The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
The Mask Is Off—Ruling Class Decides It’s OK to Hate White Anglo Gentiles
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
nytdreher

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

You maybe heard about the black law professor who published an op-ed in the New York Times expressing the anguish he claims to feel when teaching his kids, as he feels he should, that white people can’t be trusted, and blacks can’t be friends with them. [Can My Children Be Friends With White People?, by Ekow N. Yankah November 11, 2017]

The professor is Ekow N. Yankah. He teaches at Yeshiva University in New York City. To judge from his pictures, he’s a full-blood negro. Some commenters, in comment threads to articles about the op-ed, have speculated that the name as published is a pseudonym, on the grounds that “Ekow,” that’s e-k-o-w, is just a reversal of “woke,” which is the word currently used by Cultural Marxists to mean “fully compliant with the latest release of political correctness.”

I am wiser than those commenters. I know that in the West African nation of Ghana, it is a common thing for children to be named for the day of the week on which they were born. I was born on a Sunday: had I been Ghanaian, my name would be Kwasi, which means “Sunday”.

Well, Ekow means “Thursday.” Professor Yankah was born on a Thursday; and either he or his parents—or, much less probably, his grandparents—are Ghanaian. Or, just possibly, his parents are native American blacks practising West African onomastics.

His op-ed was widely circulated and generated much comment. Sample quote:

For many weary minorities, the ridiculous thing was thinking friendship was possible in the first place. It hurts only if you believed friendship could bridge the racial gorge.

Prof. Yankah [Email him] no longer believes that. Second sample quote:

I do not write this with liberal condescension or glee. My heart is unbearably heavy when I assure you we cannot be friends.

Third sample quote:

For African-Americans, race has become a proxy not just for politics but also for decency. White faces are swept together, ominous anxiety behind every chance encounter at the airport or smiling white cashier. If they are not clearly allies, they will seem unsafe to me.

You get the picture.

My own reaction to the op-ed was a yawn—and the reflection, which also showed up here and there in the comment threads, that if living an “unsafe” life among whites causes the professor such alienation and angst, and such fears for his offspring, perhaps he’d be happier in his, or his parents’, native country—where roughly every seventh person is named “Ekow.”

That reaction inspired the further thought, also visible in the comment threads, that while blacks who live in black countries like Ghana are risking their lives and their families’ life savings to escape to white countries, blacks who live in white countries express no gratitude for their good fortune.

Do these latter blacks ever themselves reflect on this contradiction? I doubt it.

But what made this dreary bit of hypocrisy—the guy is a law professor, for crying out loud: he drives a much better car than I do—what made it Radio Derb-worthy was a personal aspect.

One of the articles about the professor’s op-ed was by Rod Dreher in the American Conservative, November 12th. [NYT Op-Ed: White People Are Violent Racists]

I had a slight acquaintance with Rod during my early days at National Review. I recall him as a pleasant fellow, somewhat shy, of the type that, in conversation, pauses carefully to digest one’s question and think out an answer. Though I didn’t grasp it at the time, his writing shows him to be a deeply committed Christian with interesting ideas about the proper role and attitude of such people in developed early-21st-century society.

I mean, his ideas are interesting to people who find that kind of thing interesting. I confess I’m not one of those people; but that’s not Rod’s fault.

What is his fault, and what I herewith register my complaint about, is that in the November 12th article about Prof. Yankah’s op-ed, Rod posits an equivalence between that op-ed and my infamous 2012 article in Taki’s Magazine titled “The Talk: Nonblack Version”—the article that got me dropped as a contributor by National Review.

Here is Rod’s opening paragraph:

Back in 2012, John Derbyshire was fired by National Review for this column in Taki’s Magazine in which he listed the things he told his children so that they could protect themselves from black violence.

I note in passing the inaccuracy there in Rod’s saying that I was fired. Since I wasn’t an employee of National Review, I could not be fired. That may sound nitpicky, but Rod graduated from journalism school, and journalists are supposed to be punctilious about facts.

That aside, Rod’s opening paragraph is not objectionable. I do indeed want my kids to protect themselves from violence; and on all the statistics I know of, blacks are far more violent than non-blacks. It’s a thing kids ought to know. How will they know it if their parents don’t tell them?

What I object to in Rod’s piece: his then equating my article with Prof. Yankah’s. From Rod, quoting Prof. Yankah.

“Spare me platitudes of how we are all the same on the inside. I first have to keep my boys safe.”

That is the black version of what John Derbyshire said.

Sorry, but I think that gives a wrong impression. Rod reinforces that impression further on, when he notes that my piece, a white guy warning his kids about blacks, got me dropped, while Prof. Yankah’s piece—in a much more prestigious publication—will have no negative consequences for his career.

That’s a fair point in itself, and of course true; but it reinforces the equivalence between me and Prof. Yankah—an equivalence I strenuously resent and deny.

Yes, you can match up some of my sentences with some of the professor’s. But the overall tone and cast of my article are quite different from his.

He tells his kids they should not hope for real friendship with whites. Here’s what I wrote:

In that pool of forty million, there are nonetheless many intelligent and well-socialized blacks. (I’ll use IWSB as an ad hoc abbreviation.) You should consciously seek opportunities to make friends with IWSBs. In addition to the ordinary pleasures of friendship, you will gain an amulet against potentially career-destroying accusations of prejudice.

That not only is not parallel to anything Prof. Yankah wrote, it’s the opposite of what he wrote.

Again, while professor Yankah tells his kids to approach whites with wary suspicion, I tell mine, quoting myself again:

The default principle in everyday personal encounters is, that as a fellow citizen, with the same rights and obligations as yourself, any individual black is entitled to the same courtesies you would extend to a nonblack citizen.

I don’t know that that’s precisely contrary to anything Prof. Yankah wrote. But it surely bespeaks a frame of mind more generous and citizenly than his.

I await Rod’s tearful, groveling apology. In the meantime, I am starting a petition to urge Prof. Yankah to return to Ghana, where he and his children can be free at last, free at last from the horrid indignities of white supremacy.

Reading Professor Yankah’s op-ed, I had a thought I’ve had quite a lot recently: Where social antagonisms are concerned, we’re passing into an age of dropped masks.

ORDER IT NOW

What I mean is, the ill feelings of one social group for another—of urbanites for country folk, of women for men, of Democrats for Republicans, of blacks for whites, of Jews for gentiles—used to be expressed publicly in a much lower key than they are today. Prof. Yankah’s snarling at whites as untrustworthy hypocrites is an illustration of this. You wouldn’t have seen something like that in the New York Times when I started reading it 44 years ago; nor even, I think, ten years ago.

The current jihad against men supposed to have forced themselves on women is another illustration. No doubt women have always been annoyed by the attentions of men they find unattractive, like the porcine Harvey Weinstein (although the depth of that annoyance can be much modified by the appeal to the female id of male status, wealth, and power…depending of course on the woman).

Now all these complexities of the mating game, and the polite hypocrisies used to mask them, have been cast away. It’s now frank, open warfare.

Again, I am sure there have always been Jews who loathe and despise gentiles. But until recently it would have been unthinkable for one such to argue, in the pages of the New York Times again, that legacy American gentiles should be deported en masse to make room for Third World immigrants because the latter are more hard-working, law-abiding, smarter, religious, entrepreneurial, and fertile than those non-immigrant dullards. [Only Mass Deportation Can Save America, By Bret Stephens, June 16, 2017]

It’s true Bret Stephens [Email him] reveals, two thirds of the way through his article, “O.K., so I’m jesting about deporting ‘real Americans’ en masse.”

But then he immediately adds:”(Who would take them in, anyway?)” Which sort of nullifies the revelation.

Again, the mask has been dropped. Bret Stephens doesn’t do masks. Like Professor Yankah, just hates us white Anglo gentiles, and doesn’t care who knows it.

That’s the key point: He doesn’t care who knows it. He’s on the right side in our Cultural Revolution. It’s fine for blacks to insult white s, for women to insult men, for city slickers to insult flyover hicks, for Jews to insult gentiles.

The converses are not okay, in fact worse than not-okay. For a white to drop the mask of politeness and openly insult blacks—or even, as I found out, to just state true facts about them without malice—is considered an outrage.

Likewise, for a male to point out that a fair proportion of successful women in showbiz are cheap sluts, or that metropolitan liberals are often crass snobs, or that the percentage of obnoxiously ethnocentric jerks among American Jews is rather high, is the cue for a Two Minutes Hate against the speaker.

These petty resentments and animosities have always been present under the surface, of course. I’m just saying that now, where they are in line with the CultMarx narrative, they can be openly and freely expressed, and used to whip up pogroms against the offender groups: whites, men, gun owners, Trump supporters, gentiles.

I’m sure Chinese students of the mid-1960s often nursed resentments against their teachers, politicians, and other authority figures. Those resentments were kept in check by polite traditional restraints, though, as well as by the enforcers of a totalitarian state. But once Mao Tse-tung let loose the Red Guards, the targets of ordinary social resentment could be humiliated, beaten, and killed.

Our own Cultural Revolution has so far stopped at humiliation (and career-wrecking).

But I quietly wonder how much longer that will continue to be the case.

2010-12-24dl[1]

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by VDARE.com com:FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 524 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. blevene says:

    Rod Lehrer states you were fired from the National Review which you state is inaccurate. The biographical tag line of your article states, “This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him.” A wonderful line, but if you are going to continue to correct others who quote it you really must change it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /jderbyshire/the-mask-is-off-ruling-class-decides-its-ok-to-hate-white-anglo-gentiles/#comment-2083311
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. he percentage of obnoxiously ethnocentric jerks among American Jews is rather high,

    Especially on the Editorial Pages of the New York Times.

    It would benefit Mr. Yankah to teach that while friendship may not be “possible” a friendly acquaintance is pretty easy to accomplish especially if it revolves around good manners.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Olorin
    Agree. However I doubt that good manners is anywhere near the top of the list of qualifications for getting hired to teach at Yeshiva University.

    Or most other universities these days, for which being an obnoxious, contentious, ethnocentric, anti-white faux-Chosen (fauxsen?) is pretty much de rigueur for teaching positions and administrative sinecures.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Yan Shen says:

    One of the most insightful quotes I’ve read.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.

    Mr. Derbyshire will deny this equivalence noted now by at least 3 people on the basis that well strictly speaking his observations about blacks are factually correct. And he paid lip service to how obviously out of 40 million blacks in this country some of them are okay. I mean uh the Bell Curve suggests that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person, right?

    Yes, you can match up some of my sentences with some of the professor’s. But the overall tone and cast of my article are quite different from his.

    Ha ha ha. Anyone who’s semi-followed your writings over the years gets the clear and distinct impression that your big thing is warning all of us endlessly about the Black Menace. I mean when numerous outsiders, including those who aren’t particularly big fans of political correctness, reading your writings all come to the same conclusion, i.e. that you don’t seem to like blacks all that much, in the same way that Ta Nehisi Coates or Ekow Yankah give the clear and distinct impression that they don’t like white people that much, maybe it’s time to reassess whether or not your words are being misconstrued?

    If you don’t dislike blacks, then you’re probably doing a terrible job of conveying that fact by obsessing endlessly over them and the supposed Black Menace that’s coming for us all.

    That being said, the unfortunate thing is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get worshiped and feted by our PC society for obsessing endlessly over whites and the White Menace. If there was any justice in this world, we’d treat them the same way we would a John Derbyshire.

    Read More
    • Troll: Twinkie
    • Replies: @WJ
    Actually Derb is doing quite well. He has a substantial audience through Unz and other outlets.

    I doubt that he dislikes blacks. He is simply fatigued by the endless cultural inconsistency that shows the black community as the perpetual victim when, of course, they are victimizing members of other races at a vastly disproportionate rate. Police shootings are a good example. We have all read the analysis, white people on a Per capita basis are far more likely to be shot by police and of course, black men are basically 100 times more likely to be shot by a member of their own race than by a policeman. Interracial rape is another example.

    The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this "professor" is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa.
    , @boogerbently
    ...except, of course, that the FACTS overwhelmingly support Derbs arguments.
    , @Vinteuil
    This must be the tenth time you've retailed that silly quote.
    , @silviosilver
    My feelings about blacks generally range from "I don't like blacks much" to "God I hate n-words." What am I really hating though? I would say that, above all, it's their presence. I hate having blacks around. When there are no blacks around, I don't waste any time hating them. If I knew I could permanently get blacks out of my life, I'd happily wish them well. It's a strange kind of "hatred" to wish the people you "hate" well, isn't it? It's certainly strange if you compare this hatred to individuals that I hate. I don't wish such people well at all. If I were to wish anything about them, I would wish something bad to happen to them. I think this is an important distinction.

    If there are no blacks around, I might be feeling happy or I might be feeling sad, but the entry of blacks into that scene always makes it worse, never better, and the degree to which it's worse hinges on how many blacks are around. The first couple of blacks are inconsequential, but things start heading downhill very quickly. If a daytime scene becomes some twenty percent black, that's about the point that I start hating it. At night, it takes far fewer - by ten percent I'm definitely feeling it.

    I don't like asians much either, but the intensity of this dislike is monumentally less than that towards blacks. It's more a cold indifference than a dislike, and it takes an awful lot of asians being on the scene before I start feeling down. A scene can easily be fifty percent asian and I won't feel any heightened negative emotion, no matter how long I spend there. A scene can be over ninety percent asian and spending short periods in it doesn't bother me - which is something I could never say about blacks.

    Latinos are a very different matter. Racially, I'm not bothered by their presence at all. On the contrary, I actually like them. I hate the effects they have on society, but this is a rather abstract, contemplative hate, not something visceral, the way it is with blacks. Language is the main turn-off with Latinos. I can understand and speak basic Spanish, and I sometimes enjoy speaking/practicing it, but my Spanish is not nearly good enough to join in rapid fire conversations. So being surrounded by Spanish speakers is not a pleasant experience.

    Given the enormous social pressure to be "anti-racist," what I've written here surely makes me sound like a race-obsessed hater. People generally don't go into detail about their feelings on this issue, not even with trusted friends. It's just not done. This is quite remarkable when you think of what a huge role race plays in social life. I think the 'old school' model of white racist hate is responsible for this. Whites may have had very good reasons for feeling as they did, but the experience of this kind of racism was quite brutal to those on the receiving end of it. It has left a very bitter taste in people's mouths, and people rightly fear a return to that kind of society. Unfortunately, this is also people's idea of what a "racist society" would necessarily be like, which helps keep expression of racial feelings taboo (real racial feelings, I mean).

    Those of us who favor racial reform (pro-white racial reform, or at least anti-anti-white reform) should be very grateful that the internet has given us the opportunity to have these very important conversations. It's a great pity that pro-white racial reformers wasted so many years on stormfront-like nutzi stupidity, which is not only morally dubious, but from a practical standpoint has a snowball's chance in hell of ever eventuating. I am hopeful that a 'reasonable racism' can be achieved (and reflected in social policy). If it ever is, it will in large part be thanks to intelligent, considerate sites like unz.com and writers like Derb.

    , @SMK
    To equate JD and T. Coates is absurd and execrable. The paramount distinction is that JD is honest and realistic. Coates and his ilk are liars and/or psychotics, totally delusional, completely estranged from and impervious to objective reality. But JD is punished, condemned and traduced and vilified as a "racist" for his honesty and realism, not only by blacks and white left-liberals, but also by "cucks" like Dreher and neocons and mainstream Republicans, whereas Coates is rewarded, exalted and enriched, for his lies and delusions.
    , @RadicalCenter
    Hey, snarky little boy who mocks adults for recognizing reality: I have been physically assaulted by African-"Americans" twice, years apart, utterly unprovoked, with the attacker shouting anti white racist drivel each time. Each time the attacker was larger than I, and I'm not small, and I was alone (brave people, these).

    My wife and I have both been SPIT ON by African-"Americans" for having the temerity to wear political shirts they didn't like. One of them expressly threatened our very small children.

    My best friend, a slightly built and kind guy, was surrounded, spit on, hit in the head, robbed, mocked, seriously injured, and left terrified on a subway car floor in NYC years ago, again by African-"Americans." Nobody helped him, and African-"American" passengers sitting nearby laughed out loud as he was savaged. He has never felt safe again.

    My acquaintance in high school was raped by an African-"American" in a NJ city, which she was visiting to foolishly do volunteer work in a "disadvantaged" community.

    More broadly rather than anecdotally, official government crime statistics are overwhelming and consistent across decades and across regions. They show an epidemic of African violence against everyone not African, with whites as favorite victims, And disproportionally little such violence in the other direction by whites (like me) and Asians (like my wife) against Africans.

    When you speak in your sarcastic smarmy tones about the "supposed black menace", I know that you have no compassion in your heart for our fear and suffering or those of our families. There's nothing supposed about this menace, and I imagine you know that. Hope you get a taste of that "supposed" menace directly.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    It seems that Dreher is explicitly acknowledging that there is a double standard at work:

    John Derbyshire lost his job at a leading conservative magazine because he wrote a column on another website detailing his strategy for helping his children protect their Sino-Anglo bodies (Derb is a British-born man married to a Chinese-born woman) from violent black people. I didn’t see that Derb left NR editor Rich Lowry much choice but to fire him. Some things you simply cannot publish without serious consequence, even if they express honestly your fears, well-grounded or not. If you’re white, that is. But if you’re black, you can submit a column to The New York Times saying that all white people are violent racists unless proven otherwise, and that blacks should not be friends with whites, and it will be published, because that is what it means to be a right proper American liberal in 2017.

    It does seem that he is slightly undermining you, but it also seems that he wants to be on your side without fully saying so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thea
    Dreher is a coward.

    Unfortunately there are a lot of them in positions of influence and power.

    Cowards resent people who have the fortitude to stand up and say what they know to be true but are afraid to reveal. Dreher is more despicable than the NYT writers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Yan Shen says:

    Let me put it this way. Obsessing endlessly over the Black Menace, and then adding at the end that I obviously don’t mean that all black people are like that since the uh Bell Curve tells us that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person in this country is basically a slightly more intellectual way of saying that you couldn’t possibly dislike black people since a few of your best friends are in fact black.

    I think David Duke has a clear and profound obsession with the Jewish Menace but I can’t imagine that in actual life he literally hates every single Jewish person. In fact, he might very well point out that well some Jewish people here and there are okay, so I obviously didn’t mean 100% of them were like that. And uh damn, that Gal Gadot sure is a babe…

    It may not be an exact science like physics or chemistry, but given the social creatures that homo sapiens are, most of us have a relatively good sense of when someone has a positive or negative perception of someone else through their words and actions.

    In your case Mr. Derbyshire, I hate to break it to ya, the conclusion is that you don’t like black people all that much. Which honestly is fine. Unlike the rest of the PC police, I’m actually a huge believer in freedom of association and the right to like or not like whoever you want. I don’t think you’ve done anything particularly wrong, although given that you seem genuinely surprised by how others perceive your writings, it might not hurt to mention that to an outsider, you sure do seem like someone who likes obsessing over black people endlessly.

    The more egregious thing here though, which has also been duly noted by various others, is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get treated like they’re the second coming of Jesus Christ for basically doing more or less the same thing that the Derb does. That we treat race hustlers of different ethnicity so differently merely on the basis of their skin color seems quite contrary to the notions of fairness and equality that MLK so fervently fought for. And the fact that anyone could possibly think that anything Mr. Coates has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight is simply mind boggling…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Why do you use "uh?" Its really weird.
    , @Colleen Pater
    Your thinking is confused. You're young and brainwashed into thinking a certain way. groups have average behavior, individuals within groups vary. Its perfectly possible to take individuals as they come, while understanding what that individuals group is like.More importantly, what you understand about the group is theoretical, you can even hate the group and its just a concept, whereas how well you take the individual as they are is real. before you were born this was the test, since full stalinism the test is now can you not pretend but actually believe in a completely absurd opposite interpretation of an entire group to be made up of entirely perfect and identical individuals no matter what your lying eyes and ears see and hear. On average negroes are somewhere between an ape and a human, not a white but an average human say between a jungle asian and an ape. We all know this, the entire world know this to be an absolute fact, even the most far left cuck that ever lived knows this in his bones. We also know there's some really wonderful blacks, blacks we really love.I live among the worst sort of blacks but every day while seething at the disgraceful behavior I must endure among them I am also confronted by the reality of the really great blacks.In fact the person I loved most in the world was black, I have quite a few black friends. But sadly over the years i have had to conclude if I could push a button and all the blacks would disappear i would hesitate.

    People like yourself are responsible for this, responsible for what you would term my hatefulness, because Im sure you will simply dismiss the above as impossible to be true and the ranting of a hater, well yes i hate the black race in a sense, Im a dispassionate person so its really more accurate to say i have concluded the world simply cant afford to indulge its existence any more.But semantics. At some point we will all feel this way, because of people like you we will one day probably soon be in a civil war in large part about your race views vs mine.Your ilk has contrived a situation where i can no longer ignore the racial differences of people in far off lands and focus occasionally only on their cooking art religion culture and nations geography, instead i must seriously consider whether I can safely live as a minority among them ruled by them in fact.And of course the answer is no only whites can be trusted to rule over other races fairly, well fair in the white sense, in the tribal morality the rest of the races ascribe to its perfectly fair to exploit any weakness of the other. Now thats cool its actually how nature intended it and this is all us whites fault. we should never have started this experiment in fairness few of us wanted to at first.

    But hears the thing, its not just race, its ideology. At a certain point you realize this is a low level war now but it will lead to white genocide as surely as night follows day unless it becomes a hot war. And you non whites are not really the problem youre a biological weapon jews and goodwhites are using against whites. Now these jews and goodwhites are fucking idiots who think that once us bad whites are gone tey will be allowed to rule the world lolol yeah pretty incredibly stupid. But once you see this you really have to ask yourself can i be friends with a liberal, as long as they dont come right out and say they want me dead, if i think they don't consciously understand what the inevitable conclusion of their thinking is can i be friends with a liberal? many of them mean well almost all truly believe what they think is not only true and good but that it will have the best outcome for all.They are like the good blacks i meet every day the good asians and good muslims and jews. he thing is they may not know it but I do as the situation progresses they will always side with each other over my interest as they do know, those good non whites are always voting for more anti white politics while living on white generosity in white lands, they dont think anything of it and Im not supposed o either, im supposed to assume i can afford to be pushed a bit further and feel good about my trust in this insanity. Im not supposed to realize that at some point white instinct for self preservation will kick in and whites will do what all animals backed into a corner do they will fight and boeing whites they will win, and war being war it will be horrific and all you non whites will suffer and be pushed into the sea.And you have to wonder will the good whites and jews get away with it, will they be pushed into the sea too. will they ever say wow we were wrong to think that could work we are the ones who are responsible for all those deaths? Even a child could have predicted how that would end. I dont think i can be friends with the good whites and jews, they are capable of knowing better. you muds youre just following the prime directive, I get it i just wish the goodwhites got it, but an accident of evolution has prevented them from getting it, they need to be culled so they cant pass that on to any more whites. The jews they are interesting they are both tribal and know better, they need too be dealt with once and for all. they can never be allowed to live among us again.
    , @Father O'Hara
    A quick thought of little consequence,but Derbs oldest boy jumps out of airplanes for Uncle Sam. So you might think,"Ha,that guy can take care of himself!" But then you recall those stories that pop up,like a Marine with combat medal comes back from Bumfuckistan,gets shot by Negro at Mickey D's.
    Pretending a moral equivalence between Derb and this spear chucker (Sorry,uncalled for) is ridiculous. Preach on Rev. Derb!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Yan Shen says:

    Now anyone who claims that white Americans today are violent racists obviously would be wrong, statistically, sociologically, and morally, as uh someone else might well point out.

    I wonder though if an African American made that claim about white racism and violence anytime prior to say 1960 or 1970 would’ve been that far off the mark? In another post of mine elsewhere on this blog, I argued that one of the reasons why all of us are having to suffer through the madness of our politically correct and quite frankly batshit crazy contemporary society, including having to see men like Coates endlessly feted as the second coming of Jesus Christ, is because of prior bad behavior on the part of whites in this country, what with slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan and the likes. This prior bad behavior is precisely the reason why all of us will now hear till the End of Time that racism and privilege are what’s holding back blacks today. If only whites back in the day would’ve acted like decent human beings towards blacks instead of obviously discriminating against them, then the success or failure of blacks would be upon their own shoulders and we wouldn’t endlessly have to hear all sorts of convoluted excuses for their behavior. It’s kind of like how the prior extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now all of us will have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till the End of Time.

    How many other sane and good things have been ruined and taken away from the rest of us good folks in this country because of this prior bad behavior on the part of whites? One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime is one of those big things that few very media outlets will have an honest discussion about. And in a classic case of projection, East Asians are often slandered as being racist towards blacks when simply many of them have what I’ve described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality that couldn’t be further away from the kind of racial essentialism that characterizes so many blacks and whites in this country today.

    Read More
    • Troll: AndrewR
    • Replies: @Nick Granite
    Perhaps those "ignorant" segregationists of the Jim Crow era knew a thing or two about blacks that the walled off enlightened ones hadn't the slightest clue about. The two cultures separated by thousands of years could not be more different. In their own crude way they were correct in separation and I only say crude because it's the modern western era. Not so long ago tribes used to just wipe each other out in disagreement. Much like blacks are now wiping out those pesky successful white farmers in S Africa.
    , @TTSSYF
    I doubt anyone here much cares what you think or write. It's a whole lot of sanctimonious nothing.
    , @renfro
    '' One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness''


    After a life time of having an even keel toward races and judging people as individuals I am all out of fairness and sympathy.
    All I have to say now is if you don't like it go back to Asia.
    , @Epochehusserl
    Black people had been enslaving each other for as far back as records go. Around the period of time when the country was founded, ie late 18th century, other people were enslaving white people (see the Crimean Khanate). The very idea that you are putting into your head that slavery could be considered wrong comes from WASPs the people who founded the country. Whites didnt institute slavery. As far as Jim Crow, it didnt exist everywhere. Is it worse than what we have now? Tossing out the results of standarized tests because a judge doesnt like the results? Sending people to college who cant do college level work? Preventing businesses from testing employees because the whole issue has been politicized thereby forcing young people to take on loans? Listening to civil rights activists who go on about how it is outrageous that blacks were considered inferior in the same breath that they demand lowered standards for their group?
    , @Father O'Hara
    I am so sorry,dear Asian Prince,that this country is not all it could have been,and should've been,for you. My most 'umble apologies.
    Again,tho,if you're not happy,get the Fuck out!!!
    , @boogerbently
    I think the creators and supporters of " slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan" are looking particularly prescient, especially given the advantage of hindsight.
    , @Sam J.
    "...Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime..."

    Oh so now Whites are responsible for Black on Asian violence? This is why I don't want any more races of any sort, especially Asians, imported into the country. Just more aggrieved anti-Whites.

    The other evils he mentioned have ready explanations. The KKK was a matter of survival for Whites after the War of Northern Aggression. Confederate soldiers, damn near everyone, weren't
    allowed to vote. They lost their civil rights. So the whole entire legislatures of the South looked exactly like, Detroit. The whole evil stew was supported by Northern troops placed in the South. Filled with Scalawags, carpet baggers and Negros who proceeded to loot the already stricken South. After a decade or so of this the White Men decided enough was enough and formed the KKK. Actually a guerilla war contingent against turning the whole South into today's equivalent of Detroit. It worked. The North decided they didn't want a guerilla war and left. If Detroit had been smart they would have formed their own KKK and they wouldn't be destroyed like they are today. Segregation, the same. Look at Baltimore Maryland where section 8 and constant criminal attacks on Whites drives them out. With segregation there's none of that. Think of how many people paid for their little houses all their lives and then HAD to move or be killed by Blacks.

    As for a lot of Blacks being good people. Yes true but what's in it for me to hang out with them and find out whether this is true of "this particular" Black person or not? Nothing. I can hang out with Whites and be MUCH less likely to be involved in any sort of pozzed Black behavior. I don't have to explain myself or spend all my time trying to heal whatever animosities Blacks have. I'm polite to Blacks and publicly treat them the same way I want to be treated but I want nothing to do with them. There's no percentage in hanging around with Blacks. If this is hate, then so be it.

    I don't remember where I got this comment but I saved it and it about sums the situation up better than anything else I've seen.

    “White people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.”
    , @AnotherDad

    How many other sane and good things have been ruined and taken away from the rest of us good folks in this country because of this prior bad behavior on the part of whites? One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime is one of those big things that few very media outlets will have an honest discussion about. And in a classic case of projection, East Asians are often slandered as being racist towards blacks when simply many of them have what I’ve described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality that couldn’t be further away from the kind of racial essentialism that characterizes so many blacks and whites in this country today.
     
    Whites reacting to black violence, low-IQ, impulsiveness and not wanting to be around blacks -- racists!

    Asians reacting to black violence, low-IQ, impulsiveness and not wanting to be around blacks -- victims!

    Most eregious
     
    "Egregious" ... seriously--you poor dears.

    "Most egregious" ... "Most"? ... there's actually a list?

    Man being an Asian immigrant sounds rough. Being yanked from your families and homeland.
    Being piled into the slave ships. Being sent to work in the cane fi ... uh ... the software office cubicles.

    Maybe try looking up "egregious".

    I'll help you out. The Asian immigrant experience taken as unitary Confucian whole by definition can not be "egregious" or even anywhere near it--unless you're all nuts. You are doing it by choice. The baseline is "your life in your own nation". Since Asians continue to want to leave their own nations and come to America, the Asian experience in America is obviously by definition quite positive.

    Confucian

    The proper "Confucian" reaction for Asian immigrants should be gratitude to the white people who have built a nation so far superior to your own, that you have chosen to ditch yours to join it.

    I understand that Chinese culture is not big on the whole "thank you" concept--seeing it as phony formality. Rather--as I understand it, your Confucian obligation is to return the favor. Which for immigrants is basically beyond their reach. But the best alternative for Asian immigrants would be throwing in firmly with white people to oppose the wrecking and dismantling of their nation. But as you are in the West now saying something like "Thank you for creating a superior nation to our own and letting us live in it" would be pleasant to hear.
    , @TWS
    If you were a real American you'd know the answer to your question. You have to go back.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Howard Zinn explains how the top two or so % rich people in the USA are able to rule because they cause antagonisms between the 98% or so not rich.
    I fear Brussels has the same policy in the still existing member states.
    Lagerfeld, a well known fashion designer in Germany, probably jewish, now accuses Merkel of letting in the enemies of jews.
    Belgium is waking up.
    In a short time two serious riots in Brussels, when police appears they are attacked immediately.
    Cars demolished, shop windows thrown in, looting, just because a French rapper on social media asked to come together.
    Swedish police now is being equipped with special microphones, that can detect gunshots between other noise.
    Today Dutch blacks again will try to disturb the old Dutch Sinterklaas children festivity, because of his Black Petes.
    They are unable to see that Pete is black of soot, Pete reminds them of their slavery history, they say.
    Great developments.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ia

    Lagerfeld, a well known fashion designer in Germany, probably jewish,
     
    Nah.

    http://ethnicelebs.com/karl-lagerfeld
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Amasius says:

    I didn’t do any more than skim this African’s screed, but still I must ask: What the hell is he even talking about? Why would it ever be “unsafe” to be friends with White people? What are they going to do, rob or rape you? Trick you into putting your hands up so they can shoot you in the back? The whole notion is just plain stupid. They dressed him in a suit and he’s learned to ape (no mean pun intended) the intonation of Whites, but he has an 87 IQ at best, I swear.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TTSSYF
    Totally agree. The words are recognizable as English, but the thoughts are pure gibberish. Just like what Coates writes.
    , @Truth
    Why would it ever be “unsafe” to be friends with White people? What are they going to do, rob or rape you? Trick you into putting your hands up so they can shoot you in the back?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxttPzq5A18
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Realist says:

    What is amazing is how compliant whites are to grab their socks. There is no other race as willing to be annihilated .

    Read More
    • Replies: @ia
    Western whites aren't going to stand a chance when their enemies assume power. It'll be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sad.
    , @Carroll Price
    Whites weren't always that way, but 140 years of unrelenting Yankee propaganda has made them that way.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.

    Derbyshire is again repackaging himself. Last week he was a “philosemite,” or an “anti antisemite.” But I guess once you are established in the punditry business, you’ve got a sort of tenure.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Dreher's problem is not that he isn't a 'committed Christian'. It's that he is abnormally other-directed and emotional and has a seriously deficient sense of honor. His social advocacy is a function of his issues (which appear to include anxiety and mood disorders, among other things). He has a considerable history of affiliation and disaffiliation and his default mode is one of accusation (commonly contra people with whom he was once associated). His most recent set of perigrinations incorporated moving back to his home town (pop. 1,700) coincident with his sister's illness and death, proclaiming loudly he would never leave, then decamping to the state capital after his father's death. (It's a reasonable wager than he's no longer on speaking terms with a run of people in his home town, and that's affecting his kids).
    , @Anonymous

    Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.
     
    Funny, a devout Christian guy like John Lennox (University of Cambridge [MA, MMath, PhD]; University of Oxford [MA, DPhil]), Emeritus Professor of Mathematics at University of Oxford, writes books on God, Science, and Christianity like, Determined to Believe: The Sovereignty of God, Freedom, Faith, and Human Responsibility.

    And guys like areligious, naturalist Derb (University College London; University of London), computer programmer and social science commentator, writes books like, Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics.

    , @Jake
    Derbyshire indeed has gotten away with a great deal for much longer than would a guy named Ryan O'Regan (especially if he were known to be a devout Catholic) or Andrew Jackson Calhoun (especially if he were known to be a devout Southern Baptist with an interest in Scots-Irish cultural heritage which he knew was NOT some branch of WASP).

    A WASP atheist/agnostic, even when he is from the lower middle class/working class, is assumed to be at least largely acceptable to the forces of Progressivism, because those forces are first and foremost anti-Christ, anti-Christendom, and anti any national/regional/linguistic group of white Christians who are decidedly conservative culturally or religiously in terms of historic Christendom.


    WASP culture is the antithesis of conservative in terms of historic Christendom.
    , @Jake
    As for Rod Dreher: he is so filled with tenderness for blacks that they are very much for him a Scared Cow race of victims.

    That position is Liberal, not Christian. I doubt Dreher has ever allowed himself to meditate theologically, but if he did, and has the mental capacity, he would recognize that his racial attitudes fit with Liberal denial of Original Sin, but just for blacks. Dreher's racial views are best understood if you think of blacks being almost immaculately conceived free of Original Sin, while whites, or at least Southerners, got all the extra Original Sin blacks did not get.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Jason Liu says:

    I thought you folks would be glad at the thought of segregating your kids from other races

    Read More
    • Replies: @NoWeltschmerz
    If you're foolish enough to believe that you write an article in a major newspaper about a private decision with no ulterior motives then your "argument" might have had some validity. The point many commentators are making is the rank hypocrisy of a newspaper publishing an article by a black African claiming that American whites are somehow not to be trusted. If he doesn't permit his children to have white friends, with whom will they be friends? Does he live in a predominantly lower class black neighborhood? I bet he doesn't. Do Jewish people count as white in his mind, I bet they don't (employed at Yeshiva U. for crying out loud). Is he even serious about what he writes? Probably not. Does it get someone of whom no one has ever heard attention? Indeed it does. Is this a coincidence? I'll leave it to you to decide.

    You know, someone whose comment history suggests, shall we say, a certain affinity for the Chinese Communists really ought to know that often times newspaper articles can't be taken at face value.
    , @ia
    Most people here aren't white nationalists. They aren't even identarians. They're civic nationalists.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. fnn says:

    An eyewitness (novelist Andy Nowicki) reflects on Cville after three months:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  13. unit472 says:

    Fortunately ‘peak social outrage’ occurs early in life and is most acute during one’s college years. While liberal arts faculties are insulated from economic reality their students are not and student loans instantly transforms the twenty something SJW into a debt serf upon graduation.

    As these student/SJW transition into debt serfdom in our moribund economy they will find they don’t have a lot of contact with the ‘elites’ and the ‘elites’ don’t care what they think anyway. If you can’t pony up several hundred dollars to attend a Congressional fundraiser you aren’t going to even be in the same room as a political leader much less get your hands on him. Business elites are even harder to reach as they don’t ‘do’ public events.

    As long as this situation holds true ( and it will hold true for as long as the elites can maintain it) the only representative of ‘the Establishment’ the average citizen will ever meet is the cop.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    On the other hand, if those SJWs want to go 'organizing' (i.e., rioting), Papa Soros will probably be willing to at least guarantee them a living through one of his many, many fine 'charities'.
    , @Wally
    Indeed, that is the poetic justice in so much of this.

    The precious little posers will get a cold douche of reality once they leave nursery school.

    They asked for it.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Just when I thought I couldn’t hate myself any more than I already do…

    What if he’s driven to move to Africa??

    I can’t bear to think of it.

    Read More
    • LOL: Seamus Padraig
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. [please delete the first error-filled post ... It posted prematurely, and there was no edit feature]

    Instead of a petition to get him and his family to go back, maybe you should start a GoFundMe or other crowdsource page to raise the capital to induce him to do it of his own free will. I wonder what his price point might be. Certainly enough for him to live like a king.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. LondonBob says:

    Just be thankful Trump won, all signs ares that era of pretense is over, just imagine oif these people had the full power of the government behind them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. Art says:

    Again, the mask has been dropped. Bret Stephens doesn’t do masks. Like Professor Yankah, just hates us white Anglo gentiles, and doesn’t care who knows it.

    That’s the key point: He doesn’t care who knows it. He’s on the right side in our Cultural Revolution. It’s fine for blacks to insult white s, for women to insult men, for city slickers to insult flyover hicks, for Jews to insult gentiles.

    WOW!

    Mass Kudos – John Derbyshire

    You get respect!

    Think Peace — Art

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62

    Mass Kudos – John Derbyshire

    You get respect!
     

    Hey, Art. Just as one swallow does not make a Spring, one article in which the author drops a few "truth crumbs" does not make the man The Real Deal.

    Recall that he has openly admitted to being "terrified of offending the Jews," as it may be "career-wrecking."

    If he were the Real Deal he would have given this article a more truthful title, e.g.,


    The Mask Is Off—The Jewish Ruling Class Decides It’s OK to Hate White Anglo Gentiles
     
    Also, rather than referring to it as a Cultural Revolution in this sentence:

    Our own Cultural Revolution has so far stopped at humiliation (and career-wrecking).
     
    he should have used the more accurate phrase of Counter Counter-Cultural Revolution as it would highlight that the present conflict is a reaction to the Counter Cultural Revolution of the 1960s. By referring to it by its proper name, he would have highlighted the source for these politically correct ideas was the Jewish Frankfurt School, whose main goal was to ensure fascism never reared its ugly head in America, as it did in continental Europe, by, as one critic of Theodor Adorno's Authoritarian Personality put it, "treating the American people like inmates of an insane asylum." He could have highlighted that the entire effort of the domestic policy wing of The Lobby has been to eradicate any signs of antisemitism by pursuing two separate tracks:

    1. pushing to instill the poisonous ideology of political correctness
    2. pushing to open the gates wide open for mass immigration by working for close to 100 years to get the congress to pass a non-restrictionist immigration act which the finally succeeded to do in 1965

    Had he stated all these things in his article, I would've agreed with your assessment that he deserved to be regarded as a mensch.

    As things currently stand, however, I would say he has a long way to go before we can grant him that status.

    That said, this article was indeed a step in the right direction.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. John Reb says:

    The upcoming tv series “Confederate”, produced by a combo of Jews and Blacks, pretty much proves this. Check out this article about it.

    http://www.returnofkings.com/126374/new-tv-series-confederate-will-be-used-to-browbeat-and-humiliate-southern-whites

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    If a TV show can humiliate you, you probably don't have much self respect in the first place. This show will be no more than a Chihuahua yapping at the heels of a lion.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. karalan says:

    “Our own Cultural Revolution has so far stopped at humiliation (and career-wrecking). But I quietly wonder how much longer that will continue to be the case.”

    I’d like to see more people wake up to this reality – many have seen it coming for years now.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bleuteaux
    Does it need to be more, in today's age? We have an almost totally globalized society. Career annihilation, social media annihilation, for transgressing the zeitgeist can pretty easily end a person's ability to feed himself and his family. We don't really have local economies, any more. It's hard to simply disappear into a local company that operates independently of the larger, global society. Piss off the right people and one is looking at, at best, minimum wage work, probably heavy manual labor.

    When you really think about it, it's actually a lot more efficient than killing people. Violence and revolutions are messy processes, and they ruin the economic cash cow that keep people wealthy. Better to ostracize a man into oblivion and let him kill himself through excruciating, useless work, substance abuse, and near-total social isolation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Renoman says:

    Birds of a feather, no big news here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. What’s this? Talk of the Jews? Is John Derbyshire becoming ekow on the JQ?

    Read More
    • LOL: utu
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. Heros says:

    Derb may have been banished from “good” company for racism, but he still dances the anti-semite tight rope. He has railed against “anti-semites” in the past as good as any semite could.

    Well with this piece he may end up throwing away his anti-semite amulet. We’ll have to see where he stands after new revelations about the depravity of gods chosen arise. Invasion of Lebanon, Mossad/Saudi connections, 9/11, who knows. Just their associating anything “right wing” with “nazi” and then banning/shutting it down is becoming obvious.

    Interestingly, Stephens recent opinion piece was about how being a christian zionist is not sufficient to protect one from charges of being an anti-semite because, as Stephens claims, the Nazi’s were anti-semite Zionists. Its just like how global warming became climate change became climate disruption. Gentiles lose, no matter what. The truth is that as far as gods chosen people are concerned, all gentiles are anti-semites unless they have a written indulgence from some rabbi, so why even consider these charges relevant to anything except their time proven lust for revenge. Derb seems to be slowly figuring this out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. Art Deco says:

    I have a suspicion that the ‘obnoxious ethnocentric jerk’ is a New York type. I don’t think I’ve ever encountered it in meatworld myself. You see it in print in the writings of Messrs. Peretz, Wieseltier, Maccoby, Goldhagen, Stephens, Kertzer, and, at one remove, Neil Kozodoy, Podhoretz pere and Podhoretz fils. That’s New York, Boston, and Washington, emphasis on New York.

    Prof. Yankah’s accent makes plain he’s American-born. His parents are Ghanian. What’s odd about his advocacy is that he actually has no family history in the American South and his wife is white. He’s begging for a big ‘screw you, dad’ from his children (who have grown up in Manhattan in far tidier and pleasant circumstances than they might have known ca. 1975).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    More than likely his kids agree with him.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Art Deco says:
    @Bro Methylene
    Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.

    Derbyshire is again repackaging himself. Last week he was a "philosemite," or an "anti antisemite." But I guess once you are established in the punditry business, you've got a sort of tenure.

    Dreher’s problem is not that he isn’t a ‘committed Christian’. It’s that he is abnormally other-directed and emotional and has a seriously deficient sense of honor. His social advocacy is a function of his issues (which appear to include anxiety and mood disorders, among other things). He has a considerable history of affiliation and disaffiliation and his default mode is one of accusation (commonly contra people with whom he was once associated). His most recent set of perigrinations incorporated moving back to his home town (pop. 1,700) coincident with his sister’s illness and death, proclaiming loudly he would never leave, then decamping to the state capital after his father’s death. (It’s a reasonable wager than he’s no longer on speaking terms with a run of people in his home town, and that’s affecting his kids).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    Dreher’s problem is not that he isn’t a ‘committed Christian’. It’s that he is abnormally other-directed and emotional and has a seriously deficient sense of honor.
     
    You're one to talk, drone.
    , @Hibernian
    Baton Rouge is a stone's throw from Mr. Dreher's home town. They're both in SE Louisiana.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. WJ says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the most insightful quotes I've read.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     
    Mr. Derbyshire will deny this equivalence noted now by at least 3 people on the basis that well strictly speaking his observations about blacks are factually correct. And he paid lip service to how obviously out of 40 million blacks in this country some of them are okay. I mean uh the Bell Curve suggests that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person, right?

    Yes, you can match up some of my sentences with some of the professor’s. But the overall tone and cast of my article are quite different from his.
     
    Ha ha ha. Anyone who's semi-followed your writings over the years gets the clear and distinct impression that your big thing is warning all of us endlessly about the Black Menace. I mean when numerous outsiders, including those who aren't particularly big fans of political correctness, reading your writings all come to the same conclusion, i.e. that you don't seem to like blacks all that much, in the same way that Ta Nehisi Coates or Ekow Yankah give the clear and distinct impression that they don't like white people that much, maybe it's time to reassess whether or not your words are being misconstrued?

    If you don't dislike blacks, then you're probably doing a terrible job of conveying that fact by obsessing endlessly over them and the supposed Black Menace that's coming for us all.

    That being said, the unfortunate thing is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get worshiped and feted by our PC society for obsessing endlessly over whites and the White Menace. If there was any justice in this world, we'd treat them the same way we would a John Derbyshire.

    Actually Derb is doing quite well. He has a substantial audience through Unz and other outlets.

    I doubt that he dislikes blacks. He is simply fatigued by the endless cultural inconsistency that shows the black community as the perpetual victim when, of course, they are victimizing members of other races at a vastly disproportionate rate. Police shootings are a good example. We have all read the analysis, white people on a Per capita basis are far more likely to be shot by police and of course, black men are basically 100 times more likely to be shot by a member of their own race than by a policeman. Interracial rape is another example.

    The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this “professor” is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa.

    Read More
    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @helena
    "The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this “professor” is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa."

    Not so. The Narrative clearly states that colonisation of Africa disrupted social development i.e. Europeans robbed Africans of the development that would have otherwise been theirs. And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin.
    , @macilrae

    black men are basically 100 times more likely to be shot by a member of their own race than by a policeman.
     
    I was listening to a debate on BBC Radio 4 today and there was one participant - an extremely articulate Englishman - who was allowed to put this point successfully (as I saw it). He challenged the strident pro-BLM panel member on just where the problem lay - quoting the statistics of the relative numbers of deaths - as well as those from police shootings where the person shot did, or did not, carry a gun (twenty or so did not I think).

    Later in the program this same gentleman mentioned the small town in Germany which has been obliged to take in a large number of all-male Somalis, speaking no German and with no useful skills, and pointed out that these were clearly economic migrants who had abandoned their women and children to find a better life in Germany. He asked wherein lay the sense of this and, if all Africans in the same situation were permitted to stay in Europe, how could that be sustainable?

    To hear this on the BBC (which I am thinking of as "The Africa Channel" these days) was quite refreshing.

    , @forgottenpseudonym
    He may have zero slave lineage, but tgere a good chance that he has slave owner lineage.
    , @MBlanc46
    You said it, so I don’t have to. You said it better, too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. John

    They won’t be happy until we are chattel slaves on Ophra Winfrey’s Plantation.

    The AltRight strategy must be to trigger the Democrats into extreme anti-white race hate with images of blue-eyed-blond-hair young Hhuwhite Families with Hhuwhite children…..

    A CIVIL WAR IN AMERICA=A RACE WAR IN AMERICA……Think about it Hhuwhite Folks…

    Muslim “Americans” will never be forced by the biological mutant Rachel Maddow to bake a wedding cake for two gay bikers who want to exchange their wedding bowels at the Epischopal Church right next to Saint Patricks…..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. conatus says:

    Great piece!
    From School Ties, a 1992 movie, to Mad Men, Anglos are portrayed as oppressive snots, lording it over the rest of America with their insidiously overpolite ethnic ties(project much?).

    And I always wondered why this book

    http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674013032

    The Rise and Fall of Anglo-america, fell stillborn from Harvard’s press? Few if no reviews in the mainstream?
    Perhaps “the Fall” aspect is better left unremarked upon so our overlords could still have the dying Anglo horse to whip in the future?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. Thea says:
    @Anonymous
    It seems that Dreher is explicitly acknowledging that there is a double standard at work:

    John Derbyshire lost his job at a leading conservative magazine because he wrote a column on another website detailing his strategy for helping his children protect their Sino-Anglo bodies (Derb is a British-born man married to a Chinese-born woman) from violent black people. I didn’t see that Derb left NR editor Rich Lowry much choice but to fire him. Some things you simply cannot publish without serious consequence, even if they express honestly your fears, well-grounded or not. If you’re white, that is. But if you’re black, you can submit a column to The New York Times saying that all white people are violent racists unless proven otherwise, and that blacks should not be friends with whites, and it will be published, because that is what it means to be a right proper American liberal in 2017.
     
    It does seem that he is slightly undermining you, but it also seems that he wants to be on your side without fully saying so.

    Dreher is a coward.

    Unfortunately there are a lot of them in positions of influence and power.

    Cowards resent people who have the fortitude to stand up and say what they know to be true but are afraid to reveal. Dreher is more despicable than the NYT writers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @40 Acres and A Kardashian
    Indeed. Dreher is the Queen of the Cucks.

    It's obvious from reading him consistently that, unlike many ordinary people he knows all about the Jews and what they've done/are doing to this country. He also knows, like everyone in America, that the idea that blacks are in any sense equal to whites is a gigantic lie. Because from time to time he writes things that reveal just how much he knows. But a few days later, either after realizing himself he'd said too much, or been called out by one of his cuck fans, he'll post an over the top rant about the evil of racism or anti-semitism or homophobia.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Lil Roddy will throw anyone and everyone under the bus as long as he can signal his virtue and get invited to the right parties on his book tours.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  30. @John Reb
    The upcoming tv series "Confederate", produced by a combo of Jews and Blacks, pretty much proves this. Check out this article about it.

    http://www.returnofkings.com/126374/new-tv-series-confederate-will-be-used-to-browbeat-and-humiliate-southern-whites

    If a TV show can humiliate you, you probably don’t have much self respect in the first place. This show will be no more than a Chihuahua yapping at the heels of a lion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TTSSYF
    If it were one TV show, I would agree. But it isn't. It's just one more part of a much larger, coordinated effort. One might even refer to it as part of a vast, Left-wing conspiracy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. @Yan Shen
    Now anyone who claims that white Americans today are violent racists obviously would be wrong, statistically, sociologically, and morally, as uh someone else might well point out.

    I wonder though if an African American made that claim about white racism and violence anytime prior to say 1960 or 1970 would've been that far off the mark? In another post of mine elsewhere on this blog, I argued that one of the reasons why all of us are having to suffer through the madness of our politically correct and quite frankly batshit crazy contemporary society, including having to see men like Coates endlessly feted as the second coming of Jesus Christ, is because of prior bad behavior on the part of whites in this country, what with slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan and the likes. This prior bad behavior is precisely the reason why all of us will now hear till the End of Time that racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today. If only whites back in the day would've acted like decent human beings towards blacks instead of obviously discriminating against them, then the success or failure of blacks would be upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't endlessly have to hear all sorts of convoluted excuses for their behavior. It's kind of like how the prior extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now all of us will have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till the End of Time.

    How many other sane and good things have been ruined and taken away from the rest of us good folks in this country because of this prior bad behavior on the part of whites? One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime is one of those big things that few very media outlets will have an honest discussion about. And in a classic case of projection, East Asians are often slandered as being racist towards blacks when simply many of them have what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality that couldn't be further away from the kind of racial essentialism that characterizes so many blacks and whites in this country today.

    Perhaps those “ignorant” segregationists of the Jim Crow era knew a thing or two about blacks that the walled off enlightened ones hadn’t the slightest clue about. The two cultures separated by thousands of years could not be more different. In their own crude way they were correct in separation and I only say crude because it’s the modern western era. Not so long ago tribes used to just wipe each other out in disagreement. Much like blacks are now wiping out those pesky successful white farmers in S Africa.

    Read More
    • Replies: @David
    I really agree with this.

    There's a book called A Fools Errand, by One of the Fools, a fictitious account of reconstruction and the beginning of Jim Crow and the KKK published in 1879. The novel garnered the endorsement of hundreds of newspapers and was extremely popular, selling in the hundreds of thousands.

    In the book, southern whites are depicted a merely malevolent. The carpetbaggers as angelic if naive regarding the incorrigibility of Southrons. A black is never shown doing anything that could, at least in tiny part, justify the white reaction to liberated blacks.

    However, if you search "negro" in newspapers of the time, blacks are constantly depicted as getting into legitimate legal trouble for violent behavior.

    As part of the plot, the narrator, having served in the Union Army, moves to the South after the war. He uses a local connection to rig the auction of a plantation so he can acquire it at a impossibly low price, cheating its southern (and so evil) owner of its fair price. But the narrative presents this as an unimpeachable act, not the cause of legitimate grievance on the part of locals.

    The narrative we live in now, of goodwhites vs badwhites, and cherubic, moral-agency-free blacks, was being strongly pushed from the very beginning.
    , @Dissident
    Perhaps those “ignorant” segregationists of the Jim Crow era knew a thing or two about blacks that the walled off enlightened ones hadn’t the slightest clue about. The two cultures separated by thousands of years could not be more different.

    Why did those Southerners import Africans into America as slaves in the first place? Could said whites have not known enough to realize that move could not end well? Incredibly short-sighted, no?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. @unit472
    Fortunately 'peak social outrage' occurs early in life and is most acute during one's college years. While liberal arts faculties are insulated from economic reality their students are not and student loans instantly transforms the twenty something SJW into a debt serf upon graduation.

    As these student/SJW transition into debt serfdom in our moribund economy they will find they don't have a lot of contact with the 'elites' and the 'elites' don't care what they think anyway. If you can't pony up several hundred dollars to attend a Congressional fundraiser you aren't going to even be in the same room as a political leader much less get your hands on him. Business elites are even harder to reach as they don't 'do' public events.

    As long as this situation holds true ( and it will hold true for as long as the elites can maintain it) the only representative of 'the Establishment' the average citizen will ever meet is the cop.

    On the other hand, if those SJWs want to go ‘organizing’ (i.e., rioting), Papa Soros will probably be willing to at least guarantee them a living through one of his many, many fine ‘charities’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. There are Europeans and non-Europeans, Whites and non-whites.

    Let’s simplify the nomenclature.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  34. Rod Dreher is basically a dud–I call him Dud Dreher, in fact. The only thing he really cares about–and the only place where he ever dares challenge The Narrative–is on social issues. On every other topic, he’s just pointless. Since I’m not that much into social issues, I don’t bother with him to much anymore.

    Read More
    • Agree: German_reader
    • Replies: @Ron Unz

    Rod Dreher is basically a dud–I call him Dud Dreher, in fact. The only thing he really cares about–and the only place where he ever dares challenge The Narrative–is on social issues. On every other topic, he’s just pointless. Since I’m not that much into social issues, I don’t bother with him to much anymore.
     
    You may actually may be doing him a bit too much justice...

    If I remember correctly, Dreher's early career was heavily dependent upon his very vocal leading role in the Conservative Movement attacks on "Gay Marriage" proposals around the late 1990s or so.

    But then, maybe a dozen years later, a good fraction of all the conservative funding began coming from Neocons like Singer, who were ardent gay-rights activists and advocates for Gay Marriage, while Andrew Sullivan, founder of the Gay-Marriage movement, had became one of the most influential conservative-leaning media pundits. So all the prominent conservatives, including Dreher, soon switched sides and began supporting Gay Marriage, or at least not actively opposing it. For example, I remember when the leader of the biggest conservative anti-Gay Marriage organization suddenly announced he'd totally changed his mind, and publicly endorsed Gay Marriage.

    In Dreher's case, I seem to recall he wrote some column very mildly raising questions about the issue, then immediately issued a deep apology to Sullivan for any offence he might have possibly caused.

    (I hope I'm not getting any of my recollections a bit garbled here.)

    The key factor underlying much of this sort of thing is the extreme financial fragility of DC pundits and thinktankers, and their abject terror at risking the unemployment lines. Basically, if the CEO of Coke announces a new soft drink strategy, all his mid-level marketing people naturally get into line behind it, and the exact analogy is true of all these "mainstream opinion journalists."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. TTSSYF says:
    @Amasius
    I didn't do any more than skim this African's screed, but still I must ask: What the hell is he even talking about? Why would it ever be "unsafe" to be friends with White people? What are they going to do, rob or rape you? Trick you into putting your hands up so they can shoot you in the back? The whole notion is just plain stupid. They dressed him in a suit and he's learned to ape (no mean pun intended) the intonation of Whites, but he has an 87 IQ at best, I swear.

    Totally agree. The words are recognizable as English, but the thoughts are pure gibberish. Just like what Coates writes.

    Read More
    • Agree: Forbes
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. TTSSYF says:
    @Yan Shen
    Now anyone who claims that white Americans today are violent racists obviously would be wrong, statistically, sociologically, and morally, as uh someone else might well point out.

    I wonder though if an African American made that claim about white racism and violence anytime prior to say 1960 or 1970 would've been that far off the mark? In another post of mine elsewhere on this blog, I argued that one of the reasons why all of us are having to suffer through the madness of our politically correct and quite frankly batshit crazy contemporary society, including having to see men like Coates endlessly feted as the second coming of Jesus Christ, is because of prior bad behavior on the part of whites in this country, what with slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan and the likes. This prior bad behavior is precisely the reason why all of us will now hear till the End of Time that racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today. If only whites back in the day would've acted like decent human beings towards blacks instead of obviously discriminating against them, then the success or failure of blacks would be upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't endlessly have to hear all sorts of convoluted excuses for their behavior. It's kind of like how the prior extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now all of us will have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till the End of Time.

    How many other sane and good things have been ruined and taken away from the rest of us good folks in this country because of this prior bad behavior on the part of whites? One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime is one of those big things that few very media outlets will have an honest discussion about. And in a classic case of projection, East Asians are often slandered as being racist towards blacks when simply many of them have what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality that couldn't be further away from the kind of racial essentialism that characterizes so many blacks and whites in this country today.

    I doubt anyone here much cares what you think or write. It’s a whole lot of sanctimonious nothing.

    Read More
    • Agree: BenKenobi
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. TTSSYF says:
    @Chris Mallory
    If a TV show can humiliate you, you probably don't have much self respect in the first place. This show will be no more than a Chihuahua yapping at the heels of a lion.

    If it were one TV show, I would agree. But it isn’t. It’s just one more part of a much larger, coordinated effort. One might even refer to it as part of a vast, Left-wing conspiracy.

    Read More
    • Agree: Thea
    • Replies: @polskijoe
    The left wing conspiracy is called the "Open Conspiracy"

    it is related to Fabian Socialism (they also supported Lenin/Trotsky)
    and Modern Liberalism (left wing social, corporate money interests).

    there are two major internationalist movements:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_International
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_International
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. I don’t want to be around blacks. Blacks don’t want to be around me. Can we get an amicable divorce already?

    Funny how the State has made it so damned easy for two married parents to split up, yet forces two races with irreconcilable differences to be together.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Blacks don't want a complete divorce. They want your alimony payments--forever.
    , @Truth
    Northern Minnesotta is pretty white. Move.
    , @Sam J.
    That's a great comment.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. geokat62 says:
    @Art

    Again, the mask has been dropped. Bret Stephens doesn’t do masks. Like Professor Yankah, just hates us white Anglo gentiles, and doesn’t care who knows it.

    That’s the key point: He doesn’t care who knows it. He’s on the right side in our Cultural Revolution. It’s fine for blacks to insult white s, for women to insult men, for city slickers to insult flyover hicks, for Jews to insult gentiles.
     
    WOW!

    Mass Kudos - John Derbyshire

    You get respect!

    Think Peace --- Art

    Mass Kudos – John Derbyshire

    You get respect!

    Hey, Art. Just as one swallow does not make a Spring, one article in which the author drops a few “truth crumbs” does not make the man The Real Deal.

    Recall that he has openly admitted to being “terrified of offending the Jews,” as it may be “career-wrecking.”

    If he were the Real Deal he would have given this article a more truthful title, e.g.,

    The Mask Is Off—The Jewish Ruling Class Decides It’s OK to Hate White Anglo Gentiles

    Also, rather than referring to it as a Cultural Revolution in this sentence:

    Our own Cultural Revolution has so far stopped at humiliation (and career-wrecking).

    he should have used the more accurate phrase of Counter Counter-Cultural Revolution as it would highlight that the present conflict is a reaction to the Counter Cultural Revolution of the 1960s. By referring to it by its proper name, he would have highlighted the source for these politically correct ideas was the Jewish Frankfurt School, whose main goal was to ensure fascism never reared its ugly head in America, as it did in continental Europe, by, as one critic of Theodor Adorno’s Authoritarian Personality put it, “treating the American people like inmates of an insane asylum.” He could have highlighted that the entire effort of the domestic policy wing of The Lobby has been to eradicate any signs of antisemitism by pursuing two separate tracks:

    1. pushing to instill the poisonous ideology of political correctness
    2. pushing to open the gates wide open for mass immigration by working for close to 100 years to get the congress to pass a non-restrictionist immigration act which the finally succeeded to do in 1965

    Had he stated all these things in his article, I would’ve agreed with your assessment that he deserved to be regarded as a mensch.

    As things currently stand, however, I would say he has a long way to go before we can grant him that status.

    That said, this article was indeed a step in the right direction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    "That said, this article was indeed a step in the right direction."

    Indeed it is.

    And quite honestly I am surprised that step was taken.

    My guess: Derb is getting old and realizes that he cannot, in good conscience, completely ignore the Jewish question and retain integrity as a man who speaks the truth.

    I like Derb. But taking on the JQ is fraught with risks.

    And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.

    But their hatred for the goyim and consequent destructive behavior to European civilization has to be recognized and challenged if we are to prevent our nations from becoming Towers of Babel.

    Derb needs to be applauded for his efforts in this direction.

    I do not think the man is a coward. He is starting to emerge from the cave, albeit hesitantly.

    I expect more from him in the future.

    , @Art
    the percentage of obnoxiously ethnocentric jerks among American Jews

    geokat62,

    Derbyshire wrote some strong words – words the Jews will hate – will he recant?

    Maybe – maybe not – never the less - today his words are more than welcome. Maybe they will give someone else of note, a little backbone.

    Most of the comments are about the black/white angle – not about the Gentile/Jew angle of this article.

    Strange – the Blacks have no power in America and the Jews all the power in America – and people ignore the Jews – amazing.

    Think Peace --- Art

    p.s. Jew power is enforced by the Jew owned media.

    p.s. America is not America because of that.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Zionists are the worlds agent provocateurs and war mongers ie as long as they can get someone else to fight and die for their NWO, to see their plans for we goyim, please read The Protocols of Zion.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  41. @Yan Shen
    Let me put it this way. Obsessing endlessly over the Black Menace, and then adding at the end that I obviously don't mean that all black people are like that since the uh Bell Curve tells us that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person in this country is basically a slightly more intellectual way of saying that you couldn't possibly dislike black people since a few of your best friends are in fact black.

    I think David Duke has a clear and profound obsession with the Jewish Menace but I can't imagine that in actual life he literally hates every single Jewish person. In fact, he might very well point out that well some Jewish people here and there are okay, so I obviously didn't mean 100% of them were like that. And uh damn, that Gal Gadot sure is a babe...

    It may not be an exact science like physics or chemistry, but given the social creatures that homo sapiens are, most of us have a relatively good sense of when someone has a positive or negative perception of someone else through their words and actions.

    In your case Mr. Derbyshire, I hate to break it to ya, the conclusion is that you don't like black people all that much. Which honestly is fine. Unlike the rest of the PC police, I'm actually a huge believer in freedom of association and the right to like or not like whoever you want. I don't think you've done anything particularly wrong, although given that you seem genuinely surprised by how others perceive your writings, it might not hurt to mention that to an outsider, you sure do seem like someone who likes obsessing over black people endlessly.

    The more egregious thing here though, which has also been duly noted by various others, is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get treated like they're the second coming of Jesus Christ for basically doing more or less the same thing that the Derb does. That we treat race hustlers of different ethnicity so differently merely on the basis of their skin color seems quite contrary to the notions of fairness and equality that MLK so fervently fought for. And the fact that anyone could possibly think that anything Mr. Coates has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight is simply mind boggling...

    Why do you use “uh?” Its really weird.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TTSSYF
    I think it's a conscious effort to be annoying but very revealing of deep-seated anger, and flies in the face of these long-winded posts of phony earnestness.
    , @Hu Mi Yu

    Why do you (Yan Shen) use “uh?” Its really weird.
     
    It represents a pause to think. He chose his following words carefully and perhaps used a euphemism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Bro Methylene
    Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.

    Derbyshire is again repackaging himself. Last week he was a "philosemite," or an "anti antisemite." But I guess once you are established in the punditry business, you've got a sort of tenure.

    Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.

    Funny, a devout Christian guy like John Lennox (University of Cambridge [MA, MMath, PhD]; University of Oxford [MA, DPhil]), Emeritus Professor of Mathematics at University of Oxford, writes books on God, Science, and Christianity like, Determined to Believe: The Sovereignty of God, Freedom, Faith, and Human Responsibility.

    And guys like areligious, naturalist Derb (University College London; University of London), computer programmer and social science commentator, writes books like, Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Your making a stupid point...for one can be a social-cultural Christian-atheist-agnostic....as opposed to the anti-Christian social and cultural filth of the New Athiests such as the filthy cockroaches Christopher Hitchens and Monty Python’s Eric Idle....

    You have the 1,000 pound “bench press” view of intelligence....Intelligence doesn’t work like that....Intelligence has a nonsyntactical conceptual-fluid flowing-across the various domains of not well understood dimensions where human species intelligence can function operate...component-aspect to it...

    , @attilathehen
    "That was the second time the Ottomans reached Vienna, the first being in 1529 under Suleiman the Magnificent. On both occasions they were stymied." You posted this about Poland diversifying.

    Are you sad or happy Turkish Muslims were stymied in their jihad on Vienna?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Jake says:

    The proto-WASP Derbyshire is very late to the game.

    Derbyshire is a math nerd, so it he should realize the need to repeat essential formulas. WASP culture is the product of a Judaizing heresy: Anglo-Saxon Puritnaism.

    Any Judaizing heresy that comes to wield political power will produce philo-Semitic culture. Derbyshire has a long career of acknowledging that he – Mr English-born and raised WASP ‘paleoconservative’ – is a philo-Semite., one who simply does not understand the fear of Jews.

    WASP culture, under archetype WASP Oliver Cromwell, officially allied with Jews, taking Jewish money to wage war, including wars of cultural extermination, against non-WASP white Gentiles. Jews were legally allowed back into England and granted special rights and privileges denied to the vast majority of native British Isles Christians.

    Therefore, WASP culture has ALWAYS been about WASPs allying with Jews against Christendom and the peoples and cultures of historic Christendom. To be anti-Christendom is to be anti-white – even if the specific anti-Christendom leader/perpetrator is a Caucasian who feels he or she is Christian.

    We live in the end stage of that Judaizing heresy gaining control of a wealthy nation. And that end stage is suicidal.

    Read More
    • Replies: @40 Acres and A Kardashian

    Derbyshire has a long career of acknowledging that he – Mr English-born and raised WASP ‘paleoconservative’ – is a philo-Semite., one who simply does not understand the fear of Jews.
     
    That's only partly true. Yes, Derbyshire has written on several occasions about the fact that he generally likes Jews. But he's never said he "does not understand the fear of Jews." In fact, as someone else pointed out above, he understands very well that Jews are extremely powerful and any political pundit who dares criticize them regularly or forcefully will quickly have his career ruined. Like Joe Sobran.

    Yes, Derbyshire most certainly does understand the fear of Jews.

    What he claims not to understand isn't people who don't fear Jews, but people who don't like Jews.

    Whether he really means that or not, and whether he genuinely likes Jews by and large, who knows? He might, or he may just be afraid of Jews.

    , @attilathehen
    Jake, if I recall correctly, you're RCC and accept black/Asian priests-popes. Cuck pope Frannie is in the process of destroying Western Europe. You can't blame the WASPs/Jews for all our problems.
    , @Leading Edge
    Slightly off-topic, but on-topic in the big picture:

    Professor: Museum of the Bible Represents ‘Judeo-Christian Perspective,’ Leaves Out Other Religions

    “There are a number of prominent omissions that make it clear that it’s not a museum of the Bible as one might imagine it from a secular perspective,” Joel S. Baden, a professor of the Hebrew Bible at Yale University, told the New York Times. “They don’t do a good job of talking about whether parts of the Bible are historically accurate.”

    Baden added that he thinks the museum does not represent Islam and Mormonism to the same degree as other religions.


    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/19/professor-museum-bible-represents-judeo-christian-perspective-leaves-religions

    Perhaps the Bible Museum should change its name to Holocaust Museum II to be more inclusive.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    A Europe We Can Believe In

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-16/europe-we-can-believe

    Globalism turns Anglo-Saxons into Junglo-Saxons in Cuckrimas. Iconic power of Negro as the new Master of European land and wombs.

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/11/happy-sjwmas.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  45. wayfarer says:

    Diversity – Share It, Celebrate It, Embrace It.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. KenH says:

    I wonder, will Ekow N. Yankah be banned from Twitter and his videos demonetized on Youtube for his denunciation of whites? The problem with virtue signaling, pearl clutching, “race doesn’t matter” cucks like Dreher and his ilk is that they’ll dismiss Ekow Yankah’s as just the musings of only a small minority of blacks. They’re desperate to reassure themselves and each other that things are basically well in multiracial murica and might even be better if everyone would just read their articles.

    To admit otherwise and acknowledge that widespread black hatred of whites has no solution other than a reciprocal hatred of them coupled with de jure separation would demolish their fragile worldview which holds that periodically attacking “badwhites” coupled with a little Jesus juice and economic wonkery can hold the disparate and mutually antagonistic racial groups together. They remind me of the kids who were told Santa Claus isn’t real but remain in denial.

    But I quietly wonder how much longer that will continue to be the case.

    If and when they successfully gut the second amendment which they are trying to do.

    Read More
    • Agree: SMK
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  47. There was nothing like this in the past civil rights movements. IMO, its a sign of the weakness of leftist agitation, not strength.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    You're a leftist.

    You and tha Derb are both adherents to the liberal philosophy of interracial marriage.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. The only thing holding the multicultural American Empire together is money printing from the privately-controlled Federal Reserve Bank. When the next global financial implosion hits, you will see the Fed plunge right through the Zero Interest Rate Policy level and move into Negative Interest Rates. That will be when the young people refuse to pay the massive government debt and the government worker pension debt.

    John Derbyshire’s reaction to the arrogant sub-Saharan Black African named Thursday and the cuckservative weakling named Dreher is one shared by many Americans. Derbyshire has also lived in and around New York City for decades, so he has learned to navigate around Blacks and to avoid Blacks.

    Remember, Hillary Clinton knew enough about New York Blacks to scout out the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York for her New York home. Millions of other White people who live around New York City have done the same damn thing that both Hillary Clinton and John Derbyshire have done: find a spot in the New York City area that is blessedly free of criminal Black types.

    Derbyshire’s civilizational survival instincts are excellent, and the suggestions he gave to his kids about how to avoid criminal Blacks was mostly just common sense. But he might consider that we all won’t be doomed if a global financial implosion removes the current ruling class of the American Empire. Some of us will prosper quite nicely when the anti-White ruling class rats are removed from power.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    Derbyshire has also lived in and around New York City for decades, so he has learned to navigate around Blacks and to avoid Blacks.
     
    He was born in a basically, all-white community in England. If he had stayed there he wouldn't have needed to learn.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    There are a number of financially-aware people on unz, and you sound like one too, Charles. I completely agree - the stupidity will peak when the financial crash happens. I don't think it will be business-as-usual for ANYONE, even the best of us, but I agree that some good people will prosper in the end.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. renfro says:
    @Yan Shen
    Now anyone who claims that white Americans today are violent racists obviously would be wrong, statistically, sociologically, and morally, as uh someone else might well point out.

    I wonder though if an African American made that claim about white racism and violence anytime prior to say 1960 or 1970 would've been that far off the mark? In another post of mine elsewhere on this blog, I argued that one of the reasons why all of us are having to suffer through the madness of our politically correct and quite frankly batshit crazy contemporary society, including having to see men like Coates endlessly feted as the second coming of Jesus Christ, is because of prior bad behavior on the part of whites in this country, what with slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan and the likes. This prior bad behavior is precisely the reason why all of us will now hear till the End of Time that racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today. If only whites back in the day would've acted like decent human beings towards blacks instead of obviously discriminating against them, then the success or failure of blacks would be upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't endlessly have to hear all sorts of convoluted excuses for their behavior. It's kind of like how the prior extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now all of us will have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till the End of Time.

    How many other sane and good things have been ruined and taken away from the rest of us good folks in this country because of this prior bad behavior on the part of whites? One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime is one of those big things that few very media outlets will have an honest discussion about. And in a classic case of projection, East Asians are often slandered as being racist towards blacks when simply many of them have what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality that couldn't be further away from the kind of racial essentialism that characterizes so many blacks and whites in this country today.

    ” One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness”

    After a life time of having an even keel toward races and judging people as individuals I am all out of fairness and sympathy.
    All I have to say now is if you don’t like it go back to Asia.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Jake says:
    @Bro Methylene
    Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.

    Derbyshire is again repackaging himself. Last week he was a "philosemite," or an "anti antisemite." But I guess once you are established in the punditry business, you've got a sort of tenure.

    Derbyshire indeed has gotten away with a great deal for much longer than would a guy named Ryan O’Regan (especially if he were known to be a devout Catholic) or Andrew Jackson Calhoun (especially if he were known to be a devout Southern Baptist with an interest in Scots-Irish cultural heritage which he knew was NOT some branch of WASP).

    A WASP atheist/agnostic, even when he is from the lower middle class/working class, is assumed to be at least largely acceptable to the forces of Progressivism, because those forces are first and foremost anti-Christ, anti-Christendom, and anti any national/regional/linguistic group of white Christians who are decidedly conservative culturally or religiously in terms of historic Christendom.

    WASP culture is the antithesis of conservative in terms of historic Christendom.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. JamesG says:

    This is (not completely) OT.

    Last night Charlie Rose interviewed the current female president of Harvard University.

    She said that in the incoming class of Harvard College, “Minorities are the majority.”

    That either means blacks are more that 50% or “People of Color” are which I guess would includes Asian and Asian-Descent of various non-white shades.

    If she meant the former, Wow! If she meant the latter, I’d like a breakdown, to know how many are African American.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eagle Eye

    I’d like a breakdown, to know how many [Harvard admittees] are African American.
     
    It would be fascinating to compare the number of African American admittees with full American ancestry to the number of admittees from Africa or with African parents/grandparents.
    , @Anonymous
    According to BBC, here is Harvard's Class of 2021:

    Asian Americans make up 22.2%, followed by African Americans at 14.6%, Hispanic or Latino students at 11.6%, and Native American or Pacific Islanders at 2.5%.

     

    The over-representation of blacks against their share of population is pretty hilarious. Harvard simply must take in large number of Asians to balance out blacks just to keep the average SAT high enough. Gentile whites are clearly massively under-represented in the institution they founded. This equally clearly does not apply to Jewish whites - by religion, the the class is 7.7% Jewish (the actual figure for Jews must be higher because other religions include Agnostic and Other): http://features.thecrimson.com/2017/freshman-survey/lifestyle/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. TTSSYF says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Why do you use "uh?" Its really weird.

    I think it’s a conscious effort to be annoying but very revealing of deep-seated anger, and flies in the face of these long-winded posts of phony earnestness.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. helena says:
    @WJ
    Actually Derb is doing quite well. He has a substantial audience through Unz and other outlets.

    I doubt that he dislikes blacks. He is simply fatigued by the endless cultural inconsistency that shows the black community as the perpetual victim when, of course, they are victimizing members of other races at a vastly disproportionate rate. Police shootings are a good example. We have all read the analysis, white people on a Per capita basis are far more likely to be shot by police and of course, black men are basically 100 times more likely to be shot by a member of their own race than by a policeman. Interracial rape is another example.

    The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this "professor" is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa.

    “The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this “professor” is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa.”

    Not so. The Narrative clearly states that colonisation of Africa disrupted social development i.e. Europeans robbed Africans of the development that would have otherwise been theirs. And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jivilov
    "Europeans robbed Africans of the development that would have otherwise been theirs"? Seriously? Africans were enslaved and colonized simply 'cuz they weren't developed in the first place.

    Likewise, to state their development would have been "similar to Europeans" is a cultural relativist trope which must be sustained by faith, not reason. The corrupt, kleptocratic, dysfunctional autocracies of sub-Saharan Africa are a reminder that all groups, all cultures are not equal, as is the contrary example of Jews and their advanced Homeland of Israel.
    , @renfro
    Actually Africa did have some developments or empires but they never resembled the civilizations of the many others who impacted Africa .
    Egyptians and Arabs probably had the most influence on African developments in BC times....along with Greeks, Persians and Romans all of who traipsed all over Africa as traders. You can see in particular the Arab and Greek influence in the buildings of the African cities that existed then.

    However I would not say that Europeans robbed them of developments they would have had...but then again that depends on what you would be satisfied to call viable civilized development.
    True Europeans did colonize parts of Africa for their own profit---but I would distinguish between white farmers who settled there and the ones who stole and are still stealing valuable resources like minerals and diamonds....and killing wildlife.
    Also look at what happened when white settlers farmers land was taken and given to blacks as in Zimbabwe....they couldnt or wouldn't farm the land and raise crops and the nation almost starved, inflation ran rampant and it descended into the failed mess you see today.
    "If" they were smart, instead of hating and blaming the white Europeans , they should try to form some cooperation agreement and learn from the white know how and advanced methods so they can run a country that can at least feed itself.
    , @Anon
    "...colonisation of Africa disrupted social development... And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin."

    You mean the sub-Saharan Africans would have created a new Chinese civilization? Or another Aztec civilization? The sub-Saharans had plenty of time (millennia) to discover the laws of physics, math, and engineering. What was the problem? Did not Greeks study with Egyptians (Northern Africa)? Russian bothered to learn from Europeans and Russia became basically a European country. Compare that to South Africa that is falling apart under the perfectly black rule. Moreover, SA shows a horrifying level of murderous racism against white people.
    The Africans could always go to their roots and create "their" civilization in Africa. Instead, the hordes of young and aggressive black male migrants demand their place in European society that does not want them. Perhaps you should become a spokesperson for the migrants and explain them how wonderful it would be to go back home and create "their" social development in Africa.
    The narrative actually says that some Africans are incompatible with European culture. Such pretenders as Mr. Yankah should better part with white society and become engaged in" social development" that is better suited to their race. It is never too late. NYC could surely survive without Mr. Yankah' expertise.

    , @Malla
    Greece and Serbia are as poor as Africa because of the Ottomans looting their countries, no wait..... Ireland is as poor as Africa because the British ruled and looted Ireland, no wait...... HongKong is poor as Africa because the British ruled and looted HongKong, no wait......Macau is poor as Africa because the Portuguese ruled and looted Macau, no wait.....Singapore is as poor as Africa, because the British ruled and looted Singapore, no wait...... Liberia is as rich as Germany because the Liberians were never colonized, no wait...... South Korea is as poor as Africa because the Japanese ruled and looted Korea, no wait......Finland is as poor as Africa because the Swedes and the Russians ruled and looted Finland, no wait......
    What is going wrong here???
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. David says:
    @Nick Granite
    Perhaps those "ignorant" segregationists of the Jim Crow era knew a thing or two about blacks that the walled off enlightened ones hadn't the slightest clue about. The two cultures separated by thousands of years could not be more different. In their own crude way they were correct in separation and I only say crude because it's the modern western era. Not so long ago tribes used to just wipe each other out in disagreement. Much like blacks are now wiping out those pesky successful white farmers in S Africa.

    I really agree with this.

    There’s a book called A Fools Errand, by One of the Fools, a fictitious account of reconstruction and the beginning of Jim Crow and the KKK published in 1879. The novel garnered the endorsement of hundreds of newspapers and was extremely popular, selling in the hundreds of thousands.

    In the book, southern whites are depicted a merely malevolent. The carpetbaggers as angelic if naive regarding the incorrigibility of Southrons. A black is never shown doing anything that could, at least in tiny part, justify the white reaction to liberated blacks.

    However, if you search “negro” in newspapers of the time, blacks are constantly depicted as getting into legitimate legal trouble for violent behavior.

    As part of the plot, the narrator, having served in the Union Army, moves to the South after the war. He uses a local connection to rig the auction of a plantation so he can acquire it at a impossibly low price, cheating its southern (and so evil) owner of its fair price. But the narrative presents this as an unimpeachable act, not the cause of legitimate grievance on the part of locals.

    The narrative we live in now, of goodwhites vs badwhites, and cherubic, moral-agency-free blacks, was being strongly pushed from the very beginning.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    '' The narrative we live in now, of goodwhites vs badwhites, and cherubic, moral-agency-free blacks, was being strongly pushed from the very beginning.''

    Not really.
    The Albion Tourgé author (my spelling may be off) was a Union solider who got imprisoned in the south during the war. He had a love - hate thing for the south .
    After the war he moved to North Carolina and got appointed to be a judge but everyone called him a carpet bagger and generally shunned him from society so he gave up and moved back to the north.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. “If they are not clearly allies, they will seem unsafe to me”. Yankah is an idiot and a fraud. Where is Jesse Jackson when you need him?
    I remember in 1979 Jackson said when he approaches an elevator bank he always enters the elevator with a white or an Asian in it instead of the elevator with a Negro. Jackson decried the situation, but admitted he was afraid of Negro crime.
    Does anyone remember Muhammad Ali’s 1974 classic, “I’m awfully glad my grandaddy got on that boat”?
    Professor Yankah, do us white devils a favor: go back to Ghana.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. @Anonymous

    Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.
     
    Funny, a devout Christian guy like John Lennox (University of Cambridge [MA, MMath, PhD]; University of Oxford [MA, DPhil]), Emeritus Professor of Mathematics at University of Oxford, writes books on God, Science, and Christianity like, Determined to Believe: The Sovereignty of God, Freedom, Faith, and Human Responsibility.

    And guys like areligious, naturalist Derb (University College London; University of London), computer programmer and social science commentator, writes books like, Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics.

    Your making a stupid point…for one can be a social-cultural Christian-atheist-agnostic….as opposed to the anti-Christian social and cultural filth of the New Athiests such as the filthy cockroaches Christopher Hitchens and Monty Python’s Eric Idle….

    You have the 1,000 pound “bench press” view of intelligence….Intelligence doesn’t work like that….Intelligence has a nonsyntactical conceptual-fluid flowing-across the various domains of not well understood dimensions where human species intelligence can function operate…component-aspect to it…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. macilrae says:
    @WJ
    Actually Derb is doing quite well. He has a substantial audience through Unz and other outlets.

    I doubt that he dislikes blacks. He is simply fatigued by the endless cultural inconsistency that shows the black community as the perpetual victim when, of course, they are victimizing members of other races at a vastly disproportionate rate. Police shootings are a good example. We have all read the analysis, white people on a Per capita basis are far more likely to be shot by police and of course, black men are basically 100 times more likely to be shot by a member of their own race than by a policeman. Interracial rape is another example.

    The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this "professor" is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa.

    black men are basically 100 times more likely to be shot by a member of their own race than by a policeman.

    I was listening to a debate on BBC Radio 4 today and there was one participant – an extremely articulate Englishman – who was allowed to put this point successfully (as I saw it). He challenged the strident pro-BLM panel member on just where the problem lay – quoting the statistics of the relative numbers of deaths – as well as those from police shootings where the person shot did, or did not, carry a gun (twenty or so did not I think).

    Later in the program this same gentleman mentioned the small town in Germany which has been obliged to take in a large number of all-male Somalis, speaking no German and with no useful skills, and pointed out that these were clearly economic migrants who had abandoned their women and children to find a better life in Germany. He asked wherein lay the sense of this and, if all Africans in the same situation were permitted to stay in Europe, how could that be sustainable?

    To hear this on the BBC (which I am thinking of as “The Africa Channel” these days) was quite refreshing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Sean says:

    Again, the mask has been dropped. Bret Stephens doesn’t do masks. Like Professor Yankah, just hates us white Anglo gentiles, and doesn’t care who knows it.

    Is this trenchant sentence not missing a word?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. Jake says:
    @Bro Methylene
    Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.

    Derbyshire is again repackaging himself. Last week he was a "philosemite," or an "anti antisemite." But I guess once you are established in the punditry business, you've got a sort of tenure.

    As for Rod Dreher: he is so filled with tenderness for blacks that they are very much for him a Scared Cow race of victims.

    That position is Liberal, not Christian. I doubt Dreher has ever allowed himself to meditate theologically, but if he did, and has the mental capacity, he would recognize that his racial attitudes fit with Liberal denial of Original Sin, but just for blacks. Dreher’s racial views are best understood if you think of blacks being almost immaculately conceived free of Original Sin, while whites, or at least Southerners, got all the extra Original Sin blacks did not get.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    Dreher’s racial views are best understood if you think of blacks being almost immaculately conceived free of Original Sin, while whites, or at least Southerners, got all the extra Original Sin blacks did not get.
     
    All this original sin and blame you cite. Blacks (70%) seem to be immune to. They just do/ No future orientation just letting the chips fall where they may. The churched blacks are decent but backward.
    , @Hank Rearden
    Liberal is Christian, especially when it comes to going Blacked. Following the International Jew's globalist mandate (Matthew 28:19), Christians started early converting Blacks into the church (Acts 8:26-40), then quickly raised Blacks into church leadership as "teachers and prophets." (Acts 13:1)

    Liberal humanist values are merely a hollowed-out version of a theistic myth. If you hold the notion that you have some magical way to "save" Blacks and make them more like you by converting them to your religion, you're hardly different than a progressive SJW who thinks they have some magical way to "save" Blacks and make them more like you by spending more money on education for Blacks.

    Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in Zir sight.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. denk says:

    Chinese should empathise with the plight of other minorities, better still,
    unite with them to fight those white trash.

    This is hardly isolated incident.
    I’ve read/heard/seen so many cases where Chinese were gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc, thats right, anglo land.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Heros
    Here is Colin Flaherty's 74 video Black on Asian Violence play list:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVisIIRP5Q0&list=PLrWfhyZLmyQTxHjFkyVmEfTaAGadNsGCg

    Most of these cowardly attacks involve multiple "teenagers" and a single Asian, usually a diminutive Asian female.

    There is even a Black on Asian violence play list for Sacramento alone:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlRlmB2ksvk&list=PLrWfhyZLmyQQdVVnsgv7iK99MRGHwcevZ

    He also has play lists for Black on Senior, Black on Children, and also play lists for Black on White violence for practically every US city.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw/playlists

    American Black "teenagers" are little more than feral predators preying on the weak and vulnerable at the behest of their jewish owners.
    , @NoWeltschmerz
    The first step you should take to empathize is to move to the inner city and have your kids educated there. I'll be happy to provide my e-mail address so you can let me know how that's working out...mmmmkay?
    , @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    Don't join the legion of the oppressed Denk.
    Chinese are welcome. They are a welcome people. No one is asking that you state your gratitude, but it is extremely poor form to join the legion of the oppressed.
    There are plenty of confused people in the comments here clamoring for a gang war who will all be the first to go home and crack open a beer and watch from a distance when the gangs actually gather on the playground mound. No one - no, one - wants it, and seriously they are just confused - everyone is, even the "white" elite scared to death their ox is gonna be gored - confused.
    But long run - joining the legion of the oppressed is not going to advance you - it's going to come with a cost. I don't think you can afford the cost. The low road is easy but it doesn't turn out to be cheap.
    , @Wally
    Look again, the aggressor was mulatto. Oops.
    , @Truth
    Hey the "mulattos" are getting a little restless...

    http://us.tomonews.com/a-suspected-neo-nazi-attack-on-an-asian-man-in-barcelona-s-subway-is-causing-outrage-2918373?utm_source=Youtube%20TomoNewsUS&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=062016%20barcelona%20subway%20neo%20nazi


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DddRyRUyQJY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0N9v6HsrOc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKMHCJrKOls

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gXpQTTLTVc

    , @anon

    gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc,
     
    Calling bullshit on this, as far as Australia is concerned.
    If it were true, the Murdoch Media Empire would be in a frenzy.
    Note to Denk:
    Pacific Islanders are indeed prone to violence against the weak, but they ain't White.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Heros says:
    @denk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLCRq0gGg30

    Chinese should empathise with the plight of other minorities, better still,
    unite with them to fight those white trash.

    This is hardly isolated incident.
    I've read/heard/seen so many cases where Chinese were gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc, thats right, anglo land.

    Here is Colin Flaherty’s 74 video Black on Asian Violence play list:

    Most of these cowardly attacks involve multiple “teenagers” and a single Asian, usually a diminutive Asian female.

    There is even a Black on Asian violence play list for Sacramento alone:

    He also has play lists for Black on Senior, Black on Children, and also play lists for Black on White violence for practically every US city.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw/playlists

    American Black “teenagers” are little more than feral predators preying on the weak and vulnerable at the behest of their jewish owners.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    It'd be more to the point if you can show me instances of
    Whites being racially attacked by Chinese anywhere in the world.
    Not holding my breath.
    , @MBlanc46
    Black youfs don’t require Jewish owners, or any other sort of owners , to prey on people. It’s simply what they like to do.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Joe Hide says:

    The solution is so simple to all these problems. Development of easy to use widespread technology to rapidly and easily identify psychopaths, sociopaths, narcissists, etc. Cell phone aps or similiar should be beyond easy to use. This societal evolution is coming, the complete exposure of these parasites so we can isolate and dis-empower them. It will happen so fast that everyone of them will be caught off-guard. You just watch!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. Wally says: • Website

    Hey dumsky, the aggressor is a mulatto.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    LOL, a really...really...light Mulatto. Know in Staten Island, Providence and Queens as a "Wop,"
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Clyde says:
    @Jake
    As for Rod Dreher: he is so filled with tenderness for blacks that they are very much for him a Scared Cow race of victims.

    That position is Liberal, not Christian. I doubt Dreher has ever allowed himself to meditate theologically, but if he did, and has the mental capacity, he would recognize that his racial attitudes fit with Liberal denial of Original Sin, but just for blacks. Dreher's racial views are best understood if you think of blacks being almost immaculately conceived free of Original Sin, while whites, or at least Southerners, got all the extra Original Sin blacks did not get.

    Dreher’s racial views are best understood if you think of blacks being almost immaculately conceived free of Original Sin, while whites, or at least Southerners, got all the extra Original Sin blacks did not get.

    All this original sin and blame you cite. Blacks (70%) seem to be immune to. They just do/ No future orientation just letting the chips fall where they may. The churched blacks are decent but backward.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    It is not what I cite, nor even what Negroes do that matters. What white Elites, and people like Rod Dreher, think about Negroes and are willing to do to 'bad whites' in order to uplift the poor Negroes - now that matters.

    Everything is bound up inextricably with philosophical truth, which includes being opposite veritas. Everything , then, that is false and wrongheaded about the Modern world, which is now suicidal across the board, is about some perversion to replace something essential to Christendom.

    Because that is so, every attempt to correct the problems with secularism in any form - whether WASP pragmatism or French anticlericalism or American frontier democracy or a-doctrinal Constitutional monarchy or Steve Sailer's 'citizenism' - is at best pissing in the wind while Satan rampages.

    For what used to be The West, it is either Christ or chaos.
    , @Hank Rearden

    "The churched blacks are decent."
     
    Not hardly, pilgrim. Magic pews are as effective at transforming blacks into Americans as magic dirt.

    "God damn America!"

    -The Rev. Jeremiah Wright
    Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago
     
    , @RadicalCenter
    Let's stop peddling the myth of the nice black church ladies. As we saw from Obama's church, those so-called churches are often as much politics and hatred of whites as theology or The Ten Commandments and the like.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. The professor is Ekow N. Yankah. He teaches at Yeshiva University in New York City. To judge from his pictures, he’s a full-blood negro. Some commenters, in comment threads to articles about the op-ed, have speculated that the name as published is a pseudonym, on the grounds that “Ekow,” that’s e-k-o-w, is just a reversal of “woke,” which is the word currently used by Cultural Marxists to mean “fully compliant with the latest release of political correctness.”

    Doing the same with the author’s last name, making it Haknay, tells you something about his writing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  66. Jake says:
    @Clyde

    Dreher’s racial views are best understood if you think of blacks being almost immaculately conceived free of Original Sin, while whites, or at least Southerners, got all the extra Original Sin blacks did not get.
     
    All this original sin and blame you cite. Blacks (70%) seem to be immune to. They just do/ No future orientation just letting the chips fall where they may. The churched blacks are decent but backward.

    It is not what I cite, nor even what Negroes do that matters. What white Elites, and people like Rod Dreher, think about Negroes and are willing to do to ‘bad whites’ in order to uplift the poor Negroes – now that matters.

    Everything is bound up inextricably with philosophical truth, which includes being opposite veritas. Everything , then, that is false and wrongheaded about the Modern world, which is now suicidal across the board, is about some perversion to replace something essential to Christendom.

    Because that is so, every attempt to correct the problems with secularism in any form – whether WASP pragmatism or French anticlericalism or American frontier democracy or a-doctrinal Constitutional monarchy or Steve Sailer’s ‘citizenism’ – is at best pissing in the wind while Satan rampages.

    For what used to be The West, it is either Christ or chaos.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Yan Shen
    Let me put it this way. Obsessing endlessly over the Black Menace, and then adding at the end that I obviously don't mean that all black people are like that since the uh Bell Curve tells us that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person in this country is basically a slightly more intellectual way of saying that you couldn't possibly dislike black people since a few of your best friends are in fact black.

    I think David Duke has a clear and profound obsession with the Jewish Menace but I can't imagine that in actual life he literally hates every single Jewish person. In fact, he might very well point out that well some Jewish people here and there are okay, so I obviously didn't mean 100% of them were like that. And uh damn, that Gal Gadot sure is a babe...

    It may not be an exact science like physics or chemistry, but given the social creatures that homo sapiens are, most of us have a relatively good sense of when someone has a positive or negative perception of someone else through their words and actions.

    In your case Mr. Derbyshire, I hate to break it to ya, the conclusion is that you don't like black people all that much. Which honestly is fine. Unlike the rest of the PC police, I'm actually a huge believer in freedom of association and the right to like or not like whoever you want. I don't think you've done anything particularly wrong, although given that you seem genuinely surprised by how others perceive your writings, it might not hurt to mention that to an outsider, you sure do seem like someone who likes obsessing over black people endlessly.

    The more egregious thing here though, which has also been duly noted by various others, is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get treated like they're the second coming of Jesus Christ for basically doing more or less the same thing that the Derb does. That we treat race hustlers of different ethnicity so differently merely on the basis of their skin color seems quite contrary to the notions of fairness and equality that MLK so fervently fought for. And the fact that anyone could possibly think that anything Mr. Coates has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight is simply mind boggling...

    Your thinking is confused. You’re young and brainwashed into thinking a certain way. groups have average behavior, individuals within groups vary. Its perfectly possible to take individuals as they come, while understanding what that individuals group is like.More importantly, what you understand about the group is theoretical, you can even hate the group and its just a concept, whereas how well you take the individual as they are is real. before you were born this was the test, since full stalinism the test is now can you not pretend but actually believe in a completely absurd opposite interpretation of an entire group to be made up of entirely perfect and identical individuals no matter what your lying eyes and ears see and hear. On average negroes are somewhere between an ape and a human, not a white but an average human say between a jungle asian and an ape. We all know this, the entire world know this to be an absolute fact, even the most far left cuck that ever lived knows this in his bones. We also know there’s some really wonderful blacks, blacks we really love.I live among the worst sort of blacks but every day while seething at the disgraceful behavior I must endure among them I am also confronted by the reality of the really great blacks.In fact the person I loved most in the world was black, I have quite a few black friends. But sadly over the years i have had to conclude if I could push a button and all the blacks would disappear i would hesitate.

    [MORE]

    People like yourself are responsible for this, responsible for what you would term my hatefulness, because Im sure you will simply dismiss the above as impossible to be true and the ranting of a hater, well yes i hate the black race in a sense, Im a dispassionate person so its really more accurate to say i have concluded the world simply cant afford to indulge its existence any more.But semantics. At some point we will all feel this way, because of people like you we will one day probably soon be in a civil war in large part about your race views vs mine.Your ilk has contrived a situation where i can no longer ignore the racial differences of people in far off lands and focus occasionally only on their cooking art religion culture and nations geography, instead i must seriously consider whether I can safely live as a minority among them ruled by them in fact.And of course the answer is no only whites can be trusted to rule over other races fairly, well fair in the white sense, in the tribal morality the rest of the races ascribe to its perfectly fair to exploit any weakness of the other. Now thats cool its actually how nature intended it and this is all us whites fault. we should never have started this experiment in fairness few of us wanted to at first.

    But hears the thing, its not just race, its ideology. At a certain point you realize this is a low level war now but it will lead to white genocide as surely as night follows day unless it becomes a hot war. And you non whites are not really the problem youre a biological weapon jews and goodwhites are using against whites. Now these jews and goodwhites are fucking idiots who think that once us bad whites are gone tey will be allowed to rule the world lolol yeah pretty incredibly stupid. But once you see this you really have to ask yourself can i be friends with a liberal, as long as they dont come right out and say they want me dead, if i think they don’t consciously understand what the inevitable conclusion of their thinking is can i be friends with a liberal? many of them mean well almost all truly believe what they think is not only true and good but that it will have the best outcome for all.They are like the good blacks i meet every day the good asians and good muslims and jews. he thing is they may not know it but I do as the situation progresses they will always side with each other over my interest as they do know, those good non whites are always voting for more anti white politics while living on white generosity in white lands, they dont think anything of it and Im not supposed o either, im supposed to assume i can afford to be pushed a bit further and feel good about my trust in this insanity. Im not supposed to realize that at some point white instinct for self preservation will kick in and whites will do what all animals backed into a corner do they will fight and boeing whites they will win, and war being war it will be horrific and all you non whites will suffer and be pushed into the sea.And you have to wonder will the good whites and jews get away with it, will they be pushed into the sea too. will they ever say wow we were wrong to think that could work we are the ones who are responsible for all those deaths? Even a child could have predicted how that would end. I dont think i can be friends with the good whites and jews, they are capable of knowing better. you muds youre just following the prime directive, I get it i just wish the goodwhites got it, but an accident of evolution has prevented them from getting it, they need to be culled so they cant pass that on to any more whites. The jews they are interesting they are both tribal and know better, they need too be dealt with once and for all. they can never be allowed to live among us again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Mulegino1 says:

    International Jewry will continue its traditional exploitation of susceptible minorities to vilify and attack the non-Jewish majorities in those parts of the world under its hegemonic umbrella. It did the same thing during the Bolshevik Revolution. How many of the members of the Central Committees were of Russian Orthodox provenance? Jews formed something like 85% of the leadership of the first Soviet government despite being only 2 % or so of the population of the Russian Empire.

    The worship of Jewry (as a collective) is the sine qua non, the absolute prerequisite for membership in the card carrying world of the kosher cuckoisie, where treason and corruption prosper. The hive of collective Jewry will invariably elevate its worst and most repulsive members to the top of the heap and will do so with respect to its own reserve army of the shabbos goyim. The Bushes, Clintons and Obamas are a perfect example of this in the United States.

    How long will it take for the men (as in “vires”) of the west to realize that we- Christendom, the Europe of Nations and the inheritors of its traditions and culture- lost the Second World War? So much of the current cognitive dissonance and blindness to reality hinges upon the suicidal legend of the “Good War”? Unless this reality enters into our collective conscious post haste, our civilization and society will be buried for good.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    Your statement that "Jews formed something like 85% of the leadership of the first Soviet government" is true.

    The same Judeo-Bolshevist values can be observed in Christian behavior, as "not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them" (Acts 4:32, 6:1), including the church's murderous methods to spread "fear" as it consolidated its stranglehold on money (Acts 5:11), in accordance with the Magic Rabbi's hatred of the "rich." (especially Luke 6:24, also Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, Luke 18:22, Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25, Luke 12:13-21, Luke 16:19-31)


    "....primitive Christianity is Bolshevism."

    -Ludwig von Mises, Socialism, p. 413
    http://www.econlib.org/library/Mises/msS10.html#IV.29.14
     

    , @renfro
    '' The Bushes, Clintons and Obamas are a perfect example of this in the United States.''


    Obama’s boast: ‘I am the closest thing to a Jew that has ever sat’ in the Oval Office

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/2/obama-i-am-closest-thing-jew-has-ever-sat-oval-off/

    Obama identified with Jews as he considered blacks also victims of the white man.

    Bush I tolerated them and Bush II was too uncurious to notice them.

    Clinton stacked his adm with them cause he found them useful for unsavory errands and fundraising.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Hu Mi Yu says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Why do you use "uh?" Its really weird.

    Why do you (Yan Shen) use “uh?” Its really weird.

    It represents a pause to think. He chose his following words carefully and perhaps used a euphemism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TTSSYF
    Ridiculous, of course. He need only pause his fingers, not continue working to type "uh". It is meant to be condescending and annoying, particularly because of where it is being used; i.e., to signify his contempt for what follows.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Hank Rearden
    I don't want to be around blacks. Blacks don't want to be around me. Can we get an amicable divorce already?

    Funny how the State has made it so damned easy for two married parents to split up, yet forces two races with irreconcilable differences to be together.

    Blacks don’t want a complete divorce. They want your alimony payments–forever.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    The Jews using the Holocaust in order to milk endless concessions from the Germans, too. As long as gentiles dominate Germany.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @Jake
    As for Rod Dreher: he is so filled with tenderness for blacks that they are very much for him a Scared Cow race of victims.

    That position is Liberal, not Christian. I doubt Dreher has ever allowed himself to meditate theologically, but if he did, and has the mental capacity, he would recognize that his racial attitudes fit with Liberal denial of Original Sin, but just for blacks. Dreher's racial views are best understood if you think of blacks being almost immaculately conceived free of Original Sin, while whites, or at least Southerners, got all the extra Original Sin blacks did not get.

    Liberal is Christian, especially when it comes to going Blacked. Following the International Jew’s globalist mandate (Matthew 28:19), Christians started early converting Blacks into the church (Acts 8:26-40), then quickly raised Blacks into church leadership as “teachers and prophets.” (Acts 13:1)

    Liberal humanist values are merely a hollowed-out version of a theistic myth. If you hold the notion that you have some magical way to “save” Blacks and make them more like you by converting them to your religion, you’re hardly different than a progressive SJW who thinks they have some magical way to “save” Blacks and make them more like you by spending more money on education for Blacks.

    Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in Zir sight.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @denk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLCRq0gGg30

    Chinese should empathise with the plight of other minorities, better still,
    unite with them to fight those white trash.

    This is hardly isolated incident.
    I've read/heard/seen so many cases where Chinese were gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc, thats right, anglo land.

    The first step you should take to empathize is to move to the inner city and have your kids educated there. I’ll be happy to provide my e-mail address so you can let me know how that’s working out…mmmmkay?

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    I do not live in murkka.
    But witness even anglos in Asia behave like they'r still the colonial
    masters there !

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qrbd6KHgbg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. @Jason Liu
    I thought you folks would be glad at the thought of segregating your kids from other races

    If you’re foolish enough to believe that you write an article in a major newspaper about a private decision with no ulterior motives then your “argument” might have had some validity. The point many commentators are making is the rank hypocrisy of a newspaper publishing an article by a black African claiming that American whites are somehow not to be trusted. If he doesn’t permit his children to have white friends, with whom will they be friends? Does he live in a predominantly lower class black neighborhood? I bet he doesn’t. Do Jewish people count as white in his mind, I bet they don’t (employed at Yeshiva U. for crying out loud). Is he even serious about what he writes? Probably not. Does it get someone of whom no one has ever heard attention? Indeed it does. Is this a coincidence? I’ll leave it to you to decide.

    You know, someone whose comment history suggests, shall we say, a certain affinity for the Chinese Communists really ought to know that often times newspaper articles can’t be taken at face value.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @Yan Shen
    Now anyone who claims that white Americans today are violent racists obviously would be wrong, statistically, sociologically, and morally, as uh someone else might well point out.

    I wonder though if an African American made that claim about white racism and violence anytime prior to say 1960 or 1970 would've been that far off the mark? In another post of mine elsewhere on this blog, I argued that one of the reasons why all of us are having to suffer through the madness of our politically correct and quite frankly batshit crazy contemporary society, including having to see men like Coates endlessly feted as the second coming of Jesus Christ, is because of prior bad behavior on the part of whites in this country, what with slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan and the likes. This prior bad behavior is precisely the reason why all of us will now hear till the End of Time that racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today. If only whites back in the day would've acted like decent human beings towards blacks instead of obviously discriminating against them, then the success or failure of blacks would be upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't endlessly have to hear all sorts of convoluted excuses for their behavior. It's kind of like how the prior extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now all of us will have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till the End of Time.

    How many other sane and good things have been ruined and taken away from the rest of us good folks in this country because of this prior bad behavior on the part of whites? One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime is one of those big things that few very media outlets will have an honest discussion about. And in a classic case of projection, East Asians are often slandered as being racist towards blacks when simply many of them have what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality that couldn't be further away from the kind of racial essentialism that characterizes so many blacks and whites in this country today.

    Black people had been enslaving each other for as far back as records go. Around the period of time when the country was founded, ie late 18th century, other people were enslaving white people (see the Crimean Khanate). The very idea that you are putting into your head that slavery could be considered wrong comes from WASPs the people who founded the country. Whites didnt institute slavery. As far as Jim Crow, it didnt exist everywhere. Is it worse than what we have now? Tossing out the results of standarized tests because a judge doesnt like the results? Sending people to college who cant do college level work? Preventing businesses from testing employees because the whole issue has been politicized thereby forcing young people to take on loans? Listening to civil rights activists who go on about how it is outrageous that blacks were considered inferior in the same breath that they demand lowered standards for their group?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Clyde

    Dreher’s racial views are best understood if you think of blacks being almost immaculately conceived free of Original Sin, while whites, or at least Southerners, got all the extra Original Sin blacks did not get.
     
    All this original sin and blame you cite. Blacks (70%) seem to be immune to. They just do/ No future orientation just letting the chips fall where they may. The churched blacks are decent but backward.

    “The churched blacks are decent.”

    Not hardly, pilgrim. Magic pews are as effective at transforming blacks into Americans as magic dirt.

    “God damn America!”

    -The Rev. Jeremiah Wright
    Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. In the standard MO of politics, it is a question of whose ox needs to be gored.
    But it’s possible to argue: someone has decided that an ox needs to be gored, and a rumor has been spread that an ox needs to be gored, and everyone is in a panic that their ox might be gored.
    If you happen to be elite, and white, you can look around at the groups and ask yourself – besides your ox which you decidedly do not want gored – who can you best argue that their ox should be gored?
    Well – it hardly needs to be argued that the easiest group to pick on and seek an ox goring for is: non-elite whites. No other group is worth the mess.

    And there you have it – that’s probably what all this is about.

    But – it is possible that the “someone” or “polite company” or “social circles” that have adopted this groupthink that an ox needs to be gored are both:

    1. Innumerate, and 2. in error

    It may be we are baring our knives at one another on the basis of panic borne of ignorance and innumeracy. It may be that the minorities among us, on balance, are constituted of silent majorities that wish that white people would cool the hell down.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  77. @Art Deco
    I have a suspicion that the 'obnoxious ethnocentric jerk' is a New York type. I don't think I've ever encountered it in meatworld myself. You see it in print in the writings of Messrs. Peretz, Wieseltier, Maccoby, Goldhagen, Stephens, Kertzer, and, at one remove, Neil Kozodoy, Podhoretz pere and Podhoretz fils. That's New York, Boston, and Washington, emphasis on New York.


    Prof. Yankah's accent makes plain he's American-born. His parents are Ghanian. What's odd about his advocacy is that he actually has no family history in the American South and his wife is white. He's begging for a big 'screw you, dad' from his children (who have grown up in Manhattan in far tidier and pleasant circumstances than they might have known ca. 1975).

    More than likely his kids agree with him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    I doubt they're capable of the jujitsu which would be required given that they have maternal side relatives, among others which which they associate.
    , @Anon
    What would be Professor Yankah's opinion about killing out white farmers, which is currently going on in South Africa? Blacks are majority there. Do they kill whites because of the incompatibility ("unfriendliness") between the white and black races? https://needtoknow.news/2017/05/torture-murder-whites-south-africa-rise-due-anti-white-rhetoric-ruling-party-african-national-congress/
    "South Africa: Attacks and murder of whites is on the rise. The rate of intentional homicide in South Africa is more than fifteen times greater than the world average. It could even be worse, because South African police have stopped releasing statistics. The rise in farm attacks is blamed on anti-white hate speech by the ruling African National Congress. South African President Jacob Zuma recently called for the confiscation of white-owned land without compensation. A member of parliament shouted: “Bury them alive!” during a speech about the plight of white farmers."

    Well. At least we can see a picture of the dream coming true.
    As Professor Yankah writes, "for African-Americans, race has become a proxy not just for politics but also for decency." The solution is obvious: The black Americans should go back to Africa and join their decent race there. Because of the unbridgeable "racial gorge," whites have no hope of integrating the blacks into the white society. Just let the blacks go. Go, go, go -- before you start killing out whites en masse and before your start demanding “Bury them alive!”

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @Anon
    Blacks don't want a complete divorce. They want your alimony payments--forever.

    The Jews using the Holocaust in order to milk endless concessions from the Germans, too. As long as gentiles dominate Germany.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    The nominal sums set aside for reparations have amounted to about $6 bn. Germany's gdp is about $3,400 bn per annum, so I think they can absorb the sum.

    About 2/3 of the Jewish population of Europe were killed over the period running from 1938 to 1945.
    , @Johann Ricke

    The Jews using the Holocaust in order to milk endless concessions from the Germans, too. As long as gentiles dominate Germany.
     
    I wouldn't call $6b a whole lot of concessions. At $1,000 per soul, that's an amount stateside defendants can only dream of settling for. What's more typical is anywhere from 100x to 1000x the average amount mentioned. Note that Germany got to keep all the stuff (real estate, corporate assets, jewelry, gold, art) it seized from Jews it exterminated, and that was not only a whole lot more than $1,000 per person; it was when $1,000 was real money.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. @denk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLCRq0gGg30

    Chinese should empathise with the plight of other minorities, better still,
    unite with them to fight those white trash.

    This is hardly isolated incident.
    I've read/heard/seen so many cases where Chinese were gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc, thats right, anglo land.

    Don’t join the legion of the oppressed Denk.
    Chinese are welcome. They are a welcome people. No one is asking that you state your gratitude, but it is extremely poor form to join the legion of the oppressed.
    There are plenty of confused people in the comments here clamoring for a gang war who will all be the first to go home and crack open a beer and watch from a distance when the gangs actually gather on the playground mound. No one – no, one – wants it, and seriously they are just confused – everyone is, even the “white” elite scared to death their ox is gonna be gored – confused.
    But long run – joining the legion of the oppressed is not going to advance you – it’s going to come with a cost. I don’t think you can afford the cost. The low road is easy but it doesn’t turn out to be cheap.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk

    Don’t join the legion of the oppressed Denk.
    Chinese are welcome
     
    Thats not what I gathered, there'r legions of Chinese haters in this site alone !

    I do agree there's a divide and conquer conspiracy going on,
    courtesy of the masters of universe.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Thea
    Dreher is a coward.

    Unfortunately there are a lot of them in positions of influence and power.

    Cowards resent people who have the fortitude to stand up and say what they know to be true but are afraid to reveal. Dreher is more despicable than the NYT writers.

    Indeed. Dreher is the Queen of the Cucks.

    It’s obvious from reading him consistently that, unlike many ordinary people he knows all about the Jews and what they’ve done/are doing to this country. He also knows, like everyone in America, that the idea that blacks are in any sense equal to whites is a gigantic lie. Because from time to time he writes things that reveal just how much he knows. But a few days later, either after realizing himself he’d said too much, or been called out by one of his cuck fans, he’ll post an over the top rant about the evil of racism or anti-semitism or homophobia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    Dreher is not a profile in courage for sure.

    He is kind of like Charles Murray--without the intellectual heft.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. lavoisier says: • Website
    @geokat62

    Mass Kudos – John Derbyshire

    You get respect!
     

    Hey, Art. Just as one swallow does not make a Spring, one article in which the author drops a few "truth crumbs" does not make the man The Real Deal.

    Recall that he has openly admitted to being "terrified of offending the Jews," as it may be "career-wrecking."

    If he were the Real Deal he would have given this article a more truthful title, e.g.,


    The Mask Is Off—The Jewish Ruling Class Decides It’s OK to Hate White Anglo Gentiles
     
    Also, rather than referring to it as a Cultural Revolution in this sentence:

    Our own Cultural Revolution has so far stopped at humiliation (and career-wrecking).
     
    he should have used the more accurate phrase of Counter Counter-Cultural Revolution as it would highlight that the present conflict is a reaction to the Counter Cultural Revolution of the 1960s. By referring to it by its proper name, he would have highlighted the source for these politically correct ideas was the Jewish Frankfurt School, whose main goal was to ensure fascism never reared its ugly head in America, as it did in continental Europe, by, as one critic of Theodor Adorno's Authoritarian Personality put it, "treating the American people like inmates of an insane asylum." He could have highlighted that the entire effort of the domestic policy wing of The Lobby has been to eradicate any signs of antisemitism by pursuing two separate tracks:

    1. pushing to instill the poisonous ideology of political correctness
    2. pushing to open the gates wide open for mass immigration by working for close to 100 years to get the congress to pass a non-restrictionist immigration act which the finally succeeded to do in 1965

    Had he stated all these things in his article, I would've agreed with your assessment that he deserved to be regarded as a mensch.

    As things currently stand, however, I would say he has a long way to go before we can grant him that status.

    That said, this article was indeed a step in the right direction.

    “That said, this article was indeed a step in the right direction.”

    Indeed it is.

    And quite honestly I am surprised that step was taken.

    My guess: Derb is getting old and realizes that he cannot, in good conscience, completely ignore the Jewish question and retain integrity as a man who speaks the truth.

    I like Derb. But taking on the JQ is fraught with risks.

    And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.

    But their hatred for the goyim and consequent destructive behavior to European civilization has to be recognized and challenged if we are to prevent our nations from becoming Towers of Babel.

    Derb needs to be applauded for his efforts in this direction.

    I do not think the man is a coward. He is starting to emerge from the cave, albeit hesitantly.

    I expect more from him in the future.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    '' And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.''>>>>>

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

    I have been asking this question to those who claim it for years and never get a response.
    I recently asked it of a commenter here and got nothing but rambling gibberish about Hollywood and popular music and etc..
    I don't consider those contributions to America as every group including blacks claim that as a contribution .
    I also don't consider Jewish science or nobels as contributions either as many others have also contributed to science won nobels.

    I want to see something that Jews have contributed that others haven't or contributed more than others have. Something of positive importance distinctly Jewish.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @Jake
    The proto-WASP Derbyshire is very late to the game.

    Derbyshire is a math nerd, so it he should realize the need to repeat essential formulas. WASP culture is the product of a Judaizing heresy: Anglo-Saxon Puritnaism.

    Any Judaizing heresy that comes to wield political power will produce philo-Semitic culture. Derbyshire has a long career of acknowledging that he - Mr English-born and raised WASP 'paleoconservative' - is a philo-Semite., one who simply does not understand the fear of Jews.

    WASP culture, under archetype WASP Oliver Cromwell, officially allied with Jews, taking Jewish money to wage war, including wars of cultural extermination, against non-WASP white Gentiles. Jews were legally allowed back into England and granted special rights and privileges denied to the vast majority of native British Isles Christians.

    Therefore, WASP culture has ALWAYS been about WASPs allying with Jews against Christendom and the peoples and cultures of historic Christendom. To be anti-Christendom is to be anti-white - even if the specific anti-Christendom leader/perpetrator is a Caucasian who feels he or she is Christian.

    We live in the end stage of that Judaizing heresy gaining control of a wealthy nation. And that end stage is suicidal.

    Derbyshire has a long career of acknowledging that he – Mr English-born and raised WASP ‘paleoconservative’ – is a philo-Semite., one who simply does not understand the fear of Jews.

    That’s only partly true. Yes, Derbyshire has written on several occasions about the fact that he generally likes Jews. But he’s never said he “does not understand the fear of Jews.” In fact, as someone else pointed out above, he understands very well that Jews are extremely powerful and any political pundit who dares criticize them regularly or forcefully will quickly have his career ruined. Like Joe Sobran.

    Yes, Derbyshire most certainly does understand the fear of Jews.

    What he claims not to understand isn’t people who don’t fear Jews, but people who don’t like Jews.

    Whether he really means that or not, and whether he genuinely likes Jews by and large, who knows? He might, or he may just be afraid of Jews.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Still wondering when Derb is going to put two and two together here (if ever).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  84. ‘Our own Cultural Revolution has so far stopped at humiliation (and career-wrecking).
    But I quietly wonder how much longer that will continue to be the case.’

    Thank you for another eye-opener, Unz. I’ve not known Derbyshire for long, and he has already put me off at times, but this is a great article (unfortunately, with internet links now de rigueur in every sort of article, we are never treated to a complete, thorough and well-written article, clearly laying out all its main points, but must, if we can be bothered, click, then later if we remember or can be asked, click the back arrow). I find these last two lines to be the most poignant: they control our minds already, and the politicians–so how much longer till the pogroms begin? My personal feeling is, if at all possible (i.e. if it won’t harm you or your family too much, or, if you’re of a heroic disposition, even if it does), tell these little people what you think of them. Write them, pester them, don’t let them rest, don’t let them off the hook, get in their faces–it’s the least we all can do for our children, for their children…
    I write this listening to Mozart’s Magic Flute. Such beauty. And my God!–all from whitey!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Daniel, if you think will want to read something that is linked to in the article, do a right-click (mouse button, laptop pad, holding-down your finger extra long on a tablet, whatever), and then "open in new tab". That way, you can keep on reading the original article in an orderly fashion. The pages from the links that you were interested in will be there when you're done.

    Hey, it's what I do ... no charge, Mr. Le Mouch ... this time. ;-}
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Wally says:
    @denk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLCRq0gGg30

    Chinese should empathise with the plight of other minorities, better still,
    unite with them to fight those white trash.

    This is hardly isolated incident.
    I've read/heard/seen so many cases where Chinese were gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc, thats right, anglo land.

    Look again, the aggressor was mulatto. Oops.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    He called that guy 'fucking chinese nigger'
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. lavoisier says: • Website
    @40 Acres and A Kardashian
    Indeed. Dreher is the Queen of the Cucks.

    It's obvious from reading him consistently that, unlike many ordinary people he knows all about the Jews and what they've done/are doing to this country. He also knows, like everyone in America, that the idea that blacks are in any sense equal to whites is a gigantic lie. Because from time to time he writes things that reveal just how much he knows. But a few days later, either after realizing himself he'd said too much, or been called out by one of his cuck fans, he'll post an over the top rant about the evil of racism or anti-semitism or homophobia.

    Dreher is not a profile in courage for sure.

    He is kind of like Charles Murray–without the intellectual heft.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Art says:
    @geokat62

    Mass Kudos – John Derbyshire

    You get respect!
     

    Hey, Art. Just as one swallow does not make a Spring, one article in which the author drops a few "truth crumbs" does not make the man The Real Deal.

    Recall that he has openly admitted to being "terrified of offending the Jews," as it may be "career-wrecking."

    If he were the Real Deal he would have given this article a more truthful title, e.g.,


    The Mask Is Off—The Jewish Ruling Class Decides It’s OK to Hate White Anglo Gentiles
     
    Also, rather than referring to it as a Cultural Revolution in this sentence:

    Our own Cultural Revolution has so far stopped at humiliation (and career-wrecking).
     
    he should have used the more accurate phrase of Counter Counter-Cultural Revolution as it would highlight that the present conflict is a reaction to the Counter Cultural Revolution of the 1960s. By referring to it by its proper name, he would have highlighted the source for these politically correct ideas was the Jewish Frankfurt School, whose main goal was to ensure fascism never reared its ugly head in America, as it did in continental Europe, by, as one critic of Theodor Adorno's Authoritarian Personality put it, "treating the American people like inmates of an insane asylum." He could have highlighted that the entire effort of the domestic policy wing of The Lobby has been to eradicate any signs of antisemitism by pursuing two separate tracks:

    1. pushing to instill the poisonous ideology of political correctness
    2. pushing to open the gates wide open for mass immigration by working for close to 100 years to get the congress to pass a non-restrictionist immigration act which the finally succeeded to do in 1965

    Had he stated all these things in his article, I would've agreed with your assessment that he deserved to be regarded as a mensch.

    As things currently stand, however, I would say he has a long way to go before we can grant him that status.

    That said, this article was indeed a step in the right direction.

    the percentage of obnoxiously ethnocentric jerks among American Jews

    geokat62,

    Derbyshire wrote some strong words – words the Jews will hate – will he recant?

    Maybe – maybe not – never the less – today his words are more than welcome. Maybe they will give someone else of note, a little backbone.

    Most of the comments are about the black/white angle – not about the Gentile/Jew angle of this article.

    Strange – the Blacks have no power in America and the Jews all the power in America – and people ignore the Jews – amazing.

    Think Peace — Art

    p.s. Jew power is enforced by the Jew owned media.

    p.s. America is not America because of that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sherman
    Hey Genius

    "Never the less" s/b "nevertheless".

    Shalom

    Sherm
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. @Mulegino1
    International Jewry will continue its traditional exploitation of susceptible minorities to vilify and attack the non-Jewish majorities in those parts of the world under its hegemonic umbrella. It did the same thing during the Bolshevik Revolution. How many of the members of the Central Committees were of Russian Orthodox provenance? Jews formed something like 85% of the leadership of the first Soviet government despite being only 2 % or so of the population of the Russian Empire.

    The worship of Jewry (as a collective) is the sine qua non, the absolute prerequisite for membership in the card carrying world of the kosher cuckoisie, where treason and corruption prosper. The hive of collective Jewry will invariably elevate its worst and most repulsive members to the top of the heap and will do so with respect to its own reserve army of the shabbos goyim. The Bushes, Clintons and Obamas are a perfect example of this in the United States.

    How long will it take for the men (as in "vires") of the west to realize that we- Christendom, the Europe of Nations and the inheritors of its traditions and culture- lost the Second World War? So much of the current cognitive dissonance and blindness to reality hinges upon the suicidal legend of the "Good War"? Unless this reality enters into our collective conscious post haste, our civilization and society will be buried for good.

    Your statement that “Jews formed something like 85% of the leadership of the first Soviet government” is true.

    The same Judeo-Bolshevist values can be observed in Christian behavior, as “not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them” (Acts 4:32, 6:1), including the church’s murderous methods to spread “fear” as it consolidated its stranglehold on money (Acts 5:11), in accordance with the Magic Rabbi’s hatred of the “rich.” (especially Luke 6:24, also Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, Luke 18:22, Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25, Luke 12:13-21, Luke 16:19-31)

    “….primitive Christianity is Bolshevism.”

    -Ludwig von Mises, Socialism, p. 413

    http://www.econlib.org/library/Mises/msS10.html#IV.29.14

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    Of course you neglect to mention that the "communism" of the Christian community referenced in the Acts of the Apostles was strictly voluntary, and subsequently abandoned as unworkable on a societal basis (while adhered to successfully and providentially for well over a thousand years in the monastic orders, which were instrumental in building western civilization).

    What does this have to do with the Judeo-Bolsheviks and their tyrannical and murderous reign over the Christians of Russia- or Hungary- or Romania- or wherever?

    And how dare you call Christ "the magic Rabbi"? There is nothing "magical" about Him at all; in a metaphysical sense, God can perform miracles at the time and place of His own choosing. Perhaps you - like your spiritual and (blood?) ancestors- would prefer the murderous thug Barrabas!

    , @Nico
    The communistic situation described in the Acts of the Apostles didn't last for very long (although it has continued in religious orders taking the vow of poverty), and in fact Hebraic Christianity more generally didn't outlast it by much in most places. Ethiopia is one of the rare cases where any substantial Hebraic attitudes and aesthetics of Christian culture have survived the process of Hellenization, as far as the dioceses and lay obligations are concerned.

    However, nowadays it's easy to fail to take this into account. Much of Protestantism has been preoccupied throughout its history with attempting - consciously or otherwise - to re-Hebraize Christianity. They have not been particularly successful, in no small part because they do not actually understood first-century Judaism nor why the Hebraic rhythm of early Christian life was so quickly cast aside. Nevertheless, their efforts have produced results which one might call amusing, were they not so destructive, for instance the idiotic caricature known as "Messianic Judaism" or the more influential (and more dangerous) Christian Zionism.

    The Catholic world largely held out against this re-Hebraization until after World War II when wanting to appear more "open" led the Church to make itself over with some Protestant, liberal and Hebraic do-ups. The results here are not only fugly but also utterly devoid of entertainment value.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @Yan Shen
    Let me put it this way. Obsessing endlessly over the Black Menace, and then adding at the end that I obviously don't mean that all black people are like that since the uh Bell Curve tells us that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person in this country is basically a slightly more intellectual way of saying that you couldn't possibly dislike black people since a few of your best friends are in fact black.

    I think David Duke has a clear and profound obsession with the Jewish Menace but I can't imagine that in actual life he literally hates every single Jewish person. In fact, he might very well point out that well some Jewish people here and there are okay, so I obviously didn't mean 100% of them were like that. And uh damn, that Gal Gadot sure is a babe...

    It may not be an exact science like physics or chemistry, but given the social creatures that homo sapiens are, most of us have a relatively good sense of when someone has a positive or negative perception of someone else through their words and actions.

    In your case Mr. Derbyshire, I hate to break it to ya, the conclusion is that you don't like black people all that much. Which honestly is fine. Unlike the rest of the PC police, I'm actually a huge believer in freedom of association and the right to like or not like whoever you want. I don't think you've done anything particularly wrong, although given that you seem genuinely surprised by how others perceive your writings, it might not hurt to mention that to an outsider, you sure do seem like someone who likes obsessing over black people endlessly.

    The more egregious thing here though, which has also been duly noted by various others, is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get treated like they're the second coming of Jesus Christ for basically doing more or less the same thing that the Derb does. That we treat race hustlers of different ethnicity so differently merely on the basis of their skin color seems quite contrary to the notions of fairness and equality that MLK so fervently fought for. And the fact that anyone could possibly think that anything Mr. Coates has ever written even remotely suggests genius or deep analytical insight is simply mind boggling...

    A quick thought of little consequence,but Derbs oldest boy jumps out of airplanes for Uncle Sam. So you might think,”Ha,that guy can take care of himself!” But then you recall those stories that pop up,like a Marine with combat medal comes back from Bumfuckistan,gets shot by Negro at Mickey D’s.
    Pretending a moral equivalence between Derb and this spear chucker (Sorry,uncalled for) is ridiculous. Preach on Rev. Derb!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Rurik says:

    Rod Dreher in the American Conservative

    why would anyone of integrity give a rat’s arse what some dickhead says in the disgraced American Cuckservative?

    when they fired Philip Giraldi, (the best thing they had going for them), they proved to all the world that they’re nothing but a den of craven, sniveling lickspittles, willing to betray the best among them to curry favor with the enemies of everything American and conservative – so long as their are shekels to be sucked.

    Any and every single writer down to the minions working for that execrable rag have long since quit by now. Continuing to represent that den of traitors and cowards would be like continuing to serve as George Bush’s press secretary after it was obvious he lied the country into catastrophic wars. If you have a shred of integrity, you quit once it becomes brutally obvious that the organization you used to work for is a rotten den of anti-American, perfidious scum.

    as for the butt-hurt Negro, I watched him on Tucker Carlson crying because Trump won, and that’s supposed to mean that every white (and presumably black) person who voted for him hates and wants to kill the negro professor and his children.

    Voting from Trump is for the negro, an act of violence against him and his brood.

    I guess because if you don’t worship the negro as sacrosanct, and agree that when he rapes and murders in numbers widely out of proportion to his numbers in society, that he should be arrested and put into a cage where he (and all rapists and murders, regardless of race) belong.. then you fall out of the good graces of the Affirmative Action Negro professor and anti-white hysterical shitbag.

    I guess these butt-hurt black crybabies have been getting a free pass on their predations upon white (and black and every other) community for so long, that now they think they’re entitled to rape and murder with impunity, simply by claiming that any attempt to rein in their worst elements = amounts to white racism and KKK, Adolf Hitler and Jim Crow.

    I wish the professor were here, so I could tell him to his racist, black face.. to fuck off.

    And take his vile racist hate and suck on it.

    Go back to Africa where your kind have ruined everything they touch, and leave white America, if you hate it so much, to live in peace and prosperity, something we have hardly known ever since the black criminal element you pretend doesn’t exist has done everything in its power to destroy every single thing in American society that is beautiful, sublime and noble. And replace it with the crass, the base and the ugly.

    and kudos Mr. Derbyshire for finally mentioning the ‘J’ word.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  91. Ron Unz says:
    @Seamus Padraig
    Rod Dreher is basically a dud--I call him Dud Dreher, in fact. The only thing he really cares about--and the only place where he ever dares challenge The Narrative--is on social issues. On every other topic, he's just pointless. Since I'm not that much into social issues, I don't bother with him to much anymore.

    Rod Dreher is basically a dud–I call him Dud Dreher, in fact. The only thing he really cares about–and the only place where he ever dares challenge The Narrative–is on social issues. On every other topic, he’s just pointless. Since I’m not that much into social issues, I don’t bother with him to much anymore.

    You may actually may be doing him a bit too much justice…

    If I remember correctly, Dreher’s early career was heavily dependent upon his very vocal leading role in the Conservative Movement attacks on “Gay Marriage” proposals around the late 1990s or so.

    But then, maybe a dozen years later, a good fraction of all the conservative funding began coming from Neocons like Singer, who were ardent gay-rights activists and advocates for Gay Marriage, while Andrew Sullivan, founder of the Gay-Marriage movement, had became one of the most influential conservative-leaning media pundits. So all the prominent conservatives, including Dreher, soon switched sides and began supporting Gay Marriage, or at least not actively opposing it. For example, I remember when the leader of the biggest conservative anti-Gay Marriage organization suddenly announced he’d totally changed his mind, and publicly endorsed Gay Marriage.

    In Dreher’s case, I seem to recall he wrote some column very mildly raising questions about the issue, then immediately issued a deep apology to Sullivan for any offence he might have possibly caused.

    (I hope I’m not getting any of my recollections a bit garbled here.)

    The key factor underlying much of this sort of thing is the extreme financial fragility of DC pundits and thinktankers, and their abject terror at risking the unemployment lines. Basically, if the CEO of Coke announces a new soft drink strategy, all his mid-level marketing people naturally get into line behind it, and the exact analogy is true of all these “mainstream opinion journalists.”

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    If I remember correctly, Dreher’s early career was heavily dependent upon his very vocal leading role in the Conservative Movement attacks on “Gay Marriage” proposals around the late 1990s or so.

    You don't. Prior to 2002, the bulk of his work consisted of film and restaurant reviews. He had a general column in the New York Post for a time, where his most remarked-upon piece was a critique of the funeral of Aaliyah. He left the Post in 2001, coincident with the anthrax scares, and landed a job on the back-of-the-book at National Review. His signature ca. 2002 re general commentary consisted of loud complaints contra episcopal non-feasance. He had no more association with the marriage issue than did any randomly selected person associated with the Catholic or oecumenical press.

    You're referring to David Blankenhorn, I think. My wager would be that foundations put the screws to him and he didn't have many alternatives because he's approaching retirement age.

    , @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    The key factor underlying much of this sort of thing is the extreme financial fragility of DC pundits and thinktankers, and their abject terror at risking the unemployment lines. Basically, if the CEO of Coke announces a new soft drink strategy, all his mid-level marketing people naturally get into line behind it, and the exact analogy is true of all these “mainstream opinion journalists.”
     
    Agreed.
    I would numerately look at USCT696 and draw these conclusions from the data:

    1) There is no representation problem by racial demography in the giant swath of households between $35K and $199K - in the broadest spectrum of Americans representation is pretty, representative
    2) There is probably terrible fear in the quartile of $35K to $99K that they will drop into or be pushed into the sub-$35K quartile ... and this fear is probably especially palpable for households the CB calls "white"
    3) While whites are under-represented in the bottom quartile of <$35K/year - they remain an absolute majority by factors of greater than 2X both African Americans and Hispanics, in same category - add up all poor households in America that aren't white and there are fewer than those which are

    So - poverty is a big problem that hurts everyone, and attempting to splice poverty by race and leave the largest impoverished group out to the curb and under the bus ... seems like a strategy for civil strife.

    Numerately - we should ignore race for the most part and 1) do what we can to minimize suffering in the bottom quartile and provide routes out of it, and 2) assure those in the next quartile that we aren't targeting them for a drop on the basis of race, and are doing what we can to help them.

    Numerately - that's the real problem, and it's a totally do-able problem - our wealthy, resource-rich nation, can do this problem.

    But ... all the mid-level innumerates got the memo to dial race to 10 and leave the air raid siren on.

    What do we do about that?
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    One of your better comments, Mr. Unz. It's not just the pundits, though, that must toe the line due to financial insecurity, but they are the ones that are trying to influence the rest (and you should realize that 95% of Americans have never heard of any but 5 or 10 pundits, so some of this pundit-on-pundit talk is thankfully lost on the majority).

    The problem with the prosperous middle class turning into a poor working class at best is that people that are barely hanging on economically are too afraid to cause any fuss or create any resistance to the PC, Cultural-Rev 2.0 stuff. Not only that, Americans in general are spendthrifts and most believe in spending everything coming in - living paycheck to paycheck and at the highest debt levels they can get away with. This has just been the American way for 4-5 decades running.

    This is part of the reason people have not been pushing back against the treatment they have gotten from the Globalist elites and the cntrl-left. It all works out great for the latter.
    , @Seamus Padraig
    I was following Dreher as recently as 2013, and I got the impression that he was still against gay marriage, even though he was fairly defeatist about it. He would occasionally complain that Andrew Sullivan wasn't nice to him any more, so I take it that his fundamental sympathies hadn't changed. But unfortunately, social issues are about all Rod cares about.

    As per your point about the "extreme financial fragility" of the pundit class, no way I can disagree with that. Actually, it's the same fear most of us have, just more acute.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. Truth says:
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  93. Truth says:

    Rod reinforces that impression further on, when he notes that my piece, a white guy warning his kids about blacks, got me dropped, while Prof. Yankah’s piece—in a much more prestigious publication—will have no negative consequences for his career.

    Dude, do you EVER stop whining about how Johnny, or Tennessee, or Ekow, got a bigger peice of pie than you did?

    I’m sure Chinese students of the mid-1960s often nursed resentments against their teachers, politicians, and other authority figures. Those resentments were kept in check by polite traditional restraints, though, as well as by the enforcers of a totalitarian state.

    …And do you ever stop kissing Chinese ass. You have to take a step back and look, WASP Sing, these practices are unseemly.

    I’m sure Chinese students of the mid-1960s often nursed resentments against their teachers, politicians, and other authority figures. Those resentments were kept in check by polite traditional restraints, though, as well as by the enforcers of a totalitarian state.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    Whenever "Truth" opens his yap, one should keep in mind that this a man who actually believes that the Earth is flat. He is an actual, unironic flat-earther.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    Hey, I liked your last paragraph. It took me about 5 sec. to realize that was a repeat of Mr. Derbyshire's writing accidentally doubled up from the block-quote.

    That paragraph is not Chinese ass-kicking anyway. Is reading comprehension too white a thing to emulate? Axe your friends about this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @Yan Shen
    Now anyone who claims that white Americans today are violent racists obviously would be wrong, statistically, sociologically, and morally, as uh someone else might well point out.

    I wonder though if an African American made that claim about white racism and violence anytime prior to say 1960 or 1970 would've been that far off the mark? In another post of mine elsewhere on this blog, I argued that one of the reasons why all of us are having to suffer through the madness of our politically correct and quite frankly batshit crazy contemporary society, including having to see men like Coates endlessly feted as the second coming of Jesus Christ, is because of prior bad behavior on the part of whites in this country, what with slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan and the likes. This prior bad behavior is precisely the reason why all of us will now hear till the End of Time that racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today. If only whites back in the day would've acted like decent human beings towards blacks instead of obviously discriminating against them, then the success or failure of blacks would be upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't endlessly have to hear all sorts of convoluted excuses for their behavior. It's kind of like how the prior extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now all of us will have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till the End of Time.

    How many other sane and good things have been ruined and taken away from the rest of us good folks in this country because of this prior bad behavior on the part of whites? One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime is one of those big things that few very media outlets will have an honest discussion about. And in a classic case of projection, East Asians are often slandered as being racist towards blacks when simply many of them have what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality that couldn't be further away from the kind of racial essentialism that characterizes so many blacks and whites in this country today.

    I am so sorry,dear Asian Prince,that this country is not all it could have been,and should’ve been,for you. My most ‘umble apologies.
    Again,tho,if you’re not happy,get the Fuck out!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rdm
    A person can say whatever the hell he wants in a discourse as long as the discussion stays in the course. Just because a negative connotation of the US slavery, lynching history was brought upon in lieu of racial equality in this 21st century, a person with a seemingly East Asian decent cannot be called out with a specious retort like "Get the Fuck out!"

    A convenient retort that White Americans these days are resorting when it comes to defending the ugly history of the US is "Go back to where you come from", which is largely based on the idea that they belong to the majority of this country, even if their dubious european parents come here with refugee status back in the days while 5th or 6th generation East Asian Americans are simply called out with an easy comeback "Go back to Asia".

    What a lame joke.

    The only thing that people consider you being an American is being "White". The rest of your biological wastes have been accumulating in this American soil for good-for-nothing.

    , @Anon
    Check first your ancestry, dude
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Truth says:
    @Amasius
    I didn't do any more than skim this African's screed, but still I must ask: What the hell is he even talking about? Why would it ever be "unsafe" to be friends with White people? What are they going to do, rob or rape you? Trick you into putting your hands up so they can shoot you in the back? The whole notion is just plain stupid. They dressed him in a suit and he's learned to ape (no mean pun intended) the intonation of Whites, but he has an 87 IQ at best, I swear.

    Why would it ever be “unsafe” to be friends with White people? What are they going to do, rob or rape you? Trick you into putting your hands up so they can shoot you in the back?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    It's notable how you rely exclusively upon fictional anti-white race-hatred propaganda to justify your own unrelenting racism. But I guess that's all you have.
    , @res
    Perhaps you should start using the pseudonym "Fiction"?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. Sherman says:
    @Art
    the percentage of obnoxiously ethnocentric jerks among American Jews

    geokat62,

    Derbyshire wrote some strong words – words the Jews will hate – will he recant?

    Maybe – maybe not – never the less - today his words are more than welcome. Maybe they will give someone else of note, a little backbone.

    Most of the comments are about the black/white angle – not about the Gentile/Jew angle of this article.

    Strange – the Blacks have no power in America and the Jews all the power in America – and people ignore the Jews – amazing.

    Think Peace --- Art

    p.s. Jew power is enforced by the Jew owned media.

    p.s. America is not America because of that.

    Hey Genius

    “Never the less” s/b “nevertheless”.

    Shalom

    Sherm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. Truth says:
    @Hank Rearden
    I don't want to be around blacks. Blacks don't want to be around me. Can we get an amicable divorce already?

    Funny how the State has made it so damned easy for two married parents to split up, yet forces two races with irreconcilable differences to be together.

    Northern Minnesotta is pretty white. Move.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Id est, we've got you on the run, white man, and we're lovin it! Keep runnin. And stay out of Eskimo territory.
    , @Chuckie
    Minnesota is being filled with refugees, especially from Somalia. So no, can’t find refuge there.

    https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/us-state-department-and-resettlement-contractors-salted-minnesota-with-over-10000-somali-refugees-since-2005/

    I believe Wyoming is the only state in the U.S. that has resisted settling of 3rd world savages from the Refugee Resettlement Program. But the open borders folks are working on wearing them down. https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2016/03/14/wyoming-public-radio-pushing-refugee-resettlement-for-wyoming/

    I was searching for a retirement location in the U.S. where the population is majority white and had my worst fears confirmed. Looking beyond the states that have high populations of African-Americans and Latinos, in the other states, there were clusters of refugees all over the place, taking the remaining scarce jobs for rock-bottom wages. Given the rates at which minorities breed, it won’t be too long before there are no places in the U.S. white people can live among a majority of whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Truth says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    There was nothing like this in the past civil rights movements. IMO, its a sign of the weakness of leftist agitation, not strength.

    You’re a leftist.

    You and tha Derb are both adherents to the liberal philosophy of interracial marriage.

    Read More
    • Troll: Daniel Chieh
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    That has fuck all to do with Leftism.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Art Deco says:
    @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    More than likely his kids agree with him.

    I doubt they’re capable of the jujitsu which would be required given that they have maternal side relatives, among others which which they associate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Truth says:
    @Charles Pewitt
    The only thing holding the multicultural American Empire together is money printing from the privately-controlled Federal Reserve Bank. When the next global financial implosion hits, you will see the Fed plunge right through the Zero Interest Rate Policy level and move into Negative Interest Rates. That will be when the young people refuse to pay the massive government debt and the government worker pension debt.

    John Derbyshire's reaction to the arrogant sub-Saharan Black African named Thursday and the cuckservative weakling named Dreher is one shared by many Americans. Derbyshire has also lived in and around New York City for decades, so he has learned to navigate around Blacks and to avoid Blacks.

    Remember, Hillary Clinton knew enough about New York Blacks to scout out the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York for her New York home. Millions of other White people who live around New York City have done the same damn thing that both Hillary Clinton and John Derbyshire have done: find a spot in the New York City area that is blessedly free of criminal Black types.

    Derbyshire's civilizational survival instincts are excellent, and the suggestions he gave to his kids about how to avoid criminal Blacks was mostly just common sense. But he might consider that we all won't be doomed if a global financial implosion removes the current ruling class of the American Empire. Some of us will prosper quite nicely when the anti-White ruling class rats are removed from power.

    Derbyshire has also lived in and around New York City for decades, so he has learned to navigate around Blacks and to avoid Blacks.

    He was born in a basically, all-white community in England. If he had stayed there he wouldn’t have needed to learn.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Nonsense. Britain is being rapidly "diversified" as we speak.
    And not coincidentally, its violent crime rate is skyrocketing.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Art Deco says:
    @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    The Jews using the Holocaust in order to milk endless concessions from the Germans, too. As long as gentiles dominate Germany.

    The nominal sums set aside for reparations have amounted to about $6 bn. Germany’s gdp is about $3,400 bn per annum, so I think they can absorb the sum.

    About 2/3 of the Jewish population of Europe were killed over the period running from 1938 to 1945.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Bullshit. And you’re a cuck.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Truth says:
    @Wally
    Hey dumsky, the aggressor is a mulatto.

    LOL, a really…really…light Mulatto. Know in Staten Island, Providence and Queens as a “Wop,”

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Wop was a rude word for Italians.

    Italians on the mainland, including southern Italy, typically have ZERO subSahara-African DNA, limited to no Arab DNA, and very little to zero North African DNA. Much more common is Greek and Balkan DNA (the major testing companies define genetic regions diffently).

    This is borne out by my maternal family's own recent genetic tests, showing origins primarily in the Lazio and Campagna, zero sub Saharan African DNA, zero to one percent North African DNA, and never more than five percent Middle Eastern DNA even among the oldest generation.

    Italy is not Sicily, genius.

    I think you may not know what mulatto means and particularly how it has actually been used in the American context.

    Finally, here is a word for you to learn through practical experience: hospitalized. Try out your word WOP on some italian-Americans on the street in Staten Island, Brooklyn, Bronx, Jersey, Philly, etc., and tell us how that goes for ya.

    Also, since you like ethnic slurs against Italians, try using the comparable slur against some African-"Americans" and update us during your second hospital stay.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Art Deco says:
    @Ron Unz

    Rod Dreher is basically a dud–I call him Dud Dreher, in fact. The only thing he really cares about–and the only place where he ever dares challenge The Narrative–is on social issues. On every other topic, he’s just pointless. Since I’m not that much into social issues, I don’t bother with him to much anymore.
     
    You may actually may be doing him a bit too much justice...

    If I remember correctly, Dreher's early career was heavily dependent upon his very vocal leading role in the Conservative Movement attacks on "Gay Marriage" proposals around the late 1990s or so.

    But then, maybe a dozen years later, a good fraction of all the conservative funding began coming from Neocons like Singer, who were ardent gay-rights activists and advocates for Gay Marriage, while Andrew Sullivan, founder of the Gay-Marriage movement, had became one of the most influential conservative-leaning media pundits. So all the prominent conservatives, including Dreher, soon switched sides and began supporting Gay Marriage, or at least not actively opposing it. For example, I remember when the leader of the biggest conservative anti-Gay Marriage organization suddenly announced he'd totally changed his mind, and publicly endorsed Gay Marriage.

    In Dreher's case, I seem to recall he wrote some column very mildly raising questions about the issue, then immediately issued a deep apology to Sullivan for any offence he might have possibly caused.

    (I hope I'm not getting any of my recollections a bit garbled here.)

    The key factor underlying much of this sort of thing is the extreme financial fragility of DC pundits and thinktankers, and their abject terror at risking the unemployment lines. Basically, if the CEO of Coke announces a new soft drink strategy, all his mid-level marketing people naturally get into line behind it, and the exact analogy is true of all these "mainstream opinion journalists."

    If I remember correctly, Dreher’s early career was heavily dependent upon his very vocal leading role in the Conservative Movement attacks on “Gay Marriage” proposals around the late 1990s or so.

    You don’t. Prior to 2002, the bulk of his work consisted of film and restaurant reviews. He had a general column in the New York Post for a time, where his most remarked-upon piece was a critique of the funeral of Aaliyah. He left the Post in 2001, coincident with the anthrax scares, and landed a job on the back-of-the-book at National Review. His signature ca. 2002 re general commentary consisted of loud complaints contra episcopal non-feasance. He had no more association with the marriage issue than did any randomly selected person associated with the Catholic or oecumenical press.

    You’re referring to David Blankenhorn, I think. My wager would be that foundations put the screws to him and he didn’t have many alternatives because he’s approaching retirement age.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ron Unz

    You’re referring to David Blankenhorn, I think. My wager would be that foundations put the screws to him and he didn’t have many alternatives because he’s approaching retirement age.
     
    Thanks for remembering the name of that top conservative of the anti-Gay Marriage crusade who immediately endorsed Gay Marriage once his donors so directed him.

    And it's certainly possible that my memory might be at fault regarding the extent of Dreher's zeal on that same issue in the 1990s and others having to do with "Gay Rights" but that was what I vaguely remembered. I just spent a couple of minutes Googling around, but unfortunately there isn't as much from that period still up on the Internet. The little I found suggested that Dreher mostly wrote along Rightwing Christian cultural lines in that era, and since all the Christian Rightists were always fighting the Gay Activists back then, I do think it generally tends to support my own recollection.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. Mulegino1 says:
    @Hank Rearden
    Your statement that "Jews formed something like 85% of the leadership of the first Soviet government" is true.

    The same Judeo-Bolshevist values can be observed in Christian behavior, as "not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them" (Acts 4:32, 6:1), including the church's murderous methods to spread "fear" as it consolidated its stranglehold on money (Acts 5:11), in accordance with the Magic Rabbi's hatred of the "rich." (especially Luke 6:24, also Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, Luke 18:22, Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25, Luke 12:13-21, Luke 16:19-31)


    "....primitive Christianity is Bolshevism."

    -Ludwig von Mises, Socialism, p. 413
    http://www.econlib.org/library/Mises/msS10.html#IV.29.14
     

    Of course you neglect to mention that the “communism” of the Christian community referenced in the Acts of the Apostles was strictly voluntary, and subsequently abandoned as unworkable on a societal basis (while adhered to successfully and providentially for well over a thousand years in the monastic orders, which were instrumental in building western civilization).

    What does this have to do with the Judeo-Bolsheviks and their tyrannical and murderous reign over the Christians of Russia- or Hungary- or Romania- or wherever?

    And how dare you call Christ “the magic Rabbi”? There is nothing “magical” about Him at all; in a metaphysical sense, God can perform miracles at the time and place of His own choosing. Perhaps you – like your spiritual and (blood?) ancestors- would prefer the murderous thug Barrabas!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    The communism enforced by the Judeo-Bolshevist Church was clearly not voluntary, by any stretch of the imagination. Read Acts 5:11 again. See that word "fear?"

    If two people disappeared into a charity meeting at the Clinton Foundation and came out dead, would you really take the excuse that their murders were justified because they had "lied to the Holy Hillary" about their level of charity? And what if St. Hillary boasted that it caused "great fear" enough to increase "charity" contributions?

    Here's the crime committed in Acts 5:11, if Saint Hillary had done the same thing. See that word "fear" again?


    COERCION IN THE FIRST DEGREE
    (Class D felony)
    PENAL LAW 135.65(2)
    Under our law, a person is guilty of coercion in the first degree when 1 he or she compels or induces a person to engage in conduct...by means of instilling in him or her a fear that, if the demand is not complied with, the actor or another will...Cause physical injury to a person..
     
    P.S. If there's nothing magical about the Magic Rabbi, why did he attract several astrological magi to his birth?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. What’s needed is a broad rejection of the 1964 definition of “white”.
    European is a thing.
    Indo-european is a thing.
    Non-Indo-european, European, is a thing.
    All manner of European ethnic and national ancestries, are things.
    “White”, is not a thing – it’s a thing being forced on us, and it’s driving all of us crazy.
    What would be awesome is if Trump accomplished this during his tenure – truly if he accomplished nothing else this one single accomplishment would mark him in history as the man who saved the Republic from itself:
    * Compel all government reporting (save possibly US Census) to limit identity reporting to two questions: A) Are you of African American ancestry?, B) Are you of Native American ancestry?
    There are the only two groups which can muster an adequate case for general recompense or terms-of-treaty from the US as a whole.
    A way to do it would be to trade in the wall, i.e.: in exchange for dropping all plans for a wall, gain buyoff from Latinos of all stripes that they will no longer be specially identified in query or reporting for college admissions, employment, promotion or any other kind of government accounting. Male/Female would have to go too. We’ll need to ask Team Feminism to Take One for the Team and postpone the Settling of Scores for awhile while we mend fences that can still be mended.

    Do that – simple “no reporting” on anything except for AA, yes/no, NA, yes/no … that alone would be like an ocean of cool water over the Great Fire of Rome.

    And failing all that, “white” people, as defined arbitrarily by people in 1964, long dead … could probably be rejected. If everyone agrees not to be white, ever, the powers that be can respond but not in any way that will be worth the cost.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    “White”, is not a thing – it’s a thing being forced on us, and it’s driving all of us crazy.
     
    Well, it's been around since the 1790 census, so who forced it on us?

    https://www.censusrecords.com/content/1790_Census
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. Truth says:
    @denk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLCRq0gGg30

    Chinese should empathise with the plight of other minorities, better still,
    unite with them to fight those white trash.

    This is hardly isolated incident.
    I've read/heard/seen so many cases where Chinese were gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc, thats right, anglo land.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. renfro says:
    @Mulegino1
    International Jewry will continue its traditional exploitation of susceptible minorities to vilify and attack the non-Jewish majorities in those parts of the world under its hegemonic umbrella. It did the same thing during the Bolshevik Revolution. How many of the members of the Central Committees were of Russian Orthodox provenance? Jews formed something like 85% of the leadership of the first Soviet government despite being only 2 % or so of the population of the Russian Empire.

    The worship of Jewry (as a collective) is the sine qua non, the absolute prerequisite for membership in the card carrying world of the kosher cuckoisie, where treason and corruption prosper. The hive of collective Jewry will invariably elevate its worst and most repulsive members to the top of the heap and will do so with respect to its own reserve army of the shabbos goyim. The Bushes, Clintons and Obamas are a perfect example of this in the United States.

    How long will it take for the men (as in "vires") of the west to realize that we- Christendom, the Europe of Nations and the inheritors of its traditions and culture- lost the Second World War? So much of the current cognitive dissonance and blindness to reality hinges upon the suicidal legend of the "Good War"? Unless this reality enters into our collective conscious post haste, our civilization and society will be buried for good.

    ” The Bushes, Clintons and Obamas are a perfect example of this in the United States.”

    Obama’s boast: ‘I am the closest thing to a Jew that has ever sat’ in the Oval Office

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/2/obama-i-am-closest-thing-jew-has-ever-sat-oval-off/

    Obama identified with Jews as he considered blacks also victims of the white man.

    Bush I tolerated them and Bush II was too uncurious to notice them.

    Clinton stacked his adm with them cause he found them useful for unsavory errands and fundraising.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Obama’s boast: ‘I am the closest thing to a Jew that has ever sat’ in the Oval Office'
     
    Larry Sinclair is Jewish?

    But Monica is for sure, and Bill was sitting, wasn't he?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. TTSSYF says:
    @Hu Mi Yu

    Why do you (Yan Shen) use “uh?” Its really weird.
     
    It represents a pause to think. He chose his following words carefully and perhaps used a euphemism.

    Ridiculous, of course. He need only pause his fingers, not continue working to type “uh”. It is meant to be condescending and annoying, particularly because of where it is being used; i.e., to signify his contempt for what follows.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Dr. X says:

    Glad to see Derb finally appears to be getting red-pilled on the JQ.

    Derb’s Jew-philia seems largely predicated on high Jewish IQ, but nobody has ever argued that the Jews are stupid. Rather, the condescending goy-hatred, the insufferable “God’s Chosen” nepotism, tribalism, and hypocrisy, and the fact that Israel has Uncle Sam on a short leash are the issues that concern most of us.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  110. ia says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Howard Zinn explains how the top two or so % rich people in the USA are able to rule because they cause antagonisms between the 98% or so not rich.
    I fear Brussels has the same policy in the still existing member states.
    Lagerfeld, a well known fashion designer in Germany, probably jewish, now accuses Merkel of letting in the enemies of jews.
    Belgium is waking up.
    In a short time two serious riots in Brussels, when police appears they are attacked immediately.
    Cars demolished, shop windows thrown in, looting, just because a French rapper on social media asked to come together.
    Swedish police now is being equipped with special microphones, that can detect gunshots between other noise.
    Today Dutch blacks again will try to disturb the old Dutch Sinterklaas children festivity, because of his Black Petes.
    They are unable to see that Pete is black of soot, Pete reminds them of their slavery history, they say.
    Great developments.

    Lagerfeld, a well known fashion designer in Germany, probably jewish,

    Nah.

    http://ethnicelebs.com/karl-lagerfeld

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. @WJ
    Actually Derb is doing quite well. He has a substantial audience through Unz and other outlets.

    I doubt that he dislikes blacks. He is simply fatigued by the endless cultural inconsistency that shows the black community as the perpetual victim when, of course, they are victimizing members of other races at a vastly disproportionate rate. Police shootings are a good example. We have all read the analysis, white people on a Per capita basis are far more likely to be shot by police and of course, black men are basically 100 times more likely to be shot by a member of their own race than by a policeman. Interracial rape is another example.

    The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this "professor" is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa.

    He may have zero slave lineage, but tgere a good chance that he has slave owner lineage.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. ia says:
    @Realist
    What is amazing is how compliant whites are to grab their socks. There is no other race as willing to be annihilated .

    Western whites aren’t going to stand a chance when their enemies assume power. It’ll be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sad.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist
    Quite right
    , @dfordoom

    Western whites aren’t going to stand a chance when their enemies assume power.
     
    Western whites have a strategy prepared for such an eventuality. They're going to apologise. Then they're going to apologise some more. Then they're going to crawl and grovel and start crying. It's bound to work.
    , @Sin City Milla
    Yep.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. “White” is tolerable, if not ideal, but please don’t call me an “Anglo” or a “gentile”. I’m a White Anglo-Saxon Papist.

    “Gentile” derives from something like “outsider”, so its use should be restricted to those inside the group outside of which it refers. I mean, just ’cause I don’t think Joseph Smith was a prophet, I get slapped with a silly epithet?

    Now, for “Czechia”. The ugly-sounding– in English– “Belarus” and “Moldova” at least have the excuse of being the natives’ name for their country. But this, this is bad English, bad Czech, bad Latin, and bad Polish. What’s wrong with “Česko”?

    Or Bohemia, for that matter? Or Moravia?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Merge it back with Slovakia because Czechoslovakia was a very cool-sounding name.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. ia says:
    @Jason Liu
    I thought you folks would be glad at the thought of segregating your kids from other races

    Most people here aren’t white nationalists. They aren’t even identarians. They’re civic nationalists.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. @renfro
    '' The Bushes, Clintons and Obamas are a perfect example of this in the United States.''


    Obama’s boast: ‘I am the closest thing to a Jew that has ever sat’ in the Oval Office

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/2/obama-i-am-closest-thing-jew-has-ever-sat-oval-off/

    Obama identified with Jews as he considered blacks also victims of the white man.

    Bush I tolerated them and Bush II was too uncurious to notice them.

    Clinton stacked his adm with them cause he found them useful for unsavory errands and fundraising.

    Obama’s boast: ‘I am the closest thing to a Jew that has ever sat’ in the Oval Office’

    Larry Sinclair is Jewish?

    But Monica is for sure, and Bill was sitting, wasn’t he?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    What's needed is a broad rejection of the 1964 definition of "white".
    European is a thing.
    Indo-european is a thing.
    Non-Indo-european, European, is a thing.
    All manner of European ethnic and national ancestries, are things.
    "White", is not a thing - it's a thing being forced on us, and it's driving all of us crazy.
    What would be awesome is if Trump accomplished this during his tenure - truly if he accomplished nothing else this one single accomplishment would mark him in history as the man who saved the Republic from itself:
    * Compel all government reporting (save possibly US Census) to limit identity reporting to two questions: A) Are you of African American ancestry?, B) Are you of Native American ancestry?
    There are the only two groups which can muster an adequate case for general recompense or terms-of-treaty from the US as a whole.
    A way to do it would be to trade in the wall, i.e.: in exchange for dropping all plans for a wall, gain buyoff from Latinos of all stripes that they will no longer be specially identified in query or reporting for college admissions, employment, promotion or any other kind of government accounting. Male/Female would have to go too. We'll need to ask Team Feminism to Take One for the Team and postpone the Settling of Scores for awhile while we mend fences that can still be mended.

    Do that - simple "no reporting" on anything except for AA, yes/no, NA, yes/no ... that alone would be like an ocean of cool water over the Great Fire of Rome.

    And failing all that, "white" people, as defined arbitrarily by people in 1964, long dead ... could probably be rejected. If everyone agrees not to be white, ever, the powers that be can respond but not in any way that will be worth the cost.

    “White”, is not a thing – it’s a thing being forced on us, and it’s driving all of us crazy.

    Well, it’s been around since the 1790 census, so who forced it on us?

    https://www.censusrecords.com/content/1790_Census

    Read More
    • Replies: @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    Come on. Are you serious?
    So - how I answer depends on your angle.
    Is it the "white privilege" angle, or the angle that Americans have used a logism, "white" for centuries?

    The latter is irrelevant - it's the 1964 definition applied in academic and employment applications, hiring, admissions and promotions - that's killing us.
    The former is a deflection attempt by the top 5% to avoid having their ox gored by way of "sharing" their state with their economic inferiors, "look, look - don't look at my trust fund, look at that penniless guy trying to find a job, see 'white privilege', we have to admit our privilege, gore his ox not mine I'm one of the good guys!"

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. renfro says:
    @lavoisier
    "That said, this article was indeed a step in the right direction."

    Indeed it is.

    And quite honestly I am surprised that step was taken.

    My guess: Derb is getting old and realizes that he cannot, in good conscience, completely ignore the Jewish question and retain integrity as a man who speaks the truth.

    I like Derb. But taking on the JQ is fraught with risks.

    And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.

    But their hatred for the goyim and consequent destructive behavior to European civilization has to be recognized and challenged if we are to prevent our nations from becoming Towers of Babel.

    Derb needs to be applauded for his efforts in this direction.

    I do not think the man is a coward. He is starting to emerge from the cave, albeit hesitantly.

    I expect more from him in the future.

    ” And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.”>>>>>

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

    I have been asking this question to those who claim it for years and never get a response.
    I recently asked it of a commenter here and got nothing but rambling gibberish about Hollywood and popular music and etc..
    I don’t consider those contributions to America as every group including blacks claim that as a contribution .
    I also don’t consider Jewish science or nobels as contributions either as many others have also contributed to science won nobels.

    I want to see something that Jews have contributed that others haven’t or contributed more than others have. Something of positive importance distinctly Jewish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    9 to 1 says there's a processor in the device you are commenting with - that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in.
    , @Rdm
    Contributions of Jews to the US have a wide spectrum. Upgrading trashy Black music and twerking from their platforms as if they were reincarnation of Mozart's musical masterpieces. On the other hand, Jewish contribution in American STEM fields have manyfold.

    As a spider web of Jewish presence is so strong, they are now copying exactly what Whites have done before.

    A white person drew a square box, all White people call it Punnet Square.
    A white person connects between malaria and mosquitoes after coming back from India, a White community gave him a Nobel Prize.

    Every little thing White people identified, discovered were given Whites name whereas all ancients discoveries, identifications were just ... you know, no-name.

    Following that, a significant presence of Jewish in many European institutions have managed to catapulted even a tiny success of Jews in the US.
    , @lavoisier
    Fair enough question. I will largely leave out Hollywood as you suggest but the film industry used to be a force for good even if film making itself was invented by Edison.

    Jewish scientists are incredibly important in biomedical advances. You want to dismiss the Nobel prizes because other scientists are contributing to this important work, but Jewish scientists are roughly 30% of the receipients of the prizes in Medicine, Physics, and Chemistry. That number is nothing short of amazing.

    Many of the advances in the war against cancer have been led by Jewish scientists and physicians. That many people are cured today from cancer whom otherwise would have died is due in no small measure to the work of Jewish scientists.

    High energy physics and astrophysics are indebted to the work of many Jewish scientists.

    I think to have this conversation fairly we have to acknowledge their outsized positive contributions, even while being honest about their outsized negative contributions to our civilization.

    , @wayfarer

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

     

    Rabbi Dov Zakheim, made a creative accounting contribution to America.

    As a dual Israeli-American citizen, he was comptroller of the Pentagon when 2.3 trillion-dollars vanished without a trace, and was never even be questioned by the U.S. Congress.

    Talk about, Israeli-American ingenuity!

    ….......
    , @Sin City Milla
    Al Jolson. Jay Gould. Stephen Jay Gould. And Anton LaVey. They certainly contributed something...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Saul Alinsky: accuse others of what you are doing yourself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  119. @Ron Unz

    Rod Dreher is basically a dud–I call him Dud Dreher, in fact. The only thing he really cares about–and the only place where he ever dares challenge The Narrative–is on social issues. On every other topic, he’s just pointless. Since I’m not that much into social issues, I don’t bother with him to much anymore.
     
    You may actually may be doing him a bit too much justice...

    If I remember correctly, Dreher's early career was heavily dependent upon his very vocal leading role in the Conservative Movement attacks on "Gay Marriage" proposals around the late 1990s or so.

    But then, maybe a dozen years later, a good fraction of all the conservative funding began coming from Neocons like Singer, who were ardent gay-rights activists and advocates for Gay Marriage, while Andrew Sullivan, founder of the Gay-Marriage movement, had became one of the most influential conservative-leaning media pundits. So all the prominent conservatives, including Dreher, soon switched sides and began supporting Gay Marriage, or at least not actively opposing it. For example, I remember when the leader of the biggest conservative anti-Gay Marriage organization suddenly announced he'd totally changed his mind, and publicly endorsed Gay Marriage.

    In Dreher's case, I seem to recall he wrote some column very mildly raising questions about the issue, then immediately issued a deep apology to Sullivan for any offence he might have possibly caused.

    (I hope I'm not getting any of my recollections a bit garbled here.)

    The key factor underlying much of this sort of thing is the extreme financial fragility of DC pundits and thinktankers, and their abject terror at risking the unemployment lines. Basically, if the CEO of Coke announces a new soft drink strategy, all his mid-level marketing people naturally get into line behind it, and the exact analogy is true of all these "mainstream opinion journalists."

    The key factor underlying much of this sort of thing is the extreme financial fragility of DC pundits and thinktankers, and their abject terror at risking the unemployment lines. Basically, if the CEO of Coke announces a new soft drink strategy, all his mid-level marketing people naturally get into line behind it, and the exact analogy is true of all these “mainstream opinion journalists.”

    Agreed.
    I would numerately look at USCT696 and draw these conclusions from the data:

    1) There is no representation problem by racial demography in the giant swath of households between $35K and $199K – in the broadest spectrum of Americans representation is pretty, representative
    2) There is probably terrible fear in the quartile of $35K to $99K that they will drop into or be pushed into the sub-$35K quartile … and this fear is probably especially palpable for households the CB calls “white”
    3) While whites are under-represented in the bottom quartile of <$35K/year – they remain an absolute majority by factors of greater than 2X both African Americans and Hispanics, in same category – add up all poor households in America that aren't white and there are fewer than those which are

    So – poverty is a big problem that hurts everyone, and attempting to splice poverty by race and leave the largest impoverished group out to the curb and under the bus … seems like a strategy for civil strife.

    Numerately – we should ignore race for the most part and 1) do what we can to minimize suffering in the bottom quartile and provide routes out of it, and 2) assure those in the next quartile that we aren't targeting them for a drop on the basis of race, and are doing what we can to help them.

    Numerately – that's the real problem, and it's a totally do-able problem – our wealthy, resource-rich nation, can do this problem.

    But … all the mid-level innumerates got the memo to dial race to 10 and leave the air raid siren on.

    What do we do about that?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Issac
    The confounding factor missed here is that the clean numeracy you've alluded to misses the relatively one-way traffic of empathy for the lower quartile. Whites in virtually every cohort have empathy for minorities in the lowest quartile. Minorities in any cohort have a concomitant lack of empathy for whites in most quartiles, with greater ire being reserved for the lowest. Any solution that does not account for the demographic angle, orthogonal to the economic, will be doomed to fail.
    , @RadicalCenter
    We are not wealthy. The fed gov and households are deeply in debt. We need to stop fooling ourselves to feeel good. But I like your general approach.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. @Art Deco
    The nominal sums set aside for reparations have amounted to about $6 bn. Germany's gdp is about $3,400 bn per annum, so I think they can absorb the sum.

    About 2/3 of the Jewish population of Europe were killed over the period running from 1938 to 1945.

    Bullshit. And you’re a cuck.

    Read More
    • Troll: German_reader
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. Rdm says:
    @Father O'Hara
    I am so sorry,dear Asian Prince,that this country is not all it could have been,and should've been,for you. My most 'umble apologies.
    Again,tho,if you're not happy,get the Fuck out!!!

    A person can say whatever the hell he wants in a discourse as long as the discussion stays in the course. Just because a negative connotation of the US slavery, lynching history was brought upon in lieu of racial equality in this 21st century, a person with a seemingly East Asian decent cannot be called out with a specious retort like “Get the Fuck out!”

    A convenient retort that White Americans these days are resorting when it comes to defending the ugly history of the US is “Go back to where you come from”, which is largely based on the idea that they belong to the majority of this country, even if their dubious european parents come here with refugee status back in the days while 5th or 6th generation East Asian Americans are simply called out with an easy comeback “Go back to Asia”.

    What a lame joke.

    The only thing that people consider you being an American is being “White”. The rest of your biological wastes have been accumulating in this American soil for good-for-nothing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Zoodles
    That is because the actual ethnic americans, the american-americans are white. And the USA is their motherland. A Chinese person can no more be an ethnic american than an anglo saxon person can be han chinese.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. Realist says:
    @ia
    Western whites aren't going to stand a chance when their enemies assume power. It'll be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sad.

    Quite right

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. Olorin says:
    @Mark James
    he percentage of obnoxiously ethnocentric jerks among American Jews is rather high,

    Especially on the Editorial Pages of the New York Times.

    It would benefit Mr. Yankah to teach that while friendship may not be "possible" a friendly acquaintance is pretty easy to accomplish especially if it revolves around good manners.

    Agree. However I doubt that good manners is anywhere near the top of the list of qualifications for getting hired to teach at Yeshiva University.

    Or most other universities these days, for which being an obnoxious, contentious, ethnocentric, anti-white faux-Chosen (fauxsen?) is pretty much de rigueur for teaching positions and administrative sinecures.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. @Mulegino1
    Of course you neglect to mention that the "communism" of the Christian community referenced in the Acts of the Apostles was strictly voluntary, and subsequently abandoned as unworkable on a societal basis (while adhered to successfully and providentially for well over a thousand years in the monastic orders, which were instrumental in building western civilization).

    What does this have to do with the Judeo-Bolsheviks and their tyrannical and murderous reign over the Christians of Russia- or Hungary- or Romania- or wherever?

    And how dare you call Christ "the magic Rabbi"? There is nothing "magical" about Him at all; in a metaphysical sense, God can perform miracles at the time and place of His own choosing. Perhaps you - like your spiritual and (blood?) ancestors- would prefer the murderous thug Barrabas!

    The communism enforced by the Judeo-Bolshevist Church was clearly not voluntary, by any stretch of the imagination. Read Acts 5:11 again. See that word “fear?”

    If two people disappeared into a charity meeting at the Clinton Foundation and came out dead, would you really take the excuse that their murders were justified because they had “lied to the Holy Hillary” about their level of charity? And what if St. Hillary boasted that it caused “great fear” enough to increase “charity” contributions?

    Here’s the crime committed in Acts 5:11, if Saint Hillary had done the same thing. See that word “fear” again?

    COERCION IN THE FIRST DEGREE
    (Class D felony)
    PENAL LAW 135.65(2)
    Under our law, a person is guilty of coercion in the first degree when 1 he or she compels or induces a person to engage in conduct…by means of instilling in him or her a fear that, if the demand is not complied with, the actor or another will…Cause physical injury to a person..

    P.S. If there’s nothing magical about the Magic Rabbi, why did he attract several astrological magi to his birth?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    "Fear" , when used in its New Testament context, does not necessarily imply coercion of coercive human forces such as governments or people in authority. However, the "fear" of the Jews (by the apostles), before Pentecost, was based upon a real fear of being turned over to the very coercive and oppressive Sanhedrin, whereas the "fear of the Lord" was based upon the acknowledgement of God's omnipotence and justice. I realize that this is too much for a Talmudic dominated mind to digest in one sitting, though. You can speak all you want about the "Magic Rabbi." To paraphrase Napoleon Buonaparte, if you desire to discredit Him, just get yourself killed and then resurrect. That should be enough to sate your Talmudic mindset's thirst for satisfaction, right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. @renfro
    '' And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.''>>>>>

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

    I have been asking this question to those who claim it for years and never get a response.
    I recently asked it of a commenter here and got nothing but rambling gibberish about Hollywood and popular music and etc..
    I don't consider those contributions to America as every group including blacks claim that as a contribution .
    I also don't consider Jewish science or nobels as contributions either as many others have also contributed to science won nobels.

    I want to see something that Jews have contributed that others haven't or contributed more than others have. Something of positive importance distinctly Jewish.

    9 to 1 says there’s a processor in the device you are commenting with – that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    '' 9 to 1 says there’s a processor in the device you are commenting with – that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in''

    Sorry no cigar...if you are referring to first processor or even the microprocessor. Ted Hoff (German American) actually conceived the micro...there two others guys involved and one was Jewish but he isn't the creator.

    I said specifically jewish ...some thing only a jew or jews alone have done.

    , @Miro23

    ” 9 to 1 says there’s a processor in the device you are commenting with – that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in”
     
    If you're talking about Andy Grove, he was also greatly concerned about the Outsourcing Model, and the great harm that it was doing to the US on many levels. He wrote a great article about it on Bloomberg that didn't get anything like the publicity that it deserved:

    "How America Can Create Jobs"
    http://www.openvms.org/http%3A//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-07-01/andy-grove-how-america-can-create-jobs

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. Rdm says:
    @renfro
    '' And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.''>>>>>

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

    I have been asking this question to those who claim it for years and never get a response.
    I recently asked it of a commenter here and got nothing but rambling gibberish about Hollywood and popular music and etc..
    I don't consider those contributions to America as every group including blacks claim that as a contribution .
    I also don't consider Jewish science or nobels as contributions either as many others have also contributed to science won nobels.

    I want to see something that Jews have contributed that others haven't or contributed more than others have. Something of positive importance distinctly Jewish.

    Contributions of Jews to the US have a wide spectrum. Upgrading trashy Black music and twerking from their platforms as if they were reincarnation of Mozart’s musical masterpieces. On the other hand, Jewish contribution in American STEM fields have manyfold.

    As a spider web of Jewish presence is so strong, they are now copying exactly what Whites have done before.

    A white person drew a square box, all White people call it Punnet Square.
    A white person connects between malaria and mosquitoes after coming back from India, a White community gave him a Nobel Prize.

    Every little thing White people identified, discovered were given Whites name whereas all ancients discoveries, identifications were just … you know, no-name.

    Following that, a significant presence of Jewish in many European institutions have managed to catapulted even a tiny success of Jews in the US.

    Read More
    • Replies: @daniel le mouche
    'A white person drew a square box, all White people call it Punnet Square.'

    Thank you for the new term, 'Punnet Square'. It's very, very strange, but I've been white all my life and have never heard of it--I must be the only dumbfuck whitey shitstick that ain't.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. Ron Unz says:
    @Art Deco
    If I remember correctly, Dreher’s early career was heavily dependent upon his very vocal leading role in the Conservative Movement attacks on “Gay Marriage” proposals around the late 1990s or so.

    You don't. Prior to 2002, the bulk of his work consisted of film and restaurant reviews. He had a general column in the New York Post for a time, where his most remarked-upon piece was a critique of the funeral of Aaliyah. He left the Post in 2001, coincident with the anthrax scares, and landed a job on the back-of-the-book at National Review. His signature ca. 2002 re general commentary consisted of loud complaints contra episcopal non-feasance. He had no more association with the marriage issue than did any randomly selected person associated with the Catholic or oecumenical press.

    You're referring to David Blankenhorn, I think. My wager would be that foundations put the screws to him and he didn't have many alternatives because he's approaching retirement age.

    You’re referring to David Blankenhorn, I think. My wager would be that foundations put the screws to him and he didn’t have many alternatives because he’s approaching retirement age.

    Thanks for remembering the name of that top conservative of the anti-Gay Marriage crusade who immediately endorsed Gay Marriage once his donors so directed him.

    And it’s certainly possible that my memory might be at fault regarding the extent of Dreher’s zeal on that same issue in the 1990s and others having to do with “Gay Rights” but that was what I vaguely remembered. I just spent a couple of minutes Googling around, but unfortunately there isn’t as much from that period still up on the Internet. The little I found suggested that Dreher mostly wrote along Rightwing Christian cultural lines in that era, and since all the Christian Rightists were always fighting the Gay Activists back then, I do think it generally tends to support my own recollection.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    The most prominent critics of 'gay' 'marriage' among NGO officialdom were Maggie Gallagher (who was president of the National Organization for Marriage) and Jennifer Roback Morse (who runs the Ruth Institute). Gallagher has said publicly that Blankenhorn was pushing other issues when 'gay' 'marriage' came to be controversial and was ambivalent about involving himself in that particular dispute. An attorney did call Blankenhorn as an expert witness in one of the gay marriage cases. He was an odd selection for that role because he's much more of an advocate than a social researcher and there's been some speculation that the attorney in question was throwing the case.


    Dreher's contributions to Touchstone are here:

    http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/author.php?id=75


    He's had only one piece published in First Things, and that in the last couple of years. His contribution to Our Sunday Visitor that I can remember was on Natural Family Planning. His expressed viewpoint on 'gay' 'marriage' was incorporated into blog commentary. It was absolutely standard and anyone offering contributions to publications like the above holds to the same view.

    , @40 Acres and A Kardashian
    IIRC, Dreher was nominally against it back then, but he was mostly MIA on the Gay Marriage thing until a few years ago, when photographers and florists started getting fined out of existence for refusing to serve gay weddings. Then he freaked out and it was all, "OMG, they're going to start treating us the same way they treated those evil scumbags who opposed interracial marriage (i.e., virtually every white American until a few years ago)!!!!"

    He can never provide a good answer as to why people who think interracial marriage should be forced to serve interracial weddings, but people who oppose gay marriage shouldn't have to serve gay weddings, except "People who oppose interracial marriage are vile bigots just like all of our parents and deserve whatever they get."

    Not much principle involved. Just "hey, feds, you should strip my neighbors of their constitutional rights, because I disagree with them, but you shouldn't take mine away."

    And he's loudly in favor of "civil unions", which are just gay marriages under another name.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. @Reg Cæsar

    “White”, is not a thing – it’s a thing being forced on us, and it’s driving all of us crazy.
     
    Well, it's been around since the 1790 census, so who forced it on us?

    https://www.censusrecords.com/content/1790_Census

    Come on. Are you serious?
    So – how I answer depends on your angle.
    Is it the “white privilege” angle, or the angle that Americans have used a logism, “white” for centuries?

    The latter is irrelevant – it’s the 1964 definition applied in academic and employment applications, hiring, admissions and promotions – that’s killing us.
    The former is a deflection attempt by the top 5% to avoid having their ox gored by way of “sharing” their state with their economic inferiors, “look, look – don’t look at my trust fund, look at that penniless guy trying to find a job, see ‘white privilege’, we have to admit our privilege, gore his ox not mine I’m one of the good guys!”

    Read More
    • Replies: @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    Betchya -
    4 of 5 people who post that Facebook meme "show this video to someone if they don't understand privilege", has a trust fund, a private equity account, a hedge fund account, a parent or grandparent with one, or significant land holdings - and they really, really, really, really want you to think about the skin color of the odd-random state-U STEM graduate looking for a job who paid his way through college, so that you don't get nosy about their (likely unearned) asset holdings.
    The 5th person of 5 is a useful idiot.
    , @daniel le mouche
    ' it’s the 1964 definition'

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems I read somewhere years ago that Nixon was the one who created the term. Suddenly, you were put into very large groups for census purposes: white, black, hispanic, asian, american indian. If so, presumably that would make it more towards 1970--nitpicking, true, but still: even more recent.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Truth
    Northern Minnesotta is pretty white. Move.

    Id est, we’ve got you on the run, white man, and we’re lovin it! Keep runnin. And stay out of Eskimo territory.

    Read More
    • Replies: @daniel le mouche
    'we’ve got you on the run, white man, and we’re lovin it! Keep runnin.'

    Yes, you People of Color gots us onna ruuuun. An you done did it all by y'selves. No puppet masters of any particular persuasion pulling y'alls strings, uh uhhh.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. CCZ says:

    “The Earth will not swallow a race to extinction, but another [race] will.” This is the official motto of the Immigration and Population Ministry of Burma/Myanmar. I guess the Social Justice Jihadists and Open Borders Globalists have not yet gained control. You definitely can’t get that motto into a NY Times op-ed about the invasion of Europe and North America.

    The sheer number of Rohingya Muslims fleeing genocide in Burma—over 10,000 per day since late August—has become too huge to ignore. It’s the reason why U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson will visit Burma on Wednesday. In his briefings on the crisis, Tillerson will likely encounter another question of numbers: the claim, voiced often by Burmese officials and hardline Buddhist monks, that Rohingya Muslim “overpopulation” threatens their country’s Buddhist majority.

    “The population growth of Rohingya Muslims is 10 times higher than that of the Rakhine [Buddhists],” said Win Myaing, a spokesperson for Burma’s western Rakhine State, where most of the stateless Rohingya live. That was in 2013, when the state passed a controversial two-child limit law that applied only to Muslims. Just last month, an administrator of a “Muslim-free” village outside Yangon told The New York Times, “[Rohingya] are not welcome here because they are violent and they multiply like crazy, with so many wives and children.” The motto of Burma’s immigration ministry is, “The Earth will not swallow a race to extinction, but another [race] will.”

    Krithika Varagur, The Atlantic, November 14, 2017

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  131. @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    Come on. Are you serious?
    So - how I answer depends on your angle.
    Is it the "white privilege" angle, or the angle that Americans have used a logism, "white" for centuries?

    The latter is irrelevant - it's the 1964 definition applied in academic and employment applications, hiring, admissions and promotions - that's killing us.
    The former is a deflection attempt by the top 5% to avoid having their ox gored by way of "sharing" their state with their economic inferiors, "look, look - don't look at my trust fund, look at that penniless guy trying to find a job, see 'white privilege', we have to admit our privilege, gore his ox not mine I'm one of the good guys!"

    Betchya –
    4 of 5 people who post that Facebook meme “show this video to someone if they don’t understand privilege”, has a trust fund, a private equity account, a hedge fund account, a parent or grandparent with one, or significant land holdings – and they really, really, really, really want you to think about the skin color of the odd-random state-U STEM graduate looking for a job who paid his way through college, so that you don’t get nosy about their (likely unearned) asset holdings.
    The 5th person of 5 is a useful idiot.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. Art Deco says:
    @Ron Unz

    You’re referring to David Blankenhorn, I think. My wager would be that foundations put the screws to him and he didn’t have many alternatives because he’s approaching retirement age.
     
    Thanks for remembering the name of that top conservative of the anti-Gay Marriage crusade who immediately endorsed Gay Marriage once his donors so directed him.

    And it's certainly possible that my memory might be at fault regarding the extent of Dreher's zeal on that same issue in the 1990s and others having to do with "Gay Rights" but that was what I vaguely remembered. I just spent a couple of minutes Googling around, but unfortunately there isn't as much from that period still up on the Internet. The little I found suggested that Dreher mostly wrote along Rightwing Christian cultural lines in that era, and since all the Christian Rightists were always fighting the Gay Activists back then, I do think it generally tends to support my own recollection.

    The most prominent critics of ‘gay’ ‘marriage’ among NGO officialdom were Maggie Gallagher (who was president of the National Organization for Marriage) and Jennifer Roback Morse (who runs the Ruth Institute). Gallagher has said publicly that Blankenhorn was pushing other issues when ‘gay’ ‘marriage’ came to be controversial and was ambivalent about involving himself in that particular dispute. An attorney did call Blankenhorn as an expert witness in one of the gay marriage cases. He was an odd selection for that role because he’s much more of an advocate than a social researcher and there’s been some speculation that the attorney in question was throwing the case.

    Dreher’s contributions to Touchstone are here:

    http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/author.php?id=75

    He’s had only one piece published in First Things, and that in the last couple of years. His contribution to Our Sunday Visitor that I can remember was on Natural Family Planning. His expressed viewpoint on ‘gay’ ‘marriage’ was incorporated into blog commentary. It was absolutely standard and anyone offering contributions to publications like the above holds to the same view.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Wally says:
    @unit472
    Fortunately 'peak social outrage' occurs early in life and is most acute during one's college years. While liberal arts faculties are insulated from economic reality their students are not and student loans instantly transforms the twenty something SJW into a debt serf upon graduation.

    As these student/SJW transition into debt serfdom in our moribund economy they will find they don't have a lot of contact with the 'elites' and the 'elites' don't care what they think anyway. If you can't pony up several hundred dollars to attend a Congressional fundraiser you aren't going to even be in the same room as a political leader much less get your hands on him. Business elites are even harder to reach as they don't 'do' public events.

    As long as this situation holds true ( and it will hold true for as long as the elites can maintain it) the only representative of 'the Establishment' the average citizen will ever meet is the cop.

    Indeed, that is the poetic justice in so much of this.

    The precious little posers will get a cold douche of reality once they leave nursery school.

    They asked for it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Truth
    Why would it ever be “unsafe” to be friends with White people? What are they going to do, rob or rape you? Trick you into putting your hands up so they can shoot you in the back?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxttPzq5A18

    It’s notable how you rely exclusively upon fictional anti-white race-hatred propaganda to justify your own unrelenting racism. But I guess that’s all you have.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    @Truth

    It’s notable how you rely exclusively upon fictional anti-white race-hatred propaganda to justify your own unrelenting racism. But I guess that’s all you have.
     

    He also has flat-earthism. He is an actual flat-earther.
    , @Truth
    Yeah, or I could be using humor...


    ...(or not).
    , @daniel le mouche
    'It’s notable how you rely exclusively upon fictional anti-white race-hatred propaganda to justify your own unrelenting racism.'

    Truth's first two videos, showing all the black man/ white woman ideal couples, were eye-opening to one such as me that doesn't have a t.v., or an I Phone, hasn't been to a movie in about 20 years, and despises every form of pop music, but Rhianna especially sticks out (not just her gigantic negroid buttocks either). So, thank you Truth. The reality of internationalists (we know who that is) foisting interracial, multicultural chaos, hatred and ugliness on all of the western world, and it's also happening to some extent elsewhere like in Asia: the phenomenon is very REAL, and people such as Truth and so many at Unz who care, who are outraged and sickened--for the sake of their children--should be highly commended. Nothing fictional about it.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. lavoisier says: • Website
    @renfro
    '' And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.''>>>>>

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

    I have been asking this question to those who claim it for years and never get a response.
    I recently asked it of a commenter here and got nothing but rambling gibberish about Hollywood and popular music and etc..
    I don't consider those contributions to America as every group including blacks claim that as a contribution .
    I also don't consider Jewish science or nobels as contributions either as many others have also contributed to science won nobels.

    I want to see something that Jews have contributed that others haven't or contributed more than others have. Something of positive importance distinctly Jewish.

    Fair enough question. I will largely leave out Hollywood as you suggest but the film industry used to be a force for good even if film making itself was invented by Edison.

    Jewish scientists are incredibly important in biomedical advances. You want to dismiss the Nobel prizes because other scientists are contributing to this important work, but Jewish scientists are roughly 30% of the receipients of the prizes in Medicine, Physics, and Chemistry. That number is nothing short of amazing.

    Many of the advances in the war against cancer have been led by Jewish scientists and physicians. That many people are cured today from cancer whom otherwise would have died is due in no small measure to the work of Jewish scientists.

    High energy physics and astrophysics are indebted to the work of many Jewish scientists.

    I think to have this conversation fairly we have to acknowledge their outsized positive contributions, even while being honest about their outsized negative contributions to our civilization.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @denk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLCRq0gGg30

    Chinese should empathise with the plight of other minorities, better still,
    unite with them to fight those white trash.

    This is hardly isolated incident.
    I've read/heard/seen so many cases where Chinese were gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc, thats right, anglo land.

    gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc,

    Calling bullshit on this, as far as Australia is concerned.
    If it were true, the Murdoch Media Empire would be in a frenzy.
    Note to Denk:
    Pacific Islanders are indeed prone to violence against the weak, but they ain’t White.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    Off hand I immediately recall this incident, its just tip of an iceberg.

    http://bit.ly/2yY0MUy
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Truth

    Derbyshire has also lived in and around New York City for decades, so he has learned to navigate around Blacks and to avoid Blacks.
     
    He was born in a basically, all-white community in England. If he had stayed there he wouldn't have needed to learn.

    Nonsense. Britain is being rapidly “diversified” as we speak.
    And not coincidentally, its violent crime rate is skyrocketing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Everywhere is being diversified, Toby. Your slaveowners like it that way and you do whatever they tell you to, so don't hate, CON-GRAJ-U-LATE!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Reg Cæsar
    "White" is tolerable, if not ideal, but please don't call me an "Anglo" or a "gentile". I'm a White Anglo-Saxon Papist.

    "Gentile" derives from something like "outsider", so its use should be restricted to those inside the group outside of which it refers. I mean, just 'cause I don't think Joseph Smith was a prophet, I get slapped with a silly epithet?

    Now, for "Czechia". The ugly-sounding-- in English-- "Belarus" and "Moldova" at least have the excuse of being the natives' name for their country. But this, this is bad English, bad Czech, bad Latin, and bad Polish. What's wrong with "Česko"?

    Or Bohemia, for that matter? Or Moravia?

    Merge it back with Slovakia because Czechoslovakia was a very cool-sounding name.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Merge it back with Slovakia because Czechoslovakia was a very cool-sounding name.
     
    Nah. Split the Czech Republic into Bohemia and Moravia. And bring back the king. I'm sure there are lots of pretenders to choose from.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    More than likely his kids agree with him.

    What would be Professor Yankah’s opinion about killing out white farmers, which is currently going on in South Africa? Blacks are majority there. Do they kill whites because of the incompatibility (“unfriendliness”) between the white and black races? https://needtoknow.news/2017/05/torture-murder-whites-south-africa-rise-due-anti-white-rhetoric-ruling-party-african-national-congress/
    “South Africa: Attacks and murder of whites is on the rise. The rate of intentional homicide in South Africa is more than fifteen times greater than the world average. It could even be worse, because South African police have stopped releasing statistics. The rise in farm attacks is blamed on anti-white hate speech by the ruling African National Congress. South African President Jacob Zuma recently called for the confiscation of white-owned land without compensation. A member of parliament shouted: “Bury them alive!” during a speech about the plight of white farmers.”

    Well. At least we can see a picture of the dream coming true.
    As Professor Yankah writes, “for African-Americans, race has become a proxy not just for politics but also for decency.” The solution is obvious: The black Americans should go back to Africa and join their decent race there. Because of the unbridgeable “racial gorge,” whites have no hope of integrating the blacks into the white society. Just let the blacks go. Go, go, go — before you start killing out whites en masse and before your start demanding “Bury them alive!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    The Jews using the Holocaust in order to milk endless concessions from the Germans, too. As long as gentiles dominate Germany.

    The Jews using the Holocaust in order to milk endless concessions from the Germans, too. As long as gentiles dominate Germany.

    I wouldn’t call $6b a whole lot of concessions. At $1,000 per soul, that’s an amount stateside defendants can only dream of settling for. What’s more typical is anywhere from 100x to 1000x the average amount mentioned. Note that Germany got to keep all the stuff (real estate, corporate assets, jewelry, gold, art) it seized from Jews it exterminated, and that was not only a whole lot more than $1,000 per person; it was when $1,000 was real money.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Do you have similar numbers for the dispossessed Palestinians?
    First, there was Nakba. "In the 1930s, Jewish land ownership had increased from approximately 1% to just over 6% of the land, and violence had increased as well. With the emergence of several Zionist terrorist gangs (whose ranks included a number of future Prime Ministers of Israel), there was violent conflict. Numerous people of all ethnicities were killed – then, as now, the large majority of them Christian and Muslim Palestinians. This growing violence culminated in Israel's ruthless 1947-49 "War of Independence,"in which at least 750,000 Palestinian men, women, and children were expelled from their homes... Zionist forces committed 33 massacres and destroyed 531 Palestinian towns." http://ifamericaknew.org/history/ref-nakba.html

    Then Israel has applied special Jewish method of genociding: "1.2 million Palestinian olive trees uprooted in Palestinian occupied territories;" "Olive orchards are being destroyed in the West Bank, but defense and media officials have agreed yet again that everything should be done to respect the public's right not to know," https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.554690

    The theft of Palestinian land: "...according to the Yesha Council, 382,031 Israeli citizens lived in the 121 officially recognized Israeli settlements in the West Bank, almost exclusively Jewish citizens of Israel."

    The theft of Palestinian water: "Flaunting international laws against the pillage of occupied lands, Israel controls the mountain aquifer -80 percent of which lies beneath the West Bank - and over-extracts it for agriculture, as well as settlers' pools and verdant lawns. In 2009, the Mountain Aquifer supplied 40 percent of Israel's agricultural needs and 50 percent of its population's drinking water. Israel also takes more than its share from the coastal aquifer that lies beneath Gaza, and diverts the Wadi Gaza into Israel's Negev desert, just before it reaches Gaza. Lastly, Israel's wall conveniently envelops wells and springs that lie east of the Green Line."

    Considering the criminal behavior of the Jewish state towards the colonized native population, your mournful reminder "Germany got to keep all the stuff (real estate, corporate assets, jewelry, gold, art)" is senseless. The Jewish state is the bloody criminal aggressor. Currently Israel cooperates with the remnants of ISIS and with Wahhabist Saudi Arabia against the sovereign Syria. This is highly immoral. Moreover, Israel and Israel-firsters have been trying to "employ" the US in a war against Iran. The Nuremberg Protocols have condemned precisely this kind of behavior.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Mulegino1 says:
    @Hank Rearden
    The communism enforced by the Judeo-Bolshevist Church was clearly not voluntary, by any stretch of the imagination. Read Acts 5:11 again. See that word "fear?"

    If two people disappeared into a charity meeting at the Clinton Foundation and came out dead, would you really take the excuse that their murders were justified because they had "lied to the Holy Hillary" about their level of charity? And what if St. Hillary boasted that it caused "great fear" enough to increase "charity" contributions?

    Here's the crime committed in Acts 5:11, if Saint Hillary had done the same thing. See that word "fear" again?


    COERCION IN THE FIRST DEGREE
    (Class D felony)
    PENAL LAW 135.65(2)
    Under our law, a person is guilty of coercion in the first degree when 1 he or she compels or induces a person to engage in conduct...by means of instilling in him or her a fear that, if the demand is not complied with, the actor or another will...Cause physical injury to a person..
     
    P.S. If there's nothing magical about the Magic Rabbi, why did he attract several astrological magi to his birth?

    “Fear” , when used in its New Testament context, does not necessarily imply coercion of coercive human forces such as governments or people in authority. However, the “fear” of the Jews (by the apostles), before Pentecost, was based upon a real fear of being turned over to the very coercive and oppressive Sanhedrin, whereas the “fear of the Lord” was based upon the acknowledgement of God’s omnipotence and justice. I realize that this is too much for a Talmudic dominated mind to digest in one sitting, though. You can speak all you want about the “Magic Rabbi.” To paraphrase Napoleon Buonaparte, if you desire to discredit Him, just get yourself killed and then resurrect. That should be enough to sate your Talmudic mindset’s thirst for satisfaction, right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hank Rearden
    I appreciate your repulsion to Hebethinkery, but the terms I used to describe Jesus are all in the Bible. As far as discrediting the resurrection tale—by your own repeatability standard—Jesus was a latecomer, as many other Jews rose from the dead (MT 27:52) before he got around to it. (MT 28:6) Yet another Jewish zombie walking around Jerusalem? Whoop-Dee-Doo! White men standing on the moon is a much more impressive feat. Oh, the horrid indignities of white supremacy, suffered by the jealous who have yet to reach such heights.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. @Truth
    You're a leftist.

    You and tha Derb are both adherents to the liberal philosophy of interracial marriage.

    That has fuck all to do with Leftism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I don't know if Stormfront is back on line again, but I do know that they would disagree with you there, Sport!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=664&v=FhrLcl2bjk8
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. @Yan Shen
    One of the most insightful quotes I've read.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     
    Mr. Derbyshire will deny this equivalence noted now by at least 3 people on the basis that well strictly speaking his observations about blacks are factually correct. And he paid lip service to how obviously out of 40 million blacks in this country some of them are okay. I mean uh the Bell Curve suggests that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person, right?

    Yes, you can match up some of my sentences with some of the professor’s. But the overall tone and cast of my article are quite different from his.
     
    Ha ha ha. Anyone who's semi-followed your writings over the years gets the clear and distinct impression that your big thing is warning all of us endlessly about the Black Menace. I mean when numerous outsiders, including those who aren't particularly big fans of political correctness, reading your writings all come to the same conclusion, i.e. that you don't seem to like blacks all that much, in the same way that Ta Nehisi Coates or Ekow Yankah give the clear and distinct impression that they don't like white people that much, maybe it's time to reassess whether or not your words are being misconstrued?

    If you don't dislike blacks, then you're probably doing a terrible job of conveying that fact by obsessing endlessly over them and the supposed Black Menace that's coming for us all.

    That being said, the unfortunate thing is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get worshiped and feted by our PC society for obsessing endlessly over whites and the White Menace. If there was any justice in this world, we'd treat them the same way we would a John Derbyshire.

    …except, of course, that the FACTS overwhelmingly support Derbs arguments.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. res says:
    @Truth
    Why would it ever be “unsafe” to be friends with White people? What are they going to do, rob or rape you? Trick you into putting your hands up so they can shoot you in the back?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxttPzq5A18

    Perhaps you should start using the pseudonym “Fiction”?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Is that the opposite of "Truth?"

    I'm just askin'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. @Yan Shen
    Now anyone who claims that white Americans today are violent racists obviously would be wrong, statistically, sociologically, and morally, as uh someone else might well point out.

    I wonder though if an African American made that claim about white racism and violence anytime prior to say 1960 or 1970 would've been that far off the mark? In another post of mine elsewhere on this blog, I argued that one of the reasons why all of us are having to suffer through the madness of our politically correct and quite frankly batshit crazy contemporary society, including having to see men like Coates endlessly feted as the second coming of Jesus Christ, is because of prior bad behavior on the part of whites in this country, what with slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan and the likes. This prior bad behavior is precisely the reason why all of us will now hear till the End of Time that racism and privilege are what's holding back blacks today. If only whites back in the day would've acted like decent human beings towards blacks instead of obviously discriminating against them, then the success or failure of blacks would be upon their own shoulders and we wouldn't endlessly have to hear all sorts of convoluted excuses for their behavior. It's kind of like how the prior extremely bad behavior that was the Holocaust means that now all of us will have to hear about anti-Semitism as well till the End of Time.

    How many other sane and good things have been ruined and taken away from the rest of us good folks in this country because of this prior bad behavior on the part of whites? One of the most egregious things is that Asian American immigrants to this country have to deal with many of the social repercussions of all this madness. Black on Asian crime is one of those big things that few very media outlets will have an honest discussion about. And in a classic case of projection, East Asians are often slandered as being racist towards blacks when simply many of them have what I've described as a no-nonsense Confucian mentality that couldn't be further away from the kind of racial essentialism that characterizes so many blacks and whites in this country today.

    I think the creators and supporters of ” slavery and Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan” are looking particularly prescient, especially given the advantage of hindsight.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @Charles Pewitt
    The only thing holding the multicultural American Empire together is money printing from the privately-controlled Federal Reserve Bank. When the next global financial implosion hits, you will see the Fed plunge right through the Zero Interest Rate Policy level and move into Negative Interest Rates. That will be when the young people refuse to pay the massive government debt and the government worker pension debt.

    John Derbyshire's reaction to the arrogant sub-Saharan Black African named Thursday and the cuckservative weakling named Dreher is one shared by many Americans. Derbyshire has also lived in and around New York City for decades, so he has learned to navigate around Blacks and to avoid Blacks.

    Remember, Hillary Clinton knew enough about New York Blacks to scout out the mostly White town of Chappaqua, New York for her New York home. Millions of other White people who live around New York City have done the same damn thing that both Hillary Clinton and John Derbyshire have done: find a spot in the New York City area that is blessedly free of criminal Black types.

    Derbyshire's civilizational survival instincts are excellent, and the suggestions he gave to his kids about how to avoid criminal Blacks was mostly just common sense. But he might consider that we all won't be doomed if a global financial implosion removes the current ruling class of the American Empire. Some of us will prosper quite nicely when the anti-White ruling class rats are removed from power.

    There are a number of financially-aware people on unz, and you sound like one too, Charles. I completely agree – the stupidity will peak when the financial crash happens. I don’t think it will be business-as-usual for ANYONE, even the best of us, but I agree that some good people will prosper in the end.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Father O'Hara
    I am so sorry,dear Asian Prince,that this country is not all it could have been,and should've been,for you. My most 'umble apologies.
    Again,tho,if you're not happy,get the Fuck out!!!

    Check first your ancestry, dude

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. German_reader is too kind, thank you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  149. @Ron Unz

    Rod Dreher is basically a dud–I call him Dud Dreher, in fact. The only thing he really cares about–and the only place where he ever dares challenge The Narrative–is on social issues. On every other topic, he’s just pointless. Since I’m not that much into social issues, I don’t bother with him to much anymore.
     
    You may actually may be doing him a bit too much justice...

    If I remember correctly, Dreher's early career was heavily dependent upon his very vocal leading role in the Conservative Movement attacks on "Gay Marriage" proposals around the late 1990s or so.

    But then, maybe a dozen years later, a good fraction of all the conservative funding began coming from Neocons like Singer, who were ardent gay-rights activists and advocates for Gay Marriage, while Andrew Sullivan, founder of the Gay-Marriage movement, had became one of the most influential conservative-leaning media pundits. So all the prominent conservatives, including Dreher, soon switched sides and began supporting Gay Marriage, or at least not actively opposing it. For example, I remember when the leader of the biggest conservative anti-Gay Marriage organization suddenly announced he'd totally changed his mind, and publicly endorsed Gay Marriage.

    In Dreher's case, I seem to recall he wrote some column very mildly raising questions about the issue, then immediately issued a deep apology to Sullivan for any offence he might have possibly caused.

    (I hope I'm not getting any of my recollections a bit garbled here.)

    The key factor underlying much of this sort of thing is the extreme financial fragility of DC pundits and thinktankers, and their abject terror at risking the unemployment lines. Basically, if the CEO of Coke announces a new soft drink strategy, all his mid-level marketing people naturally get into line behind it, and the exact analogy is true of all these "mainstream opinion journalists."

    One of your better comments, Mr. Unz. It’s not just the pundits, though, that must toe the line due to financial insecurity, but they are the ones that are trying to influence the rest (and you should realize that 95% of Americans have never heard of any but 5 or 10 pundits, so some of this pundit-on-pundit talk is thankfully lost on the majority).

    The problem with the prosperous middle class turning into a poor working class at best is that people that are barely hanging on economically are too afraid to cause any fuss or create any resistance to the PC, Cultural-Rev 2.0 stuff. Not only that, Americans in general are spendthrifts and most believe in spending everything coming in – living paycheck to paycheck and at the highest debt levels they can get away with. This has just been the American way for 4-5 decades running.

    This is part of the reason people have not been pushing back against the treatment they have gotten from the Globalist elites and the cntrl-left. It all works out great for the latter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    I'll just include one paragraph from the article, but links will be inop:

    Let me now get to the point of why this way of living also results in a big increase in the control-freak, Orwellian police state society. Let me go back to that "living paycheck-to-paycheck" phrase. Here's what's the problem with that, aside from the normal worries about the monthly struggle to pay down all the STUFF: One loses much control of his direction in life when he is tied in to the incoming salary on a very short time-line. Let me put this better as an example. I've been reading about the fired Google-guy who wrote a simple, in-my-opinion still PC, memo about the whole male/female differences thing. (This post is not about the particulars, and, as to be expected, Steve Sailer is all over it here, here, here, here, and here.). This guy may come out of this with a job soon, just because this situation has gotten lots of attention. That doesn't happen to the average employee, however, and it can't. The closer you are bound to your job via your tight month-to-month budget, the less likely you will quit, speak-out, or even push-back a slight bit, when you are harassed with all the mass stupidity. You are not a free agent if you live like this - you are much more beholden to your employer and must be more of a suck-up, a kiss-ass, whatever it entails, to the dieversity and PC-crap than if you had a year or two's salary put away to find a new job or even a new career and leave the stupidity behind!
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. @Achmed E. Newman
    One of your better comments, Mr. Unz. It's not just the pundits, though, that must toe the line due to financial insecurity, but they are the ones that are trying to influence the rest (and you should realize that 95% of Americans have never heard of any but 5 or 10 pundits, so some of this pundit-on-pundit talk is thankfully lost on the majority).

    The problem with the prosperous middle class turning into a poor working class at best is that people that are barely hanging on economically are too afraid to cause any fuss or create any resistance to the PC, Cultural-Rev 2.0 stuff. Not only that, Americans in general are spendthrifts and most believe in spending everything coming in - living paycheck to paycheck and at the highest debt levels they can get away with. This has just been the American way for 4-5 decades running.

    This is part of the reason people have not been pushing back against the treatment they have gotten from the Globalist elites and the cntrl-left. It all works out great for the latter.

    I’ll just include one paragraph from the article, but links will be inop:

    Let me now get to the point of why this way of living also results in a big increase in the control-freak, Orwellian police state society. Let me go back to that “living paycheck-to-paycheck” phrase. Here’s what’s the problem with that, aside from the normal worries about the monthly struggle to pay down all the STUFF: One loses much control of his direction in life when he is tied in to the incoming salary on a very short time-line. Let me put this better as an example. I’ve been reading about the fired Google-guy who wrote a simple, in-my-opinion still PC, memo about the whole male/female differences thing. (This post is not about the particulars, and, as to be expected, Steve Sailer is all over it here, here, here, here, and here.). This guy may come out of this with a job soon, just because this situation has gotten lots of attention. That doesn’t happen to the average employee, however, and it can’t. The closer you are bound to your job via your tight month-to-month budget, the less likely you will quit, speak-out, or even push-back a slight bit, when you are harassed with all the mass stupidity. You are not a free agent if you live like this – you are much more beholden to your employer and must be more of a suck-up, a kiss-ass, whatever it entails, to the dieversity and PC-crap than if you had a year or two’s salary put away to find a new job or even a new career and leave the stupidity behind!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. wayfarer says:
    @renfro
    '' And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.''>>>>>

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

    I have been asking this question to those who claim it for years and never get a response.
    I recently asked it of a commenter here and got nothing but rambling gibberish about Hollywood and popular music and etc..
    I don't consider those contributions to America as every group including blacks claim that as a contribution .
    I also don't consider Jewish science or nobels as contributions either as many others have also contributed to science won nobels.

    I want to see something that Jews have contributed that others haven't or contributed more than others have. Something of positive importance distinctly Jewish.

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

    Rabbi Dov Zakheim, made a creative accounting contribution to America.

    As a dual Israeli-American citizen, he was comptroller of the Pentagon when 2.3 trillion-dollars vanished without a trace, and was never even be questioned by the U.S. Congress.

    Talk about, Israeli-American ingenuity!

    ……….

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Vinteuil says:
    @Yan Shen
    One of the most insightful quotes I've read.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     
    Mr. Derbyshire will deny this equivalence noted now by at least 3 people on the basis that well strictly speaking his observations about blacks are factually correct. And he paid lip service to how obviously out of 40 million blacks in this country some of them are okay. I mean uh the Bell Curve suggests that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person, right?

    Yes, you can match up some of my sentences with some of the professor’s. But the overall tone and cast of my article are quite different from his.
     
    Ha ha ha. Anyone who's semi-followed your writings over the years gets the clear and distinct impression that your big thing is warning all of us endlessly about the Black Menace. I mean when numerous outsiders, including those who aren't particularly big fans of political correctness, reading your writings all come to the same conclusion, i.e. that you don't seem to like blacks all that much, in the same way that Ta Nehisi Coates or Ekow Yankah give the clear and distinct impression that they don't like white people that much, maybe it's time to reassess whether or not your words are being misconstrued?

    If you don't dislike blacks, then you're probably doing a terrible job of conveying that fact by obsessing endlessly over them and the supposed Black Menace that's coming for us all.

    That being said, the unfortunate thing is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get worshiped and feted by our PC society for obsessing endlessly over whites and the White Menace. If there was any justice in this world, we'd treat them the same way we would a John Derbyshire.

    This must be the tenth time you’ve retailed that silly quote.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. @Yan Shen
    One of the most insightful quotes I've read.

    Suppose you were a white person with a deep-seated dislike for black people, and you were intent on training your son to feel the same way. Suppose that, day after day, week after week, you instructed him to study the details of every instance of black-on-white crime. Say you advised your son to extrapolate from these incidents the notion that black people are generally dangerous, and that your zeal to present him with disturbing anecdotes along these lines never waned.

    You would be wrong, in just about every possible way: statistically, sociologically, morally. You would be doing your son a gross and damaging disservice. For yourself you would invite, and earn, broad contempt. If your opinions became publicly known, you might well find yourself unwelcome in polite company and your job at risk. Indeed, the National Review contributor John Derbyshire was fired for expressing such sentiments in a blog post three years ago.

    And yet for harboring roughly the same level of suspicion, fear, mistrust, distaste, and unease about whites as Derbyshire does about blacks, the essayist and blogger Ta-Nehisi Coates has found himself crowned America’s leading civic thinker.
     
    Mr. Derbyshire will deny this equivalence noted now by at least 3 people on the basis that well strictly speaking his observations about blacks are factually correct. And he paid lip service to how obviously out of 40 million blacks in this country some of them are okay. I mean uh the Bell Curve suggests that 1/6 of blacks are smarter than your average white person, right?

    Yes, you can match up some of my sentences with some of the professor’s. But the overall tone and cast of my article are quite different from his.
     
    Ha ha ha. Anyone who's semi-followed your writings over the years gets the clear and distinct impression that your big thing is warning all of us endlessly about the Black Menace. I mean when numerous outsiders, including those who aren't particularly big fans of political correctness, reading your writings all come to the same conclusion, i.e. that you don't seem to like blacks all that much, in the same way that Ta Nehisi Coates or Ekow Yankah give the clear and distinct impression that they don't like white people that much, maybe it's time to reassess whether or not your words are being misconstrued?

    If you don't dislike blacks, then you're probably doing a terrible job of conveying that fact by obsessing endlessly over them and the supposed Black Menace that's coming for us all.

    That being said, the unfortunate thing is that men like Coates or Yankah basically get worshiped and feted by our PC society for obsessing endlessly over whites and the White Menace. If there was any justice in this world, we'd treat them the same way we would a John Derbyshire.

    My feelings about blacks generally range from “I don’t like blacks much” to “God I hate n-words.” What am I really hating though? I would say that, above all, it’s their presence. I hate having blacks around. When there are no blacks around, I don’t waste any time hating them. If I knew I could permanently get blacks out of my life, I’d happily wish them well. It’s a strange kind of “hatred” to wish the people you “hate” well, isn’t it? It’s certainly strange if you compare this hatred to individuals that I hate. I don’t wish such people well at all. If I were to wish anything about them, I would wish something bad to happen to them. I think this is an important distinction.

    If there are no blacks around, I might be feeling happy or I might be feeling sad, but the entry of blacks into that scene always makes it worse, never better, and the degree to which it’s worse hinges on how many blacks are around. The first couple of blacks are inconsequential, but things start heading downhill very quickly. If a daytime scene becomes some twenty percent black, that’s about the point that I start hating it. At night, it takes far fewer – by ten percent I’m definitely feeling it.

    I don’t like asians much either, but the intensity of this dislike is monumentally less than that towards blacks. It’s more a cold indifference than a dislike, and it takes an awful lot of asians being on the scene before I start feeling down. A scene can easily be fifty percent asian and I won’t feel any heightened negative emotion, no matter how long I spend there. A scene can be over ninety percent asian and spending short periods in it doesn’t bother me – which is something I could never say about blacks.

    Latinos are a very different matter. Racially, I’m not bothered by their presence at all. On the contrary, I actually like them. I hate the effects they have on society, but this is a rather abstract, contemplative hate, not something visceral, the way it is with blacks. Language is the main turn-off with Latinos. I can understand and speak basic Spanish, and I sometimes enjoy speaking/practicing it, but my Spanish is not nearly good enough to join in rapid fire conversations. So being surrounded by Spanish speakers is not a pleasant experience.

    Given the enormous social pressure to be “anti-racist,” what I’ve written here surely makes me sound like a race-obsessed hater. People generally don’t go into detail about their feelings on this issue, not even with trusted friends. It’s just not done. This is quite remarkable when you think of what a huge role race plays in social life. I think the ‘old school’ model of white racist hate is responsible for this. Whites may have had very good reasons for feeling as they did, but the experience of this kind of racism was quite brutal to those on the receiving end of it. It has left a very bitter taste in people’s mouths, and people rightly fear a return to that kind of society. Unfortunately, this is also people’s idea of what a “racist society” would necessarily be like, which helps keep expression of racial feelings taboo (real racial feelings, I mean).

    Those of us who favor racial reform (pro-white racial reform, or at least anti-anti-white reform) should be very grateful that the internet has given us the opportunity to have these very important conversations. It’s a great pity that pro-white racial reformers wasted so many years on stormfront-like nutzi stupidity, which is not only morally dubious, but from a practical standpoint has a snowball’s chance in hell of ever eventuating. I am hopeful that a ‘reasonable racism’ can be achieved (and reflected in social policy). If it ever is, it will in large part be thanks to intelligent, considerate sites like unz.com and writers like Derb.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rdm
    I'd say with 100% honesty, either you like whatever race or whatever ethnic person, I don't care.

    If a White person I'm coming across on the street doesn't like me, I'm fine with that. If a White person doesn't want to talk with me during lunch break, I'm totally fine with that.

    But if a White person getting arrogant in front of me with a perceived notion of "This is my country, I will BS whatever the heck I want", it always gets on my nerve, knowing that this white guy was just an immigrant to this country and he was using the racial perception of this country to his advantage.

    That I know for sure for some BS A-hole european in this country.
    , @Truth

    My feelings about blacks generally range from “I don’t like blacks much” to “God I hate n-words.” What am I really hating though? I would say that, above all, it’s their presence. I hate having blacks around. When there are no blacks around, I don’t waste any time hating them. If I knew I could permanently get blacks out of my life, I’d happily wish them well. It’s a strange kind of “hatred” to wish the people you “hate” well, isn’t it? It’s certainly strange if you compare this hatred to individuals that I hate. I don’t wish such people well at all. If I were to wish anything about them, I would wish something bad to happen to them. I think this is an important distinction.
     
    So how much lint did you find?

    I mean, in your navel.
    , @lavoisier
    I try to take individuals as individuals--regardless of race.

    But I am acutely aware of group differences in behaviors, particularly behaviors that are dangerous to me and my family.

    My own feeling is that I have as much in common with low level whites as I do with low level blacks. I despise both groups with equal vehemency--as both can be equally destructive and criminal.

    The problem for the black community, and for all those who come in contact with this community, is that the percentage of low level blacks is far higher than the percentage of low level whites. And the welfare state has created a dysgenic negative effect on the black population as it is now doing to the white population.

    The drag from low lifes is much higher in the black community than the white community and leads to societal collapse in places like Detroit and wherever the black population reaches a critical mass.

    I truly feel bad for the intelligent and crime free fraction of the black population. There are simply not enough of these good and smart people to offset the destruction wrought by the low lifes in their population.

    , @daniel le mouche
    I thank you for an honest appraisal of your feelings on The Race Question. I find myself in agreement, though God knows I can't say that in public, or even, as you mentioned, to close friends. I myself grew up in a place with nearly no blacks, and it was a great childhood. I think racial mixing is very ugly, and very unnatural. Oh sure, it's natural for great big m'thaf'kka negroids to enjoy screwing white women, just out of hatred and spite. I hereby once more declare: life without blacks is downright pleasant.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. denk says:
    @Heros
    Here is Colin Flaherty's 74 video Black on Asian Violence play list:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVisIIRP5Q0&list=PLrWfhyZLmyQTxHjFkyVmEfTaAGadNsGCg

    Most of these cowardly attacks involve multiple "teenagers" and a single Asian, usually a diminutive Asian female.

    There is even a Black on Asian violence play list for Sacramento alone:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlRlmB2ksvk&list=PLrWfhyZLmyQQdVVnsgv7iK99MRGHwcevZ

    He also has play lists for Black on Senior, Black on Children, and also play lists for Black on White violence for practically every US city.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw/playlists

    American Black "teenagers" are little more than feral predators preying on the weak and vulnerable at the behest of their jewish owners.

    It’d be more to the point if you can show me instances of
    Whites being racially attacked by Chinese anywhere in the world.
    Not holding my breath.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Heros
    I showed you 84 clips of blacks brutally assulting and robbing asians, and you provide clips of a couple of drunk whites slapping asians in trains. Booohooohoooo. First of all in none of those clips was the asian assulted hard enough to even leave contusions, so they would be very difficult to prosecute. Second of all, blacks are 13% of the population and yet judging by the number of clips they account for 95% of assults on asians. Yet you obsess about white violence. Booohooohooo. I'll bet Asians are overly represented in the present avalanche of snow flakes.
    , @daniel le mouche
    You obviously haven't travelled in Asia. Word of advice if you do: be tall. This is no guarantee against racial violence directed at you, but the shorter or scrawnier you look, the chances go way up. I've experienced situations in Korea, Japan, China, Thailand, the Philippines and Vietnam--and I'm tall, if rather nice looking. I look forward to the attacks on my character of some enlightened Unzers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. Zoodles says:
    @Rdm
    A person can say whatever the hell he wants in a discourse as long as the discussion stays in the course. Just because a negative connotation of the US slavery, lynching history was brought upon in lieu of racial equality in this 21st century, a person with a seemingly East Asian decent cannot be called out with a specious retort like "Get the Fuck out!"

    A convenient retort that White Americans these days are resorting when it comes to defending the ugly history of the US is "Go back to where you come from", which is largely based on the idea that they belong to the majority of this country, even if their dubious european parents come here with refugee status back in the days while 5th or 6th generation East Asian Americans are simply called out with an easy comeback "Go back to Asia".

    What a lame joke.

    The only thing that people consider you being an American is being "White". The rest of your biological wastes have been accumulating in this American soil for good-for-nothing.

    That is because the actual ethnic americans, the american-americans are white. And the USA is their motherland. A Chinese person can no more be an ethnic american than an anglo saxon person can be han chinese.

    Read More
    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Rdm
    It's the same that Derb, an immigrant to this country, spewing out anti-Black ever since he inked his idea on journalism. Derb is using the perceived notion of "White American".

    The same can be said with Prof Ekow, whose lineage is nothing to do with slavery in this American soil, but his skin pigeonholes him into another affirmative-actioned Negros. So he fights with his fellow Blacks.

    This is the DNA of the US. A fresh European immigrant will deny anything to do with slavery, Jim Crow, KKK, yet they will immensely reap the benefit of "being Whites".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Jivilov says:
    @helena
    "The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this “professor” is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa."

    Not so. The Narrative clearly states that colonisation of Africa disrupted social development i.e. Europeans robbed Africans of the development that would have otherwise been theirs. And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin.

    “Europeans robbed Africans of the development that would have otherwise been theirs”? Seriously? Africans were enslaved and colonized simply ‘cuz they weren’t developed in the first place.

    Likewise, to state their development would have been “similar to Europeans” is a cultural relativist trope which must be sustained by faith, not reason. The corrupt, kleptocratic, dysfunctional autocracies of sub-Saharan Africa are a reminder that all groups, all cultures are not equal, as is the contrary example of Jews and their advanced Homeland of Israel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Mr. Anon says:
    @Art Deco
    Dreher's problem is not that he isn't a 'committed Christian'. It's that he is abnormally other-directed and emotional and has a seriously deficient sense of honor. His social advocacy is a function of his issues (which appear to include anxiety and mood disorders, among other things). He has a considerable history of affiliation and disaffiliation and his default mode is one of accusation (commonly contra people with whom he was once associated). His most recent set of perigrinations incorporated moving back to his home town (pop. 1,700) coincident with his sister's illness and death, proclaiming loudly he would never leave, then decamping to the state capital after his father's death. (It's a reasonable wager than he's no longer on speaking terms with a run of people in his home town, and that's affecting his kids).

    Dreher’s problem is not that he isn’t a ‘committed Christian’. It’s that he is abnormally other-directed and emotional and has a seriously deficient sense of honor.

    You’re one to talk, drone.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Exactly, he epitomizes cuckdom.
    , @Truth
    I wish you were one not to, Grasshopper.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. denk says:
    @anon

    gratuitously abused, assaulted by white trash in USA/OZ etc,
     
    Calling bullshit on this, as far as Australia is concerned.
    If it were true, the Murdoch Media Empire would be in a frenzy.
    Note to Denk:
    Pacific Islanders are indeed prone to violence against the weak, but they ain't White.

    Off hand I immediately recall this incident, its just tip of an iceberg.

    http://bit.ly/2yY0MUy

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    From your link:

    Lina told Chinese language newspaper Sydney Today it was about midday when a “caucasian looking man” began his verbal attack.
     
    Who describes someone as ''a caucasian looking man''?
    This NewsCorp article features an SBS video which has nothing to do with the article, except to denigrate White people.
    N.S.W. Police weren't asked to comment, indicating no complaint was made.
    Looks like a racebaiting hoax.
    , @Stebbing Heuer
    I'm from that part of Sydney, perhaps I can help.

    Burwood these days is pretty much entirely Chinese.

    It's odd that someone would pick on a Chinese woman and say 'Go back to your own country', when both of them would have been surrounded by tens of Chinese people, at any time of day or night.

    My guess is, the guy would have been a mental case, possibly a schiz. They loiter around the inner-west because there are a few shelters out there.

    There is a huge taboo against hitting women in Australia, as you would expect. It is extremely rare in public, just not done except by mental cases.

    If the guy were a racist he most likely would have picked on a man. I'm betting it was a mental case who just took a dislike to the poor woman for being Chinese. I don't think we can extrapolate out to Australian society, or western societies more generally, from this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anon
    It's notable how you rely exclusively upon fictional anti-white race-hatred propaganda to justify your own unrelenting racism. But I guess that's all you have.

    It’s notable how you rely exclusively upon fictional anti-white race-hatred propaganda to justify your own unrelenting racism. But I guess that’s all you have.

    He also has flat-earthism. He is an actual flat-earther.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Johann Ricke

    The Jews using the Holocaust in order to milk endless concessions from the Germans, too. As long as gentiles dominate Germany.
     
    I wouldn't call $6b a whole lot of concessions. At $1,000 per soul, that's an amount stateside defendants can only dream of settling for. What's more typical is anywhere from 100x to 1000x the average amount mentioned. Note that Germany got to keep all the stuff (real estate, corporate assets, jewelry, gold, art) it seized from Jews it exterminated, and that was not only a whole lot more than $1,000 per person; it was when $1,000 was real money.

    Do you have similar numbers for the dispossessed Palestinians?
    First, there was Nakba. “In the 1930s, Jewish land ownership had increased from approximately 1% to just over 6% of the land, and violence had increased as well. With the emergence of several Zionist terrorist gangs (whose ranks included a number of future Prime Ministers of Israel), there was violent conflict. Numerous people of all ethnicities were killed – then, as now, the large majority of them Christian and Muslim Palestinians. This growing violence culminated in Israel’s ruthless 1947-49 “War of Independence,”in which at least 750,000 Palestinian men, women, and children were expelled from their homes… Zionist forces committed 33 massacres and destroyed 531 Palestinian towns.” http://ifamericaknew.org/history/ref-nakba.html

    Then Israel has applied special Jewish method of genociding: “1.2 million Palestinian olive trees uprooted in Palestinian occupied territories;” “Olive orchards are being destroyed in the West Bank, but defense and media officials have agreed yet again that everything should be done to respect the public’s right not to know,” https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.554690

    The theft of Palestinian land: “…according to the Yesha Council, 382,031 Israeli citizens lived in the 121 officially recognized Israeli settlements in the West Bank, almost exclusively Jewish citizens of Israel.”

    The theft of Palestinian water: “Flaunting international laws against the pillage of occupied lands, Israel controls the mountain aquifer -80 percent of which lies beneath the West Bank – and over-extracts it for agriculture, as well as settlers’ pools and verdant lawns. In 2009, the Mountain Aquifer supplied 40 percent of Israel’s agricultural needs and 50 percent of its population’s drinking water. Israel also takes more than its share from the coastal aquifer that lies beneath Gaza, and diverts the Wadi Gaza into Israel’s Negev desert, just before it reaches Gaza. Lastly, Israel’s wall conveniently envelops wells and springs that lie east of the Green Line.”

    Considering the criminal behavior of the Jewish state towards the colonized native population, your mournful reminder “Germany got to keep all the stuff (real estate, corporate assets, jewelry, gold, art)” is senseless. The Jewish state is the bloody criminal aggressor. Currently Israel cooperates with the remnants of ISIS and with Wahhabist Saudi Arabia against the sovereign Syria. This is highly immoral. Moreover, Israel and Israel-firsters have been trying to “employ” the US in a war against Iran. The Nuremberg Protocols have condemned precisely this kind of behavior.

    Read More
    • Agree: renfro
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. denk says:
    @NoWeltschmerz
    The first step you should take to empathize is to move to the inner city and have your kids educated there. I'll be happy to provide my e-mail address so you can let me know how that's working out...mmmmkay?

    I do not live in murkka.
    But witness even anglos in Asia behave like they’r still the colonial
    masters there !

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    I am a proud white American, and I acted respectfully and politely during my recent first trip to Asia. I have numerous white American and Canadian friends and acquaintances who have visited Asia - some of whom, like me, are married to Asians - and not one would dream of acting as portrayed there.

    Specious generalization on your part about supposed widespread western rudeness, that is contrary to our personal experience.
    , @NoWeltschmerz
    You got me. One video definitely proves your point. I never thought you lived in the US, I assumed Mainland China.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. Mr. Anon says:
    @Truth

    Rod reinforces that impression further on, when he notes that my piece, a white guy warning his kids about blacks, got me dropped, while Prof. Yankah’s piece—in a much more prestigious publication—will have no negative consequences for his career.
     
    Dude, do you EVER stop whining about how Johnny, or Tennessee, or Ekow, got a bigger peice of pie than you did?

    I’m sure Chinese students of the mid-1960s often nursed resentments against their teachers, politicians, and other authority figures. Those resentments were kept in check by polite traditional restraints, though, as well as by the enforcers of a totalitarian state.
     
    ...And do you ever stop kissing Chinese ass. You have to take a step back and look, WASP Sing, these practices are unseemly.

    I’m sure Chinese students of the mid-1960s often nursed resentments against their teachers, politicians, and other authority figures. Those resentments were kept in check by polite traditional restraints, though, as well as by the enforcers of a totalitarian state.

    Whenever “Truth” opens his yap, one should keep in mind that this a man who actually believes that the Earth is flat. He is an actual, unironic flat-earther.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    You've written this twice in the last 4 comments.

    I guess for the person who skipped comment 159 for some reason?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Rdm says:
    @silviosilver
    My feelings about blacks generally range from "I don't like blacks much" to "God I hate n-words." What am I really hating though? I would say that, above all, it's their presence. I hate having blacks around. When there are no blacks around, I don't waste any time hating them. If I knew I could permanently get blacks out of my life, I'd happily wish them well. It's a strange kind of "hatred" to wish the people you "hate" well, isn't it? It's certainly strange if you compare this hatred to individuals that I hate. I don't wish such people well at all. If I were to wish anything about them, I would wish something bad to happen to them. I think this is an important distinction.

    If there are no blacks around, I might be feeling happy or I might be feeling sad, but the entry of blacks into that scene always makes it worse, never better, and the degree to which it's worse hinges on how many blacks are around. The first couple of blacks are inconsequential, but things start heading downhill very quickly. If a daytime scene becomes some twenty percent black, that's about the point that I start hating it. At night, it takes far fewer - by ten percent I'm definitely feeling it.

    I don't like asians much either, but the intensity of this dislike is monumentally less than that towards blacks. It's more a cold indifference than a dislike, and it takes an awful lot of asians being on the scene before I start feeling down. A scene can easily be fifty percent asian and I won't feel any heightened negative emotion, no matter how long I spend there. A scene can be over ninety percent asian and spending short periods in it doesn't bother me - which is something I could never say about blacks.

    Latinos are a very different matter. Racially, I'm not bothered by their presence at all. On the contrary, I actually like them. I hate the effects they have on society, but this is a rather abstract, contemplative hate, not something visceral, the way it is with blacks. Language is the main turn-off with Latinos. I can understand and speak basic Spanish, and I sometimes enjoy speaking/practicing it, but my Spanish is not nearly good enough to join in rapid fire conversations. So being surrounded by Spanish speakers is not a pleasant experience.

    Given the enormous social pressure to be "anti-racist," what I've written here surely makes me sound like a race-obsessed hater. People generally don't go into detail about their feelings on this issue, not even with trusted friends. It's just not done. This is quite remarkable when you think of what a huge role race plays in social life. I think the 'old school' model of white racist hate is responsible for this. Whites may have had very good reasons for feeling as they did, but the experience of this kind of racism was quite brutal to those on the receiving end of it. It has left a very bitter taste in people's mouths, and people rightly fear a return to that kind of society. Unfortunately, this is also people's idea of what a "racist society" would necessarily be like, which helps keep expression of racial feelings taboo (real racial feelings, I mean).

    Those of us who favor racial reform (pro-white racial reform, or at least anti-anti-white reform) should be very grateful that the internet has given us the opportunity to have these very important conversations. It's a great pity that pro-white racial reformers wasted so many years on stormfront-like nutzi stupidity, which is not only morally dubious, but from a practical standpoint has a snowball's chance in hell of ever eventuating. I am hopeful that a 'reasonable racism' can be achieved (and reflected in social policy). If it ever is, it will in large part be thanks to intelligent, considerate sites like unz.com and writers like Derb.

    I’d say with 100% honesty, either you like whatever race or whatever ethnic person, I don’t care.

    If a White person I’m coming across on the street doesn’t like me, I’m fine with that. If a White person doesn’t want to talk with me during lunch break, I’m totally fine with that.

    But if a White person getting arrogant in front of me with a perceived notion of “This is my country, I will BS whatever the heck I want”, it always gets on my nerve, knowing that this white guy was just an immigrant to this country and he was using the racial perception of this country to his advantage.

    That I know for sure for some BS A-hole european in this country.

    Read More
    • Replies: @silviosilver

    But if a White person getting arrogant in front of me with a perceived notion of “This is my country, I will BS whatever the heck I want”, it always gets on my nerve, knowing that this white guy was just an immigrant to this country and he was using the racial perception of this country to his advantage.
     
    It's much more than a 'racial perception.' America indubitably was a consciously and intentionally white country, and its failure to remain a white country has caused great harm to its white population.

    But one can't live in the past forever.

    Derisive white racial attitudes and displays of those attitudes belong to the past. They not only cause unfair distress to non-whites, they harm pro-white racial interests too.

    As I said, I do not like blacks, but I never racially offend blacks to their faces or let on how I feel about their race. If anything, I tend to go out of my way a little to be extra nice when dealing with them - eg a random conversation at a bar - just to make my life go smoother. Conversations I find myself in with blacks are very seldom anything I'd call 'stimulating,' but sharing a joke or two or a tale of male exploits can be a pleasant way to pass a bit of time. Every so often I'm touched by the friendliness of a black person, and then I come away from it questioning my racial values or wistfully ruminating about the nature of race-relations. I have to remind myself that race is never about individuals, it's always about numbers. Race and numbers, race and numbers, race and numbers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. @Mr. Anon

    Dreher’s problem is not that he isn’t a ‘committed Christian’. It’s that he is abnormally other-directed and emotional and has a seriously deficient sense of honor.
     
    You're one to talk, drone.

    Exactly, he epitomizes cuckdom.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Rdm says:
    @Zoodles
    That is because the actual ethnic americans, the american-americans are white. And the USA is their motherland. A Chinese person can no more be an ethnic american than an anglo saxon person can be han chinese.

    It’s the same that Derb, an immigrant to this country, spewing out anti-Black ever since he inked his idea on journalism. Derb is using the perceived notion of “White American”.

    The same can be said with Prof Ekow, whose lineage is nothing to do with slavery in this American soil, but his skin pigeonholes him into another affirmative-actioned Negros. So he fights with his fellow Blacks.

    This is the DNA of the US. A fresh European immigrant will deny anything to do with slavery, Jim Crow, KKK, yet they will immensely reap the benefit of “being Whites”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    The benefit of being discriminated against in employment, intimidated or targeted for violence on urban streets (as I have been assaulted more than once by Africans spouting racial hatred), and mocked and hated in tv and movies and schools daily? Yeah, that's some impressive white privilege there.

    Whatever America you are portraying, it doesn't exist and hasn't existed in most places in my lifetime. Whites are at a distinct DISadvantage in university admissions and hiring, relative to what their merits would warrant.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. denk says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    Don't join the legion of the oppressed Denk.
    Chinese are welcome. They are a welcome people. No one is asking that you state your gratitude, but it is extremely poor form to join the legion of the oppressed.
    There are plenty of confused people in the comments here clamoring for a gang war who will all be the first to go home and crack open a beer and watch from a distance when the gangs actually gather on the playground mound. No one - no, one - wants it, and seriously they are just confused - everyone is, even the "white" elite scared to death their ox is gonna be gored - confused.
    But long run - joining the legion of the oppressed is not going to advance you - it's going to come with a cost. I don't think you can afford the cost. The low road is easy but it doesn't turn out to be cheap.

    Don’t join the legion of the oppressed Denk.
    Chinese are welcome

    Thats not what I gathered, there’r legions of Chinese haters in this site alone !

    I do agree there’s a divide and conquer conspiracy going on,
    courtesy of the masters of universe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    Thats not what I gathered, there’r legions of Chinese haters in this site alone !
     
    This site is a magnet for them - it's not representative.
    I assume we are talking about "white" people (1964 and post-thereof definition) - do you really think the majority, or even a plurality, of white people have anything but positive feelings for Chinese? Think really hard about this if you are tempted to say "no". The signs of good feelings towards Chinese are so ubiquitous they're like street lamps. Go out and look for street lamps. Don't let the scorpions attracted to each other like hate-magnets warp you with them.
    , @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    I do agree there’s a divide and conquer conspiracy going on
     
    Conscious or not - yes - "divide and conquer" is underway.

    Steve Sailer writes a lot about LACC. I'd like to see him write some more about impressions he had of the old WASPs who frequented that place and similar ones in Palm Springs and other peripheries around the same time - that is, if he was close enough to any of them to gather impressions. My impressions have generally been: 1) it is very wise to watch what they do, not what they say, 2) if your penny-pinching uncle Barry thinks he knows a lot about economics and is very loud about what he knows, you do better following the quiet example of the WASPs than the loud example of uncle Barry, 3) if they cared a wit about the MC or WC, they didn't bother to show it and they always seemed just fine with UMC talking among itself like it was in their member, but the barriers creating exclusion were always enforced.

    There is an elite. It runs hedge funds, private equity, mutual funds, university endowments, heads up boards of directors.

    It is quite unfair to generalize the privilege of this elite to people in the bottom two socio-economic quartiles who share their phenotype and religious history (Anglo-Protestant - expanded since 1964 to include European Catholics).
    It's also quite unfair to generalize the privilege of the elite to an ethnicity.

    The elite is the elite - they are elite on account of the real factors that distinguish themselves from the non-elites and which cause their own interests to fall out of alignment with the non-elite they rise above.

    The systemic weakness is that a well-working system would have governance in place to assure a solid majority of those rising to the elite (60-80%) are prevented from doing so unless they are able to demonstrate bonafides of their interests being aligned with the commons, or their willingness to subordinate their interests to those of the commons.

    Our system has run on 18th century aristocratic fumes too long so what we are getting now is the disconnnect.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. denk says:
    @Wally
    Look again, the aggressor was mulatto. Oops.

    He called that guy ‘fucking chinese nigger

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I watched 7 times though, it's inconclusive as to whether he dropped the "r" at the end.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. joef says:

    When will American non Blacks stop pretending that we don’t have an unsustainable afro american problem in this country. Afro american aggressive animosity, and endless demands for more parasitical free lunch benefits, cannot continue indefinitely. All the obfuscations, and denial, cannot change this unfortunate fact. Wishful thinking, pandering, and undeserved praise (for unearned accomplishments), cannot solve this ruinous situation.

    We non Blacks have two choices: hold afros accountable for their bad behavior, or allow this to continue to our eventual devolution. Afros themselves have the choice of reforming their attitudes, or continue their hostile adversarial relationship with the rest of the nation. Liberals have a choice to realistically help afros (in real terms) by demanding responsibility from them, or continue to haphazardly accuse other Whites of false racism.

    A house divided cannot stand. We cannot expect to continuously erode the foundation of the nation, and still have a realistic expectation of its long term viability. The component parts of the nation (municipalities) are already eroding… when too many component parts erode, eventually it detrimentally affects the total system at large.

    Will non Blacks make the decision to correct this decaying situation? I am afraid not. Too many distractions of entertainment/materialism (paid by our expanding credit card debt), too easy to just ignore the issue, and accuse anyone who brings up these unwelcome facts as racist, too much White flight migration to keep the afro problem out of sight & out of mind, too many suburbanites/elites/limo libs who are isolated enough to never have to directly confront the issue (for now), and too many politicians who are willing to perform the quid pro quo of welfare benefits for votes (at tax payers expense).

    Because of this lack of political will, predatory afros sense this weakness, and will keep pushing their adversarial agenda against the nation. But if we are honest with ourselves, we must know that this cannot last forever, and if true, the endpoint will not be a peaceful one. Either we confront the afro problem now, or be confronted by it later when it will be worse. The choice is ours to make, and the consequences of inaction will be severe.

    Read More
    • Agree: TTSSYF, lavoisier
    • Replies: @Thea
    Spoiler alert, No action will be taken .

    Remember 9/11? That lead to an influx of Muslim immigrants and louder denunciations of Islamaphobia. Thus, this problem will be ignored as well. They'll hunt whites and East Asians and eventually any other non blacks like they do in Zimbabwe & South Africa.

    The only hope is total economic collapse of a solar flare that knocks out all power grids.

    We are doomed.
    , @Miro23

    The choice is ours to make, and the consequences of inaction will be severe.
     
    The US chose Trump but what difference did that make? The US is still making aggressive Neocon orchestrated moves against Iran, Russia etc. and there doesn't seem to be any urgency with the Wall or Infrastructure Spending.

    On this view, "The choice isn't ours to make", with real policy decisions coming from the full spectrum of US Special Interests - Zionists, Outsourcers, Wall St, Pharma, MIC , Agro etc. etc. until the USA is a bankrupted shell.

    There's still a long way to go, but the end of the line for a 100% corrupt Special Interest Democracy looks like the Philippines:


    As the 2006 World Development Report said, “15% of Filipinos were living in absolute poverty, and 47% subsisted on an income between US$1 and US$2 a day. Half of the 12 million population of Manila lives in shanty towns that line the expressways, rail tracks and waterways of the metropolis. After 25 years of repeated economic crises, the Philippines economy is now critically dependent on the overseas earnings of an estimated 10 million, mostly female workers – out of a population of 80 million – employed as child carers, nurses and more in richer states around the world.”
    Joe Studwell, "Asian Godfathers: Money and Power in South East Asia" https://www.amazon.com/Asian-Godfathers-Money-Power-Southeast/dp/0802143911/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511081357&sr=1-1&keywords=studwell%2C+money+power
     
    Studwell quotes the Philippine's best known living author, Francisco Sionil José (from an interview in the far Eastern Economic Review December 2004) saying, “We are poor because our élites have no sense of nation.”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. @Jake
    The proto-WASP Derbyshire is very late to the game.

    Derbyshire is a math nerd, so it he should realize the need to repeat essential formulas. WASP culture is the product of a Judaizing heresy: Anglo-Saxon Puritnaism.

    Any Judaizing heresy that comes to wield political power will produce philo-Semitic culture. Derbyshire has a long career of acknowledging that he - Mr English-born and raised WASP 'paleoconservative' - is a philo-Semite., one who simply does not understand the fear of Jews.

    WASP culture, under archetype WASP Oliver Cromwell, officially allied with Jews, taking Jewish money to wage war, including wars of cultural extermination, against non-WASP white Gentiles. Jews were legally allowed back into England and granted special rights and privileges denied to the vast majority of native British Isles Christians.

    Therefore, WASP culture has ALWAYS been about WASPs allying with Jews against Christendom and the peoples and cultures of historic Christendom. To be anti-Christendom is to be anti-white - even if the specific anti-Christendom leader/perpetrator is a Caucasian who feels he or she is Christian.

    We live in the end stage of that Judaizing heresy gaining control of a wealthy nation. And that end stage is suicidal.

    Jake, if I recall correctly, you’re RCC and accept black/Asian priests-popes. Cuck pope Frannie is in the process of destroying Western Europe. You can’t blame the WASPs/Jews for all our problems.

    Read More
    • Replies: @polskijoe
    I agree with you
    that WASP/Jews cant be blamed for everything.

    However, there is a link between
    1) Protestants elites and
    2)Jew elites and
    3)Anti-cleric elites (aka antiCatholics) in former Catholic dominated societies.

    This link is called Freemasonry.

    Freemasonry became dominate in Anglo speaking countries.
    US and UK always had the highest number of Freemasons. (Truman, Churchill, Ford, many American presidents, etc)
    (they require a believe in god, have large numbers, and they are pseudo-christian the vast majority of them are qausi-Protestant).
    These guys were dependent on Jewish money.

    Freemasonry elsewhere adopted the
    The anti-cleric view.
    (they require no belief, they are attacking Christian in all shapes and forms, and they spread lbgt)
    This Freemasonry gave "emanicipation" to Jews.
    Allow Jews to gain power a few hundred years ago.


    For 200 years, Freemasonry
    attacked the Catholic Church and Catholic nations.
    (French Revolution, Mexican Revolution/Christian war, Italy reuinication getting rid of Papal lands,
    and several others).

    In 1960s the Catholic Church was changed. It was the French Revolution of the CC.
    And now you have a divided Church, amongst the people and elites.

    Now you have some Catholics who propose gay marriage and immigration.
    Joe Biden, and other weirdos.
    , @RadicalCenter
    Seems like a reasonable criticism. Anyone claiming to care about the survival of our countries as civilized western places where our posterity can be safe, at peace, productive, trusting and trusted, advanced, and reasonably free, can NOT continue supporting the RC church.

    We left the RC Church because of their aggressive support for the third world conquest of America and western countries, more than any other reason. It is a thoroughly infiltrated institution that has worse than zero respect for and loyalty to western civilization and white / european peoples and their cultures, rights, and interests.

    To Hell with anyone working to destroy my country. It does not help if he wears a collar and falsely purports to be a man of God.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @denk
    Off hand I immediately recall this incident, its just tip of an iceberg.

    http://bit.ly/2yY0MUy

    From your link:

    Lina told Chinese language newspaper Sydney Today it was about midday when a “caucasian looking man” began his verbal attack.

    Who describes someone as ”a caucasian looking man”?
    This NewsCorp article features an SBS video which has nothing to do with the article, except to denigrate White people.
    N.S.W. Police weren’t asked to comment, indicating no complaint was made.
    Looks like a racebaiting hoax.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk

    Who describes someone as ”a caucasian looking man”?
     
    Whoever is being attacked by a 'caucasian looking man'

    'This NewsCorp article features an SBS video which has nothing to do with the article, except to denigrate White people.
    N.S.W. Police weren’t asked to comment, indicating no complaint was made.'
     
    There was a witness ,
    Ms X told SBS that as she didn't hear from the police, she phoned Burwood station yesterday, confirmed her contact details and expressed her willingness to provide witness statement.
    "I was wondering why it's been so long yet the police still haven't contacted me?"

    'Looks like a racebaiting hoax.'
     
    IM not convinced .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. Derbshire, you’re going to have to fully disclose at the top of your columns. This is so new readers can get a better idea of who you are.

    You have a Chinese wife and Chinese offspring. Your imported Chinese wife and Chinese daughter voted for Obama. Very disingenuous to criticize blacks. You need to disclose info about your family.

    Also, you are very philosemitic. I recall reading an article of yours several years ago of your admiration of the smartest people ever, the Jews.

    Mentioning the Chinese cultural revolution also indicates that your wife and offspring may harbor similar tendencies towards the West.

    You, as a WASP/gentile, need to do some introspection as to who really hates whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "...you’re going to have to fully disclose at ..."
    Is this a voice of your ancestors that used to be police informants? Being such a prude, you should better announce your real name and occupation.
    By the way, your own "tendencies towards the West" are not clear at all.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. renfro says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    9 to 1 says there's a processor in the device you are commenting with - that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in.

    ” 9 to 1 says there’s a processor in the device you are commenting with – that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in”

    Sorry no cigar…if you are referring to first processor or even the microprocessor. Ted Hoff (German American) actually conceived the micro…there two others guys involved and one was Jewish but he isn’t the creator.

    I said specifically jewish …some thing only a jew or jews alone have done.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    ha haha hahhah hahah a ha
    OMG
    Thanks.
    Good start to Sunday, that was a great laugh man.
    What other insights do you have to share? Please show the world your wisdom.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. @Anonymous

    Actually, it is Catholics who are in the most danger. Committed Darwinists such as Derbyshire are relatively safe. As for Dreher, he is most unconvincing as a Christian of any sort. God only knows what he really is.
     
    Funny, a devout Christian guy like John Lennox (University of Cambridge [MA, MMath, PhD]; University of Oxford [MA, DPhil]), Emeritus Professor of Mathematics at University of Oxford, writes books on God, Science, and Christianity like, Determined to Believe: The Sovereignty of God, Freedom, Faith, and Human Responsibility.

    And guys like areligious, naturalist Derb (University College London; University of London), computer programmer and social science commentator, writes books like, Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics.

    “That was the second time the Ottomans reached Vienna, the first being in 1529 under Suleiman the Magnificent. On both occasions they were stymied.” You posted this about Poland diversifying.

    Are you sad or happy Turkish Muslims were stymied in their jihad on Vienna?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. Thea says:
    @joef
    When will American non Blacks stop pretending that we don't have an unsustainable afro american problem in this country. Afro american aggressive animosity, and endless demands for more parasitical free lunch benefits, cannot continue indefinitely. All the obfuscations, and denial, cannot change this unfortunate fact. Wishful thinking, pandering, and undeserved praise (for unearned accomplishments), cannot solve this ruinous situation.

    We non Blacks have two choices: hold afros accountable for their bad behavior, or allow this to continue to our eventual devolution. Afros themselves have the choice of reforming their attitudes, or continue their hostile adversarial relationship with the rest of the nation. Liberals have a choice to realistically help afros (in real terms) by demanding responsibility from them, or continue to haphazardly accuse other Whites of false racism.

    A house divided cannot stand. We cannot expect to continuously erode the foundation of the nation, and still have a realistic expectation of its long term viability. The component parts of the nation (municipalities) are already eroding... when too many component parts erode, eventually it detrimentally affects the total system at large.

    Will non Blacks make the decision to correct this decaying situation? I am afraid not. Too many distractions of entertainment/materialism (paid by our expanding credit card debt), too easy to just ignore the issue, and accuse anyone who brings up these unwelcome facts as racist, too much White flight migration to keep the afro problem out of sight & out of mind, too many suburbanites/elites/limo libs who are isolated enough to never have to directly confront the issue (for now), and too many politicians who are willing to perform the quid pro quo of welfare benefits for votes (at tax payers expense).

    Because of this lack of political will, predatory afros sense this weakness, and will keep pushing their adversarial agenda against the nation. But if we are honest with ourselves, we must know that this cannot last forever, and if true, the endpoint will not be a peaceful one. Either we confront the afro problem now, or be confronted by it later when it will be worse. The choice is ours to make, and the consequences of inaction will be severe.

    Spoiler alert, No action will be taken .

    Remember 9/11? That lead to an influx of Muslim immigrants and louder denunciations of Islamaphobia. Thus, this problem will be ignored as well. They’ll hunt whites and East Asians and eventually any other non blacks like they do in Zimbabwe & South Africa.

    The only hope is total economic collapse of a solar flare that knocks out all power grids.

    We are doomed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    Spoiler alert, No action will be taken .
     
    Yes, you are correct that nothing will change. If we continuously follow a certain direction, we will eventually arrive at that certain destination. Especially when we do not have the political will to change it.

    The overwhelming liberal confirmation bias is that afro americans are innocent victims, crime stats notwithstanding. To a liberal, either the reported homicide rate does not exist, or the victims do not exist, or if they do exist then the afros didn't do it... all of which indicates applied irrationality against reality. The same goes with the cost of servicing afros with welfare entitlements.

    What is not being acknowledged is that cities like Detroit, and Camden NJ, are the future of this nation in microcosm. Many believe, that despite the fact of it happening to these components of the nation, that it cannot possibly happen to this nation itself (or at least to significant portions of it). In my opinion these cities are the canaries in the coal mine indicating our future national economic bankruptcy.

    I have posted many times in the past that we are in a situation where our racial balkanization, combined with economic decline, will result in massive large scale social unrest. If this nation ever has an economic decline like Venezuela, there is no way that afro americans will behave themselves by acting in a civically responsible manner (they don't do that now!). Once the entitlement goodies stop, their afro declared race war begins. The libs better hope I am completely wrong on this one, because they will definitely not survive the aftermath of this potential outcome (the libs will have the most to lose, which is probably why they want to desperately kick the can down the road).

    Yet, like the story of the scorpion & the frog, even if the afros could win a race war, they would lose. This is from the fact that they are so dependent upon us for their daily needs, they couldn't possibly survive without us. Further, living in close proximity with afros (for a long time in my old city neighborhood) I found most afros are not as tough as advertised. They pick easy targets, and like easy victories, by some unfair advantage of either size, weapons, age, or numbers. There are some notable exceptions to this, like the afro who runs the narcotics corner, his enforcers, and trained boxers. But without some sort of unfair advantage, many of them are more show than go.

    So I am not significantly worried about an afro race war being successful. I am more worried of its aftereffects with scarcity, and damaged infrastructure (especially following a national economic bankruptcy event). Does this have to happen? No, the people most responsible for this potential outcome, can change it... but I highly doubt the afros will ever decide to do that. If they did, no one would be happier than me, but reality does not show too much hope in this. So the next best alternative is to prepare to outlast the crisis. Non Blacks did not ask for this, but this is the potential future that is being forced upon us, and all we can do is to make the appropriate response.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. wayfarer says:

    From stone age, to space age.

    With a college degree, quantum leaps just may be possible.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  176. Eagle Eye says:
    @JamesG
    This is (not completely) OT.

    Last night Charlie Rose interviewed the current female president of Harvard University.

    She said that in the incoming class of Harvard College, "Minorities are the majority."

    That either means blacks are more that 50% or "People of Color" are which I guess would includes Asian and Asian-Descent of various non-white shades.

    If she meant the former, Wow! If she meant the latter, I'd like a breakdown, to know how many are African American.

    I’d like a breakdown, to know how many [Harvard admittees] are African American.

    It would be fascinating to compare the number of African American admittees with full American ancestry to the number of admittees from Africa or with African parents/grandparents.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. @Rdm
    I'd say with 100% honesty, either you like whatever race or whatever ethnic person, I don't care.

    If a White person I'm coming across on the street doesn't like me, I'm fine with that. If a White person doesn't want to talk with me during lunch break, I'm totally fine with that.

    But if a White person getting arrogant in front of me with a perceived notion of "This is my country, I will BS whatever the heck I want", it always gets on my nerve, knowing that this white guy was just an immigrant to this country and he was using the racial perception of this country to his advantage.

    That I know for sure for some BS A-hole european in this country.

    But if a White person getting arrogant in front of me with a perceived notion of “This is my country, I will BS whatever the heck I want”, it always gets on my nerve, knowing that this white guy was just an immigrant to this country and he was using the racial perception of this country to his advantage.

    It’s much more than a ‘racial perception.’ America indubitably was a consciously and intentionally white country, and its failure to remain a white country has caused great harm to its white population.

    But one can’t live in the past forever.

    Derisive white racial attitudes and displays of those attitudes belong to the past. They not only cause unfair distress to non-whites, they harm pro-white racial interests too.

    As I said, I do not like blacks, but I never racially offend blacks to their faces or let on how I feel about their race. If anything, I tend to go out of my way a little to be extra nice when dealing with them – eg a random conversation at a bar – just to make my life go smoother. Conversations I find myself in with blacks are very seldom anything I’d call ‘stimulating,’ but sharing a joke or two or a tale of male exploits can be a pleasant way to pass a bit of time. Every so often I’m touched by the friendliness of a black person, and then I come away from it questioning my racial values or wistfully ruminating about the nature of race-relations. I have to remind myself that race is never about individuals, it’s always about numbers. Race and numbers, race and numbers, race and numbers.

    Read More
    • Agree: anarchyst
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. polskijoe says:
    @TTSSYF
    If it were one TV show, I would agree. But it isn't. It's just one more part of a much larger, coordinated effort. One might even refer to it as part of a vast, Left-wing conspiracy.

    The left wing conspiracy is called the “Open Conspiracy”

    it is related to Fabian Socialism (they also supported Lenin/Trotsky)
    and Modern Liberalism (left wing social, corporate money interests).

    there are two major internationalist movements:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_International

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_International

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. @Mulegino1
    "Fear" , when used in its New Testament context, does not necessarily imply coercion of coercive human forces such as governments or people in authority. However, the "fear" of the Jews (by the apostles), before Pentecost, was based upon a real fear of being turned over to the very coercive and oppressive Sanhedrin, whereas the "fear of the Lord" was based upon the acknowledgement of God's omnipotence and justice. I realize that this is too much for a Talmudic dominated mind to digest in one sitting, though. You can speak all you want about the "Magic Rabbi." To paraphrase Napoleon Buonaparte, if you desire to discredit Him, just get yourself killed and then resurrect. That should be enough to sate your Talmudic mindset's thirst for satisfaction, right?

    I appreciate your repulsion to Hebethinkery, but the terms I used to describe Jesus are all in the Bible. As far as discrediting the resurrection tale—by your own repeatability standard—Jesus was a latecomer, as many other Jews rose from the dead (MT 27:52) before he got around to it. (MT 28:6) Yet another Jewish zombie walking around Jerusalem? Whoop-Dee-Doo! White men standing on the moon is a much more impressive feat. Oh, the horrid indignities of white supremacy, suffered by the jealous who have yet to reach such heights.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. I visited Ghana on an official trade mission. I found the people to be relaxed, very friendly, uncritical of whites, n the country comparatively free of crime, that is compared to the US. I also learned that no person of European descent can become a citizen of Ghana, vote, own land, or participate in professional organizations. From my conversations, I gathered that this situation was common across Africa. While most Ghanaians were extremely poor, making maybe ten cents an hour, there exists a wealthy elite that is closely tied to the US. Among this elite dual citizenship with the US is common n they often have experience working in top levels of American corporations n American governmental institutions making enormous sums. While I saw no direct evidence, I concluded that elites in Ghana n other West African countries have extremely close ties to the Congressional Black Caucus n that the black elite in West Africa n in the US is a single small club where everyone knows each other, n that this club is wealthy n exclusive n attaches no importance to national boundaries.

    Dual citizenship means that the likes of Mr Yankah likely not only obtained his position via patronage but has the permanent option of returning to Ghana at any time as a full citizen, in fact likely already has a very well paid elite government position waiting for him since this is the usual career procedure for elites there. His statements on whites i believe came not from Ghana, which has no whites to hate, but from his club ties to the American Black elite, whose raison d’etre n battle cry is anti-white hatred n would quickly lose their untouchable privileges if peace were to break out. As a member of the international Black aristocracy, which the US has made fabulously wealthy by African standards, Yankah has no personal stake but is merely echoing the shibboleths of the Club as is expected of its members.

    The economy of Ghana did not independently create this elite. The US has given well over a billion dollars in aid to Ghana as well as chasing Chinese n Russian oil companies out n encouraging American oil cos to develop offshore concessions. Whose interests this foreign policy serves, making Ghana the 52nd state, is open to question.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  181. polskijoe says:
    @attilathehen
    Jake, if I recall correctly, you're RCC and accept black/Asian priests-popes. Cuck pope Frannie is in the process of destroying Western Europe. You can't blame the WASPs/Jews for all our problems.

    I agree with you
    that WASP/Jews cant be blamed for everything.

    However, there is a link between
    1) Protestants elites and
    2)Jew elites and
    3)Anti-cleric elites (aka antiCatholics) in former Catholic dominated societies.

    This link is called Freemasonry.

    Freemasonry became dominate in Anglo speaking countries.
    US and UK always had the highest number of Freemasons. (Truman, Churchill, Ford, many American presidents, etc)
    (they require a believe in god, have large numbers, and they are pseudo-christian the vast majority of them are qausi-Protestant).
    These guys were dependent on Jewish money.

    Freemasonry elsewhere adopted the
    The anti-cleric view.
    (they require no belief, they are attacking Christian in all shapes and forms, and they spread lbgt)
    This Freemasonry gave “emanicipation” to Jews.
    Allow Jews to gain power a few hundred years ago.

    For 200 years, Freemasonry
    attacked the Catholic Church and Catholic nations.
    (French Revolution, Mexican Revolution/Christian war, Italy reuinication getting rid of Papal lands,
    and several others).

    In 1960s the Catholic Church was changed. It was the French Revolution of the CC.
    And now you have a divided Church, amongst the people and elites.

    Now you have some Catholics who propose gay marriage and immigration.
    Joe Biden, and other weirdos.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Thanks for pointing out the Freemasons. I keep forgetting to add them to the RCC/Zioevangizers. The troika should be RCC/Zioevangiers/Freemasons. The Jews just hang on and do as they're told. These 3 evil groups are destroying the West. I am still a Christian and am looking into the Orthodox church. Also, I start everything with IQ, which frightens everybody I talk to. IQ leads to race differences but this needs to be brought out more and more.

    RCC/Zioevangizers/Freemasons don't care about gay marriage. I'm against it. The argument against it will have to include evolution. But these three groups will shy away from that argument. We have to just keep bringing this up.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. @Ron Unz

    You’re referring to David Blankenhorn, I think. My wager would be that foundations put the screws to him and he didn’t have many alternatives because he’s approaching retirement age.
     
    Thanks for remembering the name of that top conservative of the anti-Gay Marriage crusade who immediately endorsed Gay Marriage once his donors so directed him.

    And it's certainly possible that my memory might be at fault regarding the extent of Dreher's zeal on that same issue in the 1990s and others having to do with "Gay Rights" but that was what I vaguely remembered. I just spent a couple of minutes Googling around, but unfortunately there isn't as much from that period still up on the Internet. The little I found suggested that Dreher mostly wrote along Rightwing Christian cultural lines in that era, and since all the Christian Rightists were always fighting the Gay Activists back then, I do think it generally tends to support my own recollection.

    IIRC, Dreher was nominally against it back then, but he was mostly MIA on the Gay Marriage thing until a few years ago, when photographers and florists started getting fined out of existence for refusing to serve gay weddings. Then he freaked out and it was all, “OMG, they’re going to start treating us the same way they treated those evil scumbags who opposed interracial marriage (i.e., virtually every white American until a few years ago)!!!!”

    He can never provide a good answer as to why people who think interracial marriage should be forced to serve interracial weddings, but people who oppose gay marriage shouldn’t have to serve gay weddings, except “People who oppose interracial marriage are vile bigots just like all of our parents and deserve whatever they get.”

    Not much principle involved. Just “hey, feds, you should strip my neighbors of their constitutional rights, because I disagree with them, but you shouldn’t take mine away.”

    And he’s loudly in favor of “civil unions”, which are just gay marriages under another name.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. dfordoom says: • Website
    @ia
    Western whites aren't going to stand a chance when their enemies assume power. It'll be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sad.

    Western whites aren’t going to stand a chance when their enemies assume power.

    Western whites have a strategy prepared for such an eventuality. They’re going to apologise. Then they’re going to apologise some more. Then they’re going to crawl and grovel and start crying. It’s bound to work.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. renfro says:
    @helena
    "The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this “professor” is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa."

    Not so. The Narrative clearly states that colonisation of Africa disrupted social development i.e. Europeans robbed Africans of the development that would have otherwise been theirs. And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin.

    Actually Africa did have some developments or empires but they never resembled the civilizations of the many others who impacted Africa .
    Egyptians and Arabs probably had the most influence on African developments in BC times….along with Greeks, Persians and Romans all of who traipsed all over Africa as traders. You can see in particular the Arab and Greek influence in the buildings of the African cities that existed then.

    However I would not say that Europeans robbed them of developments they would have had…but then again that depends on what you would be satisfied to call viable civilized development.
    True Europeans did colonize parts of Africa for their own profit—but I would distinguish between white farmers who settled there and the ones who stole and are still stealing valuable resources like minerals and diamonds….and killing wildlife.
    Also look at what happened when white settlers farmers land was taken and given to blacks as in Zimbabwe….they couldnt or wouldn’t farm the land and raise crops and the nation almost starved, inflation ran rampant and it descended into the failed mess you see today.
    “If” they were smart, instead of hating and blaming the white Europeans , they should try to form some cooperation agreement and learn from the white know how and advanced methods so they can run a country that can at least feed itself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chuckie
    Given the looming African population boom, the responsible thing would be for western countries to stop all money, food, vaccinations, aid of any kind to Africa and let them take care of themselves (or not). Really. For the good of the planet. The fact that Ethiopia's population has doubled in the past decade or two solely due to aid from westerners is a suicidal kind of thing for whites to do. It's got to stop.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. renfro says:
    @David
    I really agree with this.

    There's a book called A Fools Errand, by One of the Fools, a fictitious account of reconstruction and the beginning of Jim Crow and the KKK published in 1879. The novel garnered the endorsement of hundreds of newspapers and was extremely popular, selling in the hundreds of thousands.

    In the book, southern whites are depicted a merely malevolent. The carpetbaggers as angelic if naive regarding the incorrigibility of Southrons. A black is never shown doing anything that could, at least in tiny part, justify the white reaction to liberated blacks.

    However, if you search "negro" in newspapers of the time, blacks are constantly depicted as getting into legitimate legal trouble for violent behavior.

    As part of the plot, the narrator, having served in the Union Army, moves to the South after the war. He uses a local connection to rig the auction of a plantation so he can acquire it at a impossibly low price, cheating its southern (and so evil) owner of its fair price. But the narrative presents this as an unimpeachable act, not the cause of legitimate grievance on the part of locals.

    The narrative we live in now, of goodwhites vs badwhites, and cherubic, moral-agency-free blacks, was being strongly pushed from the very beginning.

    ” The narrative we live in now, of goodwhites vs badwhites, and cherubic, moral-agency-free blacks, was being strongly pushed from the very beginning.”

    Not really.
    The Albion Tourgé author (my spelling may be off) was a Union solider who got imprisoned in the south during the war. He had a love – hate thing for the south .
    After the war he moved to North Carolina and got appointed to be a judge but everyone called him a carpet bagger and generally shunned him from society so he gave up and moved back to the north.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    Derbshire, you're going to have to fully disclose at the top of your columns. This is so new readers can get a better idea of who you are.

    You have a Chinese wife and Chinese offspring. Your imported Chinese wife and Chinese daughter voted for Obama. Very disingenuous to criticize blacks. You need to disclose info about your family.

    Also, you are very philosemitic. I recall reading an article of yours several years ago of your admiration of the smartest people ever, the Jews.

    Mentioning the Chinese cultural revolution also indicates that your wife and offspring may harbor similar tendencies towards the West.

    You, as a WASP/gentile, need to do some introspection as to who really hates whites.

    “…you’re going to have to fully disclose at …”
    Is this a voice of your ancestors that used to be police informants? Being such a prude, you should better announce your real name and occupation.
    By the way, your own “tendencies towards the West” are not clear at all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Its the voice of the low-IQ and the insane, the very picture of white trailer trash. Such individuals are naturally drawn to the most extreme ideologies(to which even Derby seems moderate) since their status is raised higher in comparison simply by having white skin in spite of having no education, being retarded, etc. Its a well known phenomenon.

    The good news is that she's pretty much ignored even here. She's pretty much a poison pill to any organization that she joins, and would probably be evicted. Like typical low-IQ women, though, she's pretty much self-focused on how things affect her alone so she doesn't care.
    , @Truth
    Again, you are attacking a white woman for desiring that white people marry whites? Please explain this.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. @polskijoe
    I agree with you
    that WASP/Jews cant be blamed for everything.

    However, there is a link between
    1) Protestants elites and
    2)Jew elites and
    3)Anti-cleric elites (aka antiCatholics) in former Catholic dominated societies.

    This link is called Freemasonry.

    Freemasonry became dominate in Anglo speaking countries.
    US and UK always had the highest number of Freemasons. (Truman, Churchill, Ford, many American presidents, etc)
    (they require a believe in god, have large numbers, and they are pseudo-christian the vast majority of them are qausi-Protestant).
    These guys were dependent on Jewish money.

    Freemasonry elsewhere adopted the
    The anti-cleric view.
    (they require no belief, they are attacking Christian in all shapes and forms, and they spread lbgt)
    This Freemasonry gave "emanicipation" to Jews.
    Allow Jews to gain power a few hundred years ago.


    For 200 years, Freemasonry
    attacked the Catholic Church and Catholic nations.
    (French Revolution, Mexican Revolution/Christian war, Italy reuinication getting rid of Papal lands,
    and several others).

    In 1960s the Catholic Church was changed. It was the French Revolution of the CC.
    And now you have a divided Church, amongst the people and elites.

    Now you have some Catholics who propose gay marriage and immigration.
    Joe Biden, and other weirdos.

    Thanks for pointing out the Freemasons. I keep forgetting to add them to the RCC/Zioevangizers. The troika should be RCC/Zioevangiers/Freemasons. The Jews just hang on and do as they’re told. These 3 evil groups are destroying the West. I am still a Christian and am looking into the Orthodox church. Also, I start everything with IQ, which frightens everybody I talk to. IQ leads to race differences but this needs to be brought out more and more.

    RCC/Zioevangizers/Freemasons don’t care about gay marriage. I’m against it. The argument against it will have to include evolution. But these three groups will shy away from that argument. We have to just keep bringing this up.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @JamesG
    This is (not completely) OT.

    Last night Charlie Rose interviewed the current female president of Harvard University.

    She said that in the incoming class of Harvard College, "Minorities are the majority."

    That either means blacks are more that 50% or "People of Color" are which I guess would includes Asian and Asian-Descent of various non-white shades.

    If she meant the former, Wow! If she meant the latter, I'd like a breakdown, to know how many are African American.

    According to BBC, here is Harvard’s Class of 2021:

    Asian Americans make up 22.2%, followed by African Americans at 14.6%, Hispanic or Latino students at 11.6%, and Native American or Pacific Islanders at 2.5%.

    The over-representation of blacks against their share of population is pretty hilarious. Harvard simply must take in large number of Asians to balance out blacks just to keep the average SAT high enough. Gentile whites are clearly massively under-represented in the institution they founded. This equally clearly does not apply to Jewish whites – by religion, the the class is 7.7% Jewish (the actual figure for Jews must be higher because other religions include Agnostic and Other): http://features.thecrimson.com/2017/freshman-survey/lifestyle/

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    This article has freshman racial percentages from 1980-2015 for a wide variety of colleges: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/24/us/affirmative-action.html

    The recent PR blitz about Harvard's racial composition is odd. First, because according to the article above Harvard's freshman class has been minority white since 2014. Second, because in your quote "African Americans" are listed as 14.6% but looking at the Harvard 2015 statistics in the link above it was 8% AA and 7% multiracial. So are they just counting all the multiracial group as AA or do they actually know the true number? (and if they know, how?) And what about the African Africans?

    BTW, what does everyone think about African Americans being over-represented (relative to population percentages) among Harvard freshman while white gentiles (and whites as a whole) are significantly under-represented? Must be an awfully big thumb on that affirmative action scale.

    From the genre of never enough diversity articles: https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/04/harvards-acceptance-of-a-record-high-percentage-of-blacks-is-a-very-small-win-for-diversity/360753/

    Forbes has a more complete breakdown for Harvard. They show overall black Harvard enrollment at 5.1%.

    Hillel thinks Harvard has 12% Jewish undergrads and 67% (!) Jewish grad students (click #14 in list): http://www.hillel.org/about/news-views/news-views---blog/news-and-views/2015/06/24/2015-top-60-schools-by-jewish-student-population
    , @res

    Harvard simply must take in large number of Asians to balance out blacks just to keep the average SAT high enough.
     
    I'm not sure average SAT score matters much anymore. They focus more on the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile scores. Very convenient for allowing a fairly long tail of underachievers.

    I looked for Harvard average SAT and most of what I find is median or 25-75% range, but this Crimson survey did have an average SAT score and an SAT/GPA scatterplot: http://features.thecrimson.com/2016/freshman-survey/makeup-narrative/

    I wonder about the student reporting a sub 1400/2400 SAT score and a 4.0 GPA. If that's not bogus anyone care to bet on their major?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @helena
    "The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this “professor” is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa."

    Not so. The Narrative clearly states that colonisation of Africa disrupted social development i.e. Europeans robbed Africans of the development that would have otherwise been theirs. And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin.

    “…colonisation of Africa disrupted social development… And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin.”

    You mean the sub-Saharan Africans would have created a new Chinese civilization? Or another Aztec civilization? The sub-Saharans had plenty of time (millennia) to discover the laws of physics, math, and engineering. What was the problem? Did not Greeks study with Egyptians (Northern Africa)? Russian bothered to learn from Europeans and Russia became basically a European country. Compare that to South Africa that is falling apart under the perfectly black rule. Moreover, SA shows a horrifying level of murderous racism against white people.
    The Africans could always go to their roots and create “their” civilization in Africa. Instead, the hordes of young and aggressive black male migrants demand their place in European society that does not want them. Perhaps you should become a spokesperson for the migrants and explain them how wonderful it would be to go back home and create “their” social development in Africa.
    The narrative actually says that some Africans are incompatible with European culture. Such pretenders as Mr. Yankah should better part with white society and become engaged in” social development” that is better suited to their race. It is never too late. NYC could surely survive without Mr. Yankah’ expertise.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "You mean the sub-Saharan Africans would have created a new Chinese civilization? Or another Aztec civilization? The sub-Saharans had plenty of time (millennia) to discover the laws of physics, math, and engineering. What was the problem?"

    "Problem" explained.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYT73cCK-N0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYSz010CVss

    "Compare that to South Africa that is falling apart under the perfectly black rule. Moreover, SA shows a horrifying level of murderous racism against white people."

    Remember how Europeans developed their colonies. By brute force. Sure, there were a number of benefits they brought to their conquered peoples, but the overarching ideology was the belief of superiority. Furthermore, they played up the historic tribal differences by creating artificial borders and selecting one or two tribes as being supportive "administrators". That is, certain groups received benefits for helping Europeans in Africa run the nation (of course in a subordinate role); in return, when the benevolent Europeans gave Africans their freedom, it was believed that this group would be able to simply govern. However, European structures had created a power vacuum, which is other than surprising, which resulted in political turbulence in a host of nations.

    In the case of South Africa, the British set forth laws that denied blacks the opportunity to mine diamonds and gold if they found it on their own property. Furthermore, the natives had been taken over by force, against their own will, by outside influences, beginning in the 1870′s, and had no say regarding their political or economic future. It is similar to the American colonists who demanded that they be able to sell goods on their own without being subject to imperial control.

    Cecil Rhodes told the House of Assembly in Cape Town (1887) that “the native is to be treated as a child and denied the franchise. We must adopt a system of despotism in our relations with the barbarians of South Africa”. In less oratorical moments, he put it even more bluntly: “I prefer land to niggers.” He personally supervised the seizure of close to a million square miles of prime territory from its inhabitants, which included tracts that stored valuable mineral deposits. In 1896, his name was linked with the Jameson Raid, an illegal effort to annex territory held by the Boers, which was a primary factor for a war that began in 1899 and ended in 1902.

    Would you like to more, citizen?
    , @helena
    "The sub-Saharans had plenty of time (millennia) to discover the laws of physics, math, and engineering. What was the problem?"

    The PoIHEC (people of infinite hair and eye colour) hid the equations from the PoB (people of brown).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. Blacks do not hate whites. The only problem here is that they are simply not able to come up with another subject.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  191. @ia
    Western whites aren't going to stand a chance when their enemies assume power. It'll be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sad.

    Yep.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. @renfro
    '' And like Derb I have a lot of admiration for the Jews and their many contributions to our culture and our civilization.''>>>>>

    I am not challenging you in a negative way but can you list for me the specific things Jews have contributed to America?

    I have been asking this question to those who claim it for years and never get a response.
    I recently asked it of a commenter here and got nothing but rambling gibberish about Hollywood and popular music and etc..
    I don't consider those contributions to America as every group including blacks claim that as a contribution .
    I also don't consider Jewish science or nobels as contributions either as many others have also contributed to science won nobels.

    I want to see something that Jews have contributed that others haven't or contributed more than others have. Something of positive importance distinctly Jewish.

    Al Jolson. Jay Gould. Stephen Jay Gould. And Anton LaVey. They certainly contributed something…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @denk
    Off hand I immediately recall this incident, its just tip of an iceberg.

    http://bit.ly/2yY0MUy

    I’m from that part of Sydney, perhaps I can help.

    Burwood these days is pretty much entirely Chinese.

    It’s odd that someone would pick on a Chinese woman and say ‘Go back to your own country’, when both of them would have been surrounded by tens of Chinese people, at any time of day or night.

    My guess is, the guy would have been a mental case, possibly a schiz. They loiter around the inner-west because there are a few shelters out there.

    There is a huge taboo against hitting women in Australia, as you would expect. It is extremely rare in public, just not done except by mental cases.

    If the guy were a racist he most likely would have picked on a man. I’m betting it was a mental case who just took a dislike to the poor woman for being Chinese. I don’t think we can extrapolate out to Australian society, or western societies more generally, from this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk

    My guess is, the guy would have been a mental case
     
    I did a five min search and it turns out the following .......

    *Chinese students viciously attacked by local hooligans in Oz,
    The attackers shouted,
    'fucking Chinese, go back to your own country'

    https://the-riotact.com/gang-attacks-chinese-students-in-race-hate-bashings-at-woden-interchange/221024/comment-page-2#comments


    *A Chinese lady assaulted by a Caucasian in a Virgin flight,
    'Chinese pigs, get the fuck outta here'

    *A caucasian ANU student attacked his Chinese classmates/lecturer with baseball bat............

    In Lena's case,
    The attacker also shouted 'Get out of my country'

    Like I say, this is just a cursory search, so it's just the tip of an iceberg.

    Applying Ian Flaming's fundamental rule of probability,
    'Once is accidence, twice is coincidence, thrice.......
    enemy action !'

    All indications points to racism rather than some
    isolated 'mental case'
    , @denk
    My replies to you aint getting thru,
    calling it a day now !
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. Malla says:

    Well the NWO guys have finally made their final intention clear, before the new world order takes over officially. Beige Power.

    A glimpse via their propaganda outlet, the Canadian CBC, into one of their important aim all along , having no pure White people around. White nationalists/ Nazi types have been saying this for years but no one took them seriously. But now the NWO are more open about their aims.

    Strangly the main guy in the video Mujumdar is most probably a upper caste Hindu whose lighter skinned and more Caucasoid ancestors looked down upon the more Australoid darker skinned lower caste dalits of India. Talk about hypocrisy!!

    Hey North East Asians, you guys are next, trust me on this.

    http://www.dailystormer.com/jewish-woman-responsible-for-half-negroid-miss-japan/

    Before the One World Govt takes over, no White or East Asian should be left alive in their pure state. Then they can rule over the future Brown Black masses forever.

    Under Communism they killed the best in the country so they became the only best in the country. Now that concept is been taken to a Global level.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk

    Hey North East Asians, you guys are next, trust me on this.
     
    It already started...
    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/11/14/quad-n14.html

    Jp [honorable whitemen] is assigned the job to chaperone India [honorable whitemen wannbe] into the whitey club,

    https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/japan-to-train-30-000-indian-engineers-via-toyota-programme-1628451

    http://dailym.ai/2jDjw93
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. Malla says:
    @helena
    "The whole debate is so tiresome when you consider this “professor” is African immigrant with zero slave lineage and zero reason for institutional resentment. He should return to the dung hole that is Africa."

    Not so. The Narrative clearly states that colonisation of Africa disrupted social development i.e. Europeans robbed Africans of the development that would have otherwise been theirs. And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin.

    Greece and Serbia are as poor as Africa because of the Ottomans looting their countries, no wait….. Ireland is as poor as Africa because the British ruled and looted Ireland, no wait…… HongKong is poor as Africa because the British ruled and looted HongKong, no wait……Macau is poor as Africa because the Portuguese ruled and looted Macau, no wait…..Singapore is as poor as Africa, because the British ruled and looted Singapore, no wait…… Liberia is as rich as Germany because the Liberians were never colonized, no wait…… South Korea is as poor as Africa because the Japanese ruled and looted Korea, no wait……Finland is as poor as Africa because the Swedes and the Russians ruled and looted Finland, no wait……
    What is going wrong here???

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Nicely played.
    , @Anonymous
    Ethiopia is as rich as Switzerland because it was never colonized...
    , @helena
    Yeah it's tough. The Welsh and Scots resent the English conquering their lands but actually it was the Normans* and they conquered the English more thoroughly than they did the Welsh and Scots.

    *those pesky scandies with their technological inventions; stone castles, ha!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. i wonder if his car is made in ghana.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  197. Miro23 says:
    @joef
    When will American non Blacks stop pretending that we don't have an unsustainable afro american problem in this country. Afro american aggressive animosity, and endless demands for more parasitical free lunch benefits, cannot continue indefinitely. All the obfuscations, and denial, cannot change this unfortunate fact. Wishful thinking, pandering, and undeserved praise (for unearned accomplishments), cannot solve this ruinous situation.

    We non Blacks have two choices: hold afros accountable for their bad behavior, or allow this to continue to our eventual devolution. Afros themselves have the choice of reforming their attitudes, or continue their hostile adversarial relationship with the rest of the nation. Liberals have a choice to realistically help afros (in real terms) by demanding responsibility from them, or continue to haphazardly accuse other Whites of false racism.

    A house divided cannot stand. We cannot expect to continuously erode the foundation of the nation, and still have a realistic expectation of its long term viability. The component parts of the nation (municipalities) are already eroding... when too many component parts erode, eventually it detrimentally affects the total system at large.

    Will non Blacks make the decision to correct this decaying situation? I am afraid not. Too many distractions of entertainment/materialism (paid by our expanding credit card debt), too easy to just ignore the issue, and accuse anyone who brings up these unwelcome facts as racist, too much White flight migration to keep the afro problem out of sight & out of mind, too many suburbanites/elites/limo libs who are isolated enough to never have to directly confront the issue (for now), and too many politicians who are willing to perform the quid pro quo of welfare benefits for votes (at tax payers expense).

    Because of this lack of political will, predatory afros sense this weakness, and will keep pushing their adversarial agenda against the nation. But if we are honest with ourselves, we must know that this cannot last forever, and if true, the endpoint will not be a peaceful one. Either we confront the afro problem now, or be confronted by it later when it will be worse. The choice is ours to make, and the consequences of inaction will be severe.

    The choice is ours to make, and the consequences of inaction will be severe.

    The US chose Trump but what difference did that make? The US is still making aggressive Neocon orchestrated moves against Iran, Russia etc. and there doesn’t seem to be any urgency with the Wall or Infrastructure Spending.

    On this view, “The choice isn’t ours to make”, with real policy decisions coming from the full spectrum of US Special Interests – Zionists, Outsourcers, Wall St, Pharma, MIC , Agro etc. etc. until the USA is a bankrupted shell.

    There’s still a long way to go, but the end of the line for a 100% corrupt Special Interest Democracy looks like the Philippines:

    As the 2006 World Development Report said, “15% of Filipinos were living in absolute poverty, and 47% subsisted on an income between US$1 and US$2 a day. Half of the 12 million population of Manila lives in shanty towns that line the expressways, rail tracks and waterways of the metropolis. After 25 years of repeated economic crises, the Philippines economy is now critically dependent on the overseas earnings of an estimated 10 million, mostly female workers – out of a population of 80 million – employed as child carers, nurses and more in richer states around the world.”
    Joe Studwell, “Asian Godfathers: Money and Power in South East Asia” https://www.amazon.com/Asian-Godfathers-Money-Power-Southeast/dp/0802143911/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511081357&sr=1-1&keywords=studwell%2C+money+power

    Studwell quotes the Philippine’s best known living author, Francisco Sionil José (from an interview in the far Eastern Economic Review December 2004) saying, “We are poor because our élites have no sense of nation.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    US chose Trump but what difference did that make? The US is still making aggressive Neocon orchestrated moves against Iran, Russia etc. and there doesn’t seem to be any urgency with the Wall or Infrastructure Spending.
     
    Yes we did choose Trump, and the Republican corporatist neocons are actually more shocked about it then the socialist Democrat leftist. I do not see why, after all Trump is essentially a 3rd party candidate, and much of his support is from the Reagan Democrats that the Republicrats betrayed through globalist cheap labor policies. When Trump said he would drain the swamp, I do not believe he realized how big the swamp really is.

    I believe our foreign entanglements are also being used as a distraction from our domestic problems of underemployment, debt, and the afro criminal menace. They frequently use the boogeyman of terrorist to scare us. I do believe that terrorism is a problem within its own parameters, but afro americans kill more Americans, year after year, than all the terrorist actions combined. If we honestly examined the raw numbers of homicides caused by afros (who are full of racial animus), then we should be labeling them as domestic terrorist. But liberal denial of reality will prevent us from doing so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. Miro23 says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    9 to 1 says there's a processor in the device you are commenting with - that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in.

    ” 9 to 1 says there’s a processor in the device you are commenting with – that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in”

    If you’re talking about Andy Grove, he was also greatly concerned about the Outsourcing Model, and the great harm that it was doing to the US on many levels. He wrote a great article about it on Bloomberg that didn’t get anything like the publicity that it deserved:

    “How America Can Create Jobs”

    http://www.openvms.org/http%3A//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-07-01/andy-grove-how-america-can-create-jobs

    Read More
    • Replies: @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    I agree the outsourcing model is bad economics and to the degree that the UC understands it and all other classes sustain their ignorance of it - it's a form of economic warfare. It's case-in-point central of the fundamental obscenity at the heart of "free trade" which lets capital go anywhere and holds labor stay-put.

    But there are currently over 40000 Americans - the overwhelming majority not Jewish and yet prospering on account of his work - employed on account of him. We do not get to find a single fault in a person or a single error in his or her thinking or politics and erase their merits on account of it, because Jewish.
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
    Primary devastating harm of the outsourcing is that it erodes the value of currency of the country.
    All other negative effects are secondary.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. @Malla
    Greece and Serbia are as poor as Africa because of the Ottomans looting their countries, no wait..... Ireland is as poor as Africa because the British ruled and looted Ireland, no wait...... HongKong is poor as Africa because the British ruled and looted HongKong, no wait......Macau is poor as Africa because the Portuguese ruled and looted Macau, no wait.....Singapore is as poor as Africa, because the British ruled and looted Singapore, no wait...... Liberia is as rich as Germany because the Liberians were never colonized, no wait...... South Korea is as poor as Africa because the Japanese ruled and looted Korea, no wait......Finland is as poor as Africa because the Swedes and the Russians ruled and looted Finland, no wait......
    What is going wrong here???

    Nicely played.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. I forgot that Derb had written this (IT IS SO TRUE):

    In that pool of forty million, there are nonetheless many intelligent and well-socialized blacks. (I’ll use IWSB as an ad hoc abbreviation.) You should consciously seek opportunities to make friends with IWSBs. In addition to the ordinary pleasures of friendship, you will gain an amulet against potentially career-destroying accusations of prejudice.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  201. Corvinus says:
    @Anon
    "...colonisation of Africa disrupted social development... And that development could have been similar to Europeans because all humans are exactly the same under the skin."

    You mean the sub-Saharan Africans would have created a new Chinese civilization? Or another Aztec civilization? The sub-Saharans had plenty of time (millennia) to discover the laws of physics, math, and engineering. What was the problem? Did not Greeks study with Egyptians (Northern Africa)? Russian bothered to learn from Europeans and Russia became basically a European country. Compare that to South Africa that is falling apart under the perfectly black rule. Moreover, SA shows a horrifying level of murderous racism against white people.
    The Africans could always go to their roots and create "their" civilization in Africa. Instead, the hordes of young and aggressive black male migrants demand their place in European society that does not want them. Perhaps you should become a spokesperson for the migrants and explain them how wonderful it would be to go back home and create "their" social development in Africa.
    The narrative actually says that some Africans are incompatible with European culture. Such pretenders as Mr. Yankah should better part with white society and become engaged in" social development" that is better suited to their race. It is never too late. NYC could surely survive without Mr. Yankah' expertise.

    “You mean the sub-Saharan Africans would have created a new Chinese civilization? Or another Aztec civilization? The sub-Saharans had plenty of time (millennia) to discover the laws of physics, math, and engineering. What was the problem?”

    “Problem” explained.

    “Compare that to South Africa that is falling apart under the perfectly black rule. Moreover, SA shows a horrifying level of murderous racism against white people.”

    Remember how Europeans developed their colonies. By brute force. Sure, there were a number of benefits they brought to their conquered peoples, but the overarching ideology was the belief of superiority. Furthermore, they played up the historic tribal differences by creating artificial borders and selecting one or two tribes as being supportive “administrators”. That is, certain groups received benefits for helping Europeans in Africa run the nation (of course in a subordinate role); in return, when the benevolent Europeans gave Africans their freedom, it was believed that this group would be able to simply govern. However, European structures had created a power vacuum, which is other than surprising, which resulted in political turbulence in a host of nations.

    In the case of South Africa, the British set forth laws that denied blacks the opportunity to mine diamonds and gold if they found it on their own property. Furthermore, the natives had been taken over by force, against their own will, by outside influences, beginning in the 1870′s, and had no say regarding their political or economic future. It is similar to the American colonists who demanded that they be able to sell goods on their own without being subject to imperial control.

    Cecil Rhodes told the House of Assembly in Cape Town (1887) that “the native is to be treated as a child and denied the franchise. We must adopt a system of despotism in our relations with the barbarians of South Africa”. In less oratorical moments, he put it even more bluntly: “I prefer land to niggers.” He personally supervised the seizure of close to a million square miles of prime territory from its inhabitants, which included tracts that stored valuable mineral deposits. In 1896, his name was linked with the Jameson Raid, an illegal effort to annex territory held by the Boers, which was a primary factor for a war that began in 1899 and ended in 1902.

    Would you like to more, citizen?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    "Would you like to more, citizen?"
    Well.
    What would be your opinion on the Brits who survived Roman oppression? What about Russians who were predominantly illiterate up to the end of 17th century but still were able to join the European civilization? And how about the Chinese who have survived the terrorizing and mass-murderous Cultural Revolution? The latter was surely more serious than the regrettable denying “the opportunity to mine diamonds and gold if they found it on their own property” for blacks in SA. Moreover, the North-African Egypt was able to produce an awesome civilization. Sub-Saharan Africa – not so successful.
    A food for thought: from "Issues of Increasing Levels of Poverty and Hunger in Africa, with Specific Reference to South Africa," by Mmafale Phogole http://www.ai.org.za/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/11/No-8.-Issues-of-Increasing-Levels-of-Poverty-and-Hunger-in-Africa-with-specific-Reference-to-south-Africa.pdf
    “Population growth in relation to the limited and often fragile resource base is both a cause and consequence of poverty. Only a few years from now, by 2025, Africa’s population could more rise to 1,2 billion.”
    Who is going to feed and educate the hordes of poor and aggressive and below-average-IQ black teens born to the Afrcan mothers? At least you cannot accuse Europeans of bad influence in this case, since white women are more prudent re bringing up children to this world.
    , @Art Deco
    He personally supervised the seizure of close to a million square miles of prime territory from its inhabitants, which included tracts that stored valuable mineral deposits.

    Rhodes was chief minister of the Cape Colony, which had a land area of 128,000, had been initially settled in the 17th century, and had come into possession of the British a century earlier. The Transvaal and Orange Free State were settled by Boers and not conquered by the British until the year Rhodes died. Natal was a British colony from the 1840s and Rhodes was never in charge there. Rhodesia and Nyasaland together had a land area of shy of 500,000 sq miles, but the British presence during Rhodes' lifetime was largely limited to hunting for mineral concessions.

    , @wayfarer

    Cecil Rhodes told the House of Assembly in Cape Town (1887) that “the native is to be treated as a child and denied the franchise. We must adopt a system of despotism in our relations with the barbarians of South Africa”.

     

    Financed by N M Rothschild & Sons, Rhodes succeeded over the next 17 years in buying up all the smaller diamond mining operations in the Kimberley area.”

    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Rhodes
    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N_M_Rothschild_%26_Sons

    "Israel’s triumphant return to Africa." – "Diamonds in return for weapons." – "Accustomed as it is to bringing democratic organizations to their knees, the State of Israel spontaneously prefers to negotiate with autocratic regimes or dictatorships."

    source: http://orientxxi.info/magazine/israel-s-triumphant-return-to-africa,2006
    , @Chuckie
    Here's part of a fascinating account of a white Brit on expedition in Africa 150 years ago. There are things he describes as the nature of Africans that ring so true today. At some point, can we accept that there are real biological differences between races?

    http://catalog.lambertvillelibrary.org/texts/English/baker/albert/albert_i.htm

    "He was an excellent example of the natural instincts of the negro remaining intact under all circumstances. Although remarkably superior to his associates, his small stock of knowledge was combined with such an exaggerated conceit, that he was to me a perpetual source of amusement, while he was positively hated by his comrades, both by Arabs and blacks, for his overbearing behaviour. Having seen many countries, he was excessively fond of recounting his adventures, all of which had so strong a colouring of the "Arabian Nights," that he might have been the original "Sinbad the Sailor." His natural talent for geography was really extraordinary; he would frequently pay me a visit, and spend hours in drawing maps with a stick upon the sand, of the countries he had visited, and especially of the Mediterranean, and the course from Egypt and Constantinople to England. Unfortunately, some long story was attached to every principal point of the voyage. The descriptions most interesting to me were those connected with the west bank of the White Nile, as he had served some years with the trading party, and had penetrated through the Makkarika, a cannibal tribe, to about two hundred miles west of Gondokoro. Both he and many of Ibrahim's party had been frequent witnesses to acts of cannibalism, during their residence among the Makkarikas. They described these cannibals as remarkably good people, but possessing a peculiar taste for dogs and human flesh. They accompanied the trading party in their razzias, and invariably ate the bodies of the slain. The traders complained that they were bad associates, as they insisted upon killing and eating the children which the party wished to secure as slaves: their custom was to catch a child by its ankles, and to dash its head against the ground; thus killed, they opened the abdomen, extracted the stomach and intestines, and tying the two ankles to the neck they carried the body by slinging it over the shoulder, and thus returned to camp, where they divided it by quartering, and boiled it in a large pot. Another man in my own service had been a witness to a horrible act of cannibalism at Gondokoro.

    The traders had arrived with their ivory from the West, together with a great number of slaves; the porters who carried the ivory being Makkarikas. One of the slave girls attempted to escape, and her proprietor immediately fired at her with his musket, and she fell wounded; the ball had struck her in the side. The girl was remarkably fat, and from the wound, a large lump of yellow fat exuded. No sooner had she fallen, than the Makkarikas rushed upon her in a crowd, and seizing the fat, they tore it from the wound in handfuls, the girl being still alive, while the crowd were quarrelling for the disgusting prize. Others killed her with a lance, and at once divided her by cutting off the head, and splitting the body with their lances, used as knives, cutting longitudinally from between the legs along the spine to the neck.

    Many slave women and their children who witnessed this scene, rushed panic-stricken from the spot and took refuge in the trees. The Makkarikas seeing them in flight, were excited to give chase, and pulling the children from their refuge among the branches, they killed several, and in a short time a great feast was prepared for the whole party. My man, Mahommed, who was an eyewitness, declared that he could not eat his dinner for three days, so great was his disgust at this horrible feast."
    -- Sir Samuel W. Baker, "The Albert N'Yanza. Great Basin of the Nile, and Explorations of the Nile Sources." 1868
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Anon
    "...you’re going to have to fully disclose at ..."
    Is this a voice of your ancestors that used to be police informants? Being such a prude, you should better announce your real name and occupation.
    By the way, your own "tendencies towards the West" are not clear at all.

    Its the voice of the low-IQ and the insane, the very picture of white trailer trash. Such individuals are naturally drawn to the most extreme ideologies(to which even Derby seems moderate) since their status is raised higher in comparison simply by having white skin in spite of having no education, being retarded, etc. Its a well known phenomenon.

    The good news is that she’s pretty much ignored even here. She’s pretty much a poison pill to any organization that she joins, and would probably be evicted. Like typical low-IQ women, though, she’s pretty much self-focused on how things affect her alone so she doesn’t care.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    [If you want your comments published, provide something other than the sort of content-free---and very repetitive---insults that mark you as a mental defective, especially since so many of them are directed at "Anonymous." You would probably be much happier spending your time on some other website.]
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. @denk

    Don’t join the legion of the oppressed Denk.
    Chinese are welcome
     
    Thats not what I gathered, there'r legions of Chinese haters in this site alone !

    I do agree there's a divide and conquer conspiracy going on,
    courtesy of the masters of universe.

    Thats not what I gathered, there’r legions of Chinese haters in this site alone !

    This site is a magnet for them – it’s not representative.
    I assume we are talking about “white” people (1964 and post-thereof definition) – do you really think the majority, or even a plurality, of white people have anything but positive feelings for Chinese? Think really hard about this if you are tempted to say “no”. The signs of good feelings towards Chinese are so ubiquitous they’re like street lamps. Go out and look for street lamps. Don’t let the scorpions attracted to each other like hate-magnets warp you with them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @denk
    Its not about UNZ only.
    I look around and see lots of white angst, even loathing against Chinese.
    Partly due to their resentment of increasing Chinese presence in their neighborhood I guess, but the five eyes govn's intensive hate mongering of the China bogeyman theme surely doesnt help.

    Andrew Wang,
    'A lot of blame on anti Chinese sentiment has been the negative influence of right wing facists globally, the racist attitudes of Trump and the desperate nature of Turnbull and Bishop who continously critisise China for reclaiming their own sovereign territories in order to get in favor with the Trump administration. These negative comments have easily been absorbed by the uneducated. '

    https://the-riotact.com/gang-attacks-chinese-students-in-race-hate-bashings-at-woden-interchange/221024/comment-page-2#comments
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. @Anon
    Merge it back with Slovakia because Czechoslovakia was a very cool-sounding name.

    Merge it back with Slovakia because Czechoslovakia was a very cool-sounding name.

    Nah. Split the Czech Republic into Bohemia and Moravia. And bring back the king. I’m sure there are lots of pretenders to choose from.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Wasn't the old King involved in some sort of scandal with an American actress?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. @renfro
    '' 9 to 1 says there’s a processor in the device you are commenting with – that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in''

    Sorry no cigar...if you are referring to first processor or even the microprocessor. Ted Hoff (German American) actually conceived the micro...there two others guys involved and one was Jewish but he isn't the creator.

    I said specifically jewish ...some thing only a jew or jews alone have done.

    ha haha hahhah hahah a ha
    OMG
    Thanks.
    Good start to Sunday, that was a great laugh man.
    What other insights do you have to share? Please show the world your wisdom.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. I’ve read two articles this morning from Mr. Derbyshire.

    I was particularly impressed with the one which showed strong correlations between African Americans and violent crime vs. the comparatively weak correlation between other races and violent crime. But I was disappointed in Mr. Derbyshire’s retreat into the “correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation” canard.

    I have two things to say to the invocation of the old canard, truthful as it might be and useful as it might be to a critical mind as invoking it often recommends further and deeper inquiry.

    The first is that, whereas a high degree of correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation…once a cause is identified with certainty there is almost invariably a very high degree of correlation. And, it’s towards that cause that we should focus our efforts. Indeed, as a scientist, I can tell you that this is precisely how the scientific method works and, as a result, that’s how discoveries are made.

    So, let’s not be so dismissive of correlations and admit to ourselves that often quite obvious correlations are unduly dismissed in the search for causation simply because PC is invoked. So, the search for causation is deflected from its rightful course, and, this serves not useful purpose. Indeed, it subverts the very use of investigations in the first place.

    The second thing I have to say is that the degree to which correlation accurately suggests causation, what I’ll call the two “C’s” of investigation, need to be view through the prism of a third “C”…common sense.

    As the leader, protector and servant of my family, I’ll rely on the common sense my personal experience in life has provided me to draw conclusions about how I’ll behave and how I’ll advise my family to behave in the presence of those who might threaten them. And, I’ll do so with both impunity from and disregard for PC.

    You can bet your life on my doing so. And, some who might threaten my family even remotely are betting exactly that.

    Without any apologies,

    David

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  207. @Miro23

    ” 9 to 1 says there’s a processor in the device you are commenting with – that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in”
     
    If you're talking about Andy Grove, he was also greatly concerned about the Outsourcing Model, and the great harm that it was doing to the US on many levels. He wrote a great article about it on Bloomberg that didn't get anything like the publicity that it deserved:

    "How America Can Create Jobs"
    http://www.openvms.org/http%3A//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-07-01/andy-grove-how-america-can-create-jobs

    I agree the outsourcing model is bad economics and to the degree that the UC understands it and all other classes sustain their ignorance of it – it’s a form of economic warfare. It’s case-in-point central of the fundamental obscenity at the heart of “free trade” which lets capital go anywhere and holds labor stay-put.

    But there are currently over 40000 Americans – the overwhelming majority not Jewish and yet prospering on account of his work – employed on account of him. We do not get to find a single fault in a person or a single error in his or her thinking or politics and erase their merits on account of it, because Jewish.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    We do not get to find a single fault in a person or a single error in his or her thinking or politics and erase their merits on account of it, because Jewish.
     
    Andy Grove was a great innovator and Intel was, and is, a great force for high tech US based employment. He was concerned about hi tech outsourcing: "How American Can Create Jobs" http://www.openvms.org/http%3A//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-07-01/andy-grove-how-america-can-create-jobs

    And, in my opinion, he wrote one of the best business books of all time: "Only The Paranoid Survive" https://www.amazon.com/Only-Paranoid-Survive-Exploit-Challenge/dp/0385483821/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511111830&sr=1-1&keywords=only+the+paranoid+survive

    The problem is that we are talking about groups here, not single persons.

    A large majority of organized Jewry in the US is fully behind AIPAC, with its wrecking of the Democratic process, and they are fully behind Israel right or wrong. Individual Jews may not personally like the Neo-cons and Middle East wars, but they tend to keep quiet while their country (the US?) is looted and tricked into one war after another.

    .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. @denk

    Don’t join the legion of the oppressed Denk.
    Chinese are welcome
     
    Thats not what I gathered, there'r legions of Chinese haters in this site alone !

    I do agree there's a divide and conquer conspiracy going on,
    courtesy of the masters of universe.

    I do agree there’s a divide and conquer conspiracy going on

    Conscious or not – yes – “divide and conquer” is underway.

    Steve Sailer writes a lot about LACC. I’d like to see him write some more about impressions he had of the old WASPs who frequented that place and similar ones in Palm Springs and other peripheries around the same time – that is, if he was close enough to any of them to gather impressions. My impressions have generally been: 1) it is very wise to watch what they do, not what they say, 2) if your penny-pinching uncle Barry thinks he knows a lot about economics and is very loud about what he knows, you do better following the quiet example of the WASPs than the loud example of uncle Barry, 3) if they cared a wit about the MC or WC, they didn’t bother to show it and they always seemed just fine with UMC talking among itself like it was in their member, but the barriers creating exclusion were always enforced.

    There is an elite. It runs hedge funds, private equity, mutual funds, university endowments, heads up boards of directors.

    It is quite unfair to generalize the privilege of this elite to people in the bottom two socio-economic quartiles who share their phenotype and religious history (Anglo-Protestant – expanded since 1964 to include European Catholics).
    It’s also quite unfair to generalize the privilege of the elite to an ethnicity.

    The elite is the elite – they are elite on account of the real factors that distinguish themselves from the non-elites and which cause their own interests to fall out of alignment with the non-elite they rise above.

    The systemic weakness is that a well-working system would have governance in place to assure a solid majority of those rising to the elite (60-80%) are prevented from doing so unless they are able to demonstrate bonafides of their interests being aligned with the commons, or their willingness to subordinate their interests to those of the commons.

    Our system has run on 18th century aristocratic fumes too long so what we are getting now is the disconnnect.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Malla
    Greece and Serbia are as poor as Africa because of the Ottomans looting their countries, no wait..... Ireland is as poor as Africa because the British ruled and looted Ireland, no wait...... HongKong is poor as Africa because the British ruled and looted HongKong, no wait......Macau is poor as Africa because the Portuguese ruled and looted Macau, no wait.....Singapore is as poor as Africa, because the British ruled and looted Singapore, no wait...... Liberia is as rich as Germany because the Liberians were never colonized, no wait...... South Korea is as poor as Africa because the Japanese ruled and looted Korea, no wait......Finland is as poor as Africa because the Swedes and the Russians ruled and looted Finland, no wait......
    What is going wrong here???

    Ethiopia is as rich as Switzerland because it was never colonized…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Please look at the data before making some sensational claims: http://www.mylifeelsewhere.com/compare/ethiopia/switzerland
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. denk says:
    @anon
    From your link:

    Lina told Chinese language newspaper Sydney Today it was about midday when a “caucasian looking man” began his verbal attack.
     
    Who describes someone as ''a caucasian looking man''?
    This NewsCorp article features an SBS video which has nothing to do with the article, except to denigrate White people.
    N.S.W. Police weren't asked to comment, indicating no complaint was made.
    Looks like a racebaiting hoax.

    Who describes someone as ”a caucasian looking man”?

    Whoever is being attacked by a ‘caucasian looking man’

    ‘This NewsCorp article features an SBS video which has nothing to do with the article, except to denigrate White people.
    N.S.W. Police weren’t asked to comment, indicating no complaint was made.’

    There was a witness ,
    Ms X told SBS that as she didn’t hear from the police, she phoned Burwood station yesterday, confirmed her contact details and expressed her willingness to provide witness statement.
    I was wondering why it’s been so long yet the police still haven’t contacted me?”

    ‘Looks like a racebaiting hoax.’

    IM not convinced .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. denk says:
    @Stebbing Heuer
    I'm from that part of Sydney, perhaps I can help.

    Burwood these days is pretty much entirely Chinese.

    It's odd that someone would pick on a Chinese woman and say 'Go back to your own country', when both of them would have been surrounded by tens of Chinese people, at any time of day or night.

    My guess is, the guy would have been a mental case, possibly a schiz. They loiter around the inner-west because there are a few shelters out there.

    There is a huge taboo against hitting women in Australia, as you would expect. It is extremely rare in public, just not done except by mental cases.

    If the guy were a racist he most likely would have picked on a man. I'm betting it was a mental case who just took a dislike to the poor woman for being Chinese. I don't think we can extrapolate out to Australian society, or western societies more generally, from this.

    My guess is, the guy would have been a mental case

    I did a five min search and it turns out the following …….

    *Chinese students viciously attacked by local hooligans in Oz,
    The attackers shouted,
    fucking Chinese, go back to your own country’

    https://the-riotact.com/gang-attacks-chinese-students-in-race-hate-bashings-at-woden-interchange/221024/comment-page-2#comments

    *A Chinese lady assaulted by a Caucasian in a Virgin flight,
    Chinese pigs, get the fuck outta here’

    *A caucasian ANU student attacked his Chinese classmates/lecturer with baseball bat…………

    In Lena’s case,
    The attacker also shouted ‘Get out of my country

    Like I say, this is just a cursory search, so it’s just the tip of an iceberg.

    Applying Ian Flaming’s fundamental rule of probability,
    ‘Once is accidence, twice is coincidence, thrice…….
    enemy action !’

    All indications points to racism rather than some
    isolated ‘mental case’

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rdm
    Majority of "Mental Retardation" cases are more prevalent among White people. White people can easily undergo nervous breakdown.

    1 Muslim guy drove down in New York City, killed 6 people. Entire Muslim community is blamed.

    1 White guy blew up Las Vegas concert, taking 58 lives at the tip of his finger --> Mental Illness
    1 White guy fired at Texas Church, taking 26 lives at Sunday afternoon --> Mental Illness

    The bottom line is, mental strength of White guys are as good as a flimsy tungsten. Now they can't get their superiority reach out to White women (mudshark), they are now flocking to whoever worship their Whiteness --> Asian women. What more can you ask for?

    Derb keeps labeling all White people as "Gentiles", in fact, there is a profound gap between Gentiles and Rednecks. Sometimes they don't know where they belong to.

    Do you see the difference between these two?

    http://i65.tinypic.com/1z6sfvr.png

    Both are the same: one in suit and one in mugshot
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "You mean the sub-Saharan Africans would have created a new Chinese civilization? Or another Aztec civilization? The sub-Saharans had plenty of time (millennia) to discover the laws of physics, math, and engineering. What was the problem?"

    "Problem" explained.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYT73cCK-N0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYSz010CVss

    "Compare that to South Africa that is falling apart under the perfectly black rule. Moreover, SA shows a horrifying level of murderous racism against white people."

    Remember how Europeans developed their colonies. By brute force. Sure, there were a number of benefits they brought to their conquered peoples, but the overarching ideology was the belief of superiority. Furthermore, they played up the historic tribal differences by creating artificial borders and selecting one or two tribes as being supportive "administrators". That is, certain groups received benefits for helping Europeans in Africa run the nation (of course in a subordinate role); in return, when the benevolent Europeans gave Africans their freedom, it was believed that this group would be able to simply govern. However, European structures had created a power vacuum, which is other than surprising, which resulted in political turbulence in a host of nations.

    In the case of South Africa, the British set forth laws that denied blacks the opportunity to mine diamonds and gold if they found it on their own property. Furthermore, the natives had been taken over by force, against their own will, by outside influences, beginning in the 1870′s, and had no say regarding their political or economic future. It is similar to the American colonists who demanded that they be able to sell goods on their own without being subject to imperial control.

    Cecil Rhodes told the House of Assembly in Cape Town (1887) that “the native is to be treated as a child and denied the franchise. We must adopt a system of despotism in our relations with the barbarians of South Africa”. In less oratorical moments, he put it even more bluntly: “I prefer land to niggers.” He personally supervised the seizure of close to a million square miles of prime territory from its inhabitants, which included tracts that stored valuable mineral deposits. In 1896, his name was linked with the Jameson Raid, an illegal effort to annex territory held by the Boers, which was a primary factor for a war that began in 1899 and ended in 1902.

    Would you like to more, citizen?

    “Would you like to more, citizen?”
    Well.
    What would be your opinion on the Brits who survived Roman oppression? What about Russians who were predominantly illiterate up to the end of 17th century but still were able to join the European civilization? And how about the Chinese who have survived the terrorizing and mass-murderous Cultural Revolution? The latter was surely more serious than the regrettable denying “the opportunity to mine diamonds and gold if they found it on their own property” for blacks in SA. Moreover, the North-African Egypt was able to produce an awesome civilization. Sub-Saharan Africa – not so successful.
    A food for thought: from “Issues of Increasing Levels of Poverty and Hunger in Africa, with Specific Reference to South Africa,” by Mmafale Phogole http://www.ai.org.za/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/11/No-8.-Issues-of-Increasing-Levels-of-Poverty-and-Hunger-in-Africa-with-specific-Reference-to-south-Africa.pdf
    “Population growth in relation to the limited and often fragile resource base is both a cause and consequence of poverty. Only a few years from now, by 2025, Africa’s population could more rise to 1,2 billion.”
    Who is going to feed and educate the hordes of poor and aggressive and below-average-IQ black teens born to the Afrcan mothers? At least you cannot accuse Europeans of bad influence in this case, since white women are more prudent re bringing up children to this world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "What would be your opinion on the Brits who survived Roman oppression?"

    I thought white people were creators, not destroyers. Anyhow, Roman citizens imported themselves to, I mean settled in, Great Britain from many parts of the Empire. And the Brits received opportunities to become immersed into Roman culture.

    "The latter was surely more serious than the regrettable denying “the opportunity to mine diamonds and gold if they found it on their own property” for blacks in SA."

    Jackbooting is jackbooting. Besides, I only thought leftists tried to moralize here.

    "Sub-Saharan Africa – not so successful."

    According to European standards of what constitutes a "successful civilization".

    "Who is going to feed and educate the hordes of poor and aggressive and below-average-IQ black teens born to the Afrcan mothers?"

    Great question. But Thomas Malthus had the answers. I imagine that there will be famine and urban strife as a result of competition for natural resources among Africans. That is, of course, that the new imperialism led by Chinese businesses there doesn't deliver the death blow.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Anonymous
    Ethiopia is as rich as Switzerland because it was never colonized...

    Please look at the data before making some sensational claims: http://www.mylifeelsewhere.com/compare/ethiopia/switzerland

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    You might want to take your sarcasm detector in for a tuneup.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. Truth says:
    @Anon
    It's notable how you rely exclusively upon fictional anti-white race-hatred propaganda to justify your own unrelenting racism. But I guess that's all you have.

    Yeah, or I could be using humor…

    …(or not).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. Heros says:
    @denk
    It'd be more to the point if you can show me instances of
    Whites being racially attacked by Chinese anywhere in the world.
    Not holding my breath.

    I showed you 84 clips of blacks brutally assulting and robbing asians, and you provide clips of a couple of drunk whites slapping asians in trains. Booohooohoooo. First of all in none of those clips was the asian assulted hard enough to even leave contusions, so they would be very difficult to prosecute. Second of all, blacks are 13% of the population and yet judging by the number of clips they account for 95% of assults on asians. Yet you obsess about white violence. Booohooohooo. I’ll bet Asians are overly represented in the present avalanche of snow flakes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. Truth says:
    @Anon
    Nonsense. Britain is being rapidly "diversified" as we speak.
    And not coincidentally, its violent crime rate is skyrocketing.

    Everywhere is being diversified, Toby. Your slaveowners like it that way and you do whatever they tell you to, so don’t hate, CON-GRAJ-U-LATE!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. Truth says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    That has fuck all to do with Leftism.

    I don’t know if Stormfront is back on line again, but I do know that they would disagree with you there, Sport!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=664&v=FhrLcl2bjk8

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. Truth says:
    @res
    Perhaps you should start using the pseudonym "Fiction"?

    Is that the opposite of “Truth?”

    I’m just askin’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    Not the exact opposite, but close enough. Comment was in regard to presenting a movie clip as evidence of reality.

    And "Truth" is stranger than "Fiction". ; )
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. Truth says:
    @silviosilver
    My feelings about blacks generally range from "I don't like blacks much" to "God I hate n-words." What am I really hating though? I would say that, above all, it's their presence. I hate having blacks around. When there are no blacks around, I don't waste any time hating them. If I knew I could permanently get blacks out of my life, I'd happily wish them well. It's a strange kind of "hatred" to wish the people you "hate" well, isn't it? It's certainly strange if you compare this hatred to individuals that I hate. I don't wish such people well at all. If I were to wish anything about them, I would wish something bad to happen to them. I think this is an important distinction.

    If there are no blacks around, I might be feeling happy or I might be feeling sad, but the entry of blacks into that scene always makes it worse, never better, and the degree to which it's worse hinges on how many blacks are around. The first couple of blacks are inconsequential, but things start heading downhill very quickly. If a daytime scene becomes some twenty percent black, that's about the point that I start hating it. At night, it takes far fewer - by ten percent I'm definitely feeling it.

    I don't like asians much either, but the intensity of this dislike is monumentally less than that towards blacks. It's more a cold indifference than a dislike, and it takes an awful lot of asians being on the scene before I start feeling down. A scene can easily be fifty percent asian and I won't feel any heightened negative emotion, no matter how long I spend there. A scene can be over ninety percent asian and spending short periods in it doesn't bother me - which is something I could never say about blacks.

    Latinos are a very different matter. Racially, I'm not bothered by their presence at all. On the contrary, I actually like them. I hate the effects they have on society, but this is a rather abstract, contemplative hate, not something visceral, the way it is with blacks. Language is the main turn-off with Latinos. I can understand and speak basic Spanish, and I sometimes enjoy speaking/practicing it, but my Spanish is not nearly good enough to join in rapid fire conversations. So being surrounded by Spanish speakers is not a pleasant experience.

    Given the enormous social pressure to be "anti-racist," what I've written here surely makes me sound like a race-obsessed hater. People generally don't go into detail about their feelings on this issue, not even with trusted friends. It's just not done. This is quite remarkable when you think of what a huge role race plays in social life. I think the 'old school' model of white racist hate is responsible for this. Whites may have had very good reasons for feeling as they did, but the experience of this kind of racism was quite brutal to those on the receiving end of it. It has left a very bitter taste in people's mouths, and people rightly fear a return to that kind of society. Unfortunately, this is also people's idea of what a "racist society" would necessarily be like, which helps keep expression of racial feelings taboo (real racial feelings, I mean).

    Those of us who favor racial reform (pro-white racial reform, or at least anti-anti-white reform) should be very grateful that the internet has given us the opportunity to have these very important conversations. It's a great pity that pro-white racial reformers wasted so many years on stormfront-like nutzi stupidity, which is not only morally dubious, but from a practical standpoint has a snowball's chance in hell of ever eventuating. I am hopeful that a 'reasonable racism' can be achieved (and reflected in social policy). If it ever is, it will in large part be thanks to intelligent, considerate sites like unz.com and writers like Derb.

    My feelings about blacks generally range from “I don’t like blacks much” to “God I hate n-words.” What am I really hating though? I would say that, above all, it’s their presence. I hate having blacks around. When there are no blacks around, I don’t waste any time hating them. If I knew I could permanently get blacks out of my life, I’d happily wish them well. It’s a strange kind of “hatred” to wish the people you “hate” well, isn’t it? It’s certainly strange if you compare this hatred to individuals that I hate. I don’t wish such people well at all. If I were to wish anything about them, I would wish something bad to happen to them. I think this is an important distinction.

    So how much lint did you find?

    I mean, in your navel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. Truth says:
    @Mr. Anon

    Dreher’s problem is not that he isn’t a ‘committed Christian’. It’s that he is abnormally other-directed and emotional and has a seriously deficient sense of honor.
     
    You're one to talk, drone.

    I wish you were one not to, Grasshopper.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    I've never seen anything you've written that was remotely funny. You seem to think you're funny, but it's not obvious to anyone else. But then some of you black guys do tend to over-estimate your own meager talents.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. denk says:
    @Stebbing Heuer
    I'm from that part of Sydney, perhaps I can help.

    Burwood these days is pretty much entirely Chinese.

    It's odd that someone would pick on a Chinese woman and say 'Go back to your own country', when both of them would have been surrounded by tens of Chinese people, at any time of day or night.

    My guess is, the guy would have been a mental case, possibly a schiz. They loiter around the inner-west because there are a few shelters out there.

    There is a huge taboo against hitting women in Australia, as you would expect. It is extremely rare in public, just not done except by mental cases.

    If the guy were a racist he most likely would have picked on a man. I'm betting it was a mental case who just took a dislike to the poor woman for being Chinese. I don't think we can extrapolate out to Australian society, or western societies more generally, from this.

    My replies to you aint getting thru,
    calling it a day now !

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. Truth says:
    @Mr. Anon
    Whenever "Truth" opens his yap, one should keep in mind that this a man who actually believes that the Earth is flat. He is an actual, unironic flat-earther.

    You’ve written this twice in the last 4 comments.

    I guess for the person who skipped comment 159 for some reason?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon

    You’ve written this twice in the last 4 comments.
     
    Is it not true? You ARE a flat-earther. You yourself have said so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. Art Deco says:
    @Corvinus
    "You mean the sub-Saharan Africans would have created a new Chinese civilization? Or another Aztec civilization? The sub-Saharans had plenty of time (millennia) to discover the laws of physics, math, and engineering. What was the problem?"

    "Problem" explained.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYT73cCK-N0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYSz010CVss

    "Compare that to South Africa that is falling apart under the perfectly black rule. Moreover, SA shows a horrifying level of murderous racism against white people."

    Remember how Europeans developed their colonies. By brute force. Sure, there were a number of benefits they brought to their conquered peoples, but the overarching ideology was the belief of superiority. Furthermore, they played up the historic tribal differences by creating artificial borders and selecting one or two tribes as being supportive "administrators". That is, certain groups received benefits for helping Europeans in Africa run the nation (of course in a subordinate role); in return, when the benevolent Europeans gave Africans their freedom, it was believed that this group would be able to simply govern. However, European structures had created a power vacuum, which is other than surprising, which resulted in political turbulence in a host of nations.

    In the case of South Africa, the British set forth laws that denied blacks the opportunity to mine diamonds and gold if they found it on their own property. Furthermore, the natives had been taken over by force, against their own will, by outside influences, beginning in the 1870′s, and had no say regarding their political or economic future. It is similar to the American colonists who demanded that they be able to sell goods on their own without being subject to imperial control.

    Cecil Rhodes told the House of Assembly in Cape Town (1887) that “the native is to be treated as a child and denied the franchise. We must adopt a system of despotism in our relations with the barbarians of South Africa”. In less oratorical moments, he put it even more bluntly: “I prefer land to niggers.” He personally supervised the seizure of close to a million square miles of prime territory from its inhabitants, which included tracts that stored valuable mineral deposits. In 1896, his name was linked with the Jameson Raid, an illegal effort to annex territory held by the Boers, which was a primary factor for a war that began in 1899 and ended in 1902.

    Would you like to more, citizen?

    He personally supervised the seizure of close to a million square miles of prime territory from its inhabitants, which included tracts that stored valuable mineral deposits.

    Rhodes was chief minister of the Cape Colony, which had a land area of 128,000, had been initially settled in the 17th century, and had come into possession of the British a century earlier. The Transvaal and Orange Free State were settled by Boers and not conquered by the British until the year Rhodes died. Natal was a British colony from the 1840s and Rhodes was never in charge there. Rhodesia and Nyasaland together had a land area of shy of 500,000 sq miles, but the British presence during Rhodes’ lifetime was largely limited to hunting for mineral concessions.

    Read More
    • Agree: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Interesting; cuck vs cuck.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. Truth says:
    @denk
    He called that guy 'fucking chinese nigger'

    I watched 7 times though, it’s inconclusive as to whether he dropped the “r” at the end.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  225. Truth says:
    @Anon
    "...you’re going to have to fully disclose at ..."
    Is this a voice of your ancestors that used to be police informants? Being such a prude, you should better announce your real name and occupation.
    By the way, your own "tendencies towards the West" are not clear at all.

    Again, you are attacking a white woman for desiring that white people marry whites? Please explain this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. @Miro23

    ” 9 to 1 says there’s a processor in the device you are commenting with – that a certain Hungarian Jewish immigrant had a lot to do with bringing into being, and as much to do with all the well-employed Americans in a highly competitive industry that the US leads the world in”
     
    If you're talking about Andy Grove, he was also greatly concerned about the Outsourcing Model, and the great harm that it was doing to the US on many levels. He wrote a great article about it on Bloomberg that didn't get anything like the publicity that it deserved:

    "How America Can Create Jobs"
    http://www.openvms.org/http%3A//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-07-01/andy-grove-how-america-can-create-jobs

    Primary devastating harm of the outsourcing is that it erodes the value of currency of the country.
    All other negative effects are secondary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Primary devastating harm of the outsourcing is that it erodes the value of currency of the country.
    All other negative effects are secondary.
     
    This should be true, but the US is a special case, since the Dollar is the world's Reserve Currency. Most traded goods and commodities are denominated in $ so trading nations have to hold Dollar Balances, creating an artificial demand for the currency, and protecting it from the consequences of US deficits.

    Commodities like oil and Asian exports are denominated in dollars, so these real values sustain the currency.

    That's not to say that the situation will last forever. Sterling was the world's reserve currency under the British Empire but its role gradually petered out along with the Empire. But even here, it still had a residual reserve role as late as the 1970's (until the Sterling Crisis and 25% p.a. inflation finished it off).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  227. Heros says:

    I am surprised that no one has commented on Yankah’s eyes. They are even creepier than the gibberish spewing out of his mouth.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  228. Miro23 says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle
    I agree the outsourcing model is bad economics and to the degree that the UC understands it and all other classes sustain their ignorance of it - it's a form of economic warfare. It's case-in-point central of the fundamental obscenity at the heart of "free trade" which lets capital go anywhere and holds labor stay-put.

    But there are currently over 40000 Americans - the overwhelming majority not Jewish and yet prospering on account of his work - employed on account of him. We do not get to find a single fault in a person or a single error in his or her thinking or politics and erase their merits on account of it, because Jewish.

    We do not get to find a single fault in a person or a single error in his or her thinking or politics and erase their merits on account of it, because Jewish.

    Andy Grove was a great innovator and Intel was, and is, a great force for high tech US based employment. He was concerned about hi tech outsourcing: “How American Can Create Jobs” http://www.openvms.org/http%3A//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-07-01/andy-grove-how-america-can-create-jobs

    And, in my opinion, he wrote one of the best business books of all time: “Only The Paranoid Survive” https://www.amazon.com/Only-Paranoid-Survive-Exploit-Challenge/dp/0385483821/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511111830&sr=1-1&keywords=only+the+paranoid+survive

    The problem is that we are talking about groups here, not single persons.

    A large majority of organized Jewry in the US is fully behind AIPAC, with its wrecking of the Democratic process, and they are fully behind Israel right or wrong. Individual Jews may not personally like the Neo-cons and Middle East wars, but they tend to keep quiet while their country (the US?) is looted and tricked into one war after another.

    .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    A large majority of organized Jewry in the US is fully behind AIPAC, with its wrecking of the Democratic process, and they are fully behind Israel right or wrong. Individual Jews may not personally like the Neo-cons and Middle East wars, b

    AIPAC is a lobby. They don't 'wreck the democratic process' any more than any other lobby. 'Organized Jewry' was not to be found among the Obama administrations detractors and Jewish voters best survey researchers could tell gave him about 80% of their ballots, his hostility to Israel's interests notwithstanding.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  229. @Art Deco
    He personally supervised the seizure of close to a million square miles of prime territory from its inhabitants, which included trac