The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
That OTM Caravan—A Warning About the Most Important Graph In the World
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
un_population_2017_europe_vs_me-africa

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From his speaking and tweeting earlier this week, after a briefing from Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, it is plain that President Donald J. Trump did not know, until Secretary Nielsen enlightened him, that there is no legal way for the U.S.A. to prevent most foreigners from just walking into our country, then settling here permanently. Why should he have? I doubt one citizen in a hundred knew it.

The drill is, you get yourself to Mexico or Canada, go to the US border, present yourself to a border agent, and ask for asylum. The law says that your asylum application must then be formally recorded and considered. The considering of course takes for ever.

Ideally, you’d be detained in custody while it goes on. In practice, there are nothing like enough detention facilities because Congress won’t appropriate the funds. So most applicants are just given an appearance date, then released. They disappear into the U.S. interior and hook up with relatives, friends, or their gang boss from back home.

That’s a rough sketch of what happens, although a fair one, as can be seen from the number of asylum applications outstanding—300,000 currently, up from 16,000 five and a half years ago.

It doesn’t apply to persons from contiguous nations—Mexico and Canada—who can be refused entry. Hence the term you often see in coverage of the situation at our southern border: “OTMs,” which stands for “Other Than Mexicans.”

The Trump administration has recently fiddled with the process to try to reduce the backlog, with what success we don’t yet know. [ US will target asylum backlog by reviewing newer cases first, by Amy Taxin, AP, January 31, 2018]

We’d better hope for some success: If the rate of increase is constant for another five and a half years, the number of asylees will be kissing six million. Then another five and a half years at the same rate gets you over a hundred million. It’s a geometric progression, see?

So here’s this caravan of OTMs coming up through Mexico to our southern border. Thursday’s Daily Mail had a very good photo-montage of the caravanners, putting faces and bodies to the news coverage.

A striking number of the bodies belonged to pregnant women. Why would that be, I wonder? A lot of others belonged to winsome-looking children. Surely we wouldn’t be so heartless as to turn away little kiddies, would we?

However, if you discount some for the tabloid Daily Mail’s natural preference for the picturesque, it’s plain that the biggest cohort of caravanners are unattached young men, a lot of them sporting tattoos.

I have nothing against young men, and not very much against tattoos. Looking at these faces and bodies, though, I do seriously doubt that any of this cohort, if permitted to settle among us, will take up brain surgery, theoretical physics, or the composing of symphonies.

That’s by the by. If this caravan were composed entirely of credentialed professional doctors, engineers, architects, and lawyers, I still wouldn’t approve of their being allowed to settle in my country by virtue of merely showing up at the border.

I don’t mind these people, or dislike them. I certainly don’t hate them, as the infantile language of the Cultural Marxists would say. Some of them look like nice ordinary people. Check out, for example, William Castillo and his family from El Salvador in the Daily Mail montage. I’d guess Mr. Castillo is a hardworking guy who wants his best for the little boy. Heck, if I were an ordinary working Joe in El Salvador, I’d want to get out of there, too.

The world’s full of people like that, though: hundreds of millions, billions of them. If even a minor fraction of them—half a billion, say—settled in the U.S.A., we would have a radically different country. I rather like our country the way it is.

So, “hate”? Not really. I wouldn’t even scold these caravanners as people intending to break our laws. In fact, they don’t actually aim to break any laws. What they aim to do is take advantage of our terminally stupid laws on asylum—laws that the U.S. Congress could fix in a one-hour session, were it not for the fact that our legislators are too useless and corrupt to do what is necessary.

“Hate”? I am, as regular listeners surely know, a genial fellow. One or two personal and particular grudges aside, I don’t hate anybody.

There are, though, persons of whom I can say that if, while watching a Netflix movie in my living room, I were to glance out my window and see that person covered in tar and feathers and being chased down the street by a jeering mob of my fellow-citizens, I would not rise from my Barcalounger and go to their assistance.

William Castillo is not one of those people.

Chuck Schumer‘s one, though. Paul Ryan’s another; and Nancy Pelosi, and Mitch McConnell, and Maxine Waters, and Lindsey Graham, and John McCain, and Luis Gutierrez, and Kamala Harris, and Steny Hoyer, and Elijah Cummings, and Jerry Brown, and …

And here’s a thing I confess I didn’t know: This business of shepherding Central Americans up through Mexico in caravans to the U.S. border has been going on for fifteen years. [Who’s Pueblo Sin Fronteras, the group behind the migrant caravan that drew Trump’s ire?, by Nicole Acevedo, NBCNews, April 4, 2018] The organizers, an outfit called Pueblos Sin Fronteras—People Without Borders—actually boast on their website, quote, “more than fifteen years,” but fifteen years is what our own media outlets say.

ORDER IT NOW

Who knew? Well, the folk down in Central America plainly knew. The Mexican government must have known: It’s their territory the caravans have been passing through year after year. The people financing Pueblos Sin Fronteras surely know, and presumably have known for all fifteen of those years.

It’s we, the poor taxpaying shlubs of the U.S.A., who didn’t know. Nobody told us. Must’ve slipped their minds.

The latest news is that our President has ordered National Guard troops to the border. The number isn’t clear; between two and four thousand, we are told. That’s not even a band-aid. It’s actually fewer troops than George W. Bush’s Operation Jump Start.

You remember George W. Bush, right? And how passionate he was about securing our borders, right? Right.

The troops being sent will not of course be shooting people down as they cross the border. What I’d guess they’ll be doing is taking over some of the Border Patrol drudge work to free up Border Patrol agents to deal with asylum applicants.

Of which there may not be many. The size of the caravan seems to have dwindled considerably. The government of Mexico has been handing out permits so that the caravanners can stay in that country.

I’d guess that a couple of hundred of them will press on to the U.S. border, claim asylum, and end up in our unskilled workforce, our ob-gyn wards, and our welfare rolls, as seems to have been the case with previous years’ caravans.

That couple of hundred will be a drop in the ocean. Border Patrol apprehended thirty-seven thousand individuals between ports of entry on our Southwest Border during March. February, twenty-seven thousand; January, twenty-six thousand; Fiscal 2017 (which ended last September), 304 thousand. Caravan or no caravan, the invasion goes on.

But the caravan story is a warning, a harbinger, a portent. Of a whole lot more—a whole lot more—people from outhouse countries trying to get into the stable, prosperous, free nations that they see on their TV and movie screens and hear about from friends and relatives who have emigrated there.

Random observation from the current press. This is actually The Economist, March 31st:

In a Pew poll, about 40 percent of respondents in countries such as Nigeria, Ghana and Senegal said they planned to move to another country within five years. Asked whether they would move at once if they had the means and opportunity, 75 percent of Nigerians and Ghanaians said yes. Polling by Afrobarometer in Nigeria last year suggests why. Most of those thinking of leaving said it was to find work or escape economic hardship.

[Europe is sending African migrants home. Will they stay?]

That’s from an article about sub-Saharan Africans who reached Libya in hopes of getting to Europe, but who instead are being flown back to their home countries free of charge, courtesy of a joint effort by the EU and UN to stop the flow of so-called “asylum seekers” into Europe.

The returnees are glad to get out of Libya, where—according to The Economist—they were being sold for $400 a head in slave markets. But once they get back home they are itching to escape again:

One mother, on receiving her daughter from Libya, said she would simply try to fly her to Europe instead.

That’s with things as they are today. If you follow Steve Sailer’s posts you’ll be familiar with what Steve calls The World’s Most Important Graph. That’s the one of UN population projections through the rest or this century, the one that shows Africa’s population soaring up into the four billion zone while Europe’s flatlines.

Not very long ago—a mere generation, twenty or thirty years ago—it was possible to believe that any Third World country, with sensible economic policies, could become a Denmark, a U.S.A., an Australia. The Cold War was won; we were witnesses to the End of History.

Nobody believes any of that now. History may have ended, but human biodiversity didn’t. Countries with a decently high mean IQ, and some track record of civilizational attainment, and not in thrall to crazy religious or ideological cults, will do well. The rest will sink into squalor and desperation.

There are some open cases. India may have a chance, Brazil possibly, Southeast Asia and some Arab countries.

Black Africa, though, and most of Latin America north of the white “cone” nations—Chile, Argentina, Uruguay—… is it possible to have any hope for these places?

I was just recently reading something about Venezuela. Four million people have fled the place. [Fleeing Venezuelans need refuge in the US, Latin America and elsewhere, By Alvaro Vargas Llosa, Fox News, March 31, 2018.] Inflation is six thousand percent per annum. There are food riots; people are eating their pets.

And this is a country with major oil reserves!

What’s that you say? “Resource curse“? Norway has major oil reserves; where is their resource curse?

On the horizon, five or ten or fifteen years from now, we can foresee great movements of people—tens and hundreds and millions of people, by land and sea and air. Very few of them will be white, so it will be interesting to see whether our current, compulsory hypocrisies about race will hold up under the onslaught.

This week’s caravan of a few hundred may not be that consequential in itself. It did, though, give us a clue—a foretaste—of the shape of things to come.

2010-12-24dl[1]John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by VDARE.com com:FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Africans, Donald Trump, Immigration 
Hide 79 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. If people can just walk up to a border point, ask for asylum and then walk right in, what good would a wall do?

    E-Verify OTOH…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    E-Verify, plus Patriot Act style denial of financial accounts to illegal aliens, plus a change to Schedule E to require names, SSNs, and bank account numbers for all renters, and a change to forms associated with Schedule D to require similar data for property sales. And tie all this together with real-time computer systems.

    Implementation of this, and sanctuary cities could just be ignored. They'd only help criminals, and the citizens would soon vote out the mayor and city council members.
    , @Forbes
    My understanding is/was refugees and asylum seekers are supposed to make a claim for that status at the first country they enter (unless, that is, the conditions causing the status sought continue to exist), and not pass through another country to a preferred destination. Passing through another country en route to a preferred destination demonstrates the claimant is an economic migrant, and not a refugee or asylum seeker.

    Of course, these provisions need to be enforced. Enforcement is negligible. Mexico lets these parties pass through so that it is not their problem, but falls on the US.
    , @Mr. Anon

    If people can just walk up to a border point, ask for asylum and then walk right in, what good would a wall do?
     
    1.) Stop Mexicans. As Mr. Derbyshire stated: "It doesn’t apply to persons from contiguous nations—Mexico and Canada—who can be refused entry."

    2.) Send a clear message to the rest of the World: Go away. You are not wanted here. Uncle Sucker doesn't live here anymore.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. I wrote about a solution to this game 16 years ago.

    http://www.g2mil.com/Jan2002.htm

    #1 Establish 24/7 federal courts to instantly hear deportation cases.

    Most American cities have continuous courts in session, like “night court”, to quickly resolve minor legal issues without keeping people in jail for days. However, the entire US Court system runs on a formal “calendar” with regular hours and holidays. Because of the flood of immigration cases, the calendar has backlogged in many districts. Since it is impossible to detain most illegal immigrants who are arrested for several weeks until their hearing, hundreds of thousands are set free each year. This has become so well-known that one-third of those arrested for violating immigration laws demand a deportation hearing, even those caught “red-handed” crossing the border or presenting false passports or visas at airport arrival stations. As a result, 85% of those arrested who demand a hearing are freed in the USA after promising to appear a few weeks later; 90% of them never show. The recent “shoe bomb” terrorist was traveling with a forged passport. If he had preferred to enter the USA for terrorist activities, he may have been released into the USA despite his fake passport with a promise to appear at his deportation hearing.

