 46% of all annual USAID
     
    That's a lie. You can see the actual numbers here:
    https://explorer.usaid.gov/aid-dashboard.html
    Israel isn't even the largest recipient.

    So your 10 number is false as well. The fact is that the "Palestinians" have received tens of billions in foreign aid over the past 20 years. Where did the tens of billions go? Certainly not to build up the economy of those South Syrians who in the past few decades invented the name "Palestinians".

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Svigor says:

    In a nutshell, author Finkelstein condemns Israeli Jews because they refuse to hand over their country to a people singularly devoted to their annihilation.

    In a nutshell, Jews condemned southerners because they refused to hand over their territory to a people singularly devoted to their annihilation. Works about as well.

    Jews bar everyone but Jews from immigrating to their Apartheid State, regardless of whether their demographic blows up pizza parlors or not – the vast majority of humanity does not. Israel’s security pose is a bit thin.

    How about inventing an entire ethnicity in the 1960s for the sole purpose of destroying another peoples’ country?

    Zionists are nuts. Flatter yourselves much? Meanwhile, Jewish professors in America are all on Team Leftist, which states that Amerinds are definitely not an “invented ethnicity.” Except, they are. I’ll accept Palestinians as an “invented” ethnicity when all the Jewish professors leave Team Leftist and stop championing the “invented” ethnicity of American Indians.

    P.S., the Khazar theory is wrong, but not anti-Semitic. It was concocted by a warm Jew who did it to deflect accusations of Jewish racial purity.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. Svigor says:

    Palestinian thoughts mean more than Jewish bombs in the sick minds of Zionists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. biz says:
    @Rehmat
    Which money are you talking darling?

    Israel receives more than 46% of all annual USAID. Since 1970s, Israel has sucked over $3 trillion from the US taxpayers. The US pays 25% of Israel's annual military budget.

    In spite of all that and $93 billion from Germany for not killing enough Jews during WWII - Ha'aretz reported in 2006 that on in every three Israeli Jewish child live in poverty. Only if Gaza's 1.7 million Palestinian receive 10% of Israel's foreign aid - they could be as rich as people in Brunei.

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/06/13/sultan-of-brunei-and-the-jewish-lobby/

    Israel receives more than 46% of all annual USAID

    That’s a lie. You can see the actual numbers here:

    https://explorer.usaid.gov/aid-dashboard.html

    Israel isn’t even the largest recipient.

    So your 10 number is false as well. The fact is that the “Palestinians” have received tens of billions in foreign aid over the past 20 years. Where did the tens of billions go? Certainly not to build up the economy of those South Syrians who in the past few decades invented the name “Palestinians”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Wrong! You are just mouthing more hasbara BS.

    'Israel' is the number one recipient of US taxpayers money by far, and that apartheid state is now demanding five billion per year.

    The top 5 recipients are:
    'Israel': $3.1 billion
    Egypt: $1.5 billion
    Afghanistan: $1.1 billion
    Jordan: $1.0 billion
    Pakistan: $933 million

    http://mondoweiss.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/1-countries-scaled-to-economic-aid-from-usa-a800.jpg

    The Palestinian money is then forcibly used to purchase 'Israeli' goods & materials, so very convenient

    And then there's the big gas fields just off the Gaza coast which 'Israel' is stealing

    The name Palestine has been used for centuries, check old maps & atlases.

    You clearly do not know what you are talking about.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Svigor says:

    You can put aid to Egypt into the Israeli column, too. They’re joined at the hip, and both are in service of the same lobby.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. Svigor says:

    It’s funny how het up the Hebrews Judeans Jews get about The Naming of the Palestinians.

    Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians.

    Get used to hearing that, fellas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz

    It’s funny how het up the Hebrews Judeans Jews get about The Naming of the Palestinians.

    Palestinians, Palestinians
     
    "Palestinian" Arabs can call themselves whatever they want but it does't change the fact that the idea of them as an indigenous people was invented whole cloth in 1965. Before that they viewed themselves as proudly the Arab peoples who conquered the region, and nothing was "Palestinian" about them including their name, which if anything was "South Syrians".

    This video explains it


    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about "Palestinians" being original inhabitants.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. dahoit says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    Which of Israel's prime ministers was not "an Obnoxious Loudmouth Jewish Supremacist?"

    1. David Ben-Gurion: 1948-1954
    2. Moshe Sharett: 1954-1955
    3. David Ben-Gurion: 1955-1963
    4. Levi Eshkol: 1963-1969 (died in office)
    5. Golda Meir: 1969-1974
    6. Yitzhak Rabin: 1974-1977
    7. Menachem Begin: 1977-1983
    8. Yizthak Shamir: 1983-1984
    9. Shimon Peres: 1984-1986 -
    10. Yitzhak Shamir: 1986-1992 -
    11. Yitzhak Rabin: 1992-1995 (murdered in office)
    12. Shimon Peres: 1995-1996 -
    13. Benjamin Netanyahu: 1996-1999 -
    14. Ehud Barak: 1999-2001 -
    15. Ariel Sharon: 2001-2006 -
    16. Ehud Olmert: 2006-2009 -
    17. Benjamin Netanyahu: 2009- current

    And many were or are convicted criminals,by their own govt.What a hoot.
    If we actually knew the suffering of these people,to walk in thier shoes for a few days,to actually experience what they go through daily,we might have the impetus to change all this crap.
    The Zionist MSM shows nada,and the print arm just frames the violence as all Palestinian perpetrated,with poor Israeli victims.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. dahoit says:
    @Mark Green
    Bold statements. Uncompromising. Thank you, Norman, for invoking the appropriate term--'Jewish Supremacism'--to describe the animating force that drives so much Israeli policy. This dark force has also contaminated much of the modern world.

    Jewish supremacism has steered America towards aggressive warfare and occupation. A unique 'special relationship' between Israel and the US has allowed this cancer to harden and spread. As a result, whole nations have been destroyed. Countless lives have been ruined or annihilated. And there's probably more mayhem on the way.

    So please put aside this 'anti-Semitism' nonsense. It's distracting and manipulative.

    Who is doing the killing? Anti-Semites? Where?

    Who is orchestrating the serial warfare? 'Anti-Semites'? Who?

    Don't let your demons get the best of you.

    'Anti-Semitism' has become a Jewish obsession that actually serves today's Jewish supremacists. You must put it aside for the good of humanity. The anti-Semitic boogeyman is invoked to keep non-Jews quiet, feeling 'guilty' and on the sidelines. Sadly, it's worked all too well.

    Non-Jews however are getting fed up with all-Zionist debating societies, not to mention the endless array of compromised 'experts' who are quick to explain what's wrong with the world (particularly in the Middle East) while advocating for US policies that elevate and fortify the Jewish State. This is a charade.

    Yes, many of these Zionists enjoy massive Christian support but it's the Jewish community that establishes the ground rules, the boundaries of discourse, the shape of the 'special relationship', and its overall objectives.

    Thus, prominent (Jewish) leaders in America can openly advocate for preemptive war (mass murder) but if you tie their hate speech to their Jewishness, then--and only then--does the political shit really hit the fan.

    It's anti-Semitic! (Nazi references to follow).

    This moral canard has it exactly backwards. Controversial assertions get criminalized while warmongering (and war) get a pass. Absurd. I blame organized Jewry for these insidious taboos and double-standards. Does saying this render me an anti-Semite? Probably.

    Let's face it: our kosher warlords in Washington have a conflict-of-interest the size of Brooklyn. Most should therefore recuse themselves from public service when Israel is involved. Indeed, many politically-active Zionists in America have failed in their self-appointed mission to chart a prudent course for our nation in the Middle East. This fact deserves to be widely known. But it isn't. Free Speech has been sabotaged.

    In Washington, entrenched pro-Zionist machinations go back over 100 years. Alison Weir revealed this pattern of betrayal in her concise and heavily-researched book, 'Against Our Better Judgement'.

    In the meantime, reckless charges of 'anti-Semitism' have helped squelch non-Jewish dissent vis-a-vis Israel at every turn. Unfortunately, just the accusation of anti-Semitism can derail the noble efforts (and careers) of good people who instinctively reject unfairness, aggression and greed. Can we talk about it? No.

    Unacknowledged Jewish privilege represents a triumph for Jewish supremacists who live off moral and political double-standards. This is unfair to the rest of humanity. Does saying this make me an anti-Semite? Yes.

    The case can be made that most Zionist activists have too much personal and emotional involvement in Israel to serve as disinterested architects of America's Mideast policies. Crypto-Israelis should therefore step aside--or at the very least allow a proportionate number of non-Jews to participate in charting US policies in the Middle East. But don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen. Why? Jews don't trust the goyim. We're just too 'anti-Semitic'. So the cycle repeats.

    Alas, it's the Jewish sense of (collective) greatness along with the Jewish commitment to remaining a distinct (separate) 'people' that stokes so much recurring discord. OK, irrational hostility to Jews (anti-Semitism) has been there, too, I suppose. But it's far more complex than advertised.

    Unfortunately, the 'values' which exalt Jewish separateness goes back to G-d's covenants with the Jewish people. It's in the Torah and the Talmud. (But let's skip that for now.)

    It's time instead to address urgent, ongoing political deeds--not Norman's (or anyone's) fanatical obsession with Adolf Hitler, long dead and thoroughly discredited.

    Is America's political posture out of balance? If not, then why would the world's foremost superpower be picking lethal fights with small and very distant nations who pose no threat to us?--and most of these countries could be trading partners. Who benefits from these Mideast wars?

    I see Zionist fingerprints everywhere. Am I wrong about this?

    Enabling the series of recent disasters in Iraq, Libya, Palestine and elsewhere is a Jewish sense of entitlement and superiority. This is a problem for friend and foe alike. Resist their agenda too strenuously and you can be declared an 'anti-Semite'. So think good thoughts!

    Jewish narcissism and Jewish psychopathy are real and living threats to the non-Jewish world. Smearing me and others who share this perspective will not gainsay its truth.

    The antisemite slur is because everything they spew is BS.
    You are only antiBS.
    The Jews have been universally loved throughout history.
    I can spew too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. dahoit says:
    @HdC
    How does the good Dr know they were exterminated? How does he know that they did not die of disease, starvation, murder by their "brethren" for whatever trumped-up reason?

    Since the Germans were so short of labour it is beyond belief to think that they would kill en masse worthwhile labourers.

    And the age of survivors between 70 and 90+ belies the claim that the Germans killed all the Jews they could lay their hands on.

    I think the good Dr owes us an explanation regarding his claim of extermination. Not holding my breath, though. HdC

    Well,the serial liars(not DR.F) say exterminated,belied by the uncounted,or unreported by MSM number of survivors.The Germans were efficient if nothing else,if they wanted to kill all the Jews in their hands they would have.Did many many many die.Yes.
    The Gas Chamber stuff doesn’t wash either.The grapevine would have let any person on the trains heading there,or at the camps itself,know that the showers were gas.Riots.Nah,doesn’t pass muster.They could have easily murdered the persons on the trains by lining them and shooting them.The whole tale is one from the fairies.Zyklon B was a bug spray to kill lice etc..I think it possible some were aphyxiated?: and from there the gas tales spread.Who emptied the chambers of the dead?Serial liars lie serially,and to believe any of their stories is problematic at the least.Why would the Weasel run with his German captors,the exterminators,from the Russians.Doesn’t wash one bit.
    And the fact of Hitler,facing the whole worlds military might,would have had to put his mortal enemies in camps for his own security,is never addressed.He tried to deport some to Palestine,I’ve read.Where else could he have,no one would take them,its fact.
    Just pointing out reality,not endorsing it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Wally [AKA "BobbyBeGood"] says: • Website

    Jews: the bride at every wedding and the corpse at every funeral.

    anti-semitic: any thought or person that a Jew doesn’t like

    recommended:
    ‘mythical ’6,000,000′ planned / promoted in the 1800s’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=112&p=67861&hilit=1869

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrew E. Mathis
    Quite clearly, the issue for you is not Zionism or "Jewish supremacism," which you steadfastly refuse to define, but Jews in and of themselves. Otherwise, you wouldn't troll threads written by Jews or that mention the Holocaust and fling invective from your safe anonymity. Most curious of all is your insistence that anti-Semitism is poorly defined or non-existent. You need only consult the nearest mirror.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Wally says: • Website
    @biz

    Israel receives more than 46% of all annual USAID
     
    That's a lie. You can see the actual numbers here:
    https://explorer.usaid.gov/aid-dashboard.html
    Israel isn't even the largest recipient.

    So your 10 number is false as well. The fact is that the "Palestinians" have received tens of billions in foreign aid over the past 20 years. Where did the tens of billions go? Certainly not to build up the economy of those South Syrians who in the past few decades invented the name "Palestinians".

    Wrong! You are just mouthing more hasbara BS.

    ‘Israel’ is the number one recipient of US taxpayers money by far, and that apartheid state is now demanding five billion per year.

    The top 5 recipients are:
    ‘Israel’: $3.1 billion
    Egypt: $1.5 billion
    Afghanistan: $1.1 billion
    Jordan: $1.0 billion
    Pakistan: $933 million

    The Palestinian money is then forcibly used to purchase ‘Israeli’ goods & materials, so very convenient

    And then there’s the big gas fields just off the Gaza coast which ‘Israel’ is stealing

    The name Palestine has been used for centuries, check old maps & atlases.

    You clearly do not know what you are talking about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    And then there’s the big gas fields just off the Gaza coast which ‘Israel’ is stealing
     
    Will Israel's Natural-Gas Fields Ever Get Developed? by Arthur Herman.

    this past December, things suddenly reversed on both fronts. Cutting through the Gordian knot of a half-decade’s negotiations, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that, despite Knesset opposition, his office had reached a final deal with Noble Energy. Only a day later, the Wall Street Journal reported that top-secret talks in Switzerland had resulted in a diplomatic breakthrough: normal relations were being restored between Turkey and Israel. On his way back from a visit to Riyadh, Erdogan remarked to a reporter, “Israel and Turkey need each other.”

    Provided Ankara doesn’t back out at the last minute, and provided Israel’s supreme court doesn’t overturn Netanyahu’s deal with Noble and Delek, these two breakthroughs—a double-play for Israel’s prime minister—could begin to change the energy landscape of the eastern Mediterranean and the entire Middle East. . . .

    "an outlet must be created to those energy markets. That outlet is precisely what Turkey can offer in the shape of a jointly built pipeline, plans for which were made years ago but have lain dormant. If completed (the estimated cost is $3 billion), that pipeline would seal Turkey’s re-engagement with Israel and become a main conduit for offshore natural-gas finds not only from Israel but, under the right conditions, from all across the eastern Mediterranean. . . .

    "many have fretted that the initial deal signed with [Texas, USA firm] Noble in 2005 would give too much to the American company and its Israeli partners, and not enough to Israel.

    In order to correct the last situation, a special commission was set up in 2010 to decide whether taxes on Noble’s prospective revenues should be increased. After due deliberation the commission ruled, unsurprisingly, that government royalties should be raised from the agreed-upon 20 percent to somewhere between 52 and 62 percent. [ shades of Mossadeq] Speaking for the government, Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz conceded that Israel’s 60-year-old petroleum-tax regime had indeed been unfairly tilted in favor of private firms, adding that a “situation where the citizens of the state of Israel are almost the only ones in the whole world—certainly in the Western world—who can’t enjoy their natural resources is insupportable.” [poor wittle Israel]
    Gritting their teeth, Noble and Delek accepted and soldiered on. Not only, however, did some Israelis continue to insist that the increase was still insufficient . . ."
     
    With all that stolen-from-Gaza extractive natural resource around, Israel shouldn't need the dole it extracts from USA taxpayers, wouldn't you think?
    , @biz
    I provided the foreign aid numbers directly from the US Government's own website, while you quoted an anti-Israel communist propaganda site (Mondoweiss).

    I'll trust my numbers, thanks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. @Wally
    Jews: the bride at every wedding and the corpse at every funeral.

    anti-semitic: any thought or person that a Jew doesn't like

    recommended:
    'mythical '6,000,000' planned / promoted in the 1800s'
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=112&p=67861&hilit=1869

    Quite clearly, the issue for you is not Zionism or “Jewish supremacism,” which you steadfastly refuse to define, but Jews in and of themselves. Otherwise, you wouldn’t troll threads written by Jews or that mention the Holocaust and fling invective from your safe anonymity. Most curious of all is your insistence that anti-Semitism is poorly defined or non-existent. You need only consult the nearest mirror.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    Wrong! You are just mouthing more hasbara BS.

    'Israel' is the number one recipient of US taxpayers money by far, and that apartheid state is now demanding five billion per year.

    The top 5 recipients are:
    'Israel': $3.1 billion
    Egypt: $1.5 billion
    Afghanistan: $1.1 billion
    Jordan: $1.0 billion
    Pakistan: $933 million

    http://mondoweiss.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/1-countries-scaled-to-economic-aid-from-usa-a800.jpg

    The Palestinian money is then forcibly used to purchase 'Israeli' goods & materials, so very convenient

    And then there's the big gas fields just off the Gaza coast which 'Israel' is stealing

    The name Palestine has been used for centuries, check old maps & atlases.

    You clearly do not know what you are talking about.

    And then there’s the big gas fields just off the Gaza coast which ‘Israel’ is stealing

    Will Israel’s Natural-Gas Fields Ever Get Developed? by Arthur Herman.

    this past December, things suddenly reversed on both fronts. Cutting through the Gordian knot of a half-decade’s negotiations, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that, despite Knesset opposition, his office had reached a final deal with Noble Energy. Only a day later, the Wall Street Journal reported that top-secret talks in Switzerland had resulted in a diplomatic breakthrough: normal relations were being restored between Turkey and Israel. On his way back from a visit to Riyadh, Erdogan remarked to a reporter, “Israel and Turkey need each other.”

    Provided Ankara doesn’t back out at the last minute, and provided Israel’s supreme court doesn’t overturn Netanyahu’s deal with Noble and Delek, these two breakthroughs—a double-play for Israel’s prime minister—could begin to change the energy landscape of the eastern Mediterranean and the entire Middle East. . . .

    “an outlet must be created to those energy markets. That outlet is precisely what Turkey can offer in the shape of a jointly built pipeline, plans for which were made years ago but have lain dormant. If completed (the estimated cost is $3 billion), that pipeline would seal Turkey’s re-engagement with Israel and become a main conduit for offshore natural-gas finds not only from Israel but, under the right conditions, from all across the eastern Mediterranean. . . .

    “many have fretted that the initial deal signed with [Texas, USA firm] Noble in 2005 would give too much to the American company and its Israeli partners, and not enough to Israel.

    In order to correct the last situation, a special commission was set up in 2010 to decide whether taxes on Noble’s prospective revenues should be increased. After due deliberation the commission ruled, unsurprisingly, that government royalties should be raised from the agreed-upon 20 percent to somewhere between 52 and 62 percent. [ shades of Mossadeq] Speaking for the government, Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz conceded that Israel’s 60-year-old petroleum-tax regime had indeed been unfairly tilted in favor of private firms, adding that a “situation where the citizens of the state of Israel are almost the only ones in the whole world—certainly in the Western world—who can’t enjoy their natural resources is insupportable.” [poor wittle Israel]
    Gritting their teeth, Noble and Delek accepted and soldiered on. Not only, however, did some Israelis continue to insist that the increase was still insufficient . . .”

    With all that stolen-from-Gaza extractive natural resource around, Israel shouldn’t need the dole it extracts from USA taxpayers, wouldn’t you think?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Israel flouts the global consensus supporting a two-state solution…

    In which of these two states will Christians constitute a majority, and therefore have some say in their governance?

    “What crime did Palestinians commit…?”

    Siding with the Arabian Mohammedan invaders is pretty serious. Ask the Copts. Or the Spaniards– that’s precisely the crime that got the Jews expelled from Spain.

    The system of apartheid incarnated an essence so flagrantly antithetical and repugnant to the epochal zeitgeist

    The “epocahal zeitgeist” was the sheerest horse manure. The problem wasn’t
    apartheid, it was togetherness.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  34. Both sides want total victory or continued war. The unleashing of Israeli forces against Gaza is no exception. This slaughter cannot begin without the cooperation of the Hamas government of Gaza, which obliges Israeli hardliners by allowing repeated, albeit futile, attacks against Israel. They do not have a “Plan B”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @SolontoCroesus
    Which of Israel's prime ministers was not "an Obnoxious Loudmouth Jewish Supremacist?"

    1. David Ben-Gurion: 1948-1954
    2. Moshe Sharett: 1954-1955
    3. David Ben-Gurion: 1955-1963
    4. Levi Eshkol: 1963-1969 (died in office)
    5. Golda Meir: 1969-1974
    6. Yitzhak Rabin: 1974-1977
    7. Menachem Begin: 1977-1983
    8. Yizthak Shamir: 1983-1984
    9. Shimon Peres: 1984-1986 -
    10. Yitzhak Shamir: 1986-1992 -
    11. Yitzhak Rabin: 1992-1995 (murdered in office)
    12. Shimon Peres: 1995-1996 -
    13. Benjamin Netanyahu: 1996-1999 -
    14. Ehud Barak: 1999-2001 -
    15. Ariel Sharon: 2001-2006 -
    16. Ehud Olmert: 2006-2009 -
    17. Benjamin Netanyahu: 2009- current

    Israel’s head of state (like Italy’s) is its president. Netanyahu and most of the rest of those were prime ministers (heads of government).

    Read More
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    a distinction without a difference.

    All those listed, as Netanyahu, represent the public, political, and I daresay consensus face of Jewish Israeli zionism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. @Dave Pinsen
    Israel's head of state (like Italy's) is its president. Netanyahu and most of the rest of those were prime ministers (heads of government).

    a distinction without a difference.

    All those listed, as Netanyahu, represent the public, political, and I daresay consensus face of Jewish Israeli zionism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Karl says:

    how many elections has Finklestein won?

    how many pussies get wet, looking at Finklestein?

    how many Pakistani generals know better than to tangle with Finklestein’s army?

    President Trump wouldn’t hire Finklestein to be a White House laundryman.

    Raise your hand if you would let Finklestein adjust the brakes on your car?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. DaveE says:

    All this “anti-Semite” stuff is laughable. If you want to talk about “anti-Jewism” I’m OK with that.

    Judaism is an ideology, even if you accept the lie that Jews are a race or an ethnic group, there can be no denying that Jews are an ideological group.

    As such, there’s nothing wrong whatsoever with hating their ideology and by extension, the people who implement it. Some ideologies fully deserve to be reviled.

    As much as other ethnic struggles in Africa and elsewhere may have killed more people than Israel has, this week, it just doesn’t affect us here in America.

    The crimes of the Jews, however, have completely destroyed any semblance of decency this country may have once had. It started with the Jew-run operation called 9/11, morphed into Jew-instigated wars against countries that did us no wrong whatsoever, backed up by the Jew-run Police State, the new Checka (they’ve had lots of practice), the Jewish trashing of our economy, our jobs outsourced by Jewish MBAs…. on and on.

    I don’t hate Jews for what they did to Palestine. I hate Jews for what they did to America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  39. Art says:

    Israel’s Current Head of State Is an Obnoxious Loudmouth Jewish Supremacist

    Did one man do all this?

    200 hidden nukes.

    An apartheid country.

    A one religion country.

    A 1,000,000-person prison in Gaza.

    The killing of 1,400 men, women, and children in Gaza.

    Squater settlements.

    The right of return for Jew but not Palestinian.

    All the pernicious laws against the indigenous Palestinians.

    Hmm?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. biz says:
    @Wally
    Wrong! You are just mouthing more hasbara BS.

    'Israel' is the number one recipient of US taxpayers money by far, and that apartheid state is now demanding five billion per year.

    The top 5 recipients are:
    'Israel': $3.1 billion
    Egypt: $1.5 billion
    Afghanistan: $1.1 billion
    Jordan: $1.0 billion
    Pakistan: $933 million

    http://mondoweiss.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/1-countries-scaled-to-economic-aid-from-usa-a800.jpg

    The Palestinian money is then forcibly used to purchase 'Israeli' goods & materials, so very convenient

    And then there's the big gas fields just off the Gaza coast which 'Israel' is stealing

    The name Palestine has been used for centuries, check old maps & atlases.

    You clearly do not know what you are talking about.

    I provided the foreign aid numbers directly from the US Government’s own website, while you quoted an anti-Israel communist propaganda site (Mondoweiss).

    I’ll trust my numbers, thanks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous
    fizziks provided numbers from US Agency for International Development.

    Israel's massive aid is not development aid, it's mostly military aid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @biz
    I provided the foreign aid numbers directly from the US Government's own website, while you quoted an anti-Israel communist propaganda site (Mondoweiss).

    I'll trust my numbers, thanks.

    fizziks provided numbers from US Agency for International Development.

    Israel’s massive aid is not development aid, it’s mostly military aid.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. biz says:
    @Svigor
    It's funny how het up the Hebrews Judeans Jews get about The Naming of the Palestinians.

    Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians, Palestinians.

    Get used to hearing that, fellas.

    It’s funny how het up the Hebrews Judeans Jews get about The Naming of the Palestinians.

    Palestinians, Palestinians

    “Palestinian” Arabs can call themselves whatever they want but it does’t change the fact that the idea of them as an indigenous people was invented whole cloth in 1965. Before that they viewed themselves as proudly the Arab peoples who conquered the region, and nothing was “Palestinian” about them including their name, which if anything was “South Syrians”.

    This video explains it

    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about “Palestinians” being original inhabitants.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    Israel's "head of state" is President Reuvin Rivlin, not Prime Minister Netanyahu.
    , @Art
    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about “Palestinians” being original inhabitants.

    I have a 1910 Encyclopedia Britannica – perhaps the most knowledgeable history book ever written and published.

    There are 25 pages under the heading - Palestine.

    So you are 100% wrong and rude to boot.
    , @DaveE
    Why do you bastards even bother with your lies anymore? Do you REALLY think we don't know what you did?

    Please don't bother with your latest excuse..... "Oh, white people stole America from the Indians so why shouldn't we Jews steal Palestine, like Yhwy told us to do?

    Lewis and Clark both noted in their diaries how they met, like FOUR Indians, all the way from St Loius to Portland.

    That lie ain't gonna fly no mo'. Just a little preemptive "security" I guess.
    , @DaveE
    And furthermore, there are Roman tax tables, dozens of them, minimum, that refer to "Palestina."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. biz says:
    @biz

    It’s funny how het up the Hebrews Judeans Jews get about The Naming of the Palestinians.

    Palestinians, Palestinians
     
    "Palestinian" Arabs can call themselves whatever they want but it does't change the fact that the idea of them as an indigenous people was invented whole cloth in 1965. Before that they viewed themselves as proudly the Arab peoples who conquered the region, and nothing was "Palestinian" about them including their name, which if anything was "South Syrians".

    This video explains it


    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about "Palestinians" being original inhabitants.

    Israel’s “head of state” is President Reuvin Rivlin, not Prime Minister Netanyahu.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Art says:
    @biz

    It’s funny how het up the Hebrews Judeans Jews get about The Naming of the Palestinians.

    Palestinians, Palestinians
     
    "Palestinian" Arabs can call themselves whatever they want but it does't change the fact that the idea of them as an indigenous people was invented whole cloth in 1965. Before that they viewed themselves as proudly the Arab peoples who conquered the region, and nothing was "Palestinian" about them including their name, which if anything was "South Syrians".

    This video explains it


    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about "Palestinians" being original inhabitants.

    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about “Palestinians” being original inhabitants.

    I have a 1910 Encyclopedia Britannica – perhaps the most knowledgeable history book ever written and published.

    There are 25 pages under the heading – Palestine.

    So you are 100% wrong and rude to boot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz

    There are 25 pages under the heading – Palestine.
     
    Sure, there was a territory called Palestine. But there were no people called "Palestinians" - unless they were Jews.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. DaveE says:
    @biz

    It’s funny how het up the Hebrews Judeans Jews get about The Naming of the Palestinians.

    Palestinians, Palestinians
     
    "Palestinian" Arabs can call themselves whatever they want but it does't change the fact that the idea of them as an indigenous people was invented whole cloth in 1965. Before that they viewed themselves as proudly the Arab peoples who conquered the region, and nothing was "Palestinian" about them including their name, which if anything was "South Syrians".

    This video explains it


    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about "Palestinians" being original inhabitants.

    Why do you bastards even bother with your lies anymore? Do you REALLY think we don’t know what you did?

    Please don’t bother with your latest excuse….. “Oh, white people stole America from the Indians so why shouldn’t we Jews steal Palestine, like Yhwy told us to do?

    Lewis and Clark both noted in their diaries how they met, like FOUR Indians, all the way from St Loius to Portland.

    That lie ain’t gonna fly no mo’. Just a little preemptive “security” I guess.

    Read More
    • Replies: @biz
    Please don’t bother with your latest excuse….. “Oh, white people stole America from the Indians so why shouldn’t we Jews steal Palestine, like Yhwy told us to do?

    I've never said this - that white people stole America from the Indians. I don't know where you get that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. DaveE says:
    @biz

    It’s funny how het up the Hebrews Judeans Jews get about The Naming of the Palestinians.

    Palestinians, Palestinians
     
    "Palestinian" Arabs can call themselves whatever they want but it does't change the fact that the idea of them as an indigenous people was invented whole cloth in 1965. Before that they viewed themselves as proudly the Arab peoples who conquered the region, and nothing was "Palestinian" about them including their name, which if anything was "South Syrians".

    This video explains it


    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about "Palestinians" being original inhabitants.

    And furthermore, there are Roman tax tables, dozens of them, minimum, that refer to “Palestina.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. biz says:
    @DaveE
    Why do you bastards even bother with your lies anymore? Do you REALLY think we don't know what you did?

    Please don't bother with your latest excuse..... "Oh, white people stole America from the Indians so why shouldn't we Jews steal Palestine, like Yhwy told us to do?

    Lewis and Clark both noted in their diaries how they met, like FOUR Indians, all the way from St Loius to Portland.

    That lie ain't gonna fly no mo'. Just a little preemptive "security" I guess.

    Please don’t bother with your latest excuse….. “Oh, white people stole America from the Indians so why shouldn’t we Jews steal Palestine, like Yhwy told us to do?

    I’ve never said this – that white people stole America from the Indians. I don’t know where you get that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. biz says:
    @Art
    You are a sucka if you believe this Islamic propaganda about “Palestinians” being original inhabitants.

    I have a 1910 Encyclopedia Britannica – perhaps the most knowledgeable history book ever written and published.

    There are 25 pages under the heading - Palestine.

    So you are 100% wrong and rude to boot.

    There are 25 pages under the heading – Palestine.

    Sure, there was a territory called Palestine. But there were no people called “Palestinians” – unless they were Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Norman Finkelstein Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation
Confederate Flag Day, State Capitol, Raleigh, N.C. -- March 3, 2007