In 2008, the American people voted overwhelmingly for change. They never got it. Hence, Trump.
To pretend there’s no connection between Obama’s failed presidency and the subsequent rise of Donald John Trump, is to ignore the obvious and shrug off responsibility for the situation the country is in today.
Obama created Trump, the man didn’t simply emerge from the ether. Had Obama acted in good faith and kept his promises to shake up the status quo, end the foreign wars, restore civil liberties, hold Wall Street accountable and relieve the economic insecurity that working families across the country now feel, Hillary Clinton would have been a shoe-in on November 8th. As it happens, Obama made no effort to achieve any of these objectives, which is why Hillary was defeated in the biggest political upset in the last century.
The point we want to emphasize here is that the Democratic leadership is responsible for Trump, not the working class people in the red states who merely did what they had to do to effect change. These people can’t be blamed for voting for their own best interests. That’s what people always do. Had Obama done anything to genuinely improve the economy, things might have turned out differently. But he didn’t, in fact– as popular as Obama was– a full two-thirds of the American people thought the country was headed in the wrong direction. In other words, the election was a referendum on Obama’s performance as the primary steward of the US economy. Obama lost that referendum.
Even so, the DNC could have reloaded and taken a different approach to the economy under Hillary. But they didn’t. They thought the “recovery” meme would be effective enough to put them over the finish line. But it wasn’t effective enough, because too many people saw that the recovery was a fraud, that there was no recovery, that it was all a slick Madison Avenue public relations swindle aimed at concealing the fact that Obama had restructured the US economy in a way that deliberately kept growth at-or-below 2 percent so the Fed could continue pumping cheap cash to its constituents on Wall Street while everyone else saw their personal debt-load grow, their standards of living slip, and their retirement savings vanish into thin air. Isn’t that what really happened?
Obama’s grand restructuring project has resulted in perennial economic stagnation and widespread pessimism about the future. The former president oversaw the greatest transfer of wealth from working class people to parasitic plutocrats in the history of the country. It wasn’t an accident. Obama was following a blueprint that was given to him by his handlers at the DNC.
So now the country is going to be led by a brash billionaire reality TV celebrity who has no previous political experience and who seems unusually sensitive to any kind of personal criticism. Not surprisingly, there’s no sign that the Democratic leadership has either learned its lesson or feels any responsibility for this extraordinary development.
Why is that? Why hasn’t anyone in the DNC admitted their failure, admitted that they didn’t accurately gage the mood of the country or the hunger for change? Why haven’t they acknowledged that putting the most untrustworthy candidate of all time –a thoroughly dislikable, warmongering harridan– on the ticket was a mistake? Why?
It’s because this vile collection of corporate Dems who run the party are incapable of self reflection, right? It’s because the Podesta throng — who still hold the party in their deathgrip –truly believe that bamboozling their base with Potemkin executives like Barack Obama, is a tip-top way to run the government. They think Obama’s tenure as president was a success story, mainly because his grandiloquent bloviating and larking around on stage with sleeves rolled up like some comical mid-level plant manager– diverted attention from the trillions of dollars that were being sluiced to the banking whores and speculators on Wall Street. Isn’t that why the Dems haven’t changed?
They actually think they’ve discovered the secret formula for winning elections, and that the election of Trump in 2016 was just a “one off”, a temporary setback.
But it’s not a one off. The rise of Trump has been accompanied by the rise of rightwing parties and ideology across the planet. What we are seeing is a fundamental change in the zeitgeist, which is “the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time.” In this view, Obama represents the culmination of the values and ideas that emerged during the 1960s and persisted until just recently when they collapsed. The utter corruption of the progressive vision –due, in large part, to the cynical and reactionary policies of the Democrats– has paved the way for a new era, the Trump Era, in which state repression is bound to increase even while personal liberty and economic security are steadily eviscerated.
And what is the Democrats response to this new phenom?
Why, nothing at all. The whole matter seems to be over their heads entirely. They don’t seem to grasp the shifting public mood, the changing epoch, or how it will impact their future plans. Instead, they are doing everything in their power to make themselves even more irrelevant. It’s pathetic.
And keep in mind, that ever since the election, the Dems have made no effort at course correction, no effort to reconnect with the millions of working people in the red states who used to vote Democrat but switched because they wanted change. No. Instead, party leaders have embarked on a moronic character assassination campaign aimed at discrediting the new president by alleging Russian “hacking” of the election. And while they have produced absolutely zero hard evidence to substantiate their loony claims, the Dems, the media and the thoroughly unreliable Intel agencies have continued this scapegoating onslaught thinking that they are shaping public opinion in a way that undermines President Trump.
It would all be laughable if it wasn’t so serious. But it is serious. The rise of Trump poses significant challenges to democratic government, but, regrettably, the opposition party is in the middle of a major nervous breakdown. How are they going to stop this autocratic juggernaut in their present state of collapse?
They won’t be able to. They’re going to continue to get beaten to a pulp unless they get it together and stop running around with their hair on fire yelling, “The Russians are coming”. That kind of idiocy doesn’t win elections. It’s a turn-off.
The Democratic Party has to be more than a membership register attached to a donor’s list. It needs to reconnect with its base by committing itself to basic progressive values, civil liberties, non intervention, and economic fairness. It needs to try to understand why working people are either leaving the party altogether or are so disgusted they won’t even make the effort to vote.
How about a little self examination, eh? How about clearing out the deadwood starting with crooked Hillary and her sleazy compadre, Podesta? How about committing to a vision for change that’s more than a public relations scam aimed at hoodwinking your base? How about ending the buck-passing bullshit and pushing legislation that offers some tangible relief for student debt, dwindling retirements, stagnant wages, and spiraling health care costs.
The Democratic party doesn’t have to be a place where progressive ideas go to die. But they’d better get it together fast or it’s going to be game-over.
MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.