    Tom Ridge should tackle this problem immediately by requesting the establishment of ten federal immigration courts in areas with high case loads. Ideally, some of these courts would be inside major airports, like: JFK, LAX, and Miami. He would request the appointment of 100 new magistrates and introduce the esteemed judges to military and police life of working nights, weekends and holidays so detainees who demand a hearing see a federal magistrate within hours of arrest. Aliens attempting to play the court game will be sent back across the border or put on a flight home within 24 hours. In other cases, the judge may determine that a mistake may have been made and order the suspect released, detained, or released on bond. Ironically, this will eventually save money each year because of lower prisoner detention and transport costs. Eventually, the illegal immigration game players will learn that the “demand a hearing” loophole has closed and the problem will subside. This will free Border Patrol agents to spend more time making “new” arrests and allow immigration officers to pursue those who overstay visas.

    #2 Aliens arrested in the USA are not eligible for political asylum.

    The “political asylum” game is well known in the Third World. A billion people on Earth are repressed and can present an excuse for asylum. They are welcome to apply at any US embassy or consulate overseas, or while they are legally visiting the USA. However, they should not be allowed that option after arrest for violating US law by entering illegally or overstaying their visa. Each year, thousands of people who are caught at US airports with a forged passports or visas demand “political asylum”, and then are allowed to enter the USA anyway pending a hearing. Thousands more who are arrested for overstaying their visas or lacking any legal documents scream “political asylum” for prompt release. Over 90% never show up for their hearing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    "Aliens arrested in the USA are not eligible for political asylum." -- Perhaps, this is the best solution.
    , @GourmetDan

    I wrote about a solution to this game 16 years ago.
     
    As we all know... solutions are easy to develop and implement... the government, however, has absolutely no interest in solving any problem...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Hail says: • Website

    the number of asylum applications outstanding—300,000 currently, up from 16,000 five and a half years ago.

    Article from left-wing agitator-journalist Betsy Woodruff (April 5, 2018):

    “Want Asylum in America? Get Ready for Hell.”

    Right. Yet there are 300,000? Betsy Woodruff is lying.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Truth says:

    Hey guys, “Three-dimensional chess!”

    …Check…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moi
    Why any woman would have sex with Trump beats me. But Stormy is way nicer and probably more intelligent than Trump.
    , @J.Ross
    Oh no, he had consensual sex with a beautiful woman or eighty, IMPEACHMENT WHEN???
    The chess metaphor applies here by the way because the two sides are playing completely different games. But hey, in fairness, I'm sure Hillary could pull chicks a quarter as conventionally attractive, when she's able to make it outside.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Anonymous[734] • Disclaimer says:
    @anony-mouse
    If people can just walk up to a border point, ask for asylum and then walk right in, what good would a wall do?

    E-Verify OTOH...

    E-Verify, plus Patriot Act style denial of financial accounts to illegal aliens, plus a change to Schedule E to require names, SSNs, and bank account numbers for all renters, and a change to forms associated with Schedule D to require similar data for property sales. And tie all this together with real-time computer systems.

    Implementation of this, and sanctuary cities could just be ignored. They’d only help criminals, and the citizens would soon vote out the mayor and city council members.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    Be much more effective if we cut off bennies to all the non-citizens who apply, and jail a few employers who hire non-citizens and not-legally-resident-and-not-permitted aliens.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. unit472 says:

    The EU has the Dublin Accord where asylum seekers will be evaluated in the country the claim is initially made. Obviously this leaves Italy, Greece and Spain more exposed to unwanted migrants but it is a useful principle to observe globally. If you leave Honduras and cross Mexico you should not be given asylum in the US because your opportunities are greater there. Asylum is just that. A temporary status created by a ‘well founded’ fear of persecution by the GOVERNMENT of your own nation.

    Fear of crime , unemployment or even starvation maybe ‘well founded’ but they have nothing to with political asylum. We might have had 65 million Americans voters expressing a well founded fear of Donald Trump after the 2016 election but there is no nation on earth able to accommodate such a flood of people. In reality the only people with a legitimate claim to ‘political asylum’ might have been limited to those targeted by Robert Mueller. Lt. General Michael Flynn meets the standard as it obvious he was the victim of a politicized FBI engaged in a conspiracy against Flynn’s boss.

    The sad reality is, given the numbers involved, people, no matter how horrible their situation, are not going to be able to go to another country to escape. The world is not big or rich enough therefore we need to end this idea of asylum for the masses.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SMK
    It's all over, America is finished. Blessedly, I'll be dead long before the U.S. is transformed into a nonwhite-majority hellhole of 400 and then 500 and then 600(?) million people. I'm so glad I don't have children and especially grandchildren and great-grandchildren.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. Anon[418] • Disclaimer says:

    Derb, you left Podhoretz off your hate list.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Forbes says:
    @anony-mouse
    If people can just walk up to a border point, ask for asylum and then walk right in, what good would a wall do?

    E-Verify OTOH...

    My understanding is/was refugees and asylum seekers are supposed to make a claim for that status at the first country they enter (unless, that is, the conditions causing the status sought continue to exist), and not pass through another country to a preferred destination. Passing through another country en route to a preferred destination demonstrates the claimant is an economic migrant, and not a refugee or asylum seeker.

    Of course, these provisions need to be enforced. Enforcement is negligible. Mexico lets these parties pass through so that it is not their problem, but falls on the US.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    Kind of "Deck-chairs on the Titanic" to fret about migrants stopping at the first country. After they get done turning that into a shithole, they'll move on like locusts to the next promising land. No, Western people need to decide if they have a right to survive and figure out what that means.
    , @jilles dykstra
    Your understanding is right.
    However, in Europe, countries like Greece and Italy want to get rid of them as soon as possible.
    In order to facilitate this, according to German sources, German border police etc. got verbal orders to let anyone pass.
    So they simply board a train to Germany.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Could William Castillo be any worse than some of the Brits who have been inflicted on us in the last 10 or 15 years, like Elliot Rodger, Chris Harper-Mercer and Michael Sandford? I highly doubt it. Is there a way we could keep them all out?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:

    No sympathy for any western country country until we quit bombing and interfering in other countries affairs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    " No sympathy for any western country country "
    should be
    No sympathy for any western government.
    Maybe on the contrary, applying Ockam's Razor, the theory that explains this madness is that migration also is an object of the bombing.
    , @anonymous
    Ah, this...

    As I like to say, European (read white) nations and their batshit crazy delusional pagan polytheist faiths, for Europeans.

    But, keep your greedy effing psychopathic hands off other nations, and their wealth. That said, I am all for mutually beneficial business relationships.

    I expect your kind to take in a few 100 refugees every year to burnish the mask of humanitarianism, and to also screw the natives in those business relationships... after all, old habits die hard, right.

    If not, white genocide is the solution.

    , @annamaria
    "No sympathy for any western country until we quit bombing..."
    -- Fair. If only the populace had the mechanisms of punishing the war profiteers and corrupted Israel-occupied US Congress.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Dwright says:

    Still not giving a fig about Williamson no matter how far you two go back.
    Oh, he didn’t mean for us to die but our communities? a difference but enough of one.

    Communities die for sure if you abandon them. Time for him to call U-Haul and abandon his and get honest work. Probably whore himself out somewhere else, survival and all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Exactly. It's like the nonsense that Ignatiev and other libtards spew about wanting to kill whites but 'really, we don't mean literally people, only the concept of 'whiteness''. And yet,libtards dictate that whites cannot be any race other than white or they're racist and misappropriating culture. And that our DNA is an abomination. What other rational conclusion could there be but that they literally mean the extermination of white people?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Hcat says: • Website

    If we were one of those countries like Russia or Japan or Spain that’s not reproducing, I’d say give us a new population. But we’re not.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    If we were one of those countries like Russia or Japan or Spain that’s not reproducing, I’d say give us a new population. But we’re not.
     
    You're an idiot.

    Go and do some research on Euro-American fertility rates.

    They're far below replacement and falling. The European peoples are being genocided by their own governments, who promote wholesale slaughter of the unborn, teach kids that reproduction is the only sexual vice, and promote homosexual marriage.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Anonymous[527] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dwright
    Still not giving a fig about Williamson no matter how far you two go back.
    Oh, he didn’t mean for us to die but our communities? a difference but enough of one.

    Communities die for sure if you abandon them. Time for him to call U-Haul and abandon his and get honest work. Probably whore himself out somewhere else, survival and all.

    Exactly. It’s like the nonsense that Ignatiev and other libtards spew about wanting to kill whites but ‘really, we don’t mean literally people, only the concept of ‘whiteness”. And yet,libtards dictate that whites cannot be any race other than white or they’re racist and misappropriating culture. And that our DNA is an abomination. What other rational conclusion could there be but that they literally mean the extermination of white people?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Biff says:

    I used to care, but things have changed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. On the horizon, five or ten or fifteen years from now, we can foresee great movements of people—tens and hundreds and millions of people, by land and sea and air. Very few of them will be white

    Oh God John you can’t fight it that way.
    I am completely disappointed I have followed you for years and yes: you know better.

    Anyone in China worried about Chinese skin color? Korea? Taiwan? Japan?

    Know why: that doesn’t work. It will not work as a unifying principle – full stop, mic drop – it won’t work get it through your head it won’t work.

    And what more evidence do you need other than the fact that there is nothing – spot nothing – the adversaries want more, than for you to keep trying?

    You are trucking them bullets with this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. eah says:

    As I pointed out in this comment, the ‘caravan’ is about asylum/refugee status — re the graph, western countries can change their own laws and defend their own borders — but they must also abrogate/withdraw from international treaties requiring them to accept and consider applications for asylum.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Clyde

    As I pointed out in this comment, the ‘caravan’ is about asylum/refugee status — re the graph, western countries can change their own laws and defend their own borders — but they must also abrogate/withdraw from international treaties requiring them to accept and consider applications for asylum.
     
    These treaties and agreements about refugees and asylum seekers is a European thing plus some other dumb nations like Canada and formerly Australia. I am almost certain the US has signed onto a minimum of this nonsense and that all we need in America is a change in our internal laws. Possible Trump's executive orders can kill this free for all at our southern border. Or it might need laws passed by Congress, which will never happen.

    The reason we have these old laws where Mexicans can be sent back immediately, others cannot, is that it used to be that Mexicans were 99% of the border jumpers. Now that Central American nations are in on the scam, my guess is Mexicans are down to 70%.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. In the good old days Maltus explained that just food shortage, hunger, starvation, could control population.
    In these days half starving third world babies can be seen daily on our screens, the Gutmenschen, leftists, are of the opinion that hunger should not be anywhere.
    Alas, if an African mother is just a good wife if she has at least three children, the overpopulation, if there is enough food, just will accelerate.
    The German Thilo Sarrazin is of the opinion that we have no responsibility for poor countries, cannot have, as w’re unable to change the cultures;
    He adds ‘we cannot even change Greek culture’.
    He wrote a book, 2010, how differing birth rates will destroy Germany, immigrants have high numbers of children, intelligent ‘German’ women none, or just one, Merkel fired him immediately.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
    Thilo Sarrazin's work starts from an incorrect premise - namely, that immigrants will continue to reproduce faster than incumbents, after the first-generation. That's at significant odds with the data.

    What actually tends to happen is that the first-generation born to immigrant parents is large - mostly because the immigrants pursue reproductive strategies consistent with their point of origin, and 'too many' survive because of low infant mortality in the destination country. That said: new immigrants reproduce about in-line with the poor in the destination country - who also reproduce 'too fast' for anybody's liking - it's just that the overwhelming bulk of immigrants are poor.

    The large first-cohort has significantly better economic prospects than their parents, and they are only slightly-more-fecund than the children of incumbents. By generation 2, fecundity settles to statistically the same as the incumbents.

    In other words, there is a 'bump' to the non-incumbent population, but it has very (very very) slight impact on the overall demography.

    The only way to get a significant tilt to the demographic 'mix' is to import a new cohort of non-incumbents, every single year. That is what has been happening, pretty much throughout the West - but an absolute key driver of this, has been the West's malignant interference in the development path of the 'Third World'.

    As to why immigrant women pursue 'bad' reproductive strategies: that, too, is straightforward.

    In subsistence societies, children are the only real investment good: when the things produced are perishable, families have no way to 'save' excess output except by feeding it to offspring. So you breed to the extent possible (in fact the optimal strategy is to have 2 pregnancies more than your output will feed, to account for child mortality), and raise your children to understand that they have an intergenerational commitment to care for you when you can no longer feed yourself.

    That is the way human societies worked for millennia, and it's still the way things work in non-industrialised regions, even in advancing countries (e.g., South-East Asia, Latin America; Africa; and parts of Central and Eastern Europe).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. @Anonymous
    No sympathy for any western country country until we quit bombing and interfering in other countries affairs.

    ” No sympathy for any western country country ”
    should be
    No sympathy for any western government.
    Maybe on the contrary, applying Ockam’s Razor, the theory that explains this madness is that migration also is an object of the bombing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moi
    Wow. Check out the places we've bombed, invaded and overthrown governments since WWII and/or Nam, and then tell we did that because them folks were overrunning our country.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Anon[892] • Disclaimer says:

    Rupert Murdoch’s papers say you and Drumph are wrong.

    THE US President has sent the National Guard to the Mexican border to stem the flow of immigrants, but this graph shows why it’s ridiculous.

    http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/donald-trumps-mexico-wall-border-crossing-arrests-are-at-historic-low/news-story/ec0710cfe9cd46f265f7e49bd002a33f

    It’s a GRAPH, so suck on that you redneck Drumph dummies. Do y’all even MATH? haha

    Read More
    • Replies: @Liljoe
    You have to go back
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Anonymous[737] • Disclaimer says:

    Even if there were 10 million Central American migrants admitted to the US over the next 10 years it wouldn’t really change America. The children of the migrants would assimilate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mark Presco
    A true believer in the new religion of Antiracism. Let me show you how blacks, who have been here for over a hundred years have assassinated.

    In the ‘60s, 23% of black children were born to unwed mothers, today it’s 75%. The vast majority of black women now use and abuse their children in a deliberate effort to abuse the welfare system. Don’t believe me? Then maybe you’ll believe her.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzspsovNvII

    These welfare systems exist mostly in white cultures because the average white citizen shoulders the responsibility to pay more into the system than they take from it. Otherwise, it is unsustainable.

    The most prominent of these are Sweden, Germany, the USA and the UK. Apparently it’s escaped you notice that these are the very countries targeted by the migrants.

    They can kiss their welfare systems goodbye.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Moi says:
    @Truth
    Hey guys, "Three-dimensional chess!"

    ...Check...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pOdaGTDjMs

    Why any woman would have sex with Trump beats me. But Stormy is way nicer and probably more intelligent than Trump.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. @Anonymous
    E-Verify, plus Patriot Act style denial of financial accounts to illegal aliens, plus a change to Schedule E to require names, SSNs, and bank account numbers for all renters, and a change to forms associated with Schedule D to require similar data for property sales. And tie all this together with real-time computer systems.

    Implementation of this, and sanctuary cities could just be ignored. They'd only help criminals, and the citizens would soon vote out the mayor and city council members.

    Be much more effective if we cut off bennies to all the non-citizens who apply, and jail a few employers who hire non-citizens and not-legally-resident-and-not-permitted aliens.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. @Forbes
    My understanding is/was refugees and asylum seekers are supposed to make a claim for that status at the first country they enter (unless, that is, the conditions causing the status sought continue to exist), and not pass through another country to a preferred destination. Passing through another country en route to a preferred destination demonstrates the claimant is an economic migrant, and not a refugee or asylum seeker.

    Of course, these provisions need to be enforced. Enforcement is negligible. Mexico lets these parties pass through so that it is not their problem, but falls on the US.

    Kind of “Deck-chairs on the Titanic” to fret about migrants stopping at the first country. After they get done turning that into a shithole, they’ll move on like locusts to the next promising land. No, Western people need to decide if they have a right to survive and figure out what that means.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. Clyde says:
    @eah
    As I pointed out in this comment, the 'caravan' is about asylum/refugee status -- re the graph, western countries can change their own laws and defend their own borders -- but they must also abrogate/withdraw from international treaties requiring them to accept and consider applications for asylum.

    As I pointed out in this comment, the ‘caravan’ is about asylum/refugee status — re the graph, western countries can change their own laws and defend their own borders — but they must also abrogate/withdraw from international treaties requiring them to accept and consider applications for asylum.

    These treaties and agreements about refugees and asylum seekers is a European thing plus some other dumb nations like Canada and formerly Australia. I am almost certain the US has signed onto a minimum of this nonsense and that all we need in America is a change in our internal laws. Possible Trump’s executive orders can kill this free for all at our southern border. Or it might need laws passed by Congress, which will never happen.

    The reason we have these old laws where Mexicans can be sent back immediately, others cannot, is that it used to be that Mexicans were 99% of the border jumpers. Now that Central American nations are in on the scam, my guess is Mexicans are down to 70%.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. anonymous[243] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    No sympathy for any western country country until we quit bombing and interfering in other countries affairs.

    Ah, this…

    As I like to say, European (read white) nations and their batshit crazy delusional pagan polytheist faiths, for Europeans.

    But, keep your greedy effing psychopathic hands off other nations, and their wealth. That said, I am all for mutually beneficial business relationships.

    I expect your kind to take in a few 100 refugees every year to burnish the mask of humanitarianism, and to also screw the natives in those business relationships… after all, old habits die hard, right.

    If not, white genocide is the solution.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Moi says:

    “The rest will sink into squalor and desperation.

    There are some open cases. India may have a chance, Brazil possibly, Southeast Asia and some Arab countries.”

    The writer hasn’t a clue what he’s talking about to say India is one of the exceptions. India, under PM Modi, has become a Hindu nationalist country, neoliberal economic policies have been adopted, farmers have committed suicide by thousands because of being crushed by debt, and the plight of the poor (60 percent of the country) has not improved. Other than that, everything is hunky-dory. I suggest the writer visit there and take in the Taj Mahal (which history books now being written say it was built by the Hindus and not by the Mughal emperor Shahjehan for his wife…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. Moi says:
    @jilles dykstra
    " No sympathy for any western country country "
    should be
    No sympathy for any western government.
    Maybe on the contrary, applying Ockam's Razor, the theory that explains this madness is that migration also is an object of the bombing.

    Wow. Check out the places we’ve bombed, invaded and overthrown governments since WWII and/or Nam, and then tell we did that because them folks were overrunning our country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. Why is anyone still soiling his tutu over them nasty immugrintz while the Wall Street vultures and their buddies in DC and Tel Aviv squeeze us dry?

    Immigration of any sort only happens because it benefits the .001% and as long as it serves as a bogeyman against which we can direct our dislike, (not hatred, mind you …I get it), at anyone but our bosses, it’s gonna stay.

    All any of the rest of us can do about it is to make sure we have a supply of Depends at the ready.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. No. The graph, as most future projections do, fails to consider future change. It is based on the situation that now exists.

    After the Chinese have taken control of all of the important parts of Africa by simply supporting the local tribal chieftains, they will ensure that the population expansion is controlled. Birth control will be instituted on a practical basis.

    Remember that under Chairman Mao, China prohibited Chinese families from having more than one child. Abortions were widely available. Why should the Chinese have greater regard for Africans then they have for their own people.

    Control methods will include abortion, birth control pills, and the introduction of disease germs when necessary. Also available will be local wars between tribes with a history of animosity towards each other. Promoted by the Chinese. Secretly of course.

    Does that technique ring any bells with regard to the modern Middle Eastern situation?

    Read More
    • Replies: @TT

    After the Chinese have taken control of all of the important parts of Africa by simply supporting the local tribal chieftains, they will ensure that the population expansion is controlled. Birth control will be instituted on a practical basis.

    Remember that under Chairman Mao, China prohibited Chinese families from having more than one child. Abortions were widely available. Why should the Chinese have greater regard for Africans then they have for their own people.

    Control methods will include abortion, birth control pills, and the introduction of disease germs when necessary.
     
    Mao never implemented birth control, its Deng. Why? After all the Japan & civil wars, worsen by Mao's failed economy plan, many Chinese were starving. Few years of drought had most agriculture destroyed, many millions were starved to death with West grains embargo. Deng recognized without birth control, there will be foreseeable disaster.

    This birth control is applied on urbans only, scary abuses we heard are often due to officials eager to perform, not policy. My China friend told his father had 2 children in Beijing but refused to pay small fine out of principle till now, causing his municipal gov to get 1000x fine & punishment (no promotion) yet nothing they can do to him except regular persuasion.

    This birth control also not applicable on rural farmers who need many helpers or on minority ethnics.

    The world is lucky to have Deng & Chinese sacrifice, otherwise we will be flooded by many billions of Chinese hungry refugees by now. As Deng & Prez Xi said, the greatest contribution of China to mankind & the world is to feed a billion Chinese without giving the world a crisis. Now China is encouraging all to have 2 children.

    Poor Singapore under Lee Kuang Yew adopted similar policy in 1980's, stop at 2, punished from 3. When Spore developed well, they implemented incentives for more children but too late.

    Under China Bri(Belt Road Initiative) or OBOR, Africa is growing well. Their corrupted politicians learn from Chinese that by making country prosp, a bigger cake give everyone more share. So Chinese are changing them positively.

    Also available will be local wars between tribes with a history of animosity towards each other. Promoted by the Chinese. Secretly of course.
     
    No one practise this art more skillful, refine & wider scale than US Nato, openly for last 100s yrs. They are still doing actively now to exploit resources & sabotage China Bri, in everywhere, Africa & ME. China prefer peaceful & prosperous world to buy their products, hence Bri goal.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. cezanne says:

    We need the wall, that is the only way to stop these invaders from their ability to claim asylum. It is pretty clear that congress will not (doesn’t have the will) change the asylum laws to better reflect the “new” state of world affairs. Extreme vetting to get on a plane to our nation and a border wall, NOW! Then we can tackle citizenship for those born on U.S. soil by non-citizens. The Bullshit needs to stop!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. Liljoe says:
    @Anon
    Rupert Murdoch's papers say you and Drumph are wrong.

    THE US President has sent the National Guard to the Mexican border to stem the flow of immigrants, but this graph shows why it’s ridiculous.
     
    http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/donald-trumps-mexico-wall-border-crossing-arrests-are-at-historic-low/news-story/ec0710cfe9cd46f265f7e49bd002a33f
    It's a GRAPH, so suck on that you redneck Drumph dummies. Do y'all even MATH? haha

    You have to go back

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Wong
    Gun kills, it is a fact, otherwise military, the death machine, won't owns guns. Of course not all the death caused by gun, but getting rid of guns is the first step of removing violent death by crimes. One thing at a time, you have to start somewhere somehow, if you work at it, sooner or later you will get the US society civilized like the nations in Europe or Eastern Asia.

    But if you are looking for execuses not taking the first step, the US will be forever buried deep in the gun violence. Getting rid of guns is a reflection of the character of the nation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Hcat
    If we were one of those countries like Russia or Japan or Spain that’s not reproducing, I’d say give us a new population. But we’re not.

    If we were one of those countries like Russia or Japan or Spain that’s not reproducing, I’d say give us a new population. But we’re not.

    You’re an idiot.

    Go and do some research on Euro-American fertility rates.

    They’re far below replacement and falling. The European peoples are being genocided by their own governments, who promote wholesale slaughter of the unborn, teach kids that reproduction is the only sexual vice, and promote homosexual marriage.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. @Forbes
    My understanding is/was refugees and asylum seekers are supposed to make a claim for that status at the first country they enter (unless, that is, the conditions causing the status sought continue to exist), and not pass through another country to a preferred destination. Passing through another country en route to a preferred destination demonstrates the claimant is an economic migrant, and not a refugee or asylum seeker.

    Of course, these provisions need to be enforced. Enforcement is negligible. Mexico lets these parties pass through so that it is not their problem, but falls on the US.

    Your understanding is right.
    However, in Europe, countries like Greece and Italy want to get rid of them as soon as possible.
    In order to facilitate this, according to German sources, German border police etc. got verbal orders to let anyone pass.
    So they simply board a train to Germany.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @Anonymous
    Even if there were 10 million Central American migrants admitted to the US over the next 10 years it wouldn't really change America. The children of the migrants would assimilate.

    A true believer in the new religion of Antiracism. Let me show you how blacks, who have been here for over a hundred years have assassinated.

    In the ‘60s, 23% of black children were born to unwed mothers, today it’s 75%. The vast majority of black women now use and abuse their children in a deliberate effort to abuse the welfare system. Don’t believe me? Then maybe you’ll believe her.

    These welfare systems exist mostly in white cultures because the average white citizen shoulders the responsibility to pay more into the system than they take from it. Otherwise, it is unsustainable.

    The most prominent of these are Sweden, Germany, the USA and the UK. Apparently it’s escaped you notice that these are the very countries targeted by the migrants.

    They can kiss their welfare systems goodbye.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. AaronB says:

    Unfortunately, the alt-right is simply too retarded to formulate an intelligent strategy.

    If the alt-right was even remotely capable of long term strategic thinking, they would recognize that the old white America can’t be saved and that the crucial task right now is to depose our current psychopathic elites who wish to create a new slave-based social system.

    That would mean the alt-right allying with immigrants, blacks, and Asians – stop saying anything bad about them whatsoever and welcome them and turn them against the elites.

    Turn the weapon of the elites against them.The strategy of the elites is to create a divided society using the classic divide and conquer tactic, and the obvious way to thwart this is for all factions to unite.

    Then, after the current elite is deposed, we can consider breaking up the country along ethnic and cultural lines, shaking hands, and going our seperate ways, if need be.

    Or if the alt-right is truly Machiavellian like it laughably likes to pretend, if whites are a majority they can then turn against their allies after having utilized them against the current elites. (I am not advocating this strategy. I would be horrified by it. I am just pointing out that it would be an intelligent Machiavellian strategy by people who supposedly see themselves as “dark triad” but are too stupid to see two steps ahead and wear their intentions on their sleeves for all to see).

    The alt-right has no intelligent leaders capable of flexible long term strategy utilizing deception and concealment and strategic alliances – probably because white culture lacks the mechanisms to coordinate and transmit such a strategy, or create a sense of shared purpose and identity based on unspoken assumptions ,having hollowed itself out through its commitment to ‘reason’.

    Another intelligent strategy would be to infiltrate universities and institutions by pretending to completely agree with the current leftist agenda. Then once in position, undermine it from within.

    A crucial tactic of undermining is pretending to agree in order to gain credibility, then slowly shifting the discourse, and undermining from within.

    These tactics would require the development of cultural mechanisms that create a sense of shared identity and purpose that would allow collective action based on unspoken assumptions and obviate the need to base group cohesion on clearly formulated principles or values (laying all your cards on the table for friend and foe alike to see, something white culture cannot help doing now)

    But of course, such Machiavellian thinking is utterly beyond the great minds of the alt-right who love to go on and on about how dark triad they are, and the “war” us fought in what has become the usual stupid white manner – frontal atrack, meeting force with force.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Further, instead of focusing outwards, the alt-right should focus on creating group cohesion through education and community and charity programs, resulting in a shared sense of identity and common purpose. On this basis it will have the cohesion to mount a serious challenge and the cultural capital to develop an intelligent strategy.

    Consider Hamas and Hezbollah - both create group cohesion through an extensive network of charity programs and community outreach and educational initiatives.

    Where is the alt-right community outreach and charitanle works in the poor white communities of the rust belt and the Midwest?

    Ha!

    The first rule of mounting a successful political challenge is developing the social level, yet the alt-right utterly neglects the social level. It makes no effort to build up group cohesion and identity through social outreach programs.

    The stupid "individualism" and "rationality" of white culture make it impossible to engage in collective social build-up and to formulate a strategy that does not depend on stupidly meeting force with force in an obvious way.

    Time to learn from the successful non-whites what white culture is missing - look at Hamas, Hezbollah, Jews, Asians - study them. Stop being stupid.

    It's time to be humble and learn. Go to school. The era of effortless white superiority is over.

    Everyone else learned what there was to learn from white culture - now it is whites who must start learning from others, or die.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. AaronB says:
    @AaronB
    Unfortunately, the alt-right is simply too retarded to formulate an intelligent strategy.

    If the alt-right was even remotely capable of long term strategic thinking, they would recognize that the old white America can't be saved and that the crucial task right now is to depose our current psychopathic elites who wish to create a new slave-based social system.

    That would mean the alt-right allying with immigrants, blacks, and Asians - stop saying anything bad about them whatsoever and welcome them and turn them against the elites.


    Turn the weapon of the elites against them.The strategy of the elites is to create a divided society using the classic divide and conquer tactic, and the obvious way to thwart this is for all factions to unite.

    Then, after the current elite is deposed, we can consider breaking up the country along ethnic and cultural lines, shaking hands, and going our seperate ways, if need be.

    Or if the alt-right is truly Machiavellian like it laughably likes to pretend, if whites are a majority they can then turn against their allies after having utilized them against the current elites. (I am not advocating this strategy. I would be horrified by it. I am just pointing out that it would be an intelligent Machiavellian strategy by people who supposedly see themselves as "dark triad" but are too stupid to see two steps ahead and wear their intentions on their sleeves for all to see).

    The alt-right has no intelligent leaders capable of flexible long term strategy utilizing deception and concealment and strategic alliances - probably because white culture lacks the mechanisms to coordinate and transmit such a strategy, or create a sense of shared purpose and identity based on unspoken assumptions ,having hollowed itself out through its commitment to 'reason'.

    Another intelligent strategy would be to infiltrate universities and institutions by pretending to completely agree with the current leftist agenda. Then once in position, undermine it from within.

    A crucial tactic of undermining is pretending to agree in order to gain credibility, then slowly shifting the discourse, and undermining from within.

    These tactics would require the development of cultural mechanisms that create a sense of shared identity and purpose that would allow collective action based on unspoken assumptions and obviate the need to base group cohesion on clearly formulated principles or values (laying all your cards on the table for friend and foe alike to see, something white culture cannot help doing now)

    But of course, such Machiavellian thinking is utterly beyond the great minds of the alt-right who love to go on and on about how dark triad they are, and the "war" us fought in what has become the usual stupid white manner - frontal atrack, meeting force with force.

    Further, instead of focusing outwards, the alt-right should focus on creating group cohesion through education and community and charity programs, resulting in a shared sense of identity and common purpose. On this basis it will have the cohesion to mount a serious challenge and the cultural capital to develop an intelligent strategy.

    Consider Hamas and Hezbollah – both create group cohesion through an extensive network of charity programs and community outreach and educational initiatives.

    Where is the alt-right community outreach and charitanle works in the poor white communities of the rust belt and the Midwest?

    Ha!

    The first rule of mounting a successful political challenge is developing the social level, yet the alt-right utterly neglects the social level. It makes no effort to build up group cohesion and identity through social outreach programs.

    The stupid “individualism” and “rationality” of white culture make it impossible to engage in collective social build-up and to formulate a strategy that does not depend on stupidly meeting force with force in an obvious way.

    Time to learn from the successful non-whites what white culture is missing – look at Hamas, Hezbollah, Jews, Asians – study them. Stop being stupid.

    It’s time to be humble and learn. Go to school. The era of effortless white superiority is over.

    Everyone else learned what there was to learn from white culture – now it is whites who must start learning from others, or die.

    Read More
    • Replies: @wayfarer

    “If we never had the courage to take a leap of faith, we'd be cheating God out of a chance to mount us up with wings like eagles and watch us soar.”

    – Jen Stephens, The Heart's Journey Home
     
    It's our artificial world, within which it's difficult for some to find harmony.

    As it stands, once familiar laws of natural selection are on hold, as new laws of artificial selection hold sway within our dog-eat-dog urban jungles.

    Sadly, it's no longer a “human-civilization,” but more likely a human-plantation. When for each dollar earned, it costs about two-dollars just to survive.

    Some say “screw it” and suicide, as it's a quick way out of all this madness. But woe, there is some truth in “Groundhog Day” and self-destruction is no solution.

    It's god given animal-nature to enjoy simply surviving, and deep down it's human-nature to enjoy this as well. It's god given animal-nature to desire freewill, and deep down it's human-nature too desire this as well.

    There was a time when simply surviving was easy, and freewill was rarely infringed upon. But no longer, as we live in a world today where so many now want to “succeed” and more often than not achieving “success” requires that one infringe upon the freewill of another.

    In six-weeks I'll be homeless once again without much of a light at the end of that bitter tunnel, but strangely enough couldn't feel happier, as I'll be sleeping at a beach next to the sweet wild-blue Pacific Ocean.

    I'll say keep-on-truckin' mankind, and move forward sowing seeds of unconditional love and forgiveness, until the bitter-sweet end.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxLMr784l0Q
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Z-man says:

    There are, though, persons of whom I can say that if, while watching a Netflix movie in my living room, I were to glance out my window and see that person covered in tar and feathers and being chased down the street by a jeering mob of my fellow-citizens, I would not rise from my Barcalounger and go to their assistance.
    William Castillo is not one of those people.
    Chuck Schumer‘s one, though. Paul Ryan’s another; and Nancy Pelosi, and Mitch McConnell, and Maxine Waters, and Lindsey Graham, and John McCain, and Luis Gutierrez, and Kamala Harris, and Steny Hoyer, and Elijah Cummings, and Jerry Brown, and …

    Yes.
    I have this wish that ‘Linda’ Graham, ‘Nutz’ McCain, Tom ‘pickin’ Cotton and, lets have a real Neochoen, Alan Douche-a-witz are put in a barrel and sent down the Niagra Falls. Just a pleasant thought.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Z-man
    Well, Nutz McCain is almost gone so lets replace him with someone more virulent. Posters, have anyone in mind? We'll take a poll! (Grin)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Z-man says:
    @Z-man

    There are, though, persons of whom I can say that if, while watching a Netflix movie in my living room, I were to glance out my window and see that person covered in tar and feathers and being chased down the street by a jeering mob of my fellow-citizens, I would not rise from my Barcalounger and go to their assistance.
    William Castillo is not one of those people.
    Chuck Schumer‘s one, though. Paul Ryan’s another; and Nancy Pelosi, and Mitch McConnell, and Maxine Waters, and Lindsey Graham, and John McCain, and Luis Gutierrez, and Kamala Harris, and Steny Hoyer, and Elijah Cummings, and Jerry Brown, and …
     
    Yes.
    I have this wish that 'Linda' Graham, 'Nutz' McCain, Tom 'pickin' Cotton and, lets have a real Neochoen, Alan Douche-a-witz are put in a barrel and sent down the Niagra Falls. Just a pleasant thought.

    Well, Nutz McCain is almost gone so lets replace him with someone more virulent. Posters, have anyone in mind? We’ll take a poll! (Grin)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Z-man

    There are persons of whom I can say that if, while watching a Netflix movie in my living room, I were to glance out my window and see that person covered in tar and feathers and being chased down the street by a jeering mob of my fellow-citizens, I would not rise from my Barcalounger and go to their assistance.
    Chuck Schumer‘s one, though. Paul Ryan’s another; and Nancy Pelosi, and Mitch McConnell, and Maxine Waters, and Lindsey Graham, and John McCain, and Luis Gutierrez, and Kamala Harris, and Steny Hoyer, and Elijah Cummings, and Jerry Brown, and …
     

    I have this wish that ‘Linda’ Graham, ‘Nutz’ McCain, Tom ‘pickin’ Cotton and, lets have a real Neochoen, Alan Douche-a-witz are put in a barrel and sent down the Niagra Falls. Just a pleasant thought.
     

    Well, Nutz McCain is almost gone so lets replace him with someone more virulent. Posters, have anyone in mind? We’ll take a poll!
     
    I have a new one, Mark Levin, a radio commentator who pronounces his name Le-vin. Oh, he needs to be tar and feathered and sent over the falls. (Grin)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Truth
    Hey guys, "Three-dimensional chess!"

    ...Check...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pOdaGTDjMs

    Oh no, he had consensual sex with a beautiful woman or eighty, IMPEACHMENT WHEN???
    The chess metaphor applies here by the way because the two sides are playing completely different games. But hey, in fairness, I’m sure Hillary could pull chicks a quarter as conventionally attractive, when she’s able to make it outside.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    No Buddy, he denied knowledge of a contract made, by a lawyer, supposedly on his behalf, with someone else: Which may void the contract.

    Chess.........................checkers.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. J.Ross says: • Website

    Nobody likes civil war talk but all of the confidence of the nation wrecking activists comes from certainty that nobody is ever going to do anything anyway, and even if they are not proven wrong in time, horrors loom. Whether Trump succeeds in implementing real policy change or not, we will sooner or later find ourselves having to impose brutally unfriendly terms on unsympathetic strangers. Even in the invite the-world-fantasy somebody is going to have to be made to accept an unambiguous “no.” This timeline is playing out like the unsupervised brat who starts collecting cute pets without realizing everything that entails, and who must one day make horrible decisions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
    In the alternative, unsympathetic strangers start imposing brutally unfriendly terms on us. The cute pets of the spoiled brat take over the house.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. I have not gotten past this first paragraph on asylum. The US is under no obligation to take asylum seekers in country — none.

    https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  43. From his speaking and tweeting earlier this week… it is plain that President Donald J. Trump did not know, until Secretary Nielsen enlightened him, that there is no legal way for the U.S.A. to prevent most foreigners from just walking into our country, then settling here permanently.

    This rather makes the case that building a wall would be a complete waste of time, because the wall cannot be continuous without a single gateway or border crossing point, unless the plan is to completely seal the land border and only allow travel by sea or air.

    Who knew? Well, the folk down in Central America plainly knew. The Mexican government must have known: It’s their territory the caravans have been passing through year after year. The people financing Pueblos Sin Fronteras surely know, and presumably have known for all fifteen of those years.

    It’s we, the poor taxpaying shlubs of the U.S.A., who didn’t know. Nobody told us.

    This rather makes the case for Presidents making policy based on sound advice from experts, and not on what they see on Rupert Murdoch’s tabloid TV. And not appointing their own family members and well-endowed models as White House advisors.

    Lesson learned!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  44. These prospects can be stupid. They assume circumstances will stay unchanged, so the exponential growth will go on and on. But nothing stays unchanged.

    Look at Kosovo: before the American “liberation” Skipetar ladies used to give a birth to 6 or more children. Nowadays (after less than 20 yrs.) women bear only one child, or have got no child, or have left the territory. The Skipetar population lost one half, in spite of the prospects that had seen them as the biggest people of Balkans.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  45. @J.Ross
    Nobody likes civil war talk but all of the confidence of the nation wrecking activists comes from certainty that nobody is ever going to do anything anyway, and even if they are not proven wrong in time, horrors loom. Whether Trump succeeds in implementing real policy change or not, we will sooner or later find ourselves having to impose brutally unfriendly terms on unsympathetic strangers. Even in the invite the-world-fantasy somebody is going to have to be made to accept an unambiguous "no." This timeline is playing out like the unsupervised brat who starts collecting cute pets without realizing everything that entails, and who must one day make horrible decisions.

    In the alternative, unsympathetic strangers start imposing brutally unfriendly terms on us. The cute pets of the spoiled brat take over the house.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. wayfarer says:
    @AaronB
    Further, instead of focusing outwards, the alt-right should focus on creating group cohesion through education and community and charity programs, resulting in a shared sense of identity and common purpose. On this basis it will have the cohesion to mount a serious challenge and the cultural capital to develop an intelligent strategy.

    Consider Hamas and Hezbollah - both create group cohesion through an extensive network of charity programs and community outreach and educational initiatives.

    Where is the alt-right community outreach and charitanle works in the poor white communities of the rust belt and the Midwest?

    Ha!

    The first rule of mounting a successful political challenge is developing the social level, yet the alt-right utterly neglects the social level. It makes no effort to build up group cohesion and identity through social outreach programs.

    The stupid "individualism" and "rationality" of white culture make it impossible to engage in collective social build-up and to formulate a strategy that does not depend on stupidly meeting force with force in an obvious way.

    Time to learn from the successful non-whites what white culture is missing - look at Hamas, Hezbollah, Jews, Asians - study them. Stop being stupid.

    It's time to be humble and learn. Go to school. The era of effortless white superiority is over.

    Everyone else learned what there was to learn from white culture - now it is whites who must start learning from others, or die.

    “If we never had the courage to take a leap of faith, we’d be cheating God out of a chance to mount us up with wings like eagles and watch us soar.”

    – Jen Stephens, The Heart’s Journey Home

    It’s our artificial world, within which it’s difficult for some to find harmony.

    As it stands, once familiar laws of natural selection are on hold, as new laws of artificial selection hold sway within our dog-eat-dog urban jungles.

    Sadly, it’s no longer a “human-civilization,” but more likely a human-plantation. When for each dollar earned, it costs about two-dollars just to survive.

    Some say “screw it” and suicide, as it’s a quick way out of all this madness. But woe, there is some truth in “Groundhog Day” and self-destruction is no solution.

    It’s god given animal-nature to enjoy simply surviving, and deep down it’s human-nature to enjoy this as well. It’s god given animal-nature to desire freewill, and deep down it’s human-nature too desire this as well.

    There was a time when simply surviving was easy, and freewill was rarely infringed upon. But no longer, as we live in a world today where so many now want to “succeed” and more often than not achieving “success” requires that one infringe upon the freewill of another.

    In six-weeks I’ll be homeless once again without much of a light at the end of that bitter tunnel, but strangely enough couldn’t feel happier, as I’ll be sleeping at a beach next to the sweet wild-blue Pacific Ocean.

    I’ll say keep-on-truckin’ mankind, and move forward sowing seeds of unconditional love and forgiveness, until the bitter-sweet end.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    The insane thing is, that for people who claim to promote white solidarity they spend zero time on trying to build up social capital among whites and developing asabiyah and a common collective culture where everyone belongs and looks out for each other.

    It's like a people that has broken down all its cultural capital and become radical individualists are suppsed to suddenly organize politically on the inspiring slogan of "shared genetic heritage". In fact, every white person knows that there is no safety net for him should he fail or stck his neck out - a Jew or a Korean can take risks and the community will cushion his fall and provide new start up capital. Even every member of Hezbollah knows that he get a new house if Israel destroys his and will be applauded and appreciated by his community.

    If you look at Jewish organizations like chabad, they're largely devoted to defining and celebrating Jewish culture - if you look at alt-right writets, they're mostly mocking and putting down other groups.

    The problem is that "shared identity" being pushed by the alt-right is so uninspiring - it's mostly about HBD and other abstractions. It has none of the warm appeal to deep emotion that a mythical or poetic connection to illustrious ancestors and a rich cultural heritage would create. But they can't do this because it's not "rational".

    They need to reconstitute their social capital and develop a collective economic interdependence that protects everyone, and foster shared identity through a sense of mythical and poetic heritage as well as a connection to dead ancestors, and not HBD.

    What are the chances the idiots will do any of this :) The alt-right are a bunch of clowns.

    Well wayfarer good luck being homeless - it sounds crazy but I really do understand your sense of excitement :) It really is a kind of freedom.

    There is a part of me that finds it very appealing - you know the tramp culture in early 20th century America was full of romance and adventure, and every normal culture has a rich and storied tradition of holy vagabonds and wanderers and cave dwellers who are an accepted part of social life and are even appreciated.

    It's only our death cult culture that doesn't.

    I used to sometimes tell friends and family that a part of me wants to be homeless - they looked at me like I was nuts. Americans :) What a bunch of buffoons.

    George Orwell wrote a book about being homeless for a year - he talks about the sense of liberation.

    Well, good luck as you "go into the homeless life", as the Buddha said, and I hope the road is easy and you find some decent situation pnevway or another.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Joe Wong says:
    @Anon
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agQ7A0q1wK4

    Gun kills, it is a fact, otherwise military, the death machine, won’t owns guns. Of course not all the death caused by gun, but getting rid of guns is the first step of removing violent death by crimes. One thing at a time, you have to start somewhere somehow, if you work at it, sooner or later you will get the US society civilized like the nations in Europe or Eastern Asia.

    But if you are looking for execuses not taking the first step, the US will be forever buried deep in the gun violence. Getting rid of guns is a reflection of the character of the nation.

    Read More
    • LOL: schnellandine
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    Yeah I still remember a BBC radio program praising Japan for its success in rounding up all their personally owned firearms. People like this have children and vote.
    , @Mr. Anon

    One thing at a time, you have to start somewhere somehow, if you work at it, sooner or later you will get the US society civilized like the nations in Europe or Eastern Asia.
     
    Yeah. North Korea. Yugoslavia................civilized. And so peaceful.

    Your post is proof that even one Wong doesn't make a White.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. AaronB says:
    @wayfarer

    “If we never had the courage to take a leap of faith, we'd be cheating God out of a chance to mount us up with wings like eagles and watch us soar.”

    – Jen Stephens, The Heart's Journey Home
     
    It's our artificial world, within which it's difficult for some to find harmony.

    As it stands, once familiar laws of natural selection are on hold, as new laws of artificial selection hold sway within our dog-eat-dog urban jungles.

    Sadly, it's no longer a “human-civilization,” but more likely a human-plantation. When for each dollar earned, it costs about two-dollars just to survive.

    Some say “screw it” and suicide, as it's a quick way out of all this madness. But woe, there is some truth in “Groundhog Day” and self-destruction is no solution.

    It's god given animal-nature to enjoy simply surviving, and deep down it's human-nature to enjoy this as well. It's god given animal-nature to desire freewill, and deep down it's human-nature too desire this as well.

    There was a time when simply surviving was easy, and freewill was rarely infringed upon. But no longer, as we live in a world today where so many now want to “succeed” and more often than not achieving “success” requires that one infringe upon the freewill of another.

    In six-weeks I'll be homeless once again without much of a light at the end of that bitter tunnel, but strangely enough couldn't feel happier, as I'll be sleeping at a beach next to the sweet wild-blue Pacific Ocean.

    I'll say keep-on-truckin' mankind, and move forward sowing seeds of unconditional love and forgiveness, until the bitter-sweet end.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxLMr784l0Q

    The insane thing is, that for people who claim to promote white solidarity they spend zero time on trying to build up social capital among whites and developing asabiyah and a common collective culture where everyone belongs and looks out for each other.

    It’s like a people that has broken down all its cultural capital and become radical individualists are suppsed to suddenly organize politically on the inspiring slogan of “shared genetic heritage”. In fact, every white person knows that there is no safety net for him should he fail or stck his neck out – a Jew or a Korean can take risks and the community will cushion his fall and provide new start up capital. Even every member of Hezbollah knows that he get a new house if Israel destroys his and will be applauded and appreciated by his community.

    If you look at Jewish organizations like chabad, they’re largely devoted to defining and celebrating Jewish culture – if you look at alt-right writets, they’re mostly mocking and putting down other groups.

    The problem is that “shared identity” being pushed by the alt-right is so uninspiring – it’s mostly about HBD and other abstractions. It has none of the warm appeal to deep emotion that a mythical or poetic connection to illustrious ancestors and a rich cultural heritage would create. But they can’t do this because it’s not “rational”.

    They need to reconstitute their social capital and develop a collective economic interdependence that protects everyone, and foster shared identity through a sense of mythical and poetic heritage as well as a connection to dead ancestors, and not HBD.

    What are the chances the idiots will do any of this :) The alt-right are a bunch of clowns.

    Well wayfarer good luck being homeless – it sounds crazy but I really do understand your sense of excitement :) It really is a kind of freedom.

    There is a part of me that finds it very appealing – you know the tramp culture in early 20th century America was full of romance and adventure, and every normal culture has a rich and storied tradition of holy vagabonds and wanderers and cave dwellers who are an accepted part of social life and are even appreciated.

    It’s only our death cult culture that doesn’t.

    I used to sometimes tell friends and family that a part of me wants to be homeless – they looked at me like I was nuts. Americans :) What a bunch of buffoons.

    George Orwell wrote a book about being homeless for a year – he talks about the sense of liberation.

    Well, good luck as you “go into the homeless life”, as the Buddha said, and I hope the road is easy and you find some decent situation pnevway or another.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. annamaria says:
    @Carlton Meyer
    I wrote about a solution to this game 16 years ago.

    http://www.g2mil.com/Jan2002.htm

    #1 Establish 24/7 federal courts to instantly hear deportation cases.

    Most American cities have continuous courts in session, like "night court", to quickly resolve minor legal issues without keeping people in jail for days. However, the entire US Court system runs on a formal "calendar" with regular hours and holidays. Because of the flood of immigration cases, the calendar has backlogged in many districts. Since it is impossible to detain most illegal immigrants who are arrested for several weeks until their hearing, hundreds of thousands are set free each year. This has become so well-known that one-third of those arrested for violating immigration laws demand a deportation hearing, even those caught "red-handed" crossing the border or presenting false passports or visas at airport arrival stations. As a result, 85% of those arrested who demand a hearing are freed in the USA after promising to appear a few weeks later; 90% of them never show. The recent "shoe bomb" terrorist was traveling with a forged passport. If he had preferred to enter the USA for terrorist activities, he may have been released into the USA despite his fake passport with a promise to appear at his deportation hearing.

    Tom Ridge should tackle this problem immediately by requesting the establishment of ten federal immigration courts in areas with high case loads. Ideally, some of these courts would be inside major airports, like: JFK, LAX, and Miami. He would request the appointment of 100 new magistrates and introduce the esteemed judges to military and police life of working nights, weekends and holidays so detainees who demand a hearing see a federal magistrate within hours of arrest. Aliens attempting to play the court game will be sent back across the border or put on a flight home within 24 hours. In other cases, the judge may determine that a mistake may have been made and order the suspect released, detained, or released on bond. Ironically, this will eventually save money each year because of lower prisoner detention and transport costs. Eventually, the illegal immigration game players will learn that the "demand a hearing" loophole has closed and the problem will subside. This will free Border Patrol agents to spend more time making "new" arrests and allow immigration officers to pursue those who overstay visas.

    #2 Aliens arrested in the USA are not eligible for political asylum.

    The "political asylum" game is well known in the Third World. A billion people on Earth are repressed and can present an excuse for asylum. They are welcome to apply at any US embassy or consulate overseas, or while they are legally visiting the USA. However, they should not be allowed that option after arrest for violating US law by entering illegally or overstaying their visa. Each year, thousands of people who are caught at US airports with a forged passports or visas demand "political asylum", and then are allowed to enter the USA anyway pending a hearing. Thousands more who are arrested for overstaying their visas or lacking any legal documents scream "political asylum" for prompt release. Over 90% never show up for their hearing.

    “Aliens arrested in the USA are not eligible for political asylum.” — Perhaps, this is the best solution.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. annamaria says:
    @Anonymous
    No sympathy for any western country country until we quit bombing and interfering in other countries affairs.

    “No sympathy for any western country until we quit bombing…”
    – Fair. If only the populace had the mechanisms of punishing the war profiteers and corrupted Israel-occupied US Congress.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Z-man says:
    @Z-man
    Well, Nutz McCain is almost gone so lets replace him with someone more virulent. Posters, have anyone in mind? We'll take a poll! (Grin)

    There are persons of whom I can say that if, while watching a Netflix movie in my living room, I were to glance out my window and see that person covered in tar and feathers and being chased down the street by a jeering mob of my fellow-citizens, I would not rise from my Barcalounger and go to their assistance.
    Chuck Schumer‘s one, though. Paul Ryan’s another; and Nancy Pelosi, and Mitch McConnell, and Maxine Waters, and Lindsey Graham, and John McCain, and Luis Gutierrez, and Kamala Harris, and Steny Hoyer, and Elijah Cummings, and Jerry Brown, and …

    I have this wish that ‘Linda’ Graham, ‘Nutz’ McCain, Tom ‘pickin’ Cotton and, lets have a real Neochoen, Alan Douche-a-witz are put in a barrel and sent down the Niagra Falls. Just a pleasant thought.

    Well, Nutz McCain is almost gone so lets replace him with someone more virulent. Posters, have anyone in mind? We’ll take a poll!

    I have a new one, Mark Levin, a radio commentator who pronounces his name Le-vin. Oh, he needs to be tar and feathered and sent over the falls. (Grin)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Z-man
    I know she's a 'lightweight' (pun intended, lol) but Nutz McCain's daughter can be added to my barrel over Niagara list. She is now a well paid slut on The View, that Judaic woman's morning show that attacks the equally Judaic Donald Trump 24/7 and she spews the Republitard NEOCON party line like her doomed father.
    Jeeeesus forgive me. (Repentant emoji here)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Truth says:
    @J.Ross
    Oh no, he had consensual sex with a beautiful woman or eighty, IMPEACHMENT WHEN???
    The chess metaphor applies here by the way because the two sides are playing completely different games. But hey, in fairness, I'm sure Hillary could pull chicks a quarter as conventionally attractive, when she's able to make it outside.

    No Buddy, he denied knowledge of a contract made, by a lawyer, supposedly on his behalf, with someone else: Which may void the contract.

    Chess…………………….checkers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. @jilles dykstra
    In the good old days Maltus explained that just food shortage, hunger, starvation, could control population.
    In these days half starving third world babies can be seen daily on our screens, the Gutmenschen, leftists, are of the opinion that hunger should not be anywhere.
    Alas, if an African mother is just a good wife if she has at least three children, the overpopulation, if there is enough food, just will accelerate.
    The German Thilo Sarrazin is of the opinion that we have no responsibility for poor countries, cannot have, as w're unable to change the cultures;
    He adds 'we cannot even change Greek culture'.
    He wrote a book, 2010, how differing birth rates will destroy Germany, immigrants have high numbers of children, intelligent 'German' women none, or just one, Merkel fired him immediately.

    Thilo Sarrazin’s work starts from an incorrect premise – namely, that immigrants will continue to reproduce faster than incumbents, after the first-generation. That’s at significant odds with the data.

    What actually tends to happen is that the first-generation born to immigrant parents is large – mostly because the immigrants pursue reproductive strategies consistent with their point of origin, and ‘too many’ survive because of low infant mortality in the destination country. That said: new immigrants reproduce about in-line with the poor in the destination country – who also reproduce ‘too fast’ for anybody’s liking – it’s just that the overwhelming bulk of immigrants are poor.

    The large first-cohort has significantly better economic prospects than their parents, and they are only slightly-more-fecund than the children of incumbents. By generation 2, fecundity settles to statistically the same as the incumbents.

    In other words, there is a ‘bump’ to the non-incumbent population, but it has very (very very) slight impact on the overall demography.

    The only way to get a significant tilt to the demographic ‘mix’ is to import a new cohort of non-incumbents, every single year. That is what has been happening, pretty much throughout the West – but an absolute key driver of this, has been the West’s malignant interference in the development path of the ‘Third World’.

    As to why immigrant women pursue ‘bad’ reproductive strategies: that, too, is straightforward.

    In subsistence societies, children are the only real investment good: when the things produced are perishable, families have no way to ‘save’ excess output except by feeding it to offspring. So you breed to the extent possible (in fact the optimal strategy is to have 2 pregnancies more than your output will feed, to account for child mortality), and raise your children to understand that they have an intergenerational commitment to care for you when you can no longer feed yourself.

    That is the way human societies worked for millennia, and it’s still the way things work in non-industrialised regions, even in advancing countries (e.g., South-East Asia, Latin America; Africa; and parts of Central and Eastern Europe).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. I have a pretty significant interest in demographic forecasting, and I can tell you that the chart for Africa will be wrong by more than 50% because it’s a pitifully naïve ‘electronic ruler’ projection that fails to account for rising prosperity.

    It’s the same shitful analytical method that was applied to the West up until the 50s, and generated Chicken Little-style Malthusian forecasts for Western poverty and starvation.

    Copy the next paragraph, and give me a solid shellacking if I turn out to be wrong.

    African population will stabilise in the mid-21st century at ~2.2 billion, and will decline at ~0.5%/year thereafter until it finally stabilises at ~1.5b in the early 2100s. Food security will be high and improving, and outward-migration will be a trickle.

    You see, the rapid rise in African population from 1950 to 2000-ish was driven by dramatic reductions in infant mortality and increases in adult life expectancy – because of increased hygiene, better access to medicine, and increased prosperity due to some very limited capital-deepening that started after the end of colonialism.

    Those key drivers are nowhere near half-finished, and were rising off very very very low bases… and as usual it took a while before the reduced infant-mortality risk started to influence African fertility rates.

    However it has done so, and the reproductive strategies of African women are already adapting – even though their material prosperity is still extremely low.

    In other words, that scary red curve will start to flatten well before 2070 (that’s where the UN’s bureaucrats have stuck the start of the ‘second knee’ in the sigmoid function). I would be surprised if it’s not actually flattening already.

    My best estimate is that Africa starts to find its feet in the next decade or so, and starts to exploit its mineral resources in ways that benefit its citizens (this will involve breaking contracts that were put in place as colonialism was in its death throes – which gave long-tailed contracts to French, Belgian, and English firms that ensured that the profits flowed to them not to local entities).

    Once that happens, and the median African starts to get some piddling fraction of the benefits that normally accrue to people who live atop vast mineral wealth (e.g., Australians)… their standard of living will rise faster than is currently expected, and the natural concomitant will be a dramatic fall in fertility.
    .
    .
    Another forecasting interest of mine (I have several) included how to model regional migration and how to evaluate whether immigration is welfare-enhancing or not (measuring ‘welfare’ by per-capita consumption, adjusted to account for changes in Gini coefficient).

    Turns out that for places with good data, the results are weakly-positive, even when the source of the immigrants is ‘bad’.

    France is an exception – mostly because the immigrants arrived with a valid grudge that stemmed from the colonial era: life would be better in France, but they were determined not to forgive. (That said: imagine the French soccer team without the Beurs and Blacks; likewise, the French military, police and gendarmerie would be even worse if it had to recruit from white French).

    Good examples:

    Australia, which had wave after wave of ‘undesirable’ immigrants (Chinese, then Irish, then Greeks and Italians, then Vietnamese, then Somali and other African, then Middle Eastern) – there were unambiguously positive results at T+30 for all ‘waves’ (obviously the last two waves cannot be evaluated yet). Looking at IQ scores for each wave, using the highest score that is no later than the time the wave happened… these were all “sub-80-IQ” populations.

    US, which also had Chinese, Irish, German, Italian (in the 19th and 20th century) at times when the best guess at the median IQ for these groups was ~80 at best. The economic effects of those waves were less positive than the Australian data, but nonetheless were clearly non-negative.

    England, which has had Pakistani and Indian, Kenyan and other African, and Eastern European (mostly Polish) ‘waves’… again, ‘sub-80-IQ’ cohorts. Result: again, weakly positive.

    France, where the biggest wave of migration was North African from the Maghreb (Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria) and also black-African (Cote d’Ivoire, Senegal, Cameroon, Cap Verde). Again, ‘sub-80-IQ’ cohorts; result was solidly negative.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  55. ” Very few of them will be white…” This applies to your Chinese wife and offspring. As a reminder, your Chinese wife and daughter voted for Obummer.

    You have to start writing about the other OTMs, the Chinese. They are causing lots of problems.

    They don’t have the intelligence to even grow good rice, their staple.

    https://www.amren.com/news/2018/04/a-chinese-scientist-stole-american-rice-and-will-spend-up-to-a-decade-in-prison/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    So here you are, the hen who always smearing China with oozing jealousy to John's Chinese wife & children.

    The problem these Chinese have in US, is they are generally too wealthy, highly intelligent IQ 105 vs your low 90, hardworking, well educated, well behave with no drugs or crimes, and much better looking than obese fat whites with frackles.

    So we men all desire to marry beautiful gentle Chinese or Asian women, they are perfect good obedient traditional wives, giving us a perfect warm family that you feminist can never provide.

    Man is borned to be bread winner, woman a home maker. Stupid western feminism value destroyed nature law, hence spiraling divorces, disharmony relationship and broken families.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. White supremacists are pissing themselves and it’s actually pretty funny.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  57. TT says:

    The world’s full of people like that, though: hundreds of millions, billions of them. If even a minor fraction of them—half a billion, say—settled in the U.S.A., we would have a radically different country. I rather like our country the way it is

    Then USA will be great again, greater than China in 2050, develop with US superior technology & free printing dollars.

    Many murkans are whining on China miraculous growth is simply due to US transferring of technology & fund working on cheap labour, Caldre is one foolish chap insisting that. So why not trial it on US to have a billion people enter & see if goes India or China direction. May be it will work like a charm.

    Anyhow, these caravans refugees look like peaceful Dreamers, just like all murkans & their (violent colonial) ancesters who migrate to US with dream, is there any different? Ask Amerindians, they know.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  58. TT says:

    There are some open cases. India may have a chance, Brazil possibly, Southeast Asia and some Arab countries.

    Black Africa, though, and most of Latin America north of the white “cone” nations—Chile, Argentina, Uruguay—… is it possible to have any hope for these places?

    Im surprise by John utter ignorant & uninformed statement that make him either been either sarcastic or mere murkan idiots.

    Cant you connect the dots, all these poor countries are subverted by US UK Nato? You make their countries poor, so unbearable poor, to enrich your unsustainable luxury wasteful lifestyle, 8% pp using (40%?) resources. Then you bombed them, sent in terrorists. So its rightful US should take in all who desire to escape from economic or security hardship created by your gov.

    I was just recently reading something about Venezuela. Four million people have fled the place. [Fleeing Venezuelans need refuge in the US, Latin America and elsewhere, By Alvaro Vargas Llosa, Fox News, March 31, 2018.] Inflation is six thousand percent per annum. There are food riots; people are eating their pets.

    And this is a country with major oil reserves!

    What’s that you say? “Resource curse“? Norway has major oil reserves; where is their resource curse?

    Yes, its resources curse, courtesy of the US lead West vultures. Everyone resource rich is fcuk by West.

    Go read in globalresearch why Venezuela is having food crisis & hyperinflation when they have world No1 proven biggest oil resources. Hint: They refused to subjugate to West exploitation.

    Since Prez Chevos nationalized oil assets, the US darling become a tyrant. Every US Potus are shrieking Venezuela is US National Threat, with sanction & invasion threat. Tillerson: ” we are not about to attack, but their army should do a coup”.

    CIA is waging asymmetric war to subvert this prosperous socialism country. Sanction, oil price depressing, CIA sabotaging, lot of counterfeit money is airborned to stir hyperinflation. CIA backed opposition are hoarding subsidized food to dump or sell off to neighboring countries.

    If so many poor countries without oil & socialism can have enough food, even Syria & Iraq under war, poor John you must be a real fool to believe Venezuelan is eating own pets.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. TT says:
    @HallParvey
    No. The graph, as most future projections do, fails to consider future change. It is based on the situation that now exists.

    After the Chinese have taken control of all of the important parts of Africa by simply supporting the local tribal chieftains, they will ensure that the population expansion is controlled. Birth control will be instituted on a practical basis.

    Remember that under Chairman Mao, China prohibited Chinese families from having more than one child. Abortions were widely available. Why should the Chinese have greater regard for Africans then they have for their own people.

    Control methods will include abortion, birth control pills, and the introduction of disease germs when necessary. Also available will be local wars between tribes with a history of animosity towards each other. Promoted by the Chinese. Secretly of course.

    Does that technique ring any bells with regard to the modern Middle Eastern situation?

    After the Chinese have taken control of all of the important parts of Africa by simply supporting the local tribal chieftains, they will ensure that the population expansion is controlled. Birth control will be instituted on a practical basis.

    Remember that under Chairman Mao, China prohibited Chinese families from having more than one child. Abortions were widely available. Why should the Chinese have greater regard for Africans then they have for their own people.

    Control methods will include abortion, birth control pills, and the introduction of disease germs when necessary.

    Mao never implemented birth control, its Deng. Why? After all the Japan & civil wars, worsen by Mao’s failed economy plan, many Chinese were starving. Few years of drought had most agriculture destroyed, many millions were starved to death with West grains embargo. Deng recognized without birth control, there will be foreseeable disaster.

    This birth control is applied on urbans only, scary abuses we heard are often due to officials eager to perform, not policy. My China friend told his father had 2 children in Beijing but refused to pay small fine out of principle till now, causing his municipal gov to get 1000x fine & punishment (no promotion) yet nothing they can do to him except regular persuasion.

    This birth control also not applicable on rural farmers who need many helpers or on minority ethnics.

    The world is lucky to have Deng & Chinese sacrifice, otherwise we will be flooded by many billions of Chinese hungry refugees by now. As Deng & Prez Xi said, the greatest contribution of China to mankind & the world is to feed a billion Chinese without giving the world a crisis. Now China is encouraging all to have 2 children.

    Poor Singapore under Lee Kuang Yew adopted similar policy in 1980′s, stop at 2, punished from 3. When Spore developed well, they implemented incentives for more children but too late.

    Under China Bri(Belt Road Initiative) or OBOR, Africa is growing well. Their corrupted politicians learn from Chinese that by making country prosp, a bigger cake give everyone more share. So Chinese are changing them positively.

    Also available will be local wars between tribes with a history of animosity towards each other. Promoted by the Chinese. Secretly of course.

    No one practise this art more skillful, refine & wider scale than US Nato, openly for last 100s yrs. They are still doing actively now to exploit resources & sabotage China Bri, in everywhere, Africa & ME. China prefer peaceful & prosperous world to buy their products, hence Bri goal.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Anon[232] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen
    " Very few of them will be white..." This applies to your Chinese wife and offspring. As a reminder, your Chinese wife and daughter voted for Obummer.

    You have to start writing about the other OTMs, the Chinese. They are causing lots of problems.

    They don't have the intelligence to even grow good rice, their staple.

    https://www.amren.com/news/2018/04/a-chinese-scientist-stole-american-rice-and-will-spend-up-to-a-decade-in-prison/

    So here you are, the hen who always smearing China with oozing jealousy to John’s Chinese wife & children.

    The problem these Chinese have in US, is they are generally too wealthy, highly intelligent IQ 105 vs your low 90, hardworking, well educated, well behave with no drugs or crimes, and much better looking than obese fat whites with frackles.

    So we men all desire to marry beautiful gentle Chinese or Asian women, they are perfect good obedient traditional wives, giving us a perfect warm family that you feminist can never provide.

    Man is borned to be bread winner, woman a home maker. Stupid western feminism value destroyed nature law, hence spiraling divorces, disharmony relationship and broken families.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    So we men all desire to marry beautiful gentle Chinese or Asian women,
     
    "All?!?!?!" Damn, stick a fork in white people, the race is done.
    , @attilathehen
    You obviously went native like Derbyshire.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Truth says:
    @Anon
    So here you are, the hen who always smearing China with oozing jealousy to John's Chinese wife & children.

    The problem these Chinese have in US, is they are generally too wealthy, highly intelligent IQ 105 vs your low 90, hardworking, well educated, well behave with no drugs or crimes, and much better looking than obese fat whites with frackles.

    So we men all desire to marry beautiful gentle Chinese or Asian women, they are perfect good obedient traditional wives, giving us a perfect warm family that you feminist can never provide.

    Man is borned to be bread winner, woman a home maker. Stupid western feminism value destroyed nature law, hence spiraling divorces, disharmony relationship and broken families.

    So we men all desire to marry beautiful gentle Chinese or Asian women,

    “All?!?!?!” Damn, stick a fork in white people, the race is done.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    " ... the race is done."

    Perhaps, but those of African ancestry will still be intellectually vacant and physically grotesque.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. SMK says: • Website
    @unit472
    The EU has the Dublin Accord where asylum seekers will be evaluated in the country the claim is initially made. Obviously this leaves Italy, Greece and Spain more exposed to unwanted migrants but it is a useful principle to observe globally. If you leave Honduras and cross Mexico you should not be given asylum in the US because your opportunities are greater there. Asylum is just that. A temporary status created by a 'well founded' fear of persecution by the GOVERNMENT of your own nation.

    Fear of crime , unemployment or even starvation maybe 'well founded' but they have nothing to with political asylum. We might have had 65 million Americans voters expressing a well founded fear of Donald Trump after the 2016 election but there is no nation on earth able to accommodate such a flood of people. In reality the only people with a legitimate claim to 'political asylum' might have been limited to those targeted by Robert Mueller. Lt. General Michael Flynn meets the standard as it obvious he was the victim of a politicized FBI engaged in a conspiracy against Flynn's boss.

    The sad reality is, given the numbers involved, people, no matter how horrible their situation, are not going to be able to go to another country to escape. The world is not big or rich enough therefore we need to end this idea of asylum for the masses.

    It’s all over, America is finished. Blessedly, I’ll be dead long before the U.S. is transformed into a nonwhite-majority hellhole of 400 and then 500 and then 600(?) million people. I’m so glad I don’t have children and especially grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. @Truth

    So we men all desire to marry beautiful gentle Chinese or Asian women,
     
    "All?!?!?!" Damn, stick a fork in white people, the race is done.

    ” … the race is done.”

    Perhaps, but those of African ancestry will still be intellectually vacant and physically grotesque.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    ...and alive...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. J.Ross says: • Website
    @Joe Wong
    Gun kills, it is a fact, otherwise military, the death machine, won't owns guns. Of course not all the death caused by gun, but getting rid of guns is the first step of removing violent death by crimes. One thing at a time, you have to start somewhere somehow, if you work at it, sooner or later you will get the US society civilized like the nations in Europe or Eastern Asia.

    But if you are looking for execuses not taking the first step, the US will be forever buried deep in the gun violence. Getting rid of guns is a reflection of the character of the nation.

    Yeah I still remember a BBC radio program praising Japan for its success in rounding up all their personally owned firearms. People like this have children and vote.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Truth says:
    @SunBakedSuburb
    " ... the race is done."

    Perhaps, but those of African ancestry will still be intellectually vacant and physically grotesque.

    …and alive…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @Anon
    So here you are, the hen who always smearing China with oozing jealousy to John's Chinese wife & children.

    The problem these Chinese have in US, is they are generally too wealthy, highly intelligent IQ 105 vs your low 90, hardworking, well educated, well behave with no drugs or crimes, and much better looking than obese fat whites with frackles.

    So we men all desire to marry beautiful gentle Chinese or Asian women, they are perfect good obedient traditional wives, giving us a perfect warm family that you feminist can never provide.

    Man is borned to be bread winner, woman a home maker. Stupid western feminism value destroyed nature law, hence spiraling divorces, disharmony relationship and broken families.

    You obviously went native like Derbyshire.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Z-man says:
    @Z-man

    There are persons of whom I can say that if, while watching a Netflix movie in my living room, I were to glance out my window and see that person covered in tar and feathers and being chased down the street by a jeering mob of my fellow-citizens, I would not rise from my Barcalounger and go to their assistance.
    Chuck Schumer‘s one, though. Paul Ryan’s another; and Nancy Pelosi, and Mitch McConnell, and Maxine Waters, and Lindsey Graham, and John McCain, and Luis Gutierrez, and Kamala Harris, and Steny Hoyer, and Elijah Cummings, and Jerry Brown, and …
     

    I have this wish that ‘Linda’ Graham, ‘Nutz’ McCain, Tom ‘pickin’ Cotton and, lets have a real Neochoen, Alan Douche-a-witz are put in a barrel and sent down the Niagra Falls. Just a pleasant thought.
     

    Well, Nutz McCain is almost gone so lets replace him with someone more virulent. Posters, have anyone in mind? We’ll take a poll!
     
    I have a new one, Mark Levin, a radio commentator who pronounces his name Le-vin. Oh, he needs to be tar and feathered and sent over the falls. (Grin)

    I know she’s a ‘lightweight’ (pun intended, lol) but Nutz McCain’s daughter can be added to my barrel over Niagara list. She is now a well paid slut on The View, that Judaic woman’s morning show that attacks the equally Judaic Donald Trump 24/7 and she spews the Republitard NEOCON party line like her doomed father.
    Jeeeesus forgive me. (Repentant emoji here)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Tiny Duck says:

    How does it feel?

    Knowing your ancestors will be People of Color and that all you hold dear will be shat upon?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Z-man
    That would be descendents not ancestors.
    , @Truth
    Well, the first part feels pretty damn good.
    , @Mr. Anon

    How does it feel?

    Knowing your ancestors will be People of Color and that all you hold dear will be shat upon?
     
    Your statement makes clear that all you and your kind have to offer the World is..............shit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Z-man says:
    @Tiny Duck
    How does it feel?

    Knowing your ancestors will be People of Color and that all you hold dear will be shat upon?

    That would be descendents not ancestors.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Truth says:
    @Tiny Duck
    How does it feel?

    Knowing your ancestors will be People of Color and that all you hold dear will be shat upon?

    Well, the first part feels pretty damn good.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. expat47 says:

    Studies on IQ, and it has been done by many groups, that the white IQ is in the 100 range, blacks in the 80 range. I forget the brown, am not familiar with the Chinese, although it could be above that of whites. There are around 26 million blacks in the U.S. and if the 80 range is correct we possibly have a whole bunch of dummies already here. The problem with the massive number of African and other nations started back in the 60′s by Ted Kennedy’s legislation who lied that it would not change the a ratio of the citizens here at that time. We could give back Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California to Mexico and they could pay us back the pennies on the dollars we paid them for some of it. Whatever happens, the country long ago became what it is today. I remember Slick Willie proudly acclaiming a white minority in 30 years. I heard it is now less than 30 years, It is too late to rectify the damage that has already been done. The N.W.O., want it and they will get what they want, Trump or whomever replaces him.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  72. “I wouldn’t even scold these caravanners as people intending to break our laws. In fact, they don’t actually aim to break any laws.”

    Wrong. They commit armed robbery by proxy the moment they set foot on US soil. They enjoy free food, electricity, healthcare, K-through-12 babysitting, and housing.

    These are not folks down on their luck accepting a shameful temporary handout while they look for work — they’re here with explicit purpose to consume tax-funded gibmedats, those taxes collected at gunpoint by Uncle Samantha.

    The only thing they bring to the table is a prodigious appetite.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  73. Meh add to R&D spending, build vertical farming with desalinated water.. it’s not difficult, then build roads and infrastructure. Just gotta not spend $5 trillion on war really.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  74. We always hear that the way to stop illegal immigration is to help people where they are.

    Actually, there’s a lot better reasons than that to do so.

    History shows that birth rates drop as the economic conditions improve, and NOT the other way around.

    History also shows that population control without economic improvements can only be achieved by force and infanticide, and even then they only work slightly. Economic conditions did more to control Chinese overpopulation that any hard fisted crackdowns by the Communist government.

    It also makes no sense to take away large families from peoples for whom nothing else in life brings joy or is worth living for. Any attempts to limit population without concurrent improvements in quality of life are doomed to failure – not to mention the misery it imposes on the poor people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  75. @Carlton Meyer
    I wrote about a solution to this game 16 years ago.

    http://www.g2mil.com/Jan2002.htm

    #1 Establish 24/7 federal courts to instantly hear deportation cases.

    Most American cities have continuous courts in session, like "night court", to quickly resolve minor legal issues without keeping people in jail for days. However, the entire US Court system runs on a formal "calendar" with regular hours and holidays. Because of the flood of immigration cases, the calendar has backlogged in many districts. Since it is impossible to detain most illegal immigrants who are arrested for several weeks until their hearing, hundreds of thousands are set free each year. This has become so well-known that one-third of those arrested for violating immigration laws demand a deportation hearing, even those caught "red-handed" crossing the border or presenting false passports or visas at airport arrival stations. As a result, 85% of those arrested who demand a hearing are freed in the USA after promising to appear a few weeks later; 90% of them never show. The recent "shoe bomb" terrorist was traveling with a forged passport. If he had preferred to enter the USA for terrorist activities, he may have been released into the USA despite his fake passport with a promise to appear at his deportation hearing.

    Tom Ridge should tackle this problem immediately by requesting the establishment of ten federal immigration courts in areas with high case loads. Ideally, some of these courts would be inside major airports, like: JFK, LAX, and Miami. He would request the appointment of 100 new magistrates and introduce the esteemed judges to military and police life of working nights, weekends and holidays so detainees who demand a hearing see a federal magistrate within hours of arrest. Aliens attempting to play the court game will be sent back across the border or put on a flight home within 24 hours. In other cases, the judge may determine that a mistake may have been made and order the suspect released, detained, or released on bond. Ironically, this will eventually save money each year because of lower prisoner detention and transport costs. Eventually, the illegal immigration game players will learn that the "demand a hearing" loophole has closed and the problem will subside. This will free Border Patrol agents to spend more time making "new" arrests and allow immigration officers to pursue those who overstay visas.

    #2 Aliens arrested in the USA are not eligible for political asylum.

    The "political asylum" game is well known in the Third World. A billion people on Earth are repressed and can present an excuse for asylum. They are welcome to apply at any US embassy or consulate overseas, or while they are legally visiting the USA. However, they should not be allowed that option after arrest for violating US law by entering illegally or overstaying their visa. Each year, thousands of people who are caught at US airports with a forged passports or visas demand "political asylum", and then are allowed to enter the USA anyway pending a hearing. Thousands more who are arrested for overstaying their visas or lacking any legal documents scream "political asylum" for prompt release. Over 90% never show up for their hearing.

    I wrote about a solution to this game 16 years ago.

    As we all know… solutions are easy to develop and implement… the government, however, has absolutely no interest in solving any problem…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Mr. Anon says:
    @anony-mouse
    If people can just walk up to a border point, ask for asylum and then walk right in, what good would a wall do?

    E-Verify OTOH...

    If people can just walk up to a border point, ask for asylum and then walk right in, what good would a wall do?

    1.) Stop Mexicans. As Mr. Derbyshire stated: “It doesn’t apply to persons from contiguous nations—Mexico and Canada—who can be refused entry.”

    2.) Send a clear message to the rest of the World: Go away. You are not wanted here. Uncle Sucker doesn’t live here anymore.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. Mr. Anon says:
    @Tiny Duck
    How does it feel?

    Knowing your ancestors will be People of Color and that all you hold dear will be shat upon?

    How does it feel?

    Knowing your ancestors will be People of Color and that all you hold dear will be shat upon?

    Your statement makes clear that all you and your kind have to offer the World is…………..shit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Mr. Anon says:
    @Joe Wong
    Gun kills, it is a fact, otherwise military, the death machine, won't owns guns. Of course not all the death caused by gun, but getting rid of guns is the first step of removing violent death by crimes. One thing at a time, you have to start somewhere somehow, if you work at it, sooner or later you will get the US society civilized like the nations in Europe or Eastern Asia.

    But if you are looking for execuses not taking the first step, the US will be forever buried deep in the gun violence. Getting rid of guns is a reflection of the character of the nation.

    One thing at a time, you have to start somewhere somehow, if you work at it, sooner or later you will get the US society civilized like the nations in Europe or Eastern Asia.

    Yeah. North Korea. Yugoslavia…………….civilized. And so peaceful.

    Your post is proof that even one Wong doesn’t make a White.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Factorize says:

    To accompany the most important graph in the world here is the most important map in the world.
    What happens when we start have to start begging people to move here?
    More importantly, what happens when every nation starts outbidding each other for migrants?

    Notice the deep blue world that starts to emerge around 2030. That will be about the time that we’ll realize how far up deep into the ocean we all are to demographic collapse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS