Challenging America will be the focus of meetings in Yekaterinburg, Russia, on Monday and Tuesday for Chinese President Hu Jintao, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and other leaders of the six-nation Shanghai Co-operation Organisation. The alliance comprises Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Tajiki stan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, with observer status for Iran, India, Pakistan and Mongolia.
The attendees have assured American diplomats that dismantling the US financial and military hegemony is not their aim. They simply want to discuss mutual aid â€“ but in a way that has no role for the US or for the dollar as a vehicle for trade among these countries.
The meeting is an opportunity for China, Russia and India to â€śbuild an increasingly multipolar world orderâ€ť, as Mr Medvedev put it in a St Petersburg speech this month. What he meant was this: we have reached our limit in subsidising the US military encirclement of Eurasia while also allowing the US to appropriate our exports, companies and real estate in exchange for paper money of questionable worth. â€śThe artificially maintained unipolar systemâ€ť, Mr Medvedev said, was based on â€śone big centre of consumption, financed by a growing deficit, and thus growing debts, one formerly strong reserve currency, and one dominant system of assessing assets and risksâ€ť.
Keen observers of America, if not effective managers of their own economies, these countries argue that the root of the global financial crisis is that the US makes too little and spends too much. Especially upsetting is US military expenditure â€“ such as military aid to Georgia or the presence in the oil-rich Middle East and central Asia â€“ using money that foreign central banks recycle.
Overconsumption by US citizens, US buy-outs of foreign companies and dollars the Pentagon spends abroad all end up in foreign central banks. These governments face a hard choice: either recycle the dollars back to America by buying US Treasury bonds or let the â€śfree marketâ€ť force up their currencies relative to the dollar â€“ thereby pricing their exports out of world markets, creating domestic unemployment and business failures. US-style free markets hook them into a system that forces them to accept unlimited dollars. Now they want out.
This means creating an alternative. Rather than making merely â€ścosmetic changes as some countries and perhaps the international financial organisations themselves might wantâ€ť, Mr Medvedev concluded his St Petersburg speech: â€śWhat we need are financial institutions of a completely new type, where particular political issues and motives, and particular countries, will not dominate.â€ť
For starters, the six countries intend to trade in their own currencies so as to get the benefit of mutual credit, rather than give it to the US. In recent months China has struck bilateral deals with Brazil and Malaysia to trade in renminbi rather than the dollar, sterling or euros.
Many foreigners see the US as a lawless nation. How else to characterise a country that holds out a set of laws for others â€“ on war, debt repayment and the treatment of prisoners â€“ but ignores them itself?
The US is the worldâ€™s largest debtor, yet has avoided the pain of â€śstructural adjustmentsâ€ť imposed on other debtor nations. US interest rate and tax reductions in the face of exploding trade and budget deficits are seen as the height of hypocrisy in view of the austerity programmes that Washington has forced on other countries via the International Monetary Fund and other vehicles.
It is no mystery to other countries how the US remains above the law. Foreigners see a financial system backed by American military bases encircling the globe. The IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organisation and other Washington surrogates are seen as vestiges of a lost American empire no longer able to rule by economic strength, left only with military domination. They see this hegemony cannot continue without adequate revenues and are attempting to hasten the bankruptcy of the US financial-military world order. If China, Russia and their allies have their way, the US will no longer live off the savings of others, nor have the money for unlimited military spending.
US officials wanted to attend Yekaterinburg as observers. They were told no. It is a word that Americans will hear much more in the future.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009