The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewLinh Dinh Archive
Jewish Genius
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In 2018, the publication of Albert Einstein’s travel diaries was greeted by newspaper headlines lamenting his politically incorrect views of Asians, particularly the Chinese.

Most egregious was Einstein’s verdict on Chinese women, “I noticed how little difference there is between men and women; I don’t understand what kind of fatal attraction Chinese women possess that enthralls the corresponding men to such an extent that they are incapable of defending themselves against the formidable blessing of offspring.”

In social situations, discretion is advisable, but in writing, honesty is best, and the world has suffered much because what is actually thought is nearly always snuffed out or blunted. Plus, there’s self-deception and the myriad deficiencies and obstacles intrinsic to language, writing or speaking. We’re not built to ventilate much truth.

I’m glad Einstein was candid. Though these jottings were intended for his stepdaughters, the likelihood of public exposure was extremely high, considering his unprecedented fame. Hyper self-conscious, the famous compose everything for an audience, even their “private” letters. In any case, there’s clear intentional humor here, as in the need to defend against the “formidable blessing” of marriage!

In 1867, Mark Twain noticed some Moroccan women in Gibraltar, “veiled Moorish beauties (I suppose they are beauties) from Tarifa,” then he arrived in Tangier, Morocco, “I have caught a glimpse of the faces of several Moorish women (for they are only human, and will expose their faces for the admiration of a Christian dog when no male Moor is by), and I am full of veneration for the wisdom that leads them to cover up such atrocious ugliness.”

Twain built up that sentence, didn’t he? The Innocents Abroad was his most successful book. Now, it would be condemned. Another funny passage is of Twain leaving Milan by train, “The more immediate scenery consisted of fields and farmhouses outside the car and a monster-headed dwarf and a moustached woman inside it. These latter were not show-people. Alas, deformity and female beards are too common in Italy to attract attention.”

Anticipating negative reactions to Einstein’s biases, editor Ze’ev Rosenkranz spent a good chunk of his introduction addressing the scientist’s “candid and (at times) offensive private notes.” This was Einstein exploring “his more irrational and instinctual side and to be freer in his expression of his personal prejudices.” Plus, Einstein was primarily a scientist, after all, and only evolved into a preeminent humanitarian later.

Much of Einstein’s travel writing is compelling enough, for even fleeting encounters would trigger in him provocative observations. Compared to his didactic, cant filled essays, here is a much richer record of his thinking, and you’re right there as he muses.

Einstein in Colombo, “We drove in individual little carts that were drawn on the double by Herculean and yet so refined people. I was very much ashamed of myself for being complicit in such despicable treatment of human beings but couldn’t change anything. Because these beggars in the form of kings descend in droves on any foreigner until he has surrendered to them. They know how to implore and to beg until one’s heart is shaken up. On the streets of the indigenous quarter one can see how these fine people spend their primitive lives. For all their fineness, they give the impression that the climate prevents them from thinking backward or forward by more than a quarter of an hour. They live in great filth and considerable stench down on the ground, do little, and need little. Simple economic cycle of life. Far too penned up to allow any distinct existence for the individual. Half-naked, they reveal their fine and yet powerful bodies and their fine, patient faces. Nowhere shouting like the Levantines in Port Said. No brutality, no market crying existence, but quiet, acquiescent drifting along, albeit not lacking in a certain lightheartedness. Once you take a proper look at these people, you can hardly take pleasure in the Europeans anymore, because they are more effete and more brutal and look so much cruder and greedier—and therein unfortunately lies their practical superiority, their ability to take on grand things and carry them out. Wouldn’t we too, in this climate, become like the Indians?”

Since Einstein wasn’t queer, transitioning or gender neutrois, unfortunately, he found several women on his trip pleasant to look at or interact with, “Yet Einstein’s gaze is not simply that of the ‘seeing [white] male [ . . . ] whose imperial eyes passively look out and possess,’ even though that is also an integral part of his gaze. As a German Jew and an insider/outsider, his was a ‘double-consciousness,’ which is the ‘sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others.’ Thus, Einstein is also gazing at himself while being gazed at by others.”

I’m too stupid to understand such a nuanced dissection by Rosenkranz, but maybe you can help me? Please?

To show that Einstein’s view on the Chinese was complex, and not just negative, Rosenkranz quotes from his 1919 letter to another Jewish physicist, Paul Ehrenfest, “I get most joy from the emergence of the Jewish state in Palestine. It does seem to me that our kinfolk really are more sympathetic (at least less brutal) than these horrid Europeans. Perhaps things can only improve if only the Chinese are left, who refer to all Europeans with the collective noun ‘bandits.’”

Let’s pause here, for this is more revealing than anything in the travel diaries. Since Europeans are horrid, perhaps they should disappear completely, with only the Chinese left, and, presumably, Jews. No Freudian slip, it’s a genocidal wet dream bluntly stated.

ORDER IT NOW

In 1939, Einstein sent a letter to FDR urging the US to develop the atomic bomb, to beat Germany to the same. In 1944, Einstein wrote, “The Germans as an entire people are responsible for these mass murders and must be punished as a people if there is justice in the world and if the consciousness of collective responsibility in the nations is not to perish from the earth entirely.” Since Jews were collectively targeted, Germans must be collectively punished. This is Old Testament justice, “And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.” (Exodus 21:23-25).

In war, it’s only too natural to strive to destroy your opponent completely, and I’m not singling out Einstein for censure here, but only to highlight that he’s not the slightly goofy pacifist of the popular imagination.

And Einstein wasn’t an unbiased internationalist either. His ethnocentrism was extreme. In his 1938 “Our Debt to Zionism,” Einstein lamented, “Now the fateful disease of our time—exaggerated nationalism, borne up by blind hatred—has brought our work in Palestine to a most difficult stage. Fields cultivated by day must have armed protection at night against fanatical Arab outlaws.”

So Jews stealing Arab land through mass murder weren’t nationalist, fanatical or diseased, but their victims were. With such reasoning, I’m sure glad I’m not a genius. Here is some seriously top shelf moral relativism.

All this only makes sense if you believe Jews can do no wrong and are always the victims, but who think this, really? Everyone but Nazis, dipshit, not least of all the smartest guy ever!

To illustrate this obvious point, Einstein trots out “an ancient fable, with a few minor changes.” A shepherd tells a horse, “You are the noblest beast that treads the earth. You deserve to live in untroubled bliss; and indeed your happiness would be complete were it not for the treacherous stag. But he practiced from youth to excel you in fleetness of foot. His faster pace allows him to reach the water holes before you do. He and his tribe drink up the water far and wide, while you and your foal are left to thirst.” Tricked by the shepherd’s anti-Semitic bullshit, the horse becomes his slave.

Practiced from youth to excel, Jews just kick your fuckin’ ass, but since you can’t take this fair-and-square humiliation, you won’t stop googling “gas chamber.”

Europeans are functionally superior to Sri Lankans because they’re cruder, greedier, more effete yet more brutal. Jews, on the other hand, drink up everything far and wide because they stayed home and did their homework.

Blinded by baseless hatred, you can’t see that Jews are in fact your teachers and saviors. They’re, like, Jesuses. Einstein, “to be a Jew means to bear a serious responsibility not only to his own community, but also toward humanity.”

It’s just who they are, “The bond that has united the Jews for thousands of years and that unites them today is, above all, the democratic ideal of social justice, coupled with the ideal of mutual aid and tolerance among all men […] Personalities such as Moses, Spinoza and Karl Marx, dissimilar as they may be, all lived and sacrificed themselves for the ideal of social justice; and it was the tradition of their forefathers that led them on this thorny path. The unique accomplishments of the Jews in the field of philanthropy spring from the same source.”

You may think you have issues with Jewish racial supremacism, suffocating righteousness, manipulation of power, distortion of media, endless war mongering or hatred of your heritage, but you’re just envious, man, or need a good lay, as Wilhelm Reich would say, or you just hate knowledge. Einstein speaks of “the hatred of the Jews by those who have reason to shun popular enlightenment. More than anything else in the world, they fear the influence of men of intellectual independence.”

Such narcissistic bombast is not just embarrassing, but toxic and genocidal, if enshrined as dogmas.

In Tangier, Twain stopped at “a spot where stood a monument which was seen and described by Roman historians less than two thousand years ago, whereon was inscribed: “WE ARE THE CANAANITES. WE ARE THEY THAT HAVE BEEN DRIVEN OUT OF THE LAND OF CANAAN BY THE JEWISH ROBBER, JOSHUA.”

Just like today’s Palestinians, Canaanites just couldn’t stand social justice, universal tolerance and popular enlightenment, and that’s why they had to erect this baleful monument to hatred, and Twain, too, had to be an anti-Semite for drawing our attention, even for a second, to these disappeared Semites.

Linh Dinh’s latest book is Postcards from the End of America. He maintains a regularly updated photo blog.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Albert Einstein, Jews, Political Correctness, Racism 
Hide 548 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Blankaerd says:

    I wonder if Einstein was thinking about fucking his cousin as he wrote down his observations about Chinese women? Must’ve been a hell of a looker, that cousin of his.

    Perhaps fucking his cousin is also what made him forget about citing Hendrik Lorenz and Henri Poincare in his paper on special relativity? You know, the people who actually laid the mathematical foundation for the theory of special relativity?

  2. Rational says:

    EINSTEIN: A TYPICAL JEWISH PLAGIARIST.

    When I saw the title, I thought you will talk about how Einstein was a plagiarist. Intersting article, still.

    Just google “Einstein” + plagiarist and you will see lots of books on the topic. Here is one:

    The manufature and sale of St. Einstein:

    https://www.amazon.com/manufacture-sale-St-Einstein/dp/1913057240

    Judaists use the trope that “we are smart” to cover up their sickness, depravity, criminality, and barbarianism, to fool the goyim. Anybody who brings 3rd world aliens into their country is sick and depraved beyond belief.

    Einstein was too stupid. If he read the Torah carefully, he would have realized in a minute that Moses never existed, like Spinoza did. And Joseph McCabe did, when he wrote “forgery of the old testament.”

    See: mosesneverexisted.zohosites.com

    No Moses, no exodus, so no Israel, so no Jew. All social constructs. All delusions of the criminally insane Judaists.

  3. So Jews stealing Arab land.

    How?

    The Jews took Palestine from the Brits who took it from the Turks, the Turks took it from the Arabs who took it from the Romans, and the Romans took it from the Jews. The homerland of the Arabs is Arabia and not Palestine.

  4. AaronB says:

    I have to admit that you confuse me.

    On the one hand, you moved to Vietnam – a racist country. I’ve spent much time in Vietnam, and I know that a white person cannot be accepted. You cannot “convert” to Vietnamese, as you can to Judaism. The country is thoroughly racist and xenophobic, yet you claim to have found peace and a home there.

    Moreover, the Vietnamese certainly nurture a serious superiority complex, both to other SEAsians, and even to white people. They may accept that whites are visibly superior to them in every metric, but are convinced that where it counts, in some indefinable way, the Vietnamese are almost a different species in terms of superiority.

    This attitude is common to all of Asia.

    So clearly, you have no principled objection to ethnic chauvinism, as your country and people have a worse case of it than Jews.

    So what can the source of your hated of Jews be? Not your stated motive, that they are nationalistic.

    What comes through in your writing about Jews is resentment at their superiority – not principled objection to nationalism. In other words, your own competing nationalism. But why should a Vietnamese care that Jews are superior? Do Vietnamese in America really see themselves as in competing nationalism with Jews?

  5. anon[190] • Disclaimer says:

    A lot of good thinking here, Linh. Good piece.
    I don’t know of any person, no matter how high his/her IQ, who is smart in every way.
    The issues you raise are causing a lot of harm in the world.
    Judaism is a religion. There are Jewish cultures. There are Ashkenazi genes associated with high IQ.
    Neither religion nor culture can be conferred by genes.
    One need not belong to a group.

  6. @The Dark Night

    … the Romans took it from the Jews.

    Who took it from the Canaanites …. etc., etc., etc.

  7. @The Alarmist

    Neither religion nor culture can be conferred by genes.

    It may be the case that religions and cultures are substantially (although certainly not entirely) the products of genes, to the degree that religions and cultures are comprised of organized, coherent and repetitive

    -archetypes
    -attitudes
    -behavioral patterns
    -images
    -preferences
    -priorities
    -social structures
    -temperament
    -values

    that are largely instinctive, intuitive and often unconscious. They may have a significant biological and genetic base. To a degree they feel deterministically programmed.

  8. Patricus says:

    Einstein was certainly gifted in theoretical physics. He was also a great admirer of Stalin long after all sane people saw what Stalin was. Taking war and extermination to German civilians is so evolved and civilized Albert. Talk about ugly Europeans and Asians. Try gazing upon Jews. Not a pretty picture.

    Every ethnic group thinks they are somehow better than the rest. If they believed they were the dregs of humanity that would be a sad thing to behold. Somewhere I read that Koreans believe they are humanity’s racial elite because they are most removed from our common African ancestors. That makes the rest of us pretty low in their eyes. Perhaps we should embrace dominance by our Korean betters.

    AaronB, in what sense are Jews “superior”. Never noticed that. Irish, on the other hand, surpass even Koreans. The rest of humanity are mulattos.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @milermp1
    , @HB
  9. @The Alarmist

    Who took it from the Canaanites …. etc., etc., etc.

    No group has an innate or divine right to any particular territory. These matters are in a state of perpetual flux and turmoil, and are usually resolved through the effective application of physical force.

    • Replies: @Avery
  10. AaronB says:
    @Patricus

    AaronB, in what sense are Jews “superior”. Never noticed that. Irish, on the other hand, surpass even Koreans. The rest of humanity are mulattos.

    Lol, exactly 🙂

    That’s why Dinh’s moral cant and hypocrisy is so silly. He’s getting worked up over nothing. He should have a sense of humor.

    He reminds me of many white expats in Asia. They can’t handle the fact the often primitive and backwards locals actually believe they are infinitely superior to mighty whitey.

    Maybe because I was born Jewish, the Asian feeling of superiority never bothered me. I got a kick out of it and enjoyed its more absurd aspects. I saw the humor in it, and understood it.

  11. Saggy says: • Website
    @The Dark Night

    So Jews stealing Arab land.

    How?

    The Jews didn’t steal the Arab land, they managed to get the west to steal it for them, starting in WW I. Millions died in that war because the Jews did not want it to end. Jews were the direct cause of WW II, effectively controlling the British elite who declared war on Germany. Many more millions died in that war. The cost of Israel in terms of European lives is enormous. Finally the Jews were handed Israel as a result of a preposterous and degenerate hoax the likes of which the world had never seen. If we’re lucky the cost of Israel to the world has been paid, but it could blow up at any minute.

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
    , @Herzog
  12. Parbes says:

    Very good essay by Dinh… Especially commendable is his pulling the mask off of Einstein – a great physicist, but unfortunately also a typical Jewish piece of shit.

    • Agree: Moi
  13. RJL says:

    Thanks Linh.

    Most insightful examination and exposure of (((the problem))) I’ve ever encountered.

  14. AaronB says:

    Btw, the remark about the crude European being better at industry was a European trope of the time. It originated in the Romantic reaction against science and industry. You can find it in dozens of gentile European writers. Einstein was merely being a good European and parroting the views of his class and time.

    As late as the 30s, George Orwell was writing about how ugly and misshapen the European was compared to the beautiful Burmese! Having been to Burma, I can tell you Orwell was out of his mind, and his remark reflects the self hating state of mind of Europe rather than anything objective.

    If readers here actually read the European classics and were educated, four fifths of the commentary on Jews would collapse. Only invincible ignorance makes it possible.

    As for Einstein’s comparison of Jews outcompeting Europeans and that being the source of resentment, that in no way contradicts his point that European superiority in industry is connected to crudeness and materialism.

    Admit it, Linh, you’re supposedly a poet but you never read a book published before 1950 🙂

    Don’t be embarrassed, 99% of the people on this site haven’t.

  15. @AaronB

    You need to make up your mind.

    You can convert to, or slowly grow into Christianity. But you can’t be born attesting to the truth of the Trinity and the transsubstantiation.

    Conversely, you can be born a horse, or an arse, but cannot convert to caballine.

    Either you were “born Jewish”, or Jewishness is a social construct which accommodates conversion.

    If you only meant that your parents were cousins, well, it’s not unheard of. Every other nation has its remote villages, inhabited by superior people, who won’t interbreed.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  16. AaronB says:
    @Dacian Julien Soros

    That’s silly. Why can’t you be born into a religious tradition? Why can’t you be born into a community that traditionally practiced a certain religion?

    To be born a Jew is to be born into a community that has traditionally practiced Judaism. This community will have some genetic link to the community that first practiced Judaism, but it will have picked up a considerable amount of foreign genetic material along the way.

    A Jew is anyone born into any of these communities scattered around the world. An observant Jew is anyone born into these communities who also practices the religion. A convert to Judaism is someone who voluntarily joins this community and at least for a period of time, practices the religion as well.

    Its all very simple and clear.

    Hindus are a similar case.

  17. Goy says:
    @Blankaerd

    Incest and the Jew are one and the same. Anyone that has dealt with them has plenty of stories of their decadent perversion. The most major fugly slut from my high school (her first was her older brother) ended up as a high school teacher, as well as mother. I’m sure the cycle repeated. I still remember the smell of her privates after all these years. When a high schooler turns it down, we know how bad it had to be. LOL. Horny hypocrites is my thought on the Jew

  18. ivan says:
    @The Dark Night

    The men who fought under British arms in that part of the world during WWI were largely Muslims. The Jews did not win anything.

  19. Einstein’s remarks that are not related to physics have been met with ridicule before. Jacques Ellul, far from being an anti-semite, wrote on p. 435 of his book The Technological Society (1954):

    We are forced to conclude that our scientists are incapable of any but the emptiest platitudes when they stray from their specialties. It makes one think back on the collection of mediocrities accumulated by Einstein when he spoke of God, the state, peace, and the meaning of life. It is clear that Einstein, extraordinary mathematical genius that he was, was no Pascal; he knew nothing of political or human reality, or, in fact, anything at all outside his mathematical reach. The banality of Einstein’s remarks in matters outside his specialty is as astonishing as his genius within it.

    Patricus: “Every ethnic group thinks they are somehow better than the rest.”

    Every ethnic group except whites. Both Christian and secular whites are under the spell of Christianity’s egalitarian vision. Consequently, the white man deplores ethnocentrism, and would root it out of himself and others. It’s what Jesus would have wanted; and besides, if you want to set up and run a world empire, preaching equality makes things a whole lot easier. In addition to being proof of virtue, it’s just good for business.

    • Replies: @iffen
  20. ivan says:
    @Blankaerd

    His cousin wasn’t a better looking woman than Mileva Maric his first wife, even though Maric herself walked with a limp. Einstein had also forgotten to thank her, a woman good enough to enter the university at a time when such a thing was a rare occurrence.

    He had also ‘forgotten’ to thank the Australian, William Sutherland who preceded him in discovering the atomic reasons for Brownian motion. Although Abraham Pais was gracious enough to include Sutherland as a co-discoverer of that theory it doesn’t change the fact that Sutherland had published his 1904 paper in a widely read publication, that Einstein himself would have access to while working in the patent office.

    As for refusing to acknowledge Poincare for the 1905 relativity paper, Einstein went one better than Poincare. He introduced all the malarkey about shrinking rulers and slowing clocks, that has sown confusion among the hapless students ever since. All that was important for Poincare was the Lorentz invariant, he didn’t care to speculate unnecessarily. But that made him a ‘conventionalist’, an ordinary bird you see.

    So of the three papers published in 1905 that gave us the so-called miraculous year of Einstein, only the paper on photo-electric effect was original with Einstein. But don’t try telling that to the Einstein worshippers who will overcome you with a tidal wave of verbiage and speculative ‘mathematics’.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Kolya Krassotkin
  21. ivan says:

    Norman Mailer in his Fire on the Moon his take on the moon landing took the Negroes to the cleaners over some pages, telling them essentially that they are incapable of such a feat, as opposed to white men like himself. Jews from the Occident in the 20th century have always regarded themselves as white men until some found that it is more profitable to set themselves apart.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  22. Tot says:

    “For he flatters and deceives himself in his own eyes Thinking that his sinfulness will not be discovered and hated [by God].”

    ‭‭PSALMS‬ ‭36:2‬ ‭AMP‬‬
    https://www.bible.com/1588/psa.36.2.amp

  23. Druid says:
    @Goy

    So true. I’ve seen it as well

  24. @Blankaerd

    Don’t forget Olinto de Pretto who first published the famous E = mc^2 equation two years before Einstein grabbed the credit for it.

    • Replies: @Barr
    , @Richard B
    , @Whitewolf
  25. As quoted in Linh Dinh’s essay, Editor Ze’ev Rosenkranz makes the following apology for Einstein:

    “Yet Einstein’s gaze is not simply that of the ‘seeing [white] male [ . . . ] whose imperial eyes passively look out and possess,’ even though that is also an integral part of his gaze. As a German Jew and an insider/outsider, his was a ‘double-consciousness,’ which is the ‘sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others.’ Thus, Einstein is also gazing at himself while being gazed at by others.” [emphasis added]

    Causing Dinh to ask rhetorically:

    I’m too stupid to understand such a nuanced dissection by Rosenkranz, but maybe you can help me? Please?

    Andrew Joyce answer’s Dinh’s question in a piece titled, “The Necessity of Anti-Semitism” published here in the Unz Review five days prior:

    In the Jewish mind, the corrosive nature of their interactions with European peoples has always taken on a heroic aspect. The ruse is played out, for themselves and us, that in these interactions we see a unique and virtuous questioning by ‘insiders/outsiders’ uniquely and helpfully placed to show Western culture its own flaws. [emphasis added]

  26. Franz says:
    @The Dark Night

    The homerland of the Arabs is Arabia and not Palestine.*

    “Palestine” was contested ground all through ancient history, but mostly empty.

    Mittani fought Hittite/Assyrians, Egypt fought them both, neither fight was considered especially important. The chiefs among the combatants even married in with each other after the fighting.

    Palestine never held one Jew.

    Arab historians have, for over a thousand years, proved that those who now call themselves “Jews” are in fact Arab imposters who “created” their land claim in Alexandria less than 150 years before the current era, “translating” the Torah into Greek, they said. Making it up, in fact.

    Short version, plenty of evidence: Egypt knew neither Pharaoh nor Moses by Ashraf Azzat, an Egyptian patriot who’s as fed up with Yahweh fairytales as some of the rest of us. Low price Kindle edition. No pictures, but a quick wake-up.

    People all know that Aladdin and Jehovah come from the same batch of Tall Tales. For whatever reason, we keep granting “wisdom” to one of them, despite abundant evidence of its fraudulence and evil.

    * BTW: “Homerland.” Great Freudian slip for fans of the fictional genre called Psychology. Homer as in myth and legend… just like David, Soloman, “slavery in Egypt” etc etc etc.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  27. swamped says:

    “Most egregious was Einstein’s verdict on Chinese women, ‘I noticed how little difference there is between men and women; I don’t understand what kind of fatal attraction Chinese women possess that enthralls the corresponding men to such an extent that they are incapable of defending themselves against the formidable blessing of offspring.’…whatever that attraction is – & it’s still hard to fathom after all these years – it has resulted in the very dubious “blessing” of a very formidable over population in China that is much more egregious for the whole world. It’s a wonder that the whole planet doesn’t tilt to the East like the Leaning Tower of Pisa, with the intensive population density of Asian countries. The lack of curves in Chinese babes apparently hasn’t dampened Chinese men’s desire. A couple of years ago, a German website rated 100 major cities around the world for LBGTXYZ, etc. friendliness & Beijing came in last. A Pew Survey showed only 21% of Chinese approve of homosexuality. But maybe it doesn’t matter so much: if the girls look like young boys, the homo’s probably won’t notice the difference anyway.

  28. @Franz

    Latest genetic tests confirm male DNA of Jews to be most similar to modern-day Syrians. Don’t take my word for it. See for yourself. Arabs originated in Yemen.

    In Europe, the early Jewish migrants intermarried with Roman women. To this day, European Jews and Italians share genetic and cultural ties. They’re physically similar in appearance as well. Which is why Jews are always playing Italians and Italian-Americans are always playing Jews.

    DNA reflects this. A European Jew is a cross between a Syrian and an Italian who had a Polish grandmother if you wanted to paraphrase their genetics.

    Askenazi did not exist until Hadrian wrecked Judea. Mizrahi and Sephardic did, but Ashkenazi are a relative new hybrid race. Similar to Latin Americans.

    Their DNA reflects the ability and willingness for females to leave the sinking ship. Some new group of males with some evolutionary advantage (Jews in Rome for some reason, Spanish in Mexico or Philippines) moves in and many women are attracted to them and eager to pump. Soon, a new race emerges which is codified into a new race.

    • Replies: @Franz
    , @Tony Ryals
  29. Let’s pause here, for this is more revealing than anything in the travel diaries. Since Europeans are horrid, perhaps they should disappear completely, with only the Chinese left, and, presumably, Jews. No Freudian slip, it’s a genocidal wet dream bluntly stated.

    Einstein: just another (((white))) racist in a world with too many.

  30. @The Dark Night

    The homerland of the Arabs is Arabia and not Palestine.

    The homeland of the Ashkenazim is the Pale of Settlement, not Palestine.

    • Agree: annamaria, Miggle
    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  31. @Saggy

    In fairness, on August 2, 1940, a non-aggression pact between the Soviet Union and the Third Reich was still in effect, so any appeal to the idea of stopping “Stalin’s Bolshevik expansion efforts” at that particular moment would have certainly elicited laughter from an informed British reader.

    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @Hippopotamusdrome
  32. Nodwink says:

    I was reading yet another essay on antisemitism, and was struck by this first paragraph:

    From the beginning, Judaism has dwelt on the relationship between singularity and universality. In its account of the origins of the world, humankind and its divisions, the first 11 chapters of the Book of Genesis set out the universal background to Jewish particularity. The rub comes in chapter 12: “Now the Lord said to Abraham . . . I will make you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing.” Anti-Semites have not taken this well.

    Of course gentiles reject the idea of “Jewish particularity.” I and many others reject the idea of ethnic particularity for any group. How is that antisemitic?

  33. I don’t agree with the author re most claims.

    No one who knows science would dispute that Einstein was probably last universal physicist, close in eminence to Newton & almost certainly a more important figure than J.C. Maxwell. This trio, Newton, Maxwell & Einstein comprise the summit that physics (or whole “natural philosophy”) had produced so far.

    But, apart from a few crackpots, it is not about science (and even if it were, it is impossible to rank science’s greats: for instance, Gauss & Euler possessed almost superhuman genius that evidently dwarfs anything Einstein could have come up with; just, Einstein lived in a specific time when a man of genius, with developed imagination & theoretical-physicist type of intelligence (not mathematician’s) could achieve a lot. Nowadays, perhaps more gifted individuals cannot do much & Einstein would, now, have been a talented scientist, but probably nothing spectacular).

    It is about Saint Albert myth I have never bought into that the whole text is about.

    Taking a dispassionate view, it is evident from his biographies: Einstein was not some kind of “Jewish supremacist”, this is a complete nonsense; his primary ethnic loyalty was toward Jewish people, and this remained throughout his adult life; he was not a staunch German patriot (as many of his co-ethnics had been), but would have remained happy within German cultural sphere (he spoke only German, having learned English only to a lower-level of proficiency during more than 20 years) had not history turned out other way; he was, broadly speaking, a humanist, pacifist & individualist with flashes of insight into social & political reality; generally, he was leftist leaning pro-socialist.

    He was aware that Stalin was a political gangster & harbored no illusions about it, but it seemed to him- as did to most others, a majority of them non-Jews- that Stalin was a lesser evil than Hitler with all his racial hygiene, open racism & barbarism. Einstein became aware of the scope of shoah only after the war, but Hitler’s persecution of Jews from 1933. to 1941. was more than enough to make him- and not only him- an implacable enemy of racist extremism as exemplified by Nazi regime.

    Of course he did pronounce many unsavory remarks, from contemporary PC point of view, about races & peoples & other things- but, who didn’t? If we were to show all dirty laundry of unpleasant opinions of all distinguished individuals in past 100-200 years, every single person, from any nation & (non)religious persuasion could be depicted as almost a monster.

    In short, Einstein was not a saint. But, when I think of it- no one, including recognized saints, during recorded human history of past 5,000 years, had ever been. Einstein was not Saint Albert, but,equally, not a sinister (Jewish) supremacist.

    • Disagree: Poupon Marx
    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Anon 2
  34. @AaronB

    Your statement is astute but after years overseas let me follow up-

    Asians are often transnational. As are Jews. As are Indians. Whites who suffer the worst are so-called “sons of the soil” who have not traveled and are geographically isolated. When you are worldly, you have a different perspective on media, money and mankind.

    East Asians and Indians understand money. As well as Jews. Better maybe.

    Asians and Indians watch their own films and in any event are born objectivists. So no media manipulation there.

    Neither group cares how they are perceived. Neither do whites, of course, but Asians and Indians are not subject to PC.

    Asians and Indians are mobile. If things get tough in Seattle, they move on. They’ve always had a colonial attitude. Here today, gone tomorrow.

    • Agree: Poupon Marx
  35. @Rational

    I intuitively doubted a lot about the scientific stature of Einstein, when I was an undergraduate. At that time, almost everything I had been brought up to believe had the notion of incompleteness and omission. Simply put, like almost all of the general population, and as Mr. Unz has chronicled in his revelatory multiple series, what you thought was true was the accepted version of history. Only his digging and excavating in a systematic and honest manner turned up the truth, like some buried ancient temple under a cover of lesser settlements and earth.

    From the specific case of the Einsteins, supported heroes and great achievers, in the increasing virtual and surreal and unreal milieu we live in, any large pronouncement or claim must be skeptically received. Ideally, “We won’t be fooled again” -The Who. It is important and vital that we listen for that small, initial voice, whisper, or vague thought that intimates something is incomplete, or that there is more to this, or information is being withheld. This is a sort of precognition, not developed into explicit wording with conventional form. From there, to pursue the truth, the Reality will be met with resistance, the metaphor of the excavation of the archaeologist or fossil hunter. The blood hound that sniffs and finds where the bodies are in collapsed buildings under the rubble. This inherent trait, developed by Natural Selection, using the “sixth sense” for prescient of danger, is suppressed by evil modern social science misuse.

    Filling in the blanks, we know that Jews are a networking people that have developed a keen ability to perceive weakness and vulnerabilities in other peoples. Not just materially, but in their belief structures and internal hierarchies. They have been, since ancient times, the best sales people, trading and purveying across boundaries and regions, providing the nobilities with novel items, or the common folk with a broader variety of goods. Their internationalism and networking has been turbo charged by their highly developed appreciation and honing of financial skills. Like lasers, day and night, husbands and wives in their predominant business relationship, they study, plot, and plan on ways to dominate a particular venue or domain. The sheer effort alone usually results in their success over competitors. They are unbridled and not limited by conventional or tradition moral boundaries and limitations.

    From that general background, consider Einstein. All of his contemporaries were diligently following and carrying out experiments and research, using the Scientific Method, with is the use of inductive elements-data, measurements, observations, effects, etc-in order to either uphold and bolster deductive hypotheses or explanations, in either direction. That is, one creates an inference or a hypothesis and than seeks to validate by experience, or the hypothesis is spontaneously born out of the relationship and correlation, shall we say, of data. This is often a surprise and unintended insight.

    On the other hand, The Genius Of All Geniuses For All Time, our Einstein was a patent clerk at the Swiss Patent Office. He examined innovations and inventions to verify their originality. But in the absence of any laboratory work at all, we are led to believe that he alone created the foundations and synthesis of the General and Special Theories of Relativity. THAT is what I was told, as was the entire World. My entire first 26 years of education was uniform with no dissent of this simple statement that preposterously represented Truth and Veracity.

    The years went by and I focused on the normal aspects of life. Only very recently did I start to read of the credible doubts that such intellectual advancement was the creation of a “super genius” that popped out of the Patent Office and spewed forth this incredible insight. From several sources, I have read that several elements of Einstein’s Theory came from different researchers, where deductions had formed from a concentrated experimental and theoretical area.

    Considering the Nature of the Jewish mentality-that of being the super merchandiser and demand stimulator through the ages-this is how Einstein took up his place as the almost mythical super genius. First the need. The masses, in the upheavals of the Twentieth Century were looking for heroes and leaders. Einstein, like a CEO, saw component parts of Relativity, with individual researchers working in their concentrated earnestness as scientists, perceived a great opportunity to stitch these together as a whole and integrated concept-and take the adulation and glory. Far from being the innocent, childlike savant, he appears to have been a cynical opportunist and a bit of a showman, cultivating an image. I never once recalled, in the popular milieu, of Einstein having remarked upon the shoulders of the pioneers upon which he stood.

    Considering the epochs of history where a pivotal Jewish figure suddenly appeared as the dominant figure to influence the direction of history, a series of “coincidences’ become apparent. Benjamin Disraeli heading the British Government at the height of its influence in the Victorian Era, securing a large loan from Rothschild and full influence; when asked by Rothschild what his collateral will be, Disraeli remarked, The Whole British Empire. Karl Marx, an obscure philosopher, creates a series of documents that are phantasmagorical but opportune for the tumultuous times in the early days of the Industrial Revolution. If Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto were blueprints for a mechanical system, the unit would not even start up. BUT, it held out a utopian carrot and sugar candy, something for the Working Classes and something for the Intellectual Classes. For the Working Classes, not more deprivation, and the fruits of their labor all go and stay with them. For the Intellectuals, a permanent place as The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, the interpreters and guiding hand through the new Golden Age to Come. Thus the Intellectual could finally best the creator or wealth, the capitalist, the manager, The Reality Masters. A new world was created for the Intellectual. Performance, results did not matter. Theoretic Purity did, and Reality would just have to be reshaped and redone to suit Theory and Abstraction. Because these people hold tremendous prominence, allowed to rise to power on nothing more than talk and abstraction, The West is crumbling because Reality did to conform or cooperate.

    Marxism/Communism, almost certainly commissioned by Rothschild and associate Jewish families was a key too toward a reorganization of Western Society that suited perfectly a parasitic elite that had always sought out to control and own everything. Nothing ever conceived could have been more perfectly tailored for Elite Jewish interests: officially atheist, all power to The State, international and universal, automatic enemy lists (Reactionary Elements), control of every aspect of a persons’ lives in order to clean out the minds of the masses of reactionary, harmful, and “counterrevolutionary” thoughts, feelings, and reflexes. Sure, it’s stupid and inane, but its value is the legitimacy and cover it provides for garden variety tyrants and authorities, for sadists and sociopaths. It excludes all competition.

    Think about other “just coincidental” Jewish heroes who suddenly appear to take over a new movement of direction in society. Larry Ellison, who used previously research material from IBM to start up Oracle. The Google boys, who used research algorithms created by Stanford, Mark Zuckerberg, emerging from a group-founded by two Gentile brothers-who took over the leadership of Facebook. Michael Dell of Dell Computers, Henry Kissinger, National Security Advisor to an increasingly weakened President Nixon, Bob Dylan, aka Bob Zimmerman, and on and on. How is it, at just the inflection point, the pivot of historical forces (whether artificial or natural) on of these characters appears with incredible knowledge and creativity, to produce massive influence?

    I submit that they are supported by a vast network, a pool of specialists, coaches, mentors, with deep expertise in many fields. That Jews excel at the vision of seeing the “Next Big Thing” is undeniable. But that comes from a more collective origin, rather than singular, I believe. Did Bob Dylan really produce all that music singularly, the culture warping, anti-establishment output by himself? While the epoch was receptible and vulnerable, he copious did. But once, his time was past, he was a failure at any artistic medium. Gone was his music and lyrical pity output. His career as an actor was a total disaster. All of his creative juice disappeared. And I believe, his support system that clandestinely propped him up.

    Consider all of those previously mentioned, and their meteoritic rise from absolute obscurity to overnight sensations and dominance in their fields of endeavors. What they have, and nobody else is the vast consultancy of money, influence, expertise worldwide of the International Jew. If you are starting out in a competitive world, and you have them on your side, your enterprise will be like a pallet carried on multiple shoulders through the crowd. You can’t lose, because you have a legion of shadow and unknown advisors and guidance councilors shepherding you to dominance.

    Did you ever wonder how the Beatles went from being a quartet of musicians, unschooled, not able to read music, to SUDDENLY producing Sergeant Peppers Album? This was a big quantum jump, musicologically (as was His Satanic Majesty’s Request by the Rolling Stones). The missing element was the Jew George Martin, classically trained and a long term arranger for Black musicians. He and his son were the foundation and fuel for the greater sophistication of the Beatles music, as well as other groups. Also, of interest is how the Beatles and Stones lyrics moved farther into advanced social commentary and advocacies. In short time their products and personal utterances mirrored those of the Far Left, in effect and actuality, the memes and narratives of classical Jewish agitprop.

    Beside such hegemony-exquisite in timing, delivery, and intensity-in culture and business, the hiring of Henry Kissinger as Nixon’s brain on how to handle the Vietnam War was the last leg of independence for the United States. From then on, the complete Zionist penetration into EVERY nook and cranny of American secrets and privileged information was complete. America, the elephant, was taken over by the tiny handler riding on his neck with the sharp tongs. There is no coincidence that the Indo-Chinese French War led to the Vietnam war, which led to the revolt of America’s upper IQ youth, concomitantly aided and floated by the “Counter Culture” of the 1960s. It was generated and largely manipulated by Jews. It had been planned and advanced over decades. By the explosion of the 1960s, the effect had borne fruit. Jews were in charge of the record companies of the bards and musical bands, controlled the venues (Fillmore Auditoriums, Woodstock Festival, management (Beatles, Rolling Stones, and many if not mostly all of rock groups of that period). The Jews created the 1960s revolutionary culture and piloted it for the whole way.

    In every major field, the networked Jews have an indepth army of consultancy, advisors and financiers to make sure of success of one of their own, who will then go on to add money and expertise to the next comer upper. This is equal to or exceeds the Chinese Way of dominance throughout Asia, by the same mechanisms, networks, liquid capital, and expertise slice through competition outside of its ethnic and material interests.

  36. Saggy says: • Website
    @Digital Samizdat

    This is not a joke ….

    Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s snubbing of numerous German peace overtures condemned an estimated sixty million human beings across Europe to death.

    The Nazi peace offers, and there were many, were real and the goal was to avoid the catastrophe of WW II.

    The response of the Brits was always a complete and summary rejection ….

  37. Here is a thoughtful article about Einstein with specific references. It is very similar to others I have read by bona fide physicists. Einstein The Bundler, The Recombiner, seems to be the real man behind the hologram.

    https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm

    The article also mentions that he did this with the full assent of this fellow scientists. Even Eddington, the big, stopping Englishman gushed over Einstein. How can this be?

    The answer lies in a common action. Generally, we can ask in parallel, how is it that so many patriots, men of integrity and rectitude end up being money grubbing hacks? In the case of Einstein’s contemporaries not misrepresenting himself, it is easy given a standard scenario.

    Someone appears at the prominent individual’s door. That individual offers the subject a choice. One take the money, a lot of it, and the promotion and aid toward any endeavor you may undertake in future. Or, if not, my people operating successfully from antiquity, will financially, socially, and professionally wreck your life. We do not ever cease once we have a target and objective. This adversity will not stop ever, it will extend to any and all you descendants. You and every member of your family will only be able to live in the margins of society. “So say I, of the Group that many are afraid to name or mention, and invisible force that operates behind the scenes, unseen, that remember for millennia.

    Look around you contemporarily. Notice all the public figures that have completely changed in a short time, flipped, inversely, the complete opposite of what they espoused before? There are so many. And look at their comportment. Do they not look frightened, as if someone had a bomb belt strapped to them? Do a thought experiment, using past positions and statements compared to today. In so many of these cases, it is impossible to organically and naturally change to such a large extent, unless a very substantial EXTERNAL force were applied.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @EpicOfFlight
  38. Mulegino1 says:
    @Saggy

    And that rejection cost them their empire and ultimately their way of life.

    Britain is today a land of “bare, ruined choirs,” whose sole unifying factor is a Hymiewoodesque royal family and football; perhaps the only thing that constitutes its connection to the past are a few academics who can recall its real history with any degree of coherence. Its grave was dug by its philosemitic Cromwells and Churchills.

    It used to be that the sun never set on the British Empire; the current UK is the third world garbage heap upon which it never shines.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @annamaria
  39. @Poupon Marx

    Your our society is atomized and the worship of the cult of the individual is what makes you all miserable. You should fight back. The social milieu has been commercialized and only the down-in-gutter can bond with each other. The Jew, meanwhile has kept his social and commercial contacts intact and taken advantage.
    This leaves the Goyim dancing on the stage as individuals.
    The elite are (or jews) in synch with the chosenites or compromised.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    , @ben sampson
  40. They’re, like, Jesuses.

    Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. John 14:6 NKJV

  41. /The Innocents Abroad was his most successful book. Now, it would be condemned./

    Zionists regularly trot out Innocents as propaganda, claiming it provides “proof” that Palestine was empty before Herzl initiated the dispossession project in earnest. Of course, those who attempt to exploit the text as such fail to consider Twain’s satirical style and frequent use of hyperbole.

    Twain is a darling of Jews for his ostensibly glowing review of them published in Harper’s. Ironically, Twain introduces the piece with the following passage:

    I can stand any society. All that I care to know is that a man is a human being – that is enough for me; he can’t be any worse. I have no special regard for Satan; but I can at least claim that I have no prejudice against him. It may even be that I lean a little his way, on account of his not having a fair show.

    Make of it what you will. Were I a God-fearing Jew, I’d have to think twice about an endorsement of my people premised upon sympathy for the devil.

  42. utu says:
    @Blankaerd

    …Einstein was thinking about fucking his cousin… – She was his double-cousins.

    “Elsa Einstein was born Elsa Einstein on Jan. 18, 1876. That’s not a mistake, Elsa’s father was Rudolf Einstein, the cousin of Albert Einstein’s father. That’s not as strange as is gets, though. Her mother and Albert’s mother were also sisters, so Elsa and Albert Einstein were actually first cousins.”

    So genetically Elsa was more like his sister.

    “Elsa’s children from her first marriage allegedly viewed Albert as a “father figure,” but he also developed an infatuation with her eldest daughter, Ilse. In one of the most startling revelations, Albert had considered breaking off his engagement to Elsa and proposing to 20-year-old Ilse instead.”

    In one of his letters Einstein reared to his family life with Elsa nd her daughter Ilse as “my small harem.”

    • Replies: @Andre Citroen
  43. @Digital Samizdat

    People do not speak Yiddish in Russia. Yiddish is a European language, so the homeland of Ashkenazim is Europe. Did I say it was Palestine?

  44. utu says:
    @ivan

    “…Brownian motion…”

    – In 1904 Einstein was asked to review several papers for special edition of Festschrift for Ludwig Boltzmann’s sixtieth birthday which included Marian von Smoluchowski’s paper on density fluctuations in gases and some of their consequences which very likely inspired 1905 Einstein paper on Brownian motion. In 1906 Smoluchowski published his paper on the explanation of Brownian motion.

    • Replies: @ivan
  45. utu says:

    The proof beyond doubt of Einstein plagiarism in 1927:

    [MORE]

    https://www.unz.com/article/neurotic-leftists-mobbing-noah-carl-un-pc-cambridge-u-researcher-establishment-right-dithers/?highlight=klein#comment-2710253
    It is possible that Einstein had some character flaw because totally unnecessarily already after his Nobel prize and when he was more famous than any other physicist before him in 1927 he plagiarized 1926 paper of Oscar Klein that lead to the Kaluza-Klein theory. But he was caught and the editor of the journal forced Einstein to write a statement that everything he showed was done year earlier by Klein. That’s why we have the Kaluza-Klein theory and not Kaluza-Klein-Einstein or Einstein only theory. Furthermore there is a proof that Einstein had a copy of Klein paper because he praised it in a letter to Ehrenfest. What does it tell you about him? Why? Was he some kind of psychopath? Kleptomaniac? Sense of impunity? Entitlement? One journal dared to review his paper and had it rejected. Einstein was furious. Wrote a furious letter that “you do not review my papers” and he never tried to publish in the same journal again.

    https://www.unz.com/article/neurotic-leftists-mobbing-noah-carl-un-pc-cambridge-u-researcher-establishment-right-dithers/?highlight=klein#comment-2711291
    (1) Find a copy of “Zu Kaluzas Theorie des Zusammenhanges von Gravitation und Elektrizität. Erste Mitteilung” (1927). And you will find the disclaimer that the editor Hr. H. Mandel forced Eisntein to write:

    Hr. H. Mandel macht mich darauf aufmerksam, dass die von mir hier mitgetcilten Ergbnisse nich neu sind. Der ganze Inhalt findet sich in der Arbeit vo O. Klein (Zeitschr. f. Physik 37, 12, 1926, S. 895). Man vergleiche ferner Fochs Arveit (Zeitschr. f. Physisk 39, 226, 1926).

    (2) Then get yourself

    Introduction to Volume 15 of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence June 1925 – May 1927
    https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10662

    where you will find the following:

    “Both Ehrenfest and Lorentz urged Einstein to come to Leyden and join their meetings with Klein. Einstein wrote that he had to finish some things before vacationing with his sons (Doc. 319), but asked to see Klein’s paper two and a half months after he had been first informed of it (Doc. 356). Most likely at Ehrenfest’s suggestion, Klein wrote to Einstein directly in late August 1926 (Doc. 363). He sent Einstein not only the manuscript of his paper (Klein, O. 1926), but also proposed how he wanted to develop the theory further. In particular, he explained his idea of assuming a periodicity of the fifth coordinate, averaging over it, and reconceptualizing Schrödinger’s wave function as a component of the five-dimensional metric by effectively dropping the sharpened cylinder condition and using the same version of the condition that Kaluza had used seven years earlier.”

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  46. @Rev. Spooner

    I cannot but agree with your assessment. I am an educated person, well traveled, and easily better read than many. Despite all this, for the truths of so many things to come out, to the top, and to be revealed came later in my life. If it was not for sites like this one, The Occidental Observer, American Renaissance, Revisionist History, and other “ray cyst” {LOL} sites, I would still be groping for the actual and Real. There is so mush energy and matter that is directed and produced to conceal the Truths of the World. By which I mean facts, data, empirical, actual, concrete, and reasoning based on logic and wisdom.

    Most people are not energetic enough, or even motivated to seek the Truth, even when the alarm bells are ringing in their heads.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  47. @Digital Samizdat

    any appeal to the idea of stopping “Stalin’s Bolshevik expansion efforts” at that particular moment would have certainly elicited laughter

    German involvement in the Spanish Civil War

  48. Franz says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Latest genetic tests confirm male DNA of Jews to be most similar to modern-day Syrians.

    True ’nuff!

    Point is to go back just a hair further.

    Azzat makes it a point to note that Arabia was massively contested ground in the Bronze Age, due to the need for Egypt to protect the Horus Road to Babylon and hence on the Silk Road further east.

    The fly in history at this point has always been, why should Egypt, Babylon, etc, have wasted a moment of time or a squad of good soldiers on Canaanite scrubland? The names especially didn’t add up when the bible was matched with Egyptian history.

    Here’s where Assat clears it all up: Arab scholars as early as the year 900 nailed the place names down to what is now North Yeman and surrounding areas. Joshua DID conquer; there WAS a Jerico… all on the Arabian peninsula.

    The sand in the gearbox was the (understandable) tendency of Egyptian historians not to be especially specific about precisely which band of marauders they were fighting at any specific time. They used terms like “apiru”, “Habiru.” and “Vile Asiatics” as synonyms. They knew who they were talking about, but centuries later… we don’t.

    Anyway Assat knew that actual history has always pointed to a real event, initiated by Babylon, to physically pry several bandit Arabian tribes north. This was the famous “Babylonian exile”. Most never returned to their North Yemanite homeland, but some (“Jews”) invented a new one centuries later. The rest you know. It also has the virtue of explaining how these “Vile Asiatics” ended up being so far north of their actual homeland, the Arabian peninsula. By turning into Syriac Peoples, they had a huge effect on history, not always benign.

    The “marry in” part is critical too. You mention Italy correctly, and my family is from the old Austrian Empire, where marrying in was common. My maternal grandmother was probably a converso, her last name being Feigle, a common Jewish name in that area back then.

    Like this: Spain, Italy and Austria were all a “New Canaan” for a certain period. We just have to remember the original Canaan was the same: A new homeland — for no Jews were there prior to Babylon.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  49. @AaronB

    It is very easy to dislike Jews, because of their uniquely-qualitatively and quantitively-bad, sociopathic character. The cult of Einstein is one example. As this author notes, the consequences of the top-down, deductive first then application (induction), has been disastrous for society.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/03/24/review-of-roger-schlaflys-how-einstein-ruined-physics/

    The pity is that the good Jews can be tarred with the same brush as the evil and wicked one. For me, you are next to worthless, because you explain it away with casuistry, and casual dismissal.

    • Replies: @ivan
  50. @Rational

    Einstein was mostly a fraud and yes a typical Jewish Pervert. The Jews control all media, universities, institutions, economic pathways and the internet. Kevin MacDonald has done a good job of showing the inner networking control of our daily lives. The Jews control our vision of the universe because we constantly only get view that they provide for us from the movies to their control of Wikipedia. They have 24 hour monitoring of the world events and they immediately swing in to action to control the info and the dialogue.

    It is amazing just how good it works whether it’s frauds like Einstein or any other history the Jews control the narrative. The Jews always look like the victim and the savior no matter what they do.

    • Replies: @SafeNow
  51. many fools attack the Holy Scriptures thinking that it is tantamount to an attack on the jews. but this is the furthest thing from the truth. had the jews really followed the Word they would have accepted the Messiah.
    some nazis were boasting they would not suffer the fate of holofernes, but God works in mysterious ways. as for canaanites, no one will miss child scarifying idolaters. you would not even have known they had existed had Prophet Joshua not mentioned their name. crocodile tears.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @anno nimus
  52. ivan says:
    @utu

    The schtick that the Einstein groupies use to boost their man’s allegedly unprecedented originality is two-fold:

    i. Claim that sitting in his Zurich patent office he was splendidly isolated from all developments in the physical sciences, when in truth Einstein and his buddies including Besso, were avid readers of all the new developments as published in international and German circles.

    ii. Assert that even if others had made original contributions before him, he alone had the insight to raise these discoveries above the mundane, by raising them to the level of universal principles. Cynics have said that this amounts to devaluing the painstaking work of the original contributors. For example Poincare was not interested in making a gobbledegook of his relativity theory by talking of shrinking lengths and dilating time as though were in fact real, when they may well be artifacts of the – simple – mathematical calculations. (It was Poincare himself who had introduced precursors of these notions, which Einstein then exaggerated). But this made him a ‘conventionalist’, an ordinary bloke.

    About his later ‘gravitational’ theory I’ll have more to say when the occasion arises as I haven’t been able to master the various mathematical tricks used to obscure and misdirect the earnest layman.

    • LOL: eah
    • Replies: @utu
    , @utu
  53. anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:
    @anno nimus

    meh

    More Yellow Pages
    Less Biiiible

    No one ever went to war over an interpretation of 700 pages of telephone numbers

  54. ivan says:
    @Poupon Marx

    One can say that the British lost their edge in physics, when they slavishly followed the ‘top-down’ approach instead of their own robust (mathematically informed) empiricism. Oliver Heaviside had no use for the Special Theory and had he lived would have taken apart the General Theory. And Ernst Rutherford just laughed it off :

    One of the participants was Sir Maurice Amos, a retired chief justice of the Egyptian court. Amos asked Rutherford, “I do not see why Einstein is accorded a greateiE public acclaim than you. After all, you invented the nuclear model of the atom; and that model provides the basis for allphysical science today and it is even more universal in its applications than Newton’s laws of gravitation. Whereas Einstein’s predictions refer to such minute departures from the Newtonian theory that I do not see what all the fuss is about.” Rutherford, in response, turned to Eddington and said, “You are responsible for Einstein’s fame.”

    https://www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral-histories/4552

    – Dr Chandrasekhar’s reminiscences

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  55. Dumbo says:
    @AaronB

    There is an obvious genetic component to Judaism – which can be seen in the simple fact that most (not all) Jews “look like Jews”. Of course, the religion being what it is, ultra-exclusionary and shunning converts, it reinforces its own genetic permanence. Even Jews who (sincerely) convert to Christianity keep being seen by others as Jews (i.e. Lawrence Auster, Brother Nathanael), and only after a few generations of conversion and mixing they are no longer seen as “Jews”.

    Of course there is also a cultural and religious element. But it’s not the only, and perhaps not even the most important element.

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
    , @AaronB
  56. utu says:
    @ivan

    (1) Agree. He was also writing brief abstracts of papers he read for Planck.

    (2) Poincare and Lorentz were more cautious and were not willing to push as much as Einstein while they got all mathematical foundations that matters, that were the crux of the STR before Einstein. Einstein introduced the 2nd postulate because it was the only way he could derive the Lorentz transforms that seemed independent of Lorentz’s derivation. While Lorentz derived his transforms from the invariance of Maxwell Equations (using the 1st postulate of Einstein which was formulated by Poincare already in 1900). BTW, Einstein did not need the 1st postulate to derive the Lorentz transforms. Then Einstein using the transforms showed that Maxwell Equations were invariant. That’s why Lorentz said that Einstein postulated what we (him and Poincare) have proven/demonstrated.

    (3) As far as the GTR, the mathematics of it was done by Grossman up to some point. I have heard that their relationship broke down and Einstein was left with unfinished work therefore he turned to Hilbert for help who sent him on a postcard the solution (the postcard is lost) while all the other were preserved. And then the issue of priority arose. Several years ago several Einstenians idolaters wrote a paper proving Einstein priority however several physicists objected. See:

    https://www.unz.com/article/neurotic-leftists-mobbing-noah-carl-un-pc-cambridge-u-researcher-establishment-right-dithers/?highlight=hilbert#comment-2710532
    Cleansing of the archives. As you know there was a controversy also concerning the General Theory of Relativity in which Einstein was helped by several mathematicians but still could not get the final equation right so he turned to Hilbert for advice. There was an exchange of correspondence and the card (yes they were using post cards because stamps were cheaper) that Hilbert sent with the solution is missing. Then in 1990s there was a printer copy of Hilbert paper found that could be decisive in determining whether Hilbert had priority or not. A team of physicist/historians got hold of it and wrote a paper which got great media coverage (NYT…) that they finally determined that after all Einstein was first. It seems that the authors got full backing of Max Planck Institute. But there were some Germans who did not go along with it. Apparently some Germans (physicists and historians of physics) still have balls. Actually one of them was a woman. They began to look closer and found that the printer copy has a cut out with a missing crucial equation. Somebody cut out with razor the equation that Hilbert wrote. One German physicist/historian of very good reputation wrote a book in German (still not translated into English) refuting the previous findings. Also one physicist from Zurich wrote a paper that gave a very convincing scenario how and when the printer copy was altered.

    On “Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute”, published by L. Corry, J. Renn, and J. Stachel
    http://www.znaturforsch.com/aa/v59a/s59a0715.pdf

    How Hilbert has found the Einstein equations before Einstein and forgeries of Hilbert’s page proofs
    https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0610154

    Daniela Wuensch, “zwei wirkliche Kerle”, Neues zur Entdeckung der Gravitationsgleichungen der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie durch Einstein und Hilbert. Termessos, 2005, ISBN 3-938016-04-3

  57. utu says:
    @ivan

    Also see my comment #45 about plagiarizing of Klein paper in 1927.

  58. Dumbo says:

    I don’t know much about physics to be able to say much about Einstein’s work – but as a person he didn’t seem to have been such a nice guy, and his political opinions always seemed kinda dumb for a genius.

    It is also possible that his fame and influence was inflated, Jews are good at that. I mean, of course many of them are quite brilliant, of course some individual Jews provided some amazing breakthroughs in sciences or in arts – you couldn’t “inflate” something that has no achievement whatsoever. But then I think about people like Susan Sontag, or Woody Allen, or others who were sold as great intellectuals or artists when really they were not that exceptional, and sometimes even frauds, such as Bruno Bettelheim.

    That said, I do think that Jews are a special people. In a way, both blessed and cursed.

  59. @Franz

    Genetic tests show little but Italian ancestry in European Jews. Another words, the Ashkenazi arrived in Rome and intermarried with local women and were a separate entity by the time of the Fall of Rome when they moved North into the Rhine valley.

    Italians and Jews have always had cultural and genetic ties, but North-Central Europeans did not intermarry with Jews at all. By the time the Jews moved North after the fall of Rome they were already a separate race.

    Jews are basically Italians.

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @Franz
    , @Wally
  60. Faux scientist, faux human being- Einstein reveals himself to be just another spiteful Ashkenazi-Khazarian demi-humanoid shyster who plagiarized from the same Germans he denigrated. Throw him on the scrapheap with other liars and charlatans: Boas, Freud, Marx and the rest.
    Incarcerate, convict, asset strip, expel. Rinse and Repeat.
    They must all leave with what they came with: nothing. What do they need our wealth for? Can’t the chosenites just make the magic sky god rain money? Perhaps they need another burnt offering?

  61. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Funny reading that any culture is racist coming from a Jew.

    My take is other cultures are more open about how they feel about others, whereas Hews obscure how racist they are with SJW stunts that are phony.

    Maybe the Vietnamese say right through you and they didn’t accept you for a good reason.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @AaronB
  62. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    You seem like a typical Jew who went to the East expecting these primitives to see you as their superior, only to be disappointed when they weren’t very impressed by you.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  63. Anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:

    Einstein was warped. There are very few Chinese or East Asian women that I encounter each day that I don’t want to have sex with. Age 25 to 75, they all make me harder than a diamond in a snowstorm, to quote Ricky Bobby.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  64. @The Dark Night

    ‘…The Jews took Palestine from the Brits who took it from the Turks, the Turks took it from the Arabs who took it from the Romans, and the Romans took it from the Jews. The homerland of the Arabs is Arabia and not Palestine.’

    Usual Zionist tripe. Not even worth rebutting.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  65. @AaronB

    ‘…What comes through in your writing about Jews is resentment at their superiority – not principled objection to nationalism. In other words, your own competing nationalism. But why should a Vietnamese care that Jews are superior? Do Vietnamese in America really see themselves as in competing nationalism with Jews?’

    This is interesting. You assert that Linh feels resentment at the superiority of Jews — but you don’t question the underlying notion that Jews are in fact superior. Do you feel that Jews are superior?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @AaronB
  66. @AaronB

    ‘Don’t be embarrassed, 99% of the people on this site haven’t.’

    Your persistent vagueness makes me suspect you’re included in that 99%. There is never a specific reference, quotation, or even tangible fact. I suppose you’ve read some gloss on the internet.

  67. @ivan

    ‘Norman Mailer in his Fire on the Moon his take on the moon landing took the Negroes to the cleaners over some pages, telling them essentially that they are incapable of such a feat, as opposed to white men like himself. Jews from the Occident in the 20th century have always regarded themselves as white men until some found that it is more profitable to set themselves apart.’

    This Jewish ‘we’re not white’ thing is above all just another of the ever-more transitory sillinesses of our age. It’s in the same category as abolishing our border patrol or transsexual bathrooms or ‘black lives matter’ or that annoying Swedish child.

    Think of it as yet another symptom of the general malady.

    • Replies: @ivan
  68. renfro says:

    “to be a Jew means to bear a serious responsibility not only to his own community, but also toward humanity.”

    Politically astute people know how Jews operate…and its not genius or for humanity, its always for themselves alone and in the most unethical , deceptive and dirty ways.

    Oral History Interview with
    Edwin M. Wright
    Wooster, Ohio
    July 26, 1974
    by Richard D. McKinzie
    excerpts…

    David Niles was the protocol officer in the White House, and saw to it that the State Department influence was negated while the Zionist view was presented. You get this from Mr. Truman’s book, but also there are many stories that are not known.

    One of them was that when the election was coming up in 1946 in New York, the group of New York Jews called upon Mr. Truman. Emmanuel Cellar was the head of this committee. Rabbi Steven Wise and several others were in it. They called upon Mr. Truman and said, “We have just been talking with Mr. [Tom] Thomas Dewey. He is willing to come out and declare for a Jewish state, and we are going to turn our money and urge the Jews to vote for him unless you beat him to it.” Then Emmanuel Cellar pounded upon Mr. Truman’s desk and said, “And if you don’t come out for a Jewish state we’ll run you out of town.”
    https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/oral-histories/wright

    THAT…..is where I would have called in the Secret Service boys and had them all hauled off to jail to await trial for threatening and trying to bribe a US President.

    Trump can’t be in any more trouble than he already is….he should try this….it would literally eclipse every scandal that has ever hit Washington.

  69. @Anonymous

    I think the point Aaron was trying to make was that Asians did not care how Jews felt and Jews do not seem to care how Asians feel about them.

    Its like this, man. If a black thinks you are racist he might inflict physical harm that will force you to either suffer injury or go to jail defending yourself. A Jew or Asian will do nothing. Neither really care if you are racist…they care about the money in their pocket.

    Blacks seem to be egomaniacs with inferiority complexes. Jews and Asians and Indians do not.

    Your average Korean grocer in LA, for example, was appallingly racist to the very blacks whose money they were taking. But Koreans were indifferent to criticism. Hollywood Jews produced a few films in the early nineties Blaxploitation cycle (MENACE II SOCIETY, BOYZ IN THE HOOD) that depicted Koreans as racist and NAACP constantly complained but Koreans were wholly indifferent.

    Nor did the thousands of Koreans in the ghetto become crackhead junkies when the crack craze hit. Nor did they contract AIDS. Both these things wiped out huge portions of the black community but Koreans simply continued selling their Colt 45 and taking black money. Eventually blacks, lacking any way to compete economically, simply burnt their stores down in the LA Riots. But Koreans were prepared and shot their asses off.

    Asians and Indians are impervious to Jewish criticism. Sticks and stones break bones, words don’t hurt them.

    Similarly, Jews don’t really care what Asians or Indians think of them. Both Brahmin and Jews believe they are the chosen ones.

    John Derbyshire has called this the arrow of resentment. It is usually economic.

    Culturally, Asians and Indians are inscrutable to Jews and inaccessible. They simply don’t care about words or media messages or anything abstract.

    Finally, they have their own financial systems. They loan one another money. They don’t need to seek out usurious credit.

    It is hard to con someone who does not care at all one whit. I think that is what it comes down to. And also the point Aaron was making.

    He doesn’t care how Asians feel about him. He grew up in Israel. A self-sustaining ethno-state. If Asians believe he is primitive it has no affect on him.

    We are all fundamentally driven by self-interest and opportunism. Or at least the more economically successful races like Jews and Asians are.

  70. @Anonymous

    Asians cannot distinguish Jews from other whites. I’ve lived in Asia for ten years and I am here to tell you that. No Asian is going to walk up to Alicia Silverstone or Harvey Keitel and distinguish them from a Gentile. Impossible.

  71. @anno nimus

    child sacrificing … correction.
    from wiki
    In Leviticus 18:21, 20:3 and Deuteronomy 12:30-31, 18:10, the Torah contains a number of imprecations against and laws forbidding child sacrifice and human sacrifice in general. The Tanakh denounces human sacrifice as barbaric customs of Baal worshippers (e.g. Psalms 106:37).

  72. @Sean McBride

    You would be very hardpressed to make a case that the particulars of a religious faith, or religious practices, were significantly determined by genes, would you not?

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
  73. “so Jews stealing Arab land by mass murder weren’t nationalist” is your jibe in response to what Einstein wrote in 1938. Maybe some events of the 1948 war would appear to support your view of Israeli actions but how can you justify that as an answer to Einstein’s 1938 views?

    • Replies: @Linh Dinh
  74. I understand eistein view back in the day about chinese women

    this was before make-up, modern hairstylists and, specially, cosmetic cirurgies. the last thing is ultra common in east asia. they even have special cams that “correct” live the thinness of their faces.

    plus, all of they being thin is a good thing RIGHT NOW, but back then it was just the norm for the entire world.

    I’m attracted by asian women, but I’ll never want to have kids with any of them

  75. Kitty says:

    I like how the Jew celebrates Chinese for calling Europeans “bandits”, considering that his own racial brethren are the ones who directed the Europeans to conflict against China…

  76. Wally says:
    @Rational

    More on yet another Zionist fraud, fake ‘genius’, and all around shyster:

    Exposing the Real Albert Einstein: https://principia-scientific.org/exposing-the-real-albert-einstein
    The Great Einstein Hoax: https://www.amazon.com/Great-Einstein-Hoax-Herb-Rose/dp/1478748095
    Jew icon Einstein was rabidly racist, xenophobic: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/12/einsteins-travel-diaries-reveal-shocking-xenophobia
    Albert Einstein was a Fraud
    http://coconutrevival.com/?p=5656
    Einstein, plagiarist of the century: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm
    and:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/efWhgxlziT40/

  77. Wally says: • Website
    @Rational

    Einstein, among his low life endeavors, endorsed and wrote an introduction to the 1943 Communist / Zionist propaganda ‘Black Book of Polish Jewry‘ which among other things claimed Jews were steamed to death, were electrocuted in special metal plated barracks, etc., etc.
    recommended:

    ‘Black Book of Polish Jewry’, believe it or you will be arrested in 16 Euro. countries & Israel: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11193

    Black Book of Polish Jewry / early storyline development: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8138

    Einstein & the Jewish soap lie: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9445

    • Replies: @Wally
  78. renfro says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Jews are basically Italians.

    gawd…not that worn out claim again.

    The Jews moved into Italy from the Roman Empire….and they moved into Southern Italy, not Northern Italy and Southern and Northern Italians have different linages . The Italian Jew actually was a semite.

    Further no matter how much Jews study themselves and the Ashkenazi , the original finding on the Ashkenazi keeps being proved over and over.
    The Jews constantly study themselves trying to find out who they are….some Jews want to prove they are all of semite origins, others, knowing Jews are a mix want to assign it to European, instead of more primitive Khazar or Turkic or Africa. Nevertheless the origins of the Ashkenazi as Khazarian is the only one that makes historical sense and explains the huge numbers of Jews in eastern Europe.

    “”Our findings support the Khazarian hypothesis and portray the European Jewish genome as a mosaic of Near Eastern-Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries, thereby consolidating previous contradictory reports of Jewish ancestry. We further describe a major difference among Caucasus populations explained by the early presence of Judeans in the Southern and Central Caucasus. Our results have important implications for the demographic forces that shaped the genetic diversity in the Caucasus and for medical studies.

    https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/5/1/61/728117/

    “While it is clear that Ashkenazi maternal ancestry includes both Levantine [Near Eastern] and European origins—the assignment of several of the major Ashkenazi lineages to pre-historic European origin in the current study is incorrect in our view,” physician-geneticists Doron Behar and Karl Skorecki of the Rambam Healthcare Campus in Israel, whose previous work indicated a Near Eastern origins to many Ashkenazi mitochondrial types.
    After the dissolution of Khazaria, the Ashkenazi (Khazarians who converted to Judaism) drifted both north into Russia, Poland and the Ukraine, and westwards into the Balkans. By 11th and 12th centuries, these Eastern Jews make their first appearance in the Jewish literature of France and Germany. This history explains the number of Jews in Poland , Ukraine and Russia is the one that matches history and was established by Salo Wittmayer Baron who was a Polish-born American historian who taught at Columbia University .”

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  79. ‘…And Einstein wasn’t an unbiased internationalist either. His ethnocentrism was extreme. In his 1938 “Our Debt to Zionism,” Einstein lamented, “Now the fateful disease of our time—exaggerated nationalism, borne up by blind hatred—has brought our work in Palestine to a most difficult stage. Fields cultivated by day must have armed protection at night against fanatical Arab outlaws.”

    So Jews stealing Arab land through mass murder weren’t nationalist, fanatical or diseased, but their victims were…’

    Well, to be fair here, as of 1938 the Zionists weren’t seizing the land of the Palestinians by brute force…yet.

    To demonstrate that Einstein condoned Zionist theft, you’d need to find quotes from him justifying Zionism dating from after 1948. What you’ve got here is more or less the equivalent of an approving remark about Nazism made in 1937. You can’t demand that people disassociate themselves from crimes that have yet to be committed.

  80. @Poupon Marx

    A fantastic read. Thank you.

    Hat in hand.

  81. Franz says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Jews are basically Italians.

    Very not.

    Jewish Ashkenazim were part of Europe for centuries before there was an “Italy”.

    Horseman from Khazar and Sarmatia were connected totally. It’s why Poles and Germans had lots of Jewish DNA from the bad old days.

    Fact is the “Alan” tribes of Sarmatia and the Khazars were totally on the same page, as far as raiding and nation building grows.

    There is an ancient rumor, not unbelievable, that they shared information about nautical maps and Christopher Columbus got all his details and maps from Khazar sources.

    Not unlikely if you consider the dates and details.

  82. SafeNow says:
    @niteranger

    “The Jews control the dialogue…amazing how good it works….the Jews control the narrative.”

    There seems to be a ”talking gene” at work. Perhaps descended from thousands of years hunched over the Torah, and debating it. Thus, we get successful Jewish lawyers, pundits, journalists, professors, psychiatrists, politicians, and of course, yentas. It is amazing to me that this genetic trait succeeds, because its tone is one of dissension, contentiousness, hyper-criticalness, and hyper-touchiness. To me, it seems off-putting, but it works; listeners are awestruck; I don’t know why.

    • Replies: @niteranger
    , @Whitewolf
  83. padre says:

    Looking at their picture and features, I just wonder where did they find a strenth to call someone ugly!

  84. eah says:

    In his 1938 “Our Debt to Zionism,” Einstein lamented, “Now the fateful disease of our time—exaggerated nationalism, borne up by blind hatred—has brought our work in Palestine to a most difficult stage. Fields cultivated by day must have armed protection at night against fanatical Arab outlaws.”

    Note that Einstein wrote this in 1938, ie before WWII and the post-‘Holocaust’ influx of Jews into Palestine, aka the British Mandate, where both Arabs and Jews lived — re “Jews stealing Arab land through mass murder”, I assume most people would think you are referring to the founding of Israel after WWII — before that, ie during the British Mandate, there were competing Arab and Zionist nationalist movements in Palestine — I know little about the detailed history of that period, so it is not clear to me how much of “Jews stealing Arab land through mass murder” was happening in 1938, ie during the British Mandate but before the post-WWII Zionist violence that led to the establishment of Israel.

  85. Since Einstein wasn’t queer, transitioning or gender neutrois, unfortunately, he found several women on his trip pleasant to look at or interact with, “Yet Einstein’s gaze is not simply that of the ‘seeing [white] male [ . . . ] whose imperial eyes passively look out and possess,’ even though that is also an integral part of his gaze. As a German Jew and an insider/outsider, his was a ‘double-consciousness,’ which is the ‘sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others.’ Thus, Einstein is also gazing at himself while being gazed at by others.”

    I’m too stupid to understand such a nuanced dissection by Rosenkranz, but maybe you can help me? Please?

    This is not something deep or mysterious. The author, Rosekranz, tries to say that some sophisticated German Jews, as an assimilated, yet still a distinct minority, possessed double consciousness: one of the ruling, “imperial” Westerners & the other of the colonized, non-European minorities. Completely assimilated Jewish Germans, like Marx, were frequently pan-Teutonic Germans & their consciousness of the world was not split.

    In Einstein, as Rosenkranz would like us to believe, there was a cognitive split, so to say: he looked on Asians both as a representative of dominant Europeans (and their world-view re colonialism etc.) & as a member of an outsider minority located in Europe- but still remaining a non-Euro ethnic group, so potentially “an ally” of colonized colored races.

    Personally, I don’t find Rosenkranz’s “defense” of Einstein convincing. Einstein probably, as virtually all thinking Europeans of his time, vacillated in his perception of the natives. He was not, on emotional level, a secret ally of coloreds due to his outsider-Jewish identity; he was just, like all Westerners who encountered non-whites, confused & juggled with possible reactions. He speculated on pros & cons.

  86. iffen says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Patricus: “Every ethnic group thinks they are somehow better than the rest.”

    Every ethnic group except whites. Both Christian and secular whites are under the spell of Christianity’s egalitarian vision.

    And they believe that this egalitarianism is “the” way for all the world, and that belief and the righteousness that goes with it makes them “better” than any other group.

  87. @The Dark Night

    “…The Jews took Palestine from the Brits who took it from the Turks, the Turks took it from the Arabs who took it from the Romans, and the Romans took it from the Jews…”

    …and the Jews took it from the Canaanites, by means of GENOCIDE (see the book of Joshua).

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  88. iffen says:

    As a German Jew and an insider/outsider, his was a ‘double-consciousness

    This comes out of post-modernism. It means that Jews shouldn’t be considered white, because in addition to a white consciousness they have a non-white (Jewish) consciousness. This is why they should be considered as having full membership in the coalition and not be questioned by other members of the coalition as to their rightful status as non-white.

  89. @AaronB

    “Mephistopheles: Why, this is hell, nor am I out of it. Think’st thou that I, who saw the face of God. And tasted the eternal joys of heaven, Am not tormented with ten thousand hells?”

  90. @AaronB

    Btw, the remark about the crude European being better at industry was a European trope of the time. It originated in the Romantic reaction against science and industry. You can find it in dozens of gentile European writers. Einstein was merely being a good European and parroting the views of his class and time.

    Call me a Nazi, but this really doesn’t sound like a European speaking: “It does seem to me that our kinfolk really are more sympathetic (at least less brutal) than these horrid Europeans.”

    If readers here actually read the European classics and were educated, four fifths of the commentary on Jews would collapse. Only invincible ignorance makes it possible.

    And only resentful chauvinism makes it a Jewish imperative to lay claim to the accomplishments of Gentiles. Which of “the European classics” would undermine the commentary on Jews here?

  91. >So Jews stealing Arab land through mass murder weren’t nationalist, fanatical or diseased, but their victims were.

    Under British trusteeship, before independence, when Einstein was writing the essays you cite, Jews bought land from wealthy absentee landlords, commenced farming it and displaced Arab tenant farmers. No wonder the displaced Arabs tried to burn the new farmers out. A well-written novel about those times is Arthur Koestler’s Thieves in the Night.

    No stealing, no mass murdering. The author in his hatred of Jews choses to ignore the facts.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  92. Anonymous[102] • Disclaimer says:
    @Poupon Marx

    Every reader should copy and read the article to understand the other Big Lie of the century. It’s also worth studying in some detail for the sheer enjoyment of watching Einstein’s hagiographers disappear up their own butts in response to the points made therein.

    • LOL: Poupon Marx
  93. Alfred says:
    @The Dark Night

    The important thing to note is that the Palestinians are going to get it back. What happened in Saudi Arabia and Yemen recently was only a shot across the bow.

    Hezbollah is now in a position to target the home of Netanyahu should they wish to do so. Of course, they will never do so. He is doing a great job of making everyone in the region hate Israel and in fooling the Jewish population of that country. He is leading them down a dead-end.

    Note how the Israelis even pissed off the Russians. Syria has largely become a no-fly zone for Israel. Instead of standing back, the Israelis have started targeting Iraq. So who is going to take back the millions of Jews when they want to return to where they came from?

    • Replies: @Jake
    , @The Dark Night
  94. Barr says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    Wow!

    Tell us more about it .thanks

    • Replies: @bomag
  95. @AaronB

    Yes, Jewishness is both a congenital and an acquired condition, “it’s all simple”, said the man who thinks circumcision makes sense.

    • Replies: @Anonymous Snanonymous
  96. Barr says:
    @The Dark Night

    The Jews didn’t take it from Palestine. They goaded blackmailed and bribed some Britush leaders . They made them fight for it . Once Britain were weakened enough ,wounded enough and couldn’t even escape ,the Jews stabbed the British.

    America should learn from this .

    American diversity might create more tension ,division,and might force the country into what ethnically diverse Sub Saharan countries , Syria ,India have become . The diverse population can sink into ethnocentric political and economic arrangements with quota , political correctness, , restricted movements across racial lines and into creating more ghettos . Amerucan Jews then might seize this opportunity and become the arbiter . White ,Yelow,!Brown might look to the Jews to come and sort things out . ( how many times Fox and CNN have reminded us that Israeli opinion,findings,intelligence,interrogation, defense ,and mind reading of terrorists are better than us and we should seek their help !! )

    Very soon all we will have Jew as head master,as head cop as head judge,as head politician,as head professor,as head researcher,as head broadcaster . The Jew will be synonymous with Head .

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
  97. Einstein has been largely exposed for the fraud and plagiarist he was. His was just the typical case of the Jewish media promoting one of their own. Similar to how a few months ago a research team that included a Jewish girl “discovered” a black hole and photographed it. Of course they did no such thing and the contribution of the Jewish girl was minimal but that didn’t stop the media from splashing her picture, and hers alone, all over as the Jewish girl hero.

    One is reminded of course of the other great Jewish “genius” Jonas Salk who copied, almost entirely, the work of goy scientists John Enders, William Hammon, David Bodian and Dorothy Horstmann. The latter four did all the work and research in the development of the polio vaccine with Salk swooping in at the end to take credit, which the (Jewish owned) media was all too happy to go along with.

    • LOL: eah
  98. T. “Humankind cannot bear very much reality.”
    ― T. S. Eliot, Four Quartets
    Perhaps why hope is the last curse found in Pandoras Box.

  99. @renfro

    The Khazar theory is simply not reflected in the DNA of Askenazi Jews. The human genome has been broken down to reflect on average that Jews are a surprising split between Levant (Closest to modern day Syrians) and Italians.

    Little DNA evidence suggests any relationship with Turkic Mongols.

    The Jews who moved to Poland were in fact Sephardic and originally from Spain because the King of Poland invited them.

    • Replies: @Jake
  100. @Franz

    DNA tests don’t reflect this. They suggest an even split between Levant and Italian genes, on average. Not Turkic Mongol.

    The Jews in Poland however, were Sephardic who migrated there after the King of Poland invited them following their expulsion from Spain.

    …So why would DNA not reflect a Turkic Mongol genome if this is the origin of the Ashkenazi?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Franz
  101. Linh Dinh says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    Irgun operations in 1937-38:

    1937, March– 2 Arabs killed on Bat Yam beach.
    1937, November 14– 10 Arabs killed by Irgun units launching attacks around Jerusalem, (“Black Sunday”)
    1938, April 12– 2 Arabs and 2 British policemen were killed by a bomb in a train in Haifa.
    1938, April 17– 1 Arab was killed by a bomb detonated in a cafe in Haifa
    1938, May 17– 1 Arab policeman was killed in an attack on a bus in the Jerusalem-Hebron road.
    1938, May 24– 3 Arabs were shot and killed in Haifa.
    1938, June 19– 18 Arabs killed (9 men, 6 women and 3 children), 24 injured by a bomb that was thrown into a crowded Arab market place in Haifa.
    1938, June 23– 2 Arabs were killed near Tel Aviv.
    1938, June 26– 7 Arabs were killed by a bomb in Jaffa.
    1938, June 27– 1 Arab was killed in the yard of a hospital in Haifa.
    1938, July 5– 7 Arabs were killed in several shooting attacks in Tel Aviv.
    1938, July 5– 3 Arabs were killed by a bomb detonated in a bus in Jerusalem.
    1938, July 5– 1 Arab was killed in another attack in Jerusalem.
    1938, July 6– 18 Arabs and 5 Jews were killed by two simultaneous bombs in the Arab melon market in Haifa. More than 60 people were wounded. The toll over two days of riots and reprisals was 33 dead, 111 wounded.
    1938, July 8– 4 Arabs were killed by a bomb in Jerusalem.
    1938, July 16– 10 Arabs were killed by a bomb at a marketplace in Jerusalem.
    1938, July 25– 43 Arabs were killed by a bomb at a marketplace in Haifa.
    1938, August 26– 24 Arabs were killed by a bomb at a marketplace in Jaffa.

  102. Jake says:

    If Linh Dinh ever harbored any hope that his writing could be allowed to find a large audience, the following quote killed it: “Let’s pause here, for this is more revealing than anything in the travel diaries. Since Europeans are horrid, perhaps they should disappear completely, with only the Chinese left, and, presumably, Jews. No Freudian slip, it’s a genocidal wet dream bluntly stated.”

    Yes, even many of the most genuinely ‘humanitarian’ Jews have genocidal wet dreams about the annihilation of the West and whites.

    And yes, that means that Jews would be left with no cultures based on Judaing heresy (WASP) to protect them from being hated and despised and feared by Mohammedans and Chinese and Indians.

    Jews are driven by desire to get even for Jesus and Christianity. And the more they succeed, the more they sow their own destruction on this earth. Satan tales allies only a a term, and then delights in rending them.

  103. Jake says:
    @Alfred

    “So who is going to take back the millions of Jews when they want to return to where they came from?”

    The leaders of the Anglosphere, the leaders of the WASP world. And the ‘conservative’ Protestants of the WASP world.

    What we need to save the US is more WASP culture acting to destroy every non-WASP white culture. VDARE is on board.

  104. Jake says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    And Poland eventually got reduced to a shadow if itself, an impotent vassal. Poland has never recovered from welcoming the horde of Jews and allowing them leeway to ‘make good’ in the Polish Empire.

  105. @ivan

    Yes, this is nothing more than the politicization of science, or using it as a power lever. Most-if not all-deliberate scientific frauds follow this line. Basically, a conclusion wants/needs to be but forth and the “evidence” is gathered to reinforce the hypothesis. Climate Change, Gun Control research, Lysenkosim, and many others where the “researcher/scientist” has his personal aggrandizement in goal, a political agenda by the nomenklatura is desired, or other unscientific ends.

    Scientific foundation is evidence, data, objective observation. And dispassionately so. In spite of outside pressures and human weakness, this imperative must be followed, personal disappointment notwithstanding. However, our research institutions are filled with armies of the kind of people that have staked whole careers on a principle, process, or finding. If that were to change, careers might be over and prestige would go down the toilet. After a certain point, when a scientist finds his hypotheses and conclusions (deduction) from the data sets were not correlated or significant, he can come cleans-thereby admitting that he burned up resources and time to no practical end [which isn’t quite true, because the DISPROVED something. Also important.]

    Here is a depressing finding about the current state of scientific research:

    https://phys.org/news/2018-07-beware-scientific-studiesmost-wrong.html

    https://news.yahoo.com/beware-those-scientific-studies-most-wrong-researcher-warns-164336076.html;_ylt=AwrCmrDxPZddHCoABQEPxQt.;_ylu=X3oDMTBybGY3bmpvBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMyBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzcg–

    “The majority of papers that get published, even in serious journals, are pretty sloppy,” said John Ioannidis, professor of medicine at Stanford University, who specializes in the study of scientific studies.

    This sworn enemy of bad research published a widely cited article in 2005 entitled: “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.”

    Since then, he says, only limited progress has been made.

    Some journals now insist that authors pre-register their research protocol and supply their raw data, which makes it harder for researchers to manipulate findings in order to reach a certain conclusion. It also allows other to verify or replicate their studies.

    Because when studies are replicated, they rarely come up with the same results. Only a third of the 100 studies published in three top psychology journals could be successfully replicated in a large 2015 test.

    Medicine, epidemiology, population science and nutritional studies fare no better, Ioannidis said, when attempts are made to replicate them.

    “Across biomedical science and beyond, scientists do not get trained sufficiently on statistics and on methodology,” Ioannidis said.

    Too many studies are based solely on a few individuals, making it difficult to draw wider conclusions because the samplings have so little hope of being representative.

    The whole inductive-deductive paradigm is upside down. Integrity is the casualty. Einstein led the century in unscrupulous scientific methodology and prostitution. His papers were pure deduction-he did no research in a lab-and merely stated the general thesis-the deduction, on the work of others, not not even validating and replicating the results.

    This slimy schlimiel deserves condemnation and opprobrium, not celebration. A clown and monkey.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  106. If
    Einstein was born in Germany. He did grow up in German culture. He did study in German university
    surrounded by German students. He did become a scientist.
    If
    he would have been born in India he would be pulling ricksha to this day.

  107. Walter says:

    Einstein, the Iconic Hero, alas, like the formidable Robert E. Lee, Jefferson, and all the other Murkanzski demigods, burned to the ground.

    Without their ruined gods the peoples fight one another until – you guessed it – they elect new gods.

    That’s the way it goes… Especially at the End of an Era..

    But to be fair, Einstein was just an man, ordinary, and compromised, like most (or all) the rest of us… It’s the magical aspect that’s swept away in the flames.

    Do the Chinese still call westerner people bandits? I had thought the favored pejorative was “long-noses”…

    The veiled Arab ladies are, many, beautiful. But some are not. Hence the democratic solution, hide all so as to keep them from fighting one-another.

    Two can play at that game, but it’s a long bet…

  108. Where were all the jewish geniuses hiding before Einstein? Re cancel culture, they can strangle Gandhi with Einstein’s entrails for all I care. (Jews will never, of course, allow this to happen, at least wrt to Einstein).

  109. eah says:

    1905 was Einstein’s Annus Mirabilis — that year he published four landmark papers — the one on the photoelectric effect is generally considered the most significant by physicists, since it introduced the idea of energy quanta, and laid the foundation for the development of quantum mechanics, the most powerful mathematical tool used in theoretical physics during the first half of the 20th century — the paper on the photoelectric effect was the only one specifically mentioned in 1921 when Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize.

    People who seek to discredit Einstein (for whatever reason — ?) by mentioning the other papers he published in 1905 — eg on special relativity and mass-energy equivalence — are, in this sense, “barking up the wrong tree” — Einstein was widely respected by his scientific peers, and I have not read of anyone among his contemporaries who begrudged him his fame.

    • Replies: @Ivan
  110. Bill says:
    @AaronB

    Reading you is exactly like reading Bill Kristol calling people who disagree with him unserious.

  111. @The Dark Night

    Didn’t the Jews take it from the Canaanites too though?

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  112. @utu

    The distinguished mathematician, E T Whittaker, was one of the few to confront the Einstein Fable during Einstein’s lifetime. As Wikipedia, for once correctly, puts it:

    In 1951 (Vol. 1) and 1953 (Vol. 2), he published an extended and revised edition of his book in two volumes. The second volume contains some interesting historical remarks. For example, it contains a chapter named “The Relativity Theory of Poincaré and Lorentz”, where Whittaker credited Henri Poincaré and Lorentz for developing special relativity, and especially alluded to Lorentz’s 1904 paper (dated by Whittaker as 1903), Poincaré’s St. Louis speech (The Principles of Mathematical Physics) of September 1904, and Poincaré’s June 1905 paper.[12] He attributed to Einstein’s special relativity paper only little importance, which he said “set forth the relativity theory of Poincaré and Lorentz with some amplifications, and which attracted much attention”, and he credited Einstein only with being the first to publish the correct relativistic formulas for relativistic aberration and the Doppler effect. He also attributed the formula E = m c 2 {\displaystyle E=mc^{2}} E=mc^{2} to Poincaré. In 1984 Clifford Truesdell wrote that Whittaker “aroused colossal antagonism by trying to set the record straight on the basis of print and record rather than recollection and folklore and professional propaganda,…”[13]

    Sadly, few other physicists or mathematicians put their heads above the parapet to contradict the Einstein Fable. And its not a legend or myth, but a fable, that is a purposefully fictitious narrative or story. Real people can be the subject of fables just as surely as characters from fiction. Think of the fables of the Emperor Napoleon, Abraham Lincoln or Adolf Hitler for example.
    The Fable of Albert Einstein seems to be slowly but surely unravelling.

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @eah
  113. @AaronB

    L’Shana tova… you are honest!

  114. @Poupon Marx

    Poupon Marx, you’ve articulated much better than I ever could have what I’ve been thinking for a very long time. The ruling elite have been manipulating societies since ancient times. Most of the upheaval, war, revolution and genocide throughout the ages are planned in advance for the benefit of the ruling families.

    Speaking of wonder boys that came from nowhere, some believe, including myself that Bill Gates is also (crypto) jewish. And let’s not forget Steve Jobs either. Golden boys thrust from obscurity to legend by the hidden hand.

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
  115. @Dacian Julien Soros

    I got circumcised at 21 and have never looked back and I have no regrets. You should try it!

  116. Given Linh Dinh’s clear & creative writing, he is amomg the truly distinguished freedom fighters of our time; for another example, Philip Giraldi.

    I deeply regret but admire how Linh sacrifices his career and exalts truth telling at all cost. Admittedly spoiled, 😏, I hoped for the Seven Stories Press publication of his “Obscured Americans” book.

    As many assembled here are aware, Linh truly knows who is the enemy, and does not hesitate to “step upon the 3rd rail.” For example, in comment # 103, he educated the pretend highbrow, Wizard of ZionoZ, on Irgun operations, 1937-1938.🇮🇱 Continue to stay unflappable, my friend!

  117. Hacienda says:

    Einstein was a remarkable generalist. In fact, deeply biased toward generalizing. LD is a poet and Vietnamese who prides himself on not generalizing; living in the “details” of the organism. Vietnam defeated America in a large and consequential war. He also sees an America culture that is moving away from the pathologies of generalizing (hope this smacks you upside the head more you bloated bitch, Pat Buchanan). Why would LD be jealous of the Jews? LD is a fucking unsung hero.

    • Replies: @mikemikev
  118. Clearly, Linh Dinh is a very good writer and hence one is interested in what he has to say about things that are very unique but I must say, when it comes to Jews, he puts on goggles of a particular shade to be not able to distinguish his intense dislike based on rejection of his writings by Jewish editors or his genuine love for the Palestinians. Maybe it’s both!

    • Replies: @bjondo
  119. Anonymous[200] • Disclaimer says:

    I have a thought experiment of my own:

    Imagine a group of people mostly but not wholly related by culture/religion/ancestry called the assholes. Like the disparaged, vital, underappreciated body part of the same name — which is a set of opposing muscle groups working together — the assholes are known to work together. Some people end up blaming the assholes for all that is wrong with the world. Others are aware that the assholes have been at times unjustly persecuted. The assholes themselves in typical asshole fashion maintain that they as the quintessential persecuted minority are above all criticism……

    I should probably apologize for this.

  120. @ivan

    When you objectively examine Einstein’s life outside of math and physics, you soon conclude he was a pig.

    • Replies: @ivan
  121. bjondo says:
    @Anonymous Snanonymous

    Or
    maybe he is exactly, right on target
    with his analysis
    using God given, clear, eagle-eyes goggles.

    5ds

  122. PeterMX says:

    Einstein disliked his German countrymen very much and this was long before WW II already. In a letter to the German physicist Max Planck during WW I Einstein exressed his wish thet Germany lose the war. Planck objected in his reply, pointing out that Germany wanted to end the war but Einstein would have none of it. Einstein also referred to Germans as “the blonde beast”. But with everything ever saiid about the Germans always being how bad they were, there was never any need to defend him from criticism. With the strong anti-German feeling in the US, Einstein and other Jews with anti-German feelings were welcomed as the “good guys”, or maybe even the “good German”. Whwn another German Jew came to the US and criticized the Germans for being “pro-war”, placing blame on them for WW I, Americans apparently liked that too. But maybe some of the blame for this goes to the Jewish writers building German Jewish critics of Germans up. Of course, this is why some Germans considered Jews traitors and I think many others had a similarly critical, but less harsh opinion. Amid all the propaganda, most Americans didn’t think this far, but if American Jews or anyone else had spoke about the US that way, they would have called them traitors, but they welcomed Germany’s “traitors” as being good guys.

    • Replies: @Ivan
  123. @The Dark Night

    And on and on – the Afrikaans did not steal African lands, British colonialists in Kenya did not acquire fertile highlands and named them the White Highlands, neither did Americans steal Native American lands. When savagery is invoked, anything goes. I am a legal American resident and own a property in Texas and it still remains legally mine and will continue to remain mine. Palestinians on the other hand – some of whom could well have been Jewish converts to Islam, and who have been in that region for centuries can be murdered or dispossessed to reinforce Jewish narratives.

    Of course Linh’s piece would easily pass as yet another anti-Semitic write. Why a Vietnamese would be so regarded and even have his posts deleted from Facebook, is anyone’s guess. Antisemitism also extends to a Brazilian cartoonist where he depicted an open secret of the Zionist tail wagging the American dog (my paraphrasing) and defended his work by stating his anti-Zionist position by – guess who – the NY Times, that mouthpiece of Zionist dreck. That defense fell on deaf ears. Naturally.

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/10/03/the-new-york-times-called-a-famous-cartoonist-an-anti-semite-repeatedly-they-didnt-ask-him-for-comment/

    The same paper defended tooth and nail, the Danish cartoonist depiction of the Moslem prophet. Truth be told that once the “civilized” characterize the Other as savage, anything goes, including their genocide, mass murder or dispossession. I wonder how many MSM sites would accept Linh’s article, even though most of it speaks about Einstein’s own writings, not Linh’s.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  124. @Jeff Stryker

    Not sure about the Asians where you are, but there is no people on the planet more concerned with “face” than the Chinese. It’s their concept, after all. There is also no people on the planet more communitarian than the Chinese (with the possible exception of Jews). Those two qualities means the Chinese are far from indifferent to slights–perceived or otherwise.

    And, like the Jews, they have a long racial memory.

    • Replies: @bjondo
  125. Bigbeef says:

    The real question is “if the Jews are half as smart as some of them or others claim they are, how come they are one of the biggest losers in history, and losing big time today?” The strange thing is how come everyone thinks they are winners instead of feeling kinda sorry for them? History: from slaves, to vassals, to wandering poor, to cash cows for European princes, to barely tolerated minority, to gas chamber, to again wandering poor immigrants, to totally besieged “home”, to again despised or disappearing minority in the West. Even the mountain monk who does nothing all day but chant in Tibet, or the Sri Lankan know-nothing farmer, or even the drunk aborigines in the new worlds, never in their wildest dreams thought they would go totally extinct. If among certain groups of people, ethnicity, religion, there is a constant worry that they might go extinct, maybe you are doing it wrong and maybe you are in fact dumb? Ever thought of that? I can easily imagine all the Muslims and Jews getting kicked out of the West because they don’t know how to shut up.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Pheasant
  126. milermp1 says:
    @Patricus

    “If they believed they were the dregs of humanity that would be a sad thing to behold. ”

    Like a whole generation of Europeans these days?

    • Replies: @Anon
  127. Wally says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Italian?

    IOW, ‘ancestral’ ties to a few Jews who migrated to Italy before a few more did.

    UR readers need to realize that Zionist Jeff Stryker is someone who says that the ‘Nazi gas chambers’ were fact. Hardly credible.

  128. augusto says:

    Of course the true jewish genius – besides that well known Nazarean 2000 years ago – is the AIPAC concept and Aipac reality.
    Which transformed a great solid nation of 320 million into a vassal of a violent racist crime prone regime of 6 million.

  129. @Dumbo

    There is an obvious genetic component to Judaism…

    Downstream from genetic traits:

    -behavioral traits
    -cultural traits
    -ethnic traits
    -ideological traits
    -mental traits
    -personality traits
    -physical traits
    -psychological traits
    -religious traits

    Jews themselves often depict themselves in terms which strongly suggest a genetic basis for identity (see, for instance, Philip Roth, Saul Bellow, Woody Allen, any number of popular Hollywood movies, etc.).

    On the American scene they comprise a distinct ethnic group (in the genetic sense), as much as Irish Americans, Italian Americans, African Americans and other groups.

    Why this matters: one wonders if genetic factors play a significant factor in many human conflicts, including ethnic, national and cultural conflicts. Eventually science (including machine and deep learning) may be able to figure this out in a highly precise way.

    It is likely that many human groups instinctively organize themselves around genetic similarities.

    Variable degrees of messianic ethnocentrism among ethnic groups may be the product of genetic factors. In other words, some ethnic groups may be more innately ethnocentric than others.

  130. Heymrguda says:

    It’s always struck me that Jews, as a group at least, seem to want capitaiism for themselves and socialism for everybody else.

  131. @Wizard of Oz

    You would be very hardpressed to make a case that the particulars of a religious faith, or religious practices, were significantly determined by genes, would you not?

    There may well be a strong correlation between genetic traits and the emotional embrace of particular ideological themes and memes, both religious and secular. Ideological beliefs to a degree are the product of temperament, and temperament to a degree is the product of genetic factors.

  132. Che Guava says:

    I have read up to this comment on the thread, and am not sure if later commentors have stated what I want to say, but have a few random points.

    Einstein’s vaunted ‘world’ tour of the 1920s was as the show pony of Chaim Weizmann (in a much earlier post I was mistakenly saying Herzl, I think, looking it up tonight was very difficult, even with using Weizmann as a search term) for Zionism.

    His visit to Japan is still fondly remembered, but one must recall that it was mainly to propagandize Zionism.

    The delegation of Hitler Youth visiting more than ten years later was a much bigger hit with anyone except the top social classes, in that timeframe.

    As for plagiargism, sound arguments can be made for both special and general relativity (the latter only largely, the former whole cloth),

    Having worked through the mathematics, it is impressive (and enjoyable) when presented in modern notation, but clearly in large part stolen from, mainly, German and French predecessors, with a good dash of standing on the shoulders of great Brit physicists. He never, for example, integrated Maxwell’s brilliant work on electromagnetism.

    Without preening, I will state that I had mastered differential and integral calculus a little earlier than Einstein, doesn’t give me a 212 IQ as the Jewish hagiographies claim for Albert.

    I forget the name of the author, but the writer of the biography of John Nash, A Beautiful Mind , describes Einstein in the background at Princeton as a rather dirty and smelly character. That was based on interviews with people there at the time.

    The movie based on the book is like a P..K. Dick version of the book (which I liked), but holy Einstein is absent. The book is more interesting.

    Finally, a whine about pop culture. In Spielberg’s execrable AI, Doctor Know is clearly an effort to shove the myth of Einstein down people’s throats.

    Much more crap propaganda there, but that is the part that is relevant to the topic.

  133. @Colin Wright

    Historical facts, Colin. Undeniable facts. Impossible to rebut.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @annamaria
  134. bjondo says:
    @craig nelsen

    like the Jews, they have a long racial memory.

    One fiction,
    the other real.

  135. @Franklin Ryckaert

    And the Jews took it from the Canaanites.

    Not too accurate but true. The Hebrews, the 12 Tribes of Israel took it from Canaanites. And then the Assyrians took it from them, then Persians took it from the Assyrians, and returned the Israelis from Persia to Palestine, which was called the Land of Israel among the Hebrews. And then the Greeks took it from Persians, and the Romans later took it from the Greeks, and then the Arabs came from the desert and took it from the Romans, and the Turks later took it from the Arabs. Then the Brits came and took it from the Turks. The Jews came and took it from the Brits. So what’s wrong with that?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  136. @Alfred

    Yes, who is going to take the Jews if Israel is attacked and ruined? This is something to think about.

    At least a half of the Jewish population of Israel has double citizenship. Millions of Zionist Jews coming to your countries – imagine that. I can only wish you good luck and say I hope this is not going to happen. Because otherwise I am afraid you are going to get screwed. Israeli Jews are active, ambitious, intelligent and connected.

  137. @Ilya G Poimandres

    The Hebrews did. The Jews are not the same people. But this is what I was talking about: the Jews are the descendants of the Hebrews, and since there are no more Caananites there is no other people who can claim Palestine as their homeland. The Arabs came from the Arabian peninsula 1,200 years ago. Perhaps it’s time for them to repatriate.

    • Replies: @renfro
  138. TX says:
    @AaronB

    lol…what a liar

    jews are an ethnic clan

    judaism is the clan religion

    stop lying, jew

  139. Hey augusto!

    Want to see some real Jewish genius?

    Fyr, linked below is Tru News
    interview on Carbyne911 and how talented 🙄 Jews outfoxed Amerika & weaponized the 911 emergency system. Please be patient, ‘cuz the video starts with a terrific look into freak criminal, Jeffrey Epstein’s “genius level”😈 & corresponding side business.*

    Carbyne911: Israeli Tech Scheme to Weaponize 911 Emergency Call System

    Carbyne911: Israeli Tech Scheme to Weaponize 911 Emergency Call System

    Posted by TruNews on Monday, 16 September 2019

    Frankly, Linh Dinh’s article, “Einstein’s genius,” is captivatingly brilliant. Nonetheless, I regret to suggest that it’s over-the-heads of a large percentage of my “Homeland” Scranton’s general population,😕 a lively segment are aware, pissed off, and the rest are in denial. Thanks & my “Tru” respect, augusto!

    * I believe Epstein ain’t dead & he knows everything that “If only America knew.”

  140. barr says:
    @Linh Dinh

    Back then , Jews used to wear Arab dress to mask identity before committing terrorism
    because no one would believe that Arab would commit terrorism .

    • Replies: @Anon
  141. TKK says:

    $100 bucks to analyze something other than Jews.

    Doughnuts?

    Owls?

    Fire?

    I don’t find them endlessly fascinating.

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
  142. @The Dark Night

    At least a half of the Jewish population of Israel has double citizenship. Millions of Zionist Jews coming to your countries – imagine that. I can only wish you good luck and say I hope this is not going to happen. Because otherwise I am afraid you are going to get screwed. Israeli Jews are active, ambitious, intelligent and connected.

    Don’t push it. Unlike most commenters, I’m not an anti-Semite. But, with that attitude, you may
    end up as soap.

    • LOL: renfro
    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  143. @Goy

    >Incest and the Jew are one and the same.

    This is crazy talk. I grew up in a jewish neighborhood and I never heard of such a thing, gossip that so-and-so was involved with a relative, and people do gossip. You jew haters just make this stuff up out of your head.

  144. @Linh Dinh

    Thank you for that. I could argue that it doesn’t quite justify the “stealing the land by mass murder” but it dis cause me look up this in the supposedly Jew controlled Wikipedia.

    “Individual massacres during the 1936–39 Arab revolt in Palestine are listed below. In total, during the course of these events, between September 27, 1937 – 1939, 5,000 Arabs, 415 Jews and several hundred Britons were killed.”

    I hadn’t realised how early large scale Zionist terrorism began.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  145. bjondo says:

    The real Yid genius – unchanging, constant hate for all others:

    2500 yrs ago, few years ago, today:

    Israeli officer: I was right to shoot 13-year-old child

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/nov/24/israel

    5ds

    • Replies: @utu
  146. @Colin Wright

    ‘This is interesting. You assert that Linh feels resentment at the superiority of Jews — but you don’t question the underlying notion that Jews are in fact superior. Do you feel that Jews are superior?’

    It’s a tad unfair — but in the absence of a response, I think we can proceed on the assumption that Aaron does feel Jews are superior.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  147. @Rational

    Can’t disagree with you there.

    Lauren Guyenot in his well written treatise on the subject, “From Yahweh to Zion”, that all serious scholars are aware of the fact that everything that is in and precedes the 5 Books of Moses are all fairy tales.

    A number of Jewish scholars have written in the past several years that both Judaic history and the corresponding religion of Judaism has all been rewritten in the past two hundred years.

    I never quite understood how since these scholars in their writings did not go into deep detail but Guyenot does.

    It is a book that should be required reading along with the books by Shlomo Sand that show how the Judaic belief system moved around the Mediterranean and into Europe. And far from being a minor belief system, it was quite significant in its day.

    However, Guyenot’s treatise on the subject is far superior to Sand’s works.

  148. @Linh Dinh

    ‘Irgun operations in 1937-38…’

    To review, the issue is when did the Jews begin simply taking land, as opposed to acquiring it by other means — like purchase.

    Now, my understanding is that much of the land in Palestine had traditionally been held under the usual sort of feudal arrangement where there was a lord and a more or less dependent peasantry. Under either the Westernizing Ottomans or the British, this was reinterpreted as the more modern system of land tenure: there’s a landlord, and the peasants are seen as his tenants. He ‘owns’ the land, and they ‘rent’ it from him. Functionally, it’s the same as always. The peasants work, and they give money to the lord.

    Now, when the Zionists began arriving in Palestine, they started buying this land from those landlords willing to sell. At first, the peasants weren’t terribly concerned; they assumed they would continue to work the land as always, and pay the dues they had always paid.

    When the shit hit the fan was when it emerged that the Jews didn’t want the peasantry there at all; they wanted Jews to be the physical farmers.

    Hence the Arab Revolt — as I understand it. One can see matters from the Palestinians’ point of view. One can see them from the Jewish point of view. I’d be inclined to sympathize with the Palestinians’ point of view — but a central fact remains.

    The Jews weren’t ‘stealing’ the land. Not yet. Einstein — fairly reasonably — saw them as innocently farming it and being ‘attacked’ by the Palestinian peasantry. It’s not how I would look at it, but his position isn’t indefensible. By the paradigms that obtained in the West at the time, the Jews were in the right. They’d bought the land, and were farming it.

    As of 1938, it wasn’t an outrage for Einstein to the see the Jews in Palestine as the aggrieved party. It wasn’t 1948 — not yet.

    • Replies: @Bombercommand
  149. Art says:
    @AaronB

    With very very few exceptions – from top to bottom – from Einstein to AaronB – Jews just cannot escape the delusional childhood indoctrination put on them by their elders.

    The very intelligent Jew – Sam Shama – once flirted with empathy for the Palestinians – only to fall back into his childhood hard core Jewness.

    The same for AaronB – once he was open – now he has degenerated even more into his verbose Jewishness. Like Einstein, he truly is a man without character – he pushes insulting sentence after insulting sentence on his fellow commenters – always extending and pushing the separation between his Jewish self and humanity.

    AaronB is soulless. He shares nothing with his fellow humans. He only has contempt for us. He has the unchangeable mind of a hard coded rabid Jew. How inferior. What a weakling.

  150. The article is clearly tendentious, but what is, in my eyes, more interesting is -who is a genius?

    Historically, genius was close, but not identical to Greek daimon, or some deity “above” a person who leads or protects him, akin to guardian angel. In relatively modern usage, without spiritual/religious connotation, this is applied to individuals who are extremely gifted in their chosen fields.

    On closer inspection, people who are virtually superhuman in their gifts are easy to recognize, there are very few of them. If we are to believe their biographers & can evaluate their works, there is no doubt that transcendent, almost god-like geniuses were Alexander the Great, Caesar, Napoleon, Plato, Bach, Gauss, Newton, Euler, Michelangelo, Shakespeare, Dostoevsky, Beethoven, Proust, …

    Lesser known creative “supermen” include, I’d say, William Rowan Hamilton, Thomas Young & some others.

    On the other hand, there are tremendously influential people who, in my opinion, were not geniuses – or at least there was nothing “superhuman” about them; very gifted but not so transcendentally creative – but somehow happened to be in the right place & in the right time: Copernicus, Darwin, …
    Also, there are fields like chemistry & biomedical sciences where one can change the world very much, but I don’t see a wealth of extreme creativity & ingenuity- say, Lavoisier or Pasteur.

    Charles Murray, being interviewed about his book “Human Accomplishment”, said that, in his opinion, the most accomplished (influential) human being was Aristotle. I happen to agree, but- there is something plodding & boring about Aristotle that puts him, I’d say, far below Plato- although Aristotle was much more influential in a variety of fields. Or, take one of 10-20 most important discoveries in history, DNA. Watson & Crick, co-discoverers, do not seem to qualify as even small geniuses. Without them, DNA structure was bound to be discovered, sooner or later. In other fields, Goethe seems to have been a genius of personality, a truly fascinating & charismatic man. But, his work is, if we read it from contemporary point of view, a rather small enterprise in comparison with Tolstoy’s.

    So, where this leaves us with Einstein?

    Einstein was- putting aside all the gobbledegook about plagiarism etc.- truly a remarkable genius, but not quite of the caliber of Newton or Gauss. He looms larger than many others due to a combination of various elements. One thing is, certainly, Jewish propaganda- but this is not crucial. Actually, there was a confluence of factors: in 20th C, physics replaced chemistry as the science (which was dominant in the 19th C world-view, just read Jules Verne); special & general theories of relativity fire popular imagination much more than more radical modern quantum mechanics & its later developments because space-time is more fundamental to our perception of life than some quantized energies or probabilistic interpretation most people can’t relate to; then, gravity & cosmology seem to impress people because there is a hint of something grand, literally cosmic & “ultimate” – so average Joe Sixpack gets a thrill from this scientific metaphysics for dummies, so to speak; Einstein’s stature was magnified also by popular cliches of armchair super-mind who disentangles “mysteries of universe”. He was, doubtless, the last universal physicist & the one who had overturned many common sense notions on space & time which were taken for granted. Here, I think, most of his appeal lies. His accomplishment will be cherished even when many of his basic concepts are superseded.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  151. utu says:
    @bjondo

    https://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/30/books/l-voltaire-and-the-jews-590990.html
    In his ”Letter of Memmius to Cicero” (1771), Voltaire, in the pose of an ancient Roman reporting on the Jews, wrote: ”They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  152. eah says:
    @Verymuchalive

    Interesting that you omitted this part of the passage (from the Wikipedia page about Whittaker) you cited:

    On the other hand, Abraham Pais wrote that “Whittaker’s treatment of special relativity shows how well the author’s lack of physical insight matches his ignorance of the literature”. According to Roberto Torretti, “Whittaker’s views on the origin of special relativity have been rejected by the great majority of scholars”, and he cites Max Born (1956), Gerald Holton (1960,1964), Scribner (1964), Goldberg (1967), Zahar (1973), Hirosige (1976), Schaffner (1976), and Arthur I. Miller (1981).

    “LOL”

    • Replies: @utu
  153. AaronB says:
    @Dumbo

    Yes, there is a genetic trait, but culture and religion are generally associated with particular ethnic groups, although not completely.

    Oh, and Jews don’t shun converts. They are welcomed, although they are not sought out. This is partially a relic of living among Christians and Muslims, who did not let Jews proselytize.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  154. mikemikev says:
    @Hacienda

    Vietnam defeated America in a large and consequential war.

    It was a police action. If it was a war Hanoi would have been turned to rubble in an afternoon and Soviet supplies would have dropped to zero.

    • Replies: @Hacienda
    , @Walter
  155. AaronB says:
    @Anonymous

    Every single Asian country is more racist than Jews. This is obvious and non controversial.

    A blond white kid born in Japan will be bullied and not accepted as Japanese. His children and grandchildren will look different and not be accepted. A Japanese convert to Judaism would be warmly accepted by the community. I know a Korean convert who is warmly embraced by her Orthodox community.

    Jews only seem ethnocentric in the context of the post-Enlightenment West. Jews are unusually open and accepting in an Asian context, or pre-Enlightenment Western context.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Wally
    , @Anonymous
  156. AaronB says:
    @Anonymous

    White attraction to Asian women is cultural, and of recent origin. The 80s I think. Before then the general impression was that Asian women are quite ugly. De Gaul had some choice words on this subject.

    • Replies: @Anonymous Snanonymous
  157. So a Jew wrote about Palesting in 1919. Why are the 2019 Jews telling me there is no, nor was there ever a Palestine??

    • Replies: @eah
  158. AaronB says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    It was an armed Arab insurrection against the British Army, with widespread Arab attacks on Jewish villages and terrorist activity against Jews.

    The Arab casualties were mostly in fights against the British Army – over 2000 killed by the Brits according to Wiki – and against Jewish villages.

    In response to increasing Arab attacks on Jews, both individually and in communities, some right wing Jewish groups began attacking Arabs indiscriminately.

    That Dinh presents precisely the Arab attempt to destroy the Jewish community in Mandatory Palestine and steal its land as an example of Jews trying to steal Arab land, is another example of the astonishing projection going on when it comes to Jews.

    • Replies: @Antares
    , @Wizard of Oz
    , @barr
  159. Poco says:
    @AaronB

    Brining attention to a thing isn’t hate.

  160. @Linh Dinh

    The full story (most of it anyway) is told in State of Terror: How Terrorism Created Modern Israel by Thomas Suarez. From my review:

    “Suarez’s meticulously researched volume shows that almost from the moment Zionists set foot in Palestine they began wantonly murdering and maiming people in service to their plan to empty the land of its inhabitants. Though the great majority of their victims have been Palestinians, the Zionists also slaughtered Europeans, Americans, non-Palestinian Arabs, and even their fellow Jews.”

    https://crescent.icit-digital.org/articles/book-exposes-history-of-zionist-terrorism

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  161. Richard B says:
    @Blankaerd

    Since Europeans are horrid, perhaps they should disappear completely, with only the Chinese left, and, presumably, Jews. No Freudian slip, it’s a genocidal wet dream bluntly stated.

    I’ve been saying this for ages.

    Not because I possess superhuman powers of penetrating insight.

    But because it couldn’t be more obvious.

    This is why Silicon Valleyberg is working with the Chinese government and not with the US Military.

    Let me repeat, This is why Silicohen Valley is…..

    You get the idea.

    This would help explain the symbolic marriage between the obviously gay Mark Zuckerberg and his Chinese wife.

    It explains why The CIA (Communist Israeli America) is so accomodating to the Chinese government’s many spy rings in the US.

    And, of course, their joint-venture in The Belt and Road Initiative.

    They’re splitting up the world between them.

    From this perspective, commenters at TUR is akin to the passangers of The Titanic after the iceberg and before the drowning.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @Republic
  162. Wally says:
    @Bigbeef

    If Jews were really so smart they would have conjured up a better, more believable story than their impossibly fake & stupid ‘6,000,000 & gas chambers’.

  163. Richard B says:

    Correction of last sentence from previous comment:

    From this perspective, commenters at TUR are akin to the passangers of The Titanic after the iceberg and before the drowning.

  164. Richard B says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    Albert Einstein. The Mark Zuckerberg of Physics.

    • LOL: Sick of Orcs
  165. @Richard B

    This would help explain the symbolic marriage between the obviously gay Mark Zuckerberg and his Chinese wife.

    Obviously gay……hmmmm.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  166. @Colin Wright

    /I think we can proceed on the assumption that Aaron does feel Jews are superior./

    It’s fairly evident in his writing.

    It’s easy enough to understand why one might feel this way when examining elements of the prophetic tradition whose efficacy has transcended generations: prayer, abnegation, cleanliness, etc. But then we read the following

    http://www.jewfaq.org/whoisjew.htm

    It is important to note that being a Jew has nothing to do with what you believe or what you do. A person born to non-Jewish parents who has not undergone the formal process of conversion but who believes everything that Orthodox Jews believe and observes every law and custom of Judaism is still a non-Jew, even in the eyes of the most liberal movements of Judaism, and a person born to a Jewish mother who is an atheist and never practices the Jewish religion is still a Jew, even in the eyes of the ultra-Orthodox. In this sense, Judaism is more like a nationality than like other religions, and being Jewish is like a citizenship. [emphasis added]

    As such, in Judaism, the value of ethnicity supersedes that of conduct, which illuminates the aggression of Israel vis a vis its neighbors. In the Torah, God decrees that sodomy is a grave sin and that the malfeasance of the judiciary led to the destruction of the tribe of Lot. Today’s Israel does nothing to prevent its proliferation, instead turning its wrath on Palestinians, most of whom would agree with Orthodox Jews about its abomination.

    Centuries before Jews took custody of the land, life was relatively pacific between Jews and Muslims in the Middle East. Since the late nineteenth century, their reign has been characterized almost entirely by conflict with Muslims. At the root of this conflagration lies the racist nationalism inherent to zionism — a racism that is certainly not unique to Jews, though held as divinely ordained by zionists alone. Where other peoples have adopted the corollary (e.g. that they are superior to others by virtue of their bloodline), they’re essentially practicing a hybrid of zionism.

    • Replies: @renfro
  167. utu says:
    @eah

    Max Born was on both sides of the debate of priority. He actually lived in Scotland and helped Whittaker in research for his book by translating German papers. One can find many Born’s quotes supporting Whittaker position:

    “The striking point is that [Einstein’s 1905 paper On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies] contains not a single reference to previous literature. It gives you the impression of quite a new venture. But that is, of course, as I have tried to explain, not true.”

    “In regard to [Poincare’s] work I refer to the excellent book by Sir Edmund Whittaker, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, which was already in use as a guide in my student times. It has now been completely rewritten. The second volume of the new edition deals with ‘The Modem Theories, 1900-1926’; there you can find quotations from Poincare’s papers, some of which I have looked up in the original. They show that as early as 1899 he regarded it as very probable that absolute motion is indetectable in principle and that no ether exists. He formulated the same ideas in a more precise form, though without any mathematics, in a lecture given in 1904 … he predicted the rise of a new mechanics which will be characterized above all by the rule, that no velocity can exceed the velocity of light. Whittaker was so impressed by these statements that he gave to the relevant chapter in his book the title ‘The Relativity Theory of Poincare and Lorentz.’ Einstein’s contributions appear there as being of minor importance… I have tried to form an opinion about this question from my own recollections and with the help of a few publications available to me…”

    “Does this mean that Poincare knew all this before Einstein? It is possible, but the strange thing is that this lecture definitely gives you the impression that he is recording Lorentz’s work… On the other hand, Lorentz himself never claimed to be the author of the principle of relativity…”

    At the same time Born was corresponding with Einstein and voiced his concern for the Whittaker’s book under preparations that it may hurt Einstein reputation in the English speaking world. It seems that Born comes across as a weasel which Einstein kind of points out to in his letter:

    “If anyone can be held responsible for the fact that you are migrating back to the land of the mass-murderers of our kinsmen, it is certainly your adopted fatherland [i.e., Whittaker’s Scotland] — universally notorious for its parsimony. But then we know only too well that the collective conscience is a miserable little plant which is always most likely to wither just when it is needed most.”

    in which he refers to the fact that Born who was Jewish was intending to return to Germany after WWII and to the stereotype of Scotts.

    You can read more about it here:

    https://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath571/kmath571.htm

    I would not take Roberto Torretti too seriously as clearly his job was to repair cracks in the edifice of Einstein reputation and in the priority dispute.

    • Replies: @eah
  168. eah says:
    @Gamecockjerry

    Why are the 2019 Jews telling me there is no, nor was there ever a Palestine??

    They mean a recognized nation state — Palestine was the common name of the land controlled by the British in the Levant after the breakup of the Ottoman Empire/in the aftermath WWI — more formally it was called the British Mandate (or Mandatory Palestine) — the two main competing groups that wanted to fill this nation state vacuum were the Arabs (“Palestinians”) and the Jews (Zionists) — both Arabs and Jews lived in the territory of the British Mandate, but until the end of WWII there were far more Arabs than Jews (the British attempted to control Zionist immigration into Palestine) — after WWII, there was a large influx of Jews into Palestine; the British acquiesced to this — the Jews/Zionists then began their organized para-military violent campaign (some would call it terrorism I guess) against both the British authorities and Arab nationalists in an effort to force the creation of a Jewish nation state — the world eventually acquiesced to this as well, in large part due to sympathy for Jews engendered by reports of their treatment/persecution by the Nazis during WWII.

  169. Antares says:
    @AaronB

    We only bought their land, the land where they depend on, where they eat from, where they live on, and then kicked them out. No, we didn’t do anything wrong. No, no, no. Don’t blame us for their misery. We have every right to do so. Stop blaming us. We stole it legally.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  170. Antares says:

    Theodore Herzl was obvious about the fate of the Palestinians: it would not be a pleasant episode. In other words: the violence was planned and deliberate. The cost of a few jewish lives was therefore calculated.

    So every time a zionist troll starts crying it can be assumend that their deaths were calculated. Or perhaps they did it themselves. A liar cannot and should not be trusted.

  171. AaronB says:
    @Colin Wright

    I’m not sure in what sense to you mean superior. I certainly do not consider Jews biologically superior. In fact, in the OT it is emphasized again and again that Jews were not chosen for any biological trait they were superior in, and they certainly are not portrayed as the greatest warriors around or anything like that.

    I do, of course, consider Jewish religion and culture superior to much of what is out there, but not necessarily superior to Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc, at their best. And many aspects of Jewish culture as it developed in the diaspora I strongly dislike. I do appreciate Israeli culture though 🙂

    I am a Jew primarily because I am religious, and I believe there must be some karmic reason I was born precisely into this ancient faith and not another. If I wasn’t born Jewish, I don’t know that I would rush to convert. Very high spirituality can be found in many traditions.

    I am impressed Colin that you admit Jews were not stealing land in Palestine before the wars. Most Israel haters are not that honest – see that loon Kevin Barrett. There may be hope for you yet.

  172. @Kevin Barrett

    Kevin,

    On Amazon, the Kindle edition is unavailable for purchase. Do you know why this is?

  173. Hacienda says:
    @mikemikev

    Far better defined as war than a police action. Defining it as police action is active denial. And denial is bad for losing weight, running up debt, winning competitions. Anthony Robbins, Jordan Peterson, Oprah and most reasonable people would agree on this.

    I don’t doubt if you could place all the America military on one side in a 100 x 100 mile combat zone and the Vietcong on the other side on a flat empty terrain with nothing and nobody else, then the American side wipes out the Vietcong. Unfortunately, to recreate the actual conflict you have to drop in all the other things- jungle, mountains, public communications, women, mosquitos, China, Jean Paul Sartre, Marx, college students, MLK, etc.

    • Replies: @mikemikev
  174. @Goy

    Me thinks, it was you and your older sister that did it and that stench you can’t get rid off should be very familiar, for it is you that you are smelling. Don’t project!

  175. barr says:
    @The Dark Night

    Sure, they can pick cotton in Alabama . Raise pigs in Tennessee and Manila and clean the stairs of the Vatican . We need them .

  176. will of d says:

    the jews are guilty but we are too for only crying helplessly without prepare a plan to counterattack their perfidous influence

  177. eah says:
    @utu

    I would not take Roberto Torretti too seriously

    Thanks for the advice buddy — and who the fuck are you to tell me who is and who is not to be taken seriously?

    You can read more about it here:

    I don’t really want or need to “read more about it” — I spent some/enough time on it during my days as a student (and after): I found the topic of relativity, which is both complicated and subtle, very interesting.

    Most science is accretive and synthetic: it builds on and combines ideas that already exist — doing so in a way that creates a new, theoretically coherent way to see or understand or interpret nature is also a work of some genius — fundamentally, this is what Einstein did in his paper on special relativity, which as a scientific work stands on its own.

    • Replies: @utu
  178. @Jake

    Jews are driven by desire to get even for Jesus and Christianity. And the more they succeed, the more they sow their own destruction on this earth. Satan tales allies only a a term, and then delights in rending them.


    BRILLIANT LOGOS TRUTH!!!

    (!!! SYMBOLIZES THE ONE GOD WHO IS TRIUNE.)

  179. Anonymous[380] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    It’s not racist to have rules of belonging and membership. Vietnam, like many traditional societies, has its own rules. (Why should they accede to your rules?) It’s not informed by racism. It’s just that you’re not one of them. It’s not an unfriendly gesture. It’s just a fact.

    Ethnic chauvinism is one thing, double-standards, dissimulation and deception are another matter, and it’s for that Jews are infamous for. “One rule for thee, another rule for me.”

    What’s important is objectivity and fair play. Jews aren’t known for that. And isn’t that the crux of the problem? Maybe the Vietnamese think they’re superior. But at least they reserve you the right to feel the same way. They don’t complain about what they do themselves (unlike the Jew).

    By the way, have you considered that maybe the supposed superiority that poor/colonized people feel isn’t genuine? It’s something they conjure up as a defense mechanism?

    It seems unfair to compare religion with ethnicity. Judaism should be compared to other religions. And by comparison, Judaism is most appalling.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  180. Anonymous[380] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    I do, of course, consider Jewish religion and culture superior to much of what is out there, but not necessarily superior to Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc, at their best.

    Please tell us how the Jewish religion is superior to ANYTHING that is out there? I really want to know. Because frankly I can’t find anything redeeming about it.

  181. @AaronB

    Once the blacks started dipping their quils into the white inkpots, which forced many a white to look at the yellow pool for an easy catch, for that is what they were considered. I have seen some of the prettiest East Asian women with dullest (my euphemism) of white men… it must drive the Asian guys crazy to see the crème de la crème of their women marrying outside their communities.

  182. Anonymous[380] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Dark Night

    Impossible to rebut.

    It’s not a question of the possible, but whether one has the energy and will. You guys are so tiresome.

    The word games you play and the sophistry. It’s so transparent.

  183. utu says:
    @eah

    I don’t really want or need to “read more about it” – Ignorance is bliss.

  184. mikemikev says:
    @Hacienda

    It’s what was left out that matters. Namely heavy strategic bombing.

    • Replies: @Hacienda
  185. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Every single Asian country is more racist than Jews. This is obvious and non controversial.

    From a Jew, perhaps not. But history and current events tell a diametrically different story.

    A blond white kid born in Japan will be bullied and not accepted as Japanese. His children and grandchildren will look different and not be accepted. A Japanese convert to Judaism would be warmly accepted by the community. I know a Korean convert who is warmly embraced by her Orthodox community.

    You’re comparing ethnic membership with religion. You’re free to become Buddhist, Taoist, Shinto or Confucian.

    Anyone may be able to convert to Judaism, but being seen as an “ethnic Jew” is another story.

    The fact that a “blond kid” born in Japan will not be accepted as Japanese doesn’t make them racist. In most places, membership in the group is not predicated on birthplace. You’re projecting your norms on them. Why should they accede to your rules?

    Over time, a blonde kid who assimilates, marries and dwells among them can indeed become one of them. Granted, a “different sort” of one of them. But one of them, nonetheless. But it also depends on the extent and degree he truly feels, thinks and breathes as one of them. Flashing citizenship papers won’t count for very much.

  186. Wally says:
    @Wally

    BTW:

    EU Court Rules “Holocaust Denial” Not Protected by Rights Law: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12771

    yet:
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

    Article 19.
    Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
    https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

  187. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymouse

    Under British trusteeship, before independence, when Einstein was writing the essays you cite, Jews bought land from wealthy absentee landlords, commenced farming it and displaced Arab tenant farmers.

    No stealing, no mass murdering.

    This sort of “logic” is the same kind that Jews use today to argue “there is no such thing as a Palestinian.”

    Early Zionists displaced the homes of indigenous people; land their ancestors lived on and worked for hundreds if not thousands of years. Your “legal” deed in hand cannot morally justify expulsion.

    Poor peasants who are born, work and die on the land of their ancestor may not have “legal” deeds to defend themselves in court, but the land is theirs no less.

    Native people don’t need legal documents to prove that the land they live on belong to them, and not to you, the outsider.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  188. Walter says:
    @mikemikev

    You’re both only partially right…. The US was defeated in Vietnam when the US Army began to mutiny…and so did the people in the US…

    The war was to take over and to maintain the recently abandoned French heroin trade, and also to oblige the guys who had Johnson by the short hairs over his corruption and his involvement in the Kennedy hit… It was ideological in theory, but based on plundering the treasury.

    Peter Dale Scott pretty much nails it… So does Alfred McCoy…

    • Replies: @Rerevisionist
  189. AaronB says:
    @Anonymous

    Asian rules on belonging are based mostly on race. As a white man, I can master the subtleties of Vietnamese culture all I want. I will never, ever be accepted as Vietnamese. You, as a Vietnamese, if you converted to Judaism, would be immediately accepted.

    Its fine with me if you want to defend the Asian practice of race based group membership. I’m just pointing out its far more exclusionary than the rules for Jewish identity.

    By the way, have you considered that maybe the supposed superiority that poor/colonized people feel isn’t genuine? It’s something they conjure up as a defense mechanism?

    Certainly. All instances of groups thinking they are innately superior is really defensive in nature, whether its Chinese, Japanese, White, or Jewish.

    What’s important is objectivity and fair play. Jews aren’t known for that. And isn’t that the crux of the problem? Maybe the Vietnamese think they’re superior. But at least they reserve you the right to feel the same way. They don’t complain about what they do themselves (unlike the Jew).

    Vietnamese favor their own people all the time, and are known for deception and double dealing towards foreigners. As are all the Asian peoples with the exception of Japan and only with regard to deception and double dealing – the Japanese heavily favor themselves and exclude and discriminate against foreigners.

    As for those Jews who argue against the idea of favoring one’s own group in general, these are Enlightenment ideas created by white Europeans that those Jews have been corrupted by. Such Jews are also against Jewish exceptionalism.

  190. @Franz

    See Jon Entine’s column on Genetic Literacy Project discussing a genetic study showing ashkenazi Jews to be FORTY percent Italian on average, via the maternal line.

    Sephardim are a different story, of course.

    • Replies: @Franz
    , @Jeff Stryker
  191. Hacienda says:
    @mikemikev

    Which occurs in a war, no? That’s not anything any police force uses.
    Come on, you can do better than that. I’ve reviewed some of your posts. You’re just trying to be annoying.
    Give the Viets their due. A result is result. You can’t change it, like Rambo.

  192. jhan says:

    social justice is an oxymoron.

    forced charity is not justice, its more like slavery.

    those who advocate it do not have your best interest at heart.

  193. anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:

    Something must have changed in Chinese women or Jewish men or both in the past 90 years, today Jewish men go crazy over Asian women. Woody Allen, Zuckerberg et al.

  194. anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    I think that Linh is just telling it like it is and sees how the United States made the best life for the most numbers of people the world has ever seen and the Jews weren’t satisfied with that. They did everything in their power to destroy it and they have. Linh is just telling it like it is, he’s an honest man who doesn’t mince his words.

    • Agree: Republic
  195. Wally says:
    @AaronB

    said:
    “A blond white kid born in Japan will be bullied and not accepted as Japanese. His children and grandchildren will look different and not be accepted. ”

    I’ve spent considerable time in Japan, a lovely place.
    While they definitely take care of their own, so to speak, the notion that a Euro-white blond child would necessarily be bullied is just not true. Not even close.

    There is a certain curiosity that Japanese have for Euro-white blonds, no doubt. Rather charming actually.
    Unlike the treatment dished out by violent, racist, dumb blacks on Euro-white blonds, or the violent, racist, treatment dished out by dumb Jews against Palestinians, I have never witnessed or even heard of a Euro-white blond being bullied for being a Euro white blond in Japan.

    FWIW

  196. Hacienda says:
    @AaronB

    Asian rules on belonging are based mostly on race. As a white man, I can master the subtleties of Vietnamese culture all I want. I will never, ever be accepted as Vietnamese. You, as a Vietnamese, if you converted to Judaism, would be immediately accepted.

    There’s a lot more to it than that. Few Asians, if any, can live formatively outside of their Asian country, return and then be accepted into that country as an insider. And it’s the difficulty both in the natives and the changes that are now part of the ex patrioted Asian. Ex patriot Japanese talk about this problem. Alberto Fujimori couldn’t reintegrate into Japan. My own daddy who was invited back to Korea by President Chun Doo Hwan never got back the knack of hanging with Koreans comfortably, despite native fluency and super high position. Inability to reintegrate is the price paid for “precious” Asian conservatism. It’s just how the world works. At least some Westerners themselves wouldn’t trust, to the degree that they do, free moving and bi-civilational Asians if it were “that easy”.

    Besides that, you show a great deal of innumeracy. You can’t compare Jews to Asians. The numbers don’t line up.

  197. @Jeff Stryker

    And which Italians are you talking about – southern Italians or northern Italians ? Southern Italian Jews or Northern Italian Jews ?I still accept the conclusion that Jews of Poland are genetically more like Christians of Poland than they are genetcally similar to other Jews.Jews of Hungary are more gentetically similar to other Hungarians than they are to other Jews,etc.
    On the other hand after I wrote a long and never finished rhyme called Aryan Agrarian around 1999
    more research on genetics in the 2000s substantiated that most modern Europeans are most likely
    related to people entering Europe from the Middle East with agriculure and grains brought from there after the last ice age.Your European women like your European men were once dark complected Middle East Caucasions just AFTER THE LAST ICE AGE ONLY A SHORT WHILE AGO who got white due to Vitamin D deficiency caused by bringing their grain diet to colder climes of northern Europe.Whiter Greeks and Italians are the result of some of those vitamin D deficiency created whites remigrating south as did Alexander the Great’s father who pushed into Greece from the north as did so many white Indo Aryan speakers who became Greeks long before him.

    [MORE]

    Linguistics would also bare this out and particularly the word aryan or agrarian which is basically the same word.It is not only found in the Sanskrit of India but as the word arti in Lithuanian and the Indo Aryan languages of India probably are I believe the result of white Vitamin D deficency created norhern agrarians who first domesticated the horse around what we now call the Ukraine
    migrating or invading not only into the Middle East where they first originated from and got their agriculure from when their ancestors were dark complected Caucasians but they also with their newly domnesticated horse of the steppes were able to extend their new migration further to what is now Afghanistan and India and Iran etc. as well of course as into what is now Greece and Italy bringing their Indo Aryan language with them.But unlike the Mongolian tribeman much later,they always rode with their grain seeds in search of new land to settle and plant.
    Celts were also part of this Indo Aryan and possibly horse agrayan peoples.In fact Celts also called themselves aryans or agrarians even if they did have horses,So horses were domesticated by white agrarians and white ‘Jews’ are for the most part a result of of a shared genettic ancestry with northern Eurasian agrarians whose ancesors lost skin pigmentation as a result of Vitamin D deficiency of their agrarian dietas they they grains to northern climes in the last few millenia.
    Because the genetics of white skin are recessive they can be easily be disappeared when mated with others of darker skin complexions perhaps in hair and eye pigmentaion even more so than skin. For this reason we don’t see so many blue eyed Indians etc. even though northern Indians like Pakistanis are often lighter skinned than souther Indian caucasians are.And any light skinned Italians,Jewish or other,are in my opinion clearly indicative of having agrarian ancestors who remigrated from northern climes south into Italy but who ultimately came from ancestors who brought grains to northern Eurasia from the Middle East or fertile crecent and whose ancestors had black hair and darker complexions.
    As one last Einsteinian ‘thought experiment Mr.Stryker,let’s imagine this black haired dark complected viral Jewish male has sex with that blonde shiksa you fantasize of,what will be the result ? A black haired baby because ‘blondness’ is a recessive trait.So back to the drawing board Einstein……Unless of course the black haired father is not really a Semite but instead a Europoid with a recessive gene for light colored hair as well….

    http://politicalandsciencerhymes.blogspot.com/2011/09/aryan-agrarian.html

    Aryan Agrarian …

    by Tony Ryals

    Then there was later Old World agricultural man,
    Migrating further north as he settled southern land,
    And losing to survive his healthy southern tan,
    Creeping further north a kilometer or so a year,
    Darker complected babies dying causing pain and fear,
    Bringing agricultural seeds from the Fertile Crescent or Turkey’s Anatolian,
    Where god was once revered as a woman not a man,
    But one thing they could not predict one thing they could not foresee,
    Was that their diet, which once sustained them well, was now deficient of Vitamin-D,
    What was once a vitamin provided by the sun reacting with the skin,
    Was now blocked by protective clothing and skin pigment melanin,
    Which deprived their bones in turn of assimilating calcium,
    So the disease we now call rickets got the best of them,…….

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Jay Fink
  198. Richard B says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Sounds like someone’s triggered cause they thought they were “slightly gay.” Until now.

  199. Shadow says:

    Intelligence and predatory cunning are not the same. Although at times they may be interrelated. That’s where the confusion lies. A shark isn’t smart. It just knows where to get the sweet meat. The same applies to humans. There are plenty of examples of this. I’ll let you figure it out.

  200. Jewish Genius is an oxymoron. Jews had nothing to do with the development of Western civilization. Blacks/Asians/Muslims had nothing to do with the development of Western civilization.

    Einstein was a bright man but he did not do anything a Western man could do. If he were alive today, he would be involved with Asian females. Jews have high intermarriage rates with blacks/Asians.

    As to Joshua and what happened to the Canaanites. The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed. The New Testament is the Old Testament revealed. Yahweh of the Old Testament and Jesus of the New Testament are the same God. Whatever happened in the Old Testament was meant to happen in order to bring about the events of the New Testament.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcionism Marcionism is a heresy in the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches.

    Caucasoids are the smartest racial group. Mongoloids are a distant second in IQ. Negroids are last in IQ.

  201. @Poupon Marx

    Very good-explains most of it. I have produced the same results as you from my 68 years but it takes a long time unless one has intelligent well versed people explain things and this will not be done by the mass media or in our schools. Little was ever taught to me but my father told me when I was a teenager that the newspapers (mainstream media like NY Times) often lie and to always go to other sources for truth. My Irish father was a fairly typical blue collar worker but he had a high IQ.
    It is only through sites like UR and magazines that youth will learn just how things really work.

    It is even more astonishing when one sees how massive lies are perpetuated by the current media-how truth is totally ignored. The Russian collusion has to be one of the greatest fabrications in US history, and Biden’s denying his strongarming of the Ukraine and saying the other side is at fault is clearly an obvious lie yet people won’t accept truth when it goes against their ideology. How can this society survive all the fools and white collar criminals?

    Throughout the 1960s and 1970s the media and politicians repeatedly stressed that we face a future ice age that will occur very soon and then the left particularly a liar who worked for NASA made global warming popular to where it is now a multi billion dollar industry with so much money going to universities and political appointees.
    The NY Times in the 1970s repeatedly printed stories about how the earth was entering a new ice age. But if you say anything to refute the global warming crowd you are called an idiot.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  202. Speaking of Einstein, a frequent commenter on other fora (Helen) has constantly ranted about Einstein. Though I agreed with her views on Israel and Palestine, she seemed absolutely unhinged about Einstein. At first, I doubted everything she said about the great “humanitarian,” as notable anti-Zionists of the time like Albert Lilienthal considered Einstein “anti-Zionist,” and even today Einstein is listed among https://www.righteousjews.org/initial-list.html. But then I found out about Einsteins secret letter to Nehru.

    I knew from a college physics class that the “Lorentz transformation” was fundamental to special relativity, but it still wasn’t worth it to me to investigate Helen’s charges of plagiarism. However, after reading this article linked, I decided to do a web search for “einstein plagiarized relativity” and came up with the following article, which definitely has the ring of truth: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm

    What’s key here is that Einstein did not credit Lorentz or Poincare in his special relativity paper, nor did he credit De Pretto or any of his predecessors for E=MC2. Einstein’s job as a patent clerk meant he read many of the papers of the brilliant minds of the time, and he took advantage of that foundation without attribution. Even if he made a contribution by integrating many of these ideas into a single paper, the fact that as a patent clerk knowing the rules he still did not cite any of those geniuses is damning.

    Albert Einstein, fraud of the Century.

    • Replies: @Tony Ryals
  203. To heck with Jews, religious or claimants to blood and culture, or anyone nationality for that matter, except for the Irish who are top of genetic pool.
    Who else can lay claim to surrendering to Romans, Scotts, Papacy and a Queens Church of England, always.getting butts kicked and bowing to Queen, and and still after generations of inbreeding and having so many bastard children of Englishmen, dare to still call themselves Irish.
    The.Irish gave the world.crappy poetry, and sad songs of always losing in love, money, mafia, and half their lands, until today they live in a.bankrupt nation that without foreign money holders not even Israel would want.
    Yet we still get drunk, even we half-a-half-a half-half -a-halfs that have lived in US for 200 years, or got run out of Erie by Irish/EnglishScotts/ Welsh mix breeds breeds.100 years ago and were happy to find any female to marry, still we will raise our glass to being Irish.
    There are Jews in Ireland, probably more than real Irish, but there are many Jews, religious and half Semitic bloods that do not advertize and are doing quite well in all aspects of life.
    As long as Ireland and New England USA does not run out of alcohol products, except wines, there will be an Ireland no matter who lives there.
    Will the Irish outlast Israel and it’s culture, most likely not, and.but they care not who inherits the earth when they be gone.
    And let the last of Irish??¿¿ be the next to last to die, still have a bottle of Irish Whiskey to pour a dollop or two upon the ground at the last.wake before he finishes the last of it and has but Kosher wine from then on.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  204. @Lost american

    Our experiences are similar and parallel. I’m 70. One of the reasons I retained false beliefs for so long is that no-one around me was challenging the status quo and accepted wisdom and truth. I grew up in the heart of texas and heard about the perfidy of Jews from “lower” class people. In the middle class that I grew up, there was not challenge. How is that? Because, they were direct descendants of the British and Scots-Irish that kept to themselves. They were “country people”, natives like the native people of Florida and the rest of the South.

    I of course ignored this as the talking of “ignorant people”. What a supreme irony. It will take a blockbuster to wake up the non-Jewish population. They use and discard everyone and anyone for their sole gain.

  205. renfro says:
    @The Dark Night

    Why am I not surprised that regardless of what kind of Jew a Jew is….there are really only two kinds when it comes to Jew trolling….the Ignorant Jew and the Lying Jew. I am going to assume you are the ignorant kind and educate you. You can rage and hasbara till the cows come home….the facts of history are the facts.

    The time line of Arabia in Thompson’s book is below. It is the factual historical account acknowledged by all historians world wide. None of these dates or events or groups are disputed by any serious historian…..except of course by some Jewish history myth makers. Which is where Jews get their mythical history from.
    The Palestines are the descendants of the Canaanites which means they have lived on the land of Palestine for 9000 years.

    [MORE]

    # Jerusalem was not founded by Jews, i.e. adherents of the Jewish religion. It was founded between 3000 BCE and 2600 BCE by a West Semitic people or possibly the Canaanites, the common ancestors of Palestinians, Lebanese, many Syrians and Jordanians, and many Jews. But when it was founded Jews did not exist.
    # Jerusalem was founded in honor of the ancient god Shalem. It does not mean City of Peace but rather ‘built-up place of Shalem.”
    # The “Jewish people” were not building Jerusalem 3000 years ago, i.e. 1000 BCE. First of all, it is not clear when exactly Judaism as a religion centered on the worship of the one God took firm form. It appears to have been a late development since no evidence of worship of anything but ordinary Canaanite deities has been found in archeological sites through 1000 BCE. There was no invasion of geographical Palestine from Egypt by former slaves in the 1200s BCE. The pyramids had been built much earlier and had not used slave labor. The chronicle of the events of the reign of Ramses II on the wall in Luxor does not know about any major slave revolts or flights by same into the Sinai peninsula. Egyptian sources never heard of Moses or the 10 plagues & etc. Jews and Judaism emerged from a certain social class of Canaanites over a period of centuries inside Palestine.
    # Jerusalem not only was not being built by the likely then non-existent “Jewish people” in 1000 BCE, but Jerusalem probably was not even inhabited at that point in history. Jerusalem appears to have been abandoned between 1000 BCE and 900 BCE, the traditional dates for the united kingdom under David and Solomon. So Jerusalem was not ‘the city of David,’ since there was no city when he is said to have lived. No sign of magnificent palaces or great states has been found in the archeology of this period, and the Assyrian tablets, which recorded even minor events throughout the Middle East, such as the actions of Arab queens, don’t know about any great kingdom of David and Solomon in geographical Palestine.
    # Since archeology does not show the existence of a Jewish kingdom or kingdoms in the so-called First Temple Period, it is not clear when exactly the Jewish people would have ruled Jerusalem except for the Hasmonean Kingdom.
    The Assyrians conquered Jerusalem in 722.
    The Babylonians took it in 597 and ruled it until they were themselves conquered in 539 BCE by the Achaemenids of ancient Iran, who ruled Jerusalem until Alexander the Great took the Levant in the 330s BCE.
    Alexander’s descendants, the Ptolemies ruled Jerusalem until 198 when Alexander’s other descendants, the Seleucids, took the city.
    With the Maccabean Revolt in 168 BCE, the Jewish Hasmonean kingdom did rule Jerusalem until 37 BCE, though Antigonus II Mattathias, the last Hasmonean, only took over Jerusalem with the help of the Parthian dynasty in 40 BCE.
    Herod ruled 37 BCE until the Romans conquered what they called Palestine in 6 CE (CE= ‘Common Era’ or what Christians call AD).
    The Romans and then the Eastern Roman Empire of Byzantium ruled Jerusalem from 6 CE until 614 CE when the Iranian Sasanian Empire Conquered it, ruling until 629 CE when the Byzantines took it back.
    #The Muslims conquered Jerusalem in 638 and ruled it until 1099 when the Crusaders conquered it.
    The Crusaders killed or expelled Jews and Muslims from the city.
    The Muslims under Saladin took it back in 1187 CE and allowed Jews to return, and Muslims ruled it until the end of World War I, or altogether for about 1192 years.
    #Adherents of Judaism did not found Jerusalem. It existed for perhaps 2700 years before anything we might recognize as Judaism arose. Jewish rule may have been no longer than 170 years or so, i.e., the kingdom of the Hasmoneans.
    # Therefore if historical building of Jerusalem and historical connection with Jerusalem establishes sovereignty over it as Netanyahu claims, here are the groups that have the greatest claim to the city:
    A. The Muslims, who ruled it and built it over 1191 years.
    B. The Egyptians, who ruled it as a vassal state for several hundred years in the second millennium BCE.
    C. The Italians, who ruled it about 444 years until the fall of the Roman Empire in 450 CE.
    D. The Iranians, who ruled it for 205 years under the Achaemenids, for three years under the Parthians (insofar as the last Hasmonean was actually their vassal), and for 15 years under the Sasanids.
    E. The Greeks, who ruled it for over 160 years if we count the Ptolemys and Seleucids as Greek. If we count them as Egyptians and Syrians, that would increase the Egyptian claim and introduce a Syrian one.
    F. The successor states to the Byzantines, which could be either Greece or Turkey, who ruled it 188 years, though if we consider the heir to be Greece and add in the time the Hellenistic Greek dynasties ruled it, that would give Greece nearly 350 years as ruler of Jerusalem.
    G. There is an Iraqi claim to Jerusalem based on the Assyrian and Babylonian conquests, as well as perhaps the rule of the Ayyubids (Saladin’s dynasty), who were Kurds from Iraq.
    Source, Thomas Thompson History of Arabia

    renfro says: to comment 69 on Cook article
    June 22, 2019 at 4:40 am GMT • 1,000 [email protected] Ryckaert
    You are so ignorant and jewishly brainwashed it is painful to see. I don’t like wasting my time on Jews who Never Learn but I will reply this time so readers here can see the real and accurate history of Palestine.
    This is the history agreed on by all the world’s most respected historians.
    The time line of Arabia in Thompson’s book is below. It is the factual historical account acknowledged by all historians world wide. None of these dates or events or groups are disputed by any serious historian…..except of course by the Jewish myth makers, which I am guessing is where you get your mythical history from.
    # Jerusalem was not founded by Jews, i.e. adherents of the Jewish religion. It was founded between 3000 BCE and 2600 BCE by a West Semitic people or possibly the Canaanites, the common ancestors of Palestinians, Lebanese, many Syrians and Jordanians, and many Jews. But when it was founded Jews did not exist.
    # Jerusalem was founded in honor of the ancient god Shalem. It does not mean City of Peace but rather ‘built-up place of Shalem.”
    # The “Jewish people” were not building Jerusalem 3000 years ago, i.e. 1000 BCE. First of all, it is not clear when exactly Judaism as a religion centered on the worship of the one God took firm form. It appears to have been a late development since no evidence of worship of anything but ordinary Canaanite deities has been found in archeological sites through 1000 BCE. There was no invasion of geographical Palestine from Egypt by former slaves in the 1200s BCE. The pyramids had been built much earlier and had not used slave labor. The chronicle of the events of the reign of Ramses II on the wall in Luxor does not know about any major slave revolts or flights by same into the Sinai peninsula. Egyptian sources never heard of Moses or the 10 plagues & etc. Jews and Judaism emerged from a certain social class of Canaanites over a period of centuries inside Palestine.
    # Jerusalem not only was not being built by the likely then non-existent “Jewish people” in 1000 BCE, but Jerusalem probably was not even inhabited at that point in history. Jerusalem appears to have been abandoned between 1000 BCE and 900 BCE, the traditional dates for the united kingdom under David and Solomon. So Jerusalem was not ‘the city of David,’ since there was no city when he is said to have lived. No sign of magnificent palaces or great states has been found in the archeology of this period, and the Assyrian tablets, which recorded even minor events throughout the Middle East, such as the actions of Arab queens, don’t know about any great kingdom of David and Solomon in geographical Palestine.
    # Since archeology does not show the existence of a Jewish kingdom or kingdoms in the so-called First Temple Period, it is not clear when exactly the Jewish people would have ruled Jerusalem except for the Hasmonean Kingdom.
    #The Assyrians conquered Jerusalem in 722.
    #The Babylonians took it in 597 and ruled it until they were themselves conquered in 539 BCE by the Achaemenids of ancient Iran, who ruled Jerusalem until Alexander the Great took the Levant in the 330s BCE.
    #Alexander’s descendants, the Ptolemies ruled Jerusalem until 198 when Alexander’s other descendants, the Seleucids, took the city.
    #With the Maccabean Revolt in 168 BCE, the Jewish Hasmonean kingdom did rule Jerusalem until 37 BCE, though Antigonus II Mattathias, the last Hasmonean, only took over Jerusalem with the help of the Parthian dynasty in 40 BCE.
    #Herod ruled 37 BCE until the Romans conquered what they called Palestine in 6 CE (CE= ‘Common Era’ or what Christians call AD).
    #The Romans and then the Eastern Roman Empire of Byzantium ruled Jerusalem from 6 CE until 614 CE when the Iranian Sasanian Empire Conquered it, ruling until 629 CE when the Byzantines took it back.
    #The Muslims conquered Jerusalem in 638 and ruled it until 1099 when the Crusaders conquered it.
    #The Crusaders killed or expelled Jews and Muslims from the city.
    #The Muslims under Saladin took it back in 1187 CE and allowed Jews to return, and Muslims ruled it until the end of World War I, or altogether for about 1192 years.
    #Adherents of Judaism did not found Jerusalem. It existed for perhaps 2700 years before anything we might recognize as Judaism arose. Jewish rule may have been no longer than 170 years or so, i.e., the kingdom of the Hasmoneans.
    # Therefore if historical building of Jerusalem and historical connection with Jerusalem establishes sovereignty over it as Netanyahu claims, here are the groups that have the greatest claim to the city:
    A. The Muslims, who ruled it and built it over 1191 years.
    B. The Egyptians, who ruled it as a vassal state for several hundred years in the second millennium BCE.
    C. The Italians, who ruled it about 444 years until the fall of the Roman Empire in 450 CE.
    D. The Iranians, who ruled it for 205 years under the Achaemenids, for three years under the Parthians (insofar as the last Hasmonean was actually their vassal), and for 15 years under the Sasanids.
    E. The Greeks, who ruled it for over 160 years if we count the Ptolemys and Seleucids as Greek. If we count them as Egyptians and Syrians, that would increase the Egyptian claim and introduce a Syrian one.
    F. The successor states to the Byzantines, which could be either Greece or Turkey, who ruled it 188 years, though if we consider the heir to be Greece and add in the time the Hellenistic Greek dynasties ruled it, that would give Greece nearly 350 years as ruler of Jerusalem.
    G. There is an Iraqi claim to Jerusalem based on the Assyrian and Babylonian conquests, as well as perhaps the rule of the Ayyubids (Saladin’s dynasty), who were Kurds from Iraq.
    Source, Thomas Thompson History of Arabia

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @The Dark Night
  206. @SafeNow

    Absolutely! It seems like the World is Hypnotized! I don’t know if it’s because of Jews being thrown out of all the countries and nations of the world or the so called Holocaust but it works like magic and people literally bow down to these perverts, con artists and murders.

    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
  207. Anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Asian rules on belonging are based mostly on race.

    No, not based on race, but ancestry and belonging. They’re related, but crucially different. A person of 100% Vietnamese ancestry will be excluded if he doesn’t “belong”.

    As a white man, I can master the subtleties of Vietnamese culture all I want. I will never, ever be accepted as Vietnamese.

    Because you haven’t quite mastered it. They’re not convinced. And you haven’t ensconced yourself in the community as truly one of them. You’re just an interloper who picked up the lingo and patois. You’re a carpetbagger that wants to be “in”. And when it’s convenient for you, then you’re “out”. No, they won’t have any of that.

    Its fine with me if you want to defend the Asian practice of race based group membership.

    It’s not race based. It’s family based. It’s community based. It’s relationship based. Live among them long enough and you can be one of them too.

    Vietnamese favor their own people all the time, and are known for deception and double dealing towards foreigners.

    Maybe so, but not quite like the Jew. For the Vietnamese, deception and double-dealing is a no-no — and their conscience and holy books tell them so. For the Jew, it seems to be perfectly okay — and their conscience and holy books tell them so.

    the Japanese heavily favor themselves and exclude and discriminate against foreigners.

    As I stated earlier, to the extent they do that, they don’t begrudge others for doing the same. But the Jew does. The Jew demands universality while he is himself tribal. The Jew plays by double-standards that others do not.

    As for those Jews who argue against the idea of favoring one’s own group in general

    It would be good if Jews were sincerely universal. But they’re not. It’s just a ploy to weaken others and advance themselves. They’re hypocrites and two-faced. “One rule for thee, another for me.”

    Such Jews are also against Jewish exceptionalism.

    So the duplicity of the Jew is the figment of our collective imaginations? Please, don’t try to gaslight us.

    Duplicity and exceptionalism is what makes the Jew Jewish. Take away that and he’s just a normal bloke.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  208. renfro says:
    @AaronB

    I am impressed Colin that you admit Jews were not stealing land in Palestine before the wars. Most Israel haters are not that honest – see that loon Kevin Barrett. There may be hope for you yet.

    The Jews weren’t in a position to steal Palestine land before 1948 Jews wee less than 2% of the Palestine population and didn’t have the numbers to oppress the Palestines.
    When Jews claim they bought the land they neglect to mention that those land purchases were few and occurred before 1948.

    After 1948 the Jews made up the Absentees Property Law and seized everything . This included ‘owners of Palestine land who were not Palestines but Arabs from other countries. Not just land but also included seizing businesses, factories and bank accounts.

    [MORE]

    ABSENTEES’ PROPERTY LAW, 5710-1950*
    1. In this Law –
    (a) “property” includes immovable arid movable property, moneys, a vested or contingent right in property, goodwill and any right in a body of persons or in its management;
    (b) “absentee” means –
    (1) a person who, at any time during the period between the 16th Kislev, 5708 (29th November, 1947) and the day on which a declaration is published, under section 9(d) of the Law and Administration Ordinance, 5708-1948(1), that the state of emergency declared by the Provisional Council of State on the 10th Iyar, 5708 (19th May, 1948)(2) has ceased to exist, was a legal owner of any property situated in the area of Israel or enjoyed or held it, whether by himself or through another, and who, at any time during the said period –
    (i) was a national or citizen of the Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, SaudiArabia, Trans-Jordan, Iraq or the Yemen, or
    (ii) was in one of these countries or in any part of Palestine outside the area of Israel, or
    (iii) was a Palestinian citizen and left his ordinary place of residence in Palestine
    (a) for a place outside Palestine before the 27th Av, 5708 (1st September, 1948); or
    (b) for a place in Palestine held at the time by forces which sought to prevent the establishment of the State of Israel or which fought against it after its establishment;
    (2) a body of persons which, at any time during the period specified in paragraph (1), was a legal owner of any property situated in the area of Israel or enjoyed or held such property, whether by itself or through another, and all the members, partners, shareholders, directors or managers of which are absentees within the meaning of paragraph (1), or the management of the business of which is otherwise decisively controlled by such absentees, or all the capital of which is in the hands of such absentees;
    (c) “Palestinian citizen” means a person who, on the 16th Kislev, 5708 (29th November, 1947) or thereafter, was a Palestinian citizen according to the provisions of the Palestinian Citizenship Orders, 1925-1941, Consolidated(3), and includes a Palestinian resident who, on the said day or thereafter, had no nationality or citizenship or whose nationality or citizenship was undefined or unclear;
    (d) “body of persons” means a body constituted in or outside Palestine, incorporated or unincorporated, registered or unregistered, and includes a company, partnership, cooperative society, society under the Law of Societies of the 29th Rajab, 1327 (3rd August, 1909) and any other juridical person and any institution owning property;
    (e) “absentees’ property” means property the legal owner of which, at any time during the period between the 16th Kislev, 5708 (29th November, 1947) and the day on which a declaration is published, under section 9(d) of the Law and Administration Ordinance, 5708-1948, that the state of emergency by the Provisional Council of State on the 10th Iyar, 5708 (19th May 1948), has ceased to exist, was an absentee, or which, at any time as aforesaid, an absentee held or enjoyed, whether by himself or through another; but it does not include movable property held by an absentee and exempt from attachment or seizure under section 3 of the Civil Procedure Ordinance, 193
    continue ……https://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/E0B719E95E3B494885256F9A005AB90A

    Most Israelis are living on land stolen by the Jewish state under the Absentee Property Law.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  209. @Antares

    ‘We only bought their land, the land where they depend on, where they eat from, where they live on, and then kicked them out. No, we didn’t do anything wrong. No, no, no. Don’t blame us for their misery. We have every right to do so. Stop blaming us. We stole it legally.’

    They had attempted to ‘steal it legally’ — unsuccessfully. As of 1947, Jews still owned only 5-7% of the land of Palestine.

    Hence the expropriations of 1947-now. Since the Palestinians wouldn’t sell, their land would have to be taken by force.

  210. MikePToo says:
    @Anonymous Snanonymous

    You didn’t have it bitten off by a rabbi then, or did you?

  211. renfro says:

    Another example of Israel and the Jews losing control of the narrative in the public .domain. Their bribes backfiring. Fans rip her up over Israel.

    Lovato apologizes after accepting free trip to Israel (and $150,000) In exchange for social media posts
    mondoweiss

    [MORE]
    After backlash over a trip to Israel, singer and actress Demi Lovato apologized for offending anyone and implied that the visit was gifted to her in exchange for complimentary social media posts about the country. Lovato reportedly received $150,000 for the trip, with some of it coming from the Jerusalem Ministry.
    While it is unclear who organized the tour, Lovato recently hired a new pro-Israel manager who has been honored by an anti-BDS organization.

    According to Ynet’s Ran Boker, Lovato was paid over $150,000 to visit the country. Some of that money apparently came from the Jerusalem Ministry with additional funds secured by private benefactors. While Lovato asserted that the trip was “free”, this means at least some of it was financed by Israeli taxpayers.
    The posts prompted a deluge of pro-Palestine comments by social media users. After the backlash, Lovato deleted them all and turned off the comment option on the photos. She then shared an apology in the form of an Instagram Story, which was quickly deleted:

    ”I’m extremely frustrated. I accepted a free trip to Israel in exchange for a few posts. No one told me there would be anything wrong with going or that I could possibly be offending anyone. With that being said, I’m sorry if I hurt or offended anyone, that was not my intention. Sometimes people present you with opportunities and no one tells you the potential backlash you could face in return. This was meant to be a spiritual experience for me NOT A POLITICAL STATEMENT and now I realize it hurt people and for that I’m sorry. Sorry I’m not more educated, and sorry for thinking this trip was just a spiritual experience. Going against all advice right now and apologizing because it feels right to me and I’d rather get in trouble for being authentic to myself, than staying quiet to please other people. I love my fans, all of them, from all over.”

  212. renfro says:
    @AnonStarter

    I think we can proceed on the assumption that Aaron does feel Jews are superior

    lol….Aaron reminds me of a girl my brother once dated. I cant remember how it came up in the conversation but she made the statement the she knew she was a ”blue blood’…because her veins were blue.
    At first we laughed but then realized she was totally serious.

  213. Linh Dinh says: • Website

    Hi all,

    Thanks to AaronB, we know that we’re unread, uneducated and don’t know anything about history:

    If readers here actually read the European classics and were educated, four fifths of the commentary on Jews would collapse. Only invincible ignorance makes it possible.

    […]

    Admit it, Linh, you’re supposedly a poet but you never read a book published before 1950 🙂

    Don’t be embarrassed, 99% of the people on this site haven’t.

    AaronB said this although in this very article, I talk about Mark Twain, while in my last, just over a week ago, I discussed Jack London, who died in 1916.

    What he’s telling you is that you don’t know your own heritage, but he does, so he’s here to save you from your own ignorance.

    Like Bragadocious, AaronB just keeps on lying shamelessly, but it’s for your own good, since you’re so stupid.

    A while back, I had to write this about him:

    Hi all,

    In Plastic Recycling and Jousting Jews, I clearly stated that my criticism of Israel and Jewish power preceded the unraveling of my literary career, but “I have no regrets, for one must do what’s right.”

    AaronB turned it around to say that my failures caused my “Jew hatred,” “Its s huge temptation, one that I’ve succumbed to, to blame others, foreigners, outsiders, etc, for our own failures and defeats.”

    In “Mashed Potato and Another War for Israel,” I object to Jewish instigated genocides, but AaronB, again, turns it around to claim that “Linh Dinh can despise Jews and wish to eradicate all of them as much as he likes.”

    This is why I indentify Jews as “Masters of inversion.” AaronB is a perfect example.

    I’ve stated repeatedly that I’m not against Jews as an ethnicity, only the Jewish ideology.

    Again, “The Nazis’ racism was but a mirror and fleeting offshoot of Jewish racial supremacy, which endures to manipulate, fleece and wreak havoc on humanity, with Jews themselves among its victims, so Jews, too, must be delivered from this sick mindset. No more chosen people.”

    Again, I’m against racial supremacy, the idea of a chosen people and genocide, and there is nothing unnatural or hateful about these objections. I expect all sane people, including those born Jewish, to share my stance. How can you not?

    In short, AaronB is an Einstein, and that’s not a compliment.

    Linh

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Parsnipitous
  214. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘…His accomplishment will be cherished even when many of his basic concepts are superseded.’

    Lol (well, almost). I can’t help observing you could be talking about Freud.

  215. @Linh Dinh

    The journals of Ahad Ha’am (a.k.a. Asher Zvi Hirsch Ginsberg) include some of the best evidence that zionists were intent on displacing Palestinians from the very beginning of Herzl’s project. From Wrestling With Zion (1898):

    https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ahad_Ha%27am

    The Arabs, especially the urban elite, see and understand what we are doing and what we wish to do on the land, but they keep quiet and pretend not to notice anything. For now, they do not consider our actions as presenting a future danger to them. … But, if the time comes that our people’s life in Eretz Yisrael will develop to a point where we are taking their place, either slightly or significantly, the natives are not going to just step aside so easily. …

    We must surely learn, from both our past and present history, how careful we must be not to provoke the anger of the native people by doing them wrong, how we should be cautious in our dealings with a foreign people among whom we returned to live, to handle these people with love and respect and, needless to say, with justice and good judgment. And what do our brothers do? Exactly the opposite! They were slaves in their Diasporas, and suddenly they find themselves with unlimited freedom, wild freedom that only a country like Turkey [the Ottoman Empire] can offer. This sudden change has planted despotic tendencies in their hearts, as always happens to former slaves [‘eved ki yimlokh – when a slave becomes king – Proverbs 30:22]. They deal with the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, trespass unjustly, beat them shamefully for no sufficient reason, and even boast about their actions. There is no one to stop the flood and put an end to this despicable and dangerous tendency.

    Dispossession was the objective from the onset:

    https://www.mepc.org/node/4861

    Thus from the very beginning of Zionism’s dream of creating a Jewish state, there were two complementary and equally imperative objectives: gain land and replace the majority population, either by denying them their rights, out-populating them or displacing them by one method or another. Despite soothing promises by Herzl and other Zionists that Jews and Palestinians would live happily side by side, there was, indeed, no other way to create Zionism’s envisioned Jewish state in Palestine.

  216. Ivan says:
    @eah

    I understand enough physics to know that Einstein’s work on what is called the Old Quantum Theory is original and groundbreaking. Very clearly he was an expert in using the idea of the quanta in various guises – the photo electric effect, the theory of specific heat, the idea of population inversion that he applied with great skill which segued into his work on statistical physics. But his work on relativity has led generations of scientists and the studious middle-brow down a rabbit hole. Nowadays the sensible fellows who understand such advanced ideas as the Lagrangian that gives the geodesic on curved surfaces use that to get a handle on the general theory. But that way of approaching a ‘straight line’ is just to use the calculus of variations to pop up the answers. In my opinion after many years of struggling with his ideas on relatively the man Einstein has perpetrated an elaborate fraud , unknowingly of course on generations of physicists

  217. renfro says:
    @The Dark Night

    The Jews took Palestine from the Brits who took it from the Turks, the Turks took it from the Arabs who took it from the Romans, and the Romans took it from the Jews. The homerland of the Arabs is Arabia and not Palestine.

    I always find it so amusing that the Jews claim Palestine as their homeland.
    Jews were wanders, always wandering from one country to another…..when all during their wandering centuries they could have returned to Palestine and didn’t.
    When they did…. er… ‘return’….it was only because the ‘holocaust’ scared them into doing so.

    So much for ‘their eternal longing’ for their homeland.

    Its all a con.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  218. Ivan says:
    @PeterMX

    Considering that even though we may dislike Einstein as being a cad, he had nonetheless lost his extended family to the Nazis, he was on to something when he evoked the “blonde beast”.

    • Replies: @bjondo
    , @PeterMX
  219. @anti_republocrat

    Didn’t credit Michelson or Morley either.Ha.

  220. Linh:

    Einstein in Colombo

    Reading that part of Einstein’s travel piece, I could not be sure if in fact this was the Colombo of present day Sri Lanka.

    We drove in individual little carts that were drawn on the double by Herculean and yet so refined people

    This would suggest a transport vehicle we know as a rickshaw still in use in some Asian countries.

    Please enlighten me if you can. The half naked natives sounds a bit odd for Asiatic peoples, especially Indian women who tend to dress rather conservatively, something I also noticed during my visit to Colombo, Sri Lanka, some 30 years ago.

    • Replies: @Linh Dinh
    , @RSDB
  221. AaronB says:
    @Linh Dinh

    Well, you weren’t familiar with the standard Romantic critique of Western man, and his science and industry, even though this was the main theme of most European writing from the 19th century on.

    You thought it was some Jewish thing. To be fair, you are no more ignorant than most people on this site who write about Jews.

    And it is obvious you have not read much of Mark Twain. If you did, you’d know his critique of Western man was absolutely scathing, and he compared Europeans unfavourably to other groups, including Jews, who he too, like Einstein, described as less morally crude than whites.

    This self-criticism was simply the standard attitude of sensitive and artistic whites since the creation of science, technology, etc. It was also the attitude of Asian races who dealt with Europeans, until they too in modern times became equally crude.

    As an artist and a poet, you surely realize that science, technology, bleak theories like Darwinism, etc make life ugly and repel the sensitive person. Sensitive and artistic types in the West have been grappling with this issue since the creation of science.

    My Jewish vanity would love to take credit for the artistic and poetic revolt against the mechanical way of thinking and ugly theories like Darwinism, but alas sensitive Europeans did the heavy lifting here.

    As for the idea that European man is cruder than other races, less morally refined and less poetic and artistic, and that’s why the mechanical way of thinking arose among them, and why they create ugly theories like Darwinism – well, I personally part company with the majority of European authors on this.

    European man may have appeared cruder and harsher towards the end of the 19th century, after several centuries of living under these harsh thought systems. But we know now there is nothing uniquely crude about Western man, as Asians are now equally crude, if not cruder.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @annamaria
    , @Art
  222. @Linh Dinh

    This AaronB jerk is a complete joke and pretender. It first made me think he’s paid (there’s a whole ziosquad here at UR), but he seems neither bright nor professional enough. His trolling is sub-par and he loves the attention.

  223. AaronB says:

    I have to reiterate how astonishing it is that the Romantic critique of Western man and his science is so totally forgotten today. They think it is an invention of Jews! (I wish).

    This can only mean that the triumph of science and the mechanical way of thinking is so total and thorough that it completely routed its main adversary from the field of battle.

    No one remembers any more that for centuries, European history was a dialectic between Science and Romanticism. But today science is identified with Western culture, and its honorable adversary is dead and buried.

    Perhaps, Jews do keep alive today some faint echo of the Romantic critique – and perhaps the merciless attack on Jews here is the last charge of the soldiers of Science, seeking to vanquish poetry, imagination, love, and art from the field forever, and permanently install the mechanical way of thought, and ugly theories like Darwinism.

    Is it a coincidence that Linh Dinh writes about the ugly, harsh, bleak, unpoetic aspect of life – and that he absolutely hates Jews and Judaism?

    I cannot believe that is a coincidence.

  224. bjondo says:
    @Ivan

    By extended you mean
    his cousin’s wife and 2 daughters
    murdered in 1944, per wikipedia?

    Doubt if Albert really cared.

    He cared for himself.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_the_family_of_Robert_Einstein

    • Replies: @ivan
  225. @Rational

    Correct. for a conprehensive look at how this was accomplished read Laurent Guyenot’s fine book “From Yahweh To Zion.

  226. @Colin Wright

    The farmland in The Eyalet Of Syria was not held by lords according to a feudal ownership system, I repeat there was no feudal land ownership system. The farmland was collectively owned by the village(a system practiced worldwide for thousands of years) and the reality of this collective ownership was acknowledged by the Ottoman Empire, as they acknowledged that Historical Syria was an independent nation that had become a province of the Ottoman Empire. However this created a problem for the Ottoman’s. They wanted Property Tax, but allegedly found it difficult to collect, so they concocted, without the agreement of the village landholder, new phony Title documents to these village holdings and sold them to middleman. To retain this phony title the middlemen had to pay the Property Tax, which they extracted from the village, and they always extracted far more than the value of the tax. As the villagers had little coin, it was payment in kind(crops etc), and profiteering by the middlemen was rampant. The jooooz never purchased the land from the rightful owners, they purchased these phony title deeds concocted by the Ottoman Empire, and being jooooz eagerly slipped into the role of exploitative middleman, thus the first stage of jooooish terror began. Once the Brits took over and installed a joooo as Governor of the illegal sub-mandate of Palestine severed from The Mandate Of Syria, the real jooooish terror began in the form of mass evictions of the rightful owners of the land. So yes, the jooooz began stealing the land sometime between 1919-1922. It seems even jooooz are a bit uneasy regarding their crime as to this day the land thieved from Arab villages is retained by an entity called something like “The Jewish Trust” and is leased to jooooz only, this land is over 90% of the land in the zionist entity. Because of this, the land can easily returned to the heirs of the disenfranchised real owners(who reside in poverty in Gaza and refugee camps in Jordan and Syria). Of course there was plenty of joooish terror used to acquire many other properties. For example the 500 year old houses on the Jaffa waterfront now “owned” by jooooz were seized by terror, the real owners fled for their lives to Gaza, where they are now slurred as “terrorists”, while the real, jooooish terrorists squat on their homes. So Einstein’s position was indefensible, and ignorant, and stupid, and it was already 1948 in 1919.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  227. AaronB says:
    @Anonymous

    It would be good if Jews were sincerely universal.

    Would it be good if the Vietnamese were universal? Or the Japanese?

    I can respect principled opposition to any form of nationalism whatsoever, though I disagree with it.

    But when a Vietnamese focuses on Jews and not the racism and exceptionalism of his own people, it begins to seem like simply a case of sour grapes, and competing nationalism.

    That’s not an impressive position to take.

    And when someone like Colin Wright from rural Oregon who has no connection to the region suddenly develops a monomaniac obsession with Jewish nationalism but is uninterested in all the other problems that beset our suffering world, one pauses and thinks that one isn’t exactly dealing with values and principles.

  228. Linh Dinh says: • Website
    @Justsaying

    Hi Justsaying,

    Einstein visited Sri Lanka/Ceylon twice, on his way to Penang, Malacca, Singapore, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Japan, then on his way back to Europe.

    His first impression:

    Yesterday evening we approached Colombo with considerable delay. Before the coast came into view we got caught in a severe tropical storm with a cloudburst, forcing the ship to stop. When it brightened up around 9 o’clock, it turned out that we were near the harbor. A pilot drew near in a rowboat, and we soon docked next to another Japanese steamship. We saw here for the first time an elderly Indian, fine, distinguished face with gray beard, who brought us two telegrams and—begged for a tip. We saw other Indians as well, brown to black sinewy figures with expressive faces and bodies and humble demeanor. They look like nobles transformed into beggars. Much unspeakable pride and downtroddenness are united there.

    Linh

  229. annamaria says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Have you heard about the seminal works of Lorenz and Poincare? No? — this explains your insistence on the alleged greatness of A. E.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  230. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    What kind of delusion is this?

    Everyone knows Jews are the most racist people on earth.

    Jews even discriminate amongst themselves with pure Ashkenazi Jews being the most pure Jew.

  231. @Tony Ryals

    All of what you just referred to occurred long before the Roman Empire when the Askenazi race was begun by migrating male Jews marrying Italian women.

    Prior to Hadrian, there was no such thing as a Diaspora or Ashkenazi.

    Genetic studies indicated that European Jews are mostly Italian on their mother’s side and not Sicilian either. Jews never immigrated to Saracen-controlled Sicily. They immigrated to Southern mainland Italy around Rome.

    Today a European Jew is about 60% Italian according to DNA tests. There is little indication of Turkic Mongol genes resulting from a mass conversion of Khazars.

    You only have to look at a European Jew or observe the cultural ties with Italians to see the genesis of Ashkenazi.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  232. @Barr

    Quote: Everything will be ‘Head.’

    Reply: That raises the question; will the expression ‘Giving Head’ still be viable and meaningful one?

  233. @EpicOfFlight

    The ‘golden boys’ always start out in a ramshackle shed, a debilitated barn or a smokey garage.

    Nobody mentions the $$$ TPTB invest in them.

    Must be a reason why we’re kept int the dark….

  234. @AaronB

    AaronB,

    From what I read there seems to be plenty of racism in Israel between the different Jews: Ashkenazi, Sephard, blacks, newcomer Russian Jews. Jack Bernstein used to write about it in his book The life of an American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel about his experiences in 1970s Israel. And we’ve all seen scenes of race riots in Tel Aviv by Ethiopian Jews complaining about discrimination. Not quite what you imply in your comment.

  235. Whitewolf says:
    @AaronB

    As for those Jews who argue against the idea of favoring one’s own group in general, these are Enlightenment ideas created by white Europeans that those Jews have been corrupted by. Such Jews are also against Jewish exceptionalism.

    I’m sure there’s some true believer Jews out there that who honestly argue against favoring one’s own group. Mostly what people see though is Jews who argue against Whites( and only Whites) favoring their own group while being extremely ethnocentric themselves. These Jews like Einstein have wet dreams of a world without White people. Their desire to reach that goal eclipses even the desire of the most extreme anti-semite to rid the world of Jews. I doubt even Palestinians hate Jews as much as Jews hate Whites.

  236. Whitewolf says:
    @SafeNow

    There seems to be a ”talking gene” at work. Perhaps descended from thousands of years hunched over the Torah, and debating it. Thus, we get successful Jewish lawyers, pundits, journalists, professors, psychiatrists, politicians, and of course, yentas. It is amazing to me that this genetic trait succeeds, because its tone is one of dissension, contentiousness, hyper-criticalness, and hyper-touchiness. To me, it seems off-putting, but it works; listeners are awestruck; I don’t know why.

    Part of why it works is the sheep effect. People paid to pretend to be awestruck listeners get other people following suit. A lot of religions/cults do the same. Plus people just want to be left in peace and can’t be bothered arguing non-stop with people that can never be pleased.

    • Replies: @renfro
  237. Franz says:
    @RadicalCenter

    Thanks I just got to it.

    I knew of the Italy connection but like the far side of the moon, I was not aware how much of it there is.

  238. @utu

    It is important to note that this is just Voltaire *posing* as an ancient Roman.

  239. Franz says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    I really can’t argue that part of it.

    I do know the Khazar Hypothesis has been questioned more than once.

    There is no special reason to disbelieve the thesis of Egypt Knew Neither Pharaoh Nor Moses as far as I can see. I mean, Ezzat specifically tells us the old records show the North Yemen tribes that became Israelite peoples did get to the Levant. Just by way of Babylon and Alexandria. They did not come from there in the first place.

    It is known following the A.D. 70 military action on the part of Titus & the Tenth Legion, the survivors and refugees from Jerusalem spent a lot of years proselytizing. According to Arab scholars they were quite successful even after the Arab conquest, and had to be forbidden by law to convert any Islamic person to Judaism. Some were luckier than others, but my guess is that slightly over 500 years of converts is going to punch up a lot of DNA one way or another.

    My feeling is that the more people know of Ezzat’s work, and the history it rests on, the more they’ll unpack what actually happened. Those of us who spent any time with Ancient Egyptian history know he’s got something on the ball. The place names in Arabia transposed to Canaan, etc, are all compelling and truly explain the Bronze Age mysteries with stunning accuracy. For me it was like a sudden pile of blur snapping right into focus.

    I am not arguing with anyone on this one, like I say, more work needs to be done. That Rome was Europe’s soft underbelly is not really surprising. But like so much else, very depressing.

  240. ivan says:
    @bjondo

    He cared for himself. I cannot argue with that.

    Einstein was a swine who did not take care of his own family. Apparently the divorce settlement involved passing his Nobel Prize money to his first wife Mileva, but Einstein promptly lost it during the Great Depression. He didn’t bother to take care of, or even visit his invalid son Eduard Einstein who was left all alone after the death of his mother.

    But anyone who comes into sights of the Nazis have my sympathy.

  241. ivan says:
    @Colin Wright

    But one cannot help but notice the malice behind it.

    See this exchange between Morgan Freeman and Mike Wallace on Black History Month.

  242. @Anonymous

    My understanding is that very little of the land in the Ottoman province which included Palestine was freehold land – say 6 oor 7 per cent, and that, very sensibly, it was that land that Rothschild and other rich Zionist supporters’ money was used to buy. To then give notice to tenants according to the terms of leases or liccenses under which they farmed the land (very likely far less efficiently than was possible) was only what had been occurring in Europe for hundreds of years as populations increased rapidly and the Agricultural Revolution paralleled the Industrial Revolution. (Think Highland cleances and enclosures of the commons).

    Bedouin in the northern Negev today are suffering from being at the weak end of this difference of interests with only the advantage that the state won’t leave them entirely to fend for themselves.

    You ignore the reality that your vague moral conception of ownership is bound to give way in a modern state to legal rights – unless of course you have the numbers in a democracy. In which case “You may win the argument but I’ve got the numbers”.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  243. ivan says:
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    Einstein the father of male chauvinist pigs, on the conditions for his clinging wife to remain with him.

    CONDITIONS

    A. You will make sure:

    1. that my clothes and laundry are kept in good order;
    2. that I will receive my three meals regularly in my room;
    3. that my bedroom and study are kept neat, and especially that my desk is left for my use only.

    B. You will renounce all personal relations with me insofar as they are not completely necessary for social reasons. Specifically, You will forego:

    1. my sitting at home with you;
    2. my going out or travelling with you.

    C. You will obey the following points in your relations with me:

    1. you will not expect any intimacy from me, nor will you reproach me in any way;
    2. you will stop talking to me if I request it;
    3. you will leave my bedroom or study immediately without protest if I request it.

    D. You will undertake not to belittle me in front of our children, either through words or behavior.

    http://www.openculture.com/2013/12/albert-einstein-imposes-on-his-first-wife-a-cruel-list-of-marital-demands.html

  244. Whitewolf says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    I saw a poster advertising a quiz night at a cafe a while back. It had a picture of Einstein with the equation 6-3=6 underneath. I don’t know if it was deliberate or someone just grabbed the first pic they found with Einstein off of the internet but it was probably more appropriate.

  245. Robjil says:
    @renfro

    The 614 AD Persian conquest of Jerusalem is history that is hidden in our Zion Age of Faith.

    Why? Jewish massacres of Christians and the massive destruction of Christian Jerusalem. We are not allowed to hear of bad things Jews do ever.

    Here are some articles on this.

    One from a Israeli source. They admit it. Our Shabbos Goy Media outside Israel will not talk about it.

    https://www.jpost.com/Local-Israel/In-Jerusalem/Massacre-at-Mamilla

    Here is another one from a frequent writer here at Unz, Israel Shamir.

    http://www.israelshamir.net/English/mamilla.htm

    How about Kito’s war 115-177 BC? Diaspora Jews revolted all over the Eastern Mediterranean. They massacred hundreds of thousands of civilians and destroyed Roman infrastructure on a massive scale. In Libya, there are still evidence of this destruction.

    https://followinghadrian.com/2018/11/05/the-rebuilding-of-cyrene-by-hadrian-in-ad-118-9-hadrian1900/

    http://www.alternativeinsight.com/The_New_Sicarii.html

  246. @The Dark Night

    All invaders on this list came only as rulres and to a lesser extent as settlers. The Jews came as GENOCIDERS and then as settlers. That is the difference and that is wrong with that.

  247. thank you.
    will we ever take out all this double thinking from our heads?

  248. Robjil says:
    @AaronB

    Aldous Huxley said that the Darwin thought the following of the human species: The human species is a wild species. Why? The Top people led the human species and they are wild. The human species will be always wild since wild people keeping going to the top. The only way of taming the human species is for a alien species to tame them.

    We have free speech at Unz. I think free speech can tame the Top people of the human species. The Top people of our time appeared to be Jewish or Israel firsters. They give this away with the big 6 denial laws, the clamping down of any talk of Top Jews doing bad things, and hiding any history of Jews doing bad things ever.

    The Top Jews are very unique to be the Top people of the human species. They have a very special trick to keep themselves on top. It is anti-S to say they exist at the Top or that they do anything bad. This trick has been working like a charm for the past hundred years. The exposure of the crimes of the Top Jews on the net is causing mass hysteria for the Top Jews. They fear that they have been found out. They don’t want to be tamed. They want to be forever wild.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  249. Avery says:
    @Sean McBride

    {No group has an innate or divine right to any particular territory.}

    Sure they do: not ‘innate or divine right’ right, but right of being there first.
    Hundreds of 1,000s years ago (or millions, whatever) the Earth was void of human/humanoid occupancy. Empty spaces all around. Then proto-humans, then humans moved into those empty spaces and some stayed and multiplied. Others moved on to other empty spaces, etc, etc

    When there is an established occupancy at a previously empty space, how is it that people already there do not have the right of – let’s call it – first claim?

    Do _you_ have any rights to your own house or anybody can walk in from the street and force you out and take it?

    I know and understand that there is a lot grey area and overlap (…..sources of conflict). But how is it that one does not have a right to where he and his ancestors have lived for 1,000s of years, have established dwellings, farms, improved the land, added value to it, etc.

  250. @annamaria

    When I was in collage in the 60s and 70s, Einstein was a cult figure. Posters, real and surreal, of him were selling briskly, and hung the walls of a lot of students, during those heady days of “revolution”, and giving the parents and their values the middle finger.

    I look back at it and am amazed how we were manipulated and “nudged” (the insidious term and book by Cass Sunstein). Jews took full control of the culture during the early sixties. They manipulated movements into dead ends or over the cliffs. White Christian kids never saw it coming-and still don’t.

  251. @RadicalCenter

    Jared Taylor wrote a similar article on Amren that is a dry academic summation of Jewish DNA. None of which is traceable to Turkic-Mongols.

  252. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I agree on the founding of Israel. The movie of the 1960s was pure Goebbels/Stalin like propaganda, with a musical score. The movie was “Exodus”, about the poor, turned out, victimized, castigated, and mistreated Jew, yearning for a “homeland” **sob**, just like you and me. The lyrics in the score contained these words, “God gave this land to me”. Also, Leon Uris, wrote historical fiction with the Jews as heroes and good guys, Arabs as primitive, reflexive, barbarous, and eager to kill.

    All should read George Washington’s Farewell Address. If we had followed his advice, we would be a fully functioning, healthy country with a future, a country with honor, integrity, and dignity. We are NONE of these. And we have no future.

    https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp

    One concept: stay out of the entanglements of foreign powers and leave them alone. The Middle East would have been a sea of tranquility today, bothering no one, if we had left it alone, if the CIA and the US Federal Government was not used as provocateur and agent of transnational corporations and International Jewry.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Avery
  253. @AaronB

    Nothing you write has any sincerity or comes from intended integrity. You spew forth a tangle and mangle of words to confuse and confound. Your thoughts jump around, statements are misleading blurbs that contain inanities and are made for the gullible and weak-minded. This is regular, calculated and practiced. Warburg used the same drivel of meaninglessness at testimony in Congress regarding his subversive practices of supporting Communists in Europe leading up to the Russian Revolution. Adolf Hitler recited what he was told by Jews, in print. It is garble and turns in on itself, making no sense, but giving vague and disconnected affect.

    You should not be here. Your thoughts are designed to disempower the larger number and enable theft, larceny, and falsehoods to an extreme minority. This is manipulation, agitprop, with evil intent. You’re a whore.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  254. Republic says:
    @Richard B

    This would help explain the symbolic marriage between the obviously gay Mark Zuckerberg and his Chinese wife.

    Jews changing their host, i.e., parasites switching to a new host

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    , @Richard B
  255. Dumbo says:

    Jews are basically Italians.

    This idea that Jews are Italian I find very strange, I’d like to see the DNA studies.

    Character-wise, they are very different from Italians. Maybe you can argue that they are similar to Cosa Nostra Sicilians, but the difference is that most Sicilians (at least nowadays) have a negative view of the mafia, while Jews tend to protect even their worst criminals.

    They are in terms of character and culture more similar to Arabs, which would make sense if they really came from the Middle East, or perhaps the Khazar theory could be right, as the ashkhenazi obviously came from the East and not the South, and they look more Turkish than Italian.

    That said, of course they mixed with lots of people among the way, from ancient Romans and Greeks to more recently with Slavs and Turks.

    I wonder if their keeping of their genetic traits has more to do with cousin marriage, Jews are kinda like Gypsies in a way, they’ve been in the diaspora forever and mixed with other people but you know a gypsy when you see one. Most Jews marry among themselves and even those who intermarry can just skip a generation and their sons marry again a Jew. I’m pretty sure that Zuckermerd’s half-Chinese daughter will eventually marry a Jew and not a Chinaman.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  256. @Republic

    Zuckerberg is a congenital sociopath, meaning he cannot feel empathy or sympathy for any other living thing. His wife, speaking in an interview, said that he cares more for the dog than her. Zuckerberg marries a Chinese and then makes clear that the future of Facebook (he has picked the winning horse) is not Amurka but China. His incursions into China are completely sycophantic, and synchronous with Chinese censorship, agitprop, lies, propaganda. He kisses their ass.

    Meanwhile, in public pronouncements, Senate hearings , he and his scrotum scrubber team lie and lie about their intentions and internal structure and functioning. Specific Jews like this excrement, the Google Boys-and most of Silly Cone Valley love totalitarian governments that keep them highly placed and invulnerable to mundane things like morality, truth, integrity, public service to humanity, or any inconvenience. They have bought and blackmailed everyone who has the power to stop them

    • Replies: @Richard B
  257. annamaria says:
    @The Dark Night

    “Historical facts”

    — As reality demonstrates, zionists abhor facts. See the persecution of honest researchers in the Bolshevik revolution and WWII by thugs from the ADL and the Lobby hysterics about the undeniable historical facts.

    Zionists hate, hate facts. You don’t even have your own culture — literature, architecture, music — to make a claim on historical facts; everything is borrowed from other cultures — Persian, Spanish, German, Russian…

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  258. @Dumbo

    Look up the DNA studies. They exist. Jared Taylor wrote an interesting article. A very small founding population of Jewish males arrived in Rome following the Diaspora and intermarried with local Roman women to such a degree that if you took an Askenazi off the street today their DNA would test 40% to 60% Italian.

    Gypsies are Indians. They apparently borrowed some words and religious beliefs while wandering through Iran but genetically they are Punjabi.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  259. melpol says:

    Real Jews are rare and unique. The real Jew is not a follower of Judaism but a political junkie and sexual pervert. Real Jews have an innate talent that contributes to cultural progress and should be put on a pedestal. Real Jews idolize Chinese nations and believe Asiatics will dominate Europe. The highest representative of real Jews is the Jewess, she goes where few venture to explore. Real Jews are here to stay with or without Israel.

    • Replies: @Hacienda
  260. Cassandra says:
    @Blankaerd

    Constantin Carathéodory must be noted here. Essential.

  261. Hacienda says:
    @melpol

    Your comments are like haikus of observation. Excellent.

  262. @renfro

    Never did I say that Jerusalem was founded by the Jews. Don’t put words in my mouth. And stop posing as a knowledgeable man. I have forgotten more than you have known, son.

    Palestinians are not Canaanites, they are Arabs who speak Arabic. Period. And their homeland is Arabian peninsula. Scientific fact. Period.

    The Jews who now have become Israelis are for the most part related to the ancient Hebrews only distantly, and some are not related at all, which doesn’t matter in respect to the topic of this discussion, which is the allegation that Jews stole the land of the Palestinians. My point was to remind that this land was not their land, and never was their homeland.

    The Jews conquered this land, beating up the Brits and then the Arabs in 1948. You all are living on a conquered land. So stop accusing the Jews, you have no right to do this.

    • Replies: @renfro
  263. @ploni almoni

    Then you should start learning it, a.s.a.p.

  264. @Poupon Marx

    is our little sixth sense at work here?
    hmmm!

  265. AaronB says:
    @Robjil

    Interesting theory.

    I think its certainly correct to say that society is led by the worst people, because the worst people are those who wish to dominate others.

    The only partial exception is a hereditary aristocracy – because random people ruling you means at least some of them didn’t want power.

    However, aristocracies develop entrenched interests, and historically have often been incompetent and terriblly oppressive to their subjects.

    So that’s no real solution either.

    That Jews have a lot of power today is undeniable, and that some Jews use this to stifle criticism is also true. But most don’t, and the “double standard” Jews are a minority. And its inevitable, because all humans have corrupt elements.

    The thing is, that Jews are a distraction. They are not the primary reason Western society is in such trouble.

    • Replies: @gruff
  266. @annamaria

    To begin with, of course the Jews have their own culture. The Jewish culture is one of the most ancient in the world. You borrowed from it: the religion, the Bible, the God, the heroes and the teaching. And you twisted it all, but this is not the point now.

    Of course the Jews have their own literature. First of all religious and philosophical literature. All the books of the Old and the New Testament, the Talmud and the Book of Splendour, and lots of less known books. You don’t have your own religious books. Except for the Hammer of Witches. Congratulations.

    The Jews have secular literature of their own, even written in their own language: Yiddish. Lots of great books. I.B. Singer, G. Scholem and others are great Jewish writers of our time. Have you read these writers? No. You have no idea what you’re talking about, then.

    The Jews are great in music and fine art too. There has been a lot of talented Jewish musicians and painters. And this is a big question, who borrows what and from who, but the Jews are more ancient than you, and you have borrowed so much from the Jews that it makes that impossible for a sane person of your national background to accuse the Jews of borrowing anything: you have borrowed more.

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @Tony Ryals
  267. @AaronB

    ‘…And when someone like Colin Wright from rural Oregon who has no connection to the region suddenly develops a monomaniac obsession with Jewish nationalism but is uninterested in all the other problems that beset our suffering world…’

    One wonders how you infer that.

    The truth of the matter is that I just haven’t seen much occasion to consult you about what measures to take to restore our Coho Salmon fisheries.

  268. @Rev. Spooner

    well why isn’t he fighting back indeed..why isn’t this the focal and direct point of an alternative publication for eg., clarifying for the people what is what in lots of nooks and crannies and in open fields?

    sixth sense here necessary?

    I mean his response is several orders of magnitude over and above what is generally submitted to the Unz by ordinary posters, as if it was fed by a vast complex of support, not just one person… of which Poupon Marx is the trademark

  269. Dumbo says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    I prefer this theory by an Israeli:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478715/

    https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowledges-jews-in-fact-khazars-secret-plan-for-reverse-migration-to-ukraine/

    Regarding the study you cite, I’ve looked at it online and it seems to be less convincing than what you make it to be, and certainly does not say that “Jews are Italian”.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3543

    In any case, this genetic history predates the diaspora and the formation of Italy as such and so it is likely that they just descend from earlier Jews living in the Roman Empire or locals who converted (before Christianity, Judaism would expand via conversion). Funnily enough, many of those early Jews would have converted to Christianity later on, so it would make sense that both Christians and Jews in the area have a somewhat similar origin. By the way, “Italians” really originate from different peoples/tribes, Etruscans, Romans, Sabines, Siculians, Greeks, etc and their genetic make-up can differ quite a lot depending on the region.

  270. @Bombercommand

    ‘…So Einstein’s position was indefensible, and ignorant, and stupid, and it was already 1948 in 1919.’

    Perhaps…but Einstein’s position was understandable. Rightly or wrongly, in 1938 he could have perceived the Arab Revolt as a matter of savages attacking peaceful Jews farming their own land. It would have been hard to put such a gloss on the events of 1948.

    • Replies: @Bombercommand
  271. @AaronB

    ‘…And many aspects of Jewish culture as it developed in the diaspora I strongly dislike. I do appreciate Israeli culture though 🙂…’

    This has interesting implications as to what your values are.

    Obviously, to start with, living in diversity and equality may be good for the goyim, but it isn’t what’s good for the Jews. They need to sit like and effendi and eat, while the gentile serves them.

    Then we have the worship of violence and brute force.

    Finally, there’s contempt for the law. It’s merely a figleaf, to be retrospectively plastered over whatever act of theft or injustice you feel inclined to commit.

    This would be what differentiates the Jew of the diaspora from the Israeli ‘culture’ you admire.

  272. AaronB says:
    @Poupon Marx

    I’m disappointed in you.

    Like me, you’re also disenchanted with the modern West and its ugly, mechanical way of thinking. You’ve turned to Buddhism – although your remarks hardly reflect the serene acceptance of the Buddha who has transcended the duality of opposites.

    Okay, so lets say Jews are these awful deceitful people, etc., and are doing oppressive and awful things with their power today. Let’s grant all that.

    Do you think Jews are responsible for the ugly side of Western culture that makes so many sensitive and poetic souls flee from it? Do you think Jews are responsible for the disenchantment of Western culture? And would you agree that this disenchantment is the main problem facing the West?

    At worst, one can say of today’s Jews – lets say – that they found a power vacuum and seized power, and are acting with the usual oppressive stupidity of those that have seized power. This makes it a rather banal and ordinary political problem. Eventually, the Jewish grip on power will slip, and other groups – with their own brand of stupidity – will contribute to oppressing the common folk.

    Political problems come and go. But spiritual problems are forever. I would love to hear your ideas not on the political problem of Jews, but on the Romantic critique of Western man – the disenchantment of the West.

  273. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Historical researches do not support the stories of the Bible. But let’s assume the stories are true. The Hebrews – not the Jews – the Hebrews commited genocide of the Canaanite peoples. So what? This is not even history, this is a pre-historic period. The Ancient Egypt era. Long before the Rome. You can’t ascribe the alleged crimes of the ancient Hebrews to the modern Jews. That’s completely asinine.

    The Hebrews of the first Temple period were not called the Jews. Their kingdome was ruined and the Temple destroyed, and they were exiled to Mesopotamia, from where they returned as the Jews. A part of the nation which lived in Judea during the second Temple period was called the Jews, because in that part, in Judea they were keeping the Jewish tradition, unlike Israelis who lived in Galilea, the northern part of the country where the Greek culture dominated.

    And speaking of genocide, you first take a better look at your own people and not so distant historical events which were taking place in your homeland, not so long ago and tell me about the extermination of heretics, such as Bogomils and Kathars. Tell me about the Maya and Incas civilizations, which were ruined to the dust and then we will discull the terrible genocide of the tribes of Canaan, whether it happened or not.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  274. The point of this discussion really ought to be not that Einstein was a plagiarist or that Einstein was a Jew, but that the theory of relativity is fundamentally flawed (and quantum mechanics too).

    Any theory which undermines the basis of causality, which introduces the bizarre concept of relative time, or which eschews any attempt at determinative explanation in favor of probabilistic outcomes, is not a scientific theory at all, it is an antiscientific theory, a theory of chaos and nonsense.

    Relativity and quantum mechanics are not the pinnacles of the scientific worldview; they are actually symptoms of its decline. They are a withdrawal from the clarity and exactitude which once characterized the scientific enterprise and a retreat into a murky world of utterly pragmatic, ad hoc solutions which are the close kinsmen of superstition.

    When you criticize Einstein for being a plagiarist or a Jew while at the same time accepting the basic framework of relativity, that is tantamount to swallowing the poison and objecting to the wrapper it came in. The danger lies elsewhere, and it is already within us.

  275. PeterMX says:
    @Ivan

    I’m not aware how much of his family he lost. I never heard he lost any, although many Germans lost some. My German mother lost a good part of her family though and the war was no joy for my father’s family either. You are one of the typical people I refer to in my comment, brought up on years of lies and propaganda. It has only been acceptable to talk about Germans that way and whites that were not German didn’t mind it. Like you, they agreed. Well, now all American whites are the hated majority. This is what the poor, innocent Jews have done.

    • Replies: @ivan
  276. @Bardon Kaldian

    You will be among the 28 hundred gentiles I’ll save from the Wrath of God. You are kind of funny. I will need a fool to make me laugh.

  277. @AaronB

    You are full of conceit and delusion if you think you can influence me with this tripe and half-baked drivel. You are a monkey and a clown, who exhibits intellectual sloth and implicit mocking at what you pre-suppose is the normative Christian Goy handicapped mentally mutilated and limited by a failed religion and its ethos.

    Your imbecilic rhetorical and phony concern for others is noticeable from a considerable distance as one would expect from is marinated in excrement as a place of repose.

    Here is a complete exposition of your métier. Stop wasting my time, small man.

    http://age-of-treason.com/2014/05/26/on-jewish-deception/

    • Replies: @AaronB
  278. @Intelligent Dasein

    This is not self-evident or revealing. It is idiosyncratic and incomprehensible. As such, it is a throw away such as is background noise. Sorry.

  279. @Saggy

    Had Churchill agreed to Hitler’s Peace Offer (No doubt he did want peace with Britain!) We would probably have found ourselves very quickly engaged with Germany in a war on the USSR. Of course, no one can tell how that would have turned out but I beg leave to doubt that it would have saved many lives, as compared to the actual WW2.

  280. Richard B says:
    @Republic

    parasites switching to a new host

    That’s exactly right!

    But, they’ve finally met their match with the Chinese. For a number of reasons.

    Trusting TUR commenters to be able to rattle off a few reasons off of the top of their heads, I’ll leave them to fill in the blanks.

    In any event, the best Jewish Supremacy Inc. will manage with China is if they become their accountants in the West.

    That’ll last until the transition, when they’ll be completely replaced, forever.

    Why do you think The Jewish Cognitive Elite* are allowing a few ethnocentric pro-Westerners a voice, even within their own ranks?

    Hedging their bets and playing both sides to the middle, as always (and just in case).

    *c. Gilad Atzmon’s video on this subject.

  281. annamaria says:
    @The Dark Night

    “Millions of Zionist Jews coming to your countries.”
    — You do know that the Soviet Jews [“who now form 20% of the Jewish population of Israel”] were economic migrants because Israel was available for immigration? The generous subsidies for the newcomers were given on a condition that the newcomers stay in Israel. The Jewish State has been an artificial entity from the get-go. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6a7fd8.html

  282. Richard B says:
    @Poupon Marx

    True.

    But to the extent China succeeds Zuckerberg & Co. will be employees, for a while.

    Then they’ll be replaced – forever.

    In short, the Chinese will do to them what they did to us.

    Jewish Supremacy Inc. is to China what Useful Idiot Shabbos Goy Unlimited was to JSI.

    • Agree: Poupon Marx
  283. AaronB says:
    @Poupon Marx

    I had thought that perhaps you had a glimmer of spirituality.

    I still think there might be a tiny spark there. God willing you will overcome your “storm and stress” period and develop that spark.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  284. utu says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    STR of Lorentz, Poincare, Einstein and Minkowski is mathematically self-consistent and it was experimentally tested through and through. OTOH only three or four predictions of GTR of Einstein, Grossman and Hilbert were confirmed experimentally.

    The only important issue about Einstein is his honesty and the phenomenon of his cult as a part of the Jewish Zeitgeist. Bringing Einstein down to his actual size in the narrative of our culture is a very important task that if successful will be the litmus test for reversing the narrative of Jewish cultural domination.

    • Replies: @ivan
  285. @Intelligent Dasein

    Very interesting observations. I would be interested to know what are your thoughts on :
    1) Dark Matter.
    2) Dark Energy.
    3)The Big Bang.
    4) Entanglement of photons. (Faster than light communications between.)

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  286. annamaria says:
    @AaronB

    ” European man is cruder than other races, less morally refined and less poetic and artistic…”

    — Why there are no Jewish giants of letters, music and visual art, who represent the Jewish culture? Instead, all prominent “artistic” Jews have been nurtured by the achievements of European civilization. There are no “artistic” Jews that have ever reached the level of Michelangelo, Rembrandt, Bach, Bosch, Mozart, Goethe, Tolstoy, Gaudi while relying on the mysterious Jewish culture as compared to European culture. Modern Jews own everything to western civilization.

    • Agree: utu
  287. annamaria says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Looks quite Turkish to me: Avigdor Lieberman, came to the Jewish State from Moldova.

    • Replies: @Parbes
    , @Avery
  288. utu says:

    “…morally refined and very poetic and artistic…” AaronB’s people

    Future of humanity and human civilization depends on them.

  289. Parbes says:
    @annamaria

    This guy does NOT look Turkish – he looks Semitic. Which is exactly what he is, of course.

  290. renfro says:
    @The Dark Night

    Never did I say that Jerusalem was founded by the Jews. Don’t put words in my mouth. And stop posing as a knowledgeable man. I have forgotten more than you have known, son.

    Poor try at obfuscation little man but Jerusalem being founded by the Jews was not a point in your comment or my reply. You may have forgotten some of your jewish myths but I have forgotten nothing of the facts of real history.

    Palestinians are not Canaanites, they are Arabs who speak Arabic. Period. And their homeland is Arabian peninsula. Scientific fact. Period.

    99% of worlds most respected historians and anthropologist say they were. The world takes their word for it . Jewish claims and myths are taken with a grain of salt because of their history of trying to ‘invent’ a history that fails in the face of facts.

    The Jews who now have become Israelis are for the most part related to the ancient Hebrews only distantly, and some are not related at all, which doesn’t matter in respect to the topic of this discussion, which is the allegation that Jews stole the land of the Palestinians. My point was to remind that this land was not their land, and never was their homeland.

    Answered above several times—world’s most renown historians vr the Jewish claims and myths .

    The Jews conquered this land, beating up the Brits and then the Arabs in 1948. You all are living on a conquered land. So stop accusing the Jews, you have no right to do this

    I have no right to do this?….LOL… Try and stop me. You are too stupid to understand this but you Jews are once again riding to your appointmen in Samarra.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  291. Truth3 says:

    We are ALL Canaanites now.

  292. renfro says:
    @The Dark Night

    but the Jews are more ancient than you,

    Jews can only be more ancient than other people if they are ‘Neanderthals’….who the Homo Sapiens replaced.

    We could probably make the case that Jews are most ancient if they admit to being descended from the Neanderthals. A female Homo neanderthalensis skull was discovered at Tabun Cave at Mount Carmel in Israel.May 5, 2018.
    20 percent of Neanderthal DNA survived in some modern humans, notably expressed in the skin, hair and diseases of modern people. The proportion of Neanderthal-inherited genetic material is about 1 to 4 percent [later refined to 1.5 to 2.1 percent] of the population. (NatGeo)…..which would fit the population of Jews.

    The guys in this picture certainly show the resemblance to the Neanderthal..

    https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/11/09/National-Politics/Images/SA3_96401415568011.jpg?uuid=MwponGhWEeS6_WWYGSpEjQ

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  293. renfro says:
    @AaronB

    And when someone like Colin Wright from rural Oregon who has no connection to the region suddenly develops a monomaniac obsession with Jewish nationalism but is uninterested in all the other problems that beset our suffering world, one pauses and thinks that one isn’t exactly dealing with values and principles

    Its simple . A lot of articles here are about Jews.
    So we discuss the Jews.

    We don’t discuss the world’s problems with Jews because Jews have no interest in world problems, they are only interested in talking about themselves.

  294. @foolisholdman

    Certainly, my good sir.

    1) and 2) are easy enough. Neither dark energy nor dark matter exist (and neither do black holes, while we’re on the subject). These are quite obviously the poster children for 2oth century epicycles. Anybody who does not see and admit that is probably not capable of serious thought and there is little point in discussing these subjects with them.

    3) The Big Bang in its current (inflationary) formulation is certainly nonsense, and so are the cognate ideas of the Hubble expansion and the cosmic microwave background radiation. However, the Big Bang is also a bit of a red herring, for it is not material to the question it is meant to address, viz cosmic origins.

    The dictum of Aristotle and appropriated by St. Thomas Aquinas remains the foundational principle of all cosmology, and it is this: The universe must either have always existed, or it was created ex nihilo at some point in the past. However, there is no test, no experiment or observation one could make that would be capable of distinguishing between the two. Therefore, while Christians must accept by Revelation that the universe was created, a faithful Christian who really understood his religion would never attempt to prove such a thing, because no proof can be forthcoming. Furthermore, as far as the physical observation of the scientist is concerned, the universe must be epistemologically infinite in duration. For related reasons, it must also be infinite in its spatial extent and in the divisibility of space and matter. The “three infinites”—i.e. of duration, extent, and divisibility—are the ur-principles of physical cosmology; they are the touchstones that render nonsensical any physical theory that violates any one of them. Schopenhauer has a very elegant and accessible explanation of all this in The World as Will and Idea.

    4) Quantum entanglement and FTL communication can be treated as two separate questions. Concerning entanglement, it really ought not to be surprising at all that when any conserved quantity is distributed between two bodies, the one will be the complement of the other. The entire aura of spookiness surrounding this subject results from the mistaken belief that the quantity exists in superposition before the observation is made. I’m afraid that just isn’t true. Shrodinger’s cat applies to all things everywhere and always. Cats are ether alive or dead, and spins are either up or down. The physicist are interposing a grand bit of silliness between A and B, but they end up reaching the same conclusion anyway, namely that there is no hope for FTL communication along these lines, and that is of course correct.

    However, there is no objection to FTL communication in general, or to FTL travel. This is another one of those things that relativity gets profoundly wrong. There is no reason why an object cannot be accelerated to any arbitrary speed; the speed of light is no more a cosmic speed limit than is the speed of sound. The difficulty (as well as the so-called “relativistic mass increases” observed in particle accelerators) results from the fact that all known means of propulsion ultimately boil down to electromagnetic charges pushing against each other, and you cannot use the electromagnetic force to push something faster than the force itself moves through its own medium. That would be sort of like trying to break the sound barrier with an engine blowing out compressed air. Relativistic mass increases are a mistaken interpretation of the quite mundane fact that more and more energy must be applied, with exponentially diminishing effect, as you approach the natural speed of the medium.

    • Replies: @ivan
    , @foolisholdman
  295. renfro says:
    @Whitewolf

    To me, it seems off-putting, but it works; listeners are awestruck; I don’t know why.

    It works because its babble. It makes no sense and therefore your average listener, not knowing about Jewish pilpul, ‘assumes’ that because he cant make sense of it it must be beyond his understanding.

    Look at all the babble comments Jews make on here….aren’t you almost struck wordless by the nonsensical babble,……. babble babble….fact and evidence free babble.

  296. @AaronB

    /your remarks hardly reflect the serene acceptance of the Buddha who has transcended the duality of opposites/

    The very disposition you display in this forum demonstrates that you yourself don’t reflect such “serene acceptance.” Were it otherwise, you wouldn’t be here.

    Since you’re surely smart enough to recognize you aren’t the example you wish to see in others, it follows that you’re here for the purpose of contention.

    Is this an inherently Jewish trait, or has the Enlightenment now possessed your soul for good?

  297. AaronB says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    I would have thought that Quantum Physics in particular liberated us from the deterministic clockwork universe of Newtown.

    But you favor a deterministic, clockwork science, it seems.

    I would have thought that determinism partly caused the modern collapse of morale in Europe.

    And relativity is merely the insights of the mystics.

    Popular culture has not yet caught up with the spiritual implications of cutting edge science, and remain a stuck in the mechanistic Newtonian universe which spells to religion.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  298. Intelligent Dasein: “When you criticize Einstein for being a plagiarist or a Jew while at the same time accepting the basic framework of relativity, that is tantamount to swallowing the poison and objecting to the wrapper it came in. ”

    “The observer, when he seems to himself to be observing a stone, is really, if physics is to be believed, observing the effects of the stone upon himself. Thus science seems to be at war with itself: when it most means to be objective, it finds itself plunged into subjectivity against its will. Naive realism leads to physics, and physics, if true, shows that naive realism is false. Therefore naive realism, if true, is false; therefore it is false.”
    ―Bertrand Russell, An Inquiry Into Meaning and Truth

    Certainly Einstein’s relativity theories, especially when combined with others such as those of Freud and Darwin, have had profound cultural consequences. Einstein’s theories constituted a revolution in thought that fundamentally overthrew the old intellectual order. After Einstein, Western man was forced to regard with suspicion not only his own motives and origins, and not even just the absolute character of the moral order that he had been taught to believe came from the transcendent source called God. Now, in a relativistic world, even the evidence of his own senses was called into question. As a direct result, the old, comfortable, placid Newtonian and Euclidean universe ruled over by a bearded white Gentleman who created man in his own image and had given him his moral rules to live by had been destroyed. The blast at Hiroshima was both a public announcement of the truth of this totally new world view and a confirmation of the death of God.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  299. Herzog says:
    @Saggy

    I’m not knowledgeable enough to have a well-grounded view on whether or not the renewed Jewish takeover of parts of Palestine / the Holy Land / whatever can justifiably be described as stealing.

    Yet even if it could, wouldn’t it have to be assessed as a tiny beginning only of karmic justice for the nation at the receiving end?

  300. @The Dark Night

    You are one real idiot.Euro Jews are not even Jews except in their own delusions – they are white Euro trash. No connection to the maid rapist Abraham or the daughter raper Lot but yet still they are your heroes and role models.And you call that an advanced ‘culture’. ? Ha.

    I wrote and essay years ago on the Catholic church and Ariistotle’s,et.al.’s four elements ‘earth,air, water and fire’ and the relatively recent discovery of atoms that allowed us to calculate the amount of phosphates consumed and excreted by the pope for each earth orbit or year,(about a pound and a half),.And you know what because the bible of the church or torah of the pseudo Jews is too ignorant to even have ‘four or five elements of Aristotle the jews actually had to plagiarize Aristrotle’s et.al.’s four elements to put in their shitty kabbala ! t least the catholic chiurch cited Aristotle…..

  301. Hacienda says:

    After Einstein, Western man was forced to regard with suspicion not only his own motives and origins, and not even just the absolute character of the moral order that he had been taught to believe came from the transcendent source called God. Now, in a relativistic world, even the evidence of his own senses was called into question.

    LOL. Then Western man is a pathetic retard by your recounting. You mean before Einstein, Western man was a blinkered idiot. He/She never dreamed, never hallucinated, never saw that objects took on different colors under different conditions? What a fool this Western Man was.

  302. @Anonymous Snanonymous

    It’s understandable, if you are coming from an American mindset, and you’re told for decades, starting with kindergarten, that search of happiness is a continuous occupation.

    How could you “look back” for something that is irreparable?

    It’s like moaning about your parent’s Alzheimer. If you want to carry on pursuing happiness, you put them in some institution, at their own expense, and that’s that.

    Can you articulate precisely what is the majority of humanity missing by not getting circumcised? Should we also cut some “superfluous” toes, pluck our appendices, trim our coccyges?

  303. Avery says:
    @annamaria

    {Looks quite Turkish to me:}

    You must be joking.
    Turks look like this?
    Which so-called ‘Turks’?

    What you see today – i.e. blue eyed, light complexioned ‘Turk’ – and who call themselves ‘Turks’ are not actually Turks: they are forcibly ‘Turkified” other ethnicities. Original nomad Turks came from Central and East Asia. Uyghurs*, who have not intermixed with others, are closest that come to what an (original) Turk looks like.

    __________________________
    * https://www.worldbulletin.net/diplomacy/turkish-fm-visits-uighur-region-during-china-visit-video-h65694.html

    [Ahmet Davutoglu, who has become the first Turkish foreign minister ever to visit Uighur Autonomous Region in China, toured historical sites in Kashgar city.
    Davutoglu and an accompanying Turkish delegation arrived early Thursday in Kashgar in the extreme west of China and the extreme southwest of Uighur region.
    Davutoglu first visited the tomb of Mahmud Kashgari and then they toured the tomb of Yusuf Has Hajib as well the 500-year-old Id Khah Mosque, the largest mosque in China.
    “We are visiting the land of our ancestors,” Davutoglu said.]

  304. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    To then give notice to tenants according to the terms of leases or liccenses under which they farmed the land (very likely far less efficiently than was possible) was only what had been occurring in Europe for hundreds of years

    The moral difference being that in Europe evicted tenants were replaced with other Europeans. In Palestine, natives were replaced with “foreign invaders.”

  305. annamaria says:
    @Poupon Marx

    “The Middle East would have been a sea of tranquility today, bothering no one, if we had left it alone if the CIA and the US Federal Government was not used as provocateur and agent of transnational corporations and International Jewry.”
    — So tragically true.

  306. Art says:
    @AaronB

    My Jewish vanity would love to take credit for the artistic and poetic revolt against the mechanical way of thinking and ugly theories like Darwinism

    I see where you miserable tribal Jews have started a systematic attack on Darwin.

    Darwin is one of the top three thinkers of all time. Jesus and Newton being the other two.

    I assure you that other than Jesus, there has not been one Jew who ever lived, that intellectually qualifies to carry Darwin’s lunch bucket.

    I can see why you mystical Jews are so pissed off – Darwin’s evolution displaced your Jew god. He made it so that your exclusive miserable pipsqueak tribal god, had no place in the everyday life of humanity. He made the creator truly universal. He made us all products of God’s nature.

    (Your Little Jew inferiority is showing.)

    • Replies: @Been_there_done_that
  307. Hacienda: “You mean before Einstein, Western man was a blinkered idiot. He/She never dreamed, never hallucinated, never saw that objects took on different colors under different conditions? ”

    There is a big difference between questioning a particular perception and questioning the nature of reality itself. In this sense, I think Intelligent Dasein makes a good point. Relativity theories are poison to the old, static notion of reality, and the statements of quantum mechanics, if true, as they appear to be, imply that the world is fundamentally not a rational place. Science arose from the assumption that it is, and therein lies a contradiction.

    • Replies: @Hacienda
    , @utu
  308. annamaria says:
    @The Dark Night

    “speaking of genocide…”
    — All nations have their dark pages, but only one tribe has made a profitable business out of shaming others and pretending on superior morality and incomparable victimhood. This tribe is known for its lack of shame.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  309. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Would it be good if the Vietnamese were universal? Or the Japanese?

    Universal values do not mean the absence of discrimination of every kind. It means recognizing our common (equal) humanity and fair play/fair rules in order to enhance our separate/common well-being.

    So that means families will continue to exist. Communities continue to exist. States continue to exist. Ethnic identities continue to exist. It doesn’t mean blurring everything and becoming a giant, amorphous blob.

    The mistake of modern liberalism is the attempt to erase natural distinctions in order to achieve “equality”. Rather than embracing differences and then transcending it while at the same time continuing to recognize the importance of those differences, modern liberalism attempts to erase it and “flatten” reality.

    The fundamental Jewish problem is not that they are racist or discriminatory (because many people are guilty of that). The Jewish problem is duplicity, dissimulation and operating by double-standards for tribal gain, viz, “One rule for thee, another for me.” Who does this besides sociopaths/psychopaths?

    • Replies: @AaronB
  310. annamaria says:
    @AaronB

    First, you invoke the name of God in vain.
    Second, your allegedly smart (and smug) mocking of others on a subject of spirituality is entertaining for you only.
    And third, if you manage to irritate some commenters on this forum, this does not mean that the commenters take you seriously.

  311. Avery says:
    @Poupon Marx

    {One concept: stay out of the entanglements of foreign powers and leave them alone.}

    Correct. That was how the Republic was mean to be, until it got corrupted by foreign elements.

    [“It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.” FAREWELL ADDRESS TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES | MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1796 George Washington]
    [“Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations-entangling alliances with none.
    The inaugural pledge of Thomas Jefferson]

    {The Middle East would have been a sea of tranquility today, bothering no one, …..}

    Nice sentiment, but completely false: Middle East was anything but a sea of tranquility, long before US (or UK) existed or started meddling. No need for me to list all the wars and bloodshed that went on in Middle East before US started meddling.

    For sure, US should have stayed waaaay out of Middle East, because as soon it got involved and started meddling, everything that went wrong is on US: and there is no end to it. But to imagine Middle East a sea of tranquility, if not for US (& UK) meddling – is false. How do you think Middle East, which had hardly any Muslims, is now almost completely Islamized? By the sword of Islam and boodshed (rivers of shed blood of indigenous Christians).

    Another recent example: although US helped him after the war started, Saddam invaded Iran all on his own initiative. The result was an 8 year war of bloodshed that cost about 1,000,000 dead Iranians and Iraqis. Mostly Iranians.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    , @anon
    , @barr
  312. Anonymous[297] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Einstein was a slob who cared nothing about dressing up and appearance. His hygiene habits we’re atrocious! He often smelled like garbage. It is widely accepted that had took his Serbian wife work (also a mathematician) and stole her work prior to divorcing her. Moreover, he lied about Germany’s quest for a nuclear weapon. Which prompted the America to create WMD. In short Einstein was a scumbag of the highest order!

  313. melpol says:

    Rich Goys prefer the attractive Jewess as a sex partner or wives. She has the technique to produce a heightened orgasm in her admirers. Rich Jews prefer the Shiksa or Nordic woman to produce the heightened orgasm. Mother Nature wants superior/attractive opposites to mate. She is responsible for that mind blowing orgasm for experimenting Jews and Goys.

    • Replies: @Jay Fink
  314. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    Do you think Jews are responsible for the ugly side of Western culture that makes so many sensitive and poetic souls flee from it?

    Probably at least responsible for abetting, exacerbating and accelerating ugliness.

    Introduce an amoral subgroup with latent antagonism towards the dominant group and interested primarily in money and tribal power. What happens?

    It’s a drive to the spiritual bottom. It’s Ayn Rand capitalism, economic exploitation and personal enrichment by ANY MEANS. To heck with ethics and long term moral/social consequences. It’s identity politics and social fragmentation.

  315. Hacienda says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    There is a big difference between questioning a particular perception and questioning the nature of reality itself.

    Yet, science does the first with far more diligence and frequency than the later.
    One big difference between Einstein and Newton was their understanding of reference frames. That rate of change of time depends on the velocity of person experiencing the velocity, while for Newton everyone has the same time frame and one time. I don’t see that God’s existence, non existence, or absolute morality is much changed under either physical interpretation. Maybe for some people who were confused by the terminology- “relativity”. Which is a semantical mistake, but who cares about this type of mistake? The Jews?

  316. Adir says:

    Someone’s salty…

  317. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Your timeline is way off. Western Man lost his bearings, references and markers at the time of the Enlightenment and Darwin’s Theory of Evolution-specifically that we were the cousins of primates and further developed on a time and complexity scale.

    This is one of the great failure of Christianity. It did not have the completeness, complexity, or depth to enable West. Man to come to terms. Buddhism would have, does. Christianity is a Jewish invention, as has been said by Jews, “What more do you want? We gave you a savior, a Messiah, and a religion?” Once in the refrigerator, it rotted and spoiled all the other fruit.

    I’m not going into didactic mode here. You can find these sources and the observations easily-or should I say that they are readily available.

    What kind of “Dr.” are you?

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Anonymous
  318. @Avery

    {One concept: stay out of the entanglements of foreign powers and leave them alone.}

    Correct. That was how the Republic was mean to be, until it got corrupted by foreign elements.

    I agree only partly. There was nothing “foreign” about the greater centralized control and Federalism of the Hamiltonians, versus the Jeffersonians-the agrarian, small is beautiful, decentralized, and Confederation thinking. Hamilton was the Proto Internationalist Financier, or perhaps one should say Transnationalism. Perhaps Hamilton and the urban/urbane types had connections with Rothschild et al. But this dichotomy has and always will exist, like a constant tug of war..

    Thank you for expanding upon the sentiments of George and Thomas, and most of the principals and prime movers of the Independence.

    {The Middle East would have been a sea of tranquility today, bothering no one, …..}

    Nice sentiment, but completely false: Middle East was anything but a sea of tranquility, long before US (or UK) existed or started meddling. No need for me to list all the wars and bloodshed that went on in Middle East before US started meddling.

    For sure, US should have stayed waaaay out of Middle East, because as soon it got involved and started meddling, everything that went wrong is on US: and there is no end to it. But to imagine Middle East a sea of tranquility, if not for US (& UK) meddling – is false. How do you think Middle East, which had hardly any Muslims, is now almost completely Islamized? By the sword of Islam and boodshed (rivers of shed blood of indigenous Christians).

    Agree and disagree. The Middle Beast was a roiling cauldron during the conquests of Muhammed. Was he in any way assisted or supported by the Jews? And after Mo’ Hammered came the Seljuk and Ottoman Turds, I mean Turks from he Northern Plains. And after that, relative calm until the end of the Caliphate and WWI.

    From that point. Oil was discovered in Saudi Arabia in the 1930s. But aside from European and American incursion or disruptive influence, the Middle East was split up into relatively small kingdoms under the unifying aegis of Mohammedanism. The populations were calm, ways and means in everyday life were settled and constant with a rhythm of life. Recall: In the post WWII period it was safe for Occidentals to travel through the entire Middle East from Morocco through the Levant, to Turkey, Iran, Egypt, Libya. Even movies were made in that milieu. And the 1960s hippies sang songs such as “Marrakesh Express” , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TYq9RjdYYU&list=RD0TYq9RjdYYU&start_radio=1&t=35&t=35

    The main point of it was to revere a pre-industrial civilization (Rousseau’s Wet Dream Revisited) and to score cheap hashish.

    Many travel brochures showed the Arab bazzars-“Something for you, Effendi?”. Archaeological expeditions were copious. My parents traveled through the ancient sites in Syria. (It was all safe and tranquillo, then.)

    So, stop and consider. What if we just did our commercial business and did not interfere? For Das Geld, destabilizing governments, supporting revolutionaries who promised us greater concessions instead of the present government. Iran, CIA, two governments toppled for US concessions. Vietnam, CIA assassination of Catholic Royal Family. Iraq, installed multiple governments, notably So Damn Insane, thereby obligated to make war on Iran. Shah of Iran, Jimmy Carter said get rid of him for the “Holely Man”, Khomeini, the Pope Francis so far the other side that they met at the same side opposite the sphere.

    This is my main point: Left alone, minor intra-country squabbles, coups, etc., would have gone on. Countries in the region would have their megalomaniacs doing stupid things. But it would have been LOCAL and REGIONAL, not spilling into Europe or anywhere else. Only when the “Great Powers” got involved did it turn to shit: Britain partitions India and Pakistan. Britain, the Imperial War Monger, used the Middle East as strategic outposts for its global “Empire”, egged on by the Jew Disraeli pandering to the vanity of the Sweathog Queen Victoria and the City of London.

    Like the Prime Directive of the Starship Enterprise, “Do not interfere with other cultures; do not imbue or inject your/our values, ways and means, etc, etc. Do no harm. Observe and do not effect”.

    These actions came from ideas, wrong ideas, destructive ideas. And these actions based on bad ideas and a deficit religion called Christianity, created great negative Karma. So negative, and so imbalanced that the bill is coming due. Look at it from different angles. Cities in the Old Toasterment were destroyed by God for their wickedness and disobedience of His Word and commandments.

    Therefore resolved: The Middle East would today be relatively calm and placid.

    It is erroneous to describe the Middle East’s great destructive tendencies as integral and self-generated. Do you for a nano-second not realize that every Middle East ruler or state official does not know that the Western Powers disruptive involvement is little more than the behest and service (valet and shoe shine) to its masters, Israel?

    • Replies: @Anon
  319. Hacienda: “Yet, science does the first with far more diligence and frequency than the later. … I don’t see that God’s existence, non existence, or absolute morality is much changed under either physical interpretation.”

    When considered so narrowly, perhaps not. But the point is that taken together, the theories of Darwin, Einstein, and Freud undermine the concept of reality as it had been understood up to their time. Specifically, if observation is always relative to an observer, and that observer can no longer be sure of anything, even his own origins, perceptions, and motivations, where does that leave God, and the moral code he supposedly gave man? Of course, the idea that there is no absolute truth or reality independent of human perception has been known since ancient times. But it acquired considerable prestige when the advances of science seemed to back it up. Modern moral relativism and scientific atheism owe a considerable debt to the work of these three men.

    Poupon Marx: “Western Man lost his bearings, references and markers at the time of the Enlightenment and Darwin’s Theory of Evolution…”

    I mentioned Darwin. But he came along well after the Enlightenment, and his ideas still have not found universal acceptance, especially among Christians. Yours seems a very bleak view, since the Enlightenment enabled the Industrial Revolution and the birth of technological civilization, and the latter is virtually synonymous with the West and Western man. He’s very proud of it and regards it as his most significant accomplishment. If the West were to lose that, and revert to pre-Enlightenment religious mumbo-jumbo as its explanation for everything, would that constitute getting its bearings back?

    • Replies: @Hacienda
    , @Dumbo
    , @Daniel Rich
  320. anarchyst says:

    The one reason that makes “jews” so successful is that they formulate and enact laws (civil-rights for some) that deny us whites the right to look after our own self-interest while they flout the laws that are imposed on the rest of us. THAT, my friend is a reason for their “success”.

    A good example of jewish flouting of “civil-rights” laws is the jewish community of Kiryas Joel, New York, among others. If you are not jewish, you cannot buy property there, nor can you send your non-jewish children to the (jews-only) “public” schools.

    Not only that, but most of the jews who occupy Kiryas Joel and other “jews only” communities also take advantage of “social services” and “welfare” programs out of proportion to their numbers. Almost every jew is running some kind of “scam” on the American “social welfare system”.

    You see, “multiculturalism and diversity for thee, but not for me” is the jewish mantra and is the primary way that they destroy cultures and civilizations. Their lack of morality figures heavily into their success. Jews think nothing of screwing over a “goy”; it is just “normal business” for them…

    Jews are the only group that lacks a moral component. Jews are very amoral, think nothing of screwing a “goy” out of money, possessions, or even reputation or life. You see, the jewish talmud elevates the jew above all others, “goyim” being “livestock with souls, created only to serve the jew”.

    This amorality is a critical component in jewish life and is partially responsible for jewish successes. When one does not possess a moral compass that defines and separates “right from wrong” THAT in itself gives the jew greater latitude to “get what he wants” as there are “no limits” on what a jew may do to gain the advantage in just about any situation. The lack of a moral component within jewish life is a major reason for jewish supremacy in civilized societies.

    It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”.

    This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more.

    As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, even bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.

    Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.

    At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.

    A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.

    Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew”, and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

  321. Jews are high-functioning psychopaths. Imagine a race comprised entirely of Ted Bundys, conning their way into peoples’ sympathies and then butchering them before moving onto their next victim, that’s what Jews are. “Habiru sagaz” means desert cutthroat: the ancestors of the Jews.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  322. @The Alarmist

    As @The Dark Night (=benighted?) took it from Theodor Herschel, who took it from…

  323. Hacienda says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    But the point is that taken together, the theories of Darwin, Einstein, and Freud undermine the concept of reality as it had been understood up to their time. Specifically, if observation is always relative to an observer, and that observer can no longer be sure of anything, even his own origins, perceptions, and motivations, where does that leave God, and the moral code he supposedly gave man?

    I agree that Darwin made a big difference. Einstein and Freud too. But it’s too pat. You can throw in Copernicus, Voltaire, Nietzsche, Galileo, Hume probably scores of others I’m not well read enough to mention. And the immeasurable influence of non-European cultures. And what about the ancients like- Protagoras, Herodotus. You seem to have a view of the world where there is monolithic Christian Europe and nothing else right up to D, E, F, then boom – moral relativity. Very limited. Very limited. SMH.

  324. ivan says:
    @PeterMX

    Anyone who had suffered in that era has my sympathies.

  325. ivan says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Relativistic mass increases are a mistaken interpretation of the quite mundane fact that more and more energy must be applied, with exponentially diminishing effect, as you approach the natural speed of the medium.

    An illuminating point.

  326. @AaronB

    It still leaves a huge imbalance between Arabs killed by Jews and Jews killed by Arabs. Roughly First World (or Second) against Third World. Cp. Plassey, Rorke’s Drift etc. Well, that’s one possible version.

  327. ivan says:
    @utu

    The “holy trinity” of yesteryears – Marx, Einstein, and Freud – have been cut down to human size. Freud was practicing literary criticism in the guise of psychoanalytic science. Einstein’s malarkey about shrinking lengths and dilating clocks convince only the members of his cult. Marx is no longer the prophet of the future. But nonetheless they remain considerable presences for good or ill.

  328. melpol says:

    There exists only 10 thousand super Jews and a subset of 100 thousand. All have high IQs and remarkable verbal abilities. Most leftovers are useless except for breeding purposes. It is possible that a worthless Jew can breed another Einstein because Jewish genius genes lie dormant and occasionally rise for community service. Epstein was a super Jew and was brought down because of his taste for 15 year old gals.

  329. Dumbo says:

    “Epstein was a super Jew”

    Wtf is a super jew? Epstein was trash and pretty mediocre in practically everything. Jews can only be said to be “superior” to anyone in their worship of Power. This is also the reason why there are few real artistic Jewish geniuses – many times they use their considerable talents in the arts for other purposes, so they are not always sincere and their art is more akin to propaganda.

    Let us also say that Anglos and Jews are not really enemies and that idea that “the evil Jews” replaced the “poor defenseless WASP elite” is bogus. Anglo elite and Jewish elite have been working together at least since Cromwell. They are kind of similar in their worship of Power and in their hypocrisy too.

  330. anon[366] • Disclaimer says:
    @Avery

    “Another recent example: although US helped him after the war started, Saddam invaded Iran all on his own initiative.“

    Saudi royal showed the letter from US administration to Saddam confirming US ‘s full support in case Saddam decided to attack Iran

    ( consortiumnews )

    • Replies: @Avery
  331. Dumbo says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    But the point is that taken together, the theories of Darwin, Einstein, and Freud undermine the concept of reality as it had been understood up to their time. Specifically, if observation is always relative to an observer, and that observer can no longer be sure of anything, even his own origins, perceptions, and motivations, where does that leave God, and the moral code he supposedly gave man? Of course, the idea that there is no absolute truth or reality independent of human perception has been known since ancient times. But it acquired considerable prestige when the advances of science seemed to back it up. Modern moral relativism and scientific atheism owe a considerable debt to the work of these three men.

    But they were basically wrong. Darwin’s theory explains micro-evolution but not macro-evolution – the “origin of the species” that was the object of his theory. Freud was basically writing fiction, no one takes him seriously as a scientist. Einstein, I cannot judge too much, but the comments of Intelligent Dasein above seem to me a good start. At least they make more sense to me that all the nonsense we hear about “black holes” and whatnot.

    Also, there is obviously a reality that exist independent of human perception. “Modern moral relativism” and “the idea that there is no absolute truth” are not an intellectual advancement, actually they are the opposite, a throwback to a lower form of understanding. By the way, the Ancient Greeks were already discussing all those things, so it is not really even a new thing.

  332. @renfro

    Adelson isn’t Neanderthal. He’s Ferengi.

  333. Anon[203] • Disclaimer says:
    @Justsaying

    “And on and on – the Afrikaans did not steal African lands”

    Which ‘African’ lands? Africa is a massive continent not a country and from what I’ve read South Africa was a sparsely populated area inhabited by the Koi San, before the Afrikaans and Zulus made their way over there.

    But South Africa would likely not be the place it is now had it not been for the influence of the Afrikaans.

    “Truth be told that once the “civilized” characterize the Other as savage, anything goes, including their genocide, mass murder or dispossession”

    Truth be told, things like human sacrifice, ritualistic murder of albinos and children, cannibalism, and even not having a written language (although it’s not bad, is a huge draw back to a society) are savage no quotation marks required.

    And it requires a hell of a lot of deception, censorship, and pandering for no reason to firstly get everyone to say otherwise and then brain wash the next generation into automatically believing vacuous lies.

    The truth is that savages do exist and have existed, regardless of whether people like you don’t regard human sacrifice and ritualistic killing as ‘savage’.

    And btw most parts of Africa didn’t have roads or wheeled transportation before the late 19th century, by the 1960’s, although still poor, some African people were buzzing around on scooters.

    “Roads make a crucial contribution to economic development and growth and bring important social benefits. They are of vital importance in order to make a nation grow and develop. In addition, providing access to employment, social, health and education services makes a road network crucial in fighting against poverty. Roads open up more areas and stimulate economic and social development. For those reasons, road infrastructure is the most important of all public assets”

    The importance of road maintenance
    https://www.worldhighways.com/categories/maintenance-utility/features/the-importance-of-road-maintenance/

  334. Anon[203] • Disclaimer says:
    @Justsaying

    In 2004…

    “Moeletsi Mbeki, head of the South African Institute of International Affairs, told a meeting in Durban that Africa was in a spiral of decline.

    “The average African is poorer than during the age of colonialism,” the president’s younger brother said. He accused Africa’s post-colonial rulers of neglecting development and wasting money on “enormous entourages of civil servants”.
    He contrasted this with the record of colonial governments who built the roads and cities that Africa depends on today. Mr Mbeki pointed out that China had lifted 400m people out of penury during the past 20 years while, over the same period, 90m Nigerians had fallen below the poverty line despite their country’s oil wealth.

    A UN report published in July found that Africa was the only continent where most people were poorer than they were two decades ago”

    Africans ‘better off under colonialism’
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.independent.ie/world-news/africa/africans-better-off-under-colonialism-25899046.html

  335. @Jeff Stryker

    I am white and shop preferentially in Asian stores. I don’t care what Asians think of me; I’m sure it’s not flattering, but at most I’m sure I’m pegged as “one of the good ones” as I don’t shoplift, try to haggle at the register, show up with 12 non-working (probably stolen) credit cards, etc. Things that the local blacks *and* the local whites do.

    The Koreans during the L.A. riots didn’t even shoot that many people; I was living in the area at the time and remember the TV footage and the average Korean would “heel” the shot, shooting high. But that they had guns out and weren’t just waving them but discharging them made a great impression.

    It is indeed a good observation that if a black thinks you’re racist, he’ll try to do you physical harm while an Asian or Jew won’t do a thing.

    However, in my area there are two kinds of whites: The affluent ones who *only* associate with other affluent whites, and thus, not being affluent myself, might as well all be 1000 miles away, and what can only be called “white trash” – smoking, drinking, tattooed, speaking a strange muttering patois that’s difficult to understand, and both violent and crime-prone. The places they shop are not pleasant places. Hence, I shop at Asian places where I don’t have to be anywhere near white trash, don’t have to worry about my bike being stolen or parts missing off of it when I come out with my groceries, don’t have to worry about being followed by (white) beggars asking for cigarettes, money, etc.

    I don’t give a shit that Asians would be horrified at the idea of my marrying their daughter and would rather not live next door to me. They are far more pleasant to be around than “my” people, who don’t seem to need outside forces like “da jooz” etc. to sink them, they’re doing a fine job of sinking themselves. For more on this, check out the writings of one Thomas Dalrymple on whites in a 100% white culture in England who are as “ghetto” as they come.

    To put it simply, I honestly think most whites are really no more advanced than the Goths or the Picts, have 14 children (if they can afford it and God knows out in flyover country they try) and however many survive to adulthood are kicked out in their mid-late teens to sink or swim. There is just about zero attention to education, any sense of history, any kind of long-term planning at all. “My” people are absolutely not going to do well long-term against people who have had sophisticated cultures for 1000s of years.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Twodees Partain
  336. @Intelligent Dasein

    Thank you very much for the reply! I am very pleased to read that you have the same opinion as I have come to on so many subjects. Dark energy and Dark matter have always struck me as being about as probable as phlogiston and caloric and like them fudge-factors to fill in for misunderstood or missing data. Black holes are imaginary too? I had not realized that. Hasn’t someone “photographed” one just recently? What are they really then? Are neutron stars real?

    The Big bang, the explanation for the background microwave radiation and the “expansion of the Universe” always seemed to me to be substitutes for the Creation and essentially religious in origin.

    That would be sort of like trying to break the sound barrier with an engine blowing out compressed air.

    Isn’t that what a jet engine in a supersonic plane is doing? Isn’t that what happens in a supersonic wind tunnel?

    Anent expansion of the Universe, is it possible that the speed of light in a vacuum is not constant? I ask because of the red-shift of distant stars. Could it be that something slows light down as it spreads out from its source? In a medium denser than vacuum, light travels slower than in vacuo. As space is not a perfect vacuum could it be that light is slowed down by it ? I realize this may be a silly idea, but the apparent “edge of the Universe” needs accounting for somehow.

    2oth century epicycles

    What are these? I do not understand the term. I have looked up epicycles in the Shorter Oxford, but it all seems to be about planetary orbits, which does not seem to fit the context.

    • Replies: @Anon
  337. Avery says:
    @anon

    {…confirming US ‘s full support in case Saddam decided to attack Iran}

    ….in case Saddam decided…….

    Q.E.D.

  338. Anon[930] • Disclaimer says:
    @foolisholdman

    Epicycles were corrections made to ensure the Ptolemaic system worked. We “knew” they were there because we “observed” their effects on planetary position. Hence the other guy’s analogy– epicycles stand in for something we think we know exists just because the theory says it must.

  339. RSDB says:
    @Justsaying

    I can only assume Einstein was talking about men. It’s not that uncommon to see men shirtless, especially if they are engaged in some sort of hard work, and it was probably more common in the early part of the 20th century.

    You may see a woman shirtless but she’s probably a wealthy concertgoer: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/srilanka/12070897/Sri-Lankan-president-Organisers-of-Enrique-Iglesias-should-be-whipped-as-punishment.html

    Here are two rickshaw-men in sarongs (one with and one without shirt) from a little before that era:

  340. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @alex in San Jose AKA Digital Detroit

    “However, in my area there are two kinds of whites: The affluent ones who *only* associate with other affluent whites, and thus, not being affluent myself, might as well all be 1000 miles away, and what can only be called “white trash” “

    If those are the only two kinds and you’re not the affluent kind, which kind are you?

    “who don’t seem to need outside forces like “da jooz” etc. to sink them, they’re doing a fine job of sinking themselves. For more on this, check out the writings of one Thomas Dalrymple on whites in a 100% white culture in England who are as “ghetto” as they come”

    That book was about the what Theodore Dalrymple called the underclass. Do you think that all ordinary working class people, or those that are not particularly affluent are the criminal underclass?

    ” “My” people are absolutely not going to do well long-term against people who have had sophisticated cultures for 1000s of years”

    Do you think ‘Asian’ countries didn’t have different classes as well? Who do you think built the great wall of China etc?

    • Replies: @Republic
  341. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @barr

    “Back then, Jews used to wear Arab dress to mask identity before committing terrorism because no one would believe that Arab would commit terrorism”

    My granddad on my dad’s side did national service in Palestine/Israel after WW2 and said terrorism from jewish groups was the problem in those days too…

  342. anarchyst says:
    @Staudegger

    Food for thought…

    Is it possible that the jewish practice of “male genital mutilation” has something to do with jewish mental illness?

    Jewish “male genital mutilation” is performed on the eighth day after the birth of a jewish male child.

    Not only is the foreslin removed, but the dirty jewish “mohel” then fellates the infant, transmitting whatever STDs the “mohel” possesses to the infant.

    As many venereal diseases do not manifest their destructive symptoms to well into adult life, this is probably why so many jews harbor mental illness.

    • Replies: @Anon
  343. Pheasant says:
    @Poupon Marx

    Oppenhiemer did not want Einstien to work on the atomic bomb because he thought he was a third rate scientist.

  344. @renfro

    No, this is not so.

    First of all Jews never left Palestine. During all the 2,000 years there have been functioning diaspora settlements in Jerusalem and Safed, religious schools, prominent rabbis lived there, even in Gaza. All the time.

    But the Jews couldn’t return en masse because the Talmud prohibits that. The Talmud warns to not rise “as a wall” which means political movements on this scale are forbidden. But Hasidic Jews re-interpret the laws in their own way, and Zionism began as an esoteric teaching.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  345. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @milermp1

    ” “If they believed they were the dregs of humanity that would be a sad thing to behold. ”

    Like a whole generation of Europeans these days?”

    I haven’t met those Europeans…

  346. @renfro

    Friend I don’t need to stop you, you can do whatever you want and say whatever you want and be whatever you want. I’m just reminding you that it makes you look stupid and proves your ignorance when you are accusing the Jews for something your nation is responsible just as much or more.

    From now on, your comments are going to be ignored.

  347. I believe it. Being a theoretical person, who deals in symbols and abstractions-not at all in of itself bad, but necessary in many cases. Examples are those in design or designers. Anyway, aside from pure mathematicians-whose greatest value lies in discovery and expansion of what is already known and predictability, and what possible parameters and limits may exist-Einstein never laid a finger, or spent anytime in a laboratory, as far as I know. So, it follows, that The Manhattan Project was to BUILD a machine. Einstein would have been useless.

    Later in his life at Princeton, where his significant scientific output dropped off tremendously, he admitted in an interview, that he had gotten “lazy”. I read this years ago. He called himself an mathematician and Theoretical Physicist. I believe, by that time, there was no one left that he could piggy back off to consolidate, rework, or add some frosting to a cake and crow that he had made a big “discovery”.

    And once again, I say THANK YOU to Ron Unz for maintaining the stand alone best site for exposition in the entire World.

  348. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    “Food for thought…

    Is it possible that the jewish practice of “male genital mutilation” has something to do with jewish mental illness?

    Jewish “male genital mutilation” is performed on the eighth day after the birth of a jewish male child.

    Not only is the foreslin removed, but the dirty jewish “mohel” then fellates the infant, transmitting whatever STDs the “mohel” possesses to the infant.

    As many venereal diseases do not manifest their destructive symptoms to well into adult life, this is probably why so many jews harbor mental illness “

    Although there are probably better ways of doing it these days and we find it inappropriate, I think they probably did that afterwards to try and stop the bleeding…

  349. @annamaria

    You are wrong again. The countries, defeated at war always pay contributions and are always ashamed. Look at Germany after the WW1.

    So don’t start wars, or win them if you do and if you have lost, shut up and wait until others forgive and forget. No one forced you to start a war.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @annamaria
    , @Adelaar
  350. Republic says:
    @Anon

    re: Thomas Dalrymple, that is his pen name, his real name is Anthony Daniels, which is Jewish.

    His book, Life at the bottom: The worldview that makes the underclass is an excellent
    expose of the underclass in the UK.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  351. Pheasant says:
    @Bigbeef

    And yet they survived?

    If it was so bad for them as you claim how come Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews had more success in Europe than Mizrahi Jews did in the Arab world?

    How come they are still here at all in fact?

    Many smaller minorities not tolerated by the European majority are no longer around to Whine and complain e.g the Cathars etc.

    What you have provided is not history it is just a martyrology and a self serving one at that.

    Jews are in Europe because they want to parasitise the European peoples period.

    As Luther said we did not fetch them from Jerusalem.

  352. anon[335] • Disclaimer says:

    New citizenship in hand, Israelis vote from abroad in Portuguese elections
    Thousands of recently naturalized Jews of Sephardic descent were able to cast absentee ballots ahead of Sunday’s parliamentary poll — even if they had never lived in Portugal

    Times of Israel

    Israel denies voting rights to people under its occupation who have been living there all their lives and never left for anywhere .
    Here somebody who has no connection – religious or cultural or personal and never has lived there is given citizenship and voting right !!!! WTF ?

    May be the writing is in the wall – Syria Hizbulla and Iran will hunt the usurpers down . They thieves are looking for escape route .
    What kind of Europe will it be ? 19-20 the century ? Type ?
    The Jews will restart the fights among newly divided Europe
    along religious cultural language divisions to remain

    as decider and claim to be the sage intelligent disinterested
    humanist .

  353. Pheasant says:
    @Republic

    Marred by the fact that (Dr) Daniels is (conveniently) race blind and pretends that black and mixed race people are part of the white underclass.

    His actual pen name is Theodore Dalrymple which he borrowed from the upper class historian William Dalrymple. He has also written under other pen names such as Edward Theberton.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  354. Pheasant says:
    @The Dark Night

    Jews emigrate to the west in vast numbers from Israel anyway. Massive brain drain.

    They had to pass laws in Germany to make Russian Jews go to Israel instead of Berlin after the fall of the wall.

  355. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:

    “This is my main point: Left alone, minor intra-country squabbles, coups, etc., would have gone on. Countries in the region would have their megalomaniacs doing stupid things. But it would have been LOCAL and REGIONAL, not spilling into Europe or anywhere else. Only when the “Great Powers” got involved did it turn to shit: Britain partitions India and Pakistan. Britain, the Imperial War Monger, used the Middle East as strategic outposts for its global “Empire”, egged on by the Jew Disraeli pandering to the vanity of the Sweathog Queen Victoria and the City of London”

    [MORE]

    “For me, whether the Raj was good or bad is not as important as whether it was better than what went before it. Of course it was. The British didn’t come to conquer India; it was a creeping takeover facilitated and encouraged by Indians. Gujarat was relieved when the British finally protected them from the excesses of the Marathas (who still squat on Baroda) and the incompetence of the Mughal rump. It was the Oswal Jains who financed and executed Robert Clive’s win at Plassey. They did so because the Mughal governors there were in power but incapable of leading them, even if they were not foreign…

    …All Indians should be forced to read Sir Jadunath Sarkar’s four-volume history of the century between Aurangzeb’s death and the final defeat of the Marathas. Mother India was weeping and wounded when she went into the arms of Victoria”

    “the british brought end to the muslim rule – was a great gift. british looted but muslims destroyed. british built universities, the biggest railway system. muslim burned books but the british built the libraries to save the books. muslims destroyed indian art but the british built museums to house the treasures. more than anything else, the british were the first to rule india as one in spite of the facts there were more than 500 states and principalities. that was the first time in history a power ruled all of india, that also for 200 years”

    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/aakarvani/dear-shashi-tharoor-the-fault-was-not-in-the-raj-but-in-ourselves/

    “India’s first post-independence census showed the population to be 80 per cent illiterate, with a typical life expectancy not exceeding 40.

    But these bleak facts should not obscure the fact that British rule in India was a joint effort, impossible without the widespread co- operation of Indians themselves.

    Despite the country’s vast population (apparently about 255 million in 1881 and about 390 million in 1947), there were never more than 70,000 British troops in India; the running of the country required an enormous infrastructure of native troops, police and bureaucrats. As Hitler observed, Indians merely had to spit all at once and every Briton in India would have drowned.

    Indians assisted with Empire because it brought them unprecedented order and civility. Indians were no strangers to outside rulers; for eight centuries before the Raj, the sub-continent had been subjected to the plunder and depravity of the Mughals – Muslim rulers who came from as far west as Turkey.

    Delhi was razed eight times in that period and great pyramids were constructed with the skulls of its inhabitants.

    Because Islam permits the enslavement of non-Muslims, Indians were sold across the Islamic world in such quantities that the international price of slaves collapsed.

    The Afghan mountain range of the Hindu Khush (which translates as the ‘Hindu Slaughter’) is named after the huge numbers who died there while being marched to the markets of Arabia and Central Asia.

    For all the artistic refinement and opulence of India’s past rulers – and their poetry, music, and the magnificence of the Taj Mahal are testament to that – they oversaw a period of general barbarism in which the ordinary Indian was no more than a starving chattel.

    The rebellions which eventually arose against the Mughals – such as the Sikhs in Punjab and the Marathas in the south – fractured the rulers’ power, and enabled the British to get their own foot in the door”

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1298569/amp/Britain-need-make-apology-India-Empire-.html

    “British rule from the time after the mutiny is often called the Raj. During this period a tiny number of British officials and troops (about 20,000 in all) ruled over 300 million Indians. This was often seen as evidence that most Indians accepted and even approved of British rule. There is no doubt that Britain could not have controlled India without the co-operation of Indian princes and local leaders, as well as huge numbers of Indian troops, police officers, civil servants etc”

    CASE STUDY 4 BACKGROUND: LIVING IN THE BRITISH EMPIRE: INDIA
    http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/empire/g2/cs4/background.htm

  356. Pheasant says:
    @Hide Behind

    ‘There are Jews in Ireland, probably more than real Irish, but there are many Jews, religious and half Semitic bloods that do not advertize and are doing quite well in all aspects of life.’

    Tell me more.

  357. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @Poupon Marx

    [A series of extremely long off-topic quotes is bad behavior and may get all your future comments trashed.]

  358. tac says:

    Trumpstein does not care about the people–especially the deplorables. One man did, one of the greatest leaders of the 20th century–one that has been demonized like none other! This man–unlike ANY politician since dared to put the interests of his people ahead of anything else. Whether you agree or disagree, have an open mind to revisit this case; perhaps you will now see what you missed previously.

    Perhaps the monetary answer to the banksters’ usury has been tried before. And because it was so successful the banksters declared war on this simple yet principled system of monetary discipline and demonized its leader–unlike any other person before and since (specifically so this system would not catch on and put the banksters out of usurious money-lending practices).

    What if most of everything we were told–especially about history–was an outright lie, fabrication, “enhancement”, distortion or embellishment? What if you could investigate for yourselves and confirm this fable was organized? If so, then it must be by way of reason to have been intentional! We are not talking about pieces here or there, but wholesale chunks inverted and presented by corrupt “officials” as sacrosanct history based on “research”. No, ladies and gentlemen, these are no more than propaganda talking points made to keep you in your place: devoid of the truth, distracted from an en-devour thereof, or coerced into silence or taken out if all else failed.

    The awakening is here and now in our lifetimes; what remains is our effort to commit …. time for a reprogramming course indeed ….

    Hitler, more than an other politician since then, cared more about his people than imaginable. For example, he used non-inflationary government created and issued Labor Treasury Certificates to fund Germany from the poorest country in Europe to the richest in five years. This made the bankers (Judea) declare on Germany. This simple approach to money (money is not an intrinsic value rather it is a “measure” of value much like a measuring cup that measures commodities like sugar, flour, grain, etc.) could have caught on in the rest of Europe and throughout the world putting the end to the banksters and their usury.

    “Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/how-hitler-defied-the-bankers/

    If you have ever dared or not to watch a video, please make an concerted effort to watch this one (just about six minutes long but one that needs views and redistribution like none other) and one that may hold the most retained value from its consumption:

    Adolf Hitler – The Man who fought the Bank:


    extended version of this video here:

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/pWue3IPIuCwt/

  359. Jay Fink says:
    @Tony Ryals

    I am 100% Ashkenazi. My maternal haplogroup is H which is one of the most common in Europe. My paternal haplogroup is E-M34 which is definitely not white, I believe it originates in the Levant. If anyone is knowledgeable about genetics I would appreciate more insight on E-M34. I uploaded my raw DNA to a site that told me my genetic distance is very close to Italy, Southern Italy in particular.

    So (like most Jews) I am genetically half white and the white side originates in Southern Italy. I should have dark skin and eyes. Yet I have light features and blue eyes. My grandparents immigrated from what is now known as Ukraine. If I was to travel to Ukraine I think I would physically blend in with everyone even if I have no Eastern European DNA. If I was to travel to Sicily or to the lands my fathers lineage came from (Syria?) I would definitely not blend in physically and would be immediately pegged as a tourist. This had puzzled me but your post explains it pretty well.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Tony Ryals
  360. @Jay Fink

    Southern Italy and Sicily are different countries.

    Mainland Italians don’t have any Arab blood. Maltese have more Arab blood than Italian. Sicily has an Arabic admixture but not to the same degree as Malta.

    Blonde blue eyed mainland Southern Italians are common. They become more rare in Sicily and more rare still in Malta.

    Also, virtually all Ashkenazi Jews possess smaller degrees of DNA. I’ve read it is about 10%.

  361. @Colin Wright

    My first point is simple, the jooooz did not purchase the land from its legal owners, the jooooz purchased fraudulent title deeds to that land, therefore their claim of ownership is null and void [ by Uti Possidetis according to ancient Roman principle, a valid principle in all times and places]. My second point is that “Mandatory Palestine”(sic), is also a fraud. The only legal mandatory entity is The Mandate Of Syria [by Uti Possidetis Juris]. Mandate Of Syria was illegally severed into a French zone and an United Kingdom zone. The English then illegally severed their zone into Palestine and TransJordan, the French illegally severed theirs into up to five sub-mandates at various times, ending with two: Lebanon and Syria, plus the French illegally severed Historical Syria’s Hatay Province and gifted it to Turkey. Therefore there was no legal entity called ” Mandatory Palestine”(sic). Occam’s Razor would say that this over complicated, byzantine, monkey business had but two goals: politically fraction Historical Syria to neutralize any attempt at self determination, and create an illegal political entity (Palestine) to be handed over, gratis, to the jooooz. The zionist freak show is shot through from top to bottom by fraud and lies, like their putrid “torah”.

  362. AaronB says:
    @Poupon Marx

    Western Man lost his bearings, references and markers at the time of the Enlightenment and Darwin’s Theory of Evolution-

    Very intelligent and wise remark. Bravo.

    • Replies: @Art
  363. AaronB says:
    @Anonymous

    The fundamental Jewish problem is not that they are racist or discriminatory (because many people are guilty of that). The Jewish problem is duplicity, dissimulation and operating by double-standards for tribal gain, viz, “One rule for thee, another for me.” Who does this besides sociopaths/psychopaths

    This is incorrect. Traditional Judaism believes other nations are legitimate and should exist, and that other religions can be appropriate to other peoples. It is Christianity and Islam that seeks to assimilate everyone, and even Buddhism believes only it is truly effective and legitimate.

    It is the Enlightenment that is hostile to nationalism and peoplehood, and that is the creation of Europe.

    Asian culture is famous for practicing dissimulation, duplicity, and double-standards towards foreigners. This has been remarked upon since the moment Europeans came into contact with Asians.

    Of course, in the past, Europeans acted no different towards foreigners. Spanish duplicity towards the trusting Aztecs and Incas was trruly pitiful and tragic, and the duplicity of Clive in India also had great pathos. It seems sadly to be a universal human trait.

    What I am getting from you, as from Linh Dinh, is a case of competing nationalism towards Jews, and no principled arguments based on values.

    And once again the Law of Projection is at play – you and Dinh celebrate your own nationalism, but seek to portray Jewish nationalism as uniquely illegitimate and bad. Jews, of course, have no problem with Vietnamese nationalism.

    You remind me of Colin Wright celebrating Arab nationalism but being obsessed with suppressing Jewish nationalism.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @PorkTastic
  364. anon[409] • Disclaimer says:

    “Witness in Amber Guyger murder case found shot dead in Dallas
    Police seek motive in the killing of Joshua Brown, who testified against a white police officer who murdered her black neighbor, Botham Jean”
    Guardian ( UK )

    From UK to CNN and MSNBC , justifiably coverage is seen and the motive is insinuated .
    Where is the same level of enquiry and insinuation to the
    death of Epstein?

  365. Jay Fink says:
    @melpol

    I am just one individual but I noticed my tastes in women are different than most guys. I am attracted to women who are heavily polished and sexy looking. I like to see women wear a lot of makeup, have long sexy nails, tight clothing, high heels etc. I am not a fan of the comfort/frumpy trend. Yet most guys I talk to prefer the opposite, a humble girl next door type. What they desire is underwhelming to me. Not sure if this has anything to do with me being Jewish or not.

  366. Anonymous[853] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pheasant

    “Marred by the fact that (Dr) Daniels is (conveniently) race blind and pretends that black and mixed race people are part of the white underclass.

    His actual pen name is Theodore Dalrymple which he borrowed from the upper class historian William Dalrymple”

    I read that book a few years ago, I don’t doubt he encountered these characters as a prison doctor and psychiatrist and I didn’t feel any reason to suspect that most of the people he was talking about weren’t white…

  367. annamaria says:
    @The Dark Night

    “So don’t start wars, or win them if you do and if you have lost, shut up and wait until others forgive and forget. No one forced you to start a war.”
    — The Jewish State has been in a state of permanent war for decades because Israelis are ever hungry for lebensraum. This is why your holobiz museums are an abomination.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  368. annamaria says:
    @The Dark Night

    One more time in response to your moralizing:
    All nations have their dark pages, but only one tribe made a profitable business out of pretending on superior morality and incomparable victimhood. This tribe is known for its lack of shame.
    Close already your holobiz museums — they smell too much of the self-proclaimed Jewish terrorists (see Nakba), the thuggish ADL (founded to protect a pedophile rapist and murderer), and your new friends of Israel in Ukraine (the Banderites).

    “Is Israel trying to hide arms exports to neo-Nazi militias in Ukraine?” https://972mag.com/israel-arms-exports-neo-nazis-ukraine/141942/

  369. Dumbo: “But [Darwin, Einstein, and Freud] were basically wrong.”

    As Thomas Kuhn points out in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, all scientific theories have problems. But the point is that even if in some ways wrong, the theories put forward by these three men changed the worldview of Western man. Being wrong doesn’t make that impossible. Look at Christianity, which dominated Western man’s conception of the universe previously. It, too, is wrong. Yet its influence was profound.

    Dumbo: “By the way, the Ancient Greeks were already discussing all those things, so it is not really even a new thing.”

    The ancient Greeks had no ideas similar to Darwin’s theory of evolution, and it’s too bad they didn’t. If there had been a Darwin among them, the history of racism would have been quite different, and it’s likely the white race would be better off today. Similarly, the ancients had no concept of “the unconscious”, which will probably be seen as Freud’s lasting contribution to psychology. He was first to apply it to the human mind in a scientific way, and popularized it. The central idea here, that there is an awareness in man that is separate from his conscious awareness, was quite unknown to the ancients. Far from being disproved, cognitive psychology has experimentally confirmed the existence such processes. Einstein’s theories, of course, were also quite beyond them.

    It was only on account of the prestige of science that the relativism intrinsic to these men’s theories was able to make headway against the static Christian conception of the universe that preceded it. Without the successes of science that gave it that prestige, nobody would have taken them seriously. Nowadays people generally have adopted a scientific view of reality instead of a religious one only because science has been more successful than prayer in getting results. This has changed Western culture, and caused great weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth in certain quarters, as we can see from some of the comments on this thread.

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
    , @Dumbo
  370. Tony Ryals says: • Website
    @Jay Fink

    Whatever ‘100% Ashkenazi’ is basically you’re another white guy as far as I’m concerned. You may have certain facial features that that might lead me to think maybe you are a Euro Jew by ancestry but I’ve seen German Jews that look perfectly German or Polish or Scandanavian or Russian who I would never guess were Jewish unless they told me.I still don’t think Stryker knows what he’s talking about.He criticizes me for pointing out one of the most outstanding features of Euro Jews being white skin and often non black hair because this feature dates too far back,(a few thousand years),for him to take into consideration.Of course he himself started refering to ‘Ashkenazi’ that he claims were in Italy even before Yiddish speaking Askenazi even exist !

    And yet the joke is that those blonde or red headed women who he fantasises being bred with his dark skinned black haired ‘Jewish’ daddy figures were already white skinned and blonde from or their ancestors were from Vitamin D deficiency long before their ancestors migrated south again into what we now call Italy.And Stryker seems to think it was more importantthat the Semitic males he favors in his pornographic fantasy who seduced these mythological blonde bimbos were Hebrew or more likely Aramaic speaking Jewish Semites rather than Arabic speaking ones who he no doubt perceives as inferior.So in his fantasy it all occured inland so those evil dumb Arabs didn’t enter into his genetic stew.Hee.

    But of course because black hair is a dominant gene charateristic all these blonde bimbos who will learn to become good Jewish mommies will all reproduce black haired children.And it s true the Arabs only enter Italy after Islam comes into existentance after the 7th century.Anyway while the blonde bimbos who became good Jewish mothers did become blonde and white due to Vitamin D deficiency of their ancestors only a few short thousands of years ago since the last ice age it didn’t occur in Italy but it did occur LONG before there were Hebrew with doctors.Hee Hee.And if you’re white you’re part of that agrarian or aryan history.In fact although it was never reflected in Asian hair color which remained black nor in eye color,I believe Northern Asian agrarians such a Chineses and Japanese also tend to have a bit paler complexions than their agrartian counterparts in South East Asia.Lin Dinh may have an opinion about this. Asian have more carotein like Vitamin A precurser in their skin fat cells which is what gives them a slight yellowish pigmentation whether light complected or not.
    However regarding your real ‘jewishness’ or Strykers – that is all in the mind or brain – not the genes – and is learned or relearned with each new generation and programed by mommy and daddy or rabbi etc. into what I call your ‘psychomolecular code’.This requires that your neurons make unique proteins for memory as you learn to speak Yiddish or German or English or Spanish or Hebrew,etc.Precisely the same as imprinting in baby chickens as they ‘learn’ through visual imprinting to recognize their chicken mother.

    Proteins are formed in the neuronjs as the learning occurs.This in my opinion is why the brain is in part protected from our bodies immune system.Otherwise as we were learning to speak a language or learning to be Christian or Jewish or Moslem or Hindu proteins being formed are so divergent from the genetically hard wired proteins mormally produced by all our other cells that our immune system would actually attack our own thoughts or language or religion as foreign proteins !
    This is why the womb has a barrier to protect a fetus from its mother’s immune system so it doesn’t attack the fetus and its proteins as foreign invading cells attacking the mother.So the brain is like the womb of the mind.
    So your Judaism has nothing to do with your genes.If given a few Japanes teachers and nannies and babies from any place in the world I could easily teach them that they were Jewish in fluent Japanese and convince them that Japanese was Hebrew and that they were the ‘chosen people’ or chosen ‘Semites’ as the case may be.Ha.

    https://tostaduriaantigua.blogspot.com/2018/07/ode-to-psychomolecular-code-by-tony.html

    But there’s still the question of religion,
    Which is also probably located in the psychomolecular region,
    We have Aryans who call themselves Jews just for politics,
    And Asians who are no longer Buddhist but Catholics,
    We have Christians of every extraction,
    Thanks mainly to Guttenbergís printing press contraption
    If Aryans can be Jews,
    I guess what this proves,
    Is that the genes don’t program religion,
    If the human brain codes do not become more synchronous with the needs of the gene codes that makes them,
    Their very own brain codes may very well bake them,
    Herein I end my ode to the psychomolecular code,

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  371. Jay Fink says:

    If my Judiasm has nothing to do with my genes (which you make a good case for) how do genetic testing services pick up on it?

  372. utu says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “Relativity theories are poison to the old, static notion of reality.”

    “Certainly Einstein’s relativity theories […] have had profound cultural consequences.”

    “After Einstein, Western man was forced to regard with suspicion not only his own motives and origins, and not even just the absolute character of the moral order that he had been taught to believe came from the transcendent source called God.”

    There is nothing relative in the theory of relativity. The “relativity” in the name of the theory is a misnomer as understood in the pop-culture by ignoramuses like yourself. Actually the theory of relativity reinforces the absolute nature of laws of physics. The principle of relativity was known to Galileo who saw that laws of motions and mechanics are the same regardless of the reference frame in uniform motion. You can play tennis on a sailing ship and there will be no difference in the behavior of the tennis ball.

    Poincare in 1904 formulated relativity principle as follows:

    “The principle of relativity, according to which the laws of physical phenomena should be the same, whether for an observer fixed, or for an observer carried along in a uniform movement of translation; so that we have not and could not have any means of discerning whether or not we are carried along in such a motion.”

    And Einstein restated the same in 1905:

    “The laws of physics take the same form in all inertial frames of reference.”

    What Lorentz, Poincare and the Einstein realized that to maintain this principle the laws of electromagnetism (Maxwell equations) the bilinear transformation between coordinates of time and space must be different than in Galileo system and thus Lorentz transforms were arrived at. And this had a profound consequence that laws of mechanics had to be changed as Newton’s 2nd law was not invariant with respect of Lorentz transforms, meaning that Newton was slightly off while Maxwell was right.

    Try to remember for the future that the Theory of Relativity (STR) restates the fact that the Laws of Physics are ABSOLUTE, i.e., they do not change in inertial systems. They are NOT RELATIVE! The principle of relativity might be looked at as a test whether a particular generalization qualifies as being a law of physics.

    Your self-serving drivel to justify your atheism does not follow form Einstein or Darwin or Freud, though Dr. Freud perhaps could help you understand where form such limiting and absolutists Weltanschauung as atheism could find a place in your heart, providing you have one.

  373. @The Dark Night

    ‘…First of all Jews never left Palestine…”

    Indeed. It would appear that in the eighth and ninth century, the overwhelming majority of Jews there converted to Islam.

    Today, they are known as ‘Palestinians.’

  374. Anonymous[213] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    When I talk about dissimulation and double-standards, I don’t mean that a people should treat foreigners the way it treats its own. But that however it views foreigners, it reserves foreigners the same right in their countries to act the same.

    For example, the Vietnamese may acknowledge that foreigners are treated as 2nd class citizens in its country. But the Vietnamese will also expect to be treated as 2nd class when he visits a foreign country.

    Unlike the Jew, he doesn’t complain about unfair treatment while he does the same. This is the duplicity and double-standard of the Jew. “One rule for thee, another for me.”

    Different rules for in-groups and out-groups are not always a bad thing. Many time, they are good and benign. Families should treat each other differently than non-family, for instance.

    But the Jew whines that he should be treated like a member of the family though he fails to extend the same courtesy to others. This is the double-standard and dissimulation. They lie and mislead about what they believe and do. “One rule for thee, another for me.”

    American, French and German . . . “We are that!,” they proclaim. And deserve to be views/treated as such with no distinction. But then they turn around and secretly conspire as a subgroup. “One rule for thee, another for me.”

    And when people notice, they cry, “anti-Semitism!” Nothing to see here. They try to gaslight us. Or defend Jewish tribalism under some benign pretext. Or it’s not tribalism at all. They’re just smarter.

    Christianity/Islam are proselytizing religions, but while they are dualistic in view, it’s one standard for all humanity. Everyone is condemned by the same rules and saved by the same rules. Judaism is dualistic in view but has multiple rules for humanity. “One rule for thee, another for me.”

    Buddhism is not even in the same category. Legitimate? “Nothing legitimate”, the buddhist says. True and effective? “Nothing true, nothing effective.”

    Jewish nationalism is fantastic. But do it in your own country. Don’t be a Jewish nationalist while holding an American passport assuming the guise of an American. Worse, don’t pretend you’re not a Jewish nationalist. Stop lying.

  375. Anonymous[213] • Disclaimer says:
    @Poupon Marx

    Christianity is a Jewish invention

    Isn’t the Jew himself a latter invention? Wasn’t Rabbinic Judaism formulized post-Christianity?

    The Jew is to the Talmud as the Christian is to the New Testament. Both share the Torah in common, as do the Muslim.

    So the “Jew” gave Europe nothing. Religiously, they just share a common ancestry.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  376. @AaronB

    ‘…Political problems come and go. But spiritual problems are forever. I would love to hear your ideas not on the political problem of Jews, but on the Romantic critique of Western man – the disenchantment of the West.’

    You’ve been looking at too many Pre-Raphaelite paintings or something. One problem here (among several) is that your whole argument presupposes that there was in fact some sort of golden age where men lived spiritually satisfying lives, etc — then the fierce bad enlightenment came along and ruined it all.

    I don’t think so. I don’t think you do either. You’re advancing all this crap for some convoluted reason of your own — but I know it’s crap, and I think you do as well.

  377. utu: “There is nothing relative in the theory of relativity. The “relativity” in the name of the theory is a misnomer as understood in the pop-culture by ignoramuses like yourself. ”

    Unfortunately, I can’t return the insult, for to call someone who thinks that Einstein’s theories have had no impact on popular culture an ignoramus would be a grave overestimation of your abilities. To prattle on about the same without realizing it’s called “relativity theory” for a reason boggles the mind.

    utu: “Your self-serving drivel to justify your atheism does not follow form Einstein or Darwin or Freud, though Dr. Freud perhaps could help you understand where form such limiting and absolutists Weltanschauung as atheism could find a place in your heart, providing you have one.”

    You’re a very silly person. It does not surprise me therefore that you rush to defend God’s honor. But it does make me laugh.

  378. @AaronB

    How do you reason the (primarily) Jewish desire to flood the west with non whites? Or to use American blood and treasure to fight wars on behalf of Isreal?

    Remember these jews are putative citizens of the host countries not of Israel but their actions seem motivated by their undying live for Israel and what seems like hatred for the native populace ( which is why they seem to facilitate easy immigration laws to allow ever more third worlders to move in, be it legal or illegal)

    Does this count as “Jewish nationalism” to you? Or is it classic Jewish parasitism on display here?

  379. DarkEyes says:

    Einstein must be very confused and tired when talking about Chinese women.

    To be clear, Chinese women are erotique and sexy women.

    • Replies: @Ivan
  380. Miggle says:
    @The Dark Night

    The Jews took Palestine from the Brits who took it from the Turks, the Turks took it from the Arabs who took it from the Romans, and the Romans took it from the Jews. The homerland of the Arabs is Arabia and not Palestine.

    Total, malignant fiction. There is no Jewish history. When Rome gave the Jews of her Empire autonomy about AD 200, giving the rabbis the power of life and death over all Jews in the Roman Empire, the Jewish dark age followed, lasting centuries. During that time Hellenistic Judaism, which for centuries had reached from the Atlantic to Persia, when Persia extended as far as the Indus Valley, disappeared. Six million killed? We don’t know. All records destroyed by the Jews. But there is archeological evidence of destruction of synagogues, and scattered inscription fragments.

    Hellenistic Judaism was then over four centuries old, but Rabbinical Talmudism was only about one century old and the Jewish lobby, the Rabbinate, had been in an organized battle for that autonomy. What was fatal for Hellenistic Judaism was that it was not Talmudic.

    Meanwhile, there is history. Rome took over Palestine, yes, but not from the Jews. The Jews stayed. There is no record of Jewish expulsion from Palestine after AD 69-70. None from Jewish sources, though the Jews never hide that fact of their persecution, instead massively exaggerate any such event and no doubt invent. They were never expelled. There were already large numbers of Jews in Europe after centuries of proselytizing.

    There was a Muslim conquest of Palestine which did not bring demographic change, but over the next three or so centuries most of the Hebrews converted to Islam because they thought Islam was virtually the same as Judaism, and thought the added mountain of legalisms coming out of Babylon was not. They wanted it simple. They stuck to real Judaism by becoming Muslims, and, like the Arameans after the Muslim conquest of Syria, began to call themselves Arabs. That is history.

    Notice that Arab no longer meant Arabian. They were all Semites, virtually or wholly indistinguishable. There was no flood of Arabians into Syria or Palestine. A few were allowed to move out of Arabia, but they preferred to go to Damascus because it was the capital of the caliphate.

    So the homeland of the Palestinian Arabs, so-called Arabs, is Palestine, not Arabia, and you are talking malignant nonsense. Your own “homerland” is Europe.

    Further. That autonomy that Rome gave to get the pestilential Jews out of her hair was like the autonomy under Ezra and Nehemiah given by the Persians, no doubt for the same reason, yet we have the fiction of Esther about the Persians.

    And that autonomy was given to them by most European kingdoms until about the end of the 18th century. Then the bungle of enfranchisement came, and the rabbis hated it because they lost all their power. Jews have expressed hatred of the Enlightenment. And so we are left with the pestilence. And we have learned from their conduct since 1947, from their frightful treatment of the Palestinians, the real Jews, how intrinsically and deeply evil the Talmudic Jews are.

    Thanks to Israel, the world is waking up to that.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  381. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Quote: “…Specifically, if observation is always relative to an observer, and that observer can no longer be sure of anything, even his own origins, perceptions, and motivations…”

    Reply: OK. That explains Jewish neurotics. What fuels the shameless, murderous, land stealing bit?

  382. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Quote: “It was only on account of the prestige of science that the relativism intrinsic to these men’s theories was able to make headway against the static Christian conception of the universe that preceded it.”

    Reply: I’m not going to single out Christianity as the sole culprit, but [very much] in general religions have functioned as giant anchors, pinning much dire needed progress to the walls of darkened torture chambers, for far too long.

    However, who can trust science when it proclaims cigarettes are harmless, D.U. only makes you stronger and the Boeing MAX 737 is safe to fly?

    It means certain segments of said science cultures are as flawed as some of their theories.

    One might argue progress is only made when there’s a willingness to think differently, a courage to express thoughts rubbing everyone the wrong way and a society that knows how to deal with diversity of thought/s, without minorities strangling majorities in PC webs of gobbledygook.

    The universe seems to tend to prefer some sort of balance that keeps most elements within it, in place. Once elements begin to fly their own course, chaos ensues. Although, over time, a new balance will arise. And on and on and on. Mankind travels along a similar path, and historically proved to have done so, for as long as it stood properly upright.

    The question is: when will we learn?

  383. @Anonymous

    What you ask does not matter. It is immaterial because it does not move matter, change minds, or motivate people. What is important is what people believe at this moment, and what and how and how much it determines their behavior or inhibition. Understand? Does it matter if millions of cucked and suckered Christians are led blind to their slaughter on doctrinal sequence or arcane theological points?

    I hope you do well in future debates in the basement of your local run-down church with your “study group”.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  384. Dumbo says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Nowadays people generally have adopted a scientific view of reality instead of a religious one only because science has been more successful than prayer in getting results. This has changed Western culture

    I think you’re kinda late to the party. The age when people thought “God was dead” and “Science has all the answers” was the end of the 19th Century.

    You’d be amazed to find out how little scientists really know about a lot of things in the universe. (That when we’re not being lied to, “because Science”), and how unscientific our own age really is, as of course most people know even less about science than scientists and just accept what they’re being told without questioning it.

    P.S. I’m not negating scientific progress, or should we say the progress of knowledge and technology, as science is just a method. I’m not even saying that it is not a more “objective” view of things. But what it can answer about the world is limited, for several reasons.

    P.S.2. As for Freud, his major influence was mostly in literature and art, particularly in Surrealism, not in science. His only innovation was to give a name (“unconscious”) to something everyone already knew existed, even if they explained it in a different way (not that Freud theories about dreams for instance made any real sense – the Greek ones about gates of horn and ivory were saner.)

  385. HB says:
    @Patricus

    If Einstein was gifted in theoretical physics why is his full correspondence with his wife Mileva still in “bunker” and away from public eye and scrutiny.
    His wife was a second woman to finish a full program at Department of Mathematics and Physics at Zurich Polytechnic.

  386. Daniel Rich: “What fuels the shameless, murderous, land stealing bit?”

    Life is war, and hate powers the world.

  387. @AaronB

    Ridiculous.

    If you read Kipling, or Wilberforce, or Pitt, or Gladstone, or Kant, or Bismarck, or Ecclestone, or even any economist including and since Adam Smith and even Disraeli, a Jew, the trope was not the ‘crude European’ but the virtuous industrious European versus the effete orientals.

    Marx might have had a word to say about ‘crude’ Europeans – but that was coming from the crudest of Jews, as always, projecting his own vices on those around him whom he resented.

    You prove every single word of one of Mein Kampf’s most famous passages. Here you squat, like a Toad, with the apparent memory of a goldfish. The Jewish cause of the west decline has been proven to you again, and again, and again. But it all washes off you like water from a raincoat.

    You have been provided sundry and endless proofs.

    Your attempt to attribute current western decline to ineffable and abstract aspects of the ‘Enlightenment’ and now I see ‘Romanticism’ (a new ploy) is pathetic.

    It is Jewish academics and Jewish College administrators and Jewish Educationalists who now prevent even the true understanding of both the Enlightenment and Romanticism – because they are buried under Jewish cultural marxism. How can any element of the West survive the Jewish culture of critique?

    It’s ridiculous. It is Jewish individuals with names, and addresses and places of employment and affiliations to various NGO’s who are flooding the West with invaders, destroying all western institutions, executing the complete destruction of the Western heritage – Christian, Greco-Roman and European peoples.

    You lie so fluently. It’s quite amazing.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  388. @AaronB

    The Romantic reaction of say, the Pre-Raphaelites was a reaction to fundamentally Jewish political economy. The whole line of Victorian Utopian political economists were reacting against, for example, the Jewish intermingled nobility seeking to prevent the removal of the Corn Laws. Peel lost office for repealing the Corn laws.

    That’s what infuriates me perhaps more then anything else. The depradations and rapaciousness of the East India Companies and the Foreign War Offices and the colonial offices were those of Jews.

    It was, as always, Jewish monies that funded the entire colonial enterprise. The Raj would have been impossible without the Jewish bankers and the Jewish currency issuers who funded it.

    Yet it is white countries who must apparently pay their historical weregild by being eradicated for the pleasure and preference of Jews who espouse neo-babelism.

    It was the Sassoons who flooded China with Opium. Who fomented the Boxer rebellion.

    It was Charles Trevelyan, a brilliant man, who resided over the Irish famine. And he was descended from an Otto – he was crypto-Jewish.

    • Replies: @MAOWASAYALI
  389. @AaronB

    You lie.

    What is the genetic test for Christianity?

    Is there a genetic test for Judaism?

  390. @AaronB

    Why did Ben Shapiro, a famous Israel Firster from a famous Jewish Slytherin line, boast that he was ‘100% pure’ if cultural Judaism is of more import then genetic Judaism.

    Why is there a genetic test for Judaism? Is there a genetic test for other religions?

  391. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @Poupon Marx

    “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

    Why cede the past to the Jew? We let them control the narrative and then we’re suprised that they control our minds and hearts?

    I don’t think these are arcane points. They have far ranging ramifications.

    Without Christian and evangelical support, AIPAC and Israel could not be as poisonous as they are.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  392. @Tony Ryals

    Yiddish came into existence after the Jews entered the Rhine Valley following the fall of Rome.

    The founding diaspora of Jews migrated to Rome, intermarried with local Italian women and created the Ashkenazi long long before migrating North after Rome was sacked into the Rhineland where Yiddish emerged as a German language.

    • Replies: @Tony Ryals
  393. @AaronB

    https://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html

    Quantum Physics does the opposite of produce ‘spiritual implications’.

    The latest epicycles to Quantum Physics takes us all the way back to the Pre-Socratics like Parmenides and posits that the universe has always existed.

    That precludes God because it posits a perpetual universe without a creator or a creation.

    As always, the truth is the opposite of what you say. Quantum Physics is attempting to excise from the universe ‘spiritual implications’.

    This ‘Quantum Physics’ model purports to account for the massive amounts of ‘Dark matter’ in the universe.

    https://www.nature.com/news/no-sign-of-dark-matter-in-underground-experiment-1.14057

    Except no trace of it can be found – and it’s supposedly 85% of the universe. Yet we can find no trace. Why?

    And dark matter is supposedly a key element of relativity within the discipline of modern astronomy – but there is no sign that it exists. Maybe we just can’t detect it yet. Or maybe it doesn’t exist.

    How many grants and how much money has been spent on ‘Dark matter’. Something that can’t apparently be emprically proven to exist?

    Of course Jews aggrandise relativity. It is a source of massive funding without the need for any results beyond endless fake and unverifiable models – like the climate change scam.

    But more importantly relativity is extrapolated from physics into metaphysics and epistemology and the claim is made that there is no such thing as objective truth.

    “It is true that there is no such thing as objective truth”.

    Again you lie. You are a gormless fool.

    “Popular culture has not yet caught up with the spiritual implications of cutting edge science, and remain a stuck in the mechanistic Newtonian universe which spells to religion.”

    Popular culture is absolutely saturated and infested with relativity from the highest level to the lowest.

    The Jewish IQ in your case seems to be as mythological as most elements of the Holohoax.

    How can you say that popular culture hasn’t caught up to the spiritual implication of relativity? Everything is relative, from gender to notions of ‘economic equality’, to religion to notions of truth itself. Relativity is King, and the Jew wields relativity against Aristotle and all the adherents of correspondence theory from the Pre-Socractics to now. Because the Jew loves a world in flux, unmoored, that he can exploit and shape and deceive. Because the Christian God of objective truth is an insult to his false ‘chosen’ status he self-prescribes.

    I think you’re genuinely just a bit dumb – and this isn’t some kind of 4d chess of subversiveness.

    Please, spare us your flinging of hands towards ‘the Enlightenment’. And stop pretending Physics isn’t as subject to Jewish gatekeeping as much as every other domain.

    The Jew will do anything at all including kill people to maintain the order of climate change and materialism – because he knows if the truth were revealed it might refill the Churches.

    You’re actually just amusing at this point. Jews are such Gammas.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  394. @The Dark Night

    “People do not speak Yiddish in Russia. Yiddish is a European language, so the homeland of Ashkenazim is Europe. Did I say it was Palestine?”

    Fraud. You just revealed yourself. You are not a Jew. Yes, Jews speak Yiddish in Russia and other Eastern European nations. My Ukrainian family spoke Yiddish as their first language.

    You are not a Jew. This is standard knowledge. Who are you then? Because you are certainly not a Jew, as all Jews from all backgrounds know this.

    The homeland of the proto-Ashkenazi Jews was the Eurasian steppe, Levant and Babylon, before they moved into Europe en masses starting around 1000 AD, in several waves. There were populations in places like Italy and the Balkans previous, but they are not Ashkenazi. Again, standard knowledge for Jews. You are so obviously a fraud. Who are you? And what is your deal?

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  395. AaronB says:
    @Flint Clint

    I do not seek much relativity in today’s world.

    I see absolute certainty. I see absolute certainty there is no God. I see absolute certainty nothing exists beyond our senses. I see absolutely certainty that what logic cannot prove is not real.

    If we accepted that the intellect and the physical senses are not absolute instruments of truth, as all previous cultures did, we would at once break free of our demoralizing modern prison.

    Modern physics has merely rediscovered what all traditional cultures have known. As T.S Eliot said, in your end is your beginning.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  396. @Saggy

    Oh, I know about Hitler’s peace overtures. The fact that they were all rejected is why he ultimately decided to invade Russia.

  397. Anon 2 says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    In a sense, General Theory of Relativity was nothing new, and therefore we cannot really credit Einstein with a great discovery. It was the German mathematician Riemann in the late 19th century who made the first attempt at explaining gravitation in terms of the curvature of 3-dim (Euclidean) space. That attempt failed because he lacked the concept of spacetime. The latter was developed by two people, Poincaré and Minkowski, during 1906-08, and today bears the name of Minkowski space (four-dimensional spacetime). General Relativity then developed by Einstein (with a lot of help from his Jewish collaborators like Levi-Civita), and by Hilbert independently, turned out to be a good approximation to reality, in the sense that so far it has passed all empirical tests, i.e., thinking of gravity in terms of the curvature of (4-dimensional) spacetime appears to be a valid approximation. But like all theories in science, GR will eventually be replaced by an even better approximation. One thing that the public doesn’t understand is that science is all about approximations and probabilities. If you want absolute truth, you won’t find it in science. Science is very limited in this sense.

    The four decades from about 1890 to 1930 was an extraordinary period in the history of physics that will never be repeated. It was the time when almost all low hanging fruit has been picked. To quote Dirac, it was the time when even the second-rate minds made first-rate discoveries, i.e., you didn’t have to be particularly smart to make the discoveries but you did have to be imbedded into a specific milieu – science is all about teamwork.

    Einstein was certainly pretty good in developing his approximations, along with at least 20-30 other 20th century physicists like Lorentz, Poincaré, Rutherford, Maria Sklodowska-Curie, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Tesla, Dirac, Fermi, Bardeen, etc. If you ask me, I would nominate Dirac as the greatest physicist of the 20th century. He not only developed relativistic quantum theory (e.g., Dirac equation) but also laid the foundations of quantum field theory – universal approach in modern physics. Moreover, in the last chapter of his Quantum Mechanics textbook he developed the concept of path integrals, which was later fleshed out by Feynman. However, I think in general that theoretical physicists are overrated, and experimental physicists are severely underrated, partly because the details of the experimental procedures put most people to sleep.

  398. Tony Ryals says: • Website
    @Jeff Stryker

    In your fantasies.But at least I suppose you’re right,(far right),about Israel’s acceptance of like minded converts to Judaism.Prior to 9/11 the Israeli government and Menachem Atzmon and his Shin Beit boys who ‘guarded’ Logan Airport on 9/11 actually flew Richard Reid the future ‘shoe bomber’ to Israel on ElAl airlines from Schiphol Airport Amsterdam so he could traipse over to Gaza to get explosives from Hamas for his future shoe bomb.And then quite conveniently they just happened to be the guards at De Gualle Airport Paris France who didn’t remember him and allowed him to board American Airlines flight 66 to the U.S. just a month after their 9/11 fiasco.
    And although young American Jews who dissent against the evil manner in which Israel treats Palestinians are now often investigated and screened for any critical to Israel internet posts they may have made we see below that a relative of Hitler and others with a Nazi past have been welcomed with open arms by the rabbis and government of Isra-heil.

    Delusions of grand manure…….

    A relative of Hitler is now Jewish and living in Israel. So is the son of a Waffen-SS man. Tanya Gold talks to the descendants of Nazis who have embraced Judaism

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/aug/06/judaism.secondworldwar

  399. @Colin Wright

    OT: Hi Colin, if you are the person I think you are, some years ago on a different site, you mentioned a good history of the Thirty Years War that you happened to be looking at. If I recall correctly, this was quite a heavy tome, and it was relatively new.

    I don’t have the reference, however, and I would like to find it. Could you reply with that reference if you recall it (and if you are the same Colin Wright)? Thanks.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  400. Ivan says:
    @DarkEyes

    Einstein was right about the Chinese women of his time, no eyelashes, no wavy hair, chest as flat as a runway, bones protruding around the ass etc, etc. Much of it can of course be blamed on poor nutrition. Their idea that that the ideal woman should have her feet cruelly bound, would not have been found attractive to men from the Occident either.

  401. Ivan says:

    Einstein can hardly be termed a “racist” by the standards of his era. As for the Asians one wag put it thus : “The Asians have forgotten more about racism than the West ever learned.”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  402. @Anonymous

    Have you spent anytime with the American evangelicals. Look at them on TV, as the Bible is interpreted FOR THEM by a guy in a BUSINESS SUIT. The irony escapes all of them.

    Getting them to break the established choke hold of the “Judeo-Christian Ethic” and the rest of that hogwash would be like trying to move boulders with a pencil. They are schools of fish.

    I cannot say more on this matter. Their betrayal and sell-destruction is too much to bear.

  403. @utu

    Looks like Moe and Larry combined.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  404. @Stochastic Determinist

    ‘OT: Hi Colin, if you are the person I think you are, some years ago on a different site, you mentioned a good history of the Thirty Years War that you happened to be looking at. If I recall correctly, this was quite a heavy tome, and it was relatively new.

    I don’t have the reference, however, and I would like to find it. Could you reply with that reference if you recall it (and if you are the same Colin Wright)? Thanks.’

    I must be the same Colin Wright; what are the odds?

    It’s Peter Wilson, The Thirty Years War: Europe’s Tragedy. I wouldn’t say it’s good so much as thorough. It tends to attempt to portray the forest by describing each successive tree. The author makes no attempt to fit the events into a unifying interpretation — indeed, he tends to make a point of demolishing existing interpretations. This isn’t necessarily a failing; but it does make for heavy going, as I apparently said.

    However, it’s a keeper; I regularly purge my library, and this one I hold on to.

  405. @Miggle

    I am not reading this nonsense, you are wasting your time writing it.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  406. @Lol just lol

    I said “people do not speak Yiddish in Russia” and I meant “people” in general. Since the Russian Jews speak Yiddish it shows that they learned it somewhere else. Yiddish is a Germanic language and there was no other place to learn Yiddish but Germany, from where the Ashkenazi Jews moved to Poland and thus found themselves in Russia.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  407. @annamaria

    At least you will have to admit that the war of 1948 and the war of 1973, the two most important wars which happened in Palestine in our time, were not started by the Jews. The Arabs attacked Israel. The Jews didn’t attack the Arabs and didn’t take their land. The Arabs came there from Arabia. Palestine is not their land.

  408. @Colin Wright

    Yes. This is common knowledge. Even Ben-Gurion admitted this, and he wrote a book about that. Most Palestinians are to some degree related to the Jews, some of them are the descendants of the Jewish converts. So what?

    • Replies: @anon
  409. ‘Most Palestinians are to some degree related to the Jews, some of them are the descendants of the Jewish converts. So what?’

    So if there are legitimate owners of any land, the Palestinians are the legitimate owners of Palestine.

    Judaism’s religious claim won’t wash; Christians and Muslims could equally well claim it. Equally to the point, those who have inhabited the land all along — the Palestinians — chose to change their faith at various points. Some became Christians, some Muslims. In neither case did this somehow strip them of their right to their homeland.

  410. @Flint Clint

    ‘…You lie so fluently. It’s quite amazing.’

    Indeed. I wonder if AaronB even has the same consciousness of the distinction between truth and falsehood that the rest of us do.

    I’ve noticed something similar with blacks. They will say things that I would just dismiss as obviously false; it’s as if they simply assert whatever sounds good.

    More to the point, one of the first things that struck me about Zionist propaganda when I started paying attention — ca. 2000 — was its byzantine falsity. Others lie, of course, but as a kind of exception to the truth. ‘Well, we can’t admit that; we didn’t do it.’

    However, the framework remains one of truth. ‘Okay, this is my car — but I’ve idea where that baggie of drugs came from. Never seen it before in my life.’ Everything’s the truth — except about that baggie…

    The Zionists build cathedrals of lies. A flying buttress of lies supports a dizzying dome of lies, permitting glittering stained glass windows of lies. It’s actually kind of impressive, in a perverse way. It makes such relatively cumbersome constructions as Marxist-Leninism look almost primitive and obvious, by comparison.

    But is AaronB even aware of the truth as something distinct from his rhetorical constructions? I’m skeptical.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  411. barr says:
    @Avery

    Counting the number of wars engaged by Europeans against themselves and against African, Asian, and American since the fall of Rome , one realizes that so many wars were never fought by any other religion or by any other geographical entity .

  412. barr says:
    @AaronB

    Why don’t you try and see what happens when you enter the house of your neighbor and don’t leave but bring few more of your kin . Also find out what happens when the police shows up and starts openly overtly clandestinely and covertly supports your claim with some bullshit like you always had a dream of this place ,that God promised you this house in a dream which you wrote down in a book form and somewhere around your exact linear 100th generation lived around the house 2000 years ago.

    Find out .

    BTW ,anything your neighbor does after police sides with you will be moral and ethical. UN may not agree . Then it would be moral and ethical to rebuild a new and different UN.

  413. anon[818] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Dark Night

    So what ? You haven’t seen that ‘what ‘ part yet. But it is in the offing .

  414. Chinaman says:
    @AaronB

    As a native, I grew up with a lot of white people in Hong Kong.

    They always strike me as feral animals with low impulse control and low IQ. Never thought they were superior except when it comes to physical violence or sports.

    As a kid, I remember being baffled at why they are struggling on simple math problems and why they are alway the one into fights and engage in all kinds of uncivilised crazy acts.

    As an adult, I had hired a lot of white people in the past in my company. I have about 10 white people working for me now. From the perspective of a Chinaman,..Most (not all) white people are lazy and unreliable. ( watch America factory on Netflix) I guess this have been true since the founding of America when the Chinese built the railroad (which lead to the infamous Chinese exclusion act) and then the trade war we see today.

    I guess we should just look at objective measures of superiority like IQ and crime rates…or the IMO team of America.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Flint Clint
  415. @The Dark Night

    Zionist terrorist groups were waging “war “against Palestinian Arabs prior to 1948 . Wikipedia which has been accused of having a bias in favor of Israel states ” Zionist political violence refers to acts of terror or violence committed by Zionists . The period of Zionist political terror started on June 30 1924 and continued on a sporadic basis until September 17, 1948 . .. Actions were carried out by individuals and Jewish paramilitary groups such as the Irgun …The Irgun began bombing Palestinian
    Arab civilian targets in 1938 . While the Palestinian Arabs were ‘carefully disarmed’ by the British Mandatory Authorities by 1939 , the Zionists were not.”
    Thomas Suarez in ” State of terror : How terrorism created the modern State of Israel ” uses declassified documents from British archives to describe how Zionist terrorism ultimately “dictated the course of events during the British Mandate and it is Israeli State terrorism that continues to dictate events today .”

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  416. AaronB says:
    @Chinaman

    I don’t see this as an opportunity for bashing whites. Both Chinese and white people have their good points and their bad points.

    I suspect you’ve had some bad experiences with white people, and so now you bash them. That’s understandable. I suspect Colin Wright had some bad experiences with Israelis, and now he has developed an obsession with bashing them and only them in the whole wide world.

    As a Jew, it would be easy for me to despise the alt-right and the angry commenters on this site. But I think a better attitude is to have sympathy for them and try and understand why they are so angry and miserable.

    Whatever your bad experiences with whites, bashing them probably will only make you feel better in the short term. When you finally don’t care enough even to bash them, and can see them for what they are, just humans, you’ll have finally gotten over whatever trauma they inflicted on you.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  417. AaronB says:
    @Colin Wright

    I think we have a very different understanding of truth and reality.

    You seem to have a binary black and white approach. All the bad is on the side of Israel and the Jews, or whatever group you’ve decided on. You have an either/or mentality, like most Westerners.

    Whereas for me, I have a both/and mentality – I may think Israel is in the main correct here, but I am not without sympathy and appreciation for the other side.

    I try to see a situation as many-sided, whereas you see it monochromatically. Consequently you develop obsessions.

    My approach is more similar to the wisdom of old religious and spiritual traditions, whereas yours is that of the deterministic, clockwork, rigidity of Newtonian science or Aristotelian logic.

    People like you cannot understand my approach – it is utterly incomprehensible and alien, and you must suspect me of ulterior motives.

  418. @AaronB

    “I do not seek much relativity in today’s world.”

    Where are you looking? Transgenderism is a function of relativity. The arguments for the equivalence and legitimacy of Homosexuality are a function of relativity. The arguments in favour of goyim eating bugs is a function of relativity. Contemporary injunctions to cannabalism are always framed with relativistic arguments referable to ‘historical man’ – wherein it is deemed acceptable, relative to historical circumstances.

    Immigration and multiculturalism is based upon relativity – all men are interchangeable and yawning chasms of difference are relativised into insignificance. Feminism is founded in a metaphysics of relativity – women always arrayed relative to men. Every single founding female author of feminism has been an ugly Jewish woman, with almost zero exceptions. Because feminism is based upon the Jewish relational framework of masculine women and feminine men and dysfunction and distrust.

    The entire Liberal paradigm relies upon relativity. Relativity determines that nothing is unequal – merely relative. And it’s Jews who have fostered and nurtured it the most – so that they can lie, and divide and conquer by a pretension to equality, whilst they secretly nurture absolute supremacism.

    “I see absolute certainty. I see absolute certainty there is no God. I see absolute certainty nothing exists beyond our senses. I see absolutely certainty that what logic cannot prove is not real.”

    Logic itself is contested as an artifact of ‘white patriarchy’ – gleefully by Jews like Noel Ignatiev and Tim Wise who love engaging in double-think. Because logic itself is unacceptable if it infringes a Jews’ sensibilities and preferences. There is no logic today, because logic militates against the core premises of Jewish supremacism.

    So what you are seeing is the certitude of the illogic of solipsism. And it’s Jewish generated – the idea that the will alone can determine reality. The Jew rejects correspondence theory – because the only truth he will accept is his own – an emanation of the Jews’ fundamental revolution against the natural order and against the divine. Hence the culture of critique and the relegation of all things to social constructs. Because if there was a natural order, it would offend against the Jew’s sense of omnipotence.

    There is a complete absence of logic at large, even if the opposite is claimed. What logic are you referring to? The logic of the replication crisis? Debauched Jew-science? Whereon 70% of scientists can’t replicate other’s work or even their own. Ridiculous. Jews have strangulated the progress of the world, not facilitated it. It makes me sick hearing Jews preening about ‘Nobel prizes’. What use are Nobel prizes when the entire scientific enterprise has been subverted to comprehensively by Jewish commercialism and Jewish secrecy. It’s quite probable there are advances being made – but they aren’t being divulged. And DIY public domain public advance is outright suppressed.

    “If we accepted that the intellect and the physical senses are not absolute instruments of truth, as all previous cultures did, we would at once break free of our demoralizing modern prison.”

    You’re just talking about the ancient disjunction between the empiricists and the deductivists and the atomists who sought to reconcile both. And you’re acting as if what you’re saying is somehow profound. The Eleatics and the Ionians. The very beginning of western civilization understood the conflict between the senses and reason – see the paradoxes of Zeno. It is accepted, you Jewish ingrate. It was accepted by western civilization thousands of years ago. Why do we have to keep talking about foundational premises of the West as if they are somehow new? As if they are some mystical emergence from some sultry Eastern sect?

    Listen – all of you just need to go back to Israel. Every single Jew in the world needs to go to the Jewish homeland and kvetch about the West to their fellow Jewish ingrates with the same absence of understanding and fluency you emit.

    “Modern physics has merely rediscovered what all traditional cultures have known. As T.S Eliot said, in your end is your beginning.”

    No. Not all traditional cultures have accepted oneism. In fact few have in any sophisticated manner – except for the western tradition of Parmenides. Hinduism simply treats the Dharma as ineffable and indescribable. Well, Parmendies articulated oneism rather well, so that it could form the basis of a philosophy, not just a mystical instinct.

    Jews simply don’t understand western civilization, because you aren’t western, and don’t belong in the west. Every Jew needs to return to Israel the homeland for the Jews. Because Jews are simply inimical to the continuation of a functioning western civilization. It’s descent into barbarism, disorder, and very soon open war is the fault of the Jews.

    There is going to be a point in time when none of this is going to be debated. There will be no debate about ‘personal truths’ or ‘relative truths’ or ‘accuracies absent truths’ etc. And this debate only doesn’t occur in earnest because it is suppressed by Jewish media.

    There will be just be everyone going back, and Truth prevailing.

    “If we accepted that the intellect and the physical senses are not absolute instruments of truth, as all previous cultures did, we would at once break free of our demoralizing modern prison.”

    This infuriates me. Because almost every western philosopher has accepted exactly this. Practically every single one since the very first.

    But that accomplishment has to be denigrated and suppressed by Jews who hate the West and try to undermine it and diminish it at every opportunity.

    Go back to Israel – the Jewish hegemony isn’t going to survive the next severe economic contraction. A huge panoply of historical grievances particularly of white people is going to be expiated.

    I have nothing against Jews actually – I’m sure you’re a nice person. But your ignorance combined with your Jewish confidence is not to be permitted to poison more generations of white men and women.

    • Agree: Poupon Marx
  419. @AaronB

    You’re a midwit who doesn’t know what you’re talking about. You’ve said so many garishly stupid things in this thread.

    “My approach is more similar to the wisdom of old religious and spiritual traditions, whereas yours is that of the deterministic, clockwork, rigidity of Newtonian science or Aristotelian logic.”

    There’s a word for it – solipsism. And it isn’t old or spiritual. And it’s pretty hilarious to ‘insult’ someone by ascribing to them the logic of Aristotle. That’s a complement, and a self-reveal.

    “You seem to have a binary black and white approach. All the bad is on the side of Israel and the Jews, or whatever group you’ve decided on. You have an either/or mentality, like most Westerners.”

    No. Any cretin understands any phenomena is multi-modal and multifaceted.

    The reason, you gormless midwit that you perceive ‘binary’ attributions is because of the your total and absolute foreclosure of responsibility. You perceive ‘obsession’ and ‘binary thinking’ because you simply eschew any degree of humility or acceptance of Truth that infringes on your sensibilities. And the more you do, the more intensively the western interlocutor insists on the Truth. Hence ‘obsession’. And the Jews instinct is always to censor, never to engage in Socratic deduction.

    As always, it’s the opposite. You clearly have the usual, conventional trite boring Jewish ‘broken glass’ approach to argument where any concession of the part if conceived as a relinquishment of the whole.

    It’s just ridiculous. He is more intelligent then you are.

    You make this grand flourish to… Solipsism. And then you purport to denigrate The Philosopher.

    It’s hilarious. Stop talking about the West. You’re of the East. Go molest some Muslims. You have nothing to say about the West.

  420. Art says:
    @AaronB

    Western Man lost his bearings, references and markers at the time of the Enlightenment and Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

    Very intelligent and wise remark. Bravo.

    Oh dear — the Jew continues his desperate attack on science and modernity. The Jew must attack Darwin because evolution destroys his mystical god. His mythical story of paradise on Earth is totally devoid of fact. His story of Passover is caca. His specialness in the eyes of god is an egotistical joke. His claims of a land grant from god are leading to the evil spilling of blood.

    God’s law is nature itself. When we follow the laws of nature we progress. Nature allows intellectual cooperation within biological groups. Without question, cooperation has evolved in the human species. We do not need to be separated from each other. We regress when we ignore natures laws. By rejecting evolution science, the Jews have chosen to regress away from Western thought and into the disease of tribalness.

  421. @AaronB

    AaronB here is one issue that surely you won’t purport obliqueness on.

    Boycott Divestment and Sanction.

    https://theintercept.com/2018/12/17/israel-texas-anti-bds-law/

    What is your view on BDS? Do you support it?

    Here is the American view on it:

    “This outrageous, infuriating, disgusting attempt to literally FORCE Americans to economically submit to the Israeli economy makes me want to put every single God-damned Neo-Palestinian on a boat tomorrow. And I am pretty sure I know exactly where those Americans who are less well-inclined to Israel will want to put them. The mere fact that the Neo-Palestinian lobby in the USA could even entertain such an abominable action, let alone imagine that it is even remotely Constitutional and attempt to put it into effect, makes five things eminently clear to every single American.

    Jews are not and can never be Americans. They are a distinct nation with their own homeland and their own interests, some of which are totally incompatible with American interests and values.

    Jews do not understand the first thing about America. They don’t fathom the core American concept of liberty any better than the average Amazonian tribesman or Swedish socialist does (you’re demonstrating that here – you fundamentally just don’t understand western concepts).

    There was never any such thing as a “Judeo-Christian” heritage. There are no “Judeo-Christian” values. That is propaganda created in the mid-20th century and utilized to help pass the 1965 Naturalization Act that demographically destroyed the USA.

    All those nations that kicked the Jews out over the last two thousand years probably had good reasons for doing so.

    Marco Rubio is an enemy of the American people. This is exactly why you should never elect immigrants and the children of immigrants to rule over you.”

    Do you get it?

    This is a basic issue that strikes at the heart of the Western liberty and you affect that you can’t understand how anyone could possibly oppose Israeli preferences. You affect that anyone who has a veiw on BDS is just a member of the ‘alt-right’ who is confused and needs your instruction and benevolence.

    The United States is not Israel. Israel is not sovereign over the United States. Do you understand this? If you guys don’t understand this in the very close future you are all going to be removed from the jurisdiction.

    The left of the United States have already decided to renegotiate the relationship.

    The right is going to do the same – because the Jewish gate-keeping isn’t going to hold.

    Why do you swine do this? You’re wrong, you pig. No one requires your benevolence and understanding. Merely your acknowledgement and retractions. You aren’t intelligent enough to affect a ‘benign contempt’.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  422. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ivan

    “The Asians have forgotten more about racism than the West ever learned.”

    Any evidence for this? It seems to be a not uncommon assertion with zero merit.

    • Replies: @Ivan
  423. @Chinaman

    Chinamen – do you understand anything about your own history?

    Almost all of the pathologies you ascribe to whites were insults and depradations upon China committed by Jews.

    It was a Sassoon who poisoned China with Opium. It was a Sassoon who fomented the Boxer rebellion.

    Don’t behave like Negros and make the wrong attributions. Just because someone is white, doesn’t mean they’re white, capishe?

    For what it’s worth, I’ve invigilated Chinese students in exams and they cheat at rates that are simply astounding and unfathomable to my sensibilities.

    My experience of Chinese is that they cheat. They cheat, and they spit, and they lie without demur, and they have an almost insect-like aversion to individuality and personal freedom.

    Much is going to rest on whether Chinese people in the West are capable of self-rule or if they will simply respond like insects to the clicking commands of the Communist party. We shall see.

    But we admire you all the same. Chinese have built an amazing civilization and have a racial brotherhood – and you were much smarter then us in that you refused the Jewish pivot into China.

    But be careful – because you too could come under vectors of cultural attack from the Jews as we have. Colonising Africa could have consequences – I’m pretty sure enough Blacks could turn Shanghai into Detroit.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Alexandros
  424. Saggy says: • Website
    @AaronB

    People like you cannot understand my approach – it is utterly incomprehensible and alien, and you must suspect me of ulterior motives.

    We can understand it when it is explained to us by someone who knows ….. enter Maurice Samuel who wrote a book explaining the differences between the Jewish and goy approach to life…. the book is ‘You Gentiles’ …. it’s mandatory for the goy who wants to understand the Jews … from a review …

    Written in 1924, this shocking classic work of Jewish Supremacism maps out what the avowedly Zionist author saw as the cause of anti-Semitism through the ages: an irreconcilable difference between Jews and all Gentiles, but Europeans in particular. This difference, Samuel argued, was inherent and biological in origin. The author argues that the real point of difference between Jew and Gentile is that the Gentiles follow what he calls the base “triviality” of Gentiles versus the God-like “seriousness” of Jews. This huge psychological difference, Samuel says, is the reason why Jews regard “playful” Gentiles as backward and silly, and why Gentiles will never be able to penetrate the Jewish perception of the world. The book goes on to discuss the main points of difference in behavior between Jews and Gentiles focusing on physical activity, religion, concepts of good and evil, loyalty, science, fair play, and discipline. Maurice spells out why Jews have different attitudes to all these moral and philosophical issues-and why these values are the opposite of those endorsed by Gentiles. Samuel then says that these inherent and unchangeable differences will always make the Jews out to be “destroyers” and the “subverters” of European culture and society.

    Maurice Samuel explains Jewish morality and contrasts it with goy morality. They spring from totally different sources according to Samuel, with Gentiles treating life as a “sport,” where morality is is defined by not breaking the rules, while Jews do not accept the Gentile rules and see morality as doing what God told them to, even if it means breaking rules. Jews regard the goyim as frivolous, and Samuel makes some good arguments, for example that the goys have any number of Christian religions and they fight amongst themselves, so clearly the goys don’t take religion seriously. Hard to argue with that. Whereas the Jews’ morality is based on doing whatever G– demands, and there are no rules beyond that. So, the notions of honor, integrity, honesty, fair play, etc., represent arbitrary and capricious rules to the Jews and they are amused when the goyim suffer themselves to follow them.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Flint Clint
  425. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @Saggy

    This gives too much religious credit to the Jew. Jewish morality is based on legalism. Thus they write tomes and copiously on how to get around God’s laws. Bending, twisting and reshaping words and meanings are the Jews’ stock and trade.

  426. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @Flint Clint

    Almost all of the pathologies you ascribe to whites were insults and depradations upon China committed by Jews.

    Abetted and enabled by whites. The Jew can do nothing without white collaboration (past, present and future).

    The Jew is the exaggerated variant of the European man. No scruples. No compunctions. No self imposed boundaries. No moderation. Absolutely amoral and rapacious.

    My experience of Chinese is that they cheat. They cheat, and they spit, and they lie without demur, and they have an almost insect-like aversion to individuality and personal freedom.

    The result of centuries of social/cultural debasement.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  427. @Saggy

    Samuel is partly correct.

    But it’s also based upon the Jewish position on the socio-sexual hierarchy.

    Gamma males and midwits like to claim that anyone who doesn’t support their view merely ‘doesn’t understand’ them. I understand AaronB perfectly well, because I am much more intelligent then he is. Not everything he says emerges from his Jewishness. Part of it is just Aaron himself. He is a Gamma. Jordan Peterson said the same thing – anyone who doesn’t understand his 12-path way he claims just can’t understand him, or is acting in bad faith.

    I understand the Jewish mindset well enough. Henry Kissinger himself, a key mediator between the high Jews of ancient finance and the secular political world said had he not been born a Jew he would have been an anti-semite purely out of necessity.

    Jews are not executing ‘God’s law’ – if that were the case they would be followers of Jesus Christ.

    The whole essence of Judiasm nee Babylonian pharaisaical Rabbinism is to deceive God.

    You call these people serious?

    In the Kapparot ritual before Yom Kippur around Rosh Hashana, they wave a chicken around their heads and receive ‘atonement’ by putting all of their sins onto the chicken.

    A serious religion?

    These people are not serious.

    Their crimes are serious. They are not serious.

    So they wave a chicken around like fools because they transfer their sins into the chicken. Because God won’t know, you see. He’ll punish the chicken, not the human sinner. Is that doing what God told them too? God said ‘don’t worship Golden calves’. What do these arseholes do? They put a big massive golden shining Golden Bull, balls swinging, in the middle of Wall Street and worship it. Is that obeying God’s commands? God said to the Jews ‘don’t lie’. So what do they do? They find a bunch of stinking paranoid Rabbis who council lying relentlessly to all non-Jews. Is that obeying God’s commands?

    The entire point of modern Judaism is to pervert and subvert and invert God’s order and replace it with their own will. That’s the essence of the Talmud.

    And they have the temerity to seek to end the confessional.

    It is Jews in Australia under the guise of a ‘Royal Commission’ into child sexual abuse who have recommended that the seal of the confession be breached and Priests be subjected to subpoena and required to reveal the sins of the penitents. Because Jews say that penitents are at risk of being sexually abused in the confessional – as opposed to by their stinking Rabbis at any point in time anywhere.

    Meanwhile their own prolific child abuse is ignored and concealed. And they endlessly attempt to change the Church from a path to personal salvation to Tikkun Olam.

    Then, they fund Muslim councils and associations to bring legal suits for racial vilification and hate-speech against any Australian who seeks to protect the vestiges of Australian civilization from gradual eradication. It’s the Jews who ended free speech in New South Wales and claimed it was necessary for the sake of cultural harmony. Because they want to betray Australia to the Chinese.

    It is simply a deeply depraved and amoral mentality with all of the elevation and moral standing of a mafia clique. And it can’t continue to be ignored. Removing the seal of the confessional is basically to destroy Christianity. It’s disgraceful. And yet no one says a thing.

    • Replies: @Ivan
    , @Ivan
    , @The Dark Night
  428. Ivan says:
    @Anonymous

    Take it the way it was meant. You can find the evidence when you look for them. I’ve lived among “Asians” all my life.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  429. Ivan says:
    @Flint Clint

    Very disturbing conduct from our “elder brothers in faith”. Like others I’ve noticed that it doesn’t pay to play by the rules of Talmudistan.

  430. Ivan says:
    @Flint Clint

    According to Morrison, George Pell should well be stripped of his honours based on the say so, of an unstable faggot, but those child-molesting religious Jews, who made aliyah to Israel elicit no comment from him. The Proddies are half the problem.

  431. @Anonymous

    Nonsense.

    Perhaps executed in part with Whites – but absolutely not enabled by them. What else were whites to do?

    “The Jew is the exaggerated variant of the European man. No scruples. No compunctions. No self imposed boundaries. No moderation. Absolutely amoral and rapacious.”

    Ridiculous. Absolutely a ridiculous statement. Here’s a clue – if that were true, why is it that the Baizuo concept exists, and is congruent and describes white people in power so accurately? If that were true, Baizuo wouldn’t exist. There would be only this nonsensical caricature you present. Every statement I make, I corroborate and substantiate about Jews. And even then, I don’t deny their virtues, which are a great many.

    Jews were expelled from China in AD 845 b y the Tang dynasty – because they were subverting the Chinese, just the same as they’ve subverted the West. But it didn’t work, because the Kaifeng Jews exchanged Silver for Opium with their western brethren and embarked on poisoning China.

    Sidney Ritternburg was one of Mao’s Jewish handlers and his adviser. The cultural revolution came about due to Jewish advice to Mao. The chief reason why Chinese today steal, lie and cheat as a default behavioural set.

    Israel Epstein and Sidney Shapiro advised the Communist party at it’s ascendance to power in 1949.

    Don’t give me Asian arrogance. White men respected Chinese power.

    Have you ever hear of the Summer Palace? Yuanmingyan – Garden of Perfect Brightness – it was 5 x bigger then the forbidden City. And David Sassoon and the Kaifeng Jews arranged for it to be destroyed – because just like in the West, a people culturally debased and defenestrated is easy to manipulate and divide.

    Do you understand China was ruled for many years already, by Crypto Jews? the Hakka. It was Hakka behind the Taping rebellion. It was Hakka who have been many leaders – people like Sun Yat Sen, Deng Xiaoping, Lee Kuan Yew, Thaksin Shinawatra. Lol, Xi Jinping is a Hakka. These are a Jewish strain without the religion in Chinese history.

    Robert Lawrence Kuhn is one of the most influential men in China – and he is a Jew, and this is right now, today. He summarises the policy of strong, beautiful, harmonious, civilized China and sanitises it for Western audiences.

    To David Sassoon must be added Silas Aaron Hardoon and the Rothschild East India Company – as the culprits for the opium trade. And now their descedents – the Sacklers, are destroying American people with Opiods. Jews never change.

    And before Chinese repeat falsified history, understand that where 200,000 opium addicts in the late 19th c – 3 quarters of them women.

    You need to read Arnold Leese’s essay “The Jewish Rotting of China” for some persepctive. Every key position in the process of the Bolshevik destruction of China was Jewish. The same as Russia. Why would it be any different? Jacob Schiff funded Mao.

    Morris Cohen was described by the South Afircan Sunday Express in 1945 as “the guiding genius behind the war-lords of China” – people like Ben Kizer, Snamensky, Trebitch Lincoln etc.

    There is a reason your leaders are refusing Jewish en masse emigration into China. They know their own history. Don’t bore me with Asian arrogance and accusation. This is the truth.

    The British are blamed for the depradations of the Jews.

    And don’t be Asian and talk to me about rapaciousness. White people have about one tenth of the rapaciousness of the Asians. Asians armed with fiat funny money because they don’t mind having a few hundred workers killed in their factories are buying up the entire West. It will not end well. Unless of course, all the Asian women simply decide to marry white people. But we shall see. There has been a complete switch in historical roles. Maybe whites will have to send home the Asians as well, if they refuse to make common cause. We shall see.

    But don’t tell me ridiculous ignorant piffle about white people in China.

    Look up how Chinese infrastructure was simply stolen by the Bolsheviks.

    But the Chinese shouldn’t think to adopt the Jewish model to take over the West. When the next economic contraction really hits, anyone behaving like Jews best be very wary, lest they be sent back also to whence they came.

  432. anarchyst says:
    @Flint Clint

    Tying Judaism to Christianity was a clever trick used by the jews to “cement” their claim to the “land of Israel” and of the covenant, to which I reply, “God is not a real estate agent”.

    Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their covenant with God was then “null and void”.

    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s.

    I cringe when I hear well-meaning people talk about out judeo-Christian heritage.
    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    The only common thread between Christianity and judaism is the Ten Commandments, nothing more.

    The god of judaism is a vengeful god, totally unlike the merciful and welcoming God of Christianity.

    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality or social status, not true of judaism.
    Judaism is an insular belief system that shuns outsiders, prohibits proselytization, and promotes a form of supremacy, relegating all gentiles (non-jews) to the status of livestock-subhumans with souls, only to be used for the advancement and benefit of jews.

    In fact, slavery (of goyim) is still condoned and encouraged in the jewish Talmud.

    Jews DID murder Jesus Christ. Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II ecumenical council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder.

    As always is the case, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

    How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way).

    It makes absolutely no sense at all.

    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.

    It is time the Jewish lobbies and the American Government leaders as well as the evangelical Christian leaders who mislead the poor American young into joining the military and believing that they are doing something for God and Christianity by fighting Israel’s wars were named, shamed and arrested and tried for treason.

  433. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @Flint Clint

    Nonsense. Perhaps executed in part with Whites – but absolutely not enabled by them. What else were whites to do?

    How can the effete Jew do anything without white assistance, white numbers, white manpower and the authority of white institutions?

    What else can whites do? Demand honesty, loyalty and integrity. Stop conspiring with Jews because it’s expedient.

    “The Jew is the exaggerated variant of the European man. No scruples. No compunctions. No self imposed boundaries. No moderation. Absolutely amoral and rapacious.”

    Sorry. Here I was describing the Jew, not whites.

    And even then, I don’t deny their virtues, which are a great many.

    What virtue?

    As you said yourself, Judaism is not a serious religion. There is no virtue in waving chickens and fooling god. Mendacity is not just a character flaw but deeply rooted in their religious sentiment.

    And don’t be Asian and talk to me about rapaciousness. White people have about one tenth of the rapaciousness of the Asians.

    How so? I see little/nothing in history that suggests that (though Imperial Japan is a black eye). And I see nothing in their sacred scrolls that teach that.

  434. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ivan

    I’ve lived among “Asians” all my life.

    Westerners are wont to mistake prejudice, bad form and discrimination for racism. Racism is an ideology. It’s a lot more than being a xenophobic jerk.

    • Replies: @ivan
  435. ivan says:
    @Anonymous

    I have to clarify that I am an Asian myself. Indian from the south.

  436. @AaronB

    ‘I think we have a very different understanding of truth and reality…’

    You could say that — but of course not in the way you suggest.

    I wonder if you actually think what you’re saying has any validity, or if you merely figure I might.

    ‘…People like you cannot understand my approach – it is utterly incomprehensible and alien, and you must suspect me of ulterior motives.’

    You’re half right there. Of course I’ve said I suspect you of having ulterior motives, so no points for figuring that one out. Otherwise, though, while I’m happy to say your approach is indeed alien to me, it’s all too comprehensible.

    ‘I may think Israel is in the main correct here, but I am not without sympathy and appreciation for the other side…’

    Funny, I must have missed the posts. Could you point me to one?

    Anyway, thanks for recharging my batteries. For it is evil things we are fighting…

  437. @The Dark Night

    ‘At least you will have to admit that the war of 1948 and the war of 1973, the two most important wars which happened in Palestine in our time, were not started by the Jews…’

    Curious how 1967 becomes ‘unimportant.’ However, yes on 1973, no on 1948.

    The 1948 war was most definitely started by Jews. Let’s leave aside the role of the Jews in forcing partition in the first place.

    As soon as the partition plan was accepted, the Zionists began (in violation of their own word) using terror to expel Christian and Muslim Palestinians from the territory allotted to the Jewish state. By the hundreds of thousands, terrified fellow Arabs descended on the newly independent or still only quasi-independent Arab states surrounding the Jewish enclave — and the people of these states demanded that their governments do something.

    You would argue they should have stood idly by? By the time independence came — and the Arab armies actually moved — the Jews had already been waging war for five months.

    Moreover, it was not the Arab States who invaded the land assigned to the Jewish state; but the Jews who invaded the land that had been assigned to the Palestinian state. As soon as independence was declared, the Jews invaded the territory that had been assigned to the Arabs. The two Arab armies that intervened in significant numbers — Transjordan and Egypt — found themselves attempting to stop Zionist invaders, illegally invading territory the Zionists had agreed to respect just six months earlier.

    So yeah. In 1973 Syria and Egypt attacked — to recover the land Israel had seized in 1967. However, 1948 — and every other war — began with Zionist aggression.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  438. @Colin Wright

    You know I’m not going to argue about that, because I think the land conquered is a legit land. All nations live on conquered lands.

    If we begin to set limits based on ethnic origins of people you would have to move far away from home. You are living on a conquered land.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  439. @Art

    Darwin is one of the top three thinkers of all time. Jesus and Newton being the other two.

    You ought to read Tom Wolfe’s final book, Kingdom of Speech, in which he exposes Charles Darwin for having unfairly taken credit for ideas on evolution first expressed by Alfred Wallace, essentially plagiarism.

    Also, in that book Wolfe completely ridicules Noam Chomsky for being a pompous charlatan and hypocrite. His universal grammar hypothesis has been discredited. (But many readers of this forum likely already know that.)

  440. AaronB says:
    @Flint Clint

    If you didn’t exist, I’d have to invent you 🙂 You exemplify what I am saying here perfectly.

    Not only are white misdeeds within their own culture – things like the Enlightenment and Darwinism (called culture of critique and psychopathy) – projected onto Jews, but now even white colonial crimes against others, is projected onto Jews.

    All that remains is that Medieval aggressions should be projected onto Jews – perhaps the vicious extirpation of the Cathars, the Spanish genocides in America, the Thirty Years War, etc.

    Be inventive 🙂 Just go through a list of every negative thing ever in Western history, and find a way it is really the fault of Jews (that is, in fact, the purpose of this site really)

    This way, you will be lily white and blameless, and all your guilt and Shadow will be cast off onto the Scapegoat.

    Of course, the price for this is short term relief – but long term, the price is seething anger and rage, unstable emotion, failure of every kind, and inability to become a whole, sane, balanced, integrated personality, capable of moving on once again. Pretty much where you are now.

    The West is “stuck” in psychological terms – neither the escapism of self-hate as practiced by the Left, nor the the escapism of projection of the Shadow onto others by the Right (two sides of the same coin), can ever heal the breach on the Wests soul.

    Only accepting and integrating the Shadow can. Not denial of self, as the Left foes, and not projection of the bad part of the self, as the Right does.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
    , @Flint Clint
  441. AaronB says:
    @Flint Clint

    And I say these things for your own good. As you know, its often been said that anti-Semitism is a great gift to the Jews.

    One, it makes us more united than we otherwise would be. And two, it distracts you from the self criticism needed to fix your mistakes.

    Everyone makes mistakes. If one projects rather than self reflects, one remains stuck. That’s what the Arab world did as well.

    But I am not one of those cynical Jews who wish to manipulate the dumb goyim into remaining forever stuck.

    I want a healthy world for everyone, which will ultimately be a peaceful and better world.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  442. @The Dark Night

    ‘…If we begin to set limits based on ethnic origins of people you would have to move far away from home. You are living on a conquered land.’

    Ah, ye olde Indian argument.

    Boy, that takes me back. Hasbariots liked to trot that out back in about 2002 — discredited then, and still discredited now.

    You know why the argument’s no good. There’s no point in me telling you.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  443. @AaronB

    That’s ridiculous.

    You project so much it’s farcical.

    Everything I said about China is simply a true statement.

    And most of the colonial projects were administrated by Jews. That’s also a fact. It’s extraordinary how that phenomenon occurred across so many of the different European colonial empires. Every single one had it’s Jewish operated and funded East India Company.

    You guys then do your classic inversions and blame us for your own faults. It’s your darkness. Your projection. It’s almost surreal.

    No white person alive given the state of pedagogy and cultural marxism does what you say. It’s ridiculous. Every person on the right wing is full of admission for past faults. What is resented is the non-reciprocation and singular nature of this admission. Lol, so Jews dindu nuffin wrong never ever? You cretin.

    I haven’t done that. I’ve never blamed ‘solely’ Jews. But the extent and scope of your implication is much larger then you ever concede – and the vectors of blame by you and yours are simply farcically deceitful and untrue. That’s precisely why people are do dismayed by the total disavowal of any hand in anything ever. It’s actually pathological.

    Again – how do you say these things on this website? All of the evidence is immediately to hand. Most of the so-called Jewish persecution down the centuries has been fabricated, or richly justified.

    My ancestry is such that the persecution actually far exceeds the Jews. But I don’t morbidly enforce the adherence of all others to my biography.

    Well it’s funny you bring up the Spanish – given the Jewish interests in the gold-trade. Lol even someone as Niall Ferguson as covered that.

    You people are hilarious. Just go through all of history and extirpate your presence entirely lol. It was all just ‘the Enlightenment’. It was ‘the Enlighenment’ that made Imanuel Cellar pass the 1965 Naturalisation Act. It was ‘the Enlightenment’ and not Vic Alhadeef and the Jewish Boards of Deputies who passed section 94Z in New South Wales. Etc.

    Integration of the Shadow you say. Well you’re quite right. That’s coming – I’d say at the next major economic contraction.

  444. @AaronB

    Lol of course – anti-semitism actually doesn’t exist, and you guys have to invent it when it doesn’t.

    Well anti-whiteism is the real actual version of anti-semitism. And it’s slowly coalescing and instilling a sense of white solidarity in exactly the manner you claim in the opposite.

    You are farcicial. Every white person in our cultural marxist world of social science has a healthy understanding of alleged European misdeeds. My own background is somewhat complicated and dictates insight into European inter-rivalries. But luckily the degree of hatred directed at whites today is removing those rivalries. I feel a great solidarity now with fellow whites.

    The difference with the right is the understanding that a large measure of our cultural marxist and Jewish seived history is false, and that it is not universal, reciprocal and the guilt vectors are singularly applied to whites. It’s hilarious. And Jews are interwoven in all of it given their monopolies on European capital down the centuries – yet pretend they played no part. It’s actually surreal. And here you are, doubling down lol.

    I’ve always wondered why Jewish historians never talk about the Muslim slave trade etc.

    Everything I said about China is correct.

    It’s your projections, your darkness. You simply extirpate from all of history any Jewish culpability for absolutely anything – despite being removed from over 106 countries and counting at various stages.

    It’s quite incredible and pathological. On this website, you still forego any responsibility for anything ever. You dindu nuffin.

    Whites have admitted much wrongdoing – there is neither scapegoating from the Right, nor self-hate. Merely contextualisation and realisation of falsification.

    I’ll give you one basic example. Jews in Australia have relentlessly insisted that Aborigines were genocided. There was no genocide. That’s retarded. It was the exact opposite. Yet that vector is applied relentlessly by Jews in both the Liberals and Labour to insist Australia needs to become entirely inhabited by non-Australians, lol.

    The same in South Africa. Jewish intellectuals insisted the Bantu were genocided – when their population growth in two generations was on of the highest in recorded history. The same in Canada – the local inuit barely existed. There was no fricken genocide. It’s insane.

    Of course Darwinism and the Enlightenment are ideas that have had effects. And Imanuel Cellar was a Jew who faciliated the 1965 Naturalization Act. And the equivalents all across the West were enacted by Jews.

    You’re hilarious. You guys simply prove every element of certain passages regarding interactions with you true.

    You have applied critique to every element of the West to extirpate your presence from any of it’s vices.

    Welcome to the new world of the same.

    • Replies: @Miggle
    , @Miggle
  445. @AaronB

    You’re quite right – Jews have always treated it as some kind of mental illness, and it’s bizarre. Because people who resisted them 1000’s of years ago like the Canaanites and Amalek etc are STILL hated today lol. Yet that’s someone not ‘anti’.

    You guys do invent it – most of the so called ‘anti-semitic’ crimes in Europe attributed to white people are self-inflicted. It’s hilarious. And the ADL and SPLC define it so widely it’s ridiculous – opposing the destruction of the American constitution for BDS is ‘anti-semitic’.

    You still haven’t responded to that – how do Jews justify the total destruction of the first amendment and the economic subjugation of the American nation through anti-BDS? And that’s solely on Israel. Not the ‘Hellenic’ Jews you project all faults upon, to the degree you do at all.

    The cry of wolf is so incessant I don’t believe it actually occurs. Muslims do commit anti-semitic acts, as do blacks and hispanics, but that is always minimised by Jewish media.

    Yes, the West is well aware of it’s mistakes – and the chief mistake was to allow Jews like those of the Frankfurt school to reside in it.

    The West is very well versed in it’s errors. But it’s time other groups became well versed in theirs.

    You’re right about anti-semitism. Anti-whiteness is creating the same effects, and it’s barely begun.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Anonymous
  446. AaronB says:
    @Flint Clint

    I’m just observing that whites today seem divided into two extremist factions in regards to Western history.

    The Left – completely reject the West.

    The alt-right – project all Western problems onto Jews.

    Both are equally unhealthy, it seems to me.

    A healthy balanced approach would be to accept Western mistakes and neither collapse in self hatred like the Left nor deny there’s anything internally wrong like the Right.

    Both the Left and the Right are ultimately motivated by shame and escapism.

    Accepting mistakes and moving forward is the way to go.

    Up to you. Good luck.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
    , @Anonymous
  447. Damith says:

    Nice summary and very accurate in my opinion. In respect to the Counter Culture of the 60’s . Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon

  448. @alex in San Jose AKA Digital Detroit

    Admit it: you don’t actually know any white folks. Come on now, fess up.

  449. @The Dark Night

    Wow, Darkie. That was a really clumsy save you just pulled. I hope you do another one before you wander off. It’s entertaining to watch you floundering.

  450. @Andre Citroen

    Indeed. She looks like Larry after a visit to Moe’s barber.

    • Replies: @Andre Citroen
  451. @AaronB

    Again, you simply avoid any subject which might be implicating.

    It isn’t the Left who are seeking to destroy the first amendment with AIPAC’s insane Israel-favouring anti BDS destruction of American liberty.

    That’s you – that’s Jews. The left, despite all their insanity, actually oppose it. A Somali bigamist wastrel still has more integrity then the entire Jewish lobby in the United States – and she is only in the United States in the first place because of you and yours.

    Of course there are issues that are internally wrong. You accuse others of binary thinking and personify binary thinking. Who here has ever said it is all Jews’ fault exclusively? No one. But it simply doesn’t change the Jewish influence, in some cases singular, in other cases joined by other factors, on all the negative factors that are destroying the West. Financial, economic, cultural, military, legal – all of it. We live in a Jewish world. The atheism, materialism, hidden paganism, feminism, communism, globalism, pornography – all of it is Jewish in it’s genesis and antecedents. All of it in the West. It’s quite remarkable.

    It’s simply an accurate and congruent observation of the state of affairs .

    I am not an alt-retard, and support Israel more often then not, and Hitler did a lot wrong.

    But it is what is, and you have simply elided any area of culpability – like the anti-BDS destruction of the Constitution and economic enslavement of the entire United States. I’m a businessman. If these laws continue to be passed and are found constitutional it will mean I can’t compete with Jews – because if I don’t trade with them I am an anti-semite and I will receive henious punishments. That’s absolutely ridiculous and simply can’t be permitted.

    Or the interest free loans from Jews to Jews alone.

    Or the Jewish drafting and enacting of practically every single item of globalist and oppressive legislation that exists in the West, from Canada to the United States to the United Kingdom to Australia. The latest being section 94D of the Crimes Act 1900 NSW. 2 Effing years in prison for true statements that cause a Jew or any other Not-Australian ethnic ‘psychological’ violence.

    All of these countries were properous and free white countries until Jews got their hands on power.

    Israel should be opened up to unfettered immigration from Africa until there are no Israeli’s left in the whole world. That’s Tikkun Olam – that’s how we can heal the world.

    The Right absolutely take responsibility for an array of issues – but the Jewish Question is more pertinent then ever. Do you support the economic enslavement of the United States and American nation for Israel, or not?

    That’s not escapism. That’s sth we can’t escape from.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
    , @Anonymous
  452. Miggle says:
    @The Dark Night

    I am not reading this nonsense, you are wasting your time writing it.

    I didn’t write it for you, obviously, but to expose to others what typical Jewish deception looks like.

    Try staying with the facts. Honesty.

    It’s historic fact that the homeland of the Palestinian Arabs is Palestine, not, as you pretend, Arabia.

    And that the Palestinian Arabs are the Bible-era Hebrews. The Ashkenazim certainly are not.

    I may not agree with everything Israel Shamir writes on this subject, so I’ll take a clause from his Galilee Flowers out of context (p. 57):

    […] It make sense, as the Palestinians are the true descendants of Biblical Israel, of the indigenous people […]

    I can’t personally argue the point that Islam is a truer version of classical Judaism than Talmudism is, but it is said that the Hebrews of the ninth century and earlier, most of them, held that opinion. Or at least, were repelled by the Babylonian Talmud being foisted upon them. Again from Galilee Flowers, p. 152:

    That is why many Palestinian Jews and Christians of the Seventh Century accepted Islam and became Palestinian Moslems. They remained in their villages; they did not depart for Poland or England; they did not learn Yiddish; they did not study the Talmud, but they continued to shepherd their flocks and plant almond trees.

    But closer to my point, perhaps, Galilee Flowers p. 161:

    For ordinary local Jews, Islam was the return to the faith of Abraham and Moses. They had not been able to follow the intricacies of the new Babylonian faith anyway. The majority of them became Muslims […]

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  453. @Colin Wright

    No, I don’t know what’s wrong with this argument. I am not a “Hasbariot,” whatever that means, I wasn’t online in 2002. But I know that very few peoples in the world live on their own native land. Most peoples live on conquered land.

    I am fond of world history.

  454. Anon 2 says:

    I’d like to recommend Ken Wilber, America’s most translated
    philosopher. He is a great synthesizer of Western and Eastern
    thought. Reading his books, you get the best of the West with
    the best of the East. You could start with

    (1) A Brief History of Everything;

    (2) The Marriage of Sense and Soul – Integrating Science and Religion.

    It seems like everybody here is stuck in the pre-1945 thought patterns.
    Wilber will bring you up to date. He is not afraid to attack Postmodernism,
    and has interesting things to say about Theory of Evolution and Modern
    Physics.

  455. @Flint Clint

    Remarkable indeed: the atheism, materialism, paganism, feminism, communism, globalism, pornography – all of it is Jewish in it’s genesis and antecedents.

    Really?

    Pornography was invented by the Greeks, and then adopted by the Romans. And resurrected by the French. Why would it be Jewish in its genesis?

    Atheism was introduced first in Greece and in India, I am not sure who was first but it happened at about the same time, which means one could borrow from the other. But none of them could borrow it from the Jews.

    Materialism was also invented by the Greeks and was known in India at the same time. Later it was given a new life in France and all throughout Europe by the prominent thinkers of the Enlightenmet era. Non-Jewish.

    Paganism has never been Jewish.

    Feminism was a product of the Enlightenmet. The Jews began taking part in the process when it was already in action. There is a theological basis for feminism but in essense it is not a Jewish thing.

    Communism was developed in Europe and in Russia by Jews and non-Jews alike, along with anarchism and this is the only point in the comment which can be said was predominantly Jewish. But now it isn’t.

    And I don’t know what is globalism.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  456. @Flint Clint

    Actually the chicken ritual is an African magic trick and is not a part of Judaism. There is no such ritual in the books. It was brought from Africa by the Sephardic Jews. It is practiced by the common folk. Rabbis advice to gift money to the poor instead.

    • Replies: @Joey Pastrami
  457. @Miggle

    So, what’s the point?

    The homeland of all Arabs is Arabia, which means by the way a desert in Hebrew. All Arabs come from the Arabian desert. This is an anthropological fact.

    The Palestinian Arabs are Arabs, and some Palestinians are the Hebrews who converted to Islam. This is also a common knowledge. So what?

    The world is not built around ethnic or historical rights of various peoples and most peoples are not living on their ethnic lands. This is also a fact.

    • Replies: @Miggle
    , @Anonymous
  458. Great piece.

    You can never have too much coverage of Jew hypocrisy, because it is so oppressively omnipresent.

  459. Miggle says:
    @The Dark Night

    So, what’s the point?

    The homeland of all Arabs is Arabia, which means by the way a desert in Hebrew. All Arabs come from the Arabian desert. This is an anthropological fact.

    So your answer to established truth is simple denial? It is false that all Arabs come from the Arabian desert. Distinguish between Arabs (a word whose meaning changed over time) and Arabians. Didn’t you read the words of Israel Shamir that I quoted? I included his writing that the Jews remained in Palestine, the majority converted to Islam, but they continued to shepherd their sheep and grow orchard trees.

    The Semites of the regions conquered by the Muslims, even unconverted Christian Arameans in Damascus, over time began to call themselves Arabs. That is on the record. After all, following their conquests the Arabs were the elite, and in every generation there are some who are the ambitious and want to join the elite. Over a few centuries that makes a difference. Granted, there is likely to be a remnant who didn’t claim that identity.

    I could have quoted the famous tenth century Rabbi Saadia, the Gaon of Sura in Babylonia, who previous to his appointment there lived in Tiberias, the centre of Jewish learning in Palestine, the top authority on the Babylonian Talmud at the time, who lamented (or expressed fury about) the high rate at which he saw the Jews converting to Islam around him in Palestine. And that had been going on for centuries, obviously.

    The Palestinian Arabs are Arabs, and some Palestinians are the Hebrews who converted to Islam. This is also a common knowledge. So what?

    The Arabs in general are Semites. The Palestinian Arabs are Hebrews, but for complex reasons of faith (perhaps because in the Koran, Noah doesn’t even have a son named Shem, but here I am only guessing at the reason) don’t like to mention that.

    But there is much literature on the subject. Shlomo Sand in The Invention of the Jewish People points out that David Ben-Gurion, before an Arab rebellion in the 1920s which sent him into denial, clearly asserted in at least one book that the Palestinian Arabs were descendants of the Bible-era Jews.

    The world is not built around ethnic or historical rights of various peoples and most peoples are not living on their ethnic lands. This is also a fact.

    Not of various peoples, only of Jews, right? Only they, exclusively, have such “rights”, so Polish Jews have the “right” to Palestine?

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  460. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Dark Night

    The world is not built around ethnic or historical rights of various peoples

    I think it more or less is. But there’s recent history and ancient history. However the Jew invokes ancient myth and “history” and consanguinity to a fabled people that they have mostly no connection to.

    and most peoples are not living on their ethnic lands. This is also a fact.

    Actually, for the most part, most people do. The Chinese dwell in China. The Japanese in Japan. Indians in India. Africans in Africa. Native Australians in Australia. And so on.

    • Agree: Miggle
    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  461. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    I’m just observing that whites today seem divided

    Once again, the Jew kibitzes about the goings on while absolving himself for what’s going on. Why is it only whites are divided? Aren’t Jews vigorously participating in the melee as well?

    A healthy balanced approach would be to accept Western mistakes and neither collapse in self hatred like the Left nor deny there’s anything internally wrong like the Right.

    Good advice, but what is the Jew doing to further harmony and peace?

    The picture you sketch suggests that the Jew is a passive bystander rather than the instigator and irritant that he is. He’s just drifting with the current, carried along by the prevailing Western zeitgeist. You refuse to acknowledge that the Jew foments, disturbs and exploits events, making things worse than they otherwise might be.

    To be sure, there are many things internally wrong with the West, but sometimes you have to remove the poison before trying to heal the wound.

    Accepting mistakes and moving forward is the way to go.

    What mistakes do Jews accept? Are they responsible for anything?

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
  462. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @Flint Clint

    Muslims do commit anti-semitic acts, as do blacks and hispanics

    Disagree. It’s not bigotry when bad behavior is met with retaliation.

  463. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:
    @Flint Clint

    I am not an alt-retard, and support Israel more often then not

    How can you morally defend supporting Israel “more often then not”?

  464. @The Dark Night

    It’s a common practice of witchcraft found around the world.

  465. @Miggle

    You are missing the point.

    Here is first of all about the Arabs and Arabians, from the Dictionary: “Arabian, a member of a Semitic people originally from the Arabian peninsula,” “relating to or associated with Arabia or its people.” The homeland of Arabs is Arabia. And it doesn’t matter if they are a Semitic people or not. So what? The Ethiopians are also a Semitic people.

    Yes, that is a known fact that at least a half of the Palestinians are ex-Jews. So what? Ben-Gurion wrote a book about them and Shlomo Sand wrote about that. That doesn’t mean that all Palestinians are the ex-Jews, and there is still at least a half of them who are indeed Arabs. And that doesn’t mean that a land should always belong to those who are now the residents of it. So what? People have been changing places all the time. Migrations and wars. The Jews, in this respect, know it much better than the others. You have always had your own land.

    So be fare to the Jews.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  466. @Anonymous

    And so on, right. The Israelis in Israel.

    Look, the Jews are not a biological nation. They think in different terms. You are saying they have no connection to the “fabled people” of the Bible, because they are of different blood. It doesn’t matter to them. The connection is spiritual and intellectual. It is in the tradition, religion, language, prayers, holidays, memories and the view of the world. The Jews are without any doubt the direct descendants of those who originated this tradition. Even if it was 30 generations ago, and if there are many converts in the family, it doesn’t matter because being a Jew is a spiritual, intellectual and cultural paradigm and not a biological trait.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  467. Miggle says:
    @The Dark Night

    Here is first of all about the Arabs and Arabians, from the Dictionary: “Arabian, a member of a Semitic people originally from the Arabian peninsula,” “relating to or associated with Arabia or its people.” The homeland of Arabs is Arabia. And it doesn’t matter if they are a Semitic people or not. So what? The Ethiopians are also a Semitic people.

    You are sliding around the truth yet again. All your replies have been nothing but that, again and again. Common usage ignorantly assumes that Arab and Arabian are exact synonyms and the dictionary tells us that common usage. That does not vouch for the factual truth of it when significant historians say the contrary, just tells us that common usage. Leave it to the historians, not the dictionary editors.

    I have handled all your arguments, but again and again you come with slippery denials.

    Yes, that is a known fact that at least a half of the Palestinians are ex-Jews. So what? Ben-Gurion wrote a book about them and Shlomo Sand wrote about that. That doesn’t mean that all Palestinians are the ex-Jews, and there is still at least a half of them who are indeed Arabs. And that doesn’t mean that a land should always belong to those who are now the residents of it. So what? People have been changing places all the time. Migrations and wars. The Jews, in this respect, know it much better than the others. You have always had your own land.

    There is no basis for your saying merely “at least half” when there was no demographic change are the time of the Muslim conquest. Yes, the demography of any region changes over centuries, but it is safe to say that at least 99 percent of the modern Palestinian Arabs have substantial Hebrew ancestry, while the Ashkenazim in general have zero Hebrew ancestry. There are plenty of DNA tests by Jews for Jews that claim they have such ancestry but the first rule in that connection is that the Jews are liars. Those experiments get the results they are required to get.

    The Palestinian Arabs are the indigenous people of all of Palestine, the original Judeans (with the original Canaanites mixed in to some proportion, when we are looking at the whole of Canaan). And if it is true that Islam is closer to Bible-era Judaism than the later Talmudism is the Palestinian Arabs are currently the real Jews in Palestine, and the Ashkenazim and Sephardim are fake Jews. That modern Jews are no more than “so-called Jews”, not real Jews, is a point Benjamin H. Freedman hammered again and again. You call the Palestinians “ex-Jews”, say half of them are, when the Palestinians are the only real Jews there: all of them are.

    So be fare to the Jews.

    Learn to spell. But first, learn to tell the truth.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  468. @Miggle

    You are missing my point again. And you think that I am trying to digress. I am trying to explain! You don’t want to listen. So one last time, I’ll try and if doesn’t work than there is nothing else I can do for you.

    1. It doesn’t matter how many Palestinians have Hebrew roots. I said “a half” because that is what I learned from the DNA studies. But it doesn’t matter – the point is “it doesn’t matter” whether they are the ex-Hebrews, the Russians or the Canaanites, or some kind of aboriginals. They are not Jews. Period.

    A Jew is who follows Judaism.

    2. You are trying to put it all under the materialistic, scientific glass. You are correct from the anthropological point of view. But this is not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about religion. From that point of view, it makes no difference if all the Palestinians are the most direct descendants of the most Jewish Jews: if they are now Muslims, they are not Jews.

    And sorry for the spelling. My third language. It happens.

  469. Miggle says:
    @Flint Clint

    I’ll give you one basic example. Jews in Australia have relentlessly insisted that Aborigines were genocided. There was no genocide. That’s retarded. It was the exact opposite. Yet that vector is applied relentlessly by Jews in both the Liberals and Labour to insist Australia needs to become entirely inhabited by non-Australians, lol.

    Flint Clint, we need to admit that there were significant 19th century massacres of the Australian Aborigines, and that they had no initial immunity to the contagious infections the British and Irish brought with them. And it appears that there may have been in effect a total genocide of the original Tasmanians.

    But a significant point is that the killings were all illegal, counted as murder. The British Parliament did not permit it. There was no equivalent of a US Army attack and massacre of the Redskins. The British army in Australia did not do that.

    It was an era in which there was no long distance communication and no rapid travel. And no photography. Settlers hours away from any centre of authority could usually do whatever they wanted and it might be months before it became known, if it ever did.

    Many whites in Australia at the time, including farmers, were good Christians who strongly opposed murder of the Aborigines. Some travelled to remote regions campaigning against it.

    But still there were many massacres.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  470. Miggle says:
    @Flint Clint

    Lol of course – anti-semitism actually doesn’t exist, and you guys have to invent it when it doesn’t.

    I agree. Even if modern Jews were Semites, which they are not, anti-Semitism by non-Jews is a hoax.

    The Christians never hated the Jews, but the Jews always hated the Christians, and sometimes provoked a reaction. In all cases by the rabble, or criminals; in most cases only very local.

    But their wailing about so-called anti-Semitism, as though they had some special privilege, is disgusting.

    The only anti-Semites are the Jews themselves, with their frightful oppression of the real Semites in Palestine.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  471. Anonymous[210] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Dark Night

    And so on, right. The Israelis in Israel.
    Look, the Jews are not a biological nation.
    They think in different terms.
    It doesn’t matter to them.
    The connection is spiritual and intellectual.

    And when reason fails, the sophistry and mental contortions emerge. How very Jewish of you.

  472. @Miggle

    There weren’t.

    Stefan Molyneux and researchers at the Occidental Observer have proven that events either were fabricated or massively exaggerated.

    Historians have gone back and tried to replicate the Jewish historians findings about mass cullings and ‘stolen generations’ and found there is no evidence. Or, if there were deaths they were extremely small – on the scale of the British shooting a couple of Bostonians in the Amerian revolution. Not tens of thousands – tens.

    Unintentional germ contamination isn’t genocide either – people unaware of germ theory can’t deliberately infect adversaries.

    The Aborigine myths are just Jewish Holocaust creation.

    Colin Tatz is a Jew primarily responsible for the Aborigine Holocaust myth.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/09/06/the-jewish-war-on-white-australia-colin-tatz-and-the-genocide-charge-part-one/

    The claims that Aborigine social deprivation is a function of racism is a Jewish lie. It’s a function of their IQ and their historical patterns of behaviour translated onto a contemporary milieu. Just like the black family only existed BECAUSE of Jim Crow, not in spite of it.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/09/08/the-jewish-war-on-white-australia-colin-tatz-and-the-genocide-charge-part-three/

    The Stolen generations has been massively exaggerated. Total numbers in almost 100 years were 8,250, not ‘100,000’ – and that’s to save kids from being raped and eaten by their fellows. It also includes adoptees and children voluntarily relinquished.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/09/09/the-jewish-war-on-white-australia-colin-tatz-and-the-genocide-charge-part-four/

    Tatz the lying Jew said in Victoria upwards of 40,000 children were stolen. Actually – the answer is zero. Zero were stolen, according to his definitions, in Victoria.

    I’ll dig up Molyneux’s references later.

    Never, ever believe a Jew talking about history.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  473. @Miggle

    Yes that’s true but almost all anti-semitic events are perpetrated by Jews themselves.

    https://christiansfortruth.com/jews-in-winnipeg-arrested-after-being-caught-faking-antisemitic-hate-crime-attacks/ Canada

    https://bklyner.com/jewish-man-arrested-for-recent-anti-semitic-crimes-sheepshead-bay/ United States

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2087991/Jewish-man-arrested-string-anti-Semitic-hate-crimes.html United Kingdom

    And there is an article seemingly buried that almost all of the anti-semitic attacks in a US state were committed by one Israeli. But I’ll find it.

  474. @The Dark Night

    Pornography is and always been dominated by Jews – https://dailystormer.name/pornography-the-secret-weapon-of-the-jews/ I don’t care if it’s the Stormer – it’s a cited compilation. Feel free to go through and debunk. But it is what it is.

    Here is Haaretz, confirming the Stormer: https://www.haaretz.com/life/.premium.MAGAZINE-israeli-porn-is-booming-and-the-industry-insists-it-s-about-more-than-just-sex-1.5472336

    ‘Porn is booming in Israel’. Especially gay porn.

    Pornhub and Xvideos are owned by Jews. Nothing is free.

    We need not even speak of Weimar. Nor of London.

    Atheism/Materialism I included within communism, albeit loosely – and because of how atheism is promoted by Jews in the Jewish academy, and the Jewish media. Key tenets like evolution and relativity now are being scientifically undermined. But consciouness of the GodHead threatens Jewish commerce. So such findings are suppressed. Similar to the Climate Change Anthropogenic scam.

    Talmudism absolutely is Pagan. A Pantheon of multiple entities or essences worshipped at the same time. That is Pagan. We get all these explanations, but I trust Ariel Toaff and Michael Hoffmann. Anything that treats Satan and God as equivalent and merely equal and opposite is Pagan. Christian’s don’t worship or solicit Satan.

    Here is a list of Jewish feminists, a very partial list: http://www.thefullwiki.org/List_of_Jewish_feminists

    Every founding author of feminism has been a Jewish woman – because modern Jewish society is Matriachal with lineage passed through the female line and women dominating discourse. Millennial gentile women are going to start looking for answers when they implode in about ten years. One wonders if they’re going to notice this.

    And any feminist where it was not clear if they were Jewish – they were almost always married to Jews, like Helen Burley Brown.

    And feminism is promoted through Jewish media – you’ll notice that it isn’t promoted to the same degree in China. Because Jewish media can’t operate there.

    Communism was a Jewish enterprise. Contemporary sources around the revolution make it clear.

    I know there is danger in the word ‘all’. But Jewish dominance in all these areas is unavoidable to notice.

    The barest research shows how far the influence goes.

    • Agree: MAOWASAYALI
    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  475. Miggle says:
    @Flint Clint

    Never, ever believe a Jew talking about history.

    That part I agree with.

    But as a child, many, many, many decades ago, I was taken for holidays to a part of the Gippsland Lakes where people spoke of keeping an eye out for human skeletons or bones. I never saw any, but it was said that a massacre had occurred there, and that such relics had been found.

    I also have a book by one James Bonwick, The Lost Tasmanian Race, published in around 1870-80 concerning events in the 1830s. It goes into much detail, is illustrated with portraits, etchings, but they refer to photographs (which perhaps couldn’t be printed back then) of Lalla Rookh or Truganina, the last woman, Wooreddy, Truganina’s husband, and William Lanné, the last man, this last said to have been “photographed by Mr. C. A. Woolley, 1866” and a number of others.

    I don’t think James Bonwick was a Jew.

  476. Anon 2 says:

    For smart chimps like us there is no better recipe for this-worldly success
    than being a highly intelligent sociopath. It’s easy to list textbook examples
    of that: Harvey Weinstein, Bernie Madoff, Robert Maxwell (father of Ghislaine
    Maxwell, born in Czechia as Jan Binyamin Hoch), and many others. Clearly,
    all of these are examples of egos run amok – highly evolved individuals
    don’t behave like that.

    Fortunately, to their credit, many Jews in the U.S. are aware of their pathology
    (e.g., much higher rates of mental illness, of homosexuality, and of many other
    dysfunctions, most likely due to extreme inbreeding), and desperately try to
    improve their genome by marrying Aryans. So we need to be compassionate
    toward the Jews – there is hope for them yet.

  477. @Flint Clint

    Chinese have built an amazing civilization and have a racial brotherhood – and you were much smarter then us in that you refused the Jewish pivot into China.

    That’s funny for a country that adopted Marxism and thinks the Talmud is an inspiring book. Jews will have it easy with the bugs.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Flint Clint
  478. Adelaar says:
    @The Dark Night

    So. Your advice is to completely and undoubtedly, once and for all, win the next war against the Jews? Gotcha!

  479. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Flint Clint

    No I am not going to debunk this “compilation” written by Lasha Darkmoon. She lost her mind a long time ago. You debunk it.

    Porn of course is popular in Israel among the secular people, same as everywhere. Perhaps some pornosites are owned by Jews. But this doesn’t mean the Jews “dominate pornography.” Who is making all these videos? Who is uploading them? Who is watching them?

    Even if all the Jews in the world were making a new porn video everyday that wouldn’t make ten percent of the global porn traffic.

    This culture is and always was a gentile thing. The Greeks invented it, the French made it popular. Now as the Jews are taking part you begin to see a problem in it, all of a sudden. Where were you earlier?

    Also, I don’t care who you trust, Hoffman or Toaff but if you are going to say something about the Talmud please use quotations. Where does it treat Satan as God?

    Also, if Communism was Jewish, then why all the symbolism in it is Masonic? Why does it look so similar to the emblems of Freemasons?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  480. @The Dark Night

    The Jews took Palestine from the Brits….

    Actually, it was given to them by the Brits as compensation–more like a bribe though– for getting American soldiers involved in killing and being killed in WWI aka (((The Great War))). Cf. Balfour Declaration.

  481. @Blankaerd

    LOL: Einstein cheated on his first wife, Mileva Marić (the real mathematician of the two), by fucking and eventually marrying his first cousin, Elsa Einstein.

  482. @Flint Clint

    Sidney Ritternburg was one of Mao’s Jewish handlers and his adviser. The cultural revolution came about due to Jewish advice to Mao. The chief reason why Chinese today steal, lie and cheat as a default behavioural set.

    Yes, this is also my position and I have argued it here before at UNZ, when I asked Who really wrote Mao’s Little Red Book?

    [Note to admin: the above link to my previous comment is not working.]

    Here is the photo that says it all: The young Rittenberg looking attentively and proudly at his little Red Book in the doddering hands of a senile-looking Mao who was more interested in smoking his cigarette.

  483. @The Dark Night

    “…Porn of course is popular in Israel among the secular people, same as everywhere. Perhaps some pornosites are owned by Jews. But this doesn’t mean the Jews “dominate pornography.” Who is making all these videos? Who is uploading them? Who is watching them?

    Even if all the Jews in the world were making a new porn video everyday that wouldn’t make ten percent of the global porn traffic…”

    We are not talking about “traffic”, we are talking about production, and here Jews are disproportionally represented (as in every morally subversive activity under the sun). They do this deliberately to weaken Goyim in order to enslave them. It is striking that most porno sites are entirely for free. The thousands of models who perform in those videos have to be paid. Who pays for that without making any profit? Rich subversive Jews.

    “…Also, if Communism was Jewish, then why all the symbolism in it is Masonic? Why does it look so similar to the emblems of Freemasons..?”

    Have you ever wondered what the source is of Freemasonry, which has as its symbolic centre the temple of Solomon? FYI, the temple of Solomon is not of interest to Christians (Golgotha is), but for Jews it is.

    • Agree: MAOWASAYALI
    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  484. @Anonymous

    Quote: “What mistakes do Jews accept? Are they responsible for anything?”

    Reply: They’re only responsible for not explaining a situation well enough…

  485. Anonymous[314] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alexandros

    thinks the Talmud is an inspiring book.

    Most people outside the West are probably not familiar with the Talmud. They know the OT and NT. They presume Jews follow the OT.

    Jews will have it easy with the bugs.

    Whites like you remind the world that Jews and whites are very often peas in a pod.

  486. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Franklin, this is some kind of pathological thinking.

    Who started porn? Not Jews – the French. And who were the first pornographers? Not Jews – the Greeks. And the Hindus.

    Who is consuming this product? For the most part, gentiles. And who is making them do that? No one.

    And how would Jews produce these materials, without gentile performers? Even if all the porno sites in the world were Jew-owned, a product without consumers would make no sense. So if you know that most porno is free you must be a consumer, and thus are essential to the production of it. Stop watching it and it will fade out.

  487. @Walter

    @Walter on Vietnam – With respect, the US was ‘in’ Vietnam because Jews wanted it. Americans hadn’t a clue, and still don’t.

    -One reason was to waste bombs, war material, and the rest, e.g. expensive planes and helicopters. They needed borrowing as the expense wasn’t sustainable from current taxation, and the Jew LBJ must have arranged high terms for his mates. Borrowing meant more debt to Jews, the more the better. It seems more bombs were used that in the entire WW2.

    -More waste meant poorer Americans, higher taxes and of course some dead goyim

    -Jews are well aware of the money made from banking, generally attributed to Rothschilds mainly, though who knows. The object was to enforce a jewish bank and get a permanent chunk of everything in the money economy

    -Jews work internationally; in each nation or group they have Freemasons or whatever, operating in secret from their fellow. These would of course make money. Arms manufacturers, suppliers of bombs and torture equipment, renters of housing in what was left after bombing, etc would make money. Roman Catholics left from France in Vietnam wanted land, too

    -Drugs, prostitution have a long history of Jewish involvement

    -Jews controlled printed media in the USA (Nat Geographic, Time, Life, Readers Digest, New York Times ad nauseam) and TV, TV news, films. Even intelligent Americans were utterly overwhelmed

    -Experimental chemical warfare, explosives, landscape destruction were tested

  488. @The Dark Night

    “…Who is consuming this product? For the most part, gentiles. And who is making them do that? No one…”

    Like with drugs, we blame the providers of the addiction, not the weak addicted public. Do you know who destroyed the lives of millions of Chinese with opium? Right, the very “pious” Jewish Sassoon family. Jews always sniff the weaknesses of man and then proceed to exploit them withn utmost ruthlesness. They don’t care about the lives of Goyim because according to their Talmud religion only Jews are human. Gentiles are animals created in human form to better serve the Jews. A rogue religion for a rogue people.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @The Dark Night
  489. Anonymous[314] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Dark Night

    Who started porn? Not Jews – the French. And who were the first pornographers? Not Jews – the Greeks. And the Hindus. Who is consuming this product? For the most part, gentiles. And who is making them do that? No one.

    Does the concept of exploitation mean anything to you? Normal people limit, censor and place self-imposed moral boundaries on their personal behavior, including business.

    Jews seem to have no such compunction. They are absolutely amoral. A little vice is insufficient. They push and push until the wheels come off. You can’t dissuade them with reason and appeal to the good. Behavior can only be proscribed by law and threat. And even then they will try to find a way around it.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  490. Anonymous[314] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Jews always sniff the weaknesses of man and then proceed to exploit them withn utmost ruthlesness.

    Above all else, the Jew loves money.

    If there’s money to be made, they will appeal to the crudest, vilest and most primitive instincts in man in order to have it.

    It is this willingness to do what most people are unwilling to do that separates the Jew from the rest of humanity.

  491. @Alexandros

    No they won’t.

    You see it even now with the NBA. Han want to ‘replace’ the Jews, not assimilate with them. They want to emulate them in the sense of achieving a similar hegemony.

  492. @The Dark Night

    How is it possible to not watch it when Jews have saturated it into culture to an extent that is simply unavoidable?

    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/7xywwb/let-this-be-the-last-no-nut-november-nofap-meme-explained

    Here, a Jew tells us that abstinence from porn is white supremacism and misogyny.

    Only a Jew, with their sense so completely distorted by sin and their inversion and subversion of everything distilled into their very being could say that recusal from porn is misogyny.

    Oh look
    https://fox5sandiego.com/2019/10/10/san-diego-based-porn-site-owners-employees-charged-with-sex-trafficking/

    More Jews in porn arrested for sex trafficking. And dog bites man.

    E Michael Jones has covered the Jewish porn-mongering.

    It’s hilarious to listen to the C*** Jews calling people a ‘failed academic’ because their hit squads arranged from them to be fired for the political views – exactly as the 1882 Christian convocation on the Jewish question identified over a hundred years ago.

    Jews are synonymous with porn. Accept it. Accept it, apologise and undertake to tell your fellows to stop circulating porn amongst the gentiles.

    ‘Just don’t imbibe it goy’

    https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/school-life/marijke-rancie-claims-schools-are-wrong-to-teaching-students-about-sex-and-masturbation/news-story/71d7dc3d9bfd3908184f46aa72dd47ed

    How is that possible Jew?

    Your Jewish pedagogists in the LGBTQ community teach 5 year olds to probe themselves in the arse-hole and that they have ‘2 virginities’.

    Don’t respond to me. The evidence is overwhelming. Porn is Jewish. I don’t care if the Greeks first depicted naked figures on Urns. The Greeks who are now totally subjuated to Jewish debt have barely anything to do with porn now – unless it’s providing Shikses for Jews to sex traffic.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  493. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Flint Clint

    I am not responding to you so don’t bother reading. I am responding to this bollocks. For other people:

    You can avoid watching porno. You can also vote against porno. You can protest against porno, as people did in Israel, and get it banned from TV and demand safe no-porn Internet, at least as an option, as people did in Israel.

    However most people like it so much that even a thought about a real protest doesn’t come to them. I know it was banned in Iran and it is banned in China, but in Europe and the US, and in most countries in fact no one seems to be worried. Don’t blame Jews for giving you what you want, gentiles! You are all porn addicts.

    Stop consuming it and the production will cease. It is in your hands, no pun intended.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
    , @Dumbo
  494. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Anonymous

    Jews must follow 613 rules and regulations, most of which are moral boundaries, and Jews had set the Law long before the Romans did.

    What are you talking about? Criminals?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  495. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Franklin, stop throwing punches or learn how to do it. You sound ridiculous.

    Here again, “according to their Talmud religion only Jews are human.” Show it to me! I am saying there is no such thing. You will never find anything like that in the Talmud. How would it be possible for a gentile to become a Jew if he wasn’t a human?

    And conserning the drugs, the position of Judaism is that people can consume them as long as it doesn’t harm their health. Use it wisely and you won’t become addicted.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  496. Anonymous[314] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Dark Night

    Jews must follow 613 rules and regulations, most of which are moral boundaries

    LOL. Sure. Rules applicable only inside the tribe.

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  497. Anon 2 says:

    Frankly I’m astonished how quickly Jews in general (and Israel specifically)
    are developing bad reputation in the United States, especially among
    those under 40 and among nonwhites, and that’s despite massive and
    unrelenting Jewish propaganda.

    Of course, as long as Jews are seen as obscenely rich they will be envied and
    disliked. It’s part of human nature to envy the rich, particularly as the
    United States is now suffering from staggering levels of inequality. And
    the Jews are indeed obscenely rich: about 40% of American billionaires
    are Jewish even though Jews constitute only 2% of the population. This
    implies that Jewish oligarchs can buy American politicians right and left,
    completely subverting U.S. politics. That’s not making Jews many friends.

  498. @Flint Clint

    It was the Sassoons who flooded China with Opium. Who fomented the Boxer rebellion.

    Surprise: The Sassoons were Jews from Baghdad! Who would have guessed?

    But your take on the Boxer Rebellion is very unusual, to say the least.

    The official narrative of the Boxer Rebellion never made much sense to me either, especially the part about the indemnity and how America “remitted” a portion of it back to China to pay for Chinese students to study in America and for building the now famous Tsinghua University in Beijing.

    From Wikipedia for Boxer Protocol:

    On December 28, 1908, the United States remitted $11,961,121.76 of its share of the Indemnity to support the education of Chinese students in the United States and the construction of Tsinghua University in Beijing,[16] thanks to the efforts of the Chinese ambassador Liang Cheng.[17]

    What was the Boxer Rebellion in 1900 compared to the Taiping Rebellion from 1850 to 1864?…a Sunday school picnic, really, when you realize that as many as 50 million Chinese were slaughtered in the Taiping Rebellion.

    • Replies: @MAOWASAYALI
  499. @The Dark Night

    If consumers should refrain from consuming, why can’t Jews just choose to refrain from producing?

    Here is a list of current Jews in porn, and it’s very partial:

    Jacob Frankl – Girls Gone Wild
    Seth Warshavsky – the ‘Bill Gates’ of porn
    Nina Hartley – feminist with massive porn empire
    Al Goldstein “The reason Jews are in porno is because we think Jesus sucks”
    Mal Warub
    Eric Jover
    Andy Abrams aka “Randy West”
    Mark Spiegler who handles Sasha Grey – who is probably Jewish
    Ron Jeremy, disgusting pigman
    Traci Lords aka Nora Louise Kuzma
    Reuben Sturman – longtime porn mogul
    Bill Asher and Steven Hirsch of Vivid
    The Glasser Family – who love their incest porn “eff my stepsister’.

    Gee, if people should simply shun consuming it, surely Jews with their incredible intelligence and self-control and elevated noble moral sensibilities can stop producing it?

    Who can forget pornhub celebrating Rosh Hashana with a Star of David in the ‘O’ or P ‘O’ rn Hub.

    Bollocks is it?

    Stop producing it and consumption will cease – you can’t consume what hasn’t been produced.

    And every time anyone tries, guess what happens! Jews in Jew media write long articles vituperating any attempt at chastity or purity as being ‘white supremacism’ and ‘unhealthy’ for the goy.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/us/hate-groups-porn-conspiracy.html

    Here is the New York Times, famous bastion of the Jews – saying that any criticism of porn and proposals for abstinence is anti-Semitic.

    And yet you tell me that I am being disingenuous. Your fellow disloyals at the New York Times disagree with you Sagi. They are so convinced of the Jewish nature of pornography, they have written an earnest article decrying anyone who opposes it as anti-Semitic.

    Because as I said Jewishness is synonomous and interchangeable with porn.

    You know why else it’s impossible to avoid? Because Jews are using it in elementary school with little children to groom them into becoming sex objects for their perversions and their sex empires.

    https://www.lifenews.com/2019/08/30/former-planned-parenthood-instructor-we-pushed-sex-ed-on-kids-to-create-a-market-for-abortion/

    Here is Jew, Monica Cline, talking about Planned Parenthood “Planned Parenthood’s sex education grooms students for promiscuity, Cline believes, and this promiscuity leads them to abortion. “The sex education grooms them for promiscuity. Grooms them for STD treatment, and grooms them for abortion,” she said.”

    Now good on Monica for whistle-blowing. She’s a keeper. No one here bears any animus to Jews per se. Only the actions. This was a good action. Therefore Monica deserves adulation.

    But you see the problem? How are you supposed to avoid porn if ‘some’ Jews are demanding it be used to groom school children?

    https://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/20/school-uses-planned-parenthood-curriculum-to-teach-kids-oral-sex/

    Or kids being taught oral sex through watching oral sex in Jew produced pornography, in Jew profiteered schools in Washington?

    There is no end to the links.

    Just accept it. The New York Times and Haaretz certainly have. Jews are synonymous with porn. So if it’s so easy to ‘choose’ not to consume it, when actually it’s impossible because it’s part of curricula, why can’t Jews Tikkun Olam and stop producing the porn?

    The thing is, it takes a particular mindset to actually ‘make’ porn, as opposed to guiltily view it. I bet, that if Jews weren’t making porn, there wouldn’t be near as much porn. White people have a certain, hesitancy, about this stuff, even now.

    Just admit it. It’s not the worst thing. The infuriating thing is when you pretend up is down. Don’t do that. Israel is a cool place, and it should exist. But it’s a haven of porn. That’s not good.

    And now look at what’s on Drudge:

    https://www.dailystar.co.uk/love-sex/inside-theworlds-most-elitesexclubwhere-hollywood-20554496

    ‘The worlds most exclusive sex club’

    They got rid of the Menorah that was in one of the photos – Drudge has changed ownership. Funny they put this on there.

    E Michael Jones has written about how sex can be used to subjugate. Maybe Europeans for example don’t want their kids to be debauched. Having to home school kind of sucks doesn’t it. That’s another annoying thing.

  500. @MAOWASAYALI

    Who was Liang Cheng, the man who, if we are to believe Wikipedia, convinced no less than US President Teddy Roosevelt, the father of American Imperialism himself, to “remit” almost 12 million dollars back to China to fund the building of Tsinghua University? LOL

    Well, you have to know how to ‘read between the lines’ as they say… I do, and to my antisemitic delight, I always find freemason spooks and Jews.

    I’ll highlight and connect the Wikipedia dots for the convenience of our time-challenged readers:

    [MORE]

    Early life in the United States
    Liang was born in Panyu, Guangdong Province. At the age of 12, he was sent to study in the United States as part of the Chinese Educational Mission. He studied at Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts, but returned to China in 1881 when the program was canceled.[2]

    One of the reasons for the cancellation of the mission was that the students were adopting too many American customs, and Liang was no exception. While at Phillips, he became a star baseball player for the school, most famously in a game against Phillips Exeter Academy in 1881, where he batted in three runs with two extra base hits.[3]

    Ambassador to the United States
    On July 19, 1902, Liang was appointed the Chinese ambassador to the United States, Spain, and Peru (this later was changed to ambassador to the United States and Mexico, and in late 1903, to just the United States[1]), replacing Wu Tingfang. Shortly after assuming his post, Liang met with President Theodore Roosevelt, who asked him about his Phillips Academy days. As the story goes, Roosevelt asked who Liang thought was the best player on the team. Forgoing the usual Chinese cultural habit of modesty, Liang replied that he was. “From that moment the relations between President Roosevelt and myself became ten-fold stronger and closer,” said Liang.[3]

    The Boxer Protocol signed at the conclusion of the Boxer Rebellion specified that China was to pay war reparations to the Eight-Nation Alliance in silver, but seven of the countries demanded payment in gold instead. The United States was amenable to silver, but changed its mind in order to preserve unanimity with the rest of the alliance.

    During those discussions in early 1905, US Secretary of State John Hay had mentioned to Liang that he felt the amount of the indemnity to be paid was too high, and Liang saw an opportunity to have the US return some of that money. Negotiations were initially successful, except that China did not want to reveal what it would do with the returned funds. The US was wary of political corruption and demanded that the funds would be used in “establishing educational institutions and financing foreign study”.

    However, the refund of the indemnity did not take place until two years later. Various hurdles, such as Hay’s death, mistreatment of Chinese Americans, and the killing of the missionary Eleanor Chestnut in Lianzhou, all caused delays. Furthermore, public opinion in the US was against refunding, and Hay’s successor Elihu Root, despite previously being “sympathetic” toward China, now reversed course.[2]

    Liang decided to approach Commerce Secretary Oscar S. Straus and Secretary of the Interior James Rudolph Garfield. In April 1907 those two then asked Roosevelt to recheck the actual expenditures of the US Army in China. Thanks to Liang’s friendly relationship with Roosevelt, the President agreed to the request.

    The monies that Liang negotiated were used to establish Tsinghua University in Beijing and to fund the Boxer Indemnity Scholarship Program.

    Schwarzman Scholars
    Schwarzman Scholars (Chinese: 苏世民学者; Pinyin: Sūshìmín Xuézhě), is an international scholarship program founded by American financier Stephen A. Schwarzman.[1][2] The program launched in June 2016, upon the completion of Schwarzman College at Tsinghua University (THU), located in Beijing, China.[3][4] The college was designed by Robert A.M. Stern, Dean of the Yale School of Architecture and hosts up to 200 scholars annually from the U.S., China and other countries around the world. Scholars study for a one-year master’s degree at Tsinghua University.[5]

    Modeled on the Rhodes Scholarship at Oxford University and the classical Chinese academies known as Shūyuàn (Schwarzman College is called Sūshìmín Shūyuàn in Chinese, translated directly as Schwarzman Academy), Schwarzman Scholars at Tsinghua University will compete with similar international scholarship programs like the Yenching Scholarship at Peking University.[6]

    Early life and education
    Schwarzman was raised in a Jewish family in Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, the son of Arline and Joseph Schwarzman.[4][5] His father owned Schwarzman’s, a former dry-goods store in Philadelphia, and was a graduate of the Wharton School.[6]

    Schwarzman attended the Abington School District in suburban Philadelphia and graduated from Abington Senior High School in 1965.[7] He attended Yale University, where he was part of the Skull and Bones secret society.[8][9] After graduating in 1969, he briefly served in the U.S. Army Reserve before attending Harvard Business School, where he graduated in 1972.[10]

    Shalom motherfuckers!

  501. Dumbo says:
    @The Dark Night

    Don’t blame Jews for giving you what you want, gentiles! You are all porn addicts.

    It’s true that most people (white and non-white) are kinda dumb and follow all kinds of fads and negative influences, many of which were created or mainly led by Jews, from Marxism to porn, but why is it that Jews can’t stop producing all this vile material, and not for their own consumption, but for other people? Gee, it’s almost like they want to subvert other people’s societies and corrupt their morals!

    When you say things like that, can you still wonder why people become “antisemitic”? People would gladly stop “blaming Jews” if they were not so set in doing destructive things.

    Are Jews incapable of self-reflection or self-criticism?

    “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?”

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  502. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Yes, some Jews participate in porn. So what?

    “MindGeek owns and operates many popular pornographic websites, including video sharing services Pornhub, RedTube, and YouPorn, as well as adult film production companies Brazzers, Digital Playground, Men.com, WhyNotBi.com, Reality Kings, and Sean Cody, among others.”

    Founders: Matt Keezer, Stephane Manos, Ouissam Youssef, Fabian Thylmann – Jews, too?

    Look it up for me, please.

  503. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Anonymous

    Always, everywhere. Except the international law.

  504. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Dumbo

    Problem is, friend – it isn’t Jews who produce “this vile material” but a corporation owned by four people: one German, one Arab, and two Canadians. One of them is of French origin. The enterprise is called MindGeek. Look it up.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Dumbo
  505. @The Dark Night

    None of the biggest pioneers of porn-Hefner, Flynt, Guccione of Penthouse-were Jewish. Gerard Damiano, who directed the first commercially successful pornographic film, was Italian. Al Goldstein was Jewish, but he was sort of a minor figure far behind the others.

    The idea that Jews created pornography to keep the Gentile down is about as ludicrous as blacks who claim that whitey invented crack to keep destroy blacks.

    Money gives many different races purpose. And obviously porn was a quick way to make money-you needed two willing bodies and a bed.

    Most Jewish men in porn are failed actors who had to find another way to make a living. Many Jews try to become actors and fail. Ron Jeremy tried to become a Broadway actor and, given his appearance, was doomed to failure. He turned to porn in order to make money.

  506. gruff says:
    @AaronB

    The thing is, that Jews are a distraction. They are not the primary reason Western society is in such trouble.

    This is true. But they’re not helping, quite the opposite in fact.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  507. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    I though that Jews created crack! To sell it to blacks, so they start hating “whities.” And then Jews created Black Lives Matter. As well as Jews were the richest among the slave traders. And at the same time Jews promote inter-racial relationships.

    Terrible people.

  508. @Jeff Stryker

    Money gives many different races purpose. And obviously porn was a quick way to make money-you needed two willing bodies and a bed.

    Who do you think prints the money? Schmuck.

  509. Dumbo says:
    @The Dark Night

    Obviously Jews don’t have a monopoly on porn, just as they don’t have a monopoly on banking, loan sharking, law, leftism activism, accounting, media, and even, believe it or not, the Hollywood non-porn film industry – but they do have a presence that is highly disproportional to their small number in those industries, and an influence that is higher in society than most other groups, and an influence that is in many cases negative, or contrary to the interests of the majority.

    I don’t know why that is, I wish that I knew, but I know that it’s what happens. It’s not “all the Jew’s fault”, but it’s also hard to ignore their influence. I wish they would admit that, and then we could move on. But no, we almost never get an admission of guilt or any kind of self-criticism for their role. It’s always deflection.

    Now, thankfully I am not so familiar with the porn industry to know whether the major players are Jewish or gentile, but I’m pretty sure that there are many Jews in the porn industry, just as most producers in Hollywood are Jews. Maybe it’s just for the money, I don’t know.

    But are you saying that many influential Jews do not have any negative influence in the culture at large?

    • Replies: @The Dark Night
  510. Dumbo says:
    @gruff

    Maybe because they are like sharks or vultures, they sense a weak prey and attack. But come to think of it, it’s not only Jews now, it’s Indians, Muslims, Asians, Blacks, even Hispanics, all are feasting on the rotting corpose of poor Whitey… But in the end, Whites are dumb, perhaps the dumbest race of all, because for all their qualities, they rarely understand when they’re being played as suckers. Also, they love their hedonism and their feeling of being “special”, therefore their constant “virtue signaling” and all that crap. On the other hand they are the most creative race bar none, so perhaps it’s part of the package, the other side of the coin.

  511. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Dumbo

    How can a man be sure about something he knows little about?

    I told this to others at least two times tonight: check it out, look it up. MindGeek Corporation produces most porno. The owners are a German, an Arab, a Frenh and one Canadian. No Jews.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  512. @The Dark Night

    Yes, I looked it up at MindGeek – Wikipedia and I found :

    Founders : Matt Keezer, Stephan Manos, Ouissam Yousseff, Fabian Thylmann.

    Key People : Feras Antoon (CEO), David Marmorstein Tassilo (COO).

    Owners : Feras Antoon, David Marmorstein Tassilo.

    Of these names Manos and Yousseff are found on the Avotaynu consolidated Jewish surname index, but are not exclusively Jewish names. MARMORSTEIN however, is also on that list and is exclusively a Jewish name. Of this person note 5 of the Wikipedia article says :

    Auerbach, David (23 October 2014). “Vampire Porn”. Slate. Retrieved 19 December 2014. “Thylman was bought out by current CEO Ferras Antoon and COO David Tassillo, longtime players within the company, who now control operations from Montreal.”

    I TOLD YOU SO, I TOLD YOU SO, I TOLD YOU SO.

  513. @Franklin Ryckaert

    You will not see uncircumcised dicks on internet porn which makes it 100% kosher, IMO.

  514. The Dark Night [AKA "Sagi Harari"] says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Told me so what?

    Thylman was arrested and had to sell his share. Marmorstein bought it in 2013, when the enterprise had existed for 10 years already. So what we get now is a 50-50 gentile-Jew ownership.

  515. Dumbo: “But in the end, Whites are dumb, perhaps the dumbest race of all, because for all their qualities, they rarely understand when they’re being played as suckers.”

    You call them dumb because you don’t agree with them. In other words, you think that you are a better judge of what is good for them than they are themselves. But unfortunately, attempting to evaluate what’s in the best interests of someone or something necessarily involves value judgements and speculation about the future. There’s no objective way to do it.

    Assuming that someone else can know better than you do what’s best for you, or that you can know what’s best for someone else is also dangerous. Taken seriously, it leads only to enslavement. For example, who’s the man who knows what’s best for you, if that man is not you? If there were such a wise man, then you should become his slave, and do whatever he tells you to do. In a certain time and place, they called this Führerprinzip.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  516. Dumbo says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    You call them dumb because you don’t agree with them. In other words, you think that you are a better judge of what is good for them than they are themselves.

    No, my good “Dr”, I call them dumb because it seems to me stupid that they fill their countries with lots of non-white foreigners who don’t care about them and who will cause an infinity of problems in the future, but if they see this as “good” because it makes them feel virtuous and generous, or because they believe in the multicultural utopia that was promised them, or because it is a cheap way to find servants and maids, or for whatever short-term gain, I do not really care. Now I don’t pretend to have any special knowledge into the future, but looking into the past this type of situation usually lead to conflict and strife. So to me it seems pretty dumb to sacrifice the future for short term gain, but there’s not much that I or anyone can do about it right now.

    Also, you are not always the best judge of what’s best for you. See alcoholics or drug addicts. Sometimes you need someone else to point things out for you, to guide you and to help you. Nothing to do with slavery, exactly the opposite. We can be slaves to our “freedom” or to our desires just the same.

  517. Dumbo: “No, my good “Dr”, I call them dumb because it seems to me stupid …”

    Exactly. You don’t agree with them.

    Dumbo: “… it seems pretty dumb to sacrifice the future for short term gain, but there’s not much that I or anyone can do about it right now. ”

    You’re assuming facts not in evidence. Only the future can show if they are correct or not, or if there’s something that anyone can do about it.

    Dumbo: “… I don’t pretend to have any special knowledge into the future …”

    Yes you do. You think you see the future better than they do.

    Dumbo: “Also, you are not always the best judge of what’s best for you. See alcoholics or drug addicts. Sometimes you need someone else to point things out for you, to guide you and to help you. Nothing to do with slavery, exactly the opposite. We can be slaves to our “freedom” or to our desires just the same.”

    So in other words, you see whites as slaves anyway (either to their “freedom” or their desires), so you think changing masters would be better — at least, if what the master wants them to do agrees with what you think is best. But perhaps, instead, they are actually as free as you are, and have decided to do what they’re doing. Did you ever think of that?

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  518. Dumbo says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    I see now that you probably work in the academia in some kind of post-modernism department, hence the Dr. title. You know what, I’m not going to waste more time replying to you because you’re just discussing stupid things that were only tangential to my initial point and are not really relevant.

    I don’t think I see the future better than anyone, even if I do think that I have a knowledge of history that is above average for a non-specialist, but you don’t even really need that just to understand a little bit about human conflicts and usual behavior.

    Maybe that’s the main problem of white people, “high IQ stupidity” seems to make them unable to understand the more basic, common sense things.

    Good bye.

  519. Dumbo: “Maybe that’s the main problem of white people, “high IQ stupidity” seems to make them unable to understand the more basic, common sense things. ”

    Or maybe, the main problem with the right is its inconsistency and hypocrisy. That could account for its inability to make any headway with the public. Take Dumbo here, for example. Like most on the right who post at unz, he apparently accepts the Führerprinzip, but is too embarrassed to say so. He thinks white people (except for him, of course) need someone to guide them; that they need a Führer. He thinks they’ve been duped, brainwashed, or as he puts it, are simply too stupid to choose correctly. But Dumbo himself doesn’t need such a man to tell him what to do, nosiree! He’s smart, and perfectly capable of deciding for himself what’s in his own interest. It never occurs to him that everyone else thinks they are just as capable as he is.

    However, it is, as I said, a dangerous principle to put into practice, because once you accept that John Q. Public isn’t the best judge of his own interests, then it’s only a question of finding someone who is. If the state is the best judge of what’s in the best interests of the individual, what happens when the state is headed by someone even less to the taste of Dumbo and his ilk than the current regime? How’s Dumbo gonna like it when Elizabeth Warren is his new commie mommy? Not much, I’d guess.

    The right is trapped in ossified paradigms, but appears unaware of it. I could have more respect for them if they just would admit they are incompetent at choosing what is good for themselves and are looking for a Führer to tell them what to think and how to behave. But of course, they’d never do that. It would be too humiliating! This suggests to me that the right secretly intends to fail; it engages in self-defeating strategies because it doesn’t really want to win. If and when it decides it wants to win, it will have to develop new paradigms, and pry its thinking loose from the 1930s.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Perun
  520. AaronB says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    could have more respect for them if they just would admit they are incompetent at choosing what is good for themselves and are looking for a Führer to tell them what to think and how to behave. But of course, they’d never do that.

    I freely admit this. I am too incompetent to decide what’s good for me and need someone to tell me. That’s why I need God, the Tao, etc. Whatever you want to call it.

    The conscious I that I think is me simply cannot know what is good for me.

  521. Perun says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    If and when it decides it wants to win, it will have to develop new paradigms, and pry its thinking loose from the 1930s

    Which new paradigms do you propose?

  522. Dannyboy says:
    @Blankaerd

    Freud’s Daddy was molesting his daughter IIRC. LOL

    What a bunch. And these creatures want to control to world.

  523. AaronB: “I am too incompetent to decide what’s good for me and need someone to tell me. That’s why I need God, the Tao, etc. Whatever you want to call it.”

    St. Paul used to refer to himself and other Christians as slaves of Christ. In that way we see that the Führer can even be an imaginary figure, and this will have certain advantages. For example, since he’s not real, and his supposed commands are as fictional as he is, he’s not going to be able to object when his words are “misinterpreted”. This gives his slaves a bit more latitude in their behavior. They can change as circumstances warrant. Having God as your imaginary Führer also neatly circumvents the succession problem which has so often bedeviled empires.

    Unfortunately though, this flight into irrationality represented by religion has led only to racial disaster for whites. Christianity and its cultural residue are anti-racist at their core. I see this as being bound up, in a complicated way, with the white man’s civilizational accomplishments. There is something deeply anti-racist about civilization itself.

    AaronB: “The conscious I that I think is me simply cannot know what is good for me.”

    Only an entity with perfect knowledge of the future and perfect values could. Too bad there isn’t one.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  524. Perun: “Which new paradigms do you propose?”

    For example, the usual way of understanding race is as a breeding population of individuals. If we instead conceive of the white race as a special type of superorganism guided by a collective intelligence, certain conclusions will follow, such as: If the white man’s civilization-building instinct is comparable to the motion of a school of fish, or a flock of migrating birds, his actions become more intelligible. They can be understood as self-directed, though only on a collective, not on an individual level. This obviates the need for constructing conspiracy theories to explain his behavior, and also can suggest certain methods of changing it.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Perun
  525. AaronB says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    What I am talking about is that mankind has the need to surrender himself at least partially to something larger than himself that is mysterious and he does not fully understand.

    He has to partially surrender responsibility and partially surrender conscious control or he goes mad.

    Modern life is the desire to be constantly in conscious control.

    It has made us mad.

    The Italian poet Leopardi called it the barbarism of reason.

    The reason for this is that the conscious mind is only part of who we are. We are also the unconscious – and connected to everything.

    But if we insist on defining ourselves as only our conscious mind, then we cut ourselves off from reality, and go mad.

    This is the insight of religion.

    Of course, religion can forget this and become about just stupid rules and dreary restrictions, and become part of the problem.

  526. AaronB says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    For example, the usual way of understanding race is as a breeding population of individuals. If we instead conceive of the white race as a special type of superorganism guided by a collective intelligence, certain conclusions will follow, such as:

    What you are saying is that race itself cannot inspire unity.

    But the idea of race can. It is not automatic. It must be explained the right way.

    So we are back to the realm of ideas. The correct idea of race might inspire. But these ideas do not spontaneously arise on their own. They must be sought.

    In that case, race is superfluous. Any racially diverse group can be taught to see itself as the same race. It is an idea.

    And I think this is what we historically see. A nation typically contains remarkable phenotypic diversity, yet thinks of itself as one people.

  527. AaronB: “Any racially diverse group can be taught to see itself as the same race. It is an idea. ”

    No, what I’m saying is nearly the opposite: that race in a state of nature is a real biological entity that can be usefully seen as a superorganism. One such superorganism is a colony of bees. It’s more than just a collection of individual bees; more than just the sum of its parts. In natural conditions, the various human races are similar. After they arose, they remained separated by geographic barriers and didn’t associate much. This is analogous to a bee colony, in that there is not much natural mixing of bees between colonies. The bees won’t allow it. They will fight intruders from other colonies; kill them or cast them out. Only under a very restricted set of conditions can separate colonies be induced to integrate with each other. For humans, these conditions are brought about by the spread of civilization.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  528. Perun says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    , and also can suggest certain methods of changing it.

    Could you be more specific?

  529. AaronB says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Ah, I see I misunderstood you.

    You are not suggesting white people unite around the idea of race, as many here do, but that this unity is already a spontaneous natural phenomenon, and that realising this can help is understand collective white behavior.

    You are not prescribing you are describing.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  530. AaronB says:
    @AaronB

    However, if we really follow your analogy, it is not clear we can have any impact.

    First, a biological organism has certain natural stages it goes through, such as youth and old age. So the white superorganism might simply be in a state of old age, or perhaps a biological state of disease.

    Second, if this collective behavior is spontaneous and organic, then any attempt to change direction would have to also be an expression of a natural, organic process.

    This duality of a “we” separate from this organic process would be just a fiction, in the biological model.

    There would only be spontaneous biological process – and any change in direction would be spontaneous.

  531. AaronB: “So the white superorganism might simply be in a state of old age, or perhaps a biological state of disease. ”

    Superorganisms can be killed, but they don’t die of old age. There are 2400 year old termite mounds in the Congo, and fungal superorganisms in excess of 8000 years old. Bee colonies can go on forever so long as they aren’t destroyed by an outside force. Human races are like that too.

    AaronB: “This duality of a “we” separate from this organic process would be just a fiction, in the biological model.

    There would only be spontaneous biological process – and any change in direction would be spontaneous.”

    I agree. Assuming the white race is a superorganism, racists and anti-racists are both part of the same collective racial intelligence. Any decision about which direction to take the white race, either into extinction through race mixing, or to remain separate, can be seen as a spontaneous decision of the group. At present, the racist faction seems to be in the minority. This could change, but there’s reason to think it won’t unless something radically changes the environment. The situation is similar to that faced by a bee colony when scouting for a new location for a nest. It’s a group decision, and some locations are seen as better than others according to hard-coded rules. But what happens if all the potential locations but one are eliminated? Then they have no choice, and have to relocate to the only place left. Racist whites may have it in their power to eliminate anti-racist alternatives for the group. If white survival is the only alternative left, then it will necessarily come to pass. Therefore I say, quit focusing on persuasion, on “waking people up”, and quit waiting for a new Führer to appear, because there are a lot of reasons to think that’s not going to happen. Instead, focus on changing the environment. A change that would permanently make a global civilization impossible would be ideal.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  532. frank scott says: • Website

    aside from all the “jews are brilliant” vs “jews are assholes” intellectual and moral points made by many here, a factual point is that einstein did not write a letter to fdr urging development of the atom bomb..at others urging he signed the letter written by another person or committee…that’s more than signing a petition but less than creating the letter himself and it should be noted…and whatever the allegations of his scientifically not being the originator of the theory just barely understood by a tiny, tiny minority of the human race, he also borrowed from others in being a socialist, an anti-capitalist and a pacifist, the last three far more important than whether or not he liked jews , ate kosher or wore bikini underwear..

  533. AaronB says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    This seems a well thought out position.

    However, most right wingers on this site seem to wish to persuade others and wake them, and this has to be seen as a spontaneous process that we cannot really affect.

    And really all persuasion, it has long been noted, is basically futile. Persuasion basically does not work, because man is not a reasonable being whose mind is under his control, but a spontaneous biological process subject to vast impersonal natural forces.

    So you cannot persuade right wingers to your plan – what you can do, is attract like minded people. People on the same wave length.

    A group of people who are spontaneously like minded can make themselves known to each other by seeming attempts at persuasion.

  534. AaronB: “And really all persuasion, it has long been noted, is basically futile. … you cannot persuade right wingers to your plan.”

    I’m not trying to persuade, just offering a solution to a problem they claim they want to solve. Whether anyone wants to implement it or not only the future will show. Certainly anyone (or any group) capable of implementing this strategy won’t need my help.

    The overemphasis on persuasion as a technique of effecting change is an interesting phenomenon. Partly it’s an inheritance from Christianity, arising from its obsession with free will and the individual “soul”; there’s something evangelical about it. In part it’s market-driven, since the various right-wing “education” sites are owned by people who make their living from it. There’s good money in preaching to the choir, as it turns out. Then too, it’s a great way to temporize; to pass the time while the process of white racial destruction continues; to be entertained while doing nothing to halt it. That’s why I say, above, that it seems to me that these people don’t really want to win. In practice, such websites exist to divert potentially dangerous energies into harmless channels. Their participants are engaging in idle chit chat when they could be doing something concrete. Occasionally, there have been a few people — Brenton Tarrant, Anders Breivik, Ted Kaczynski, Charles Manson, to name just a few — who actually have done some things against the system, but as the tools they used were not well-suited to the task at hand, they’ve been ineffective in changing the collective mind. The chatterers turn away from them in horror, an indication of where their true allegiances lie. But technology is improving all the time, and that includes technologies of social disruption. Someday, perhaps soon, it may be possible for someone to apply these emerging techniques in the way I’ve sketched out. What happens when “the lone gunman” opens up on the world with a truly effective weapon? One that can foreclose the possibility of white racial death through race mixing? We’ll just have to wait and see.

    • Replies: @Flint Clint
  535. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    That’s a fair point.

    But I think you’re wrong.

    The Christian Nationalist Right is giving form to these sentiments, and a place for them to be expressed politically:

    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/creating-the-white-tribe/

    You have increasing testimonies of persuasion, particularly in young white men, that constitute a silent majority.

    You are also going to see a response to Han Minzu Zhuyi: https://www.asiasentinel.com/book-review/the-great-han-race-nationalism-and-tradition-in-china-today/

    If we are in competition with China, then arguments will be made to emulate the formula for their success. Jews will try relentlessly to invert truth and claim diversity is our relative strength – but that isn’t going to work.

    https://observer.com/2016/11/americas-emerging-nationalism-crisis/

    The White parties of the West are going to form regardless of what anyone wants, or prefers. Why?

    https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/road-rage-row-turned-rochdale-17107382

    Because Nogs and Mudslimes are going to Nog and Mudslime, and there will be nowhere else to go.

    The white formation within the various polities will occur orthogonal to the Jews – Jews are not going to have the same kind of public influence on politics as before, the private influence of course through finance and entrenched monopolies will of course remain immense.

    So there is persuasion occurring. In a sense you are correct, one just has to wait.

    The counter to this is South Africa. But the historical time is very different now to what it was then. I don’t believe that whites in the US will allow themselves to be put in the position of the Boer. Nor in Europe.

    What happens in Italy will be a bellwether. If the present government of Jew-backed traitors can survive, that may spell doom for Europe. But no govt in Italy lasts more then a year – lets see what happens.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment