The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
Trump Is Right About Syria. It's Time to Pack Up and Go Home
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Here’s what most people don’t understand about the war in Syria: The combat-phase of the war is largely over. What’s left is an arduous mop-up operation in the Idlib demilitarized zone and a potentially explosive standoff between the United States and Turkey in the north.

For a while it looked like the US-Turkey confrontation would fizzle-out after President Trump announced the withdrawal of all US troops from the theater. But Trump has apparently caved in to his hawkish foreign policy team and agreed to leave 400 military personnel behind to participate in a ‘multinational observer force’ in northeastern Syria. The announcement has dashed all hopes for an expedited political settlement and sabotaged Turkey’s plan to expel terrorists along its southern border, establish a “safe zone” stretching 20 miles into Syria, and resettle some of the more than 3 million Syrian refugees it has taken in over the last eight years. In short, Trump’s new plan needlessly prolongs the conflict while further alienating a critical ally in the region. And what does the US gain by implementing the policy? Nothing. All the main cities and industrial hubs have already been recaptured, reconstruction has already begun, and Syrian President Bashar al Assad is safely tucked away in Damascus. The only thing Washington’s multinational force will do is provoke an invasion by Turkey whose security is gravely undermined by the plan. Certainly that is not what Trump wants, is it, to stumble into a war with a country that serves as a vital transit-route and energy hub for the pivot to Asia?

The point we’re trying to make is that, the real conflict in Syria is no longer between the Syria Army and the foreign jihadists, it’s between the United States and Turkey. If the US were to withdrawal, the confrontation would end clearing the way for dialogue, compromise, and (eventually) serious negotiations. Turkey, Russia and Iran have made already great strides in resolving their differences through the Astana Process. A US withdrawal will undoubtedly lead to a comprehensive ceasefire followed by a final settlement.

None of this is possible as long as the US occupies territory in the east. That is why the US needs to withdraw its troops, stop its meddling, and leave. Regrettably, the Trump administration is now pushing a plan that is no different than the one announced by Rex Tillerson on January 18, 2018 when the former Secretary of State announced the creation of a 30,000-man Border Security Force (BSF) to occupy East Syria. The Turkish leadership saw Tillerson’s announcement as an attempt to betray Turkey by creating a de facto Kurdish state along its southern border. Adding insult to injury, Tillerson’s 30,000-man Border Security Force was to be comprised of YPG militants that are linked to the terrorist organization, the PKK, which has prosecuted a scorched earth campaign against Turkey for more than three decades.

Two days after Tillerson’s provocative announcement, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan launched a ground and air offensive into Syria capturing the city of Afrin before moving eastward to the Euphrates River. The message was clear: Turkey will defend its national security interests whether it ruffles Washington’s feathers or not. The formation of a multinational observer force along the border to protect Washington’s proxies (The YPG also known as the SDF) creates the same ominous circumstances that preceded Turkey’s last incursion. Does Washington really think that Turkey will allow the strategy to be implemented? How about if the shoe was on the other foot: Would Washington allow ISIS units to occupy camps along the US-Mexico border?

Of course, not. The idea is ridiculous. There’s ample evidence that Trump understands what’s going on and actually empathizes with Erdogan. In fact, just days before Trump’s “withdrawal” announcement, Trump had a long conversation with Erdogan during which he acknowledged that the US mission had been accomplished, ISIS had been defeated, and that it was time for the US to go. An article is the Times Of Israel recounts what actually transpired in Erdogan’s conversation with Trump. Check it out:

“The Dec. 14 call came a day after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and his Turkish counterpart Mevlut Cavusoglu agreed to have the two presidents discuss Erdogan’s threats to launch a military operation against U.S.-backed Kurdish rebels in northeast Syria, where American forces are based…..

“The talking points were very firm,” said one of the officials, explaining that Trump was advised to clearly oppose a Turkish incursion into northern Syria and suggest the U.S. and Turkey work together to address security concerns. “Everybody said push back and try to offer (Turkey) something that’s a small win, possibly holding territory on the border, something like that.”

Erdogan, though, quickly put Trump on the defensive, reminding him that he had repeatedly said the only reason for U.S. troops to be in Syria was to defeat the Islamic State and that the group had been 99 percent defeated. “Why are you still there?” the second official said Erdogan asked Trump, telling him that the Turks could deal with the remaining IS militants.

With Erdogan on the line, Trump asked national security adviser John Bolton, who was listening in, why American troops remained in Syria if what the Turkish president was saying was true, according to the officials. Erdogan’s point, Bolton was forced to admit, had been backed up by Mattis, Pompeo, U.S. special envoy for Syria Jim Jeffrey …

In the following days, Trump remained unmoved by those scrambling to convince him to reverse or at least delay the decision to give the military and Kurdish forces time to prepare for an orderly withdrawal…”
(“Trump decided on Syria pullout during phone call with Erdogan, ignored advisers”, The Times of Israel)

Let’s summarize: Erdogan threatened to invade Syria, so Trump’s advisors told him to pacify Erdogan with empty promises. Trump was told exactly what ‘he could and couldn’t say’, but quickly went off script and decided to settle the matter by himself. (Big surprise) As it happens, Trump not only made the right decision, but the only decision that would patch up relations with an important ally while avoiding a catastrophic invasion.

Now Trump has backtracked on his promise and things are worse than ever. Now the administration is going to use a multinational force to knife Turkey in the back, annex Syrian sovereign territory for an autonomous Kurdish state, and actualize the neocon dream of permanently partitioning the war-torn country.

That is not to suggest that Erdogan’s aims are pure or praiseworthy. They’re not. Erdogan wants a safe zone that can be resettled with refugees whose leaders are beholden to Ankara and who will act as agents for political change in Syria. Erdogan is a scheming, narcissistic, street-fighter who is driven by personal ambition and an unquenchable thirst for power. Fortunately, those attributes can be tempered through diplomacy, negotiation and compromise. But that process can not even begin until the US withdraws its troops and its Kurdish proxies are forced to strike a deal with Damascus. Once again, it is the United States that stands in the way of any movement towards peace.

If the US withdraws, then the Kurds will have to hash out an agreement with Syrian President Bashar al Assad for protection from the Turks. The Kurds will gain limited autonomy provided they decommission their army and agree to share critical oil revenues. The Turks will get their ‘safety zone’ but with strings attached and under terms that are agreeable to both Iran and Russia. In other words, Turkey will not be allowed to simply annex the area it militarily occupies. Putin will make sure of that.

There will likely be a massive resettlement of Syrian refugees in the north and east, but Turkey will be required to share peacekeeping and security duties with Moscow. And while this accommodation may create a soft partition in the north, I suspect Putin will agree to the arrangement in order to placate Erdogan and to bring the war to a swift end.

So what Trump needs to do is reject the counsel of his advisors and stick to his guns. He needs to keep his campaign promise and end the pointless foreign wars. He needs to realize that the only way the war is going to end is if Uncle Sam packs it in and goes home. As Commander in Chief he can make that happen.

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Military, Donald Trump, Syria, Turkey 
Hide 12 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Realist says:

    Trump Is Right About Syria. It’s Time to Pack Up and Go Home

    Trump is playing good cop/bad cop for the Deep State. Look at all the hubris and belligerence from Trump toward Russia, Iran, Syria, China and Venezuela and others.

  2. the american empire now visibly collapsing and acting like the ottoman one then dying in the early 20th century, steward of the middle east at that time, refuses to face reality knowing once it leaves it can never return.

    our departure from syria and then over time the rest of the middle east will echo the ottoman fate of lawrence of arabia days.

    only death and humiliation to our over stretched and worn out military there will move the needle in washington to pack up and leave.

    at some point some one or some entity will send a missile or missiles into the miniscule al tanf usa base in southern syria wiping it off the map in seconds. then washington will have ist ……….what do we do now moment!

  3. “And what does the US gain by implementing the policy?”

    I don’t know what the people of the US gain from this, but our politicians gain further infusions of Benjamins from their paymasters in that corner of the world.

    “Would Washington allow ISIS units to occupy camps along the US-Mexico border?”

    There seem to be a large number of US politicians who would invite them in.

  4. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    Jewish Convergence on Latin america.

    When the Cuban revolution happened, many Jews lost out as they’d invested heavily into casinos and other enterprises there. But the Jewish Left stood with the revolutionaries against Jewish business interests. They chose ideology over identity.

    Today, almost all Jews are agreed on Venezuela. From Bernie Sanders to Elliott Abrams, Maduro must go. (And is seems Jews like Sean Penn made pro-Chavez noises in the past to humiliate Bush II more than anything else. They didn’t say much about Obama-Hillary’s warmongering policies.) There has been a convergence of Jewish ‘left’ and Jewish ‘right’ on foreign affairs. Since almost all Jews, ‘left’ and ‘right’, hate Russia and Iran(as obstacles to Jewish Supremacism), any nation closely aligned with them must be destroyed.

    If 68 was a pivotal point for the Goy West, the turning point for Jews seems to have been 67 when Six Day War boosted Jewish tribal pride through the stratosphere. Since 67/68, Jewish politics became more tribal whereas white goy politics became less national.
    Identity > ideology.

    While Jewish ‘left’ and Jewish ‘right’ converged in favoring identity, the Jews and Whites diverged in that whites came to favor ideology(of anti-nationalism pushed on goyim by Jews). But even as whites came to denounce nationalism, they made an exception for Jews and Israel. Indeed, whites became fanatical about supporting Jewish nationalism as much as they became rabid in denouncing such among themselves.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  5. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    It’s not a matter of who is right or who is wrong. It’s a matter of ‘What Jews want’ and ‘What Jews don’t want’. It’s like US politics is not about ‘left’ vs ‘right’. If it is, why is the ‘leftist’ Democratic Party supportive of right-wing Israel but hostile to left-wing Venezuela? The real divide at the top is between ‘Is it good for Jews’ vs ‘Is it bad for Jews’.

    For Jewish Power, Syria must be smashed and divided because it’s an ally of Iran. Jews fear the Shia Crescent, but then, who destroyed Iraq as Sunni barrier between Syria and Iran? Neocons, but Jews never do a mea culpa. Recently, Frum and Boots finally admitted that Iraq War was a mistake, but it’s ONLY because Iraq ended up as a Shia bridge between Iran and Syria. They don’t really care about the countless people killed.

  6. Sethko says:

    Trump caves in because the Israelis and the Israel lobby and their bought and paid for ‘security complex’ have him by the balls. He caves to these bastards or they will probably eliminate him forcefully. He’s a gangster himself, so he knows how it works. We are ruled by criminals and by mentally and morally deficient imbeciles, and by a world of big money behind it all. In the fairly short run, we are royally screwed. Long-term survival is not a real possibility.

  7. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:

    So what Trump needs to do is reject the counsel of his advisors and stick to his guns.

    Sadliy, that’s one thing that Trump will never do. To be honest, at this point it’s just as well. It is now completely beyond Washington’s power to overthrow the Syrian government, so the only thing all this squabbling with Turkey over the Kurds is ever going to accomplish is to finally finish off NATO. To that I say: good!

  8. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    In one of his more memorable pieces, our own Israel Shamir explained how the romance between the Jews and the Left came to and end: http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Love_Labours.htm

  9. mr. whitney:

    great to see you back!

    fz

  10. Sean says:

    The West owes the Kurds the same as Turkey: nothing.

    Certainly that is not what Trump wants, is it, to stumble into a war with a country that serves as a vital transit-route and energy hub for the pivot to Asia?

    The Turks seem to assume they are strategically vital, and that the West needs them for demographic replacement, but such is not the case. If they want to be independent players; fine, they are going to pay dearly for it.

  11. Dear Mr. Whitney,

    wonderful to read your first comment after – perceived – half a century!

    Jochen Scholz
    LtCol, rtrd.
    GEAF

  12. after this last batch of gold is there anything left to steal in Syria that Trump can get his hands on?

    if not it’s not worth staying. I imagine that is what Trump meant all along. there is nothing left to steal so its a waste of time and money to stay

    Trump may leave anyway: or maybe ‘Rothschild can pay for the american deployment to make it possible to stay’

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS