The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMike Whitney Archive
Return to Crisis: Things Keep Getting Worse
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Had the economy been fundamentally sound in 1929 the effect of the great stock market crash might have been small…. But business in 1929 was not sound; on the contrary it was exceedingly fragile. It was vulnerable to the kind of blow it received from Wall Street. Those who have emphasized this vulnerability are obviously on strong ground. Yet when a greenhouse succumbs to a hailstorm something more than a purely passive role is normally attributed to the storm. One must accord similar significance to the typhoon which blew out of lower Manhattan in October 1929.”

Extracts from The Great Crash: 1929, John Kenneth Galbraith, First Published 1955, Chapter 10: “Cause and Consequence”, Page 204.

The virus that spread to stock markets around the world and nearly destroyed the global financial system in 2008 has reemerged with a vengeance sending global equities deep into the red and wiping out more than $5 trillion in market capitalization in less than two weeks. On Tuesday, before the opening bell, major market index futures in the US plunged more than 400 points signaling another violent day of selling ahead. Worries that a slowdown in China will impact global growth pushed Asian and European markets deep into negative territory while US futures indicate that the Dow Jones is headed for its ninth triple-digit day in ten sessions. The deluge of bad news has battered confidence in the Fed and “sent global equities to their worst monthly slump in more than three years”. Millions of Mom and Pop investors have sold out already and are headed for the exits. Here’s a recap from Bloomberg:

“Mom and pop are running for the hills. Since July, American households — which account for almost all mutual fund investors — have pulled money both from mutual funds that invest in stocks and those that invest in bonds. It’s the first time since 2008 that both asset classes have recorded back-to-back monthly withdrawals, according to a report by Credit Suisse.

Credit Suisse estimates $6.5 billion left equity funds in July as $8.4 billion was pulled from bond funds, citing weekly data from the Investment Company Institute as of Aug. 19. Those outflows were followed up in the first three weeks of August, when investors withdrew $1.6 billion from stocks and $8.1 billion from bonds, said economist Dana Saporta.

“Anytime you see something that hasn’t happened since the last quarter of 2008, it’s worth noting,” Saporta said in a phone interview. ….Withdrawals from equity funds are usually accompanied by an influx of money to bonds, and an exit from both at the same time suggests investors aren’t willing to take on risk in any form.” (“Fed Up Investors Yank Cash From Almost Everything Just Like 2008“, Bloomberg)

While the slowdown in China may be the spark for recent volatility, it certainly isn’t the cause. There’s a growing consensus that the real problem originated in 2008 when the Fed refused to write-down the debts from the insolvent banking system thus creating the conditions for another calamitous financial crisis sometime in the future. And while the Fed’s zero rates and titanic doses of liquidity might have helped to ease the symptoms by flooding the system with cash, the underlying issues remain the same. Thus, as the medication has worn off, the virus has reappeared stronger than ever revealing the ineffectiveness of the Fed’s remedies and the urgent need for alternate therapies.

Stocks are massively overpriced due to the setting of interest rates below the rate of inflation which creates a subsidy for speculators. The policy has had the precise effect that the Fed intended, it has generated a humongous asset bubble in stocks and bonds transferring trillions of dollars to Wall Street banks and financial institutions. According to Yale economist Robert Shiller, the only time stocks have been this “high or higher were in 1929, 2000, and 2007—all moments before market crashes.”

Robert Shiller: “…Bonds, and increasingly real estate also look overvalued. This is different from other over-valuation periods such as 1929, when the stock market was very overvalued, but the bond and housing markets for the most part, weren’t. It’s an interesting phenomenon.”

At the same time bankers and hedge fund managers have been raking in record profits on financially-engineered products that neither add to overall productivity or improve the broader economy, ordinary working people have seen their wages stagnate, incomes plunge and their prospects for a comfortable retirement vanish along with their ever-dwindling 401-K. According to investment guru John Hussman:

“U.S. wages and salaries have plunged to the lowest share of GDP in history, while the civilian labor force participation rate has dropped to levels not seen since the 1970s. Yet consumption as a share of GDP is near a record high.”

The problem is that the Fed must prevent the real economy from growing, otherwise, workers wages will improve, prices will rebound, inflation will rise, and the Fed will be forced to raise rates. And, of course, higher rates are what Wall Street fears most, in fact, the six year bull market was built entirely on cheap, plentiful liquidity that has inflated historic bubbles in financial assets across-the-board. Even the slightest uptick in rates will bring the whole fake edifice crashing to earth, which is why any talk of “normalization” sends stocks into a nosedive.

This is why policymakers will continue to slash budget deficits and implement other austerity measures to cut off the vital flow of fiscal support to the real economy. A thriving economy with low unemployment, rising incomes and wages, and positive inflation is the death knell for zero rate shenanigans, like stock buybacks, where a company repurchases its own shares to push prices higher to boost executive compensation and reward shareholders. Buybacks are type of stock manipulation that used to be banned but are presently, all the rage. Interestingly, Barron’s attributes the recent turnaround in the market to a surge in buybacks that staunched the bloodletting on Wall Street. Take a look:

“Like the Wizard of Oz, who was revealed as nothing more than a man behind a curtain working some cool special effects, stock buybacks might not be the great and powerful market force they were thought to be.

What do I mean? Two weeks ago, the Standard & Poor’s 500 began to sell off as concerns about China, commodities, and emerging markets made headlines. But just as the popular benchmark looked like it was entering free fall, it suddenly reversed. Who was the mysterious savior rescuing the markets? Articles published soon after the remarkable rebound were quick to point out that trading desks at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley had seen the most corporate buying on record, suggesting it was share buybacks that kept the market afloat.” (“Pushback on Buybacks,” Barron’s)

So, a surge in buybacks actually turned the markets around and stopped a selloff?

Indeed. This is how buybacks distort pricing, by countering normal supply-demand dynamics with infusions of capital that would normally be directed towards improving productivity. Weak regulations and cheap cash have changed the incentives structure so that easiest way to enrich stakeholders is by piling on more debt, raking off hefty profits, and leaving the wreckage for someone else to clean up. This is nihilistic rationale that drives buybacks. Keep in mind, the Fed’s low rates were sold to the public as a way to stimulate investment in the real economy. As it happens, hiring for full-time jobs is still at depression era levels while business investment (Capex) has collapsed. The bulk of earnings are being devoted almost-exclusively to goosing stock prices to reward insatiable CEOs and their do-nothing shareholders. Check it out:

“The allocation of corporate profits to stock buybacks deserves much of the blame. Consider the 449 companies in the S&P 500 index that were publicly listed from 2003 through 2012. During that period those companies used 54% of their earnings—a total of $2.4 trillion—to buy back their own stock, almost all through purchases on the open market. Dividends absorbed an additional 37% of their earnings. That left very little for investments in productive capabilities or higher incomes for employees…

Why are such massive resources being devoted to stock repurchases? Corporate executives give several reasons, which I will discuss later. But none of them has close to the explanatory power of this simple truth: Stock-based instruments make up the majority of their pay, and in the short term buybacks drive up stock prices. In 2012 the 500 highest-paid executives named in proxy statements of U.S. public companies received, on average, $30.3 million each; 42% of their compensation came from stock options and 41% from stock awards. By increasing the demand for a company’s shares, open-market buybacks automatically lift its stock price, even if only temporarily, and can enable the company to hit quarterly earnings per share (EPS) targets…

If the U.S. is to achieve growth that distributes income equitably and provides stable employment, government and business leaders must take steps to bring both stock buybacks and executive pay under control. The nation’s economic health depends on it….” (“Profits without Prosperity“, William Lazonick, Harvard Business Review)

There’s no chance the Fed will raise rates in the current environment. Corporate earnings and revenues have been shrinking since the forth quarter of 2014 which will make it harder for CEOs to justify adding to their debtload to repurchase more shares. As the appetite for buybacks wanes, stocks are bound to dip even lower putting more pressure on bank balance sheets and forcing corporations to divert more cash to debt servicing. The Fed’s threat to raise rates is merely a bluff to attract foreign capital to US markets and to prevent the dollar from falling off a cliff.

While it’s always possible that the markets could stabilize or stocks could rebound sharply, it’s more likely that we have reached a tipping point where the excesses are about to be wrung from the system through an excruciating downturn followed by an inevitable currency crisis. We expect the six year-long fake recovery to end much like it did in 1929, where one demoralizing selloff followed the other, and where the crashing of stock prices fueled the publics distrust of the central bank, the government and all of the nations main institutions. Here’s a brief summary from Galbraith’s masterpiece:

“The singular feature of the great crash of 1929 was that the worst continued to worsen. What looked one day like the end proved on the next day to have been only the beginning. Nothing could have been more ingeniously designed to maximize the suffering, and also to ensure that as few as possible escaped the common misfortune. The fortunate speculator who had funds to answer the first margin call presently got another and equally urgent one, and if he met that there would still be another. In the end all the money he had was extracted from him and lost. The man with the smart money, who was safely out of the market when the first crash came, naturally went back in to pick up bargains. The bargains then suffered a ruiness fall. Even the man who waited out all of October and all of November, who saw the volumne of trading return to normal and saw Wall Street become as placid as a produce market, and who then bought common stocks would see their value drop to a third or a fourth of the purchase price in the next twenty-four months. The Coolidge bull market was a remarkable phenonmemon. The ruthlessness of its liquidation was, in its own way, equally remarkable.” ( Extracts from “The Great Crash: 1929″, John Kenneth Galbraith, First Published 1955, Page 130 Things Become More Serious)

As of this writing, the Dow is down 317, the S&P 500, down 37, the Nasdaq, down 71.

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at [email protected].

(Republished from Counterpunch by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Economics • Tags: Financial Crisis, Wall Street 
Hide 12 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. these 1929 analogies are bootless. During those bygone days the country had a rock-solid industrial base, and c. 20,000 tons of gold to back the currency. Both now gone. When the upper levels of the Ponzi cave in – derivatives like the dollar, stocks, bonds, insurance policies, mortgages, pensions,etc. – there is nothing below but a moral, political, and economic Black Hole. This collapse is going to be civilizational, and terminal

    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @Marian
    , @Anonymous
  2. Dr. Jim Willie of Golden Jackass also explains the troubling issues behind the current economic dilemma.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpBrruw0OuI

    I’m not sure if this is a bombshell video, but there are indeed some interesting, eye-opening things which Dr. Jim Willie reveals. Two hours of Dr. Willie explaining in high-pitch, and nearly running out of saliva. One of the disturbing things he reveals is how New York and London stole Saudi gold. I thought to myself: Really ?! Is this true?! WT…???!!! Why isn’t this in the news??!! Can someone confirm if this is really true or just an allegation. Someone!

  3. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Great Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    “Rigorous” econometrics and amateur econometrics are both largely mathematical jibberish. The best position to take is this:someday the economy will collapse because all growth must come to and end..it is no more complicated than this.

    The ideology and policy of growthamania goes hand-in-hand with the open and deliberate policy of low wage-wage slave labor markets in the US. And this goes hand-in-hand with the open and deliberate policy of race-replacing The Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class….street by street…town by town…county by county….state by state…..across the US. Post-1965 Immigration Reform Act immigration policy is all about importing nonwhite legal immigrant scab labor-the high fertility-highly racialized Democratic Party Voting Bloc.

  4. Marian says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    This crash will be a fatal one. There is nothing left except made in China Silicon Valley. There are a bounty of natural resources to sell off to the usual oligarchs.

    I do hope all those real life monopoly players have converted to stable foreign currencies, and have bought their new digs in immigration restricted countries of New Zealand, Australia or Israel. Poor NZ and Australia. The banksters and their ilk won’t be able to stop themselves.

  5. Flower says:

    1. The Federal Reserve owns you. It owns your house, your car, your family, your money, your future, your life. Go ahead, show your mortgage receipts and deeds and titles, they own those too.
    2. The Federal Reserve’s operating theory is that debt=money. That’s right, according to the Fed, “if there were no debt, there would be no money”.
    3. There is a difference between wealth and money.
    4. The Fed is NOT about creating wealth, it is all about creating money. Go figure.
    5. A few folks were complaining that even though the price per barrel for oil was $40, the price at the pump was not reflecting this low amount. They were wrong, the price at the pump was reflecting the price/barrel, it’s just that their money had lost that much value (i.e. purchasing power) since the last time oil was $40/barrel.
    6. Things keep getting worse because they are supposed to.

  6. anon • Disclaimer says:

    The bankster fallacy is believing that driving down wages creates prosperity when it only takes a moment’s thought to realise how it can’t work long term as it ends with no one able to buy anything.

    However in the short term it makes them so much money they do it anyway.

    When it all comes down they’ll fly off to private islands somewhere with their loot and watch the chaos they caused on TV.

  7. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Agree completely. There is nothing to fall back to. Most citizens are already financially struggling with many being subsidized by the fed gov. The dollar must inevitably collapse as economic fundamentals go down. No Ponzi scheme lasts forever.

  8. annamaria says:

    An analysis of the financial problem in the US by William Edstrom: “Wall Street and the Military are Draining Americans High and Dry”

    1. An actual US debt is $46.1 trillion “owed by the US government is because of military and intelligence expenses.”
    2. A prescription for the cure: “We can cut taxes for the poor and middle class by raising the income tax standard deduction to $90,000 (plus annual increases). Raise the income tax rate and capital gains rate to 90%. 6.2% payroll taxes on all income over $117,000 a year plus a temporary nationwide 8.875% sales tax (same as the NYC sales tax) on all financial sales (e.g. stocks, derivatives) will have the government debt in the USA paid off within a decade. Cutting military/war/secret police spending in half in the USA will help to pay off the government’s debt faster, when taxes can again be cut for all. Greater wall street oversight, especially on derivatives and hedge funds is requisite….
    A single payer health plan like Medicaid for All will cover everyone and extend our lifespans. Building enough new medical schools and university hospitals will end the doctor shortage. Together with lowered drug and device costs attained by trimming the patent monopoly from 17 years to 3 years will save the US economy $1.1 trillion a year. Raising the Social Security minimum monthly payment to $2,000 a month (plus annual increases) and having one pension for all Americans will eliminate thousands of redundent government pension plans, saving the USA $0.5 trillion in annual pension costs while eliminating poverty among Elderly Americans.”

    Considering the level of degeneration of the US Congress (in the context of the absolute power of plutocracy), the above suggestion seems utterly idealistic.
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/02/wall-street-and-the-military-are-draining-americans-high-and-dry/

    • Replies: @Flower
    , @MarkinLA
  9. Flower says:
    @annamaria

    Your thoughts certainly are compelling and deserve discussion; however, in a statement that shouts “We are Americans and we are stupid!” this article garnered a whopping 8 comments. Compare that to the number of comments on race issues, or pot issues, or feminist issues. The economy and your money are in the shape they are because America LOVES IT THAT WAY. America’s future is brighter and sweeter and we all live in infinite peace and prosperity because we are indispensable. That’s what we are told, so it must be true.

  10. MarkinLA says:
    @annamaria

    Raise the income tax rate and capital gains rate to 90%.

    Even after WWII when the tax rates were this high to pay off the war debt, the tax code was littered with deductions such that nobody actually paid those rates and all sorts of tax avoidance scams were hatched and snared people who eventually had their deductions denied. There were ridiculous deductions for owning a racing horse that an engineer friend of mine was in because he got 5 times his investment in deductions over 5 years. When even some lowly engineer is paying 40% income taxes you made out.

    The problem with any tax code is that there are good earnings and useless earnings. Taxing a guy like Steven Jobs who had vision and an ability to produce more wealth for everybody isn’t such a good idea. Taxing useless parasites on Wall Street who try and make the market go up and down so they can take a slice on every movement is a good tax.

  11. The problem with any tax code is that there are good earnings and useless earnings. Taxing a guy like Steven Jobs who had vision and an ability to produce more wealth for everybody isn’t such a good idea. Taxing useless parasites on Wall Street who try and make the market go up and down so they can take a slice on every movement is a good tax.

    Amen!

    We have previously been able to pull ourselves out of depression and recession through manufacturing. We no longer have the type of manufacturing base to pull out of this current tailspin. The financial interests that control our country have looted us, we are basically a hollow shell of our former selves. Currently, the only thing keeping this game of musical chairs going is money printing, lying and manipulation.

    The only chance we have to change this mess is to end the immigration of third-world poverty, put tariffs on imported goods, move to a consumption tax and start taxing the hell out of moving capital, manufacturing or intellectual property out of this country. But that is not going to happen, our rulers are greedy whores to the financial interests that got us into this mess in the first place. Basically it is too late – we are screwed.

  12. annamaria says:

    “We no longer have the type of manufacturing base to pull out of this current tailspin.”

    True. Whatever is left is in service of the Federal Reserve via war profiteers (including the bloody ideologists):
    http://news.bitofnews.com/the-9-most-powerful-weapons-manufacturers-in-the-world/
    http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/should-the-us-spend-1-trillion-on-nuclear-weapons/

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mike Whitney Comments via RSS