The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewLinh Dinh Archive
Plastic Recycling and Jousting Jews
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Leipzig, 2015

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Our first year in Ea Kly was a failure. We lost quite a bit of money. For the past month, I’ve been in Saigon so we could formulate a new game plan. Even in a low-wage economy like Vietnam, plastic recycling is barely feasible.

Seeing people falling is funny. In his magisterial Crowds and Power, Elias Canetti observes, “A human being who falls down reminds us of an animal we might have hunted and brought down ourselves. Every sudden fall which arouses laughter does so because it suggests helplessness and reminds us that the fallen can, if we want, be treated as prey. If we went further and actually ate it, we would not laugh.”

A fallen man is funny because he’s no longer composed, erect and posturing, but symbolically reduced to meat, to be stripped naked, slaughtered then eaten. Go ahead and laugh. I’m falling right in front of y’all. Eat my ass.

Last year, I also fell right out of the American literary scene, though this process has been drawn out for nearly a decade. You see, when I mocked Obama, questioned 9/11, dismantled the Bin Laden “assassination,” advocated for the boycott of American presidential elections, rejected Hillary Clinton, dismissed American higher education as a brainwashing scam and appeared on Iran’s Press TV dozens of times, I lost most of my literary allies, nearly all of whom are servile academics. My worst sins, however, were repeated attacks on Jewish power and frank discussions of racial differences, which culminated in “Blacks, Jews and You.”

Here’s how Wikipedia describes my racial views, “He has suggested that African-American biological inferiority means that ‘in every field besides sports, entertainment and politics, blacks are failing spectacularly against all other races,’ but I’ve never described any race as biologically inferior or superior to another. Here is exactly what I said:

In every field besides sports, entertainment and politics, blacks are failing spectacularly against all other races, a fact readily admitted to by blacks and black apologists themselves as evidence of America’s racism and oppression of blacks. America is racist, but so is every other country and person, for racism, at core, is merely an extension and manifestation of innate self-love. One loves oneself, family then nation, which is made up of those that share one’s language, above all, as well as culture and history, if not also a physical similarity.

In an email, one lifelong academic moron screamed at me for “excoriating” blacks, and I was astounded and saddened that a man charged with teaching thousands of young people how to write better English clearly did not understand such a basic verb as “excoriate.” Though I’ve talked many times about black crime and dysfunction, I’ve never lashed out at this entire race, for that would be preposterous, and not enlightening. The observer’s job is to highlight, describe and explain, with praise or censure sentimental acts best kept to a minimum.

There’s only one American poet left who admits to being my friend, and Ian Keenan and I were sort of neighbors, with him living just across the Delaware from Philadelphia. We took a few multi-day MegaBus trips together. When you’re over 50, it’s no fun to sleep on a tight, bumpy seat so save on hotel bills, but that’s what Ian and I did. Spending little, we explored Toronto, Montreal, Atlanta and New Orleans.

Emailing Ian, I wrote, “Though I’m accused of being a hater of blacks, I’ve actually written many more sympathetic words about blacks than nearly all of my critics combined. Take my Jackson, Wisconsin, Point Breeze and North Philly postcards, for examples, with the first two in my book, or a bunch of poems in A Mere Rica. I observe blacks closely, listen to them attentively and quote them at length, which are more than what most poets are willing to do, even the black ones!” Then, “Pay particular attention to Stewart Crenshaw, an allegory about the black experience that’s one of my best stories.” Much of this writing is now gathered in a free PDF, BLACKS. Read it and judge for yourself.

In English and Vietnamese, I’ve also written about Vietnamese dysfunction, with many accounts in prose and poetry of dishonesty, power abuse, corruption, mindless superstition and general idiocy. Check out my novel, Love Like Hate. Of course, I’ve also described many instances of beauty, empathy, courage, resilience and sacrifice, which I’ve routinely encountered them wherever I went, for they are all necessary for human survival.

About 15 years ago, Ron Silliman sized me up, “note that he is hardly the only good or successful Vietnamese American poet, let alone the only poet to come from a working class background, yet he is not writing ‘about’ or even ‘toward’ nor ‘from’ any one of these contexts so much as he is through them—they are lenses, filters, that condition his perspective on everyday life. Imagine what any other poet with this strong a sense of form would have had to become in order to write such poetry. Ted Berrigan, for example. Berrigan shares Linh’s class background, which enables him to be as ruthless in a different way as Linh is in his. But the comparison stops there. Linh is writing straightforward poetry, but from a perspective shared by almost no one else. This kind of exile is far deeper than mere geography… you can feel Linh’s deep loneliness on every page & realize that there are aspects of his poetry that you can’t find anywhere else. We probably haven’t had a writer this singular since the death of William Burroughs.”

ORDER IT NOW

Even at the time, I thought Silliman overpraised me, and I remember thinking, Poor Ron. I hope he won’t regret such effusiveness. Now that I’m tarred as a Fascist, perhaps Ron wishes he never endorsed me at all. In any case, I went from being compared to Burroughs and Bukowski to being untouchable, with no reading invitations for years before I left the USA.

It’s no mystery, really. I’ve become a pariah because I’ve repeatedly attacked Jewish power. That’s the one unforgivable cardinal sin in that Jew-dominated nation, where every public intellectual, academic, politician and even the president must prostrate himself endlessly before this mendacious, blood thirsty and vindictive Moloch.

How can they forgive me for calling their sacred Holocaust an elaborate myth that’s “propped up by a shoahload of bogus scholarship and hundreds of tear jerking movies”? And I’ve added, “The Holocaust does not explain genocide but enables it, but few dare to say so, for fear of Jewish power.”

Jewish power has only inconvenienced my life a bit, not humiliated me daily, bulldozed my house, arrested me, tortured me, shot me or destroyed my entire society, so I’m the slightest casualty among its millions of victims. Americans, though, are both victims and mercenaries of Jewish power, for even as they help Jewish power to destroy other societies, their own is being deformed and wrecked by Jewish power. America is Jewish power’s war horse, galloping towards the glue factory.

Wars fought for Israel are added to the list of American war crimes, to be condemned by Jews as evidence of the innate evilness of the white race.

Why is Jewish power so hated for so long by so many nations? Elie Wiesel, “For two thousand years the Jewish people lived on the edge of destruction; somewhere Jews were always being killed? For what? For no reason.” Since Jews are always persecuted and killed “for no reason,” Christian and Muslim goys across dozens of countries where Jews have dwelt must be evil, for they have all feared, dreaded or despised Jews to some degree, “for no reason.”

In his eye opening Yahweh to Zion, Laurent Guyénot observes, “Every historical conflict between Jews and goyim is assumed to be the fault of the goyim. If a man quarrels with everyone in his life—his neighbors, his boss, his coworkers, those he meets on the street—and then insists that all of those people are persecuting him for no reason whatsoever, few of us would take him at his word.”

Guyénot traces the Jew’s problem to his racist, supremacist Yahweh, who promises that the Jew’s destiny is to rule over the entire world, “The book of Isaiah would be expanded during several centuries, without deviating from the initial plan, which was to make Zion the new center of the world: ‘It will happen in the final days that the mountain of Yahweh’s house will rise higher than the mountains and tower above the heights. Then all the nations will stream to it. […] For the Law will issue from Zion and the word of Yahweh from Jerusalem’ (2:2–3). Kings, Yahweh assures his people, ‘will fall prostrate before you, faces to the ground, and lick the dust at your feet’ (49:23), whereas ‘I shall make your oppressors eat their own flesh, they will be as drunk on their own blood as on new wine. And all humanity will know that I am Yahweh, your Saviour, your redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob’ (49:26). ‘For the nation and kingdom that will not serve you will perish, and the nations will be utterly destroyed’ (60:12).”

Buddha never preached anything so bloodcurdling. This ultimate us against them philosophy is rabidly racist and intolerant, for it judges all outsiders, goyim, as slaves, at best. In “Oddities of the Jewish Religion,” Jewish Ron Unz concludes, “A religion based upon the principal of ‘Love Thy Neighbor’ may or may not be workable in practice, but a religion based upon ‘Hate Thy Neighbor’ may be expected to have long-term cultural ripple effects that extend far beyond the direct community of the deeply pious. If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews and also developed an enormous infrastructure of cultural dishonesty to mask that attitude, it is difficult to believe that such an unfortunate history has had absolutely no consequences for our present-day world, or that of the relatively recent past.”

Since collective judgement is at the heart of Jewish thinking, one shouldn’t be surprised to find entire groups targeted under Communism, a Jewish inspired movement that’s still not discredited, despite its millions of victims.

In 2008, a friend took me to Caffe Trieste in North Beach to meet Jack Hirshman, the poet laureate of San Francisco. Shaggy, well wrinkled and cheery, Hirshman certainly looked like an old, celebrated poet, or just some homeless guy, if the setting was the Tenderloin. The first thing Jack did was show me a brochure from the Stalin Museum in Gori, Georgia. He then gushed about Simon Sebag Montefiore’s just released Young Stalin. “It’s great! You must get it!” This, to a Vietnamese refugee from Communism. In his one letter to me, 15 years earlier, Jack also spoke of Stalin.

Changing the topic, I asked Jack how he had managed to live all these years without a job, since UCLA fired him in 1966. Gleefully, Jack recounted a succession of women, and when he got to Agneta Falk, I interrupted, “So you dumped Sarah [Menefee]?”

“Yes, I did,” Jack grinned, “but thanks to Marxism and Leninism, we’re still comrades!”

When you encounter a man who speaks of universal love and solidarity, consider how he treats those closest to him, for if he can’t be considerate to those who love and trust him the most, then his profession of love for an abstract humanity is but a sham.

During the 2016 Democratic Convention in Philadelphia, I saw many young progressives marching down Broad Street with large red flags, within half a mile of Little Cambodia, a neighborhood of Communist victims.

Peaceful vigils in Leipzig, Germany helped to bring down the Berlin Wall, thus ending East Germany’s Communist nightmare, yet today, you’ll find taunting, pro Communist stickers around Leipzig, along with various progressive declarations, such as “NO HUMAN IS ILLEGAL.” Yes, that’s true, but an immigrant to, say, Vietnam, Nigeria or Israel can certainly be illegal, so why should Germany have open borders? On Hainstraße, I spotted a cute sticker that read, “STILL NOT LOVING GERMANY. NO NATION. NO BORDER. FIGHT LAW AND ORDER!”

Orwell, “an education in Marxism and similar creeds consists largely in destroying your moral sense,” and common sense, too, I should add.

ORDER IT NOW

In a Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald points out that “Since the 1960s a hostile, adversary elite has emerged to dominate intellectual and political debate. It is an elite that almost instinctively loathes the traditional institutions of European-American culture: its religion, its customs, its manners, and its sexual attitudes,” and the consequence of this is “a long-term decline in the hegemony of European peoples in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world.” White people will go down, in short, and this is great news not just to this hostile, Jewish-dominated elite, but to the many whites who have come to reject their heritage as shameful and hateful, but how do you get a population to despise itself so, to the point of cultural suicide?

It’s easy when you dominate the American academy and media, as Jews have done for decades, so on television, there’s a long list of white trash, from Archie Bunker to Honey Boo, but Jews are always sympathetic and sensitive, and the New York Times in 1999 could have 273 stories about the Holocaust and just 23 for all of Africa. In Hollywood films, priests are often depicted as perverts or worse. Kevin MacDonald, “Examples where Christianity is portrayed negatively abound. For example, in the film Monsignor (1982), a Catholic priest commits every imaginable sin, including the seduction of a glamorous nun and then is involved in her death. In Agnes of God (1985), a disturbed young nun gives birth in a convent, murders her baby, and then flushes the tiny, bloody corpse down the toilet. There are also many subtle anti-Christian scenes in Hollywood films, such as when the director Rob Reiner repeatedly focuses on the tiny gold crosses worn by Kathy Bates, the sadistic villain in Misery.”

Kevin MacDonald sums up, “The best strategy for a collectivist group like the Jews for destroying Europeans therefore is to convince the Europeans of their own moral bankruptcy. A major theme of [Culture of Critique] is that this is exactly what Jewish intellectual movements have done. They have presented Judaism as morally superior to European civilization and European civilization as morally bankrupt and the proper target of altruistic punishment. The consequence is that once Europeans are convinced of their own moral depravity, they will destroy their own people in a fit of altruistic punishment. The general dismantling of the culture of the West and eventually its demise as anything resembling an ethnic entity will occur as a result of a moral onslaught triggering a paroxysm of altruistic punishment. And thus the intense effort among Jewish intellectuals to continue the ideology of the moral superiority of Judaism and its role as undeserving historical victim while at the same time continuing the onslaught on the moral legitimacy of the West.”

For several summers, I taught at Bard College in upstate New York, in its MFA programs. We had an informal online forum where much was discussed, so when a Bard professor, Joel Kovel, was apparently fired for his book, Overcoming Zionism, I raised this issue, but no other professor responded, not one! This shouldn’t surprise, since the President of Bard College was Leon Botstein, an Israeli citizen. These Bard “intellectuals” didn’t dare to cross their bossman.

Dumped, Kovel released a statement that ended:

On the responsibility of intellectuals

Bard has effectively crafted for itself an image as a bastion of progressive thought. Its efforts were crowned with being anointed in 2005 by the Princeton Review as the second-most progressive college in the United States, the journal adding that Bard “puts the ‘liberal’ in ‘liberal arts.'” But “liberal” thought evidently has its limits; and my work against Zionism has encountered these.

A fundamental principle of mine is that the educator must criticize the injustices of the world, whether or not this involves him or her in conflict with the powers that be. The systematic failure of the academy to do so plays no small role in the perpetuation of injustice and state violence. In no sphere of political action does this principle apply more vigorously than with the question of Zionism; and in no country is this issue more strategically important than in the United States, given the fact that United States support is necessary for Israel’s behavior. The worse this behavior, the more strenuous must be the suppression of criticism. I take the view, then, that Israeli human rights abuses are deeply engrained in a culture of impunity granted chiefly, though not exclusively, in the United States—which culture arises from suppression of debate and open inquiry within those institutions, such as colleges, whose social role it is to enlighten the public. Therefore, if the world stands outraged at Israeli aggression in Gaza, it should also be outraged at institutions in the United States that grant Israel impunity. In my view, Bard College is one such institution. It has suppressed critical engagement with Israel and Zionism, and therefore has enabled abuses such as have occurred and are occurring in Gaza. This notion is of course, not just descriptive of a place like Bard. It is also the context within which the critic of such a place and the Zionist deology it enables becomes marginalized, and then removed.

With books such as White Racism: a Psychohistory; The Enemy of Nature: the End of Capitalism or the End of the World; History and Spirit: an Inquiry into the Philosophy of Liberation; The Radical Spirit; and Red Hunting in the Promised Land: Anticommunism and the Making of America, Kovel was a classic Jewish progressive thinker, and as a well-loved professor at a super progressive college, Kovel thought he had earned the rights to dissect and criticize Israel’s many human right abuses, but it was clearly a career destroying move, so what’s the lesson here?

It’s this: you can be against racism, apartheid, borders, border walls, fascism, nationalism, ethnocentrism, traditional religion, war and genocide all you want, but Israel must be treated differently, for what’s good for the rest of the world doesn’t apply to Jews. This double standard is not inadvertent, but a deliberate strategy deployed by a hostile elite to weaken, divide and demoralize the masses.

ORDER IT NOW

When my Vietnam-born wife first came to the US in 2001, she learned English and American culture partly by watching television, so daily, she saw white and black people screaming and clawing at each other on stage, with clothing sometimes torn off. Though she found these spectacles grotesque, she laughed along, because everybody else was laughing. It was normal to see Americans acting like animals. At the end of each show, the man who had orchestrated this entire howling depravity would give a brief lecture on how to behave, thus Jerry Springer joins Jesus, Marx, Freud, Trotsky, Boas, Alinsky, Ginsberg, Goodman and Chomsky as a Jewish teacher for goyim, for even white trash need Jewish guidance to get through this treacherous life.

Now why would a yellow guy like me care about the “Jewish problem,” since it affects mainly white and Muslim nations? I have no choice, actually, for I actually admire and value all cultures, German, Japanese, Italian, French, Czech, Turkish, Spanish, Hungarian, Ukrainian, Dutch, Mexican, American, Canadian, English, Scottish, any and all of them, including Jewish, as long as its genocidal Yahweh is neutralized.

In each culture, I see the intricate flowering of traditions going back millennia, so the willful erosion or destruction of any of them, I see as the gravest crime. When Jews lead the charge against other people’s heritage, as with Communism, open borders or multiculturalism, I can’t help but raise my voice. Though this has brought me no benefits, only woes, I have no regrets, for one must do what’s right.

The Nazis’ racism was but a mirror and fleeting offshoot of Jewish racial supremacy, which endures to manipulate, fleece and wreak havoc on humanity, with Jews themselves among its victims, so Jews, too, must be delivered from this sick mindset. No more chosen people.

Linh Dinh’s latest book is Postcards from the End of America. He maintains a regularly updated photo blog.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Anti-Semitism, Jews, Political Correctness, Zionism 
Hide 373 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. AaronB says:

    Dude its over. You’re in Vietnam now. Jews are few there.

    Calm down, relax, and focus on making a good life for your self.

    Its not an accident that this piece on Jew hated starts with describing your own failures in the plastic plant….

    Its s huge temptation, one that I’ve succumbed to, to blame others, foreigners, outsiders, etc, for our own failures and defeats – and there is always some truth there.

    But it’s just poison for our own minds. It’s always we that are the problem deep down. Yes, others may deal with us unjustly – but everyone deals with that.

    I am sorry your life in Vietnam isn’t turning out the way you’d like, but revisiting old hatreds from America for psychological comfort won’t help you.

    You know what you need…you need a religion Lin Dinh. The failures and injustices of life cannot be born with any kind of dignity unless one sees them in a cosmic context.

    Anyways, the next time you fail at some aspect of your new Vietnamese life will we be treated to another torrent if Jew hatred?

    Learn from the stoic dignity of your Vietnamese neighbors who accept setbacks with equanimity and laughter, and don’t need much out of life to be happy.

    Your posts are always so gloomy – you know, it is possible to be joyous in poverty. And since you’ve chosen poverty or had it imposed on you, why not enjoy life instead of being steeped in bitterness?

  2. Anon[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    There is nothing wrong with hating Jews for all the Sins against humanity they have committed over the last 3 to 4 thousand years. Asians in particular see Jews as a true human oddity like any other mutant. What I am sure and many others find curious is that the mutation has persisted for so many generations and not been eliminated from the gene pool by natural selection.

    But then again Satan has a different set of standards than humans. The Jewish Religion is not a Religion but a Cult of Capitalism and Greed, and Selfishness. Look at the Half Monkey that is the Israeli Prime Minister. Its so funny how he may go to prison like many of the previous Israeli Prime Ministers. Guess that’s what happens to a Society and Culture based on Capitalism Greed and Selfishness.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  3. Anon[367] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    “A religion based upon the principal of ‘Love Thy Neighbor’ may or may not be workable in practice,

    principle

  4. Anon[367] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Since collective judgement is at the heart of Jewish thinking, one shouldn’t be surprised to find entire groups targeted under Communism, a Jewish inspired movement that’s still not discredited, despite its millions of victims.

    Communism has been thoroughly rejected and discredited. But it’s not denounced as often as Nazism.

    He then gushed about Simon Sebag Montefiore’s just released Young Stalin. “It’s great! You must get it!” This, to a Vietnamese refugee from Communism. In his one letter to me, 15 years earlier, Jack also spoke of Stalin.

    Communism had its dark and evil side but also its uses as a weapon of resistance. It led to unification of Vietnam and independence of Cuba from American imperialism.

    In WWII, the totalist organizational methods of Stalinism allowed triumph over Nazi Germany.

    Communism also shielded Eastern Europe from vagaries of the capitalist West.

    And in the Cold War, communism offered some kind of counterbalance against US hegemonism.

  5. Republic says:

    LD

    sorry to learn about your problems with the trash recycling business in Vietnam
    But you have been doing a great job in another trash removal/exposing business
    Hope that you can continue to recycle that trash DNA back to its origins

  6. AaronB says:
    @Anon

    Look, I agree that for the defeated and broken, those with a lifetime of humiliations and failures behind them, it is perfectly natural and in a sense even appropriate to hate on Jews – who are symbolic of success.

    I’m not not disputing that. And yes, increasingly Asians fall into this category, especially those that grew up believing the myth that they are smarter than whites and then find they can’t quite compete with whites at the highest level, and become bitter.

    So I understand where you are coming from and consider your attitude to have a certain amount of moral justification, and to at least make natural sense.

    And I sympathize with you and wish you well, and wish your life hadn’t turned out that way.

    My point is simply that indulging in resentments are fine, but at some point all of us want to spiritually heal – and that after a certain point you are merely poisoning your self.

    Powerful Jews don’t care about the impotent rage of Dinh, and the elaborate masks and fronts he devises to channel his pain at how his life turned out. But the bile builds up in him – he can’t even forget his resentments after starting a new and happy life in Vietnam! They gnaw at him and eat at his entrails.

    All human beings suffer indignity, injustice, and humiliation – and we can let it consume us, or put it in a cosmic context.

    The choice is ours.

  7. Truth says:

    Uh..oh;

    Linhjo just activated the Nuclear Football. Who else here has the STONES to join him in martyrdom?

    Sailer?
    Derbyshire?
    Kersey?
    Reed?
    Frost?
    Fulford?
    Mercer?
    Durocher?
    Karlin?

    You’ve had fun with the Knee-grows, Beaners and “liberals”, now, are you going to step up to the big leagues?

    I’m looking forward to the answer!

    (BTW Linjho, I wouldn’t extend too much hope in camaraderie with any of your contemporaries, here, on this issue. I think you’re all alone with a blindfold and a cigarette.)

  8. AaronB:

    Why refer to Mr. Dinh as “dude”? Are you a personal friend of his? In any case, it makes you appear very stupid.

    Someone has to say this.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  9. @AaronB

    No one least of all Linh is hating on Jews.

    It’s not hate to point out true things.

    Why do you keep saying someone is hating on Jews?

    No one is doing that.

    Linh has just written an extremely clear article. I admire him greatly even more than I did before.

    It was not hate.

    It was thought.

    Stop with your sloganeering. No one is hating on Jews.

    • Agree: Twodees Partain
  10. PPB says:

    “When you encounter a man who speaks of universal love and solidarity, consider how he treats those closest to him, for if he can’t be considerate to those who love and trust him the most, then his profession of love for an abstract humanity is but a sham.”

    This has been my experience too. The few people I’ve known who were possessed by an agenda to “save the world” not only had a competely inflated assessment of their own ability to do anything of the sort, but were uniformly nasty and inconsiderate towards those nearest them, especially if and when those others failed to signal their true belief in the agenda and underlying ideology in question. It also became clearer to me over time that this nastiness was in all these cases the expression of a pervasive resentment that had its origins in nothing whatsoever to do with the world of politics, but for which political activity (whether hands-on or purely mental/imaginary) provided a convenient but ultimately false means of resolution, as did projecting the resentment itself onto whatever nearby target could serve as a momentary lightning rod.

    It’s not that these people were without genuine concern for the well-being of those whom they sought to help, but this natural compassion was so interfused with the distorting influence of the accompanying resentment that the disharmony was difficult to bear over time. Equally trying and not unrelated was the more general fact that their do-gooder impluse was to a significant degree egoic (i.e. based on self-will and the need for self-justification rather than on acting in harmony with the greater stream of life or from an innate calling).

    As for the Jewish thing, I’ve only met one Jew in my life (among many, many more whom I’ve gotten to know and befriend) who as an individual embodied the set of traits that Linh Dinh mentioned, and did so transparently and overtly. What this suggests to me is that any cultural ideology, specifically including the distortions, contradictions and errors present within it, has a varying ability to mold the psyche of those individuals subject to its influence, and to maintain its grip even in the face of sincere questioning or significant levels of cognitive dissonance. Some individuals simply appear more resistant to this type of indoctrination and conditioning than do others. I also suspect that much has already been researched and written about how this dynamic plays itself out at a colletive level among different cultures, or how some cultural ideologies have stronger defense mechanisms against anyone “breaking out of the prison”. If so or if not, I’d be interested to know more.

  11. anon[867] • Disclaimer says:

    Did you understand the incidents at Bard college ? This is not about hard work or intelligence or success . That was about ” in your face I can do, What can you do about it? Nothing ”
    That is what the street gang does.

  12. Franz says:

    In each culture, I see the intricate flowering of traditions going back millennia, so the willful erosion or destruction of any of them, I see as the gravest crime.

    You’re right.

    When people say “politically correct” or even “liberal” anymore they’re just being weasels. They’re afraid to name the real issue.

    Zionism is the steamroller flattening the world into an unrecognizable goop that will pave the slick road to Globalism. They’re only starting with the USA and EU, which are both unrecognizable since the end of WWII. In the end it will be as the Protocols said, as noted by the only true prophet the United States produced in the 20th century, Henry Ford.

    • Replies: @Wade
  13. @AaronB

    Aaron, looks like you’ve shed your faux ever so philosophical side since it was apparently getting you no where here on the UR

    Good riddance I say. Now you can be your true self shilling for da joos and their ever present holohoax memories shoved down our throats through hollyweird and statues and museums and what not.

  14. @Truth

    Well of late no one big name with Balls have had the courage to do this. Ironically mostly women have been able to do that (Ann coulter?? Those effin Joos??) and one of them was that Black somali from Minnesota..
    Funny How sometimes immigration turns out against the very people who are shilling for it the most!!

  15. @Truth

    By the way, Reed has already crossed the Rubicon and there’s no going back after that. Sailer flirts with the idea every now and then. However, Durocher has gone whole hog and I do not think he’s a coward like Derb. Karlin, being a Russian citizen, is no big fan of the whole Juuish saga so he maintains a curious distance but every now and then he does call them out on their hypocrisy, which is good IMHO.

    So out of that list, the cowardice award goes to the venerable Derb, that old horse who has on occasion admitted he is too afraid to take them on lest his ONLY source of income suffocates.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Hamlet's Ghost
  16. Rational says:
    @AaronB

    LINH DINH IS A GREAT WRITER. SIR, DON’T LET HASBARA TROLLS GET YOU DOWN.

    Mr. Dinh: The first commentator AaronB appears to be a Judaist himself, a hasbara troll, that are hired by NothingYahoo to brainwash the public:

    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20190523-israel-launches-massive-recruitment-drive-for-social-media-warriors/

    Mr. Linh Dinh is doing a honest business and making a honest living, with plastic work, unlike many Judaists who steal and loot the goyim. Israel is a thief beggar state living on stolen money and beggary, begging Germany and others for “holocaust reparations” using the fake holohoax scam.

    See the book: The Holocaust Industry.

    About Judaism being evil, Mr. Dinh is right. Judaism is a gutter religion and a criminal cult. Facts are facts. The Judaists are despised now by whites, blacks, Christians, Muslims, Indians, Chinese and other orientals, too, all over the world, and they do not understand why!!!! How retarded.

    • Replies: @Bliss
  17. One of Linh’s early influences was Celine who reacted to what he perceived to be Jewish influences in the League of Nations where he worked in his 20s. While Celine and the Nativist camps of Parisian writing didn’t fraternize long with the anti-Nativist camps there, there was in London the phenomenon of the Christian Tom Eliot hanging with the anti-Nativist Wyndham Lewis, whose Blast Magazine promised the “end of the Christian era.” Pound was not consistently Nativist but tended that way, staying friends with Lewis who nonetheless bashed Joyce, Hemingway, etc. That the anti-Nativist was a native and the Nativists immigrants is no coincidence. Lewis referenced anti-immigrant tension in Britain but the wave of migration was nothing like it is today.

    Lewis: “Pious attachment to the soil.. scarcely exists in America.. it is an attachment to the absence of those things.. the refreshing anonymity of a great city.. compared with the oppressive opposite.. in the village.”

    Lewis: “It is the Christian nations that have taught the Jews the bad habits, not the other way around.”

    I don’t see any substantiation to the conclusion here blaming Hitler on the Jews, nor do I await any. Kovel’s book cited above mentions George Eliot’s endorsement of Christian Zionism that has been traced to British Protestantism in the 1840s (Anita Schapira). Fox News still propagandizes for Christian Zionist wars. Also, neither Kovel or Norman Finkelstein (sometimes in Unz) assume that Zionist propaganda utilizing the Holocaust proves that the whole thing didn’t happen, which would roughly describe my own view.

  18. SND says:

    I went to college with Leon Botstein. He lived a couple doors down from me in the dorm. We became buddies. One day he came up to me & said, “[SND], do you want to see a real revolutionary? Come with me.” He took me into his room & showed me a shrine he had constructed there…to Joseph Stalin. Despite his so-called “doctor’s plot antisemitism” many diaspora Jews were still tight with Uncle Joe. Leon is the ultimate verbal IQ Jew. He could talk circles around you with tremendous authority. This lead to his very successful career – as a fundraiser. That’s the basic job of a college president & Leon knew it & did it. That’s why Kovel had to go. Not because Leon is “an Israeli” (though who knows about possible “dual citizenship”}. He was born in Switzerland & his family moved to New York where he attended the now-being-attacked High School of Music & Art. Jewish power extends from a wallet. Offend the donors & you’ll be gone.

    By the way, fine article Linh!

    • Replies: @Ian Keenan
  19. @SND

    SND, Botstein has self-identified as Zionist to Kovel and various others.

  20. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @AaronB

    …for the defeated and broken, those with a lifetime of humiliations and failures behind them, it is perfectly natural and in a sense even appropriate to hate on Jews – who are symbolic of success.

    How (((stereotypical)))—more Jew ad hominem innuendo—as if no decent, successful, and intelligent person could find the tiniest cause to criticize Jewish belief or behavior! How sadly reminiscent of the (((Soviet))) weaponization of psychiatry against political and religious opponents. How remarkable that a tribe so self-obsessed can also be so bereft of self-awareness! How so beyond the ken of “geniuses” [snickering] to reflect on cause (Judaism’s Master Race creed and resultant Jewish behavior) and effect (“antisemitism”)!

    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
  21. One Tribe says:
    @AaronB

    It must be said, you are pathetic shill, validating some of what is written courageously, and for the most, without even malice.
    This is not an article about the author hating something, it is an article condemning hatred, especially collective, and duplicitous hatred that is apparent to the unchained mind.

  22. One Tribe says:

    Lihn, I loved the article, especially the bravery.

    But the exposition is superb, a complete story, yet succinct, and smooth to flow through, truly exceptional.

    You are NOT alone!

    …change is coming…

    • Replies: @renfro
  23. Biff says:
    @AaronB

    Here’s the rub little boy. Never once have I seen Linh express the attitude he is owed anything above what he has honestly earned, which clearly separates him from the chosen class.

    And then….

    You know what you need…you need a religion Lin Dinh. The failures and injustices of life cannot be born with any kind of dignity unless one sees them in a cosmic context.

    Your offer pie in the sky..

  24. @AaronB

    It really speaks to the fundamental evil of jewish identity when the first comment to a sincere and fair criticism of Jews is a psychopathologising piece of pseudoscientific garbage. I have noticed this a lot and I do not think it is a coincidence.

    I think the commenter is a really bad person.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  25. Lo says:

    I don’t understand the obsession with the Holocaust. Look it was almost 80 years ago. Regardless of details, it justifies neither Israel’s treatment of Palestinians nor supporting Israel at the expense of the interests of the US. If anything you are strengthening the hands of Zionists when you make claims such as the Holocaust didn’t happen or similar. This whole obsession with the Holocaust is only helping the Zionist cause by giving them ammo. It shouldn’t be difficult to say “yes, Holocaust happened, it was an issue between Germans and Jews” done. No need to debate numbers, no need to debate gas, no need to debate crematoriums. How does it help with any issues writers on this site keep writing about? Jews themselves don’t care about the Holocaust, if they did, they would have respect for the memory of those people and don’t turn it into a spectacle (people like Norman Finkelstein are exceptions, I have great respect for the man).

