The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
We Should be Talking About Meritocracy’s Problems, But New York’s de Blasio Just Wants to Destroy the Whole Thing
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
asianprotesters

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I got a bit carried away with congressional maneuvering over immigration issues last week, leaving myself no time for other topics in the news. Here’s one of those topics: the assault on meritocracy.

Now, the whole issue of meritocracy is problematic. It needs some serious thought and public discussion, but isn’t getting much of either.

I’ve spoken and written about this at length. Here quote from myself I was, for example, in my February Diary at VDARE.com this year, commemorating the sixtieth anniversary of Michael Young’s book The Rise of the Meritocracy:

I think most Americans, if put to the question, would say that meritocracy—rewards proportional to one’s ability and effort—is an ideal; much more desirable, at least, than an aristocracy of birth. The notion that a meritocracy may not be stable, may in fact produce an aristocracy of birth, is not welcome to us. It may none the less be true.[PDF]

And here I was on Radio Derb, October 2015, longish quote:

This is in my opinion the number one social-science issue of our time. How do we avoid the trap Michael Young described in 1958, the meritocracy trap, of asociety stratified by ability, especially now we know that ability is largely inherited, and so presumably stamped in the genome?

And how shall we cope when the geneticists have located the genes that contribute to intelligence and personality? They are well under way—you’d be surprised …

So here’s how it’ll be fifteen or twenty years from now.You want to have a baby. Using your sperm, some number of your wife’s eggs are fertilized in a lab. The genomes of the embryos are scrutinized to see which one has the best genes for intelligence and personality. That one is implanted and taken to term; the others are destroyed.

This is not even genetic engineering, although we may have that too. It’s just picking the best of many children you might have, if you had many children—a hundred, perhaps.

Who gets to do it, though? Just the rich and the powerful? Or everybody? What are the social consequences?

This is a great looming social issue of our time, and even more of our children’s time.

OK, so here’s a new item concerning New York City’s specialized high schools. There are nine of these very selective schools. One specializes in the arts and performing arts, though, and is generally left out of news items like this one. The others admit students via a rigorous written examination, the Specialized High School Admissions Test, SHSAT for short.

The news: New York City’s communist mayor Bill de Blasio wants to scrap the SHSAT. Why does he want to do that? Why do you think?

Let His Honor explain. Here’s Comrade Bill, in a June 2nd op-ed:

Right now, we are living with monumental injustice. The prestigious high schools make 5,000 admissions offers to incoming ninth-graders. Yet, this year just 172 black students and 298 Latino students received offers. This happened in a city where two out of every three eighth-graders in our public schools are Latino or black …

Can anyone defend this? Can anyone look the parent of a Latino or black child in the eye and tell them their precious daughter or son has an equal chance to get into one of their city’s best high schools? Can anyone say this is the America we signed up for?

[Our specialized schools have a diversity problem. Let's fix it by Bill de Blasio; Chalkbeat.org, June 2, 2018]

I did a Ctrl-F for the word “Asians” in de Blasio’s op-ed: no hit. That, to borrow a culinary simile from French politics, is like writing a 944-word article about jugged hare in redcurrant jelly without mentioning the jugged hare.

Asians, East and South Asians, comprise about twenty percent of New York City high-school freshmen. Whites are around ten percent. Sun People—blacks and Hispanics—are seventy percent.

At the elite high schools admitting via the SHSAT exam Asians are 62 percent overall. Once again: They are twenty percent of the relevant population, 62 percent of those passing the SHSAT.

At Stuyvesant, the most popular of the specialized high schools, Asians are 73 percent (whites twenty percent, Sun People seven percent). Brooklyn Tech—which, by the way, Mayor de Blasio’s son attended, is a mere 61 percent Asian(and again twenty percent white). Queens High School for the Sciences is seventy-six percent Asian.

Staten Island Tech bucks the trend somewhat. It’s only 41 percent Asian, 52 percent white, seven percent Sun People. Yet more diverse is the High School of Math, Science, and Engineering up in Harlem: a paltry 37 percent Asian, 25 percent white, 38 percent Sun People.

They spoil the effect somewhat though by having a larger-than-average sex imbalance: seventy percent guys, thirty percent gals. The average for the specialized high schools is more like sixty-forty. Obviously some really flagrant discrimination going on there.

The local politics on this issue is getting pretty rancorous. June 10th there was a big demo outside City Hall: Asians—well-nigh all East Asians, to judge from the news pictures—protesting de Blasio’s plan to scrap the SHSAT. Taking on those Tiger Moms, Comrade Bill, you’re looking for trouble. [Protesters gather at City Hall to oppose de Blasio’s no-test plan, By Gina Daidone and Bruce Golding, NY Post, June 10, 2018]

For people who don’t mind facing the realities of human nature, the two takeaways here are:

  • One, the folly of mass non-European immigration—what elsewhere I have referred to as importing an overclass;
  • Two, race and sex realism.

Importing An Overclass: To import an overclass is to invite resentment and disharmony. How is this not obvious?

Race and Sex Realism: On the second point, the truly depressing thing is how far outside the boundary of acceptable commentary race and sex realism remain.

Men and women display, in the statistical generality, different inclinations and preferences. The human races, again in the statistical generality, profile differently on intelligence, personality, and characteristic behaviors.

None of this is astounding or outrageous; it’s just basic biology.

Yet these truths are unmentionable. Even sensible, well-informed commentators—people as based as you can be while holding a job writing for Main Stream Media publications—steer clear of them.

Here for example is Michael Goodwin, a very smart and sensible guy, writing on the New York Post about de Blasio’s proposal:

But those facts are ignored by de Blasio because they reveal the real problem—too many elementary and middle schools in black and Latino neighborhoods are perennial failure factories. He talks a good game about fixing them and is throwing a ton of taxpayer money at them, but has little to show for it.

[De Blasio's latest bad idea will hurt city's elite schools,by Michael Goodwin; New York Post, June 5th 2018.]

Just gotta fix the schools, see? Just gotta find a way to fix those schools! That’ll get rid of all those discrepancies!

Here’s another commentator I like and admire a lot: Heather Mac Donald, writing in City Journal, not about de Blasio’s plan, but about the push for race and sex diversity in the sciences at large:

When it comes to URMs [“Under-Represented Minorities”] math deficits show up at the earliest ages. It is only there where the achievement gap can be overcome, through more rigorous, structured classrooms and through a change in family culture to put a high premium on academic achievement. The institutional response to the achievement gap, however, is racial preferences.

[How Identity Politics Is Harming the Sciences, by Heather Mac Donald; City Journal, Spring 2018.]

So again: fix the schools—and the families!

Gotta fix the families, too!

I hasten to say that I don’t believe there is dishonesty here. Michael Goodwin, on my one personal encounter with him, seemed like a straight-up guy. Heather I count as a friend, and I don’t doubt her sincerity.

Not everybody can be interested in everything, though. These are graduates of the Humanities and law schools, lacking the cold eye of the scientifically inclined.

Plainly we need more and better education in math and the sciences. Here’s a suggestion: Let’s establish some high schools specializing in those fields, with admission by a rigorous written examination …

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 125 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Tiger Moms didn’t care when white children were forced into schools with feral Negroes. Let their Tiger Cubs deal with Shitavious and LeDeron.

    It stands to be a great show! Pass the popcorn!

  2. cthulhu says:

    That 70-30 sex imbalance is just about exactly what you see at heavily engineering/physics/math colleges that don’t do too much AA, like Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Colorado School of Mines, Missouri Science and Technology, Caltech, etc.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
    , @JMcG
  3. llloyd says: • Website

    Tiger Moms and Asians generally, maybe universally, have no desire to form an alliance with the whites. They all carry a mother’s milk version of white history. Simultaneously, they detest coloured people as Maos. That is bestial. If they meet a cultivated coloured person, they are surprised and appreciative. In Asia, from my experience, all their English language text books were written about a hundred years ago. They aspire to a world that existed over one hundred years ago, and themselves as the whites. I once asked my College class in China, would they grieve if a million whites starved to death. They all laughed and said no.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
  4. ITV (Idiot TeleVision) has some female dindu ‘footballer’) commentating on the World Cup. Must have sent Tyrone’s Rezoooomay!. WTF – fishbucket footie is a joke – they’re fat, ugly, wear baggy mannish clothes & the quality is appealing. There’s not a single sexy move you can make like the good feminine sports (gymnastics & volleyball). Wearing bikinis would at least discouraged the frumpy Gabrador types!!!

    But of course much black diversity, nuh patriarchy means the third world halfwit is unsackable. I can’t even watch the WC any more! White Men boycott it!!! Make sure you don’t paly a bunch of schoolboys 7-0!!!!

    • Replies: @Truth
  5. Anon[323] • Disclaimer says:

    Yellow dogs are for homomania, diversity, PC, interracism, and anti-white narrative.

    Make yellows suffer in NY.

    Go Blasio.

    If yellows voted for Obama and Hillary, let them have PC and Diversity shoved up their butts.

    • Replies: @phil
    , @Anon
  6. Bliss says:

    One, the folly of mass non-European immigration—what elsewhere I have referred to as importing an overclass;

    Why worry, your children will be part of that overclass. With a Tiger Mom and a smart, white collar English dad (albeit underclass by birth) they must be set for life. Right?

    This obsessive immigrant bashing is just too hypocritical coming from you.

  7. JackOH says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    DH, we bang on about Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union treating folks, Jews and property-owners and what-not, unduly badly. Cruel, inhuman, all that.

    We don’t notice, I guess, the cruelty and inhumanity that happens when America treats its Blacks unduly well. Our clueless White leadership still goes on about “closing gaps”, “diverse neighborhoods”, “diverse work forces”, which, I’m very confident, a lot of Blacks interpret as, “We’ve got honky on the run.”

    My own judgment is that relatively few Blacks have the intellectual or “sociological” chops for school work, and many ought to be issued a school-leaving certificate after maybe eight years and be allowed to enter the work force on maybe a 20-hours-per-week basis.

    • Agree: AndrewR
  8. KenH says:

    We are importing both an underclass (Mestizos and Indians from Mexico and central America, Muslim refugees) who needs lots of whitey’s tax dollars to survive and a potential overclass in East Asians whose families are largely immune from cult Marxism and who still stress racial and family loyalty and academic achievement. Of course, one great advantage for them is that cult Marxism was designed to denature, mentally derange and destroy white Europeans and is succeeding in that endeavor.

    As with other schools or businesses once Stuyvesant lowers the standards to accommodate undeserving blacks and Latinos things won’t stop there. Blacks and Latinos will invariably fail and then the war cry will then be “culturally biased curriculum” leading to watered down curriculum and massive grade inflation, so it just becomes another diploma mill.

    The end goal is to make blacks and Latinos an overclass through race and gender based admissions in schools and hiring at law firms and corporations. Most government agencies already employ race and gender based hiring so the next step for them is to deny whites employment with the government.

    • Replies: @Anon
  9. @JackOH

    Good comment! A lot of young people would benefit if “academic” education were cut off after about the 8th grade and they were channeled into vocational training for a job suited to their abilities and interests. In a racially homogeneous population you can actually do this–the three tiered German system as it used to work was a good example. But in a racially diverse society, it’ll be hard not to notice that the vocational track will be disproportionately black and then we’re where we are now. I see no solution, but I’m up for suggestions!

  10. JackOH says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    DH, thanks. Trouble is I don’t know how you sell Booker T. Washington (manual trades, self-help) and Martin Luther King, Jr. (content of character) back to Black folks who’ve been conditioned by gutless White giveaways and Black Supremacist pop philosophy they’re a lot more wonderful and productive than they actually are.

  11. @cthulhu

    CalTech is 50/50 female/male, mandated no matter what now, right?

    • Replies: @artichoke
  12. @Diversity Heretic

    But in a racially diverse society, it’ll be hard not to notice that the vocational track will be disproportionately black and then we’re where we are now.

    The educational track MEANT to be a vocational track. Voc-Ed to your heart’s desire, Blacks don’t hold employment in the fields of electrician, HVAC, Construction, IT, automotive, plumbing, name the vocational trade, Blacks don’t do it, even at the lowest trainee level. I don’t see any Blacks in these positions.

    Vocational track the Blacks all you want, they can’t even fake it til they make it. I don’t want to go all HBD on you or anything, but is there the slightest chance, vocations are beyond the capability of the Sub-Saharan IQ? In their natural state, they don’t develop or maintain it, we see it confirmed from South Africa to Detroit. Remove the Whites, hand over First World infrastructure over to <Third World intellect and you get Detroit. They can't even farm. Given all this to work with, how exactly does the vocational track of Blacks into vocational education benefit anyone except of course the Asian and Jewish and White children who wouldn't now have to deal with the 'tracked-out" Blacks in their own AP classes?

    Oh. Wait. I get it now.

  13. Derbyshire, Asians will never be an overclass. The Japanese are the only intelligent Asians. They are busy with their first world nation. Other Asians are parasites. Here is another problem the Chinese are causing.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/06/dhs_issues_subpoenas_investigating_chinese_identity_fraud_ring_funneling_fake_students_to_american_universities.html

    Asians have to go back to Asia. This includes you and your family.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Anon
  14. @Jim Christian

    Yep, the majority of blacks, unfortunately, are simply unable to contribute to a modern society. There are very few jobs that someone with an IQ of 85 or below can be trained to do. Well, that’s half of all American blacks right there. Let me repeat, half of American blacks are not smart enough to contribute to society even if they had the right culture and natural work ethic, which, of course, they do not.

    Sub-Saharan Africans with no white admixture are even more pointless – at least in their ability to contribute to or maintain a modern economy.

    Good blue-collar jobs requires a resonably bright (IQ above 100), reasonably hardworking guy. Given the fact that only ~17% of blacks have an IQ of 100 or above, that blacks generally don’t like hard work and that any black who shows any ability in school is pushed into the college track to fill future AA slots in corporations and the government, you have to figure that there would be a very, very small number of black guys in Voc-Ed track.

    • Replies: @Thomm
    , @Anon
  15. @Bliss

    Why is pointing out facts “bashing”?

    As a white person, why do I have any obligation to allow into my country someone who not of my people. The Japanese don’t allow non-Japanese to become citizens of their country. Is that wrong in your opinion? And if so, why should the Japanese care one whit what you think?

    In essence, what is wrong with wanting to live among your own people and to be ruled by your own people? It’s a very natural desire.

    • Agree: Mishra
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  16. rbbebrod says:
    @JackOH

    Excellent post.

    From an educator in a very well financed area addressing the apparent need of many of the middle class students ( not socially backward, cognitively challenged groups ) to be channeled into this type of career ); there are already far too many motivated and extremely capable individuals with the chops to be not only learning a trade, but to become eventual business owners, who are fighting to get into the trade schools. A great number of the average public high school population appear incapable of anything more than basic low level work, in a world which is facing increasing automation.

  17. @Diversity Heretic

    Good point re: the German three-tiered system but, no, it wouldn’t work–for the reason cited. I wonder if Japan –far more homogeneous than Germany (let alone the US)– has the same system. In any event…what to do?

  18. Truth says:
    @Curtis Mouser I

    ITV (Idiot TeleVision) has some female dindu ‘footballer’) commentating on the World Cup. Must have sent Tyrone’s Rezoooomay!. WTF – fishbucket footie is a joke – they’re fat, ugly, wear baggy mannish clothes & the quality is appealing. There’s not a single sexy move you can make like the good feminine sports (gymnastics & volleyball). Wearing bikinis would at least discouraged the frumpy Gabrador types!!!
    But of course much black diversity, nuh patriarchy means the third world halfwit is unsackable. I can’t even watch the WC any more! White Men boycott it!!! Make sure you don’t paly a bunch of schoolboys 7-0!!!!

    Well I’ll say one thing for you; at least you didn’t go into the “low IQ is our biggest problem” meme.

    • Replies: @Thomm
  19. It is amusing that the anti-racists insist we are all the same (and thus no racial discrimination can be justified), but when they look at certain facts, such as the preponderance of Asians in these schools, then suddenly we’re not all the same and something must be done about it. Amusing too if you consider this situation from another angle: Since we’re all the same, then only racism can account for the high percentage of Asians in these schools; but since whites are supposedly in control, how can it be explained that their schools are full of yellows?

  20. Thomm says:

    Derbyshire said :

    Importing An Overclass: To import an overclass is to invite resentment and disharmony. How is this not obvious?

    Because America is far more capable of assimilation than Britain is. This is obviously a sore spot for Derb.

    Point #2 : Without Asian immigraton, Derbyshire would not have found a wife at all. He is NOT, by any stretch, the type of man that white women go for. Only an Asian woman would be so tolerant of this level of nerdiness.

  21. @Thomm

    He and his Chinese family have to go back to Asia. Asia needs them to teach them about democracy.

  22. JMcG says:
    @cthulhu

    Look at the President of RPI. Then read the alumni magazine. Then weep.

  23. Corvinus says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    “A lot of young people would benefit if “academic” education were cut off after about the 8th grade and they were channeled into vocational training for a job suited to their abilities and interests.”

    I do agree we must as a society emphasize the trades again. But cutting off school after 8th grade? Um, no. Parents and their children can decide what occupations they will pursue.

    “In a racially homogeneous population you can actually do this–the three tiered German system as it used to work was a good example.”

    You mean in a homogenous AND heterogenous population/

  24. Corvinus says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    “As a white person, why do I have any obligation to allow into my country someone who not of my people.”

    Your people are American citizens. Of course, you have the liberty to oppose illegal immigrants and seek legislation to limit or prevent them from coming into our nation. I actually support such laws. What I do NOT support is the belief that non-whites or non-European immigrants are immoral degenerates.

    “The Japanese don’t allow non-Japanese to become citizens of their country.”

    That is THEIR policy. We in America have different policies. We are not Japan.

    “In essence, what is wrong with wanting to live among your own people and to be ruled by your own people? It’s a very natural desire.”

    Our people, again, are American citizens. Again, you have the freedom to live among your fellow whites. There are a plethora of white neighborhoods in our nation.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
  25. JMcG says:

    John,
    I think the world of you, but in regards to your apprehension that a meritocracy might result in an aristocracy by birth: You must surely have heard “Shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in three generations?”
    Do you think that any offspring that might result from the recent marriage of the spare heir to the throne might lead to an entrenched aristocracy of merit? Now, I’m as sympathetic to the argument presented in The Bell Curve as the next man, but Good Lord are people getting dumber and dumberer.
    All the best!

  26. anon[115] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m with de Blasio on this one. These people voted for a Democrat mayor, let them eat cake! Let him flush out all the Asians from NYC, send them back to China.

  27. utu says:
    @Thomm

    Go back to India. Try to solve the toilet problem there.

    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  28. utu says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    the three tiered German system as it used to work

    It used to work in late 19c and 20c in Germany and many European countries when you could be trained for life long career of qualified worker or technicians. Now economy is different. No life long careers on this level even in Germany.

  29. anon[115] • Disclaimer says:

    Meritocracy and Capitalism go hand in hand, you can’t have one without the other. In its pure form each allows the most capable and hard working to succeed. It is the kind of society that truly allows each individual to live up to his/her full potential.

    Capitalism is bad when it is coupled with lawlessness(like China or Russia) or becomes crony capitalism(much of the west).

    Meritocracy is bad when it is coupled with nepotism (like what we have with elite school admissions favoring legacy, development etc.), then it is no longer a true meritocracy.

    Unfortunately thanks to human nature, both capitalism and meritocracy will always be in danger of being corrupted. That’s why strong laws must be in place and a clean government must be around to enforce these laws.

    Harvard practices bad meritocracy that is corrupted by nepotism and racism, but NYC’s schools practice true meritocracy. It doesn’t get any fairer than going strictly by standardized test results. If you don’t like that too many Asians are getting in, start deporting them. I’m sure many of those who are in NYC are illegals or children of illegals. Do the same with the hispanic kids. Then there will be plenty of room left for black and Jewish kids. Change the immigration law. Do not change the method of admission.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  30. Benderman says:

    Hail De Blasio! Maybe the Chinese will go back to China if they’re made uncomfortable enough.

  31. Thomm says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    All this is true. Blacks have low IQs.

    But WN wiggers have even lower IQs. Their average IQ is 70. They cannot survive without the support of the rest of us, which is why they are desperate to institute a form of white socialism.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @utu
  32. @attilathehen

    Well John, on the way you and yours are welcome to beds chez moi. And your mischlings can meet my clever young mischling relations.

  33. If you are a smart hardworking white person shouldn’t you be pleased to go and share the fees brought in at Tang, Loh, Rubenstein & Goldberg as part of the 0.1 per cent or just 1 or even 10 per cent?

  34. @anon

    No! No! Don’t deport them. They’ll go and take it out on you with the weapons they invent or software they write – only just :-)

  35. My great grandfathers/mothers had huge families. Today one would expect so many marriages to East and South Asians and Jews that they had met at university or as interns or judges’ clerks that there would be so much intermarriage that there wouldn’t be an issue amongst people with any clout. Maybe that’s almost true anyway now that I think of the final qualification.

  36. @Thomm

    I see no sign that the UK is importing an over class (what? Pakistani pedophiles?) so you’ll need to educate me if you want to substantiate your first point.

  37. ” This is in my opinion the number one social-science issue of our time. How do we avoid the trap Michael Young described in 1958, the meritocracy trap, of asociety stratified by ability, especially now we know that ability is largely inherited, and so presumably stamped in the genome? ”

    Stupid question, what trap ?
    Does the writer want to go back to say 1648, when a peace conference was held to end wars, for us Dutch especially our rebellion against Philips of Spain.
    We sent two Dutch negotiators to Germany, not aristocrats.
    This was quite embarassing, the protocol did not foresee those of non aristocratic birth attending.
    If my memory is right, protocal talks took several months, maybe six.
    Yet our two Dutchmen were by far the most intelligent at the conference.

    It is a choice: do we want our societies to be run by the ablest, with indeed hereditary consequences, or not ?
    Napoleon made France great by introducing merit as decisive factor.
    Sarrazin warns how immigration destroys Germany, migrant with lower IQ’s, getting a lot of children, threaten what German industrialists say ‘we export IQ’.

    Like it or not, but there is a relation between IQ and income.
    South Africa demonstrates it, since the blacks took over the country deteriorates.
    There even is a relation between brains and survival:
    ⦁ William H. Calvin, ‘De opkomst van het intellect, Een reis naar de ijstijd’, Amsterdam 1994 (The Ascent of Mind. Ice Climates and the Evolution of Intelligence’, 1990

    • Replies: @Anon
  38. ” a change in family culture to put a high premium on academic achievement”

    Which will work – over many generations, if the smartest people have the most status and the most kids. Maybe Heather Mac is right in theory – in practice I don’t see John McWhorter or Thomas Sowell replacing [insert rapper here] any time soon.

    How many kids has Tah Nehesi Coates?

  39. Coemgen says:
    @Bliss

    Why worry, your children will be part of that overclass. With a Tiger Mom and a smart, white collar English dad (albeit underclass by birth) they must be set for life. Right?

    Not necessarily. One’s children may end up with the imagination of a rice farmer (thank you mom!) and the diligence of a shepherd (thanks dad!).

    Though in Derbyshire’s case—he seems to be quite diligent—perhaps an artifact of anglo-saxon-norman heritage, his children may be saved that possible scenario.

    On the other hand, one has to admit, the combination of a rice farmer’s diligence and a shepherd’s imagination sounds quite powerful.

  40. @utu

    Take it easy on poor Thomm. He hindu nuthin.

    • Replies: @Anon
  41. @Corvinus

    Apparently you subscribe to the idea that the United States is a “proposition nation.” Has that ever worked anywhere?

    Using a country like Japan for comparison is perfectly legitimate. The US was about 90% white before the Immigration Act of 1965 put in motion the changes that now allow you to pretend that this was not really a country created and built by white people for themselves and their posterity.

    BTW “plethora,” your SAT vocabulary word of the day, is singular, genius.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @EliteCommInc.
    , @res
  42. Derb was clear about this issue. One could add a few things (higher levels of cheating among Asian students etc.), but, more or less, that’s it: https://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/time-to-stop-importing-an-immigrant-overclass/

  43. Whites need affirmative action policies just to keep up with East Asians. No wonder the west is collapsing.

    As far as I know, the only thing whites are more creative at is finding new ways to destroy their nations. Hah!

    • Replies: @jbwilson24
  44. windwaves says:

    this is another example of how the bs narrative out there imposed by the few, is destroying our society.

    Now we are attacking asians !

    And by the way all of this is mere COMMUNISM, this is what the narrative is all about: we are all equal so destroy anything that would suggest otherwise.

    The SHSAT test is a mere test of commitment and dedication., If you are too stupid to (a) want to be at a specialized school and (b) not want to commit and dedicate some time to ensure preparation for the test then, go elsewhere. But no, the commies such as debiaso &Co now claim …whatevert diversity dirty bs. Diversity is good and is real, why fight it ? Again, communism crap, nothing else.

    And so, here we go, a good thing for the country i.e. a school that works and produces great AMERICAN talent is threatened by these complete imbecile and his friends. Truly unbelievable. And really, not surprising. Anything that works will be attacked and destroyed unless of course it’s already in the head of the elite.

  45. From de Blasio to Dante… from meritocracy to the affirmative action. Is it any wonder than?

  46. @Diversity Heretic

    This! Let’em have it good and hard I say. Or better yet how about they all go back to East Asia for their schooling. I hope DeBlasio floods these schools with Blacks and Hispanics.

    Also, notice how easily we have transitioned from just one set of problem folks, Blacks, to now two sets, Black and Hispanics. Every single article now lists Blacks and Hispanics. Just like we have to now say/write he or she, instead of the all encompassing he.

    But let’s please keep that Southern Border open.

  47. Anon[277] • Disclaimer says:

    Some men just want to watch the world burn.

  48. @George Orwell

    “Whites need affirmative action policies just to keep up with East Asians. No wonder the west is collapsing.”

    Nope. There was a recent study out of Princeton (by an Asian professor) that showed that upper middle class whites (and above) are easily capable of competing with Asians. In fact, they outcompete them.

    The problem is the lower middle to low whites, who are undisciplined, lazy, bereft of cultural norms of hard work, meritocracy, success, etc. Add to that video game culture, feminization in schools, drug usage, single parenthood rates of 50%, etc.

    There are far more of the latter than the former. If whites had the discipline and drive of East Asians, we’d be in much better shape.

    Anyhow, it will be interesting to see the asians deal with their new feral classmates.

  49. anon[286] • Disclaimer says:
    @JackOH

    My own judgment is that relatively few Blacks have the intellectual or “sociological” chops for school work, and many ought to be issued a school-leaving certificate after maybe eight years and be allowed to enter the work force on maybe a 20-hours-per-week basis.

    They’re no good for the work force either. What kind of work do you think blacks are fit for? Not retail or service because they are so rude they’d scare away all the customers. Not farming because that reminds the sensitive souls too much of slavery, and besides it’s hard work and they’re too lazy for it. Not any kind of skills trade because they haven’t got the brains for it. Not construction or kitchen work because that’s too hard, besides Mexican illegals have those cornered. What can they do? Besides sports, rapping and dancing, these are people who can only consume and reproduce. They haven’t got the brains or the work ethnic to hold down any real jobs.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @JackOH
  50. I am not among the very few who avoid the genetic question. Whether genetics is unique to color and intelligence is another matter. The central question has not been whether merit ids a sound basis for for entry into an institution of higher learning or employment. To argue that there is an attack on meritocracy is to misframe the central question.

    The issue is whether meritocracy has actually been practiced across the board with equitable consideration. The answer based on the historical record is clear: no. If that is demonstrated as accurate and the record is clear that “meritocratic” application is rife with bias’s favoring some and excluding others, the issue is correction.

    1. how deep
    2. how broad
    3. how inclusive the and
    4. the method of correction

    Having shortchanged the corrective actions in the past to favor whites, to benefit whit: male and female and those counted as whites, the issue remains how to correct for class bias’s that continue to favor the majority.

    And those are the issues before we to Gattaca.

    • Replies: @Anon
  51. anon[286] • Disclaimer says:

    The left always argue as if it’s the schools that make the students good or bad, not the other way around. They think that if you put a flunkie in a “good school”, he’d magically become a good student. If that were true, why don’t our elite colleges simply take in all the least qualified candidates and turn them into geniuses? Harvard knows that even the best black students they admit cannot compete with their white and Asian counterparts, and overwhelmingly graduate in soft majors like ethnic, gender and regional studies. That’s why they’re lowering the standards of all their STEM classes now so all the women, black and hispanics can pass.

    That is the next step for these egalitarians. After they squeeze in the 25% otherwise unqualified blacks and hispanics into the top schools, they’ll start complaining about the segregated classrooms, about how the Asian and white kids are “channelled” into the AP classes, while the black/hispanic kids are stuck in the easy classes. The solution then will be to allow everyone to take all AP classes, and watch them flunk these classes. After that, the solution will be to lower the standards of AP classes so they can all ace them, and ignore the AP test scores, or scream to make AP tests easier so they too can get 5′s. Either that or start attacking AP as “culturally biased” and force the schools to junk AP altogether.

    If we can’t all be equally smart, let’s make sure we are all equally dumb. Equal outcome at all cost.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/03/nyregion/the-segregated-classrooms-of-a-proudly-diverse-school.html

  52. HPLCguru says:

    One thing that is missing from all the discussion about “race” (or some collective if yo will)and abilities or IQ is the parents and environment. I am a biochemist because my parents raised me “as if they were Jewish” in a “bad” neighborhood (There were much worse neighborhoods but all the neighborhoods were completely white at the time) in a suburb of the South side of Chicago. Some parents were alcoholics, or the dad was gone and mom was playing around. Or a family of felons where a friend of mine in grade school was punched and kicked from 3 years on. He was as fast as I was in math but he had no chance. I would have no chance at being a scientist (publications and patents) if my parents hadn’t raised me “as if they were Jewish” which meant self discipline and delayed gratification; respect for knowledge and art; learn an instrument and be in the band and orchestra. In addition I was raised on Jazz in a very prejudiced town which led to studying hard to get out of the neighborhood. Science is rigorous and I stand by: There NO correlation between the concentration of melanin in the dermis and the functioning of the human brain”. There is no rigorous definition of race and IQ values should come with error bars. Chinese and Jewish families spend a lot of time disciplining their kids when the kids are young and then continuing until their kids have maximized what they can accomplish. BUT we must have a meritocracy in order to survive. Kids must be allowed to fail. We are not collectives but individuals who decide to associate with each other. Communism/Marxism/Socialism work for the social insects (bees, ants termites) falsely put humans in collectives for control by the central planners. Economics under kings etc, under communism and under a central bank are all forms of central planning which always rewards the planners. This getting rid of meritocracy is central planning crap. Science and engineering without a meritocracy means eventually no science and engineering. Check out D. Orlov’s stages of collapse on ClubOrlov since that is where our empire is heading

    • Replies: @europeasant
    , @Anon
  53. Thomm says:

    It is funny how a couple of WN faggots still think I am Indian. They similarly think that Thorfinsson and DB Cooper are Indian. At the same time, they can’t figure out that Corvinus, Johnnywalker123, and Talha are Indian.

    If these WN faggots took off their gimp suits and went outside once in a while, they would actually have some knowledge of the outside world.

    I mean, I realize that 70-IQ White Trashionalists are functionally retarded, but still.

    Heh heh heh heh

    • Replies: @Anon
  54. Thomm says:
    @Truth

    Truth, old pal.

    I request your help to connect White Trashionalists with the song I wrote for them. They greatly enjoy the song, but Runz often does not let it pass moderation since the song (despite being humorous) is considered too truthful for the delicate flowers here.

    Here is the song :

    http://www.unz.com/article/what-the-alt-right-and-regressive-left-have-in-common/#comment-2275482

    It is truly a novel creation, but I must request your help in getting it placed in a position where more WNs can benefit from it.

    • LOL: Truth
  55. anon[189] • Disclaimer says:

    Popping some popcorn. This should be a good show.

  56. republic says:

    A possible solution to the end of the SHSAT is to follow what many national medical schools in Latin America do, have almost open admissions, but weed out a large percentage of the the medical school class after the first annual exam.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  57. phil says:
    @Anon

    Generally speaking, East Asians do not at all sympathize with “homomania”. They actually took to the streets en masse in support of California’s Proposition 8, which defined marriage as between one man and one woman. However, Proposition 8, which won majority support among voters statewide, was overturned in the courts.

    “Democracy” does not matter if the courts can achieve a political objective of activist Jews.

    The Left’s political objectives must be achieved “by all means necessary,” including violence in the case of AntiFa. Most East Asians are completely clueless about the larger political struggle going on.

  58. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    People think you’re Indian because your manner of speech reminds them of whoever subtitled this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFhQ3cEIMBI&t=18s

  59. Corvinus says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    “Apparently you subscribe to the idea that the United States is a “proposition nation.” Has that ever worked anywhere?”

    In the United States.

    “Using a country like Japan for comparison is perfectly legitimate.”

    Actually, it is not. Historically, and generally speaking, Japan has been and remains a closed society not welcoming of perpetual, external influences. The United States has had relatively brief periods of embracing this attitude. Furthermore, America is a nation of immigrants; Japan is not.

    “The US was about 90% white before the Immigration Act of 1965…”

    Actually, it was predominately of European descent, with a healthy dose of natives and imported Africans. Of course, you should recall that various European ethnic groups, like the Germans, Irish, Poles, Italians, and Slavs, were deemed other than desirable and other than assimilable.

    “put in motion the changes that now allow you to pretend that this was not really a country created and built by white people for themselves and their posterity.”

    “Posterity” has three possible meanings: one’s actual legal descendants and heirs, one’s succeeding generations, or simply refers to later times. Samuel Johnson in his dictionary preceding the Revolution and in his edition contemporary with defines it as both descendants and succeeding generations. Note if “succeeding generations” means the same thing as descendants, or vice versa, it would have been unnecessary to include both definitions. He also cited to Latin, wherein posteritas refers means future generations, one’s actual descendants, AND future times.

    Now, Johnson was NOT descended from the successful revolutionaries of 1776 nor even related to the statesmen of 1789. Thus, we could discount him and his dictionary. Yet, Webster’s Dictionary at that same time uses the same definitions, and employs the same language of the day. How do we address “the addition of the word ‘our’ must restrict it to descendants alone?” Simply, we add “our” to either definition and both stand equally well on their own – “our descendants,” “our succeeding generations” – without changing their relationship or meaning.

    Indeed, Madison and company COULD have meant only the descendants of the then “People of the United States”, which includes the half-white, half-Indian, and Dutch, German, Scots, Irish, and French. half breeds from Indian-settler matches, Dutch and Germans, Scots and Irish. Lafayette, von Steuben, Pulaski, and Kosciuszko, not native born, so they had to go back.

    However, it would have been easy enough for the Founding Fathers to have written into the Constitution, words to the effect of, “The law for citizenship in the United States shall be the same as prevailed in that other great democracy, Athens, at the time of Pericles”, which would given special consideration in deserving cases, most notably Pericles’ son by the courtesan, Aspasia, was granted citizenship, even though not full blooded Athenian. There were dozens of ways to have restricted citizenship, but the Founding Fathers, being educated and intelligent men, neglected to make those distinctions.

    Rather, they wrote into the Constitution an understanding and intent to permit naturalization, with the implication of immigration, in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2—“No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty-five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen” AND Article One, Section Three, Clause Three—“No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”

    The Founding Fathers here were focusing exclusively on higher qualifications for more important offices, in the context of permitting people who were not citizens, who came from outside, to come in and become citizens. Shortly thereafter, Naturalization Act of 1790, written by men closely in tune with the tenor of the times and either drafters of the Constitution, or associates of those who drafted it – permitted free white aliens, who had been resident for two years, to become citizens.

    YET, the Founding Fathers granted Congress the expressive permission to change such criteria. While this act was restrictive, it was not restricted to British white people, and certainly not only descendants of those here prior to the Revolution. What about Negroes and Asians and womenfolk? Well, we have an amendment process.

    Regarding posterity, the concept does NOT refer exclusively to one’s own children. In particular, “Novus Ordo Seclorum” reflects the intention of the Founding Fathers to install political checks and balances to safeguard against tyranny REGARDLESS of one’s racial or ethnic background. It is other than accurate to state that the Founding Fathers sought to exclusively preserve a genetic legacy, i.e. Anglo-America, since there is no racial or gender criteria to adhere to the universal principles of “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” which are embedded in our representative form of government. Recall that Congress has the power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization….” By definition, naturalization extends citizenship, and all the rights and duties related to it, to those other than the “original” settlers and immigrants. The proposition remains that immigrants must meet the criteria as established by Congress to enter our shores.

    “BTW “plethora,” your SAT vocabulary word of the day, is singular, genius.”

    Plethora, as in overabundance. There are an overabundance of white neighborhoods in our nation.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
  60. @Diversity Heretic

    It’ll be like The Ghet-to meets Funky Chinatown:

  61. anon[143] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Government jobs. That’s all they’re good for. Read this from Jason Riley in WSJ:

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/my-lazy-summer-as-a-public-employee-1529449487?mod=hp_opin_pos1

    If you don’t have a login, here’s an excerpt:

    Each morning after we’d punched in and donned our uniforms, a half-dozen of us summer hires—mostly college kids like me who had gotten the job via our parents’ connections—would pile into a utility van. Waiting behind the wheel was a genial old-timer named Hank, who drove us to the assigned neighborhood, where we would walk house-to-house recording the meter readings. Once we finished our routes, Hank told us that first morning, the rest of the day was ours. Typically, it took only about two hours.

    The upshot was that we spent most of the summer devising creative ways to kill entire afternoons, and not a few late mornings. We’d read, nap, hit the beach, shoot hoops, catch a movie, play videogames and engage in various other activities that I’m almost certain fell outside the job description for a water-meter reader. After we’d decided on a plan, Hank would drop us off and disappear until it was time to return the van to the dispatcher and punch out for the day. My recollection is that no one on my crew ever asked questions or feared getting caught. And the summer workers on other crews, we eventually learned, were up to the same antics.

    Last week, Baltimore’s inspector general revealed that over a 20-month period, city meter readers earned $120,000 while loafing on the clock. “For over a year, Baltimore’s water meter readers would get a list of jobs at the beginning of their shifts,” the Baltimore Sun reported. “When they were done, workers either drove around aimlessly or went home instead of getting more work to do.” Investigators used GPS records from work vehicles to catch the errant employees, but their behavior was an open secret among supervisors. As the Sun explained: “Investigators learned that Department of Public Works, which employed the meter readers, had an unofficial policy condoning the practice.”

    Also read Heather MacDonald’s excellent book The Burden of Bad Ideas on what actually goes on in a lot of government welfare agencies and charitable foundation offices.

    • Replies: @Anon
  62. @HPLCguru

    Let’s see some numbers. SAT, ACT test scores. All I see is your opinions.

    BTW the average ACT test score of Black(African) high school valedictorians in my very large city is in the vicinity of 21.

  63. @Buzz Mohawk

    i rarely respond to the obvious baiting, but on occasion.

    It is astonishing how much such advocates as you know about your own country. The people you are talking about have been rated as white for more than twenty years on survey data sheets.

    Buy as you your understanding of who built the country. More than half of the country’s GDP was on slavery at various times, whether the sales trade of humans or actual human labor. I think it is safe to say that whiteness has no exclusive claim.

    And the constant attempts to invalidate the contribution of blacks makes the case very clear that said labor was valuable hence the effort to blot it from the record. Now given the populations of blacks to whites, it’s very clear that black labor is responsible for a majority stake holders in “building” the country. It requires no fancy math or data tables, manipulating interpretations of the numbers.

    http://faculty.weber.edu/kmackay/economics%20of%20slavery.asp

    Hard to conceive such irrational conclusions as the country was built by whites. Now given that blacks were denied patent rites, rights to intellectual creation and development — we have no idea how to evaluate the contributions. But their contribution have been documented in science, medicine, industrial development and other fields.

    You have noted one truth — whites are irrational in discussing the matter of blacks in the US. As a conservative, it is deeply disappointing how bereft citizens are on this issue and how glib supposed intellectuals are in maintaining this understanding.

    • Replies: @Thomm
    , @Buzz Mohawk
    , @Anon
  64. Thomm says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    It is astonishing how much such advocates as you know about your own country.

    That is because White Trashionalists have IQs in the 70 range.

    White Trashionalists tend to be in extreme denial about how Jews, Poles, Italians, and even Irish were not considered ‘white’ when they first arrived in America.

    Hell, White Trashionalists still claim that Jews are not white.

    • Troll: Buzz Mohawk
  65. AndrewR says:
    @llloyd

    Would they grieve if tens of millions of Chinamen starved? That’s what happened only 60 years ago.

    Would a class of American students grieve if a million Chinese starved? Also unlikely. You’re presenting a false narrative of a unique “Asian” disdain towards “whites.”

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
  66. Wayne says:

    Back in the late 60s I attended Baltimore Polytechnic Institute, a math and engineering high school for boys founded in Baltimore City in the 1880s. At the time it was one of the top ten high schools in the country.
    About that time Baltimore acquired its first black school superintendent, Dr. Roland Patterson. I remember him stating that “Poly” was a wonderful school and every child in Baltimore should have the opportunity to attend school there.
    You can imagine what it’s like now.

  67. @EliteCommInc.

    Categorizing people as white who are predominantly Amerindian is a falsehood. Their conquistadors ruling class, which is European, is happy that they are bleeding into our country, which serves as a relief valve for them.

    Sub-Saharan Africans were imported a cheap labor to replace my mother’s ancestors, the original White indentured servants in the old south. Black contribution consisted of forced manual labor primarily in what is now the Southeastern United States. The descendants cost us billions of dollars now and are an overall drain. That is the long-term cost of cheap labor.

    I laugh at claims of Black inventors denied patents and overestimations of Black labor to America. The United States became far more than what it was during slavery.

    When I write “White,” I mean the broad European race. I use the terms interchangeably. One of the problems weakening any attempt at European/White sense of self is this Sapir-Whorf problem of not even having a consistent name.

    What was White in the beginning is not as relevant as what is, in fact White/European.

    You also leave out intellectual capital and a lot of things European people contributed to make this country.

    No slight is intended to the labor of all people over the centuries, including blacks who made Southern agrarian life possible. That went out with the Civil War, but you you it is always 1865.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  68. @Corvinus

    Where do you get the time to write all this stuff?

    At some point, people settled the Japanese islands and kept them as their own. European people (“White” as a word used interchangeably because it is 2018 now) pioneered, conquered and settled what is the United States. Even if some were not considered White, they are in my category of White, interchangeable with European.

    You refer to an “overabundance” of white neighborhoods. That is yet another singular term and one that carries the connotation that you feel there are too many. Do you think there are too many White neighborhoods in our nation? I expect at least 1,000 words in reply.

  69. JackOH says:
    @anon

    anon 286, bro’, “talented tenth” Blacks were doing documented construction as general contractors in my part of Ohio as early as the 1860s. Okay?

    We’re looking for a fair shake for Americans, Black, White, polka-dot, I don’t give a shit. That means dismantling affirmative action. That means letting people live where they want to live. That means slamming the faggot schoolteacher who hits on schoolkids, but ignoring the gays who just want to live private lives. That means prosecuting corporations and their officers that destroy the civic culture by recruiting Guatemalans to work at meat-packing plants 2000 miles from their home. That means calling out bullshit Roman Catholic, Lutheran, and other bullshit “faith-based” organizations that talk compassion, but are mostly interested in reclaiming influence and grant moneys. (FWIW-I’m a cradle Lutheran. Lapsed from Christian belief for decades. Describe myself as a “reviving Christian”, non-dogmatic type, although nobody asks.)

  70. @Buzz Mohawk

    LOL. Who even has the time to read Cornhole’s drivel. He’s an automatic skip in the comments for me. I always try to read yours though.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  71. The obvious genetic superiority of Asians to whites is so great that the Chinese objection to miscegenation with whites makes complete sense. It also makes very likely the dominance of the planet by these superior people unless Washing starts a serious war wuickly. Biology is destiny, it is said, and the biology is unmistakeable. But is not it better to have the superior race in charge, however Negro-like it may make many whites feel??

    • LOL: Truth
  72. @Buzz Mohawk

    You seem to think your issue is with me. not the case. I don’t make the surveys distributed by survey data producers.

    now, yo the issue of black production. Actually my comments are related directly to the economic benefits of black labor and production in the areas noted.

    1. in relation to gdp — whether said production is pre 1865 or past that point. Your attempt to igeon hole me into some date strata is rejected. Because in the discussion we are talking about who built the country. And that means labor/production to the economy as well as other benefits. And as the data demonstrates blacks historically outperform whites as contributors when compared to the size of population. –. Here’s an analytical model in which proportionality can be distributed to the whole and make sense to population and the overall output to economic benefit.

    2. That analysis by the numbers damages the veracity that the country was built by whites. Trying to measure losses to the credit of blacks by denying them access to copy and patent rights — the ability to sue we simply will never know the economic benefit to country and the loss to the black population. Blacks have been major contributors, if not accredited with the same. As your comments reflected by most whites does. That argument goes beyond “free labor”.

    3. Here’s the problem pretending that blacks were not robbed of fair wage and credit for products, innovations, and creations, not to reference a national policy to deny them the right to protect their economic contributed to their benefit, via low wages, segregation, artificial barriers to maintain their status as low IQ contributors as excuse to maintain that system. So given the data attempting to ascertain value of a contributor whose contribution has been marginalized, stolen or denied on such a scale will be difficult at best — but clearly when examining black life in the US the population has contributed more than credited. Note my comments are not in any manner a case for laziness, welfare, or any of the ills that might plague the small proportion of blacks, including inner city crime — none of which is unique to blacks as such have been plagues to all populations in varying degrees who have occupied said class status – save blacks are easier targets.

    4. I have not intended to be so windy — for the analysis is very clear. my position is that citizenship at the price aid by the least of our citizens is worthy of honor and no one — no one here illegally should be granted anything save safe passage home. I for one will ever support a policy to supplant any US citizen regardless of their skin color or polity and its time that the majority cease pretending they can address issues by disenfranchising blacks via legal or illegal policies. not am i going to pretend that the country has redressed bthe matter effectively.

    Don’t like blacks don’t hang around them on your time, your place — but to what is guaranteed this conservative is not going to hoodwinked into stealing from them — even if they hate my guts to the last gene.

  73. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    Who gives a rat’s A$$ about Noo Yawk and Asian immigrants.? Not me.

    Do what the Irish and German Catholics did 180 years ago. Build your own school system.

    Oh, it’s not the Asian Way to spend your money on private schools when you can parasite off the public schools you didn’t build and don’t pay taxes to because you don’t report income?

    Too bad. Go home.

  74. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    I’m no intellectual, but I spent most of my life in workplaces that were 20 to 40 percent black.

    The more you know them, the less you want to be around them. That doesn’t even count the incessant sex harassment because in the workplace, the women are nastier and lazier and more incompetent than the men.

    Your posts make it obvious you’ve never spent much time around blacks, you’re just quoting from standard African American studies text books.

  75. @Anon

    But…for Asian people who’ve lived here since birth (like Derbyshire’s kids, incidentally), America IS home.

    In any case, if the primary function of modern post-secondary education is signaling, then “build your own school system” is unlikely to help.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @attilathehen
  76. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Charitable foundations are worse than government offices. What the charitable foundations do is insert themselves between a government agency that actually does something and the clientele the agency serves.

    For instance counseling people about food stamps or how to apply for social security. You get food stamps depending on income and number of people in the house. Social security depends on how long you worked and what you earned. Social security is all in the computerized records

    Yet foundation parasites make millions a year waiting around in their offices giving useless advice.

  77. Thomm says:
    @Frederick V. Reed

    LOL! Fred Reed is the shock troop specifically tasked with generating confusion so that White Nationalists implode. He is also essential in Ron Unz’s goal to normalize Hispanics and elevate them above White Trashionalists (the bottom 20% of whites).

    It is part of Ron Unz’s master plan. He is a sophisticated Confuse and Conquer Jew, and it is a privilege to see him execute this plan. I am strongly in support.

  78. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @HPLCguru

    South side of Chicago? You should have gone to Mount Carmel High School, , plenty of scholarships for a boy who got a high score on the HSPT entrance exam.

  79. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    You’ve never heard of affirmative action have you? It’s been 50 years. I don’t think you live in the United States. Maybe some kind of never never land.

  80. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    He has to go to the public library as his uncles garden shed where he lives doesn’t get WIFI.

  81. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Not sure but I think you got the wrong rebellion wasn’t it more like 1538?

  82. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    I don’t know about his Derbyshire’s personality but hudging by his photos, he’s very good looking.

    I can’t imagine anyone of any race going for an ugly on call $10.00 an hour coder living in his uncle’s garden shed like you.

    • Replies: @Truth
  83. KenH says:
    @Frederick V. Reed

    The obvious genetic superiority of Asians to whites is so great that the Chinese…

    Yes Fredrico, the superiority of East Asians is so great that China has to steal all of our advanced technology developed by the inferior white males via industrial espionage, one sided offset contracts, and blackmail. One area where they are superior to whites, far superior, is in their racial pride and refusal to allow immigrants unlike themselves, especially Latin Americans, into China.

    If whites dare to have a racial conscience and notice that Mestizos are not only different, but inferior to whites then you explode like a pinata and start squealing about white nationalism. But you’re down with brown racial nationalism both in Mexico and the U.S.

    • Agree: MikeatMikedotMike
    • Replies: @Anon
  84. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @The American Libertarian

    Signaling what?

    I’ll repeat. If they don’t like the public schools, build their own. They’ve already built their own corrupt cheating Chinese parallel society. So build their own schools.

  85. Truth says:
    @Anon

    $10.00 an hour coder

    H1-B…must… End!

  86. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Citizen of a Silly Country

    40 percent of blacks have IQs below 80.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  87. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    Every year there are scandals all over California about mostly Chinese students paying other students to take classes for them.

    Usually a teacher noticed that the same person is in the class under a different name than last year.

    Foreign students are required to read write and speak reasonable English so they can use English textbooks and write papers. They are required to pass what’s called the TOEFL exam.

    But Chinese students pay others to take the exam for them and arrive in the US unable to read their text books.

  88. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jim Christian

    What’s wrong with a vocational education? I’d rather be a well
    Paid auto mechanic than have a masters in English and be a waiter.

    Or have double masters in education and grievance studies and teach in a dangerous black school in Baltimore, Atlanta Philky Detroit, Flint Mi Gary In Chicago etc.

    Do high schools have vocational ed any more other than basic auto shop?

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  89. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    Asians are soooo superior to Whites that the wealthiest are as eager to escape to a White country before the next revolution , property confiscation Whatever as the coolies who mortgage themselves for $40,000 to be smuggled in a shipping container to America to be a slave in a sweatshop or restaurant.

    Mexicans aren’t the only ones who drop their anchor babies in America
    I won’t even get stared in the way China has dumped its elderly in our social security, elder care and medical system

    America; child welfare system of Mexico and Central America and pension system of China, Korea and Thailand.

    • Replies: @myself
  90. Corvinus says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    “Where do you get the time to write all this stuff?”

    It’s actually pretty easy when one is knowledgeable.

    “At some point, people settled the Japanese islands and kept them as their own.”

    So what?

    “European people (“White” as a word used interchangeably because it is 2018 now) pioneered, conquered and settled what is the United States.”

    Along with tribal groups and African slaves.

    Again, you are conveniently forgetting or are being willfully obtuse in that several European groups were deemed “not to be one of us”. Were the nativists who made that argument wrong in their assessment? Moreover, “white” and “European” are not interchangeable, as one is a race and one refers to a group of different ethnic groups. Recall that the Irish and the Poles were not deemed as “white” by some nativists. And, of course, some on the Alt Right call American whites today”race traitors” and “anti-white” for making their own decisions about race and culture.

    “Even if some were not considered White, they are in my category of White, interchangeable with European.”

    OK, if you make this statement, White to you is subjective in nature, not necessarily predicated squarely on genetics. If you have your own “category of White”, are other white able to have their own categories? Which categorization is then deemed “correct” or “proper”?

    “You refer to an “overabundance” of white neighborhoods. That is yet another singular term and one that carries the connotation that you feel there are too many.”

    That would be your imagination working overtime. There is no “connotation” here. I believe it’s more than OK to have an overabundance of white neighborhoods for you to choose which one to be part of. Isn’t having a wide range of choices better than a few?

    “Do you think there are too many White neighborhoods in our nation?”

    No.

    • Replies: @Anon
  91. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Asians vote, when they vote overwhelmingly for the anti white democrats. My only political interest is removing affirmative action discrimination against Whites.

    Since that will never happen, I’ll just bitch about it and extremely dislike the affirmative action beneficiary races and the judges who created them.

  92. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    Have you been to any government agency in the last 30 years? Did you notice who worked there?

  93. Corvinus says:
    @The preferred nomenclature is...

    “He’s an automatic skip in the comments for me.”

    Too bad, you could learn a thing or two, dear.

  94. anonymous[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    It’s gotta be closer to 41.

  95. No serious people could elect DeBlackio. We live under a matriarchy. Witness Prez Tramp’s epic cuckery over wailing semi-retarded mesoamerican kiddies. What’s next? A presidential edict against daycare? Let every negro out of prison so his fifteen sprogs won’t cry? And how on earth will Tramp fix every kid ever given up for adoption by strangers?

    Let the demonrats impeach this cuckold buffoon so we can get on with the decline and fall of American matriarchal empire collapse while the average white taxpayer swills crap beer and cheers on his favorite negro bounceyball team.

  96. @AndrewR

    Would a class of American students grieve if a million Chinese starved?

    Yes. Not just cry, but mortgage their parents’ to donate money.

    Look at the reaction to Haiti being the same after its earthquake. Or Bantus killing Bantus in bantuland.

  97. Rich says:
    @Thomm

    “Wiggers” are disgraceful. kids who deny their own race and history, buy you’re exaggerating how low their IQ’s are. In a White person, an IQ of 70 would be considered severely mentally disabled and they would be living in a group home. In the Black population an IQ of 70 would probably put them in a leadership position.

    • Replies: @Thomm
  98. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    “Where do you get the time to write all this stuff?”

    It’s actually pretty easy when one is knowledgeable.

    Leaving aside the issue of whether you are correct (you aren’t), you missed the point of the question: “Where do you get the time to write all this stuff?”

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  99. @Frederick V. Reed

    Kiko Reed:

    “Wooooooorld staaaaaaaar!!!!!!”

    • LOL: Truth
  100. @Anon

    I have sent most of work experience around whites —- and good grief, there’s not a comment that would be applicable to said white populations in the workplace: graft theft, adultery, lieing, backstabbing, taking credit for other people’s work, cheating on time cards . . . etc.

    That includes the armed forces . . . and as for harassment, white women have made it a staple or wok life — and if there is a convenient black male around all the easier to play the card. To wit white men are eager to come to the rescue, despite knowing the charge is nonsense —-

    old sociopathy that works is hard to let go of.

  101. utu says:
    @Thomm

    Go back to India. Fix their toilet system.

  102. Most parts of Britain abolished selective high-school education between 1965 and 1975. The result was that the proportion of those in the top professions who went to fee-paying schools, a proportion that had been steadily decreasing for decades, began once again to increase.

    The prime beneficiaries of non-selective education are the wealthiest 5%, the UMC, who can use their wealth to opt out of the system and ensure that their children get a good education at fee-paying schools. The Education Secretary who abolished selective education, Tony Crosland, was himself a UMC socialist who attended the famous fee-paying Winchester College. Yet although his policy coincided with his own class interests, the arguments presented in public entirely concerned the supposed advantages for the working class (at that time Britain did not have large ethnic minorities).

    I expect it is the same in NYC – the wealthy do not want the children of poor or average (and mainly Asian) families to join their ranks, but they don’t dare say so – so they’ll pretend they are concerned about those (mainly Black and Hispanic) who don’t get into selective schools.

  103. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “Leaving aside the issue of whether you are correct (you aren’t), you missed the point of the question: “Where do you get the time to write all this stuff?””

    Of course I am correct. And as far as my time goes, my secretaries take care of what needs to be done. Women, when properly told what to do, are great mules. Then I can count my money, golf, have my mistresses on the side, and write on blogs to bother people like you, who are my kind but not my kind. Get my drift?

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Thomm
  104. Asians, East and South Asians, comprise about twenty percent of New York City high-school freshmen. Whites are around ten percent. Sun People—blacks and Hispanics—are seventy percent.

    Really? White high-school freshmen in NYC, not counting Hispanics but counting Jews, are only 10% of the total? This deserves an article in its own right.

  105. @Anon

    You are correct. Like mine, your knowledge comes from experience, while he is blowing smoke and referencing biased studies that support his hypothesis.

    He’s also off on a tangent, sounding like he thinks I am denying that blacks are Americans and part of our history. They are citizens, whose early economic contribution was positive, but whose long term has been proven financially negative and continues to be. He believes the BS he reads that grossly overstates their role in building the early country, and then goes on to ignore everything that was built after the early stages — when black labor was an even smaller part of the century of growth, innovation and development that made the US the richest nation on Earth.

  106. Thomm says:
    @Rich

    In a White person, an IQ of 70 would be considered severely mentally disabled and they would be living in a group home. In the Black population an IQ of 70 would probably put them in a leadership position.

    White Trashionalists are one half of a defective subrace within whites. White variance in quality is very high, and the bottom 20% of whites are even *lower* than the bottom 20% of blacks, even as the white median is very high.

    The white race improves all the time since we have a unique mechanism to precipitate our genetic waste matter into these carriers for rapid elimination from the gene pool. Of this defective subrace, the men become WN wiggers, and the women become the fat bluehaired feminists. Both represent genetic waste matter, the expulsion of which is necessary to maintain white excellence.

    • Replies: @artichoke
    , @res
  107. res says:
    @Buzz Mohawk

    BTW “plethora,” your SAT vocabulary word of the day, is singular, genius.

    I’m not sure this is quite as simple as you describe. See this blog post discussing plethora in the context of notional agreement: https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2017/04/plethora.html
    And more on notional agreement from Merriam-Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/notional-agreement-subject-verb-principle-proximity
    Another take: https://stroppyeditor.wordpress.com/2013/12/16/a-number-of-people-doesnt-understand-notional-agreement/

    Google Ngrams does appear to support your interpretation though: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=are+a+plethora%2C+is+a+plethora&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Care%20a%20plethora%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cis%20a%20plethora%3B%2Cc0

  108. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Of course I am correct.

    Well, how’s that for contentless ego?

    my secretaries take care of what needs to be done.

    Nurses are not secretaries, even if they do help ensure that life is beautiful all the time. Don’t tell them you think they are mules or they might have to double your injections. You don’t want that again, do you?

  109. myself says:
    @Anon

    the wealthiest are as eager to escape to a White country

    Not the wealthiest, by any means. Those stay home, where they are the elite.

    The smart and qualified, but who are not part of the “toppest-tier” in their homelands – now those come to the developed world.

    • Replies: @Thomm
  110. @Anon

    Nothing at all wrong with vocational. But even THAT is highly technical. Auto mechanics? Tech. Drafting? Lasers and computers. Electrician? You only know how deep it is if you ARE one. Highly technical, heavily regulated and coded, all tied into emergency/energy management systems which takes you out to computers, telephony, all sorta of data and telecom protocols.

    And so my point was, 99.999% of Blacks don’t pack the gear to study in any of these pursuits. They just don’t. But sure, put them into these programs, bus them out of the neighborhood and at least they won’t be disrupting the Jewish, White and Asian kids with their violence and bullshit. They still won’t be worth a damn to anyone, but at least they didn’t destroy the kids that are serious STEM candidates in their larval stage. It’s un-fucking-believable to me that we allow the Splibbs to disrupt ANYTHING, let alone the cream of the academic crop. It’s unacceptable. It undermines our society at the very start. Racism? Only thing institutional about it is, the children learn at an early age what Negroes are, how they operate and how stupidly, pointlessly violent they are. And useless. You can’t escape HBD and IQ. Ya just can’t.

  111. Thomm says:
    @Corvinus

    Of course I am correct.

    Of course. Remember that a White Trashionalist is so unproductive that they can’t even realize how substandard they really are.

    They are so far below the talent level of mainstream white people that White Trashionalists are not even the same race. See my Comment #109 for full details.

    • Replies: @Anon
  112. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    a White Trashionalist

    how substandard they really are

    As it turned out, a recent substandard they was actually black: http://www.unz.com/isteve/seattle-bicycle-enthusiast-they-eaten-by-a-mountain-lion/

  113. @The American Libertarian

    Derbyshire’s Chinese offspring don’t think of the USA as home. His daughter is an Obummer voter so we see where her racial ties lead. The son had problems and needed to be straightened out by the US Army. Derbyshire has been writing columns about some coalitions with black race realists. This is a sign of what his Chinese offspring are up to. His Chinese offspring know they are aliens.

  114. artichoke says:
    @Jim Christian

    Oh hell it looks like it. http://m.admissions.caltech.edu/content/class-profile

    When did that start? Caltech was better because it hadn’t followed MIT down that road.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  115. artichoke says:
    @Thomm

    Do you have any evidence for these assertions?

    What is a White Trashionalist anyway, is it a white person living in a poor part of Appalachia? Is it tautologically defined as a WN male or radical feminist female? Is it trivially (relative to your conclusion) defined as the set of American whites with IQ’s below say 75 i.e. a set worse than the set of all American blacks?

    By the way, I am sure that WN’s generally don’t have especially low IQ’s, because I’ve seen plenty of coherent comments and argumentation, well expressed, in support of their views. But the set of WN’s who declare themselves to be so publicly and identifiably may well be pretty dumb and/or gluttons for punishment.

    • Replies: @Thomm
  116. artichoke says:
    @Anon

    180 years ago there were no such things as income taxes, nor reporting income. So the comparison isn’t entirely apt. But if the Chinese ran a school for their own children, there’s probably the risk those kids would never acquire a native English accent, and their first-gen parents know it..

  117. @artichoke

    Steve Sailer pointed out that little tidbit awhile back. Love to see how many of the frosh make it out the other end. If it’s like female Naval Officers handed command of ships at sea, they won’t finish and also, they’ll leave a trail of destruction like all EEOC hires and appointments.

    EEOC is the end, the absolute end.

  118. Thomm says:
    @artichoke

    What is a White Trashionalist anyway, is it a white person living in a poor part of Appalachia?

    Most definitely not. Honest, hardworking, poorer whites are not ‘trash’ by any means. By contrast, a wastematter white can be the offspring of even educated, wealthy parents.

    The definition of ‘White Trashionalist’ and ‘Wigger’ and ‘Wigaboo’ changed around 1994, for a number of reasons too lengthy to get into here (the rape scene in Pulp Fiction was probably the catalyst).

    Is it tautologically defined as a WN male or radical feminist female?

    Just like we are the only race who produces hair other than black, we are also the only race that has a mechanism where all the waste matter collects into some designated wastebaskets (approx. 20% of the white population), for rapid expulsion. Income level has little correlation to which offspring will be a wastebasket vs. not.

    The extremely high variance within whites (the top 20% of white men are nearly supermen, and the top 20% of white women are a large portion of the few 8s, 9s, and 10s in the world), is explained by this. The bottom 20% of whites are extremely defective in every possible way. Homosexuals are just 3% of the general white population, but at least 25% of White Trashionalists (as Jack Donovan pointed out years ago).

    In the old days, the men of this race were the inept cannon fodder that cleared the way for better troops, and the women were often exiled as witches, etc. Nowadays, the men of this tier become White Trashionalists while the women become the fat bluehaired feminists.

  119. Thomm says:
    @myself

    Not the wealthiest, by any means. Those stay home, where they are the elite.

    Of course. The WN wiggers need to believe this fiction because the truth damages their snowflake egos.

    The Chinese who buy up pricey real estate in America and Australia don’t even occupy those homes themselves, and don’t even bother to rent it out to local white tenants. They typically buy a $5M property and just keep it locked, as a store of asset value.

  120. most Americans, if put to the question, would say that meritocracy—rewards proportional to one’s ability and effort—is an ideal; much more desirable, at least, than an aristocracy of birth.

    Agreed, but the core fallacy of Meritocrats is that the highest scorers on the test must be admitted, others rejected. Wrong! In most situations more applicants will have sufficient merit to succeed than places (seats) available. The only fair system is to choose by lottery from the excess number of qualified candidates.

    This will go some way towards thwarting the Tiger Moms who coach for the tests. The outcome will still be skewed towards those who are brighter and have greater aptitude. That’s real meritocracy — not automatically choosing the top scorers, but ensuring that all those who are good enough have a chance of being chosen.

    Conall Boyle author Lotteries for Education

  121. John,

    I like you as a writer, but I think your views hurt black people. They seem a little unwilling to take in all logical factors behind lack of ability, and lay the blame at race.
    Surely it’s possible that poor diet, lack of nutrients and education had a knock-on effect on race-based IQ. You have to admit, the lack of education for blacks (and their lack of balanced diet – sometimes forced, sometimes not as a result of enslavement) must have had some effect on intellect.

    The mean IQ of blacks and whites has risen roughly equivalently in the past century. I feel that the white IQ will level off, while the mean black IQ will rise (of course, adjusting for socio-economic status) to ‘white’ levels.

  122. res says:
    @Thomm

    White variance in quality is very high, and the bottom 20% of whites are even *lower* than the bottom 20% of blacks, even as the white median is very high.

    This is just dumb. White mean IQ is around 100 with an SD of 15. That means the 16th percentile for whites is about 85–the black mean. Thus the 20th percentile for whites is actual higher than the black mean.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS