The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJames Petras Archive
Immigration: Western Wars and Imperial Exploitation Uproot Millions
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_505286539

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Introduction

“Immigration” has become the dominant issue dividing Europe and the US, yet the most important matter which is driving millions to emigrate is overlooked is wars.

In this paper we will discuss the reasons behind the massification of immigration, focusing on several issues, namely (1) imperial wars (2) multi-national corporate expansion (3) the decline of the anti-war movements in the US and Western Europe (4) the weakness of the trade union and solidarity movements.

We will proceed by identifying the major countries affected by US and EU wars leading to massive immigration, and then turn to the western powers forcing refugees to ‘follow’ the flows of profits.

Imperial Wars and Mass Immigration

The US invasions and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq uprooted several million people, destroying their lives, families, livelihood, housing and communities and undermining there security.

As a result, most victims faced the choice of resistance or flight. Millions chose to flee to the West since the NATO countries would not bomb their residence in the US or Europe.

Others who fled to neighboring countries in the Middle East or Latin America were persecuted, or resided in countries too poor to offer them employment or opportunities for a livelihood.

Some Afghans fled to Pakistan or the Middle East but discovered that these regions were also subject to armed attacks from the West.

Iraqis were devastated by the western sanctions, invasion and occupation and fled to Europe and to a lesser degree the US , the Gulf states and Iran.

Libya prior to the US-EU invasion was a ‘receiver’ country accepting and employing millions of Africans, providing them with citizenship and a decent livelihood. After the US-EU air and sea attack and arming and financing of terrorist gangs, hundreds of thousands of Sub-Sahara immigrants were forced to flee to Europe. Most crossed the Mediterranean Sea to the west via Italy, Spain, and headed toward the affluent European countries which had savaged their lives in Libya.

The US-EU financed and armed client terrorist armies which assault the Syrian government and forced millions of Syrians to flee across the border to Lebanon,Turkey and beyond to Europe, causing the so-called ‘immigration crises’ and the rise of rightwing anti-immigrant parties. This led to divisions within the established social democratic and conservative parties,as sectors of the working class turned anti-immigrant.

Europe is reaping the consequences of its alliance with US militarized imperialism whereby the US uproots millions of people and the EU spends billions of euros to cover the cost of immigrants fleeing the western wars.

Most of the immigrants’ welfare payments fall far short of the losses incurred in their homeland. Their jobs homes, schools, and civic associations in the EU and US are far less valuable and accommodating then what they possessed in their original communities.

Economic Imperialism and Immigration: Latin America

US wars, military intervention and economic exploitation has forced millions of Latin Americans to immigrate to the US.. Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras engaged in popular struggle for socio-economic justice and political democracy between 1960 – 2000. On the verge of victory over the landed oligarchs and multinational corporations, Washington blocked popular insurgents by spending billions of dollars, arming, training, advising the military and paramilitary forces. Land reform was aborted; trade unionists were forced into exile and thousands of peasants fled the marauding terror campaigns.

The US-backed oligarchic regimes forced millions of displaced and uprooted pr unemployed and landless workers to flee to the US.

US supported coups and dictators resulted in 50,000 in Nicaragua, 80,000 in El Salvador and 200,000 in Guatemala. President Obama and Hillary Clinton supported a military coup in Honduras which overthrew Liberal President Zelaya— which led to the killing and wounding of thousands of peasant activists and human rights workers, and the return of death squads, resulting in a new wave of immigrants to the US.

The US promoted free trade agreement (NAFTA) drove hundreds of thousands of Mexican farmers into bankruptcy and into low wage maquiladoras; others were recruited by drug cartels; but the largest group was forced to immigrate across the Rio Grande. The US ‘Plan Colombia’ launched by President Clinton established seven US military bases in Colombia and provided 1 billion dollars in military aid between 2001 – 2010. Plan Colombia doubled the size of the military.

The US backed President Alvaro Uribe, resulting in the assassination of over 200,000 peasants, trade union activists and human rights workers by Uribe directed narco-death squad.Over two million farmers fled the countryside and immigrated to the cities or across the border.

US business secured hundreds of thousands of Latin American low wages, agricultural and factory workers almost all without health insurance or benefits – though they paid taxes.

Immigration doubled profits, undermined collective bargains and lowered US wages. Unscrupulous US ‘entrepreneurs’ recruited immigrants into drugs, prostitution, the arms trade and money laundering.

Politicians exploited the immigration issue for political gain – blaming the immigrants for the decline of working class living standards distracting attention from the real source : wars, invasions, death squads and economic pillage.

Conclusion

Having destroyed the lives of working people overseas and overthrown progressive leaders like Libyan President Gadhafi and Honduran President Zelaya, millions were forced to become immigrants.

Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Colombia, Mexico witnessed the flight of millions of immigrants — all victims of US and EU wars. Washington and Brussels blamed the victims and accused the immigrants of illegality and criminal conduct.

The West debates expulsion, arrest and jail instead of reparations for crimes against humanity and violations of international law.

To restrain immigration the first step is to end imperial wars, withdraw troops,and to cease financing paramilitary and client terrorists.

ORDER IT NOW

Secondly, the West should establish a long term multi-billion-dollar fund for reconstruction and recovery of the economies, markets and infrastructure they bombed The demise of the peace movement allowed the US and EU to launch and prolong serial wars which led to massive immigration – the so-called refugee crises and the flight to Europe. There is a direct connection between the conversion of the liberal and social democrats to war -parties and the forced flight of immigrants to the EU.

The decline of the trade unions and worse, their loss of militancy has led to the loss of solidarity with people living in the midst of imperial wars. Many workers in the imperialist countries have directed their ire to those ‘below’ – the immigrants – rather than to the imperialists who directed the wars which created the immigration problem. Immigration, war , the demise of the peace and workers movements, and left parties has led to the rise of the militarists, and neo-liberals who have taken power throughout the West. Their anti-immigrant politics, however, has provoked new contradictions within regimes,between business elites and among popular movements in the EU and the US. The elite and popular struggles can go in at least two directions – toward fascism or radical social democracy.

 
Hide 88 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    WHY ALIENS INVADE USA+EU? TO DO THE JOB JUDAISTS WON’T DO—ELIMINATE WHITES BY PROXY.

    Thanks for the interesting article, Sir. You make good points. But I happen to be very familiar with “immigration” and I will tell you some important reasons.

    1. The first reason for the alien invasion is because people in 3rd world countries discovered that they CAN get visas and move to USA and EU. They saw their neighbors move to USA, and they thought, “if he can, why can’t I?”.

    It is because the Judaists pushed through the 1964 immigration act in USA and the Jewish media promotes the alien invasion the world over—to ethnically cleanse whites and genocide them out of existence, by proxy.

    In Germany, the Judaists have forced Merkel to let the aliens invade.

    Patriotic parties who spoke against this invasion were labeled “neo-nazi” by the Jewish media, were banned and their leaders jailed.

    2. Global population Explosion—More and more people in 3rd world countries. Again, they won’t be here if we did not let them in.

    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Rational says:

    JUDAISTS WHO OPENLY BRAGGED ABOUT EXTERMINATING THE WHITE RACE…AND IMMIGRATION IS THEIR TOOL.

    Maybe some readers will assume I am a “conspiracy theorist”, so I want to back up my previous comment about the Jewish role in immigration with quotes–from the horses’ mouth, that I found online:

    “The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today’s races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”–Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Jewish Austrian politician, considered the father of the modern European Union.

    “Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”—Jewish Barbara Lerner Spectre, founding director of Paideia, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden.

    “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the White race.”Jewish Noel Ignatiev

    “The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists.”—Source unknown.

    “We’ll keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”—Author unknown.

    “Treason to the White race is Loyalty to Humanity”– Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Professor, Jewish.

    “The White race is the cancer of human history.”—Judaist Susan Sontag,

    Jewish author Tim Wise wished white hearts would stop beating.

    Read More
    • Replies: @llloyd
    The Jews were very comfortably ensconced in Europe. Their richest class had joined or even led the European elites. Then they suddenly faced expulsion. Whatever one's opinion on that, it was traumatic for a people without a religious safety valve to handle it except vengence. They cannot forgive or attribute it to the will of Allah or even seek re-incarnation or yoga. That is if they self identify as Jews. Kalergi was non Jewish but married into the Jewish community. That as often happens made him a fanatic for his adopted community. He was also half Japanese which made him anti-white.
    , @jilles dykstra
    " “The White race is the cancer of human history.”—Judaist Susan Sontag, "
    Should be
    “The White race is the cancer of jewish history.”
    Jews once were a very powerful people:
    Michael Grant, 'The Jews in the Roman World', 1973, New York
    Roman military might and christianity destroyed that power.
    Therefore the theory that Paul created christianity as a secret agent of the Roman emperor is an interesting one
    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, ‘Verschlusssache Jesus, Die Wahrheit über das frühe Christentum’, (The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, 1991), 2005, Bergisch Gladbach
    I'm inclined to suppose that the copper Dead Sea scroll decribing where the jewish wealth was hidden is real.
    , @Them Guys
    This is who said or wrote those quotes you list as "author Unknown"...

    “…The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists…
    …Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”
    — Noel Ignatiev, Jew Harvard professor and founder of "Race Traitor"

    This Is the full entire, jewish woman, Susan Sontag, quote....Note she did a name change like so many jews always do.

    “Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Balanchine ballets, et al. don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.”
    — Susan Sontag (Rosenblatt), Partisan Review, Winter 1967, p. 57.

    Here is a couple more jewish stated quotes just to give folks a real, factual true idea, of just how evil and Nefarious so many jews really are...You wont ever hear of these type quotes or issues from ANY MSM Jewspapers or Talmudvision aka Electronic Rabbi= TV msm News shows eh.

    “Political Zionism is an agency of Big Business. It is being used by Jewish and Christian financiers in this country and Great Britain, to make Jews believe that Palestine will be ruled by a descendant of King David who will ultimately rule the world. What seclusion! It will lead to war between Arabs and Jews and eventually to war between Moslems and non-Moslems. That will be the turning point of history.”
    — Henry H. Klein, “A Jew Warns Jews,” 1947.(It wont be a descendant of David Mr. Klein, rather he will be the jewish Antichrist man seated in the jew 3rd temple, Ie: A Fraud Fake, same as Khazars pretending to be a real judah jew).

    “Terrorism and ‘revenge’ were…to be glorified as the ‘moral… and even sacred’ values of Israeli society. . . . [T]he military symbol was now Unit 101, led by Arik [Ariel] Sharon. …The lives of Jewish victims…had to be sacrificed to create provocations justifying subsequent reprisals. … A hammering, daily propaganda, controlled by the censors, was directed to feed the Israeli population with images of the monstrosity of the Enemy.”
    — from the dairy of Moshe Sharett, Prime Minister of Israel, in Livia Rokach’s "Israel's Sacred Terrorism", p. 44 (1980). Rokach’s father was Sharett’s minister of the Interior and had access to inside information. She was later found dead in a hotel room in Rome under mysterious circumstances.

    Did you Catch that? jews' own top Israel state Leaders, Admitting they have zero problems of Killing Via Terrorism, their Own Jewish peoples, in order to push fwd their nefarious, evil zio agendas!......With "Best Friends, and Best ever allies such as Israel, and Jews", Who ever needs any enemys eh?..ps: how can anyone doubt jewdeo intent to mass murder Non jews, especially european whites, as done in 1917 russia etc, when they even terrorize and kill their own jews?!


    Yet even with such massive stated proof by/from jew top Leadership, we still have so many Naysayers, and jew firster/defenders who screech and Howl at every reply posting here, that Dares to mention or Name the many examples and jewish persons within Americas Major Newspaper and top TV News stations, that keep doing and promoting and reporting the very exact same type Lies as the above quote explains...Ie: A hammering, daily propaganda, controlled by the censors, was directed to feed the "American People with images of the monstrosity of the Enemy.” (I switched Israli population-to-American People-to make a point). Good Point it is too.


    Many/Most Sane folk, as do most here at unz, state how Dem Lib equals a severe Mental Illiness and I fully agree...However, how can any Sane knowledgeable person not also make exact same declaration, about those otherwise very smart person's that continue to harbor some form internal or mental block for lack of better word, and continue to always Jump! at every chance to bash and call vile names of those who post info and proof etc. of so much terrible jewish involvment in most every wrong and evil agenda and thing globally? This goes Double bad for those that are not even a jew!...Shabozz Goys? Or Puppies from pavlovs Dog's Litter who kneejerk defend israel and jewry every chance they can find?...Maybe a combo of both? Why so difficult to simply admit to truths, especially as spoken straight from jews own mouth's and written from jews own pens?


    THIS Quote is directly related to Article above!

    “[The oligarchs] exploited the disintegration of the Soviet system to loot the treasures of the state and to amass plunder amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. In order to safeguard the perpetuation of their business, they took control of the state. >>>Six of the seven are Jews<<<. . . . [Boris] Berezovsky boasts that he caused the war in Chechnya, in which tens of thousands have been killed and a whole country devastated. He was interested in the mineral resources and a prospective [oil] pipeline there.”
    — Uri Avnery describing an Israeli TV series called “The Oligarchs,” in an article entitled “How the Virgin Became a Whore” (2004). This series will never be broadcast in the USA, of course.

    Shown On Israeli TV shows, yet so Many jews in and from israel still Claim to never know a damn thing, whenever its a jew or jew's involved in abject treachery and massive Rip-Offs eh?

    Yeah lemme see if I can somehow recall how they state it typically...Hmmm, Oh yes here it is..."Why Us? Why its always we jews gets Poysacutid and booted out? When everyone knows we jews nevva evva does any wrongs or evils...Its antisemitism I tells ya!

    Perhaps international jewry As a Whole, needs change main name of jew, to, call jews the, Three jewish Monkeys...See no jewish evils--Hear no jewish evils---Speak no jewish evils...Trust Us we is honest!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Taysse says:

    The same people who are keen on bombing foreign countries are equally keen on mass unrestricted immigration. Those who oppose immigration are, most often, equally disinclined to meddle in the internal affairs of sovereign nations. The current crisis stems from the fact that the latter group have had no effective political representation for decades. The “contradictions within regimes, between business elites and among popular movements in the EU and the US” are not new, as this author claims. They have just, at last, hit the political surface. Seems to me that fascism and radical social democracy (however you care to describe those flyblown words) are not necessarily the only resolutions to the present mess. Lots of non-fascist nations and non-radical social democracies control their borders and immigration quite effectively. Our sloppy half-assed liberal democracy certainly has the means to do likewise. And then there’s always civil war or secession.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Paw
    There are about 100 million of refugees and growing , mostly liberated by the wahabist Saudi Arabia , now the Power of the Human rights at UN and they organize all this flood , invasions and occupation in other words destruction of our world...It lead in by feminists too, as they are fascinated by violence of afroarabs..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Biff says:

    yet the most important matter which is driving millions to emigrate is overlooked is wars.

    Overlooked on purpose, since it’s really bad PR for those who give the orders.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815

    Read More
    • Replies: @Them Guys
    Yes, but these wars, especially mid east regions, which only began around 2003, cannot explain the massive ongoing, never ended, illegal Mexicans and other south American hoards that have been and continue to Flood the USA with, what must by now be at least 40-+-Million, and Not the forever we been hearing from tv news, eleven million "undocumenteds"...Wrong! Both ways too, Undocumented is really Illegal Criminal Aliens Invaders period. Which by all methods known of, equal an Act of War against America by Mexico and other foreign nations.

    There also has been very well documented proof galore of actual Mexican Govnt published and created, Comic Book like flyers of several pages, that fully explain and describe in a step by step way for Mexican citizens to become an illegal Alien Invader immigrant into the USA lands.

    Those comic books also describe best methods for illegals to, once inside usa borders, to locate and make use of various govnt of usa agencies, and non profits that assist with beds-Cash$$$-Welfare, even though welfare is illegal for non citizens, and closest Hosp. to drop baby at so to attain "birth right baby status and remain here till baby is aged 18 yrs old and receive welfare bennies in name of kid etc."

    So these comic books proven as a Mexican govnt created and published How-Too to Violate usa laws, are an act of war against America and its legit citizens(that's Me and You).

    Just because No real live ammo bullets has yet been fired at us by them, don't change facts of an act of war on behalf of Mexican govnt.


    In fact, Every Non usa state or nation govnt that refuses to control there peoples on so massive a scale, are All to blame at various levels...levels that all are in one way or other violations of usa sovereignty.


    Picture Mexcio, with its very stringent and always Prosecuted Immigration Laws, mandatory 2-3 yrs hard prison terms, Shooting border jumpers at south mex border, etc...Picture the Crys and Howl's if say....10-20 or more Millions of American citizens, White ones mainly, with a million negroes for good measure of course, decided to Flood into Mexico, and take Firearms and demand mexico recognize our 2nd amendt, and supply Us with tons of English speakers, translators, Free Food, Hospital services, and of course when every single of Our white American, 10 million females give birth we too demand instant citizenship for the new baby! Along with same welfare perks usa gives mex illegals. And when said muti millions white folks Refuse to exit or leave, and also demand Court Hearings for every whitey immigrant into our NEW Homeland Mexico!


    Anybody who thinks or believes that will not cause meican govnt to call out its own mex army, and shoot such american invaders?....Is a total complete idiot bordering on being a true asshole in deep denial.


    Therefore, yes mid east and various usa govnt actions in south amer. and central amer. has probably caused "Some" of our illegals problems...But no where near the vast amounts as promoted in article period....3000-4000 daily across usa border, and done since 1965, when Two jews, a US Rep from NY with help from his NY media jew pal, invented, promoted for close to three years, got it finally passed into 1965 usa fed Immgration Law Changes...By design, TO, Destroy White Americans and America. No amount of vast denials can change facts and thats a fact. Look it all Up any who doubt it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. llloyd says: • Website
    @Rational
    JUDAISTS WHO OPENLY BRAGGED ABOUT EXTERMINATING THE WHITE RACE...AND IMMIGRATION IS THEIR TOOL.

    Maybe some readers will assume I am a "conspiracy theorist", so I want to back up my previous comment about the Jewish role in immigration with quotes--from the horses' mouth, that I found online:

    "The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today's races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."--Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Jewish Austrian politician, considered the father of the modern European Union.


    "Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive."—Jewish Barbara Lerner Spectre, founding director of Paideia, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden.

    "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the White race."Jewish Noel Ignatiev

    "The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists."—Source unknown.

    "We'll keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed."—Author unknown.

    "Treason to the White race is Loyalty to Humanity"-- Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Professor, Jewish.

    "The White race is the cancer of human history."—Judaist Susan Sontag,

    Jewish author Tim Wise wished white hearts would stop beating.

    The Jews were very comfortably ensconced in Europe. Their richest class had joined or even led the European elites. Then they suddenly faced expulsion. Whatever one’s opinion on that, it was traumatic for a people without a religious safety valve to handle it except vengence. They cannot forgive or attribute it to the will of Allah or even seek re-incarnation or yoga. That is if they self identify as Jews. Kalergi was non Jewish but married into the Jewish community. That as often happens made him a fanatic for his adopted community. He was also half Japanese which made him anti-white.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    " Then they suddenly faced expulsion. "
    Nothing sudden:
    Ismar Schorsch, 'Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870 - 1914', New York 1972
    ‘Christianity and the Holocaust of the Hungarian Jewry’, Moshe Y Herclz, 1993 New York University press
    Jakob Wassermann, 'MEIN WEG ALS DEUTSCHER UND ALS JUDE', Berlin 1921
    Jakob Wassermann, 'Die Juden von Zirndorf', 1897 1999 München
    Fritz Stern, 'Gold and Iron, Bismarck, Bleichröder, and the Building of the German Empire', New York, 1977.
    Alexander Solschenizyn, ´Die russisch- jüdische Geschichte 1795- 1916, >> Zweihundert Jahre zusammen <<´, Moskau 2001, München 2002
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Paw says:
    @Taysse
    The same people who are keen on bombing foreign countries are equally keen on mass unrestricted immigration. Those who oppose immigration are, most often, equally disinclined to meddle in the internal affairs of sovereign nations. The current crisis stems from the fact that the latter group have had no effective political representation for decades. The “contradictions within regimes, between business elites and among popular movements in the EU and the US” are not new, as this author claims. They have just, at last, hit the political surface. Seems to me that fascism and radical social democracy (however you care to describe those flyblown words) are not necessarily the only resolutions to the present mess. Lots of non-fascist nations and non-radical social democracies control their borders and immigration quite effectively. Our sloppy half-assed liberal democracy certainly has the means to do likewise. And then there’s always civil war or secession.

    There are about 100 million of refugees and growing , mostly liberated by the wahabist Saudi Arabia , now the Power of the Human rights at UN and they organize all this flood , invasions and occupation in other words destruction of our world…It lead in by feminists too, as they are fascinated by violence of afroarabs..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Biff
    A three legged dog walks into a Saloon and says “I’m looking for the man who shot my Paw?”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Biff says:
    @Paw
    There are about 100 million of refugees and growing , mostly liberated by the wahabist Saudi Arabia , now the Power of the Human rights at UN and they organize all this flood , invasions and occupation in other words destruction of our world...It lead in by feminists too, as they are fascinated by violence of afroarabs..

    A three legged dog walks into a Saloon and says “I’m looking for the man who shot my Paw?”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. TG says:

    I certainly agree that the many wars that the Untied States are fighting overseas are stupid and immoral and we would be better off spending that money at home. But the notion that the immigration crisis is due to these stupid wars is mostly wrong. No. It’s because Malthus was right, and people having more children than they can afford to support produces terrible poverty. Period.

    Now the United States is certainly responsible for Libya – that country was doing pretty well before we trashed it. But Libya is an outlier. Let’s consider Yemen. In 1985 the population of Yemen was 10 million. They have a sky high fertility rate, and with enough food, their population should double every 20 years. Consider that:

    1985: 10 million
    2005: 20 million
    2025: 40 million
    2045: 80 million
    2065: 160 million
    2085: 320 million
    2105: 640 million
    and so on.

    Now Yemen is not a big country with a lot of rain like India or China, it’s small and has very little rainfall. By itself, it could probably grow enough food to feed maybe 10 million people. Can the Yemenis handle the population of California by 2025? No. Even with more than ten times the rainfall as Yemen, and over a century of intensive industrial development, California is straining at 40 million. And could Yemen manage to support the current population of the United States by 2085? No.

    It is too-rapid population growth that is the problem with Yemen. Yemen is a black hole for food, they can suck up all the food aid, and dump any number of refugees on us, and still be hungry for more. The bombs our allies are dropping on Yemen are just making the rubble bounce. And there are many more countries like Yemen out there..

    But there is one area where yes, we are responsible for Yemen. Because we deny that Malthus was right, because the rich want cheap labor, and so we insist that people who could maybe support two kids, should have six, because ‘people are the ultimate resource.’ Yeah sure, if you think of people as cattle.

    Read More
    • Replies: @animalogic
    "No. It’s because Malthus was right, and people having more children than they can afford to support produces terrible poverty. Period."
    The upshot of your comment is that essentially poor countries are poor b/c they breed too much.
    Sure: it's an important factor - but it's also been proven ad-nauseam, if you want to stop over breeding you must lift living standards. The current economic political situation internationally makes such an outcome difficult for those countries lacking cultural/institutional foundations for such an uplift.
    Incidentally, there's plenty of food on earth - there's be better food security if we were willing to change economic & environmental goals.
    However, the author is fundamentally correct: war & poverty are the major (not exclusive) push factors in immigration. The view that a certain cultural minority group has encouraged & manipulated people movements for its own nefarious goals is not inconsistent with the author's views.
    , @Kratoklastes

    we deny that Malthus was right
     
    Anyone with a lick of sense denies that Malthus was right, because he was wrong.

    Not only was he wrong when his main conclusions are compared to what happened subsequently: he was already wrong when he first put pen to paper.

    His main conclusions:
    ① population grows geometrically; but
    ② output grows linearly; so
    ③ population will eventually outstrip output; and so
    ④ widespread starvation will ensue.

    Malthus wrote that drivel down in 1798.

    At that point in time, agricultural output had been growing faster than population for five generations. So Malthus was unaware of a century of data from his own country that refuted his core hypothesis.

    This is actually a really interesting thing to think about and reseearch, and so I urge you to read the rest of this comment. Or don't - someone else will.

    For those playing at home, output grew faster than population over the entire century to 1770, thanks to the British Agricultiural Revolution .

    That Malthus was not aware of this, and was furthermore not aware of the role of technological change to augment agricultural productivity, makes him someone whose entire work should be dismissed a priori.


    And what's even more worser - all of the evidence collected over the last 2 centuries shows that one of his main claims - viz.,

    that population does invariably increase when the means of subsistence increase
     
    is absolutely false.

    In fact once you get past literal subsistence agriculture (where children are produced as investment goods, due to the lack of availability of alternative forms of savings), the outright best explanator of falling fertility rates is... rising prosperity.

    Malthus was the George Monbiot of his day (or for those more familiar with issues like this, the Paul Erlich): a sensationalist dilettante who did not bother to test his hypotheses against readily available data.
    .
    OK, here's where we get to some really interesting things.
    .
    Poor countries are poor because there is a deliberate refusal of the West to enable them to build capital stocks: at the moment they are being fed 'aid plus debt' infrastructure projects that have the intended aim of obtaining Western financial control over their resource bases.

    As India showed (when it moved to food security in the 1970s), modern agricultural techniques - including modern plant and equipment, but also phosphate fertilisers - is staggeringly productive.

    By stark contrast, African nations are specifically prohibited from using aid funds to purchase broadacre fertilisers - mainly because Western politicians think it will mean a Black Baby Boom who will flood upwards into Europe. (As if people decamp from places where food security is improving and life's getting better).

    And here's the really really interesting bit.

    Life is improving - and fertility rates are falling - in the developing world.

    This is partly because of rising living conditions (albeit slowly and off a low base), but it is also partly because they are becoming aware that their past infant mortality problems are no longer a problem.

    One of the reproductive errors that the poor in the West made, was continuing to have 'many pregnancies' after the infant-mortality problem dropped from 1-in-4 to 2-in-1000. So our lower-class cohort expanded rapidly; it took two generations for them to work out that their kids were all living to adulthood, whereupon they started to make some changes to their reproductive strategies. Nobody was telling them otherwise.

    African women - in particular - are getting access to information that is helping them develop reproductive strategies that are a better 'fit' for a world in which 3 pregnancies leads to 2 births, which leads to 2 adults. (Also, any supernumerary production can be saved in forms other than children: capital markets are not very developed, but they at least exist)

    Over the next couple of decades, the African birth rate will plummet (the same is true of the developing world more generally). Current projections of birthrates for Africa fail to understand that reproductive strategies adapt.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. james says: • Website

    Whilst I consider myself to be as opposed as James Jatras is to all the neo-colonial wars by the U.S. and its allies going back at least to the commencement of the wars against Korea and Vietnam in September 1945, right up to the current wars against the peoples of Syria, Yemen and elsewhere, James Jatras should surely agree that working class and middle class people in First World countries, notably in Germany, Sweden and the United States, are also victims of these wars.

    The hundreds of thousands who, since 2015, aided by the likes of George Soros and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, have fled to First World countries from the chaos caused by war and globalism, are being used, by those who fomented those wars, to also undermine democracy and to destroy working conditions in the First World. If this is not stopped, living conditions of ordinary people in the First World will, before long, be reduced to those of the Third World, with little benefit to the hundreds of millions more remaining there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    Do you have Jatras on the brain? This was written by James Petras.
    , @Them Guys
    Another good point is..The massive waves of immigrants into EU nations, and usa, that we are told is all due to mid east wars...So..Why was it safe and okay to remain in those war zone countries up until 2015?

    Those wars began in 2003. Even Syria as newest or latest war, if correct? Began in 2007 or later right? So not only did all those masses remain within own war torn nations, but they even left behind almost every Female, Old folks, Parents, Babies, Wives etc....While the Males, mainly of war age simply left to invade eu and usa and england?

    Somethings wrong with that picture folks. We are Not being told the rest of story.

    As an Male American, if You just Had to leave your home and country and do so fast due to bombs and war, would You leave behind wives and babies and small kiddies? Leave behind old parents still alive?....OR would You Remain at home to Fight and save your america nation and homes?

    No need to answer as we know what it is eh. Somethings very rotten in story we being told again and again regards these wars and mass invaders going ONLY into WHITE Nations.

    If as lib leftys and neocon repukes keep telling us of how wonderfull and positive, mass immigrations of NON whites is...And how they keep telling us, that this agenda IS Main best solution for all problems that aills entire world.

    Then Why do they Never, Ever, promote nor insist nor cause an equally mass invasion of Others, Non native types, into Japan? China? Vietnam? AFRICA? MEXICO? et al?

    If we really do have a huge bad global problem as they tell us, and mass immigrations are The main solution....Why only whitey nations need or get "Fixed"?

    That on its own explains this as no more and no better than a massive huge swindle scam against European Whiteys period. With many involved, but as per usual, jewry at top leaderships and head honchos of what jews do best...Scam ∧ Swindle ∧ Lie about it all. Jewry demands for Israel to remain an Only White skinned Jewish Nation, is the final proof in the pudding.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Good article by Petras. He is right about the ‘immigrant crisis’ in Europe and its cause; namely, the willful and unnecessary destruction of Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq by Zio-NATO-Washington. And let’s not forget Palestine.

    The criminal annihilation of these ancient cultures deserves retribution. But don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen. Zio-America is a rich, powerful, supremacist state with nukes. It does what is “in its interests” (allegedly) and it does not apologize, even when millions of lives are taken or ruined.

    Petras is also right that the US has meddled persistently and, at times, unconscionably throughout the Americas. But today’s refugee problem involving ‘migrants’ from Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico and Guatemala is driven by in no small part by that region’s widespread corruption, sloth, economic failures, lawlessness, and an inability by these countries to compete effectively in the global marketplace.

    Yes, Uncle Sam (and countless Yankee profiteers) has played a nefarious role down there in countless instances. But these semi-failed-states also have real demographic problems that are fast becoming America’s demographic problem. This is a big part of the problem.

    This lesson can be re-learned when we examine America’s persistent inability to turn millions of semi-educated, working-age, African Americans into productive, civic- minded, law-abiding citizens.

    First world America is not a good fit for many nationalities. So let’s keep their numbers in America low.

    Conclusion: restrict immigration and deport as many non-white illegal immigrants as possible.

    Read More
    • Agree: artichoke, renfro
    • Replies: @animalogic
    "But today’s refugee problem involving ‘migrants’ from Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico and Guatemala is driven by in no small part by that region’s widespread corruption, sloth, economic failures, lawlessness, and an inability by these countries to compete effectively in the global marketplace.

    Yes, Uncle Sam (and countless Yankee profiteers) has played a nefarious role down there in countless instances."
    Don't disagree with your "no small part". But here's the tricky question (I don't have an answer - I doubt one exists): to what extent has the US's constant malign interference with these countries for over 100 years, contributed to, exacerbated & actively encouraged the corruption etc you accurately reference ?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Europe is reaping the consequences of its alliance with US militarized imperialism whereby the US uproots millions of people and the EU spends billions of euros to cover the cost of immigrants fleeing the western wars.

    Most of the immigrants’ welfare payments fall far short of the losses incurred in their homeland. Their jobs homes, schools, and civic associations in the EU and US are far less valuable and accommodating then what they possessed in their original communities.

    The “migrant crisis”, in which millions of third world migrants from US warzones are resettled in Europe, is the global elite’s method for bringing permanent chaos to the first world to ensure their rule is total and permanent.

    It is far less bloody and physically destructive than what has been done to the Middle East, where ancient monuments and settlements have been bombed to dust, but mass immigration comes with the (directed and planned) eventual deconstruction of European identity and culture, and tearing down of our monuments, unpersoning of our heroes to make way for a hellish one world system.

    The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
    “The Jews are an incurably bad people, a people always seeking its own benefits and wanting to enslave the world, a people which in spite of all its efforts to assimilate, still remains strange and hostile to the non-Jews. The Jew is the torchbearer of capitalism, exploitation, usury, and suppression. At the same time, he is also the yeast of history, upsetting and destroying all that is stable, the troublemaker incarnate. In short, the Jewish people is the curse of humanity.”
    Nahman Syrkin, 1898, The Zionist Ideal, pp 337

    “There is an older power at work, which seeks to destroy all national spirit, all ordered government in every country. What is this power? A large body of opinion answers: Jewish Power.” Nesta Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, 1924
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. RobinG says:
    @james
    Whilst I consider myself to be as opposed as James Jatras is to all the neo-colonial wars by the U.S. and its allies going back at least to the commencement of the wars against Korea and Vietnam in September 1945, right up to the current wars against the peoples of Syria, Yemen and elsewhere, James Jatras should surely agree that working class and middle class people in First World countries, notably in Germany, Sweden and the United States, are also victims of these wars.

    The hundreds of thousands who, since 2015, aided by the likes of George Soros and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, have fled to First World countries from the chaos caused by war and globalism, are being used, by those who fomented those wars, to also undermine democracy and to destroy working conditions in the First World. If this is not stopped, living conditions of ordinary people in the First World will, before long, be reduced to those of the Third World, with little benefit to the hundreds of millions more remaining there.

    Do you have Jatras on the brain? This was written by James Petras.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Anon[184] • Disclaimer says:

    What wars are we causing right now in Mexico? Central America? South America? None.

    What wars are Europeans causing in Sub-Saharan Africa? None.

    Yet the US is being flooded with illegals from below the Rio Grande, and Europe is being flooded with black, sub-Saharan Africans. Only one group from the Middle East, the Syrians, is currently experiencing war conditions that are caused by outsiders, yet Europe and the US are dealing with massive waves of people outside this area.

    They’re coming because of our lifestyles. The gold rush is on, and the US and Europe are the gold the illegals are drooling after. They want our money, period.

    Even Syrians don’t have to come to Europe. There are other Middle East countries they could go to.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    These ME countries do not offer the better life: income, housing, medical care.
    A migrant costs us some € 33.000 a year.
    If the higher costs of medical care for them are included, I fear not.
    , @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III

    Even Syrians don’t have to come to Europe. There are other Middle East countries they could go to.
     
    It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.

    (You must be one of those low IQ black African negroes they talk about here.)

    Turkey - 3,572,565 (registered April 2018)
    Lebanon - 2.2 million (estimated arrivals as of December 2015)
    Jordan - 1,265,000 (census results as of November 2015)
    Germany - 600,000 (2014 to late 2016)

    Source: Refugees of the Syrian Civil War
    , @redmudhooch

    What wars are we causing right now in Mexico? Central America? South America? None.

    What wars are Europeans causing in Sub-Saharan Africa? None.
     
    The CIA never sleeps. Never. Venezuela. Columbia. Honduras............

    Did I mention CIA never sleep.
    , @Biff

    They’re coming because of our lifestyles.
     
    They want to come here, and get fat and lazy watching a dumbed down boob-tube, with their in-bred cousin, while watching their neighborhood burn, because the cops just killed their track-star brother? Then the burning of their neighborhood causes the crack labs to explode sending chemicals into the water supply that gets lapped up by all the local pit bulls, which gets them all zipper-necked into eating the children when they aren’t even hungry, and that gets the gang-bangers to start shooting at the pit bulls while holding the gun sideways sending bullets in every fucking direction imaginable hitting electrical transformers knocking out the power in the middle of summer, which cuts off the air conditioners, sending more zombies into the streets?

    That life style?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. USA immigration is politically quite different from migration into the EU.
    Jewish sociologist dr Stephen Steinlight is afraid of immigration from the south into the USA ‘for them USA jews are just rich people, they know nothing about the holocaust’.
    The ME wars, according to Hollings in 2004 Bush jr promised AIPAC the Iraq war if he got the jewish votes.
    Long before Israel developed plans to to destabilise the whole ME, Netanyahu continues this policy.
    Alas, with Syria and Iran he finds Putin on his way, maybe also Erdogan.
    Cynical people suppose that the migration from the ME and N Africa is part of the plan, the European cultures must be destroyed or destabilised to make the EU into a USA clone.
    This plan may backfire, immigration may well be the end of the EU.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    AIPAC has had decades long programs trying to convert Hispanics to the Israel Jewish cause....recruiting them for all expense paid trips to Israel, flying them DC for AIPAC conferences, offering scholarships to promising young Latinos, etc.,etc.

    But it hasn't worked very well on Hispanics....so now AIPAC is concentrating on India immigrants.


    Communities: AIPAC's Hispanic Community | AIPAC.org

    https://www.aipac.org/connect/communities/hispanic

    Latinos in the United States represents the largest and fastest growing population group in the country, today making up roughly 15% of the U.S. population
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. @llloyd
    The Jews were very comfortably ensconced in Europe. Their richest class had joined or even led the European elites. Then they suddenly faced expulsion. Whatever one's opinion on that, it was traumatic for a people without a religious safety valve to handle it except vengence. They cannot forgive or attribute it to the will of Allah or even seek re-incarnation or yoga. That is if they self identify as Jews. Kalergi was non Jewish but married into the Jewish community. That as often happens made him a fanatic for his adopted community. He was also half Japanese which made him anti-white.

    ” Then they suddenly faced expulsion. ”
    Nothing sudden:
    Ismar Schorsch, ‘Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870 – 1914′, New York 1972
    ‘Christianity and the Holocaust of the Hungarian Jewry’, Moshe Y Herclz, 1993 New York University press
    Jakob Wassermann, ‘MEIN WEG ALS DEUTSCHER UND ALS JUDE’, Berlin 1921
    Jakob Wassermann, ‘Die Juden von Zirndorf’, 1897 1999 München
    Fritz Stern, ‘Gold and Iron, Bismarck, Bleichröder, and the Building of the German Empire’, New York, 1977.
    Alexander Solschenizyn, ´Die russisch- jüdische Geschichte 1795- 1916, >> Zweihundert Jahre zusammen <<´, Moskau 2001, München 2002

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. @Rational
    JUDAISTS WHO OPENLY BRAGGED ABOUT EXTERMINATING THE WHITE RACE...AND IMMIGRATION IS THEIR TOOL.

    Maybe some readers will assume I am a "conspiracy theorist", so I want to back up my previous comment about the Jewish role in immigration with quotes--from the horses' mouth, that I found online:

    "The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today's races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."--Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Jewish Austrian politician, considered the father of the modern European Union.


    "Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive."—Jewish Barbara Lerner Spectre, founding director of Paideia, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden.

    "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the White race."Jewish Noel Ignatiev

    "The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists."—Source unknown.

    "We'll keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed."—Author unknown.

    "Treason to the White race is Loyalty to Humanity"-- Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Professor, Jewish.

    "The White race is the cancer of human history."—Judaist Susan Sontag,

    Jewish author Tim Wise wished white hearts would stop beating.

    ” “The White race is the cancer of human history.”—Judaist Susan Sontag, ”
    Should be
    “The White race is the cancer of jewish history.”
    Jews once were a very powerful people:
    Michael Grant, ‘The Jews in the Roman World’, 1973, New York
    Roman military might and christianity destroyed that power.
    Therefore the theory that Paul created christianity as a secret agent of the Roman emperor is an interesting one
    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, ‘Verschlusssache Jesus, Die Wahrheit über das frühe Christentum’, (The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, 1991), 2005, Bergisch Gladbach
    I’m inclined to suppose that the copper Dead Sea scroll decribing where the jewish wealth was hidden is real.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    Jews once were a very powerful people:
     
    In Rome ?....not really.
    In fact Israel, as it is known, was a 'client state' of Rome and had to pay taxes to Rome.
    Rabbis collected the taxes and could 'keep a part' for themselves.
    The Jews revolted against this and Rome wiped them out.
    Wash, rinse, repeat .....is how it went thereafter until modern times.

    This book is really, really hard to read and in four volumes----but its considered one of the best for its timeline....you can read it online
    Fall of The Roman Empire by Gibbons

    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25717/25717-h/25717-h.htm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. So, basically the point of this article is BDS Israel.

    Beyond that, we’re all up to date on the Time Magazine child exploitation situation around here. I think it’s probably safe to say that woman’s shifty situation is far from the only one of it’s kind with these hordes in both the US and EU nations. So we can drop the pretext about refugees. It’s half true at best.

    Most these people are economic opportunists, plain and simple.
    Pirates here to loot a burning ship.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. I’m all too happy to condemn US and EU imperialism and wars, as anyone should be. But they have little to do with immigration. A path to those who have is all those who have not need to make them come. No coercive force is necessary. It’s not like South Africa became inundated with blacks because it was bombing the rest of Africa.

    These current migrant crises in the have nothing to do with war and everything to do with the crooked governments and elites and Jews like Soros and Rothschild bribing the armies of demographic replacement and then sponsoring their voyage to the West.

    You can drop bombs or foreign aid on the 3rd world, the only real difference between the two with regards to impact on immigration is whether or not you thin or boom the population before they come. Just look at the population boom humanitarian aid has caused in Africa if you want to see what direction tomorrow’s migrant crisis will be invading from.

    Ultimately, the only way to stop immigration is to physically stop immigration. If it becomes clear to them that they can’t get in, they will eventually stop coming to try. It won’t be worth the effort.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    I’m all too happy to condemn US and EU imperialism and wars, as anyone should be. But they have little to do with immigration.
     
    Partly true as in the case of India as you can see below (strictly economic opportunism) but not entirely true for the others. It has long been proven by data studies that the main causes of migration are wars, internal conflicts, natural disasters and famines.

    Either way these are the results.

    https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/international-migration-report-2017.html

    The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights)
    18 December 2017

    (excerpts)

    There are now an estimated 258 million people living in a country other than their country of birth — an increase of 49% since 2000 — according to new figures released by UN DESA today, on International Migrants Day. The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights), a biennial publication of the department, states that 3.4% of the world’s inhabitants today are international migrants. This reflects a modest increase from a value of 2.8% in 2000. By contrast, the number of migrants as a fraction of the population residing in high-income countries rose from 9.6% in 2000 to 14% in 2017

    In 2017, high-income countries hosted 64%, or nearly 165 million, of the total number of international migrants worldwide. Moreover, most of the growth in the global population of international migrants has been caused by movements toward high-income countries, which host 64 million of the 85 million migrants added since 2000.

    The number of international migrants includes 26 million refugees or asylum seekers, or about 10% of the total. Although a majority of the world’s international migrants live in high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries host nearly 22 million, or 84%, of all refugees and asylum seekers.
    There has been a global increase in the median age of migrants, from 38.0 years in 2000 to 39.2 years in 2017. However, in some regions, such as Asia, Oceania and especially Latin America and the Caribbean, the median age of migrants has decreased by about three years.
    In 2017, 48.4% of international migrants were women. Female migrants outnumber males in all regions except Africa and Asia; in some countries of Asia, male migrants outnumber females by about three to one.
    In 2017, two thirds of all international migrants were living in just twenty countries, and half of all international migrants were residing in just ten countries. The largest number of international migrants (49.8 million, or 19% of the global total) reside in the United States. Saudi Arabia, Germany and the Russian Federation host the second, third and fourth largest numbers of migrants worldwide (around 12 million each), followed by the United Kingdom (nearly 9 million).
    Destination and origin of international migrants
    More than six of every ten international migrants reside in Asia or Europe (80 and 78 million, respectively). Northern America hosts the third largest number (58 million), followed by Africa (25 million), Latin America and the Caribbean (9.5 million) and Oceania (8.4 million).
    These migration patterns are consistent with the growth seen during the period 2000 – 2017, when Asia added some 30 million migrants, followed by Europe, which added 22 million, Northern America, 17 million, and Africa, 10 million.
    In most countries of Europe, Northern America and Oceania, international migrants comprised more than 10% of the total population in 2017.
    In 2017, Asia and Europe were the regions of origin for the largest numbers of international migrants — 106 million and 61 million, respectively. Latin America and the Caribbean followed with 38 million and Africa with 36 million.
    Between 2000 and 2017, Africa experienced the largest relative increase in the number of international migrants who had originated in that region (+68%), followed by Asia (+62%), Latin America and the Caribbean (+52%) and Oceania (+51%).

    India has the largest number of persons born in the country who are now living outside its borders. The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017, ahead of the number of Mexican-born persons living outside Mexico (13 million). The Russian Federation, China, Bangladesh, Syrian Arab Republic and Pakistan and Ukraine also have large migrant populations living abroad, ranging from 6 to 11 million each.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Yeah…and in the meantime…I still don’t want them in the US…I don’t give a fuck about the leftist sob story…..

    Alt Right Immigration Policy:0 nonwhite legal immigrants and 0 nonwhite illegal aliens forever…..including 0 high skill Asian legal immigrants forever……

    Read More
    • Agree: Them Guys
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  20. Them Guys says:
    @Rational
    JUDAISTS WHO OPENLY BRAGGED ABOUT EXTERMINATING THE WHITE RACE...AND IMMIGRATION IS THEIR TOOL.

    Maybe some readers will assume I am a "conspiracy theorist", so I want to back up my previous comment about the Jewish role in immigration with quotes--from the horses' mouth, that I found online:

    "The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today's races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."--Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Jewish Austrian politician, considered the father of the modern European Union.


    "Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive."—Jewish Barbara Lerner Spectre, founding director of Paideia, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden.

    "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the White race."Jewish Noel Ignatiev

    "The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists."—Source unknown.

    "We'll keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed."—Author unknown.

    "Treason to the White race is Loyalty to Humanity"-- Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Professor, Jewish.

    "The White race is the cancer of human history."—Judaist Susan Sontag,

    Jewish author Tim Wise wished white hearts would stop beating.

    This is who said or wrote those quotes you list as “author Unknown”…

    “…The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists…
    …Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”
    — Noel Ignatiev, Jew Harvard professor and founder of “Race Traitor”

    This Is the full entire, jewish woman, Susan Sontag, quote….Note she did a name change like so many jews always do.

    “Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Balanchine ballets, et al. don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.”
    — Susan Sontag (Rosenblatt), Partisan Review, Winter 1967, p. 57.

    Here is a couple more jewish stated quotes just to give folks a real, factual true idea, of just how evil and Nefarious so many jews really are…You wont ever hear of these type quotes or issues from ANY MSM Jewspapers or Talmudvision aka Electronic Rabbi= TV msm News shows eh.

    “Political Zionism is an agency of Big Business. It is being used by Jewish and Christian financiers in this country and Great Britain, to make Jews believe that Palestine will be ruled by a descendant of King David who will ultimately rule the world. What seclusion! It will lead to war between Arabs and Jews and eventually to war between Moslems and non-Moslems. That will be the turning point of history.”
    — Henry H. Klein, “A Jew Warns Jews,” 1947.(It wont be a descendant of David Mr. Klein, rather he will be the jewish Antichrist man seated in the jew 3rd temple, Ie: A Fraud Fake, same as Khazars pretending to be a real judah jew).

    “Terrorism and ‘revenge’ were…to be glorified as the ‘moral… and even sacred’ values of Israeli society. . . . [T]he military symbol was now Unit 101, led by Arik [Ariel] Sharon. …The lives of Jewish victims…had to be sacrificed to create provocations justifying subsequent reprisals. … A hammering, daily propaganda, controlled by the censors, was directed to feed the Israeli population with images of the monstrosity of the Enemy.”
    — from the dairy of Moshe Sharett, Prime Minister of Israel, in Livia Rokach’s “Israel’s Sacred Terrorism”, p. 44 (1980). Rokach’s father was Sharett’s minister of the Interior and had access to inside information. She was later found dead in a hotel room in Rome under mysterious circumstances.

    Did you Catch that? jews’ own top Israel state Leaders, Admitting they have zero problems of Killing Via Terrorism, their Own Jewish peoples, in order to push fwd their nefarious, evil zio agendas!……With “Best Friends, and Best ever allies such as Israel, and Jews”, Who ever needs any enemys eh?..ps: how can anyone doubt jewdeo intent to mass murder Non jews, especially european whites, as done in 1917 russia etc, when they even terrorize and kill their own jews?!

    Yet even with such massive stated proof by/from jew top Leadership, we still have so many Naysayers, and jew firster/defenders who screech and Howl at every reply posting here, that Dares to mention or Name the many examples and jewish persons within Americas Major Newspaper and top TV News stations, that keep doing and promoting and reporting the very exact same type Lies as the above quote explains…Ie: A hammering, daily propaganda, controlled by the censors, was directed to feed the “American People with images of the monstrosity of the Enemy.” (I switched Israli population-to-American People-to make a point). Good Point it is too.

    Many/Most Sane folk, as do most here at unz, state how Dem Lib equals a severe Mental Illiness and I fully agree…However, how can any Sane knowledgeable person not also make exact same declaration, about those otherwise very smart person’s that continue to harbor some form internal or mental block for lack of better word, and continue to always Jump! at every chance to bash and call vile names of those who post info and proof etc. of so much terrible jewish involvment in most every wrong and evil agenda and thing globally? This goes Double bad for those that are not even a jew!…Shabozz Goys? Or Puppies from pavlovs Dog’s Litter who kneejerk defend israel and jewry every chance they can find?…Maybe a combo of both? Why so difficult to simply admit to truths, especially as spoken straight from jews own mouth’s and written from jews own pens?

    THIS Quote is directly related to Article above!

    “[The oligarchs] exploited the disintegration of the Soviet system to loot the treasures of the state and to amass plunder amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. In order to safeguard the perpetuation of their business, they took control of the state. >>>Six of the seven are Jews<<<. . . . [Boris] Berezovsky boasts that he caused the war in Chechnya, in which tens of thousands have been killed and a whole country devastated. He was interested in the mineral resources and a prospective [oil] pipeline there.”
    — Uri Avnery describing an Israeli TV series called “The Oligarchs,” in an article entitled “How the Virgin Became a Whore” (2004). This series will never be broadcast in the USA, of course.

    Shown On Israeli TV shows, yet so Many jews in and from israel still Claim to never know a damn thing, whenever its a jew or jew's involved in abject treachery and massive Rip-Offs eh?

    Yeah lemme see if I can somehow recall how they state it typically…Hmmm, Oh yes here it is…"Why Us? Why its always we jews gets Poysacutid and booted out? When everyone knows we jews nevva evva does any wrongs or evils…Its antisemitism I tells ya!

    Perhaps international jewry As a Whole, needs change main name of jew, to, call jews the, Three jewish Monkeys…See no jewish evils–Hear no jewish evils—Speak no jewish evils…Trust Us we is honest!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Illegal unlimited immigration is national suicide for any country that is under assault from this immigration flood and this immigration exodus was brought on by the Zionist wars which were perpetrated by the Zionist attack on 911 to trigger the Mideast wars which has led to the mass illegal unlimited immigration.

    This immigration assault will lower the living standard of the countries affected to third world standards and make them easier to meld into the one world government that has been planned by the Zionists who are behind the NWO, read the PROTOCOLS OF ZION , this is the future the Zionists are pushing.

    Here in America they plan to merge the U.S. and Canada and Mexico into the NORTH AMERICAN UNION similar to the EU as another stepping stone of the way to their NWO, wake up America while their is still time to save our country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. @Anon
    What wars are we causing right now in Mexico? Central America? South America? None.

    What wars are Europeans causing in Sub-Saharan Africa? None.

    Yet the US is being flooded with illegals from below the Rio Grande, and Europe is being flooded with black, sub-Saharan Africans. Only one group from the Middle East, the Syrians, is currently experiencing war conditions that are caused by outsiders, yet Europe and the US are dealing with massive waves of people outside this area.

    They're coming because of our lifestyles. The gold rush is on, and the US and Europe are the gold the illegals are drooling after. They want our money, period.

    Even Syrians don't have to come to Europe. There are other Middle East countries they could go to.

    These ME countries do not offer the better life: income, housing, medical care.
    A migrant costs us some € 33.000 a year.
    If the higher costs of medical care for them are included, I fear not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Them Guys says:
    @Biff

    yet the most important matter which is driving millions to emigrate is overlooked is wars.
     
    Overlooked on purpose, since it’s really bad PR for those who give the orders.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815

    Yes, but these wars, especially mid east regions, which only began around 2003, cannot explain the massive ongoing, never ended, illegal Mexicans and other south American hoards that have been and continue to Flood the USA with, what must by now be at least 40-+-Million, and Not the forever we been hearing from tv news, eleven million “undocumenteds”…Wrong! Both ways too, Undocumented is really Illegal Criminal Aliens Invaders period. Which by all methods known of, equal an Act of War against America by Mexico and other foreign nations.

    There also has been very well documented proof galore of actual Mexican Govnt published and created, Comic Book like flyers of several pages, that fully explain and describe in a step by step way for Mexican citizens to become an illegal Alien Invader immigrant into the USA lands.

    Those comic books also describe best methods for illegals to, once inside usa borders, to locate and make use of various govnt of usa agencies, and non profits that assist with beds-Cash$$$-Welfare, even though welfare is illegal for non citizens, and closest Hosp. to drop baby at so to attain “birth right baby status and remain here till baby is aged 18 yrs old and receive welfare bennies in name of kid etc.”

    So these comic books proven as a Mexican govnt created and published How-Too to Violate usa laws, are an act of war against America and its legit citizens(that’s Me and You).

    Just because No real live ammo bullets has yet been fired at us by them, don’t change facts of an act of war on behalf of Mexican govnt.

    In fact, Every Non usa state or nation govnt that refuses to control there peoples on so massive a scale, are All to blame at various levels…levels that all are in one way or other violations of usa sovereignty.

    Picture Mexcio, with its very stringent and always Prosecuted Immigration Laws, mandatory 2-3 yrs hard prison terms, Shooting border jumpers at south mex border, etc…Picture the Crys and Howl’s if say….10-20 or more Millions of American citizens, White ones mainly, with a million negroes for good measure of course, decided to Flood into Mexico, and take Firearms and demand mexico recognize our 2nd amendt, and supply Us with tons of English speakers, translators, Free Food, Hospital services, and of course when every single of Our white American, 10 million females give birth we too demand instant citizenship for the new baby! Along with same welfare perks usa gives mex illegals. And when said muti millions white folks Refuse to exit or leave, and also demand Court Hearings for every whitey immigrant into our NEW Homeland Mexico!

    Anybody who thinks or believes that will not cause meican govnt to call out its own mex army, and shoot such american invaders?….Is a total complete idiot bordering on being a true asshole in deep denial.

    Therefore, yes mid east and various usa govnt actions in south amer. and central amer. has probably caused “Some” of our illegals problems…But no where near the vast amounts as promoted in article period….3000-4000 daily across usa border, and done since 1965, when Two jews, a US Rep from NY with help from his NY media jew pal, invented, promoted for close to three years, got it finally passed into 1965 usa fed Immgration Law Changes…By design, TO, Destroy White Americans and America. No amount of vast denials can change facts and thats a fact. Look it all Up any who doubt it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. cecil1 says:

    Ridiculous garbage that obfuscates the issues.

    NO matter what happens, White Genocide by immigration is a crime, not a policy option.

    NO matter what happens elsewhere, it must not result in my nation being destroyed by design or just excuse.

    There’s a problem somewhere does NOT justify White Genocide. So stop trying endlessly to excuse it.

    Its despicable.

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone IS White Genocide.

    Some basic truths: Access to White people is not a human right

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians..."
    --- Sir, have you studied the world history in a high school?
    --- Do you know this white woman? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmIRYvJQeHM ("Hillary Clinton "We Came, We Saw, He Died."
    "Under Gaddafi, education and health care were free for all.
    Newlyweds received U.S $50,000 from the government. Gaddafi’s government had legislation providing for a grant to newlyweds to buy their first apartment so as to help start a family.
    Gaddafi carried out the world’s largest irrigation project to make water available to the whole country.
    Libya had no external debt and had reserves of $150 billion. [The USA has a debt of over $21 trillion.]
    The price of petrol was $0,14 per litre
    Having a home was considered a human right. Gaddafi’s Green Book categorically stated, “The house is a basic need of both the individual and the family, therefore it should not be owned by others.”
    People had enough food
    Gaddafi launched a programme to privatize all Libyan oil to every citizen of Libya."
    Libya today: http://www.informafrica.com/blog/photos-of-sirte-after-the-nato-bombing-in-libya/https://www.africanexponent.com/post/ten-reasons-libya-under-gaddafi-was-a-great-place-to-live-2746
    https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-e3970458a36482ac0a5a344eae544bf3-c
    Syria today: http://darkroom-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/2013/01/REU-SYRIA-CRISISBODIES.jpg
    --- Do you know this white man? https://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/308-12/16561-focus-cheneys-halliburton-made-395-billion-on-iraq-war " Cheney's Halliburton Made $39.5 Billion on Iraq War"
    --- Do you know why Methodists call for the expulsion of Bush and Cheney from Church? https://bushlibraryblog.wordpress.com/methodist-debate/methodists-call-for-expulsion-of-bush-cheney-from-church/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Them Guys says:
    @james
    Whilst I consider myself to be as opposed as James Jatras is to all the neo-colonial wars by the U.S. and its allies going back at least to the commencement of the wars against Korea and Vietnam in September 1945, right up to the current wars against the peoples of Syria, Yemen and elsewhere, James Jatras should surely agree that working class and middle class people in First World countries, notably in Germany, Sweden and the United States, are also victims of these wars.

    The hundreds of thousands who, since 2015, aided by the likes of George Soros and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, have fled to First World countries from the chaos caused by war and globalism, are being used, by those who fomented those wars, to also undermine democracy and to destroy working conditions in the First World. If this is not stopped, living conditions of ordinary people in the First World will, before long, be reduced to those of the Third World, with little benefit to the hundreds of millions more remaining there.

    Another good point is..The massive waves of immigrants into EU nations, and usa, that we are told is all due to mid east wars…So..Why was it safe and okay to remain in those war zone countries up until 2015?

    Those wars began in 2003. Even Syria as newest or latest war, if correct? Began in 2007 or later right? So not only did all those masses remain within own war torn nations, but they even left behind almost every Female, Old folks, Parents, Babies, Wives etc….While the Males, mainly of war age simply left to invade eu and usa and england?

    Somethings wrong with that picture folks. We are Not being told the rest of story.

    As an Male American, if You just Had to leave your home and country and do so fast due to bombs and war, would You leave behind wives and babies and small kiddies? Leave behind old parents still alive?….OR would You Remain at home to Fight and save your america nation and homes?

    No need to answer as we know what it is eh. Somethings very rotten in story we being told again and again regards these wars and mass invaders going ONLY into WHITE Nations.

    If as lib leftys and neocon repukes keep telling us of how wonderfull and positive, mass immigrations of NON whites is…And how they keep telling us, that this agenda IS Main best solution for all problems that aills entire world.

    Then Why do they Never, Ever, promote nor insist nor cause an equally mass invasion of Others, Non native types, into Japan? China? Vietnam? AFRICA? MEXICO? et al?

    If we really do have a huge bad global problem as they tell us, and mass immigrations are The main solution….Why only whitey nations need or get “Fixed”?

    That on its own explains this as no more and no better than a massive huge swindle scam against European Whiteys period. With many involved, but as per usual, jewry at top leaderships and head honchos of what jews do best…Scam ∧ Swindle ∧ Lie about it all. Jewry demands for Israel to remain an Only White skinned Jewish Nation, is the final proof in the pudding.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Svigor

    Those wars began in 2003. Even Syria as newest or latest war, if correct? Began in 2007 or later right? So not only did all those masses remain within own war torn nations, but they even left behind almost every Female, Old folks, Parents, Babies, Wives etc….While the Males, mainly of war age simply left to invade eu and usa and england?

    Somethings wrong with that picture folks. We are Not being told the rest of story.

    As an Male American, if You just Had to leave your home and country and do so fast due to bombs and war, would You leave behind wives and babies and small kiddies? Leave behind old parents still alive?….OR would You Remain at home to Fight and save your america nation and homes?
     

    Indeed. We are meant to believe that hordes of men were forced out of their home countries and into the West by war, but they left all their women and children behind. To face slaughter?

    Doesn't sound like the kind of men sane people would allow to immigrate.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. denk says:

    tsk tsk tsk
    South Koreans praise Trump, who escalates the Yemen war started by Obama, while fuming at the influx of Yemeni refugees into Jeju.

    Priceless.

    hehehhe

    https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2018-06-28/-fake-refugees-get-out-how-south-koreans-are-channeling-trump

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    The SK should've asked murkka to collect those Yemenis refugees., except the murkkans themselves have already decared Yemenis persona non grata.

    uncle sham sez...
    I break it, you fix it.

    What can the SK do ?

    ehehhe
    , @artichoke
    We're trying to get the Houthis out so they can have their country back. We didn't start that war, the Houthis did.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @Anon
    What wars are we causing right now in Mexico? Central America? South America? None.

    What wars are Europeans causing in Sub-Saharan Africa? None.

    Yet the US is being flooded with illegals from below the Rio Grande, and Europe is being flooded with black, sub-Saharan Africans. Only one group from the Middle East, the Syrians, is currently experiencing war conditions that are caused by outsiders, yet Europe and the US are dealing with massive waves of people outside this area.

    They're coming because of our lifestyles. The gold rush is on, and the US and Europe are the gold the illegals are drooling after. They want our money, period.

    Even Syrians don't have to come to Europe. There are other Middle East countries they could go to.

    Even Syrians don’t have to come to Europe. There are other Middle East countries they could go to.

    It’s better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you’re a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.

    (You must be one of those low IQ black African negroes they talk about here.)

    Turkey – 3,572,565 (registered April 2018)
    Lebanon – 2.2 million (estimated arrivals as of December 2015)
    Jordan – 1,265,000 (census results as of November 2015)
    Germany – 600,000 (2014 to late 2016)

    Source: Refugees of the Syrian Civil War

    Read More
    • Replies: @Svigor
    What's the problem? Sounds like he was 100% correct.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Everybody is simply beating around the bush here and reluctant to get to the main crux.

    Just what is the between-the -lines message which Petras, a died-in-the wool, leftist is trying to get across?

    His underlying message is the same one relentlessly propagated by every leftist writer world-wide and that being :

    IF WE WOULD FINALLY MOVE TO SOCIALISM ALL OF THESE (FABRICATED) PROBLEMS WOULD THEN BE RESOLVED.

    He doesn’t even register Venezuela or Cuba or the old UdSSR, none of them do, as they are patently insane, irrational and hopelessly lost.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and pro jazz artisit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. Svigor says:

    (1) Low Human Capital
    (2) Low Human Capital
    (3) Low Human Capital
    (4) Invade the World, Invite the World Globalism.

    FIFY.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. artichoke says:

    Some Americans go down there to do business. Historical patterns are disrupted, some people benefit, some do worse, and for sure a lot of infrastructure is built that the natives never could have built for themselves. Diseases are eradicated, life expectancy and expectations soar.

    Then there’s a revolt or something, the business people leave, and then guys like the author of this article get to tally all the damage, without taking into account the massive benefits left behind. There’s a highway running thru Central America now. Do you think Hondurans were going to build that? Maybe “you didn’t build that” Obama thinks the Hondurans actually did, including the engineering and heavy equipment work, the tunnels and the bridges.

    And then we’re told we owe them for the damage (only the damage) others, American businessmen and politicians, did. Or we’re supposed to bring those folks to our country and put them into our social safety net.

    Nah, forget it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. Svigor says:
    @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III

    Even Syrians don’t have to come to Europe. There are other Middle East countries they could go to.
     
    It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.

    (You must be one of those low IQ black African negroes they talk about here.)

    Turkey - 3,572,565 (registered April 2018)
    Lebanon - 2.2 million (estimated arrivals as of December 2015)
    Jordan - 1,265,000 (census results as of November 2015)
    Germany - 600,000 (2014 to late 2016)

    Source: Refugees of the Syrian Civil War

    What’s the problem? Sounds like he was 100% correct.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    Any signs of decency, Svigor? https://www.commondreams.org/news/2013/04/07/11-afghan-children-among-dead-latest-usnato-bombing
    , @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III
    His statement implies that he thinks refugees COULD have gone to neighboring countries but chose instead to migrate en masse to Europe. If he was aware that the vast majority DID, in fact, go to neighboring states, why make that statement in the first place?

    Someone should start a campaign to encourage people displaced by American and European sponsored wars to migrate to the countries responsible for their lives and homes being destroyed, and offer them incentives to raise large families there. The weak and wimpy Western public needs to suffer consequences for the death and destruction their governments unleash in their citizens' names. Westerners really are the worst snowflakes. Islamic terrorists only had to kill a few thousand of these water soluble civilians (over a 15-year period) for Western civilization to start unraveling.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Svigor says:
    @Them Guys
    Another good point is..The massive waves of immigrants into EU nations, and usa, that we are told is all due to mid east wars...So..Why was it safe and okay to remain in those war zone countries up until 2015?

    Those wars began in 2003. Even Syria as newest or latest war, if correct? Began in 2007 or later right? So not only did all those masses remain within own war torn nations, but they even left behind almost every Female, Old folks, Parents, Babies, Wives etc....While the Males, mainly of war age simply left to invade eu and usa and england?

    Somethings wrong with that picture folks. We are Not being told the rest of story.

    As an Male American, if You just Had to leave your home and country and do so fast due to bombs and war, would You leave behind wives and babies and small kiddies? Leave behind old parents still alive?....OR would You Remain at home to Fight and save your america nation and homes?

    No need to answer as we know what it is eh. Somethings very rotten in story we being told again and again regards these wars and mass invaders going ONLY into WHITE Nations.

    If as lib leftys and neocon repukes keep telling us of how wonderfull and positive, mass immigrations of NON whites is...And how they keep telling us, that this agenda IS Main best solution for all problems that aills entire world.

    Then Why do they Never, Ever, promote nor insist nor cause an equally mass invasion of Others, Non native types, into Japan? China? Vietnam? AFRICA? MEXICO? et al?

    If we really do have a huge bad global problem as they tell us, and mass immigrations are The main solution....Why only whitey nations need or get "Fixed"?

    That on its own explains this as no more and no better than a massive huge swindle scam against European Whiteys period. With many involved, but as per usual, jewry at top leaderships and head honchos of what jews do best...Scam ∧ Swindle ∧ Lie about it all. Jewry demands for Israel to remain an Only White skinned Jewish Nation, is the final proof in the pudding.

    Those wars began in 2003. Even Syria as newest or latest war, if correct? Began in 2007 or later right? So not only did all those masses remain within own war torn nations, but they even left behind almost every Female, Old folks, Parents, Babies, Wives etc….While the Males, mainly of war age simply left to invade eu and usa and england?

    Somethings wrong with that picture folks. We are Not being told the rest of story.

    As an Male American, if You just Had to leave your home and country and do so fast due to bombs and war, would You leave behind wives and babies and small kiddies? Leave behind old parents still alive?….OR would You Remain at home to Fight and save your america nation and homes?

    Indeed. We are meant to believe that hordes of men were forced out of their home countries and into the West by war, but they left all their women and children behind. To face slaughter?

    Doesn’t sound like the kind of men sane people would allow to immigrate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    Indeed. We are meant to believe that hordes of men were forced out of their home countries and into the West by war, but they left all their women and children behind. To face slaughter?
     
    56% of international migrants are women....add in children with them and there are fewer male migrants overall.

    http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimatesmaps.shtml?2t2
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. denk says:
    @denk
    tsk tsk tsk
    South Koreans praise Trump, who escalates the Yemen war started by Obama, while fuming at the influx of Yemeni refugees into Jeju.

    Priceless.

    hehehhe

    https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2018-06-28/-fake-refugees-get-out-how-south-koreans-are-channeling-trump

    The SK should’ve asked murkka to collect those Yemenis refugees., except the murkkans themselves have already decared Yemenis persona non grata.

    uncle sham sez…
    I break it, you fix it.

    What can the SK do ?

    ehehhe

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. artichoke says:
    @denk
    tsk tsk tsk
    South Koreans praise Trump, who escalates the Yemen war started by Obama, while fuming at the influx of Yemeni refugees into Jeju.

    Priceless.

    hehehhe

    https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2018-06-28/-fake-refugees-get-out-how-south-koreans-are-channeling-trump

    We’re trying to get the Houthis out so they can have their country back. We didn’t start that war, the Houthis did.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    I'll sleep over it....

    hope to get back tomorrow barring unforseen
    circumstances.
    , @denk
    I just realise that Trump has banned refugees from the following seven countries...

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

    This is almost the same list of seven countries that murkka conspired to 'do' in a five year plan, as revealed by gen Wesley Clark....

    Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Somalia, And Sudan

    .except they've added Yemen cuz Lebanon is already kaput.

    five of these have become failed states riven by terrorism, Iran is now in the cross hair, murkka's Saudi mercs are waging a genocidal war in Yemen which makes Fallujah looks like child's play. [1]

    murkka is responsible for this mess, its now reaping the whirlwind, but what've SK done to deserve this ?

    [1]
    https://newmatilda.com/2017/03/19/the-war-in-yemen-is-turning-to-genocide-and-australia-is-quietly-supporting-it/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. denk says:
    @artichoke
    We're trying to get the Houthis out so they can have their country back. We didn't start that war, the Houthis did.

    I’ll sleep over it….

    hope to get back tomorrow barring unforseen
    circumstances.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. renfro says:
    @RealAmericanValuesCirca1776Not1965
    I'm all too happy to condemn US and EU imperialism and wars, as anyone should be. But they have little to do with immigration. A path to those who have is all those who have not need to make them come. No coercive force is necessary. It's not like South Africa became inundated with blacks because it was bombing the rest of Africa.

    These current migrant crises in the have nothing to do with war and everything to do with the crooked governments and elites and Jews like Soros and Rothschild bribing the armies of demographic replacement and then sponsoring their voyage to the West.

    You can drop bombs or foreign aid on the 3rd world, the only real difference between the two with regards to impact on immigration is whether or not you thin or boom the population before they come. Just look at the population boom humanitarian aid has caused in Africa if you want to see what direction tomorrow's migrant crisis will be invading from.

    Ultimately, the only way to stop immigration is to physically stop immigration. If it becomes clear to them that they can't get in, they will eventually stop coming to try. It won't be worth the effort.

    I’m all too happy to condemn US and EU imperialism and wars, as anyone should be. But they have little to do with immigration.

    Partly true as in the case of India as you can see below (strictly economic opportunism) but not entirely true for the others. It has long been proven by data studies that the main causes of migration are wars, internal conflicts, natural disasters and famines.

    Either way these are the results.

    https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/international-migration-report-2017.html

    The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights)
    18 December 2017

    (excerpts)

    There are now an estimated 258 million people living in a country other than their country of birth — an increase of 49% since 2000 — according to new figures released by UN DESA today, on International Migrants Day. The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights), a biennial publication of the department, states that 3.4% of the world’s inhabitants today are international migrants. This reflects a modest increase from a value of 2.8% in 2000. By contrast, the number of migrants as a fraction of the population residing in high-income countries rose from 9.6% in 2000 to 14% in 2017

    In 2017, high-income countries hosted 64%, or nearly 165 million, of the total number of international migrants worldwide. Moreover, most of the growth in the global population of international migrants has been caused by movements toward high-income countries, which host 64 million of the 85 million migrants added since 2000.

    The number of international migrants includes 26 million refugees or asylum seekers, or about 10% of the total. Although a majority of the world’s international migrants live in high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries host nearly 22 million, or 84%, of all refugees and asylum seekers.
    There has been a global increase in the median age of migrants, from 38.0 years in 2000 to 39.2 years in 2017. However, in some regions, such as Asia, Oceania and especially Latin America and the Caribbean, the median age of migrants has decreased by about three years.
    In 2017, 48.4% of international migrants were women. Female migrants outnumber males in all regions except Africa and Asia; in some countries of Asia, male migrants outnumber females by about three to one.
    In 2017, two thirds of all international migrants were living in just twenty countries, and half of all international migrants were residing in just ten countries. The largest number of international migrants (49.8 million, or 19% of the global total) reside in the United States. Saudi Arabia, Germany and the Russian Federation host the second, third and fourth largest numbers of migrants worldwide (around 12 million each), followed by the United Kingdom (nearly 9 million).
    Destination and origin of international migrants
    More than six of every ten international migrants reside in Asia or Europe (80 and 78 million, respectively). Northern America hosts the third largest number (58 million), followed by Africa (25 million), Latin America and the Caribbean (9.5 million) and Oceania (8.4 million).
    These migration patterns are consistent with the growth seen during the period 2000 – 2017, when Asia added some 30 million migrants, followed by Europe, which added 22 million, Northern America, 17 million, and Africa, 10 million.
    In most countries of Europe, Northern America and Oceania, international migrants comprised more than 10% of the total population in 2017.
    In 2017, Asia and Europe were the regions of origin for the largest numbers of international migrants — 106 million and 61 million, respectively. Latin America and the Caribbean followed with 38 million and Africa with 36 million.
    Between 2000 and 2017, Africa experienced the largest relative increase in the number of international migrants who had originated in that region (+68%), followed by Asia (+62%), Latin America and the Caribbean (+52%) and Oceania (+51%).

    India has the largest number of persons born in the country who are now living outside its borders. The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017, ahead of the number of Mexican-born persons living outside Mexico (13 million). The Russian Federation, China, Bangladesh, Syrian Arab Republic and Pakistan and Ukraine also have large migrant populations living abroad, ranging from 6 to 11 million each.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dagon Shield
    The largest percentage of people living outside of their native lands are whites... the Indians migrated to the far flung corners of the world over the last two centuries not just in the last two decades unlike the Mexicans, who are only heading up north. It ain't the same thing!
    , @denk

    The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017
     
    Those figures didnt include the following countries which were WMMed by Indians and rendered 'Indian territory'...

    Arunachal Pradesh. Assam. Manipur. Meghalaya. Mizoram. Nagaland. Sikkim. Tripura.

    Sikkim, Bhutan.

    Singapore is already de facto Bhutanised.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Last night the poor pitiful young male thug refugees in Sweden showed their gratitude for life long welfare by destroying 70 bus stop shelters in the poor pitiful refuge cities of Gothenburg and Malndahl

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. renfro says:
    @Svigor

    Those wars began in 2003. Even Syria as newest or latest war, if correct? Began in 2007 or later right? So not only did all those masses remain within own war torn nations, but they even left behind almost every Female, Old folks, Parents, Babies, Wives etc….While the Males, mainly of war age simply left to invade eu and usa and england?

    Somethings wrong with that picture folks. We are Not being told the rest of story.

    As an Male American, if You just Had to leave your home and country and do so fast due to bombs and war, would You leave behind wives and babies and small kiddies? Leave behind old parents still alive?….OR would You Remain at home to Fight and save your america nation and homes?
     

    Indeed. We are meant to believe that hordes of men were forced out of their home countries and into the West by war, but they left all their women and children behind. To face slaughter?

    Doesn't sound like the kind of men sane people would allow to immigrate.

    Indeed. We are meant to believe that hordes of men were forced out of their home countries and into the West by war, but they left all their women and children behind. To face slaughter?

    56% of international migrants are women….add in children with them and there are fewer male migrants overall.

    http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimatesmaps.shtml?2t2

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. renfro says:

    Trump keeps appointing Jews….the world keeps rejecting them.

    US nominee loses race to lead UN migrant agency

    By Morgan Gstalter – 06/29/18 08:13 AM EDT 189

    President Trump’s nominee to lead the United Nations migration agency has been knocked out of the race, The Associated Press reported Friday.

    Ken Isaacs came in third, behind Antonio Vitorino of Portugal and Laura Thompson of Costa Rica, in a vote by delegates in Geneva.
    The loss breaks a decades-long streak of Americans leading the UN’s International Organization for Migration (IOM).

    Isaacs had come under fire for a number of anti-Muslim comments he has made in the past.
    A CNN report in March highlighted a number of anti-Muslim comments Isaacs made from 2015-2017.
    One comment included Isaacs pushing back on a Catholic bishop on a CNN report following a terrorist attack in the U.K. The bishop said that terrorism is not “what the Muslim faith asks people to do.”
    Isaacs responded to the report with a comment saying, “CNN, Bishop if you read the Quran you will know ‘this’ is exactly what the Muslim faith instructs the faithful to do.”
    CNN also found that Issacs retweeted other users’ disparaging comments about the Muslim Brotherhood and New York state policies recognizing Muslim holidays multiple times in 2015, 2016 and 2017.
    Isaacs has apologized for his past social media attacks on Islam and Muslims.
    He said last month that his tweets criticizing the religion as violent were not intended to “hurt anyone’s feelings” but insisted that many posts were taken out of context.
    Isaacs, the vice president of Christian relief organization Samaritan’s Purse, was nominated by Trump to become the director general of the IOM.
    The Trump administration stood by their nominee after the posts resurfaced.
    State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert told The Washington Post in February that the administration believed Isaacs would still serve with “dignity and respect” as head of the IOM.
    “Mr. Isaacs has apologized for the comments he posted on his private social media account. We believe that was proper for him to do so,” Nauert said.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. @renfro

    I’m all too happy to condemn US and EU imperialism and wars, as anyone should be. But they have little to do with immigration.
     
    Partly true as in the case of India as you can see below (strictly economic opportunism) but not entirely true for the others. It has long been proven by data studies that the main causes of migration are wars, internal conflicts, natural disasters and famines.

    Either way these are the results.

    https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/international-migration-report-2017.html

    The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights)
    18 December 2017

    (excerpts)

    There are now an estimated 258 million people living in a country other than their country of birth — an increase of 49% since 2000 — according to new figures released by UN DESA today, on International Migrants Day. The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights), a biennial publication of the department, states that 3.4% of the world’s inhabitants today are international migrants. This reflects a modest increase from a value of 2.8% in 2000. By contrast, the number of migrants as a fraction of the population residing in high-income countries rose from 9.6% in 2000 to 14% in 2017

    In 2017, high-income countries hosted 64%, or nearly 165 million, of the total number of international migrants worldwide. Moreover, most of the growth in the global population of international migrants has been caused by movements toward high-income countries, which host 64 million of the 85 million migrants added since 2000.

    The number of international migrants includes 26 million refugees or asylum seekers, or about 10% of the total. Although a majority of the world’s international migrants live in high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries host nearly 22 million, or 84%, of all refugees and asylum seekers.
    There has been a global increase in the median age of migrants, from 38.0 years in 2000 to 39.2 years in 2017. However, in some regions, such as Asia, Oceania and especially Latin America and the Caribbean, the median age of migrants has decreased by about three years.
    In 2017, 48.4% of international migrants were women. Female migrants outnumber males in all regions except Africa and Asia; in some countries of Asia, male migrants outnumber females by about three to one.
    In 2017, two thirds of all international migrants were living in just twenty countries, and half of all international migrants were residing in just ten countries. The largest number of international migrants (49.8 million, or 19% of the global total) reside in the United States. Saudi Arabia, Germany and the Russian Federation host the second, third and fourth largest numbers of migrants worldwide (around 12 million each), followed by the United Kingdom (nearly 9 million).
    Destination and origin of international migrants
    More than six of every ten international migrants reside in Asia or Europe (80 and 78 million, respectively). Northern America hosts the third largest number (58 million), followed by Africa (25 million), Latin America and the Caribbean (9.5 million) and Oceania (8.4 million).
    These migration patterns are consistent with the growth seen during the period 2000 – 2017, when Asia added some 30 million migrants, followed by Europe, which added 22 million, Northern America, 17 million, and Africa, 10 million.
    In most countries of Europe, Northern America and Oceania, international migrants comprised more than 10% of the total population in 2017.
    In 2017, Asia and Europe were the regions of origin for the largest numbers of international migrants — 106 million and 61 million, respectively. Latin America and the Caribbean followed with 38 million and Africa with 36 million.
    Between 2000 and 2017, Africa experienced the largest relative increase in the number of international migrants who had originated in that region (+68%), followed by Asia (+62%), Latin America and the Caribbean (+52%) and Oceania (+51%).

    India has the largest number of persons born in the country who are now living outside its borders. The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017, ahead of the number of Mexican-born persons living outside Mexico (13 million). The Russian Federation, China, Bangladesh, Syrian Arab Republic and Pakistan and Ukraine also have large migrant populations living abroad, ranging from 6 to 11 million each.

    The largest percentage of people living outside of their native lands are whites… the Indians migrated to the far flung corners of the world over the last two centuries not just in the last two decades unlike the Mexicans, who are only heading up north. It ain’t the same thing!

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    The largest percentage of people living outside of their native lands are whites… the Indians migrated to the far flung corners of the world over the last two centuries not just in the last two decades unlike the Mexicans, who are only heading up north. It ain’t the same thing
     
    BS....it is the same thing
    If you want anyone to believe that more whites immigrate out of their countries show us the data. Comments are worthless unless backed up with the official data.

    What do you not understand about this data. Indians make up the largest number of international immigrants and they aren't white.

    India has the largest number of persons born in the country who are now living outside its borders. The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017, ahead of the number of Mexican-born persons living outside Mexico (13 million).

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/indian-immigrants-united-states-2#21

    https://esa.un.org/miggmgprofiles/indicators/files/India.pdf

    Immigrants from India are the second-largest foreign-born group in the United States, after Mexicans.
    The number of unauthorized immigrants from India grew faster than the number of any other immigrant group between 2000 and 2006.
    The estimated number of unauthorized immigrants from India has more than doubled since 2000, rising from 120,000 to 270,000 in 2006. This rate (125 percent) is faster than that of any other group between 2000 and 2006.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Fair enough. Let’s focus on eliminating the causes of US-led war and the immigrant issue should therefore cease to be such a major problem.

    1. Human rights must be de-emphasized. Stop teaching children to be moral exceptionalists, because that directly leads to intervention on the basis of ideological superiority. Every imperialist act in history has been sold as the necessary spread of civilization versus primitive ignorance, and it’s difficult to believe that the most emphatic anti-imperialists cannot seem to recognize that the constant refrain of “spreading human rights” is merely the latest incarnation of this age-old ideological shell game.

    2. Refuse to reelect anybody who has voted in favor of military intervention. That’ll pretty much empty the government, destroy the existing two-party duopoly, and clear the way for candidates who are eager to represent the will of the people (which poll after poll shows are in favor of stronger immigration controls).

    3. Having no need for support from entrenched interests, this new batch of elected officials will be more free to ignore the coercion of military, money, and alliance that has encouraged every intervention thus far. The new officials may find it expedient to enact new laws (or enforce existing ones) that prevent foreign influence and domestic collusion. Perhaps we could redefine or more accurately define “hate speech” to address speculative propaganda in the media that is likely to encourage military action (see Russiagate) or to rationalize such behavior by “friendly nations.”

    4. Having taken strong steps toward this goal, one would hope that we could once again feel secure in presenting rational arguments and humane enforcement for strong immigration policy, should any immigration still exist after imperialist military action has been curtailed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "Refuse to reelect anybody who has voted in favor of military intervention. That’ll pretty much empty the government, destroy the existing two-party duopoly, and clear the way for candidates who are eager to represent the will of the people (which poll after poll shows are in favor of stronger immigration controls).'
    -- Excellent.
    , @renfro
    Mostly agree.

    But beware of this:

    Human rights must be de-emphasized. Stop teaching children to be moral exceptionalists, because that directly leads to intervention on the basis of ideological superiority.
     
    Unless you want 'children of the corn' coming after you too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Not good!

    ATLANTA – A disgruntled veteran set himself on fire in protest Tuesday outside the Georgia Capitol in downtown Atlanta, according to the Georgia State Patrol.

    Authorities said veteran John Michael Watts, 58, who was protesting his treatment by the V.A., used a combination of fireworks and gasoline to set himself on fire. A spokesperson for the Georgia State Patrol said officers quickly extinguished the man. Medics rushed him to Grady Memorial Hospital by ambulance. The spokesperson said no one else was hurt.

    Veteran who set himself on fire outside Georgia Capitol identified

    http://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/veteran-sets-himself-on-fire-outside-georgia-state-capitol

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  43. @Anon
    What wars are we causing right now in Mexico? Central America? South America? None.

    What wars are Europeans causing in Sub-Saharan Africa? None.

    Yet the US is being flooded with illegals from below the Rio Grande, and Europe is being flooded with black, sub-Saharan Africans. Only one group from the Middle East, the Syrians, is currently experiencing war conditions that are caused by outsiders, yet Europe and the US are dealing with massive waves of people outside this area.

    They're coming because of our lifestyles. The gold rush is on, and the US and Europe are the gold the illegals are drooling after. They want our money, period.

    Even Syrians don't have to come to Europe. There are other Middle East countries they could go to.

    What wars are we causing right now in Mexico? Central America? South America? None.

    What wars are Europeans causing in Sub-Saharan Africa? None.

    The CIA never sleeps. Never. Venezuela. Columbia. Honduras…………

    Did I mention CIA never sleep.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RobinG
    And in addition - - -

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQwaPetvwqI
    Jennifer Harbury: Today’s Refugee Crisis Is Blowback from U.S. Dirty Wars in Central America
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. It’s the old one-two. They get you to support their wars and interventions and color revolutions. Which create mobs of immigrants. Which they then send to take your jobs away and disrupt your communities. Whereupon they get you to vote for them by badmouthing immigrants. So they can wage more wars. So they can make more immigrants. So they can sic more of ‘em on you. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  45. Everybody thinks about nothing but Mexicans when they think about immigration. Nobody thinks of Indian techs turning Podunk USA into New Delhi. Rather have the Mexicans. I mean, half the country was stolen from them anyway.

    Read More
    • Agree: renfro
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    Petras is right, but it seems many ‘refugees’ are using the war as excuse to seek better life in Europe. This is especially true of black Africans who move through Libya to Europe. After all, Sweden had nothing to do with current Western policy in the Middle East. But so many head there. Why? Israel had a lot to do with the mess in the Middle East but no one goes there cuz Israel has tough walls. So, this is less about right and wrong than about might and strong.

    Anyway, Diversity works only within the EUROPEAN Union. In order for the EU to be European, it must be by Europeans and for Europeans. As it currently functions, the EU might as well be called the World Union, or especially the Afro-Islamo-European-Union. It says something about current EU that it is so hostile toward fellow whites in Russia and Hungary and Poland while being so celebratory and welcoming of Africans, Arabs, and Asians. So, basically, the current EU wages war on White Europe and tries to unite Europe with non-Europe. Furthermore, it wages war on the meaning of what it means to be European. According to EU, a ‘European’ is anyone who just comes to Europe and signs a piece of paper. So, history, culture, and blood no longer matter. A European with 10,000s of years of racial evolution in Europe and 1,000s of years of cultural history in Europe is NO MORE EUROPEAN than a newly arrived African or Arab who just learned the language and signed a citizenship paper. Basically, it means that the roots of a European has NO meaning. It doesn’t matter if your roots in Europe racially go back eons and culturally go back millennia. You are NO MORE EUROPEAN than some Arab or African who just came for free gibs and to assimilate to globo-homo Hollywood-Rap culture.
    Calling Africans, Arabs, and Asians the ‘New Europeans’ is a sleight-of-hand trick. It’s like replacing orange juice with lime juice and labeling it as ‘new orange juice’. Suppose I take over your house and call myself the ‘new you’. That way, YOU didn’t lose your house to me because I’m the ‘new you’. So, the house still belongs to you because I am ‘you’, or the ‘new you’. Isn’t that ridiculous? It’s all semantic BS.

    Hungary joined the EUROPEAN Union to cooperate more fully with fellow Europeans. It didn’t join to become one with Afro-Islamo-European Union. Also, Hungarians know what a real European is. He is a person with deep racial, historical, and cultural roots in Europe. But EU has changed rules so that ANYONE can become an Insta-European by signing a piece of paper. The rich stream of European blood has been replaced with the stamp of globo-homo ink. A true European has no more claim or birthright to Europe than billions of non-Europeans around the world. (This is the logic of colonialism and imperialism. Just like European imperialists tried to suppress the birthrights of the peoples they conquered, the globalist project of EU seeks to suppress any notion of ancestral claim and birthright among Europeans in their mother-continent.) EU will say dumb things like ‘Europe was always a world of immigrants’, but virtually all those peoples were fellow whites, fellow Europeans. Surely, a bunch of blacks going from one African nation to another is less jarring than a bunch of non-Africans settling in Africa. The same is true of Europe. A bunch of Poles going to Germany or UK is less jarring and disruptive than millions of black Africans and Arab Muslims taking over entire areas of Europe. Also, the history of Europe was about resistance against foreign invaders. Mongols invaded Russia and even reached Poland. They were eventually pushed out. Moors invaded Sicily and Spain. They were pushed back to North Africa eventually. Turks invaded Greece and parts of Balkans; they tried to invade more. Europeans rolled back the Turkish tide. Europe wasn’t about inviting invasions by non-Europeans but about repelling them.

    Anyway, it is not Hungary or Poland that violated the agreements of the European Union. It was the globo-homo elites of EU who’ve decided to collaborate with the Empire of Judea. They are not real leaders but comprador-collaborators. Their duty was to keep Europe European and to facilitate easier and more efficient cooperation among Europeans, but they undermined their own project by effectively uniting Europe with Africa and the Middle East(and even Asia). Meanwhile, they badmouth Russia because they’re puppets of Globo Supremacists filled with hatred for Putin who said NO to Homomania(as proxy of Globo Domination).

    Also, there is no greater human right than for a nation to survive as a people and culture. Demographic Imperialism that replaces the people and culture is a form of geo-ethnocide. It’s obvious from the creation of Israel that massive movements of peoples can lead to a destruction of a people and culture. Massive Jewish demographic imperialism led to the eradication of Palestinian nationhood. Palestinians live like animals in a zoo in Gaza. They live under Apartheid conditions in the West Bank.
    After WWII, the anti-imperialist struggles of Third World peoples were all nationalist. Hindus in India told the British to go home because India is for Indians. Africans told Europeans to pack up and leave because black Africa belongs to black Africans. Anti-imperialism founded on the principle of universal nationalism was the most fundamental form of human rights. Before we can have individual rights and liberties, we must be free as a people from foreign or imperialist domination. For example, Palestinian individuals in Israel have many individual rights and liberties, but they are NOT free as a people. Their nation, Palestine, has been taken over by Jews, and all Palestinians, no matter how rich or free as individuals, don’t have a nation because their land now belongs to Zionist overlords. If it happened to Palestinians, it can happen to anyone. Consider how Kosovo had once been the sacred homeland of Serbians. But over time, Albanian Muslims moved in and settled in Kosovo under Ottoman rule, and the Serbs lost their ancient homeland forever. But I suppose EU can advise Serbians to just see Albanian Muslims as ‘New Serbians’. Of course, Albanians don’t see themselves that way.

    Also, Diversity has many meanings. The World is Diverse, after all. So, Diversity as a condition of the world isn’t a problem. The world will always be diverse, made up of various races, ethnic groups, nations, cultures, religions, regions, and etc. But Diversity as PC formula is about forcing Demographic Imperialism on each nation(except Israel). Every nation must be made into a mini-world. But why? Hungary is Hungary, and it should be Hungarian. If you want to see China or Africa, visit China or Africa. Why bring China, Africa, Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, and etc. into your own nation, especially if it’s small? If rising Diversity is such a huge headache for massive nations like the US and Brazil with so much space, imagine its impact on smaller nations like Hungary and Poland? At the very least, white Americans can flee from Diversity. In small European nations, you are stuck with it right outside your door.

    The kind of Diversity pushed by EU is really a form of imperialism. Diversity as a condition of the world is just a reality. But Diversity as a formula is about coercing all nations(except Israel) to surrender to massive demographic imperialism and replacement. It’s usually about higher-IQ prosperous nations with low-birthrates being demographically taken over by low-IQ peoples from poor nations with high birthrates. The result will be loss of entire civilizations. Just do the math. Over time, the current Diversity policy of EU will turn all of Europe into something like Morocco. Is Morocco a happy place? If diverse North Africa is so great, why do people there want to move to white Europe?

    Also, EU’s pontificating about Human Rights is so much BS. If EU really cares about non-whites, why doesn’t it ever stand up to globo US neo-imperialist policy that destroyed so much of the Middle East and North Africa? For the most part, the EU didn’t do anything about George W. Bush’s illegal war on Iraq. EU was silent about Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright’s sanctions that killed 100,000s of Iraqi women and children. The EU has continued to support Israeli occupation of West Bank. EU has gone along with US sanctions against Iran that hurt so many people. EU supported Obama-and-Hillary’s destruction of Libya even though Gaddafi made peace with the West. EU worked with the US to aid terrorists and Jihadis to tear Syria apart. 400,000 people died. EU never stood up to globo US empire that destroys millions of lives in the Muslim World.
    Indeed, the so-called ‘refugee’ crisis is the result of globo US neo-imperialism in Middle East and North Africa. But the EU, that is gutless in standing up to American power, huffs and puffs about Hungary and Poland whose only desire is to protect their nations. It is the globo US that is pushing the Invade-Invite Policy. It says the US should freely invade and destroy nations around the world(especially to serve Israel’s interests), and as millions and millions of people will be displaced by such invasions, the white world must ‘invite’ those people as a ‘humanitarian’ gesture. So, Jews use Western Power to destroy all nations hated by Israel, and then, Jews morally pressure white nations to accept the ‘refugees’.

    Finally, Diversity-as-Formula is a form of imperialism. Nazi Empire was about diversity. It was about many peoples being forced to live under the Nazi umbrella. Soviet Empire was diverse. It was about many peoples being forced to live under Soviet Hegemony. The EU is now about forcing demographic imperialism on every European nation to make them more diverse. Just like Nazi Empire forced Slavic lands to accept German settlers, the EU forces European nations to accept African and Muslim invaders displaced by globo-homo imperialist wars in the Middle East and North Africa. (Jews apparently want to use wars to empty the Middle East so that they can grab more territory.)

    The EU project could have worked if it had remained European and respected the national rights of all European peoples. But it turned into an arm of Judeo-Globo-Homo project. As such, it went from a sunny project of uniting and preserving Europe to a stormy project uniting Europe with Africa, Muslim World, and South Asia. It came to be about forcing the Diversity Formula or the Demographic-Imperialist Agenda on each and every nation.

    So, why did so many white people fall for this poison pill? Because Political Correctness imbues vain white people with a new kind of supremacism. If imperialist whites of the past were racial supremacists, today’s whites are moral supremacists. They think they are soooooooo very goody-good and holier-than-others because they are so obedient to the Globo-Homo Agenda that demeans anything white and patriotic as ‘racist’ while extolling anything Diverse(usually black) as sacrosanct. So, just by mouthing sacramental platitudes about ‘diversity’ and ‘human rights’, these insufferably smug PC whites think they are superior to nationalists and patriots. But then, communists also felt morally superior by mouthing off platitudes about ‘equality’ and ‘revolution’. Just another form of supremacism among people for whom every corner of the world must be made to cave to their dogmatically imbecile notion of right-and-wrong.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "... it is not Hungary or Poland that violated the agreements of the European Union. It was the globo-homo elites of EU who’ve decided to collaborate with the Empire of Judea. They are not real leaders but comprador-collaborators. Their duty was to keep Europe European and to facilitate easier and more efficient cooperation among Europeans, but they undermined their own project by effectively uniting Europe with Africa and the Middle East (and even Asia). Meanwhile, they badmouth Russia because they’re puppets of Globo Supremacists filled with hatred for Putin who said NO to Homomania(as proxy of Globo Domination)."
    -- On point. Thank you.
    , @Josep

    For the most part, the EU didn’t do anything about George W. Bush’s illegal war on Iraq.
     
    I seem to recall that France, Germany and some other European countries opposed the Iraq War and got a lot of flak for it from the American and British press.
    Also, there once was a blog, Davids Medienkritik (http://medienkritik.typepad.com), where owner David Kaspar focused on what he felt was anti-Americanism in the German mainstream media. The latest article was published sometime in 2014 (some years after the Iraq War came to an end) and the blog had since become dormant. I haven't read much into it, so feel free to determine which of David's railings are real or bogus.

    The EU has continued to support Israeli occupation of West Bank.
     
    What I find ironic is how how many Israeli news outlets (YNetNews, JPost, and Algemeiner) accuse the EU of being anti-Israel.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. RobinG says:
    @redmudhooch

    What wars are we causing right now in Mexico? Central America? South America? None.

    What wars are Europeans causing in Sub-Saharan Africa? None.
     
    The CIA never sleeps. Never. Venezuela. Columbia. Honduras............

    Did I mention CIA never sleep.

    And in addition – – -

    Jennifer Harbury: Today’s Refugee Crisis Is Blowback from U.S. Dirty Wars in Central America

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    No it's not. It's blowback from the historic inability of Central and South Americans to govern competently. They don't understand markets, their whole concept of property is pretty fuzzy and choked with screwed-up, vestigial imperial grants, and they have a typically Continental view of the State.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. annamaria says:
    @cecil1
    Ridiculous garbage that obfuscates the issues.

    NO matter what happens, White Genocide by immigration is a crime, not a policy option.

    NO matter what happens elsewhere, it must not result in my nation being destroyed by design or just excuse.

    There's a problem somewhere does NOT justify White Genocide. So stop trying endlessly to excuse it.

    Its despicable.

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone IS White Genocide.

    Some basic truths: Access to White people is not a human right
    https://i.imgur.com/wXKT2t5.png

    “Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians…”
    — Sir, have you studied the world history in a high school?
    — Do you know this white woman? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmIRYvJQeHM (“Hillary Clinton “We Came, We Saw, He Died.”
    “Under Gaddafi, education and health care were free for all.
    Newlyweds received U.S $50,000 from the government. Gaddafi’s government had legislation providing for a grant to newlyweds to buy their first apartment so as to help start a family.
    Gaddafi carried out the world’s largest irrigation project to make water available to the whole country.
    Libya had no external debt and had reserves of $150 billion. [The USA has a debt of over $21 trillion.]
    The price of petrol was $0,14 per litre
    Having a home was considered a human right. Gaddafi’s Green Book categorically stated, “The house is a basic need of both the individual and the family, therefore it should not be owned by others.”
    People had enough food
    Gaddafi launched a programme to privatize all Libyan oil to every citizen of Libya.”
    Libya today: http://www.informafrica.com/blog/photos-of-sirte-after-the-nato-bombing-in-libya/https://www.africanexponent.com/post/ten-reasons-libya-under-gaddafi-was-a-great-place-to-live-2746

    https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-e3970458a36482ac0a5a344eae544bf3-c

    Syria today:— Do you know this white man? https://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/308-12/16561-focus-cheneys-halliburton-made-395-billion-on-iraq-war ” Cheney’s Halliburton Made $39.5 Billion on Iraq War”
    — Do you know why Methodists call for the expulsion of Bush and Cheney from Church? https://bushlibraryblog.wordpress.com/methodist-debate/methodists-call-for-expulsion-of-bush-cheney-from-church/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. annamaria says:
    @Svigor
    What's the problem? Sounds like he was 100% correct.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. annamaria says:
    @Sollipsist
    Fair enough. Let's focus on eliminating the causes of US-led war and the immigrant issue should therefore cease to be such a major problem.

    1. Human rights must be de-emphasized. Stop teaching children to be moral exceptionalists, because that directly leads to intervention on the basis of ideological superiority. Every imperialist act in history has been sold as the necessary spread of civilization versus primitive ignorance, and it's difficult to believe that the most emphatic anti-imperialists cannot seem to recognize that the constant refrain of "spreading human rights" is merely the latest incarnation of this age-old ideological shell game.

    2. Refuse to reelect anybody who has voted in favor of military intervention. That'll pretty much empty the government, destroy the existing two-party duopoly, and clear the way for candidates who are eager to represent the will of the people (which poll after poll shows are in favor of stronger immigration controls).

    3. Having no need for support from entrenched interests, this new batch of elected officials will be more free to ignore the coercion of military, money, and alliance that has encouraged every intervention thus far. The new officials may find it expedient to enact new laws (or enforce existing ones) that prevent foreign influence and domestic collusion. Perhaps we could redefine or more accurately define "hate speech" to address speculative propaganda in the media that is likely to encourage military action (see Russiagate) or to rationalize such behavior by "friendly nations."

    4. Having taken strong steps toward this goal, one would hope that we could once again feel secure in presenting rational arguments and humane enforcement for strong immigration policy, should any immigration still exist after imperialist military action has been curtailed.

    “Refuse to reelect anybody who has voted in favor of military intervention. That’ll pretty much empty the government, destroy the existing two-party duopoly, and clear the way for candidates who are eager to represent the will of the people (which poll after poll shows are in favor of stronger immigration controls).’
    – Excellent.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. annamaria says:
    @Anon
    Petras is right, but it seems many 'refugees' are using the war as excuse to seek better life in Europe. This is especially true of black Africans who move through Libya to Europe. After all, Sweden had nothing to do with current Western policy in the Middle East. But so many head there. Why? Israel had a lot to do with the mess in the Middle East but no one goes there cuz Israel has tough walls. So, this is less about right and wrong than about might and strong.

    Anyway, Diversity works only within the EUROPEAN Union. In order for the EU to be European, it must be by Europeans and for Europeans. As it currently functions, the EU might as well be called the World Union, or especially the Afro-Islamo-European-Union. It says something about current EU that it is so hostile toward fellow whites in Russia and Hungary and Poland while being so celebratory and welcoming of Africans, Arabs, and Asians. So, basically, the current EU wages war on White Europe and tries to unite Europe with non-Europe. Furthermore, it wages war on the meaning of what it means to be European. According to EU, a 'European' is anyone who just comes to Europe and signs a piece of paper. So, history, culture, and blood no longer matter. A European with 10,000s of years of racial evolution in Europe and 1,000s of years of cultural history in Europe is NO MORE EUROPEAN than a newly arrived African or Arab who just learned the language and signed a citizenship paper. Basically, it means that the roots of a European has NO meaning. It doesn't matter if your roots in Europe racially go back eons and culturally go back millennia. You are NO MORE EUROPEAN than some Arab or African who just came for free gibs and to assimilate to globo-homo Hollywood-Rap culture.
    Calling Africans, Arabs, and Asians the 'New Europeans' is a sleight-of-hand trick. It's like replacing orange juice with lime juice and labeling it as 'new orange juice'. Suppose I take over your house and call myself the 'new you'. That way, YOU didn't lose your house to me because I'm the 'new you'. So, the house still belongs to you because I am 'you', or the 'new you'. Isn't that ridiculous? It's all semantic BS.

    Hungary joined the EUROPEAN Union to cooperate more fully with fellow Europeans. It didn't join to become one with Afro-Islamo-European Union. Also, Hungarians know what a real European is. He is a person with deep racial, historical, and cultural roots in Europe. But EU has changed rules so that ANYONE can become an Insta-European by signing a piece of paper. The rich stream of European blood has been replaced with the stamp of globo-homo ink. A true European has no more claim or birthright to Europe than billions of non-Europeans around the world. (This is the logic of colonialism and imperialism. Just like European imperialists tried to suppress the birthrights of the peoples they conquered, the globalist project of EU seeks to suppress any notion of ancestral claim and birthright among Europeans in their mother-continent.) EU will say dumb things like 'Europe was always a world of immigrants', but virtually all those peoples were fellow whites, fellow Europeans. Surely, a bunch of blacks going from one African nation to another is less jarring than a bunch of non-Africans settling in Africa. The same is true of Europe. A bunch of Poles going to Germany or UK is less jarring and disruptive than millions of black Africans and Arab Muslims taking over entire areas of Europe. Also, the history of Europe was about resistance against foreign invaders. Mongols invaded Russia and even reached Poland. They were eventually pushed out. Moors invaded Sicily and Spain. They were pushed back to North Africa eventually. Turks invaded Greece and parts of Balkans; they tried to invade more. Europeans rolled back the Turkish tide. Europe wasn't about inviting invasions by non-Europeans but about repelling them.

    Anyway, it is not Hungary or Poland that violated the agreements of the European Union. It was the globo-homo elites of EU who've decided to collaborate with the Empire of Judea. They are not real leaders but comprador-collaborators. Their duty was to keep Europe European and to facilitate easier and more efficient cooperation among Europeans, but they undermined their own project by effectively uniting Europe with Africa and the Middle East(and even Asia). Meanwhile, they badmouth Russia because they're puppets of Globo Supremacists filled with hatred for Putin who said NO to Homomania(as proxy of Globo Domination).

    Also, there is no greater human right than for a nation to survive as a people and culture. Demographic Imperialism that replaces the people and culture is a form of geo-ethnocide. It's obvious from the creation of Israel that massive movements of peoples can lead to a destruction of a people and culture. Massive Jewish demographic imperialism led to the eradication of Palestinian nationhood. Palestinians live like animals in a zoo in Gaza. They live under Apartheid conditions in the West Bank.
    After WWII, the anti-imperialist struggles of Third World peoples were all nationalist. Hindus in India told the British to go home because India is for Indians. Africans told Europeans to pack up and leave because black Africa belongs to black Africans. Anti-imperialism founded on the principle of universal nationalism was the most fundamental form of human rights. Before we can have individual rights and liberties, we must be free as a people from foreign or imperialist domination. For example, Palestinian individuals in Israel have many individual rights and liberties, but they are NOT free as a people. Their nation, Palestine, has been taken over by Jews, and all Palestinians, no matter how rich or free as individuals, don't have a nation because their land now belongs to Zionist overlords. If it happened to Palestinians, it can happen to anyone. Consider how Kosovo had once been the sacred homeland of Serbians. But over time, Albanian Muslims moved in and settled in Kosovo under Ottoman rule, and the Serbs lost their ancient homeland forever. But I suppose EU can advise Serbians to just see Albanian Muslims as 'New Serbians'. Of course, Albanians don't see themselves that way.

    Also, Diversity has many meanings. The World is Diverse, after all. So, Diversity as a condition of the world isn't a problem. The world will always be diverse, made up of various races, ethnic groups, nations, cultures, religions, regions, and etc. But Diversity as PC formula is about forcing Demographic Imperialism on each nation(except Israel). Every nation must be made into a mini-world. But why? Hungary is Hungary, and it should be Hungarian. If you want to see China or Africa, visit China or Africa. Why bring China, Africa, Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, and etc. into your own nation, especially if it's small? If rising Diversity is such a huge headache for massive nations like the US and Brazil with so much space, imagine its impact on smaller nations like Hungary and Poland? At the very least, white Americans can flee from Diversity. In small European nations, you are stuck with it right outside your door.

    The kind of Diversity pushed by EU is really a form of imperialism. Diversity as a condition of the world is just a reality. But Diversity as a formula is about coercing all nations(except Israel) to surrender to massive demographic imperialism and replacement. It's usually about higher-IQ prosperous nations with low-birthrates being demographically taken over by low-IQ peoples from poor nations with high birthrates. The result will be loss of entire civilizations. Just do the math. Over time, the current Diversity policy of EU will turn all of Europe into something like Morocco. Is Morocco a happy place? If diverse North Africa is so great, why do people there want to move to white Europe?

    Also, EU's pontificating about Human Rights is so much BS. If EU really cares about non-whites, why doesn't it ever stand up to globo US neo-imperialist policy that destroyed so much of the Middle East and North Africa? For the most part, the EU didn't do anything about George W. Bush's illegal war on Iraq. EU was silent about Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright's sanctions that killed 100,000s of Iraqi women and children. The EU has continued to support Israeli occupation of West Bank. EU has gone along with US sanctions against Iran that hurt so many people. EU supported Obama-and-Hillary's destruction of Libya even though Gaddafi made peace with the West. EU worked with the US to aid terrorists and Jihadis to tear Syria apart. 400,000 people died. EU never stood up to globo US empire that destroys millions of lives in the Muslim World.
    Indeed, the so-called 'refugee' crisis is the result of globo US neo-imperialism in Middle East and North Africa. But the EU, that is gutless in standing up to American power, huffs and puffs about Hungary and Poland whose only desire is to protect their nations. It is the globo US that is pushing the Invade-Invite Policy. It says the US should freely invade and destroy nations around the world(especially to serve Israel's interests), and as millions and millions of people will be displaced by such invasions, the white world must 'invite' those people as a 'humanitarian' gesture. So, Jews use Western Power to destroy all nations hated by Israel, and then, Jews morally pressure white nations to accept the 'refugees'.

    Finally, Diversity-as-Formula is a form of imperialism. Nazi Empire was about diversity. It was about many peoples being forced to live under the Nazi umbrella. Soviet Empire was diverse. It was about many peoples being forced to live under Soviet Hegemony. The EU is now about forcing demographic imperialism on every European nation to make them more diverse. Just like Nazi Empire forced Slavic lands to accept German settlers, the EU forces European nations to accept African and Muslim invaders displaced by globo-homo imperialist wars in the Middle East and North Africa. (Jews apparently want to use wars to empty the Middle East so that they can grab more territory.)

    The EU project could have worked if it had remained European and respected the national rights of all European peoples. But it turned into an arm of Judeo-Globo-Homo project. As such, it went from a sunny project of uniting and preserving Europe to a stormy project uniting Europe with Africa, Muslim World, and South Asia. It came to be about forcing the Diversity Formula or the Demographic-Imperialist Agenda on each and every nation.

    So, why did so many white people fall for this poison pill? Because Political Correctness imbues vain white people with a new kind of supremacism. If imperialist whites of the past were racial supremacists, today's whites are moral supremacists. They think they are soooooooo very goody-good and holier-than-others because they are so obedient to the Globo-Homo Agenda that demeans anything white and patriotic as 'racist' while extolling anything Diverse(usually black) as sacrosanct. So, just by mouthing sacramental platitudes about 'diversity' and 'human rights', these insufferably smug PC whites think they are superior to nationalists and patriots. But then, communists also felt morally superior by mouthing off platitudes about 'equality' and 'revolution'. Just another form of supremacism among people for whom every corner of the world must be made to cave to their dogmatically imbecile notion of right-and-wrong.

    “… it is not Hungary or Poland that violated the agreements of the European Union. It was the globo-homo elites of EU who’ve decided to collaborate with the Empire of Judea. They are not real leaders but comprador-collaborators. Their duty was to keep Europe European and to facilitate easier and more efficient cooperation among Europeans, but they undermined their own project by effectively uniting Europe with Africa and the Middle East (and even Asia). Meanwhile, they badmouth Russia because they’re puppets of Globo Supremacists filled with hatred for Putin who said NO to Homomania(as proxy of Globo Domination).”
    – On point. Thank you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    " Their duty was to keep Europe European "

    The European EU consisted of some 28 different nations with cultures and languages.
    What the Brussels gang wants is a superstate to USA model.
    Therefore free movement of persons within the EU, and immigration from outside.
    So indeed, what they're trying to do is destroying Europe.
    Even when the EU falls apart today, in 2040 those with migrant background will be 40% of the total population.
    The countries that may be able keep their identities and cultures are a few E European ones, catholic.
    What will happen nobody knows, Eric Zemmour expects civil war, followed by deportations.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. denk says:
    @artichoke
    We're trying to get the Houthis out so they can have their country back. We didn't start that war, the Houthis did.

    I just realise that Trump has banned refugees from the following seven countries…

    Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

    This is almost the same list of seven countries that murkka conspired to ‘do’ in a five year plan, as revealed by gen Wesley Clark….

    Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Somalia, And Sudan

    .except they’ve added Yemen cuz Lebanon is already kaput.

    five of these have become failed states riven by terrorism, Iran is now in the cross hair, murkka’s Saudi mercs are waging a genocidal war in Yemen which makes Fallujah looks like child’s play. [1]

    murkka is responsible for this mess, its now reaping the whirlwind, but what’ve SK done to deserve this ?

    [1]

    https://newmatilda.com/2017/03/19/the-war-in-yemen-is-turning-to-genocide-and-australia-is-quietly-supporting-it/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. denk says:
    @renfro

    I’m all too happy to condemn US and EU imperialism and wars, as anyone should be. But they have little to do with immigration.
     
    Partly true as in the case of India as you can see below (strictly economic opportunism) but not entirely true for the others. It has long been proven by data studies that the main causes of migration are wars, internal conflicts, natural disasters and famines.

    Either way these are the results.

    https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/international-migration-report-2017.html

    The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights)
    18 December 2017

    (excerpts)

    There are now an estimated 258 million people living in a country other than their country of birth — an increase of 49% since 2000 — according to new figures released by UN DESA today, on International Migrants Day. The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights), a biennial publication of the department, states that 3.4% of the world’s inhabitants today are international migrants. This reflects a modest increase from a value of 2.8% in 2000. By contrast, the number of migrants as a fraction of the population residing in high-income countries rose from 9.6% in 2000 to 14% in 2017

    In 2017, high-income countries hosted 64%, or nearly 165 million, of the total number of international migrants worldwide. Moreover, most of the growth in the global population of international migrants has been caused by movements toward high-income countries, which host 64 million of the 85 million migrants added since 2000.

    The number of international migrants includes 26 million refugees or asylum seekers, or about 10% of the total. Although a majority of the world’s international migrants live in high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries host nearly 22 million, or 84%, of all refugees and asylum seekers.
    There has been a global increase in the median age of migrants, from 38.0 years in 2000 to 39.2 years in 2017. However, in some regions, such as Asia, Oceania and especially Latin America and the Caribbean, the median age of migrants has decreased by about three years.
    In 2017, 48.4% of international migrants were women. Female migrants outnumber males in all regions except Africa and Asia; in some countries of Asia, male migrants outnumber females by about three to one.
    In 2017, two thirds of all international migrants were living in just twenty countries, and half of all international migrants were residing in just ten countries. The largest number of international migrants (49.8 million, or 19% of the global total) reside in the United States. Saudi Arabia, Germany and the Russian Federation host the second, third and fourth largest numbers of migrants worldwide (around 12 million each), followed by the United Kingdom (nearly 9 million).
    Destination and origin of international migrants
    More than six of every ten international migrants reside in Asia or Europe (80 and 78 million, respectively). Northern America hosts the third largest number (58 million), followed by Africa (25 million), Latin America and the Caribbean (9.5 million) and Oceania (8.4 million).
    These migration patterns are consistent with the growth seen during the period 2000 – 2017, when Asia added some 30 million migrants, followed by Europe, which added 22 million, Northern America, 17 million, and Africa, 10 million.
    In most countries of Europe, Northern America and Oceania, international migrants comprised more than 10% of the total population in 2017.
    In 2017, Asia and Europe were the regions of origin for the largest numbers of international migrants — 106 million and 61 million, respectively. Latin America and the Caribbean followed with 38 million and Africa with 36 million.
    Between 2000 and 2017, Africa experienced the largest relative increase in the number of international migrants who had originated in that region (+68%), followed by Asia (+62%), Latin America and the Caribbean (+52%) and Oceania (+51%).

    India has the largest number of persons born in the country who are now living outside its borders. The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017, ahead of the number of Mexican-born persons living outside Mexico (13 million). The Russian Federation, China, Bangladesh, Syrian Arab Republic and Pakistan and Ukraine also have large migrant populations living abroad, ranging from 6 to 11 million each.

    The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017

    Those figures didnt include the following countries which were WMMed by Indians and rendered ‘Indian territory’...

    Arunachal Pradesh. Assam. Manipur. Meghalaya. Mizoram. Nagaland. Sikkim. Tripura.

    Sikkim, Bhutan.

    Singapore is already de facto Bhutanised.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    Go to this link to see how Indian immigration was arrived at.
    Shows you the countries you mention and inflow-outflow re Indian émigrés.

    https://esa.un.org/miggmgprofiles/indicators/files/India.pdf
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @TG
    I certainly agree that the many wars that the Untied States are fighting overseas are stupid and immoral and we would be better off spending that money at home. But the notion that the immigration crisis is due to these stupid wars is mostly wrong. No. It's because Malthus was right, and people having more children than they can afford to support produces terrible poverty. Period.

    Now the United States is certainly responsible for Libya - that country was doing pretty well before we trashed it. But Libya is an outlier. Let's consider Yemen. In 1985 the population of Yemen was 10 million. They have a sky high fertility rate, and with enough food, their population should double every 20 years. Consider that:

    1985: 10 million
    2005: 20 million
    2025: 40 million
    2045: 80 million
    2065: 160 million
    2085: 320 million
    2105: 640 million
    and so on.

    Now Yemen is not a big country with a lot of rain like India or China, it's small and has very little rainfall. By itself, it could probably grow enough food to feed maybe 10 million people. Can the Yemenis handle the population of California by 2025? No. Even with more than ten times the rainfall as Yemen, and over a century of intensive industrial development, California is straining at 40 million. And could Yemen manage to support the current population of the United States by 2085? No.

    It is too-rapid population growth that is the problem with Yemen. Yemen is a black hole for food, they can suck up all the food aid, and dump any number of refugees on us, and still be hungry for more. The bombs our allies are dropping on Yemen are just making the rubble bounce. And there are many more countries like Yemen out there..

    But there is one area where yes, we are responsible for Yemen. Because we deny that Malthus was right, because the rich want cheap labor, and so we insist that people who could maybe support two kids, should have six, because 'people are the ultimate resource.' Yeah sure, if you think of people as cattle.

    “No. It’s because Malthus was right, and people having more children than they can afford to support produces terrible poverty. Period.”
    The upshot of your comment is that essentially poor countries are poor b/c they breed too much.
    Sure: it’s an important factor – but it’s also been proven ad-nauseam, if you want to stop over breeding you must lift living standards. The current economic political situation internationally makes such an outcome difficult for those countries lacking cultural/institutional foundations for such an uplift.
    Incidentally, there’s plenty of food on earth – there’s be better food security if we were willing to change economic & environmental goals.
    However, the author is fundamentally correct: war & poverty are the major (not exclusive) push factors in immigration. The view that a certain cultural minority group has encouraged & manipulated people movements for its own nefarious goals is not inconsistent with the author’s views.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Medvedev

    but it’s also been proven ad-nauseam, if you want to stop over breeding you must lift living standards
     
    No, it hasn't. Look at Eastern Europe or Cuba. And most of Latin America is heading the same route.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. @mark green
    Good article by Petras. He is right about the 'immigrant crisis' in Europe and its cause; namely, the willful and unnecessary destruction of Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq by Zio-NATO-Washington. And let's not forget Palestine.

    The criminal annihilation of these ancient cultures deserves retribution. But don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen. Zio-America is a rich, powerful, supremacist state with nukes. It does what is "in its interests" (allegedly) and it does not apologize, even when millions of lives are taken or ruined.

    Petras is also right that the US has meddled persistently and, at times, unconscionably throughout the Americas. But today's refugee problem involving 'migrants' from Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico and Guatemala is driven by in no small part by that region's widespread corruption, sloth, economic failures, lawlessness, and an inability by these countries to compete effectively in the global marketplace.

    Yes, Uncle Sam (and countless Yankee profiteers) has played a nefarious role down there in countless instances. But these semi-failed-states also have real demographic problems that are fast becoming America's demographic problem. This is a big part of the problem.

    This lesson can be re-learned when we examine America's persistent inability to turn millions of semi-educated, working-age, African Americans into productive, civic- minded, law-abiding citizens.

    First world America is not a good fit for many nationalities. So let's keep their numbers in America low.

    Conclusion: restrict immigration and deport as many non-white illegal immigrants as possible.

    “But today’s refugee problem involving ‘migrants’ from Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico and Guatemala is driven by in no small part by that region’s widespread corruption, sloth, economic failures, lawlessness, and an inability by these countries to compete effectively in the global marketplace.

    Yes, Uncle Sam (and countless Yankee profiteers) has played a nefarious role down there in countless instances.”
    Don’t disagree with your “no small part”. But here’s the tricky question (I don’t have an answer – I doubt one exists): to what extent has the US’s constant malign interference with these countries for over 100 years, contributed to, exacerbated & actively encouraged the corruption etc you accurately reference ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    John Gerassi, 'The Great Fear in Latin America', 1963, 1969, London.
    I was not just the USA, it began with Spaniards, Portugese, Germans, whatever.
    Oakah L. Jones Jr., ‘Santa Anna’, New York 1968
    This Santa was seen as a Mexican, he had a migration background.
    How the whites suppressed the original people
    Rigoberta Menchú, 'I, Rigoberta Menchú, An Indian Woman in Guatemala', 1984, 1996 (Me Llamo Rigoberta Menchú Y Asi Me Nació La Concienca, Barcelona 1983)
    Right now Bolivia is the only S American country ruled by those without a migration background;
    , @Josecanuc
    “I helped make Mexico ‘safe’ for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti & Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank Jew boys to collect revenue in. I helped ‘purify’ Nicaragua for the International Jewish Banking House Brown Brothers...I brought ‘light’ to the Dominican Republic for American Sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras ‘right’ for American Fruit companies in 1903. Looking back on it all, I might have given Al Capone a few good tips & hints.”
    Gen. Smedley Butler, United States Marine Corp, Ret. 1921

    And watched a DW.com documentary yesterday on the history the United State's United Fruit Company - now named "Chiqueta Bannas " and how they removed democracies and installed Puppet dictators so they could exploit the impoverished people with no fear of any consequences - United Fruit brought in Africans from Jamaica to replace them in the fields when the indigenous people started demanding better slave conditions. Im 1930's United Fruit did not pay them cash - they were given vouchers that they could use only in United Fruit stores to buy furniture, food, medicine, etc.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Biff says:
    @Anon
    What wars are we causing right now in Mexico? Central America? South America? None.

    What wars are Europeans causing in Sub-Saharan Africa? None.

    Yet the US is being flooded with illegals from below the Rio Grande, and Europe is being flooded with black, sub-Saharan Africans. Only one group from the Middle East, the Syrians, is currently experiencing war conditions that are caused by outsiders, yet Europe and the US are dealing with massive waves of people outside this area.

    They're coming because of our lifestyles. The gold rush is on, and the US and Europe are the gold the illegals are drooling after. They want our money, period.

    Even Syrians don't have to come to Europe. There are other Middle East countries they could go to.

    They’re coming because of our lifestyles.

    They want to come here, and get fat and lazy watching a dumbed down boob-tube, with their in-bred cousin, while watching their neighborhood burn, because the cops just killed their track-star brother? Then the burning of their neighborhood causes the crack labs to explode sending chemicals into the water supply that gets lapped up by all the local pit bulls, which gets them all zipper-necked into eating the children when they aren’t even hungry, and that gets the gang-bangers to start shooting at the pit bulls while holding the gun sideways sending bullets in every fucking direction imaginable hitting electrical transformers knocking out the power in the middle of summer, which cuts off the air conditioners, sending more zombies into the streets?

    That life style?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @annamaria
    "... it is not Hungary or Poland that violated the agreements of the European Union. It was the globo-homo elites of EU who’ve decided to collaborate with the Empire of Judea. They are not real leaders but comprador-collaborators. Their duty was to keep Europe European and to facilitate easier and more efficient cooperation among Europeans, but they undermined their own project by effectively uniting Europe with Africa and the Middle East (and even Asia). Meanwhile, they badmouth Russia because they’re puppets of Globo Supremacists filled with hatred for Putin who said NO to Homomania(as proxy of Globo Domination)."
    -- On point. Thank you.

    ” Their duty was to keep Europe European ”

    The European EU consisted of some 28 different nations with cultures and languages.
    What the Brussels gang wants is a superstate to USA model.
    Therefore free movement of persons within the EU, and immigration from outside.
    So indeed, what they’re trying to do is destroying Europe.
    Even when the EU falls apart today, in 2040 those with migrant background will be 40% of the total population.
    The countries that may be able keep their identities and cultures are a few E European ones, catholic.
    What will happen nobody knows, Eric Zemmour expects civil war, followed by deportations.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    I doubt that there was a precise plan to destroy Europe with immigration, considering the glaring stupidity and criminality of the deciders.
    Sure there has been the (idiotic) Wolfowitz Doctrine, the mega-profiteers passionate desires for money and more money, and the supremacist mythology of perennial trouble-makers -- all these aspects have interacted and produced a global replay of a popular cartoon "Sorcerer's Apprentice."
    The absolute majority of westerners have no idea about the horrors of mass slaughter that the Middle East has been suffering thanks to the stupid criminal designs of the stupid criminal deciders.
    Would not it be great to demands from the US/EU/UK governments to convene in destroyed Libya, next to the corpses of children and women, so that the "peoples representatives" remember the smell of death until their last days?
    Cheney, Blair, Bush the lesser, the AIPAC, the "humanitarian" activists Condi Rice, Madeleine Albright, Hilary, Samantha Powers and such, the gargoyle Sarkozy, the dishonest-to-the-bone Theresa May and Cameron -- they are cannibals of our time.
    http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/unworthy-victims-western-wars-have-killed-four-million-muslims-1990-39149394
    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/where-is-outcry-over-children-killed-by-u-s-led-forces/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @animalogic
    "But today’s refugee problem involving ‘migrants’ from Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico and Guatemala is driven by in no small part by that region’s widespread corruption, sloth, economic failures, lawlessness, and an inability by these countries to compete effectively in the global marketplace.

    Yes, Uncle Sam (and countless Yankee profiteers) has played a nefarious role down there in countless instances."
    Don't disagree with your "no small part". But here's the tricky question (I don't have an answer - I doubt one exists): to what extent has the US's constant malign interference with these countries for over 100 years, contributed to, exacerbated & actively encouraged the corruption etc you accurately reference ?

    John Gerassi, ‘The Great Fear in Latin America’, 1963, 1969, London.
    I was not just the USA, it began with Spaniards, Portugese, Germans, whatever.
    Oakah L. Jones Jr., ‘Santa Anna’, New York 1968
    This Santa was seen as a Mexican, he had a migration background.
    How the whites suppressed the original people
    Rigoberta Menchú, ‘I, Rigoberta Menchú, An Indian Woman in Guatemala’, 1984, 1996 (Me Llamo Rigoberta Menchú Y Asi Me Nació La Concienca, Barcelona 1983)
    Right now Bolivia is the only S American country ruled by those without a migration background;

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Medvedev says:
    @animalogic
    "No. It’s because Malthus was right, and people having more children than they can afford to support produces terrible poverty. Period."
    The upshot of your comment is that essentially poor countries are poor b/c they breed too much.
    Sure: it's an important factor - but it's also been proven ad-nauseam, if you want to stop over breeding you must lift living standards. The current economic political situation internationally makes such an outcome difficult for those countries lacking cultural/institutional foundations for such an uplift.
    Incidentally, there's plenty of food on earth - there's be better food security if we were willing to change economic & environmental goals.
    However, the author is fundamentally correct: war & poverty are the major (not exclusive) push factors in immigration. The view that a certain cultural minority group has encouraged & manipulated people movements for its own nefarious goals is not inconsistent with the author's views.

    but it’s also been proven ad-nauseam, if you want to stop over breeding you must lift living standards

    No, it hasn’t. Look at Eastern Europe or Cuba. And most of Latin America is heading the same route.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
    Look at the Middle East the most. Remember reading about a Muslim Syrian man with 3 wives and 22 children who went to Germany seeking asylum and is receiving 360,000 euros a year from the Germany. The article explained that wealthy Muslims in Syria, and Saudi Arabia and probably many other Muslim Countries can have 4 wives and as many children as they want. The billionaire Saudi Arabian monarchs and Ben Laden’s father had - and probably continue to have dozens of children.
    
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. annamaria says:
    @jilles dykstra
    " Their duty was to keep Europe European "

    The European EU consisted of some 28 different nations with cultures and languages.
    What the Brussels gang wants is a superstate to USA model.
    Therefore free movement of persons within the EU, and immigration from outside.
    So indeed, what they're trying to do is destroying Europe.
    Even when the EU falls apart today, in 2040 those with migrant background will be 40% of the total population.
    The countries that may be able keep their identities and cultures are a few E European ones, catholic.
    What will happen nobody knows, Eric Zemmour expects civil war, followed by deportations.

    I doubt that there was a precise plan to destroy Europe with immigration, considering the glaring stupidity and criminality of the deciders.
    Sure there has been the (idiotic) Wolfowitz Doctrine, the mega-profiteers passionate desires for money and more money, and the supremacist mythology of perennial trouble-makers — all these aspects have interacted and produced a global replay of a popular cartoon “Sorcerer’s Apprentice.”
    The absolute majority of westerners have no idea about the horrors of mass slaughter that the Middle East has been suffering thanks to the stupid criminal designs of the stupid criminal deciders.
    Would not it be great to demands from the US/EU/UK governments to convene in destroyed Libya, next to the corpses of children and women, so that the “peoples representatives” remember the smell of death until their last days?
    Cheney, Blair, Bush the lesser, the AIPAC, the “humanitarian” activists Condi Rice, Madeleine Albright, Hilary, Samantha Powers and such, the gargoyle Sarkozy, the dishonest-to-the-bone Theresa May and Cameron — they are cannibals of our time.

    http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/unworthy-victims-western-wars-have-killed-four-million-muslims-1990-39149394

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/where-is-outcry-over-children-killed-by-u-s-led-forces/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. renfro says:
    @denk

    The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017
     
    Those figures didnt include the following countries which were WMMed by Indians and rendered 'Indian territory'...

    Arunachal Pradesh. Assam. Manipur. Meghalaya. Mizoram. Nagaland. Sikkim. Tripura.

    Sikkim, Bhutan.

    Singapore is already de facto Bhutanised.

    Go to this link to see how Indian immigration was arrived at.
    Shows you the countries you mention and inflow-outflow re Indian émigrés.

    https://esa.un.org/miggmgprofiles/indicators/files/India.pdf

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    South Asians worry a lot about being 'Sikkimised' or Bhutanised'...

    Sikkim was a sovereign country before it's zapped by Indian WMM and devoured wholesale.

    Bhutan is half way there, an Indian WMMed protectorate.

    Even fellow South Asian countries Nepal, Sri Lanka are inundated by Indian WMM which become 5 columns for Delhi.

    I forget to mention the 'Rohinghas crisis' in Myanmar, they'r actually Bangalis.

    Arunachal Pradesh. Assam. Manipur. Meghalaya. Mizoram. Nagaland. Sikkim. Tripura, Sikkim, Bhutan.
    Myanmar, Singapore.
    they are all sino/mongoloid people, all kaput...either Sikkimised or Bhutanised.

    the fukusIndian cabal is orchestrating a massive yellow genocide in Asia, even China is not immune.

    the 'yellow peril' will soon be terminated.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. renfro says:
    @Dagon Shield
    The largest percentage of people living outside of their native lands are whites... the Indians migrated to the far flung corners of the world over the last two centuries not just in the last two decades unlike the Mexicans, who are only heading up north. It ain't the same thing!

    The largest percentage of people living outside of their native lands are whites… the Indians migrated to the far flung corners of the world over the last two centuries not just in the last two decades unlike the Mexicans, who are only heading up north. It ain’t the same thing

    BS….it is the same thing
    If you want anyone to believe that more whites immigrate out of their countries show us the data. Comments are worthless unless backed up with the official data.

    What do you not understand about this data. Indians make up the largest number of international immigrants and they aren’t white.

    India has the largest number of persons born in the country who are now living outside its borders. The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017, ahead of the number of Mexican-born persons living outside Mexico (13 million).

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/indian-immigrants-united-states-2#21

    https://esa.un.org/miggmgprofiles/indicators/files/India.pdf

    Immigrants from India are the second-largest foreign-born group in the United States, after Mexicans.
    The number of unauthorized immigrants from India grew faster than the number of any other immigrant group between 2000 and 2006.
    The estimated number of unauthorized immigrants from India has more than doubled since 2000, rising from 120,000 to 270,000 in 2006. This rate (125 percent) is faster than that of any other group between 2000 and 2006.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dagon Shield
    How clever and convenient! For your own benefit, you conveniently forget that all, I mean all, whites who are not residing in the European Subcontinent (it ain't no freaking continent), the traditional white lands, are for the counting purpose, are immigration derived and thus should not go around pointing fingers at newer ones!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. renfro says:
    @Sollipsist
    Fair enough. Let's focus on eliminating the causes of US-led war and the immigrant issue should therefore cease to be such a major problem.

    1. Human rights must be de-emphasized. Stop teaching children to be moral exceptionalists, because that directly leads to intervention on the basis of ideological superiority. Every imperialist act in history has been sold as the necessary spread of civilization versus primitive ignorance, and it's difficult to believe that the most emphatic anti-imperialists cannot seem to recognize that the constant refrain of "spreading human rights" is merely the latest incarnation of this age-old ideological shell game.

    2. Refuse to reelect anybody who has voted in favor of military intervention. That'll pretty much empty the government, destroy the existing two-party duopoly, and clear the way for candidates who are eager to represent the will of the people (which poll after poll shows are in favor of stronger immigration controls).

    3. Having no need for support from entrenched interests, this new batch of elected officials will be more free to ignore the coercion of military, money, and alliance that has encouraged every intervention thus far. The new officials may find it expedient to enact new laws (or enforce existing ones) that prevent foreign influence and domestic collusion. Perhaps we could redefine or more accurately define "hate speech" to address speculative propaganda in the media that is likely to encourage military action (see Russiagate) or to rationalize such behavior by "friendly nations."

    4. Having taken strong steps toward this goal, one would hope that we could once again feel secure in presenting rational arguments and humane enforcement for strong immigration policy, should any immigration still exist after imperialist military action has been curtailed.

    Mostly agree.

    But beware of this:

    Human rights must be de-emphasized. Stop teaching children to be moral exceptionalists, because that directly leads to intervention on the basis of ideological superiority.

    Unless you want ‘children of the corn’ coming after you too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. renfro says:
    @jilles dykstra
    USA immigration is politically quite different from migration into the EU.
    Jewish sociologist dr Stephen Steinlight is afraid of immigration from the south into the USA 'for them USA jews are just rich people, they know nothing about the holocaust'.
    The ME wars, according to Hollings in 2004 Bush jr promised AIPAC the Iraq war if he got the jewish votes.
    Long before Israel developed plans to to destabilise the whole ME, Netanyahu continues this policy.
    Alas, with Syria and Iran he finds Putin on his way, maybe also Erdogan.
    Cynical people suppose that the migration from the ME and N Africa is part of the plan, the European cultures must be destroyed or destabilised to make the EU into a USA clone.
    This plan may backfire, immigration may well be the end of the EU.

    AIPAC has had decades long programs trying to convert Hispanics to the Israel Jewish cause….recruiting them for all expense paid trips to Israel, flying them DC for AIPAC conferences, offering scholarships to promising young Latinos, etc.,etc.

    But it hasn’t worked very well on Hispanics….so now AIPAC is concentrating on India immigrants.

    Communities: AIPAC’s Hispanic Community | AIPAC.org

    https://www.aipac.org/connect/communities/hispanic

    Latinos in the United States represents the largest and fastest growing population group in the country, today making up roughly 15% of the U.S. population

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. renfro says:
    @jilles dykstra
    " “The White race is the cancer of human history.”—Judaist Susan Sontag, "
    Should be
    “The White race is the cancer of jewish history.”
    Jews once were a very powerful people:
    Michael Grant, 'The Jews in the Roman World', 1973, New York
    Roman military might and christianity destroyed that power.
    Therefore the theory that Paul created christianity as a secret agent of the Roman emperor is an interesting one
    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, ‘Verschlusssache Jesus, Die Wahrheit über das frühe Christentum’, (The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, 1991), 2005, Bergisch Gladbach
    I'm inclined to suppose that the copper Dead Sea scroll decribing where the jewish wealth was hidden is real.

    Jews once were a very powerful people:

    In Rome ?….not really.
    In fact Israel, as it is known, was a ‘client state’ of Rome and had to pay taxes to Rome.
    Rabbis collected the taxes and could ‘keep a part’ for themselves.
    The Jews revolted against this and Rome wiped them out.
    Wash, rinse, repeat …..is how it went thereafter until modern times.

    This book is really, really hard to read and in four volumes—-but its considered one of the best for its timeline….you can read it online
    Fall of The Roman Empire by Gibbons

    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25717/25717-h/25717-h.htm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
     "Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills...they belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers." and “A nation can survive its fools...but it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic
    so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.” Cicero, 106 - 43 BCE

    “They have penetrated already into every state, so that it is difficult to find a single place in the world in which their tribe has not been received and become dominant.” Strabo, Geographica, 7 CE - geographer map maker 64 BCE - 24 CE

    Of course Strabo wrote of the nations around the Mediterranean. Today there are only a few nations in the world - “in which their tribe has not been received and become dominant” - the ones the unlucky Christian West and all of its international allies are encircling, embargoing and black balling and negatively stereotyping since they are out of their “Jewish magic encirclement” (Corral)

    “Once they (the goy i.e., ‘dirty cattle ) all get bewitched by this ‘Jewish magic circle’ - no one can get out.” Ludwig Borne (born Loeb Baruch) 1785
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Josep says:
    @Anon
    Petras is right, but it seems many 'refugees' are using the war as excuse to seek better life in Europe. This is especially true of black Africans who move through Libya to Europe. After all, Sweden had nothing to do with current Western policy in the Middle East. But so many head there. Why? Israel had a lot to do with the mess in the Middle East but no one goes there cuz Israel has tough walls. So, this is less about right and wrong than about might and strong.

    Anyway, Diversity works only within the EUROPEAN Union. In order for the EU to be European, it must be by Europeans and for Europeans. As it currently functions, the EU might as well be called the World Union, or especially the Afro-Islamo-European-Union. It says something about current EU that it is so hostile toward fellow whites in Russia and Hungary and Poland while being so celebratory and welcoming of Africans, Arabs, and Asians. So, basically, the current EU wages war on White Europe and tries to unite Europe with non-Europe. Furthermore, it wages war on the meaning of what it means to be European. According to EU, a 'European' is anyone who just comes to Europe and signs a piece of paper. So, history, culture, and blood no longer matter. A European with 10,000s of years of racial evolution in Europe and 1,000s of years of cultural history in Europe is NO MORE EUROPEAN than a newly arrived African or Arab who just learned the language and signed a citizenship paper. Basically, it means that the roots of a European has NO meaning. It doesn't matter if your roots in Europe racially go back eons and culturally go back millennia. You are NO MORE EUROPEAN than some Arab or African who just came for free gibs and to assimilate to globo-homo Hollywood-Rap culture.
    Calling Africans, Arabs, and Asians the 'New Europeans' is a sleight-of-hand trick. It's like replacing orange juice with lime juice and labeling it as 'new orange juice'. Suppose I take over your house and call myself the 'new you'. That way, YOU didn't lose your house to me because I'm the 'new you'. So, the house still belongs to you because I am 'you', or the 'new you'. Isn't that ridiculous? It's all semantic BS.

    Hungary joined the EUROPEAN Union to cooperate more fully with fellow Europeans. It didn't join to become one with Afro-Islamo-European Union. Also, Hungarians know what a real European is. He is a person with deep racial, historical, and cultural roots in Europe. But EU has changed rules so that ANYONE can become an Insta-European by signing a piece of paper. The rich stream of European blood has been replaced with the stamp of globo-homo ink. A true European has no more claim or birthright to Europe than billions of non-Europeans around the world. (This is the logic of colonialism and imperialism. Just like European imperialists tried to suppress the birthrights of the peoples they conquered, the globalist project of EU seeks to suppress any notion of ancestral claim and birthright among Europeans in their mother-continent.) EU will say dumb things like 'Europe was always a world of immigrants', but virtually all those peoples were fellow whites, fellow Europeans. Surely, a bunch of blacks going from one African nation to another is less jarring than a bunch of non-Africans settling in Africa. The same is true of Europe. A bunch of Poles going to Germany or UK is less jarring and disruptive than millions of black Africans and Arab Muslims taking over entire areas of Europe. Also, the history of Europe was about resistance against foreign invaders. Mongols invaded Russia and even reached Poland. They were eventually pushed out. Moors invaded Sicily and Spain. They were pushed back to North Africa eventually. Turks invaded Greece and parts of Balkans; they tried to invade more. Europeans rolled back the Turkish tide. Europe wasn't about inviting invasions by non-Europeans but about repelling them.

    Anyway, it is not Hungary or Poland that violated the agreements of the European Union. It was the globo-homo elites of EU who've decided to collaborate with the Empire of Judea. They are not real leaders but comprador-collaborators. Their duty was to keep Europe European and to facilitate easier and more efficient cooperation among Europeans, but they undermined their own project by effectively uniting Europe with Africa and the Middle East(and even Asia). Meanwhile, they badmouth Russia because they're puppets of Globo Supremacists filled with hatred for Putin who said NO to Homomania(as proxy of Globo Domination).

    Also, there is no greater human right than for a nation to survive as a people and culture. Demographic Imperialism that replaces the people and culture is a form of geo-ethnocide. It's obvious from the creation of Israel that massive movements of peoples can lead to a destruction of a people and culture. Massive Jewish demographic imperialism led to the eradication of Palestinian nationhood. Palestinians live like animals in a zoo in Gaza. They live under Apartheid conditions in the West Bank.
    After WWII, the anti-imperialist struggles of Third World peoples were all nationalist. Hindus in India told the British to go home because India is for Indians. Africans told Europeans to pack up and leave because black Africa belongs to black Africans. Anti-imperialism founded on the principle of universal nationalism was the most fundamental form of human rights. Before we can have individual rights and liberties, we must be free as a people from foreign or imperialist domination. For example, Palestinian individuals in Israel have many individual rights and liberties, but they are NOT free as a people. Their nation, Palestine, has been taken over by Jews, and all Palestinians, no matter how rich or free as individuals, don't have a nation because their land now belongs to Zionist overlords. If it happened to Palestinians, it can happen to anyone. Consider how Kosovo had once been the sacred homeland of Serbians. But over time, Albanian Muslims moved in and settled in Kosovo under Ottoman rule, and the Serbs lost their ancient homeland forever. But I suppose EU can advise Serbians to just see Albanian Muslims as 'New Serbians'. Of course, Albanians don't see themselves that way.

    Also, Diversity has many meanings. The World is Diverse, after all. So, Diversity as a condition of the world isn't a problem. The world will always be diverse, made up of various races, ethnic groups, nations, cultures, religions, regions, and etc. But Diversity as PC formula is about forcing Demographic Imperialism on each nation(except Israel). Every nation must be made into a mini-world. But why? Hungary is Hungary, and it should be Hungarian. If you want to see China or Africa, visit China or Africa. Why bring China, Africa, Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, and etc. into your own nation, especially if it's small? If rising Diversity is such a huge headache for massive nations like the US and Brazil with so much space, imagine its impact on smaller nations like Hungary and Poland? At the very least, white Americans can flee from Diversity. In small European nations, you are stuck with it right outside your door.

    The kind of Diversity pushed by EU is really a form of imperialism. Diversity as a condition of the world is just a reality. But Diversity as a formula is about coercing all nations(except Israel) to surrender to massive demographic imperialism and replacement. It's usually about higher-IQ prosperous nations with low-birthrates being demographically taken over by low-IQ peoples from poor nations with high birthrates. The result will be loss of entire civilizations. Just do the math. Over time, the current Diversity policy of EU will turn all of Europe into something like Morocco. Is Morocco a happy place? If diverse North Africa is so great, why do people there want to move to white Europe?

    Also, EU's pontificating about Human Rights is so much BS. If EU really cares about non-whites, why doesn't it ever stand up to globo US neo-imperialist policy that destroyed so much of the Middle East and North Africa? For the most part, the EU didn't do anything about George W. Bush's illegal war on Iraq. EU was silent about Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright's sanctions that killed 100,000s of Iraqi women and children. The EU has continued to support Israeli occupation of West Bank. EU has gone along with US sanctions against Iran that hurt so many people. EU supported Obama-and-Hillary's destruction of Libya even though Gaddafi made peace with the West. EU worked with the US to aid terrorists and Jihadis to tear Syria apart. 400,000 people died. EU never stood up to globo US empire that destroys millions of lives in the Muslim World.
    Indeed, the so-called 'refugee' crisis is the result of globo US neo-imperialism in Middle East and North Africa. But the EU, that is gutless in standing up to American power, huffs and puffs about Hungary and Poland whose only desire is to protect their nations. It is the globo US that is pushing the Invade-Invite Policy. It says the US should freely invade and destroy nations around the world(especially to serve Israel's interests), and as millions and millions of people will be displaced by such invasions, the white world must 'invite' those people as a 'humanitarian' gesture. So, Jews use Western Power to destroy all nations hated by Israel, and then, Jews morally pressure white nations to accept the 'refugees'.

    Finally, Diversity-as-Formula is a form of imperialism. Nazi Empire was about diversity. It was about many peoples being forced to live under the Nazi umbrella. Soviet Empire was diverse. It was about many peoples being forced to live under Soviet Hegemony. The EU is now about forcing demographic imperialism on every European nation to make them more diverse. Just like Nazi Empire forced Slavic lands to accept German settlers, the EU forces European nations to accept African and Muslim invaders displaced by globo-homo imperialist wars in the Middle East and North Africa. (Jews apparently want to use wars to empty the Middle East so that they can grab more territory.)

    The EU project could have worked if it had remained European and respected the national rights of all European peoples. But it turned into an arm of Judeo-Globo-Homo project. As such, it went from a sunny project of uniting and preserving Europe to a stormy project uniting Europe with Africa, Muslim World, and South Asia. It came to be about forcing the Diversity Formula or the Demographic-Imperialist Agenda on each and every nation.

    So, why did so many white people fall for this poison pill? Because Political Correctness imbues vain white people with a new kind of supremacism. If imperialist whites of the past were racial supremacists, today's whites are moral supremacists. They think they are soooooooo very goody-good and holier-than-others because they are so obedient to the Globo-Homo Agenda that demeans anything white and patriotic as 'racist' while extolling anything Diverse(usually black) as sacrosanct. So, just by mouthing sacramental platitudes about 'diversity' and 'human rights', these insufferably smug PC whites think they are superior to nationalists and patriots. But then, communists also felt morally superior by mouthing off platitudes about 'equality' and 'revolution'. Just another form of supremacism among people for whom every corner of the world must be made to cave to their dogmatically imbecile notion of right-and-wrong.

    For the most part, the EU didn’t do anything about George W. Bush’s illegal war on Iraq.

    I seem to recall that France, Germany and some other European countries opposed the Iraq War and got a lot of flak for it from the American and British press.
    Also, there once was a blog, Davids Medienkritik (http://medienkritik.typepad.com), where owner David Kaspar focused on what he felt was anti-Americanism in the German mainstream media. The latest article was published sometime in 2014 (some years after the Iraq War came to an end) and the blog had since become dormant. I haven’t read much into it, so feel free to determine which of David’s railings are real or bogus.

    The EU has continued to support Israeli occupation of West Bank.

    What I find ironic is how how many Israeli news outlets (YNetNews, JPost, and Algemeiner) accuse the EU of being anti-Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III

    What I find ironic is how how many Israeli news outlets (YNetNews, JPost, and Algemeiner) accuse the EU of being anti-Israel.
     
    The standard Zionist line is Jews need a safe homeland because the world is teeming with goy anti-Semites who will sooner or later attempt to cull the Jews from their societies. From the Israeli state's perspective if anti-Semitism didn't exist it would have to be invented. As it is, the prevalence and severity of anti-Semitism throughout the world is hugely exaggerated by Zionist true believers. And it is deliberately conflated with criticism of individuals who happen to be Jewish and, of course, with opposition to Israel and its genocidal policies.
    , @Authenticjazzman
    " Ant-Americanism in the German mainstream media"

    There is no "anti-Americanism" in the German mainstream media, rather there is a rabid anti-US Republicanism raging through the German media, and a profoundly pro-US Democrat slant throughout said media.
    They support and praise the US Democrats no matter what the issue, and they, the German media, worship the ground BC/HC/BO walk on.
    The Germans , and their insane media, have been swept up in a neurotic, crazed anti US Republican mania for fifty years, and to the bizarre point where German so-called "conservatives" themselves are holding an anti-US Republican stance.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US army vet, and pro jazz artist.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Svigor
    What's the problem? Sounds like he was 100% correct.

    His statement implies that he thinks refugees COULD have gone to neighboring countries but chose instead to migrate en masse to Europe. If he was aware that the vast majority DID, in fact, go to neighboring states, why make that statement in the first place?

    Someone should start a campaign to encourage people displaced by American and European sponsored wars to migrate to the countries responsible for their lives and homes being destroyed, and offer them incentives to raise large families there. The weak and wimpy Western public needs to suffer consequences for the death and destruction their governments unleash in their citizens’ names. Westerners really are the worst snowflakes. Islamic terrorists only had to kill a few thousand of these water soluble civilians (over a 15-year period) for Western civilization to start unraveling.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Authenticjazzman
    " The vast majority DID , in fact, go to neighboring states"

    Yeah they did : with the goal in mind of moving on to Germany or Sweden.

    Authenticjazzman "Mensa" qualified since 1973, airborne trained US army vet, and pro jazz artist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @Josep

    For the most part, the EU didn’t do anything about George W. Bush’s illegal war on Iraq.
     
    I seem to recall that France, Germany and some other European countries opposed the Iraq War and got a lot of flak for it from the American and British press.
    Also, there once was a blog, Davids Medienkritik (http://medienkritik.typepad.com), where owner David Kaspar focused on what he felt was anti-Americanism in the German mainstream media. The latest article was published sometime in 2014 (some years after the Iraq War came to an end) and the blog had since become dormant. I haven't read much into it, so feel free to determine which of David's railings are real or bogus.

    The EU has continued to support Israeli occupation of West Bank.
     
    What I find ironic is how how many Israeli news outlets (YNetNews, JPost, and Algemeiner) accuse the EU of being anti-Israel.

    What I find ironic is how how many Israeli news outlets (YNetNews, JPost, and Algemeiner) accuse the EU of being anti-Israel.

    The standard Zionist line is Jews need a safe homeland because the world is teeming with goy anti-Semites who will sooner or later attempt to cull the Jews from their societies. From the Israeli state’s perspective if anti-Semitism didn’t exist it would have to be invented. As it is, the prevalence and severity of anti-Semitism throughout the world is hugely exaggerated by Zionist true believers. And it is deliberately conflated with criticism of individuals who happen to be Jewish and, of course, with opposition to Israel and its genocidal policies.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "... it is deliberately conflated with criticism of individuals who happen to be Jewish and, of course, with opposition to Israel and its genocidal policies."
    -- Hard to say, what nation could fall under the spell of "eternal victimhood" after the advent of the web and the availability of information on the History of Jews in Russia, Germany, and the US.
    The more triumphal deeds and words are produced by the victorious Israelis (and zionists and ziocons), the less goodwill the Jews could expect among the decent citizenry of other nations. The deeds are criminal and against the international law, and the words are of the supremacists.
    As for the "safe homeland," the Israelis are eager to leave it at the first opportunity to relocate to Germany (for all countries!) and the US. http://americanfreepress.net/tens-of-thousands-of-jews-leaving-israel-for-germany/
    The "Russian Jews" (the former Soviets) in Israel are predominantly the economic migrants looking for the best deal: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20170414-russian-jews-leave-israel/
    https://forward.com/news/4029/germany-is-moving-to-end-mass-immigration-of-jews/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. denk says:
    @renfro
    Go to this link to see how Indian immigration was arrived at.
    Shows you the countries you mention and inflow-outflow re Indian émigrés.

    https://esa.un.org/miggmgprofiles/indicators/files/India.pdf

    South Asians worry a lot about being ‘Sikkimised‘ or Bhutanised‘…

    Sikkim was a sovereign country before it’s zapped by Indian WMM and devoured wholesale.

    Bhutan is half way there, an Indian WMMed protectorate.

    Even fellow South Asian countries Nepal, Sri Lanka are inundated by Indian WMM which become 5 columns for Delhi.

    I forget to mention the ‘Rohinghas crisis’ in Myanmar, they’r actually Bangalis.

    Arunachal Pradesh. Assam. Manipur. Meghalaya. Mizoram. Nagaland. Sikkim. Tripura, Sikkim, Bhutan.
    Myanmar, Singapore.
    they are all sino/mongoloid people, all kaput…either Sikkimised or Bhutanised.

    the fukusIndian cabal is orchestrating a massive yellow genocide in Asia, even China is not immune.

    the ‘yellow peril’ will soon be terminated.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III
    His statement implies that he thinks refugees COULD have gone to neighboring countries but chose instead to migrate en masse to Europe. If he was aware that the vast majority DID, in fact, go to neighboring states, why make that statement in the first place?

    Someone should start a campaign to encourage people displaced by American and European sponsored wars to migrate to the countries responsible for their lives and homes being destroyed, and offer them incentives to raise large families there. The weak and wimpy Western public needs to suffer consequences for the death and destruction their governments unleash in their citizens' names. Westerners really are the worst snowflakes. Islamic terrorists only had to kill a few thousand of these water soluble civilians (over a 15-year period) for Western civilization to start unraveling.

    ” The vast majority DID , in fact, go to neighboring states”

    Yeah they did : with the goal in mind of moving on to Germany or Sweden.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US army vet, and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @Josep

    For the most part, the EU didn’t do anything about George W. Bush’s illegal war on Iraq.
     
    I seem to recall that France, Germany and some other European countries opposed the Iraq War and got a lot of flak for it from the American and British press.
    Also, there once was a blog, Davids Medienkritik (http://medienkritik.typepad.com), where owner David Kaspar focused on what he felt was anti-Americanism in the German mainstream media. The latest article was published sometime in 2014 (some years after the Iraq War came to an end) and the blog had since become dormant. I haven't read much into it, so feel free to determine which of David's railings are real or bogus.

    The EU has continued to support Israeli occupation of West Bank.
     
    What I find ironic is how how many Israeli news outlets (YNetNews, JPost, and Algemeiner) accuse the EU of being anti-Israel.

    ” Ant-Americanism in the German mainstream media”

    There is no “anti-Americanism” in the German mainstream media, rather there is a rabid anti-US Republicanism raging through the German media, and a profoundly pro-US Democrat slant throughout said media.
    They support and praise the US Democrats no matter what the issue, and they, the German media, worship the ground BC/HC/BO walk on.
    The Germans , and their insane media, have been swept up in a neurotic, crazed anti US Republican mania for fifty years, and to the bizarre point where German so-called “conservatives” themselves are holding an anti-US Republican stance.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US army vet, and pro jazz artist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @renfro

    The largest percentage of people living outside of their native lands are whites… the Indians migrated to the far flung corners of the world over the last two centuries not just in the last two decades unlike the Mexicans, who are only heading up north. It ain’t the same thing
     
    BS....it is the same thing
    If you want anyone to believe that more whites immigrate out of their countries show us the data. Comments are worthless unless backed up with the official data.

    What do you not understand about this data. Indians make up the largest number of international immigrants and they aren't white.

    India has the largest number of persons born in the country who are now living outside its borders. The number of Indian-born persons residing abroad numbered 17 million in 2017, ahead of the number of Mexican-born persons living outside Mexico (13 million).

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/indian-immigrants-united-states-2#21

    https://esa.un.org/miggmgprofiles/indicators/files/India.pdf

    Immigrants from India are the second-largest foreign-born group in the United States, after Mexicans.
    The number of unauthorized immigrants from India grew faster than the number of any other immigrant group between 2000 and 2006.
    The estimated number of unauthorized immigrants from India has more than doubled since 2000, rising from 120,000 to 270,000 in 2006. This rate (125 percent) is faster than that of any other group between 2000 and 2006.

    How clever and convenient! For your own benefit, you conveniently forget that all, I mean all, whites who are not residing in the European Subcontinent (it ain’t no freaking continent), the traditional white lands, are for the counting purpose, are immigration derived and thus should not go around pointing fingers at newer ones!

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    How clever and convenient! For your own benefit, you conveniently forget that all, I mean all, whites who are not residing in the European Subcontinent (it ain’t no freaking continent), the traditional white lands, are for the counting purpose, are immigration derived
     
    Well whitey hater....when the first whites came to America it was not 'a country'...it wasnt a country until 1776...so the ones who came before then weren't 'immgrants'...they can be called adventures or colonist or whatever...but not immigrants
    however fine by me if those who families came after that are immigrants who should go back to wherever....
    So if you're living here get out, if you're not dont come.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. renfro says:
    @Dagon Shield
    How clever and convenient! For your own benefit, you conveniently forget that all, I mean all, whites who are not residing in the European Subcontinent (it ain't no freaking continent), the traditional white lands, are for the counting purpose, are immigration derived and thus should not go around pointing fingers at newer ones!

    How clever and convenient! For your own benefit, you conveniently forget that all, I mean all, whites who are not residing in the European Subcontinent (it ain’t no freaking continent), the traditional white lands, are for the counting purpose, are immigration derived

    Well whitey hater….when the first whites came to America it was not ‘a country’…it wasnt a country until 1776…so the ones who came before then weren’t ‘immgrants’…they can be called adventures or colonist or whatever…but not immigrants
    however fine by me if those who families came after that are immigrants who should go back to wherever….
    So if you’re living here get out, if you’re not dont come.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    The wave of "Native Americans" that run casinos today are the last wave of Asians to enter the North American continent and Navajo certain tribes are relatively recent arrivals.

    Inuit arrived AFTER the Norse were IN Greenland and Canada. They are as Asian as Chinese in Vancouver.

    As for immigrants vs colonists, the latter immigrants were the ones who transformed the United States into a powerhouse. If Italians, Irish, Germans and yes, Jews, had not immigrated then the US would resemble the South. A lost backwater British colony.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @renfro

    How clever and convenient! For your own benefit, you conveniently forget that all, I mean all, whites who are not residing in the European Subcontinent (it ain’t no freaking continent), the traditional white lands, are for the counting purpose, are immigration derived
     
    Well whitey hater....when the first whites came to America it was not 'a country'...it wasnt a country until 1776...so the ones who came before then weren't 'immgrants'...they can be called adventures or colonist or whatever...but not immigrants
    however fine by me if those who families came after that are immigrants who should go back to wherever....
    So if you're living here get out, if you're not dont come.

    The wave of “Native Americans” that run casinos today are the last wave of Asians to enter the North American continent and Navajo certain tribes are relatively recent arrivals.

    Inuit arrived AFTER the Norse were IN Greenland and Canada. They are as Asian as Chinese in Vancouver.

    As for immigrants vs colonists, the latter immigrants were the ones who transformed the United States into a powerhouse. If Italians, Irish, Germans and yes, Jews, had not immigrated then the US would resemble the South. A lost backwater British colony.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    Well I was going to give you a lesson on American history but then remembered you are the lower class trash mouth guy who was scared of blacks and Jews and fled Mo town and the US for Asia.
    You and guys like Fred are way too obvious....all your bashing of white hicks, rednecks, middle class cul de sacs, is jealousy ....you couldn't make it here or get a woman here, except probably for the trailer trash you rant on......so you gotta vent your frustrations over the basic nothingness of your expat existence by tearing into everyone in America.

    Except it doesn't make you feel better ....your failures and inability to afford or attain a life in a decent city here in the US ......just keeps eating away at you and you gotta spew more and more trash at everyone who didnt run to Mexico or Asia or where ever in a never ending need to convince us and yourself that you are superior to us American rubes who haven't left.

    My money is on your never coming back to the US cause you know running your trash mouth here like you do would likely get your jaw broken by one of those hicks.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. annamaria says:
    @Lincoln Blockface Squarebeard III

    What I find ironic is how how many Israeli news outlets (YNetNews, JPost, and Algemeiner) accuse the EU of being anti-Israel.
     
    The standard Zionist line is Jews need a safe homeland because the world is teeming with goy anti-Semites who will sooner or later attempt to cull the Jews from their societies. From the Israeli state's perspective if anti-Semitism didn't exist it would have to be invented. As it is, the prevalence and severity of anti-Semitism throughout the world is hugely exaggerated by Zionist true believers. And it is deliberately conflated with criticism of individuals who happen to be Jewish and, of course, with opposition to Israel and its genocidal policies.

    “… it is deliberately conflated with criticism of individuals who happen to be Jewish and, of course, with opposition to Israel and its genocidal policies.”
    – Hard to say, what nation could fall under the spell of “eternal victimhood” after the advent of the web and the availability of information on the History of Jews in Russia, Germany, and the US.
    The more triumphal deeds and words are produced by the victorious Israelis (and zionists and ziocons), the less goodwill the Jews could expect among the decent citizenry of other nations. The deeds are criminal and against the international law, and the words are of the supremacists.
    As for the “safe homeland,” the Israelis are eager to leave it at the first opportunity to relocate to Germany (for all countries!) and the US. http://americanfreepress.net/tens-of-thousands-of-jews-leaving-israel-for-germany/
    The “Russian Jews” (the former Soviets) in Israel are predominantly the economic migrants looking for the best deal: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20170414-russian-jews-leave-israel/

    https://forward.com/news/4029/germany-is-moving-to-end-mass-immigration-of-jews/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. renfro says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    The wave of "Native Americans" that run casinos today are the last wave of Asians to enter the North American continent and Navajo certain tribes are relatively recent arrivals.

    Inuit arrived AFTER the Norse were IN Greenland and Canada. They are as Asian as Chinese in Vancouver.

    As for immigrants vs colonists, the latter immigrants were the ones who transformed the United States into a powerhouse. If Italians, Irish, Germans and yes, Jews, had not immigrated then the US would resemble the South. A lost backwater British colony.

    Well I was going to give you a lesson on American history but then remembered you are the lower class trash mouth guy who was scared of blacks and Jews and fled Mo town and the US for Asia.
    You and guys like Fred are way too obvious….all your bashing of white hicks, rednecks, middle class cul de sacs, is jealousy ….you couldn’t make it here or get a woman here, except probably for the trailer trash you rant on……so you gotta vent your frustrations over the basic nothingness of your expat existence by tearing into everyone in America.

    Except it doesn’t make you feel better ….your failures and inability to afford or attain a life in a decent city here in the US ……just keeps eating away at you and you gotta spew more and more trash at everyone who didnt run to Mexico or Asia or where ever in a never ending need to convince us and yourself that you are superior to us American rubes who haven’t left.

    My money is on your never coming back to the US cause you know running your trash mouth here like you do would likely get your jaw broken by one of those hicks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    American rubes CAN'T go anywhere-they reproduce too young and lack the job skills or street smarts to do so-much like the Cholos or Hood Rats.

    That is why I live overseas, because they have too many debts and kids and probate officer appointments to do so. They disgust me.

    Nobody in my hometown is bursting with patriotism, I could say what I wanted.

    I may be a working middle-class guy but I don't have to watch my kids get pounded by blacks because I cannot afford to send them to a Catholic school or see the value of my property plummet like a fart in a spacesuit.

    Nor would I live in Mexico because it is full of Cholos and I already experienced Phoenix. I would not visit Latin America. It is Cholos on steroids.

    As for Jews, I have no feeling about them one way or the other. Except that they are rare overseas-one I knew in India was married to a Bollywood actress and we played pool together. Another was married to a Chinese-Filipino woman in Cebu.
    , @Jeff Stryker
    RENFRO


    I've always wondered why hicks were patriotic. They have it the worst of any Americans, at least worse than other whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @renfro
    Well I was going to give you a lesson on American history but then remembered you are the lower class trash mouth guy who was scared of blacks and Jews and fled Mo town and the US for Asia.
    You and guys like Fred are way too obvious....all your bashing of white hicks, rednecks, middle class cul de sacs, is jealousy ....you couldn't make it here or get a woman here, except probably for the trailer trash you rant on......so you gotta vent your frustrations over the basic nothingness of your expat existence by tearing into everyone in America.

    Except it doesn't make you feel better ....your failures and inability to afford or attain a life in a decent city here in the US ......just keeps eating away at you and you gotta spew more and more trash at everyone who didnt run to Mexico or Asia or where ever in a never ending need to convince us and yourself that you are superior to us American rubes who haven't left.

    My money is on your never coming back to the US cause you know running your trash mouth here like you do would likely get your jaw broken by one of those hicks.

    American rubes CAN’T go anywhere-they reproduce too young and lack the job skills or street smarts to do so-much like the Cholos or Hood Rats.

    That is why I live overseas, because they have too many debts and kids and probate officer appointments to do so. They disgust me.

    Nobody in my hometown is bursting with patriotism, I could say what I wanted.

    I may be a working middle-class guy but I don’t have to watch my kids get pounded by blacks because I cannot afford to send them to a Catholic school or see the value of my property plummet like a fart in a spacesuit.

    Nor would I live in Mexico because it is full of Cholos and I already experienced Phoenix. I would not visit Latin America. It is Cholos on steroids.

    As for Jews, I have no feeling about them one way or the other. Except that they are rare overseas-one I knew in India was married to a Bollywood actress and we played pool together. Another was married to a Chinese-Filipino woman in Cebu.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @renfro
    Well I was going to give you a lesson on American history but then remembered you are the lower class trash mouth guy who was scared of blacks and Jews and fled Mo town and the US for Asia.
    You and guys like Fred are way too obvious....all your bashing of white hicks, rednecks, middle class cul de sacs, is jealousy ....you couldn't make it here or get a woman here, except probably for the trailer trash you rant on......so you gotta vent your frustrations over the basic nothingness of your expat existence by tearing into everyone in America.

    Except it doesn't make you feel better ....your failures and inability to afford or attain a life in a decent city here in the US ......just keeps eating away at you and you gotta spew more and more trash at everyone who didnt run to Mexico or Asia or where ever in a never ending need to convince us and yourself that you are superior to us American rubes who haven't left.

    My money is on your never coming back to the US cause you know running your trash mouth here like you do would likely get your jaw broken by one of those hicks.

    RENFRO

    I’ve always wondered why hicks were patriotic. They have it the worst of any Americans, at least worse than other whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    The "hicks" are patriotic because the American nation-state, such as it is, is all they've got. They don't have the money or skills to insulate themselves from the Vibrancy so they hope their government will maintain the unique qualities of the American nation-state and the value of their citizenship in it.

    They are coming around to the fact that America's elite is not holding up their end of this bargain. That's why they voted for Trump. They did not vote for True Conservatives with their precious, precious principles; they voted for Team Strongman.

    When the "hicks" are no longer patriotic is probably when the "non-hicks" should start worrying.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @RobinG
    And in addition - - -

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQwaPetvwqI
    Jennifer Harbury: Today’s Refugee Crisis Is Blowback from U.S. Dirty Wars in Central America

    No it’s not. It’s blowback from the historic inability of Central and South Americans to govern competently. They don’t understand markets, their whole concept of property is pretty fuzzy and choked with screwed-up, vestigial imperial grants, and they have a typically Continental view of the State.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Jeff Stryker
    RENFRO


    I've always wondered why hicks were patriotic. They have it the worst of any Americans, at least worse than other whites.

    The “hicks” are patriotic because the American nation-state, such as it is, is all they’ve got. They don’t have the money or skills to insulate themselves from the Vibrancy so they hope their government will maintain the unique qualities of the American nation-state and the value of their citizenship in it.

    They are coming around to the fact that America’s elite is not holding up their end of this bargain. That’s why they voted for Trump. They did not vote for True Conservatives with their precious, precious principles; they voted for Team Strongman.

    When the “hicks” are no longer patriotic is probably when the “non-hicks” should start worrying.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    INSULATION and OUT-MIGRATION

    You'll see a great many middle class white male retirees fleeing to Asia.

    The 1% who all have second passports whether in Israel or New Zealand will leave.

    Its the same pattern we saw in South Africa. The English South Africans fled. So did the Jews. And the Indians. It was the Boers-the original Dutch settlers-who faced the horrendous blow-back of post-Mandela.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. AGNOSTIC

    The value of their citizenship.

    There’s little value in being a poor white in Detroit or Flint. You’d be better off in Australia or Canada or any country besides South Africa. You’re little better off than a Boer-you have to ride the bus with horrendous minorities; you go to jail where some of said minorities want white boys in for their second possession or DUI to suck and screw them; their kids go to awful public schools.

    To be honest, I think poor blue-collar whites have it worst in America than anywhere in the developed world. Except Russia, maybe.

    Of course they don’t know that. They are not educated enough to know that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  82. @The Anti-Gnostic
    The "hicks" are patriotic because the American nation-state, such as it is, is all they've got. They don't have the money or skills to insulate themselves from the Vibrancy so they hope their government will maintain the unique qualities of the American nation-state and the value of their citizenship in it.

    They are coming around to the fact that America's elite is not holding up their end of this bargain. That's why they voted for Trump. They did not vote for True Conservatives with their precious, precious principles; they voted for Team Strongman.

    When the "hicks" are no longer patriotic is probably when the "non-hicks" should start worrying.

    INSULATION and OUT-MIGRATION

    You’ll see a great many middle class white male retirees fleeing to Asia.

    The 1% who all have second passports whether in Israel or New Zealand will leave.

    Its the same pattern we saw in South Africa. The English South Africans fled. So did the Jews. And the Indians. It was the Boers-the original Dutch settlers-who faced the horrendous blow-back of post-Mandela.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Josecanuc says:
    @renfro

    Jews once were a very powerful people:
     
    In Rome ?....not really.
    In fact Israel, as it is known, was a 'client state' of Rome and had to pay taxes to Rome.
    Rabbis collected the taxes and could 'keep a part' for themselves.
    The Jews revolted against this and Rome wiped them out.
    Wash, rinse, repeat .....is how it went thereafter until modern times.

    This book is really, really hard to read and in four volumes----but its considered one of the best for its timeline....you can read it online
    Fall of The Roman Empire by Gibbons

    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25717/25717-h/25717-h.htm

     “Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills…they belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.” and “A nation can survive its fools…but it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic
    so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.” Cicero, 106 – 43 BCE

    “They have penetrated already into every state, so that it is difficult to find a single place in the world in which their tribe has not been received and become dominant.” Strabo, Geographica, 7 CE – geographer map maker 64 BCE – 24 CE

    Of course Strabo wrote of the nations around the Mediterranean. Today there are only a few nations in the world – “in which their tribe has not been received and become dominant” – the ones the unlucky Christian West and all of its international allies are encircling, embargoing and black balling and negatively stereotyping since they are out of their “Jewish magic encirclement” (Corral)

    “Once they (the goy i.e., ‘dirty cattle ) all get bewitched by this ‘Jewish magic circle’ – no one can get out.” Ludwig Borne (born Loeb Baruch) 1785

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Josecanuc says:
    @Medvedev

    but it’s also been proven ad-nauseam, if you want to stop over breeding you must lift living standards
     
    No, it hasn't. Look at Eastern Europe or Cuba. And most of Latin America is heading the same route.

    Look at the Middle East the most. Remember reading about a Muslim Syrian man with 3 wives and 22 children who went to Germany seeking asylum and is receiving 360,000 euros a year from the Germany. The article explained that wealthy Muslims in Syria, and Saudi Arabia and probably many other Muslim Countries can have 4 wives and as many children as they want. The billionaire Saudi Arabian monarchs and Ben Laden’s father had – and probably continue to have dozens of children.
    

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Josecanuc says:
    @animalogic
    "But today’s refugee problem involving ‘migrants’ from Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico and Guatemala is driven by in no small part by that region’s widespread corruption, sloth, economic failures, lawlessness, and an inability by these countries to compete effectively in the global marketplace.

    Yes, Uncle Sam (and countless Yankee profiteers) has played a nefarious role down there in countless instances."
    Don't disagree with your "no small part". But here's the tricky question (I don't have an answer - I doubt one exists): to what extent has the US's constant malign interference with these countries for over 100 years, contributed to, exacerbated & actively encouraged the corruption etc you accurately reference ?

    “I helped make Mexico ‘safe’ for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti & Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank Jew boys to collect revenue in. I helped ‘purify’ Nicaragua for the International Jewish Banking House Brown Brothers…I brought ‘light’ to the Dominican Republic for American Sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras ‘right’ for American Fruit companies in 1903. Looking back on it all, I might have given Al Capone a few good tips & hints.”
    Gen. Smedley Butler, United States Marine Corp, Ret. 1921

    And watched a DW.com documentary yesterday on the history the United State’s United Fruit Company – now named “Chiqueta Bannas ” and how they removed democracies and installed Puppet dictators so they could exploit the impoverished people with no fear of any consequences – United Fruit brought in Africans from Jamaica to replace them in the fields when the indigenous people started demanding better slave conditions. Im 1930′s United Fruit did not pay them cash – they were given vouchers that they could use only in United Fruit stores to buy furniture, food, medicine, etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Josecanuc says:
    @Mishima Zaibatsu

    Europe is reaping the consequences of its alliance with US militarized imperialism whereby the US uproots millions of people and the EU spends billions of euros to cover the cost of immigrants fleeing the western wars.

    Most of the immigrants’ welfare payments fall far short of the losses incurred in their homeland. Their jobs homes, schools, and civic associations in the EU and US are far less valuable and accommodating then what they possessed in their original communities.
     
    The "migrant crisis", in which millions of third world migrants from US warzones are resettled in Europe, is the global elite's method for bringing permanent chaos to the first world to ensure their rule is total and permanent.

    It is far less bloody and physically destructive than what has been done to the Middle East, where ancient monuments and settlements have been bombed to dust, but mass immigration comes with the (directed and planned) eventual deconstruction of European identity and culture, and tearing down of our monuments, unpersoning of our heroes to make way for a hellish one world system.

    The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.
     

    “The Jews are an incurably bad people, a people always seeking its own benefits and wanting to enslave the world, a people which in spite of all its efforts to assimilate, still remains strange and hostile to the non-Jews. The Jew is the torchbearer of capitalism, exploitation, usury, and suppression. At the same time, he is also the yeast of history, upsetting and destroying all that is stable, the troublemaker incarnate. In short, the Jewish people is the curse of humanity.”
    Nahman Syrkin, 1898, The Zionist Ideal, pp 337

    “There is an older power at work, which seeks to destroy all national spirit, all ordered government in every country. What is this power? A large body of opinion answers: Jewish Power.” Nesta Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, 1924

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. BillyKid says:

    I think Latin America wants to be the new Empire in this world. They want to build a New Aztech Empire. They are supremacists, they believe to be a Superior race, but their IQ is lower by 10 to 20 points. So in fact they are inferior, the number of inventions by INdigenous and browns is very low. The white race should unite with Asians to dominate the Latin browns. But whites are doin g the wrong thing, they are giving BILLIONS of dollars to browns, and free technology, jobs, and a lot of things. That is stupid, never help your enemies. Democrat Party is the most idiot in the world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  88. @TG
    I certainly agree that the many wars that the Untied States are fighting overseas are stupid and immoral and we would be better off spending that money at home. But the notion that the immigration crisis is due to these stupid wars is mostly wrong. No. It's because Malthus was right, and people having more children than they can afford to support produces terrible poverty. Period.

    Now the United States is certainly responsible for Libya - that country was doing pretty well before we trashed it. But Libya is an outlier. Let's consider Yemen. In 1985 the population of Yemen was 10 million. They have a sky high fertility rate, and with enough food, their population should double every 20 years. Consider that:

    1985: 10 million
    2005: 20 million
    2025: 40 million
    2045: 80 million
    2065: 160 million
    2085: 320 million
    2105: 640 million
    and so on.

    Now Yemen is not a big country with a lot of rain like India or China, it's small and has very little rainfall. By itself, it could probably grow enough food to feed maybe 10 million people. Can the Yemenis handle the population of California by 2025? No. Even with more than ten times the rainfall as Yemen, and over a century of intensive industrial development, California is straining at 40 million. And could Yemen manage to support the current population of the United States by 2085? No.

    It is too-rapid population growth that is the problem with Yemen. Yemen is a black hole for food, they can suck up all the food aid, and dump any number of refugees on us, and still be hungry for more. The bombs our allies are dropping on Yemen are just making the rubble bounce. And there are many more countries like Yemen out there..

    But there is one area where yes, we are responsible for Yemen. Because we deny that Malthus was right, because the rich want cheap labor, and so we insist that people who could maybe support two kids, should have six, because 'people are the ultimate resource.' Yeah sure, if you think of people as cattle.

    we deny that Malthus was right

    Anyone with a lick of sense denies that Malthus was right, because he was wrong.

    Not only was he wrong when his main conclusions are compared to what happened subsequently: he was already wrong when he first put pen to paper.

    His main conclusions:
    ① population grows geometrically; but
    ② output grows linearly; so
    ③ population will eventually outstrip output; and so
    ④ widespread starvation will ensue.

    Malthus wrote that drivel down in 1798.

    At that point in time, agricultural output had been growing faster than population for five generations. So Malthus was unaware of a century of data from his own country that refuted his core hypothesis.

    This is actually a really interesting thing to think about and reseearch, and so I urge you to read the rest of this comment. Or don’t – someone else will.

    For those playing at home, output grew faster than population over the entire century to 1770, thanks to the British Agricultiural Revolution .

    That Malthus was not aware of this, and was furthermore not aware of the role of technological change to augment agricultural productivity, makes him someone whose entire work should be dismissed a priori.

    And what’s even more worser - all of the evidence collected over the last 2 centuries shows that one of his main claims – viz.,

    that population does invariably increase when the means of subsistence increase

    is absolutely false.

    In fact once you get past literal subsistence agriculture (where children are produced as investment goods, due to the lack of availability of alternative forms of savings), the outright best explanator of falling fertility rates is… rising prosperity.

    Malthus was the George Monbiot of his day (or for those more familiar with issues like this, the Paul Erlich): a sensationalist dilettante who did not bother to test his hypotheses against readily available data.
    .
    OK, here’s where we get to some really interesting things.
    .
    Poor countries are poor because there is a deliberate refusal of the West to enable them to build capital stocks: at the moment they are being fed ‘aid plus debt’ infrastructure projects that have the intended aim of obtaining Western financial control over their resource bases.

    As India showed (when it moved to food security in the 1970s), modern agricultural techniques – including modern plant and equipment, but also phosphate fertilisers – is staggeringly productive.

    By stark contrast, African nations are specifically prohibited from using aid funds to purchase broadacre fertilisers – mainly because Western politicians think it will mean a Black Baby Boom who will flood upwards into Europe. (As if people decamp from places where food security is improving and life’s getting better).

    And here’s the really really interesting bit.

    Life is improving – and fertility rates are falling - in the developing world.

    This is partly because of rising living conditions (albeit slowly and off a low base), but it is also partly because they are becoming aware that their past infant mortality problems are no longer a problem.

    One of the reproductive errors that the poor in the West made, was continuing to have ‘many pregnancies’ after the infant-mortality problem dropped from 1-in-4 to 2-in-1000. So our lower-class cohort expanded rapidly; it took two generations for them to work out that their kids were all living to adulthood, whereupon they started to make some changes to their reproductive strategies. Nobody was telling them otherwise.

    African women – in particular – are getting access to information that is helping them develop reproductive strategies that are a better ‘fit’ for a world in which 3 pregnancies leads to 2 births, which leads to 2 adults. (Also, any supernumerary production can be saved in forms other than children: capital markets are not very developed, but they at least exist)

    Over the next couple of decades, the African birth rate will plummet (the same is true of the developing world more generally). Current projections of birthrates for Africa fail to understand that reproductive strategies adapt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Petras Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?