    Honestly, this Jewish thing on this site recently started to be a real turnoff. From ancient history to 9/11 everything doesn’t need to be tied to Jews. By and large, the decline of European and American cultures is a result of the path they chose. The prominence of Jews also has to do with this. Jews didn’t turn America into a consumerist country, Jews didn’t invent capitalism, Jews didn’t invent mass media, Jews didn’t invent Protestantism, Jews didn’t create the philosophy, they didn’t impose Versailles on Germany and cause WWII… All these are results of West’s own development and all contributed to where West now is. Yes, Jews do have outsized influence, but it is because the majority culture allows it to happen by worshipping money.

    Other than that, yes, what did you expect from academics? They are trained to obey authority since the beginning of their lives. Those who are most obedient students end up becoming academics, particularly in soft sciences, not the smartest not the most free-minded ones. But as man is free by nature, many of them end up becoming subconsciously resentful and self-hating. Which in turn causes them to lash out against the majority in the form of far-Left politics. However, when things get too dangerous, you shouldn’t expect to find them by your side.

    Personally, I would not feel resentful towards such people. Resentment is reserved for our equals or superiors. If you did the intellectually honest thing, and if they didn’t, then they showed that they are fakes. So why even bother talking about them?

  26. Judaism is an evil racist supremacist ideology, and fighting against this evil is

    necessary to save humanity.

    • Agree: Al Liguori
  27. Kevin MacDonald is more or less a charlatan who, by exclusively focusing on Jews, is unable to explain a great deal of self-destructive white racial behavior. For example, in his magnum opus The Culture of Critique, he confines his analysis to the twentieth century without considering what went before, so naturally a distorted picture results. He neglects to even note in passing that in the nineteenth century, an America nearly 100% white and Christian, in the grip of a religious mania, tore itself in two in order to free their negro slaves and grant them full citizenship and the vote. All the rest of the racial disaster that has unfolded since then has only been a matter of living up to commitments written in the ocean of white blood shed in that conflict. It would seem that almost the only way to explain this behavior in the absence of a “hostile elite”(tm) is to say that Christianity itself from the beginning has been a Jewish plot to undermine the white race; and indeed, some (Nietzsche, Revilo Oliver, and others) have taken this tack. For MacDonald, this isn’t a satisfactory alternative though, since that would entail giving credit to Jews for white civilizational accomplishments (or at least, what MacDonald considers accomplishments) during the period of Christendom’s expansion. It would amount to admitting that there’s been a symbiosis between whites and Jews that has been at times beneficial to whites.

    Because he tries to view everything through this distorting lens of cultural conflict between Jews and whites, and to scrupulously avoid indicting Christianity, he has to come up with absurdities like “pathological altruism”, and white “guilt”, which supposedly the Jews are able to manipulate and direct outside of white control. He sees these psychological mechanisms as rooted in genetic difference between the races, yet is unable to explain why pre-Christian or non-Christian societies never suffered from such problems. Ancient Rome even had plenty of powerful Jews and didn’t; nor, at least until after the Christian takeover, did it have a “hostile elite”.

    • Agree: utu, Rational
  28. @Anon

    Communism had its dark and evil side but also its uses as a weapon of resistance. It led to unification of Vietnam and independence of Cuba from American imperialism.

    Correlation does not equal causation.

    In WWII, the totalist organizational methods of Stalinism allowed triumph over Nazi Germany.

    So “totalist organizational methods” are unique to the communist? Further could not Russia have defeated Germany except under a whip?

    Communism also shielded Eastern Europe from vagaries of the capitalist West.

    I suppose, kinda in the same way the incarcerated are generally shielded from tax hikes.

    And in the Cold War, communism offered some kind of counterbalance against US hegemonism.

    The depravity and bloodlust of the Bolshevik revolution, and all that followed, only served to strengthen American hegemony by offering such a repellent alternative.

    The most contemptible human is the full-throated communist sympathizer. Especially now, when there really is no excuse.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Sam J.
  29. OldGringo says:

    Spot on.
    Thanks for having the courage to speak out.

  30. @AaronB

    The sting of of Dihn’s article shines through the white hot anger of your responses. The only thing that can sting quite like that is the truth. You might want to reflect on that.

    • Replies: @homahr
  31. swamped says:

    ‘White people will go down, in short, and this is great news not just to this hostile, Jewish-dominated elite, but to the many whites who have come to reject their heritage as shameful and hateful, but how do you get a population to despise itself so, to the point of cultural suicide?’

    “Human history would be too fatuous for anything were it not for the cleverness imported into it by the weak—take at once the most important instance. All the world’s efforts against the ‘aristocrats’, the ‘mighty’, the ‘masters’, the ‘holders of power’, are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews—the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realized that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, ‘the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good…’”
    “This Jesus of Nazareth, the incarnate gospel of love, this ‘Redeemer” bringing salvation and victory to the poor, the sick, the sinful—was he not really temptation in its most sinister and irresistible form, temptation to take the tortuous path to those very Jewish values and those very Jewish ideals? Has not Israel really obtained the final goal of its sublime revenge, by the tortuous paths of this ‘Redeemer’, for all that he might pose as Israel’s adversary and Israel’s destroyer? Is it not due to the black magic of a really great policy of revenge, of a far-seeing, burrowing revenge, both acting and calculating with slowness, that Israel himself must repudiate before all the world the actual instrument of his own revenge and nail it to the cross, so that all the world—that is, all the enemies of Israel—could nibble without suspicion at this very bait? Could, moreover, any human mind with all its elaborate ingenuity invent a bait that was more truly dangerous?” Nietzsche

    • Agree: Saggy
  32. Really great essay Linh I enjoyed it and found the analysis of the way things are to be spot on and beautifully expresed. I feel for you having also in my way had a bit of backlash from the usual suspects for my own stance over the years but have had less to lose in as much as my career never was in others’ hands much. But they tried their best and still I know how many doors remain shut to me in some circles which is all the difference. Politically but also business opportunities curtailed. Still as you say a man should labour onward wen the truth is with him and the cause is right. You have done so with the courage of a lion brother and I salute you.

  33. @AaronB

    In other words, submit or die. Aaron, one cannot help but admire Judaism as the most cruel manifestation upon the earth. Or is Satanism the right word? You are very proud of yourself. Little do you suspect that that will be your own undoing. Evil is successful but ultimately destroys itself, and it never knows why. Keep up the good work.

    • Replies: @kikz
  34. “Seeing people falling is funny.”

    No, it isn’t. I see those “Funniest Videos” shows, and I cringe and feel sympathetic pains when I see some poor guy or gal land on his balls or her ass.

    As for your fall, anything on your list of offences would be enough to get you deplatformed, depersoned, and frog-marched to a SJW guillotine; going after the jewish lobby was just icing on the cake.

  35. Great article. What a writer!

    How different the world would be if we could read such views expressed in our own mainstream media … but to long for this is to long for some kind of tautological impossibility (if that’s the right expression), because a world in which this could happen would be a world in which such ideas would not need to be expressed.

    @ Aaron B

    Is your post an expression of wilful blindness, the helplessly brainwashed, a hate-projecting hater, carelessly contempt of the gentile? Hard to tell.
    Recognise the writer as a friend, clear-sighted but humble, offering a blessing.
    Know thyself.

  36. @AaronB

    Ha ha ha, an ad hominem. How Jewish.

    Don’t notice our power, don’t notice how we tend to undermine other cultures and use our tribalism and xenophobia to dominate. If you do notice those things, you are just a failure who isn’t pay enough attention to your own life.

    This sort of thing gets a bit old when Jews have a propensity to whine about every other ethnic group on earth. Chinese Americans holding dual citizenship? Terrible, horrible… they are all spies. Wait, did you just say that Israeli dual-citizens should be held to the same standard?? You bigot and anti-semite!!!

  37. @Anon

    “And in the Cold War, communism offered some kind of counterbalance against US hegemonism.”

    Listen dupe, the same tribe controlled both sides in the cold war. There is no ‘US’ hegemony. Countries are not agents. They do not act.

    People act. People in networks make decisions that affect countries, whether it is to set interest rates or to launch wars.

    In the case of communism, western bankers and industrialists were financing the Soviets the entire time. They armed them during the Bolshevik revolution, financed Soviet industry, armed them during WW2, and then throughout the cold war. Anthony Sutton’s works cover this, although he refuses to show how many of those bankers and industrialists were either Jewish or Freemasons.

    The same bankers like Bernard Baruch who had Churchill and FDR as puppets were also propping up the other side. Now check out who owns the majority stake in the US weapons industry, the US banking industry, the US media and hollywood.

    Sure, there were ideological factors at play, other networks of individuals with their own concerns, but the dominant power in both the USA and the Soviet Union involved the same bankers that were recently outed by scientists studying networks of share ownership. (Google ‘the secret capitalist network that runs the world’ to find the article).

    As soon as communism fell, who absconded with the wealth of the Soviet states? Hint: 8 of the 10 major oligarchs were Jewish. Odd, given that they were < 1% of the population and allegedly not involved in the power structure.

  38. @AaronB

    What a condescending and insulting tidbit of amateur psychiatry.

    This latest article by Linh Dinh was fascinating and insightful. Why not confront Dinh’s paradigm forthrightly?

    Instead, you assume a (falsely neutral) tone in an attempt to avoid the primary subject which is Israeli malfeasance, Jewish corruption and Zionist hegemony.

    Instead you offer up this:

    “Dude its over. You’re in Vietnam now. Jews are few there.

    Calm down, relax, and focus on making a good life for your self.

    It’s not an accident that this piece on Jew hated starts with describing your own failures in the plastic plant….”

    This assessment of yours is both devious and dishonest.

    Your strategy is to degrade Dinh’s thesis by degrading him, insinuating that his criticism of Zionist criminality is a result of his “personal failures”.

    This is a classically Jewish tactic. And a very low one.

    Kevin MacDonald, Andrew Joyce, Alison Weir, Philip Giraldi and many others have boldly and brilliantly dissected the phenomena of Jewish-orchestrated harm, from Palestine to Washington and beyond. It’s real. It’s ugly. And it’s no illusion.

    So why not deal with it honestly?

    Instead, you attempt to denigrate Linh Dinh for making observations about appalling and unaccountable Jewish power.

    Did you even read Dinh’s article?

    If so, why don’t you confront his basic paradigm?

    To what extent does the international Zionist lobby influence the war policies of Washington?

    Has the rule of law and the quest for equal justice under law been compromised by this lobby?

    Has Hollywood and mass media lowered the moral tone of the West?

    These are important subjects. Why don’t you confront them?

    The machinations of global Jewry are vast, complex and dark. But they are real.

    And extremely lethal.

    In fact, just discussing them can be dangerous. Have you not noticed?

    Reputations can be ruined. Careers destroyed.

    The Zionist mafia is ruthless. Do you deny this?

    Then what have you to say?

    What are your thoughts about the insidious role played by Jewish NGOs, activists, and intellectuals in furthering the racial transformation of Europe and America?

    Israel obviously rejects this model. Why the difference?

    Your words seem designed to deceive. Instead of confronting Dinh’s observations and analysis, you sanctimoniously pretend to counsel him to “get a better job” so he doesn’t “blame [Jews] for his failures”.

    Who are you trying to fool?

    Linh Dinh is not blaming you or any Jew for his personal problems, whatever they may be. So quit changing the subject.

    Dinh is correctly blaming Organized Jewry for widespread political damage, cultural toxicity, and outright war.

    Why do you avoid that fact that real Jews, powerful Jews with real biographies and real influence have sponsored and orchestrated serial warfare that has killed or ruined the lives of millions? And these globe-trotting criminals are still at it.

    You can find them on television, signing books, and riding in limos.

    Is this not disturbing to you?

    It should be.

    • Agree: Republic
  39. alexander says:

    Dear Linh,

    Here is my thinking.

    Every single individual who conspired to defraud the United States into illegal war of aggression should be held to account to the fullest extent of the law.

    Each individual found guilty should be sent to federal prison for the duration of their lives.

    Moreover, every penny of their assets should be forfeit to pay down the cost of the wars their lies created.

    The burden of our 22 trillion dollar “war debt” should fall directly on “their” shoulders, not the defrauded US taxpayer.

    This is it… This is simple American Justice.

    It is clean, forthright, honest and fair.

    Let it be done….and then see where we are.

    Until this happens, the United States is just treading water…mired in the status quo of perpetual illegal war , impending insolvency…. and exploding debt.

    When it became clear that Bernie Madoff had defrauded his investors out of 100’s of billions of dollars, who among them gives a shit if he is “Zionist” or a “Tibetan Buddhist”?

    It is the “defrauding” which is the crime, not the adherence to a belief.

    Confusing the two only muddies the waters , obfuscates the crime, and dilutes the remedy.

    Let the defrauders be held to account for the cost of their deceptions.

    Until that happens, nothing will change ….They will just keep lying .. Innocent people will just keep dying……and the US will continue to its tragic downward spiral into total insolvency.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  40. vinteuil says:

    It’s interesting to see LD getting Strange New Respect around here, but not-at-all strange new disrespect everywhere else, as he refocuses his critical gaze away from white trash and toward the chosen people.

    I mean, what did he think was going to happen?

  41. I know many Jewish people. Let me tell you they run the gamut. From hyper Jew to drug addicted, these people have lots of problems. Jews know it. They go to tremendous lengths to hide their moral and just general human failures.

    Or they rationalize and make excuses.

    The ability to lie to oneself, and believe it, must be a God given ability so we can tolerate the disaster of our life on this planet. There may be no bigger disaster than the Jews, who stubbornly refuse to admit they are just like the rest of us.

    I don’t believe Jews need to prostrate themselves before us. Just quit acting so fucking special. I know enough of you to know you’re just as fucked up as the people you imagine are beneath you.

    I know Jewish guys who have sex with ugly and distressed women. I’ve met a Jew who loved sleeping with black women. Alot of these Jews are white trash with higher IQ. But still not smart enough to know that when something stinks there is no hiding it.

    Have you ever seen a woman married to a Hasidic Jew? They look fucking miserable. Of all the men in this world she chose him? Or maybe it was arranged. I have no idea but whoa! Talk about marrying a fucking loser.

    Remember that Jew who was banging Anna Nicole Smith right before she died? He was relishing those Goy leftovers!

    Fucking fools!!

  42. vinteuil says:
    @Truth

    Who else here has the STONES to join him in martyrdom?

    Sailer?
    Derbyshire?
    Kersey?
    Reed?
    Frost?
    Fulford?
    Mercer?
    Durocher?
    Karlin?

    You’ve had fun with the Knee-grows, Beaners and “liberals”, now, are you going to step up to the big leagues?

    Do you have some reason to think that any of the guys you list have held back on what they really think about the “Jewish Question?”

    Why would they? What more do they have to lose, at this point?

    Has it ever occurred to you that they’ve noticed that guys like, e.g., lot, & jack d, & syonredux, &c, contribute a lot to the cause, around here, while guys like you contribute nothing but snark?

    • Replies: @eah
    , @Truth
  43. @AaronB

    AARON

    I only knew two Jews in my entire time overseas. One was married to a Bollywood actress and we hung around in India together because we were the only two Americans. He earned a pittance playing around bars in Mumbai and she was relatively successful. They got by, but that was all.

    The other Jew was named David and was married to a Filipino woman. He ran a shell jewelry factory. He was not rich either.

    Southeast Asian economies are owned by Chinese. And Indians have managed to get a piece of the pie themselves in countries like Malaysia and Singapore. Jews have zero influence in places like Vietnam. Zero.

    As a Third Culture kid yourself, I assume your own parents went through an experience that Mr. Linh has of leaving a disintegrating East Coast industrial graveyard in the hopes of a better standard of living and clean slate in another country. And then returned. So presumably your own family played hopscotch from an East Coast city to a new country.

    • Replies: @Anon
  44. @Lo

    they didn’t impose Versailles on Germany and cause WWII…
    ————————————————————————
    Yeah they did. And there was no holocaust.

  45. Regarding seeing the Communist slogans come back, in what had been the old East Germany –

    Eastern Europe, because of the propaganda competition with Western Europe, was the more advanced, more people-coddling version of Communist regimes, not so bad in many ways

    Talking to older people from Eastern Europe who can remember living under Communism, you often hear them say, that those were better times in some ways, and indeed many older folks wouldn’t mind having the Communists back

    It’s a bit starry-eyed in favourising a past with rose-coloured memories, but the nostalgia is grounded in a distaste for ‘shock therapy’ capitalism, and the uncertainty and anxiety that modern life has created

    In European Communist regimes you needed not to cross the political red lines, but it was a simple life with often no feelings of need or fear other than the political one, peppered by the desire for the ‘more stuff’ the West supposedly had for everyone

    May the ancient spirits of Vietnam guide Linh Dinh to happier days ahead

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
  46. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Mr. Dinh:

    Sorry that you had to find out the hard way the 11th Commandment: “Thou Shalt not Question the Holy Holocaust”

    It’s a lesson beat into many an American mind, with very punitive measures against those who dare ask historical questions about WWII.

    Be careful to not travel to Europe, where around 20 nations have laws forbidding any questioning of the holocaust, even a simple and logical one, like “If the number of dead Jews at Auschwitz dropped from 4 million to a little over 1 million–and that includes Gentiles–why do we keep hearing the magical number of 6 million?” For if you go to Europe, it’s a good possibility you’ll get arrested, tried and tossed in prison, for merely asking questions.

    I’ve always enjoyed reading your writings and hope that this setback doesn’t impede your talent.

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  47. Greg Bacon says: • Website
    @AaronB

    All human beings suffer indignity, injustice, and humiliation – and we can let it consume us, or put it in a cosmic context.

    Try telling that to most Jews, who are like junkies for misery, constantly wailing about an imaginary holocaust and demanding that the Gentile world genuflect and prostrate themselves every time they hear that black magick word.

    • Replies: @gabriel
  48. @AaronB

    The debate on ‘the who of the matter’ instead of on ‘the what of the matter’. The exposing of errors is always a good deed, said Lao Tzu approximately. There are many religions, few are fascistic, and the Jewish one is that. Can’t be exceptional without being a fascist.

  49. eah says:

    Jewish power

    • Replies: @eah
  50. eah says:
    @eah

    • Replies: @Anon
  51. eah says:
    @vinteuil

    the cause

    What exactly is “the cause, around here”? — just for my information.

    • Replies: @vinteuil
    , @Truth
  52. @Lo

    LO

    My impression of Southeast Asia is that the economic controls were in the hands of Chinese and not Jews.

    If Mr. Linh were to write that Chinese businessmen were putting him out of business, I’d believe it.

    But Jews? In Southeast Asia?

    • Replies: @Robjil
  53. iffen says:

    Thanks for explaining things, L. D.

  54. @alexander

    ALEXANDER

    I was a 29 year old American living in Dubai when the Iraq War was announced and it was not Leftist Jews that supported that war or loved Bush, but rather his GOP constituency of the sort that watch WALKER TEXAS RANGER.

    Americans who supported Bush did so knowing he was an alcoholic bum, who had a terrible track record as Governor of Texas, whose career was backed by oil companies like Haliburton who had a vested interest in Iraq oil (A business few Jews are in) and could be made to care about some backwater country run by a despot whom the Bush dynasty seemingly had a hard-on for since the days when the CIA propped Saddam Hussein up.

    Most Jews voted for Al Gore. It was the white GOP who listen to Pat Buchanan for breakfast who could not get over the fact that Clinton was a hippie whore monger and voted for Bush.

    The world has gone downhill since I was 26. Why? Because Bush was elected in the year 2000 and, as you rightfully have said, we had a trillion-dollar war debt.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Greg Bacon
    , @anon
  55. Annon56 says:

    America is Jewish power’s war horse, galloping towards the glue factory.

    Linh Dinh is the most incisive and authentic voice I’ve heard in a long time.

  56. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:

    I’ve become a pariah because I’ve repeatedly attacked Jewish power. That’s the one unforgivable cardinal sin in that Jew-dominated nation

    I was “Born in the USA” and grew up as a proud American, but I left the US with my wife and family in the mid 1980’s. Already American culture had become so superficial and material I decided to head back to my ancestors homelands in the heart of Europe. Unlike Lihn, I ended up renouncing my US “citizenship” to put an end to the tax form slavery of the IRS. This act alone lead to not only me becoming ostracised by my parents, siblings and friends, it also lead to my US tax slave children becoming ostracised there as well.

    So I would say that criticizing JP is just one way among many to become a pariah to the Yankees. Another way is to criticize American behaviour in their Holy Wars, like “the Revolution”, the “Civil War”, the “War to End all Wars”, or the “War against Fascism”. Better yet, just try dropping your US passport and see how the people at the US embassy react. Americans just don’t like hearing that they are not exceptional, but rather sub-par.

    The few times I have returned to the US to visit family since I renounced, I have been called into secondary screening and had to face hours of waiting, threats and bulling by CBP and DHS. My wife has now made what is likely her last visit because of this:

    Nearly All U.S. Visa Applicants Now Required To Submit 5-Year Social Media History

    Her ESTA visa has run out, and in order to get a new one she would have to submit all her email addresses and social media accounts. I can just imagine how many body cavities will be searched if she claims that she has no social media accounts. Her mother is 92 and would love another visit from my wife, but she me will be dead before that happens.

    So we basically live in Exile. It doesn’t really bother me because my extended American family are all typical specimens of Boobus Americanus.

    Here is a great Anker painting of an old man in exile listening to his granddaughter playing music from the homeland.

    Die Verbannten

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  57. If we take what @Linh writes as gospel then a new line of thought emerges:

    Suppose we get our way and these troublesome pests are finally and fully liquidated. Or let’s just say, they are ‘dealt with’.

    All of the reproductively-fit are sterilized. Those that have grossly and unjustly profited from their power and nepotism are simply executed. The heads of those industries once tainted by their corruption, greed, and lies, are purged from this world. The middle and lower classes are given a pass and placed into forced labor camps until their bodily utility expires and is they are then ground into fertilizer and spread onto our verdant farmlands. The children? Perhaps they will be re-absorbed and re-educated. Or failing that, gifted to a voracious Vatican clergy.

    First, their assets are seized. Great! How will we re-distribute them? To whom? On what basis? Who gets to decide where these shiny shekels go?

    The wars of conquest and attrition we’ve been forced into are ended. Do we just leave these countries or do we stay behind? It’s too late to reverse the bombings, the massacres, the evil sentiments we’ve unfortunately engendered. Would it be just for us to pay reparations? Are they still valuable strategic assets despite the wiles of those that placed us there?

    The corporations will be hollowed out of skilled managers. How do we staff these roles quickly to avoid the inevitable disruptions to our precious GDP? Who gets these jobs? Why? Who picks?

    The need emerges for a fair and honest news media, untainted by corporate interests, permissive of multiple, dissenting viewpoints. Who gets to run this media? Would it take the same format it does today (in an age of rapidly disintegrating profitability) or emerge as something else?

    Finally, our body politic. Assuming that 85% of those running our country are directly tainted, they’re then, finally, turned into human smoke. The courts are hollowed out. The chambers of so-called lawmakers are emptied. How do we replenish our governing bodies in a way that will never be corrupted again? Are we so naive to think that only one group of humans has the power and capacity to enforce a rule by the secret, select few? What about the Jesuits? Or the Masons? Or the Korean deli owners? How do we prevent this from ever happening again? And who decides that?

    • Replies: @anonandanon
    , @Al Liguori
  58. Linh,

    Maybe you’re just not cut out for business, and many who are still fail at it.

    I wonder why you don’t take up a teaching post at a university in the East. In Vietnam the pay may not be attractive but there are other more remunerative opportunities in academia out there, and your views on the JQ would not be looked upon unfavourably in many of those countries (e.g. Malaysia). I hope I am not being presumptuous by asking.

  59. @Cowboy

    You don’t have to pay taxes overseas as a US citizen unless you earn over $110,000 a year.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  60. Robjil says:
    @jeff stryker

    He is talking about the western world. He looking out on a window onto the west. It is a very sad spectacle to watch. Linh is correct on all points.

  61. I still read informationclearinghouse from time to time, (old habit from my youth as a leftist), and I noticed Linh Dinh is no longer featured there.
    Did they purge him?
    Wouldn’t surprise me. Leftists are very thin skinned.
    I’m happy to find Linh Dinh here.

    • Replies: @Republic
  62. Agent76 says:

    November 27th, 2015 US Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII

    The American public probably is not aware of these numbers and knows even less about the proxy wars for which the United States is also responsible. In the latter wars there were between nine and 14 million deaths in Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, East Timor, Guatemala, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sudan.

    https://popularresistance.org/us-has-killed-more-than-20-million-in-37-nations-since-wwii/

    Sep 5, 2016 9/11 Suspects: Rudy Giuliani

    Mayor Giuliani oversaw the illegal destruction of the 9/11 crime scene and is criminally liable for the deaths of hundreds of emergency workers for not passing on prior warnings about the collapses of the Twin Towers.

  63. Anon[157] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Are you trying to say that there is something wrong with hating Judaism and its followers: a religion whose primary and openly stated thesis is to destroy all other nations toward world rule?

    See Zohar Shemot 32a for a good summary, but this doctrine and its genocidal edicts are repeatedly found throughout the entire Torah.

    Stating that there is something wrong with hating that would make no moral or logical sense, now would it?

    It follows that you do not make sense.

    It follows that hating Judaism and its willing followers is siding with humanity.

    Just not humanity according to the Jewish supremacist definition that holds that only Jews are “man” and everyone else is equivalent to some variety of animal.

    A moral person would abandon such an openly genocidal, supremacist and imperilaistic religion. We will not expect you to abandon Judaism.

  64. Anon[157] • Disclaimer says:
    @jeff stryker

    I was a 29 year old American living in Dubai when the Iraq War was announced and it was not Leftist Jews that supported that war

    With all due respect, you don’t know what you are talking about.

    I live in one of the largest Jewish hives in the world outside of Israel. I went to school with them and know them intimately. Left Wing Jews were among the most enthusiastic supporters of the Iraq War. They are just as ethnonationlist as Right Wing Jews, on the whole. Their “Left Wing” politics are a misnomer. They are Left Wing propagandists for the goyim. Their core values are ethnically Right Wing, on the whole. They were well aware of the deeper tactical implication of the US entry into the region of Israel and you can be sure that they supported it.

  65. @Lo

    Because they are driving the world on the road to destruction and themselves, that is, you, with them.
    A crime is being committed. And you say, shut up. You are the criminal.

  66. @FROMTHEEAST

    Why do you think they cannot be turned into human beings? Why do you think they have to be liquidated? Do you know something we do not know? And why do you think they are so indispensable, so irreplaceable as if every body else is only an animal? Where did you get such strange ideas? Did not your parents teach you anything decent?

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  67. Anon[105] • Disclaimer says:
    @eah

    -> Jews put in charge
    -> Now focuses on Hungarian collaboration with Holocaust

    Accusing all nations of “crime after crime” is explicit Jewish tactical doctrine toward destroying all nations.

    Psalm 69

    27Charge them with crime upon crime;

    do not let them share in your salvation.

    28May they be blotted out of the book of life

    and not be listed with the righteous.

    When its not the Holocaust, its slavery, racism, etc. Mostly the sins of the Jews themselves.

    The deeper view is that they work to turn their own effective political tactics, like racism, into sins for the gentiles so that only they can utilize those tactics.

    Scapegoating others for their sins is a tactical doctrine of the Jews, and is represented by their most important ritual on their “holiest” day. They sacrifice a goat to who they believe is the god of the Hungarians and other gentiles, as a bribe to place the sins of the Jews onto the heads of those gentiles.

    https://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2009/06/as-above-so-below-jews-will-kill-all.html

    The Jews believe that there are seventy gods who watch over the Goyim, the nations. The seventy angels, or princes of the Gentiles are overseen by Sammael, Satan. The Jews sacrifice a goat every year, known as the “scapegoat”, to Sammael so that he will convey all of the sins of the Jews onto the Goyim and mediate for the Jews with god. Sammael sells out the Goyim he is bound to protect for a mere goat and the Goyim are thereby blamed for all the crimes of the Jews

    http://www.ybt.org/essays/rchait/scapegoat.html

    “The Medrash says that the children of Jacob give Samael, their prosecuting angel, a bribe on Yom Kippur. This bribe is the sacrificial goat”.

  68. Robjil says:

    That sticker of Volkstod (People’s death) is Amalek thinking. Amalek is the a nation that ancient Israelites were told to completely genocide.

    In the Torah, Deut. 25:19, it states to completely genocide the Amaleks.

    https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/ask-the-expert-blotting-out-amalek/

    The Torah tells us to remember the nation of Amalek that attacked the Israelites after they left Egypt. Specifically, we are told to “blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven” (Deut 25:19). Traditionally, this was understood — in a morally complicated way — to mean that Jews had an obligation to kill all Amalekites: men, women, and children.

    Is this Amalek thinking still OK these days? Even, Mad Albright thought so for Iraq in the 1990s. Our lovely MSM did not make a big deal of Mad’s OK thinking. I guess our MSM is OK with Amalek thinking. Seven nations to destroy ( Deut. 7.1-2) is another genocide theme in practice these days in the middle east. Is still OK like the Amalek theme.

    https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/961561/jewish/Positive-Commandment-187.htm

    “When G‑d will totally destroy the descendants of Amalek and remove them for all time — as will be speedily in our days, as G‑d (exalted be He) promised,6 “I will wipe out the memory of Amalek” — will we say that the mitzvah to wipe out the memory of Amalek7 was not noheg l’doros? This is not true, for in any generation when one finds a descendant of Amalek, he must be killed. The same applies to this mitzvah of killing all descendants of the seven nations, which is a milchemes mitzvah. In every generation we are required to uproot them and search after them down to the last individual. We did this until King David destroyed them completely, with the survivors being scattered and assimilated among the nations until they disappeared.
    But although they no longer exist, the mitzvah to kill them is still considered noheg l’doros, just as the mitzvah to wage war against Amalek is considered noheg l’doros even after their destruction. This is because it is not dependant on a certain time or place, such as in Egypt8 or in the desert.9 The mitzvah is dependant solely upon the object of the mitzvah: whenever they are found, the mitzvah must be fulfilled.”

    Here is Amalek theme for Germany and for Iran in an Israeli paper. An Israeli wants to nuke Germany and Iran.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/op-ed-calls-on-israel-to-nuke-german

    Right-wing media outlet Israel National News published an opinion piece Tuesday calling on Israel to launch nuclear bombs at Iran and Germany, only days after the outlet came under fire for publishing a piece accusing a war widow of killing her husband over her pro-peace views.

    Here this Israeli’s Amalek wishful gift to Iran.

    “One of Israel’s missions is to remember the crimes of Amalek, a tribe representative of pure evil in the Bible, whom Jews are commanded to obliterate. Among those descended from the band, the author writes, are Iranian leaders Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and current President Hassan Rouhani.
    “They don’t miss an opportunity to discuss the need for the annihilation of Israel,” he wrote.
    To combat this Israel must respond in kind, Ben-Eliyahu declared. “To an existential threat we must respond with an existential threat,” he wrote, “not with speeches in Congress. We must make it clear to the Iranians that Israel will wipe out their nuclear program and Tehran and Isfahan as well.”

    Here is this Israeli’s Amalek wishful gift to Germany.

    “He also called on the Jewish people to remember its near destruction at the hands of the Nazis and exact revenge on Germany, now a staunch ally of Israel.
    When the Messiah comes, Ben-Eliyahu wrote, Israel will reverse the Final Solution. “Twenty, thirty atomic bombs on Berlin, Munich, Hamburg, Nuremberg, Cologne, Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Dresden, Dortmund and so on to assure the job gets done. And the land will be quiet for a thousand years,” he wrote.”

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    , @Cowboy
  69. vinteuil says:
    @eah

    What exactly is “the cause, around here”?

    Noticing.

  70. @AaronB

    “You know what you need…you need a religion Lin Dinh. The failures and injustices of life cannot be born with any kind of dignity unless one sees them in a cosmic context.”

    And I’ve got just the right “cosmic context” within which you can bear your trials—-Judaism! In our scheme, you’re dirt! So just learn to accept your “failures” as your just desserts and the injustice of that as justice.

    …..

    “Learn from the stoic dignity of your Vietnamese neighbors who accept setbacks with equanimity and laughter, and don’t need much out of life to be happy.”

    Dude, sure rape can be painful and humiliating, but you can’t do anything about it so just learn to relax and “enjoy” it. Laughter is the best medicine.

    You “don’t need much out of life to be happy”, so when you get little and I get much, it’s a win/win!

  71. Anonymous[548] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Anyone with eyes and a brain can see that the “hate” you impugn Mr. Dinh has been turned inside out. In a society that claims to be free, yet remains intolerant or selective about criticism, it is the likes of Kovel, Finkelstein and Mr. Dinh himself among others whose career aspirations were brought to a an abrupt halt for the positions they have so courageously taken. Yet Kovel did not lose his tenure for his White Racism —- targeting millions more Whites than Jews —- but for his analysis of Zionist power. They are the victims of the vicious hatred you speak about. You are clearly an intellectual midget with no worthy moral advice on how Mr. Dinh should live his life. Unlike you, I doubt that he is a beneficiary of a hate group or lobby as are the legions of hasbara trolls paid to act as Zionist thought policemen around the world.

    • Replies: @anon
  72. Wars fought for Israel are added to the list of American war crimes, to be condemned by Jews as evidence of the innate evilness of the white race.

    Count on it. They typiclly despise everyone, especially those who lick their boots.

  73. Anonymous[126] • Disclaimer says:

    America is Jewish power’s war horse, galloping towards the glue factory.

    Wars fought for Israel are added to the list of American war crimes, to be condemned by Jews as evidence of the innate evilness of the white race.

    Well said.

    • Agree: Jacques Sheete
  74. @Robjil

    Wow. Doesn’t he know that Allied bombers had already carried out his pogrom by bombing those cities to smithereens in WW2?

    If he doesn’t, then his ignorance of history disqualifies him as a source of wise council. If he does then he is a twisted, sadistic psychopath.

    • Agree: Robjil
  75. Che Guava says:
    @jbwilson24

    It is not so odd, after the murder of Stalin, Jews in the USSR who were not leaving for (mainly) Israel or the USA. IIRC, all of the Jewish thieves had been Komsomol and CPSU members.

    Sure, none in major positions. It was not what they had been in the Soviet Union, but what Jewish ‘American’ advisors under the drunkard Eltsin who managed the whole swindle.

    Consider Browder. Father the head of CPUSA for many years. Apples don’t fall far from the tree. So what was ‘Earl Browder’ (certainly not his real name) really about?

    His son is for sure a figurehead for excused Jewish financial criminality.

    The U.S. Congress and Senate are so enslaved that they passed a special law to persecute Russians for trying to call ‘Browder’ fils to account for his obvious crimes.

    I was also greatly liking Linh Dinh’s article, regret my fractious comments of last year (except that I really don’t like those parts of Tokyo, my tax accountant’s office is there, so my tax mess means that I have been there a lot of late, and some of the shops have great decorations, but I do not like the area, namely inner south-western Tokyo).

    Last night, I met a Thai tourist who leaves tomorrow, interestingly, although he had only been here for three brief visits before, was saying the same thing with no prompting from me.

    I gave him some good recommendations for a restaurant and day-trip, but when his Thai friends arrived, they all looked like the type to be shopaholic and lurve Tokyo ‘Disney’ land.

    I have neither entered nor desired to enter that pile of crap.

    Things will work out for you, Dinh.

  76. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    …without considering what went before…

    Considering what went before: Jewish belief and behavior caused pre-Christian and non-Christian expulsions of Jews.

  77. Greg Bacon says: • Website
    @jeff stryker

    Mr. Stryker:

    Kudos to your alias, bet most don’t know JS was a porn actor, doing mostly gay movies. But maybe you’re using the Stryker alias as a metaphor for what you’re trying to do the Unz readers, give them a good humping, since you play loose with the truth about who was really behind the illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq.
    Israel was screaming like a scalded dog when we invaded Afghanistan, since they wanted the potent US military to go in and bust Iraq, which we did.

    In the article below, just substitute Iran for Iraq and you’ll be on the money.

    Israel To U.S.: Don’t Delay Iraq Attack

    Israel is urging U.S. officials not to delay a military strike against Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, an aide to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Friday.

    Israeli intelligence officials have gathered evidence that Iraq is speeding up efforts to produce biological and chemical weapons, said Sharon aide Ranaan Gissin.

    “Any postponement of an attack on Iraq at this stage will serve no purpose,” Gissin said. “It will only give him (Saddam) more of an opportunity to accelerate his program of weapons of mass destruction.”

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-to-us-dont-delay-iraq-attack/

    Maybe you’ll further confuse the issue by claiming Israelis aren’t actually Jews. And the DNA testing would agree with you.

    Here’s some more background on who was really behind the Iraq War:

    The 25 Jewish Neocons Who Got Us Into the Iraq War

    https://russia-insider.com/en/25-jewish-neocons-who-got-us-iraq-war/ri27096

    • Agree: Robjil
    • LOL: Truth
  78. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @jeff stryker

    You don’t have to pay taxes overseas as a US citizen unless you earn over $110,000 a year.

    That is a gross over simplification. It is known as the FEIE (Foreign Earned Income Exclusion), and it applies only to “Earned Income”. I gather you lived overseas but live in the US now. Did you work for a US corporation that that did your US taxes for you, or did you fill out your forms yourself?

    Lihn apparently was operating a company of some type. Whether a company incorporated by the laws of Vietnam, or as a personal business, as a US person, every piece of income would have to have been reported, and every cost deducted, all following US law which always contradicts other countries tax laws because the US is a rogue state when it comes to making and abiding by international agreements. FATCA, GILTI, the Transfer tax and may other obscure tax laws targeted at expats prove the point.

    I doubt you have been through this nightmare or you never would have made such a naiive statement. Lihn likely is not in compliance with US tax law because if he had been I am certain he would have written about the ordeal. A highly graduated Income tax was the second plank of (((Marx’s))) communist manifesto. Income taxes across the planet are a gift to all the goyim for all the wars and genocides they have committed on behalf of the jews.

    Besides, there are all types of income one can derive while living offshore that are not “Earned Income”. Here are a few:
    – Capital Gains
    – Phantom Capital Gains
    – Death Taxes
    – Interest
    – Dividends
    – Rent
    – Contracting Fees
    – Retirement income through a countries Social Security
    – Retirement income through a countries private tax advantaged savings plans.

    All of these sources of income are taxed completely differently in the US than in a “foreign country”. Navigating this tax law and tax form mine field is something very few even highly paid tax professionals can accomplish. Now try to fine one in a back woods village in Vietnam.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    , @renfro
  79. Anon[631] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    What a lazy, unsupported, and undisciplined screed.

    I hope that wasn’t you best effort. I typed a more in depth critique but my browser crashed halfway through and it was lost. Maybe I’ll come back and retype it in the near future, but you should hope that I don’t. For now, your obvious lack of context and support for your assertions will readily stand to invalidate your low-effort text wall.

    Or you can apologize for your lack of theological and historical knowledge before any other response is forthcoming from anyone, and slink away to rethink your lazy arrogance that tells you that attempting to speak out-of-school is a good idea (given that you are obviously a low-information participant here).

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Liza
  80. @Republic

    Last time I read counterpunch they were boldly pushing the hysterical MSM lie that Brett Kavanaugh was an active gang rapist in his college years.
    I haven’t been back since.

    • Replies: @Republic
  81. eah says:

    Volkstod

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Anon
  82. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @Robjil

    I have detected a change in the jewish spittle flecked propaganda message lately. Open calls for the genocide of other peoples by jews are becoming the norm.

    This could be the iron fist coming out the of velvet glove, but I think it is a move to make the goyim loose all hope, give up, and submit to the Noahide laws.

    Monday’s Trunews was about the Gay Gestapo. When you look at what the talmudists are doing with their anti Christian and anti White European culture legislation, it meshes completely with what their tranny and queer puppets are doing with their cultural marxism.

    https://www.trunews.com/stream/lgbt-equality-act-will-president-trump-and-republicans-submit-to-gay-gestapo

    Just as the Noahide laws will turn Christianity into idolotry, so will this new Globohomo act turn all heterosexuals into illegal perverts.

  83. Anon[631] • Disclaimer says:
    @jeff stryker

    Jews have zero influence in places like Vietnam. Zero.

    That’s a uniquely myopic view for the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

    Setting up random Jewish commoners as strawmen to disprove or prove Jewish power is the rankest fallacy. Its the group that counts.

    If I destroy a nation, but I am not present in it 50 years later, do I have influence over that nation?

    Communism, like Christianity, is an inherent destroyer of all nations. In terms of their end-effect, these are politically parallel Jewish creations.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  84. Dinh’s assessment of so-called “Jewish Power” is flat-out wrong. He assumes the fact that one’s Jewish ethnicity is automatically the person’s major, overriding characteristic. In fact, a large percentage of Jews consider themselves non-religious — over 50%.

    I’d estimate that 90%+ of USA Jews consider or define themselves as Americans first, and Jewish five steps down their lists. For example, I consider myself:

    1. An American
    2. A decent person
    3. An observer/thinker
    4. An ethical person
    5. A good worker
    6. A student of economics and history
    .
    .
    .
    10?. A non-religious Jew

    There isn’t one Jewish person I know who hates “goyim” or is an avowed Zionist. None of them are even rabidly pro-Israel. All are “conservative” or “reformed” Jews. They’re all just trying to get along as best they can under the Golden Rule, and I’d bet none of them would define themselves as Jewish in the #1 position.

    (BTW, I call myself Jerry Jewish simply to attract attention.)

  85. @Cowboy

    HOOT

    Apart from the USIA (Which I worked at when it was still the USIS) at the US Embassy for a brief period, I have no drawn a paycheck from a US company since 1999.

    And that job was barely above minimum wage. I did file taxes in that case. Otherwise, I’ve reported no income to the IRS since I was 25.

    Your other listings don’t apply to me.

    Hardcore disability frauds will often move to the Philippines so the country cannot check up on them. You can receive a disability check anywhere in the world but the country won’t fly to the Philippines to check up on you.

    Europeans can draw a welfare check overseas; Americans cannot. Many Brits survive off welfare in India where the money goes far.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  86. @Anon

    The last Jew to have any real influence over Vietnam was Henry Kissinger and seemingly Vietnamese got over him.

    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete
    , @Anon
  87. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @FROMTHEEAST

    There are moral options.

    educate the world about the fundamentally genocidal Master Race tenets of Judaism and the history inspired by that Jewish supremacism
    apprehend all perpetrators and accomplices of crimes against humanity, including economic crimes against humanity—accomplices,*** enablers, agitators, enforcers, mouthpieces, talking heads, puppets, middle management, political prostitutes, change agents, and other shabbos goyim
    prosecute the perpetrators and accomplices in fair and open trials
    punish the guilty
    repatriate all ill-gotten gains, especially what has been stolen by usury, bribery, and other fraud by dynastic looters
    • leave the truly innocent alone!

    “For it is the day of the vengeance of the Lord, the year of recompenses of the judgment of Sion.”
    Isaias 34:8

    ***Silent Jews are accomplices, not innocents.

    • Replies: @One Tribe
  88. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @jeff stryker

    If you were working for a US agency while abroad then it is practically certain that all you had to do was file your plain old vanilla 1042. This is as good as never having left the US.

    There are 2 main classes of US expats. 1) Those who work for US government, or large US corporations sheltered by international agreements, and 2) the rest of the goyim expats who have to file completely compliant tax forms for 2 contradictory tax systems.

    Most US people are unaware of the challenges that Congress and the IRS have placed in front of those attempting exist as an ordinary working citizen of any foreign country. Apparently you are too.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  89. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Much of what you wrote is true, but you -in my opinion- wrongly assume that Jews are a “race”, and even less that they are somehow locked into conflict with “whites” (Macdonald’s theses). More, considering Christianity & civilization as mostly Jewish cult, in essence, is wrong. It was a long growth of synthesis of many disparate elements, most of them being alien to normative Judaism.

    Most of European (Christian) history Jews were powerless & did not influence chief events of European life: east-west schism; Crusades; European age of exploration & colonial expansion; the Renaissance; Reformation & wars of religion; mercantilism, liberalism & Enlightenment; Industrial revolution, Napoleonic wars & national emancipation of European peoples; all ideologies, except later phases of Marxism (Marx’s work itself was an expression of German, not Jewish thought & European societal conditions); world wars etc.

    Jews, historically, have been influential in short periods of time in some parts of Europe, but virtually all of Western history & global influence had nothing to do with them.

  90. @Jerry Jewish

    JERRY

    Some Goyim hate Jews, but Jews don’t care about them.

    1. An American. The Jewish identity is largely defined by an East to West axis (NYC, Chicago, LA, perhaps Vegas) as oppose to the North to South axis of other white Americans. It also urban and suburban as oppose to rural and exurban. Not that I have anything against Jews, but their American identity is defined by scarce resources in urban population centers and skilled professions.

    2. A decent person. Jews generally don’t break the law. Rape and violent crime are relatively low in Jewish populations.

    3. An observer/thinker. True, this is why many Jews become stand-up comedians or sitcom writers.

    4. Ethical? This is debatable. Jews don’t commit amoral crimes such as rape or violent street crime. This is about the best this can be said about them.

    5. A good worker. Again, true. Jews are usually doing something. I attended college with Jews. They did not spend their weekends boozing it up tailgating football teams. Even the Jewish fraternity was relatively studious compared to other frats.

    6. Student of economics and history. A fairly broad generalization. Certainly Jews understand economics and the value of the dollar. No arguing that.

    Reform Jews are fairly synonymous with integration and the upper middle class. Most are long assimilated German and Russian Jews who have been in the US for five or six generations.

    I’m not Jewish, but I grew up around Jews.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Bardon Kaldian
  91. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Jerry Jewish

    No, Jerry, your defense, denial, and deflection make you an accomplice after the fact.

    If you aren’t part of the solution (Finkelstein et al.), you will be an accomplice in the eyes of the forthcoming International Court.

  92. @Cowboy

    HOOT

    The exemption for foreign-earned income rose from $80,000 in 1999 when I first arrived in Dubai to the current $110,000.

    My USIA (USIS at the time) job as a clerk in the Embassy was a temp position that only lasted a few months.

    Other than this part-time job at the Embassy, I never worked for an American company or institution abroad.

    And I did file taxes in the Philippines and go through the process of obtaining a business permit locally.

    The IRS are not going to pursue you if you earn under $110,000 a year overseas. You’re wasting your time even bothering to file.

    And I have done everything from working for Dubai publishing companies to co-owning girly bars in the Philippines.

    Again, I don’t know about EU.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  93. Robjil says:
    @jeff stryker

    You are talking about little people. Little people have no power. It is the big ones like Victoria Nuland, Robert Kagan, Douglas Feith, Larry Silverstein, William Kristol, Bill Browder, Paul Wolfowitz, Eliot Abrams, Richard Perle, and many other big Js who are stirring up most of the trouble we have on our planet. Talk about the Big Js.

  94. Republic says:
    @AryanMasterUberMan

    LD wrote this in 2014 regarding counterpunch:

    Like many others, I have raised these questions over the years, and for this, I have been branded a freak by one of the left’s most disdainful gatekeepers. After CounterPunch canceled my Postcard series on its site, which is its prerogative, of course, its editor, Jeffrey St Clair, responded to readers’ complaints by questioning my sanity, “perhaps Linh has simply joined the conspiratorialists and Dissident Voice is a more comfortable venue for him. We’ve chased most of the people who question the moon landing, whether JKF is really dead and the circularity of the earth off of CounterPunch.” So to point out the obvious lies of a criminal government is to believe that this earth is flat? Good Lord, with such a rebel, who needs sheep?

  95. I don’t think any have the guts to do what Linh has done, though at least a few listed have to have similar opinions to Linh, since they hint at the Jewish problem.

    Good luck to you, Linh. If I had somewhere else to go, I would also leave this mess to those who deserve it.

  96. anon[867] • Disclaimer says:
    @jeff stryker

    1 both 1990 and 2003 Iraq wars are the fruits of overt and covert Jewish supports and Jewish pressures for wars and was evident both in UK and USA. Jews caused both wars
    Jews threatened they would attack
    Jews prevented reconciliation

    2 Halliburton might have made some money . When disaster strikes , people do make money . But they don’t cause the disaster .

    3 There is no Left or Right Zwingli Jew as a group.

    The left Jew was against Vietnam war but same time was for preemptive choice of war by Jew against Arab in 1967 .

  97. kikz says:
    @anonandanon

    they never seem to learn.. hubris always trips on its dick. 😉 well done, dinh.

  98. @jeff stryker

    The last Jew to have any real influence over Vietnam was Henry Kissinger

    Prove it.

  99. @Greg Bacon

    For if you go to Europe, it’s a good possibility you’ll get arrested, tried and tossed in prison, for merely asking questions.

    The subversive absurdity of anti-holocaust denial laws is now on these shores. Florida just enacted it. Needs to be challenged and thrown out.

  100. Anon[428] • Disclaimer says:

    Anyone else getting of tired of jeff strykers excessive comments on all LD articles

    • Agree: utu, Twodees Partain
    • Disagree: AaronB
    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  101. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Marx’s work itself was an expression of German, not Jewish thought…

    Wrong.

    Marx was a disciple of Rabbi Moses Hess who was the true progenitor of Judeo-Communism, professing that his goal was to destroy Christendom and the Church, one and the same goal as Judaism. Marx affectionately referred to Hess as “My Communist Rabbi.” A long list of Jews boasts that Communism is Judaism. Notice that when their genocide of over 60 million Christians was under way, Satan’s tribe boasted that Communism was theirs. Now that the death toll of Judeo-Communism is well-known, the tribe pretends they had nothing to do with it:

    “Some call it Marxism – I call it Judaism.”
    Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935

    [MORE]

    “The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution”
    The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250

    “Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”
    Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936

    “Judaism is Marxism, communism”
    Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 64

    “The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.”
    Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 143

    “We Jews cannot be called upon to denounce Communism.”
    The American Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11

    “The picture which the Soviet Union presents today is one that should bring rejoicing to world Jewry.”
    The Youngstown Jewish Times, Sept. 18, 1936, page 51

    “It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.”
    Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York) July-September 1932, p. 106

    “That achievement – the Russian-Jewish revolution – destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstruct.”
    The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920

    “The Bolshevik Government of Russia is the key-stone of the arch of the proof of the Jewish conspiracy for radicalism and world-domination.”
    William Hard, The Great Jewish Conspiracy (New York: American Jewish Book Company, 1920), p. 31

    “The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism”
    Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1920), p. ix

    “The Jews [have been] furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders”
    The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11

    “Russian Jews have taken a prominent part in the Bolshevist movement”
    The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20

    “Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.”
    Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37

    “The East-Side Jew [Trotsky] that Conquered Europe”
    The liberator (New York), March 1920, pp. 26-27

    “The real East Sider [New York Jew Trotsky] is at the head of things in Russia.”
    M. L. Larkin, in The Public (New York), November 23, 1918, p. 1433

    “It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this is in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.”
    Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites
    (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 148

    “Karl Marx, who came from an old family of rabbis and brilliant Talmudic scholars, was to point the path of victory for the proletariat.”
    L. Rennap, Anti-Semitism and the Jewish Question (London, 1942), p. 31

    “Among his [Karl Marx’s] ancestors were Rabbis and Talmudists, men of learning and keen intellect.”
    Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206

    “The peculiarly Jewish logic of his [Karl Marx’s] mind”
    Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206

    “Mr. Wickham Steed lays the rise of Bolshevism at the doors of Jewry.”
    The Jewish Guardian (London), November 28, 1924, p. 4

    “The Bolshevik Revolution has emancipated the Jews as individuals”
    Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 33

    “There are many Bolshevik leaders of Jewish extraction”
    D. L. Sandelsan, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), February 20, 1920, p. 22

    “There is no Jew who does not hope with all his heart that the Soviet Union will survive and be victorious”
    Zionist Review (London: Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland), September 26, 1941, p. 7

    “Communism and internationalism are in truth and in fact great virtues. Judaism may be justly proud of these virtues”
    Harry Watan, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites
    (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 80

    “If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist internationalism … then the Jewish race is doomed.”
    George Marlen, Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin (New York, 1937), p. 414

    “The [Jewish] Commissars were formerly political exiles. They had been dreaming of revolution for years in their exile in Paris, in London, in New York, in Berlin, everywhere and anywhere. They saw in the Bolshevist Movement an opportunity of realizing the extreme ideas of Communism and internationalism to which their fate had compelled them.”
    Dr. D. S. Pazmanik, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), September 5, 1919, p. 14

    “The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country – and as yet the only country in the world – in which anti-Semitism is a crime.”
    Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), January 1942, p. 16

    “Anti-Semitism was classed [by the Soviet Government] as counter-revolution and the severe punishments meted out for acts of anti-Semitism were the means by which the existing order protected its own safety”
    The Congress Bulletin, (New York: American Jewish Congress), January 5, 1940, p. 2

    “There is no official anti-Semitism in Russia; anti-Semitism in Russia is a crime against the State.”
    Dr. Chalm Weizmann, The Jewish People and Palestine (London: Zionist Organization, 1939), p. 7

    “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.”
    Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), July-August 1941, p. 23

    “The part which Jews play in the [Communist] Government of the country [Russia] does not appear to be declining”
    Harry Sacher, in The Jewish Review (London), June-August 1932, p. 43

    “The Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. This is the historic destiny of the Jews”
    Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), pp. 99-100

    “The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism – the struggle of … Judaism versus Christianity.”
    Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105

    “Soviet Russia has declared war on Christianity, and on those who profess this faith. In the Russian villages today Bolsheviks and Herbert H. Lehman . . . were called the ‘secret government of the United States’ and were linked with ‘world communism.’”
    Dr. Louis Harap, in Jewish Life (New York), June 1951, p. 20

  102. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @jeff stryker

    The IRS are not going to pursue you if you earn under $110,000 a year overseas. You’re wasting your time even bothering to file.

    And I have done everything from working for Dubai publishing companies to co-owning girly bars in the Philippines.

    I certainly would not be bragging about that if I were you. The statute of limitations for tax fraud and failing to file never runs out. And if you think that the IRS only goes after people making more than $110,000 then you are incredibly naiive.

    Canadians who were born over the border are known as “accidental americans”. They may have never been back over the border and may never have earned a penny in the US, but they were born in the USA and therefore are considered to be US persons by the IRS. These “little fish” have been pillaged and many bankrupted by the US.

    One perfect recent example comes from Trumps 2017 tax act, he added GILTI (Global Intangeable Low Tax Income) and the Transfer tax. These tax foreign corporations owned more than 10% by a US person an additional 17.5% on certain specific US tax items. GILTI was made retroactive back to 1984, and includes a 17.5% tax on all retained earnings over those years. Imagine if the IRS finds out that you owned a bar in the Phillipines and never filed taxes, and them forcing you to refile all the way back to 1984 using their IRS approved exchange rates.

    Go ahead, slough it off. Thousands of Canadian “accidental Americans” have put their retirements into special Canadian tax free retirement corporations that are now subject to GILTI taxes. These guys have only thousands of income per year, and your beloved uncle Sam wants to steal it from them.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @Oikeamielinen
  103. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Bardon Kaldian

    More evidence of the pagan*** Jewish roots of Communism—This 1905 postcard anticipated the nexus of Judeo-Communism, kapparot, and ritual murder in designating Tsar Nicholas II as one of Judaism’s white fowl pagan kapparot animal sacrifices. The Hebrew reads: “This is a sacrificial animal so is my cleansing; it will be my replacement and cleansing the victim.” ***http://judaism.is/paganism.html

  104. awry says:
    @AaronB

    You are right in the sense that obsessing about the so-called Jewish Question only creates unnecessary trouble for anybody. Normies do not think about it, they don’t question the official narrative, and how can one blame them for that? Ignorance is bliss.
    It may be true that antisemitism is often caused by some inferiority complex, jealousy. Now we know for a fact that Jews have a higher average IQ than Gentiles. Some people like Jordan Peterson try to explain Jewish dominance solely based on this (others simply deny that such dominance exist despite that the Jews themselves like to brag about it). It may be true that successful goyim just get over this, as they know that any inquiring into this can be detrimental to one’s career to put it mildly. One must be some kind of social pariah to have enough time to waste to the topic. Or at least a born contrarian.
    And of course almost nobody dares to discuss it while not hiding behind the anonymity (or the belief of having it) on the internet, in the Western world.
    But you aren’t disproving any antisemitic claims, basically you are saying yeah that’s just how it is, suck it up. That is telling.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @AaronB
  105. “America is Jewish power’s war horse, galloping towards the glue factory.”

    I am going to use this at my next dinner party! With attribution, of course.

  106. @restless94110

    It’s not hate to point out true things.

    When you point out true things about Jews, it’s Auntie Shemi-tism.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  107. Anonymous[179] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jerry Jewish

    Oh, aren’t you a bunch of well-meaning innocents.

    Meanwhile, every node of organised Jewry is working furiously to deceive, exploit, debase and ultimately genocide my race (along with other goyim). This agenda is pretty much in the open now so it’s kind of weird that an observer/thinker like you didn’t notice.

  108. HenryT says:

    Aaron B–What a self-righteous, smug fool. He is the type of insignificant fool who denies the right to anyone who dares to point out someone’s house is on fire unless he also has the water to put it out. Another instance of insufferable and basically condescending and arrogant Jewish moralism “guiding” a Goy. Psychologism is the ruin of Western intelligence, just as subjectivism ruins objectivity. And trying to correct a dignified adult by using “dude” warns of the sophomoric oily mediocritiy of the lecture which follows.

  109. Al Liguori says: • Website

    Claims of “intelligence” are a red gefilte fish.

    Intelligence is not inherently malevolent.

    Judaism is inherently malevolent:
    • defining others as non-human.
    • exhorting evil against those “non-humans.”

  110. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Curmudgeon

    It’s not hate to point out true things.

    When you point out true things about Jews, it’s Auntie Shemi-tism.

  111. @Cowboy

    There are also Americans, who came to Canada as children and/or have spent their entire working lives in Canada, subject to the same tax laws. They have received notices from the IRS saying they owe back taxes, and will be arrested on return to the US, if they don’t pay up.
    I had an uncle who, in the 1950s, worked for a US railroad at its Canadian terminal. He was required to pay US and Canadian taxes on income, and contribute to Social Security. If memory serves me correctly, the Canadian Government allowed him to deduct the US taxes from his income, but the IRS wouldn’t allow a deduction for Canadian taxes paid. He was also able to collect Social Security, but had to pay taxes to both governments on the amount.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  112. @Al Liguori

    Not quite informed, eh? Read something serious before posting trashy rubbish.

    [MORE]

    Leszek Kolakowski: Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders – The Golden Age – The Breakdown

    Johannes Sperber: Karl Marx: A Nineteenth-Century Life

    Tristram Hunt: Marx’s General

    and a fun:

    Nathaniel Weyl: Karl Marx, racist

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  113. @Lo

    It shouldn’t be difficult to say “yes, Holocaust happened, it was an issue between Germans and Jews” done. No need to debate numbers, no need to debate gas, no need to debate crematoriums.

    It is difficult to say because it did NOT happen. Certainly something happened between Germans and Jews, but it was not a “holocaust” except in the sense that it was an uprooting of the Jews from Europe. That was ‘holocaust’ enough for the Jews to never want it repeated. But their expropriation of the word ‘holocaust’ with a capital H is unwarranted by the evidence and therefore an example of Jewish manipulation.

    There were NO 6 million dead through genocide (nor even 1 million), NO ‘gas’ except for fumigating clothing and barracks to keep detainees alive, NO crematoriums that functioned to destroy thousands of bodies a day as claimed. If you actually read about the subject you’re so opinionated on, beyond Norman Finckelstein, you could learn that for yourself. There is a need to prove it false for the sake of historical truth and German honor, things that are probably foreign to you.

    Jews themselves don’t care about the Holocaust

    Easily disproved. They care more than anyone else. In surveys, most Jews say what they most identify with as a Jew is the Holocaust. In other words, it binds Jews together as a people more than does religion.

    • Agree: Al Liguori
    • Replies: @Lo
  114. Wade says:
    @Franz

    Only true profit Henry Ford? You forgot Ezra Pound.

    • Replies: @alexander
  115. Truth says:
    @StripsOfRed

    Yeah it’s funny on an HBD blog that takes the basic point that racial differences are from nature. A few other people have dog whistled here, but only Linh has taken his differences with the tribe to an ultimate, selfless, devil-may-care, and Vietnamese conclusion…

    • Replies: @Bliss
    , @StripsOfRed
  116. Anonymous[179] • Disclaimer says:
    @awry

    Now we know for a fact that Jews have a higher average IQ than Gentiles.

    “We” actually know it to be a lie. Trusting the Jews is a fool’s errand – and trusting them on the topic of Jews is insanity.

    – Those “studies” only measured a single Jewish sub-tribe which makes that statement false right of the bat. It’s also important to note that no other Gentile was afforded the same treatment. How special.

    – The “studies” – done by Jews on a select groups of Jews – have shown a gradual increase in measured results right along the Jewish takeover of the US academia. A coincidence, surely.

    – Even if we take it at face value, the measured average IQ from those “studies” can’t even begin to explain absolutely massive over-representation of this tiny, 2% minority, in the country’s power nodes. They’d have to triple that IQ right of the chart of human capabilities and enter the lizard-species from outer space territory.

    – The average IQ in Israel seems to be in the 92-95 range. The UK scores 100 despite having more or less the same percentage of “others” in the country.

    – Genetically, Ashkenazi Jews seem to be a mixture of European whites and ME browns. This combination suggests a 90-95 average IQ at best. See above.

    – Nepotism is actually dysgenic – as is inbreeding.

    I could go further (who’s going to argue that the Western banks, academia, MSM and Hollywood are run by bright bulbs?) but it’s not necessary. High Jewish IQ is a lie. One of many.

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    , @Al Liguori
  117. Truth says:
    @vinteuil

    Syonredux is Jewish?

    I never knew, or maybe never paid attention. Well, I guess that explains why he posts a picture of a famous 1960’s Shikso every other post.

  118. Truth says:
    @eah

    Other than NOTHING LESS THAN THE TOTAL AND COMPLETE EXTERMINATION OF THE NEGRO AND ANYTHING PERTAINING TO, OR ABOUT HIM!

    I’m a little fuzzy on that myself.

    (just kidding for those of you offended).

  119. @Cowboy

    “Canadians who were born over the border are known as “accidental americans”. They may have never been back over the border and may never have earned a penny in the US, but they were born in the USA and therefore are considered to be US persons by the IRS. These “little fish” have been pillaged and many bankrupted by the US.”

    My brief study of the matter correlates with your assertions. Everyone should know about FATCA. It is astounding that at least 20 countries have signed onto FATCA.

    Two Canadian sites where these matters are addressed:
    The Isaac Brock Society: http://isaacbrocksociety.ca/
    Maple Sandbox: http://www.maplesandbox.ca/

    Also, one can become a “US person” without being a US citizen.

  120. astro3 says:

    “In each culture, I see the intricate flowering of traditions going back millennia, so the willful erosion or destruction of any of them, I see as the gravest crime” Too right! At least in the UK the Genocide Act of 1947 defines as crime any attempt to extinguish ‘in whole of in part’ a race or nation. I guess the US has its equivalent law. Could not this be used?

  121. @Anonymousers

    He is at least a troll, and probably a paid shill. As to what kind of person he is, we only have his posts as a guide. In the years I have been reading here, I’ve never seen a post of his that wasn’t like the one to which you’re replying, snide, dishonest and insulting. There are plenty like him posting daily, many posting all day long as if working a shift. All of them post in support of Zionism.

  122. Linh, do you have a preferred online retailer of your books, or do you use a personal website? I enjoy your writing, but I really admire the fact that you spoke your mind, and are willing to take the hit and go in a different direction if need be. You deserve success far more than the so-called voices of the right who constantly ask for donations, while making it clear that they will not say what needs to be said. Best wishes to you!

    • Replies: @Old Jew
  123. There are some profound truths sprinkled in this article by Linh
    America is Jewish power’s war horse, galloping towards the glue factory.
    The latest is that your online history can be demanded by the American authorities for entry into the USA.
    The Forever Victims i.e Jews will find the going tougher and tougher. They couldn’t cow down Iran,Syria and Hezbollah. Now with China and Russia aligned with them and America galloping towards the glue factory, we have a perfect scenario for WWIII

  124. @Anonymous

    – Those “studies” only measured a single Jewish sub-tribe which makes that statement false right of the bat. It’s also important to note that no other Gentile was afforded the same treatment. How special

    .

    Kind of like how Jews from all over are combined as one group for holocaust victim status, while Christians are always separated by nation. It’s always something, isn’t it?

  125. Linh Dinh wrote:

    The Nazis’ racism was but a mirror and fleeting offshoot of Jewish racial supremacy, which endures to manipulate, fleece and wreak havoc on humanity, with Jews themselves among its victims, so Jews, too, must be delivered from this sick mindset. No more chosen people.

    I find this really objectionable. First, the National Socialists, or the “Hitler followers” if you wish, or the NSDAP, never considered or called themselves a Chosen People. The Germans in the 1920’s and 30s were an oppressed people by Europe (Britain, France, Belgium, Poland, Czechoslovakia especially) and the United States of America. The “Nazis” as you call them were championing their own people, seeking to build their self-respect again and free themselves from the debilitating, destructive Versailles Dictate.

    Never were they wanting to “manipulate, fleece and wreak havoc on humanity” … that was the British and their helpers, the US and the Jews. Everything the “Nazis” did was in German self-defense and German self-preservation. To lump Jewish Racial Supremacism with German “Nazism,” as in “Zio-Nazis” in the so-popular pro-Palentinian jargon, is a factual error and misunderstanding. Many pro-Palestinian activists admit this, but say that “it works” so continue to use it nevertheless. Are Palestinians more important than Germans? Not in my book. Truth should never be compromised.

    • Agree: Saggy
    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @Saggy
  126. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Habitual liars and their habitual lies! Rejecting the belated oeuvre of those with a vested interest in denying the Jewish roots of Communism, I affirm the contemporaneous confessions of the (((prime movers and perpetrators))), some of which I already posted above. See also: “Jewish Testimony” in The Plot against the Church by Maurice Pinay, 1962, Part 1, at:
    https://christogenea.org/system/files/resources/PlotAgainstTheChurchComplete.pdf

    Derivative of Judaism’s “Kill even the best of the Gentiles”:

    “We hate Christianity and the Christians. Even the best amongst them must be considered as our worst enemies. … Down with love of our neighbours. What we need is hatred. We must learn to hate: this is they way in which we will conquer the world.”
    USSR’s 1933 New Anti-Religious Manual in Hill, Kent R. The Puzzle of the Soviet Church: An Inside Look at Christianity & Glasnost. Multnomah Press, Oregon. 1989, page 92.
    http://tinyurl.com/6p7gfgt

    With widening knowledge of their role as perpetrators, instigators, & profiteers, the adversaries to all men have resurrected their old ploy, insisting that they were forced to become murderous revolutionaries. Like the gangster that insists “The trigger pulled my finger,” the children of hell always blame “the other guy.” A recent example:
    A Review of “Revolutionary Yiddishland: A History of Jewish Radicalism,” Parts 1 – 3
    by Brenton Sanderson, January 27, 2018

    “… Intended for a mainly Jewish readership, the book is essentially an apologia for Jewish communist militants in Eastern Europe in the early to mid-twentieth century … Knowing that outright denial of the pivotal Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution and the murderous regimes it spawned is intellectually untenable, a growing number of Jewish historians concede the point, but insist this leading role was morally justified because it was essentially “defensive” in nature … In other words, tens of millions may have died because of the actions of Jewish communist militants, but their hearts were pure … Revolutionary Yiddishland is another example of that incredibly prolific literary genre: Jewish apologetic historiography.”

    A new industry is being built on denying and bypassing the facts of Jewish domination of Communism and Communist genocide. This is an excellent deconstruction of the new lies. From this very site:
    Lying About Judeo-Bolshevism
    by Andrew Joyce, The Unz Review, March 2, 2019
    http://www.unz.com/article/lying-about-judeo-bolshevism/

    And, of course, there is Solzhenitsyn:
    Two Hundred Years Together
    https://epdf.tips/200-years-together.html

    Of course, Catholics have seen this before. Jews insist that the Church forced them to become usurers, pornographers, slavers, pimps, sex slavers, extortionists, physician poisoners, and other murderers-for-hire—as if all honest labor was denied to Jews.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  127. @AaronB

    We know the Jews don’t believe in any kind of physical labor and have avoided it through the ages. They exploit others using usury, banking, philosophical gobbledygook, very tight religious networking, bribery and controlling the host nation by taking over covertly the real levers of power.
    Look at how the leader of Britain’s labor leader has been turned into a Milquetoast and a pussy.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  128. @anonandanon

    He’s a Hasbara troll making his first post under that particular name. I wouldn’t give him any more credit than that.

  129. @AaronB

    My bad AaronB . I thought I was the only one to ream you but there’s a queue. Maybe net time. Bye.

  130. Robjil says:
    @eah

    Antifa are obviously an Zion 500 BC fanatic creation. The idea of cheering about the bombing and slaughter of thousands of men,women and children in Dresden in 1945 is an Amalek concept from the Torah/Old Tesament – Deut. 25:19. Attacking civilians is genocide. They would be very much at home in a 500 BC Zion fantasy world that Israel is creating today.

  131. Read “The Israel Lobby,” by Mearsheimer and Walt.

    Read “The Culture of Critique,” by Kevin Macdonald.

    Read “The Holocaust Industry,” by Norman Finklestein.

    Read “The Fame of Dead Man’s Deeds,” by Robert Griffin.

  132. @Anonymous

    Thank you for debunking “Jews have a higher average IQ.” My appreciation is not diminished by noting that Jewish “morality,” not their average (lack of) intelligence, is the root problem. A “moral code” that consists of only “Is it good for the Jews?” and “Kill even the best of the Gentiles!” is a threat whether their average IQ is 65 or 110.

    “We” actually know it to be a lie. Trusting the Jews is a fool’s errand – and trusting them on the topic of Jews is insanity.

    – Those “studies” only measured a single Jewish sub-tribe which makes that statement false right of the bat. It’s also important to note that no other Gentile was afforded the same treatment. How special.

    – The “studies” – done by Jews on a select groups of Jews – have shown a gradual increase in measured results right along the Jewish takeover of the US academia. A coincidence, surely.

    – Even if we take it at face value, the measured average IQ from those “studies” can’t even begin to explain absolutely massive over-representation of this tiny, 2% minority, in the country’s power nodes. They’d have to triple that IQ right of the chart of human capabilities and enter the lizard-species from outer space territory.

    – The average IQ in Israel seems to be in the 92-95 range. The UK scores 100 despite having more or less the same percentage of “others” in the country.

    – Genetically, Ashkenazi Jews seem to be a mixture of European whites and ME browns. This combination suggests a 90-95 average IQ at best. See above.

    – Nepotism is actually dysgenic – as is inbreeding.

    • Replies: @Republic
    , @Anonymous
  133. Linh, don’t give up yet on the plastic recycling business. It’s currently in the international headlines:

    https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/where-in-the-world-is-that-rotting-garbage-boat-that-is-destined-for-vancouver

    https://globalnews.ca/news/5340770/canada-garbage-shipping-philippines/

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/waste-recyclables-malaysia-philippines-cbc-explains-1.5153399

    It appears these Filipinos thought they were buying sorted plastic but they were actually sold semi-sorted plastic. Back in 2013. Yes 2013. I guess you can’t just send it back to your suppliers as defective product so they got that obnoxious Filipino president involved and he threatened to attack Canada. The Philippines is now that irritating complaining customer that no supplier wants to do business with. That’s your opportunity.

    You may want to look into setting up a pre-processing facility near a Vietnamese container port. Offer to buy this semi-sorted plastic at a discount, sort out the dirty diapers and half-eaten hot dogs at your pre-processing facility, then ship the good plastic to your Ea Kly facility. Then landfill the dirty diapers and compost the half-eaten hot dogs. Your profit is from shifting the blue-bin sorting operation from North America to Vietnam, pocketing the labour price differential. You may be pleasantly surprised and find this Canadian blue-bin garbage is actually quite clean and you are now able to buy it at a deep discount due to this negative publicity generated by a 6-year-old load of garbage.

    • LOL: Commentator Mike
  134. @Jerry Jewish

    “(BTW, I call myself Jerry Jewish simply to attract attention.)”

    Well, if that ain’t an admission to being a troll, I don’t know what is.

  135. No doubt Joel Kovel would have been extremely disturbed by this quote, which distorts an obvious anti-zionist truth into a pure statement of Jew-hatred :

    “It’s this: you can be against racism, apartheid, borders, border walls, fascism, nationalism, ethnocentrism, traditional religion, war and genocide all you want, but Israel must be treated differently, for what’s good for the rest of the world doesn’t apply to Jews. This double standard is not inadvertent, but a deliberate strategy deployed by a hostile elite to weaken, divide and demoralize the masses.”

    If the phrase “for what’s good for the rest of the world doesn’t apply to Jews” had been written as “for what’s good for the rest of the world doesn’t apply to Israel,” and if the sentence “This double standard is not inadvertent, but a deliberate strategy deployed by a hostile elite to weaken, divide and demoralize the masses” had been written as “This double standard is not inadvertent, but a deliberate strategy deployed by Zionists (Israel apologists) to weaken, divide and demoralize the Palestinians’ struggle for their rights,” it would not have been a statement of Jew-hatred, and I don’t think Joel Kovel would have disagreed.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @renfro
  136. @restless94110

    “It’s not hate to point out true things. ”

    Good point. Those who call the truth “hate” are those who hate the truth.

  137. @Carolyn Yeager

    Speaking of objectionable, this meme is objectionable (to all the right people):

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  138. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @anti-zionist

    Your “distinction” between Judaism and Zionism is a fraud.

    Judaism is the Master Race theory. Zionism puts the theory into genocidal action. Jews who do not actively oppose Judaism and Zionism are accomplices, hence culpable.

  139. chris says:
    @Jerry Jewish

    But if your ranking of alligiencies is true, Jerry, how come Jewish organizations are collecting hundreds of millions of dollars in support of Jewish causes? (see Grant Smith’s organization research).

    Seriously, do you really think you can just call Linh’s comments: ‘flat-out wrong’ and refute them with some whopper you’ve pulled out of your rear end, without anyone noticing?

  140. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @Curmudgeon

    One major impediment to someone like Lihn casting off his US ownership would be the renouncement ceremony. To do so, he almost certainly has to have citizenship in some other country. In my case I was able to acquire citizenship in the country of my forefathers in what should have been an informal process.

    When I was at the US embassy renewing my US passport, probably about 1991, I asked about getting citizenship in another country. The staff at the embassy threatened to keep my US passport until I could convince them that I hadn’t already taken a second pass. Today my children, foreign born but US persons, face a fee of $2500 and a tax nightmare if they choose to renounce. If they don’t renounce they get to file taxes and report all their personal financial details to the IRS until they die.

    A few decades ago US citizenship was a treasure that the State Department could leverage because it was valued. Now slaves trying to exit the US have to pay fees and go through IRS purgatory to be free, US citizenship is a bludgeon. Green card holders will also soon face the wrath of the outsourced data miners and scrapers.

  141. Lo says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Lol a woman talking about honor. Shouldn’t you be chopping onions and potatoes in the kitchen like a good Nazi housewife? Honestly, I don’t care about dead people much. I care about today. Talking the Holocaust is just a distraction from real issues that affect today.

  142. Vietnam is supposed to have a booming economy. I don’t know how you would tap into that.

  143. Republic says:
    @Al Liguori

    The average IQ in Israel seems to be in the 92-95 range

    a non jew here

    Had a big surprise the first time that I visited Israel to see Jewish/Israeli garbage collectors.

    • Replies: @Lo
  144. Yes, “Kovel was a classic Jewish progressive thinker”. And he was unable to escape his Jewish bonds: when asked to join our weekly vigils at the local synagogue, he hemmed and hawed until finally he was forced to fabricate an excuse to miss the protest. RIP, Joel.

  145. Bardon Kaldian: “Much of what you wrote is true, but you -in my opinion- wrongly assume that Jews are a “race”, and even less that they are somehow locked into conflict with “whites” (Macdonald’s theses). ”

    Your scare quotes around the word race apparently mean that you subscribe to the scientific orthodoxy that there is no race but the human race, Homo sapiens sapiens. However, races are distinguished in many or even most non-human species, and race formation is a necessary precursor of Darwinian speciation, so there is no reason to assume a priori that there can be no such thing as different human races. In taxonomy, a race can be defined as a breeding population that has remained relatively closed over a relatively long period of time, and whose phenotype (i.e., behavior and appearance) is significantly different from surrounding populations, a description which certainly can be applied to the Jews vis-à-vis whites. Even if they are not a race yet, then I’d say that they are an incipient race in the process of formation.

    Are Jews in “locked into conflict” with whites? Only if one accepts the fundamental principles set forward by Darwin, in which life itself is a constant struggle between organisms, or as he put it in the subtitle of his famous book “the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life”. In a world of limited resources, Jews have their interests and seek control of those resources, as do whites. To think there isn’t a conflict or needn’t be one between the two groups seems unscientific and utopian to me.

    Bardon Kaldian: “More, considering Christianity & civilization as mostly Jewish cult, in essence, is wrong. It was a long growth of synthesis of many disparate elements, most of them being alien to normative Judaism.”

    I think you’re missing the forest for the individual trees. At issue isn’t whether Christianity is alien to normative Judaism (of course it is), but that Christianity arose as, and remains, a Jewish cult worshiping a Jewish God. Why do whites want to worship a Jewish God? It’s an interesting question, isn’t it?

    Bardon Kaldian: “Most of European (Christian) history Jews were powerless & did not influence chief events of European life…”

    I disagree with you here. I think Jews have had considerable influence on European civilization, in fact an influence so deep and long-lasting that it’s hard to imagine what the white man might have become without them. What if the Roman emperor Titus had simply killed all the Jews instead of dispersing them throughout the empire? Since all of the apostles were Jews, there would have been no Christianity. But, the mere fact that whites were all along for almost two thousand years worshiping a Jewish God, and subscribing to Christian morality gave Jews enormous indirect influence, even where their money power or ethnic networking didn’t. Nevertheless, it’s true that Jews only have as much power as whites and their civilization allow them to have.

  146. Lo says:
    @Republic

    That’s a really strange reason to visit a country.

    • Replies: @Republic
  147. Anonymous[179] • Disclaimer says:
    @Al Liguori

    True, but the IQ lie is being used by the Tribe to mask their massive nepotism and many people won’t do the math. At 2% of the US population, 110 average IQ would barely buy 4-5% of those “smart” positions.

    The discrepancy can only be explained with hostile nepotism – something our ancestors knew, and warned us about, for centuries.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  148. Willem says:

    Individuals may prevent other individuals to grow (as writer, entrepeneur, publisher, etc), but believing that a group, whether it be Jews, Muslims, etc can prevent you to grow as a writer, entrepeneur, etc, is close to imbecilic.

    And those who believe that groups prevented them to grow, also believe that their salvation comes by the help of their group: which is the ultimate form of mediocraty.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  149. @Al Liguori

    Excellent collection of quotes, from the horses’ mouth so to speak. And still they deny it, like this Bardon, even what their own people say. I’d understand them denying if you quote Dr. David Duke on the subject but when they deny their own? So basically you become an anti-Semite just by repeating a Jewish quote, say one by Barbara Lerner Spectre, or by Noel Ignatiev, or Susan Sontag, etc. So how does a conversation with them go? Something like:

    Jew: We run the media.
    Goy: You run the media.
    Jew: You’re an anti-Semite

    Jew: We run Hollywood.
    Goy: You run Hollywood.
    Jew: You’re an anti-Semite

    Jew: We run communism.
    Goy: You run communism.
    Jew: You’re an anti-Semite.

    Jew: We want to rule the world.
    Goy: You want to rule the world.
    Jew: You’re an anti-Semite.

    Goy: No, I’m a philo-Semite, I support Palestinians.
    Jew: Uh, Grr, you’re an anti-Semite.

    This three part review has recently been published at OO:

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/05/09/jews-and-the-left-by-philip-mendes-review-part-3/

  150. Republic says:
    @Lo

    an observation on my visit, not the reason for that trip

  151. @Willem

    Your comment is absurd.

    Group behavior can absolutely have an adverse effect on a competing group. Groups engage in resource competition all day long.

    Jewish groups favor the ingroup and do as much harm to outgroups as they possibly can. In fact, the jews as a group are the single most destructive entity on this earth.

    The obvious reason for their destructiveness is their particularist philosophy…..jews do what is good for the jews and to hell with everybody else.

    While the Christian/white philosophy is to do unto others as you would have them do unto you, a value system that is universal.

    This is obvious stuff.

    • Replies: @Willem
  152. @Anonymous

    True, but the IQ lie is being used by the Tribe to mask their massive nepotism and many people won’t do the math. At 2% of the US population, 110 average IQ would barely buy 4-5% of those “smart” positions.

    The discrepancy can only be explained with hostile nepotism – something our ancestors knew, and warned us about, for centuries.

    I agree 100%. I am fully in favor of debunking all their myriad lies, habitual and extemporaneous.

    In that vein, perhaps you’d like to recommend (or pen) material so that I may add an “IQ” webpage to my BIG JEWISH LIES section: http://judaism.is/big-lies.html At the moment, I only have a bit specifically directed at the phony “genius” Einstein.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  153. Bliss says:
    @Truth

    Wow. Unbelievable. I choked watching this. Tears flowed.

    The reason for that incredibly moving non-violent protest:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_crisis

    In South Vietnam, a country where the Buddhist majority was estimated to comprise between 70 and 90 percent of the population in 1963, President Ngô Đình Diệm’s pro-Catholic policies antagonized many Buddhists.

    Many officers in the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) converted to Catholicism in the belief that their career prospects depended on it, and many were refused promotion if they did not do so. Additionally, the distribution of firearms to village self-defense militias intended to repel Viet Cong guerrillas was done so that weapons were only given to Catholics. Some Catholic priests ran private armies, and in some areas forced conversions, looting, shelling and demolition of pagodas occurred. Some Buddhist villages converted en masse to receive aid or avoid being forcibly resettled by Diem’s regime.

    Under Diệm, the Catholic Church enjoyed special exemptions in property acquisition, and in 1959, he dedicated the country to the Virgin Mary.The Vatican flag was regularly flown at major public events in South Vietnam. Earlier in January 1956, Diệm enacted Order 46 which permitted “Individuals considered dangerous to the national defense and common security may be confined by executive order, to a concentration camp.” This order was used against dissenting Buddhists.

    On June 3, Vietnamese police and troops of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam poured chemicals on the heads of praying Buddhist protestors in the South Vietnamese city of Huế. 67 people were hospitalized and the United States privately threatened to withdraw aid.

    On June 11, Buddhist monk Thích Quảng Đức burned himself to death at a busy Saigon road intersection in protest against Diệm’s policies.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Al Liguori
  154. @Craig Nelsen

    Correlation does not equal causation.

    Back then, it made sense for non-white nations to move toward communism. Upon victory, Bolsheviks in Russia were the first to denounce Western Imperialism. It’s no wonder even non-communist Sun Yat-Sen of China learned toward the Soviets. Other European powers saw China as semi-colony.

    It was only after WWII with US as the new capitalist superpower that non-white nations were allowed to take part in capitalist development on a near-equal level. Prior to that, capitalism was almost synonymous with imperialism. The game was rigged so that Western Nations hogged the industry whereas the non-West was used as supplier of raw materials. French Imperialists suppressed national capitalist development among the Vietnamese who were used to grow and supply rubber to France.

    So, naturally, many non-whites saw communism as the most potent weapon against capitalist-imperialism. And in the first half of the 20th century, many non-white leaders spent their formative years in a period when capitalism meant West over Rest. It was nearly interchangeable with imperialism.

    But after WWII, with US as the new ascendant hegemon, the rules changed so that even non-white nations could take full part in the world trade and develop their own economies(and even heavy industries). US was more idealistic as it’d come into existence against European Empires. But the bigger reasons were more political and pragmatic. With Soviets calling on World Liberation, the US had no choice but to present itself as a generous and progressive world power that spread freedom and opportunities to ALL peoples around the world.

    Still, because of the developments of the first half of the 20th century, many Third World leaders were convinced that capitalism = imperialism. In the case of Cuba, US imperialism had its fingerprints all over the island. As for the Vietnamese nationalists, they couldn’t help but regard US power as inheritor of French colonialism, esp as the US had supported the French against the Viet Minh and then divided the nation to keep the south as a satellite.

    That said, the new template of allowing non-white nations to profit from capitalism gradually eroded the prior Third World view that capitalism = imperialism. Chinese realized this by the late 70s as it figured it had much to gain by doing business with the West. After all, capitalist US had allowed the industrialization of Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and S. Korea. US operated differently from European imperialists who’d arrived on Chinese shores in the 19th century.

    [MORE]

    Though history has judged communism to be ultimately unworkable, it was useful for a time when capitalism was synonymous with imperialism. Back then, non-white nations could not get a fair shake from the capitalist so-called liberal democratic West. After all, UK and France were said to be democratic but were the biggest imperialist powers, and they rigged matters so that non-white nations could barely industrialize. Since capitalism was rigged and controlled by the West, many non-Western intellectuals and leaders turned to communism or socialism(in the case of India under Nehru).
    Also, communism was cheap. It could be adopted for peanuts by any group. It was like an instant hammer as a means of organization, unity, and fighting spirit. In contrast, while capitalism eventually creates a bigger economy, it takes time to develop. It can never be an instant form of power and unity. Furthermore, world capitalism was controlled by the imperialist West(that lost its empires only in the decades following WWII).
    As for fascism, it requires a middle class and some form of development, something Italy and Germany had. But as non-white nations were so backward and poor, fascism didn’t go over well. In contrast, communism made instant sense to many poor folks: Attack the Greedy Rich and Drive out Imperialists. So, while communism ultimately failed, it was useful and effective for a time in certain times and places.
    Furthermore, it’s not necessarily a bad thing to have communism as a moral basis for a capitalist economy. A society that is all capitalist only knows individualism and greed. But a capitalist society that has a communist foundation has some kind of thematic balance. Capitalism drives people toward wealth, but the communist theme reminds people of nobility of work, unity, camaraderie, and etc. This is why current China and Vietnam are, in some ways, have a sounder foundation than Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea do. China and Vietnam are now capitalist and allow free enterprise, BUT the foundational communist themes do serve as a reminder that there is more to life than money and greed. It’s like the role played by Christianity in the West. It provided balance to the secular and individualist aspirations to the West. In the US, the Protestant Work Ethic and Reform Moralism offered balance to individualism, greed, and ambition. Now that such ethos have eroded away, all that is left is globo-homo degeneracy and a culture of excess. Capitalism is effective for incentives and productivity but has to be balanced by moral and spiritual themes. Without such, a materialist-consumer society gives to decadence and degeneracy whereupon the new morality becomes worship of the holy homo bung and negro rapper dong.

    So “totalist organizational methods” are unique to the communist? Further could not Russia have defeated Germany except under a whip?

    Yes, the only truly totalitarian societies were communist. Mussolini first used the term ‘totalitarian’, but he didn’t mean anything like Stalinist USSR. He meant a society where all sectors would be linked and coordinated into a whole. It wasn’t about total control of everything by the state but about the state as the mediator of totality of society. As for Nazi Germany, it was more authoritarian than Fascist Italy but still not totalitarian. Much of the economy was in private hands. Hitler had a hands-off policy over many things. He let the Churches to their own thing.
    It was in the USSR under Stalin that a real kind of totalitarianism sprung into existence. Nearly all of the economy was in statist control. The state controlled all of education, took over all of culture, shut down churches, and gained control over just about anything it could get its hands on.
    Now, totalitarianism is terrible, and Stalin was a mass killer. But against a threat like Nazi Germany, totalitarianism served USSR well in uniting the whole nation to tighten into one fist and fight back.

    And yes, Russians needed a whip. Russians are naturally lazy, messy, and confused. Without a strong leader to whip them into shape, most Russians will just dance on tables and swill vodka.

    I suppose, kinda in the same way the incarcerated are generally shielded from tax hikes.

    If the sickness of the West has been just about tax hikes, your point would be valid. But the West, esp following May 68 lunacy, has been about total racial and cultural extinction. It’s been about blind worship of Jewish supremacists. It’s been about Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. It’s been about homomania and other degeneracy. Better to be incarcerated than be ‘free’ to get syphilis and hand over one’s house and wife to African invaders. Better to be incarcerated and remain sober than be ‘free’ to turn alcoholic and blow one’s homeland in the Multi-Culti roulette in which the white man cannot win.

    Would you rather keep you daughter in prison and force her to learn core knowledge and morals OR let her be ‘free’ to get tattoos, piercings, celebrate globo-homo, and use her womb to produce black kids with a string of rapper trash? Look at London today. It is globo-homo central where Afro-Colonization of White Wombs or ACOWW is the highest value.

    Worse, the West has now even lost its freedom. At least during the Cold War, the West could say, “We got freedom even if we use it stupidly.” Now, the West doesn’t even have the freedom. Under PC controls, even a twitter comment can lead to fines and jail time. Speaking truths about Jewish Power or problems of Africans can land you in jail in France. So, what did End of History’s ‘liberal capitalist democracy’ lead to? Not only the freedom to be degenerate but No Freedom to oppose the degeneracy and destruction of the West.

    The depravity and bloodlust of the Bolshevik revolution, and all that followed, only served to strengthen American hegemony by offering such a repellent alternative.

    Soviet Union after Stalin was repressive but no longer murderous. And the killings and repressions weren’t in the same league in all communist nations. Cambodia saw the worst kind of psycho-communism, but most Eastern European nations had death tolls in the 1,000s. They weren’t much worse than UK, France, Germany, or Sweden today where you are denounced as an extremist if you oppose mass-invasion and great replacement. Likewise, not all fascist regimes were equally bloody. Nazis went furthest in mayhem, but Fascist Italy was rather mild. Franco, after punishing the Left after the Civil War, was a rather benign leader(though some will argue he wasn’t really fascist). Juan Peron was hardly a bloody despot. Just like fascist leaders varied from murderous to mild, so did communist regimes(though, on average, communism was more repressive than fascism).
    Also, mass killings happened under all imperialist powers. French and British did their share of killings around the world to maintain the empire. The US could be utterly ruthless in wars. US also backed mass-killing regimes in Latin America. And under Jewish-control, the US has destroyed millions of lives in the Middle East and killed 100,000s by invasion and starvation and man-made famine.

    Bolshevism now has to be remembered as a crime against humanity, but we have to see things in context. When the Bolsheviks came to power, capitalism was synonymous with imperialism, and most of the world was ruled by empires that resorted to ruthless violence to maintain hegemony.

  155. alexander says:
    @Wade

    Do you mean “profit” or “Prophet”.

    Because Henry Ford certainly turned a handsome “profit”……Ezra Pound,…..not so much.

  156. @jbwilson24

    In the case of communism, western bankers and industrialists were financing the Soviets the entire time. They armed them during the Bolshevik revolution, financed Soviet industry, armed them during WW2, and then throughout the cold war. Anthony Sutton’s works cover this, although he refuses to show how many of those bankers and industrialists were either Jewish or Freemasons.

    That’s just the nature of power. All peoples of all nations act like gangsters and form partnerships with ANY side to get theirs. So, globo-homo Apple Inc is so chummy with Saudi Arabia. All these people wear a 1000 different masks to expand business, opportunity, and influence.

    Keep in mind that plenty of Western finance and investment went to fascist nations as well.

  157. Truth says:
    @Bliss

    Yep, the guy didn’t flinch while he was burning either.

    • Agree: Bliss
    • Replies: @Bliss
  158. renfro says:
    @One Tribe

    Lihn, I loved the article, especially the bravery.

    But the exposition is superb, a complete story, yet succinct, and smooth to flow through, truly exceptional.

    I agree….Bravo Lihn!

  159. Bliss says:
    @Rational

    The Judaists are despised now by whites, blacks, Christians, Muslims, Indians, Chinese and other orientals, too, all over the world

    Nonsense. Almost all the white nations, especially including the colossus among them (U.S.), is more or less allied with Israel. Christian evangelicals are hard core zionists. Israel is the Holy Land of all Christians. The Hindu nationalists of India, who just got re-elected to power in a landslide, are big fans of and closely allied with Israel. China has no beef with the Jews, though it is suspicious of and suppresses it’s Christians and actively persecutes it’s Muslims.

    Unfortunately for you it is your allies the Muslims who are the most despised people in the world right now…

  160. @Bliss

    Catholic Diệm was a bulwark against genocidal Judeo-Communism. After Diệm’s assassination, the fall of Vietnam was inevitable. Diệm is vilified for the same reason that Franco is vilified and why the Catholic Church was targeted for pederastic talmudic subversion, successful Catholic opposition to malevolent Judaism and its offsprings Zionism and Judeo-Communism. Try to find that in (((Wikipedia))).

  161. renfro says:
    @Cowboy

    all following US law which always contradicts other countries tax laws

    Actually not. We do have different tax agreements with various countries.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  162. @Lo

    You know zilch about German National Socialists if you think they would approve your talking to me like this. You better believe you would be strongly disciplined. Plenty of German women spoke about German honor.

    The Holocaust is as “real” an issue today as it has ever been. I’d wager you’re saying this because you are ignorant about it, thus unable to discuss it intelligently.

    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @Lo
  163. Bliss says:
    @Truth

    Thích Quảng Đức

    the guy didn’t flinch while he was burning

    Powerful man. I had seen photos of his self-sacrifice but this was the first time I saw the video. It was so touching to see his fellow monks bowing reverently towards him as he gave up his body to the flames.

    Here’s a photograph of Thích Quảng Đức and of the monument and shrine built by the victors of the Vietnam War in his honor:

  164. homahr says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    Agreed. Love how the jews are triggered by this article. pathetic little cunts they are

  165. Mario964 says:

    You said it right, Mr Linh! I couldn’t help but thinking of MLK.

    When you encounter a man who speaks of universal love and solidarity, consider how he treats those closest to him, for if he can’t be considerate to those who love and trust him the most, then his profession of love for an abstract humanity is but a sham.

    Just take Jean Jacques Rousseau, the 18th century philosopher considered to be the ideological father of the French revolution and the new gospel, fraternity, equality and freedom, the man credited with having replaced the religion of God with the religion of Me, which underlies the current society of sewage we all in the West are condemned to live in.

    The scumbag infanticide got five children and sent all of them to die in orfanage where, in those days, almost 80 percent of newborn infants where expected to die before reaching one year age.
    He refused the offer by some of his wealthy and powerful friends to adopt them, out of fear that his sons, when reaching adult age, could accuse him of having abandoned them.

    Being totally alien to wahtever sense of shame, he later wrote “that if a man is not ready and hasn’t the means to grow his children, he should never have any!!

    Now consider this: in Italy the most successful political party at the last polls in 2018 was the M5S, a party that almost worships the abhorrent and repugnant infanticide Rousseau. They went so far in their obsession with the semi-god Rousseau that they named after him the internet platform created for participation by their followers.

    And you know what? Almost 11 millions voters cast their ballots for the M5S!! After all, in the age of so trendy abortion, what Rousseau did to his children was defined by the liberal Swiss newspaper Le Temps as “…voluntary interruption of living infants“!!

    Coming to the Jews, their number one enemy is the same since almost 2000 years: our Lord Jesus Christ. They hate Him above whoever and whatever else. They put Him on the Cross believing that He could be eliminated and forgotten, but He came back and the True Gospel was embraced by the billions while the insignicant Jew tribe became the object of everlasting shame and contempt.

    A tell-it-all book for those who can read french: L’ANTI CHRISTIANISME JUIF – L’enseignement de la heine. (Jewish Anti Christianity – The teaching of hate) – Martin Peltier – Diffusion International Edition – 2014.

  166. Saggy says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    The Nazis’ racism was but a mirror and fleeting offshoot of Jewish racial supremacy,

    Thanks for not letting this idiocy slide by.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  167. @Truth

    Boy you forgot UNZ himself. He has a whole master thesis worth of material debuking myth after Juuish myth, be it their venerable IQ or their sacred “muh holocau$t”! That’s a whole lot more than dog whistling.

    Also Reed is no classical “racist”. Didn’t you read his latest ebola article? Sailer I do agree he dog whistles all the time but that’s his style. He isn’t into long winded sterile analysis like unz or a commentary like dinh here. but most of the guys listed in that list except for derb are no cowards

  168. Saggy says: • Website
    @Carolyn Yeager

    The Holocaust is as “real” an issue today as it has ever been.

    The holohoax is more important today than ever, the US has been bombing the ME continuously, EVERY DAY, for thirty years, even during the Clinton years, because of Israel’s theft of Palestinian land, abetted by ‘international law(lessness)’ in the form of the UN and the holohoax; 40,000 bombs in 2017, https://www.vox.com/world/2018/1/30/16925544/trump-state-union-2018-military-2017, and this unending insanity could easily lead to Armageddon.

  169. @Saggy

    Nazism IS the mirror image of judaism;

    Ingroup preference.
    Outgroup hostility.
    Racial purity.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  170. renfro says:
    @anti-zionist

    Joel Kovel when interviewed (by Weiss) about turning away from Judaism and Jews said…”Judaism was dark and bitter’.

    He converted to Christianity after many years of working with Jesuits and many other religious activist abroad. He was baptized at St. Mary’s Episcopal Church in Harlem

  171. DaveE says:

    Another fine piece from a fine author.

    Mr. Dinh (or is it Linh?) is one of my favorite authors here at Unz. (Along with Mr. Giraldi and sometimes Mr. Atzmon……)

    I wish you the very best and hope your financial setbacks are temporary, so that your wisdom and eloquence will continue to enlighten us. Eloquently.

    Many thanks, once again.

    • Replies: @DaveE
  172. DaveE says:
    @DaveE

    I forgot the genius behind it all, Mr. Unz. Sorry…. and thanks.

  173. @Truth

    Good post and the list is correct. Kersey is a pseudonym and I believe he has a good chance of being Jewish because he will not allow most things about anything Jewish in responses. Unz is not always what it seems to be if you know what I mean!

    • Replies: @Truth
  174. Anonymous[179] • Disclaimer says:
    @Al Liguori

    That’s a very interesting website. Thanks.

    Unfortunately, English is not my first language so I’d rather leave it to someone more eloquent to summarise but the data is out there. This really needs proper academic research TBH.

    As for my last point: the US whites are down to 63% while the US Ashkenazi Jews are 1.8% (90% out of 2% Jewish population) which makes them 35 times less numerous than their white hosts. So, even if we assume that their average IQ is 110, only half of them would be in the 110+ IQ range, joined by a quarter of whites (110+ IQ segment in a 100 IQ population is in the 75th percentile – which is 25%).

    This means that even in the Tribe’s own fairytale we should end up with 17.5 110+ IQ whites for every single 110+ IQ Jew occupying the country’s key “smart” positions. Isn’t it amazing that not only are those numbers not reflected on the ground but we often have more Jews there?

    Statistically, this is way beyond impossible in a meritocratic system.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  175. Anonymous[179] • Disclaimer says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Ingroup preference.
    Outgroup hostility.
    Racial purity.

    This is exactly what the white race must embrace now in order to survive. There’s a reason why every animal has a fight-or-flight reaction to mortal danger – and we have nowhere to flee to.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  176. @StripsOfRed

    No doubt he saw how Joe Sobran was defenestrated from National Review and decided the better part of valor right then and there.

  177. Old Jew says:
    @OilcanFloyd

    Mr. Ron Unz pays for the articles published on “unz.com”

    If Mr. Linh needs more money he may publish here more often.

    Observe how frequent are Mr. Giraldi publishes.

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  178. AaronB says:

    Sorry my friends, I was away all day.

    I cannot possibly respond to all the thoughtful and warm comments directed my way, but I want you all to know I greatly appreciate your support and good wishes.

    I am now reading Thomas Martin’s The Seven Storied Mountain – what a sublime spiritual classic!

    I urge all you white people here struggling with rage and life disappointment to read it.

    You all desperately need a religion – you need God. You are hopeless without Him – as are we all. As am I.

    When I contrast Merton voluntarily choosing a life of simplicity and monkhood, and the sheer joy and happiness his Faith gives him, to Linh Dinh reacting with rage and hate to his career disappointments and business setbacks – I see clearly what it means to live with God or without God.

    One is Life, the other is death.

    I will end up a Jew, the religion of my forefathers – but you whites can return to Catholicism, a sublime religion that was that of your fine ancestors.

    I was, for the first time in decades, reading over the Jewish morning prayers – not praying exactly, which I haven’t done in so long, but getting my feet wet.

    I came across the wonderful line, praise the God who takes care of the “stranger, the widow, the orphan” – stranger in Judaism refers to the gentiles who live in Israel. Jews are enjoined to protect and defend, and treat with charity and kindness, the stranger among them. And this moral code was given in the Bronze Age.

    These prayers are a continuous stream of praising the God of charity, kindness, righteousness, and mercy. There is nothing there of the harshness of people on Unz ascribe to Judaism.

    Anyways, my white friends – good luck. Without a religion and God, you are lost sheep, the prey of the world.

  179. AaronB says:
    @awry

    Well, I no longer approach this issue through the lens of logic and rationality, because it has taken on a mythological dimension.

    Jews are a myth and a symbol for these people.

    For instance, everyone knows that the force which hollows out traditional cultures is the Enlightenment, and science – the two crown jewels of white European culture.

    Yet it is futile to point this out – Lin Dinh needs a potent myth he can concentrate his rage and disappointment on, not a prosaic, factually accurate reality.

    What’s more – if Dinh accepted the historical record about what forces dissolve tradition, he would merely demonize whites – as many non-whites and leftists do.

    And that’s no better than demonizing Jews, and in fact in the entire world, whites are the first and the foremost victims of the tradition dissolving forces they unleashed on the world. They have damaged other cultures – but destroyed themselves.

    Dinh admits most of his life Jews have helped him and been kind to him, but his need for a symbolic myth is infinitely stronger – and out of the modern unconsciousness, he reaches for the symbol of everything that is successful today, the Jews, and that he feels crushes him.

    There is nothing wrong with being broken and a failure – these are exactly the people every religion holds in the highest esteem.

    Dinh is a fine poet and a contemplative – business failure is irrelevant to him, or should be. Yet he prefaces this rage filled piece with a defensive opening, showing how keenly he feels it.

    And that is a shame.

    • Replies: @Lo
  180. AaronB says:
    @Rev. Spooner

    You are correct, the neglect of physical labor has been a serious defect in Jews since the Exile. It is not intrinsic to Judaism – Jewish holidays to this day are centered in agricultural events – and it is at least partly the fault of Christian societies which did not let them do physical work. Jews in Arab countries did lots of physical work.

    And it’s worth pointing out that this tendency to shy away from physical work is now a feature of America snd the West, who import Mexicans and others for that purpose.

    And this neglect of physical work has harmed no one more than Jews themselves – the Zionists understood this well, and thank God successfully corrected the problem. Jews in Israel are quite physical – military service alone makes tough physical demands for three years, and one month per year for the rest of one life.

    In my view, the diaspora is unhealthy for Jews – and unhealthy for the host nations. It’s a bad dynamic. All Jews should move to Israel, except for may be a small number.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  181. AaronB: “I came across the wonderful line, praise the God who takes care of the “stranger, the widow, the orphan” – stranger in Judaism refers to the gentiles who live in Israel. Jews are enjoined to protect and defend, and treat with charity and kindness, the stranger among them. And this moral code was given in the Bronze Age.

    These prayers are a continuous stream of praising the God of charity, kindness, righteousness, and mercy. There is nothing there of the harshness of people on Unz ascribe to Judaism.”

    What about the war of extermination Jews waged against the ancient Canaanites, as described in the Book of Joshua? I guess you’d rather not talk about that.

    AaronB: “Anyways, my white friends – good luck. Without a religion and God, you are lost sheep, the prey of the world.”

    Laying it on a bit thick, aren’t you? I seem to recall whites had a civilization of their own long before their ill-starred encounter with your tribe of desert bandits. And are you sure you want to say sheep and not cattle?

    • Replies: @Lo
    , @AaronB
  182. Lo says:
    @AaronB

    For instance, everyone knows that the force which hollows out traditional cultures is the Enlightenment, and science – the two crown jewels of white European culture.

    Yes. Still, the solution is not bringing back dead religions. Some talk as if the problem is that Christianity is dead, well, Christianity caused deaths of more Europeans than anything else with the exception of Communism if we consider Russians as Europeans (debatable, they are Eurasians both culturally and ethnically). And, I am sure pagans also felt the same way when Christianity was destroying their old traditional cultures.

    The same people who complain about fading away traditional cultures are also the people who watch TV, latest movies, listen to modern music and so on. I think as soon as you sink into mass culture, you have no right to complain that your culture is going away. It is pointless to blame Jews for one’s own choices. Which is why the focus should be on Israel and its lobby because they are actually controlling US foreign policy in ME and causing America nothing but trouble.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  183. Lo says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    AaronB: “I came across the wonderful line, praise the God who takes care of the “stranger, the widow, the orphan” – stranger in Judaism refers to the gentiles who live in Israel. Jews are enjoined to protect and defend, and treat with charity and kindness, the stranger among them. And this moral code was given in the Bronze Age.

    Too bad Israel’s moral code is from the Stone Age then. Perhaps you should preach Judaism to Israelis.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  184. Johan says:

    “Every sudden fall which arouses laughter does so because it suggests helplessness and reminds us that the fallen can, if we want, be treated as prey. ”

    “but symbolically reduced to meat, to be stripped naked, slaughtered then eaten”

    Such veritable nonsense, this deserves the ‘outstanding nonsense’ price of the month.
    Such an introduction to an article which might be worth while (considering the writer), is like a very bad first impression..

  185. @Old Jew

    Mr. Ron Unz pays for the articles published on “unz.com”

    If Mr. Linh needs more money he may publish here more often.

    I assume Linh is paid for his articles, but I am asking if he has a preferred online seller for his books.

    • Replies: @Linh Dinh
  186. AaronB says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    It was never commanded to exterminate the Cananites, only conquer the land – Cananites who accepted Jewish rule were supposed to be treated with consideration.

    This was never a “template” for Jewish/gentile relations either, but a one time special event – to provide s physical base for propagating God’s message to the world.

    Anyways, I don’t want to get too much into Jewish apologetics, because it isn’t useful – anyone sincerely interested can visit the million sites online or Chabad. So ill stop.

    As for Europeans, northern Europeans did not have a civilization before they became Christian, and the Greeks and Romans at their height developed s very impressive monotheism.

    Judaism accepts that gentiles serve God in their own legitimate ways and non-Jews may have a full share of heaven – for instance, the Rabbis teach that while its forbidden for Jews to pray to anyone but God, gentiles may pray to saints, angels, intercessors, the Trinity, etc. It is a legitimate path to God for some.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
    , @Al Liguori
    , @anon
  187. AaronB says:
    @Lo

    I generally agree Jews and Israel have far too much influence over American policy. But you should realize also, that America has been the chief restrain on Israel historically as well. It may not be good for either side.

    As for Christianity, I don’t think its responsible for deaths – humans kill with or without religion.

    Yet we see today, that without religion, man dies.

    If not Christianity, find some other way to serve God. But being without God leads to death in life.

    • Replies: @Lo
  188. I just watched the documentary “The Lobby.”

    I am thoroughly disgusted.

    The Nose has the west in a death grip.

    May God help us.

  189. AaronB says:
    @Lo

    I disagree.

    Faced with an extremely difficult situation, I think Israel is doing a very reasonable job negotiating a moral minefield.

    No one is perfect, of course.

    • Replies: @Lo
    , @Anon
  190. Truth says:
    @niteranger

    Unz is not always what it seems to be if you know what I mean!

    (wink…)

  191. Parfois1 says:

    A very timely reminder how Jewish Power affects, not only the political and economic situation in many nations – especially the “exceptional” one – and, therefore, peoples everywhere; but also it comes down on you personally should you interfere with their schemes and actions. How many people have been deprived of their education of choice or employment based on merit but for the exercise of Jewish nepotism and ethnocentrism in high places in academia, corporations and politics?

    Yet Lin Dinh also falls into the intellectual trap of equating Zionism (exercise of Jewish power) with Communism. He is entitled to his right to excoriate Communism if he so wishes, but he is dishonest or ignorant if he conflates Communism with Zionism usually associated with Judeo-Bolshevism.

    There is nothing communistic about Zionism; on the contrary, Zionism is almost synonymous with the Capitalist offshoot Fascism, unlimited corporate state power as in the US and leading EU countries now.

    Communism is not a creation of Marx or Marxism – a study of the capitalist mode of production mixed with “scientific historic materialism”, whatever that means. Communist ideas have been practised in many societies for centuries before Marx was born (eg. the English commons land before it was privatised to finish off subsistence farming and force people into workhouses and factories). One of the flag-bearers of the French Revolution, Francois Noel Babeuf, published in his La Tribune, the slogan: “Nature has given to every man the right to the enjoyment of an equal share in all property” 20 years before Marx was born.

    I’m surprised Lin Dinh in this piece (and perhaps in his mind) conflates Communism with Jewish Power (Zionism) – probably via the Judeo-Bolshevism mantra normally associated with poor understanding or plain ignorance about Communism. To be fair, his encounter with “Communism” was a war theatre, not a good ground for an unprejudiced understanding. Yet it is ironic that the cause of that war was US anti-communistic crusade (and even that is debatable if one reads Kennedy’s justification for the war) as he very well know, or should know.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  192. Linh Dinh says: • Website
    @OilcanFloyd

    Hi OilcanFloyd,

    The royalties I get for my ten books are negligible. For the past decade, I depend mostly on PayPal donations from readers, and there’s a donation button at the top of my blog.

    Also, since I have no American publishers left, I will post, at my blog, links to free PDFs of my writing.

    Linh

    • Replies: @Lo
  193. @Al Liguori

    this is as fine a piece of Zionist hasbara thread-hijacking as I’ve seen in quite awhile.

    way to go, Aaron B!

    you truly earned your $2.39.

    at a wild guess, since the Jews can’t (yet) de-platform Ron Unz,

    as (((they)))’ve done to so many others on the Right (see the ongoing (((U-tube/ADL))) purge,

    (((they))) now closely monitor this site & pounce on any article that has the word “Jew” in it

    the moment it appears. Haxo’s advice to Unz columnists:

    find a substitute word for “Jew(s)” in your titles. Something like

    “gefilte fish”, or “matzoh balls”. If Linh Dinh had titled his essay

    “Plastic Recycling and Jousting Gefilte Fish”,

    liddle (((Aaron))) would never have noticed.

    • Agree: Al Liguori
    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  194. Lo says:
    @AaronB

    As for Christianity, I don’t think its responsible for deaths – humans kill with or without religion.

    I know people kill with or without religion, but religion also is another cause. In the case of Europeans, it caused the deaths of millions. Regardless, I said it to mostly point the conflict between the idea that Jews are destroying Christianity and Europeans, and the fact Christianity itself caused deaths of millions of Europeans.

    Yet we see today, that without religion, man dies.

    Disagree. The major benefit of religion (that it keeps believers’ morale high) is its ability to convince people to not worry about death. Thus they can lead moral lives, believing in their good which will bring them heaven. However, one can manage to have a moral life, accept death, and live a better life without religion. Religion does not solve any problems, it buries them. Once one is free of religion, he can start solving those problems. I sure did. Compared to when I believed in a religion, now I am much better, free, rational, joyful, open and fairer (as basically all religions set the faithful against other faiths). I am not worried about whether what I do is right or wrong according to rules set by some dead men who died long ago, I do as I wish. If that is not living I don’t know what is. In many ways, I was dead when I believed in religion.

    Still, I don’t hate the religious, I more or less pity them for they are buried together with the problems the religion buried away for them. I also do not claim that not believing a religion sets one free for sure, one needs to have will and courage to be honest.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @AaronB
  195. Lo says:
    @Linh Dinh

    Mr. Dinh, why don’t you just write fiction under an alias and publish it yourself? In this day and age, who needs publishers?

    • Replies: @white goon
  196. Patricus says:
    @AaronB

    Aaron,

    Thanks for wishing whites well. You say you are a Jew but not white. Are you African, Asian, Aborigine? Is there some other race? The hundreds or thousands of Jews I have met are white in appearance. I’ve heard of Chinese and African Jews but, so far, haven’t met any. They are overwhelmingly European, perhaps with some middle eastern or Sephardic traces. They are not the Jews of Caeser’s time.

    Race is such a broad and nearly meaningless word. Chinese and Indians appear very different but both are called Asian. Italians , Arabs and Finns are not similar but all considered white.

    I identify as white only because I have pale skin. All the Arabs, Slavs, Spaniards, etc. are not necessarily my brothers, even those with very light skin.

    People Migrated for tens or hundreds of thousand years before there were written words. Who knows what skin shades were like in 100,000 BC?

    • Replies: @AaronB
  197. Lo says:
    @AaronB

    I don’t think so. Word choices are important. Israel isn’t facing a difficult situation, Israel has created that situation. Had they never established a colony, there would be no problem. If at least they took care of their own problems I wouldn’t care as much, but by bringing the US into ME wars they are causing major issues. All this so that they can live in a desert mentioned in a 3000 years old book of surreal claims.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @AaronB
  198. Anon[409] • Disclaimer says:
    @eah

    That City of London communist soldier on the left needs a boob job. She’s downright boyish.

    Bravo desecrating the memories of those condemned Canaanites, whoops… I mean innocent German women and children, for the Jews and their rancid ideologies.

    Goodness knows that expelling a mass of genocidal idealists from Germany, who hated the Germans as a matter of doctrine, was a great sin. At least according to the Jewish book that defines as a great transgression any action that defends against one’s own national destruction and even genocide at the hands of the Jews.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  199. Anon[409] • Disclaimer says:
    @jeff stryker

    And yet Jewish communism replaced old Vietnam with an entirely new nation, with an incalculable death toll to match. My prior comment stands.

  200. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    Thank you. I had some free-time today, so started on the (overdue) page. It is not discernible that you are not a native English speaker. Using your excellent points—thank you again—I added some online study and massaged what I had at hand for a draft: http://judaism.is/high-iq-jews.html

    I took one of your insights and worked it into both a pull quote and a meme. See my most recent response to “AaronB.”
    .
    I will keep building on the draft until it is worthy enough to pull down the “under construction” warning. Others here are welcome to contribute suggestions, research leads, and correct errors—heeding the caveat of your pull quote 🙂

    Thanks again.

    P.S. Feel free to comment on how well the Joo-gle page translation (upper right in the page headers) reads in your native tongue.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  201. AaronB: “It was never commanded to exterminate the Cananites, only conquer the land – Cananites who accepted Jewish rule were supposed to be treated with consideration.”

    Oh, I see. Unless the Canaanites (and Jebusites, Hittites, etc.) surrender unconditionally, you kill them and take their land. Very merciful, embodying the highest ideals of Judaism I’d say. This is pretty much the same deal that Israel is offering to the Palestinians.

    AaronB: “This was never a “template” for Jewish/gentile relations either, but a one time special event – to provide s physical base for propagating God’s message to the world. ”

    LOL. What about Isaiah 49:23? “And [gentile] kings shall be your nursing fathers, and their queens your nursing mothers: they shall bow down to you with their face toward the earth, and lick up the dust of your feet; …”

    AaronB: “Judaism accepts that gentiles serve God in their own legitimate ways and non-Jews may have a full share of heaven – for instance, the Rabbis teach …”

    Rabbis Ovadia Yosef, Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel from 1973 to 1983, taught that non-Jews are merely animals who exist solely to serve Jews. In an interview published in the Jerusalem Post he likened them to donkeys. In 2010 he gave a sermon in which he said:

    “Why are Gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why Gentiles were created.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovadia_Yosef#Non-Jews’_role

    Rabbi Jesus has the same opinion. The testimony of the NT is that he takes the typical attitude of a Jewish rabbi toward non-Jews, i.e., he considers them “dogs”. Cf. Mark 7:24-30 where the Prince of Peace sadistically forces a white woman to say she is one before he will grant her a miracle.

    And then you Jews wonder why you are hated …

  202. Anon[821] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    It was never commanded to exterminate the Cananites, only conquer the land – Cananites who accepted Jewish rule were supposed to be treated with consideration.

    You are a liar. We can read your Tanakh that, throughout, disputes what you state.

    Moreover, the Zohar explicitly defines all non-Jews as impure and calls for the cleansing of all impurity from the Earth (the eventual genocide of all non-Jews).

    This was never a “template” for Jewish/gentile relations either, but a one time special event – to provide s physical base for propagating God’s message to the world.

    What god is that? The Jewish nationalist god? Even the Rabbis recognize that each tribe has its own god, as they instruct for the destruction of those tribes and their gods through the so called war in heaven and unifying of the “names”.

    Except, on this website and elsewhere, you can witness that our “guardian angles” (Jewish supremacist speak for the gods of other tribes) are not dead.

    What message is that? Jewish supremacy, world conquest, and genocide of all non-Jews per the Torah (Tanakh, Talmud, and Zohar)? I’ve yet to discern any other message from your band of wandering outcasts, criminals, and murderers.

    There is modern Orthodox Rabbinical commentary that says that Jews are supposed to exterminate any remainders of the Canaanites today wherever they reside. See Chabad’s commentary on the relevant “mitzvot”. There is no qualification made for submissive Canaanites. The commentary is clear that any descendant of the Canaanites is to be murdered. We both know that, as always, the Jews commonly map anyone who does not submit to them or who presents a challenge to them (as the Germans did, even before the wars) onto their mythological enemies.

    As for Europeans, northern Europeans did not have a civilization before they became Christian,

    You are wrong to the point that you sound mentally retarded. Did you attend a real school or a public school with niggers? It makes a difference both in your concept of openly documented and agreed upon history as well as your nigger like arrogance to make authoritative assertions about topics that you obviously know nothing about. And that’s referring merely to Europe. Before that we have Anatolia, Iran, North Africa, and India.

    and the Greeks and Romans at their height developed s very impressive monotheism.

    At their height?? When?? What was this “very impressive monotheism” that you speak of? As recently as a couple of hundred years before the Christian subversion of Rome, the Romans were expelling the Jews for trying to subvert the State and the common morality with the proto-Christian Sabazios-Dionysus cults. They did this as a polytheistic nation.

    When all of this comes to a head, I’ll be glad when it does just to be done with the retard-tier-Jew revisionist history of Europe.

    Your “monotheism” has absolutely zero special meaning beyond a lightly veiled code for Jewish world-supremacism and the eradication of all other tribes.

    This is obvious given the repeatedly stated rabbinical concept of the Jewish god as a type of manifestation of the Jewish people (and vice versa, and a concept that carries over to their concept of the gods of non-Jews). Monotheism is the concept of tribal domination over other tribes and absolutely nothing else.

    This is further revealed (among other places) through the stated nation eradicating goals of your eschatology in combination with the mythological counterpart of this goal with the stated expectation of the death of all other national gods only after a world war with Islam (the eradication of all other nations after a world war with Jewish Islam). Leaving Israel as the only nation standing and the Jewish god as victorious in the “war in heaven”.

    Of course, this is all Jewish mythological bullshit and code for the destruction of all other nations at the hands of the Jews. It follows that you can shove your false reverence for and false history of monotheism very far up your rotten Neanderthal ass. Like I said, we’ll be very happy to move this forward just to be able to avoid the off-the-cuff bullshit of retard-tier Jews such as yourself.

    Judaism accepts that gentiles serve God in their own legitimate ways

    How can they serve the Jewish god? By dying and destroying themselves? Because that is the Jewish god’s (the Jews) goal for them, as stated in your texts. You don’t believe in “the God”. You believe in your god.

    and non-Jews may have a full share of heaven

    Heaven? What heaven? Jews don’t believe in “heaven”. They believe int he Jewish conquest of Earth and the genocide of most non-Jews during the final stages of that process. The Jewish transmitted concept of heaven to modern non-Jews is a bastardization of the Eurasian concept of heaven, except retooled to have non-Jewish followers the the Semitic subcults of Judaism to pray for their own genocides and “life after death” which is supposed to be better than this life. Except, rightfully so, this is not any traditional concept of the afterlife. You can shove your “share” up your ass with the rest of your nonsense content, where it should already reside.

    gentiles may pray to saints, angels, intercessors, the Trinity, etc. It is a legitimate path to God for some.

    Here’s a better idea: we’ll pray to our national gods to beat the shit out of your god in the same way that the Rabbis pray to your god for our destruction and that of our so called “angels”, which is the Rabbinic name for our national gods. How would that be, you deceptive genocidal cunt?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  203. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @AaronB

    “Three had a passion of agriculture and no good was found in them: Cain, Noah, and Uzziah.”
    Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I, translated by Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman (Soncino, 1983) vol. 1, p. 289.

    Contrary to your claim of agriculture’s benign centrality in Judaism, farming is an occupation of disrepute in Judaism. Too, the Prophets are disparaged in the Talmud, simply because the Prophets dared to criticize the Jews.

    Knowing how few Catholics are knowledgeable about Catholicism, I expect that few Jews understand Judaism—forming their self-serving [mis]understandings about Judaism from the intentionally deceptive and self-serving narratives of the rabbis. Even allowing for such ignorance, “…trusting Jews’ narrative about themselves is insanity.”

  204. @Anon

    I might add that communism also allowed China to find its own way independently of the West, which had mostly been a malign influence on the country for the two centuries prior. They had their growing pains, to put it mildly. But today, the end result is a nation that has put forth an cultural and economic model that will soon surpass and likely outlast the West. This would not have happened in China had the nationalists of Chiang Kai-Shek – deeply in the pockets of the Western capitalists – taken power.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  205. Anon[381] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Know this:

    I know a little more than your limited propaganda is leading into in this conversation. Perhaps even more than you, perhaps not. You are either practicing knowledgeable deception or naive viciousness.

    If at any point this all comes to fruition and you get your utopia, and if any of us are still surviving (which as you may or may not know, we may well be), we are not going to forget your viciousness that has cost us incalculable lives, other loss, and suffering.

    Some of you (Jews) know how all of this actually works but I would guess that most of you do not. Those that do not know are acting as vicious demons and are willfully causing great suffering and destruction for selfish purpose. We will get you in the end, I promise you that. You will not share in any new beginning with us. There will not be a place for you in that world.

    If you think that you are protected, then you have forgotten who you really are and who we are. Its not my job to remind you. I will happily watch you arrogantly damn yourself with your Judeo-supremacist admonitions.

  206. eah says:
    @AaronB

    There is nothing there of the harshness of people on Unz ascribe to Judaism.

    No one’s interested in the theory of Judaism; what’s written in some old books — it’s the political behavior of diaspora Jews that’s the problem — this is what the JQ is about.

    • Replies: @eah
    , @Biff
    , @AaronB
  207. Anon[183] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Faced with an extremely difficult situation, I think Israel is doing a very reasonable job negotiating a moral minefield.

    Judah’s existence as a nation that aspires to destroy all other nations and their defined peoples is, in itself, a moral abomination.

    Most of the world would agree, because they do not wish to be dominated and destroyed by a single crazed people and their imported genocidal morality from antiquity.

    Though, due to your group’s vicious supremacism, you wouldn’t know anything about the concept of universal morality that would hold that national survival is a human right. As Jews, you reserve that morality only for yourselves.

  208. Wally says:
    @Lo

    LOL
    Your strawmen are laughably desperate.

    – It’s Jews who obsess over their fake claim of ‘6M Jews, 5M other & gas chambers’ 24/7/365. Fact: Jews have been pushing their fake ‘6M dead Jews’ since at least 1823, no one else.

    – You simply want people to stop talking about the impossible claims because you realize it’s taking water fast. More & more people every day are now onto the impossible nature of the claims.

    – Of course you don’t want a debate on the fake ‘gas chambers’, the crematorium capabilities, the alleged enormous mass shootings into pits for which there are no immense human remains that are claimed to be in known locations … because your infantile “holocaust” cannot withstand debate, free speech, scientific scrutiny.It’s really no contest. Revisionists have easily demolished the twisted & ridiculous Zionist / Jew narrative.

    facts about the illegal Versailles Treaty:

    – The Versailles treaty was illegal as it’s signing by Germany was coerced, there were threats of military action if they did not sign.
    – The Versailles treaty was illegal as it was enforced by an illegal, brutal blockade …. before and after the coerced signing.
    -The pre-Hitler German government immediately & officially protested the illegal “treaty”.
    – The pre-Hitler German government officially & rightly renounced the illegal “treaty”.
    – The German government attempted to peacefully address the illegal treaty.
    – US President Wilson, the Democratic Party, and the US Senate rejected the imposed Versailles Treaty.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @Lo
    , @anon
  209. Parfois1 says:
    @Lo

    T

    he prominence of Jews also has to do with this. Jews didn’t turn America into a consumerist country, Jews didn’t invent capitalism, Jews didn’t invent mass media, Jews didn’t invent Protestantism, Jews didn’t create the philosophy, they didn’t impose Versailles on Germany and cause WWII… All these are results of West’s own development and all contributed to where West now is. Yes, Jews do have outsized influence, but it is because the majority culture allows it to happen by worshipping money..

    You do have a point with your concluding remark that the citizenry allowed Jewish preeminence because of the “majority culture”. If that means the host populations, you are very wrong because the people everywhere have no say in the running of their societies apart from the periodic circus of elections where they have no alternative either than electing Tweedledee or Tweedledum.

    But if you mean the dominant culture shapers it is all an open book of Jewish influence and dominance. Look at the names who mostly shaped western societies in the XX century, from Freud to the present crop of think tanks and neocons, including the father of consumerism in USA, Edward Bernays.

    In all instances you mentioned above, Jewish fingerprints are all over the place, the Frankfurt School being the main incubator for the bacillus infecting current dominant thought and institutions.

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=century+of+self+curtis&&view=detail&mid=48E5DE7EABBEB328FE2448E5DE7EABBEB328FE24&&FORM=VRDGAR

    • Replies: @Lo
  210. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @AaronB

    So many lies packed into so few words!

    (1) Your truncated “stranger in Judaism refers to the gentiles who live in Israel” conceals a key point. The ger toshav cannot merely reside with the Jews, but must submit to the “7” …ooops 620 (!!!) Noahide Laws, the Jewish version of Islamic dhimmitude. See: The 620 Universal Theocratic Laws for Non-Jews: http://www.hasidicuniversity.org/index.php?page=hu_theocracy/th_toc.htm

    (2) “Judaism accepts that gentiles serve God in their own legitimate ways…” Accepts? No, beheads! Christians who worship Jesus Christ as True God and True Man are deemed idolaters, avodah zarah, hence liable for beheading “without formalities” such as a fair trial. Among many, see: “Laws, Noachian,” Jewish Encyclopedia entry (1916), Volume 7, pp. 648-650. http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=113&letter=L

    (3) “…and non-Jews may have a full share of heaven.” No, even Noahides go to hell with the other goyim. See: Rabinical Literature: Or, The Traditions Of The Jews, Contained in Their Talmud and Other Mystical Writings by John Peter Stehelin, Volume 2, p. 10. https://tinyurl.com/y7h43pxb

    (4) In fact, even full converts to Judaism “cannot be equal to a Jew by birth.” https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2017/07/saved-by-race-convert-to-judaism-cannot.html

    (5) “It was never commanded to exterminate the Cananites, only…” exterminate Amalek. Even though the Jews exterminated the Amalek millennia ago, Chabad, your reference, insists there are still Amalek today who must be exterminated, namely enemies of the rabbis. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/267677/jewish/Wipe-Out-Amalek-Today.htm

    …trusting Jews’ narative about themselves is insanity. http://judaism.is/noahide-deceit.html

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  211. eah says:
    @eah

    it’s the political behavior of diaspora Jews that’s the problem

    • Replies: @eah
  212. Anon[231] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lo

    The major benefit of religion (that it keeps believers’ morale high) is its ability to convince people to not worry about death. Thus they can lead moral lives, believing in their good which will bring them heaven.

    That is not a benefit.

    It is a psychological trick in order to get non-Jews to prioritize a fictional life after death over life. It conveniently enables them to pray for their own total genocides, for the benefit of the Jews, in the final war before Jewish world rule.

    Only two religions tend to present a happy, final resting place in “heaven”. Those happen only to be the Jewish sub-cults of Christianity and Islam. Their root, Judaism, believes in no heaven nor hell in spite of any lip service to the contrary that serves as gentile PR. The Jews only believe in this life, which is why they tend to be more materialistic.

    And yet, everything else about the eschatologies of the three religions matches: all Muslims and Christians are to be genocided and the Jews are to inherit the Earth. The Christian elect is to enjoy eternal life on a fictional gated cloud that has been fed into their imaginations for as long as Jews have been drawing pictures for gentile consumption. Islamists have their own special motivators to reach “heaven”, tailored to the overwhelming animal drives of the racial groups that tend to comprise most of Islam.

    In traditional religion the afterlife was not a happy place. At best it was generally neutral to mildly unpleasant. Or if it was it was a happy place, like Valhalla, it was a temporary waiting room until the souls of the dead could return to Earth to fight in a last apocalyptic battle.

    The Jews believe that the serpent represents a special type of temptation toward imagination of the unreal that then substitutes for the real in the mind of the human.

    It is precisely this temptation that the non-Jewish Semitic-religious concept of heaven represents.

    As a result of it, the world willfully participates in a mass deception that is supposed to end with the complete genocide of most of them. Which most of the religious pray for in the hope of reaching “heaven” on or before the Jewish “Judgement Day”.

    It is this designed end-game that makes AronB’s participation here abhorrent.

  213. @Haxo Angmark

    Oy veh! You missed “Fran Taubman” here: http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/israels-war-criminals-in-their-own-words/ Her trajectory was predictable.

  214. Willem says:
    @Robert Dolan

    The only sociological group that I believe in, is the group that can be defined by money. Money has the advantage that it can be identified, and consequently, be treated with (by either giving more or less money to a group). Ideologies like ‘Jewish Power ‘ that prevented Dinh to rise (he seems to believe) can’t be defined and can only be treated in one way, i.e. by exterminating the whole human race.

    Why is that?

    Because there is only one race for humans: the human race.

    Now I am sure that Linh Dinh knows this, he is not an imbecile. He is just… short of money. And that is a precarious situation, I understand. So I also understand why he has to write these pieces, i.e. in order to distract me by having a ‘conversation’ with you who seems to believe the same thing as Linh Dinh.

    Dinh’s mediocraty comes clear when he seems to believe that Ron Unz saved him and keeps on saving him by letting him write at Unz Review. And since Unz review only exists because it is read by people, he subsequently must believe that he is saved by Ron Unz’ group of readers, who similar like him, but with few exceptions, do believe that there is something like ‘Jewish Power’ that should be resisted. But that resistence is never going to work since ‘Jewish Power’ cannot be defined.

    C/ I do not believe that Linh Dinh is an imbecile, yet he is saved by Unz, as he said so himself. So then what is Linh Dinh according to me?

    You do the homework.

    • Replies: @Mike P
  215. Parfois1 says:
    @jbwilson24

    In the case of communism, western bankers and industrialists were financing the Soviets the entire time. They armed them during the Bolshevik revolution, financed Soviet industry, armed them during WW2, and then throughout the cold war. Anthony Sutton’s works cover this, although he refuses to show how many of those bankers and industrialists were either Jewish or Freemasons.

    The answer to that litany of idiocies lies in the source you quoted – Anthony Sutton – and that explains the little you know about financing the USSR or anything else about it. The Soviet Union was totally cut off from international finance, its economic development home grown from people’s labour. The USSR was ostracised, blockaded and everything else. Why would a banker finance a political movement bent on destroying capitalism, the source of the bankers’ profit?

    If you mean Trotzy had links with NY bankers, that is true. And that’s why he ended up withthe ice-pick in his head.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  216. Cowboy [AKA "Hoot"] says:
    @renfro

    We do have different tax agreements with various countries.

    That are just about as good as Russia’s, Iran’s and North Korea’s nuclear agreements with the US. The US continually walks all over any treaty it signs or laws that it passes. Domestically and internationally the US is a rogue talmudist government.

    Just take GILTI and the transfer tax, passed in late 2017 as an example. This is a totally unilateral retroactive grab of non-US company profits. These companies are not in a US jurisdiction, but the IRS wanted to bring them to heel and tax them. How did they do this? They went after any US person owners possessing 10% of more of a CFC (Certified Foreign Corporation, or just about any business). They made this grab retroactive to 1984, even though the statute of limitations for a non-willful tax “crime” was long past, and GILTI was passed retroactively so no one could possibly claim “willful” tax fraud.

    GILTI was such a mess that the IRS had to postpone filing requirements from April to June to October 2018. Now all these owners and part owners of corporations, or retirement structures in Canada, have to file IRS forms for foreign companies using foreign accounting and tax standards going back decades. Do you have a clue how devastating this is? Or are you just another useful lefty idiot?

    Its not like there isn’t an international forum for making tax agreements, this is done at the OECD, where a couple of years ago a new international tax information agreement was signed by every western country but the US. Why not the US?

    Because the US had already done its privacy destroying information and tax grab with FATCA in 2010. Completely illegally the US coerced the entire western world to report all bank account owners across the planet or face 30% penalty on all dollar transactions. FATCA not only was completely against international law, it also violated the previous QI agreements that every other western country had negotiated with the US and been using for decades.

    The QI agreements allowed international bank customers financial privacy on their non-US bank accounts. If a US person had an account, say in Gibraltar, the bank there would withhold 30% on dividends and interest and report it anonymously to the IRS. The account holder, obligated to report the income to the IRS, then could deduct any other local taxes from the taxes paid to the IRS. Most US Persons didn’t bother and never reported to the IRS. So what did the US do? They destroyed financial privacy across the entire planet. And who owns the US banking system and the IRS?

  217. anon[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Would you let your children date a Negro? Just wondering.

  218. anon[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lo

    The Palestinians would be far more genetically similar to the Israelites than the likes of Sarah Silverman.

  219. anon[359] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    All that babble, and yet Goldstein still sees you as a goyim.

  220. @AaronB

    What’s the matter with you? “Non-White”? Too much sympathy for east Asians has given you slanted eyes, or what?

    And of course, Merton.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  221. Tsigantes says:
    @AaronB

    Aaron B. you appear unaware of the utter vulgarity of your Mammonite response, not to mention how off-beam it is. Pull up your socks!

  222. Biff says:
    @eah

    Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to slander

    Unless you’re a white male with a red MAGA hat on, or any Muslim anywhere who resists empire or a Muslim profit in a French cartoon, or a Russian agent with a Facebook account, or an Assad apologist, or a Mullah in Iran, or a Chinese island maker, or a Venezuelan elected president, or any dissident of a pretend democracy, or anyone who flat out has had enough of the bullshit coming from the likes of Jonathan Greenblatt.

    Feel free to slander them all.

  223. @Hapalong Cassidy

    If Chiang Kai Shek had taken power in Mainland China, he would have done what he did in Taiwan : create a prosperous modern nation. Communism was a horrendous failure in China. What the present Chinese leadership is doing now with China could have happened two generations ago.

  224. eah says:
    @eah

    it’s the political behavior of diaspora Jews that’s the problem

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @eah
  225. @Parfois1

    I’m not sure about all that, but we can now look back from a historical distance at that period and what do we see from a broader long-term perspective?

    The communist phase in all those countries (Russia, China, Eastern Europe, Vietnam) was just the transfer of property ownership by dispossession of one group of people (through nationalisation) to a new group of capitalist oligarchs by privatisation. So in the end it did favour the bankers. There are still a few hold-outs like Cuba and North Korea but they don’t count for much and which direction will they take in the long term? And since there were no real counter-revolutions to bring about this turn of events, we can conclude that those weren’t proper revolutions (or, for the more doctrinaire, perhaps they were just bourgeois revolutions, like the French one, pretending to be communist,) that brought the communist elite into power, and anyway it is those communist elites and their descendants that are the new capitalist oligarchs that benefited most from this transfer of ownership from other classes into their own hands. So communists (or so-called communists for the more doctrinaire) were just a bunch of thieves and murderers, and their socialist propaganda was just a pack of lies to befuddle the masses. But I’m not saying that there may not have been some advantages for the masses under that temporary system they installed – I mean they couldn’t just murder everybody as who would be left for them to rule over and exploit?

  226. Yes, those Jews have always been such good people. With their practices such as ritual murder, how can you not love them. I’m with Linh: NO MORE CHOSENITES!!

    “These are 131 ritual murders which are known and have been passed down to posterity in writing. [LSN: There are actually some others, particularly in the ancient period, which are not listed here.] How many have occurred and nobody today knows about them! How many thousands, yes, perhaps HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS have remained undiscovered! To torture young, innocent human beings, to kill and drink their blood, this is the greatest and most terrible aspect of all the crimes which International Jewry has taken upon itself!”
    This information came from a source that had a xian bias to it, but the fact that the majority of the earth’s population haven’t figured out yet is that Jewish and the sister title “Christian” are none but the same. “Christian” is actually a title that Jews give to the dupes who have fallen under the spell of that Jewish “religion” called Christianity.”

    https://exposingjews.wordpress.com/2014/02/16/jewish-ritual-murder/

  227. gabriel says:
    @Greg Bacon

    Well said!
    If hypocrisy would hurt the hypocrite, this guy would be in coma…

  228. Anonymous[599] • Disclaimer says:
    @Al Liguori

    Thank you very much. You’re doing a fantastic job.

    One additional red flag in those “studies” is the fact that the measured Ashkenazi advantage almost exclusively comes from verbal IQ components. So, a tribe that’s massively overrepresented in terms of academic attendance will score much higher regardless of their actual intelligence. Higher level education taught them to read complex prose and forced them to expand their vocabulary.

    Needless to say, that’s not IQ. A high-school genius will almost certainly under-perform a mediocre university graduate (or even an old guy who likes to read) in a “verbal IQ” component. Real IQ tests must eliminate education as much as possible (that’s why “math IQ” questions never require knowledge beyond rudimentary mathematics) but here we have a component that directly scales-up with education. That’s just wrong.

    When I get the time, I’ll definitely do some digging into those “studies” – especially sample selection process and “verbal IQ” angle.

    Thanks again and good luck. Here’s an image I picked up somewhere which might be useful for your research:

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  229. Anonymous[599] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    There is modern Orthodox Rabbinical commentary that says that Jews are supposed to exterminate any remainders of the Canaanites today wherever they reside. See Chabad’s commentary on the relevant “mitzvot”. There is no qualification made for submissive Canaanites. The commentary is clear that any descendant of the Canaanites is to be murdered.

    Well, let’s not forget that they hated, and betrayed, every host nation under the sun. It really didn’t matter how they welcomed them.

    And now they’re busy genociding the one race that gave them unparalleled safety and riches? It’s almost too stupid to comprehend.

    Luckily, the white goyim are waking up and those days are almost over. Imagine figuring out that a guest you hosted like a king plans to exterminate you and your family. Imagine the rage.

  230. Anonymous[599] • Disclaimer says:
    @Al Liguori

    That’s a great post.

  231. AaronB says:
    @Lo

    II am not sure that religion is something that can be argued about really. You either are at a point in life where realize the futility and inanity of the secular life, and realize your own dependence in God, or you aren’t.

    No true freedom is possible for humans – we are either the slave of our passions and environment, or we are servants of God, the ground of our being and the creator of all. Or rather, in service to God is true freedom and bliss.

    In any event, you seem enamored of your independence and self-power, like all moderns. If this is where you are at, then I think you should follow this path with all your might – don’t be a half hearted wuss about it. Don’t get stuck in some half way house. Try to figure everything out using your own power and depend on nothing, to the best if your ability.

    One cannot simply “choose” religion in our modern world – one must be ready for it. And the preparation involves a long and arduous and bitter path of trying everything else frst, of trying first to live a good secular life under ones own power.

    So go for it! Do what you gotta do – and I wish you luck and I hope the transition is swift for you.

    • Replies: @Lo
  232. AaronB says:
    @Patricus

    Of course I wish whites well. Out of all my orthodox friends, I cannot think of a single one who “hates” whites.

    The entire mission of Jews, their very reason for existing – is to be a “light unto the nation” – how the heck has this been interpreted as “hatred” of the nations!

    Does this not imply rather that the God rather loves the gentiles?

    Of course, there are evil, malicious, and stupid Jews who hate goyim – obviously. But that has nothing to do with Judaism.

    As for me being white, well, yes, Jews are of course white and Caucasian, but I’m just using the terms accepted on Unz for convenience.

    • Troll: Al Liguori
  233. AaronB says:
    @Lo

    Israel did not establish a colony – it is a colony. (For the sake of this argument). There is no other Israel.

    I agree with you that Israel is far too involved with influencing U.S. policy in general. It is understandable though. People naturally use what advantages they can.

    Did you know that this intimate alliance only began after the 1967 war, when the Israeli victory made the US see Israel a potentialy useful ally in the Cold War?

    Of course it developed in unforeseen wats, but the initial alliance was as much a self interested American act as anything.

    Before that, America actually forbade arms shipments to Israel and intersected them, even at crucial moments during the war of independence.

  234. AaronB says:
    @eah

    I agree that the behavior of Jewish people in America is frequently despicable and negative, and that Jews are entangled up in America in unhealthy ways. And Jews suffer from their own bad elements as well.

    However, there is a concerted effort here on Unz to somehow connect this to the Jewish religion, which is somehow uniquely nefarious. And that’s rather insane. I believed that too, before I began really investigating

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  235. AaronB says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Merton is the best 🙂 And yes, Jews are technically white. Just using language everyone here accepts for convenience.

    You seem to be becoming some kind of Gnostic by the way – I saw on another thread how you expressed hatred for the beauties and glories of Nature. I couldn’t understand how a sensitive and cultured person like you could hate Nature, until I put it together with your love for the works of Henry Corbin, and it made sense.

    I almost went down that path, but probably what stopped me is my spontaneous love for the natural world – in the end, even the most Gnostic at first religions eventually come around to seeing the Divine expresses in the creation, like Mahayana Buddhism, etc.

  236. @Lo

    How much does Linh get paid by Unz? If the comment section makes the content more valuable for data mining purposes should the commies and racists and crazies “get a cut of the action” (in free market terms) – especially considering recent Calipornia legislation? As agent Linh suggests it’s consistent to be an inter-personal commie so the revolution can proceed hopefully without famine or paranoia.

    • Replies: @Republic
    , @Lo
  237. Republic says:
    @AaronB

    Jews are of course white

    No, Jews are not White

    • Replies: @AaronB
  238. Republic says:
    @white goon

    How much does Linh get paid by Unz?

    nothing

  239. @Parfois1

    It’s much simpler than that.

    Communism is jewish internationalism and it’s imposed on the goyim.

    zionism is jewish nationalism and Israel is for jews only.

    There is no contradiction. Both systems work within the particularist framework
    of, “Good is what is good for the jews and to hell with the rest of humanity.”

    Oh, and jews are NOT white.

    jews are ANTI-WHITE.

  240. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @AaronB

    …the Jewish religion, which is somehow uniquely nefarious…

    You referred us to Chabad for details about Judaism: (1) Only Jews are human & (2) Kill even the best of the Gentiles…in a time when Jews have control over the Gentiles. Yes, uniquely nefarious, precisely as Chabad exhorts:

    “You are called men, but non-Jews are not called men.”
    Bava Metzia 114b

    • Replies: @AaronB
  241. @eah

    I remember seeing that. Wasn’t that taken from the documentary “Defamation?”

    Astonishing scene.

    Imagine…..the ADL goes to a foreign nation to dictate policy, with the implication that if they don’t play ball there will be economic repercussions. Essentially, the ADL went there as reps of the USA
    to demand that there could be only ONE “holocaust,” and a competing holocaust would not be allowed!

    • Agree: eah, Robjil
  242. AaronB says:
    @Republic

    According to scientific classification they officially are – they are even one 50% gentile Italian – but I agree that whiteness has come to mean here only people of Northern European extraction, in which case only a minority of Jews can be considered white, and even fewer Italians, Greeks, and Spaniards, and perhaps only half the French.

    Anyways, I agree for the purposes of discussion here white and Jew should be considered different categories.

  243. I personally don’t think Jews have a high verbal IQ, no matter how they measure it. Maybe they’re afflicted with some autistic illness that gives them a better, photographic type, memory for words, but they’re very poor at stringing together ideas into a consistent, logical, and reasonable whole. Their writings, speeches, and debates consist mainly of verbiage and when holes are punctured into their presumptuous presentations they are quickly reduced to ad hominem insults, or just giving up and refusing to debate; i.e they’re just used to talking down to people and being dismissive and condescending while calling on some authority or other as support for their illogical and unreasonable arguments. You just have to watch them debating on some formerly reputable channel like the BBC. They can’t debate, and in fact they stifle debate, as when discussing important and relevant sociological issues, they quickly start throwing around insults such as “racist”, “fascist”, “anti-Semite”, “homophobe”, “transphobe”, “xenophobe”, “mysoginist” , etc. and that’s the end of the discussion. They’re more concerned with belittling those who disagree with them than debating them and to me it indicates that they’re hardly capable of truly intelligent conversation. It’s quite funny to watch them, but what is sad is that they’re setting trends and others are adopting the same approach copying all these blabbering long-winded Jews. In fact their conversations are just boring and tiresome. I believe “prolix” is the right adjective to describe their writing, speaking, and debating manner. Yawn.

    OK, I’m generalising here, not all are like that, but if you pay attention you can see and hear what is going on. After all they are the ones in control of the media and academia so it must be their pernicious influence, stuffing everyone’s minds with their convoluted mental diarrhoea, that has resulted in this state of affairs.

    • Agree: Cowboy, Al Liguori, renfro
    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @Anonymous
  244. AaronB says:
    @Al Liguori

    https://www.aish.com/atr/Misquoting_the_Talmud.html?mobile=yes

    The problem is, people keep on taking one time specific events as general directives for how to deal with gentiles. As “templates”.

    This is called taking out of context – what was never meant to be generalized is made into a generalization.

    https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/livingtorah/player_cdo/aid/712309/jewish/Universal-Mission.htm

    Anyways, I said “honest” people genuinely interested in the truth should look.into Chabad.

    But I will not be seriously engaging in Jewish apologetics after this, lets move on.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  245. @Wally

    More & more people every day are now onto the impossible nature of the [HoloHoax] claims.

    I have archived “eyewitness” accounts by the (((habitual liars))): http://judaism.is/holocaust.html#absurdtales & http://judaism.is/holocaust.html#eyewitnesses

    One of them survived 6 firing squads. Others observed “Nazis” skeet-shooting babies, eating marmalade made of Jew babies, ½ million cute Jewish children lured into the work camps with chocolates, different colored crematoria smoke for different ethnicities, geysers of blood, the Auschwitz roller coaster of death, etc.

    My favorite is the guy who escaped by pretending to be Jesus.

    • LOL: Biff
    • Replies: @Wally
  246. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @AaronB

    We are familiar with the habitual lies of “context” and “misquote.” To Jews “context does not mean taking surrounding text into account, but in submitting to Judaism’s narrative about itself, which includes how it presents problem texts to non-Judaic audiences… based on the unsupported claims of the rabbis”—just like Rabbi Aish. Using scans from your “holy” books and rabbis, I have supplied verbatim quotes and ample context. Here is my favorite deconstruction of the talmudic “context” lie:

    • Replies: @AaronB
  247. AaronB says:
    @Al Liguori

    I understand, Liguri. It is OK if you do not like Judaism or Jews.

    Are you a religious man, Liguri? Do you have any Faith to sustain you?

    I get that you don’t like Jews – but what about religion in general?

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  248. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Commentator Mike

    The exceptions do not negate the rule: they are habitual liars. Watch the pattern of their behavior in threads here. They will start so unctuously, butter wouldn’t melt in their mouths. As soon as they are challenged, they devolve step-by-step, first with sweet lies, then with increasingly bold lies. When confronted with irrefutable evidence, they will inexorably end up name-calling, precisely as you say and precisely as “Fran Taubman” exhibited in the recent “Israeli War Criminals” thread. Our very own “AaronB” is working his way through the same playbook of talmudic deceits. Having been confronted with damning scans of “Torah” containing plenty of surrounding text, he is at the “context” stage. Remember that their “Torah” encourages lies: http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  249. Anonymous[599] • Disclaimer says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I personally don’t think Jews have a high verbal IQ, no matter how they measure it.

    That’s the problem. They mostly measure it by asking for synonyms/antonyms or missing words in a sentence – which makes it primarily a vocabulary test – which is knowledge and not IQ.

    A smart person will retrieve the data faster but the size of the database is crucial and not directly linked to intelligence.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  250. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @AaronB

    So you are switching from the “context” ploy to the “change the subject” ploy.

    Let’s not play the Jewish game of subjectivity. Instead let’s heed God’s objective Law. God’s Law is about right and wrong, not about right and left, not about like and not like, not about the rabbis’ moving goalposts “pillars of chesed and gevurah,” not about a “series of debates” in which the rabbis “defeat” God and overrule His Law (Bava Metzia 59b). http://judaism.is/torah.html#megalomania

    As an honest man, I have gone to Chabad as you advised. I have plenty to report on Chabad, including their blessing the genocidal lemba (black) Jew, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa: http://judaism.is/chabad-and-aipac.html One begins to understand why the Indians had to defend themselves against those “universal humanitarians” of Chabad in Mumbai.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  251. AaronB says:
    @Al Liguori

    Ahh, I see. You are Muslim.

    Well, I find Islam to be a beautiful and legitimate religion, especially in its Sufi form and as practiced by Talha, a fellow Muslim who comments here.

    I am glad you believe in God, and hope you find more inner peace.

    Take care.

  252. Skeptikal says:
    @the_old_one

    Calling Mr. Dinh “dude” is patronizing, trivializing, and purposefully disrespectful.
    It implies that Mr. Dinh takes himself and his ideas too seriously–according to AaronB’s assessment.
    It implies that AaronB considers himself an arbiter of Mr. Dinh’s writing and ideas.
    This is pretty silly, in light of AaronB’s incapacity to engage with Mr. Dinh’s actual writing and ideas, and his resorting instead to adolescent putdowns and playground-level insults. Such as when a lead bully tries to get weaker bullies in his gang to go along with him in ragging a target.
    AaronB’s attack style is unoriginal and hence obvious.
    What a jerk. Or I guess a troll.
    Ignore him.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  253. Al Liguori says: • Website

    Non-responsive.

    So you are switching from the “change the subject” ploy to Judaism’s inexorable last-ditch “name-calling” ploy. “Muslim,” more subtle than typical, but still name-calling.

  254. @Anonymous

    Theoretically true, but practically not. Intelligent people are ipso facto better educated and thus possess a greater vocabulary than unintelligent people. Intelligent people also read more and thus keep expanding their vocubalary, which unintelligent people don’t do.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  255. Anonymous[599] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Intelligent people will be better educated – on average – but a real IQ test must eliminate the advantages of accumulated knowledge and education as much as possible. That’s just how it works (or doesn’t, when it massively favours expanded vocabulary).

    Maybe that sounds counter-intuitive to you but that’s how actual intelligence is measured. IQ is not knowledge (although it helps in acquiring it),

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  256. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Skeptikal

    Exactly so!

    AaronB’s condescending efforts to convince us of the benignity of Judaism were met with verbatim quotes and scans of the Talmud. Even though the quotes included all the surrounding text, AaronB tried the old “context” ploy, then the “change the subject” ploy, and as is soooo (((stereotypical))), he ended up where Jews almost always end up—ad hominem name-calling.

    Two things have really awaken the goyim from coma:
    (1) the ubiquity of cell-phone with cameras—allowing the world to see what Jews do and
    (2) the easy fact-checking of the internet—allowing the world to see what Jews believe and do.

  257. eah says:
    @eah

    What’s not to like?

  258. Patricus says:
    @AaronB

    Hello AaronB,

    Like you I never meet Jews who hate America, or Christianity, or mankind in general. If they have these hatreds they conceal very well. I’m not Jewish but have known quite a few. Some of our fellow readers on the Unz site seem to think Jews are generally diabolical and have immense powers and otherworldly IQs. I am glad Unz publishes all these comments even though I am often mystified. Getting it all out into the light is the right way to handle these issues.

    As an amateur reader of history I am awed by the dislike or at least indifference of the gentiles to the Jews in Europe in the mid 20th century. I suspect very few wanted them dead but it seems most didn’t mind if they were evicted from western Europe, whether to Palestine, Madagascar or the swamps of Russia. In the US Jews are very assimilated, in my opinion, and few hate them or even recognize that they are in any significant way different from everyone else. For some reasons the assimilation of Jews didn’t work so well in Europe even after many centuries. Maybe Jews can fairly be accused of resisting assimilation on most of that continent. Why did they assimilate in America in just a couple of generations?

  259. Liza says:
    @Anon

    I typed a more in depth critique but my browser crashed halfway through and it was lost.

    There is something called Lazarus you can subscribe to and everything you typed can be revived.

  260. Lo says:
    @AaronB

    You either are at a point in life where realize the futility and inanity of the secular life, and realize your own dependence in God, or you aren’t.

    I didn’t talk about God. I talked about religions. Besides, I came from religion, I know how it is very well. You don’t need religion to believe a God. Your talk about the futility of secular life is coming from the idea that there is an end goal in life / afterlife. I already said I accepted death, what more do I need to say? It is the religious who cannot accept it, so they have to trick themselves into believing they will live forever.

    No true freedom is possible for humans – we are either the slave of our passions and environment, or we are servants of God, the ground of our being and the creator of all.

    You are presenting a false dichotomy. You don’t have to be a slave to any passions, material goods, or environment. God is with me, he doesn’t require me to be a slave he wants to me to be myself, not an instance of a template given to ancient shepherds. Thus, I don’t need religions, they are all false. None is more sound than my beliefs.

    In any event, you seem enamored of your independence and self-power, like all moderns.

    Quite the contrary, I am fully aware of my insignificance in the universe, but it doesn’t matter to me at all. In fact, it is that awareness that makes me happier than those who believe every single action of theirs is surveiled and judged by a man who blasts fire. I don’t need to be worshipped or appear significant to be happy, in fact, I owe much of my happiness to my unimportance. It’s great that people don’t care about me so that I can do as I wish. Men with power are slaves to those who they are responsible for. I’d say I am farther than moderns than the religious. I would, in fact, consider myself to be a primitive man as much as one can be today.

    Your mistake is to assume the one who doesn’t believe in religion has to live for wealth and power. No, that’s not the case. I only get happier as the time away from religion grows.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  261. Lo says:
    @Wally

    I think you are insane. But worry not, I am not here to judge. Just to clarify; I did point that Versailles was very coercive, but it was British who imposed it, and unlike what the man with black hat that just occasionally appear out of nowhere tells you, not everyone who disagrees with you is Jewish or have an agenda.

    • Replies: @Wally
  262. Lo says:
    @white goon

    You know, you are right… And you just gave me a great idea. Dinh can start selling Vietnamese plants that relax people when smoked on these pages, next to his articles. Judging by the comments section, I think he would make a killing and be the Vietnamese king of medicinal herbs in no time.

  263. @Anonymous

    Right and that is what culture free IQ testing like Raven does. I wonder however how you can test verbal intelligence without encountering the problem of acquired vocabulary.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  264. Lo says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    No woman, I am too young for you, find an old man to hit on in your weird way. I won’t give you what you want, keep your wager and spend it on coconut oil hand cream and hibiscus tea.

  265. @AaronB

    Aaron simply can’t control the impulse to spout these ignorant, incoherent bursts of toxic, hate-filled semitism.

    Sad!

  266. Lo says:
    @Parfois1

    They did not mostly shape 20th-century thought. You just want to see them everywhere. Most significant philosophers of the Western world are non-Jewish, with the exception of Marx (whose family was converts anyway, and he was atheist himself). If you think widely debunked Freud shaped Western society you know nothing about what you are talking about. There is only one actually important 20th-century philosopher in the West you could consider Jewish, that’s Wittgenstein. And he wouldn’t be considered Jewish as his maternal grandmother is a non-Jew.

    I agree they are overrepresented in the US in prominent positions, and I think it is because of tribalism, mass media control and money. However, West came to a point where tribalists and money could market their men as significant figures (clowns like Sam Harris, Shapiro or 2nd rate Yuval Noah comes to mind) a long time ago.

  267. @Bardon Kaldian

    (Marx’s work itself was an expression of German, not Jewish thought & European societal conditions)

    lolwut?
    Marx was a descendant of a line of rabbis on both sides, of course — yet to ignorant, hate-filled exponents of toxic semitism such as yourself, he was somehow “brainwashed by dem ebil Germans.”

    Perhaps you might find it easier to understand the purpose of (((Marxism))) as a tool to decapitate goyishe societies, displacing their native elites and installing an alien, hostile elite in its place, if you examined another key founder of Communism — Moses Hess, the man who converted Engels to the Communist cause.

    He started by promoting Marxism:
    “Remember, goyim — whiteness is merely a “social construct!” Class is everything! Hate any White people who have more money that you, and love non-Whites of similar economic class! Very important!”

    But then he “converted” to Zionism, saying:
    “the race struggle is primary, the class struggle is secondary.”
    His “Rome and Jerusalem: A Study in Jewish Nationalism” was a major influence on Herzl.

    It’s the same old story, of course — International Communism for the goyim, ethnonationalism for the Tribe. Zionism and Communism are just two sides of the same slimy shekel: Jewish supremacism.

    Edit:
    Missed @Al Liguori’s response. Bardon’s utter failure to address the Moses Hess issue, and his pathetic attempts to distract from it, are quite revealing…

    • Agree: Al Liguori
  268. @Anon

    Anyone else getting of tired of jeff strykers excessive comments on all LD articles

    He’s gotta earn those shekels, ya know.

    • Replies: @alexander
  269. @Mark P Miller

    “America is Jewish power’s war horse, galloping towards the glue factory.”

    I am going to use this at my next dinner party! With attribution, of course.

    Yeah, that whole paragraph captures it well. Nice turn of phrase.

    Americans, though, are both victims and mercenaries of Jewish power, for even as they help Jewish power to destroy other societies, their own is being deformed and wrecked by Jewish power. America is Jewish power’s war horse, galloping towards the glue factory.

  270. alexander says:
    @James Forrestal

    Are you suggesting that “Jeff Stryker” is a hasbara troll paid off by King Bibi to deliberately infest the comment section of Unz. Review in articles written by Linh Dinh ?

  271. Skeptikal says:
    @Al Liguori

    A newish publication refutes this canard.
    The hypothesis put forth, which much evidence support it, is that Jews self-selected for the trades and professions they ended up specializing in because of the early emphasis on literacy. This was after the destruction of the Temple, when priests and rabbis were no longer there to do all the reading of the whatever (Torah?). Anyhow, the basic argument is made here:
    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/jewish-literacy-as-the-road-to

    I think these authors, Maristella Botticini and Zvi Eckstein, may have published something more recently on this.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  272. ‘…The book of Isaiah would be expanded during several centuries, without deviating from the initial plan, which was to make Zion the new center of the world: ‘It will happen in the final days that the mountain of Yahweh’s house will rise higher than the mountains and tower above the heights. Then all the nations will stream to it. […]…’

    It won’t work. The difficulty is that America — which happens to be my country — will be sacrificed to trying to make it work.

  273. ‘…They have presented Judaism as morally superior to European civilization…’

    All one needs to do is to consider the nature and texture of pre-enlightenment Jewish life to realize the sheer absurdity of such a thesis.

    • Agree: utu
  274. @Skeptikal

    You linked to my comment about Jewish dominance/ownership of Communism, called my comment a “canard,” then offer a non-sequitur about Jews in the professions.

    Did you mean to link your “canard” epithet to a different topic?

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  275. Colin Wright: “[Quoting MacDonald] ‘…They have presented Judaism as morally superior to European civilization…’”

    Not exactly. Presenting Judaism as superior to Christianity is something a proselyte would do, and Jews aren’t proselytizing for their variety of superstition. They present themselves as morally superior, a “light unto the nations”, and Christians, who already believe that a certain Jew is God, are quite ready to agree.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  276. @Lo

    The Holohoax is being used to mask a great many crimes being committed right now against various peoples around the world including Americans. That you don’t know, don’t understand or simply don’t care reveals your gross ignorance or stupidity and probably both. Ignorance is curable but stupidity is not.

  277. @Anon

    There’s nothing wrong with that woman’s breasts. She’ll probably age well with them. Remember that in the vast majority of cases Boob job = Head job. Natural is almost always best. Had you merely taken issue with her cause, that I can agree with.

  278. Parfois1 says:

    We may discuss ad nauseum the theories and root principles that shape our worldview but neglect the power of our own experiences, observations and insights which, in their totality, inform and guide our understanding of reality. Yet, this subjectivism is often ignored because it is personal, non-objective and non-scientific, that is, reality should be observed from outside ourselves. But, by whom, if no-one else has the key to enter inside one’s own reality? This comes apropos the “Jewish Question”.

    My introduction to the subject came when as a child I read a little story in Reader’s Digest where an off-duty Jewish driver charitably offered to swap with a Christian a bus run in New York on Christmas Day. That reading formed my opinion then that the Jewish people are nice. In my teens, that reading was recalled from memory and reviewed: After all, it was only a swap, a very common thing in similar situations, everyone does it, nothing to write home about there. But why was it published and given wide prominence? Then a new understanding crept in.

    The same process repeated itself again when I absorbed all the teachings of the Frankfurt School and Tavistock Clinic and became a “new generation man” imbued with multiculturalism, assexism, anti-familism and anti-everythingism approaching nihilism.

    When my first child was born another chapter was turned and a new reality took shape gradually. After all, family, community, religion, tradition and all that old-fashion baggage matters in the real world of life and I started picking up the pieces I had thrown out. AndI felt cheated.

    Later still I started connecting the dots of my existence and realized that my sense of “self” had been to a very large extent shaped by Jewish thought although I had not come across a single Jewish person previously.

    The denouement, revelation and stark in-the-face reality came later when my first child (now a young man of 18) played for his uni team in a soccer competition. I used to drive him to the venues and watch the games and observed with anger and disgust when the opposing team one day behaved like a gang of thugs who roamed the field as an occupying force intimidating everyone including the referees. I asked my son who were that team and he said they were Jewish.

  279. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    ‘Colin Wright: “[Quoting MacDonald] ‘…They have presented Judaism as morally superior to European civilization…’”

    Not exactly. Presenting Judaism as superior to Christianity is something a proselyte would do, and Jews aren’t proselytizing for their variety of superstition. They present themselves as morally superior, a “light unto the nations”, and Christians, who already believe that a certain Jew is God, are quite ready to agree.’

    Oh no. Jews most certainly present themselves as morally superior. Even when they are critical of Israel, it’s ‘how can we Jews, so morally elevated, sink to such baseness?’

    The assumption is always that inherently, if only they would rise to the challenge, Jews are morally superior. It is a horror that they commit crimes as vile as those of the gentiles.

    It’s alright with me; I could care less about the moral nuances of why anyone turns away from the abomination that labels itself the state of Israel; just so long as they turn. However, really, the lesson Jews should draw from Israel is one of humility; it turns out that morally, they’re no better than anyone else.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  280. @AaronB

    ‘…Powerful Jews don’t care about the impotent rage of Dinh…’

    Well, they took care to render him impotent first.

    I find it significant. Writers and poets advocate and even practice all kinds of fruit-cakery — and people take them seriously or not, as they wish. No one runs them out of town on that account.

    Others perceive an orchestrated genocidal plot to eradicate the American Indian, or are pleased to work for the release of violent killers who then proceed to kill again, or cheerily call themselves ‘Stalinists,’ or favor God knows what other abominations. Heck; Alan Ginsburg used to only agree to do readings if he was guaranteed some fresh young boys for after. No one stops them writing on that account.

    So why can’t Linh Dinh deny the Holocaust if he wishes?

    • Replies: @AaronB
  281. @Patricus

    ‘…As an amateur reader of history I am awed by the dislike or at least indifference of the gentiles to the Jews in Europe in the mid 20th century…’

    Conversely, of course, Jews were always very pained by gentile suffering. One only needs to consider the response of Jews to the horrors of the Second World War; they continually emphasize the losses of other groups that suffered badly: gypsies, Serbs, the Russians, gentile Poles as well as Jewish ones, even the Germans. Why, right now, Israel is reaching out its hand to gentile Poland, saying ‘you too, suffered, as we did.’

    Yep — but can gentiles reciprocate with the same degree of empathy and concern? You’ve got a point.

    Okay — enough with the sarcasm; I’ll be serious. One striking feature of Jewish complaints about gentile indifference is that they never seem to ask themselves: ‘and when did we ever lift a finger to help them?’ There is an underlying assumption that of course everyone should concern themselves with the fate of the Jews — but there’s never any suggestion that perhaps the Jews should have concerned themselves with the fate of everyone else.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    , @Patricus
  282. Wally says:
    @Lo

    I think you are in denial of science and real history.
    You are also very childish, your responses prove it.

    You also have no chance in a debate about your beloved “holocaust” fantasy, that’s why you want people to stop talking about it.

    Stop the lying, desperate strawman arguments. I never said ‘everyone who disagrees with me is Jewish or has an agenda’, you did.

    I suggest this for you:
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    Do you think Ron Unz is insane?

  283. One Tribe says:
    @Al Liguori

    Yes!

    Just as important as arming humanity with the truth, arming the adherents, many, whom knowing the preponderance of the truth, may truly rejoin humanity… even if only one

    their ability to keep ignorance and thus adherence, their primary advantage in divide-and-conquer, simultaneously… their greatest weakness.

  284. Wally says: • Website
    @Al Liguori

    Hey Al, here’s tons more on the fantasies of so called “holocau$t eyewitnesses”.

    The Usual Ridiculous “holocaust Testimony”: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7033
    – and the list below taken from the so called ‘Holocaust’ / theatre of the absurd: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=66

    [MORE]

    · Mass graves expelling geysers of blood;[1]

    · Acid or boiling-water baths to produce human skeletons;[2]

    · Injections into the eyes of inmates to change their eye color;[3]

    · Production of shrunken heads from bodies of inmates;[4]

    · Skimming off boiling human fat from open-air cremation fires;[5]

    · Out of pity for complete strangers – a Jewish mother and her child – an SS-man leaps into the gas chamber voluntarily at the last second in order to die with them;[6]

    · Soap production from human fat, solemn burial of soap;[7]

    · Underground mass extermination in enormous rooms, by means of high voltage electricity;[8]

    · Killing in vacuum chamber or with steam or chlorine gas;[9]

    · Mass graves with hundreds of thousands of bodies, removed without a trace within a few weeks; a true miracle of improvisation on the part of the Germans;[10]

    · Gas chambers on wheels in Treblinka, which dumped their victims directly into burning pits; delayed-action poison gas that allowed the victims to leave the gas chambers and walk to the mass graves by themselves;[11]

    · Electrical conveyor-belt executions;[12]

    · Cremation of bodies in blast furnaces;[13]

    · SS bicycle races in the gas chamber of Birkenau;[14]

    · Removal of corpses by means of blasting, i.e., blowing them up;[15]

    · Blue haze after gassing with hydrocyanic acid (which is colorless);[16]

    · Singing of national anthems and the Internationales by the victims in the gas chamber; evidence for atrocity propaganda of Communist origin;[17]

    · Rapid-construction portable gas chamber sheds;[18]

    · Killing by drinking a glass of liquid hydrocyanic acid;[19]

    · Muscles cut from the legs of executed inmates contract so strongly that it makes the buckets jump about;[20]

    · Introduction of Zyklon gas into the gas chambers of Auschwitz through shower heads or from steel bottles.[21]

    · The SS made sausage in the crematoria out of human flesh.[22]

    · Mummified human thumbs were used as light switches in the house of Ilse Koch, wife of KZ commander Koch (Buchenwald).[23]

    . Breathed through a keyhole in a gas chamber door at Flossburg to stay alive, cursed the SS when they opened the door, then ran away. [24]

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  285. @Colin Wright

    “…The assumption is always that inherently, if only they would rise to the challenge, Jews are morally superior…”

    Yes, that is their “Light unto the nations”*) complex. That’s why they always protest against alleged injustice “as Jews”, i.e. as inherently morally superior people.

    ________________
    *)The term “Light unto the nations comes from 3 passages in Isaiah :

    “Yea, He saith, ‘It is too light a thing for you to be My servant, to establish the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the scions of Israel, and I shall submit you as a light unto the nations, to be My salvation until the end of the earth’ Isaiah 49:6.

    “I the LORD have called unto you in righteousness, and have taken hold of your hand, and submitted you as the people’s covenant, as a light unto the nations” Isaiah 42:6.

    “And unto your light, nations shall walk, and kings unto the brightness of your rising” Isaiah 60:3

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  286. @Colin Wright

    COLIN

    “Helping Gentiles” Let’s take the average Jew and the degree to which he is concerned with whites in post-industrial regions in the lower-class who feel ignored and derided.

    1) Why don’t Jews commit petty crimes? Watch an episode of COPS. Its always the same for lower or lower middle class whites. Pull them over, find Meth and stolen property. Jail. Jews may get stinking drunk but take a taxi. My point? Jews seemingly never end up in jail as victims of African sex tourism for the typical poor white crimes related to drug possession, drunk driving, shoplifting or property damage, petty sex crimes. When Jews go to jail it is for some Ponzi scheme or whatever.

    2) Why aren’t Jews culturally degraded? You don’t see many young Jewish single mothers despite the blaring promiscuity of Sarah Silverman. Out-of-wedlock births are common for lower and lower middle-class whites, seemingly. For Jews, the out-of-wedlock pregnancy rate is fairly non-existent.

    3) Why do so many lower or lower middle class whites marry young and start a family with no degree or well-paying job? Jews never marry before 25 or 30 and always have some skill with which they can support a family.

    4) Why is our lower class white families so dysfunctional? Mom is a drunk. Dad never married her. They were both 20 when the lower class white was born. Barely graduated high school and no degree. How many Jews do you meet who are unskilled and 20 when they start a family.

    5) Jews seem to have some sort of flexible skill. When a city or region goes south, they leave. Instantly. They’re gone. But lower class or lower middle class whites will sit around waiting for the jobs to “Come back”. Eventually, to prove how unimportant a post-industrial city is to the rest of America, the situation gets as bad as Flint where people no longer have clean water to drink.

    6) Why does Hollywood have such an effect on lower class and lower middle class whites. When Jews watched DEATH WISH, I doubt many of them actually BELIEVED that NYC muggers looked like Jeff Goldblum. Jews have been negatively portrayed in Hollywood films (Woody Allen as the neurotic loser, for example). But they really don’t seem to care. Whites do.

    What is my point? Are Jews responsible for the choices that the white lower class and lower middle class make? Are they responsible for lower class or lower middle class white’s bad choices.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @utu
  287. Skeptikal says:
    @Al Liguori

    What I contended was/is a “canard” was/is the oft-cited “fact” that Jews were forced to take up the professions they did (trade; finance; usury; tax collectors; traders; bankers; plus doctors; lawyers; etc.) by Christian prohibitions on other professions.

    The item I linked supports my contention—so, not a non sequitur. IMHO!

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  288. @AaronB

    Deuteronomy Ch 7:

    1 When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;

    2 And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:

  289. @Patricus

    Deut 7 LORD thy God did unto Pharaoh, and unto all Egypt;

    19 The great temptations which thine eyes saw, and the signs, and the wonders, and the mighty hand, and the stretched out arm, whereby the LORD thy God brought thee out: so shall the LORD thy God do unto all the people of whom thou art afraid.

    20 Moreover the LORD thy God will send the hornet among them, until they that are left, and hide themselves from thee, be destroyed.

    21 Thou shalt not be affrighted at them: for the LORD thy God is among you, a mighty God and terrible.

    22 And the LORD thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little: thou mayest not consume them at once, lest the beasts of the field increase upon thee.

    23 But the LORD thy God shall deliver them unto thee, and shall destroy them with a mighty destruction, until they be destroyed.

    24 And he shall deliver their kings into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven: there shall no man be able to stand before thee, until thou have destroyed them.

  290. Mike P says:
    @Willem

    Dinh’s mediocraty comes clear when he seems to believe …

    Dinh should be judged as a writer, not by what he believes; and in my subjective view he is easily the best writer here at Unz Review.

    The only sociological group that I believe in, is the group that can be defined by money. Money has the advantage that it can be identified, and consequently, be treated with …

    That is extremely myopic and dumb, as one would expect of a Dutchman. No, this is not an insult to Dutchmen, because Holland does not have its own currency anymore, so the Dutch are no longer an identifiable sociological group that could be defined by money and thus be the subject of any insults.

    (And before you tell me that there are other groups besides sociological ones – I am aware of that, but it is you who needlessly inserted the term “sociological” into the discussion.)

    Ideologies like ‘Jewish Power ‘ that prevented Dinh to rise (he seems to believe) can’t be defined …

    Why can’t they be “defined?” Anything can be defined. For example:

    Dutchman (m., pl.: Dutchmen): belonging to, or descended from, a former sociological group of people that used to treat each other using a currency called “Gulden.” Physically tall yet mentally stunted; both may be related to excessive consumption of cheese.

    can only be treated in one way, i.e. by exterminating the whole human race.

    Why is that?

    Because there is only one race for humans: the human race.

    This surely is the mother of all non-sequiturs. Firstly, there is one human species, but multiple races; some better looking than others. Dutchmen tend to look o.k., as long as they wear beards, helmets, and sunglasses. Secondly, where does that extermination nonsense come from? Is that really the only kind of “sociological” change you can think of? You must be a closet Naw-tzeeh.

    Seriously, your comment does not even rate as sophomoric. You must be 13 years old or something.

    • LOL: Craig Nelsen, utu
  291. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Skeptikal

    Ahhhh, I see.

    Of course, Catholics have seen this before. Jews insist that the Church forced them to become usurers, pornographers, slavers, pimps, sex slavers, extortionists, physician poisoners, and other murderers-for-hire—as if all honest labor was denied to Jews.

    You may recall the Jews’ tantrum on the publication of Ariel Toaff’s Bloody Passovers: European Jews and Ritual Murder. There were many stereotypically amusing elements to their fury, but there is one aspect that I have not heard anyone else note: It is not just a ritual murder cult that the son of Rome’s Chief Rabbi documented, but a wicked Jewish culture pervaded by perversion and criminality, including prostitution, violent extortion, and murder-for-hire, especially by physician poisoners. Toaff freely stipulated such a hellish Jewish culture, but not a peep was ever mentioned about that in all the propaganda against him and his book. http://judaism.is/ritual-murder.html

    I’m going to primarily blame Jewish “perversion and criminality, including prostitution, violent extortion, and murder-for-hire, especially by physician poisoners” on Jews’ willingness to act out their Master Race creed on us “animals in the form of humans.” Literacy may have been a contributing factor for the physician poisoners (and usurers), but less likely so in the case of the rest of the typically Jewish occupations. In our own day, I’ll bet that Anti-Pope Bergoglio does more Daf Yomi (Daily Talmud Lessons) than any of the H✡llyw✡✡d pornographers.

    • Replies: @Patricus
  292. @jeff stryker

    ‘Helping Gentiles” Let’s take the average Jew and the degree to which he is concerned with whites in post-industrial regions in the lower-class who feel ignored and derided.

    1) Why don’t Jews commit petty crimes? Watch an episode of COPS. Its always the same for lower or lower middle class whites. Pull them over, find Meth and stolen property…

    ? No doubt — but how do your examples demonstrate that Jews feel obliged to help gentiles?

    I would repeat my point, but I think I stated it quite clearly the first time.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  293. @Colin Wright

    COLIN

    Do whites have to be looked over like children by Jews the way whites in Australia have to look after aboriginals, for example?

    Are we really that stupid? They wouldn’t anyhow.

  294. Patricus says:
    @Colin Wright

    “Conversely, of course, Jews were always very pained by gentile suffering. One only needs to consider the response of Jews to the horrors of the Second World War; they continually emphasize the losses of other groups that suffered badly: gypsies, Serbs, the Russians, gentile Poles as well as Jewish ones, even the Germans. Why, right now, Israel is reaching out its hand to gentile Poland, saying ‘you too, suffered, as we did.’”

    Got the sarcasm there. Jews seem to believe they were the only ones to suffer in the war. Israel now wants reparations from Poland of all places. Of course the holocaust slaughters are wildly exaggerated and lavishly embellished. Nevertheless Jews were persecuted and did probably suffer a couple of million dead mostly via Typhus and malnutrition. Many were removed from their homes and utilized as slave labor. Many were slaughtered by Germans but also by local citizens. Total civilian casualties in the 1930s and 40s are estimated at 50 or 60 million. Those numbers might also be exaggerated. When I look at tables of casualties the quality of the data is poor and includes many redundancies.

    The Europeans didn’t like Jews and Jews disliked European Christians. It didn’t help that the Jews tended to support the hated Bolsheviks. The Germans wanted to remove Jews from western Europe along with Gypsies and others. I wonder why these people would want to go back. There might be another purge in the future.

  295. AaronB says:
    @Lo

    I owe much of my happiness to my unimportance

    I actually think that is a proto-religious sentiment 🙂

    The beginning of wisdom is the fear of the Lord – meaning, realizing we ourselves are as dust compared to the Creator.

    I find your attitude in general intelligent and sympathetic – and it contains in it the seeds of recognition of our relationship to the Other, the Cosmos, the Absolute, the Tao, God, what have you.

    Whatever your opinion on ancient religions, I don’t think man can get by without religious practice – devotion, prayer, etc. Making real and vivid in one’s life ones relationship and dependence on the Whole.

    Religions are the best systems to do this, but they are not rigid fixed prisons – personal adaptations and limited innovations are encouraged to suit your spiritual needs. In Judaism Revelation is considered ongoing – God gave the Torah, but qualified men are expected to go deeper and deeper in understanding it and adapting it.

    After a certain point in one’s development, one behind to realize these ancient religions have a tremendous amount of condensed wisdom even in the parts that seem stupid to a modern. This does not mean one cannot be somewhat critical and flexible – one accepts the ancient framework having experienced it’s surprising wisdom, but one retains a certain amount of individual flexibility.

    That is what it means to be religious. Every orthodox Jew I know retains areas of flexibility in his approach, while retaining the overall framework.

    To reject the accumulated wisdom of mankind tout court seems as foolish as making it into a rigid prison.

    Good luck.

  296. Sam J. says:
    @Lo

    “…I don’t understand the obsession with the Holocaust…”

    I think you’re wrong about this. A symbol of this horrible abuse of the memory of the Holocaust is the state of the Auschwitz Swimming Pool.

    By not keeping it up it shows they are trying to cover up the horrors of the Holocaust. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!

    The Jews should force the Palestinians to repair it.

    • LOL: Cowboy
  297. AaronB says:
    @Patricus

    Europe used to be composed of small states locked in unceasing conflict – in this situation, a high degree of social unity and conformity is necessary.

    To have a glaringly foreign element in your midst is problematic, but even worse when that element is very prominent and influential and has a very different set of practices and lifestyle.

    The Jewish history in Europe is unfortunate and tragic in many ways, and both sides share some of the fault.

    European princes should not have contracted their economic dirty work out to Jews, and Jews should not have specialized in tax farming. And physical labor should not have been forbidden them.

    Still, it seems more of a case of unforeseen consequences and no good options available than anything else.

    America was already a modern economy and it was a large entity – this kind if thing can absorb Jews better. Its like an empire.

    It’s similar to how China was able to absorb foreigners much, much better than Japan. Large entities like this are much better at that than small insecure states.

    That’s my take on it anyways.

  298. Patricus says:
    @Al Liguori

    I recently finished reading Toaff’s Bloody Passovers. I was not able to find a single credible example where Jews were fairly convicted of blood libel crimes. Every confession was preceded by torture. Those who were not tortured never confessed. No prosecutors ever produced material evidence such as bodies drained of blood. Torture was considered a valid investigative tool in the middle ages. I think it is good that investigative tool is mostly behind us.

    It is interesting how the Jews (and Christians) utilized dried blood as medicines and therapies during the middle ages. The dried blood was applied to wounds to stop bleeding, apparently effectively. Jews would use it to stop bleeding after circumcisions. It was thought to be a treatment for epilepsy. Some thought it would encourage fertility. Jews used tiny amounts in religious rituals but probably did not ingest it. Blood was purchased and it was quite expensive. Children’s blood was thought to have superior qualities. All this is weird but does not prove that Jews, or anyone else, murdered children for blood.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @NoseytheDuke
  299. AaronB says:
    @Colin Wright

    You’re getting the sequence wrong – Dinh was already a failure in his career before he suddenly began to find Holocaust denial attractive. What little success he had achieved at that point was, by his own admission, great assisted by friendly Jews, who tried to promote him.

    And that’s normal – if you fail, you will resent the successful. But in my mind, a true poet should care about material success. If you’ve chosen to be a poet, you shouldn’t be mixing the two.

    Dinh’s preface to this post, attempting to forestall mockery for his failure at the plastic plant by mocking himself first, shows an unfortunate concern with success.

    In reality, no one would mock Dinh for failing at some stupid plastic plant. He us a poet, and a good one – no one cares one but he’s good at business.

    In fact, a poet good at business is suspicious – has there ever been such a thing? Would I read their poetry?

    In my view Dinh should be allowed to deny the Holocaust if he wishes, and I am not personally offended by it. And I think the Jewish obsession with the Holocaust is terrible and unhealthy – and many orthodox Jews agree with me. I was reading an article on chabad claiming the obsession with the Holocaust assists Jewish assimilation.

    Bt I also understand why that may be considered dangerous. Jews have a mythical and totemic value, and a society that allows them to act as lightning rods for people’s personal resentments and disappointments is playing with very dangerous forces. Humans do not exist in a vacuum where ideas can be discussed neuturally.

    Every society engages in censorship – this is normal and socially necessary. I personally am attracted to absolute freedom of speech, but I think that’s probably just an unworkable abstract modern idea.

    Therefore, soft censorship seems best to me.

  300. @Commentator Mike

    You make an excellent point in this comment, insightful, irrefutable and thus very helpful for bringing the goyim up to speed which is so critically needed. I certainly intend to quote your method in discussion efforts to enlighten others to Jew tactics, imitation being the sincerest form of flattery.

    Just want to quibble with something you wrote almost as an aside, not to the thrust of your excellent main point:

    I’d understand them denying if you quote Dr. David Duke on the subject but when they deny their own?

    First of all, what makes Dr. Duke so persuasive is that he, like Dr. Kevin MacDonald, quotes extensively from Jewish sources – Jews eventually tell on themselves bragging about their conquests and destructions wrought on their enemies who invariably were also their hosts.

    Secondly, and the reason for bothering to mention this to you, is that your example mentioning David Duke buys into, thereby reinforcing, the avatar the Jewdia has made of him as a ridiculous extremist.

    In reality David Duke speaks irrefutable basic truths, is not hateful, and does not advocate evil.

    He’s simply doing all within his power, striving mightily, to save his kin and ethnicity (extended kinship) from the #JEW$4WHITE.GENOCIDE initiative.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  301. @Wally

    Mille grazie!

    What a treasure map to gold mines upon diamond mines of useful information!

    Incorporated and referenced here: http://judaism.is/holocaust.html#imbecilictestimony

    The sheer volume required extensive revisions. I also changed the URL for the BIG LIES•high Jewish IQ page: http://judaism.is/high-jewish-iq.html

    Much appreciated!

  302. @AaronB

    AARON B

    Mel Gibson was an unknown actor who did a few bit parts in Australian television shows and was paid $15,000 for Mad Max after which he returned to regional theater when a Jewish American director named Mark Rydell cast him in his first Hollywood film (I saw it with my parents) called THE RIVER.

    Had he not been cast by Rydell he would definitely not have become a Hollywood star.

    Brando also made remarks about being “disappointed in Jews” and complained that Hollywood was run by them. But of course this was a man whose entire career was a result of Jews hiring him and paying him ludicrous sums of money.

    …You’d think for all the money and success these guys enjoyed because of associations with Jews that they would be falling to their knees and blowing Jewish men in public.

    Both Brando and Gibson were morally dissolute with private lives marred by alcohol and dysfunction.

    In the case of Mr. Dinh, who seemed at one time to be slated for the JOY LUCK CLUB niche of the Asian-American literati, he got into the business seemingly aware it was heavily Jewish.

    Now let’s say you and I decide to run a Vietnamese restaurant in Little Vietnam in Texas or California or wherever they are. So on our website we put a big banner saying “WE HATE SLOPES” and when Vietnamese come in we call them a bunch of names, perhaps calling their wives “yellow cabs” or something.

    When Vietnamese enter our restaurant for reunions, running up profitable bills, we call them Zipperheads and tell them to get the hell out of our country and blame them for ruining Australia with boat people or something.

    Needless to say our business fails. The Vietnamese-American community wants us out of their district.

    You then move back to Israel, having lost money, and work on a Kibbutz putting in back-breaking labor. So you blame Vietnamese.

    Do you see what I mean? Considering the Jews were setting up Mr. Linh to be the JOY LUCK CLUB Asian-American literati flavor of the month, why did he insult them?

    At least Brando and Mel Gibson waited until they were such power players in Hollywood that Jews could not easily freeze them out and in any event had made millions of dollars.

    • Troll: renfro
  303. @Franklin Ryckaert

    You touch upon a quintessential example of Jewish hypocrisy—the Jews cherry-pick Isaias for their failed and long-rescinded “light unto the Gentiles” mission (Isaias 42:6, 49:6, 60:3), but insist that Isaias was killed by having his own mouth sawed in half for daring to accuse the Israelites for their “unclean lips” (Isaias 6:5):

    “[Isaias] thereupon pronounced [the Divine] Name and was swallowed up by a cedar. The cedar, however, was brought and sawn asunder. When the saw reached his mouth he died. [And this was his penalty] for having said, ‘And I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips.’”
    —Babylonian Talmud, Yebamoth 49b, Soncino Edition

    The (((megalomaniacal hypocrites))) are ever ready to “defeat” God and His Prophets.

  304. AaronB says:
    @jeff stryker

    You make excellent points, Jeff.

    I also think its human nature, unfortunately. Even if you are invited in and given assistance, some people will eventually try and take over, or resent the stakeholders, or be unhappy with their position. You see this with immigrants.

    Intercommunal relations are fraught, which is why I think Jews should mostly move to Israel. If Dinh’s career failed to launch in Vietnam, who would he resent?

    Btw, I think Gibson is a superb actor and a superb director. It is really a shame he’s been marginalized.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  305. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    I agree with you regarding Dr. Duke and I did defend him on some other thread a while back. I just meant that it should be more convincing quoting a Jew when debating with a Jew than quoting a non-Jew quoting a Jew. But probably it doesn’t matter if they refuse to debate and throw the anti-semitic card at you. Тhey even accuse Semitic Arabs of anti-Semitism if they happen to criticise Zionism and Israel.

    Thanks.

  306. Anonymous[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I don’t believe it’s possible and that’s why verbal IQ should not be counted in IQ tests IMO. Bottom line is that it measures vocabulary size more than intelligence and people’s vocabularies vary wildly (mostly) independent on how smart they are. Every other IQ segment (math, visualisation etc.) is carefully designed to keep knowledge out of the picture in order to get raw cognitive ability – except verbal IQ.

    Just look at this graph from the recent James Thompson’s article. Notice the odd one out.

  307. @AaronB

    AARON

    I have no idea what your business is but let us say you are a Jewish screenwriter and Dennis Leary gives you a shot. He options your screenplay, chooses to produce it and you win an Academy Award.

    Some time later you are drunk driving through New York. An Irish police officer pulls you over. You begin to rave about Micks. You tell him that Irish-Americans are all pedophile priests and Irish women are sexually repressed nymphos (Both statements might have some truth) and that all “Micks should die”.

    Dennis Leary drops you for the sequel to your hit film and writes you out of the franchise.

    Mickey Rourke and George Clooney vow not to work with you.

    Even your Jewish agent decides to drop you. Other Jews move away from you.

    Are you surprised?

    Is this rocket science?

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  308. @jeff stryker

    …You’d think for all the money and success these guys enjoyed because of associations with Jews that they would be falling to their knees and blowing Jewish men in public.

    How quintessentially Jewish both in its venality and in its perversion!

    For practicing Christians:

    Shekels don’t buy truth.

    Shekels don’t buy our souls.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @jeff stryker
  309. @Patricus

    Predictably, your “reading” missed two of Toaff’s key points, including his contradiction of your “no body” lie:

    (1) the perpetrators revealed the unknown-until-confessed location of St. Simon’s corpse. Had torture miraculously infused such knowledge?

    (2) the perpetrators revealed secret aspects of Judaic rituals that could not have been known to the torturers. Had torture miraculously infused knowledge about secret Jewish rituals?

    The habitual liars pass off the confessions as tell-me-what-you-want-me-to-say, but that tired dodge falls apart in the face of Toaff’s evidence. An English translation is available: http://www.bloodpassover.com/

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  310. Anonymous[123] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    a poet good at business is suspicious – has there ever been such a thing?

    Wallace Stevens and William Carlos Williams spring to mind, depending on how you define “business.” Then there are poets like Edgar Guest and Robert W. Service, who are to poetry as Norman Rockwell and John LaGatta are to art. Very good at what they do, very good at understanding their audience, very popular, and very wealthy.

    Would I read their poetry?

    Recommended.

    As far as Linh Dinh’s Gloomy Gus political views and especially his views of America, they seem heavily influenced by the old Howard Zinn wing of the activist academic left, which seems a bit ironic.
    Nonetheless, I enjoy reading him and look forward to his columns. I don’t consider him a poet — I don’t thing there are any real poets anymore. He’s an observer of the passing parade as he sees it. When he visited Japan, he didn’t interview Maj. Gen. Viet Xuan Luong, commander, United States Army, Japan/I Corps Forward, and a great immigrant-American success story, No. Instead he visited a red-light district and hung out with some Japanese barflies. That’s what Linh Dinh does. That’s why people read him; at least, that’s why I read him: to discover a world I personally would not go anywhere near.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  311. ‘…Though I’ve talked many times about black crime and dysfunction, I’ve never lashed out at this entire race, for that would be preposterous, and not enlightening…’

    I’ve been chewing this part of the essay over since last night.

    Maybe you aren’t biased against blacks in general, but I think it is a mistake to attempt to defend yourself against such charges, and this is true regardless of what an accurate description of your views would be.

    Let me take my attitude towards two different groups as an example; they’re entirely different, but in neither case do I feel obliged to persuade any accusers that I am not biased.

    We’ll start with blacks. I am biased against them; I’ll freely admit it. I happen to think that my bias is abundantly justified, and I am only hesitant to discuss it because at least for me, the conversation can only cover some very well-trodden ground. In another time, on a planet far, far away, I inadvertently initiated what came to be known as ‘the Great Thread.’ It ran to 282 pages, in which Colin doughtily defended himself against wave after wave of knee-jerk liberals. ‘They came, and they came. We emptied three phasers, and still they came…’

    It was memorable, but been there, done that. Now, on the other hand, people might accuse me of being anti-semitic.

    They can have their way if they want to, but I’ll only observe that I doubt if I would give a serious fig about Jews and their pluses and minuses if it weren’t for Israel. Absent Israel, Jews and Judaica would continue to be of mild interest, but more of the intellectual flavor than anything else. I’d approach it all in about the same spirit I think about medieval Europe. That’s interesting, I wonder if…

    I’m not going to spend time explaining how I’m not actually an anti-semite because blah, blah, blah. Hurl that spear. Watch it fall harmlessly to the ground. I refuse to care.

    Ditto, I would say for Linh Dinh and blacks. If he’s not biased against blacks as a group, I’ll take his word for it. Why should he have to demonstrate the fact? This is all the truer now that he’s been cast into the outer darkness. After all, as the song says, about all that having nothing left to lose confers is freedom. Dinh might as well enjoy that.

  312. AaronB says:
    @Anonymous

    Of the poets you mentioned, only Stevens is first rate. And I believe he was an insurance salesman, which is admittedly rather drab and unpoetic.

    I agree about Dinh. He’s an interesting and valuable writer, and his vignettes are tinged with poetry. But you are right no true poetry is written anymore in this age of prosaic science.

    Chronicling the demi-monde is a time honored and useful vocation. But one can do it joyfully. Poverty is as much liberation as it is tragedy. I read recently an article about the street kids of San Francisco. They all enjoyed their life and refused efforts to bring them back into the mainstream, and worked only enough to get by.

    Voluntary poverty has always been chosen by the spiritual, as it is also freedom. And that perspective is missing from modern culture, which sees any diminution if material wealth as a tragedy. Which is farcical.

    I would love to see Dinh, who is brave enough to venture into the haunts of demi-monde, write from that perspective!

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  313. Anonymous[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @Al Liguori

    How quintessentially Jewish both in its venality and in its perversion!

    I was thinking the same thing. Degenerate sociopaths often slip-up and reveal their true colours since they’re incapable of truly understanding virtue.

  314. Robjil says:
    @jeff stryker

    Mel Gibson was complaining about Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in 2006. It wasn’t anti- Semitic, it was anti- war what he said.

    Marlon Brando was protesting about Jewish controlled Hollywood not giving Native Americans a voice.

    So both weren’t anti-Semitic. They didn’t hate Jews. Mel was anti- war and Brando was pro- Native American.

    Our “free” press distorts everything.

  315. @Mark P Miller

    I actually used this quote today on a social media / politics related issue.
    I phrased it as “ A wise man recently wrote……..I admired his turn of phrase . also
    anti – antisemites just seem to come out like cockroaches sometimes. Like you just know they are ever alert. Somewhere

  316. Robjil says:
    @jeff stryker

    There is no time to wait. This is why Lind is saying this now. Neocon Jewish power is leading the world to destruction.

    Here are some of many problems stirred up by Jewish Zionist behavior in past few years. Lindh is correct to call it out before it is too late for humanity.

    2001- Seven nations to destroy Deut. 7.1-2. Wesley Clark named the seven nations to be destroyed for the nine eleven Zionist false flag. Iran is the only one holding out. It is in the “news” all the time because of that. The Zionist neocons want Iran taken out too. Taking out Iran could cause WWIII. The whole middle east has been torn up by Zionist Jewish neocons mania to destroy nations for Israel.

    2014 – Vicky Nuland used neonazis to take over Ukraine. She blessed it by saying F-k the EU. I thought Jews hated nazis and loved the EU. Vicky doesn’t make any sense. She is a Jewish Zionist who loves destruction. She could get away with everything she did without any criticism because MSM is run by Jewish power.

    This Jewish neocon destruction of the Middle East is sending millions of people from the Middle East and Africa into Europe. It is destroying the social fabric and cultures of Europe.

    Would she say the same about Israel what she said about the EU?

    Would she use neonazis to topple a government in Israel?

    Vicky Nuland’s stut in Ukraine stirred up WWIII possibilities and anti-Russia hysteria of the past five years.

  317. @Al Liguori

    ‘…The habitual liars pass off the confessions as tell-me-what-you-want-me-to-say, but that tired dodge falls apart in the face of Toaff’s evidence. An English translation is available: http://www.bloodpassover.com/&#8217;

    Learning from experience, I’ve taken the precaution of downloading the above. I wouldn’t count on it being available on the internet forever.

    It is, by the way, an erudite and exquisitely punctilious piece of academic writing, if written in a mildly obscure style. Slow down, be prepared to pay attention and average thirty pages an hour, and you’ll be rewarded. The revelations aside, it all furnishes a fascinating look into fifteenth century Italy in general.

    Incidentally, I’ll observe that the thesis isn’t actually particularly shocking. Having been subjected to violent and superstitious Christian persecution, it turns out that Jews retaliated in an equally violent and superstitious fashion. It’s really only an outrageous idea if one assumes that fifteenth century European Jews were inherently superior to fifteenth century European gentiles. So they sacrificed Christian children. Nu? Look what the Christians of the era often did to Jews.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  318. @jeff stryker

    Some time later you are drunk driving through New York. An Irish police officer pulls you over. You begin to rave about Micks. You tell him that Irish-Americans are all pedophile priests and Irish women are sexually repressed nymphos (Both statements might have some truth) and that all “Micks should die”.

    Your analogy doesn’t work because Gibson said nothing of the kind. He said the Jews run Hollywood, which is a truism Jews themselves don’t avoid repeating.

  319. @AaronB

    ‘…Every society engages in censorship – this is normal and socially necessary. I personally am attracted to absolute freedom of speech, but I think that’s probably just an unworkable abstract modern idea.

    Therefore, soft censorship seems best to me.’

    Especially if it’s good for the Jews, apparently.

    So much for freedom.

  320. utu says:
    @jeff stryker

    …You’d think for all the money and success these guys enjoyed because of associations with Jews that they would be falling to their knees and blowing Jewish men in public.

    Giving blow jobs is your way of showing gratitude?

  321. utu says:
    @jeff stryker

    You are making a mistake of mixing categories. Replace Jews in your multi point tirade with the middle and upper middle class whites and this will hold. It is about class, about education and about the cruelty of the neoliberalism of the post Thatcher and post Reagan world which was further cemented in Clinton era. The lower classes were abandoned in this new neoliberal world order. They tossed them few bones like the identity politics and gender fluidity and gay marriage which does not lead to jobs and financial stability but only elevates stress and strife.

    You seem to have a lot of self hate. I suspect you are yourself from lower classes somewhere in Michigan and you constantly bad mouth them. You seem to be oblivious to the fact that there are a lot of good people among them. You are dead inside. No love left in you. Hating who you are is always fatal.

    You want to think that you succeeded escaping your low class predicament however you were not good enough or not lucky enough to make it here in the US (Phoenix. AZ?) so you had to escape even further into the realm of the third world where you can play white American bwana and where your low class origins are not apparent.

    You compensate all the time. Each of your comment is an exercise in compensation for the lack of success that lead to the deadness of your soul. Deep down you feel you are a looser. Every time when you are not drunk walking the streets of the Thai citi you live in or when you look at your Thai girlfriend you do not love and do not trust you feel you are a looser. You live in the transactional world where everything is a pecuniary transaction and people are treated instrumentally including yourself (beware of Kant’s second categorical imperative).

    Your lack of success and your escape left an open wound. This explains why you engage in this amateurish folk anthropology (which you mistake for your erudition) of American society as you can’t forgive America for not granting you the opportunity of success.

    And you are a bully and a coward. You vent your frustration on the weak ones which is very typical of low class Americans of libertarian persuasion who at the same time like to give blow jobs to the successful ones, to their superiors, like Jews. Like libertarians you are incapable to see a bigger picture (that’s what libertarianism does to people). You do not understand the complexity due to interaction of economic and cultural forces. You see the world as a set of atomized individuals who fall into two categories only: losers and winners. But you never question the game. That’s why libertarianism was created in the first place because libertarians will not questions the rules of the game. They are not interested where the game came form. So they will never challenge the system. The system loves libertarian losers. And when the libertarians are frustrated when they hit a wall their only response is to run or in few extreme cases they take a gun and do the mass shooting. You have run.

    Probably you may fall back on the favorite libertarian fetish of IQism to explain why things are as they are. Why there are losers and winners. But there is no curiosity beyond it in you. Secretly you must believe that you are not that smart because you failed that’s why you must compensate. Your folk anthropology is your vehicle for compensation. You read papers, watch news and stupid programs like COPS and draw from it the image of the world on which you can practice your folk anthropology. But it is folk anthropology not science. You have no scientific method. You never challenge your conclusions. Because your conclusions are drawn to validate you and your choices. All you do is follow the path of the least resistance defined by confirmation bias. So it works for you. It is a closed system.

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  322. @Patricus

    Torture was considered a valid investigative tool in the middle ages. I think it is good that investigative tool is mostly behind us.

    Wrong! How could you “forget” Guantanamo? Abu Ghraib? Just to name a couple of places.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  323. @Craig Nelsen

    Didn’t Mel also say that Jews were behind all of the wars? I thought that he did.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  324. eah says:
    @AaronB

    began to find Holocaust denial attractive

    It has nothing to do with ‘attractiveness’ in the sense of seeking a scapegoat, which you imply — let me lay it out for you so it is perfectly clear — pay close attention:

    First, understand the concepts of an adversarial court proceeding and the ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard of proof — it should not be necessary to elaborate on those.

    As alleged, the ‘Holocaust’ is a crime — also a conspiracy to commit that crime — as for every crime, key questions are: what is the evidence? — is the evidence sufficient for a conviction in an adversarial court proceeding to the ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard?

    Here is the essence of ‘Holocaust denial’: people disregard the moral pressure to believe, and look at what the evidence for the ‘Holocaust’ actually is — after doing so, they conclude that the evidence is not sufficient to result in a conviction in a modern adversarial court proceeding using the ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard.

    It’s as simple as that.

  325. @Craig Nelsen

    Well I presume if a Jewish man became a liquor distributor in Boston he would be sentient that most of his purchasing base was “run” by Irish-Catholics.

    Considering the absurd amount of money a former orange juice factory worker named Mel Gibson has made in Hollywood compared to a few minor gigs on Australian television and some regional theater there, I would think he would be cool with the Jews.

    I’m not Jewish and probably would not trust any of the Jews I knew personally farther than I could throw them but if they had made me as much money as they made Gibson and Brando I’d have kept my opinions to myself.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @NoseytheDuke
  326. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    Imagine if you bought hard copies of Toaff’s first edition before all were re-called within a week! The risible premise in the revised-under-threats 2nd edition is that Christian children died at the hands of Jews, but that the children were voluntary donors of blood and things just accidentally went wrong. The second edition is meticulously deconstructed with exact quotes here: http://www.cwporter.com/toaffdonor.htm

    If you enjoy unravelling such historical mysteries, I highly recommend The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 3 The Leo Frank Case–The Lynching of a Guilty Man. Amazon banned it, the free e-book is no longer available, and the UR bookstore doesn’t stock it. The only source I found tonight is the NOI store: https://store.finalcall.com/products/the-secret-relationship-between-blacks-and-jews-volume-3

    Now is the time to buy the series. The usual suspects are positioning to buy and bully an exoneration of Leo Frank. Readers will be well-positioned to expose the hasbara. Speaking of hasbara

    • Replies: @Republic
  327. @Al Liguori

    AL

    Why else would Mel Gibson have made Mad Max if not for money? You’re telling me that non-Jews in the film industry are not in that business for money?

    I’m not Jewish myself.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  328. Anonymous[835] • Disclaimer says:
    @jeff stryker

    if they had made me as much money as they made Gibson and Brando I’d have kept my opinions to myself.

    What, no dick-sucking? I’m not sure I believe you, Shlomo.

    Your nose is showing. Even a goy sociopath wouldn’t hold his tongue and watch the world turn into shit – especially when they’re already financially independent ten times over. They’d still understand self-preservation.

  329. @utu

    UTU

    I’m the son of a scientist and an architect. As middle-class as middle-class gets.

    This this the Gen Y and Gen X generation gap. Your generation grew up with helicopter parents and came of age during an awful economy on the heels of the grimly patriotic Bush years so of course libertarians are abhorrent and you would like some form of national socialism (In the economic sense).

    I was born in 1974 and my generation were latchkey kids born during Watergate who came of age during the Clinton years so we are not particularly patriotic and the burgeoning global economy allowed many of us to jump over the wall so to speak. At age when most Gen Y live at home, many Gen X like me were already employed overseas. We are far more cynical and skeptical than Gen Y.

    While I may be a loser (Though at 25 I was already employed overseas while Gen Y had never even been able to move out of the house they grew up in) it was more a matter of the rising Asian economy becoming first world while my birthplace became increasingly Third World. You’ll find more homeless these days in America than Asia. The infrastructure of most Asian and ME countries is far better than much of the US. Certainly the skyline is nicer. Crime is lower.

    Many posters on here have stated that “Indian is a sh*thole” but I felt safer walking through Mumbai at night than Los Angeles or Detroit. I never felt as unsafe around Indians as I did around Mestizos in Phoenix.

    Much is made about the meth problem in the Philippines, but nowhere but Phoenix did foul-smelling raccoon-eyed wired-up tweakers from the unfettered white underclass out of their minds high on meth follow me around. I saw the ravages of meth addiction everywhere in Phoenix but not Philippines, despite the much-publicized drug war.

    Gen Y like yourself lived at home far into your twenties, even thirties. You did not hit the bricks at 18 or 19 and see things in low-income housing or bad areas because you lived at home. Of course Gen X could have sex, so we did not make a bunch of leathery old Jewish men in San Fernando Valley rich by becoming porn addicts.

    On the subject of free market capitalism I agree. Did nothing for the lower class. Cultural trends made it worse with the popularization of drugs and sexual freedom or, in the 90’s, alternative lifestyles which mean a bunch of pregnant drug addicts and bisexual men spreading AIDS on the down low.

    I’d compare being an expat to being woken in the middle of the night by a drunken fight on the street below your bedroom window. You are watching and can see it from a distance and you feel a bit of contempt. You see it from a distance, outside of the “system”.

    I hear the word “closed” a great deal from Gen Y and as I was born in 1974 I am old enough to regard you as a different generation. Many things are closed to you, probably.

    I’m glad I got out young. No dependents, no wife, no house. If I was a bit of a slacker in 1999 it allowed me to move overseas because I had nothing to lose and now I do not have to worry about things like BLM or MS-13.

  330. @jeff stryker

    C’mon jeff, you don’t seem to be the sort to keep his personal opinions to yourself. It’s starting to look more like you’re mad at Marlon and Mel because they could get more free poon before breakfast than you could get in your entire lifetime, even by paying Asian hookers.

  331. barting says:

    What a king of the bazoo would do for a break at the big time.Bend the knee and kiss that kosher ass.

  332. @AaronB

    AARON

    Tell that to the hippie girls who met some charismatic small bearded hippie and followed him out to a desert ranch only to discover he was a modern-day Rasputin.

  333. cowboy says:

    The busy body bastard will always be with us beguiling for better chains. When the collectives themselves buy in it’s time to head for the hills. The wilderness can be lonely but at least it’s true.

  334. @jeff stryker

    I said:

    How quintessentially Jewish both in its venality and in its perversion!
    For practicing Christians:
    Shekels don’t buy truth.
    Shekels don’t buy our souls.

    You said:

    “Why else would Mel Gibson have made Mad Max if not for money? You’re telling me that non-Jews in the film industry are not in that business for money? I’m not Jewish myself.”

    I say:

    To decent people, getting paid for a job is not selling one’s soul or a contract for lying.

    “Not Jewish”??? Well then, you have gotten up with (((fleas))):

    http://judaism.is/kosher-internet.html

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  335. @NoseytheDuke

    ‘Didn’t Mel also say that Jews were behind all of the wars? I thought that he did.’

    He did. The thing of it is, though, from my experience with Australians, if they’re pissed off, they just start going after whatever your point of vulnerability appears to be. If the cop had been fat, he would have heard about fat people. If he’d had a ridiculous Bolton-style soup-strainer, he’d have heard about that. Since he was Jewish, Mel went off about Jews.

    Unless you believe in genuflecting to the holy cult of Judaism and treating it with respect at all times, there wasn’t necessarily much to be read into Mel’s rant.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  336. Anon[263] • Disclaimer says:

    “Americans, though, are both victims and mercenaries of Jewish power, for even as they help Jewish power to destroy other societies, their own is being deformed and wrecked by Jewish power. America is Jewish power’s war horse, galloping towards the glue factory.”

    The Jewish word for this is “GOLEM.” I’m going to put this quote up on my wall because it summarizes the real state of affairs.

  337. @NoseytheDuke

    Wrong! How could you “forget” Guantanamo? Abu Ghraib? Just to name a couple of places.

    Well, yeah, but I don’t think it was being used as a “valid investigative tool” in those various cases. I mean, the people they were torturing at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib were just some nobodies who they rounded up more or less randomly, who had no real information anyway.

    So the purpose of the torture was just to extract false confessions. Of course, that was frequently the case in the Middle Ages. People would confess to witchcraft and all sorts of things when tortured. In the more recent cases, they’d confess that they belonged to some shadowy international terrorist organization — that probably never existed any more than the medieval witchcraft did.

    • Agree: NoseytheDuke
  338. eah says:

    Can anyone think of another reason why the Pacific Theater in WWII gets less attention than the European Theater? — I’m drawing a blank.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  339. Anonymous[302] • Disclaimer says:
    @eah

    Strategic importance, geopolitical importance, combat intensity, number of causalities, amount of destruction. Duh.

    • Replies: @eah
  340. Robjil says:
    @Colin Wright

    Mel was angry about Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in the summer of 2006. Israel thought it could do one of the seven nations that it wanted to destroy on its own. It did not work so well for Israel. Israel did a lot of bombing of civilians as it left. So, Mel was on the good side for being angry about this. Our “free” press doesn’t mention that he was very angry about this genocidal attack on the people of Lebanon. Our “free” press does not want us to know too much about what Israel did to Lebanon in 2006. So the theme all wars was only mentioned and not the war of 2006 that ticked off Mel.

    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180712-remembering-israels-2006-war-on-lebanon/

    “Initially, both Israel and Hezbollah claimed victory in the war, with Nasrallah declaring that Hezbollah had achieved a “divine, historic and strategic victory”. Some international observers saw the fact that Hezbollah had survived the Israeli assault, despite the asymmetrical power balance, as a PR victory for the group. According to Reuters, the Lebanese government estimated direct war damage at $2.8 billion, and lost output and income for 2006 at $2.2 billion. The economy also shrank five per cent, with tourism effectively halted.”

    Thus, Israel accomplished something after all it, it destroyed the tourist industry in Lebanon. The endless ads pushed by our “free” press to visit Israel are a crime against humanity for what Israel does to its neighbors – Lebanon and Syria. Also, add all the seven nations that Israel wants to destroy for the nine eleven false flag. It is a sin to visit Israel for what she/he/it does to the Middle East and the world.

  341. QUESTION FOR GEN Y

    A bunch of posters here, obviously under 40, seem to have an antipathy to libertarians (Which I am not).

    What is the deal with the Gen Y dislike for this particular theory? Is it because as Helicopter Children they disdain a government that does not force people to wear seat belts?

    Whats with it?

    Can some Gen Y explain this to me?

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  342. @Al Liguori

    Mel Gibson seems to have been a fairly abusive alcoholic who got lucky.

    He was cast as Mad Max because of a brawl with rugby players at a party that left him beaten up and bruised.

    MAD MAX attracted some attention from other producers.

    His career was riddled with drunk driving episodes and abuse directed mostly at women like his Russian wife.

    Decent?

    Brando was worse. His womanizing was notorious and his kids were screwed up junkies and alcoholics. One killed herself, the other went to prison and died of alcoholism not long after he got out.

    I suppose that simply because these guys disliked Jews this makes them decent people. Which is sort of like white people who pledge their love for Palestinian people simply because they perceive them as enemies of Jews.

    And again, I am not Jewish and not Phil0-Semite.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  343. @jeff stryker

    You seem very confused. I don’t think anybody here is putting Brando or Gibson on a pedestal, they were just actors with some good work and some not so good work. I doubt either would have won Father of the Year awards, but neither of them started any wars nor advocated for any either. I would think that people who hate all Jews are probably in the minority and people like Cheney, Pompeo, Bolton and their kind are rightfully hated just as much as those prominent Jews who have advocated for the ruinous wars of aggression that have taken place post 9/11. It is hard not to draw the conclusion that those wars have been initiated to serve Jewish Israeli interests though

    • Agree: utu, Al Liguori, Robjil
    • Replies: @eah
  344. eah says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    to serve Jewish Israeli interests

    Certainly to a significant degree — but the US also now has an enormous national security state, what Eisenhower called the “military industrial complex” — of what use is this and why should Americans allow themselves to be taxed and ruinously indebted to fund it unless it is to protect “us” from ever-present threats? — and what better proof of ever-present threats than constant tension and war?

    Before the end of WWII and the beginning of the ‘Cold War’, with its ever-present threat/menace, the US did not have a large standing army (federal military) because Americans didn’t want to fund it and (wisely) didn’t trust it — distrust of government is the reason for the Second Amendment — everyone can now see how right the Founding Fathers, earlier generations of Americans, and Eisenhower were about all of that.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  345. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @jeff stryker

    (((Libertarianism))) is an interesting case—yet another philosophy advanced by the same tribe of chameleons*** that gave us predatory capitalism and communism, disguised this time as (((the Austrian School))). I smell the brimstone odor of “thesis/antithesis/synthesis” (a.k.a. pillars of chesed/tiferet/gevurah). Predictably, all these tribal projects are anti-Christ. Champions of the immorality of the whatever-the-market-will-bear “free market” insist that the “Austrian” school is “science” (well, maybe the “science of Shylock”) without religious or moral judgments. These anti-Christ advocates of usury, price-gouging, and wage suppression can quote reams of (((Mises))), yet seem never to have carefully read (((Mises)))— or Luke 6:32-36:

    “…[T]he Protestant Church still tries to delude itself [that the Bible is relevant to theology].… [The Gospels] offer no rules of life except practical ones.… Jesus offers no rules of earthly action and struggle; his [sic] Kingdom is not of this world…” and then in the same breath Mises contradicts himself, “Such rules of conduct as he [sic] gives are valid for only the short interval of time which has still to be lived while waiting for the great things to come.” Ignoring the fishermen and The Carpenter Himself, Mises opines, “The primitive Christians do not produce, labour, or gather anything at all.” Ignoring the Beatitudes, the Two Greatest Commandments, and Luke 6:32-36, Mises pronounces, “The historical Christ and his [sic] teachings are quite indifferent to all social considerations.… The expectation of God’s own reorganization when the time came and the exclusive transfer of all action and thought to the future Kingdom of God, made Jesus’s teaching utterly negative. He rejects everything that exists without offering anything to replace it. He arrives at dissolving all existing social ties.… Hence his [sic] passionate attack upon everything that exists.… [T]he new order [of Christianity] demands therefore from its adherents no system of ethics, no particular conduct in any positive direction.… The clearest modern parallel to the attitude of complete negation of primitive Christianity is Bolshevism.… Jesus’s teaching in this respect…is merely negation…His teachings had no moral application to life on earth.…”

    Ludwig von Mises and J. Kahane (translator), Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, Part IV, Chapter III, “Christianity and Socialism.” New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951. pp 413-416

    https://mises.org/system/tdf/Socialism%20An%20Economic%20and%20Sociological%20Analysis_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

    *** http://judaism.is/perpetrators.html#chameleons

  346. anon[336] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    – US President Wilson, the Democratic Party, and the US Senate rejected the imposed Versailles Treaty.

    Considering America’s genocides against the Red Man and turning Germany into a puppet state they have no room to object to Versailles “morally.”

  347. eah says:

    Jews push for censorship because they do shit like this:

  348. eah says:
    @Anonymous

    Duh.

    “LOL” — it’s because of the ‘Holocaust’, you moron — no one except a historian writing a book hardly anyone will read cares anymore about the “strategic importance” blah blah of a conflict that took place many decades ago — whereas you hear about the ‘Holocaust’ nearly every damn day — and that’s true even though the atom bomb was dropped on Japan, for fucks sake.

  349. @AaronB

    I love to see this. A slimy, conniving little vermin slinks in to spread his poison and gets the response he deserves. I have a mental picture of AaronB, and it ain’t pretty. Good work, all above who replied vigorously to Aaron’s duplicitous, insinuating post or who identified this dear sweet creature as a troll.

  350. @AaronB

    You said: “Look, I agree that for the defeated and broken, those with a lifetime of humiliations and failures behind them, it is perfectly natural and in a sense even appropriate to hate on Jews – who are symbolic of success.”

    Jews have made themselves repulsive to those whom they infest since long before your modernistic model could ever apply.

    Jews in the Hellenistic world were despised because they sent money to support the Jerusalem temple instead of contributing taxes to the Greek cities in which they lived.

    The principal Jewish population in Europe was in Poland-Lithuania-Belarus-Ukraine from the 14th century on and there, Jews were co-exploiters of an immigrated peasantry.

    And recurrently, the Jew has arrived on the back of conquerors who subjugate the local population–in Spain oiling their way in in the wake of the Muslim conquest, in Eastern Europe in the trail of the Drang nach Osten, in Ukraine with the exploiters of the Polish Szlachta, and into Palestine on the back of the British Empire.

    It’s no wonder the Jew is so detested no matter where he gets his foot in the door.

    And then we have people like Henry Ford and Thomas Edison. If lack of success is what generates detestation of the Jew, how do paragons like these, who saw the Jew for what he was, fit into your model?

    You are a typically dishonest Jew whose connivances are now only too obvious. It’s good to see that almost no one here is taken in by your Ashkenazi Pilpul.

  351. @Al Liguori

    Now that you mention it, eager for thoughts identifying any downside risks we take in “trusting” the Jew Mr. Unz by posting here.

    I’ll prime the pump by saying maybe we are not extending trust at all in that it could be said that the worst that could happen is for all our comments to disappear such that all that would be lost is the time invested in the posting.

    The most extreme risk this mind can comprehend (other than somehow being identified for disclosure of identity or targeting by Mossad for assassination) would be either barring publication or making a claim on profits derived from any publication of ideas expressed in comments due to the disclaimer here that all comments become his property.

    If all he would assert as owner of these comments is the right to republish elsewhere THEN HE’D BE DOING US A DOUBLE FAVOR BY INCREASING THE CIRCULATION OF OUR IDEAS EVEN BEYOND THIS WONDERFUL SITE.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Jonathan Revusky
  352. Noman says:
    @Lo

    The supposed architects of the “Final Solution” were Jewish. Hitler, Eichmann, Himmler, and the beard Eve Braun were Jewish.

    Over half of the Third Reich officer corps were Jewish or half-Jewish. Candidates for the ovens and showers. No yellow stars on those officers’ uniforms.

    Yalta was three Jewish leaders discussing how to carve up post war Europe after the defeat of a fourth Jewish leader. “Turtles all the way down.”

    The “nazis” are the national zionists, who achieved a victory in 1948. Securing a beachhead for their invasion of the Levant.

    There is a “Final Solution”. It is the resolution of the Palestinian problem by removing the Palestinians from their ancestral homelands to make way for Eurasian Jewish immigrants with no genetic connection to the ancient Israelites.

  353. Truth says:
    @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    I’ll prime the pump by saying maybe we are not extending trust at all in that it could be said that the worst that could happen is for all our comments to disappear such that all that would be lost is the time invested in the posting.

    Yeah, that’s about it.

    Or he could have your IP addressed traced to find out who you are, ruin you credit, and have you harassed by the police, and eventually, set you up for a Chinese-Army led FEMA death squad to snatch you out of your bed at midnight and haul you off to a reorganization camp which used to be your local Wal Mart.

    Other than that, he’s helpless…

  354. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    THEN HE’D BE DOING US A DOUBLE FAVOR BY INCREASING THE CIRCULATION OF OUR IDEAS EVEN BEYOND THIS WONDERFUL SITE.

    What “ideas” are you referring to, I wonder… Maybe something like…

    I hate niggahs. They stink and they make me wanna puke!

    Repeated over and over…. Or…

    All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

    • Replies: @anon
  355. anon[169] • Disclaimer says:

    Linh you are the best.I learn so much.I love your incredible explanation of just how the Jews have done such damage to my people and our world.Thank you a thousand times.I see the Tribe’s trolls were really triggered by this article(esp Aaron B.),so that means you did a GREAT job!My friend you have my brotherly love and deep admiration.God bless you.

  356. anon[297] • Disclaimer says:

    At the end of each show, the man who had orchestrated this entire howling depravity would give a brief lecture on how to behave, thus Jerry Springer joins Jesus, Marx, Freud, Trotsky, Boas, Alinsky, Ginsberg, Goodman and Chomsky as a Jewish teacher for goyim, for even white trash need Jewish guidance to get through this treacherous life.

    and (((Maury Povich))), (((Sally Jesse Raphael aka Lowenthal))), (((Ricki Lake))), (((Geraldo))), (((Jenny Jones aka Janina Stronski))) and on and on…

  357. anon[297] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Yet Kovel did not lose his tenure for his White Racism —- targeting millions more Whites than Jews —- but for his analysis of Zionist power

    yes, i noticed that too

  358. anon[297] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    What “ideas” are you referring to, I wonder… Maybe something like…

    I hate niggahs. They stink and they make me wanna puke!

    i have to say his honesty is refreshing

  359. Tom67 says:

    Hi Linh
    I have indeed read most of what you published on Unz. You are great writer with a unique perspective.
    I am sorry, that these nitwits have managed to oust you from so many venues. But be assured you are more read and appreciated than 99% of your fellow US poets. In fact I find most “academic” poetry empty, self-obsessed and without any relevance whatsoever. I don´t know how representative the poetry in the New Yorker is, but most of it is pure drivel. Ever anxious to appease that or the other community and out to please an audience of well-off know nothing suburbanites this sort of poetry is so bad I only read it to understand the depth to which literature has fallen in the US.
    So you are in an altogether different league and what does the oak care if a pig rubs its snoat on it. (German proverb)
    As to black Americans you tell it like it is. Albeit though I might differ in ascribing the causes. Ever since I lived in the Eighties in the country of the penal laws Ireland where up to the 19.century Catholics i.e. Irish were not allowed to have a higher education nor advance in any other way except in the Church I believe that things like the penal laws and the more so slavery have a very long lasting effect. Basically men of the suppressed minotities give up on the pathes to glory and selfpropellment that are open in more egalitarian societies. Still they want to prove themselves. The only venues open are violence and the arts.
    The English prejudice against the Irish — that they were more violent and unruly if not outright “dumb” had their base in reality. The Irish were indeed well known in the poorer sections of Glasgow and Liverpool for their propensity to violence and the inability to move beyond mere physical labour. But also the Irish have a much larger share in the Arts than their numbers would suggest. In fact I have since never been in a country where there was such a love for poetry, literature and music as in Ireland. Today the country is very different as the invisible shackles of the penal laws seem finally to have come off.
    To my mind (one can argue about this of course) as a general rule African American literature is also much more interesting than the boring middle class contrived stuff that most of “white” Americans have produced.
    Finally there can be no doubting the fact that the only original contribution of the US to world music is entirely due to AfricanAmerican genius.
    Whatever – so many cheers for you from an avid reader.

  360. @AaronB

    “Its not an accident that this piece on Jew hated starts with describing your own failures in the plastic plant….”

    I agree; Dinh is projecting his own failures into his writing.

    Linh Dinh can’t help himself when he writes, “Jewish power has only inconvenienced my life a bit, not humiliated me daily, bulldozed my house, arrested me, tortured me, shot me or destroyed my entire society, so I’m the slightest casualty among its millions of victims…”.

    Dinh conveniently leaves out the part that what he wrote about (above) happens to Arabs who murder Jews with smiles on their faces: the house that is bulldozed belongs to the family who openly celebrates their son’s murdering of a Jewish grandma who was simply waiting at a bus stop, or a 13-year-old Jewish girl who was sleeping soundly in her own bed in her own home.

    Dinh doesn’t bother to understand that what Jews do to Muslims is in retaliation to a far greater injustice (murder) that was initially committed against them by Muslims. If anyone murdered my 13-year-old daughter and the murderers whole family cheered it as a great accomplishment I’d do a lot more than just bulldoze their family home – and you would too if you had a drop of red blooded decency within you.

    When a dog has rabies the decent thing to do is to shoot it.

  361. @Jerry Jewish

    I have literally never met a Jew who didn’t display an innate hostility towards Whites. Ever.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Linh Dinh Comments via RSS