The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
Why Are Africans Immigrating to “White Supremacy”?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

What image comes into your mind when you hear the phrase “white supremacy”? If you are a modern American, well-socialized into the current reigning ideology, the image is probably an old monochrome news picture from the Civil Rights era featuring leering white cops assaulting helpless blacks with billy clubs, attack dogs, or fire hoses.

For non-Americans of the modern West the image might be from some different event—the Sharpeville massacre, perhaps—but the content is essentially the same: white people being beastly to blacks.

If your cognitive reflexes come with audio accompaniment, you might hear the strains of some ditty from that same era: Bob Dylan’s “Oxford Town” (1963), maybe:

He went down to Oxford Town

Guns and clubs followed him down

All because his face was brown …

Or it might be Neil Young apostrophizing the ultimate badwhite in “Southern Man” (1970):

I heard screamin’

And bullwhips crackin’ …

If you’re not well-socialized, or if you believe that understanding what is happening in the present, and what is likely to happen in the near future, are as important as knowing what happened fifty years ago, then the phrase “white supremacy” may trigger some different image.

That’s the case with me. The image that pops into my mind when I hear “white supremacy” is that unforgettable one of the Mediterranean boat people looking up at the helicopter:

saigon-helicopter-large[1] That picture is emblematic of our age. It is destined, I am sure, to be as familiar to future generations as those of the Hindenburg disaster or the Saigon evacuation. Hundreds of black and brown faces look up at the chopper, expressing … what? Relief! Gladness! Hope!

The people in that picture are middle-class black Africans and Middle Easterners who have paid large sums of money—sometimes all their families could raise—to be trucked across great deserts in tremendous heat, kept waiting for weeks in stuffy cargo sheds with inadequate sanitation, crammed into barely-seaworthy boats, and pushed out into an unforgiving sea; all in the hope—which seems about to be fulfilled—of living at last under the blessings of white supremacy.

To these boat people, life under white supremacy is a radiant vision, a golden dream, to attain which they are prepared to risk their lives. Their dearest hope is to make it to one of the north-European nation-states where the native language is of the Germanic family: Britain, Sweden, the Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Austria, Ireland, …

Most of the people who live in those target nation-states are white, as are most of the people who govern them. (Here are current or recent cabinets of the U.K.,Sweden, and the Netherlands.) Those nation-states were established and built by white people, for white people, across many centuries of social and constitutional developmen t.

They are nation-states in which white people are supreme (“highest in rank or authority … holding or exercising power that cannot be exceeded or overruled … dominant”—Webster’s Third). By any reasonable interpretation of the phrase “white supremacy,” therefore, those target nation-states are white supremacist. Indeed, the complaint made against them by nonwhite race activists is precisely that they are white supremacist.

Presumably the boat people know this. For sure they know about nonwhitesupremacy. They have lived their lives under it and had their fill of it, to the degree they are willing to gamble all they have to escape from it.

Back in Cold War days the British opinion journalist Bernard Levin found himself watching a BBC-TV program about Germany—one of those moral-equivalency pieces the media used to put out, arguing that both West and East Germany were militarized societies under foreign domination.

Levin wrote a fine angry piece pointing out that to the best of his knowledge, the many brave souls who had risked—and in many cases, lost—their lives crossing the Berlin Wall were all headed in the same direction.

Just so with the boat people. (And their antipodean equivalents. To the best of myknowledge, there have been zero instances of boats full of white Australians hoping to make it to safety in South Asia.) Like the East German escapees, they are expressing a revealed preference—for white supremacy.

Speaking of communism: I notice with interest that communist China is now the lead country for new immigrants to the U.S.:

Move over, Mexico. When it comes to sending immigrants to the U.S., China and India have taken the lead.

China was the country of origin for 147,000 recent U.S. immigrants in 2013, while Mexico sent just 125,000, according to a Census Bureau study by researcher Eric Jensen and others. India, with 129,000 immigrants, also topped Mexico, though the two countries’ results weren’t statistically different from each other.

[Immigrants to U.S. From China Top Those From Mexico by Neil Shah; Wall Street Journal, May 3rd 2015.]

(That needs some parsing. “Researchers counted as an ‘immigrant’ any foreign-born person in the U.S. who said they previously lived abroad, without asking about legal status.” So the numbers there include guest workers and illegals.)

Far more Chinese would come if they could: I know a few such personally.

To be sure, the comparison with boat people is not altogether fair. Very few of the Chinese coming to the U.S.A. exhibit the hopeless despair that drives “asylum seekers” into Mediterranean waters from sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East.

In most parts of metropolitan China—the colonized territories of Tibet and the far West are different cases—it is today possible to live a reasonably normal life, provided your interests do not extend into “sensitive” areas, and your property or land is not coveted by powerful officials.

Communist China remains a lawless despotism, though. So far as ordinary civic rights are concerned, in fact, China under the verkrampte President Xi Jinping is now not only lawless but lawyer-less:

In December 2005 Asia Weekly, a Chinese-language magazine in Hong Kong, put 14 Chinese civil-rights advocates on its cover. It hailed them and their brethren in the cause of weiquan, or rights protection, as “men of the year” for their brave efforts to advance the rule of law in China. The cover might as well have been a “most wanted” poster. Since then authorities have turned the lawyers into a gang of “criminals” and fugitives.

All of the activists pictured on the magazine’s cover have since been imprisoned, detained, beaten or threatened, except for one lawyer who had already fled the country into exile in Canada. The most vocal among them were, as their sympathisers like to put it, “disappeared” by party-hired thugs in extralegal abductions.

[And the Law Won, The Economist, May 23rd 2015.]

So long as you don’t care much about law, rights, and liberty, China’s not bad. But white supremacy is better.

If you are a Chinese person with a lot of money, the white supremacist nations of the West also offer a safer place to put it:

“In terms of Chinese investors, I’m not kidding if I say it’s unlimited,” said attorney Min Chan, whose New York City-based Chan Law Associates advises clients participating in the wildly popular EB-5 visa program, which grants visas to foreigners who invest $500,000 in the U.S. economy in exchange for creating at least 10 jobs. More than 80 percent of the 10,000 visas went to Chinese nationals last year.

[How Chinese investors are taking over the New York real estate market by E.B. Solomont; Business Insider, March 5, 2015.]

Thoughtful readers might spot a flaw in my logic here. The name of the flaw is “Mexico.”

If any country justifies the description “white supremacist,” surely Mexico does. Here is a recent Mexican cabinet.

Mexico_Cabient[1]

Here is the Mexican Supreme Court.

mexicansupremes

As Jared Taylor might say in a quite different context: “They look white to me.”

Here by contrast are some Mexican illegal immigrants in the U.S.A.

(And for more on the point I was making at that link, see hbd-chick’s long follow-up post “Who are our Mexicans?”)

So you could say that here we have nonwhites fleeing from a strong form of white supremacy, i.e. Mexico, to a weaker one—the U.S.A.

Since the U.S. population is at least 70 percent white (including white Hispanics) while the breakdown for Mexico is usually given as indio-mestizo-white 30-60-10, there may be a general principle here.

Something like this, perhaps: White supremacy works best, its blessings are most widespread. And it is most worth fleeing to, when practiced in nations that maintain a white supermajority.

ORDER IT NOW

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjectsfor all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. His most recent book, published by VDARE.com com is FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle).His writings are archived at JohnDerbyshire.com.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Africa, Immigration, White Supremacy 
Hide 118 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Bob says:

    They don’t have to pretend.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    Because European Males are Pussies. European Women are going to mass gang raped.

    Read More
    • Replies: @rod1963
    That's about right for many white Europeans, they sold their culture and future out for a hedonistic lifestyle, cradle to grave welfare system, foreign vacations, etc.

    Hell the buggers are so self-absorbed they can't even have kids anymore. In some cases the European women refuse to take their men as boyfriends, in Germany many middle-aged women travel to Kenya for "boyfriends", it's their version of Patpong Thailand. Of course their black lovers clean them out and abandon them. But it doesn't stop.

    One could blame the elite for all of this, but who voted these open border fanatics into office? The people did. They don't want any change.

    Same going on here with the GOP, all are openly hostile to the middle-class and working against them, support open borders, etc. Yet there are millions of stupid whites waiting to vote for the man who will slit their economic and societal throats.

    This is why I laugh at the HBD'ers, they think IQ is everything, it isn't, one would have to live in a bubble to believe that. A smart person still needs guts, ability to know right from wrong, basic vitality to fight for what is his, if he doesn't he becomes a slave or if he's lucky becomes a beta cube drone in some office complex until he's replaced by a Bombay special or harassed by some fat ankled feminazi from HR till he quits. It's clear many whites are absolutely incapable of self-preservation now, even when faced by demographic destruction or being hunted down by feral blacks.

    Most would rather sit in front of their Plasma screen TV made by Chinese sweatshop workers, watching a bunch of multimillionaire blacks play professional sports and wishing they were Lebron, Kobe, etc.

    So much for evolution.
    , @Anonymous
    European feminists, like those in Sweden, emasculated their men. Let them now become objects for illegal immigrant males seeking "undocumented sex."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Wilson says:

    WHY AND HOW EUROPE MUST FORCE BOATS WITH REFUGEES TO RETURN–ARREST CAPTAIN, LEGALLY TRY AND EXECUTE CAPTAIN AND BOAT SUMMARILY, RETURN INVADERS.

    Thanks for the info, Sir. I think the real reason they are invading Europe and USA is because the criminal politicians in both countries let them in.

    Only white people are cursed with liberal scum politicians who allow foreign aliens to invade their land.

    Only white people are so gullible to allow 3rd world invaders to invade their countries. The Thai were shooting at these boats and towing them back and the racket stopped.

    These hoardes of alien invaders coming to Europe illegally on boats and ships are basically invading Europe. That is an act of war and European nations such as Italy and Greece have a right to fire at these boats and sink them. Once they do that, the message will go to these invaders that invasion is not accepted and they will stop risking their lives or make these hazardous journey.

    Letting them in, giving them asylum, rescuing them, or even processing them and then returning them are not good ideas as they all encourage more aliens to try to enter and only makes the problem worse.

    European nations must use their navies to patrol their coastal waters and prevent these alien ships and boats from entering. European naval forces can blockade these ships, and order them to return. If they do not return, the European Navy officers can board them and arrest the captain (who can then be tried and executed summarily for invasion, which should be made a capital offense), transfer the invaders back into another ship, and bomb the ship that brought them, so the ship owners cannot reuse it and suffer a big loss, making the racket unprofitable.

    Basically arrest the ship, the captain and punish them both (legal summary execution for the crime of human trafficking) and return the refugees.

    Unless and until this is done, Europe will be overrun with African invaders, who are coming with the intent to rape, murder and kill white women. White men must stand up and defend their nations from this invasion. Write to your politicians and DEMAND all immigration be banned, all aliens be deported and this crime against humanity must end or more white women will be raped and murdered by these 3rd world aliens. They must never vote for any politician who panders or supports this crime against humanity. In 3rd world countries, there would be riots and protests on the street, but the gullible whites are just watching the rapists and criminals pour in. What is wrong with whites? Why are they so brain dead?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff77450
    You know it and I know it but the U.S. and the various nations of Western Europe aren't going to do what needs to be done. Exactly how this is going to end I don't know, but I do know that it won't be pretty---for anyone.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. ViCB3 says:

    Yet don’t dare suggest that all these various immigrants have made the tacit admission that their cultures don’t work, are in their various ways dysfunctional, and that these newcomers ought to assimilate as quickly as possible to the culture of their new country. Nooo…

    Re the African Boat People:

    Shut off the welfare goodies offered up by the various European states, and then see if they still come.

    Re the Mexican Border:

    Mexico does an excellent job of policing their *Southern* Border, yet are quite lackadaisical when it come to aiding the U.S. on policing their Northern one. Indeed, they even print up and distribute helpful booklets on how to best survive an illegal crossing into the U.S. Put a (wholly punitive) 10,000% duty on Mexican goods, including Asian goods offloaded in Mexican ports for transit into the United States. Inform them that it will remain in place until illegal immigration stops completely. Then sit back and marvel at the sudden efficiency of their northernmost border policing efforts.

    But of course, none of these (and other equally) commonsensical solutions will happen. Too many vested interests at odds with it all. Status quo and all that.

    This is how countries die. Or civil wars start.

    Just a thought.

    VicB3

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Renoman says:

    All the Black folks thought that Whitey was the Devil himself until they managed to get Blackie into power. Now they all all think Whitey is a great benevolent and stupid God. And he is!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. Europe is toast; but, Americans, don’t worry: President Hillary or President Jeb will fix the U.S.’s “broken” immigration system.

    So, Americans, practice bending over while you stock up now on lube.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. War for Blair Mountain [AKA "Battle for Blair Mountain"] says:

    The nonwhite invasion of Europe and America and the mass gang raping of European Women And Native Born White America Women can not be stopped via immigration restriction…topic of Ann Coulter’s new book…because of the enormous demographic momentum and voting bloc power of nonwhites that will prevent any immigration restriction law ever being enacted. The only other option is mass expulsion:it’s either them or us.

    Should I tell the story about the White Waitress who was brutally gang raped in the back kitchen of a restaurant by Jamaican born black yoots from Brooklyn? She is now a mother of six Native Born White American Children…married the Police Officer who arrived on the scene first….she was repeatedly facially sodomized. “They did a job on her”…according to a Greek owner of a restaurant who knew all the graphic details.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rick1977
    Europe/America (Western Countries) will eventually stop mass immigration, BUT only when the hidden elite feels threathened. I think this will happen in the foreseeable future. At the end of the day, if the Elite wants it POLITIC AND VOTERS don't really matter.

    Also our Socio-Economic System will collapse, well before the Liberal Cumbaya Fest.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. So monarchal Europe conquers a bunch of low tech, late stage hunter-gatherer countries and over several centuries, imports a bunch of their wealth and a bunch of their egalitarian forager people. By the early twentieth century, Europe had reached a critical mass of foreign and domestic socialists, had distanced itself from its monarchies, and embarked on a path to the mythical nirvana promised by socialism. Presently, Europe is finalizing its death on the altar of socialism by once again importing hunter-gatherer socialists from third world countries.

    As for America, its base of the freedom culture has been completely overwhelmed by two centuries of importing people, left and right, who have very little understanding of freedom and very little desire for it.

    The US is circling the drain just a little behind Europe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. I agree wholeheartedly with everything that has been said so far on this topic, the sad & depressing thing is though, nothing is going to be done about it. We know what to do, we know what the right thing to is, but we don’t have the political power to do it, and to say such things is culturally unacceptable, as most of us know, to express such sentiments in polite society is considered to be one of the worst things you can say. I can’t see such things changing for the better, unfortunately. This is just too depressing to contemplate further.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Uhhh. White people did immigrate to brown/red nations in mass. The difference is that the arriving whites enslaved the natives.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    Uhhh. White people did immigrate to brown/red nations in mass. The difference is that the arriving whites enslaved the natives.
     
    Whacuhu got to say about that one there, Mr. Smarty Pants college professor?
    , @AnAnon
    The natives in the Americas were by and large not enslaved, and African colonization did not get underway until after our people had ended slavery.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Truth says:
    @Anonymous
    Uhhh. White people did immigrate to brown/red nations in mass. The difference is that the arriving whites enslaved the natives.

    Uhhh. White people did immigrate to brown/red nations in mass. The difference is that the arriving whites enslaved the natives.

    Whacuhu got to say about that one there, Mr. Smarty Pants college professor?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kat Grey
    There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers. However, that was then, and the invasion of Europe by undocumented, unwelcome invaders is what is happening just as I type this. Let's remain in the present and we can discuss history on another thread, if it's OK with Mr Truth.Why are they coming en masse to ethnically white nations ? Well that's easy to answer. No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome. Hell, even a Tirana is out of the question for at least the next five hundred years (I am an optimist when it suits me).

    Europe means free food, bottled water, toothpaste and toilet paper handed to them by smiling white ladies happy to assist in their own eventual subjugation , free phone credit and cigarettes, four star hotel rooms with state of the art gyms and a view of the sea, paid for by the brainwashed taxpayers. Money, money, money, designer clothes, Dolce & Gabbana, shiny cars, glimmering seafronts. Europe is magic streets with magic shops, full of bling, with just a glass window standing between them and the goodies within. Europe is France, Germany, Sweden, England; their golden gates all open wide to admit the beneficial newcomers. And oh yeah, last but not least, the icing on the three-tiered cake; plenty of long-limbed, scantily-clad silky-haired white girls whose white "boy" friends are unarmed, droopy-headed, defeated, self-hating be-spectacled liberals who believe Europe owes African migrants the right to settle within its confines without restriction. These same "men" would stand there quoting Marx and Chomsky while the "desperate seekers of a better life" gang-rape their women. In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Kat Grey says:
    @Truth

    Uhhh. White people did immigrate to brown/red nations in mass. The difference is that the arriving whites enslaved the natives.
     
    Whacuhu got to say about that one there, Mr. Smarty Pants college professor?

    There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers. However, that was then, and the invasion of Europe by undocumented, unwelcome invaders is what is happening just as I type this. Let’s remain in the present and we can discuss history on another thread, if it’s OK with Mr Truth.Why are they coming en masse to ethnically white nations ? Well that’s easy to answer. No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome. Hell, even a Tirana is out of the question for at least the next five hundred years (I am an optimist when it suits me).

    Europe means free food, bottled water, toothpaste and toilet paper handed to them by smiling white ladies happy to assist in their own eventual subjugation , free phone credit and cigarettes, four star hotel rooms with state of the art gyms and a view of the sea, paid for by the brainwashed taxpayers. Money, money, money, designer clothes, Dolce & Gabbana, shiny cars, glimmering seafronts. Europe is magic streets with magic shops, full of bling, with just a glass window standing between them and the goodies within. Europe is France, Germany, Sweden, England; their golden gates all open wide to admit the beneficial newcomers. And oh yeah, last but not least, the icing on the three-tiered cake; plenty of long-limbed, scantily-clad silky-haired white girls whose white “boy” friends are unarmed, droopy-headed, defeated, self-hating be-spectacled liberals who believe Europe owes African migrants the right to settle within its confines without restriction. These same “men” would stand there quoting Marx and Chomsky while the “desperate seekers of a better life” gang-rape their women. In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    And oh yeah, last but not least, the icing on the three-tiered cake; plenty of long-limbed, scantily-clad silky-haired white girls whose white “boy” friends are unarmed, droopy-headed, defeated, self-hating be-spectacled liberals who believe Europe owes African migrants the right to settle within its confines without restriction. These same “men” would stand there quoting
     
    Shit! You've convinced me...

    ...I'm movin' to YERUP!

    (I did want the high IQ guy to answer, though)

    , @SolontoCroesus
    Most, almost all histories of the World War I, Weimar, and World War II era omit the fact that hundreds of thousands of Russian and Polish Jews migrated to Germany after 1917, overwhelming already severely strained economic and social systems (eventuating in more starvation and tremendous unemployment) and bringing with them the intent to subvert the culture and moral values of the German people and to impose Bolshevik Communism.

    When the NSDAP crafted laws to non-violently remove those migrants and re-establish political and cultural principles that reflected German values and expand education and employment opportunities for German young people rather than the (non-legal) immigrants, those measures were called "persecution" and "evil," and the USA joined with Stalinist Bolsheviks to destroy Germany.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. “Uhhh. White people did immigrate to brown/red nations in mass. The difference is that the arriving whites enslaved the natives.”

    So why should we repeat their mistake? Whites are now economically enslaved to pay for non-white’s drain on the economy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. That overhead photo of African immigrants in an overfilled boat crossing the Mediterranean into southern Europe is the same thing that’s been going on non-stop for 35 years with Caribbean immigrants crossing the Caribbean into Florida on rickety boats and inner tubes (largely thanks to Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. AnAnon says:
    @Anonymous
    Uhhh. White people did immigrate to brown/red nations in mass. The difference is that the arriving whites enslaved the natives.

    The natives in the Americas were by and large not enslaved, and African colonization did not get underway until after our people had ended slavery.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    A more pertinent question is why is the West letting all of them in?

    It’s because the reigning ideology of the West is now determined by Jews who want to enslave the white race with ‘white guilt’ and black penis.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. Sith Efrica’s minority white, innit? What about their rulers? Is it still a white supremacy? Even if it isn’t, they surely still have a lot of the infrastructure from when it was, so it remains one in some important ways. In any case, it’s a country that’s not supermajority white.

    I mention it because a lot of Zimbabweans were and/or still are pouring in, and that would seem to also break the rule–though it’s still rather easy to explain.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. Truth says:
    @Kat Grey
    There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers. However, that was then, and the invasion of Europe by undocumented, unwelcome invaders is what is happening just as I type this. Let's remain in the present and we can discuss history on another thread, if it's OK with Mr Truth.Why are they coming en masse to ethnically white nations ? Well that's easy to answer. No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome. Hell, even a Tirana is out of the question for at least the next five hundred years (I am an optimist when it suits me).

    Europe means free food, bottled water, toothpaste and toilet paper handed to them by smiling white ladies happy to assist in their own eventual subjugation , free phone credit and cigarettes, four star hotel rooms with state of the art gyms and a view of the sea, paid for by the brainwashed taxpayers. Money, money, money, designer clothes, Dolce & Gabbana, shiny cars, glimmering seafronts. Europe is magic streets with magic shops, full of bling, with just a glass window standing between them and the goodies within. Europe is France, Germany, Sweden, England; their golden gates all open wide to admit the beneficial newcomers. And oh yeah, last but not least, the icing on the three-tiered cake; plenty of long-limbed, scantily-clad silky-haired white girls whose white "boy" friends are unarmed, droopy-headed, defeated, self-hating be-spectacled liberals who believe Europe owes African migrants the right to settle within its confines without restriction. These same "men" would stand there quoting Marx and Chomsky while the "desperate seekers of a better life" gang-rape their women. In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.

    And oh yeah, last but not least, the icing on the three-tiered cake; plenty of long-limbed, scantily-clad silky-haired white girls whose white “boy” friends are unarmed, droopy-headed, defeated, self-hating be-spectacled liberals who believe Europe owes African migrants the right to settle within its confines without restriction. These same “men” would stand there quoting

    Shit! You’ve convinced me…

    …I’m movin’ to YERUP!

    (I did want the high IQ guy to answer, though)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kat Grey
    There's a dinghy on the Libyan coast leaving for Yerup as I'm writing this..( hint, it's cheaper, safer, quicker to fly by plane and you can ask for asylum at any European airport although you won't get all the freebies and four-star Italian hotel by the sea)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Kat Grey says:
    @Truth

    And oh yeah, last but not least, the icing on the three-tiered cake; plenty of long-limbed, scantily-clad silky-haired white girls whose white “boy” friends are unarmed, droopy-headed, defeated, self-hating be-spectacled liberals who believe Europe owes African migrants the right to settle within its confines without restriction. These same “men” would stand there quoting
     
    Shit! You've convinced me...

    ...I'm movin' to YERUP!

    (I did want the high IQ guy to answer, though)

    There’s a dinghy on the Libyan coast leaving for Yerup as I’m writing this..( hint, it’s cheaper, safer, quicker to fly by plane and you can ask for asylum at any European airport although you won’t get all the freebies and four-star Italian hotel by the sea)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stan D Mute
    If they're flying, let's make sure its on an African airline and that there's a crocodile on board..
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Jefferson says:

    “Since the U.S. population is at least 70 percent white (including white Hispanics)”

    The U.S is 77 percent White when you include Mixed Race Latin Americans into the definition of “White”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_American

    As long as you broadened the definition of “White” to include most people from south of the border, “Whites” in the U.S will not become a minority anytime soon.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AnAnon
    We don't include them however because they specifically demanded a non-white identity in the 60s.

    @SolontoCroesus
    Senegal is not in the grip of a genocide, it isn't ruled by a tyrant, and its economy is improving. it is also emitting people like nobodies business. What changed in the past 25 years are that the social networks that make immigration possible have been formed, combined with parabolic population growth in the third world as a direct repsonse to improved living standards.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Why not lease land or cities in the third world that can be de facto ex officio colonies for the boat people?

    It can be administered by a pool of Western nations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. Derbyshire’s argument has more holes than Swiss cheese (yellow and white).

    Did middle-class Africans and Middle Eastern people risk their lives to flee their country 25 years ago the way they do today?

    What changed in that quarter century?

    Some clues:

    What happens when people seek to stay on their own land under their own government and culture?
    Expelled for Life
    A Palestinian Family’s Struggle to Stay on Their Land

    Here’s how her fellow Palestinians are treated on their own land by European white supremacists on Palestinian land:
    Video: Israeli soldiers violently attack unarmed Palestinian man
    Israel/Palestine Annie Robbins on June 13, 2015 /a>

    The USA is garrisoning Africa and the Middle East.
    When US wants a piece of land from which to impose military force on entire continents, it ethnically cleanses it — like Diego Garcia

    http://www.thenation.com/article/209945/us-base-more-secret-guantanamo

    Diego Garcia is not the only base the US has established to project power over Africa and Middle East —
    I’m sure that you’ve heard about the three bare-bones “staging outposts” or, in the lingo of the trade, “cooperative security locations” that the U.S. Marines have established in Senegal, Ghana, and Gabon. We’re talking about personnel from Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response-Africa, a unit at present garrisoned at Morón, Spain. . . .

    US has surrounded Iran and Middle East with military bases

    The people who refuse to flee their land, or are not able to do so, are starved, economically destabilized, their governments subjected to regime change-by-sodomy: as the leader of the US Department of State (and would-be “leader of the free world” enunciated US policy toward the governments of brown people who then risk all to live under white supremacists, We Came We Saw He Died — and the brown people fled from the destabilization the USA introduced.

    Chas Freeman spoke at a conference of The Academy of Philosophy and Letters last weekend. He said that the USA seems to have forgotten how to do diplomacy in preference for killing and use of force — militarism.

    Mike Morell, former Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency who briefed Bush at the time Bush took USA to war against Iraq, spoke about his new book recently. Morell rationalized the intelligence lies; he heaped so much praise on the “hard work and objectivity” of CIA workers he should have had violins in the background.

    Morell no longer works for US government, he is now a Senior Counselor to the Beacon Global Strategies Group. BGS was founded and is managed by Andrew Shapiro, whose bio boasts:

    From 2009-2013, Mr. Shapiro served as the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs where he revitalized and deepened political-military partnerships at home and abroad, and promoted record setting foreign military sales creating thousands of jobs in the United States while contributing to the security of key U.S. partners. [read: Israel and KSA]. As the longest serving Senate-confirmed Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Mr. Shapiro managed our security relationships with partners in the Middle East, identifying opportunities for improved relations with some partners while reducing risks when they arose. He deepened U.S. political-military talks with India and Brazil and made key contributions to the U.S. pivot to Asia by leading an increase in military sales and transfers to U.S. partners including Taiwan, Japan, and Indonesia.

    While leading the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Mr. Shapiro undertook the first major reform of export control efforts in twenty years. During his tenure, he announced the largest U.S. government foreign military sales (FMS) package in history and presided over the processing of a record number of United States Munitions List export licenses. He also managed more than $6 billion in security assistance funds and drove the development of the innovative Global Security Contingency Fund. http://beaconglobalstrategies.com/team/andrew-j-shapiro/

    In other words, the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs is an arms merchant in the guise of a bureaucrat.

    That is why, as Chas Freeman argued, the US no longer does or teaches its young people to do diplomacy — Diplomacy does not pay; selling weapons pays.

    And that is why “brown people” are fleeing their own lands and homes, not because they are eager to live under white supremacy, but for the simple expedient that life lasts longer if you are on the side that is pointing the gun rather than the side that the gun is pointed at.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    John Derbyshire, like his friends Peter Brinelow and Jared Taylor, wasn't born in the USA. He is an admitted serial border jumper, first to China (where he met his future wife as a student of his ) , and then to the USA, where he illegally perched until dropping anchor babies. He has been employed by neocon Murdochs his entire career here, an admitted philo-zionist shabbat goy shilling white racial consciousness for the Paul Gottfrieds because they believe it is good for the J_ws.

    But as Dr. E. Michael Jones has pointed out ( Culture Wars ) Catholic Italians , Irish, and Poles are not exactly white anglo saxon protestant - and like the 'white' albanians, greeks, and armenians, perhaps not even 'white' at least in a european sense of the word. So american white nationalism makes no sense since there is no unified white race or culture in the usa.

    It would be better to unify religious American Christian and other Gentiles with the religious non-Gentiles , of any race, against the social justice warriors, atheists, free trade murdoch shills and other cosmopolitan elites who are committing ethnocide against european christian values. -- and the latter certainly include the free trade white nationalists at vdare.

    They should be deported back to Merry England . We'll keep the half Chinese anchor babies since undoubtedly they know more about America then the foreign alien vdare lot, and will probably make a honest living, unlike their hypocritical race baiting progenitors. The Gottfried paleocons can stay of course, say what you want about JWish conservatism , at least it has an Ethnos.
    , @Karl
    >> Palestinian land


    next, you'll be telling us that Spaniards need to get out of Spain so that Al-Andalus can be restored.

    Be careful of what you ask for. We can turn Jordan back into Palestine by killing off ==one== royal family. By the way, the Queen there is american-born. Why don't you tell ==her== to leave.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. @Kat Grey
    There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers. However, that was then, and the invasion of Europe by undocumented, unwelcome invaders is what is happening just as I type this. Let's remain in the present and we can discuss history on another thread, if it's OK with Mr Truth.Why are they coming en masse to ethnically white nations ? Well that's easy to answer. No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome. Hell, even a Tirana is out of the question for at least the next five hundred years (I am an optimist when it suits me).

    Europe means free food, bottled water, toothpaste and toilet paper handed to them by smiling white ladies happy to assist in their own eventual subjugation , free phone credit and cigarettes, four star hotel rooms with state of the art gyms and a view of the sea, paid for by the brainwashed taxpayers. Money, money, money, designer clothes, Dolce & Gabbana, shiny cars, glimmering seafronts. Europe is magic streets with magic shops, full of bling, with just a glass window standing between them and the goodies within. Europe is France, Germany, Sweden, England; their golden gates all open wide to admit the beneficial newcomers. And oh yeah, last but not least, the icing on the three-tiered cake; plenty of long-limbed, scantily-clad silky-haired white girls whose white "boy" friends are unarmed, droopy-headed, defeated, self-hating be-spectacled liberals who believe Europe owes African migrants the right to settle within its confines without restriction. These same "men" would stand there quoting Marx and Chomsky while the "desperate seekers of a better life" gang-rape their women. In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.

    Most, almost all histories of the World War I, Weimar, and World War II era omit the fact that hundreds of thousands of Russian and Polish Jews migrated to Germany after 1917, overwhelming already severely strained economic and social systems (eventuating in more starvation and tremendous unemployment) and bringing with them the intent to subvert the culture and moral values of the German people and to impose Bolshevik Communism.

    When the NSDAP crafted laws to non-violently remove those migrants and re-establish political and cultural principles that reflected German values and expand education and employment opportunities for German young people rather than the (non-legal) immigrants, those measures were called “persecution” and “evil,” and the USA joined with Stalinist Bolsheviks to destroy Germany.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. @Kat Grey
    There's a dinghy on the Libyan coast leaving for Yerup as I'm writing this..( hint, it's cheaper, safer, quicker to fly by plane and you can ask for asylum at any European airport although you won't get all the freebies and four-star Italian hotel by the sea)

    If they’re flying, let’s make sure its on an African airline and that there’s a crocodile on board..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kat Grey
    They won't fly for risk of being put on the next flight back to their country of origin; besides they need a passport. When they are put ashore after being rescued from a migrant boat they can conjure up any type of bullshit persecution/war fairy tale they like and get free food, water, hotel rooms, cigarettes, clothing - all courtesy of the Italian taxpayers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. I’m not convinced these are “middle class” Africans as Derb suggests. Looking at them, they seem to be mostly young military aged men. The same kind of shock troops we see coming from Mexico into the U.S. In Iraq our soldiers would have shot them. But if they’re invading Europe or America rather than violating a curfew in Baghdad, they’re eligible for government welfare.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  26. …all in the hope—which seems about to be fulfilled—of living at last under the blessings of white supremacy.

    Shouldn’t that have been written: “–of living under the last blessings of….”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. Kat Grey says:
    @Stan D Mute
    If they're flying, let's make sure its on an African airline and that there's a crocodile on board..

    They won’t fly for risk of being put on the next flight back to their country of origin; besides they need a passport. When they are put ashore after being rescued from a migrant boat they can conjure up any type of bullshit persecution/war fairy tale they like and get free food, water, hotel rooms, cigarettes, clothing – all courtesy of the Italian taxpayers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. AnAnon says:
    @Jefferson
    "Since the U.S. population is at least 70 percent white (including white Hispanics)"

    The U.S is 77 percent White when you include Mixed Race Latin Americans into the definition of "White".
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_American

    As long as you broadened the definition of "White" to include most people from south of the border, "Whites" in the U.S will not become a minority anytime soon.

    We don’t include them however because they specifically demanded a non-white identity in the 60s.


    Senegal is not in the grip of a genocide, it isn’t ruled by a tyrant, and its economy is improving. it is also emitting people like nobodies business. What changed in the past 25 years are that the social networks that make immigration possible have been formed, combined with parabolic population growth in the third world as a direct repsonse to improved living standards.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kat Grey
    And let us not ignore the corrupt governments that are facilitating the illegal immigration for cheap labour and to change voting demographics.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Kat Grey says:
    @AnAnon
    We don't include them however because they specifically demanded a non-white identity in the 60s.

    @SolontoCroesus
    Senegal is not in the grip of a genocide, it isn't ruled by a tyrant, and its economy is improving. it is also emitting people like nobodies business. What changed in the past 25 years are that the social networks that make immigration possible have been formed, combined with parabolic population growth in the third world as a direct repsonse to improved living standards.

    And let us not ignore the corrupt governments that are facilitating the illegal immigration for cheap labour and to change voting demographics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Britain's disgusting, depraved and dastardly 'New Labour' administration of 1997 -2005 were the absolute masters of that game.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Corvinus says:

    “Why are Africans immigrating to white supremacy”

    Actually, they are immigrating to a land that historically has welcomed everyone, including the lowest of the lowest European stock. It took several generations for them to flourish in America.

    “Because European Males are Pussies. European Women are going to mass gang raped.”

    The majority of European rapes are committed by native Europeans.

    “Only white people are so gullible to allow 3rd world invaders to invade their countries.”

    Kemosabe, recall who invaded who first.

    “Europe will be overrun with African invaders, who are coming with the intent to rape, murder and kill white women.”

    No, here is there intent. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/15/football/koa-bosco-immigrants-football-italy

    “As for America, its base of the freedom culture has been completely overwhelmed by two centuries of importing people, left and right, who have very little understanding of freedom and very little desire for it.”

    First generation Germans fought for America, not Germany, in World War I to demonstrate their loyalty. Vietnamese boat people became store owners in urban areas. These two examples clearly show how they value freedom.

    “There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers.”

    You do realize that Europeans on their own eventually bypassed African chieftains by capturing slaves on their own.

    “No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome.”

    Patently false. Sergio Domian, an Italian scholar of art and architecture, wrote regarding the Mali Empire in the 1300’s—“Thus was laid the foundation of an urban civilization. At the height of its power, Mali had at least 400 cities, and the interior of the Niger Delta was very densely populated.”

    “In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.”

    Eeerily similar when European imperialists began to salivate at the vast riches of Africa and forcibly removed any and all native opposition.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Corvinus,
    I happily await the day when Hungary will be forced to admit millions of African and Pakistani immigrants. And believe you me, it WILL happen. The EU will insist upon it, and Hungary will do its masters bidding like a yelping little lap-dog.
    Then you can pontificate as much as you like about how 'great' black people are.
    I thought all of your Gypsies were problem enough.
    , @AnAnon
    "Kemosabe, recall who invaded who first." - pretty sure the locals didn't invite us.

    "You do realize that Europeans on their own eventually bypassed African chieftains by capturing slaves on their own." - Europeans didn't even make progress exploring Africa until the 19th century, they weren't traisping through sweltering jungles grabbing africans several centuries before then.
    , @GeorgeV
    Smiles everyone! Smiles! Welcome to Fantasy Island!
    , @Drapetomaniac
    "First generation Germans fought for America, not Germany, in World War I to demonstrate their loyalty. Vietnamese boat people became store owners in urban areas. These two examples clearly show how they value freedom."

    It is apparent that your definition of freedom means to be property of the State and have your earnings stolen by the State.

    Thanks for providing support for my point:

    “As for America, its base of the freedom culture has been completely overwhelmed by two centuries of importing people, left and right, who have very little understanding of freedom and very little desire for it.”

    PS I want to be free from your beliefs.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. Dutch Boy says:

    “White supremacy” referred not to the rule by white people but to the second class citizen status of non-white people. The non-white invaders of Europe and America have nothing to fear on that score- they will have a legal status (as victims) above that of the natives.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  32. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Kat Grey
    And let us not ignore the corrupt governments that are facilitating the illegal immigration for cheap labour and to change voting demographics.

    Britain’s disgusting, depraved and dastardly ‘New Labour’ administration of 1997 -2005 were the absolute masters of that game.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    "Why are Africans immigrating to white supremacy"

    Actually, they are immigrating to a land that historically has welcomed everyone, including the lowest of the lowest European stock. It took several generations for them to flourish in America.


    “Because European Males are Pussies. European Women are going to mass gang raped.”

    The majority of European rapes are committed by native Europeans.



    “Only white people are so gullible to allow 3rd world invaders to invade their countries.”

    Kemosabe, recall who invaded who first.



    “Europe will be overrun with African invaders, who are coming with the intent to rape, murder and kill white women.”

    No, here is there intent. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/15/football/koa-bosco-immigrants-football-italy



    “As for America, its base of the freedom culture has been completely overwhelmed by two centuries of importing people, left and right, who have very little understanding of freedom and very little desire for it.”

    First generation Germans fought for America, not Germany, in World War I to demonstrate their loyalty. Vietnamese boat people became store owners in urban areas. These two examples clearly show how they value freedom.



    “There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers.”

    You do realize that Europeans on their own eventually bypassed African chieftains by capturing slaves on their own.


    “No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome.”

    Patently false. Sergio Domian, an Italian scholar of art and architecture, wrote regarding the Mali Empire in the 1300’s—“Thus was laid the foundation of an urban civilization. At the height of its power, Mali had at least 400 cities, and the interior of the Niger Delta was very densely populated.”


    “In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.”

    Eeerily similar when European imperialists began to salivate at the vast riches of Africa and forcibly removed any and all native opposition.

    Corvinus,
    I happily await the day when Hungary will be forced to admit millions of African and Pakistani immigrants. And believe you me, it WILL happen. The EU will insist upon it, and Hungary will do its masters bidding like a yelping little lap-dog.
    Then you can pontificate as much as you like about how ‘great’ black people are.
    I thought all of your Gypsies were problem enough.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kat Grey
    And he will rue the day Hungary threw off the yoke of Communism for the shackles of the multicultural EU.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. AnAnon says:
    @Corvinus
    "Why are Africans immigrating to white supremacy"

    Actually, they are immigrating to a land that historically has welcomed everyone, including the lowest of the lowest European stock. It took several generations for them to flourish in America.


    “Because European Males are Pussies. European Women are going to mass gang raped.”

    The majority of European rapes are committed by native Europeans.



    “Only white people are so gullible to allow 3rd world invaders to invade their countries.”

    Kemosabe, recall who invaded who first.



    “Europe will be overrun with African invaders, who are coming with the intent to rape, murder and kill white women.”

    No, here is there intent. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/15/football/koa-bosco-immigrants-football-italy



    “As for America, its base of the freedom culture has been completely overwhelmed by two centuries of importing people, left and right, who have very little understanding of freedom and very little desire for it.”

    First generation Germans fought for America, not Germany, in World War I to demonstrate their loyalty. Vietnamese boat people became store owners in urban areas. These two examples clearly show how they value freedom.



    “There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers.”

    You do realize that Europeans on their own eventually bypassed African chieftains by capturing slaves on their own.


    “No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome.”

    Patently false. Sergio Domian, an Italian scholar of art and architecture, wrote regarding the Mali Empire in the 1300’s—“Thus was laid the foundation of an urban civilization. At the height of its power, Mali had at least 400 cities, and the interior of the Niger Delta was very densely populated.”


    “In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.”

    Eeerily similar when European imperialists began to salivate at the vast riches of Africa and forcibly removed any and all native opposition.

    “Kemosabe, recall who invaded who first.” – pretty sure the locals didn’t invite us.

    “You do realize that Europeans on their own eventually bypassed African chieftains by capturing slaves on their own.” – Europeans didn’t even make progress exploring Africa until the 19th century, they weren’t traisping through sweltering jungles grabbing africans several centuries before then.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Corvinus says:

    “they weren’t traisping through sweltering jungles grabbing africans several centuries before then.”

    [Laughs] The least you could do is check your…history. The Portuguese by the late 1400′s performed raids, side by side with African tribes, in capturing slaves and traversed the West African river systems to make it easier for them to purchase and warehouse their “prizes”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kyle McKenna

    [Laughs]
     
    How many Portuguese (or other Europeans) invaded Africa to stay? Millions? Tens of millions? Hundreds of millions? Because that's how many we're talking about, before this ends in the Destruction of Western Civilisation.

    And while you're cheering that, take a moment to explain why and how people should be made to pay for things others did several centuries ago.

    , @Kat Grey
    Wrong as usual (guffaws in scorn). The Africans kept their captives inside specially-built corrals until the Portuguese slavers arrived on the west coast to load them into the holds of their vessels. A large number of these slaves had been kidnapped in the interior through raids, by AFRICANS!!!
    , @AnAnon
    Not sure if trollling, or just stupid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Clyde says:

    China was the country of origin for 147,000 recent U.S. immigrants in 2013, while Mexico sent just 125,000, according to a Census Bureau study by researcher Eric Jensen and others. India, with 129,000 immigrants, also topped Mexico, though the two countries’ results weren’t statistically different from each other.
    [Immigrants to U.S. From China Top Those From Mexico by Neil Shah; Wall Street Journal, May 3rd 2015.]

    I doubt this is accurate. Did you see how they (Census Bureau) arrived at those numbers? Isn’t it better to get the real numbers from http://www.ice.gov? We get about a million legal immigrants a year. I have read many times that 400,000-450,000 of these are Mexicans. IOW Mexico sends us the most legal immigrants and the most illegal aliens. Wouldn’t it be great to see Donald Trump get elected and build a wall down there? And have Mexico pay for it, according to The Donald. This is red meat rhetoric for me.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. I have been studying Mandarin for the last five years and have reached a reasonable conversational level. Whenever I get a chance to chat with local Chinese (here in Spain) I do so and I will typically ask them how they like living in Spain. I was surprised to discover that the majority of Chinese living here would rather be back in China. They are here for purely economic reasons.

    But, more importantly as it pertains to this discussion, I cannot recall a single person ever mentioning civil rights or freedoms as a factor in deciding whether to live here in western Europe or back in China. Or mentioning it at all. As far as I can see, the above is a purely western discourse.

    In any case, regarding this mantra of current-day China being so despotic, I’m not really so sure. I have never seen much sign that this is really true. For example, there are more people locked up in the United States than in China, despite having about a quarter of the population of China.

    But again, in any comparison of pros and cons of living in the West versus China, I have never heard a Chinese person say anything about the greater “freedom” in the West. I have a hard time believing that Mr. Derbyshire’s experience in talking to people (assuming he does) would be radically different from mine in this regard.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. @Corvinus
    "they weren’t traisping through sweltering jungles grabbing africans several centuries before then."

    [Laughs] The least you could do is check your...history. The Portuguese by the late 1400's performed raids, side by side with African tribes, in capturing slaves and traversed the West African river systems to make it easier for them to purchase and warehouse their "prizes".

    [Laughs]

    How many Portuguese (or other Europeans) invaded Africa to stay? Millions? Tens of millions? Hundreds of millions? Because that’s how many we’re talking about, before this ends in the Destruction of Western Civilisation.

    And while you’re cheering that, take a moment to explain why and how people should be made to pay for things others did several centuries ago.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. rod1963 says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    Because European Males are Pussies. European Women are going to mass gang raped.

    That’s about right for many white Europeans, they sold their culture and future out for a hedonistic lifestyle, cradle to grave welfare system, foreign vacations, etc.

    Hell the buggers are so self-absorbed they can’t even have kids anymore. In some cases the European women refuse to take their men as boyfriends, in Germany many middle-aged women travel to Kenya for “boyfriends”, it’s their version of Patpong Thailand. Of course their black lovers clean them out and abandon them. But it doesn’t stop.

    One could blame the elite for all of this, but who voted these open border fanatics into office? The people did. They don’t want any change.

    Same going on here with the GOP, all are openly hostile to the middle-class and working against them, support open borders, etc. Yet there are millions of stupid whites waiting to vote for the man who will slit their economic and societal throats.

    This is why I laugh at the HBD’ers, they think IQ is everything, it isn’t, one would have to live in a bubble to believe that. A smart person still needs guts, ability to know right from wrong, basic vitality to fight for what is his, if he doesn’t he becomes a slave or if he’s lucky becomes a beta cube drone in some office complex until he’s replaced by a Bombay special or harassed by some fat ankled feminazi from HR till he quits. It’s clear many whites are absolutely incapable of self-preservation now, even when faced by demographic destruction or being hunted down by feral blacks.

    Most would rather sit in front of their Plasma screen TV made by Chinese sweatshop workers, watching a bunch of multimillionaire blacks play professional sports and wishing they were Lebron, Kobe, etc.

    So much for evolution.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    exactly!
    , @Jefferson
    "Most would rather sit in front of their Plasma screen TV made by Chinese sweatshop workers, watching a bunch of multimillionaire blacks play professional sports and wishing they were Lebron, Kobe, etc."

    Have you ever seen the racial demographics of the people sitting court side seat at an NBA game? Especially during the NBA Playoffs and NBA Finals when court side seats are even more expensive. You see Jay-Z and Beyonce for example as the token Blacks and than everybody else is White, lol.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Kat Grey says:
    @Anonymous
    Corvinus,
    I happily await the day when Hungary will be forced to admit millions of African and Pakistani immigrants. And believe you me, it WILL happen. The EU will insist upon it, and Hungary will do its masters bidding like a yelping little lap-dog.
    Then you can pontificate as much as you like about how 'great' black people are.
    I thought all of your Gypsies were problem enough.

    And he will rue the day Hungary threw off the yoke of Communism for the shackles of the multicultural EU.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Kat Grey says:
    @Corvinus
    "they weren’t traisping through sweltering jungles grabbing africans several centuries before then."

    [Laughs] The least you could do is check your...history. The Portuguese by the late 1400's performed raids, side by side with African tribes, in capturing slaves and traversed the West African river systems to make it easier for them to purchase and warehouse their "prizes".

    Wrong as usual (guffaws in scorn). The Africans kept their captives inside specially-built corrals until the Portuguese slavers arrived on the west coast to load them into the holds of their vessels. A large number of these slaves had been kidnapped in the interior through raids, by AFRICANS!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    The primary reason behind inter-tribal warfare in Africa was for the purpose of acquiring slaves from other tribes. Mungo Park, who explored sub-Saharan Africa during the late 1700s, made the observation that 2/3 of Africans were slaves to the other 1/3rd at that time. Most Africans sold to white slave traders on the west coast of Africa were already living as slaves to other Africans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    This line of reasoning will *never* work.

    To a certain mentality the western world is only successful because they stole the ‘success’ …Others are only poor because this is something that has been *inflicted* on them *BY* the west. They all *would have been* shining stars if Europe haden’t interfered in thier upward tragegtory.

    Now of course this is utter, rancid bullshit, and we all know it… but we need to understand that others won’t give up this view. It’s all they’ve got to cling to, so they will cling tightly.

    At some point we’ve got to stop even trying to rationalize with our enemies. We can’t argue with them… They have the trump card in this morality Olympiad.

    Nazi/slavery/sexist/hetronormative/redlining/colonialism/persecution/war/racism…..it’s ALL true! ….our ancestors did it all!

    They probably had bad breath too.

    Tough Shit, That’s life. It sounds trite…but it’s not *That’s Life*…literally. It always has been.

    We need to stop apologizing for the past. We can debate it till the end of time, but we can’t change it…. We can’t allow somebody else’s moralistic/self-serving interpretation of the past, to be used a tool destroy our society in the present.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    "Nazi/slavery/sexist/hetronormative/redlining/colonialism/persecution/war/racism…..it’s ALL true! ….our ancestors did it all!"

    "We need to stop apologizing for the past. We can debate it till the end of time, but we can’t change it…. We can’t allow somebody else’s moralistic/self-serving interpretation of the past, to be used a tool destroy our society in the present."

    This is the exact thought process, your parents, and theirs, and theirs, used to justify their supremacy, and others sub-humaness. The problem is you are wilfully blind to the fundamental evilness of it all, which reduces your kind to something lower than the people you hold in disdain.

    Even if there is no apparent justice in this world (if there was, bush, netanyahoo, etc., would be rotting in some hellhole), for reasons only the Creator knows, surely, His impending judgement will be, to put it mildly, a lot more fair. Your kind may have a great life now, but if you only knew what awaits you. Your ancestors ("who did it all"), should have found out already:)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. anon • Disclaimer says:

    I think i read that 1/3 of women in sub-Saharan Africa are in polygamous relationships. Let’s say that, on average, three women share one man. That means that roughly 50 million African men take 160 million African women. Assuming that everyone else is monogamous, there are 340 million African women for 450 million African men. So there are 110 million men who cannot get wives.

    I believe that this is also part of why so many want to come to Europe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AUGUSTUS FINKIN
    Anon:

    Probably the proportion is greater than a third but it's more likely that those three women will be sharing three men. During my time in Nigeria I can't recall ever seeing any young man condemned to a life of celibacy: promiscuity is universally tolerated and it seemed to me that just about anyone could have just about anyone else; albeit with a little ingenuity. This accounts for the 'healthy' birth rate and the prevalence of all kinds of STDs. Marriage also survives as an institution but over there it is even more flexible than it is 'here'!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Black African refugees are predominantly male and relatively young – which will make their future integration all the more problematic. The press in general suppresses this fact and holds them up as heroes whereas, in reality, they are simply getting the hell out and leaving their women to fend for themselves – often with multiple children.

    This will be countered in our press by saying that they are paving the way to bring their women out – or that they will earn money and send it home. Good luck with that!

    We have all heard stories of well-meaning white zealots who go to Africa to dig wells – while all the local men lounge around laughing at them – I have a friend who did this and returned disillusioned. The stereotypical African male is not a particularly edifying creature – he fancies himself as a warrior, hunter and baby-maker while all the dirty and hard work is left to his womenfolk. We see those pathetic stories of women in camps who went to the river to get water and got raped – ask: where were her menfolk and why didn’t they guard her? Too busy having fun maybe – assuming they were even in the camp at all (women, kids and old men predominate there).

    The stereotype is damn close to the statistical mean even though there are naturally exceptions to refute what I’m saying.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  45. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    i can’t wait for global warming to melt the ice cap at the south pole, then all you self righteous “whites” can go there and build your perfect society that just never materialized because…. because… uhh… AFRICANS!… yes thats it, also muslims.

    Read More
    • Replies: @unit472
    The reality is that, as William F. Buckley once pointed out, Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.

    Blacks seem to think in 'magical' terms. That if only they could live where wealthy whites live they too would become wealthy. That Harvard and Stanford always existed and whites just discovered them first and occupied them in a fully formed state. That Pacific Heights and Beverly Hills were carved out of the earth much like the Grand Canyon and only needed to be occupied by rapacious white settlers who expelled the indigenous people.

    A nation is nothing more than the aggregated talents and knowledge of its inhabitants. Move the people and you move the nation.

    , @JSM
    Me either. When the polar ice caps melt and Antartica becomes available, how glorious it will be for us Whites to create a civilization out of the wilderness again. It's been a long time since we've gotten to do that.

    And then, behold! Within fifty years the Indios in South America, the Bantus from Africa and the Abos from Australia will be lashing together rafts made of scavenged garbage dump items to set sail for the Republic of Antartica, all the while whining Whitey stole Antarctica.


    How about this: We Whites go ahead and build Elysium. Make it breathtakingly beautiful. Keep non-Whites out -- for a while. And then, when the howls of "Not fair! You stole the resources from us to build your orbiting palaces! Let us in!" reaches a crescendo, we WILL
    let them in. We will give them rides up in wonderfully appointed rockets, serve them drinks on the way, slippers for their feet.
    And, once all the non-Whites are comfortably ensconced in utter, decadent luxury, we Whites will all leave, as they will be demanding we do. We'll let them have it.

    We will go back down to Earth to the mess the non-Whites left. We will clean up and rebuild. We will wait patiently.
    Give it, say, a good fifty years to be sure the air-scrubbers up there, having lacked necessary maintenance, have failed.
    Then we can go back up, clean up the dead-silent place, open the airlocks to eject the bodies, restart the pumps and power plants, and then use those restored space stations as launching pads for White Europeans to finally return to pursuing our Manifest Destiny of exploring the Solar System.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @anon
    I think i read that 1/3 of women in sub-Saharan Africa are in polygamous relationships. Let's say that, on average, three women share one man. That means that roughly 50 million African men take 160 million African women. Assuming that everyone else is monogamous, there are 340 million African women for 450 million African men. So there are 110 million men who cannot get wives.

    I believe that this is also part of why so many want to come to Europe.

    Anon:

    Probably the proportion is greater than a third but it’s more likely that those three women will be sharing three men. During my time in Nigeria I can’t recall ever seeing any young man condemned to a life of celibacy: promiscuity is universally tolerated and it seemed to me that just about anyone could have just about anyone else; albeit with a little ingenuity. This accounts for the ‘healthy’ birth rate and the prevalence of all kinds of STDs. Marriage also survives as an institution but over there it is even more flexible than it is ‘here’!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “To the best of my knowledge, there have been zero instances of boats full of white Australians hoping to make it to safety in South Asia.)”

    Middle class Southern Europeans are fleeing in droves to black Africa.

    There are currently about 200,000 Portuguese migrants living in Angola. Almost all have arrived in recent times.

    In former French colonies in sub-Sahara Africa, there are 200,000 white French migrants in Senegal and Madagascar and other places.

    Southern Europeans are not as good as Northern Europeans in creating steady jobs so one solution is to set up camp in Africa to establish white supremacy (in business) over Africans because these nationalities can’t establish supremacy in Europe when there are more competitive Northern Europeans.

    Portuguese are particularly bad at competing in Europe. It’s often said in Portugal that it’s a nation of 15 million with 5 million abroad and 10 million at home. The people abroad are working in Luxembourg or the UK or elsewhere in the union so they are drawn to a certain kind of supremacy…but besides white supremacy what can it be called?

    Read More
    • Replies: @AUGUSTUS FINKIN
    "one solution is to set up camp in Africa to establish white supremacy (in business) over Africans"

    ... and how did that work out in Rhodesia and S.Africa?
    Pretty well actually, compared to what has happened there since. I have long advocated a deal whereby, for example, Chinese farmers would be leased good land in Africa in exchange for providing training and jobs for locals and where those farmers would have some sort of guaranteed protection and be allowed to retain their profits. The Koreans are actually doing something not unsimilar in Madagascar. Go Africa!

    , @Anonymous
    Race is a social construct.

    Why are Portuguese considered white while Rifians are considered brown?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. unit472 says:
    @Anonymous
    i can't wait for global warming to melt the ice cap at the south pole, then all you self righteous "whites" can go there and build your perfect society that just never materialized because.... because... uhh... AFRICANS!... yes thats it, also muslims.

    The reality is that, as William F. Buckley once pointed out, Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.

    Blacks seem to think in ‘magical’ terms. That if only they could live where wealthy whites live they too would become wealthy. That Harvard and Stanford always existed and whites just discovered them first and occupied them in a fully formed state. That Pacific Heights and Beverly Hills were carved out of the earth much like the Grand Canyon and only needed to be occupied by rapacious white settlers who expelled the indigenous people.

    A nation is nothing more than the aggregated talents and knowledge of its inhabitants. Move the people and you move the nation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JSM
    Right. It's like Blacks (and all other sub-100 average IQ non-Whites) think Whites have Magic Fairy Dust that they sprinkle and all that lovely infrastructure and wealth springs from the ground without further ado. And they think that Meanie Whites refuse to share the Magic Fairy Dust. It's not fair!!!
    , @Gallo-Roman

    Blacks seem to think in ‘magical’ terms. That if only they could live where wealthy whites live they too would become wealthy. That Harvard and Stanford always existed and whites just discovered them first and occupied them in a fully formed state. That Pacific Heights and Beverly Hills were carved out of the earth much like the Grand Canyon and only needed to be occupied by rapacious white settlers who expelled the indigenous people.
     
    Plenty of dingbat whites around who buy into this magical thinking, too. I can't count the number of white liberals I've argued with who appear to believe that "good schools" exist prior to the human occupation of neighborhoods. Somehow wily whites just happen to figure out where they are and move in and take them over before other people can get to them.

    However, such is the malevolence of whites, that they use their powerful juju to destroy any Good Schools that they are forced to share with others. While their destructive juju does it work, they send out scouting parties to search out as yet undiscovered Good Schools in distant (and sometimes even not yet existent) neighborhoods, to which they decamp.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. @Anonymous
    "To the best of my knowledge, there have been zero instances of boats full of white Australians hoping to make it to safety in South Asia.)"

    Middle class Southern Europeans are fleeing in droves to black Africa.

    There are currently about 200,000 Portuguese migrants living in Angola. Almost all have arrived in recent times.

    In former French colonies in sub-Sahara Africa, there are 200,000 white French migrants in Senegal and Madagascar and other places.

    Southern Europeans are not as good as Northern Europeans in creating steady jobs so one solution is to set up camp in Africa to establish white supremacy (in business) over Africans because these nationalities can't establish supremacy in Europe when there are more competitive Northern Europeans.

    Portuguese are particularly bad at competing in Europe. It's often said in Portugal that it's a nation of 15 million with 5 million abroad and 10 million at home. The people abroad are working in Luxembourg or the UK or elsewhere in the union so they are drawn to a certain kind of supremacy...but besides white supremacy what can it be called?

    “one solution is to set up camp in Africa to establish white supremacy (in business) over Africans”

    … and how did that work out in Rhodesia and S.Africa?
    Pretty well actually, compared to what has happened there since. I have long advocated a deal whereby, for example, Chinese farmers would be leased good land in Africa in exchange for providing training and jobs for locals and where those farmers would have some sort of guaranteed protection and be allowed to retain their profits. The Koreans are actually doing something not unsimilar in Madagascar. Go Africa!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Jeff77450 says:
    @Wilson
    WHY AND HOW EUROPE MUST FORCE BOATS WITH REFUGEES TO RETURN--ARREST CAPTAIN, LEGALLY TRY AND EXECUTE CAPTAIN AND BOAT SUMMARILY, RETURN INVADERS.

    Thanks for the info, Sir. I think the real reason they are invading Europe and USA is because the criminal politicians in both countries let them in.

    Only white people are cursed with liberal scum politicians who allow foreign aliens to invade their land.

    Only white people are so gullible to allow 3rd world invaders to invade their countries. The Thai were shooting at these boats and towing them back and the racket stopped.

    These hoardes of alien invaders coming to Europe illegally on boats and ships are basically invading Europe. That is an act of war and European nations such as Italy and Greece have a right to fire at these boats and sink them. Once they do that, the message will go to these invaders that invasion is not accepted and they will stop risking their lives or make these hazardous journey.

    Letting them in, giving them asylum, rescuing them, or even processing them and then returning them are not good ideas as they all encourage more aliens to try to enter and only makes the problem worse.

    European nations must use their navies to patrol their coastal waters and prevent these alien ships and boats from entering. European naval forces can blockade these ships, and order them to return. If they do not return, the European Navy officers can board them and arrest the captain (who can then be tried and executed summarily for invasion, which should be made a capital offense), transfer the invaders back into another ship, and bomb the ship that brought them, so the ship owners cannot reuse it and suffer a big loss, making the racket unprofitable.

    Basically arrest the ship, the captain and punish them both (legal summary execution for the crime of human trafficking) and return the refugees.

    Unless and until this is done, Europe will be overrun with African invaders, who are coming with the intent to rape, murder and kill white women. White men must stand up and defend their nations from this invasion. Write to your politicians and DEMAND all immigration be banned, all aliens be deported and this crime against humanity must end or more white women will be raped and murdered by these 3rd world aliens. They must never vote for any politician who panders or supports this crime against humanity. In 3rd world countries, there would be riots and protests on the street, but the gullible whites are just watching the rapists and criminals pour in. What is wrong with whites? Why are they so brain dead?

    You know it and I know it but the U.S. and the various nations of Western Europe aren’t going to do what needs to be done. Exactly how this is going to end I don’t know, but I do know that it won’t be pretty—for anyone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Rest assured that when the crunch comes, the EU political class will side with the African invaders against white Europeans.
    You will see the true colors of the EU political class come out. They will suppress any white protest with the utmost brutality and vigor. They will gun down whites in the streets like dogs in order to defend the blacks and browns.

    It's just so simple and obvious, I really can't understand why more people don't understand it. Purely and simply, the eurocrats WANT white Europeans to disappear and to replace them with blacks and browns.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff77450
    You know it and I know it but the U.S. and the various nations of Western Europe aren't going to do what needs to be done. Exactly how this is going to end I don't know, but I do know that it won't be pretty---for anyone.

    Rest assured that when the crunch comes, the EU political class will side with the African invaders against white Europeans.
    You will see the true colors of the EU political class come out. They will suppress any white protest with the utmost brutality and vigor. They will gun down whites in the streets like dogs in order to defend the blacks and browns.

    It’s just so simple and obvious, I really can’t understand why more people don’t understand it. Purely and simply, the eurocrats WANT white Europeans to disappear and to replace them with blacks and browns.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Kat Grey says:

    I concur. The governments in the EU are ensuring that white births are kept below replacement level as Africans of child-bearing age are made welcome.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  53. JSM says:
    @unit472
    The reality is that, as William F. Buckley once pointed out, Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.

    Blacks seem to think in 'magical' terms. That if only they could live where wealthy whites live they too would become wealthy. That Harvard and Stanford always existed and whites just discovered them first and occupied them in a fully formed state. That Pacific Heights and Beverly Hills were carved out of the earth much like the Grand Canyon and only needed to be occupied by rapacious white settlers who expelled the indigenous people.

    A nation is nothing more than the aggregated talents and knowledge of its inhabitants. Move the people and you move the nation.

    Right. It’s like Blacks (and all other sub-100 average IQ non-Whites) think Whites have Magic Fairy Dust that they sprinkle and all that lovely infrastructure and wealth springs from the ground without further ado. And they think that Meanie Whites refuse to share the Magic Fairy Dust. It’s not fair!!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. JSM says:

    So you could say that here we have nonwhites fleeing from a strong form of white supremacy, i.e. Mexico, to a weaker one—the U.S.A.

    No, John, I think you’ve misspoken here.

    The Mexican ruling class is mostly Spaniard in descent with some nearly-bleached-out Indio admixture remaining from the Conquistadors’ sexual adventuring. Therefore, the Mexican ruling class with its slight Indio admixture, while it is nearly White, is less White than U.S. is, U.S. population having descended from the entirely-White Northern Europeans with virtually zero Amerind admixture.

    So, for the mostly-Indio Mexicans swarming over the southern borders:
    It’s not stronger White Supremacy that the Mexicans are fleeing in order to join weaker White supremacy
    .
    They are fleeing from nearly-White supremacy to Whiter Supremacy.

    Which actually strengthens your argument. Everywhere in the world, non-Whites flee to the Whitest supremacy they can get to.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jefferson
    "No, John, I think you’ve misspoken here.

    The Mexican ruling class is mostly Spaniard in descent with some nearly-bleached-out Indio admixture remaining from the Conquistadors’ sexual adventuring. Therefore, the Mexican ruling class with its slight Indio admixture, while it is nearly White, is less White than U.S. is, U.S. population having descended from the entirely-White Northern Europeans with virtually zero Amerind admixture."

    Eva Longoria for example comes from a financially well off Mexican family, yet even she has significant Nonwhite ancestry as her DNA tests revealed that she is 27 percent Amerindian and 3 percent Sub Saharan African.

    When a well off Mexican has that much Non Caucasoid ancestry, imagine how much Non Caucasoid ancestry a Mexican living in the slums of Mexico City has.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. JSM says:
    @Anonymous
    i can't wait for global warming to melt the ice cap at the south pole, then all you self righteous "whites" can go there and build your perfect society that just never materialized because.... because... uhh... AFRICANS!... yes thats it, also muslims.

    Me either. When the polar ice caps melt and Antartica becomes available, how glorious it will be for us Whites to create a civilization out of the wilderness again. It’s been a long time since we’ve gotten to do that.

    And then, behold! Within fifty years the Indios in South America, the Bantus from Africa and the Abos from Australia will be lashing together rafts made of scavenged garbage dump items to set sail for the Republic of Antartica, all the while whining Whitey stole Antarctica.

    How about this: We Whites go ahead and build Elysium. Make it breathtakingly beautiful. Keep non-Whites out — for a while. And then, when the howls of “Not fair! You stole the resources from us to build your orbiting palaces! Let us in!” reaches a crescendo, we WILL
    let them in. We will give them rides up in wonderfully appointed rockets, serve them drinks on the way, slippers for their feet.
    And, once all the non-Whites are comfortably ensconced in utter, decadent luxury, we Whites will all leave, as they will be demanding we do. We’ll let them have it.

    We will go back down to Earth to the mess the non-Whites left. We will clean up and rebuild. We will wait patiently.
    Give it, say, a good fifty years to be sure the air-scrubbers up there, having lacked necessary maintenance, have failed.
    Then we can go back up, clean up the dead-silent place, open the airlocks to eject the bodies, restart the pumps and power plants, and then use those restored space stations as launching pads for White Europeans to finally return to pursuing our Manifest Destiny of exploring the Solar System.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Kat Grey says:

    Actually when I think about it, the African boat migrants actually wish to move to nations that already have large numbers of black people such as Germany, the UK, Sweden, Netherlands and France. I don’t see many opting to go to Poland, Romania or Bulgaria!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    Actually when I think about it, the African boat migrants actually wish to move to nations that already have large numbers of black people such as Germany, the UK, Sweden, Netherlands and France. I don’t see many opting to go to Poland, Romania or Bulgaria!!!
     
    They go to the wealthy European nations with lavish social welfare systems they can suck off of, that their wives and children (if they have them) can suck off of. Sure the guys will work. May be a low level job or petty crime and scams. But the social welfare systems that they never paid into are a main attraction. Such as free birthing services and medical, subsidized housing, yearly child allowances (payments) in the thousands of dollars. The Dole in England.
    Quite a different sistuation from a native Frenchman who hooks into the French social welfare system. Whose extended family have been paying taxes and fighting wars for French for generations. Whose family helped rebuild France after the devastation of WW2.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Corvinus says:

    “Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.”

    That’s not reality, that’s called speculation, since it depends on WHAT whites and blacks move in.


    “A nation is nothing more than the aggregated talents and knowledge of its inhabitants.”

    Exactly why the United States, as a mutt nation, demonstrates your point.

    “How many Portuguese (or other Europeans) invaded Africa to stay?”

    Enough time to remain there, extract its resources, enslave its people, and carve out Empires.

    “before this ends in the Destruction of Western Civilisation.”

    In the States, it’s called American society.

    “take a moment to explain why and how people should be made to pay for things others did several centuries ago.”

    I’m merely pointing out to the race baiters here that Europeans, in their glorious efforts to Christianize and civilize, created wondrous political, economic, and social systems through conquering and subjugation. Of course, they were no different than any other powerful group, who tend to focus merely on their achievements rather than the methods on how they achieved.

    “The Africans kept their captives inside specially-built corrals until the Portuguese slavers arrived on the west coast to load them into the holds of their vessels.”

    Absolutely, with Portuguese slave traders working directly with African tribal groups to procure human flesh in the interior. By the late 15th century Portugal had extended its reach along eastern Africa trying to establish a dominance in trade, and began to actively “recruit blacks” by setting up shop in Ethiopia, Mozambique, Madagascar.

    “The stereotype is damn close to the statistical mean…”

    Speaking of statistics, where does one find specific information the number of African males “laughing at well-meaning white zealots digging wells for them?” I’m sure you have that data at your disposal.

    “How about this: We Whites go ahead and build Elysium…”

    They way you write, I see a future for you in science fiction, since reality has escaped you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Frank DeScushin

    “Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.”

    That’s not reality, that’s called speculation, since it depends on WHAT whites and blacks move in.

     
    It's not pure speculation if it's based on numerous examples.

    Numerous cities and areas in America and Europe have switched from majority white to majority black. Name one area where the conditions improved under the new black majority.

    Likewise, we're starting to see gentrification of previously blighted majority black areas of inner cities where the white people are returning to the cities. Name one of these areas that did not improve under the new white majority.

    When answering these questions please consider crime statistics, school statistics, and appearance of the community.

    If it depends on which whites and blacks move, then why do the results always end the same?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Clyde says:
    @rod1963
    That's about right for many white Europeans, they sold their culture and future out for a hedonistic lifestyle, cradle to grave welfare system, foreign vacations, etc.

    Hell the buggers are so self-absorbed they can't even have kids anymore. In some cases the European women refuse to take their men as boyfriends, in Germany many middle-aged women travel to Kenya for "boyfriends", it's their version of Patpong Thailand. Of course their black lovers clean them out and abandon them. But it doesn't stop.

    One could blame the elite for all of this, but who voted these open border fanatics into office? The people did. They don't want any change.

    Same going on here with the GOP, all are openly hostile to the middle-class and working against them, support open borders, etc. Yet there are millions of stupid whites waiting to vote for the man who will slit their economic and societal throats.

    This is why I laugh at the HBD'ers, they think IQ is everything, it isn't, one would have to live in a bubble to believe that. A smart person still needs guts, ability to know right from wrong, basic vitality to fight for what is his, if he doesn't he becomes a slave or if he's lucky becomes a beta cube drone in some office complex until he's replaced by a Bombay special or harassed by some fat ankled feminazi from HR till he quits. It's clear many whites are absolutely incapable of self-preservation now, even when faced by demographic destruction or being hunted down by feral blacks.

    Most would rather sit in front of their Plasma screen TV made by Chinese sweatshop workers, watching a bunch of multimillionaire blacks play professional sports and wishing they were Lebron, Kobe, etc.

    So much for evolution.

    exactly!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Clyde says:
    @Kat Grey
    Actually when I think about it, the African boat migrants actually wish to move to nations that already have large numbers of black people such as Germany, the UK, Sweden, Netherlands and France. I don't see many opting to go to Poland, Romania or Bulgaria!!!

    Actually when I think about it, the African boat migrants actually wish to move to nations that already have large numbers of black people such as Germany, the UK, Sweden, Netherlands and France. I don’t see many opting to go to Poland, Romania or Bulgaria!!!

    They go to the wealthy European nations with lavish social welfare systems they can suck off of, that their wives and children (if they have them) can suck off of. Sure the guys will work. May be a low level job or petty crime and scams. But the social welfare systems that they never paid into are a main attraction. Such as free birthing services and medical, subsidized housing, yearly child allowances (payments) in the thousands of dollars. The Dole in England.
    Quite a different sistuation from a native Frenchman who hooks into the French social welfare system. Whose extended family have been paying taxes and fighting wars for French for generations. Whose family helped rebuild France after the devastation of WW2.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kat Grey
    I agree except that liberal media side-step these facts you mentioned by insisting that there is no such thing as "indigenous English" indigenous French", etc. We're all migrants!! This allows the newbies straight off the dinghies to get their benefits, pick of housing, their numerous offspring assured of a place in the packed-to-the-rafters schools. As it is they claim to be fleeing a dangerous war zone yet have already declared their preference as to which nation is to have the honour of their enriching presence.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Park says:

    Just a perspective:
    Consider this; people from Africa are trying to escape from the horrors brought into their continents by the Europeans murder squads, both from air and land.

    Consider Libya: Until the West destroyed, burned to the stone age and decimated the country, no one from Libya – since the Gaddafi revolution, ever immigrated to Europe, or to any other country. Now, they are dying to escape the hell that Libya has become.

    The truth is, it is WE, the Human, against the tyranny. If you keep on indulging in hate mongering, you are helping the Tyranny – Decide whose side are you.

    Read all the ‘must read’ news, analysis, and articles at: The News Scouter

    Get involved. Stop the divide and hate – Participate – Comment – Work against these hate mongers who are the gents of tyranny.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JSM
    The truth is, it is WE, the Human, against the tyranny. If you keep on indulging in hate mongering, you are helping the Tyranny – Decide whose side are you.

    Wrong. Blacks bring *nothing* to help Whites fight the tyranny. Losing them as allies loses us nothing -- in fact is a gain for us, as we have one less burden to carry while also trying to fight the tyranny.

    Blacks aid the tyranny because they, of their own free will, make life harder for Whites, therefore making fighting the tyranny more difficult.

    Blacks who blather about "We the Human" are, universally from what I can tell, simply trying to keep Whites from finally realizing that Whites should tend to our OWN interests, should stop it with the pathological altruism, the, yes, White supremacy of looking after, and providing for, Blacks to our own detriment.
    Blacks don't want the gimmes coming from Whites to cease, so they make mewling cries about "unity" when "unity" with the parasitic class is the LAST thing Whites need.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. GeorgeV says:
    @Corvinus
    "Why are Africans immigrating to white supremacy"

    Actually, they are immigrating to a land that historically has welcomed everyone, including the lowest of the lowest European stock. It took several generations for them to flourish in America.


    “Because European Males are Pussies. European Women are going to mass gang raped.”

    The majority of European rapes are committed by native Europeans.



    “Only white people are so gullible to allow 3rd world invaders to invade their countries.”

    Kemosabe, recall who invaded who first.



    “Europe will be overrun with African invaders, who are coming with the intent to rape, murder and kill white women.”

    No, here is there intent. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/15/football/koa-bosco-immigrants-football-italy



    “As for America, its base of the freedom culture has been completely overwhelmed by two centuries of importing people, left and right, who have very little understanding of freedom and very little desire for it.”

    First generation Germans fought for America, not Germany, in World War I to demonstrate their loyalty. Vietnamese boat people became store owners in urban areas. These two examples clearly show how they value freedom.



    “There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers.”

    You do realize that Europeans on their own eventually bypassed African chieftains by capturing slaves on their own.


    “No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome.”

    Patently false. Sergio Domian, an Italian scholar of art and architecture, wrote regarding the Mali Empire in the 1300’s—“Thus was laid the foundation of an urban civilization. At the height of its power, Mali had at least 400 cities, and the interior of the Niger Delta was very densely populated.”


    “In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.”

    Eeerily similar when European imperialists began to salivate at the vast riches of Africa and forcibly removed any and all native opposition.

    Smiles everyone! Smiles! Welcome to Fantasy Island!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. AnAnon says:
    @Corvinus
    "they weren’t traisping through sweltering jungles grabbing africans several centuries before then."

    [Laughs] The least you could do is check your...history. The Portuguese by the late 1400's performed raids, side by side with African tribes, in capturing slaves and traversed the West African river systems to make it easier for them to purchase and warehouse their "prizes".

    Not sure if trollling, or just stupid.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Jefferson says:
    @JSM
    So you could say that here we have nonwhites fleeing from a strong form of white supremacy, i.e. Mexico, to a weaker one—the U.S.A.

    No, John, I think you've misspoken here.

    The Mexican ruling class is mostly Spaniard in descent with some nearly-bleached-out Indio admixture remaining from the Conquistadors' sexual adventuring. Therefore, the Mexican ruling class with its slight Indio admixture, while it is nearly White, is less White than U.S. is, U.S. population having descended from the entirely-White Northern Europeans with virtually zero Amerind admixture.

    So, for the mostly-Indio Mexicans swarming over the southern borders:
    It's not stronger White Supremacy that the Mexicans are fleeing in order to join weaker White supremacy
    .
    They are fleeing from nearly-White supremacy to Whiter Supremacy.

    Which actually strengthens your argument. Everywhere in the world, non-Whites flee to the Whitest supremacy they can get to.

    “No, John, I think you’ve misspoken here.

    The Mexican ruling class is mostly Spaniard in descent with some nearly-bleached-out Indio admixture remaining from the Conquistadors’ sexual adventuring. Therefore, the Mexican ruling class with its slight Indio admixture, while it is nearly White, is less White than U.S. is, U.S. population having descended from the entirely-White Northern Europeans with virtually zero Amerind admixture.”

    Eva Longoria for example comes from a financially well off Mexican family, yet even she has significant Nonwhite ancestry as her DNA tests revealed that she is 27 percent Amerindian and 3 percent Sub Saharan African.

    When a well off Mexican has that much Non Caucasoid ancestry, imagine how much Non Caucasoid ancestry a Mexican living in the slums of Mexico City has.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kat Grey
    I'm unconvinced as to the veracity of these publicity DNA tests. I read an account that Tina Turner was peeved when informed that she had minimal American Indian DNA; she allegedly had a grandmother with strong Indian features who was regarded by the family to be mainly Indian. Tina herself displays similar features. Just compare her to let's say her overwhelmingly African ex-husband Ike!!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Jefferson says:
    @rod1963
    That's about right for many white Europeans, they sold their culture and future out for a hedonistic lifestyle, cradle to grave welfare system, foreign vacations, etc.

    Hell the buggers are so self-absorbed they can't even have kids anymore. In some cases the European women refuse to take their men as boyfriends, in Germany many middle-aged women travel to Kenya for "boyfriends", it's their version of Patpong Thailand. Of course their black lovers clean them out and abandon them. But it doesn't stop.

    One could blame the elite for all of this, but who voted these open border fanatics into office? The people did. They don't want any change.

    Same going on here with the GOP, all are openly hostile to the middle-class and working against them, support open borders, etc. Yet there are millions of stupid whites waiting to vote for the man who will slit their economic and societal throats.

    This is why I laugh at the HBD'ers, they think IQ is everything, it isn't, one would have to live in a bubble to believe that. A smart person still needs guts, ability to know right from wrong, basic vitality to fight for what is his, if he doesn't he becomes a slave or if he's lucky becomes a beta cube drone in some office complex until he's replaced by a Bombay special or harassed by some fat ankled feminazi from HR till he quits. It's clear many whites are absolutely incapable of self-preservation now, even when faced by demographic destruction or being hunted down by feral blacks.

    Most would rather sit in front of their Plasma screen TV made by Chinese sweatshop workers, watching a bunch of multimillionaire blacks play professional sports and wishing they were Lebron, Kobe, etc.

    So much for evolution.

    “Most would rather sit in front of their Plasma screen TV made by Chinese sweatshop workers, watching a bunch of multimillionaire blacks play professional sports and wishing they were Lebron, Kobe, etc.”

    Have you ever seen the racial demographics of the people sitting court side seat at an NBA game? Especially during the NBA Playoffs and NBA Finals when court side seats are even more expensive. You see Jay-Z and Beyonce for example as the token Blacks and than everybody else is White, lol.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. @Corvinus
    "Why are Africans immigrating to white supremacy"

    Actually, they are immigrating to a land that historically has welcomed everyone, including the lowest of the lowest European stock. It took several generations for them to flourish in America.


    “Because European Males are Pussies. European Women are going to mass gang raped.”

    The majority of European rapes are committed by native Europeans.



    “Only white people are so gullible to allow 3rd world invaders to invade their countries.”

    Kemosabe, recall who invaded who first.



    “Europe will be overrun with African invaders, who are coming with the intent to rape, murder and kill white women.”

    No, here is there intent. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/15/football/koa-bosco-immigrants-football-italy



    “As for America, its base of the freedom culture has been completely overwhelmed by two centuries of importing people, left and right, who have very little understanding of freedom and very little desire for it.”

    First generation Germans fought for America, not Germany, in World War I to demonstrate their loyalty. Vietnamese boat people became store owners in urban areas. These two examples clearly show how they value freedom.



    “There would have been no black slaves in the New World if African chieftains did not sell their own captives to Arab and European slavers.”

    You do realize that Europeans on their own eventually bypassed African chieftains by capturing slaves on their own.


    “No matter how prosperous a sub-African country is, it could never create a Paris, London or Rome.”

    Patently false. Sergio Domian, an Italian scholar of art and architecture, wrote regarding the Mali Empire in the 1300’s—“Thus was laid the foundation of an urban civilization. At the height of its power, Mali had at least 400 cities, and the interior of the Niger Delta was very densely populated.”


    “In short Europe is the big whore house north of the Med, waiting, nay begging to be enriched by vibrant Third Worlders.”

    Eeerily similar when European imperialists began to salivate at the vast riches of Africa and forcibly removed any and all native opposition.

    “First generation Germans fought for America, not Germany, in World War I to demonstrate their loyalty. Vietnamese boat people became store owners in urban areas. These two examples clearly show how they value freedom.”

    It is apparent that your definition of freedom means to be property of the State and have your earnings stolen by the State.

    Thanks for providing support for my point:

    “As for America, its base of the freedom culture has been completely overwhelmed by two centuries of importing people, left and right, who have very little understanding of freedom and very little desire for it.”

    PS I want to be free from your beliefs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Corvinus says:

    “Not sure if trollling, or just stupid.”

    I wouldn’t be too hard on yourself.

    “It is apparent that your definition of freedom means to be property of the State and have your earnings stolen by the State.”

    Dude, step away from the computer, slowly. Walk away before your brain explodes from sheer idiocy.

    “I want to be free from your beliefs.”

    Um, ok, you’re free. Whatever that means.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  67. JSM says:
    @Park
    Just a perspective:
    Consider this; people from Africa are trying to escape from the horrors brought into their continents by the Europeans murder squads, both from air and land.

    Consider Libya: Until the West destroyed, burned to the stone age and decimated the country, no one from Libya - since the Gaddafi revolution, ever immigrated to Europe, or to any other country. Now, they are dying to escape the hell that Libya has become.

    The truth is, it is WE, the Human, against the tyranny. If you keep on indulging in hate mongering, you are helping the Tyranny - Decide whose side are you.

    Read all the 'must read' news, analysis, and articles at: The News Scouter

    Get involved. Stop the divide and hate - Participate - Comment - Work against these hate mongers who are the gents of tyranny.

    The truth is, it is WE, the Human, against the tyranny. If you keep on indulging in hate mongering, you are helping the Tyranny – Decide whose side are you.

    Wrong. Blacks bring *nothing* to help Whites fight the tyranny. Losing them as allies loses us nothing — in fact is a gain for us, as we have one less burden to carry while also trying to fight the tyranny.

    Blacks aid the tyranny because they, of their own free will, make life harder for Whites, therefore making fighting the tyranny more difficult.

    Blacks who blather about “We the Human” are, universally from what I can tell, simply trying to keep Whites from finally realizing that Whites should tend to our OWN interests, should stop it with the pathological altruism, the, yes, White supremacy of looking after, and providing for, Blacks to our own detriment.
    Blacks don’t want the gimmes coming from Whites to cease, so they make mewling cries about “unity” when “unity” with the parasitic class is the LAST thing Whites need.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Seraphim says:

    I did once ask the following question: “Suppose a society in which everybody has the opportunity to freely choose his/her ideal job. Who would choose freely the job of shit cleaner? (even street cleaner, no matter that it is now called ‘agent de surface’). Or nurse in charge with washing the bottoms of the elderly dumped in a nursing home?
    The first person I asked the question was a lovely slender, blond, blue-eyed girl with an angelic air about her. The answer came even before I finished the questioning: NOT MEEE!!! Other people answered: Well, the shit cleaners, I suppose. And who are the shit-cleaners?, I asked facetiously. Well, the ones who can stand the shit! Have you been to India?
    You see why the Afro and others can’t wait to come to the “White supremacists” zone?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  69. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    This line of reasoning will *never* work.

    To a certain mentality the western world is only successful because they stole the 'success' ...Others are only poor because this is something that has been *inflicted* on them *BY* the west. They all *would have been* shining stars if Europe haden't interfered in thier upward tragegtory.

    Now of course this is utter, rancid bullshit, and we all know it... but we need to understand that others won't give up this view. It's all they've got to cling to, so they will cling tightly.

    At some point we've got to stop even trying to rationalize with our enemies. We can't argue with them... They have the trump card in this morality Olympiad.

    Nazi/slavery/sexist/hetronormative/redlining/colonialism/persecution/war/racism.....it's ALL true! ....our ancestors did it all!

    They probably had bad breath too.

    Tough Shit, That's life. It sounds trite...but it's not *That's Life*...literally. It always has been.

    We need to stop apologizing for the past. We can debate it till the end of time, but we can't change it.... We can't allow somebody else's moralistic/self-serving interpretation of the past, to be used a tool destroy our society in the present.

    “Nazi/slavery/sexist/hetronormative/redlining/colonialism/persecution/war/racism…..it’s ALL true! ….our ancestors did it all!”

    “We need to stop apologizing for the past. We can debate it till the end of time, but we can’t change it…. We can’t allow somebody else’s moralistic/self-serving interpretation of the past, to be used a tool destroy our society in the present.”

    This is the exact thought process, your parents, and theirs, and theirs, used to justify their supremacy, and others sub-humaness. The problem is you are wilfully blind to the fundamental evilness of it all, which reduces your kind to something lower than the people you hold in disdain.

    Even if there is no apparent justice in this world (if there was, bush, netanyahoo, etc., would be rotting in some hellhole), for reasons only the Creator knows, surely, His impending judgement will be, to put it mildly, a lot more fair. Your kind may have a great life now, but if you only knew what awaits you. Your ancestors (“who did it all”), should have found out already:)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Your Ancestors were everybit as evil as mine, probably more so,... just organizationally/ technologically inept.

    Ultimately, It doesn't matter.

    I'm not interested in bickering with you.

    We need to preserve our own civilization. This is the urgent priority. It's in a death spiral *today* ...We don't have the luxury of indulging the likes of you any longer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    "To the best of my knowledge, there have been zero instances of boats full of white Australians hoping to make it to safety in South Asia.)"

    Middle class Southern Europeans are fleeing in droves to black Africa.

    There are currently about 200,000 Portuguese migrants living in Angola. Almost all have arrived in recent times.

    In former French colonies in sub-Sahara Africa, there are 200,000 white French migrants in Senegal and Madagascar and other places.

    Southern Europeans are not as good as Northern Europeans in creating steady jobs so one solution is to set up camp in Africa to establish white supremacy (in business) over Africans because these nationalities can't establish supremacy in Europe when there are more competitive Northern Europeans.

    Portuguese are particularly bad at competing in Europe. It's often said in Portugal that it's a nation of 15 million with 5 million abroad and 10 million at home. The people abroad are working in Luxembourg or the UK or elsewhere in the union so they are drawn to a certain kind of supremacy...but besides white supremacy what can it be called?

    Race is a social construct.

    Why are Portuguese considered white while Rifians are considered brown?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    "Nazi/slavery/sexist/hetronormative/redlining/colonialism/persecution/war/racism…..it’s ALL true! ….our ancestors did it all!"

    "We need to stop apologizing for the past. We can debate it till the end of time, but we can’t change it…. We can’t allow somebody else’s moralistic/self-serving interpretation of the past, to be used a tool destroy our society in the present."

    This is the exact thought process, your parents, and theirs, and theirs, used to justify their supremacy, and others sub-humaness. The problem is you are wilfully blind to the fundamental evilness of it all, which reduces your kind to something lower than the people you hold in disdain.

    Even if there is no apparent justice in this world (if there was, bush, netanyahoo, etc., would be rotting in some hellhole), for reasons only the Creator knows, surely, His impending judgement will be, to put it mildly, a lot more fair. Your kind may have a great life now, but if you only knew what awaits you. Your ancestors ("who did it all"), should have found out already:)

    Your Ancestors were everybit as evil as mine, probably more so,… just organizationally/ technologically inept.

    Ultimately, It doesn’t matter.

    I’m not interested in bickering with you.

    We need to preserve our own civilization. This is the urgent priority. It’s in a death spiral *today* …We don’t have the luxury of indulging the likes of you any longer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Kat Grey says:
    @Clyde

    Actually when I think about it, the African boat migrants actually wish to move to nations that already have large numbers of black people such as Germany, the UK, Sweden, Netherlands and France. I don’t see many opting to go to Poland, Romania or Bulgaria!!!
     
    They go to the wealthy European nations with lavish social welfare systems they can suck off of, that their wives and children (if they have them) can suck off of. Sure the guys will work. May be a low level job or petty crime and scams. But the social welfare systems that they never paid into are a main attraction. Such as free birthing services and medical, subsidized housing, yearly child allowances (payments) in the thousands of dollars. The Dole in England.
    Quite a different sistuation from a native Frenchman who hooks into the French social welfare system. Whose extended family have been paying taxes and fighting wars for French for generations. Whose family helped rebuild France after the devastation of WW2.

    I agree except that liberal media side-step these facts you mentioned by insisting that there is no such thing as “indigenous English” indigenous French”, etc. We’re all migrants!! This allows the newbies straight off the dinghies to get their benefits, pick of housing, their numerous offspring assured of a place in the packed-to-the-rafters schools. As it is they claim to be fleeing a dangerous war zone yet have already declared their preference as to which nation is to have the honour of their enriching presence.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Kat Grey says:
    @Jefferson
    "No, John, I think you’ve misspoken here.

    The Mexican ruling class is mostly Spaniard in descent with some nearly-bleached-out Indio admixture remaining from the Conquistadors’ sexual adventuring. Therefore, the Mexican ruling class with its slight Indio admixture, while it is nearly White, is less White than U.S. is, U.S. population having descended from the entirely-White Northern Europeans with virtually zero Amerind admixture."

    Eva Longoria for example comes from a financially well off Mexican family, yet even she has significant Nonwhite ancestry as her DNA tests revealed that she is 27 percent Amerindian and 3 percent Sub Saharan African.

    When a well off Mexican has that much Non Caucasoid ancestry, imagine how much Non Caucasoid ancestry a Mexican living in the slums of Mexico City has.

    I’m unconvinced as to the veracity of these publicity DNA tests. I read an account that Tina Turner was peeved when informed that she had minimal American Indian DNA; she allegedly had a grandmother with strong Indian features who was regarded by the family to be mainly Indian. Tina herself displays similar features. Just compare her to let’s say her overwhelmingly African ex-husband Ike!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde
    Of course Tina Turner has some Indian blood. Sorry I am short on examples but I have noticed many blacks from Oklahoma have Indian features. Which is a beauty enhancement for the women, in my book at least. So TT was born on Nutbush, Tennessee which is 500 miles from Oklahoma City. Condaleeza Rice looks somewhat Indian to me. Dittos for Anita Hill, born in Lone Tree, OK.
    There are East Coast Indian tribes whose members mostly look black as in look like Negros. Such as the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe who own the first and largest tribal casino. If not the largest one of the top five in the USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mashantucket_Pequot_Tribe
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @unit472
    The reality is that, as William F. Buckley once pointed out, Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.

    Blacks seem to think in 'magical' terms. That if only they could live where wealthy whites live they too would become wealthy. That Harvard and Stanford always existed and whites just discovered them first and occupied them in a fully formed state. That Pacific Heights and Beverly Hills were carved out of the earth much like the Grand Canyon and only needed to be occupied by rapacious white settlers who expelled the indigenous people.

    A nation is nothing more than the aggregated talents and knowledge of its inhabitants. Move the people and you move the nation.

    Blacks seem to think in ‘magical’ terms. That if only they could live where wealthy whites live they too would become wealthy. That Harvard and Stanford always existed and whites just discovered them first and occupied them in a fully formed state. That Pacific Heights and Beverly Hills were carved out of the earth much like the Grand Canyon and only needed to be occupied by rapacious white settlers who expelled the indigenous people.

    Plenty of dingbat whites around who buy into this magical thinking, too. I can’t count the number of white liberals I’ve argued with who appear to believe that “good schools” exist prior to the human occupation of neighborhoods. Somehow wily whites just happen to figure out where they are and move in and take them over before other people can get to them.

    However, such is the malevolence of whites, that they use their powerful juju to destroy any Good Schools that they are forced to share with others. While their destructive juju does it work, they send out scouting parties to search out as yet undiscovered Good Schools in distant (and sometimes even not yet existent) neighborhoods, to which they decamp.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Clyde says:
    @Kat Grey
    I'm unconvinced as to the veracity of these publicity DNA tests. I read an account that Tina Turner was peeved when informed that she had minimal American Indian DNA; she allegedly had a grandmother with strong Indian features who was regarded by the family to be mainly Indian. Tina herself displays similar features. Just compare her to let's say her overwhelmingly African ex-husband Ike!!

    Of course Tina Turner has some Indian blood. Sorry I am short on examples but I have noticed many blacks from Oklahoma have Indian features. Which is a beauty enhancement for the women, in my book at least. So TT was born on Nutbush, Tennessee which is 500 miles from Oklahoma City. Condaleeza Rice looks somewhat Indian to me. Dittos for Anita Hill, born in Lone Tree, OK.
    There are East Coast Indian tribes whose members mostly look black as in look like Negros. Such as the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe who own the first and largest tribal casino. If not the largest one of the top five in the USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mashantucket_Pequot_Tribe

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Corvinus says:

    “Wrong. Blacks bring *nothing* to help Whites fight the tyranny.”

    That’s observably false. http://highlandercenter.org/in-memoriam-aimee-horton/

    “Blacks aid the tyranny because they, of their own free will, make life harder for Whites, therefore making fighting the tyranny more difficult.”

    Is English your second language?

    “Blacks who blather about “We the Human” are, universally from what I can tell, simply trying to keep Whites from finally realizing that Whites should tend to our OWN interests, should stop it with the pathological altruism, the, yes, White supremacy of looking after, and providing for, Blacks to our own detriment.”

    White supremacy, black supremacy, etc. is code for anti-humanity.

    “Blacks don’t want the gimmes coming from Whites to cease, so they make mewling cries about “unity” when “unity” with the parasitic class is the LAST thing Whites need.”

    The parasitic class consists of those whites, blacks, and Hispanics who abuse welfare.

    “We need to preserve our own civilization.”

    That is what Americans are doing collectively and individually every single day. You do realize Americans are white, black, brown, red, and yellow, right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @JSM
    The parasitic class consists of those whites, blacks, and Hispanics who abuse welfare.
    And, of that bunch, blacks and mexicans are vastly over-represented on a per capita basis. So blacks and mexicans are, by your own definition, far more parasitic than Whites.

    Also, welfare for Whites, since Whites as a race have a higher average IQ than blacks and mexicans, occasionally White welfare babies are conceived who grow up to be exceptionally productive in ways that truly benefit White people, partially or even fully offsetting their relatives' parasitism.

    Doesn't happen with Blacks.

    You give *one* counterexample. Sorry. One counterexample doesn't negate the millions of examples I can muster for my argument. One data point against millions doesn't budge my needle, that Blacks offer NOTHING, enough to even seeit.


    Black welfare babies almost without exception grow up to be criminal ( another form of parasitism) and / or welfare recipients themselves.

    Criminals are parasites. Blacks and Mexicans have a much higher per capita rate of armed robbery, murder and even petty theft. Parasitism.

    Also, the parasitic class also includes non-whites who use Affirmative Action, which is also parasitism, since blacks who take AA jobs either take a job away from a more productive White, thus causing loss of productivity to the rest of us, or the non-White takes an AA job that was "created" for the express purpose of, and only of, meeting "diversity" quotas. Since the job wouldn't exist but for that reason, it's parasitism.

    The only way Whites benefit from Affirmative Action is when a White woman gets a job instead of an equally or more qualified White man, but since white children can't be born unless White men and White women make love, and AA for women hurts both White men's and women's chances of finding a satisfactory mate and having a happy, fecund, lasting marriage, Affirmative Action, even when Whites (women) are the "beneficiaries," still hurts us.


    Affirmative Action should be ended.

    Blacks and Mexicans should be given one-way luxury trips back to Africa / Mexico, and, so long as they surrender their passport (if they're actually citizens), given a payment over ten years of, say, $100 K, and be DONE with you all, once and for all.

    , @JSM
    You do realize Americans are white, black, brown, red, and yellow, right?

    Nope. I most assuredly realize no such thing.

    Just as Japanese are not White nor Red nor Black, but a specific people of the Asian race who live in their homeland of Japan, Americans are a White people whose ancestry is European, who themselves either came to U.S. from Europe and became naturalized Americans, or were born here of naturalized or native-born Americans (who are White people).

    That's the correct usage, the usage that evolved before liberals set out to confuse everybody in order to genocide (the White people known as) Americans.

    Americans are White people. White people who live in our homeland America.

    Black people in America, by their own choice, are termed African-American. Different name for a different people.

    Red people descended from the folks who came into the Americas from Asia through the Bering Strait, are, by their own choice, termed "Native Americans." Different name for a different people.

    Yellow people, such as Japanese, who have moved into America are still yellow, still Japanese. Different name for a different people. Changing their address does not change their ancestry. They are *NOT* Americans, even if the gov't of the land of America granted them citizenship.

    So, no, your statement is false.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “They look white to me.”

    Can someone please clarify the HBD stance on race; preferably Derbyshire himself? Is race biological and rooted in someone’s genetic ancestry or is race a social construct based on society’s perception of them?

    The offspring of Amerindians and Europeans are not very dark skinned. Often they look like asian-white offspring. See the link below to the beautiful Olivia Munn as an example. As suppose she is also “white” since she looks “white”.

    In the picture of the illegal immigrants the four Amerindian looking ladies are not very dark but more or less tan colored. So the offspring of caramel colored Amerindians and white skinned Caucasoids are not very brown. See David Good, the mestizo son of a Yanomami woman:

    Also consider that after many generations the phenotypes of mestizo populations can be intermediate or skew towards one ancestry. The sport of boxing offers some good examples of this. Oscar de la Hoya has and his mother had typical mestizo phenotypes while his father is a doppelganger for the Montezuma looking TV correspondent John Quinones. Saul “Canelo” Alvarez looks like a red headed Spaniard (celtiberian) but his father and have family all have typical castizo phenotypes.


    The young man in the blue plaid shirt and the majority of the people in the illegal immigrant photo all look as “white” as the Mexican cabinet and Supreme Court members. The difference is the Mexican government members are better dressed, in better shape, and work indoors. I’ve reviewed a lot of 23andMe results of Mexicans with these types of “white” phenotypes. I have not seen any one with less than 30% Amerindian ancestry. The typical range is 30-50% Amerindian with sub-Saharan ancestry ranging from 0-10% and the remainder Caucasoid. So by Derbyshire’s reasoning a mestizo that mows your lawn is Indian but put in him in a suit and tie and he’s “white”.

    (I am not disputing Derbyshire’s claim of non white immigration to white governed countries. That’s a fact. Just like DNA ancestry is also a fact.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kat Grey
    A white-looking Mexican who immediately springs to mind is the late Ritchie Valens who was quite fair in colouring with marked European facial features unlike the clearly mixed Lou Diamond Phillips who played him in La Bamba.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. JSM says:
    @Corvinus
    “Wrong. Blacks bring *nothing* to help Whites fight the tyranny.”

    That’s observably false. http://highlandercenter.org/in-memoriam-aimee-horton/


    “Blacks aid the tyranny because they, of their own free will, make life harder for Whites, therefore making fighting the tyranny more difficult.”

    Is English your second language?


    “Blacks who blather about “We the Human” are, universally from what I can tell, simply trying to keep Whites from finally realizing that Whites should tend to our OWN interests, should stop it with the pathological altruism, the, yes, White supremacy of looking after, and providing for, Blacks to our own detriment.”

    White supremacy, black supremacy, etc. is code for anti-humanity.


    “Blacks don’t want the gimmes coming from Whites to cease, so they make mewling cries about “unity” when “unity” with the parasitic class is the LAST thing Whites need.”

    The parasitic class consists of those whites, blacks, and Hispanics who abuse welfare.


    “We need to preserve our own civilization.”

    That is what Americans are doing collectively and individually every single day. You do realize Americans are white, black, brown, red, and yellow, right?

    The parasitic class consists of those whites, blacks, and Hispanics who abuse welfare.
    And, of that bunch, blacks and mexicans are vastly over-represented on a per capita basis. So blacks and mexicans are, by your own definition, far more parasitic than Whites.

    Also, welfare for Whites, since Whites as a race have a higher average IQ than blacks and mexicans, occasionally White welfare babies are conceived who grow up to be exceptionally productive in ways that truly benefit White people, partially or even fully offsetting their relatives’ parasitism.

    Doesn’t happen with Blacks.

    You give *one* counterexample. Sorry. One counterexample doesn’t negate the millions of examples I can muster for my argument. One data point against millions doesn’t budge my needle, that Blacks offer NOTHING, enough to even seeit.

    Black welfare babies almost without exception grow up to be criminal ( another form of parasitism) and / or welfare recipients themselves.

    Criminals are parasites. Blacks and Mexicans have a much higher per capita rate of armed robbery, murder and even petty theft. Parasitism.

    Also, the parasitic class also includes non-whites who use Affirmative Action, which is also parasitism, since blacks who take AA jobs either take a job away from a more productive White, thus causing loss of productivity to the rest of us, or the non-White takes an AA job that was “created” for the express purpose of, and only of, meeting “diversity” quotas. Since the job wouldn’t exist but for that reason, it’s parasitism.

    The only way Whites benefit from Affirmative Action is when a White woman gets a job instead of an equally or more qualified White man, but since white children can’t be born unless White men and White women make love, and AA for women hurts both White men’s and women’s chances of finding a satisfactory mate and having a happy, fecund, lasting marriage, Affirmative Action, even when Whites (women) are the “beneficiaries,” still hurts us.

    Affirmative Action should be ended.

    Blacks and Mexicans should be given one-way luxury trips back to Africa / Mexico, and, so long as they surrender their passport (if they’re actually citizens), given a payment over ten years of, say, $100 K, and be DONE with you all, once and for all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. JSM says:
    @Corvinus
    “Wrong. Blacks bring *nothing* to help Whites fight the tyranny.”

    That’s observably false. http://highlandercenter.org/in-memoriam-aimee-horton/


    “Blacks aid the tyranny because they, of their own free will, make life harder for Whites, therefore making fighting the tyranny more difficult.”

    Is English your second language?


    “Blacks who blather about “We the Human” are, universally from what I can tell, simply trying to keep Whites from finally realizing that Whites should tend to our OWN interests, should stop it with the pathological altruism, the, yes, White supremacy of looking after, and providing for, Blacks to our own detriment.”

    White supremacy, black supremacy, etc. is code for anti-humanity.


    “Blacks don’t want the gimmes coming from Whites to cease, so they make mewling cries about “unity” when “unity” with the parasitic class is the LAST thing Whites need.”

    The parasitic class consists of those whites, blacks, and Hispanics who abuse welfare.


    “We need to preserve our own civilization.”

    That is what Americans are doing collectively and individually every single day. You do realize Americans are white, black, brown, red, and yellow, right?

    You do realize Americans are white, black, brown, red, and yellow, right?

    Nope. I most assuredly realize no such thing.

    Just as Japanese are not White nor Red nor Black, but a specific people of the Asian race who live in their homeland of Japan, Americans are a White people whose ancestry is European, who themselves either came to U.S. from Europe and became naturalized Americans, or were born here of naturalized or native-born Americans (who are White people).

    That’s the correct usage, the usage that evolved before liberals set out to confuse everybody in order to genocide (the White people known as) Americans.

    Americans are White people. White people who live in our homeland America.

    Black people in America, by their own choice, are termed African-American. Different name for a different people.

    Red people descended from the folks who came into the Americas from Asia through the Bering Strait, are, by their own choice, termed “Native Americans.” Different name for a different people.

    Yellow people, such as Japanese, who have moved into America are still yellow, still Japanese. Different name for a different people. Changing their address does not change their ancestry. They are *NOT* Americans, even if the gov’t of the land of America granted them citizenship.

    So, no, your statement is false.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Hello JSM, how are you doing?

    "Yellow people, such as Japanese, who have moved into America are still yellow, still Japanese. Different name for a different people. Changing their address does not change their ancestry. They are *NOT* Americans, "

    I guess I qualify as a yellow person - I'm 74 years old and my parents were born here in America but, yes, their parents came from Japan. We were pretty much told the same as you're saying now back in the 1940s "You are NOT Americans" and we were all hustled into camps, our possessions and homes confiscated (never returned - no doubt some true Americans got them). I don't remember a whole lot about those camps but my parents certainly did.

    In the 1960s I was drafted and served two years - one in Vietnam (for my country? You tell me not.)

    I don't speak Japanese and, dammit, my passport says I'm American - I even made the big mistake of voting for that fellow in the White House (is he an American?).

    Anyhow, I just thought I'd say "Hi" and I wondered, actually, how many generations ago your forbears arrived here in America - are you American yourself? I mean, as American as those red people you speak about?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. JSM says:

    You give *one* counterexample. Sorry. One counterexample doesn’t negate the millions of examples I can muster for my argument. One data point against millions doesn’t budge my needle, that Blacks offer NOTHING, enough to even seeit.

    How embarrassing. I retract the above sentence. I was remiss in not clicking on your link before I made an assumption that you were offering your link in good faith.

    Clearly, you have NOT given one counterexample. Your link is to a civil rights demander. Your link is to a parasite.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  81. Kat Grey says:
    @Anonymous
    “They look white to me.”

    Can someone please clarify the HBD stance on race; preferably Derbyshire himself? Is race biological and rooted in someone's genetic ancestry or is race a social construct based on society's perception of them?

    The offspring of Amerindians and Europeans are not very dark skinned. Often they look like asian-white offspring. See the link below to the beautiful Olivia Munn as an example. As suppose she is also “white” since she looks “white”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivia_Munn#/media/File:Olivia_Munn_2014_WonderCon_(cropped).jpg

    In the picture of the illegal immigrants the four Amerindian looking ladies are not very dark but more or less tan colored. So the offspring of caramel colored Amerindians and white skinned Caucasoids are not very brown. See David Good, the mestizo son of a Yanomami woman:
    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-ghbiaaCng4Y/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/Pstx2neLC3I/photo.jpg

    http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ll0-gyJdi6U/hqdefault.jpg

    Also consider that after many generations the phenotypes of mestizo populations can be intermediate or skew towards one ancestry. The sport of boxing offers some good examples of this. Oscar de la Hoya has and his mother had typical mestizo phenotypes while his father is a doppelganger for the Montezuma looking TV correspondent John Quinones. Saul “Canelo” Alvarez looks like a red headed Spaniard (celtiberian) but his father and have family all have typical castizo phenotypes.

    http://masterherald.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/oscar-de-la-hoya.jpg

    http://m.celebrityphoto.com/img/JoelHoya120108-VF97.JPG

    https://updatesfromthefield.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/johnquinones.jpg

    http://i46.tinypic.com/30w71he.jpg

    The young man in the blue plaid shirt and the majority of the people in the illegal immigrant photo all look as “white” as the Mexican cabinet and Supreme Court members. The difference is the Mexican government members are better dressed, in better shape, and work indoors. I’ve reviewed a lot of 23andMe results of Mexicans with these types of “white” phenotypes. I have not seen any one with less than 30% Amerindian ancestry. The typical range is 30-50% Amerindian with sub-Saharan ancestry ranging from 0-10% and the remainder Caucasoid. So by Derbyshire’s reasoning a mestizo that mows your lawn is Indian but put in him in a suit and tie and he’s “white”.

    (I am not disputing Derbyshire’s claim of non white immigration to white governed countries. That’s a fact. Just like DNA ancestry is also a fact.)

    A white-looking Mexican who immediately springs to mind is the late Ritchie Valens who was quite fair in colouring with marked European facial features unlike the clearly mixed Lou Diamond Phillips who played him in La Bamba.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. Merema says:

    The situation in Africa is almost beyond hope because at it stands right now, Africans can not be helped as they are right now with all the wars, tribalism, deep corruption and low abilities. One of the better countries in Africa-Kenya-is doing okay because they have a large hardworking south asian business community.

    Africans should be encouraging immigration to their countries rather than emigrating themselves.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  83. Corvinus says:

    “And, of that bunch, blacks and mexicans are vastly over-represented on a per capita basis.”

    39% of blacks are on welfare compared to 38% of whites.
    16% of Hispanics are on welfare compared to 38% of whites.
    Considerable more whites than blacks receive food stamps are white.

    
Those are facts.

    “Doesn’t happen with Blacks.”

    Patently false. There are five times as many black college graduates today than 40 years ago. Today, 84% of African-Americans have a high school diploma, compared to only 31% in 1970.

    
“Sorry. One counterexample doesn’t negate the millions of examples I can muster for my argument”

    You are prone to over-exaggeration.

    “Blacks and Mexicans have a much higher per capita rate of armed robbery, murder and even petty theft.”

    Actually, FBI statistics that whites by sheer numbers commit more of these crimes, especially white collar crimes, which are especially heinous and is in-born.

    “Blacks and Mexicans should be given one-way luxury trips back to Africa /Mexico.”

    You should write fantasy for a living.

    “Americans are a White people whose ancestry is European…”

    No, Americans are people from a variety of racial and ethnic groups. If you want to get technical about it, Europeans stole their “homeland” from Native Americans.

    
“They are *NOT* Americans, even if the gov’t of the land of America granted them citizenship.”

    That is how citizenship works, my friend.

    Read More
    • Disagree: Ozymandias
    • Replies: @Immigrant from former USSR
    Dear Corvinus:
    Can you kindly provide the source of your statement
    "39% of blacks are on welfare compared to 38% of whites" ?
    Your F.r.
    , @JSM
    "my friend."

    I'm not your friend, because you have clearly demonstrated to me, with you lies and your deliberate confusing of the language, that YOU are NOT mine.

    "That is how citizenship works"

    I am not discussing "citizenship." I am discussing ancestry.

    Citizenship is, you troll, a different thing from ancestry.

    The conflation of citizenship with ancestry, in order to confuse honest but naïve people, is being done by liberals like yourself on purpose, in service of your aims of genociding my people, by, as a first tactic, convincing everybody we don't exist. Or, if that fails, you want everyone to believe we should be blended out of existence, because you think we don't deserve to exist.

    Someone who thinks I, and my people, don't deserve to exist is no friend of mine.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    This is no different than when the Germanic Tribes overran the Roman Empire’s borders seeking the perceived benefits of “Civilization.” They inadvertently initiated the “Dark Ages” when the veneer of Roman power dissipated. Rome collapsed from within by a combination of factors acting over centuries and conspiring to make it indefensible.

    These factors included: 1) near constant Wars of Empire, 2) Impoverishment and Disenfranchisement of its Citizens by use of imported Slave Labour, 3) Debasement of its Currency and 4) rampant Moral Decay as a final result of the combination of these other factors. Caligula Caesar prostituted the Senate Wives to raise income and claimed he was teaching Senate a lesson!?!

    These factors all exist today in “New Rome” and I strongly assert that the real power behind the evil that was ancient Rome still exists. I also assert that we are either on the edge of a new “Dark Age”, or we will see something un-imagined before. In either case, the current Roman Empire, cannot stand for long.

    Demographics say the Western powers are in sharp Decline. Reductions in working age populations make current debts unmanageable in Western Europe, Canada, Japan and China. Russia does not have a debt problem but it’s population is declining as well.

    Only the US has maintained a growing population and a reasonably workable ratio between working age and retired Citizens. Some say this is due to immigration?!? And thus, the US is the battle-line for Western Hegemony. Don’t fall for it…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  85. Immigrant from former USSR [AKA "Florida Resident"] says:
    @Corvinus
    “And, of that bunch, blacks and mexicans are vastly over-represented on a per capita basis.”

    39% of blacks are on welfare compared to 38% of whites.
    16% of Hispanics are on welfare compared to 38% of whites.
    Considerable more whites than blacks receive food stamps are white.

    
Those are facts.


    “Doesn’t happen with Blacks.”

    Patently false. There are five times as many black college graduates today than 40 years ago. Today, 84% of African-Americans have a high school diploma, compared to only 31% in 1970.


    
“Sorry. One counterexample doesn’t negate the millions of examples I can muster for my argument”

    You are prone to over-exaggeration.


    “Blacks and Mexicans have a much higher per capita rate of armed robbery, murder and even petty theft.”

    Actually, FBI statistics that whites by sheer numbers commit more of these crimes, especially white collar crimes, which are especially heinous and is in-born.


    “Blacks and Mexicans should be given one-way luxury trips back to Africa /Mexico.”

    You should write fantasy for a living.


    “Americans are a White people whose ancestry is European...”

    No, Americans are people from a variety of racial and ethnic groups. If you want to get technical about it, Europeans stole their “homeland” from Native Americans.


    
“They are *NOT* Americans, even if the gov’t of the land of America granted them citizenship.”

    That is how citizenship works, my friend.

    Dear Corvinus:
    Can you kindly provide the source of your statement
    “39% of blacks are on welfare compared to 38% of whites” ?
    Your F.r.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark
    38% of whites aren't on welfare. 38% of the people on welfare are white. That's not the same thing. Whites make up 72% of the population and blacks 12%. 5% of whites are on welfare versus 28% of blacks.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @JSM
    You do realize Americans are white, black, brown, red, and yellow, right?

    Nope. I most assuredly realize no such thing.

    Just as Japanese are not White nor Red nor Black, but a specific people of the Asian race who live in their homeland of Japan, Americans are a White people whose ancestry is European, who themselves either came to U.S. from Europe and became naturalized Americans, or were born here of naturalized or native-born Americans (who are White people).

    That's the correct usage, the usage that evolved before liberals set out to confuse everybody in order to genocide (the White people known as) Americans.

    Americans are White people. White people who live in our homeland America.

    Black people in America, by their own choice, are termed African-American. Different name for a different people.

    Red people descended from the folks who came into the Americas from Asia through the Bering Strait, are, by their own choice, termed "Native Americans." Different name for a different people.

    Yellow people, such as Japanese, who have moved into America are still yellow, still Japanese. Different name for a different people. Changing their address does not change their ancestry. They are *NOT* Americans, even if the gov't of the land of America granted them citizenship.

    So, no, your statement is false.

    Hello JSM, how are you doing?

    “Yellow people, such as Japanese, who have moved into America are still yellow, still Japanese. Different name for a different people. Changing their address does not change their ancestry. They are *NOT* Americans, ”

    I guess I qualify as a yellow person – I’m 74 years old and my parents were born here in America but, yes, their parents came from Japan. We were pretty much told the same as you’re saying now back in the 1940s “You are NOT Americans” and we were all hustled into camps, our possessions and homes confiscated (never returned – no doubt some true Americans got them). I don’t remember a whole lot about those camps but my parents certainly did.

    In the 1960s I was drafted and served two years – one in Vietnam (for my country? You tell me not.)

    I don’t speak Japanese and, dammit, my passport says I’m American – I even made the big mistake of voting for that fellow in the White House (is he an American?).

    Anyhow, I just thought I’d say “Hi” and I wondered, actually, how many generations ago your forbears arrived here in America – are you American yourself? I mean, as American as those red people you speak about?

    Read More
    • Replies: @JSM
    I mean, as American as those red people you speak about?

    Sigh. Let me try again.

    As I said, the Red folks, by their OWN choice, are termed "Native Americans." These are the sounds THEY request we send out of our mouths when referring to them as a people. Now, that's a change from what they wanted to be called when *my* ancestors came here and carved our homeland out of the wilderness. Back then, the different tribes had different names for themselves, "Sioux, Mohawk, Cherokee," and various. (Now they want to be called, collectively "Native Americans." Ok. Fine.)

    But, the meaning of the words as denoting ANCESTRY, not ADDRESS, back then was understood by all.

    An Apache didn't become an Aztec by wandering into Aztec territory. Only Aztecs had the requisite ancestry to be Aztec and only Apaches had the requisite ancestry to be Apaches.

    Likewise, simply because I have my house on the same dirt where the Sioux roamed in the late 1700s, does NOT make me Sioux.

    Likewise, your (or your great-x-grandpa) moving in doesn't make you American (as defined as having European ancestry and being naturalized American or being born here of folks of European ancestry.)

    Likewise, *I* am not Japanese, irregardless of if I lived in Japan, was born in Japan, served in the Japanese Army. I lack that ancestry.

    Back before non-Whites (and their White traitorous coconspirators) decided to rid the world of my people and, in service of that aim, confused the language, people understood this.

    It's that understanding that liberals, and hypersensitives such as yourself, wish to confuse by calling non-Whites "Americans."

    Change of address does not change ancestry. Get it yet?

    Now, by all means, I'm happy that the descendants of the Sioux have the legal rights of a citizen of the country of America, but they are not Americans any more than I am Sioux. I am willing to make this concession to them having the legal rights of citizenship because, the honest fact is, the Sioux were conquered by my people. I *do* feel some amount of obligation to them. There's also, and mostly, mostly, mostly, the fact that they are FEW in numbers. They are not, by any stretch of the imagination, likely to demographically swamp *MY* people, who are Americans (i.e., we are of White, European ancestry and our ancestors came here and naturalized into Americanness.)


    And you, Hatsu Ishigura, you say you served militarily for the government of my homeland. Ok. I appreciate that. I am *NOT* saying you should have your citizenship stripped from you, because for the most part, the Japanese are not threatening us the way the mestizos and blacks do. However, should that change, should the Japanese get it in their head to make war on my people -- or war by other means as the NAMs are doing-- then my attitude would change.

    But you, Hatsu, are not American any more than you are Sioux (or whatever tribe of Red folks used to live in your area.) You do not have the requisite ancestry. Sorry. It's just a fact.

    What liberals try to do, and they do it in service of furthering their goal of genociding my people, is to confuse being American, that is to say of American ancestry, with holding citizenship rights granted by the American gov't.

    It is the very confusion of the language that liberals have created that leads to sillies like Corvinus to make ridiculous statements like "Americans are black, yellow and red as well as White." Nope.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Mark says:
    @Immigrant from former USSR
    Dear Corvinus:
    Can you kindly provide the source of your statement
    "39% of blacks are on welfare compared to 38% of whites" ?
    Your F.r.

    38% of whites aren’t on welfare. 38% of the people on welfare are white. That’s not the same thing. Whites make up 72% of the population and blacks 12%. 5% of whites are on welfare versus 28% of blacks.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Immigrant from former USSR
    Thank you, Mr. Mark.
    Now it looks close to what I expected.
    Can you give a source for that info ?
    , @Jefferson
    "38% of whites aren’t on welfare. 38% of the people on welfare are white. That’s not the same thing. Whites make up 72% of the population and blacks 12%. 5% of whites are on welfare versus 28% of blacks."

    I live in The Bay Area, the percentage of Whites here who are on welfare must be even lower than 5 percent. With the exception of homeless panhandlers, the poverty rate for Bay Area Whites is extremely low. I have never seen a poor working class neighborhood in The Bay Area that has a sizable White population.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. Immigrant from former USSR [AKA "Florida Resident"] says:
    @Mark
    38% of whites aren't on welfare. 38% of the people on welfare are white. That's not the same thing. Whites make up 72% of the population and blacks 12%. 5% of whites are on welfare versus 28% of blacks.

    Thank you, Mr. Mark.
    Now it looks close to what I expected.
    Can you give a source for that info ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark
    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reported that 11,661,000 whites are receiving welfare, 38% of recipients. There are 227,005,885 whites in the United States. If you pull out a calculator and do the math, it comes out to a little more than 5% of all whites are on welfare.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. JSM says:
    @Anonymous
    Hello JSM, how are you doing?

    "Yellow people, such as Japanese, who have moved into America are still yellow, still Japanese. Different name for a different people. Changing their address does not change their ancestry. They are *NOT* Americans, "

    I guess I qualify as a yellow person - I'm 74 years old and my parents were born here in America but, yes, their parents came from Japan. We were pretty much told the same as you're saying now back in the 1940s "You are NOT Americans" and we were all hustled into camps, our possessions and homes confiscated (never returned - no doubt some true Americans got them). I don't remember a whole lot about those camps but my parents certainly did.

    In the 1960s I was drafted and served two years - one in Vietnam (for my country? You tell me not.)

    I don't speak Japanese and, dammit, my passport says I'm American - I even made the big mistake of voting for that fellow in the White House (is he an American?).

    Anyhow, I just thought I'd say "Hi" and I wondered, actually, how many generations ago your forbears arrived here in America - are you American yourself? I mean, as American as those red people you speak about?

    I mean, as American as those red people you speak about?

    Sigh. Let me try again.

    As I said, the Red folks, by their OWN choice, are termed “Native Americans.” These are the sounds THEY request we send out of our mouths when referring to them as a people. Now, that’s a change from what they wanted to be called when *my* ancestors came here and carved our homeland out of the wilderness. Back then, the different tribes had different names for themselves, “Sioux, Mohawk, Cherokee,” and various. (Now they want to be called, collectively “Native Americans.” Ok. Fine.)

    But, the meaning of the words as denoting ANCESTRY, not ADDRESS, back then was understood by all.

    An Apache didn’t become an Aztec by wandering into Aztec territory. Only Aztecs had the requisite ancestry to be Aztec and only Apaches had the requisite ancestry to be Apaches.

    Likewise, simply because I have my house on the same dirt where the Sioux roamed in the late 1700s, does NOT make me Sioux.

    Likewise, your (or your great-x-grandpa) moving in doesn’t make you American (as defined as having European ancestry and being naturalized American or being born here of folks of European ancestry.)

    Likewise, *I* am not Japanese, irregardless of if I lived in Japan, was born in Japan, served in the Japanese Army. I lack that ancestry.

    Back before non-Whites (and their White traitorous coconspirators) decided to rid the world of my people and, in service of that aim, confused the language, people understood this.

    It’s that understanding that liberals, and hypersensitives such as yourself, wish to confuse by calling non-Whites “Americans.”

    Change of address does not change ancestry. Get it yet?

    Now, by all means, I’m happy that the descendants of the Sioux have the legal rights of a citizen of the country of America, but they are not Americans any more than I am Sioux. I am willing to make this concession to them having the legal rights of citizenship because, the honest fact is, the Sioux were conquered by my people. I *do* feel some amount of obligation to them. There’s also, and mostly, mostly, mostly, the fact that they are FEW in numbers. They are not, by any stretch of the imagination, likely to demographically swamp *MY* people, who are Americans (i.e., we are of White, European ancestry and our ancestors came here and naturalized into Americanness.)

    And you, Hatsu Ishigura, you say you served militarily for the government of my homeland. Ok. I appreciate that. I am *NOT* saying you should have your citizenship stripped from you, because for the most part, the Japanese are not threatening us the way the mestizos and blacks do. However, should that change, should the Japanese get it in their head to make war on my people — or war by other means as the NAMs are doing– then my attitude would change.

    But you, Hatsu, are not American any more than you are Sioux (or whatever tribe of Red folks used to live in your area.) You do not have the requisite ancestry. Sorry. It’s just a fact.

    What liberals try to do, and they do it in service of furthering their goal of genociding my people, is to confuse being American, that is to say of American ancestry, with holding citizenship rights granted by the American gov’t.

    It is the very confusion of the language that liberals have created that leads to sillies like Corvinus to make ridiculous statements like “Americans are black, yellow and red as well as White.” Nope.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. JSM says:
    @Corvinus
    “And, of that bunch, blacks and mexicans are vastly over-represented on a per capita basis.”

    39% of blacks are on welfare compared to 38% of whites.
    16% of Hispanics are on welfare compared to 38% of whites.
    Considerable more whites than blacks receive food stamps are white.

    
Those are facts.


    “Doesn’t happen with Blacks.”

    Patently false. There are five times as many black college graduates today than 40 years ago. Today, 84% of African-Americans have a high school diploma, compared to only 31% in 1970.


    
“Sorry. One counterexample doesn’t negate the millions of examples I can muster for my argument”

    You are prone to over-exaggeration.


    “Blacks and Mexicans have a much higher per capita rate of armed robbery, murder and even petty theft.”

    Actually, FBI statistics that whites by sheer numbers commit more of these crimes, especially white collar crimes, which are especially heinous and is in-born.


    “Blacks and Mexicans should be given one-way luxury trips back to Africa /Mexico.”

    You should write fantasy for a living.


    “Americans are a White people whose ancestry is European...”

    No, Americans are people from a variety of racial and ethnic groups. If you want to get technical about it, Europeans stole their “homeland” from Native Americans.


    
“They are *NOT* Americans, even if the gov’t of the land of America granted them citizenship.”

    That is how citizenship works, my friend.

    “my friend.”

    I’m not your friend, because you have clearly demonstrated to me, with you lies and your deliberate confusing of the language, that YOU are NOT mine.

    “That is how citizenship works”

    I am not discussing “citizenship.” I am discussing ancestry.

    Citizenship is, you troll, a different thing from ancestry.

    The conflation of citizenship with ancestry, in order to confuse honest but naïve people, is being done by liberals like yourself on purpose, in service of your aims of genociding my people, by, as a first tactic, convincing everybody we don’t exist. Or, if that fails, you want everyone to believe we should be blended out of existence, because you think we don’t deserve to exist.

    Someone who thinks I, and my people, don’t deserve to exist is no friend of mine.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. Mark says:
    @Immigrant from former USSR
    Thank you, Mr. Mark.
    Now it looks close to what I expected.
    Can you give a source for that info ?

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reported that 11,661,000 whites are receiving welfare, 38% of recipients. There are 227,005,885 whites in the United States. If you pull out a calculator and do the math, it comes out to a little more than 5% of all whites are on welfare.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. *MY* people, who are Americans (i.e., we are of White, European ancestry and our ancestors came here and naturalized into Americanness.) ”

    OK, JSM – my personal opinion here is that you are mixing up race and nationality and that your definition of “an American” stems from a personal interpretation, little shared by others.

    Native Americans, so hideously abused and now debased by your (and to an extent, maybe even my) ancestors want to get the message to blokes like us that they are the real macoy – THEY belong to one of the races that for tens of thousands of years was Native to America. You don’t, so I think: you may be European by origin but, racially, you don’t ‘belong’ here any more than I do – you assert your rights by virtue of conquest and inherited custom.

    In fact peoples of the two continents all consider themselves to be Americans and are quite affronted by the usurpation of that name by inhabitants of the USA. An American by definition is an inhabitant of the Americas – and sorry to say, that includes us both!

    But then perhaps you’ll point me to a source that defines an American as being exclusively “one of European ancestry” – seems to me those ought more properly to be called European Americans.

    Now, if you engage me on the topic of how “white” people in America are getting a bad deal in the media (who control society) and how racism in them is vilified while racism in Blacks, Chinese or, yes, Japanese people (we can be bad) is tolerated and overlooked – then I shall not argue with you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @JSM
    An American by definition is an inhabitant of the Americas – and sorry to say, that includes us both!

    Wrong. America was named by Europeans, my ancestry. So "American" as the name for us, the European-derived ethnicity that carved the nation of America (also know as United States of America) out of the wilderness, rightfully belongs to us Americans (i.e., us White folks in our homeland of America, a/k/a U.S.A who are the descendants of Europeans.).

    I'm not even sure the people who were here when Europeans came had a *name* for this landmass. I don't think they even understood the concept of geography and continents and countries. If they did, they could be rightly called the whatever-ans. But they called themselves Sioux, etc., while they never named this landmass Sioux-land, or something like that. I don't think they even possessed the concept. They simply went wherever the buffalo were.

    Mexicans are the ethny who happen to live in the landmass Mexico. If they go to Mars, they STILL won't have the ancestry that would make them be rightfully called by the syllables "American." Likewise, Japanese are the ethny that live in the landmass Japan. If they go to Mars, yada, yada.

    Americans are the European-derived ethny who live in the landmass that looks like this on the map:

    https://www.google.com/maps/place/United+States/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x54eab584e432360b:0x1c3bb99243deb742?sa=X&ei=QXOEVb7eE4n3oASzhI64Bg&ved=0CB0Q8gEwAA

    It's only because of hatred of my people, jealousy of all we've accomplished, the inferiority complex of non-Whites and envy and the impossible wish to BE us, along with greed to take from us what's ours by non-Whites that genocide-enablers like yourself are trying to appropriate our name, in service of the agenda to, ultimately, genocide us and grab for yourselves all that lovely pre-built infrastructure on this landmass.
    , @JSM
    seems to me those ought more properly to be called European Americans.

    I'm not impressed by how you think things ought to be.

    My term for myself, and the historical term our people have always called ourselves, American (and by that we mean people of European ancestry who came to U.S. and naturalized into my ethny) IS my name for myself. It is the human right of a people to be called by the name they've chosen. My people chose "American."


    That "American" is now not good enough, you say, to mean what it's always meant, White people whose ancestors came from Europe and settled on the landmass labeled United States of America on the map, when for hundreds of years, everyone in the world understood what it meant, that you are trying to force me and mine to CHANGE our name because you are trying to confuse people so you can get away with appropriating it for yourselves, these actions of yours are just further evidence of your genocidal intent.

    It's clear enough that the reason YOU want to appropriate my name is because you are one or all of the following: Jealous of all that Americans have accomplished; envious and angry that it is impossible for you to actually be us and suffering from an inferiority complex; and / or covetous and desirous of appropriating for yourself and your people all the lovely infrastructure here, without us Americans around to bother you and fight you for it.

    No, you can't have my name. You can call yourself a citizen of the United States of America if you want, but you're NOT an American.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. Jefferson says:
    @Mark
    38% of whites aren't on welfare. 38% of the people on welfare are white. That's not the same thing. Whites make up 72% of the population and blacks 12%. 5% of whites are on welfare versus 28% of blacks.

    “38% of whites aren’t on welfare. 38% of the people on welfare are white. That’s not the same thing. Whites make up 72% of the population and blacks 12%. 5% of whites are on welfare versus 28% of blacks.”

    I live in The Bay Area, the percentage of Whites here who are on welfare must be even lower than 5 percent. With the exception of homeless panhandlers, the poverty rate for Bay Area Whites is extremely low. I have never seen a poor working class neighborhood in The Bay Area that has a sizable White population.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. JSM says:
    @Katsu Ishigura
    "*MY* people, who are Americans (i.e., we are of White, European ancestry and our ancestors came here and naturalized into Americanness.) "

    OK, JSM - my personal opinion here is that you are mixing up race and nationality and that your definition of "an American" stems from a personal interpretation, little shared by others.

    Native Americans, so hideously abused and now debased by your (and to an extent, maybe even my) ancestors want to get the message to blokes like us that they are the real macoy - THEY belong to one of the races that for tens of thousands of years was Native to America. You don't, so I think: you may be European by origin but, racially, you don't 'belong' here any more than I do - you assert your rights by virtue of conquest and inherited custom.

    In fact peoples of the two continents all consider themselves to be Americans and are quite affronted by the usurpation of that name by inhabitants of the USA. An American by definition is an inhabitant of the Americas - and sorry to say, that includes us both!

    But then perhaps you'll point me to a source that defines an American as being exclusively "one of European ancestry" - seems to me those ought more properly to be called European Americans.

    Now, if you engage me on the topic of how "white" people in America are getting a bad deal in the media (who control society) and how racism in them is vilified while racism in Blacks, Chinese or, yes, Japanese people (we can be bad) is tolerated and overlooked - then I shall not argue with you.

    An American by definition is an inhabitant of the Americas – and sorry to say, that includes us both!

    Wrong. America was named by Europeans, my ancestry. So “American” as the name for us, the European-derived ethnicity that carved the nation of America (also know as United States of America) out of the wilderness, rightfully belongs to us Americans (i.e., us White folks in our homeland of America, a/k/a U.S.A who are the descendants of Europeans.).

    I’m not even sure the people who were here when Europeans came had a *name* for this landmass. I don’t think they even understood the concept of geography and continents and countries. If they did, they could be rightly called the whatever-ans. But they called themselves Sioux, etc., while they never named this landmass Sioux-land, or something like that. I don’t think they even possessed the concept. They simply went wherever the buffalo were.

    Mexicans are the ethny who happen to live in the landmass Mexico. If they go to Mars, they STILL won’t have the ancestry that would make them be rightfully called by the syllables “American.” Likewise, Japanese are the ethny that live in the landmass Japan. If they go to Mars, yada, yada.

    Americans are the European-derived ethny who live in the landmass that looks like this on the map:

    https://www.google.com/maps/place/United+States/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x54eab584e432360b:0x1c3bb99243deb742?sa=X&ei=QXOEVb7eE4n3oASzhI64Bg&ved=0CB0Q8gEwAA

    It’s only because of hatred of my people, jealousy of all we’ve accomplished, the inferiority complex of non-Whites and envy and the impossible wish to BE us, along with greed to take from us what’s ours by non-Whites that genocide-enablers like yourself are trying to appropriate our name, in service of the agenda to, ultimately, genocide us and grab for yourselves all that lovely pre-built infrastructure on this landmass.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Tiny Duck says:

    I know one thing.

    white girls crave Black Men

    Read More
    • Replies: @jack shindo
    The same existed in Europe as the .0001% of the monarchy slaved the 95% then the revolts broke out to create US and similar orthodoxies against the 'monarchy'. Now the monarchy permeates itself cleverly as capitalists interests and so the dominion continues!

    Why do Africans and other brown hordes go to Europe? The white Europeans who came to the Americas, came to develop and create their own worldview. White Europe provides stability and the opportunity depitre the real or perceived behavioural racial attitudes of said white Europeans.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. JSM says:
    @Katsu Ishigura
    "*MY* people, who are Americans (i.e., we are of White, European ancestry and our ancestors came here and naturalized into Americanness.) "

    OK, JSM - my personal opinion here is that you are mixing up race and nationality and that your definition of "an American" stems from a personal interpretation, little shared by others.

    Native Americans, so hideously abused and now debased by your (and to an extent, maybe even my) ancestors want to get the message to blokes like us that they are the real macoy - THEY belong to one of the races that for tens of thousands of years was Native to America. You don't, so I think: you may be European by origin but, racially, you don't 'belong' here any more than I do - you assert your rights by virtue of conquest and inherited custom.

    In fact peoples of the two continents all consider themselves to be Americans and are quite affronted by the usurpation of that name by inhabitants of the USA. An American by definition is an inhabitant of the Americas - and sorry to say, that includes us both!

    But then perhaps you'll point me to a source that defines an American as being exclusively "one of European ancestry" - seems to me those ought more properly to be called European Americans.

    Now, if you engage me on the topic of how "white" people in America are getting a bad deal in the media (who control society) and how racism in them is vilified while racism in Blacks, Chinese or, yes, Japanese people (we can be bad) is tolerated and overlooked - then I shall not argue with you.

    seems to me those ought more properly to be called European Americans.

    I’m not impressed by how you think things ought to be.

    My term for myself, and the historical term our people have always called ourselves, American (and by that we mean people of European ancestry who came to U.S. and naturalized into my ethny) IS my name for myself. It is the human right of a people to be called by the name they’ve chosen. My people chose “American.”

    That “American” is now not good enough, you say, to mean what it’s always meant, White people whose ancestors came from Europe and settled on the landmass labeled United States of America on the map, when for hundreds of years, everyone in the world understood what it meant, that you are trying to force me and mine to CHANGE our name because you are trying to confuse people so you can get away with appropriating it for yourselves, these actions of yours are just further evidence of your genocidal intent.

    It’s clear enough that the reason YOU want to appropriate my name is because you are one or all of the following: Jealous of all that Americans have accomplished; envious and angry that it is impossible for you to actually be us and suffering from an inferiority complex; and / or covetous and desirous of appropriating for yourself and your people all the lovely infrastructure here, without us Americans around to bother you and fight you for it.

    No, you can’t have my name. You can call yourself a citizen of the United States of America if you want, but you’re NOT an American.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. “It’s clear enough that the reason YOU want to appropriate my name is because you are one or all of the following: Jealous of all that Americans have accomplished; envious and angry that it is impossible for you to actually be us and suffering from an inferiority complex; and / or covetous and desirous of appropriating for yourself and your people all the lovely infrastructure here, without us Americans around to bother you and fight you for it.”

    Now now, steady on – this is becoming angry and personal – I give you my permission to call yourself anything you want and to define anything in the whole wide world exactly as ever pleases you – that is the right of any American. Some would say that I fought for your right to do that but, in truth, I never did a lot of actual fighting and was delighted to leave the navy and get back to my profession.

    I am actually not crazy about ‘our’ infrastructure myself but, what the heck, it’s my country and upon the whole I am happy here where on earth would I emigrate to at my age? You European Americans however need to value education a bit higher because, if you notice, we yellows have done so well in the professions that the Institutions are actually applying quotas to us – you might just approve of that but it means the best performers are being passed over – affirmative action – that’s bad for America. The response ought to be to compete with us – and win fair and square, how about it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @JSM
    "this is becoming angry and personal"

    You're darn right I'm angry and it's personal. I'm losing my country.

    "You European Americans however need to value education a bit higher because, if you notice, ....yada yada."

    Now this is funny. You Japanese come to America, take spots in the universities here built with American taxpayer dollars, and YOU presume to tell US to "value education more highly"?!!!!

    How come, if you Yellows are such superior performers, YOU don't have the highest-prestige-in-the-world universities, built by your people, in your countries that all the world is clamoring to get into? How come it's the elite universities built by us Americans, like Harvard, Yale, MIT, Cal-Tech and UCLA, that you guys are climbing over each other to try to get into? Hmmmmm?

    Meanwhile, I contemplate the fact that the ONLY group of people who have ever managed to send their own to another world beyond low-Earth orbit, is us "underperforming" Americans (defined as of European ancestry who came to America yada yada yada). And we did it in 1969, with the sum total help of you "best performing" yellows of zero, as anyone who looks at an old photo of the NASA control room in the Apollo days can clearly see.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. @Kat Grey
    Wrong as usual (guffaws in scorn). The Africans kept their captives inside specially-built corrals until the Portuguese slavers arrived on the west coast to load them into the holds of their vessels. A large number of these slaves had been kidnapped in the interior through raids, by AFRICANS!!!

    The primary reason behind inter-tribal warfare in Africa was for the purpose of acquiring slaves from other tribes. Mungo Park, who explored sub-Saharan Africa during the late 1700s, made the observation that 2/3 of Africans were slaves to the other 1/3rd at that time. Most Africans sold to white slave traders on the west coast of Africa were already living as slaves to other Africans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Anonymous • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @SolontoCroesus
    Derbyshire's argument has more holes than Swiss cheese (yellow and white).

    Did middle-class Africans and Middle Eastern people risk their lives to flee their country 25 years ago the way they do today?

    What changed in that quarter century?

    Some clues:

    What happens when people seek to stay on their own land under their own government and culture?
    Expelled for Life
    A Palestinian Family’s Struggle to Stay on Their Land

    Here's how her fellow Palestinians are treated on their own land by European white supremacists on Palestinian land:
    Video: Israeli soldiers violently attack unarmed Palestinian man
    Israel/Palestine Annie Robbins on June 13, 2015 /a>

    The USA is garrisoning Africa and the Middle East.
    When US wants a piece of land from which to impose military force on entire continents, it ethnically cleanses it -- like Diego Garcia
    http://www.thenation.com/article/209945/us-base-more-secret-guantanamo

    Diego Garcia is not the only base the US has established to project power over Africa and Middle East --
    I’m sure that you’ve heard about the three bare-bones “staging outposts” or, in the lingo of the trade, “cooperative security locations” that the U.S. Marines have established in Senegal, Ghana, and Gabon. We’re talking about personnel from Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response-Africa, a unit at present garrisoned at Morón, Spain. . . .

    US has surrounded Iran and Middle East with military bases

    The people who refuse to flee their land, or are not able to do so, are starved, economically destabilized, their governments subjected to regime change-by-sodomy: as the leader of the US Department of State (and would-be "leader of the free world" enunciated US policy toward the governments of brown people who then risk all to live under white supremacists, We Came We Saw He Died -- and the brown people fled from the destabilization the USA introduced.

    ---

    Chas Freeman spoke at a conference of The Academy of Philosophy and Letters last weekend. He said that the USA seems to have forgotten how to do diplomacy in preference for killing and use of force -- militarism.

    Mike Morell, former Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency who briefed Bush at the time Bush took USA to war against Iraq, spoke about his new book recently. Morell rationalized the intelligence lies; he heaped so much praise on the "hard work and objectivity" of CIA workers he should have had violins in the background.

    Morell no longer works for US government, he is now a Senior Counselor to the Beacon Global Strategies Group. BGS was founded and is managed by Andrew Shapiro, whose bio boasts:


    From 2009-2013, Mr. Shapiro served as the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs where he revitalized and deepened political-military partnerships at home and abroad, and promoted record setting foreign military sales creating thousands of jobs in the United States while contributing to the security of key U.S. partners. [read: Israel and KSA]. As the longest serving Senate-confirmed Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Mr. Shapiro managed our security relationships with partners in the Middle East, identifying opportunities for improved relations with some partners while reducing risks when they arose. He deepened U.S. political-military talks with India and Brazil and made key contributions to the U.S. pivot to Asia by leading an increase in military sales and transfers to U.S. partners including Taiwan, Japan, and Indonesia.

    While leading the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Mr. Shapiro undertook the first major reform of export control efforts in twenty years. During his tenure, he announced the largest U.S. government foreign military sales (FMS) package in history and presided over the processing of a record number of United States Munitions List export licenses. He also managed more than $6 billion in security assistance funds and drove the development of the innovative Global Security Contingency Fund. http://beaconglobalstrategies.com/team/andrew-j-shapiro/
     

    In other words, the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs is an arms merchant in the guise of a bureaucrat.

    That is why, as Chas Freeman argued, the US no longer does or teaches its young people to do diplomacy -- Diplomacy does not pay; selling weapons pays.

    And that is why "brown people" are fleeing their own lands and homes, not because they are eager to live under white supremacy, but for the simple expedient that life lasts longer if you are on the side that is pointing the gun rather than the side that the gun is pointed at.

    John Derbyshire, like his friends Peter Brinelow and Jared Taylor, wasn’t born in the USA. He is an admitted serial border jumper, first to China (where he met his future wife as a student of his ) , and then to the USA, where he illegally perched until dropping anchor babies. He has been employed by neocon Murdochs his entire career here, an admitted philo-zionist shabbat goy shilling white racial consciousness for the Paul Gottfrieds because they believe it is good for the J_ws.

    But as Dr. E. Michael Jones has pointed out ( Culture Wars ) Catholic Italians , Irish, and Poles are not exactly white anglo saxon protestant – and like the ‘white’ albanians, greeks, and armenians, perhaps not even ‘white’ at least in a european sense of the word. So american white nationalism makes no sense since there is no unified white race or culture in the usa.

    It would be better to unify religious American Christian and other Gentiles with the religious non-Gentiles , of any race, against the social justice warriors, atheists, free trade murdoch shills and other cosmopolitan elites who are committing ethnocide against european christian values. — and the latter certainly include the free trade white nationalists at vdare.

    They should be deported back to Merry England . We’ll keep the half Chinese anchor babies since undoubtedly they know more about America then the foreign alien vdare lot, and will probably make a honest living, unlike their hypocritical race baiting progenitors. The Gottfried paleocons can stay of course, say what you want about JWish conservatism , at least it has an Ethnos.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. JSM says:
    @Katsu Ishigura
    "It’s clear enough that the reason YOU want to appropriate my name is because you are one or all of the following: Jealous of all that Americans have accomplished; envious and angry that it is impossible for you to actually be us and suffering from an inferiority complex; and / or covetous and desirous of appropriating for yourself and your people all the lovely infrastructure here, without us Americans around to bother you and fight you for it."

    Now now, steady on - this is becoming angry and personal - I give you my permission to call yourself anything you want and to define anything in the whole wide world exactly as ever pleases you - that is the right of any American. Some would say that I fought for your right to do that but, in truth, I never did a lot of actual fighting and was delighted to leave the navy and get back to my profession.

    I am actually not crazy about 'our' infrastructure myself but, what the heck, it's my country and upon the whole I am happy here where on earth would I emigrate to at my age? You European Americans however need to value education a bit higher because, if you notice, we yellows have done so well in the professions that the Institutions are actually applying quotas to us - you might just approve of that but it means the best performers are being passed over - affirmative action - that's bad for America. The response ought to be to compete with us - and win fair and square, how about it?

    “this is becoming angry and personal”

    You’re darn right I’m angry and it’s personal. I’m losing my country.

    “You European Americans however need to value education a bit higher because, if you notice, ….yada yada.”

    Now this is funny. You Japanese come to America, take spots in the universities here built with American taxpayer dollars, and YOU presume to tell US to “value education more highly”?!!!!

    How come, if you Yellows are such superior performers, YOU don’t have the highest-prestige-in-the-world universities, built by your people, in your countries that all the world is clamoring to get into? How come it’s the elite universities built by us Americans, like Harvard, Yale, MIT, Cal-Tech and UCLA, that you guys are climbing over each other to try to get into? Hmmmmm?

    Meanwhile, I contemplate the fact that the ONLY group of people who have ever managed to send their own to another world beyond low-Earth orbit, is us “underperforming” Americans (defined as of European ancestry who came to America yada yada yada). And we did it in 1969, with the sum total help of you “best performing” yellows of zero, as anyone who looks at an old photo of the NASA control room in the Apollo days can clearly see.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Katsu Ishigura
    I think what has happened is that the architects of popular culture have truly set about dumbing down "Americans" en masse - they have taken advantage of the fact that, following the hugely successful generations up to, say, 1969 (your moon-landing) subsequent generations have increasingly lost their energy and the incentive to strive in the work-place and have, instead, focused on leisure activities. This is true of all the races that comprise America - my own included, except that Asians, being conservative, have clung more fastidiously to the old values. Even now, we still feel ashamed if we fail in school and that's why, relatively speaking, we are out-performing other ethnic groups including yours (Jews have a similar mind-set but they are slipping too).

    One thing that truly horrifies me is the loss of manufacturing expertise. Why, JSM, when your Europeans made the auto-industry and defined mass production do so many Americans now buy the cars made in Japan? You had all the advantages yet you allowed the Japanese to surpass you. Assuredly not on price but on quality and appeal. Was that due to some dirty yellow trickery or did the Japanese just work harder and smarter to make a better product? I remember, back in the 1970s, seeing a bunch of US auto workers smash up a Japanese car as a publicity stunt and I remember thinking "Yes, you surely know how to smash one up - but you don't know how to make one!" The US has lost most of its manufacturing base and it isn't just the jobs that are lost - it is the expertise - where can a start-up now find the army of trained specialists that comprise a manufacturing team? I know from first-hand it is horrendously difficult.

    You, JSM, are vociferously complaining that your country is being taken away from you - but, like many folks who are full of anger against others, this is redirected self-anger. You European Americans were in the drivers' seat and you still outnumber all other groups combined - you must blame your own apathy for allowing the professional politicians, the oligarchs and the media moguls to usurp your control. It's useless shouting at me - get out of your comfy armchair and organize a group of like-minded citizens and wrest back your rights.
    , @Katsu Ishigura
    "How come, if you Yellows are such superior performers, YOU don’t have the highest-prestige-in-the-world universities, built by your people, in your countries that all the world is clamoring to get into? How come it’s the elite universities built by us Americans, like Harvard, Yale, MIT, Cal-Tech and UCLA, that you guys are climbing over each other to try to get into? Hmmmmm?"

    Here, let me tell you.

    First of all, in our American environment we ARE 'superior performers' - we can thrive here. Please try to get your head around the fact that I was born here and, quite likely, have been alive in America longer than you have - I presume to consider it my country; just as much as you do. Through our hard-work and taxes we Japanese have contributed to America's success.

    The great weakness in Asian culture is pressure to conform and rejection of the non-conformist. Non-conformists are, almost by definition, the ones who innovate. As Fred http://www.fredoneverything.net/MoreWhiteMales.shtml (for whom I have a particular fondness) has pointed out, almost all the great innovations have historically come from white European males. Pre-Vietnam America valued education and valued individuality (as did the intellectual classes of Europe - where eccentrics were revered). Asians and Japanese in particular live to work - they can seize the successful inventions, work like Hell on them and improve them and thereby compete hands-down with their 'lazier' Western counterparts. Once freed from the yoke of forced conformity their creativity can blossom - consider Shuji Nakamura and the blue LEDs you now see winking everywhere - you should also thank him for the white LEDs which light your kitchen. In America we are free to bloom - and to compete with you Europeans: in fact your own recent apathy has empowered us.

    PS Please accept my apologies for being blown way off-topic - you may understand that I felt impelled to reply to JSM.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Seraphim says:

    @“You European Americans however need to value education a bit higher because, if you notice, ….yada yada.”
    “the ONLY group of people who have ever managed to send their own to another world beyond low-Earth orbit, is us “underperforming” Americans”

    Something happened, alas, to this group since 1969:

    “According to a study conducted in late April [2013] by the U.S. Department of Education and the National Institute of Literacy, 32 million adults in the U.S. can’t read. That’s 14 percent of the population. 21 percent of adults in the U.S. read below a 5th grade level, and 19 percent of high school graduates can’t read.
    The current literacy rate isn’t any better than it was 10 years ago. According to the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (completed most recently in 2003, and before that, in 1992), 14 percent of adult Americans demonstrated a “below basic” literacy level in 2003, and 29 percent exhibited a “basic” reading level….
    According to the Department of Justice, “The link between academic failure and delinquency, violence, and crime is welded to reading failure.” The stats back up this claim: 85 percent of all juveniles who interface with the juvenile court system are functionally illiterate, and over 70 percent of inmates in America’s prisons cannot read above a fourth grade level, according to BeginToRead.com.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/06/illiteracy-rate_n_3880355.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  102. Corvinus says:

    “You’re darn right I’m angry and it’s personal. I’m losing my country.”

    Except it’s not your country. It is a nation that consists of people from different places of the globe.

    “You can call yourself a citizen of the United States of America if you want, but you’re NOT an American.”

    Amerigo Vespucci was the first person to recognize North and South America as distinct continents that were previously unknown to Europeans, Asians and Africans. He simply labeled the ENTIRE landmass. Among historians, there has been fierce evaluation of Vespucci’s work which has to controversy–there is evidence that his writings were embellished. Regardless, an American is a citizen of the United States (from a political point of view) and a native of this landmass (from a social point of view). Jumping up and down hysterically does not change these immutable facts. America is NOT your name, it’s the name given to those people who reside and work here as citizens. That’s how it works, my friend.

    “White people whose ancestors came from Europe and settled on the landmass labeled United States of America on the map”

    The United States of America did not come into OFFICIAL existence until 1776, when the colonists rebelled. The Thirteen Colonies were part of the British Empire, which called it America. Using your logic, only those individuals who are able to directly trace their ancestry from Great Britain from 1607-1776–English, Welsh, and Scottish–would be considered “rightful natives”, NOT Europeans. Regardless, it’s a moot point.

    America is for Americans–white, black, red, brown, and yellow.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. @JSM
    "this is becoming angry and personal"

    You're darn right I'm angry and it's personal. I'm losing my country.

    "You European Americans however need to value education a bit higher because, if you notice, ....yada yada."

    Now this is funny. You Japanese come to America, take spots in the universities here built with American taxpayer dollars, and YOU presume to tell US to "value education more highly"?!!!!

    How come, if you Yellows are such superior performers, YOU don't have the highest-prestige-in-the-world universities, built by your people, in your countries that all the world is clamoring to get into? How come it's the elite universities built by us Americans, like Harvard, Yale, MIT, Cal-Tech and UCLA, that you guys are climbing over each other to try to get into? Hmmmmm?

    Meanwhile, I contemplate the fact that the ONLY group of people who have ever managed to send their own to another world beyond low-Earth orbit, is us "underperforming" Americans (defined as of European ancestry who came to America yada yada yada). And we did it in 1969, with the sum total help of you "best performing" yellows of zero, as anyone who looks at an old photo of the NASA control room in the Apollo days can clearly see.

    I think what has happened is that the architects of popular culture have truly set about dumbing down “Americans” en masse – they have taken advantage of the fact that, following the hugely successful generations up to, say, 1969 (your moon-landing) subsequent generations have increasingly lost their energy and the incentive to strive in the work-place and have, instead, focused on leisure activities. This is true of all the races that comprise America – my own included, except that Asians, being conservative, have clung more fastidiously to the old values. Even now, we still feel ashamed if we fail in school and that’s why, relatively speaking, we are out-performing other ethnic groups including yours (Jews have a similar mind-set but they are slipping too).

    One thing that truly horrifies me is the loss of manufacturing expertise. Why, JSM, when your Europeans made the auto-industry and defined mass production do so many Americans now buy the cars made in Japan? You had all the advantages yet you allowed the Japanese to surpass you. Assuredly not on price but on quality and appeal. Was that due to some dirty yellow trickery or did the Japanese just work harder and smarter to make a better product? I remember, back in the 1970s, seeing a bunch of US auto workers smash up a Japanese car as a publicity stunt and I remember thinking “Yes, you surely know how to smash one up – but you don’t know how to make one!” The US has lost most of its manufacturing base and it isn’t just the jobs that are lost – it is the expertise – where can a start-up now find the army of trained specialists that comprise a manufacturing team? I know from first-hand it is horrendously difficult.

    You, JSM, are vociferously complaining that your country is being taken away from you – but, like many folks who are full of anger against others, this is redirected self-anger. You European Americans were in the drivers’ seat and you still outnumber all other groups combined – you must blame your own apathy for allowing the professional politicians, the oligarchs and the media moguls to usurp your control. It’s useless shouting at me – get out of your comfy armchair and organize a group of like-minded citizens and wrest back your rights.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @JSM
    "this is becoming angry and personal"

    You're darn right I'm angry and it's personal. I'm losing my country.

    "You European Americans however need to value education a bit higher because, if you notice, ....yada yada."

    Now this is funny. You Japanese come to America, take spots in the universities here built with American taxpayer dollars, and YOU presume to tell US to "value education more highly"?!!!!

    How come, if you Yellows are such superior performers, YOU don't have the highest-prestige-in-the-world universities, built by your people, in your countries that all the world is clamoring to get into? How come it's the elite universities built by us Americans, like Harvard, Yale, MIT, Cal-Tech and UCLA, that you guys are climbing over each other to try to get into? Hmmmmm?

    Meanwhile, I contemplate the fact that the ONLY group of people who have ever managed to send their own to another world beyond low-Earth orbit, is us "underperforming" Americans (defined as of European ancestry who came to America yada yada yada). And we did it in 1969, with the sum total help of you "best performing" yellows of zero, as anyone who looks at an old photo of the NASA control room in the Apollo days can clearly see.

    “How come, if you Yellows are such superior performers, YOU don’t have the highest-prestige-in-the-world universities, built by your people, in your countries that all the world is clamoring to get into? How come it’s the elite universities built by us Americans, like Harvard, Yale, MIT, Cal-Tech and UCLA, that you guys are climbing over each other to try to get into? Hmmmmm?”

    Here, let me tell you.

    First of all, in our American environment we ARE ‘superior performers’ – we can thrive here. Please try to get your head around the fact that I was born here and, quite likely, have been alive in America longer than you have – I presume to consider it my country; just as much as you do. Through our hard-work and taxes we Japanese have contributed to America’s success.

    The great weakness in Asian culture is pressure to conform and rejection of the non-conformist. Non-conformists are, almost by definition, the ones who innovate. As Fred http://www.fredoneverything.net/MoreWhiteMales.shtml (for whom I have a particular fondness) has pointed out, almost all the great innovations have historically come from white European males. Pre-Vietnam America valued education and valued individuality (as did the intellectual classes of Europe – where eccentrics were revered). Asians and Japanese in particular live to work – they can seize the successful inventions, work like Hell on them and improve them and thereby compete hands-down with their ‘lazier’ Western counterparts. Once freed from the yoke of forced conformity their creativity can blossom – consider Shuji Nakamura and the blue LEDs you now see winking everywhere – you should also thank him for the white LEDs which light your kitchen. In America we are free to bloom – and to compete with you Europeans: in fact your own recent apathy has empowered us.

    PS Please accept my apologies for being blown way off-topic – you may understand that I felt impelled to reply to JSM.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Kat Grey says:

    I for one cannot disagree with anything Katsu writes. What he says is true. He is an American citizen same as anybody else born in the USA, no matter if that person is descended from the original English colonists, indigenous American Indians or black slaves. Japanese or other Asian ancestry doesn’t preclude this.

    As for his other points. whites in both Europe and America were in the driver’s seat regarding both demographics and innovation; yet through apathy, defeatism and self-abnegation allowed themselves to slide down the productive and reproductive ladder. We must not shoot the messenger for pointing out where we as white people collectively went wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  106. @Tiny Duck
    I know one thing.

    white girls crave Black Men

    The same existed in Europe as the .0001% of the monarchy slaved the 95% then the revolts broke out to create US and similar orthodoxies against the ‘monarchy’. Now the monarchy permeates itself cleverly as capitalists interests and so the dominion continues!

    Why do Africans and other brown hordes go to Europe? The white Europeans who came to the Americas, came to develop and create their own worldview. White Europe provides stability and the opportunity depitre the real or perceived behavioural racial attitudes of said white Europeans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. To respond that the Mexican Supreme Court is an example of white supremist hegemony vs the brown hordes of illegal immigrateion is clever but the truth is that they are all products of mestizaje. The indigena community and Africans in Mexico was one of neglect and priviledge and the many roadblocks worked well without the anglo-saxon legal structures so pronounced according to the laws of the era. The people at the top have less pronounced native and African features but a good diet, abilty to take a shower, have a barber, access to educational opportunities, all work together to create an appearance of equity before the law. Obviously, “the bottom dwellers” are the true inheritors of their culture while the top prefers to emulate “eurocentric values’ (nothing wrong with that) but choice is the key meaning ‘where a country wants to assert value to democracy and futuristic endeavours!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  108. @Corvinus
    “Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.”

    That’s not reality, that’s called speculation, since it depends on WHAT whites and blacks move in.



    “A nation is nothing more than the aggregated talents and knowledge of its inhabitants.”

    Exactly why the United States, as a mutt nation, demonstrates your point.

    “How many Portuguese (or other Europeans) invaded Africa to stay?”

    Enough time to remain there, extract its resources, enslave its people, and carve out Empires.

    “before this ends in the Destruction of Western Civilisation.”

    In the States, it’s called American society.

    “take a moment to explain why and how people should be made to pay for things others did several centuries ago.”

    I’m merely pointing out to the race baiters here that Europeans, in their glorious efforts to Christianize and civilize, created wondrous political, economic, and social systems through conquering and subjugation. Of course, they were no different than any other powerful group, who tend to focus merely on their achievements rather than the methods on how they achieved.

    “The Africans kept their captives inside specially-built corrals until the Portuguese slavers arrived on the west coast to load them into the holds of their vessels.”

    Absolutely, with Portuguese slave traders working directly with African tribal groups to procure human flesh in the interior. By the late 15th century Portugal had extended its reach along eastern Africa trying to establish a dominance in trade, and began to actively “recruit blacks” by setting up shop in Ethiopia, Mozambique, Madagascar.

    “The stereotype is damn close to the statistical mean…”

    Speaking of statistics, where does one find specific information the number of African males “laughing at well-meaning white zealots digging wells for them?” I’m sure you have that data at your disposal.

    "How about this: We Whites go ahead and build Elysium..."

    They way you write, I see a future for you in science fiction, since reality has escaped you.

    “Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.”

    That’s not reality, that’s called speculation, since it depends on WHAT whites and blacks move in.


    It’s not pure speculation if it’s based on numerous examples.

    Numerous cities and areas in America and Europe have switched from majority white to majority black. Name one area where the conditions improved under the new black majority.

    Likewise, we’re starting to see gentrification of previously blighted majority black areas of inner cities where the white people are returning to the cities. Name one of these areas that did not improve under the new white majority.

    When answering these questions please consider crime statistics, school statistics, and appearance of the community.

    If it depends on which whites and blacks move, then why do the results always end the same?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jack shindo
    In order for there to be equity per the switchhing of environments. the 'blacks' and the 'browns' have to steal the resources (figuratively and literally) of the white peoples, pass laws to abrogate rights, forbid them from voting, etc (at least in the USA world view manifest destiny strategem) and then see the actual results of the picking of winners and losers. It is obvious to see who the real criminals are or even the real minority, one would think!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Corvinus says:

    “Numerous cities and areas in America and Europe have switched from majority white to majority black. Name one area where the conditions improved under the new black majority.”

    Atlanta, for starters.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2015/01/15/the-cities-where-african-americans-are-doing-the-best-economically/

    Besides, it’s not race, it’s poverty and crime and education. There are low IQ, poor whites in Europe, there are low IQ, poor Asians in China, and there are low IQ, poor Brazilians in Brazil that also have the same economic issues as blacks in America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Frank DeScushin

    Atlanta, for starters.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2015/01/15/the-cities-where-african-americans-are-doing-the-best-economically/

     

    You're article doesn't say that Atlanta has improved with the influx of a black population. You article says that Atlanta is the metro market where black Americans are doing the best. There's a difference. With the large recent cheating scandal in the Atlanta public schools and Atlanta's crime rate now compared to Atlanta when it was a predominatly white city, one could easily argue that Atlanta has not improved in total even if the lives of the black people moving there have improved.

    There are low IQ, poor whites in Europe, there are low IQ, poor Asians in China, and there are low IQ, poor Brazilians in Brazil that also have the same economic issues as blacks in America.
     
    True, but despite the places where poor and/or low IQ whites and Asians live, the crime rates are considerably lower and the academic achievement rates are considerably higher than areas where poor and/or low income blacks live. If poverty and low IQ alone explained crime rates and academic success, then we would see more uniformity in the figures.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. @Corvinus
    "Numerous cities and areas in America and Europe have switched from majority white to majority black. Name one area where the conditions improved under the new black majority."

    Atlanta, for starters.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2015/01/15/the-cities-where-african-americans-are-doing-the-best-economically/


    Besides, it's not race, it's poverty and crime and education. There are low IQ, poor whites in Europe, there are low IQ, poor Asians in China, and there are low IQ, poor Brazilians in Brazil that also have the same economic issues as blacks in America.

    Atlanta, for starters.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2015/01/15/the-cities-where-african-americans-are-doing-the-best-economically/

    You’re article doesn’t say that Atlanta has improved with the influx of a black population. You article says that Atlanta is the metro market where black Americans are doing the best. There’s a difference. With the large recent cheating scandal in the Atlanta public schools and Atlanta’s crime rate now compared to Atlanta when it was a predominatly white city, one could easily argue that Atlanta has not improved in total even if the lives of the black people moving there have improved.

    There are low IQ, poor whites in Europe, there are low IQ, poor Asians in China, and there are low IQ, poor Brazilians in Brazil that also have the same economic issues as blacks in America.

    True, but despite the places where poor and/or low IQ whites and Asians live, the crime rates are considerably lower and the academic achievement rates are considerably higher than areas where poor and/or low income blacks live. If poverty and low IQ alone explained crime rates and academic success, then we would see more uniformity in the figures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Corvinus says:

    “You’re article doesn’t say that Atlanta has improved with the influx of a black population.”

    The article stated specifically that blacks left the South, then have come back since 2000, and for a myriad of reasons have bettered their community. Try reading rather than skimming.

    “If poverty and low IQ alone explained crime rates and academic success, then we would see more uniformity in the figures.”

    It’s a combination of factors, as I correctly stated, not each factor “standing alone”. Try reading rather than skimming.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  112. Karl says:
    @SolontoCroesus
    Derbyshire's argument has more holes than Swiss cheese (yellow and white).

    Did middle-class Africans and Middle Eastern people risk their lives to flee their country 25 years ago the way they do today?

    What changed in that quarter century?

    Some clues:

    What happens when people seek to stay on their own land under their own government and culture?
    Expelled for Life
    A Palestinian Family’s Struggle to Stay on Their Land

    Here's how her fellow Palestinians are treated on their own land by European white supremacists on Palestinian land:
    Video: Israeli soldiers violently attack unarmed Palestinian man
    Israel/Palestine Annie Robbins on June 13, 2015 /a>

    The USA is garrisoning Africa and the Middle East.
    When US wants a piece of land from which to impose military force on entire continents, it ethnically cleanses it -- like Diego Garcia
    http://www.thenation.com/article/209945/us-base-more-secret-guantanamo

    Diego Garcia is not the only base the US has established to project power over Africa and Middle East --
    I’m sure that you’ve heard about the three bare-bones “staging outposts” or, in the lingo of the trade, “cooperative security locations” that the U.S. Marines have established in Senegal, Ghana, and Gabon. We’re talking about personnel from Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response-Africa, a unit at present garrisoned at Morón, Spain. . . .

    US has surrounded Iran and Middle East with military bases

    The people who refuse to flee their land, or are not able to do so, are starved, economically destabilized, their governments subjected to regime change-by-sodomy: as the leader of the US Department of State (and would-be "leader of the free world" enunciated US policy toward the governments of brown people who then risk all to live under white supremacists, We Came We Saw He Died -- and the brown people fled from the destabilization the USA introduced.

    ---

    Chas Freeman spoke at a conference of The Academy of Philosophy and Letters last weekend. He said that the USA seems to have forgotten how to do diplomacy in preference for killing and use of force -- militarism.

    Mike Morell, former Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency who briefed Bush at the time Bush took USA to war against Iraq, spoke about his new book recently. Morell rationalized the intelligence lies; he heaped so much praise on the "hard work and objectivity" of CIA workers he should have had violins in the background.

    Morell no longer works for US government, he is now a Senior Counselor to the Beacon Global Strategies Group. BGS was founded and is managed by Andrew Shapiro, whose bio boasts:


    From 2009-2013, Mr. Shapiro served as the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs where he revitalized and deepened political-military partnerships at home and abroad, and promoted record setting foreign military sales creating thousands of jobs in the United States while contributing to the security of key U.S. partners. [read: Israel and KSA]. As the longest serving Senate-confirmed Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Mr. Shapiro managed our security relationships with partners in the Middle East, identifying opportunities for improved relations with some partners while reducing risks when they arose. He deepened U.S. political-military talks with India and Brazil and made key contributions to the U.S. pivot to Asia by leading an increase in military sales and transfers to U.S. partners including Taiwan, Japan, and Indonesia.

    While leading the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Mr. Shapiro undertook the first major reform of export control efforts in twenty years. During his tenure, he announced the largest U.S. government foreign military sales (FMS) package in history and presided over the processing of a record number of United States Munitions List export licenses. He also managed more than $6 billion in security assistance funds and drove the development of the innovative Global Security Contingency Fund. http://beaconglobalstrategies.com/team/andrew-j-shapiro/
     

    In other words, the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs is an arms merchant in the guise of a bureaucrat.

    That is why, as Chas Freeman argued, the US no longer does or teaches its young people to do diplomacy -- Diplomacy does not pay; selling weapons pays.

    And that is why "brown people" are fleeing their own lands and homes, not because they are eager to live under white supremacy, but for the simple expedient that life lasts longer if you are on the side that is pointing the gun rather than the side that the gun is pointed at.

    >> Palestinian land

    next, you’ll be telling us that Spaniards need to get out of Spain so that Al-Andalus can be restored.

    Be careful of what you ask for. We can turn Jordan back into Palestine by killing off ==one== royal family. By the way, the Queen there is american-born. Why don’t you tell ==her== to leave.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    Because European Males are Pussies. European Women are going to mass gang raped.

    European feminists, like those in Sweden, emasculated their men. Let them now become objects for illegal immigrant males seeking “undocumented sex.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. @Frank DeScushin

    “Whites could move en masse out of Switzerland to Haiti and Haitians could move into the now empty Switzerland and in a generation Switzerland would become an Alpine hell and Haiti a tropical paradise.”

    That’s not reality, that’s called speculation, since it depends on WHAT whites and blacks move in.

     
    It's not pure speculation if it's based on numerous examples.

    Numerous cities and areas in America and Europe have switched from majority white to majority black. Name one area where the conditions improved under the new black majority.

    Likewise, we're starting to see gentrification of previously blighted majority black areas of inner cities where the white people are returning to the cities. Name one of these areas that did not improve under the new white majority.

    When answering these questions please consider crime statistics, school statistics, and appearance of the community.

    If it depends on which whites and blacks move, then why do the results always end the same?

    In order for there to be equity per the switchhing of environments. the ‘blacks’ and the ‘browns’ have to steal the resources (figuratively and literally) of the white peoples, pass laws to abrogate rights, forbid them from voting, etc (at least in the USA world view manifest destiny strategem) and then see the actual results of the picking of winners and losers. It is obvious to see who the real criminals are or even the real minority, one would think!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. Rick1977 says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    The nonwhite invasion of Europe and America and the mass gang raping of European Women And Native Born White America Women can not be stopped via immigration restriction...topic of Ann Coulter's new book...because of the enormous demographic momentum and voting bloc power of nonwhites that will prevent any immigration restriction law ever being enacted. The only other option is mass expulsion:it's either them or us.

    Should I tell the story about the White Waitress who was brutally gang raped in the back kitchen of a restaurant by Jamaican born black yoots from Brooklyn? She is now a mother of six Native Born White American Children...married the Police Officer who arrived on the scene first....she was repeatedly facially sodomized. "They did a job on her"...according to a Greek owner of a restaurant who knew all the graphic details.

    Europe/America (Western Countries) will eventually stop mass immigration, BUT only when the hidden elite feels threathened. I think this will happen in the foreseeable future. At the end of the day, if the Elite wants it POLITIC AND VOTERS don’t really matter.

    Also our Socio-Economic System will collapse, well before the Liberal Cumbaya Fest.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. […] If whites are so awful, why are so many Africans so eager to live in white societies? […]

    Read More
  117. Stogumber says:

    Regarding East and West Germany:

    We ought to admit that there were indeed some persons who went from West to East because they couldn’t find adequate work in the West. It was not so seldom for academics (after most elder academics had left East Germany, the country was glad about everyone wo came), but it happened with working class people, too.

    And Easterners didn’t always prefer the West out of a reasoned evaluation of opportunities here and there. The motive was more the “West German dream”. In East Germany you knew your opportunities and you knew what you wouldn’t get. West Germany was too complicated and incalculable for the average mind – so everyone could hope that he would get all he wanted.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  118. Americans are people born in USA, regardless of where their ancestry is from so your reasoning is not only bogus but lacking in rational process and dept of understanding. You acknowledge that white people born in in USA are of European origin but those of non European ancestry are less than Americans or cannot be termed Americans or words to that effect. Why can you not see your distortive thinking on the matter? Of course not, but that is how yuns think!

    I am guessing you imagine you have a high IQ so if one applies a principle or concept, it should apply to all cases if arguments are applied truthfully. Doing the same thing all the time and expecting a different outcome is madness and that pathology is pandemic amongst certain groups with distortive thinking. Again, I am referring to deeds and action since anyone can talk with a forked tongue.

    Maintaing civility in a democratic process is important for change to occure so despite my PC response, god is good!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS