The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
“Taking A Knee”—Is Racial Separation the Answer?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
FootballAnthem

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Genuflecting is in the news—football players, mainly black ones, “taking a knee” during pre-game playing of the National Anthem. The most recent example, from this Sunday: teams kneeling before the anthem, and being booed anyway–NFL fans booed players for kneeling before national anthem and standing for it | NFL players tried to show support for the cause while not disrespecting the flag, but fans booed anyway, by Taylor Link, Salon.com, October 1, 2017. ] What’s up with that?

I can only give a personal take on this—not, I’m aware, a thoroughly American take.

I am an American, a citizen for fifteen years now, and very glad to be one; but I grew up elsewhere, in a monoracial country—England had few blacks, in just a few areas, until I was well into my teens. I came here as an adult, 28 years old. So I don’t see the American racial scene the way born Americans see it and grow up with it.

To an outsider like me, one very striking thing about that scene was the deep, hungry yearning among most white Americans to think well of blacks.

After the Civil Rights reforms of the sixties, there was a widespread sentiment that with the injustices of the past set aside, we ought to be able to get to a place where we would be all citizens together, equal under the law and regarding each other in a spirit of equality. It might take a few years (people felt) and need some temporary remedies—Affirmative Action, contract set-asides, and so on—but we should get there, and be a united, reasonably harmonious nation by, oh, the year 2000, for sure.

That was the mood in the early 1970s, as I perceived it.

And as I said, one part of it was a strong wish among whites to think well of blacks. Statistics bore this out. A survey in 1978 asked white Americans to estimate what proportion of black families were headed by a female. The estimates were from eight to twelve percent. The actual figure at the time was 21 percent. White people under-estimated black-white differences. They wanted to. They wanted to think well of blacks.

A lot of that yearning still persists. If you engage with the statistics much, you’re struck by how staggeringly big the black-white differences are—bigger than most people are aware, way bigger than estimates you’d get from average white Americans.

Try asking some white acquaintance how much more likely a random black American is to commit homicide, than a random white person. “Heck, I don’t know,” he’ll say, displaying considerable embarrassment at having been forced to think about the matter. “Is there really a difference? What is it, twice as likely?” The actual answer: six times as likely. [The Color Of Crime, New Century Foundation, 2016 (PDF) ]

If you replace “homicide” by “street robbery,” the multiplier is thirty times. You wouldn’t hear that as an estimate from any white person, though. White Americans just don’t want to think that badly of their fellow citizens.

Professional sports play into that yearning. I recall sitting in bars or private homes back in the seventies, when I was new to the States, watching football or basketball on TV. What jumped out at me was the peculiarity, the strangeness, of stadiums filled with mostly white people cheering on teams that were mostly black.

Occasionally I got the chance to talk to other expats like myself. Was it just me, or did they notice that strangeness, too?

Yes, they did. It wasn’t just me. That strangeness was a very American thing, a thing foreigners noticed.

The core issue there was patriotism—the American style of patriotism. White Americans love our country. We want to think well of it; we want foreigners to admire it. By the late 1960s, when there was a consensus among white Americans that blacks should have full equality under the law, there was an eagerness to welcome any kind of sign that blacks were doing well.

In professional sports, blacks do do well. So sports fed that yearning to think well of blacks.

Our own Steve Sailer, who is way more interested in sports than I am—you could hardly be less interested in sports than I am—has superb insights in this area. Here he was writing in Taki’s Magazine last week:

Blacks have come to dominate most positions in football, which reassures white conservatives of the fundamental fairness of American society. It’s difficult to believe the conventional wisdom in the press about how racist America is when the NFL is phenomenally popular despite being 68 percent black …

White spectators like to conceive of their team’s black players as defending the homeland. The ability of black football players to play as a team on Saturday and Sunday inclines whites to be more optimistic about blacks’ potential for pro-social order than might be warranted by what they observe on Monday through Friday.

Tackling Race, September 27, 2017

Reading passages like that, I find myself wondering again, for the umpteenth time, why shallow mediocrities like David Brooks or John Podhoretz have high-paid opinionating slots at major mainstream publications while Steve’s material is out beyond the fringes of respectability.

I don’t wonder for long, though, because I know the answer. It was spelled out for us a hundred years ago by T.S. Eliot: “Humankind cannot bear very much reality.” For broad marketplace appeal, tragic truth doesn’t stand a chance against feelgood falsehood.

What about black Americans, though? Those millionaire ball players, disrespecting the flag and the anthem like that—do they love the country?

Some of them, I’m sure, would insist that they do. The more literate ones, if there are any, might quote Senator Schurz at you: “Our country—when right to be kept right; when wrong to be put right.”

That’s not the strongest impression you get, though, watching those footballers take the knee. The strongest impression I got was, that I was looking at a bunch of spoiled brats.

Those hopes Americans had in the sixties and seventies, that the whole damned wretched race business would just go away under legal equality, came up against reality, and reality won. Unwilling to accept that, white Americans shifted to a different posture, a sort of paternalism.

When China was struggling to come to terms with modernity a hundred years ago, the writer Lu Xun said: “It seems that we Chinese just can’t treat foreigners as equals. We either look down on them as coarse, crude barbarians, or else we worship them as masters of science and democracy.”

American whites seem to be in some similar relation to blacks. Either blacks are an undeveloped, immature type of humanity, for whom endless excuses have to be made, or they are solemn, grave repositories of wisdom and high spirituality—Magic Negroes. The notion that they are just men and women like ourselves seems to be difficult to keep a firm grip on at any level above the one-on-one.

That first option, the paternalistic one, the infantilizing one, is the one we mostly opt for. It’s been the one mostly on display in coverage of the genuflecting footballers. They whine, they pout; they pretend they are oppressed, when by any objective standard they are petted and pampered; they sputter about “police brutality,” when all the statistics say the opposite thing. From Heather Mac Donald’s analysis of those statistics:

In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer … That 18.5 ratio undoubtedly worsened in 2016, in light of the 53 percent increase in gun murders of officers—committed vastly and disproportionately by black males.

All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides, New York Post, September 26, 2017

They stamp, and pout, and, sputter, and snarl; and white America smiles sadly, shakes its head, and says, “Well, what can you expect, poor things? After all that slavery and discrimination, all that prejudice …”

It is, as I said, like watching clueless parents dealing with spoiled children. They have no agency. They can’t help it.

Football may be our national sport; but the national pastime of white Americans, I often think, is making excuses for blacks.

The beginning of wisdom here: race realism. The truth about race is that it’s real, and the statistical differences between blacks and other races—in temperament, behavior, intelligence, and personality—are big and intractable.

You don’t like to hear “intractable“? Here’s a random news story from last week:

Education officials across California released their scores Wednesday, each highlighting what they saw as positive news in the data while lamenting the stubborn, and in some cases widening, achievement gap.

Despite decades of effort and billions of dollars in funding, test scores for white, Asian American and wealthier students are much higher than those of their black, Latino and low-income peers. On computerized tests administered in the spring, for example, just 19 percent of African American students were proficient in math, compared with 73 percent of Asian American students …

The achievement gap actually widened … including a 58-point difference between white and black San Francisco students in English—a 77 percent proficiency rate compared with 19 percent.

“Closing the opportunity gap remains our top priority,” said San Francisco Unified School District Superintendent Vincent Matthews.

California releases annual test scores — stagnant results, persistent gaps, by Jill Becker, SFGate, September 27, 2017

Lotsa luck there, Vince.

You might think, mightn’t you? that after all those “decades of effort and billions of dollars in funding,” reality is trying to tell us something.

One of Dr. Johnson’s friends had an unhappy marriage. Then the wife died, and the friend remarried. Johnson called this: “The triumph of hope over experience.”

ORDER IT NOW

The continuing yearning of white Americans to think well of our black compatriots is a triumph of patriotism over experience. The experience is all those futile “decades of effort and billions of dollars in funding.” The patriotism is the deep unwillingness to believe that our country, which we love, is fatally, structurally, flawed.

Well, is it? Is a harmonious multiracial society just not possible—beyond the design limits of human nature? Was Abraham Lincoln right when he told the freedmen that,

You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races … We suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated. [Address on Colonization to a Deputation of Negroes , August 14, 1862]

Well, maybe he was and maybe he wasn’t. But separation is no more feasible now than it was in 1862. We must struggle on forward as best we can, white and black alike.

I’m happy to give it my best shot, as an American. But I do wish, I so do wish, we could cut out the hypocrisy about “white privilege” and “police brutality,” and cut out the futility about “closing the gaps” and “fixing the schools.”

That’s my formula for an enlightened patriotism: for black and nonblack to face up honestly to reality, to our group differences, which aren’t anyone’s fault, except Mother Nature’s—as citizens united in a common enterprise, with a common collective fate as Americans.

Is it really impossible? I sure hope not. 2010-12-24dl[1] John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by VDARE.com com:FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Blacks, Political Correctness 
Hide 300 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Knee or no Knee, blacks are a threat because of BAMMAMA, or blacks are more muscular and more aggressive.

    Suppose every Negro athlete stood for the flag and got all sentimental and stuff. Really patriotic-like.

    The fact would remain that Negroes will continue to kick white boy butt in sports and hump white women and colonize white wombs while white males are relegated to wussy cuck status.

    No race can survive unless the women respect the men, especially as men don’t have power over women anymore.
    In the past, Jewish men had power over Jewish women as their society was patriarchal. So, even if Jewish men were oppressed by gentiles at times, Jewish men had power over Jewish women who had to respect Jewish men.
    But women are now no longer thumb of men. So, if a certain men are defeated by another men, the women of the defeated men don’t have to stick with them. They can go off with the winner men.

    Now, which race poses this threat to white males? Negroes.

    So, we should welcome more Negro hostility as such will justify separation. Whites need safe space from tougher and savage Negroes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    IOW, your wife / girlfriend left you for a negro.

    No worries though. How many euro white female, negro male relationships last?

    But what the hell, OJ is free, let's ask him.

    , @Pat Boyle
    Blacks are not bigger and blacks are not stronger. Blacks are faster (on foot).

    Asians are shorter and lighter. But blacks and whites are almost exactly the same heights and weights. Check the record books. Whites hold most of the records in sports like weight lifting or "World's Strongest Man". Blacks from West Africa hold all of the records in the sprints. Those from East Africa hold all of the marathon and distance races.

    The most popular spectator sports (basketball, football, and baseball) have a strong speed component. Hence blacks do very well in them. West African Blacks run faster probably because of their greater supply of 'fast twitch' muscle fibers but their are some skeletal features like longer limbs and narrower hips that also help.

    But of course the fastest men are not those who run but those who ride. The fastest race drivers, pilots and astronauts are all white.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /jderbyshire/taking-a-knee-is-racial-separation-the-answer/#comment-2027978
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Jivilov says:

    Spot on John, as usual. Your alien perspective demonstrates the superiority of cold-blooded “patriarchal” analysis over touchy-feely relativist romanticism or feel-good patriotism. There is no way out of this, as you say, although it’s a shame Lincoln didn’t double down on his initial plan for separation through colonization. Too late now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. The beginning of wisdom here: race realism. The truth about race is that it’s real, and the statistical differences between blacks and other races—in temperament, behavior, intelligence, and personality—are big and intractable.

    You didn’t mention muscle power, but that is crucial. If blacks were dumber and more aggressive but built like Gary Coleman or Emmanuel Lewis, would it matter? A chihuaua is nasty and snappy, but it’s a small dog. So most dogs don’t feel threatened by it. But take a pitfull that is tough and aggressive. Negroes are the pitbulls among the races.

    Professional sports play into that yearning. I recall sitting in bars or private homes back in the seventies, when I was new to the States, watching football or basketball on TV. What jumped out at me was the peculiarity, the strangeness, of stadiums filled with mostly white people cheering on teams that were mostly black.

    Surely, this no longer seems strange in Europe since French soccer team is mostly Negroid. And all ‘European’ sprinters are of West African descent: British, Dutch, French, Swedish, etc.

    In a way, the dominance of blacks in sports is fair since blacks are better. But then, the fact that blacks are better at sports means race-ism is real. So, in that sense, nature is ‘unfair’. Races are different, and some races are superior in different endeavors. Jews certainly kick everyone’s butt in brainy fields. Look at their dominance in elite institutions.
    It’s like Joe Louis and Jesse Owens didn’t demonstrate racial equality but racial superiority of blacks in kicking white butt. Muhammad Ali didn’t scream, “I’m equal”. He screamed “I’m the greatest after beating other boxers, black and white.”

    By the late 1960s, when there was a consensus among white Americans that blacks should have full equality under the law, there was an eagerness to welcome any kind of sign that blacks were doing well. In professional sports, blacks do do well. So sports fed that yearning to think well of blacks.

    It wasn’t just sports. Maybe music was more crucial. For adults, there was Nat King Cole and Johnny Mathis,and for young ones there was Chuck Berry and Little Richard and the Motown. Blacks have stronger voices than whites and certainly more than Mexicans and Asians.

    The problem wasn’t so much this yearning to think well of blacks. Whites DID sincerely think well of blacks in some areas. Problem was that, paradoxically enough, the very traits that made blacks entertaining and appealing to whites also made them dangerous and repulsive.

    Take black athletics. It’s fun to watch a powerful Negro like Tyson just knock everyone out. It’s like King Kong whupping a bunch of hapless baboons. It makes for great TV. But would you want such a Negro walking your streets? Ali was fun to watch, esp when making fun of Joe Louis and clobbering him in Manila. But who wants to integrate with loud-mouthed obnoxious jivers?
    Indeed, we see this paradox in jungle fever sex too. White women go with Negroes cuz black men seem so badass, tough, wild, punkass, hip, and big-donged. But THAT is precisely why they make lousy mates. Negroes are always looking for fresh pooters to plow and soon get tired of da ‘biatches’. So, we have all these white women as single mother with mulatto negrolets.
    And take blacks in comedy. I love watching Fred G. Sanford, Bubba, Aunt Esther, and others in Sanford and Son. They are like colorful loud cartoon characters. But too many of such people would make a neighborhood noisy and bit crazy. Granted, Sanfords(and the Jeffersons) are decent enough folks(and the family in Good Times too), but there are Negroes far worse, and they is crazy. This black zaniness is amusing to white folks from a distance. This is why even whites who never wanna live with blacks listen to rap music and imitate black lingo and stuff. We have kids in Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and etc imitating that stuff. They find it amusing.

    So, the problem isn’t a ‘yearning’ to like blacks. It’s that whites are crazy about certain aspects of blackness that have a dark side to them. It’s like people who love gambling really love gambling.. but overlook its dark side. It’s like people who really love sugary sodas really love it but ignore its negative affects on health.

    Even though civilization is maintained by work and morality and discipline, humans are still animals seeking thrills, excitement, and pleasure at the animal level. And sports, music, and sex bring main pleasure. And whites go wild about black sports, black thug music, and black twerking booties and black dongs. So, they cuck out to blacks for pleasure like hillbillies ‘cuck’ out to meth. They gotta have that hit. Black is the Crack for White America.

    Even though civilization is maintained by integrity and ideals(such as work ethic, truth, honesty, diligence, responsibility, etc), the animal-sensual side of us is drawn to the idols or idolatry. And Negroes, due to their wilder and tougher traits, have more idol-iconic value. Afrodolatry is much of American Culture which has become ‘Western Culture’(as EU is now just imitation US) and world culture(since all the world follows US soft power).

    But like meth will destroy a hillbilly, the black-as-crack will destroy white civilization because the black soul is savage and will destroy white manhood, and when white males lose manhood, white women will have kids with negroes, and the negro savage genes will spread all around.

    War on white males is a war on the entire white race, just like war on white females would be a war on the entire white race. White women cannot exist without white men, and white men cannot exist without white women. Every white woman is the product of white man and white woman. Every white man is the product of white man and white woman. So, the unity of white man and white woman is crucial. In the end, it isn’t feminism that drove a wedge between white men and white women. It is blacks.

    And as boatloads of black Africans come upon European shores and plant millions upon millions of blacks in white Europe, white wombs will be colonized by blacks. It will be sexual imperialism on a scale to match the Spanish conquest of Meso wombs in the New World. It will be Wombperialism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anona

    esp when making fun of Joe Louis...
     
    That was pretty funny, Joe's public image was cuckish.

    ... and clobbering him in Manila
     
    Missed that, unless you mean Joe Frazier, who really got clobbered in Jamaica, a couple of years earlier.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4-WjL8jIyQ
    , @Diversity Heretic
    Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around. But I don't think that they are really tougher than white men (uncucked). I know of no formidable aboriginal Bantu military forces that gave Europeans a tough fight in equatorial Africa. (The Zulus, by contrast, were formidable, but not Bantu.) When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They're aggressive, but not courageous.

    Like John, in the 1970s I thought that there would eventually be some kind of racial peace. Now I know it's not going to happen. But will whites be able to unite to resist their racial displacement in the United States as they become a smaller and smaller part of it?
    , @David In TN
    You're so stupid you confused Joe Louis with Joe Frazier.
    , @Grandpa Charlie
    I like that "Wombperialism" ... but, speaking as a man who was there, it really was feminism that drove wedge between white men and white women. OTOH, I did observe from a distance that within the inner circles of feminism, a certain type of black man ('professional blacks') were very successful in exploiting feminist leaders, who were often far onto the 'dowdy' side anyway. In the long run, however, the biggest wedge came from lesbians, imho. In this day and age, seems to me, the really big wedge is STDs like AIDS - or, who knows what is out there? That and the insane Republican campaign against birth-control of all kinds (such as the morning-after pill). I'm too old, but it is my settled opinion that human monkeys are always going to f*** more than is needed to maintain stable and sustainable population size, unless prophylactic constraints of some kind or another are applied.

    You do know, PF, that you are guilty of cherry-picking your data points in order to underpin your narrative. For example, while Jesse Owens is a great study, let's also discuss Jim Thorpe. And how about Michael Phelps, the most decorated Olympian of all times! Or, let's talk about the Decathlon. Yes, you have your recent example of Ashton Eaton ... who is, after all, as 'White' as he is 'Black', and whose White mother was a natural athlete and dancer (type of athlete). Anyway, my point is that the Decathlon fails to show " fact that blacks are better at sports."

    In any case, this blackism that you suggest, PF (but of course I understand that you do not support anymore than I do) reminds me of when Jean-Paul Sartre (in his essay on 'Existentialism Is A Humanism') wrote about an airplane trip he took where he sat next to two ladies who exclaimed without end about how "we" have come so far (in aviation and engineering) and "we" should be so proud of what "we" have accomplished. Sartre, as I recall was distinguishing what those nice middle-aged middle-class ladies said from humanism. It's like some Jews who think that Einstein proves intellectual superiority of all Jews. And anyway, I think the record may show that the award should go to Koreans, rather than to Jews. I once pointed that out to a young lady who, apparently Jewish, broke down into tears ... so be careful about all this stuff ... some people, especially those with egos weakened by being raised exclusively in a hothouse environment, come unglued as any little bit of truth approaches them ... it's like kryptonite, you know.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. joef says:

    blacks are an undeveloped, immature type of humanity, for whom endless excuses have to be made

    That pretty much sums the typical afro american up, despite all the convoluted denial from academia.

    They are also our most underrated national problem. With their antisocial violence growing, and an increasing parasitical relationship with the economy, it simply cannot be sustained in the longterm. You cannot have the rest of the nation supporting a sizable hostile percentage of the population (afros) indefinitely, something got to give.

    Racial seperation is the most humane answer because the other potential outcomes are worse. An afro declared r war will leave many of them dead, and an economic failed state will leave most of them starving. Unfortunately, despite hating whitey, they will never want separatism, because they know we are footing their bill. So they will continue to be a burden that we eventually will not be able to carry.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pat Boyle
    We do indeed seem to be headed towards racial separation. But in the somewhat longer run it's hard to see how we can avoid removing blacks altogether. It's not nice to think about, but unless many things change that looks like the end point of our development.

    If Western man and East Asians can continue to bring prosperity and progress ton the Earth then that day will be far in the future. But if we have some sort of large scale trouble then we may have a thinning of the herd along racial lines.

    Aside from sports and some entertainment positions already we have little use for blacks. They are more likely to be unemployed and pay no taxes. A substantial proportion of blacks who hold permanent jobs do so in 'make work' government jobs. If we were to have another depression with real economic suffering we might not be able to afford to carry the black population as we do now.

    Our easy prosperity allows us to believe in a number of racial myths. Blacks suffered rather less slavery than any other racial group. They suffered some discrimination too, but again probably less that the Irish or the Chinese in America. And of course black lives do not matter.

    Let's imagine what would happen if we had no black basketball players. The game of basketball would do just fine as it had before blacks played. By some absolute standard, an all white league would be inferior to the mostly black league we have now. But the white teams would be competitive with one another and presumably the stands would be filled - and that's all that matters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. El'geherg says: • Website

    I disagree. It is completely unfeasible for Whites and blacks to continue to live as one united people when in reality nothing unites us. They don’t want to live with me, beyond permitting me to work to fund their gibs, and I have no interest in dwelling alongside coloreds. Separation and now is the only path that might avoid major bloodshed in the near future.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rod1963
    Agree.

    Blacks and whites need to be segregated. Wherever blacks go they cause trouble and death. When their numbers grow the quality of life in that region is destroyed, whites flee and the area becomes a dead zone..

    This applies to schools, neighborhoods, businesses. etc. They are poison. Almost all whites if given the opportunity would not live next to them.

    However most whites do not want to face up to the fact that Blacks hate white society, tech and pretty much everything we do for them. You see among themselves blacks talk abotu "White man's science", "White man's medicine", they call us "ghosts", "crackers", "polar bears", etc. They go out of their way to name their kids anything but a white person's name. They go out of their way to act in ways whites dislike and make them feel uneasy.

    They don't care abotu MLK or the civil rights leaders. All they care about is extorting money from the white man so they can have "free s**t".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. KenH says:

    Try asking some white acquaintance how much more likely a random black American is to commit homicide, than a random white person. “Heck, I don’t know,” he’ll say,

    Oh sure, that’s what he’ll say to your face but deep down he knows the truth. That’s why he lives in a 95% white neighborhood and his daughters attend private white schools with only a few token blacks who are unrepresentative of the black population at large.

    Racial separation is the only answer. We’re allowed to separate from girlfriends, wives and fellow whites we aren’t compatible with but a desire to disassociate with blacks is white supremo-see and a major violation of the civil rights religion sure to invite government harassment and tyranny in “free” America.

    Familiarity breeds contempt and this is on display when whites and blacks are forced to live and work together in close proximity. We just rub each other the wrong way. Blacks are taught to hate whites practically from birth while whites are taught to judge blacks as individuals. This is unilateral disarmament for whites and racial suicide.

    It’s never going to work no matter how many billions more we spend on more racial set asides or how much whites get guilt tripped over slavery and belittled and browbeaten over their supposed privilege.

    Restoration of the freedom of association and the right to form race based communities is the only thing that can avert large scale interracial violence that’s on the horizon. But a certain (((group))) who Mr. Derbyshire dares not criticize will never let this commonsense approach come to fruition.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. What jumped out at me was the peculiarity, the strangeness, of stadiums filled with mostly white people cheering on teams that were mostly black.

    Not much difference in English soccer matches these days, though that was not the case when you and I were young, and it has occurred to me more than once that the failure of the English national soccer team to get further than the last 8 in major championships since 1966 might have something to do with several of the team members lacking the tactical sophistication that is needed to win at the highest level of the game . This seemed to be apparent when England were beaten in the European championship a couple of years ago by a team from Iceland, a country of 250,000 blonde people that does not even have a professional soccer league. Their team played well and stuck to a tactical plan that defeated the greater speed and physicality of many of the England players who would have been regarded as strong favorites to beat the Icemen.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.

    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.

    In a way, it may seem counter-intuitive that blacks are SO ANGRY. The bad ole days of ‘white racism’ are now history, a thing of the past. Blacks are big in music and sports. A mulatto , the product of a black guy humping a white woman, became president and was re-elected. Oprah is revered by many. Beyonce and black idols dominate the charts. Sports are blacker than ever. So, blacks should be happier and less hateful. Based on ‘progress’ and ‘justice’, this is true.

    But humans emotions outrun human ideas. And the human organism feels contempt for the weak. It respects what it fears. Even if it hates what it fears, it has respect for it and with respect comes admiration.

    Look how the Japanese acted terribly toward the Chinese, the ‘sick man of Asia’. But when US totally kicked Japanese butt, the Japanese were cucky-sucky to Uncle Sam. They worshiped McCarthur as shogun-god. And Japan has been America’s geisha ever since. Never mind US firebombed the hell out of Tokyo and dropped two big ones. Never mind recent revelations showed US planned to nuke 12 more cities if Japan didn’t surrender. Japanese got beaten so badly that they came to respect the US like something akin to Godzilla. A fearsome badass monster nation.

    And in the past, blacks felt this way. Sure, blacks were filled with hate and resentment against whites who called them ‘ni**er’ and drew funny ‘coon’ faces. But white man seemed fearsome back then. If some negro raped a white woman, these fearsome white men would come in hoods and hang a Negro from a tree and scare the bejeesus out of Negroes. So, the Negro thought, ‘dang, white man aint nothing to mess with. He baaaaaad.’ So, the Negro tried to prove that he’s a credit to his race. He wanted to prove that he is worthy to live along the mighty horrifying-ass white man. He felt toward whitey like a Japanese felt toward Americans after defeat WWII. “You kicked my ass, and I kiss your ass and beg your approval and acceptance.”

    So, even though things were worse for blacks in the past, blacks truly feared white folks and with that fear came not only hate but respect and admiration. It’s like Hindus respected the Brits because a handful of Brits were so masterful in ruling over a bunch of messy disorganized cow-worshipers whose national odor was curry.

    But look how things changed so drastically. Compare 1915, the year that saw the release of THE BIRTH OF A NATION with 2015, the year of Obama and the Cuck.

    Back in 1915, there was the KKK as a real force, a show of white solidarity against blacks. And Woodrow Wilson was approving of the Klan as he felt disdain for the Negroes.
    People like to think that history is moved by ideas, values, and culture. And that would be the case in a more repressed and morally-centered social order. In Muslim societies, natural forces were held in check by Islamic codes and strict morality. So, even blacks in Arab nations had to watch themselves. If they acted funky and stuff in front of Arab women, they’d be whupped and killed on the spot. And US used to be more moral and conservative. But with the rise of popculture and hedonism, animal energies of human nature began to shape history and society more, and this esp exploded with rise of youth culture that was significantly influenced by black music centered around sexual energies. Also, the black success in sports and the rise of celebrity led to narcissism of black savagery. So, there has been an acceleration of history based on natural urges. Francis Fukuyama focused only on ideas, the hegelian struggle between ideologies. And once capitalism and liberalism won, he figured it was end of History with big ‘H’. But he neglected to notice that as the Cold War progressed, ideology mattered less than idology. Western Culture was less and less about philosophy and art than about fun and fever. And the biggest ‘western’ threat to communist nations wasn’t Ayn Rand and Adam Smith but Elvis and Beatles and Hollywood. So, even if History came to an end, there was now Beastory. With idols over ideals, human history is now driven by beast energies. Even spirituality is no longer about religions with depth of tradition and contemplation but about new sensations, like homomania and negromania. Homos are so loud and flamboyant. Negroes are so wild and rambunctious. Homos and Negroes are so into self-worship that they expect all others to worship them. Any refusal is heresy in their eyes. They got idol-god-complex.

    [MORE]

    As far as blacks are concerned, history has been replaced by Fistory. Black fist is most mighty. Some even say the Washington Monument is really about the black dong.

    https://criticxxtreme.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/the-yes-they-were-black-series-worshipping-a-big-black-penis-osiris/

    With sports, music, and sex — the only things that matter in our globalist idolized culture — dominated by blacks, and with blacks showing NO INTEREST in anything but themselves in pop culture, why would blacks respect whitey anymore? Sure, blacks justify their contempt and hostility in terms of ‘white racism’ and ‘police brutality’. They make it sound like they are still the underdogs. But if we look past the rhetoric, black hate is not about fear of white power(oppression) but about contempt for white weakness. Here are black athletes dominating the fields with white cheerleaders putting out to them. They see all these soft slow white boys cheer them on like gods and heroes. They see all these lame white boys imitating rappers. They hear about cuck culture, that white men are inviting black men to hump their women. Why would blacks respect this kind of loser wuss?
    If white power today was like it was 100 yrs ago, I guarantee all blacks would be standing for the anthem. Even if they’d hate white power, they would respect it as badass. But they now see whites as so weak. And this hostility isn’t just at white ‘racists’ but white dweeberals. I mean, black guys despise Christopher Hayes and Anderson Cooper just as much. Dorks and dweebs.

    As far as they are concerned, they kick white boys’ ass and hump white women and colonize white wombs…. but white boys are welcoming THIS as ‘american as apple pie’.

    White America is now utterly disgusting, and black athletes and blacks in general have every reason to feel nothing but contempt for such weakness and cuckery.

    But then, it’s the same with Jews. Jews long felt resentment for Wasps. But there was fear and respect too. Anglos seemed so great and awesome in having created much of the modern world in economics and science and politics. And Jews thought it would take a long hard climb to reach the top. But what happened? Jews rose so fast and WAsps fell so fast. Jews began to feel contempt for these cucky-wuck wasps, and now, Jews expect white goys and girls to just cuck out to Jews like servile dogs. And the more whites try to appease Jews, the more contempt Jews feel for these dogs.

    Some say ‘nice guys finish last’. No, the issue isn’t niceness. It is weakness. Weakness is held in contempt. It is, at best, an object of compassion. Otherwise, it is wussy.

    To blacks, past history seems especially insulting since they now realize that they’d been enslaved and oppressed by a bunch of wussies and dorks. If chimps were oppressed by gorillas, they would at least respect superior gorilla strength. But if chimps were to realize that they’d been kicked around by weaker gibbons, they’re gonna feel extra hatred for the gibbons. The oppression would seem even more unjust since it violated not only morality but nature. If whites are bigger and stronger than blacks, blacks today might bitch about slavery as moral injustice but not as natural injustice. After all, nature is about rule of strong over the weak: lions over hyenas, hyenas over jackals, jackals over rabbits, etc. Once blacks realized that whites are the weaker race, they began to see slavery as not just moral wrong but natural wrong. How dare these wussy-ass white boys rule over blacks? It’d be like gorillas discovering they’d been kicked around by a bunch of chimps.

    Indeed, the reason why blacks hate the police so much is because police power goes against their instinctive savage sense of jungle justice. In sports, the only justice that matters is toughness. So, the strongest boxer wins. The toughest football players dominate the field and win the games. And blacks dominate sports because they are tougher. For savage blacks, this seems just and fair as their emotions are of the Rule of the Law of the Jungle. In sports, blacks totally dominate, and white man is a wussy bench-warmer or cucky waterboy.

    Then, how come white cops have power over blacks? Now, sane people would say police arrest black criminals and the like, but that is a matter of legal justice, an idea that makes little sense to savage blacks whose only sense of right or wrong is jungle justice. Blacks think like rappers, and rap logic is Rule of the gangster. So, blacks are less outraged by black thugs killing black thugs. It’s like sports. It’s jungle justice based on who be more ‘badass’. But then, these white police come to mess up that game. With special ‘white powers’, they gain control over blacks and drag them into police stations and even shoot some of them. If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy’s ass. That seems just to blacks. But with legal power and badges, white cops have power over stronger and tougher blacks..and that just seems ‘unjust’ to blacks whose idea of justice is ‘who can whup whose ass?’

    Because blacks are so savage and only have pop culture as mainstay of culture, they’ve come to worship themselves as a god-race. This is why data and facts don’t matter and have no effect on racial discourse that, for blacks and cucky whites, is a religious issue of Holy Negroes. Facts are useless against Faith.
    It’s like Mao was a godlike figure in China. So, stats didn’t matter. It didn’t matter that Great Leap Forward killed tens of millions. It didn’t matter that by objective measures, China was worse under Mao. Religion is about faith, not about facts. Once Mao was idolized, it didn’t matter what he did. He was above all that went wrong since he was a sacred icon.
    And blacks, Jews, and homos have such iconic power in the West. So, facts and data make no dent in the black narrative. Even most secular people are emotionally religious and cling to sacred icons. They were raised worshiping MLK, Ali, Oprah, Bob Marley, and rappers as holy icons. So, it doesn’t matter if they are told of black crime stats. They keep worshiping the icons.. like Soviets raised on Stalin-worship just believed and believed in Great Stalin despite the obvious factual evidence of the horrors of Stalinism.

    This is the danger of worshiping people and things. Best reason for worship in God is not that God exists. He doesn’t. It’s that those who don’t worship God will almost always worship something else. The current West now worships the most savage and most destructive of all races.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.
    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.
     
    You are basically correct, which is substantiated from my own experiences growing up near the afro urban ghetto, and going to integrated public schools with them. But I will enhance your argument with a little bit of empirical experience. Afros chose easy targets, and did not like hard fighting. It is true boxers, and football players, had to get accustomed to challenges, but that was the exception, and not the rule, among the urban afro ghetto dwellers.

    Also the afro who was a drug gang enforcer, or who ran the corner, was tougher than the average afro. You generally did not want to mess with them. However, generally afros avoided fighting strong/tough White guys. They picked the weak soft targets to victimize, and avoided strong hard targets. [they mostly more show than go].

    Blacks began to dominate boxing/football as Whites started to pursue academic goals, & careers, instead of physical activities. As white flight left for suburbia, they left the inner city boxing gym behind. The second issue is that afros have a lot of down time (provided by the welfare state) to perfect their game, whereas Whites had work, and other obligations/responsibilities, that limited their time available to train.


    If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy’s ass.
     
    This is not well supported by my observations. Urban afros would frequently fight with the police that are trying to arrest them, and would lose many times. At times you would see the afro actually crying about wanting to make a civilian complaint, even when he initiated the physical confrontation part of the arrest (instead of going quietly). Afros are like predators in the wild, they go after the weak. They usually do not attack unless they believe they have some sort of unfair advantage (or by fighting with the police, trying to enhance their reputations in the ghetto).

    From my great experience, out of all the urban White working class vs afro ghetto fights, the afros lost the majority of the time. The only time they will go after a strong White guy is when either they are armed, or outnumber their opponent. Many Whites, who did not have direct experience dealing with urban ghetto afros, have a distorted mythical belief in afro physical prowess (or are a fearful lib wimp who wants to pander to the afro).

    One anecdotal story that illustrates well the urban ghetto afro mentality: an acquaintance from the neighborhood, who worked solo on a delivery truck, and was a physically strong weightlifter, was confronted by an afro robber armed with a knife. The afro robber demanded money from his potential White victim, to which my acquaintance pulled out his own knife and said "lets go nig...". Upon seeing the knife, the afro stated "man you did not pull no knife, I was only goin to robbs you" (sic), and began to back away in full retreat.

    , @Mark Green
    Excellent post, Priss. But do not overlook the poisonous impact of 1) the highfalutin US Supreme Court and 2) the anti-white MSM which steers 'right-thinking' intellectuals (and jurists) towards sappy, wrong-headed solutions.

    The courts (together with judicial activists) as well as our dominant media have worked hand in hand to transform our formerly white, English-speaking civilization into something coarse, vulgar, and unrecognizable. And they're not done yet. The antifa crusade to 'stop fascism' (resistance) is being aided by the courts as well as our dominant media. This pattern will continue.

    The SCOTUS (with our MSM cheering them on) has gutted freedom of association and irrevocably undermined America's founding stock. There's trouble ahead. America is unraveling.

    , @ThreeCranes
    Fun stuff Priss, and largely true, but you should compare apples to apples. Sure black athletes can stomp girly-boy, I-phone pecking white teens but were they to come up against guys like these it would be a different story.

    According to the most realistic assessment of a black man's worth relative to a whites, the 3/5 slave law established that 6 whites were as productive as 10 blacks. (some mistakenly believe the 3/5 law only related to maintaining a balance in elections but this is shallowly mistaken. invisible hand economics ultimately distributed population according to productive capacity north/south). Blacks just can't work as long and as hard as whites. They're weak sisters.



    http://www.mendorailhistory.org/images/logging/kinsey/kinsey_11.jpg

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Logging_in_Washington_state_by_Darius_Kinsey.jpg

    http://content.lib.washington.edu/clarkkinseyweb/images/fallerswithlargetree.jpg
    , @ThreeCranes
    You're so close, Priss. Just a little change in emphasis will bring you on target.

    Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work. In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women's work. When they got to America they were forced to do work that they regarded as women's and this demeaned them. They resent that to this day.

    When they finally figured out how hard white men worked they were incredulous. If they had whitey's power they would have made beasts of burden out of their many wives, but white men were too kind-hearted to do that. That smacked of weakness which as you say, they don't respect.

    When blacks get to run things, women will be slave/animals once again. There will be no laws against rape because their society doesn't acknowledge women's rights to control who will hump her and when he will do it.

    Blacks don't mind working at football and basketball because it's basically war, which they're genetically geared for.

    In the end, blacks are incompatible with white civilization because while they were naturally selected for hunting and fighting, science and technology require patience, intelligence and fine tuning.
    , @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    Great piece! I like your observation about white weakness.

    On a similar note, back when whites dominated the world, Moslems imitated whites. I saw a picture dating from 1928 of the Queen of Afghanistan wearing conventional 1920s women's clothing with bobbed hair and a cloche hat. No head bag, much less a burka. The comeback of Moslem garb and headbags coincided with the perception of the West as weak and decadent. If a non-Moslem, non-Western nation such as China becomes dominant and pushes the Moslems around, many Moslems may imitate Chinese styles and culture and the headbag will again disappear. The Chinese are giving Chinese Moslems are hard time now, demanding that Korans and prayer rugs be turned over to authorities.

    Everybody loves a winner.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Beside their ultra-high criminality, Afros are reliable voters for democrats and neocons, which is the same thing as being seditious with respect to the US constitution..

    There is no short term solution other than separation.

    I suggest that the state of Georgia be re-designated as an independent nation of Afro-Diversity, and that all American-Afros be re-located to the new state ASAP.

    I also suggest that a reinforced fence be built around the new state of Afro-Diversity.

    American Afros that refuse to re-locate to the new state of Afro-Diversity should be required to forever lose their voting rights in the US.

    If the new nation of Afro-Diversity is successful, then feminist and queers of diversity can also be seriously considered for their own similarly independent state too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Derbyshire, actions speak louder than words. Send your Chinese wife and offspring back to China. Set the example. You can go with them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Note the regularly scheduled Jewish distraction.
    , @anon
    Yo idiot; Chinese are to the right side of whites on the bell curve. His kids will likely be superior on the HBD scale compared to you.
    , @Wally
    Are Chinese doing what low IQ blacks do?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    Derbyshire, actions speak louder than words. Send your Chinese wife and offspring back to China. Set the example. You can go with them.

    Note the regularly scheduled Jewish distraction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    “It seems that we Chinese just can’t treat foreigners as equals. We either look down on them as coarse, crude barbarians, or else we worship them as masters of science and democracy.”
     
    LOL, hey I gotta agree with Attila there, Derb. If there is racial separation, you are going to have to do one of those sitcom joints where you divide the house in half with yellow tape, kitchen, bed, stove and all, and each race must stay on its own side.

    Are you going to get the left side of the kids or the right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. anona says:
    @Priss Factor
    The beginning of wisdom here: race realism. The truth about race is that it’s real, and the statistical differences between blacks and other races—in temperament, behavior, intelligence, and personality—are big and intractable.

    You didn't mention muscle power, but that is crucial. If blacks were dumber and more aggressive but built like Gary Coleman or Emmanuel Lewis, would it matter? A chihuaua is nasty and snappy, but it's a small dog. So most dogs don't feel threatened by it. But take a pitfull that is tough and aggressive. Negroes are the pitbulls among the races.

    Professional sports play into that yearning. I recall sitting in bars or private homes back in the seventies, when I was new to the States, watching football or basketball on TV. What jumped out at me was the peculiarity, the strangeness, of stadiums filled with mostly white people cheering on teams that were mostly black.

    Surely, this no longer seems strange in Europe since French soccer team is mostly Negroid. And all 'European' sprinters are of West African descent: British, Dutch, French, Swedish, etc.

    In a way, the dominance of blacks in sports is fair since blacks are better. But then, the fact that blacks are better at sports means race-ism is real. So, in that sense, nature is 'unfair'. Races are different, and some races are superior in different endeavors. Jews certainly kick everyone's butt in brainy fields. Look at their dominance in elite institutions.
    It's like Joe Louis and Jesse Owens didn't demonstrate racial equality but racial superiority of blacks in kicking white butt. Muhammad Ali didn't scream, "I'm equal". He screamed "I'm the greatest after beating other boxers, black and white."

    By the late 1960s, when there was a consensus among white Americans that blacks should have full equality under the law, there was an eagerness to welcome any kind of sign that blacks were doing well. In professional sports, blacks do do well. So sports fed that yearning to think well of blacks.

    It wasn't just sports. Maybe music was more crucial. For adults, there was Nat King Cole and Johnny Mathis,and for young ones there was Chuck Berry and Little Richard and the Motown. Blacks have stronger voices than whites and certainly more than Mexicans and Asians.

    The problem wasn't so much this yearning to think well of blacks. Whites DID sincerely think well of blacks in some areas. Problem was that, paradoxically enough, the very traits that made blacks entertaining and appealing to whites also made them dangerous and repulsive.

    Take black athletics. It's fun to watch a powerful Negro like Tyson just knock everyone out. It's like King Kong whupping a bunch of hapless baboons. It makes for great TV. But would you want such a Negro walking your streets? Ali was fun to watch, esp when making fun of Joe Louis and clobbering him in Manila. But who wants to integrate with loud-mouthed obnoxious jivers?
    Indeed, we see this paradox in jungle fever sex too. White women go with Negroes cuz black men seem so badass, tough, wild, punkass, hip, and big-donged. But THAT is precisely why they make lousy mates. Negroes are always looking for fresh pooters to plow and soon get tired of da 'biatches'. So, we have all these white women as single mother with mulatto negrolets.
    And take blacks in comedy. I love watching Fred G. Sanford, Bubba, Aunt Esther, and others in Sanford and Son. They are like colorful loud cartoon characters. But too many of such people would make a neighborhood noisy and bit crazy. Granted, Sanfords(and the Jeffersons) are decent enough folks(and the family in Good Times too), but there are Negroes far worse, and they is crazy. This black zaniness is amusing to white folks from a distance. This is why even whites who never wanna live with blacks listen to rap music and imitate black lingo and stuff. We have kids in Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and etc imitating that stuff. They find it amusing.

    So, the problem isn't a 'yearning' to like blacks. It's that whites are crazy about certain aspects of blackness that have a dark side to them. It's like people who love gambling really love gambling.. but overlook its dark side. It's like people who really love sugary sodas really love it but ignore its negative affects on health.

    Even though civilization is maintained by work and morality and discipline, humans are still animals seeking thrills, excitement, and pleasure at the animal level. And sports, music, and sex bring main pleasure. And whites go wild about black sports, black thug music, and black twerking booties and black dongs. So, they cuck out to blacks for pleasure like hillbillies 'cuck' out to meth. They gotta have that hit. Black is the Crack for White America.

    Even though civilization is maintained by integrity and ideals(such as work ethic, truth, honesty, diligence, responsibility, etc), the animal-sensual side of us is drawn to the idols or idolatry. And Negroes, due to their wilder and tougher traits, have more idol-iconic value. Afrodolatry is much of American Culture which has become 'Western Culture'(as EU is now just imitation US) and world culture(since all the world follows US soft power).

    But like meth will destroy a hillbilly, the black-as-crack will destroy white civilization because the black soul is savage and will destroy white manhood, and when white males lose manhood, white women will have kids with negroes, and the negro savage genes will spread all around.

    War on white males is a war on the entire white race, just like war on white females would be a war on the entire white race. White women cannot exist without white men, and white men cannot exist without white women. Every white woman is the product of white man and white woman. Every white man is the product of white man and white woman. So, the unity of white man and white woman is crucial. In the end, it isn't feminism that drove a wedge between white men and white women. It is blacks.

    And as boatloads of black Africans come upon European shores and plant millions upon millions of blacks in white Europe, white wombs will be colonized by blacks. It will be sexual imperialism on a scale to match the Spanish conquest of Meso wombs in the New World. It will be Wombperialism.

    esp when making fun of Joe Louis…

    That was pretty funny, Joe’s public image was cuckish.

    … and clobbering him in Manila

    Missed that, unless you mean Joe Frazier, who really got clobbered in Jamaica, a couple of years earlier.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. A bit mystified why so many people who claim they really, really want to live apart from non-Whites choose to live in areas with lots of non-Whites.

    Looking down the list of Unz writers practically every one lives in places like greater LA, SF, DC or NY.

    Certainly not in greater Podunk, or even in any state like ND, ID, IA. ME, VT or NE.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. Truth says:
    @Anon
    Note the regularly scheduled Jewish distraction.

    “It seems that we Chinese just can’t treat foreigners as equals. We either look down on them as coarse, crude barbarians, or else we worship them as masters of science and democracy.”

    LOL, hey I gotta agree with Attila there, Derb. If there is racial separation, you are going to have to do one of those sitcom joints where you divide the house in half with yellow tape, kitchen, bed, stove and all, and each race must stay on its own side.

    Are you going to get the left side of the kids or the right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Thanks Truth. Here's an interesting post regarding the Vegas shooting:

    Apparently Milo Y. tweeted out the following:

    Follow
    Dangerous faggot @MiloYiannopfans
    #Facts
    Suspects Wife is a Asian Muslim
    Suspect shooter is a Registered Democrat
    Suspects Traveled Multiple times to Middle East#LasVegas
    5:37 AM - Oct 2, 2017
    14 14 Replies 68 68 Retweets 81 81 likes

    Someone else tweeted that Vegas is gun free zone.

    It's illegal to own a machine gun so we need to find out who provided this weapon.

    Can anyone in Vegas confirm some of this?

    Asian Muslim wife?

    Always cherchez la femme/le homme of a person.

    Derbyshire is destroying the West.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    Derbyshire, actions speak louder than words. Send your Chinese wife and offspring back to China. Set the example. You can go with them.

    Yo idiot; Chinese are to the right side of whites on the bell curve. His kids will likely be superior on the HBD scale compared to you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    anon - are you Jewish, Asian, involved with Asians? The Chinese are notorious test cheaters and thieves. This has been documented by Steve Sailer.

    Why is it necessary for China (and all other Asians) to copy the West? Why didn't the Industrial Revolution start in Asia? Why are the Chinese constantly stealing Western technology? Why do Asians get plastic surgery to look more Western?

    Charles Murray's first wife was Thai and he has Thai offspring. He is a degenerate like Derbyshire who will automatically favor Asians.
    , @eah
    All the more reason they have to go back -- the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids -- eg look into the enormous over-representation of Asians at the Univ of California, where at some campuses they are 2x, 3x, or more over-represented -- and due to the reality of the underachievement of Hispanics and Blacks, above a level that represents proportionality, every Asian admitted means a deserving (ie they meet minimum admission requirements) white kid is not admitted -- it's as simple as that -- this is America, after all -- a nation that Whites built -- why should we allow immigration to disadvantage our own children?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. How about separation followed by a race war?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "How about separation followed by a race war?"

    Ho-hum, another pasty faced armchair warrior basking in the glow of St. Brievik. Listen, we all know you are too impotent to engage in such actions in light of the severe consequences. Thankfully, you are merely blowing off steam on a blog.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. Wally says:
    @Priss Factor
    Knee or no Knee, blacks are a threat because of BAMMAMA, or blacks are more muscular and more aggressive.

    Suppose every Negro athlete stood for the flag and got all sentimental and stuff. Really patriotic-like.

    The fact would remain that Negroes will continue to kick white boy butt in sports and hump white women and colonize white wombs while white males are relegated to wussy cuck status.

    No race can survive unless the women respect the men, especially as men don't have power over women anymore.
    In the past, Jewish men had power over Jewish women as their society was patriarchal. So, even if Jewish men were oppressed by gentiles at times, Jewish men had power over Jewish women who had to respect Jewish men.
    But women are now no longer thumb of men. So, if a certain men are defeated by another men, the women of the defeated men don't have to stick with them. They can go off with the winner men.

    Now, which race poses this threat to white males? Negroes.

    So, we should welcome more Negro hostility as such will justify separation. Whites need safe space from tougher and savage Negroes.

    IOW, your wife / girlfriend left you for a negro.

    No worries though. How many euro white female, negro male relationships last?

    But what the hell, OJ is free, let’s ask him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I never cease to be amazed at the things you say under cover of anonymity that you wouldn't dare say to someone in person, lest they beat you to a bloody pulp. At 68 years old and all of five feet tall, it's not hard to imagine why.
    , @Alden
    Wally, you're so right about Priss Factor, he's really off his meds today. How many White women have a black baby every year??? 10,000 maybe? It's mostly an 18 year meal ticket to get on welfare. And how many White men watch black sports every year and contribute to the 10 million dollar a year salaries and massive tax subsidies to the owners? It's probably about 100 million.

    They are both race traitors, White women who have black babies and White men who watch black sports. But the black sports watchers are vastly more and contribute vastly more to the myth that blacks belong in White society.

    Don't cast the first stone if you watch black sports.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Wally says:
    @attilathehen
    Derbyshire, actions speak louder than words. Send your Chinese wife and offspring back to China. Set the example. You can go with them.

    Are Chinese doing what low IQ blacks do?

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Wally, what are your stats? Jewish? Involved with Asians?

    The Chinese are a little bit smarter than blacks so you can more out of them.

    But we don't need them in the West.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Rod1963 says:
    @El'geherg
    I disagree. It is completely unfeasible for Whites and blacks to continue to live as one united people when in reality nothing unites us. They don't want to live with me, beyond permitting me to work to fund their gibs, and I have no interest in dwelling alongside coloreds. Separation and now is the only path that might avoid major bloodshed in the near future.

    Agree.

    Blacks and whites need to be segregated. Wherever blacks go they cause trouble and death. When their numbers grow the quality of life in that region is destroyed, whites flee and the area becomes a dead zone..

    This applies to schools, neighborhoods, businesses. etc. They are poison. Almost all whites if given the opportunity would not live next to them.

    However most whites do not want to face up to the fact that Blacks hate white society, tech and pretty much everything we do for them. You see among themselves blacks talk abotu “White man’s science”, “White man’s medicine”, they call us “ghosts”, “crackers”, “polar bears”, etc. They go out of their way to name their kids anything but a white person’s name. They go out of their way to act in ways whites dislike and make them feel uneasy.

    They don’t care abotu MLK or the civil rights leaders. All they care about is extorting money from the white man so they can have “free s**t”.

    Read More
    • Agree: joef
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. @Priss Factor
    The beginning of wisdom here: race realism. The truth about race is that it’s real, and the statistical differences between blacks and other races—in temperament, behavior, intelligence, and personality—are big and intractable.

    You didn't mention muscle power, but that is crucial. If blacks were dumber and more aggressive but built like Gary Coleman or Emmanuel Lewis, would it matter? A chihuaua is nasty and snappy, but it's a small dog. So most dogs don't feel threatened by it. But take a pitfull that is tough and aggressive. Negroes are the pitbulls among the races.

    Professional sports play into that yearning. I recall sitting in bars or private homes back in the seventies, when I was new to the States, watching football or basketball on TV. What jumped out at me was the peculiarity, the strangeness, of stadiums filled with mostly white people cheering on teams that were mostly black.

    Surely, this no longer seems strange in Europe since French soccer team is mostly Negroid. And all 'European' sprinters are of West African descent: British, Dutch, French, Swedish, etc.

    In a way, the dominance of blacks in sports is fair since blacks are better. But then, the fact that blacks are better at sports means race-ism is real. So, in that sense, nature is 'unfair'. Races are different, and some races are superior in different endeavors. Jews certainly kick everyone's butt in brainy fields. Look at their dominance in elite institutions.
    It's like Joe Louis and Jesse Owens didn't demonstrate racial equality but racial superiority of blacks in kicking white butt. Muhammad Ali didn't scream, "I'm equal". He screamed "I'm the greatest after beating other boxers, black and white."

    By the late 1960s, when there was a consensus among white Americans that blacks should have full equality under the law, there was an eagerness to welcome any kind of sign that blacks were doing well. In professional sports, blacks do do well. So sports fed that yearning to think well of blacks.

    It wasn't just sports. Maybe music was more crucial. For adults, there was Nat King Cole and Johnny Mathis,and for young ones there was Chuck Berry and Little Richard and the Motown. Blacks have stronger voices than whites and certainly more than Mexicans and Asians.

    The problem wasn't so much this yearning to think well of blacks. Whites DID sincerely think well of blacks in some areas. Problem was that, paradoxically enough, the very traits that made blacks entertaining and appealing to whites also made them dangerous and repulsive.

    Take black athletics. It's fun to watch a powerful Negro like Tyson just knock everyone out. It's like King Kong whupping a bunch of hapless baboons. It makes for great TV. But would you want such a Negro walking your streets? Ali was fun to watch, esp when making fun of Joe Louis and clobbering him in Manila. But who wants to integrate with loud-mouthed obnoxious jivers?
    Indeed, we see this paradox in jungle fever sex too. White women go with Negroes cuz black men seem so badass, tough, wild, punkass, hip, and big-donged. But THAT is precisely why they make lousy mates. Negroes are always looking for fresh pooters to plow and soon get tired of da 'biatches'. So, we have all these white women as single mother with mulatto negrolets.
    And take blacks in comedy. I love watching Fred G. Sanford, Bubba, Aunt Esther, and others in Sanford and Son. They are like colorful loud cartoon characters. But too many of such people would make a neighborhood noisy and bit crazy. Granted, Sanfords(and the Jeffersons) are decent enough folks(and the family in Good Times too), but there are Negroes far worse, and they is crazy. This black zaniness is amusing to white folks from a distance. This is why even whites who never wanna live with blacks listen to rap music and imitate black lingo and stuff. We have kids in Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and etc imitating that stuff. They find it amusing.

    So, the problem isn't a 'yearning' to like blacks. It's that whites are crazy about certain aspects of blackness that have a dark side to them. It's like people who love gambling really love gambling.. but overlook its dark side. It's like people who really love sugary sodas really love it but ignore its negative affects on health.

    Even though civilization is maintained by work and morality and discipline, humans are still animals seeking thrills, excitement, and pleasure at the animal level. And sports, music, and sex bring main pleasure. And whites go wild about black sports, black thug music, and black twerking booties and black dongs. So, they cuck out to blacks for pleasure like hillbillies 'cuck' out to meth. They gotta have that hit. Black is the Crack for White America.

    Even though civilization is maintained by integrity and ideals(such as work ethic, truth, honesty, diligence, responsibility, etc), the animal-sensual side of us is drawn to the idols or idolatry. And Negroes, due to their wilder and tougher traits, have more idol-iconic value. Afrodolatry is much of American Culture which has become 'Western Culture'(as EU is now just imitation US) and world culture(since all the world follows US soft power).

    But like meth will destroy a hillbilly, the black-as-crack will destroy white civilization because the black soul is savage and will destroy white manhood, and when white males lose manhood, white women will have kids with negroes, and the negro savage genes will spread all around.

    War on white males is a war on the entire white race, just like war on white females would be a war on the entire white race. White women cannot exist without white men, and white men cannot exist without white women. Every white woman is the product of white man and white woman. Every white man is the product of white man and white woman. So, the unity of white man and white woman is crucial. In the end, it isn't feminism that drove a wedge between white men and white women. It is blacks.

    And as boatloads of black Africans come upon European shores and plant millions upon millions of blacks in white Europe, white wombs will be colonized by blacks. It will be sexual imperialism on a scale to match the Spanish conquest of Meso wombs in the New World. It will be Wombperialism.

    Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around. But I don’t think that they are really tougher than white men (uncucked). I know of no formidable aboriginal Bantu military forces that gave Europeans a tough fight in equatorial Africa. (The Zulus, by contrast, were formidable, but not Bantu.) When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They’re aggressive, but not courageous.

    Like John, in the 1970s I thought that there would eventually be some kind of racial peace. Now I know it’s not going to happen. But will whites be able to unite to resist their racial displacement in the United States as they become a smaller and smaller part of it?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy
    The Zulus are Bantu. The only non-Bantus in the region are the Bushmen, who were themselves conquered and displaced by the Bantus.
    , @Sandmich
    This comment reminds me of a Steve Sailer post drawing the difference between organized versus unorganized violence. Whites, and to a slightly lesser extent East Asians, are very adept at organized violence (i.e. war, etc.) and not so hot at disorganized violence (i.e. "street" crime, etc.). Other races are some mix of abilities in this regard with blacks generally being on the other side of the curve (good at disorganized, bad at organized).
    , @joef

    When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They’re aggressive, but not courageous.
     
    My general experience exactly! And the paradox is that most of the ones who are genuinely tough are actually better behaved.

    But despite that fact, what you said before is also true:


    Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around
     
    But I witnessed a lot of tougher urban neighborhood Irish, Italian, and Puerto Rican, beat ghetto afro aggressors down when confronted.
    , @Corvinus
    "Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around."

    Not really.

    "But I don’t think that they are really tougher than white men (uncucked)."

    The word "cuck" is meaningless.

    "I know of no formidable aboriginal Bantu military forces that gave Europeans a tough fight in equatorial Africa."

    Give them guns, ammunition, and training in the European style and see how it turns out.

    "When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They’re aggressive, but not courageous."

    No, they generally fight fire with fire.

    "But will whites be able to unite to resist their racial displacement in the United States as they become a smaller and smaller part of it?"

    Whites will make their own decisions when it comes to race, thank you very little.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. A google search reveals an interesting statistic, African Americans make up 16% of the total population of the United States but make up a whopping 68% of the entire American military services combined.
    I wonder why that is.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    "entire American military services combined"

    Which means?

    Source?
    , @Truth
    Not exactly

    I think what you mean to say is that they make up %68 of the %400 of the four services, or roughly %17 of each.
    , @Philip Nolan
    That is just plain wrong as a matter of FACT. Use a search engine other than google. Every post I found from a web search, from various, reputable sources, shows that blacks, as a percentage of the general population, are not overrepresented in the military.
    Just one source, but all show this to be the case, is http://www.heritage.org/defense/report/who-serves-the-us-military-the-demographics-enlisted-troops-and-officers
    Google has an anti-white bias. Do a google search for "american inventors".
    , @joef
    The military has become part of the welfare state for afros, set up by leftist Democrats.
    , @usarmyretiredsgm
    Not sure where on Google you found that statistic but it is incorrect. Military One Source data, 2015, last year available.

    Race/Ethnicity. Less than one-third (31.3%) or 407,563 of Active Duty members identify themselves as a racial minority (i.e., Black or African American, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Multi-racial, or Other/Unknown). The percentage of Active Duty members who identify themselves as a racial minority has increased each year since 2012 (from 31.6% of enlisted members and 21.9% of officers in 2012, to 33.2% of enlisted members and 22.8% of officers in 2015). The overall ratio of racial minority enlisted personnel (354,997) to racial minority officers (52,566) is 6.8 racial minority enlisted personnel for every one racial minority officer.

    That means the military is 69.7% white. Most combat arms specialties are filled with majority white. These tend to be the hardest most dangerous jobs. Been there, done that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. utu says:

    John Derbyshire and Philip Giraldi should form a task force to study which minority poses the greater threat to the United States and once for all decide whether we should concentrate our finite resources of righteous indignation and anger on Blacks or Jews. We may not have enough for both. Is it them Jews or them Blacks who keep messing our country more? What is worse, disrespecting our flag and our anthem or starting wars in the the Middle East? Without the well defined priorities we the readers at unz.com feel confused. Some of us may be suspicious whether talking about Blacks is a ploy to distract us from talking about Jews and vice versa. Some of us may wonder why CIA Giraldi would like to ethnically cleanse Jews while MI5 Derbyshire would rather have us thinking about Blacks playing or not playing football.

    Messrs. Derbyshire and Giraldi, please get together and set aside your differences and show us the righteous direction in which we all can collectively spew our hate. Perhaps a friendly call from the GRU case officer could help both of you arrive at the decision sooner.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. “That’s my formula for an enlightened patriotism: for black and nonblack to face up honestly to reality, to our group differences, which aren’t anyone’s fault, except Mother Nature’s…”

    You can’t possibly think that this can ever happen, surely. How can the great majority of black people ever accept that they are, on average, less intelligent, more prone to criminality, etc., etc.? It would be an intolerable affront to their pride. No race or other group of people would admit such a thing.

    (Yes, yes, there are the apparently self-flagellating whites, but they’re really criticising other white people, not themselves.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    You can’t possibly think that this can ever happen, surely. How can the great majority of black people ever accept that they are, on average, less intelligent, more prone to criminality, etc., etc.? It would be an intolerable affront to their pride. No race or other group of people would admit such a thing.
     
    This is an important point, but I'm not sure you are right, Matthew. White people don't have to be self-flagellating (cause that really smarts!) in order to admit that, say, Oriental people are smarter in some ways, with just massive memorization skills (try to learn Chinese sometime). About everyone admits black people are better at most types of sports, white people are better at others, etc.

    The problem is that, other than black people, no one is allowed to admit to, much less admit to accepting, these differences. You are right that pride plays a factor, but it's more the State role in punishing whites and others who will tell the truth about blacks being less intelligent. Were that to stop, and people just admit the truth, accept people for what they are good at and what they are not, things would work out a lot better. I don't know how well we could still live together, as the black violence is innate, but at least there wouldn't be this animosity at every level.

    "Race agitator, race agitator, you have no complaint.
    You are what you are,
    and you ain't what you ain't.
    So, listen up buster, and listen up good.
    Stop wishin' for bad luck and knocking on wood."


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2ccC4aULow
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. JackOH says:

    Brilliant thoughts, John. Back in the Stone Age, in my Northern and onetime industrial city, Blacks and Whites were actually integrated according to a rough “cordial but wary” standard, by market forces in housing and labor, and by a myriad of individual decisions. Then came “civil rights”–permanently legitimizing Black grievances. Let anyone judge whether America’s Blacks have actually done better over the past fifty years as a consequence. Let anyone judge whether America’s Whites have done better over the past fifty years. Let anyone judge whether both together have done better the past fifty years.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. Brabantian says: • Website

    There is a cartoon circulating – can’t find it at the moment – suggesting that actually the whole NFL kneeling thing was a trick planned by white people, like the con game played by white Mortimer & Randolph Duke against the black Eddie Murphy character in ‘Trading Places’

    Francis Scott Key who wrote the US national anthem, the ‘Star-Spangled Banner’, owned a bunch of slaves, and it’s suggested whites have tricked blacks into kneeling to the slave master (and in effect to white culture), whilst white people are standing … Indeed, sitting for the anthem might have been better symbolically

    Kneeling has traditionally been a sign of submissiveness, and in the history of the Protestant rebellions against Roman Catholic Christianity, anti-kneeling was one of the themes by several of the major Protestant groups

    Plus, as has been noted, kneeling on one knee is also a Masonic gesture, a practice of Freemasonry, as in this image:

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    suggesting that actually the whole NFL kneeling thing was a trick planned by white people,
     
    LOL, Ya think?
    , @Truth
    Hey, they have 60 knee-grows kneeling while 70,000 white people stand over them. And made them think it was their idea. And white people are angry about it.

    THAT'S SOME FUNNY AZZ SHIT! I just spit my coffee on the desk.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. KenH says:

    Another reason there will never be peace among blacks and whites is that any blacks who want to get a good education and abide by the law are accused of “selling out” and “acting white”. So there’s enormous peer pressure among blacks to act like a complete animal. But I’ve found that even many educated blacks resent whites despite their ability to conceal it and blend in better and fool church ladies and soccer moms into thinking they’re “just like us”.

    Violent crime is a badge of honor among most blacks and they tend to view their criminals as freedom fighters against the white man’s “racist” justice system.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  27. one very striking thing about that scene was the deep, hungry yearning among most white Americans to think well of blacks.

    We have to think well of them. We bought their citizenship with 620,000 white lives. It’s like paying hundreds of dollars to hear a musician who actually gave a lousy performance. Who has the guts to admit that it was a waste of money?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. anarchyst says:

    For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites.

    The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?

    The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since.

    Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedman’s Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball.

    Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless handwringing to close the “achievement gap.” To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to “Celebrate Diversity!” and “Say No to Racism.” Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.

    Some thought that what W.E.B. Du Bois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of. There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing.

    Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.

    Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and now Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us that this doesn’t mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, and more opportunities.

    But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue it’s a problem of “culture,” as if culture creates people’s behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame “white privilege.”

    But since 1965, when the elites opened America’s doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India–people who are not white, not rich, and not “connected”–have quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black “youths” are committing half the country’s violent crime–crime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it that has nothing to do with poverty.

    The experiment has failed. Not because of culture, or white privilege, or racism. The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility.

    Our rulers don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.

    The elites explain everything with “racism,” and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.,.,

    Read More
    • Agree: Rurik
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Your comment should be a widely read blog post. Helluva job, Anarchyst!
    , @Corvinus
    "The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?"

    Your hypothesis is flawed. It should read "Can a civilized people who had a different way of life compared to the greedy white Europeans who forced them into slavery overcome perpetual mistreatment in the society they live in, while acknowledging they must figure out solutions to their own problems?"

    "The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements."

    Please educate yourself on the matter by typing in "african achievements before european arrival"
    and locating several sources that utterly destroy your claim.

    "Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since."

    Acting on the will of the people in the aftermath of a Civil War, several policies were enacted despite fierce resistance.

    "Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association."

    The intrusion was Jim Crow laws to begin with. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. Indeed, so much for freedom of association.

    "The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility."

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    IOW, your wife / girlfriend left you for a negro.

    No worries though. How many euro white female, negro male relationships last?

    But what the hell, OJ is free, let's ask him.

    I never cease to be amazed at the things you say under cover of anonymity that you wouldn’t dare say to someone in person, lest they beat you to a bloody pulp. At 68 years old and all of five feet tall, it’s not hard to imagine why.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Yawn.

    Bring it, fat obsessed Zionist.

    , @Truth
    For some reason I don't see Priss as an esteemed pugilist. Maybe it just me; maybe it because HE HAS SAID SO NUMEROUS TIMES.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. @Diversity Heretic
    Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around. But I don't think that they are really tougher than white men (uncucked). I know of no formidable aboriginal Bantu military forces that gave Europeans a tough fight in equatorial Africa. (The Zulus, by contrast, were formidable, but not Bantu.) When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They're aggressive, but not courageous.

    Like John, in the 1970s I thought that there would eventually be some kind of racial peace. Now I know it's not going to happen. But will whites be able to unite to resist their racial displacement in the United States as they become a smaller and smaller part of it?

    The Zulus are Bantu. The only non-Bantus in the region are the Bushmen, who were themselves conquered and displaced by the Bantus.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
    Okay, maybe I don't know the anthropology as well as I should. I wonder why the Zulus were able to organize a formidable aboriginal fighting force, while no other Bantus I know of put up much resistance to European forces.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. As usual, an excellent article from Mr. Derbyshire. I do have to make one comment, though. He should have left out Southerners from the Americans who were and are so eager to coddle blacks, explain away their many failings, and ignore the threat they pose to our country. Contrary to what other white Americans think, very few Southerners “hate” blacks, much less wish them ill. Southerners, like any other white Americans, understand perfectly well that there are many fine, decent, intelligent, hard-working, law-abiding blacks and like any other white Americans they are thankful for this fact.

    This is the difference. Southerners KNOW that blacks are not “white people with black skin” and they never will be. They are a profoundly different race and, perhaps, a different sub-species. More importantly, this will not change. Intelligence expressed by average IQ, propensity for violence, lack of ability to plan for the future or understand the future results of present actions, hyper-sexuality , poor impulse control, are all dramatically different from whites. In physical terms they clearly have primitive traits. Muscle mass, bone density and many other traits mark a clear difference with whites, to say nothing of Asians.

    One problem is the fact that a large proportion of American blacks have some percentage of white or Native American blood, which somewhat dilutes some of the traits listed above. Unfortunately, a percentage of white blood does not necessarily bring with it unalloyed positive results. On the contrary, it may well introduce mental instability. It certainly is related to resentment, anger and rage against whites. The enraged mulatto, the bitter W.E.B. DuBois type, is almost a cliché.

    The Jim Crow system, as imperfect as it was, was an attempt to allow two very different races to live side-by-side with as little conflict as possible. True, it was inevitably seen by blacks as a terrible injustice. Whites who did not have to live in a bi-racial society with blacks usually shared this view, thus the so-called “civil rights” movement.
    What is the result of attempting to “integrate” blacks into our society by pretending that they are “just like us”?

    The ruins of that idea are all around us. Our once beautiful cities are sinks of crime, drugs and violence, black-on-white rape statistics are so awful that they could not have even been imagined by the most violent segregationist of the 1890′s, our prisons are full of blacks seething with rage and thoughts of revenge, our institutions are steadily falling apart because through affirmative action we have discarded merit and substituted racial quotas, and, worst of all, black pathologies have completely infected white America, especially in the lower classes.

    The insane effort to deny reality is wrecking our country. This “taking a knee” craze may be silly but it is just a small sign of what is to come.

    Lincoln and Jefferson were right. We can’t live together. We may as well face that fact.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Southerners KNOW that blacks are not “white people with black skin” and they never will be."

    You mean SOME southerners believe that blacks are not "white people with black skin and they never will be".

    "They are a profoundly different race and, perhaps, a different sub-species."

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    "Intelligence expressed by average IQ, propensity for violence, lack of ability to plan for the future or understand the future results of present actions, hyper-sexuality , poor impulse control, are all dramatically different from whites."

    More white people in sheer numbers are arrested for violent crimes.

    The lack of ability to plan for the future or understand the future results of present actions is not squarely race related, and neither is hypersexuality and poor impulse control.

    "In physical terms they clearly have primitive traits."

    In physical terms all people have distinct traits, some of which are over exaggerated.

    "Unfortunately, a percentage of white blood does not necessarily bring with it unalloyed positive results. On the contrary, it may well introduce mental instability."

    Citations or retract.

    "The Jim Crow system, as imperfect as it was, was an attempt to allow two very different races to live side-by-side with as little conflict as possible. True, it was inevitably seen by blacks as a terrible injustice."

    It was inevitable seen by whites and blacks as an abomination of justice. Southrons couldn't even abide by "separate but equal" as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. So much for freedom of association.

    "Lincoln and Jefferson were right. We can’t live together. We may as well face that fact."

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.
    , @Brooklyn Dave
    The Jim Cow system claimed to be separate but equal--but was it really? For example, weren't schools etc shoddier? I myself, grew up in a white neighborhood in NYC in the 1960s and early 70s. I never had any real contact with blacks till I went to a boarding high school (and that was 1 American black and 2 Haitians). The only minority we had coming in were Puerto Ricans, and we didn't associate with them. When I started working and socializing outside my neighborhood (which had largely changed by then) did I have much more contacts with non-whites. I realized there were decent black people and what I call ghetto-head black people. I am not the kind of white guy that is riddled with white guilt. But at the same time, I wouldn't say anything, just stay as far away from those types as best as I could. On the political/social front, there are very few blacks or whites that are willing (not so much to expound on the subject of race realism) but to criticize black behavior. It is programed behavior. Either one is labeled a racist or an Uncle Tom if one criticizes black behavior in public.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. In 1972 I visited London. I remember being told that America was racist and violent. I shocked Londoners by telling them that if you took Negroes out of the US, US homicide rates would approximate the UK’s. Further, that Londoners’ would think very differently about how “racist” the US was, if the UK had a significant proportion of Negroes, say 10%. Londoners’ response: that’s racist. This was 45 years ago!
    Wanting to think well of Negroes is not just an American thing, it’s a white thing.
    More generally, why do many Europeans want to import Moslems? Is it because they are darker skinned than Europeans?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. I think that the Londoners responded in this manner not just because they wanted to think well of the blacks, but because they wanted to think they are better than the Americans. We have many people here who live in exclusive white areas who think the same way. It makes them happy to “know” that they would not think the same way as we do.

    As to you questions at the bottom, I doubt many Europeans want to import Moslems (thx for correct spelling, BTW!) Most European elites want to import Moslems, as like in America, the elite DO NOT WANT any serious, capable middle class. They need to replace the middle class, as a 3rd world society works much better for them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  34. @anarchyst
    For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites.

    The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?

    The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since.

    Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedman’s Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball.

    Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless handwringing to close the “achievement gap.” To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to “Celebrate Diversity!” and “Say No to Racism.” Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.

    Some thought that what W.E.B. Du Bois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of. There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing.

    Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.

    Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and now Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us that this doesn’t mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, and more opportunities.

    But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue it’s a problem of “culture,” as if culture creates people’s behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame “white privilege.”

    But since 1965, when the elites opened America’s doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India–people who are not white, not rich, and not “connected”–have quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black “youths” are committing half the country’s violent crime–crime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it that has nothing to do with poverty.

    The experiment has failed. Not because of culture, or white privilege, or racism. The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility.

    Our rulers don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.

    The elites explain everything with “racism,” and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.,.,

    Your comment should be a widely read blog post. Helluva job, Anarchyst!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Your comment should be a widely read blog post. Helluva job, Anarchyst!
     
    I wasn't able to ''Agree' twice to his comment, so let me just do it here!

    damn straight he called that one!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @Matthew McConnagay
    "That’s my formula for an enlightened patriotism: for black and nonblack to face up honestly to reality, to our group differences, which aren’t anyone’s fault, except Mother Nature’s..."

    You can't possibly think that this can ever happen, surely. How can the great majority of black people ever accept that they are, on average, less intelligent, more prone to criminality, etc., etc.? It would be an intolerable affront to their pride. No race or other group of people would admit such a thing.

    (Yes, yes, there are the apparently self-flagellating whites, but they're really criticising other white people, not themselves.)

    You can’t possibly think that this can ever happen, surely. How can the great majority of black people ever accept that they are, on average, less intelligent, more prone to criminality, etc., etc.? It would be an intolerable affront to their pride. No race or other group of people would admit such a thing.

    This is an important point, but I’m not sure you are right, Matthew. White people don’t have to be self-flagellating (cause that really smarts!) in order to admit that, say, Oriental people are smarter in some ways, with just massive memorization skills (try to learn Chinese sometime). About everyone admits black people are better at most types of sports, white people are better at others, etc.

    The problem is that, other than black people, no one is allowed to admit to, much less admit to accepting, these differences. You are right that pride plays a factor, but it’s more the State role in punishing whites and others who will tell the truth about blacks being less intelligent. Were that to stop, and people just admit the truth, accept people for what they are good at and what they are not, things would work out a lot better. I don’t know how well we could still live together, as the black violence is innate, but at least there wouldn’t be this animosity at every level.

    “Race agitator, race agitator, you have no complaint.
    You are what you are,
    and you ain’t what you ain’t.
    So, listen up buster, and listen up good.
    Stop wishin’ for bad luck and knocking on wood.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. “You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races … We suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated. ”

    No matter how many times you tell aficionados of The Lincoln Mystery Cult™ that Honest Abe did not desire an end to slavery because it was the moral thing to do, they don’t want to hear it. So listen up, gullible fools: Lincoln wanted to end slavery AND ship blacks back to Africa because it was best for whites. How many times do you people have to see this quotation before the truth sinks in???

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. Corvinus says:
    @Propagandist Hacker
    How about separation followed by a race war?

    “How about separation followed by a race war?”

    Ho-hum, another pasty faced armchair warrior basking in the glow of St. Brievik. Listen, we all know you are too impotent to engage in such actions in light of the severe consequences. Thankfully, you are merely blowing off steam on a blog.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    LOL, he was too impotent 50 years ago at 25!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Priss Factor
    The beginning of wisdom here: race realism. The truth about race is that it’s real, and the statistical differences between blacks and other races—in temperament, behavior, intelligence, and personality—are big and intractable.

    You didn't mention muscle power, but that is crucial. If blacks were dumber and more aggressive but built like Gary Coleman or Emmanuel Lewis, would it matter? A chihuaua is nasty and snappy, but it's a small dog. So most dogs don't feel threatened by it. But take a pitfull that is tough and aggressive. Negroes are the pitbulls among the races.

    Professional sports play into that yearning. I recall sitting in bars or private homes back in the seventies, when I was new to the States, watching football or basketball on TV. What jumped out at me was the peculiarity, the strangeness, of stadiums filled with mostly white people cheering on teams that were mostly black.

    Surely, this no longer seems strange in Europe since French soccer team is mostly Negroid. And all 'European' sprinters are of West African descent: British, Dutch, French, Swedish, etc.

    In a way, the dominance of blacks in sports is fair since blacks are better. But then, the fact that blacks are better at sports means race-ism is real. So, in that sense, nature is 'unfair'. Races are different, and some races are superior in different endeavors. Jews certainly kick everyone's butt in brainy fields. Look at their dominance in elite institutions.
    It's like Joe Louis and Jesse Owens didn't demonstrate racial equality but racial superiority of blacks in kicking white butt. Muhammad Ali didn't scream, "I'm equal". He screamed "I'm the greatest after beating other boxers, black and white."

    By the late 1960s, when there was a consensus among white Americans that blacks should have full equality under the law, there was an eagerness to welcome any kind of sign that blacks were doing well. In professional sports, blacks do do well. So sports fed that yearning to think well of blacks.

    It wasn't just sports. Maybe music was more crucial. For adults, there was Nat King Cole and Johnny Mathis,and for young ones there was Chuck Berry and Little Richard and the Motown. Blacks have stronger voices than whites and certainly more than Mexicans and Asians.

    The problem wasn't so much this yearning to think well of blacks. Whites DID sincerely think well of blacks in some areas. Problem was that, paradoxically enough, the very traits that made blacks entertaining and appealing to whites also made them dangerous and repulsive.

    Take black athletics. It's fun to watch a powerful Negro like Tyson just knock everyone out. It's like King Kong whupping a bunch of hapless baboons. It makes for great TV. But would you want such a Negro walking your streets? Ali was fun to watch, esp when making fun of Joe Louis and clobbering him in Manila. But who wants to integrate with loud-mouthed obnoxious jivers?
    Indeed, we see this paradox in jungle fever sex too. White women go with Negroes cuz black men seem so badass, tough, wild, punkass, hip, and big-donged. But THAT is precisely why they make lousy mates. Negroes are always looking for fresh pooters to plow and soon get tired of da 'biatches'. So, we have all these white women as single mother with mulatto negrolets.
    And take blacks in comedy. I love watching Fred G. Sanford, Bubba, Aunt Esther, and others in Sanford and Son. They are like colorful loud cartoon characters. But too many of such people would make a neighborhood noisy and bit crazy. Granted, Sanfords(and the Jeffersons) are decent enough folks(and the family in Good Times too), but there are Negroes far worse, and they is crazy. This black zaniness is amusing to white folks from a distance. This is why even whites who never wanna live with blacks listen to rap music and imitate black lingo and stuff. We have kids in Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and etc imitating that stuff. They find it amusing.

    So, the problem isn't a 'yearning' to like blacks. It's that whites are crazy about certain aspects of blackness that have a dark side to them. It's like people who love gambling really love gambling.. but overlook its dark side. It's like people who really love sugary sodas really love it but ignore its negative affects on health.

    Even though civilization is maintained by work and morality and discipline, humans are still animals seeking thrills, excitement, and pleasure at the animal level. And sports, music, and sex bring main pleasure. And whites go wild about black sports, black thug music, and black twerking booties and black dongs. So, they cuck out to blacks for pleasure like hillbillies 'cuck' out to meth. They gotta have that hit. Black is the Crack for White America.

    Even though civilization is maintained by integrity and ideals(such as work ethic, truth, honesty, diligence, responsibility, etc), the animal-sensual side of us is drawn to the idols or idolatry. And Negroes, due to their wilder and tougher traits, have more idol-iconic value. Afrodolatry is much of American Culture which has become 'Western Culture'(as EU is now just imitation US) and world culture(since all the world follows US soft power).

    But like meth will destroy a hillbilly, the black-as-crack will destroy white civilization because the black soul is savage and will destroy white manhood, and when white males lose manhood, white women will have kids with negroes, and the negro savage genes will spread all around.

    War on white males is a war on the entire white race, just like war on white females would be a war on the entire white race. White women cannot exist without white men, and white men cannot exist without white women. Every white woman is the product of white man and white woman. Every white man is the product of white man and white woman. So, the unity of white man and white woman is crucial. In the end, it isn't feminism that drove a wedge between white men and white women. It is blacks.

    And as boatloads of black Africans come upon European shores and plant millions upon millions of blacks in white Europe, white wombs will be colonized by blacks. It will be sexual imperialism on a scale to match the Spanish conquest of Meso wombs in the New World. It will be Wombperialism.

    You’re so stupid you confused Joe Louis with Joe Frazier.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Priss isn't much of a sportsman, but his lemon chiffon souffle is TODIEFOR!
    , @Mark G.
    You consider a knowledge of black boxers to be the height of intelligence? What a dolt!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. log says:

    Race realism only matters because we’re in competition with one another and hostile against each other. Being in competition with one another means we can’t have social stability – stability requires not being in competition with one another. Competition, after all, is about altering the current status quo, or, in other words, the social hierarchy. The social hierarchy determines the distribution of resources. Competition therefore alters the distribution of resources. However, humans have relatively similar and consistent resource requirements for existence regardless of social hierarchy, and generally consider survival to supercede the otherwise general preference for social order. Therefore, ultimately, social order – peaceable, if competitive, resolutions to conflict over resources – will give way to violent resolutions to conflict over resources; the current “winners,” you see, have taken too much and are outnumbered by the losers, who are becoming aware of the growing shift in the balance of power. There ain’t enough cops and guns, eventually, to prevent violent redistribution of resources.

    And then, it’s might makes right along tribal lines. And because of the brilliant economic device of money, whitey has purposefully either killed off or prevented the conception of countless of his own descendants, thus permitting non-whitey to outnumber him grossly even in what whitey considers his own lands. After all, understood through the lens of economics, children are a parent’s most efficient competitors for resources. Thus God Money demands therefore that children be sacrificed lest the parents should suffer a decrease in social status and thus resource allocation.

    And the winds, they be a-blowin’ – “kill whitey.” Can’t you feel the breeze?

    Ah, the solution beckons even at this late date – you could try Christianity. Not the perverse and corrupt version taught by hireling priests, unjust stewards, in their congregation-funded castles, but the version that Jesus Christ taught as he walked the Earth according to the pages of the Gospels. You know all that stuff he said in the Sermon on the Mount – that is THE solution to peace and social stability. He meant it literally. Stop competing, and trust in God, and your needs will be taken care of. But who will do it? Who believes Christ sufficiently to actually do what he said?

    Is the prospect of racial warfare and genocide sufficiently likely and sufficiently negative to take another look Christ’s way, or shall we continue as we have been, and jump the cliff we are so obviously approaching, lemming-like, at breakneck speeds?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. Corvinus says:
    @Chris Bridges
    As usual, an excellent article from Mr. Derbyshire. I do have to make one comment, though. He should have left out Southerners from the Americans who were and are so eager to coddle blacks, explain away their many failings, and ignore the threat they pose to our country. Contrary to what other white Americans think, very few Southerners "hate" blacks, much less wish them ill. Southerners, like any other white Americans, understand perfectly well that there are many fine, decent, intelligent, hard-working, law-abiding blacks and like any other white Americans they are thankful for this fact.

    This is the difference. Southerners KNOW that blacks are not "white people with black skin" and they never will be. They are a profoundly different race and, perhaps, a different sub-species. More importantly, this will not change. Intelligence expressed by average IQ, propensity for violence, lack of ability to plan for the future or understand the future results of present actions, hyper-sexuality , poor impulse control, are all dramatically different from whites. In physical terms they clearly have primitive traits. Muscle mass, bone density and many other traits mark a clear difference with whites, to say nothing of Asians.

    One problem is the fact that a large proportion of American blacks have some percentage of white or Native American blood, which somewhat dilutes some of the traits listed above. Unfortunately, a percentage of white blood does not necessarily bring with it unalloyed positive results. On the contrary, it may well introduce mental instability. It certainly is related to resentment, anger and rage against whites. The enraged mulatto, the bitter W.E.B. DuBois type, is almost a cliché.

    The Jim Crow system, as imperfect as it was, was an attempt to allow two very different races to live side-by-side with as little conflict as possible. True, it was inevitably seen by blacks as a terrible injustice. Whites who did not have to live in a bi-racial society with blacks usually shared this view, thus the so-called "civil rights" movement.
    What is the result of attempting to "integrate" blacks into our society by pretending that they are "just like us"?

    The ruins of that idea are all around us. Our once beautiful cities are sinks of crime, drugs and violence, black-on-white rape statistics are so awful that they could not have even been imagined by the most violent segregationist of the 1890's, our prisons are full of blacks seething with rage and thoughts of revenge, our institutions are steadily falling apart because through affirmative action we have discarded merit and substituted racial quotas, and, worst of all, black pathologies have completely infected white America, especially in the lower classes.

    The insane effort to deny reality is wrecking our country. This "taking a knee" craze may be silly but it is just a small sign of what is to come.

    Lincoln and Jefferson were right. We can't live together. We may as well face that fact.

    “Southerners KNOW that blacks are not “white people with black skin” and they never will be.”

    You mean SOME southerners believe that blacks are not “white people with black skin and they never will be”.

    “They are a profoundly different race and, perhaps, a different sub-species.”

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    “Intelligence expressed by average IQ, propensity for violence, lack of ability to plan for the future or understand the future results of present actions, hyper-sexuality , poor impulse control, are all dramatically different from whites.”

    More white people in sheer numbers are arrested for violent crimes.

    The lack of ability to plan for the future or understand the future results of present actions is not squarely race related, and neither is hypersexuality and poor impulse control.

    “In physical terms they clearly have primitive traits.”

    In physical terms all people have distinct traits, some of which are over exaggerated.

    “Unfortunately, a percentage of white blood does not necessarily bring with it unalloyed positive results. On the contrary, it may well introduce mental instability.”

    Citations or retract.

    “The Jim Crow system, as imperfect as it was, was an attempt to allow two very different races to live side-by-side with as little conflict as possible. True, it was inevitably seen by blacks as a terrible injustice.”

    It was inevitable seen by whites and blacks as an abomination of justice. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. So much for freedom of association.

    “Lincoln and Jefferson were right. We can’t live together. We may as well face that fact.”

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Corvinus says:
    @anarchyst
    For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites.

    The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?

    The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since.

    Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedman’s Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball.

    Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless handwringing to close the “achievement gap.” To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to “Celebrate Diversity!” and “Say No to Racism.” Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.

    Some thought that what W.E.B. Du Bois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of. There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing.

    Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.

    Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and now Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us that this doesn’t mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, and more opportunities.

    But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue it’s a problem of “culture,” as if culture creates people’s behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame “white privilege.”

    But since 1965, when the elites opened America’s doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India–people who are not white, not rich, and not “connected”–have quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black “youths” are committing half the country’s violent crime–crime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it that has nothing to do with poverty.

    The experiment has failed. Not because of culture, or white privilege, or racism. The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility.

    Our rulers don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.

    The elites explain everything with “racism,” and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.,.,

    “The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?”

    Your hypothesis is flawed. It should read “Can a civilized people who had a different way of life compared to the greedy white Europeans who forced them into slavery overcome perpetual mistreatment in the society they live in, while acknowledging they must figure out solutions to their own problems?”

    “The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements.”

    Please educate yourself on the matter by typing in “african achievements before european arrival”
    and locating several sources that utterly destroy your claim.

    “Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since.”

    Acting on the will of the people in the aftermath of a Civil War, several policies were enacted despite fierce resistance.

    “Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association.”

    The intrusion was Jim Crow laws to begin with. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. Indeed, so much for freedom of association.

    “The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility.”

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @1RW
    I did look up African achievements before European arrival. I found this gem

    http://www.asbmb.org/asbmbtoday/asbmbtoday_article.aspx?id=32437

    It's got Egyptians (non-negroes btw) composing mathematical treatises 35,000 years ago and Africans shipping elephants to China. I guess they beat out India, Burma, and Vietnam on price.

    I am deeply awed
    , @Jonathan Mason

    “The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?”
     
    No, the hypothesis should be: Can the descendants of people taken from various parts of Africa....?

    And I think the answer is yes. Every human baby that is born is a little stone-age baby, but what makes the difference is the society that he/she/they are born into and the socialization process. Every child that is born has the ability to learn to speak Chinese, which seems like an incredibly difficult language to those of us who speak European languages, because there are virtually no words in common, but any black baby that is born is perfectly capable of learning Chinese and becoming a Confucian.

    While it seems to be true that some genetic groups have higher average IQ test scores than others, there is a lot of overlap. Unfortunately the social norms of Afro-American societies into which babies are born do not lend themselves very well to preparing children to be businessmen and scientists.

    My children have some black teachers, and they are not stupid people, but they tend to be poorly educated and ill-informed, but most of all they tend to parrot silly ideas they have learned from their superiors in the educational bureaucracy, some of whom are white, so it is not entirely their fault that the way they teach math is half-assed and doomed to failure.

    , @epochehusserl
    he intrusion was Jim Crow laws to begin with. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. Indeed, so much for freedom of association.
    ------------------------
    the idea behind jim crow was that the races were different and should be able to have different standards, an idea that the civil rights leaders agreed with by coming up with disparate impact. No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @Hapalong Cassidy
    The Zulus are Bantu. The only non-Bantus in the region are the Bushmen, who were themselves conquered and displaced by the Bantus.

    Okay, maybe I don’t know the anthropology as well as I should. I wonder why the Zulus were able to organize a formidable aboriginal fighting force, while no other Bantus I know of put up much resistance to European forces.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Sandmich says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around. But I don't think that they are really tougher than white men (uncucked). I know of no formidable aboriginal Bantu military forces that gave Europeans a tough fight in equatorial Africa. (The Zulus, by contrast, were formidable, but not Bantu.) When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They're aggressive, but not courageous.

    Like John, in the 1970s I thought that there would eventually be some kind of racial peace. Now I know it's not going to happen. But will whites be able to unite to resist their racial displacement in the United States as they become a smaller and smaller part of it?

    This comment reminds me of a Steve Sailer post drawing the difference between organized versus unorganized violence. Whites, and to a slightly lesser extent East Asians, are very adept at organized violence (i.e. war, etc.) and not so hot at disorganized violence (i.e. “street” crime, etc.). Other races are some mix of abilities in this regard with blacks generally being on the other side of the curve (good at disorganized, bad at organized).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Wally says:
    @Anon
    I never cease to be amazed at the things you say under cover of anonymity that you wouldn't dare say to someone in person, lest they beat you to a bloody pulp. At 68 years old and all of five feet tall, it's not hard to imagine why.

    Yawn.

    Bring it, fat obsessed Zionist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Bring it? Wanna rethink that one? Gonna make it hard for you to press charges someday.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @anon
    Yo idiot; Chinese are to the right side of whites on the bell curve. His kids will likely be superior on the HBD scale compared to you.

    anon – are you Jewish, Asian, involved with Asians? The Chinese are notorious test cheaters and thieves. This has been documented by Steve Sailer.

    Why is it necessary for China (and all other Asians) to copy the West? Why didn’t the Industrial Revolution start in Asia? Why are the Chinese constantly stealing Western technology? Why do Asians get plastic surgery to look more Western?

    Charles Murray’s first wife was Thai and he has Thai offspring. He is a degenerate like Derbyshire who will automatically favor Asians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    This is the most extensive campaign of a scorned woman I have ever seen.
    , @joef
    This is the problem. Living near the afro urban ghetto, and based on all other info available, it is obvious that most afro americans are our biggest national problem, that will eventually be responsible for the bring down of this once great nation. It is not about race (skin color), but about their parasitical antisocial behavior that is the problem.

    But the haters distract us from the adult discussion of the problem, by obsessively complaining about other groups. These other groups are as much of a problem to this nation as a pimple would be compared to a (afro) cancer. These other groups are not a problem, the antisocial afro actions are.

    I never felt threatened walking through a Chinatown, nor seen (or heard) anyone robbed (but walking through an afro urban ghetto is another story). This lack of mature focus just distorts our priorities of where our true dangers are.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. Wally says:
    @Buba Zanetti
    A google search reveals an interesting statistic, African Americans make up 16% of the total population of the United States but make up a whopping 68% of the entire American military services combined.
    I wonder why that is.

    “entire American military services combined”

    Which means?

    Source?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. @Truth

    “It seems that we Chinese just can’t treat foreigners as equals. We either look down on them as coarse, crude barbarians, or else we worship them as masters of science and democracy.”
     
    LOL, hey I gotta agree with Attila there, Derb. If there is racial separation, you are going to have to do one of those sitcom joints where you divide the house in half with yellow tape, kitchen, bed, stove and all, and each race must stay on its own side.

    Are you going to get the left side of the kids or the right?

    Thanks Truth. Here’s an interesting post regarding the Vegas shooting:

    Apparently Milo Y. tweeted out the following:

    Follow
    Dangerous faggot @MiloYiannopfans
    #Facts
    Suspects Wife is a Asian Muslim
    Suspect shooter is a Registered Democrat
    Suspects Traveled Multiple times to Middle East#LasVegas
    5:37 AM – Oct 2, 2017
    14 14 Replies 68 68 Retweets 81 81 likes

    Someone else tweeted that Vegas is gun free zone.

    It’s illegal to own a machine gun so we need to find out who provided this weapon.

    Can anyone in Vegas confirm some of this?

    Asian Muslim wife?

    Always cherchez la femme/le homme of a person.

    Derbyshire is destroying the West.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Hey that cuck must of gotten sick of having to have the house nice and clean when the dragon lady came home from work.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. 1RW says:
    @Corvinus
    "The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?"

    Your hypothesis is flawed. It should read "Can a civilized people who had a different way of life compared to the greedy white Europeans who forced them into slavery overcome perpetual mistreatment in the society they live in, while acknowledging they must figure out solutions to their own problems?"

    "The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements."

    Please educate yourself on the matter by typing in "african achievements before european arrival"
    and locating several sources that utterly destroy your claim.

    "Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since."

    Acting on the will of the people in the aftermath of a Civil War, several policies were enacted despite fierce resistance.

    "Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association."

    The intrusion was Jim Crow laws to begin with. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. Indeed, so much for freedom of association.

    "The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility."

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.

    I did look up African achievements before European arrival. I found this gem

    http://www.asbmb.org/asbmbtoday/asbmbtoday_article.aspx?id=32437

    It’s got Egyptians (non-negroes btw) composing mathematical treatises 35,000 years ago and Africans shipping elephants to China. I guess they beat out India, Burma, and Vietnam on price.

    I am deeply awed

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Actually, the Chinese Emperor sent an entire fleet including veterinarians, food, housing etc to the east Coast of Africa to buy animals for the Imperial Zoo. It was reasonable successful. Enough animals survived the trip to start a Zoo. But it was so expensive and troublesome that the government decided against any more Ocean voyages for centuries.

    The Chinese went to one of the Arab ports to buy the animals.
    , @Corvinus
    And the source you listed also noted major accomplishments by subsaharan Africans. Thanks for playing. Your parting gift is wine and cheese.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. It’s obvious to anyone with a passing familiarity of blacks, black crime and dysfunction that the NFL “protests” such as they unfolded are naked, public displays of black solidarity. And if you go just beyond the surface what is being expressed in this solidarity is that we have within the United States a dispersed black nation, (dis)organized as a giant tribe. What blacks are objecting to in the various high-profile incidents with police and a lone white Hispanic is that members of a competing tribe have encroached on their rights and territory by killing one of theirs. This is why the facts of each incident as well as application of the law don’t matter much if at all to them – the boys in blue (even the black ones) are members of the white tribe and give great offense when they enforce the white tribe’s laws with force. Black civilians can kill and terrorize blacks without much of a fuss – you’ll never get them as agitated at that exponentially higher body count because it’s an intra-tribal matter and none of the white tribe’s business.

    It’s also apparent that this narrative has been crafted somewhere in secret by sinister men who are probably not black themselves for political ends – knowing how to stir the emotions of resentful American blacks.

    I can’t take credit for it and I believe it was put this way by another of Mr. Sailer’s commentators – I’m paraphrasing – white America thought that electing Mr. Obama would be an ultimate welcoming of American blacks into the breast of the nation, while American blacks took it as a sign of racial triumph and license to act more (dysfunctionally, annoyingly) black rather than raising their standards of behavior to those displayed by Mr. Obama personally as full Americans. The black tribe got one of theirs to be the biggest of the big men and their expectation was that blacks are in charge, and they would be rained upon with the spoils. (I believe that this commentator also related that the mentality of a lot of blacks is to believe that white people have lots of good stuff because they’ve had one of theirs in charge since the inception of the nation, so naturally with Big Chief Barack holding the scepter all of the indicia of material success and esteem would just magically come to them).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    It’s obvious to anyone with a passing familiarity of blacks, black crime and dysfunction that the NFL “protests” such as they unfolded are naked, public displays of black solidarity.
     
    That's funny. I've been black since 1966, and I haven't seen black solidarity yet.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Truth says:
    @Buba Zanetti
    A google search reveals an interesting statistic, African Americans make up 16% of the total population of the United States but make up a whopping 68% of the entire American military services combined.
    I wonder why that is.

    Not exactly

    I think what you mean to say is that they make up %68 of the %400 of the four services, or roughly %17 of each.

    Read More
    • Agree: Grandpa Charlie
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. @Buba Zanetti
    A google search reveals an interesting statistic, African Americans make up 16% of the total population of the United States but make up a whopping 68% of the entire American military services combined.
    I wonder why that is.

    That is just plain wrong as a matter of FACT. Use a search engine other than google. Every post I found from a web search, from various, reputable sources, shows that blacks, as a percentage of the general population, are not overrepresented in the military.
    Just one source, but all show this to be the case, is http://www.heritage.org/defense/report/who-serves-the-us-military-the-demographics-enlisted-troops-and-officers
    Google has an anti-white bias. Do a google search for “american inventors”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Truth says:
    @Brabantian
    There is a cartoon circulating - can't find it at the moment - suggesting that actually the whole NFL kneeling thing was a trick planned by white people, like the con game played by white Mortimer & Randolph Duke against the black Eddie Murphy character in 'Trading Places'

    Francis Scott Key who wrote the US national anthem, the 'Star-Spangled Banner', owned a bunch of slaves, and it's suggested whites have tricked blacks into kneeling to the slave master (and in effect to white culture), whilst white people are standing ... Indeed, sitting for the anthem might have been better symbolically

    Kneeling has traditionally been a sign of submissiveness, and in the history of the Protestant rebellions against Roman Catholic Christianity, anti-kneeling was one of the themes by several of the major Protestant groups

    Plus, as has been noted, kneeling on one knee is also a Masonic gesture, a practice of Freemasonry, as in this image:
    https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/widowssonkneeling1.jpg

    suggesting that actually the whole NFL kneeling thing was a trick planned by white people,

    LOL, Ya think?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    Yawn.

    Bring it, fat obsessed Zionist.

    Bring it? Wanna rethink that one? Gonna make it hard for you to press charges someday.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    You messin with a real M-F G Wally, I'd reconsider.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJM2aEggBA8
    , @Wally
    WTF are you talking about now?

    Hell, you don't even know, you're just a fat obsessed Zionist.

    I realize you're not the sharpest tool in the shed, but please pay attention, you and those like you are being hammered at unz.com. :-)

    Owning you forever.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @attilathehen
    anon - are you Jewish, Asian, involved with Asians? The Chinese are notorious test cheaters and thieves. This has been documented by Steve Sailer.

    Why is it necessary for China (and all other Asians) to copy the West? Why didn't the Industrial Revolution start in Asia? Why are the Chinese constantly stealing Western technology? Why do Asians get plastic surgery to look more Western?

    Charles Murray's first wife was Thai and he has Thai offspring. He is a degenerate like Derbyshire who will automatically favor Asians.

    This is the most extensive campaign of a scorned woman I have ever seen.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Wait a minute!
    Stop!
    Cease and Desist!
    Hold the phone!

    Why is a white woman speaking up for the fidelity of the white race on a white nationalist website "an extensive campaign of a scorned woman"?

    Let me let you in on a news flash here, Hop Sing. There is no law that says that white people HAVE to like you (or me), HAVE to accept you as an equal, or HAVE to accept you integrating into their community.

    The law says they have to be fair with you in business, that's it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. Truth says:
    @Brabantian
    There is a cartoon circulating - can't find it at the moment - suggesting that actually the whole NFL kneeling thing was a trick planned by white people, like the con game played by white Mortimer & Randolph Duke against the black Eddie Murphy character in 'Trading Places'

    Francis Scott Key who wrote the US national anthem, the 'Star-Spangled Banner', owned a bunch of slaves, and it's suggested whites have tricked blacks into kneeling to the slave master (and in effect to white culture), whilst white people are standing ... Indeed, sitting for the anthem might have been better symbolically

    Kneeling has traditionally been a sign of submissiveness, and in the history of the Protestant rebellions against Roman Catholic Christianity, anti-kneeling was one of the themes by several of the major Protestant groups

    Plus, as has been noted, kneeling on one knee is also a Masonic gesture, a practice of Freemasonry, as in this image:
    https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/widowssonkneeling1.jpg

    Hey, they have 60 knee-grows kneeling while 70,000 white people stand over them. And made them think it was their idea. And white people are angry about it.

    THAT’S SOME FUNNY AZZ SHIT! I just spit my coffee on the desk.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. @Wally
    Are Chinese doing what low IQ blacks do?

    Wally, what are your stats? Jewish? Involved with Asians?

    The Chinese are a little bit smarter than blacks so you can more out of them.

    But we don’t need them in the West.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    He's white with a Latino wife. Figure that one out.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Truth says:
    @Anon
    I never cease to be amazed at the things you say under cover of anonymity that you wouldn't dare say to someone in person, lest they beat you to a bloody pulp. At 68 years old and all of five feet tall, it's not hard to imagine why.

    For some reason I don’t see Priss as an esteemed pugilist. Maybe it just me; maybe it because HE HAS SAID SO NUMEROUS TIMES.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Truth says:
    @Corvinus
    "How about separation followed by a race war?"

    Ho-hum, another pasty faced armchair warrior basking in the glow of St. Brievik. Listen, we all know you are too impotent to engage in such actions in light of the severe consequences. Thankfully, you are merely blowing off steam on a blog.

    LOL, he was too impotent 50 years ago at 25!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. Truth says:
    @David In TN
    You're so stupid you confused Joe Louis with Joe Frazier.

    Priss isn’t much of a sportsman, but his lemon chiffon souffle is TODIEFOR!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Mark Presco says: • Website

    I believe there will be a separation of the races.

    The bankers and welfare/warfare state have already destroyed the economy. It is remarkable to me that it hasn’t collapsed already, but they are steaming full speed ahead toward it’s inevitable demise.

    When it collapses there will be civil unrest. This will explode into civil war and there is no doubt in my mind that it will fracture along racial lines.

    White people need to start planning to defend their communities and then rebuild this nation as our founding fathers intended: for “white persons of good character”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

    We did it before and we can do it again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  61. Truth says:
    @attilathehen
    Thanks Truth. Here's an interesting post regarding the Vegas shooting:

    Apparently Milo Y. tweeted out the following:

    Follow
    Dangerous faggot @MiloYiannopfans
    #Facts
    Suspects Wife is a Asian Muslim
    Suspect shooter is a Registered Democrat
    Suspects Traveled Multiple times to Middle East#LasVegas
    5:37 AM - Oct 2, 2017
    14 14 Replies 68 68 Retweets 81 81 likes

    Someone else tweeted that Vegas is gun free zone.

    It's illegal to own a machine gun so we need to find out who provided this weapon.

    Can anyone in Vegas confirm some of this?

    Asian Muslim wife?

    Always cherchez la femme/le homme of a person.

    Derbyshire is destroying the West.

    Hey that cuck must of gotten sick of having to have the house nice and clean when the dragon lady came home from work.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. Truth says:
    @Alec Leamas (hard at work)
    It's obvious to anyone with a passing familiarity of blacks, black crime and dysfunction that the NFL "protests" such as they unfolded are naked, public displays of black solidarity. And if you go just beyond the surface what is being expressed in this solidarity is that we have within the United States a dispersed black nation, (dis)organized as a giant tribe. What blacks are objecting to in the various high-profile incidents with police and a lone white Hispanic is that members of a competing tribe have encroached on their rights and territory by killing one of theirs. This is why the facts of each incident as well as application of the law don't matter much if at all to them - the boys in blue (even the black ones) are members of the white tribe and give great offense when they enforce the white tribe's laws with force. Black civilians can kill and terrorize blacks without much of a fuss - you'll never get them as agitated at that exponentially higher body count because it's an intra-tribal matter and none of the white tribe's business.

    It's also apparent that this narrative has been crafted somewhere in secret by sinister men who are probably not black themselves for political ends - knowing how to stir the emotions of resentful American blacks.

    I can't take credit for it and I believe it was put this way by another of Mr. Sailer's commentators - I'm paraphrasing - white America thought that electing Mr. Obama would be an ultimate welcoming of American blacks into the breast of the nation, while American blacks took it as a sign of racial triumph and license to act more (dysfunctionally, annoyingly) black rather than raising their standards of behavior to those displayed by Mr. Obama personally as full Americans. The black tribe got one of theirs to be the biggest of the big men and their expectation was that blacks are in charge, and they would be rained upon with the spoils. (I believe that this commentator also related that the mentality of a lot of blacks is to believe that white people have lots of good stuff because they've had one of theirs in charge since the inception of the nation, so naturally with Big Chief Barack holding the scepter all of the indicia of material success and esteem would just magically come to them).

    It’s obvious to anyone with a passing familiarity of blacks, black crime and dysfunction that the NFL “protests” such as they unfolded are naked, public displays of black solidarity.

    That’s funny. I’ve been black since 1966, and I haven’t seen black solidarity yet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alec Leamas (hard at work)

    That’s funny. I’ve been black since 1966, and I haven’t seen black solidarity yet.
     
    So, how long have you been a black quarterback?

    Blacks are literally in the habit of referring to other, unrelated blacks as "my brother" and "my sister."

    Just because blacks act - well, black - among themselves in spite of this solidarity doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
    , @Father O'Hara
    The proverbial hanging curveball!
    Truth,ever hear of a murdering polecat calls himself OJ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Rurik says:

    for the umpteenth time, why shallow mediocrities like David Brooks or John Podhoretz have high-paid opinionating slots at major mainstream publications while Steve’s material is out beyond the fringes of respectability.

    cowardly idiocy

    if Phillip Giraldi has the nads to tell the obvious truth about such questions, then why does the Derb soil his knickers at the thought?

    white and black Americans are being divided so as to conquer by ((the 1%))

    blacks (and white SJW/human urinals) marinate in the 24/7/365 matrix – that all of black folly and failure is a direct consequence of the working class white man’s racism

    he did it

    and this is hammered and injected and inculcated and bashed-in to people’s psyches and sub-consciences by a demonic, motivated and diabolical ((Hollywood)), ((media)) and ((public)) institutions. With a discernible and intractable imperative to create hatred and strife and racial intolerance, all which can and will be used to further marginalize and disenfranchise certain groups (white men) as evil racists, with the obvious goal to create self-loathing where possible (in the human urinals/SJW), or ‘hate-crime’ laws against the white men still in possession of their balls and dignity.

    duh

    and the only question is.. is it motivated more by ((congenital tribal hatred)), or by a will to dominate and wield Total power over the fractured and marginalized tribes, in order to utterly enslave or destroy them out of ((tribal hatred))?

    PS, and for the record, the EXACT same thing is playing out in England, for the exact same reasons and by the exact same ((tribe)). DUH!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  64. Truth says:
    @Anon
    Bring it? Wanna rethink that one? Gonna make it hard for you to press charges someday.

    You messin with a real M-F G Wally, I’d reconsider.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    “But separation is no more feasible now than it was in 1862. We must struggle on forward as best we can, white and black alike.”

    I disagree John.

    Bringing blacks to this country was a mistake and not removing them from this country after slavery ended was an even bigger mistake.

    They never were, are not now, and will never be Americans. They are a foreign people who do not belong among us.

    They have to go back… and they will.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  66. Truth says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    This is the most extensive campaign of a scorned woman I have ever seen.

    Wait a minute!
    Stop!
    Cease and Desist!
    Hold the phone!

    Why is a white woman speaking up for the fidelity of the white race on a white nationalist website “an extensive campaign of a scorned woman”?

    Let me let you in on a news flash here, Hop Sing. There is no law that says that white people HAVE to like you (or me), HAVE to accept you as an equal, or HAVE to accept you integrating into their community.

    The law says they have to be fair with you in business, that’s it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    No law says I can't notice her deep, unfulfilled yearning for the touch of John D: the agony and pains of a rejected woman who now must embark upon a mission as shrill as it is pointless.

    Its fun, if unvirtuous, to bait the low-IQ every now and then. But I am, alas, not an exemplar of virtue.

    , @attilathehen
    Thanks Truth!!! This Chieh said he does this because he thinks I'm low IQ. This yellow brown degenerate is obviously mad that a Caucasian woman would get back at him and defend her heritage.

    In China there is some proverb about it being better for a man to have one deformed son than 7 beautiful daughters. Daniel Chieh is a perfect example of a deformed Asian male.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    Wally, what are your stats? Jewish? Involved with Asians?

    The Chinese are a little bit smarter than blacks so you can more out of them.

    But we don't need them in the West.

    He’s white with a Latino wife. Figure that one out.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Latinos can be of any race. If she is a white or Caucasian, she is acceptable. Asians/blacks are not acceptable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Rurik says:
    @Achmed E. Newman
    Your comment should be a widely read blog post. Helluva job, Anarchyst!

    Your comment should be a widely read blog post. Helluva job, Anarchyst!

    I wasn’t able to ”Agree’ twice to his comment, so let me just do it here!

    damn straight he called that one!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @Truth
    Wait a minute!
    Stop!
    Cease and Desist!
    Hold the phone!

    Why is a white woman speaking up for the fidelity of the white race on a white nationalist website "an extensive campaign of a scorned woman"?

    Let me let you in on a news flash here, Hop Sing. There is no law that says that white people HAVE to like you (or me), HAVE to accept you as an equal, or HAVE to accept you integrating into their community.

    The law says they have to be fair with you in business, that's it.

    No law says I can’t notice her deep, unfulfilled yearning for the touch of John D: the agony and pains of a rejected woman who now must embark upon a mission as shrill as it is pointless.

    Its fun, if unvirtuous, to bait the low-IQ every now and then. But I am, alas, not an exemplar of virtue.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Daniel Chieh, it's a shame you weren't one of the over 400 million Chinese that have been aborted.

    Truth is correct. As a white woman, I am not allowed to point out the obvious degeneracy of Derbyshire?

    Also, as a Chinese male, you are inferior to any Caucasian/European woman. Why? Because you're not white, you're yellow/brown.

    I state facts and you go off on some nonsense of a scorned woman.

    Leave the West.
    , @Truth

    But I am, alas, not an exemplar of virtue.
     
    But you seemed like it when you first started here, Bro. What happened?

    You were polite, neutral, fair, you tried to mediate disagreements between posters...now this?

    This is why your folks fought the boxer rebellion, its a shame they lost.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Alden says:

    “What jumped out at me was the peculiarity, the strangeness, of stadiums filled with mostly white people cheering on teams that were mostly black.”

    Exactly what I have thought for decades. What’s wrong with White men that they have this ritualistic (maybe gay) worship of black sports? And they bring their sons to the games and the games into their homes. Disgusting!

    Read More
    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  71. joef says:
    @Priss Factor
    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.

    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.

    In a way, it may seem counter-intuitive that blacks are SO ANGRY. The bad ole days of 'white racism' are now history, a thing of the past. Blacks are big in music and sports. A mulatto , the product of a black guy humping a white woman, became president and was re-elected. Oprah is revered by many. Beyonce and black idols dominate the charts. Sports are blacker than ever. So, blacks should be happier and less hateful. Based on 'progress' and 'justice', this is true.

    But humans emotions outrun human ideas. And the human organism feels contempt for the weak. It respects what it fears. Even if it hates what it fears, it has respect for it and with respect comes admiration.

    Look how the Japanese acted terribly toward the Chinese, the 'sick man of Asia'. But when US totally kicked Japanese butt, the Japanese were cucky-sucky to Uncle Sam. They worshiped McCarthur as shogun-god. And Japan has been America's geisha ever since. Never mind US firebombed the hell out of Tokyo and dropped two big ones. Never mind recent revelations showed US planned to nuke 12 more cities if Japan didn't surrender. Japanese got beaten so badly that they came to respect the US like something akin to Godzilla. A fearsome badass monster nation.

    And in the past, blacks felt this way. Sure, blacks were filled with hate and resentment against whites who called them 'ni**er' and drew funny 'coon' faces. But white man seemed fearsome back then. If some negro raped a white woman, these fearsome white men would come in hoods and hang a Negro from a tree and scare the bejeesus out of Negroes. So, the Negro thought, 'dang, white man aint nothing to mess with. He baaaaaad.' So, the Negro tried to prove that he's a credit to his race. He wanted to prove that he is worthy to live along the mighty horrifying-ass white man. He felt toward whitey like a Japanese felt toward Americans after defeat WWII. "You kicked my ass, and I kiss your ass and beg your approval and acceptance."

    So, even though things were worse for blacks in the past, blacks truly feared white folks and with that fear came not only hate but respect and admiration. It's like Hindus respected the Brits because a handful of Brits were so masterful in ruling over a bunch of messy disorganized cow-worshipers whose national odor was curry.

    But look how things changed so drastically. Compare 1915, the year that saw the release of THE BIRTH OF A NATION with 2015, the year of Obama and the Cuck.

    Back in 1915, there was the KKK as a real force, a show of white solidarity against blacks. And Woodrow Wilson was approving of the Klan as he felt disdain for the Negroes.
    People like to think that history is moved by ideas, values, and culture. And that would be the case in a more repressed and morally-centered social order. In Muslim societies, natural forces were held in check by Islamic codes and strict morality. So, even blacks in Arab nations had to watch themselves. If they acted funky and stuff in front of Arab women, they'd be whupped and killed on the spot. And US used to be more moral and conservative. But with the rise of popculture and hedonism, animal energies of human nature began to shape history and society more, and this esp exploded with rise of youth culture that was significantly influenced by black music centered around sexual energies. Also, the black success in sports and the rise of celebrity led to narcissism of black savagery. So, there has been an acceleration of history based on natural urges. Francis Fukuyama focused only on ideas, the hegelian struggle between ideologies. And once capitalism and liberalism won, he figured it was end of History with big 'H'. But he neglected to notice that as the Cold War progressed, ideology mattered less than idology. Western Culture was less and less about philosophy and art than about fun and fever. And the biggest 'western' threat to communist nations wasn't Ayn Rand and Adam Smith but Elvis and Beatles and Hollywood. So, even if History came to an end, there was now Beastory. With idols over ideals, human history is now driven by beast energies. Even spirituality is no longer about religions with depth of tradition and contemplation but about new sensations, like homomania and negromania. Homos are so loud and flamboyant. Negroes are so wild and rambunctious. Homos and Negroes are so into self-worship that they expect all others to worship them. Any refusal is heresy in their eyes. They got idol-god-complex.

    As far as blacks are concerned, history has been replaced by Fistory. Black fist is most mighty. Some even say the Washington Monument is really about the black dong.

    https://criticxxtreme.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/the-yes-they-were-black-series-worshipping-a-big-black-penis-osiris/

    With sports, music, and sex -- the only things that matter in our globalist idolized culture -- dominated by blacks, and with blacks showing NO INTEREST in anything but themselves in pop culture, why would blacks respect whitey anymore? Sure, blacks justify their contempt and hostility in terms of 'white racism' and 'police brutality'. They make it sound like they are still the underdogs. But if we look past the rhetoric, black hate is not about fear of white power(oppression) but about contempt for white weakness. Here are black athletes dominating the fields with white cheerleaders putting out to them. They see all these soft slow white boys cheer them on like gods and heroes. They see all these lame white boys imitating rappers. They hear about cuck culture, that white men are inviting black men to hump their women. Why would blacks respect this kind of loser wuss?
    If white power today was like it was 100 yrs ago, I guarantee all blacks would be standing for the anthem. Even if they'd hate white power, they would respect it as badass. But they now see whites as so weak. And this hostility isn't just at white 'racists' but white dweeberals. I mean, black guys despise Christopher Hayes and Anderson Cooper just as much. Dorks and dweebs.

    As far as they are concerned, they kick white boys' ass and hump white women and colonize white wombs.... but white boys are welcoming THIS as 'american as apple pie'.

    White America is now utterly disgusting, and black athletes and blacks in general have every reason to feel nothing but contempt for such weakness and cuckery.

    But then, it's the same with Jews. Jews long felt resentment for Wasps. But there was fear and respect too. Anglos seemed so great and awesome in having created much of the modern world in economics and science and politics. And Jews thought it would take a long hard climb to reach the top. But what happened? Jews rose so fast and WAsps fell so fast. Jews began to feel contempt for these cucky-wuck wasps, and now, Jews expect white goys and girls to just cuck out to Jews like servile dogs. And the more whites try to appease Jews, the more contempt Jews feel for these dogs.

    Some say 'nice guys finish last'. No, the issue isn't niceness. It is weakness. Weakness is held in contempt. It is, at best, an object of compassion. Otherwise, it is wussy.

    To blacks, past history seems especially insulting since they now realize that they'd been enslaved and oppressed by a bunch of wussies and dorks. If chimps were oppressed by gorillas, they would at least respect superior gorilla strength. But if chimps were to realize that they'd been kicked around by weaker gibbons, they're gonna feel extra hatred for the gibbons. The oppression would seem even more unjust since it violated not only morality but nature. If whites are bigger and stronger than blacks, blacks today might bitch about slavery as moral injustice but not as natural injustice. After all, nature is about rule of strong over the weak: lions over hyenas, hyenas over jackals, jackals over rabbits, etc. Once blacks realized that whites are the weaker race, they began to see slavery as not just moral wrong but natural wrong. How dare these wussy-ass white boys rule over blacks? It'd be like gorillas discovering they'd been kicked around by a bunch of chimps.

    Indeed, the reason why blacks hate the police so much is because police power goes against their instinctive savage sense of jungle justice. In sports, the only justice that matters is toughness. So, the strongest boxer wins. The toughest football players dominate the field and win the games. And blacks dominate sports because they are tougher. For savage blacks, this seems just and fair as their emotions are of the Rule of the Law of the Jungle. In sports, blacks totally dominate, and white man is a wussy bench-warmer or cucky waterboy.

    Then, how come white cops have power over blacks? Now, sane people would say police arrest black criminals and the like, but that is a matter of legal justice, an idea that makes little sense to savage blacks whose only sense of right or wrong is jungle justice. Blacks think like rappers, and rap logic is Rule of the gangster. So, blacks are less outraged by black thugs killing black thugs. It's like sports. It's jungle justice based on who be more 'badass'. But then, these white police come to mess up that game. With special 'white powers', they gain control over blacks and drag them into police stations and even shoot some of them. If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy's ass. That seems just to blacks. But with legal power and badges, white cops have power over stronger and tougher blacks..and that just seems 'unjust' to blacks whose idea of justice is 'who can whup whose ass?'

    Because blacks are so savage and only have pop culture as mainstay of culture, they've come to worship themselves as a god-race. This is why data and facts don't matter and have no effect on racial discourse that, for blacks and cucky whites, is a religious issue of Holy Negroes. Facts are useless against Faith.
    It's like Mao was a godlike figure in China. So, stats didn't matter. It didn't matter that Great Leap Forward killed tens of millions. It didn't matter that by objective measures, China was worse under Mao. Religion is about faith, not about facts. Once Mao was idolized, it didn't matter what he did. He was above all that went wrong since he was a sacred icon.
    And blacks, Jews, and homos have such iconic power in the West. So, facts and data make no dent in the black narrative. Even most secular people are emotionally religious and cling to sacred icons. They were raised worshiping MLK, Ali, Oprah, Bob Marley, and rappers as holy icons. So, it doesn't matter if they are told of black crime stats. They keep worshiping the icons.. like Soviets raised on Stalin-worship just believed and believed in Great Stalin despite the obvious factual evidence of the horrors of Stalinism.

    This is the danger of worshiping people and things. Best reason for worship in God is not that God exists. He doesn't. It's that those who don't worship God will almost always worship something else. The current West now worships the most savage and most destructive of all races.

    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.
    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.

    You are basically correct, which is substantiated from my own experiences growing up near the afro urban ghetto, and going to integrated public schools with them. But I will enhance your argument with a little bit of empirical experience. Afros chose easy targets, and did not like hard fighting. It is true boxers, and football players, had to get accustomed to challenges, but that was the exception, and not the rule, among the urban afro ghetto dwellers.

    Also the afro who was a drug gang enforcer, or who ran the corner, was tougher than the average afro. You generally did not want to mess with them. However, generally afros avoided fighting strong/tough White guys. They picked the weak soft targets to victimize, and avoided strong hard targets. [they mostly more show than go].

    Blacks began to dominate boxing/football as Whites started to pursue academic goals, & careers, instead of physical activities. As white flight left for suburbia, they left the inner city boxing gym behind. The second issue is that afros have a lot of down time (provided by the welfare state) to perfect their game, whereas Whites had work, and other obligations/responsibilities, that limited their time available to train.

    If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy’s ass.

    This is not well supported by my observations. Urban afros would frequently fight with the police that are trying to arrest them, and would lose many times. At times you would see the afro actually crying about wanting to make a civilian complaint, even when he initiated the physical confrontation part of the arrest (instead of going quietly). Afros are like predators in the wild, they go after the weak. They usually do not attack unless they believe they have some sort of unfair advantage (or by fighting with the police, trying to enhance their reputations in the ghetto).

    From my great experience, out of all the urban White working class vs afro ghetto fights, the afros lost the majority of the time. The only time they will go after a strong White guy is when either they are armed, or outnumber their opponent. Many Whites, who did not have direct experience dealing with urban ghetto afros, have a distorted mythical belief in afro physical prowess (or are a fearful lib wimp who wants to pander to the afro).

    One anecdotal story that illustrates well the urban ghetto afro mentality: an acquaintance from the neighborhood, who worked solo on a delivery truck, and was a physically strong weightlifter, was confronted by an afro robber armed with a knife. The afro robber demanded money from his potential White victim, to which my acquaintance pulled out his own knife and said “lets go nig…”. Upon seeing the knife, the afro stated “man you did not pull no knife, I was only goin to robbs you” (sic), and began to back away in full retreat.

    Read More
    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @Truth
    Hey man, you need to write a series of stories about a WhiteMan and his travels through the ghetto, that shit would be YUGE. Like some 21st century Huckleberry Finn ish. White boys all over the country would be walking to school happily with a copy of your book under their arm, and a slingshot and a frog in their back pocket.
    , @eah
    Many Whites, who did not have direct experience dealing with urban ghetto afros, have a distorted mythical belief in afro physical prowess

    I had more or less the same experience, except on the basketball court -- as I used to say, 'basketball is a contact sport, football is a hitting sport' -- I used to enjoy banging bodies under the boards, or pretty much anywhere on the court -- playing very aggressively that way generally -- most of the white guys I played with were the same -- I mean, let's play man -- and I was often surprised by how many of the black dudes just couldn't or wouldn't hang with that -- most did of course -- just not nearly as many as you would have expected -- once you started dishing it out too, many backed off.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Wally says:
    @Anon
    Bring it? Wanna rethink that one? Gonna make it hard for you to press charges someday.

    WTF are you talking about now?

    Hell, you don’t even know, you’re just a fat obsessed Zionist.

    I realize you’re not the sharpest tool in the shed, but please pay attention, you and those like you are being hammered at unz.com. :-)

    Owning you forever.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. Alden says:
    @1RW
    I did look up African achievements before European arrival. I found this gem

    http://www.asbmb.org/asbmbtoday/asbmbtoday_article.aspx?id=32437

    It's got Egyptians (non-negroes btw) composing mathematical treatises 35,000 years ago and Africans shipping elephants to China. I guess they beat out India, Burma, and Vietnam on price.

    I am deeply awed

    Actually, the Chinese Emperor sent an entire fleet including veterinarians, food, housing etc to the east Coast of Africa to buy animals for the Imperial Zoo. It was reasonable successful. Enough animals survived the trip to start a Zoo. But it was so expensive and troublesome that the government decided against any more Ocean voyages for centuries.

    The Chinese went to one of the Arab ports to buy the animals.

    Read More
    • Replies: @1RW
    That was sarcasm. Africans sailing to china with elephants is ridiculous. Just like the other achievements. Chinese sailing to Africa in enormous ships is a matter of historical record.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Alden says:
    @Wally
    IOW, your wife / girlfriend left you for a negro.

    No worries though. How many euro white female, negro male relationships last?

    But what the hell, OJ is free, let's ask him.

    Wally, you’re so right about Priss Factor, he’s really off his meds today. How many White women have a black baby every year??? 10,000 maybe? It’s mostly an 18 year meal ticket to get on welfare. And how many White men watch black sports every year and contribute to the 10 million dollar a year salaries and massive tax subsidies to the owners? It’s probably about 100 million.

    They are both race traitors, White women who have black babies and White men who watch black sports. But the black sports watchers are vastly more and contribute vastly more to the myth that blacks belong in White society.

    Don’t cast the first stone if you watch black sports.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Truth

    It’s obvious to anyone with a passing familiarity of blacks, black crime and dysfunction that the NFL “protests” such as they unfolded are naked, public displays of black solidarity.
     
    That's funny. I've been black since 1966, and I haven't seen black solidarity yet.

    That’s funny. I’ve been black since 1966, and I haven’t seen black solidarity yet.

    So, how long have you been a black quarterback?

    Blacks are literally in the habit of referring to other, unrelated blacks as “my brother” and “my sister.”

    Just because blacks act – well, black – among themselves in spite of this solidarity doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @Daniel Chieh
    No law says I can't notice her deep, unfulfilled yearning for the touch of John D: the agony and pains of a rejected woman who now must embark upon a mission as shrill as it is pointless.

    Its fun, if unvirtuous, to bait the low-IQ every now and then. But I am, alas, not an exemplar of virtue.

    Daniel Chieh, it’s a shame you weren’t one of the over 400 million Chinese that have been aborted.

    Truth is correct. As a white woman, I am not allowed to point out the obvious degeneracy of Derbyshire?

    Also, as a Chinese male, you are inferior to any Caucasian/European woman. Why? Because you’re not white, you’re yellow/brown.

    I state facts and you go off on some nonsense of a scorned woman.

    Leave the West.

    Read More
    • LOL: Daniel Chieh
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    Daniel Chieh, it’s a shame you weren’t one of the over 400 million Chinese that have been aborted.
     

    Darling, I'm sure you wish that, because then you would be inferior to one fewer person. But we can't all have what we want in life.

    Anyway, I'm pretty sure you're a troll designed to make other, reasonable and non-idiotic WNs look bad. If not, you do have my sympathies. Living with low IQ and mental illness in today's world is definitely a challenge, but as you and the average member of Antifa demonstrate, it is very possible(even if you develop weird fixations on handsome mathematicians).

    Toodles. Love also from my "European" French-Canadian wife.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @Anon
    He's white with a Latino wife. Figure that one out.

    Latinos can be of any race. If she is a white or Caucasian, she is acceptable. Asians/blacks are not acceptable.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    She looks like mixed race to me
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. @Truth
    Wait a minute!
    Stop!
    Cease and Desist!
    Hold the phone!

    Why is a white woman speaking up for the fidelity of the white race on a white nationalist website "an extensive campaign of a scorned woman"?

    Let me let you in on a news flash here, Hop Sing. There is no law that says that white people HAVE to like you (or me), HAVE to accept you as an equal, or HAVE to accept you integrating into their community.

    The law says they have to be fair with you in business, that's it.

    Thanks Truth!!! This Chieh said he does this because he thinks I’m low IQ. This yellow brown degenerate is obviously mad that a Caucasian woman would get back at him and defend her heritage.

    In China there is some proverb about it being better for a man to have one deformed son than 7 beautiful daughters. Daniel Chieh is a perfect example of a deformed Asian male.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. joef says:
    @attilathehen
    anon - are you Jewish, Asian, involved with Asians? The Chinese are notorious test cheaters and thieves. This has been documented by Steve Sailer.

    Why is it necessary for China (and all other Asians) to copy the West? Why didn't the Industrial Revolution start in Asia? Why are the Chinese constantly stealing Western technology? Why do Asians get plastic surgery to look more Western?

    Charles Murray's first wife was Thai and he has Thai offspring. He is a degenerate like Derbyshire who will automatically favor Asians.

    This is the problem. Living near the afro urban ghetto, and based on all other info available, it is obvious that most afro americans are our biggest national problem, that will eventually be responsible for the bring down of this once great nation. It is not about race (skin color), but about their parasitical antisocial behavior that is the problem.

    But the haters distract us from the adult discussion of the problem, by obsessively complaining about other groups. These other groups are as much of a problem to this nation as a pimple would be compared to a (afro) cancer. These other groups are not a problem, the antisocial afro actions are.

    I never felt threatened walking through a Chinatown, nor seen (or heard) anyone robbed (but walking through an afro urban ghetto is another story). This lack of mature focus just distorts our priorities of where our true dangers are.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Wait a minute!
    Hold the phone!
    Stop the presses!
    Turn the battleship around!

    Again, what is wrong with a white woman wanting to keep the white race WHYYYTE!?!?!

    I can't see why Attila gets so much strife on a WN (or alt right if you are so inclined) website for taking on BLOODSHARKS*.


    *(Bloodsharks, get it? Blood-red, mud-brown? I think I need to copywright that one...)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Truth says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    No law says I can't notice her deep, unfulfilled yearning for the touch of John D: the agony and pains of a rejected woman who now must embark upon a mission as shrill as it is pointless.

    Its fun, if unvirtuous, to bait the low-IQ every now and then. But I am, alas, not an exemplar of virtue.

    But I am, alas, not an exemplar of virtue.

    But you seemed like it when you first started here, Bro. What happened?

    You were polite, neutral, fair, you tried to mediate disagreements between posters…now this?

    This is why your folks fought the boxer rebellion, its a shame they lost.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. joef says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around. But I don't think that they are really tougher than white men (uncucked). I know of no formidable aboriginal Bantu military forces that gave Europeans a tough fight in equatorial Africa. (The Zulus, by contrast, were formidable, but not Bantu.) When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They're aggressive, but not courageous.

    Like John, in the 1970s I thought that there would eventually be some kind of racial peace. Now I know it's not going to happen. But will whites be able to unite to resist their racial displacement in the United States as they become a smaller and smaller part of it?

    When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They’re aggressive, but not courageous.

    My general experience exactly! And the paradox is that most of the ones who are genuinely tough are actually better behaved.

    But despite that fact, what you said before is also true:

    Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around

    But I witnessed a lot of tougher urban neighborhood Irish, Italian, and Puerto Rican, beat ghetto afro aggressors down when confronted.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. joef says:
    @Buba Zanetti
    A google search reveals an interesting statistic, African Americans make up 16% of the total population of the United States but make up a whopping 68% of the entire American military services combined.
    I wonder why that is.

    The military has become part of the welfare state for afros, set up by leftist Democrats.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @attilathehen
    Daniel Chieh, it's a shame you weren't one of the over 400 million Chinese that have been aborted.

    Truth is correct. As a white woman, I am not allowed to point out the obvious degeneracy of Derbyshire?

    Also, as a Chinese male, you are inferior to any Caucasian/European woman. Why? Because you're not white, you're yellow/brown.

    I state facts and you go off on some nonsense of a scorned woman.

    Leave the West.

    Daniel Chieh, it’s a shame you weren’t one of the over 400 million Chinese that have been aborted.

    Darling, I’m sure you wish that, because then you would be inferior to one fewer person. But we can’t all have what we want in life.

    Anyway, I’m pretty sure you’re a troll designed to make other, reasonable and non-idiotic WNs look bad. If not, you do have my sympathies. Living with low IQ and mental illness in today’s world is definitely a challenge, but as you and the average member of Antifa demonstrate, it is very possible(even if you develop weird fixations on handsome mathematicians).

    Toodles. Love also from my “European” French-Canadian wife.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    designed to make other, reasonable and non-idiotic WNs look bad.
     
    Well Dan, you have to admit, this is not a particularly sizable coalition we're describing here.
    , @Talha

    LOL! Just saw this:
    Love also from my “European” French-Canadian wife.
     
    Sweet - you nabbed one too, eh?

    I don't get what all the fuss is that White guys always complain about; reasonable European/White women make excellent wives.

    Find one, they're out there - I mean if a genetically defective Paki and Chinese guy could do it...

    Peace.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. Jake says:

    The deplorable white trash needs to be punished by denying it the endless privileges of life with blacks. And blacks deserve to be saved from having to deal with white trash deplorables.

    It’s a win-win for white Liberals – if they really believe what they sat.

    Read More
    • LOL: eah
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  85. This is what ethno-monopoly does to political discourse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  86. Truth says:
    @joef

    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.
    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.
     
    You are basically correct, which is substantiated from my own experiences growing up near the afro urban ghetto, and going to integrated public schools with them. But I will enhance your argument with a little bit of empirical experience. Afros chose easy targets, and did not like hard fighting. It is true boxers, and football players, had to get accustomed to challenges, but that was the exception, and not the rule, among the urban afro ghetto dwellers.

    Also the afro who was a drug gang enforcer, or who ran the corner, was tougher than the average afro. You generally did not want to mess with them. However, generally afros avoided fighting strong/tough White guys. They picked the weak soft targets to victimize, and avoided strong hard targets. [they mostly more show than go].

    Blacks began to dominate boxing/football as Whites started to pursue academic goals, & careers, instead of physical activities. As white flight left for suburbia, they left the inner city boxing gym behind. The second issue is that afros have a lot of down time (provided by the welfare state) to perfect their game, whereas Whites had work, and other obligations/responsibilities, that limited their time available to train.


    If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy’s ass.
     
    This is not well supported by my observations. Urban afros would frequently fight with the police that are trying to arrest them, and would lose many times. At times you would see the afro actually crying about wanting to make a civilian complaint, even when he initiated the physical confrontation part of the arrest (instead of going quietly). Afros are like predators in the wild, they go after the weak. They usually do not attack unless they believe they have some sort of unfair advantage (or by fighting with the police, trying to enhance their reputations in the ghetto).

    From my great experience, out of all the urban White working class vs afro ghetto fights, the afros lost the majority of the time. The only time they will go after a strong White guy is when either they are armed, or outnumber their opponent. Many Whites, who did not have direct experience dealing with urban ghetto afros, have a distorted mythical belief in afro physical prowess (or are a fearful lib wimp who wants to pander to the afro).

    One anecdotal story that illustrates well the urban ghetto afro mentality: an acquaintance from the neighborhood, who worked solo on a delivery truck, and was a physically strong weightlifter, was confronted by an afro robber armed with a knife. The afro robber demanded money from his potential White victim, to which my acquaintance pulled out his own knife and said "lets go nig...". Upon seeing the knife, the afro stated "man you did not pull no knife, I was only goin to robbs you" (sic), and began to back away in full retreat.

    Hey man, you need to write a series of stories about a WhiteMan and his travels through the ghetto, that shit would be YUGE. Like some 21st century Huckleberry Finn ish. White boys all over the country would be walking to school happily with a copy of your book under their arm, and a slingshot and a frog in their back pocket.

    Read More
    • LOL: joef
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. @Priss Factor
    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.

    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.

    In a way, it may seem counter-intuitive that blacks are SO ANGRY. The bad ole days of 'white racism' are now history, a thing of the past. Blacks are big in music and sports. A mulatto , the product of a black guy humping a white woman, became president and was re-elected. Oprah is revered by many. Beyonce and black idols dominate the charts. Sports are blacker than ever. So, blacks should be happier and less hateful. Based on 'progress' and 'justice', this is true.

    But humans emotions outrun human ideas. And the human organism feels contempt for the weak. It respects what it fears. Even if it hates what it fears, it has respect for it and with respect comes admiration.

    Look how the Japanese acted terribly toward the Chinese, the 'sick man of Asia'. But when US totally kicked Japanese butt, the Japanese were cucky-sucky to Uncle Sam. They worshiped McCarthur as shogun-god. And Japan has been America's geisha ever since. Never mind US firebombed the hell out of Tokyo and dropped two big ones. Never mind recent revelations showed US planned to nuke 12 more cities if Japan didn't surrender. Japanese got beaten so badly that they came to respect the US like something akin to Godzilla. A fearsome badass monster nation.

    And in the past, blacks felt this way. Sure, blacks were filled with hate and resentment against whites who called them 'ni**er' and drew funny 'coon' faces. But white man seemed fearsome back then. If some negro raped a white woman, these fearsome white men would come in hoods and hang a Negro from a tree and scare the bejeesus out of Negroes. So, the Negro thought, 'dang, white man aint nothing to mess with. He baaaaaad.' So, the Negro tried to prove that he's a credit to his race. He wanted to prove that he is worthy to live along the mighty horrifying-ass white man. He felt toward whitey like a Japanese felt toward Americans after defeat WWII. "You kicked my ass, and I kiss your ass and beg your approval and acceptance."

    So, even though things were worse for blacks in the past, blacks truly feared white folks and with that fear came not only hate but respect and admiration. It's like Hindus respected the Brits because a handful of Brits were so masterful in ruling over a bunch of messy disorganized cow-worshipers whose national odor was curry.

    But look how things changed so drastically. Compare 1915, the year that saw the release of THE BIRTH OF A NATION with 2015, the year of Obama and the Cuck.

    Back in 1915, there was the KKK as a real force, a show of white solidarity against blacks. And Woodrow Wilson was approving of the Klan as he felt disdain for the Negroes.
    People like to think that history is moved by ideas, values, and culture. And that would be the case in a more repressed and morally-centered social order. In Muslim societies, natural forces were held in check by Islamic codes and strict morality. So, even blacks in Arab nations had to watch themselves. If they acted funky and stuff in front of Arab women, they'd be whupped and killed on the spot. And US used to be more moral and conservative. But with the rise of popculture and hedonism, animal energies of human nature began to shape history and society more, and this esp exploded with rise of youth culture that was significantly influenced by black music centered around sexual energies. Also, the black success in sports and the rise of celebrity led to narcissism of black savagery. So, there has been an acceleration of history based on natural urges. Francis Fukuyama focused only on ideas, the hegelian struggle between ideologies. And once capitalism and liberalism won, he figured it was end of History with big 'H'. But he neglected to notice that as the Cold War progressed, ideology mattered less than idology. Western Culture was less and less about philosophy and art than about fun and fever. And the biggest 'western' threat to communist nations wasn't Ayn Rand and Adam Smith but Elvis and Beatles and Hollywood. So, even if History came to an end, there was now Beastory. With idols over ideals, human history is now driven by beast energies. Even spirituality is no longer about religions with depth of tradition and contemplation but about new sensations, like homomania and negromania. Homos are so loud and flamboyant. Negroes are so wild and rambunctious. Homos and Negroes are so into self-worship that they expect all others to worship them. Any refusal is heresy in their eyes. They got idol-god-complex.

    As far as blacks are concerned, history has been replaced by Fistory. Black fist is most mighty. Some even say the Washington Monument is really about the black dong.

    https://criticxxtreme.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/the-yes-they-were-black-series-worshipping-a-big-black-penis-osiris/

    With sports, music, and sex -- the only things that matter in our globalist idolized culture -- dominated by blacks, and with blacks showing NO INTEREST in anything but themselves in pop culture, why would blacks respect whitey anymore? Sure, blacks justify their contempt and hostility in terms of 'white racism' and 'police brutality'. They make it sound like they are still the underdogs. But if we look past the rhetoric, black hate is not about fear of white power(oppression) but about contempt for white weakness. Here are black athletes dominating the fields with white cheerleaders putting out to them. They see all these soft slow white boys cheer them on like gods and heroes. They see all these lame white boys imitating rappers. They hear about cuck culture, that white men are inviting black men to hump their women. Why would blacks respect this kind of loser wuss?
    If white power today was like it was 100 yrs ago, I guarantee all blacks would be standing for the anthem. Even if they'd hate white power, they would respect it as badass. But they now see whites as so weak. And this hostility isn't just at white 'racists' but white dweeberals. I mean, black guys despise Christopher Hayes and Anderson Cooper just as much. Dorks and dweebs.

    As far as they are concerned, they kick white boys' ass and hump white women and colonize white wombs.... but white boys are welcoming THIS as 'american as apple pie'.

    White America is now utterly disgusting, and black athletes and blacks in general have every reason to feel nothing but contempt for such weakness and cuckery.

    But then, it's the same with Jews. Jews long felt resentment for Wasps. But there was fear and respect too. Anglos seemed so great and awesome in having created much of the modern world in economics and science and politics. And Jews thought it would take a long hard climb to reach the top. But what happened? Jews rose so fast and WAsps fell so fast. Jews began to feel contempt for these cucky-wuck wasps, and now, Jews expect white goys and girls to just cuck out to Jews like servile dogs. And the more whites try to appease Jews, the more contempt Jews feel for these dogs.

    Some say 'nice guys finish last'. No, the issue isn't niceness. It is weakness. Weakness is held in contempt. It is, at best, an object of compassion. Otherwise, it is wussy.

    To blacks, past history seems especially insulting since they now realize that they'd been enslaved and oppressed by a bunch of wussies and dorks. If chimps were oppressed by gorillas, they would at least respect superior gorilla strength. But if chimps were to realize that they'd been kicked around by weaker gibbons, they're gonna feel extra hatred for the gibbons. The oppression would seem even more unjust since it violated not only morality but nature. If whites are bigger and stronger than blacks, blacks today might bitch about slavery as moral injustice but not as natural injustice. After all, nature is about rule of strong over the weak: lions over hyenas, hyenas over jackals, jackals over rabbits, etc. Once blacks realized that whites are the weaker race, they began to see slavery as not just moral wrong but natural wrong. How dare these wussy-ass white boys rule over blacks? It'd be like gorillas discovering they'd been kicked around by a bunch of chimps.

    Indeed, the reason why blacks hate the police so much is because police power goes against their instinctive savage sense of jungle justice. In sports, the only justice that matters is toughness. So, the strongest boxer wins. The toughest football players dominate the field and win the games. And blacks dominate sports because they are tougher. For savage blacks, this seems just and fair as their emotions are of the Rule of the Law of the Jungle. In sports, blacks totally dominate, and white man is a wussy bench-warmer or cucky waterboy.

    Then, how come white cops have power over blacks? Now, sane people would say police arrest black criminals and the like, but that is a matter of legal justice, an idea that makes little sense to savage blacks whose only sense of right or wrong is jungle justice. Blacks think like rappers, and rap logic is Rule of the gangster. So, blacks are less outraged by black thugs killing black thugs. It's like sports. It's jungle justice based on who be more 'badass'. But then, these white police come to mess up that game. With special 'white powers', they gain control over blacks and drag them into police stations and even shoot some of them. If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy's ass. That seems just to blacks. But with legal power and badges, white cops have power over stronger and tougher blacks..and that just seems 'unjust' to blacks whose idea of justice is 'who can whup whose ass?'

    Because blacks are so savage and only have pop culture as mainstay of culture, they've come to worship themselves as a god-race. This is why data and facts don't matter and have no effect on racial discourse that, for blacks and cucky whites, is a religious issue of Holy Negroes. Facts are useless against Faith.
    It's like Mao was a godlike figure in China. So, stats didn't matter. It didn't matter that Great Leap Forward killed tens of millions. It didn't matter that by objective measures, China was worse under Mao. Religion is about faith, not about facts. Once Mao was idolized, it didn't matter what he did. He was above all that went wrong since he was a sacred icon.
    And blacks, Jews, and homos have such iconic power in the West. So, facts and data make no dent in the black narrative. Even most secular people are emotionally religious and cling to sacred icons. They were raised worshiping MLK, Ali, Oprah, Bob Marley, and rappers as holy icons. So, it doesn't matter if they are told of black crime stats. They keep worshiping the icons.. like Soviets raised on Stalin-worship just believed and believed in Great Stalin despite the obvious factual evidence of the horrors of Stalinism.

    This is the danger of worshiping people and things. Best reason for worship in God is not that God exists. He doesn't. It's that those who don't worship God will almost always worship something else. The current West now worships the most savage and most destructive of all races.

    Excellent post, Priss. But do not overlook the poisonous impact of 1) the highfalutin US Supreme Court and 2) the anti-white MSM which steers ‘right-thinking’ intellectuals (and jurists) towards sappy, wrong-headed solutions.

    The courts (together with judicial activists) as well as our dominant media have worked hand in hand to transform our formerly white, English-speaking civilization into something coarse, vulgar, and unrecognizable. And they’re not done yet. The antifa crusade to ‘stop fascism’ (resistance) is being aided by the courts as well as our dominant media. This pattern will continue.

    The SCOTUS (with our MSM cheering them on) has gutted freedom of association and irrevocably undermined America’s founding stock. There’s trouble ahead. America is unraveling.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. eah says:

    It’s desirable, but not for that reason — re black men, consider 1) their hugely disproportionate criminality (black women less so), and 2) their extremely poor academic performance (black women too, but less so) — now consider the consequences of 1) and 2): rather than contributing to the economy in what should be their peak years, instead black men generate enormous costs (police, courts, prison, probation, etc); add to that the ‘opportunity cost’ due to their lack of participation in the economy; in addition, even the ones who don’t end up behind bars contribute minimally to the economy due to their poor education — I would not be at all surprised if > 50% of black men are functionally illiterate.

    Given all of the above, and discounting for the moment the suffering and loss victims of black crime experience, it must be the case that black people are, in aggregate, a net drag on America — they do not, in aggregate, make a positive economic contribution (I don’t think of Blacks who work for the government, largely via affirmative action, as making a positive contribution) — I think any serious study would confirm this.

    That’s why there ought to be separation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  89. Truth says:
    @joef
    This is the problem. Living near the afro urban ghetto, and based on all other info available, it is obvious that most afro americans are our biggest national problem, that will eventually be responsible for the bring down of this once great nation. It is not about race (skin color), but about their parasitical antisocial behavior that is the problem.

    But the haters distract us from the adult discussion of the problem, by obsessively complaining about other groups. These other groups are as much of a problem to this nation as a pimple would be compared to a (afro) cancer. These other groups are not a problem, the antisocial afro actions are.

    I never felt threatened walking through a Chinatown, nor seen (or heard) anyone robbed (but walking through an afro urban ghetto is another story). This lack of mature focus just distorts our priorities of where our true dangers are.

    Wait a minute!
    Hold the phone!
    Stop the presses!
    Turn the battleship around!

    Again, what is wrong with a white woman wanting to keep the white race WHYYYTE!?!?!

    I can’t see why Attila gets so much strife on a WN (or alt right if you are so inclined) website for taking on BLOODSHARKS*.

    *(Bloodsharks, get it? Blood-red, mud-brown? I think I need to copywright that one…)

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    Don't know what your second comment is about? I think it was meant for someone else. In regards to your comment about walking in the urban afro ghetto:

    Many ethnic working class white urban neighborhoods adjoined afro ghettos. We went to the same public schools, and took the same public transportation (subways and buses). We dealt with the burglaries, robberies, car thefts, and an occasional homicide from the afro ghetto invaders. I visited friends in the hospital numerous times recovering from shootings, stabbings, and gang assaults; and at times a funeral.
    And payback was a bitch when we returned the favor.

    If you don't like that I have personal familiarity with afro ghetto bad behavior, thats just too bad. Find a feckless pandering liberal wimp to talk to, who would love to pretend everything I said never happened. Empirical unwanted experience trumps desired theoretical fantasies every time.

    Otherwise thank you for your comment.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Truth says:
    @Daniel Chieh

    Daniel Chieh, it’s a shame you weren’t one of the over 400 million Chinese that have been aborted.
     

    Darling, I'm sure you wish that, because then you would be inferior to one fewer person. But we can't all have what we want in life.

    Anyway, I'm pretty sure you're a troll designed to make other, reasonable and non-idiotic WNs look bad. If not, you do have my sympathies. Living with low IQ and mental illness in today's world is definitely a challenge, but as you and the average member of Antifa demonstrate, it is very possible(even if you develop weird fixations on handsome mathematicians).

    Toodles. Love also from my "European" French-Canadian wife.

    designed to make other, reasonable and non-idiotic WNs look bad.

    Well Dan, you have to admit, this is not a particularly sizable coalition we’re describing here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Misanthropy is the most appropriate belief system in a fallen age.
    , @eah
    Well Dan, you have to admit, this is not a particularly sizable coalition we’re describing here.

    You'd be surprised -- also at how fast it's growing -- notwithstanding snide remarks from pricks like you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. eah says:
    @joef

    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.
    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.
     
    You are basically correct, which is substantiated from my own experiences growing up near the afro urban ghetto, and going to integrated public schools with them. But I will enhance your argument with a little bit of empirical experience. Afros chose easy targets, and did not like hard fighting. It is true boxers, and football players, had to get accustomed to challenges, but that was the exception, and not the rule, among the urban afro ghetto dwellers.

    Also the afro who was a drug gang enforcer, or who ran the corner, was tougher than the average afro. You generally did not want to mess with them. However, generally afros avoided fighting strong/tough White guys. They picked the weak soft targets to victimize, and avoided strong hard targets. [they mostly more show than go].

    Blacks began to dominate boxing/football as Whites started to pursue academic goals, & careers, instead of physical activities. As white flight left for suburbia, they left the inner city boxing gym behind. The second issue is that afros have a lot of down time (provided by the welfare state) to perfect their game, whereas Whites had work, and other obligations/responsibilities, that limited their time available to train.


    If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy’s ass.
     
    This is not well supported by my observations. Urban afros would frequently fight with the police that are trying to arrest them, and would lose many times. At times you would see the afro actually crying about wanting to make a civilian complaint, even when he initiated the physical confrontation part of the arrest (instead of going quietly). Afros are like predators in the wild, they go after the weak. They usually do not attack unless they believe they have some sort of unfair advantage (or by fighting with the police, trying to enhance their reputations in the ghetto).

    From my great experience, out of all the urban White working class vs afro ghetto fights, the afros lost the majority of the time. The only time they will go after a strong White guy is when either they are armed, or outnumber their opponent. Many Whites, who did not have direct experience dealing with urban ghetto afros, have a distorted mythical belief in afro physical prowess (or are a fearful lib wimp who wants to pander to the afro).

    One anecdotal story that illustrates well the urban ghetto afro mentality: an acquaintance from the neighborhood, who worked solo on a delivery truck, and was a physically strong weightlifter, was confronted by an afro robber armed with a knife. The afro robber demanded money from his potential White victim, to which my acquaintance pulled out his own knife and said "lets go nig...". Upon seeing the knife, the afro stated "man you did not pull no knife, I was only goin to robbs you" (sic), and began to back away in full retreat.

    Many Whites, who did not have direct experience dealing with urban ghetto afros, have a distorted mythical belief in afro physical prowess

    I had more or less the same experience, except on the basketball court — as I used to say, ‘basketball is a contact sport, football is a hitting sport’ — I used to enjoy banging bodies under the boards, or pretty much anywhere on the court — playing very aggressively that way generally — most of the white guys I played with were the same — I mean, let’s play man — and I was often surprised by how many of the black dudes just couldn’t or wouldn’t hang with that — most did of course — just not nearly as many as you would have expected — once you started dishing it out too, many backed off.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. @Truth

    designed to make other, reasonable and non-idiotic WNs look bad.
     
    Well Dan, you have to admit, this is not a particularly sizable coalition we're describing here.

    Misanthropy is the most appropriate belief system in a fallen age.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Don't let it happen to you Danny! Please try to rediscover that NICE guy from 2 years ago.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. eah says:
    @anon
    Yo idiot; Chinese are to the right side of whites on the bell curve. His kids will likely be superior on the HBD scale compared to you.

    All the more reason they have to go back — the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids — eg look into the enormous over-representation of Asians at the Univ of California, where at some campuses they are 2x, 3x, or more over-represented — and due to the reality of the underachievement of Hispanics and Blacks, above a level that represents proportionality, every Asian admitted means a deserving (ie they meet minimum admission requirements) white kid is not admitted — it’s as simple as that — this is America, after all — a nation that Whites built — why should we allow immigration to disadvantage our own children?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Hey, I guess anon belives it's better to create wealth for the overlords than to have a group beneath you creating them for you.
    , @yeah
    "All the more reason they have to go back — the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids ".

    I have heard "Keep out the dumb and the stupid lest we all become dumbed-down". That is a viewpoint I would tend to agree with. Put an end to this affirmative action nonsense.

    But your proposal to kick out the bright is ... well, what can I say? Some centuries back, clever women used to be denounced and burnt as witches. Clever men were strung up from trees to hang lest their cleverness reveal the village elders to be the idiots they were. Now you are saying that clever Asians should be kicked out lest they threaten the mediocre whites. I don't think whites need such protection, but if they do, then that is tough luck.
    , @eah
    https://twitter.com/huwhyte_1/status/915041068068036609
    , @eah
    Whites will never be able to placate them.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLUOJRNWsAA0Q2P.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. Andyjazz says:

    There are a number of guys I work with who are veterans of the armed services. The youngest of these is an Afghan War veteran. I asked him about the latest controversy over the national anthem protests.

    Me: Hey dude, you being a guy with a CIB (combat infantry badge) from one of our most recent wars, what do you think about the “national anthem protests?”
    Dude: What protests?
    Me: The protests at NFL football games.
    Dude: Oh, I don’t watch TV that much, what do you mean protests?
    Me: Well some players are kneeling instead of standing at the playing of the national anthem as a form of protest.
    Dude: So?
    Me: Well some people are saying that this is offensive because they’re protesting like that.
    Dude: Well the constitution says you should have the right to protest so……they’re protesting.
    Me: But they’re not standing
    Dude: So? They have the fucking right to protest if they want to so, so fucking what?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    I don't know if you realize this, Dawg, but you would have come across much better had you transposed the "me" quotations with the "dude" quotations.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. does anyone here at unz.com see an emerging police state in our wonderful country? is everyone okay with the police militarization. the army off=loading weapons like grenade launchers and various gear, armored vehicles, humvees, etc.
    the police have new toys and want to play with them. remember the aftermath of the boston marathon bombing? creepy.
    well, i guess we need to be kept in line when the empire goes up in flames. black & white.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    does anyone here at unz.com see an emerging police state in our wonderful country?
     
    Sure, you, and I and the guy who put up the "the real story behind the national anthem protests" video, that's about it.

    is everyone okay with the police militarization. the army off=loading weapons like grenade launchers and various gear, armored vehicles, humvees, etc.
     
    Of course, they're clearly going to use all that gear only to keep Knee-growz in line!


    well, i guess we need to be kept in line when the empire goes up in flames. black & white.
     
    Weinberg was right, Bro, you just can't trust anyone over 30. They're just too stupid.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @Priss Factor
    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.

    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.

    In a way, it may seem counter-intuitive that blacks are SO ANGRY. The bad ole days of 'white racism' are now history, a thing of the past. Blacks are big in music and sports. A mulatto , the product of a black guy humping a white woman, became president and was re-elected. Oprah is revered by many. Beyonce and black idols dominate the charts. Sports are blacker than ever. So, blacks should be happier and less hateful. Based on 'progress' and 'justice', this is true.

    But humans emotions outrun human ideas. And the human organism feels contempt for the weak. It respects what it fears. Even if it hates what it fears, it has respect for it and with respect comes admiration.

    Look how the Japanese acted terribly toward the Chinese, the 'sick man of Asia'. But when US totally kicked Japanese butt, the Japanese were cucky-sucky to Uncle Sam. They worshiped McCarthur as shogun-god. And Japan has been America's geisha ever since. Never mind US firebombed the hell out of Tokyo and dropped two big ones. Never mind recent revelations showed US planned to nuke 12 more cities if Japan didn't surrender. Japanese got beaten so badly that they came to respect the US like something akin to Godzilla. A fearsome badass monster nation.

    And in the past, blacks felt this way. Sure, blacks were filled with hate and resentment against whites who called them 'ni**er' and drew funny 'coon' faces. But white man seemed fearsome back then. If some negro raped a white woman, these fearsome white men would come in hoods and hang a Negro from a tree and scare the bejeesus out of Negroes. So, the Negro thought, 'dang, white man aint nothing to mess with. He baaaaaad.' So, the Negro tried to prove that he's a credit to his race. He wanted to prove that he is worthy to live along the mighty horrifying-ass white man. He felt toward whitey like a Japanese felt toward Americans after defeat WWII. "You kicked my ass, and I kiss your ass and beg your approval and acceptance."

    So, even though things were worse for blacks in the past, blacks truly feared white folks and with that fear came not only hate but respect and admiration. It's like Hindus respected the Brits because a handful of Brits were so masterful in ruling over a bunch of messy disorganized cow-worshipers whose national odor was curry.

    But look how things changed so drastically. Compare 1915, the year that saw the release of THE BIRTH OF A NATION with 2015, the year of Obama and the Cuck.

    Back in 1915, there was the KKK as a real force, a show of white solidarity against blacks. And Woodrow Wilson was approving of the Klan as he felt disdain for the Negroes.
    People like to think that history is moved by ideas, values, and culture. And that would be the case in a more repressed and morally-centered social order. In Muslim societies, natural forces were held in check by Islamic codes and strict morality. So, even blacks in Arab nations had to watch themselves. If they acted funky and stuff in front of Arab women, they'd be whupped and killed on the spot. And US used to be more moral and conservative. But with the rise of popculture and hedonism, animal energies of human nature began to shape history and society more, and this esp exploded with rise of youth culture that was significantly influenced by black music centered around sexual energies. Also, the black success in sports and the rise of celebrity led to narcissism of black savagery. So, there has been an acceleration of history based on natural urges. Francis Fukuyama focused only on ideas, the hegelian struggle between ideologies. And once capitalism and liberalism won, he figured it was end of History with big 'H'. But he neglected to notice that as the Cold War progressed, ideology mattered less than idology. Western Culture was less and less about philosophy and art than about fun and fever. And the biggest 'western' threat to communist nations wasn't Ayn Rand and Adam Smith but Elvis and Beatles and Hollywood. So, even if History came to an end, there was now Beastory. With idols over ideals, human history is now driven by beast energies. Even spirituality is no longer about religions with depth of tradition and contemplation but about new sensations, like homomania and negromania. Homos are so loud and flamboyant. Negroes are so wild and rambunctious. Homos and Negroes are so into self-worship that they expect all others to worship them. Any refusal is heresy in their eyes. They got idol-god-complex.

    As far as blacks are concerned, history has been replaced by Fistory. Black fist is most mighty. Some even say the Washington Monument is really about the black dong.

    https://criticxxtreme.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/the-yes-they-were-black-series-worshipping-a-big-black-penis-osiris/

    With sports, music, and sex -- the only things that matter in our globalist idolized culture -- dominated by blacks, and with blacks showing NO INTEREST in anything but themselves in pop culture, why would blacks respect whitey anymore? Sure, blacks justify their contempt and hostility in terms of 'white racism' and 'police brutality'. They make it sound like they are still the underdogs. But if we look past the rhetoric, black hate is not about fear of white power(oppression) but about contempt for white weakness. Here are black athletes dominating the fields with white cheerleaders putting out to them. They see all these soft slow white boys cheer them on like gods and heroes. They see all these lame white boys imitating rappers. They hear about cuck culture, that white men are inviting black men to hump their women. Why would blacks respect this kind of loser wuss?
    If white power today was like it was 100 yrs ago, I guarantee all blacks would be standing for the anthem. Even if they'd hate white power, they would respect it as badass. But they now see whites as so weak. And this hostility isn't just at white 'racists' but white dweeberals. I mean, black guys despise Christopher Hayes and Anderson Cooper just as much. Dorks and dweebs.

    As far as they are concerned, they kick white boys' ass and hump white women and colonize white wombs.... but white boys are welcoming THIS as 'american as apple pie'.

    White America is now utterly disgusting, and black athletes and blacks in general have every reason to feel nothing but contempt for such weakness and cuckery.

    But then, it's the same with Jews. Jews long felt resentment for Wasps. But there was fear and respect too. Anglos seemed so great and awesome in having created much of the modern world in economics and science and politics. And Jews thought it would take a long hard climb to reach the top. But what happened? Jews rose so fast and WAsps fell so fast. Jews began to feel contempt for these cucky-wuck wasps, and now, Jews expect white goys and girls to just cuck out to Jews like servile dogs. And the more whites try to appease Jews, the more contempt Jews feel for these dogs.

    Some say 'nice guys finish last'. No, the issue isn't niceness. It is weakness. Weakness is held in contempt. It is, at best, an object of compassion. Otherwise, it is wussy.

    To blacks, past history seems especially insulting since they now realize that they'd been enslaved and oppressed by a bunch of wussies and dorks. If chimps were oppressed by gorillas, they would at least respect superior gorilla strength. But if chimps were to realize that they'd been kicked around by weaker gibbons, they're gonna feel extra hatred for the gibbons. The oppression would seem even more unjust since it violated not only morality but nature. If whites are bigger and stronger than blacks, blacks today might bitch about slavery as moral injustice but not as natural injustice. After all, nature is about rule of strong over the weak: lions over hyenas, hyenas over jackals, jackals over rabbits, etc. Once blacks realized that whites are the weaker race, they began to see slavery as not just moral wrong but natural wrong. How dare these wussy-ass white boys rule over blacks? It'd be like gorillas discovering they'd been kicked around by a bunch of chimps.

    Indeed, the reason why blacks hate the police so much is because police power goes against their instinctive savage sense of jungle justice. In sports, the only justice that matters is toughness. So, the strongest boxer wins. The toughest football players dominate the field and win the games. And blacks dominate sports because they are tougher. For savage blacks, this seems just and fair as their emotions are of the Rule of the Law of the Jungle. In sports, blacks totally dominate, and white man is a wussy bench-warmer or cucky waterboy.

    Then, how come white cops have power over blacks? Now, sane people would say police arrest black criminals and the like, but that is a matter of legal justice, an idea that makes little sense to savage blacks whose only sense of right or wrong is jungle justice. Blacks think like rappers, and rap logic is Rule of the gangster. So, blacks are less outraged by black thugs killing black thugs. It's like sports. It's jungle justice based on who be more 'badass'. But then, these white police come to mess up that game. With special 'white powers', they gain control over blacks and drag them into police stations and even shoot some of them. If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy's ass. That seems just to blacks. But with legal power and badges, white cops have power over stronger and tougher blacks..and that just seems 'unjust' to blacks whose idea of justice is 'who can whup whose ass?'

    Because blacks are so savage and only have pop culture as mainstay of culture, they've come to worship themselves as a god-race. This is why data and facts don't matter and have no effect on racial discourse that, for blacks and cucky whites, is a religious issue of Holy Negroes. Facts are useless against Faith.
    It's like Mao was a godlike figure in China. So, stats didn't matter. It didn't matter that Great Leap Forward killed tens of millions. It didn't matter that by objective measures, China was worse under Mao. Religion is about faith, not about facts. Once Mao was idolized, it didn't matter what he did. He was above all that went wrong since he was a sacred icon.
    And blacks, Jews, and homos have such iconic power in the West. So, facts and data make no dent in the black narrative. Even most secular people are emotionally religious and cling to sacred icons. They were raised worshiping MLK, Ali, Oprah, Bob Marley, and rappers as holy icons. So, it doesn't matter if they are told of black crime stats. They keep worshiping the icons.. like Soviets raised on Stalin-worship just believed and believed in Great Stalin despite the obvious factual evidence of the horrors of Stalinism.

    This is the danger of worshiping people and things. Best reason for worship in God is not that God exists. He doesn't. It's that those who don't worship God will almost always worship something else. The current West now worships the most savage and most destructive of all races.

    Fun stuff Priss, and largely true, but you should compare apples to apples. Sure black athletes can stomp girly-boy, I-phone pecking white teens but were they to come up against guys like these it would be a different story.

    According to the most realistic assessment of a black man’s worth relative to a whites, the 3/5 slave law established that 6 whites were as productive as 10 blacks. (some mistakenly believe the 3/5 law only related to maintaining a balance in elections but this is shallowly mistaken. invisible hand economics ultimately distributed population according to productive capacity north/south). Blacks just can’t work as long and as hard as whites. They’re weak sisters.

    [MORE]

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Let me guess; you work in a Manly-man profession, like IT or accounting?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/02/top-cbs-lawyer-no-sympathy-for-vegas-vics-probably-republicans.html

    Wretched woman whose ‘sentiments’ reveal all we need to know about the globalist elites.

    That said, I don’t think anyone should be fired or blacklisted for personal opinions.

    Professions should be judged solely by job performance.

    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    She's a Jew.
    , @Truth
    Hey Priss, you can start secretly, or overtly HATE...HATE...HATING this due you used to look up to*


    http://www.theroot.com/milo-yiannopoulos-married-a-black-man-1819052191


    *(or maybe envying, you'll have to answer this one)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Truth says:
    @Daniel Chieh
    Misanthropy is the most appropriate belief system in a fallen age.

    Don’t let it happen to you Danny! Please try to rediscover that NICE guy from 2 years ago.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Truth, you're cucking. Are you Jewish/involved with Asians? Daniel Chieh is revealing his inferiority, ie, he's not white. Comments like mine are getting to him.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. Truth says:
    @eah
    All the more reason they have to go back -- the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids -- eg look into the enormous over-representation of Asians at the Univ of California, where at some campuses they are 2x, 3x, or more over-represented -- and due to the reality of the underachievement of Hispanics and Blacks, above a level that represents proportionality, every Asian admitted means a deserving (ie they meet minimum admission requirements) white kid is not admitted -- it's as simple as that -- this is America, after all -- a nation that Whites built -- why should we allow immigration to disadvantage our own children?

    Hey, I guess anon belives it’s better to create wealth for the overlords than to have a group beneath you creating them for you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Truth says:
    @Andyjazz
    There are a number of guys I work with who are veterans of the armed services. The youngest of these is an Afghan War veteran. I asked him about the latest controversy over the national anthem protests.

    Me: Hey dude, you being a guy with a CIB (combat infantry badge) from one of our most recent wars, what do you think about the "national anthem protests?"
    Dude: What protests?
    Me: The protests at NFL football games.
    Dude: Oh, I don't watch TV that much, what do you mean protests?
    Me: Well some players are kneeling instead of standing at the playing of the national anthem as a form of protest.
    Dude: So?
    Me: Well some people are saying that this is offensive because they're protesting like that.
    Dude: Well the constitution says you should have the right to protest so......they're protesting.
    Me: But they're not standing
    Dude: So? They have the fucking right to protest if they want to so, so fucking what?

    I don’t know if you realize this, Dawg, but you would have come across much better had you transposed the “me” quotations with the “dude” quotations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. @Corvinus
    "The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?"

    Your hypothesis is flawed. It should read "Can a civilized people who had a different way of life compared to the greedy white Europeans who forced them into slavery overcome perpetual mistreatment in the society they live in, while acknowledging they must figure out solutions to their own problems?"

    "The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements."

    Please educate yourself on the matter by typing in "african achievements before european arrival"
    and locating several sources that utterly destroy your claim.

    "Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since."

    Acting on the will of the people in the aftermath of a Civil War, several policies were enacted despite fierce resistance.

    "Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association."

    The intrusion was Jim Crow laws to begin with. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. Indeed, so much for freedom of association.

    "The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility."

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.

    “The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?”

    No, the hypothesis should be: Can the descendants of people taken from various parts of Africa….?

    And I think the answer is yes. Every human baby that is born is a little stone-age baby, but what makes the difference is the society that he/she/they are born into and the socialization process. Every child that is born has the ability to learn to speak Chinese, which seems like an incredibly difficult language to those of us who speak European languages, because there are virtually no words in common, but any black baby that is born is perfectly capable of learning Chinese and becoming a Confucian.

    While it seems to be true that some genetic groups have higher average IQ test scores than others, there is a lot of overlap. Unfortunately the social norms of Afro-American societies into which babies are born do not lend themselves very well to preparing children to be businessmen and scientists.

    My children have some black teachers, and they are not stupid people, but they tend to be poorly educated and ill-informed, but most of all they tend to parrot silly ideas they have learned from their superiors in the educational bureaucracy, some of whom are white, so it is not entirely their fault that the way they teach math is half-assed and doomed to failure.

    Read More
    • Disagree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    And I think the answer is yes. Every human baby that is born is a little stone-age baby, but what makes the difference is the society that he/she/they are born into and the socialization process.
     
    The tabula rasa theory of human development is back there with phlogiston and the crystal spheres.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. Truth says:
    @Lawrence Fitton
    does anyone here at unz.com see an emerging police state in our wonderful country? is everyone okay with the police militarization. the army off=loading weapons like grenade launchers and various gear, armored vehicles, humvees, etc.
    the police have new toys and want to play with them. remember the aftermath of the boston marathon bombing? creepy.
    well, i guess we need to be kept in line when the empire goes up in flames. black & white.

    does anyone here at unz.com see an emerging police state in our wonderful country?

    Sure, you, and I and the guy who put up the “the real story behind the national anthem protests” video, that’s about it.

    is everyone okay with the police militarization. the army off=loading weapons like grenade launchers and various gear, armored vehicles, humvees, etc.

    Of course, they’re clearly going to use all that gear only to keep Knee-growz in line!

    well, i guess we need to be kept in line when the empire goes up in flames. black & white.

    Weinberg was right, Bro, you just can’t trust anyone over 30. They’re just too stupid.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lawrence Fitton
    how do you fit those quotes in those gray boxes?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Truth says:
    @ThreeCranes
    Fun stuff Priss, and largely true, but you should compare apples to apples. Sure black athletes can stomp girly-boy, I-phone pecking white teens but were they to come up against guys like these it would be a different story.

    According to the most realistic assessment of a black man's worth relative to a whites, the 3/5 slave law established that 6 whites were as productive as 10 blacks. (some mistakenly believe the 3/5 law only related to maintaining a balance in elections but this is shallowly mistaken. invisible hand economics ultimately distributed population according to productive capacity north/south). Blacks just can't work as long and as hard as whites. They're weak sisters.



    http://www.mendorailhistory.org/images/logging/kinsey/kinsey_11.jpg

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Logging_in_Washington_state_by_Darius_Kinsey.jpg

    http://content.lib.washington.edu/clarkkinseyweb/images/fallerswithlargetree.jpg

    Let me guess; you work in a Manly-man profession, like IT or accounting?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    You're o for two but I'll give you a hint. I did tromp around in the same woods these guys worked in.
    , @Neil Templeton
    Truth, No cell service for the woods johnnies back in olden days. The timber was too heavy, it messed up the signal. The boys had to cut alleys through the forest to the towers so they could text up the faithful lassies back home in Tindertown. Folks was different then.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. eah says:
    @Priss Factor
    http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/02/top-cbs-lawyer-no-sympathy-for-vegas-vics-probably-republicans.html

    Wretched woman whose 'sentiments' reveal all we need to know about the globalist elites.

    That said, I don't think anyone should be fired or blacklisted for personal opinions.

    Professions should be judged solely by job performance.

    She’s a Jew.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Renoman says:

    In the words of Red Fox “I hate Niggers, Niggers is lazy, shiftless and no good. That means there’s a lotta white Niggers out there too”!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  106. eah says:
    @Truth

    designed to make other, reasonable and non-idiotic WNs look bad.
     
    Well Dan, you have to admit, this is not a particularly sizable coalition we're describing here.

    Well Dan, you have to admit, this is not a particularly sizable coalition we’re describing here.

    You’d be surprised — also at how fast it’s growing — notwithstanding snide remarks from pricks like you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    LOL, not when a white woman receives taunts for expressing her opinon that white men should marry white women.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. @Truth
    Let me guess; you work in a Manly-man profession, like IT or accounting?

    You’re o for two but I’ll give you a hint. I did tromp around in the same woods these guys worked in.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Oh, you cook up meth in a shed?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. obviously it’s the answer, and more division after that. the EU is a disaster. white people are too different. the US should divided along the lines of national identity plurality. the SE is black. the SW is mexican. the midwest is german. nyc is italian and jewish. new england is english and irish. utah is mormon. etc.

    in any heterogeneous society one group will come do dominate eventually and will be resented for it unless the other groups are retarded. is this the case in singapore?

    the new world was a bad idea from the start.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  109. @Priss Factor
    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.

    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.

    In a way, it may seem counter-intuitive that blacks are SO ANGRY. The bad ole days of 'white racism' are now history, a thing of the past. Blacks are big in music and sports. A mulatto , the product of a black guy humping a white woman, became president and was re-elected. Oprah is revered by many. Beyonce and black idols dominate the charts. Sports are blacker than ever. So, blacks should be happier and less hateful. Based on 'progress' and 'justice', this is true.

    But humans emotions outrun human ideas. And the human organism feels contempt for the weak. It respects what it fears. Even if it hates what it fears, it has respect for it and with respect comes admiration.

    Look how the Japanese acted terribly toward the Chinese, the 'sick man of Asia'. But when US totally kicked Japanese butt, the Japanese were cucky-sucky to Uncle Sam. They worshiped McCarthur as shogun-god. And Japan has been America's geisha ever since. Never mind US firebombed the hell out of Tokyo and dropped two big ones. Never mind recent revelations showed US planned to nuke 12 more cities if Japan didn't surrender. Japanese got beaten so badly that they came to respect the US like something akin to Godzilla. A fearsome badass monster nation.

    And in the past, blacks felt this way. Sure, blacks were filled with hate and resentment against whites who called them 'ni**er' and drew funny 'coon' faces. But white man seemed fearsome back then. If some negro raped a white woman, these fearsome white men would come in hoods and hang a Negro from a tree and scare the bejeesus out of Negroes. So, the Negro thought, 'dang, white man aint nothing to mess with. He baaaaaad.' So, the Negro tried to prove that he's a credit to his race. He wanted to prove that he is worthy to live along the mighty horrifying-ass white man. He felt toward whitey like a Japanese felt toward Americans after defeat WWII. "You kicked my ass, and I kiss your ass and beg your approval and acceptance."

    So, even though things were worse for blacks in the past, blacks truly feared white folks and with that fear came not only hate but respect and admiration. It's like Hindus respected the Brits because a handful of Brits were so masterful in ruling over a bunch of messy disorganized cow-worshipers whose national odor was curry.

    But look how things changed so drastically. Compare 1915, the year that saw the release of THE BIRTH OF A NATION with 2015, the year of Obama and the Cuck.

    Back in 1915, there was the KKK as a real force, a show of white solidarity against blacks. And Woodrow Wilson was approving of the Klan as he felt disdain for the Negroes.
    People like to think that history is moved by ideas, values, and culture. And that would be the case in a more repressed and morally-centered social order. In Muslim societies, natural forces were held in check by Islamic codes and strict morality. So, even blacks in Arab nations had to watch themselves. If they acted funky and stuff in front of Arab women, they'd be whupped and killed on the spot. And US used to be more moral and conservative. But with the rise of popculture and hedonism, animal energies of human nature began to shape history and society more, and this esp exploded with rise of youth culture that was significantly influenced by black music centered around sexual energies. Also, the black success in sports and the rise of celebrity led to narcissism of black savagery. So, there has been an acceleration of history based on natural urges. Francis Fukuyama focused only on ideas, the hegelian struggle between ideologies. And once capitalism and liberalism won, he figured it was end of History with big 'H'. But he neglected to notice that as the Cold War progressed, ideology mattered less than idology. Western Culture was less and less about philosophy and art than about fun and fever. And the biggest 'western' threat to communist nations wasn't Ayn Rand and Adam Smith but Elvis and Beatles and Hollywood. So, even if History came to an end, there was now Beastory. With idols over ideals, human history is now driven by beast energies. Even spirituality is no longer about religions with depth of tradition and contemplation but about new sensations, like homomania and negromania. Homos are so loud and flamboyant. Negroes are so wild and rambunctious. Homos and Negroes are so into self-worship that they expect all others to worship them. Any refusal is heresy in their eyes. They got idol-god-complex.

    As far as blacks are concerned, history has been replaced by Fistory. Black fist is most mighty. Some even say the Washington Monument is really about the black dong.

    https://criticxxtreme.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/the-yes-they-were-black-series-worshipping-a-big-black-penis-osiris/

    With sports, music, and sex -- the only things that matter in our globalist idolized culture -- dominated by blacks, and with blacks showing NO INTEREST in anything but themselves in pop culture, why would blacks respect whitey anymore? Sure, blacks justify their contempt and hostility in terms of 'white racism' and 'police brutality'. They make it sound like they are still the underdogs. But if we look past the rhetoric, black hate is not about fear of white power(oppression) but about contempt for white weakness. Here are black athletes dominating the fields with white cheerleaders putting out to them. They see all these soft slow white boys cheer them on like gods and heroes. They see all these lame white boys imitating rappers. They hear about cuck culture, that white men are inviting black men to hump their women. Why would blacks respect this kind of loser wuss?
    If white power today was like it was 100 yrs ago, I guarantee all blacks would be standing for the anthem. Even if they'd hate white power, they would respect it as badass. But they now see whites as so weak. And this hostility isn't just at white 'racists' but white dweeberals. I mean, black guys despise Christopher Hayes and Anderson Cooper just as much. Dorks and dweebs.

    As far as they are concerned, they kick white boys' ass and hump white women and colonize white wombs.... but white boys are welcoming THIS as 'american as apple pie'.

    White America is now utterly disgusting, and black athletes and blacks in general have every reason to feel nothing but contempt for such weakness and cuckery.

    But then, it's the same with Jews. Jews long felt resentment for Wasps. But there was fear and respect too. Anglos seemed so great and awesome in having created much of the modern world in economics and science and politics. And Jews thought it would take a long hard climb to reach the top. But what happened? Jews rose so fast and WAsps fell so fast. Jews began to feel contempt for these cucky-wuck wasps, and now, Jews expect white goys and girls to just cuck out to Jews like servile dogs. And the more whites try to appease Jews, the more contempt Jews feel for these dogs.

    Some say 'nice guys finish last'. No, the issue isn't niceness. It is weakness. Weakness is held in contempt. It is, at best, an object of compassion. Otherwise, it is wussy.

    To blacks, past history seems especially insulting since they now realize that they'd been enslaved and oppressed by a bunch of wussies and dorks. If chimps were oppressed by gorillas, they would at least respect superior gorilla strength. But if chimps were to realize that they'd been kicked around by weaker gibbons, they're gonna feel extra hatred for the gibbons. The oppression would seem even more unjust since it violated not only morality but nature. If whites are bigger and stronger than blacks, blacks today might bitch about slavery as moral injustice but not as natural injustice. After all, nature is about rule of strong over the weak: lions over hyenas, hyenas over jackals, jackals over rabbits, etc. Once blacks realized that whites are the weaker race, they began to see slavery as not just moral wrong but natural wrong. How dare these wussy-ass white boys rule over blacks? It'd be like gorillas discovering they'd been kicked around by a bunch of chimps.

    Indeed, the reason why blacks hate the police so much is because police power goes against their instinctive savage sense of jungle justice. In sports, the only justice that matters is toughness. So, the strongest boxer wins. The toughest football players dominate the field and win the games. And blacks dominate sports because they are tougher. For savage blacks, this seems just and fair as their emotions are of the Rule of the Law of the Jungle. In sports, blacks totally dominate, and white man is a wussy bench-warmer or cucky waterboy.

    Then, how come white cops have power over blacks? Now, sane people would say police arrest black criminals and the like, but that is a matter of legal justice, an idea that makes little sense to savage blacks whose only sense of right or wrong is jungle justice. Blacks think like rappers, and rap logic is Rule of the gangster. So, blacks are less outraged by black thugs killing black thugs. It's like sports. It's jungle justice based on who be more 'badass'. But then, these white police come to mess up that game. With special 'white powers', they gain control over blacks and drag them into police stations and even shoot some of them. If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy's ass. That seems just to blacks. But with legal power and badges, white cops have power over stronger and tougher blacks..and that just seems 'unjust' to blacks whose idea of justice is 'who can whup whose ass?'

    Because blacks are so savage and only have pop culture as mainstay of culture, they've come to worship themselves as a god-race. This is why data and facts don't matter and have no effect on racial discourse that, for blacks and cucky whites, is a religious issue of Holy Negroes. Facts are useless against Faith.
    It's like Mao was a godlike figure in China. So, stats didn't matter. It didn't matter that Great Leap Forward killed tens of millions. It didn't matter that by objective measures, China was worse under Mao. Religion is about faith, not about facts. Once Mao was idolized, it didn't matter what he did. He was above all that went wrong since he was a sacred icon.
    And blacks, Jews, and homos have such iconic power in the West. So, facts and data make no dent in the black narrative. Even most secular people are emotionally religious and cling to sacred icons. They were raised worshiping MLK, Ali, Oprah, Bob Marley, and rappers as holy icons. So, it doesn't matter if they are told of black crime stats. They keep worshiping the icons.. like Soviets raised on Stalin-worship just believed and believed in Great Stalin despite the obvious factual evidence of the horrors of Stalinism.

    This is the danger of worshiping people and things. Best reason for worship in God is not that God exists. He doesn't. It's that those who don't worship God will almost always worship something else. The current West now worships the most savage and most destructive of all races.

    You’re so close, Priss. Just a little change in emphasis will bring you on target.

    Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work. In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women’s work. When they got to America they were forced to do work that they regarded as women’s and this demeaned them. They resent that to this day.

    When they finally figured out how hard white men worked they were incredulous. If they had whitey’s power they would have made beasts of burden out of their many wives, but white men were too kind-hearted to do that. That smacked of weakness which as you say, they don’t respect.

    When blacks get to run things, women will be slave/animals once again. There will be no laws against rape because their society doesn’t acknowledge women’s rights to control who will hump her and when he will do it.

    Blacks don’t mind working at football and basketball because it’s basically war, which they’re genetically geared for.

    In the end, blacks are incompatible with white civilization because while they were naturally selected for hunting and fighting, science and technology require patience, intelligence and fine tuning.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Vinteuil
    I believe that you've made here a comment even more un-pc than anything ever written by Priss.
    , @Corvinus
    "Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work."

    In reality, people resent slavery because it is cruel and inhumane. Praytell, how do you feel about slavery that exists today?

    "In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women’s work."

    Please educate yourself on this matter.

    http://historylink101.com/lessons/farm-city/africa1.htm

    "When they got to America they were forced to do work that they regarded as women’s and this demeaned them. They resent that to this day."

    Pure fiction on your part.

    "When they finally figured out how hard white men worked they were incredulous. If they had whitey’s power they would have made beasts of burden out of their many wives, but white men were too kind-hearted to do that. That smacked of weakness which as you say, they don’t respect."

    In reality, white slaveowners whacked their slaves into submission.

    "In the end, blacks are incompatible with white civilization because while they were naturally selected for hunting and fighting, science and technology require patience, intelligence and fine tuning."

    It is clear you really don't get out much in the real world.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. something HBDers don’t understand is norms of reaction.

    norms of reaction is another reason why homogeneity is better.

    in a small homogeneous country each individual is much more likely to achieve his genetic potential.

    the only reason for heterogeneity is the greed and sociopathy of the ruling elite.

    HBDers are especially dumb when they advocate for the “free market” and small government.

    the ideal country is iceland, but without gay rights and hate speech laws, (((imposed))) from without.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  111. @Truth
    Don't let it happen to you Danny! Please try to rediscover that NICE guy from 2 years ago.

    Truth, you’re cucking. Are you Jewish/involved with Asians? Daniel Chieh is revealing his inferiority, ie, he’s not white. Comments like mine are getting to him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    But isn't Attila a mongoloid?
    , @Anonymous
    Truth is a black guy(or as he calls himself, a "proud Knee-Grow") who has been manipulating you, in a practical demonstration of your intellectual inferiority. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

    You're an embarrassment to my race. At least you're only a woman.
    , @Truth
    No, I'm African. I think it's rare that we "cuck" more likely we go grab a shotgun.

    Daniel Chieh was your nice, stereotypical Chinese guy when he started here, polite, wouldn't insult anyone, it's terrible what a year on this site has done to the guy.

    In your case, I just find it fascinating that a white woman would receive so much backlash for saying that whites should marry whites on a WN website. That's about it.

    Also, why don't you and Aldey like each other, you seem to have pretty much the same platform and are the only two broads here. I guess it's a chick-vs-chick thing?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. yeah says:
    @eah
    All the more reason they have to go back -- the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids -- eg look into the enormous over-representation of Asians at the Univ of California, where at some campuses they are 2x, 3x, or more over-represented -- and due to the reality of the underachievement of Hispanics and Blacks, above a level that represents proportionality, every Asian admitted means a deserving (ie they meet minimum admission requirements) white kid is not admitted -- it's as simple as that -- this is America, after all -- a nation that Whites built -- why should we allow immigration to disadvantage our own children?

    “All the more reason they have to go back — the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids “.

    I have heard “Keep out the dumb and the stupid lest we all become dumbed-down”. That is a viewpoint I would tend to agree with. Put an end to this affirmative action nonsense.

    But your proposal to kick out the bright is … well, what can I say? Some centuries back, clever women used to be denounced and burnt as witches. Clever men were strung up from trees to hang lest their cleverness reveal the village elders to be the idiots they were. Now you are saying that clever Asians should be kicked out lest they threaten the mediocre whites. I don’t think whites need such protection, but if they do, then that is tough luck.

    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    mediocre whites

    You miss the point: they aren't "mediocre" -- they are smart enough and have achieved at a level high enough (GPA, SAT, etc) to earn admission to UC -- which is denied them due to a measly few GPA or SAT points -- there is absolutely no significant, practical difference between the average achievement level of Whites and Asians (unlike between eg Whites and Blacks) -- the fact that our civilization and university system draws Asians like flies is more than proof of that -- they need us, we don't need them -- besides, my argument is fundamentally white nationalist, which you did not address at all -- I conceded that Asians are high-achieving -- I don't care -- their presence in large numbers disadvantages bright white kids in the country their ancestors built -- that's the point -- Dummkopf.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    Latinos can be of any race. If she is a white or Caucasian, she is acceptable. Asians/blacks are not acceptable.

    She looks like mixed race to me

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. Truth says:
    @Priss Factor
    http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/02/top-cbs-lawyer-no-sympathy-for-vegas-vics-probably-republicans.html

    Wretched woman whose 'sentiments' reveal all we need to know about the globalist elites.

    That said, I don't think anyone should be fired or blacklisted for personal opinions.

    Professions should be judged solely by job performance.

    Hey Priss, you can start secretly, or overtly HATE…HATE…HATING this due you used to look up to*

    http://www.theroot.com/milo-yiannopoulos-married-a-black-man-1819052191

    *(or maybe envying, you’ll have to answer this one)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    That makes perfect sense.

    There is the Jewish element, Homo element, and Negro element. And even 'Aryan' element.

    Milo is part-Jewish, and that fills him with Jewish chauvinism and arrogance. He is a staunch Zionist. He likes to talk about Jewish Power but not as criticism but as bragging rights. "We Jews are so powerful and great." He is proud of his Jewish 'intellect'.

    But he is also part-Greek, and that gives him that classical look, and he goes around acting like he is Apollo or something, like some homo Greek statue come to life. He's narcissistic about his 'Aryan' looks.

    And he makes a big fuss about his homo-ness. He mocks homos for trying to be 'respectable'. He revels in wild flamboyant homo-ness. He believes homos are cutting edge, hip, creative, expressive, ingenious, innovative, original, and ooh-lala. He thinks homos are superior to square straights.

    And since he's into best of everything since his main idea of pleasure is a big dong up his bung, he sees the Negromo(Negro homo) as ideal mate for his golden Jew-homo-aryan bung.

    So, Milo is the intersectionality of the main themes of 'western' culture. Jewish privilege and genius, homo narcissism and flamboyance, Aryan beauty, and funky-ass Negro dong up his bung.

    This homo stuff, I find icky, but it is more interesting that straight sexuality or real sexuality. In homo pornography, the dynamics are far more complicated. In straight sex, men is masculine, and females are feminine. Men hump the women. (There is pegging promoted by Cosmo magazine, but I wonder how many men allow women with dildos to 'peg' them.) In straight sex, men do the women. But in wild homo sex in homo porn, the dynamics get more interesting cuz the one who gets bunged can turn around the bung the guy who bunged him. So, I think homos have this mix of masculine aggression and feminine guile, and that's why homos are more dangerous. After all, even a big black homo muscle dude surely takes it up his bung by a white guy. So, Milo gets bunged but also bungs the Negro.
    That's weird. Or, there can be like a oreo train bunging: negro bunging a white buy bunging a negro bunging a white guy. Theoretically, homos can bung each other for miles on end. Dongs Across America.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. Truth says:
    @ThreeCranes
    You're o for two but I'll give you a hint. I did tromp around in the same woods these guys worked in.

    Oh, you cook up meth in a shed?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Shed? Hey man, I live in a giant tree stump! I disdain meth, prefer Amanita Muscaria and fern sprouts. I make my living painting sentimental mountain scenes on antique two-man misery whips and by judging Alphorn competitions. I think Filson is still the best (with apologies to John and his fondness for Duluth Trading Post stuff). If it was good enough for these guys doing work that coloreds just won't do.....

    http://pbs.bento.storage.s3.amazonaws.com/hostedbento-prod/filer_public/Klondike%20Images/Cantwell33%40300ppi_16x20.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. Truth says:
    @eah
    Well Dan, you have to admit, this is not a particularly sizable coalition we’re describing here.

    You'd be surprised -- also at how fast it's growing -- notwithstanding snide remarks from pricks like you.

    LOL, not when a white woman receives taunts for expressing her opinon that white men should marry white women.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. I am an American,

    Sorry John, but no, you are not. You are an Englishman who was given US citizenship.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Grandpa Charlie

    "Sorry John, but no, you are not [an American]. You are an Englishman who was given US citizenship." -- Mallory
     
    I think that, by "Englishman," Mallory means a subject of the Queen of England, (etc.), which is like being baptized in the Catholic Church, you can't get out of it.

    "In spite of all temptations

    "To belong to other nations,

    "He remains an Englishman."

    -- Gilbert and Sullivan. HMS Pinafore
     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6_vyGuhkfA

    Or, as Cecil Rhodes said, "To be born English is to win first prize in the lottery of life."

    Rhodes was, as is well known, a mad man ... an inspired mad man, but a mad man all the same. Did not Rhodes go out into the noonday African sun, intent upon conquering all of Africa for Queen Victoria and his British South Africa Company?

    We all know that to be born AMERICAN is to win firs prize in the lottery of life. Uh huh.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. 1RW says:
    @Alden
    Actually, the Chinese Emperor sent an entire fleet including veterinarians, food, housing etc to the east Coast of Africa to buy animals for the Imperial Zoo. It was reasonable successful. Enough animals survived the trip to start a Zoo. But it was so expensive and troublesome that the government decided against any more Ocean voyages for centuries.

    The Chinese went to one of the Arab ports to buy the animals.

    That was sarcasm. Africans sailing to china with elephants is ridiculous. Just like the other achievements. Chinese sailing to Africa in enormous ships is a matter of historical record.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. the derb is so absurd. in the england of today and in derb’s day all the white british footballers should have spat on the union jack and sang God Fuck the Queen.

    england is a sack of potatoes. its white people have no solidarity. none. this because it is the most unequal and the most rigidly stratified developed country.

    for its class system the uk should be nuked…with derb at the epicenter.

    the uk is a dump. the poorest country in northern europe with all of northern europe’s poorest cities. its people are ugly. the wrong side won the wars.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  120. @Truth
    Oh, you cook up meth in a shed?

    Shed? Hey man, I live in a giant tree stump! I disdain meth, prefer Amanita Muscaria and fern sprouts. I make my living painting sentimental mountain scenes on antique two-man misery whips and by judging Alphorn competitions. I think Filson is still the best (with apologies to John and his fondness for Duluth Trading Post stuff). If it was good enough for these guys doing work that coloreds just won’t do…..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    Truth, you're cucking. Are you Jewish/involved with Asians? Daniel Chieh is revealing his inferiority, ie, he's not white. Comments like mine are getting to him.

    But isn’t Attila a mongoloid?

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    attilathehen was one of Margaret Thatcher's nicknames. She was one of my idols.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. @Priss Factor
    The beginning of wisdom here: race realism. The truth about race is that it’s real, and the statistical differences between blacks and other races—in temperament, behavior, intelligence, and personality—are big and intractable.

    You didn't mention muscle power, but that is crucial. If blacks were dumber and more aggressive but built like Gary Coleman or Emmanuel Lewis, would it matter? A chihuaua is nasty and snappy, but it's a small dog. So most dogs don't feel threatened by it. But take a pitfull that is tough and aggressive. Negroes are the pitbulls among the races.

    Professional sports play into that yearning. I recall sitting in bars or private homes back in the seventies, when I was new to the States, watching football or basketball on TV. What jumped out at me was the peculiarity, the strangeness, of stadiums filled with mostly white people cheering on teams that were mostly black.

    Surely, this no longer seems strange in Europe since French soccer team is mostly Negroid. And all 'European' sprinters are of West African descent: British, Dutch, French, Swedish, etc.

    In a way, the dominance of blacks in sports is fair since blacks are better. But then, the fact that blacks are better at sports means race-ism is real. So, in that sense, nature is 'unfair'. Races are different, and some races are superior in different endeavors. Jews certainly kick everyone's butt in brainy fields. Look at their dominance in elite institutions.
    It's like Joe Louis and Jesse Owens didn't demonstrate racial equality but racial superiority of blacks in kicking white butt. Muhammad Ali didn't scream, "I'm equal". He screamed "I'm the greatest after beating other boxers, black and white."

    By the late 1960s, when there was a consensus among white Americans that blacks should have full equality under the law, there was an eagerness to welcome any kind of sign that blacks were doing well. In professional sports, blacks do do well. So sports fed that yearning to think well of blacks.

    It wasn't just sports. Maybe music was more crucial. For adults, there was Nat King Cole and Johnny Mathis,and for young ones there was Chuck Berry and Little Richard and the Motown. Blacks have stronger voices than whites and certainly more than Mexicans and Asians.

    The problem wasn't so much this yearning to think well of blacks. Whites DID sincerely think well of blacks in some areas. Problem was that, paradoxically enough, the very traits that made blacks entertaining and appealing to whites also made them dangerous and repulsive.

    Take black athletics. It's fun to watch a powerful Negro like Tyson just knock everyone out. It's like King Kong whupping a bunch of hapless baboons. It makes for great TV. But would you want such a Negro walking your streets? Ali was fun to watch, esp when making fun of Joe Louis and clobbering him in Manila. But who wants to integrate with loud-mouthed obnoxious jivers?
    Indeed, we see this paradox in jungle fever sex too. White women go with Negroes cuz black men seem so badass, tough, wild, punkass, hip, and big-donged. But THAT is precisely why they make lousy mates. Negroes are always looking for fresh pooters to plow and soon get tired of da 'biatches'. So, we have all these white women as single mother with mulatto negrolets.
    And take blacks in comedy. I love watching Fred G. Sanford, Bubba, Aunt Esther, and others in Sanford and Son. They are like colorful loud cartoon characters. But too many of such people would make a neighborhood noisy and bit crazy. Granted, Sanfords(and the Jeffersons) are decent enough folks(and the family in Good Times too), but there are Negroes far worse, and they is crazy. This black zaniness is amusing to white folks from a distance. This is why even whites who never wanna live with blacks listen to rap music and imitate black lingo and stuff. We have kids in Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and etc imitating that stuff. They find it amusing.

    So, the problem isn't a 'yearning' to like blacks. It's that whites are crazy about certain aspects of blackness that have a dark side to them. It's like people who love gambling really love gambling.. but overlook its dark side. It's like people who really love sugary sodas really love it but ignore its negative affects on health.

    Even though civilization is maintained by work and morality and discipline, humans are still animals seeking thrills, excitement, and pleasure at the animal level. And sports, music, and sex bring main pleasure. And whites go wild about black sports, black thug music, and black twerking booties and black dongs. So, they cuck out to blacks for pleasure like hillbillies 'cuck' out to meth. They gotta have that hit. Black is the Crack for White America.

    Even though civilization is maintained by integrity and ideals(such as work ethic, truth, honesty, diligence, responsibility, etc), the animal-sensual side of us is drawn to the idols or idolatry. And Negroes, due to their wilder and tougher traits, have more idol-iconic value. Afrodolatry is much of American Culture which has become 'Western Culture'(as EU is now just imitation US) and world culture(since all the world follows US soft power).

    But like meth will destroy a hillbilly, the black-as-crack will destroy white civilization because the black soul is savage and will destroy white manhood, and when white males lose manhood, white women will have kids with negroes, and the negro savage genes will spread all around.

    War on white males is a war on the entire white race, just like war on white females would be a war on the entire white race. White women cannot exist without white men, and white men cannot exist without white women. Every white woman is the product of white man and white woman. Every white man is the product of white man and white woman. So, the unity of white man and white woman is crucial. In the end, it isn't feminism that drove a wedge between white men and white women. It is blacks.

    And as boatloads of black Africans come upon European shores and plant millions upon millions of blacks in white Europe, white wombs will be colonized by blacks. It will be sexual imperialism on a scale to match the Spanish conquest of Meso wombs in the New World. It will be Wombperialism.

    I like that “Wombperialism” … but, speaking as a man who was there, it really was feminism that drove wedge between white men and white women. OTOH, I did observe from a distance that within the inner circles of feminism, a certain type of black man (‘professional blacks’) were very successful in exploiting feminist leaders, who were often far onto the ‘dowdy’ side anyway. In the long run, however, the biggest wedge came from lesbians, imho. In this day and age, seems to me, the really big wedge is STDs like AIDS – or, who knows what is out there? That and the insane Republican campaign against birth-control of all kinds (such as the morning-after pill). I’m too old, but it is my settled opinion that human monkeys are always going to f*** more than is needed to maintain stable and sustainable population size, unless prophylactic constraints of some kind or another are applied.

    You do know, PF, that you are guilty of cherry-picking your data points in order to underpin your narrative. For example, while Jesse Owens is a great study, let’s also discuss Jim Thorpe. And how about Michael Phelps, the most decorated Olympian of all times! Or, let’s talk about the Decathlon. Yes, you have your recent example of Ashton Eaton … who is, after all, as ‘White’ as he is ‘Black’, and whose White mother was a natural athlete and dancer (type of athlete). Anyway, my point is that the Decathlon fails to show ” fact that blacks are better at sports.”

    In any case, this blackism that you suggest, PF (but of course I understand that you do not support anymore than I do) reminds me of when Jean-Paul Sartre (in his essay on ‘Existentialism Is A Humanism’) wrote about an airplane trip he took where he sat next to two ladies who exclaimed without end about how “we” have come so far (in aviation and engineering) and “we” should be so proud of what “we” have accomplished. Sartre, as I recall was distinguishing what those nice middle-aged middle-class ladies said from humanism. It’s like some Jews who think that Einstein proves intellectual superiority of all Jews. And anyway, I think the record may show that the award should go to Koreans, rather than to Jews. I once pointed that out to a young lady who, apparently Jewish, broke down into tears … so be careful about all this stuff … some people, especially those with egos weakened by being raised exclusively in a hothouse environment, come unglued as any little bit of truth approaches them … it’s like kryptonite, you know.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. Art says:

    That’s my formula for an enlightened patriotism: for black and nonblack to face up honestly to reality, to our group differences, which aren’t anyone’s fault, except Mother Nature’s—as citizens united in a common enterprise, with a common collective fate as Americans.

    Is it really impossible? I sure hope not. 2010-12-24dl[1] John Derbyshire

    People of good will (mega high IQ is not required) can always find a way to work things out (even if it is decided to do nothing).

    The problem is that there are powerful people of ill will in American’s mix – Jews.

    The Jew guilt machine that rules America cannot function without victims.

    Jews need blacks to keep the whites on their heels with white guilt.

    Jews are re-enslaving blacks, making them permanent helpless wards of the Jew led deep state.

    Just knuckle under you white trash beasts – just three dozen KKK define all you white bastards!

    Hate and guilt is our game – so whitey – get to hating so we can enslave you too.

    Think Peace — Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  124. @Truth
    Hey Priss, you can start secretly, or overtly HATE...HATE...HATING this due you used to look up to*


    http://www.theroot.com/milo-yiannopoulos-married-a-black-man-1819052191


    *(or maybe envying, you'll have to answer this one)

    That makes perfect sense.

    There is the Jewish element, Homo element, and Negro element. And even ‘Aryan’ element.

    Milo is part-Jewish, and that fills him with Jewish chauvinism and arrogance. He is a staunch Zionist. He likes to talk about Jewish Power but not as criticism but as bragging rights. “We Jews are so powerful and great.” He is proud of his Jewish ‘intellect’.

    But he is also part-Greek, and that gives him that classical look, and he goes around acting like he is Apollo or something, like some homo Greek statue come to life. He’s narcissistic about his ‘Aryan’ looks.

    And he makes a big fuss about his homo-ness. He mocks homos for trying to be ‘respectable’. He revels in wild flamboyant homo-ness. He believes homos are cutting edge, hip, creative, expressive, ingenious, innovative, original, and ooh-lala. He thinks homos are superior to square straights.

    And since he’s into best of everything since his main idea of pleasure is a big dong up his bung, he sees the Negromo(Negro homo) as ideal mate for his golden Jew-homo-aryan bung.

    So, Milo is the intersectionality of the main themes of ‘western’ culture. Jewish privilege and genius, homo narcissism and flamboyance, Aryan beauty, and funky-ass Negro dong up his bung.

    This homo stuff, I find icky, but it is more interesting that straight sexuality or real sexuality. In homo pornography, the dynamics are far more complicated. In straight sex, men is masculine, and females are feminine. Men hump the women. (There is pegging promoted by Cosmo magazine, but I wonder how many men allow women with dildos to ‘peg’ them.) In straight sex, men do the women. But in wild homo sex in homo porn, the dynamics get more interesting cuz the one who gets bunged can turn around the bung the guy who bunged him. So, I think homos have this mix of masculine aggression and feminine guile, and that’s why homos are more dangerous. After all, even a big black homo muscle dude surely takes it up his bung by a white guy. So, Milo gets bunged but also bungs the Negro.
    That’s weird. Or, there can be like a oreo train bunging: negro bunging a white buy bunging a negro bunging a white guy. Theoretically, homos can bung each other for miles on end. Dongs Across America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. @Corvinus
    "The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?"

    Your hypothesis is flawed. It should read "Can a civilized people who had a different way of life compared to the greedy white Europeans who forced them into slavery overcome perpetual mistreatment in the society they live in, while acknowledging they must figure out solutions to their own problems?"

    "The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements."

    Please educate yourself on the matter by typing in "african achievements before european arrival"
    and locating several sources that utterly destroy your claim.

    "Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since."

    Acting on the will of the people in the aftermath of a Civil War, several policies were enacted despite fierce resistance.

    "Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association."

    The intrusion was Jim Crow laws to begin with. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. Indeed, so much for freedom of association.

    "The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility."

    Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter.

    he intrusion was Jim Crow laws to begin with. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. Indeed, so much for freedom of association.
    ————————
    the idea behind jim crow was that the races were different and should be able to have different standards, an idea that the civil rights leaders agreed with by coming up with disparate impact. No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "the idea behind jim crow was that the races were different and should be able to have different standards..."

    No, the concept of Jim Crow was to separate the races socially while ensuring that the races were treated equally under the law. Of course, those Southrons had to ruin everything.

    "No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it."

    You mean YOU do not believe that the races are equal. Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. O.T. but…

    Is anybody else having trouble swallowing the narrative in the most recent atrocity? I don’t subscribe to everything Paul Craig Roberts says about false flags but something stinks about this.

    An accountant?

    A multi millionaire?

    A multiple Homeowner?

    Supposedly he registered at the hotel with his girl friend’s I.D. What’s up with that? Is this even permitted today?

    And of course, he is dead (apparently by his own hand as the press would have us believe) so he can tell no tales.

    Some questions.

    Why does everyone rush to judgement that his death was a suicide?

    Why does everyone assume he acted alone? Or that he even was the shooter?

    No one saw him pull the trigger. He could have been held hostage by unknown persons for the last three days, bound and gagged and then dragged in and shot just before the real assassins fled.

    Where did he acquire true automatic weapons?

    How did he control a gun on full auto over a range of 400 yards with little or no practice? I know he didn’t have to really aim but 400 yards is a long, long way.

    And the Press? Immediately, unquestioningly accepts that he was the shooter. No questions asked.

    The Democrats immediately call for gun control.

    It’s all too predictable. I may be wrong but it seems as though something’s fishy here.

    There might be more information forthcoming–or might have been if he hadn’t conveniently been found dead.

    Americans owned plenty of guns in the years prior to the 1950′s and 60′s but we didn’t have these mass killings, so guns alone can’t be the cause. What happened between 1965 and 1975 that may have precipitated this kind of behavior? Something seems to have torn the social fabric. We seem to have lost our sense of social cohesion and consequently, our social conscience. As tragic as these sprees are, they are still statistically minor compared to the annual murder rate in Democratic controlled cities. Though denizens of our inner cities try their mightiest, their murder rate is still small potatoes compared to Nicaragua’s and Hondura’s.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    At this rate, I feel that another thousand people can die tomorrow and we will immediately turn to blaming each other.

    Clown world.
    , @Diversity Heretic
    I've had thoughts along those lines too. Hand held automatic fire is generally ineffective beyond 25 meters or so. If you have a genuine machine gun on a bipod, or tripod, that's effective, but I doubt that's what he had. And why ten guns? The finest marksmant in the world can shoot only one at a time. And changing magazines is easier than changing guns. You might have one or two spares if the barrel gets really hot, but ten? My hypothesis is that it was a group effort who then killed the guy they found (he may or may not have been part of the group), who had a well-thought out escape and evasion plan that appears to have worked. But maybe I'm wrong.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. @Anon
    But isn't Attila a mongoloid?

    attilathehen was one of Margaret Thatcher’s nicknames. She was one of my idols.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. joef says:
    @Truth
    Wait a minute!
    Hold the phone!
    Stop the presses!
    Turn the battleship around!

    Again, what is wrong with a white woman wanting to keep the white race WHYYYTE!?!?!

    I can't see why Attila gets so much strife on a WN (or alt right if you are so inclined) website for taking on BLOODSHARKS*.


    *(Bloodsharks, get it? Blood-red, mud-brown? I think I need to copywright that one...)

    Don’t know what your second comment is about? I think it was meant for someone else. In regards to your comment about walking in the urban afro ghetto:

    Many ethnic working class white urban neighborhoods adjoined afro ghettos. We went to the same public schools, and took the same public transportation (subways and buses). We dealt with the burglaries, robberies, car thefts, and an occasional homicide from the afro ghetto invaders. I visited friends in the hospital numerous times recovering from shootings, stabbings, and gang assaults; and at times a funeral.
    And payback was a bitch when we returned the favor.

    If you don’t like that I have personal familiarity with afro ghetto bad behavior, thats just too bad. Find a feckless pandering liberal wimp to talk to, who would love to pretend everything I said never happened. Empirical unwanted experience trumps desired theoretical fantasies every time.

    Otherwise thank you for your comment.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. @ThreeCranes
    O.T. but...

    Is anybody else having trouble swallowing the narrative in the most recent atrocity? I don’t subscribe to everything Paul Craig Roberts says about false flags but something stinks about this.

    An accountant?

    A multi millionaire?

    A multiple Homeowner?

    Supposedly he registered at the hotel with his girl friend's I.D. What’s up with that? Is this even permitted today?

    And of course, he is dead (apparently by his own hand as the press would have us believe) so he can tell no tales.

    Some questions.

    Why does everyone rush to judgement that his death was a suicide?

    Why does everyone assume he acted alone? Or that he even was the shooter?

    No one saw him pull the trigger. He could have been held hostage by unknown persons for the last three days, bound and gagged and then dragged in and shot just before the real assassins fled.

    Where did he acquire true automatic weapons?

    How did he control a gun on full auto over a range of 400 yards with little or no practice? I know he didn't have to really aim but 400 yards is a long, long way.

    And the Press? Immediately, unquestioningly accepts that he was the shooter. No questions asked.

    The Democrats immediately call for gun control.

    It’s all too predictable. I may be wrong but it seems as though something’s fishy here.

    There might be more information forthcoming--or might have been if he hadn't conveniently been found dead.

    Americans owned plenty of guns in the years prior to the 1950's and 60's but we didn't have these mass killings, so guns alone can't be the cause. What happened between 1965 and 1975 that may have precipitated this kind of behavior? Something seems to have torn the social fabric. We seem to have lost our sense of social cohesion and consequently, our social conscience. As tragic as these sprees are, they are still statistically minor compared to the annual murder rate in Democratic controlled cities. Though denizens of our inner cities try their mightiest, their murder rate is still small potatoes compared to Nicaragua's and Hondura's.

    At this rate, I feel that another thousand people can die tomorrow and we will immediately turn to blaming each other.

    Clown world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. @Chris Mallory

    I am an American,
     
    Sorry John, but no, you are not. You are an Englishman who was given US citizenship.

    “Sorry John, but no, you are not [an American]. You are an Englishman who was given US citizenship.” — Mallory

    I think that, by “Englishman,” Mallory means a subject of the Queen of England, (etc.), which is like being baptized in the Catholic Church, you can’t get out of it.

    “In spite of all temptations

    “To belong to other nations,

    “He remains an Englishman.”

    – Gilbert and Sullivan. HMS Pinafore

    Or, as Cecil Rhodes said, “To be born English is to win first prize in the lottery of life.”

    Rhodes was, as is well known, a mad man … an inspired mad man, but a mad man all the same. Did not Rhodes go out into the noonday African sun, intent upon conquering all of Africa for Queen Victoria and his British South Africa Company?

    We all know that to be born AMERICAN is to win firs prize in the lottery of life. Uh huh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. http://nypost.com/2017/09/30/hefners-former-valet-reflects-on-pig-nights-with-hookers-and-hef/

    Andy Warhol, Hugh Hefner, and Bill Buckley.

    All built up quite a stable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  132. MBlanc46 says:

    “Common enterprise”? No more likely than separation. Perhaps, less so. If I had to pick one to work for, it would be separation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  133. @Truth
    Let me guess; you work in a Manly-man profession, like IT or accounting?

    Truth, No cell service for the woods johnnies back in olden days. The timber was too heavy, it messed up the signal. The boys had to cut alleys through the forest to the towers so they could text up the faithful lassies back home in Tindertown. Folks was different then.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. @ThreeCranes
    O.T. but...

    Is anybody else having trouble swallowing the narrative in the most recent atrocity? I don’t subscribe to everything Paul Craig Roberts says about false flags but something stinks about this.

    An accountant?

    A multi millionaire?

    A multiple Homeowner?

    Supposedly he registered at the hotel with his girl friend's I.D. What’s up with that? Is this even permitted today?

    And of course, he is dead (apparently by his own hand as the press would have us believe) so he can tell no tales.

    Some questions.

    Why does everyone rush to judgement that his death was a suicide?

    Why does everyone assume he acted alone? Or that he even was the shooter?

    No one saw him pull the trigger. He could have been held hostage by unknown persons for the last three days, bound and gagged and then dragged in and shot just before the real assassins fled.

    Where did he acquire true automatic weapons?

    How did he control a gun on full auto over a range of 400 yards with little or no practice? I know he didn't have to really aim but 400 yards is a long, long way.

    And the Press? Immediately, unquestioningly accepts that he was the shooter. No questions asked.

    The Democrats immediately call for gun control.

    It’s all too predictable. I may be wrong but it seems as though something’s fishy here.

    There might be more information forthcoming--or might have been if he hadn't conveniently been found dead.

    Americans owned plenty of guns in the years prior to the 1950's and 60's but we didn't have these mass killings, so guns alone can't be the cause. What happened between 1965 and 1975 that may have precipitated this kind of behavior? Something seems to have torn the social fabric. We seem to have lost our sense of social cohesion and consequently, our social conscience. As tragic as these sprees are, they are still statistically minor compared to the annual murder rate in Democratic controlled cities. Though denizens of our inner cities try their mightiest, their murder rate is still small potatoes compared to Nicaragua's and Hondura's.

    I’ve had thoughts along those lines too. Hand held automatic fire is generally ineffective beyond 25 meters or so. If you have a genuine machine gun on a bipod, or tripod, that’s effective, but I doubt that’s what he had. And why ten guns? The finest marksmant in the world can shoot only one at a time. And changing magazines is easier than changing guns. You might have one or two spares if the barrel gets really hot, but ten? My hypothesis is that it was a group effort who then killed the guy they found (he may or may not have been part of the group), who had a well-thought out escape and evasion plan that appears to have worked. But maybe I’m wrong.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "My hypothesis is that it was a group effort who then killed the guy they found (he may or may not have been part of the group), who had a well-thought out escape and evasion plan that appears to have worked. But maybe I’m wrong."

    Yes, you're wrong.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. eah says:
    @yeah
    "All the more reason they have to go back — the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids ".

    I have heard "Keep out the dumb and the stupid lest we all become dumbed-down". That is a viewpoint I would tend to agree with. Put an end to this affirmative action nonsense.

    But your proposal to kick out the bright is ... well, what can I say? Some centuries back, clever women used to be denounced and burnt as witches. Clever men were strung up from trees to hang lest their cleverness reveal the village elders to be the idiots they were. Now you are saying that clever Asians should be kicked out lest they threaten the mediocre whites. I don't think whites need such protection, but if they do, then that is tough luck.

    mediocre whites

    You miss the point: they aren’t “mediocre” — they are smart enough and have achieved at a level high enough (GPA, SAT, etc) to earn admission to UC — which is denied them due to a measly few GPA or SAT points — there is absolutely no significant, practical difference between the average achievement level of Whites and Asians (unlike between eg Whites and Blacks) — the fact that our civilization and university system draws Asians like flies is more than proof of that — they need us, we don’t need them — besides, my argument is fundamentally white nationalist, which you did not address at all — I conceded that Asians are high-achieving — I don’t care — their presence in large numbers disadvantages bright white kids in the country their ancestors built — that’s the point — Dummkopf.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    The thing is who do we blame for Asians and Hispanics coming in unregulated. They are just seeking a better life for themselves and their families. If whites were allowed to do the same thing during the European immigration, I am sure we would have a massive influx of undocumented immigrants too. If we don't allow them in, then they wouldn't be here.

    This begs the question, why is this allowed. Well we know the answer to that one. The neocon corporatist Republicans want cheap labor (since the afro americans are not a reliable source of said labor); and the New Left Democrat progressives want to socially engineer the nation into being a socialist paradise of transnationalism. Plus if they can get them to pay taxes it will keep the afro entitlement system afloat.

    I agree we should control our borders, but as compared to the hostile acts of the average afro american, they are nothing (like a pimple as compared to cancer). As I responded (to Truth), I described the conditions of a working class neighborhood, existing in close proximity to ghetto areas, in the city.
    Afros were the primary aggressors who self initiated acts of violence, and stealing/damaging of property, en mass. No other group came close to their level of destructive habit.

    The neighborhood responded by catching the perpetrator, making them wish the police found them first, and giving them such a beating they wished they were dead. Payback was a bitch! The police approved of street justice back then, however the MSM and prosecutors did not.

    But ultimately it proved ineffective to save the neighborhood for several reasons:
    a) the afros were capable of thoughtless killing, as opposed to line we were unwilling to cross;
    b) the white thugs of the neighborhood were not always careful in identifying the proper target, thus attacking a random afro out of revenge, instead of the actual perpetrators. This caused unneeded escalations in hostilities.
    c) the afro perpetrators were always creatures of opportunity, unable to control their own impulses for immediate gratification, so they were ultimately undeterred from committing more & more crime;
    d) eventually the DA began prosecute legitimate acts of street justice, to obtain political favor with the lib MSM.

    In other words the afro cancer just continued to spread... the process was slowed, but did not stop. And, as said before, this high level of destructive habit was mostly confined to the afros. Its not how we feel about them that matters but how they feel about us. They are the primary aggressors, and if they stopped their bad behavior, we would stop having bad feelings about them. Then there would be no problem between us.

    We must admit to ourselves that if afros were not so completely dependent on our welfare for their daily needs, and they were the majority of the population, they would commit genocide against everyone who looks white (to the avg afro that would include Asians and Hispanics). And when thats done, turn against each other.
    , @eah
    there is absolutely no significant, practical difference between the average achievement level of Whites and Asians

    Some are probably Jewish -- but none are Asian.

    https://www.unzcloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Screenshot-2017-10-04-16.50.46.png
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. eah says:
    @eah
    All the more reason they have to go back -- the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids -- eg look into the enormous over-representation of Asians at the Univ of California, where at some campuses they are 2x, 3x, or more over-represented -- and due to the reality of the underachievement of Hispanics and Blacks, above a level that represents proportionality, every Asian admitted means a deserving (ie they meet minimum admission requirements) white kid is not admitted -- it's as simple as that -- this is America, after all -- a nation that Whites built -- why should we allow immigration to disadvantage our own children?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. Travis says:

    The Baltimore crowd began booing when the announcer began his SJW sermon, asking the fans to “Pray for Kindness, Equality, unity and Justice.” when you expect the PA announcer to say, “Please rise as we honor America, and Joey Odoms sings our national anthem” it will result in some angry fans. Nobody likes to be lectured before a football game and told to OBEY the Leftist Narrative and honor the BLM supporters who hate white America. Why should be told to Unite with the BLM activists who have rioted in Baltimore and caused the crime rate to soar.

    Football fans go to games to escape the constant SJW narrative disseminated by our media…Football was an escape from the constant sermonizing by our leftist media, teachers, corporations and politicians….now the SJW rhetoric has infested Football games. We can see the players and owners have sided with the BLM activists..booing is the least of their worries, If I owned season tickets I would burn them to keep my seats Empty and never buy another ticket as long as I live.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  138. @Jonathan Mason

    “The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?”
     
    No, the hypothesis should be: Can the descendants of people taken from various parts of Africa....?

    And I think the answer is yes. Every human baby that is born is a little stone-age baby, but what makes the difference is the society that he/she/they are born into and the socialization process. Every child that is born has the ability to learn to speak Chinese, which seems like an incredibly difficult language to those of us who speak European languages, because there are virtually no words in common, but any black baby that is born is perfectly capable of learning Chinese and becoming a Confucian.

    While it seems to be true that some genetic groups have higher average IQ test scores than others, there is a lot of overlap. Unfortunately the social norms of Afro-American societies into which babies are born do not lend themselves very well to preparing children to be businessmen and scientists.

    My children have some black teachers, and they are not stupid people, but they tend to be poorly educated and ill-informed, but most of all they tend to parrot silly ideas they have learned from their superiors in the educational bureaucracy, some of whom are white, so it is not entirely their fault that the way they teach math is half-assed and doomed to failure.

    And I think the answer is yes. Every human baby that is born is a little stone-age baby, but what makes the difference is the society that he/she/they are born into and the socialization process.

    The tabula rasa theory of human development is back there with phlogiston and the crystal spheres.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The tabula rasa theory of human development is back there with phlogiston and the crystal spheres."

    We are born with reflexes and capabilities. So, on one hand, research indicates that fetuses at a late stage of development are able to their mother's voices in utero and are able recognize the voice after they are born. On the other hand, fetuses are not ejected into our world with pre-set opinions or philosophical judgements or pre-determined knowledge bases.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. Corvinus says:
    @1RW
    I did look up African achievements before European arrival. I found this gem

    http://www.asbmb.org/asbmbtoday/asbmbtoday_article.aspx?id=32437

    It's got Egyptians (non-negroes btw) composing mathematical treatises 35,000 years ago and Africans shipping elephants to China. I guess they beat out India, Burma, and Vietnam on price.

    I am deeply awed

    And the source you listed also noted major accomplishments by subsaharan Africans. Thanks for playing. Your parting gift is wine and cheese.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Corvinus says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    And I think the answer is yes. Every human baby that is born is a little stone-age baby, but what makes the difference is the society that he/she/they are born into and the socialization process.
     
    The tabula rasa theory of human development is back there with phlogiston and the crystal spheres.

    “The tabula rasa theory of human development is back there with phlogiston and the crystal spheres.”

    We are born with reflexes and capabilities. So, on one hand, research indicates that fetuses at a late stage of development are able to their mother’s voices in utero and are able recognize the voice after they are born. On the other hand, fetuses are not ejected into our world with pre-set opinions or philosophical judgements or pre-determined knowledge bases.

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    Nine months before birth, but not a day earlier!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Corvinus says:
    @epochehusserl
    he intrusion was Jim Crow laws to begin with. Southrons couldn’t even abide by “separate but equal” as stated in the Plessy case. Moreover, white Southerners who sought to work alongside and even marry black Southerners were denied that liberty. Indeed, so much for freedom of association.
    ------------------------
    the idea behind jim crow was that the races were different and should be able to have different standards, an idea that the civil rights leaders agreed with by coming up with disparate impact. No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it.

    “the idea behind jim crow was that the races were different and should be able to have different standards…”

    No, the concept of Jim Crow was to separate the races socially while ensuring that the races were treated equally under the law. Of course, those Southrons had to ruin everything.

    “No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it.”

    You mean YOU do not believe that the races are equal. Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @epochehusserl
    “No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it.”
    -------------------------------
    neither does the eeoc. from the eeoc's own website:

    https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/factemployment_procedures.html

    For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but not testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    so either black people are capable of meeting the white standard or they are not. 50 years after the civil rights act blacks are still not deemed capable of meeting the white standard according to the government.

    You mean YOU do not believe that the races are equal. Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    I believe in the equality where the government doesnt throw out the results of standardized tests because activists dont like them. some equalities are better than others
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Corvinus says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around. But I don't think that they are really tougher than white men (uncucked). I know of no formidable aboriginal Bantu military forces that gave Europeans a tough fight in equatorial Africa. (The Zulus, by contrast, were formidable, but not Bantu.) When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They're aggressive, but not courageous.

    Like John, in the 1970s I thought that there would eventually be some kind of racial peace. Now I know it's not going to happen. But will whites be able to unite to resist their racial displacement in the United States as they become a smaller and smaller part of it?

    “Blacks have, on average, greater explosive muscularity and unpredictable aggressiveness, which makes them dangerous to be around.”

    Not really.

    “But I don’t think that they are really tougher than white men (uncucked).”

    The word “cuck” is meaningless.

    “I know of no formidable aboriginal Bantu military forces that gave Europeans a tough fight in equatorial Africa.”

    Give them guns, ammunition, and training in the European style and see how it turns out.

    “When Negroes are aggressively confronted, they generally retreat. They’re aggressive, but not courageous.”

    No, they generally fight fire with fire.

    “But will whites be able to unite to resist their racial displacement in the United States as they become a smaller and smaller part of it?”

    Whites will make their own decisions when it comes to race, thank you very little.

    Read More
    • Troll: Coemgen
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. joef says:
    @eah
    mediocre whites

    You miss the point: they aren't "mediocre" -- they are smart enough and have achieved at a level high enough (GPA, SAT, etc) to earn admission to UC -- which is denied them due to a measly few GPA or SAT points -- there is absolutely no significant, practical difference between the average achievement level of Whites and Asians (unlike between eg Whites and Blacks) -- the fact that our civilization and university system draws Asians like flies is more than proof of that -- they need us, we don't need them -- besides, my argument is fundamentally white nationalist, which you did not address at all -- I conceded that Asians are high-achieving -- I don't care -- their presence in large numbers disadvantages bright white kids in the country their ancestors built -- that's the point -- Dummkopf.

    The thing is who do we blame for Asians and Hispanics coming in unregulated. They are just seeking a better life for themselves and their families. If whites were allowed to do the same thing during the European immigration, I am sure we would have a massive influx of undocumented immigrants too. If we don’t allow them in, then they wouldn’t be here.

    This begs the question, why is this allowed. Well we know the answer to that one. The neocon corporatist Republicans want cheap labor (since the afro americans are not a reliable source of said labor); and the New Left Democrat progressives want to socially engineer the nation into being a socialist paradise of transnationalism. Plus if they can get them to pay taxes it will keep the afro entitlement system afloat.

    I agree we should control our borders, but as compared to the hostile acts of the average afro american, they are nothing (like a pimple as compared to cancer). As I responded (to Truth), I described the conditions of a working class neighborhood, existing in close proximity to ghetto areas, in the city.
    Afros were the primary aggressors who self initiated acts of violence, and stealing/damaging of property, en mass. No other group came close to their level of destructive habit.

    The neighborhood responded by catching the perpetrator, making them wish the police found them first, and giving them such a beating they wished they were dead. Payback was a bitch! The police approved of street justice back then, however the MSM and prosecutors did not.

    But ultimately it proved ineffective to save the neighborhood for several reasons:
    a) the afros were capable of thoughtless killing, as opposed to line we were unwilling to cross;
    b) the white thugs of the neighborhood were not always careful in identifying the proper target, thus attacking a random afro out of revenge, instead of the actual perpetrators. This caused unneeded escalations in hostilities.
    c) the afro perpetrators were always creatures of opportunity, unable to control their own impulses for immediate gratification, so they were ultimately undeterred from committing more & more crime;
    d) eventually the DA began prosecute legitimate acts of street justice, to obtain political favor with the lib MSM.

    In other words the afro cancer just continued to spread… the process was slowed, but did not stop. And, as said before, this high level of destructive habit was mostly confined to the afros. Its not how we feel about them that matters but how they feel about us. They are the primary aggressors, and if they stopped their bad behavior, we would stop having bad feelings about them. Then there would be no problem between us.

    We must admit to ourselves that if afros were not so completely dependent on our welfare for their daily needs, and they were the majority of the population, they would commit genocide against everyone who looks white (to the avg afro that would include Asians and Hispanics). And when thats done, turn against each other.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    Truth, you're cucking. Are you Jewish/involved with Asians? Daniel Chieh is revealing his inferiority, ie, he's not white. Comments like mine are getting to him.

    Truth is a black guy(or as he calls himself, a “proud Knee-Grow”) who has been manipulating you, in a practical demonstration of your intellectual inferiority. It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad.

    You’re an embarrassment to my race. At least you’re only a woman.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Not Guilty.

    I intended no manipulation at all. I am merely curious as to why an opinon that a white man should marry a white woman, on a white website leads one to be called a "Jew", a "barren woman", "having an agenda" or "crazy."
    , @attilathehen
    (((Anonymous))), this is the first article where I have noticed the commentator Truth. I asked him for his stats and now I know he's black. He made a comment that didn't make sense.

    You, I have dealt with. Here's a comment I left Mr. Sailer's site re the University of Sydney. Just in case you haven't read it:

    (((Anonymous))) there you go again. You constantly defend Derbyshire and his Chinese wife/offspring. You once stated Jews were smarter than gentiles (not true). The West is responsible for the world we see today, so it is tops in terms of IQ tests. Not the Asians. You claim you are for whites, but you constantly defend Jews/Asians. You have a bad case of yellow-fever.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. @Corvinus
    "The tabula rasa theory of human development is back there with phlogiston and the crystal spheres."

    We are born with reflexes and capabilities. So, on one hand, research indicates that fetuses at a late stage of development are able to their mother's voices in utero and are able recognize the voice after they are born. On the other hand, fetuses are not ejected into our world with pre-set opinions or philosophical judgements or pre-determined knowledge bases.

    Nine months before birth, but not a day earlier!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. Truth says:
    @attilathehen
    Truth, you're cucking. Are you Jewish/involved with Asians? Daniel Chieh is revealing his inferiority, ie, he's not white. Comments like mine are getting to him.

    No, I’m African. I think it’s rare that we “cuck” more likely we go grab a shotgun.

    Daniel Chieh was your nice, stereotypical Chinese guy when he started here, polite, wouldn’t insult anyone, it’s terrible what a year on this site has done to the guy.

    In your case, I just find it fascinating that a white woman would receive so much backlash for saying that whites should marry whites on a WN website. That’s about it.

    Also, why don’t you and Aldey like each other, you seem to have pretty much the same platform and are the only two broads here. I guess it’s a chick-vs-chick thing?

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Don't know who Aldey is.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. @Truth

    does anyone here at unz.com see an emerging police state in our wonderful country?
     
    Sure, you, and I and the guy who put up the "the real story behind the national anthem protests" video, that's about it.

    is everyone okay with the police militarization. the army off=loading weapons like grenade launchers and various gear, armored vehicles, humvees, etc.
     
    Of course, they're clearly going to use all that gear only to keep Knee-growz in line!


    well, i guess we need to be kept in line when the empire goes up in flames. black & white.
     
    Weinberg was right, Bro, you just can't trust anyone over 30. They're just too stupid.

    how do you fit those quotes in those gray boxes?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Highlight the quote and press "blockquote."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. Joe Webb says:

    “That’s my formula for an enlightened patriotism: for black and nonblack to face up honestly to reality, to our group differences, which aren’t anyone’s fault, except Mother Nature’s—as citizens united in a common enterprise, with a common collective fate as Americans.
    Is it really impossible? I sure hope not.”

    Derb has done a lot of great work…but. His three-piece suit suggests that he Believes in Words. Nothing wrong with that in the context of a white country, like merrie old, I mean real old, England before 1968 and Enoch Powell’s speech about bloody rivers and immigrants.
    However that was then and this is now. Likewise “citizens united in a common enterprise” sounds so quaint. A “collective fate” is probably more or less correct, but that fate is headed toward rivers of blood.

    Then, Derb’s unforgivable “group differences” sounds the alarm…rivers of bull shit. Race Differences are the Honest Words. He sounds like the weak-kneed socio-biologists using the term “populations”..pablum…instead of “races”. Derb also has a hard time spelling the word Jew.
    There is no possibility of getting Negroes to face up to anything, especially since it is ultra tough to get even Whites to face up to biological reality.

    Jared Taylor just wrote a long piece on the solution to our race problems. long line of letters. S E P A R A T I O N. terse and snappy. This is probably the reason for Derb’s piece. Taylor is , at least in this limited context, done with words, but Derb just keeps keeping on…words, words, words. (how much does he get for them, 50 cents apiece?

    To get any White to be objective , logical, calm, dispassionate, courageous, and smart…about race, among other things, is tough.
    Blacks, Beaners, Jews, ARabs, Chinks, …forget it. War is coming

    The only thing for Whites to do is stand up to their own denial dynamic, and start arming themselves with facts, reasoning, and for the time being voting.
    At the same time, being realistic, buy guns. And guns will be most useful to defend ourselves first from liberals, then jews, then blacks, etc. who hate us and want us dead or zombeized.

    Forget Derb’s words. He can be forgiven since he makes his living with them and his Chinese wife…she who must be obeyed…require discretion. There is much virtue in being financially independent.
    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  149. Joe Webb says:

    Another thing. Derb’s ‘not anyone’s fault’ is a usage that is not necessarily a ‘fault’ but to my picky-picky mind , it is worth noting that certain words , in a Darwinian context, are useless. “Fault” , like “fairness,” and many others in English (Anglish,,,as in Angleland) are useless and therefore in need of retirement. Man thinks and Father Nature laughs. It’s not fair!!! heh heh.

    Mother Nature is ok usually, but Father Nature is more like the Reality. Ancient Roman law allowed for the paterfamilias to kill his children. Father Nature naturally selects the Best because the Worst….are unaffordable. If there is any Progress still around, it is in eugenic improvement of the species Homo Sapien. So far, Whites have clearly been the race possessing the Mostest and the Bestest.

    There is no use crying over spilled milk…useless genes, etc.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  150. Truth says:
    @Lawrence Fitton
    how do you fit those quotes in those gray boxes?

    Highlight the quote and press “blockquote.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. Truth says:
    @Anonymous
    Truth is a black guy(or as he calls himself, a "proud Knee-Grow") who has been manipulating you, in a practical demonstration of your intellectual inferiority. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

    You're an embarrassment to my race. At least you're only a woman.

    Not Guilty.

    I intended no manipulation at all. I am merely curious as to why an opinon that a white man should marry a white woman, on a white website leads one to be called a “Jew”, a “barren woman”, “having an agenda” or “crazy.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    We don't get a lot of non-retarded leaders. Having a moron constantly ramble about one of the few good leaders we have is not productive; its like if someone black went to the Nation of Islam and yelled at every speech at the speaker is a bad Muslim. It wouldn't matter, that's not the point when you need solidarity. Does that make sense?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. @Corvinus
    "the idea behind jim crow was that the races were different and should be able to have different standards..."

    No, the concept of Jim Crow was to separate the races socially while ensuring that the races were treated equally under the law. Of course, those Southrons had to ruin everything.

    "No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it."

    You mean YOU do not believe that the races are equal. Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    “No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it.”
    ——————————-
    neither does the eeoc. from the eeoc’s own website:

    https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/factemployment_procedures.html

    For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but not testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    so either black people are capable of meeting the white standard or they are not. 50 years after the civil rights act blacks are still not deemed capable of meeting the white standard according to the government.

    You mean YOU do not believe that the races are equal. Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.
    ——————————————————————
    I believe in the equality where the government doesnt throw out the results of standardized tests because activists dont like them. some equalities are better than others

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "For example, Title VII..."

    **Title VII prohibits INTENTIONAL discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.** For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but NOT testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    In other words, there is a test for BOTH whites and blacks or there is NO test for whites and blacks.

    **You left out this important sentence here. Was it intentional?

    We already have covered this ground in-depth n other threads. Do you have something novel to discuss?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Truth
    Not Guilty.

    I intended no manipulation at all. I am merely curious as to why an opinon that a white man should marry a white woman, on a white website leads one to be called a "Jew", a "barren woman", "having an agenda" or "crazy."

    We don’t get a lot of non-retarded leaders. Having a moron constantly ramble about one of the few good leaders we have is not productive; its like if someone black went to the Nation of Islam and yelled at every speech at the speaker is a bad Muslim. It wouldn’t matter, that’s not the point when you need solidarity. Does that make sense?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Well, look at it another way; A bright, beautiful firebrand of a woman, young, Ivy League educated, truthful and refusing to back down arrives upon the scene. She realizes that white males get the short end of the stick in society and says so at every opportunity. She wants to seal the border and come up with a sensible plan on immigration. She wants to reduce the H-1B visa program so that white collar (white) Americans can prosper. She is a conservative, but not to the degree that anyone can call her racist! She just wants every American to earn his/her own keep and be rewarded to his/her own ability. She is popular, telegenic and respected even by her enemies.

    Only one, slight drawback; she is married to the Nigerian middle linebacker for the Arizona Cardinals. I mean, what is the difference, one can't help with whom one falls in love, right?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. Truth says:
    @Anonymous
    We don't get a lot of non-retarded leaders. Having a moron constantly ramble about one of the few good leaders we have is not productive; its like if someone black went to the Nation of Islam and yelled at every speech at the speaker is a bad Muslim. It wouldn't matter, that's not the point when you need solidarity. Does that make sense?

    Well, look at it another way; A bright, beautiful firebrand of a woman, young, Ivy League educated, truthful and refusing to back down arrives upon the scene. She realizes that white males get the short end of the stick in society and says so at every opportunity. She wants to seal the border and come up with a sensible plan on immigration. She wants to reduce the H-1B visa program so that white collar (white) Americans can prosper. She is a conservative, but not to the degree that anyone can call her racist! She just wants every American to earn his/her own keep and be rewarded to his/her own ability. She is popular, telegenic and respected even by her enemies.

    Only one, slight drawback; she is married to the Nigerian middle linebacker for the Arizona Cardinals. I mean, what is the difference, one can’t help with whom one falls in love, right?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sunbeam
    "Only one, slight drawback; she is married to the Nigerian middle linebacker for the Arizona Cardinals. I mean, what is the difference, one can’t help with whom one falls in love, right?"

    For that tale to mean anything, people would have to be familiar with who you are talking about.

    Arizona's middle linebacker is Nigerian? Who knew?

    As for his wife, same story. No idea who or what you are talking about.
    , @Anonymous
    I wouldn't make a business out of heckling her, if she's ultimately helping me and my children, it doesn't matter.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. Vinteuil says:
    @ThreeCranes
    You're so close, Priss. Just a little change in emphasis will bring you on target.

    Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work. In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women's work. When they got to America they were forced to do work that they regarded as women's and this demeaned them. They resent that to this day.

    When they finally figured out how hard white men worked they were incredulous. If they had whitey's power they would have made beasts of burden out of their many wives, but white men were too kind-hearted to do that. That smacked of weakness which as you say, they don't respect.

    When blacks get to run things, women will be slave/animals once again. There will be no laws against rape because their society doesn't acknowledge women's rights to control who will hump her and when he will do it.

    Blacks don't mind working at football and basketball because it's basically war, which they're genetically geared for.

    In the end, blacks are incompatible with white civilization because while they were naturally selected for hunting and fighting, science and technology require patience, intelligence and fine tuning.

    I believe that you’ve made here a comment even more un-pc than anything ever written by Priss.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Sunbeam says:
    @Truth
    Well, look at it another way; A bright, beautiful firebrand of a woman, young, Ivy League educated, truthful and refusing to back down arrives upon the scene. She realizes that white males get the short end of the stick in society and says so at every opportunity. She wants to seal the border and come up with a sensible plan on immigration. She wants to reduce the H-1B visa program so that white collar (white) Americans can prosper. She is a conservative, but not to the degree that anyone can call her racist! She just wants every American to earn his/her own keep and be rewarded to his/her own ability. She is popular, telegenic and respected even by her enemies.

    Only one, slight drawback; she is married to the Nigerian middle linebacker for the Arizona Cardinals. I mean, what is the difference, one can't help with whom one falls in love, right?

    “Only one, slight drawback; she is married to the Nigerian middle linebacker for the Arizona Cardinals. I mean, what is the difference, one can’t help with whom one falls in love, right?”

    For that tale to mean anything, people would have to be familiar with who you are talking about.

    Arizona’s middle linebacker is Nigerian? Who knew?

    As for his wife, same story. No idea who or what you are talking about.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/hypothetical
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Corvinus says:
    @ThreeCranes
    You're so close, Priss. Just a little change in emphasis will bring you on target.

    Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work. In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women's work. When they got to America they were forced to do work that they regarded as women's and this demeaned them. They resent that to this day.

    When they finally figured out how hard white men worked they were incredulous. If they had whitey's power they would have made beasts of burden out of their many wives, but white men were too kind-hearted to do that. That smacked of weakness which as you say, they don't respect.

    When blacks get to run things, women will be slave/animals once again. There will be no laws against rape because their society doesn't acknowledge women's rights to control who will hump her and when he will do it.

    Blacks don't mind working at football and basketball because it's basically war, which they're genetically geared for.

    In the end, blacks are incompatible with white civilization because while they were naturally selected for hunting and fighting, science and technology require patience, intelligence and fine tuning.

    “Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work.”

    In reality, people resent slavery because it is cruel and inhumane. Praytell, how do you feel about slavery that exists today?

    “In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women’s work.”

    Please educate yourself on this matter.

    http://historylink101.com/lessons/farm-city/africa1.htm

    “When they got to America they were forced to do work that they regarded as women’s and this demeaned them. They resent that to this day.”

    Pure fiction on your part.

    “When they finally figured out how hard white men worked they were incredulous. If they had whitey’s power they would have made beasts of burden out of their many wives, but white men were too kind-hearted to do that. That smacked of weakness which as you say, they don’t respect.”

    In reality, white slaveowners whacked their slaves into submission.

    “In the end, blacks are incompatible with white civilization because while they were naturally selected for hunting and fighting, science and technology require patience, intelligence and fine tuning.”

    It is clear you really don’t get out much in the real world.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    Your rebuttals fail because they don't address the salient points of my arguments. They don't address the essential points because you assume that blacks are just like whites, only darker.

    Slavery was endemic in black Africa. Humans were property and trafficked. Selling slaves to white men was a twofer because it was profitable in that it brought in trade goods which Africans themselves could not produce, e.g. iron and bronze edged tools and it got rid of pesky enemies with whom the slave dealer competed for resources.

    White slaver owners quickly realized that African blacks were truly, truly primitive--barely human. Which was objectively true as modern genetic research has born out. The most recent news is that Bantus (the ancestors of most slaves) had split off from the rest of the African family tree roughly 200,000 years ago. So the blacks from whom Europeans and Asians split off from 50--60,000 years ago were not Bantus. Bantus have genes which they hold uniquely, unshared with the rest of the human race.

    So the popular narrative is bass ackwards. It is not the case that all humanity devolved from the ancestors of American slaves. The ancestors of slaves occupy a unique branch in the human family tree.

    Now, the Southern plantation owners were confronted with a conundrum. How to domesticate this creature which was barely half human? Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc.

    So the slave owner started by preaching Christianity to them, thinking thereby to wean them of their most atavistic habits i.e. witchcraft, cannibalism etc. This is what gives rise to the notion of the compassionate Master ministering to his miserable flock. He believed—rightly—that while he was improving their material condition he was saving their souls as well. And there is no question that the material condition of black slaves was hugely better than had been their prior life in Africa. Stats on freedom from the load of parasitic diseases, life expectancy, human rights, wealth etc all bear this out. From 400,000 imported slaves there are now 42,000,000 in America. They have outbred the native whites who are supposedly engaged in "genociding" them. Hah!

    In your arguments, Corvinus, you presume to speak on behalf of a creature whom you have never encountered and whom you cannot imagine. I suggest that you travel to the Deep South where you will meet some blacks who are really and truly black, who haven’t interbred with whitey. Interview them. Administer intelligence tests to them. But bear in mind that the people you meet today have been selectively bred for domesticity, they are tame compared to the blacks brought here 250 years ago.

    In contrast, the black in our inter-city ghettos has begun a huge regression to the mean. They are becoming more feral, regressing to the state blacks lived in when they were first brought under civilization’s benevolent effects, however intolerable that may have been to the black African’s nature.

    Cheers

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. Corvinus says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    I've had thoughts along those lines too. Hand held automatic fire is generally ineffective beyond 25 meters or so. If you have a genuine machine gun on a bipod, or tripod, that's effective, but I doubt that's what he had. And why ten guns? The finest marksmant in the world can shoot only one at a time. And changing magazines is easier than changing guns. You might have one or two spares if the barrel gets really hot, but ten? My hypothesis is that it was a group effort who then killed the guy they found (he may or may not have been part of the group), who had a well-thought out escape and evasion plan that appears to have worked. But maybe I'm wrong.

    “My hypothesis is that it was a group effort who then killed the guy they found (he may or may not have been part of the group), who had a well-thought out escape and evasion plan that appears to have worked. But maybe I’m wrong.”

    Yes, you’re wrong.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. @Anonymous
    Truth is a black guy(or as he calls himself, a "proud Knee-Grow") who has been manipulating you, in a practical demonstration of your intellectual inferiority. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

    You're an embarrassment to my race. At least you're only a woman.

    (((Anonymous))), this is the first article where I have noticed the commentator Truth. I asked him for his stats and now I know he’s black. He made a comment that didn’t make sense.

    You, I have dealt with. Here’s a comment I left Mr. Sailer’s site re the University of Sydney. Just in case you haven’t read it:

    (((Anonymous))) there you go again. You constantly defend Derbyshire and his Chinese wife/offspring. You once stated Jews were smarter than gentiles (not true). The West is responsible for the world we see today, so it is tops in terms of IQ tests. Not the Asians. You claim you are for whites, but you constantly defend Jews/Asians. You have a bad case of yellow-fever.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Truth says:
    @Sunbeam
    "Only one, slight drawback; she is married to the Nigerian middle linebacker for the Arizona Cardinals. I mean, what is the difference, one can’t help with whom one falls in love, right?"

    For that tale to mean anything, people would have to be familiar with who you are talking about.

    Arizona's middle linebacker is Nigerian? Who knew?

    As for his wife, same story. No idea who or what you are talking about.
    Read More
    • Agree: Fredrik
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. The cuckery of the male commentators is unbelievable. There is (((Anonymous))) who constantly tries to prove he’s white and for the West. There is Achmed E. Newman (who has not given me his stats), Jake, the RCCer who believes it is Christ or Chaos and Daniel Chieh.

    Daniel Chieh is a different person now according to Truth. That’s because I have told him he is Chinese and inferior to Caucasian women. He did marry white trash but that happens. Asians on this and many other websites are considered smarter than Caucasians. I have consistently proven this to be false. Daniel Chiech is unhappy about being told the truth. The defense of Derbyshire’s degeneracy is amazing.

    The Caucasian male RCC commentators are useless if they accept black/Asian priests-popes.

    Here is another example of the problem with which we are dealing. This what the negrophiliac Rush Limbaugh said about the American masculinity. http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/09/28/rush-limbaugh-says-nfl-is-being-attacked-to-destroy-american-masculinity/

    The NFL/NBA are over 75% black. He believes black males are “men” in the Western sense of the word. Degeneracy!!!

    These are terrible problems we are facing and the Western Caucasian RCC/Zioevangizer male is the problem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  162. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Truth
    Well, look at it another way; A bright, beautiful firebrand of a woman, young, Ivy League educated, truthful and refusing to back down arrives upon the scene. She realizes that white males get the short end of the stick in society and says so at every opportunity. She wants to seal the border and come up with a sensible plan on immigration. She wants to reduce the H-1B visa program so that white collar (white) Americans can prosper. She is a conservative, but not to the degree that anyone can call her racist! She just wants every American to earn his/her own keep and be rewarded to his/her own ability. She is popular, telegenic and respected even by her enemies.

    Only one, slight drawback; she is married to the Nigerian middle linebacker for the Arizona Cardinals. I mean, what is the difference, one can't help with whom one falls in love, right?

    I wouldn’t make a business out of heckling her, if she’s ultimately helping me and my children, it doesn’t matter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OVr3EfB_z8
    , @attilathehen
    (((Anonymous))) Jews are notorious negrophiliacs and they marry them alot. You would like Truth. Be prepared as a Truth type in-law is in your future.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Terry says:

    In South Africa Alan Paton wrote ‘ that one day when they [white people] are turned to loving, they will find we [black people] are turned to hating’”(Pg. 40)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  164. Truth says:
    @Anonymous
    I wouldn't make a business out of heckling her, if she's ultimately helping me and my children, it doesn't matter.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Yikes.

    Peterson meets Paglia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    222,445 views in 2 days. Wow.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. @Anonymous
    I wouldn't make a business out of heckling her, if she's ultimately helping me and my children, it doesn't matter.

    (((Anonymous))) Jews are notorious negrophiliacs and they marry them alot. You would like Truth. Be prepared as a Truth type in-law is in your future.

    Read More
    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Good to know, takes one Jew to know another.
    , @Truth
    ...He should be so lucky!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. @Priss Factor
    Black disrespect for whites seems natural and obvious in our time.

    I mean, humans are organisms, and organisms fear and respect Power, not weakness.

    In a way, it may seem counter-intuitive that blacks are SO ANGRY. The bad ole days of 'white racism' are now history, a thing of the past. Blacks are big in music and sports. A mulatto , the product of a black guy humping a white woman, became president and was re-elected. Oprah is revered by many. Beyonce and black idols dominate the charts. Sports are blacker than ever. So, blacks should be happier and less hateful. Based on 'progress' and 'justice', this is true.

    But humans emotions outrun human ideas. And the human organism feels contempt for the weak. It respects what it fears. Even if it hates what it fears, it has respect for it and with respect comes admiration.

    Look how the Japanese acted terribly toward the Chinese, the 'sick man of Asia'. But when US totally kicked Japanese butt, the Japanese were cucky-sucky to Uncle Sam. They worshiped McCarthur as shogun-god. And Japan has been America's geisha ever since. Never mind US firebombed the hell out of Tokyo and dropped two big ones. Never mind recent revelations showed US planned to nuke 12 more cities if Japan didn't surrender. Japanese got beaten so badly that they came to respect the US like something akin to Godzilla. A fearsome badass monster nation.

    And in the past, blacks felt this way. Sure, blacks were filled with hate and resentment against whites who called them 'ni**er' and drew funny 'coon' faces. But white man seemed fearsome back then. If some negro raped a white woman, these fearsome white men would come in hoods and hang a Negro from a tree and scare the bejeesus out of Negroes. So, the Negro thought, 'dang, white man aint nothing to mess with. He baaaaaad.' So, the Negro tried to prove that he's a credit to his race. He wanted to prove that he is worthy to live along the mighty horrifying-ass white man. He felt toward whitey like a Japanese felt toward Americans after defeat WWII. "You kicked my ass, and I kiss your ass and beg your approval and acceptance."

    So, even though things were worse for blacks in the past, blacks truly feared white folks and with that fear came not only hate but respect and admiration. It's like Hindus respected the Brits because a handful of Brits were so masterful in ruling over a bunch of messy disorganized cow-worshipers whose national odor was curry.

    But look how things changed so drastically. Compare 1915, the year that saw the release of THE BIRTH OF A NATION with 2015, the year of Obama and the Cuck.

    Back in 1915, there was the KKK as a real force, a show of white solidarity against blacks. And Woodrow Wilson was approving of the Klan as he felt disdain for the Negroes.
    People like to think that history is moved by ideas, values, and culture. And that would be the case in a more repressed and morally-centered social order. In Muslim societies, natural forces were held in check by Islamic codes and strict morality. So, even blacks in Arab nations had to watch themselves. If they acted funky and stuff in front of Arab women, they'd be whupped and killed on the spot. And US used to be more moral and conservative. But with the rise of popculture and hedonism, animal energies of human nature began to shape history and society more, and this esp exploded with rise of youth culture that was significantly influenced by black music centered around sexual energies. Also, the black success in sports and the rise of celebrity led to narcissism of black savagery. So, there has been an acceleration of history based on natural urges. Francis Fukuyama focused only on ideas, the hegelian struggle between ideologies. And once capitalism and liberalism won, he figured it was end of History with big 'H'. But he neglected to notice that as the Cold War progressed, ideology mattered less than idology. Western Culture was less and less about philosophy and art than about fun and fever. And the biggest 'western' threat to communist nations wasn't Ayn Rand and Adam Smith but Elvis and Beatles and Hollywood. So, even if History came to an end, there was now Beastory. With idols over ideals, human history is now driven by beast energies. Even spirituality is no longer about religions with depth of tradition and contemplation but about new sensations, like homomania and negromania. Homos are so loud and flamboyant. Negroes are so wild and rambunctious. Homos and Negroes are so into self-worship that they expect all others to worship them. Any refusal is heresy in their eyes. They got idol-god-complex.

    As far as blacks are concerned, history has been replaced by Fistory. Black fist is most mighty. Some even say the Washington Monument is really about the black dong.

    https://criticxxtreme.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/the-yes-they-were-black-series-worshipping-a-big-black-penis-osiris/

    With sports, music, and sex -- the only things that matter in our globalist idolized culture -- dominated by blacks, and with blacks showing NO INTEREST in anything but themselves in pop culture, why would blacks respect whitey anymore? Sure, blacks justify their contempt and hostility in terms of 'white racism' and 'police brutality'. They make it sound like they are still the underdogs. But if we look past the rhetoric, black hate is not about fear of white power(oppression) but about contempt for white weakness. Here are black athletes dominating the fields with white cheerleaders putting out to them. They see all these soft slow white boys cheer them on like gods and heroes. They see all these lame white boys imitating rappers. They hear about cuck culture, that white men are inviting black men to hump their women. Why would blacks respect this kind of loser wuss?
    If white power today was like it was 100 yrs ago, I guarantee all blacks would be standing for the anthem. Even if they'd hate white power, they would respect it as badass. But they now see whites as so weak. And this hostility isn't just at white 'racists' but white dweeberals. I mean, black guys despise Christopher Hayes and Anderson Cooper just as much. Dorks and dweebs.

    As far as they are concerned, they kick white boys' ass and hump white women and colonize white wombs.... but white boys are welcoming THIS as 'american as apple pie'.

    White America is now utterly disgusting, and black athletes and blacks in general have every reason to feel nothing but contempt for such weakness and cuckery.

    But then, it's the same with Jews. Jews long felt resentment for Wasps. But there was fear and respect too. Anglos seemed so great and awesome in having created much of the modern world in economics and science and politics. And Jews thought it would take a long hard climb to reach the top. But what happened? Jews rose so fast and WAsps fell so fast. Jews began to feel contempt for these cucky-wuck wasps, and now, Jews expect white goys and girls to just cuck out to Jews like servile dogs. And the more whites try to appease Jews, the more contempt Jews feel for these dogs.

    Some say 'nice guys finish last'. No, the issue isn't niceness. It is weakness. Weakness is held in contempt. It is, at best, an object of compassion. Otherwise, it is wussy.

    To blacks, past history seems especially insulting since they now realize that they'd been enslaved and oppressed by a bunch of wussies and dorks. If chimps were oppressed by gorillas, they would at least respect superior gorilla strength. But if chimps were to realize that they'd been kicked around by weaker gibbons, they're gonna feel extra hatred for the gibbons. The oppression would seem even more unjust since it violated not only morality but nature. If whites are bigger and stronger than blacks, blacks today might bitch about slavery as moral injustice but not as natural injustice. After all, nature is about rule of strong over the weak: lions over hyenas, hyenas over jackals, jackals over rabbits, etc. Once blacks realized that whites are the weaker race, they began to see slavery as not just moral wrong but natural wrong. How dare these wussy-ass white boys rule over blacks? It'd be like gorillas discovering they'd been kicked around by a bunch of chimps.

    Indeed, the reason why blacks hate the police so much is because police power goes against their instinctive savage sense of jungle justice. In sports, the only justice that matters is toughness. So, the strongest boxer wins. The toughest football players dominate the field and win the games. And blacks dominate sports because they are tougher. For savage blacks, this seems just and fair as their emotions are of the Rule of the Law of the Jungle. In sports, blacks totally dominate, and white man is a wussy bench-warmer or cucky waterboy.

    Then, how come white cops have power over blacks? Now, sane people would say police arrest black criminals and the like, but that is a matter of legal justice, an idea that makes little sense to savage blacks whose only sense of right or wrong is jungle justice. Blacks think like rappers, and rap logic is Rule of the gangster. So, blacks are less outraged by black thugs killing black thugs. It's like sports. It's jungle justice based on who be more 'badass'. But then, these white police come to mess up that game. With special 'white powers', they gain control over blacks and drag them into police stations and even shoot some of them. If blacks met these white police officers in the boxing ring, they would kick the white boy's ass. That seems just to blacks. But with legal power and badges, white cops have power over stronger and tougher blacks..and that just seems 'unjust' to blacks whose idea of justice is 'who can whup whose ass?'

    Because blacks are so savage and only have pop culture as mainstay of culture, they've come to worship themselves as a god-race. This is why data and facts don't matter and have no effect on racial discourse that, for blacks and cucky whites, is a religious issue of Holy Negroes. Facts are useless against Faith.
    It's like Mao was a godlike figure in China. So, stats didn't matter. It didn't matter that Great Leap Forward killed tens of millions. It didn't matter that by objective measures, China was worse under Mao. Religion is about faith, not about facts. Once Mao was idolized, it didn't matter what he did. He was above all that went wrong since he was a sacred icon.
    And blacks, Jews, and homos have such iconic power in the West. So, facts and data make no dent in the black narrative. Even most secular people are emotionally religious and cling to sacred icons. They were raised worshiping MLK, Ali, Oprah, Bob Marley, and rappers as holy icons. So, it doesn't matter if they are told of black crime stats. They keep worshiping the icons.. like Soviets raised on Stalin-worship just believed and believed in Great Stalin despite the obvious factual evidence of the horrors of Stalinism.

    This is the danger of worshiping people and things. Best reason for worship in God is not that God exists. He doesn't. It's that those who don't worship God will almost always worship something else. The current West now worships the most savage and most destructive of all races.

    Great piece! I like your observation about white weakness.

    On a similar note, back when whites dominated the world, Moslems imitated whites. I saw a picture dating from 1928 of the Queen of Afghanistan wearing conventional 1920s women’s clothing with bobbed hair and a cloche hat. No head bag, much less a burka. The comeback of Moslem garb and headbags coincided with the perception of the West as weak and decadent. If a non-Moslem, non-Western nation such as China becomes dominant and pushes the Moslems around, many Moslems may imitate Chinese styles and culture and the headbag will again disappear. The Chinese are giving Chinese Moslems are hard time now, demanding that Korans and prayer rugs be turned over to authorities.

    Everybody loves a winner.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    On a similar note, back when whites dominated the world, Moslems imitated whites. I saw a picture dating from 1928 of the Queen of Afghanistan wearing conventional 1920s women’s clothing with bobbed hair and a cloche hat. No head bag, much less a burka.
     
    Uh, no.

    Unless you are referring to the 5 Moslems they sent to the US to get educated.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. @Truth

    It’s obvious to anyone with a passing familiarity of blacks, black crime and dysfunction that the NFL “protests” such as they unfolded are naked, public displays of black solidarity.
     
    That's funny. I've been black since 1966, and I haven't seen black solidarity yet.

    The proverbial hanging curveball!
    Truth,ever hear of a murdering polecat calls himself OJ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    OJ Didn't like blacks. He made it fairly clear.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. @Corvinus
    "Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work."

    In reality, people resent slavery because it is cruel and inhumane. Praytell, how do you feel about slavery that exists today?

    "In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women’s work."

    Please educate yourself on this matter.

    http://historylink101.com/lessons/farm-city/africa1.htm

    "When they got to America they were forced to do work that they regarded as women’s and this demeaned them. They resent that to this day."

    Pure fiction on your part.

    "When they finally figured out how hard white men worked they were incredulous. If they had whitey’s power they would have made beasts of burden out of their many wives, but white men were too kind-hearted to do that. That smacked of weakness which as you say, they don’t respect."

    In reality, white slaveowners whacked their slaves into submission.

    "In the end, blacks are incompatible with white civilization because while they were naturally selected for hunting and fighting, science and technology require patience, intelligence and fine tuning."

    It is clear you really don't get out much in the real world.

    Your rebuttals fail because they don’t address the salient points of my arguments. They don’t address the essential points because you assume that blacks are just like whites, only darker.

    Slavery was endemic in black Africa. Humans were property and trafficked. Selling slaves to white men was a twofer because it was profitable in that it brought in trade goods which Africans themselves could not produce, e.g. iron and bronze edged tools and it got rid of pesky enemies with whom the slave dealer competed for resources.

    White slaver owners quickly realized that African blacks were truly, truly primitive–barely human. Which was objectively true as modern genetic research has born out. The most recent news is that Bantus (the ancestors of most slaves) had split off from the rest of the African family tree roughly 200,000 years ago. So the blacks from whom Europeans and Asians split off from 50–60,000 years ago were not Bantus. Bantus have genes which they hold uniquely, unshared with the rest of the human race.

    So the popular narrative is bass ackwards. It is not the case that all humanity devolved from the ancestors of American slaves. The ancestors of slaves occupy a unique branch in the human family tree.

    Now, the Southern plantation owners were confronted with a conundrum. How to domesticate this creature which was barely half human? Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc.

    So the slave owner started by preaching Christianity to them, thinking thereby to wean them of their most atavistic habits i.e. witchcraft, cannibalism etc. This is what gives rise to the notion of the compassionate Master ministering to his miserable flock. He believed—rightly—that while he was improving their material condition he was saving their souls as well. And there is no question that the material condition of black slaves was hugely better than had been their prior life in Africa. Stats on freedom from the load of parasitic diseases, life expectancy, human rights, wealth etc all bear this out. From 400,000 imported slaves there are now 42,000,000 in America. They have outbred the native whites who are supposedly engaged in “genociding” them. Hah!

    In your arguments, Corvinus, you presume to speak on behalf of a creature whom you have never encountered and whom you cannot imagine. I suggest that you travel to the Deep South where you will meet some blacks who are really and truly black, who haven’t interbred with whitey. Interview them. Administer intelligence tests to them. But bear in mind that the people you meet today have been selectively bred for domesticity, they are tame compared to the blacks brought here 250 years ago.

    In contrast, the black in our inter-city ghettos has begun a huge regression to the mean. They are becoming more feral, regressing to the state blacks lived in when they were first brought under civilization’s benevolent effects, however intolerable that may have been to the black African’s nature.

    Cheers

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    You are correct. The slaves who were brought to the "New World" were not the "best and brightest", but were the dregs of their respective primitive societies. What better way to get rid of your unwanted, low-IQ slackers, criminal ne-er-do-wells, troublemakers, and others than to sell them into bondage where they would be shipped thousands of miles away, never to bother you again. We are living with the results of the misguided policies of our ancestors.
    It is long overdue to repatriate our now-useless, obsolete "farm machinery" to their countries of origin.
    , @Corvinus
    "Your rebuttals fail because they don’t address the salient points of my arguments."

    Except you did not make arguments, you offered repeated overblown generalizations like "Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work" and “In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women’s work.”

    Thus, I offered the appropriate response.

    "Slavery was endemic in black Africa. Humans were property and trafficked. Selling slaves to white men was a twofer because it was profitable in that it brought in trade goods which Africans themselves could not produce, e.g. iron and bronze edged tools and it got rid of pesky enemies with whom the slave dealer competed for resources."

    While what you state here is accurate (amazing on your part given your general level of ignorance), you do realize that European slavery and African slavery were markedly different, right? RIGHT?

    http://www.discoveringbristol.org.uk/slavery/people-involved/enslaved-people/enslaved-africans/africa-slavery

    "White slaver owners quickly realized that African blacks were truly, truly primitive–barely human."

    That was an argument proffered by Europeans in light of their own alleged biological superiority.
    Anthropologists, sociologists, and theologians have countered those assertions. Praytell, what criteria constitutes "barely human"? What determining factors show that one group of people are "more human" than another group of people?

    "Which was objectively true as modern genetic research has born out."

    What research has stated that black people are "barely human"? Citations, please.

    "Bantus have genes which they hold uniquely, unshared with the rest of the human race."

    Really, now. What are those genes? What experts in the field have come out and made this claim? Citations, please.

    "Now, the Southern plantation owners were confronted with a conundrum. How to domesticate this creature which was barely half human?"

    There was a false assumption on the part of the northern slave merchants and southern agriculturists. In retrospect, the actions taken by these two groups against their fellow humans was barbaric. Do you justify people today who enslave others in a similar fashion?

    "Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc."

    Clearly, Africans developed civilizations with these characteristics. So what you are saying is a bold face lie.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_African_civilization

    "So the slave owner started by preaching Christianity to them..."

    Invade the world, invite the world.

    "...thinking thereby to wean them of their most atavistic habits i.e. witchcraft, cannibalism etc. This is what gives rise to the notion of the compassionate Master ministering to his miserable flock."

    First, educate yourself on the wide range of religions in Africa at the time of European subjugation.
    Second, there was not anything "compassionate" about one group of people extricating by force another group of people for material gain.

    "And there is no question that the material condition of black slaves was hugely better than had been their prior life in Africa. Stats on freedom from the load of parasitic diseases, life expectancy, human rights, wealth etc all bear this out. From 400,000 imported slaves there are now 42,000,000 in America. They have outbred the native whites who are supposedly engaged in “genociding” them. Hah!"

    Slavery is considered a crime against humanity. It was not up to one group of people to unilaterally decide that another group of people was deemed inferior and thus justifiable to enslave them in order to "improve them". Again, do you justify people today who enslave others in a similar fashion?

    "In your arguments, Corvinus, you presume to speak on behalf of a creature whom you have never encountered and whom you cannot imagine."

    Black people are not creatures, they are people. Certainly a man who claims to be religious such as yourself would recognize the evils that you are supporting.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-peace/pope-urges-united-fight-against-slavery-human-trafficking-idUSKBN0KA1IS20150101

    "I suggest that you travel to the Deep South where you will meet some blacks who are really and truly black, who haven’t interbred with whitey. Interview them. Administer intelligence tests to them. But bear in mind that the people you meet today have been selectively bred for domesticity, they are tame compared to the blacks brought here 250 years ago."

    Now you be trolling.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    (((Anonymous))) Jews are notorious negrophiliacs and they marry them alot. You would like Truth. Be prepared as a Truth type in-law is in your future.

    Good to know, takes one Jew to know another.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Yes, I know, everyone is a Joooooooo.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. anarchyst says:
    @ThreeCranes
    Your rebuttals fail because they don't address the salient points of my arguments. They don't address the essential points because you assume that blacks are just like whites, only darker.

    Slavery was endemic in black Africa. Humans were property and trafficked. Selling slaves to white men was a twofer because it was profitable in that it brought in trade goods which Africans themselves could not produce, e.g. iron and bronze edged tools and it got rid of pesky enemies with whom the slave dealer competed for resources.

    White slaver owners quickly realized that African blacks were truly, truly primitive--barely human. Which was objectively true as modern genetic research has born out. The most recent news is that Bantus (the ancestors of most slaves) had split off from the rest of the African family tree roughly 200,000 years ago. So the blacks from whom Europeans and Asians split off from 50--60,000 years ago were not Bantus. Bantus have genes which they hold uniquely, unshared with the rest of the human race.

    So the popular narrative is bass ackwards. It is not the case that all humanity devolved from the ancestors of American slaves. The ancestors of slaves occupy a unique branch in the human family tree.

    Now, the Southern plantation owners were confronted with a conundrum. How to domesticate this creature which was barely half human? Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc.

    So the slave owner started by preaching Christianity to them, thinking thereby to wean them of their most atavistic habits i.e. witchcraft, cannibalism etc. This is what gives rise to the notion of the compassionate Master ministering to his miserable flock. He believed—rightly—that while he was improving their material condition he was saving their souls as well. And there is no question that the material condition of black slaves was hugely better than had been their prior life in Africa. Stats on freedom from the load of parasitic diseases, life expectancy, human rights, wealth etc all bear this out. From 400,000 imported slaves there are now 42,000,000 in America. They have outbred the native whites who are supposedly engaged in "genociding" them. Hah!

    In your arguments, Corvinus, you presume to speak on behalf of a creature whom you have never encountered and whom you cannot imagine. I suggest that you travel to the Deep South where you will meet some blacks who are really and truly black, who haven’t interbred with whitey. Interview them. Administer intelligence tests to them. But bear in mind that the people you meet today have been selectively bred for domesticity, they are tame compared to the blacks brought here 250 years ago.

    In contrast, the black in our inter-city ghettos has begun a huge regression to the mean. They are becoming more feral, regressing to the state blacks lived in when they were first brought under civilization’s benevolent effects, however intolerable that may have been to the black African’s nature.

    Cheers

    You are correct. The slaves who were brought to the “New World” were not the “best and brightest”, but were the dregs of their respective primitive societies. What better way to get rid of your unwanted, low-IQ slackers, criminal ne-er-do-wells, troublemakers, and others than to sell them into bondage where they would be shipped thousands of miles away, never to bother you again. We are living with the results of the misguided policies of our ancestors.
    It is long overdue to repatriate our now-useless, obsolete “farm machinery” to their countries of origin.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Truth says:
    @attilathehen
    (((Anonymous))) Jews are notorious negrophiliacs and they marry them alot. You would like Truth. Be prepared as a Truth type in-law is in your future.

    …He should be so lucky!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. Truth says:
    @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    Great piece! I like your observation about white weakness.

    On a similar note, back when whites dominated the world, Moslems imitated whites. I saw a picture dating from 1928 of the Queen of Afghanistan wearing conventional 1920s women's clothing with bobbed hair and a cloche hat. No head bag, much less a burka. The comeback of Moslem garb and headbags coincided with the perception of the West as weak and decadent. If a non-Moslem, non-Western nation such as China becomes dominant and pushes the Moslems around, many Moslems may imitate Chinese styles and culture and the headbag will again disappear. The Chinese are giving Chinese Moslems are hard time now, demanding that Korans and prayer rugs be turned over to authorities.

    Everybody loves a winner.

    On a similar note, back when whites dominated the world, Moslems imitated whites. I saw a picture dating from 1928 of the Queen of Afghanistan wearing conventional 1920s women’s clothing with bobbed hair and a cloche hat. No head bag, much less a burka.

    Uh, no.

    Unless you are referring to the 5 Moslems they sent to the US to get educated.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. Truth says:
    @Father O'Hara
    The proverbial hanging curveball!
    Truth,ever hear of a murdering polecat calls himself OJ?

    OJ Didn’t like blacks. He made it fairly clear.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Fredrik
    “I'm not black, I'm O.J.”

    O.J. isn't really black but in the American context he will be.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. Fredrik says:
    @Truth
    OJ Didn't like blacks. He made it fairly clear.

    “I’m not black, I’m O.J.”

    O.J. isn’t really black but in the American context he will be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. joef says:

    There are reasons why this will probably never be solved It is because even on the White side of the argument, we cannot completely agree what the exact problem is. We bring in a cacophony emotionally invested responses, mainly from our own biases and hatreds. Instead we should examine what is the exact nature/size of the main problem, using empirical evidence, as compared to more emotionally targeted problems.

    There are many accounts mentioned here of Hispanics, Blacks (which afro americans are a mere subset), Asians, Jews, cops, and Whites (from the afro side of the argument) behaving badly. All this serves as mostly distraction from the prioritizing our threats, as opposed to merely expressing our dislikes. The first question to be asked is to objectively compare the severity of the problem, and if it poses a threat to the stability (social and economic) of this nation? No group is completely monolithic in opinion (Whites themselves are fractionalized).

    However, that said, there are certain behavioral cultural traits that are shared by the majority of individuals, within a group. Afros act with enmity towards our nation. They cause more homicides in this nation than any other group. They are mostly responsible for the cost of the welfare state, which exceeds, in aggregate, all other govt functions (state & local govt do not have defense spending), Due to this they can be blamed for the majority of govt debt. And even in private debt market, afros are provided easy credit in the form of mortgages (which led up to the housing crash), car loans, student loans, and credit cards.

    In other words they are killing and bankrupting this nation. No other group, that others like to blame, has the scale of detrimental impact that afros have upon this nation. Complaining about other groups is like complaining about a paint chip, when the house is infested with termites. Even if they are more irresponsible than culpable, we cannot carry this afro burden forever.

    I do not write negatively about afros out of hate… to me it is much more important than my personal feelings (who cares what I feel, it is more important to try to accurately convey what I know)… it is strictly pragmatic (especially after thousands of hours of personal observations). Again if afros stopped behaving badly, and wanted to get along, then my criticisms stop (there would be no need for them). But all indications show that they do not plan to stop, and they always want more. Time to get our priorities strait.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bronson
    So, the question becomes: "Who encourages the behavior they exhibit?" I don't think that there is a "built-in" amount of abhorrent behavior in any race. Behavior - even "cultural" behavior - is either encouraged or discouraged via social pressure. So, who controls that approval?

    In our society, there are plenty of well-publicized voices claiming that Blacks (and women of all races) can pretty much do what they want - especially when it comes to White Men ... because, you know ... racism/slavery and (in the case of women) sexual oppression. So we ask, "Who empowers and amplifies these voices that approve the abhorrent behavior?" At the same time, "Who is it that ignores, minimizes, and even goes so far as to make excuses for (for example) four Blacks who kidnap, torture, rape, mutilate, and murder a White couple?"

    The answer if it's not obvious, is the ever-pervasive Media. Every newscast, every article, every segment of a daytime show, goes through an approval process where the content, tone, and spin are carefully monitored to make sure it "fits" the agenda. Don't believe this? Then explain why the breadth of discussion is so intensely NARROW. When do you get to hear a well-spoken Nazi-sympathizer express their views? Is it because they're "hateful"? Yet, we're barraged every day with minorities who get to scream themselves hoarse about how all Whites should die, how Whites "owe" them, how Whites "keep them oppressed", etc, etc. Why don't we have Whites Only Television? Or the Aryan Nation Network, or White Entertainment Awards, or even the NAAWP along side the NAACP ? Answer: It's not allowed - it doesn't fit (((their))) agenda.

    So, who controls the Media (more accurately called "Propaganda")? There are six corporations that control 96% of what is broadcast or written. That's Radio, TV, News, Entertainment, Magazines, Papers, Movies, Books - pretty much everything you think of as "media." All six of these "master" corporations are Jewish controlled. Additionally, about 90% of the editorial and executive staff at every major media organization is Jewish. Yes there are token goy here and there (like most of the bimbos and boneheads that do the talking - the useful idiots) - but the control is firmly in the hands of the Zionists/Ashkenazis. It's in the Zionists interest to see America tear itself apart internally relieving them of the "hard work" of dominating it overtly.

    Nothing scares the Zionists/Ashkenazi more than the majority of people realizing that THEY are the source of most of our social, cultural, and moral decay.

    I would encourage anyone who is curious to read "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" - paying special attention to Protocol #12: Control of the Press (Media)

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. Bronson says:

    I think a pretty significant reason we have the problems we have is due to the fact that getting along doesn’t fit the agenda of the Tribe. Divide and Conquer – the oldest trick in the book for subjugating a people. The Tribe doesn’t engage in this directly – they are very fond of proxy actors – or Shabos Goy if you will (Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, La Rasa, etc,etc). Anyone paying attention will see that the PTB coo with approval when a Black Student Union, or Mexican Student Union, or any other attempt is made to ostracize White people (i.e. create a racial bastion of “whatever”) – but as soon as a White person says they don’t want to live in a mixed race neighborhood, or wants to have their own racial exclusive enterprise (club, country, neighborhood, school, student union, etc) the sub-humans, supercharged by the Tribe’s media machine, screech and croak about how RAYSISS it is for them to even consider such a thing!

    The reality – when you zoom out a bit – is that “diversity” is a Zionist tactic to destroy the only race that threatens their corrosive dominance of so many elements of society: Whites. You see how they force “Diversity” into every White, Christian culture (it’s the Kalergi/Cloudhoven Plan – look up Barbara Lerner Spectre on YouTube) – while Israel remains completely free of what the Zionist/Ashkenazis jam down the throats of Europeans and Americans.

    It IS too bad that Lincoln didn’t follow through … but there’s no guarantee we wouldn’t end up right we are now because the forced integration isn’t driven by either blacks or whites – it’s Jewish. Look at who funds BLM: George Soros. Look who funds AntiFa: George Soros et. al. Who does everything they can to destroy white culture and paint it as inferior, racist, hateful, etc: The Entertainment Industry and The Southern Poverty Law Center – Both are Jewish. Who brought us Feminism and the Cuck’ing of the White Male: Ashkenazis/Zionist. All of this is right out in the open, but the same “politeness” afforded to blacks is multiplied 100X for Jews. Seeing them for who they are and what they do is very hard for most people due to the non-stop “Jews are Victims” propaganda.

    We will never have peace, and we will watch our cultures and futures rot unless we recognize who is driving the cancers that are destroying what we hold dear – and pull them out, branch and root.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    I came of age during the first push for "civil-rights" and personally saw the destruction and criminal behavior of these so-called "civil-rights marchers". We used to have a saying: "Behind every Negro, there is a Jew", as 99% of the civil-rights marchers' "handlers" were jews.
    Freedom of association was eviscerated with the passage of these well-meaning, but misguided and unconstitutional laws. What started out as race-based prohibitions on "discrimination" based on race, has morphed into the disaster we have today--every fringe and perverted group is demanding their "rights" while us honest white people are being marginalized and attacked for even attempting to demand OUR rights...Whites are very slow to act, but when the SHTF, look out. No race is as formidable tin making "corrections" to society's ills...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. Wow, I am totally amazed at the article and comments here, have not seen the like elsewhere, wow!

    This article and most of the comments define what the meaning of the word “racist” is. The phrases and words used here clearly show the essence of racism and white supremacy thinking.

    You do not realize just how racist you truly are because your way of thinking is based entirely on race, which makes it near impossible for you to realize that you’re a near perfect example of a thoroughbred racist and white supremacist.

    Of course, you’re entitled to your racist opinions but then don’t you dare think of yourself as “not a racist” or a community that is open, fair, and just, to all.

    Fortunately, most Americans do not think like you guys here, so the tide will continue to turn, and the white supremacist, which most of you are, will fade over time because time has a way of setting things right.

    You ask the question “why do they hate us so much”, but in truth, you do not wish to hear the answer to that question because it will make you feel uncomfortable and surely you will lash out at the truth and instead choose an answer that you’d prefer.

    They hate you so much because of what your forefathers have done to their forefathers. They hate you so much because of what you are have done to them yesterday and still continue doing it to them today. In the past, the whip, sword, gun, and laws were used to ensure subjugation and today it is by the power of your vote.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    "Wow, I am totally amazed..."

    Well Mr. Amazing Man, perhaps you should pose some counterarguments which factually debunk the point of view expressed here. Calling people racist is a simple sophomoric ad hominem and won't do.

    Virtually everyone here is math literate and relatively bright--of far above average intelligence. In as much as all of us follow the evidence and disdain prejudice, we would welcome any argument that appeals to our reasoning faculty. Lead on.
    , @joef
    Let me get this straight: Afros commit acts of antisocial violence upon others, and consume more than they produce, yet show no appreciation for it; Yet we are not not suppose to realistically comment about such occurrences. I think you are missing the cause and effect here, so let me spell it out for you: afros perform x acts, and that causes Y reactions (the reaction Y itself does not cause action x, because x precedes Y). I am sorry if you find unacceptable afro behavior acceptable, but that does not remove the obligation for the rest of us to be honest to ourselves about what is actually occurring. We choose not to live in denial. If afros behaved in a socially acceptable manner, most here would not bother to criticize them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. anarchyst says:
    @Bronson
    I think a pretty significant reason we have the problems we have is due to the fact that getting along doesn't fit the agenda of the Tribe. Divide and Conquer - the oldest trick in the book for subjugating a people. The Tribe doesn't engage in this directly - they are very fond of proxy actors - or Shabos Goy if you will (Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, La Rasa, etc,etc). Anyone paying attention will see that the PTB coo with approval when a Black Student Union, or Mexican Student Union, or any other attempt is made to ostracize White people (i.e. create a racial bastion of "whatever") - but as soon as a White person says they don't want to live in a mixed race neighborhood, or wants to have their own racial exclusive enterprise (club, country, neighborhood, school, student union, etc) the sub-humans, supercharged by the Tribe's media machine, screech and croak about how RAYSISS it is for them to even consider such a thing!

    The reality - when you zoom out a bit - is that "diversity" is a Zionist tactic to destroy the only race that threatens their corrosive dominance of so many elements of society: Whites. You see how they force "Diversity" into every White, Christian culture (it's the Kalergi/Cloudhoven Plan - look up Barbara Lerner Spectre on YouTube) - while Israel remains completely free of what the Zionist/Ashkenazis jam down the throats of Europeans and Americans.

    It IS too bad that Lincoln didn't follow through ... but there's no guarantee we wouldn't end up right we are now because the forced integration isn't driven by either blacks or whites - it's Jewish. Look at who funds BLM: George Soros. Look who funds AntiFa: George Soros et. al. Who does everything they can to destroy white culture and paint it as inferior, racist, hateful, etc: The Entertainment Industry and The Southern Poverty Law Center - Both are Jewish. Who brought us Feminism and the Cuck'ing of the White Male: Ashkenazis/Zionist. All of this is right out in the open, but the same "politeness" afforded to blacks is multiplied 100X for Jews. Seeing them for who they are and what they do is very hard for most people due to the non-stop "Jews are Victims" propaganda.

    We will never have peace, and we will watch our cultures and futures rot unless we recognize who is driving the cancers that are destroying what we hold dear - and pull them out, branch and root.

    I came of age during the first push for “civil-rights” and personally saw the destruction and criminal behavior of these so-called “civil-rights marchers”. We used to have a saying: “Behind every Negro, there is a Jew”, as 99% of the civil-rights marchers’ “handlers” were jews.
    Freedom of association was eviscerated with the passage of these well-meaning, but misguided and unconstitutional laws. What started out as race-based prohibitions on “discrimination” based on race, has morphed into the disaster we have today–every fringe and perverted group is demanding their “rights” while us honest white people are being marginalized and attacked for even attempting to demand OUR rights…Whites are very slow to act, but when the SHTF, look out. No race is as formidable tin making “corrections” to society’s ills…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. anarchyst says:

    Here are two true stories about “icons” of the so-called “civil rights” movement . . .

    There is much more to the “Emmett Till” story that is not widely known. Of course, killing him made him into a “martyr” of the black “civil-rights” movement, but–it is not generally known that Emmett Till was a womanizer and attempted to take his cocky “Chicago ways” in dealing with women to the Deep South. He had a “cocky attitude” and bragged about “getting it on” with white women–not a good idea in the South. . . According to published accounts, Mr. Till did not just “whistle” at a white woman, but attempted to manhandle and fondle a married white woman. In Southern culture, this is the ultimate form of disrespect. Despite Mr. Till’s relatives’ attempts to spirit him “out of town” to avoid retribution by the woman’s relatives and townspeople, his cocky attitude “got in the way”, similar to the way that “young master Trayvon’s” attitude got him killed. Despite being given numerous “chances” to apologize for his behavior, he was defiant to the end. IF he had apologized for his behavior, he would still be alive today. In fact, one of the three killers of Emmett Till was black…a fact that is conveniently omitted from published accounts.
    It is interesting to note that Emmett Till’s father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes. Maybe “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree” . . .

    Rosa Parks was not the “ordinary” black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP (at the time, run by leftist communist jews) and was “planted” in order to advance the cause of black “civil-rights” to which she was successful.
    Approximately a year previous to Rosa Parks’ refusal to vacate her seat, a REAL ordinary black woman did the same thing. This black woman received NO publicity or support from the NAACP or other black “civil-rights” organizations. You see, she was an unmarried black woman with children. According to the black civil-rights crowd, this would not do. They wanted someone who was “squeaky clean” without any “baggage”.
    Hence, Rosa Parks made (fabricated) history . . .

    There are many more fabrications of history that were used to add “legitimacy” to the so-called “civil-rights” movement . . .

    More to come . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    Emmett Till was a 15 year old who clearly failed to understand the social expectations of the South.
    He made a comment and he was murdered in cold blood. The only witness in the case--the woman behind the counter--CLAIMED she was "manhandled". He was not "a womanizer". Regardless of his lack of social grace, his conduct did not warrant such a reprisal. Moreover, Emmitt Till's accuser admitted she LIED about the incident.

    www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/07/emmett-till-murder-case/97588506

    "Rosa Parks was not the “ordinary” black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP (at the time, run by leftist communist jews) and was “planted” in order to advance the cause of black “civil-rights” to which she was successful."

    While Claudette Colvin was the first woman, at the time, there was no organized movement regarding integration. That is why Parks gets the credit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. Bronson says:
    @joef
    There are reasons why this will probably never be solved It is because even on the White side of the argument, we cannot completely agree what the exact problem is. We bring in a cacophony emotionally invested responses, mainly from our own biases and hatreds. Instead we should examine what is the exact nature/size of the main problem, using empirical evidence, as compared to more emotionally targeted problems.

    There are many accounts mentioned here of Hispanics, Blacks (which afro americans are a mere subset), Asians, Jews, cops, and Whites (from the afro side of the argument) behaving badly. All this serves as mostly distraction from the prioritizing our threats, as opposed to merely expressing our dislikes. The first question to be asked is to objectively compare the severity of the problem, and if it poses a threat to the stability (social and economic) of this nation? No group is completely monolithic in opinion (Whites themselves are fractionalized).

    However, that said, there are certain behavioral cultural traits that are shared by the majority of individuals, within a group. Afros act with enmity towards our nation. They cause more homicides in this nation than any other group. They are mostly responsible for the cost of the welfare state, which exceeds, in aggregate, all other govt functions (state & local govt do not have defense spending), Due to this they can be blamed for the majority of govt debt. And even in private debt market, afros are provided easy credit in the form of mortgages (which led up to the housing crash), car loans, student loans, and credit cards.

    In other words they are killing and bankrupting this nation. No other group, that others like to blame, has the scale of detrimental impact that afros have upon this nation. Complaining about other groups is like complaining about a paint chip, when the house is infested with termites. Even if they are more irresponsible than culpable, we cannot carry this afro burden forever.

    I do not write negatively about afros out of hate… to me it is much more important than my personal feelings (who cares what I feel, it is more important to try to accurately convey what I know)… it is strictly pragmatic (especially after thousands of hours of personal observations). Again if afros stopped behaving badly, and wanted to get along, then my criticisms stop (there would be no need for them). But all indications show that they do not plan to stop, and they always want more. Time to get our priorities strait.

    So, the question becomes: “Who encourages the behavior they exhibit?” I don’t think that there is a “built-in” amount of abhorrent behavior in any race. Behavior – even “cultural” behavior – is either encouraged or discouraged via social pressure. So, who controls that approval?

    In our society, there are plenty of well-publicized voices claiming that Blacks (and women of all races) can pretty much do what they want – especially when it comes to White Men … because, you know … racism/slavery and (in the case of women) sexual oppression. So we ask, “Who empowers and amplifies these voices that approve the abhorrent behavior?” At the same time, “Who is it that ignores, minimizes, and even goes so far as to make excuses for (for example) four Blacks who kidnap, torture, rape, mutilate, and murder a White couple?”

    The answer if it’s not obvious, is the ever-pervasive Media. Every newscast, every article, every segment of a daytime show, goes through an approval process where the content, tone, and spin are carefully monitored to make sure it “fits” the agenda. Don’t believe this? Then explain why the breadth of discussion is so intensely NARROW. When do you get to hear a well-spoken Nazi-sympathizer express their views? Is it because they’re “hateful”? Yet, we’re barraged every day with minorities who get to scream themselves hoarse about how all Whites should die, how Whites “owe” them, how Whites “keep them oppressed”, etc, etc. Why don’t we have Whites Only Television? Or the Aryan Nation Network, or White Entertainment Awards, or even the NAAWP along side the NAACP ? Answer: It’s not allowed – it doesn’t fit (((their))) agenda.

    So, who controls the Media (more accurately called “Propaganda”)? There are six corporations that control 96% of what is broadcast or written. That’s Radio, TV, News, Entertainment, Magazines, Papers, Movies, Books – pretty much everything you think of as “media.” All six of these “master” corporations are Jewish controlled. Additionally, about 90% of the editorial and executive staff at every major media organization is Jewish. Yes there are token goy here and there (like most of the bimbos and boneheads that do the talking – the useful idiots) – but the control is firmly in the hands of the Zionists/Ashkenazis. It’s in the Zionists interest to see America tear itself apart internally relieving them of the “hard work” of dominating it overtly.

    Nothing scares the Zionists/Ashkenazi more than the majority of people realizing that THEY are the source of most of our social, cultural, and moral decay.

    I would encourage anyone who is curious to read “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” – paying special attention to Protocol #12: Control of the Press (Media)

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    The MSM would have nothing to report if afros acted normal. They would lose there power. Afros commit by far thousands of times more acts of violence than reported by the MSM. And they perform these acts of violence without the MSM being present. And if there were no MSM in existence, the afros would continue to do so without it. The MSM facilitates afro antisocial actions, but they do not cause them.

    I am not a fan of collective guilt. It is used as a tool of leftist/progressives/communist, and its a shame when white nationalist, and anarcho capitalist, use it as well. There are cultural behavior patterns in every group, that is far as I can concur. But one individual is not responsible for his groups behavior, especially if he disagrees with its majority opinion. I believe in personal responsibility for ones own actions (and that equally applies to Blacks). I trust more a person who is genuinely moral & conservative from whatever ethnic division he is from, than a person from my own group who an immoral cheat.

    Thus concentrating on empirical observable acts, and I never seen the level of antisocial violent behavior, as perpetrated by afro americans (barring non participating individuals), exhibited by any other group (Asian, Arab, Jew, Catholic, Hispanic, subsaharan Africans, etc). It is mere obfuscation, when discussing personal likes/dislikes of other groups, as compared to the extremely destructive nature of the afros.

    We may, or may not, have political disagreements, and competing agendas, with other groups, but afros are steadily destroying this nation (economically and physically). I do not hate afros anymore than I hate a predatory animal. But I still recognize the predatory animal as dangerous, and I will not allow it to have the advantage over me. If it tries to kill me, I will kill it first. We should concentrate on our immediate dangers; all else is mere distraction.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. eah says:
    @eah
    All the more reason they have to go back -- the presence of too many admittedly high-achieving Asians limits the upward mobility of white kids -- eg look into the enormous over-representation of Asians at the Univ of California, where at some campuses they are 2x, 3x, or more over-represented -- and due to the reality of the underachievement of Hispanics and Blacks, above a level that represents proportionality, every Asian admitted means a deserving (ie they meet minimum admission requirements) white kid is not admitted -- it's as simple as that -- this is America, after all -- a nation that Whites built -- why should we allow immigration to disadvantage our own children?

    Whites will never be able to placate them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    https://twitter.com/AliceTeller/status/915630353276129280
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. eah says:
    @eah
    Whites will never be able to placate them.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLUOJRNWsAA0Q2P.jpg

    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    It's for their own good.

    https://twitter.com/HarmlessYardDog/status/915561595035688960
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. @Chris Bridges
    As usual, an excellent article from Mr. Derbyshire. I do have to make one comment, though. He should have left out Southerners from the Americans who were and are so eager to coddle blacks, explain away their many failings, and ignore the threat they pose to our country. Contrary to what other white Americans think, very few Southerners "hate" blacks, much less wish them ill. Southerners, like any other white Americans, understand perfectly well that there are many fine, decent, intelligent, hard-working, law-abiding blacks and like any other white Americans they are thankful for this fact.

    This is the difference. Southerners KNOW that blacks are not "white people with black skin" and they never will be. They are a profoundly different race and, perhaps, a different sub-species. More importantly, this will not change. Intelligence expressed by average IQ, propensity for violence, lack of ability to plan for the future or understand the future results of present actions, hyper-sexuality , poor impulse control, are all dramatically different from whites. In physical terms they clearly have primitive traits. Muscle mass, bone density and many other traits mark a clear difference with whites, to say nothing of Asians.

    One problem is the fact that a large proportion of American blacks have some percentage of white or Native American blood, which somewhat dilutes some of the traits listed above. Unfortunately, a percentage of white blood does not necessarily bring with it unalloyed positive results. On the contrary, it may well introduce mental instability. It certainly is related to resentment, anger and rage against whites. The enraged mulatto, the bitter W.E.B. DuBois type, is almost a cliché.

    The Jim Crow system, as imperfect as it was, was an attempt to allow two very different races to live side-by-side with as little conflict as possible. True, it was inevitably seen by blacks as a terrible injustice. Whites who did not have to live in a bi-racial society with blacks usually shared this view, thus the so-called "civil rights" movement.
    What is the result of attempting to "integrate" blacks into our society by pretending that they are "just like us"?

    The ruins of that idea are all around us. Our once beautiful cities are sinks of crime, drugs and violence, black-on-white rape statistics are so awful that they could not have even been imagined by the most violent segregationist of the 1890's, our prisons are full of blacks seething with rage and thoughts of revenge, our institutions are steadily falling apart because through affirmative action we have discarded merit and substituted racial quotas, and, worst of all, black pathologies have completely infected white America, especially in the lower classes.

    The insane effort to deny reality is wrecking our country. This "taking a knee" craze may be silly but it is just a small sign of what is to come.

    Lincoln and Jefferson were right. We can't live together. We may as well face that fact.

    The Jim Cow system claimed to be separate but equal–but was it really? For example, weren’t schools etc shoddier? I myself, grew up in a white neighborhood in NYC in the 1960s and early 70s. I never had any real contact with blacks till I went to a boarding high school (and that was 1 American black and 2 Haitians). The only minority we had coming in were Puerto Ricans, and we didn’t associate with them. When I started working and socializing outside my neighborhood (which had largely changed by then) did I have much more contacts with non-whites. I realized there were decent black people and what I call ghetto-head black people. I am not the kind of white guy that is riddled with white guilt. But at the same time, I wouldn’t say anything, just stay as far away from those types as best as I could. On the political/social front, there are very few blacks or whites that are willing (not so much to expound on the subject of race realism) but to criticize black behavior. It is programed behavior. Either one is labeled a racist or an Uncle Tom if one criticizes black behavior in public.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. @OnlyTheTruth
    Wow, I am totally amazed at the article and comments here, have not seen the like elsewhere, wow!

    This article and most of the comments define what the meaning of the word "racist" is. The phrases and words used here clearly show the essence of racism and white supremacy thinking.

    You do not realize just how racist you truly are because your way of thinking is based entirely on race, which makes it near impossible for you to realize that you're a near perfect example of a thoroughbred racist and white supremacist.

    Of course, you're entitled to your racist opinions but then don't you dare think of yourself as "not a racist" or a community that is open, fair, and just, to all.

    Fortunately, most Americans do not think like you guys here, so the tide will continue to turn, and the white supremacist, which most of you are, will fade over time because time has a way of setting things right.

    You ask the question "why do they hate us so much", but in truth, you do not wish to hear the answer to that question because it will make you feel uncomfortable and surely you will lash out at the truth and instead choose an answer that you'd prefer.

    They hate you so much because of what your forefathers have done to their forefathers. They hate you so much because of what you are have done to them yesterday and still continue doing it to them today. In the past, the whip, sword, gun, and laws were used to ensure subjugation and today it is by the power of your vote.

    “Wow, I am totally amazed…”

    Well Mr. Amazing Man, perhaps you should pose some counterarguments which factually debunk the point of view expressed here. Calling people racist is a simple sophomoric ad hominem and won’t do.

    Virtually everyone here is math literate and relatively bright–of far above average intelligence. In as much as all of us follow the evidence and disdain prejudice, we would welcome any argument that appeals to our reasoning faculty. Lead on.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. eah says:
    @eah
    https://twitter.com/AliceTeller/status/915630353276129280

    It’s for their own good.

    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    And ours -- Tulsa, OK -- let me know if you see this covered on CNN.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLVbs1TUEAAZPcz.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    I don’t watch sports, but during a newscast as the camera panned over the players taking a knee, I was surprised to see all black players. Doesn’t the NFL have an Affirmative Action program for white players?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  188. Corvinus says:
    @ThreeCranes
    Your rebuttals fail because they don't address the salient points of my arguments. They don't address the essential points because you assume that blacks are just like whites, only darker.

    Slavery was endemic in black Africa. Humans were property and trafficked. Selling slaves to white men was a twofer because it was profitable in that it brought in trade goods which Africans themselves could not produce, e.g. iron and bronze edged tools and it got rid of pesky enemies with whom the slave dealer competed for resources.

    White slaver owners quickly realized that African blacks were truly, truly primitive--barely human. Which was objectively true as modern genetic research has born out. The most recent news is that Bantus (the ancestors of most slaves) had split off from the rest of the African family tree roughly 200,000 years ago. So the blacks from whom Europeans and Asians split off from 50--60,000 years ago were not Bantus. Bantus have genes which they hold uniquely, unshared with the rest of the human race.

    So the popular narrative is bass ackwards. It is not the case that all humanity devolved from the ancestors of American slaves. The ancestors of slaves occupy a unique branch in the human family tree.

    Now, the Southern plantation owners were confronted with a conundrum. How to domesticate this creature which was barely half human? Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc.

    So the slave owner started by preaching Christianity to them, thinking thereby to wean them of their most atavistic habits i.e. witchcraft, cannibalism etc. This is what gives rise to the notion of the compassionate Master ministering to his miserable flock. He believed—rightly—that while he was improving their material condition he was saving their souls as well. And there is no question that the material condition of black slaves was hugely better than had been their prior life in Africa. Stats on freedom from the load of parasitic diseases, life expectancy, human rights, wealth etc all bear this out. From 400,000 imported slaves there are now 42,000,000 in America. They have outbred the native whites who are supposedly engaged in "genociding" them. Hah!

    In your arguments, Corvinus, you presume to speak on behalf of a creature whom you have never encountered and whom you cannot imagine. I suggest that you travel to the Deep South where you will meet some blacks who are really and truly black, who haven’t interbred with whitey. Interview them. Administer intelligence tests to them. But bear in mind that the people you meet today have been selectively bred for domesticity, they are tame compared to the blacks brought here 250 years ago.

    In contrast, the black in our inter-city ghettos has begun a huge regression to the mean. They are becoming more feral, regressing to the state blacks lived in when they were first brought under civilization’s benevolent effects, however intolerable that may have been to the black African’s nature.

    Cheers

    “Your rebuttals fail because they don’t address the salient points of my arguments.”

    Except you did not make arguments, you offered repeated overblown generalizations like “Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work” and “In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women’s work.”

    Thus, I offered the appropriate response.

    “Slavery was endemic in black Africa. Humans were property and trafficked. Selling slaves to white men was a twofer because it was profitable in that it brought in trade goods which Africans themselves could not produce, e.g. iron and bronze edged tools and it got rid of pesky enemies with whom the slave dealer competed for resources.”

    While what you state here is accurate (amazing on your part given your general level of ignorance), you do realize that European slavery and African slavery were markedly different, right? RIGHT?

    http://www.discoveringbristol.org.uk/slavery/people-involved/enslaved-people/enslaved-africans/africa-slavery

    “White slaver owners quickly realized that African blacks were truly, truly primitive–barely human.”

    That was an argument proffered by Europeans in light of their own alleged biological superiority.
    Anthropologists, sociologists, and theologians have countered those assertions. Praytell, what criteria constitutes “barely human”? What determining factors show that one group of people are “more human” than another group of people?

    “Which was objectively true as modern genetic research has born out.”

    What research has stated that black people are “barely human”? Citations, please.

    “Bantus have genes which they hold uniquely, unshared with the rest of the human race.”

    Really, now. What are those genes? What experts in the field have come out and made this claim? Citations, please.

    “Now, the Southern plantation owners were confronted with a conundrum. How to domesticate this creature which was barely half human?”

    There was a false assumption on the part of the northern slave merchants and southern agriculturists. In retrospect, the actions taken by these two groups against their fellow humans was barbaric. Do you justify people today who enslave others in a similar fashion?

    “Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc.”

    Clearly, Africans developed civilizations with these characteristics. So what you are saying is a bold face lie.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_African_civilization

    “So the slave owner started by preaching Christianity to them…”

    Invade the world, invite the world.

    “…thinking thereby to wean them of their most atavistic habits i.e. witchcraft, cannibalism etc. This is what gives rise to the notion of the compassionate Master ministering to his miserable flock.”

    First, educate yourself on the wide range of religions in Africa at the time of European subjugation.
    Second, there was not anything “compassionate” about one group of people extricating by force another group of people for material gain.

    “And there is no question that the material condition of black slaves was hugely better than had been their prior life in Africa. Stats on freedom from the load of parasitic diseases, life expectancy, human rights, wealth etc all bear this out. From 400,000 imported slaves there are now 42,000,000 in America. They have outbred the native whites who are supposedly engaged in “genociding” them. Hah!”

    Slavery is considered a crime against humanity. It was not up to one group of people to unilaterally decide that another group of people was deemed inferior and thus justifiable to enslave them in order to “improve them”. Again, do you justify people today who enslave others in a similar fashion?

    “In your arguments, Corvinus, you presume to speak on behalf of a creature whom you have never encountered and whom you cannot imagine.”

    Black people are not creatures, they are people. Certainly a man who claims to be religious such as yourself would recognize the evils that you are supporting.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-peace/pope-urges-united-fight-against-slavery-human-trafficking-idUSKBN0KA1IS20150101

    “I suggest that you travel to the Deep South where you will meet some blacks who are really and truly black, who haven’t interbred with whitey. Interview them. Administer intelligence tests to them. But bear in mind that the people you meet today have been selectively bred for domesticity, they are tame compared to the blacks brought here 250 years ago.”

    Now you be trolling.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    You sound exactly like attilathehen. What is wrong?
    , @ThreeCranes
    "Clearly, Africans developed civilizations with these characteristics. So what you are saying is a bold face lie."

    I followed your link and read all the linked content as well. None of the peoples referred to were Bantus. None were of the people who became slaves in the Western Hemisphere. Your ploy was a misdirection.

    One of us is indeed a bold-faced liar.

    Again, you have not addressed any point I made. Genetically, Bantus are out in left field, on their own. Any site showing scatter plots or tree diagrams shows this. A ten minute search will prove this, if you can be bothered.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. Corvinus says:
    @anarchyst
    Here are two true stories about "icons" of the so-called "civil rights" movement . . .

    There is much more to the "Emmett Till" story that is not widely known. Of course, killing him made him into a "martyr" of the black "civil-rights" movement, but--it is not generally known that Emmett Till was a womanizer and attempted to take his cocky "Chicago ways" in dealing with women to the Deep South. He had a "cocky attitude" and bragged about "getting it on" with white women--not a good idea in the South. . . According to published accounts, Mr. Till did not just "whistle" at a white woman, but attempted to manhandle and fondle a married white woman. In Southern culture, this is the ultimate form of disrespect. Despite Mr. Till's relatives' attempts to spirit him "out of town" to avoid retribution by the woman's relatives and townspeople, his cocky attitude "got in the way", similar to the way that "young master Trayvon's" attitude got him killed. Despite being given numerous "chances" to apologize for his behavior, he was defiant to the end. IF he had apologized for his behavior, he would still be alive today. In fact, one of the three killers of Emmett Till was black...a fact that is conveniently omitted from published accounts.
    It is interesting to note that Emmett Till's father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes. Maybe "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" . . .

    Rosa Parks was not the "ordinary" black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP (at the time, run by leftist communist jews) and was "planted" in order to advance the cause of black "civil-rights" to which she was successful.
    Approximately a year previous to Rosa Parks' refusal to vacate her seat, a REAL ordinary black woman did the same thing. This black woman received NO publicity or support from the NAACP or other black "civil-rights" organizations. You see, she was an unmarried black woman with children. According to the black civil-rights crowd, this would not do. They wanted someone who was "squeaky clean" without any "baggage".
    Hence, Rosa Parks made (fabricated) history . . .

    There are many more fabrications of history that were used to add "legitimacy" to the so-called "civil-rights" movement . . .

    More to come . . .

    Emmett Till was a 15 year old who clearly failed to understand the social expectations of the South.
    He made a comment and he was murdered in cold blood. The only witness in the case–the woman behind the counter–CLAIMED she was “manhandled”. He was not “a womanizer”. Regardless of his lack of social grace, his conduct did not warrant such a reprisal. Moreover, Emmitt Till’s accuser admitted she LIED about the incident.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/07/emmett-till-murder-case/97588506

    “Rosa Parks was not the “ordinary” black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP (at the time, run by leftist communist jews) and was “planted” in order to advance the cause of black “civil-rights” to which she was successful.”

    While Claudette Colvin was the first woman, at the time, there was no organized movement regarding integration. That is why Parks gets the credit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. @Anonymous
    Good to know, takes one Jew to know another.

    Yes, I know, everyone is a Joooooooo.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. Corvinus says:
    @epochehusserl
    “No one believes that the races are equal not the racists nor the civil rights leaders they just disagree about what should be done about it.”
    -------------------------------
    neither does the eeoc. from the eeoc's own website:

    https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/factemployment_procedures.html

    For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but not testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    so either black people are capable of meeting the white standard or they are not. 50 years after the civil rights act blacks are still not deemed capable of meeting the white standard according to the government.

    You mean YOU do not believe that the races are equal. Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    I believe in the equality where the government doesnt throw out the results of standardized tests because activists dont like them. some equalities are better than others

    “For example, Title VII…”

    **Title VII prohibits INTENTIONAL discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.** For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but NOT testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    In other words, there is a test for BOTH whites and blacks or there is NO test for whites and blacks.

    **You left out this important sentence here. Was it intentional?

    We already have covered this ground in-depth n other threads. Do you have something novel to discuss?

    Read More
    • Replies: @epochehusserl
    **Title VII prohibits INTENTIONAL discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.** For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but NOT testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    In other words, there is a test for BOTH whites and blacks or there is NO test for whites and blacks.

    **You left out this important sentence here. Was it intentional?
    ----------------------------
    The test is allowed for whites but the test is not allowed for blacks. The test for blacks is forbidden. How much more intentional can you get?

    We already have covered this ground in-depth n other threads. Do you have something novel to discuss?
    ---------------------------
    Yes we did and your assertion was that equality means whatever you say it does. You believe in a victim hierarchy but not equality before the law.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    "Your rebuttals fail because they don’t address the salient points of my arguments."

    Except you did not make arguments, you offered repeated overblown generalizations like "Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work" and “In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women’s work.”

    Thus, I offered the appropriate response.

    "Slavery was endemic in black Africa. Humans were property and trafficked. Selling slaves to white men was a twofer because it was profitable in that it brought in trade goods which Africans themselves could not produce, e.g. iron and bronze edged tools and it got rid of pesky enemies with whom the slave dealer competed for resources."

    While what you state here is accurate (amazing on your part given your general level of ignorance), you do realize that European slavery and African slavery were markedly different, right? RIGHT?

    http://www.discoveringbristol.org.uk/slavery/people-involved/enslaved-people/enslaved-africans/africa-slavery

    "White slaver owners quickly realized that African blacks were truly, truly primitive–barely human."

    That was an argument proffered by Europeans in light of their own alleged biological superiority.
    Anthropologists, sociologists, and theologians have countered those assertions. Praytell, what criteria constitutes "barely human"? What determining factors show that one group of people are "more human" than another group of people?

    "Which was objectively true as modern genetic research has born out."

    What research has stated that black people are "barely human"? Citations, please.

    "Bantus have genes which they hold uniquely, unshared with the rest of the human race."

    Really, now. What are those genes? What experts in the field have come out and made this claim? Citations, please.

    "Now, the Southern plantation owners were confronted with a conundrum. How to domesticate this creature which was barely half human?"

    There was a false assumption on the part of the northern slave merchants and southern agriculturists. In retrospect, the actions taken by these two groups against their fellow humans was barbaric. Do you justify people today who enslave others in a similar fashion?

    "Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc."

    Clearly, Africans developed civilizations with these characteristics. So what you are saying is a bold face lie.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_African_civilization

    "So the slave owner started by preaching Christianity to them..."

    Invade the world, invite the world.

    "...thinking thereby to wean them of their most atavistic habits i.e. witchcraft, cannibalism etc. This is what gives rise to the notion of the compassionate Master ministering to his miserable flock."

    First, educate yourself on the wide range of religions in Africa at the time of European subjugation.
    Second, there was not anything "compassionate" about one group of people extricating by force another group of people for material gain.

    "And there is no question that the material condition of black slaves was hugely better than had been their prior life in Africa. Stats on freedom from the load of parasitic diseases, life expectancy, human rights, wealth etc all bear this out. From 400,000 imported slaves there are now 42,000,000 in America. They have outbred the native whites who are supposedly engaged in “genociding” them. Hah!"

    Slavery is considered a crime against humanity. It was not up to one group of people to unilaterally decide that another group of people was deemed inferior and thus justifiable to enslave them in order to "improve them". Again, do you justify people today who enslave others in a similar fashion?

    "In your arguments, Corvinus, you presume to speak on behalf of a creature whom you have never encountered and whom you cannot imagine."

    Black people are not creatures, they are people. Certainly a man who claims to be religious such as yourself would recognize the evils that you are supporting.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-peace/pope-urges-united-fight-against-slavery-human-trafficking-idUSKBN0KA1IS20150101

    "I suggest that you travel to the Deep South where you will meet some blacks who are really and truly black, who haven’t interbred with whitey. Interview them. Administer intelligence tests to them. But bear in mind that the people you meet today have been selectively bred for domesticity, they are tame compared to the blacks brought here 250 years ago."

    Now you be trolling.

    You sound exactly like attilathehen. What is wrong?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Hasbara shills always sound alike at the end of the day.
    , @attilathehen
    I recall Corvinus being something of a cuck so I ignored him. I think he's RCC and accepts black/Asian priests-popes. Let's see what he says.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Anon
    You sound exactly like attilathehen. What is wrong?

    Hasbara shills always sound alike at the end of the day.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. joef says:
    @Bronson
    So, the question becomes: "Who encourages the behavior they exhibit?" I don't think that there is a "built-in" amount of abhorrent behavior in any race. Behavior - even "cultural" behavior - is either encouraged or discouraged via social pressure. So, who controls that approval?

    In our society, there are plenty of well-publicized voices claiming that Blacks (and women of all races) can pretty much do what they want - especially when it comes to White Men ... because, you know ... racism/slavery and (in the case of women) sexual oppression. So we ask, "Who empowers and amplifies these voices that approve the abhorrent behavior?" At the same time, "Who is it that ignores, minimizes, and even goes so far as to make excuses for (for example) four Blacks who kidnap, torture, rape, mutilate, and murder a White couple?"

    The answer if it's not obvious, is the ever-pervasive Media. Every newscast, every article, every segment of a daytime show, goes through an approval process where the content, tone, and spin are carefully monitored to make sure it "fits" the agenda. Don't believe this? Then explain why the breadth of discussion is so intensely NARROW. When do you get to hear a well-spoken Nazi-sympathizer express their views? Is it because they're "hateful"? Yet, we're barraged every day with minorities who get to scream themselves hoarse about how all Whites should die, how Whites "owe" them, how Whites "keep them oppressed", etc, etc. Why don't we have Whites Only Television? Or the Aryan Nation Network, or White Entertainment Awards, or even the NAAWP along side the NAACP ? Answer: It's not allowed - it doesn't fit (((their))) agenda.

    So, who controls the Media (more accurately called "Propaganda")? There are six corporations that control 96% of what is broadcast or written. That's Radio, TV, News, Entertainment, Magazines, Papers, Movies, Books - pretty much everything you think of as "media." All six of these "master" corporations are Jewish controlled. Additionally, about 90% of the editorial and executive staff at every major media organization is Jewish. Yes there are token goy here and there (like most of the bimbos and boneheads that do the talking - the useful idiots) - but the control is firmly in the hands of the Zionists/Ashkenazis. It's in the Zionists interest to see America tear itself apart internally relieving them of the "hard work" of dominating it overtly.

    Nothing scares the Zionists/Ashkenazi more than the majority of people realizing that THEY are the source of most of our social, cultural, and moral decay.

    I would encourage anyone who is curious to read "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" - paying special attention to Protocol #12: Control of the Press (Media)

    The MSM would have nothing to report if afros acted normal. They would lose there power. Afros commit by far thousands of times more acts of violence than reported by the MSM. And they perform these acts of violence without the MSM being present. And if there were no MSM in existence, the afros would continue to do so without it. The MSM facilitates afro antisocial actions, but they do not cause them.

    I am not a fan of collective guilt. It is used as a tool of leftist/progressives/communist, and its a shame when white nationalist, and anarcho capitalist, use it as well. There are cultural behavior patterns in every group, that is far as I can concur. But one individual is not responsible for his groups behavior, especially if he disagrees with its majority opinion. I believe in personal responsibility for ones own actions (and that equally applies to Blacks). I trust more a person who is genuinely moral & conservative from whatever ethnic division he is from, than a person from my own group who an immoral cheat.

    Thus concentrating on empirical observable acts, and I never seen the level of antisocial violent behavior, as perpetrated by afro americans (barring non participating individuals), exhibited by any other group (Asian, Arab, Jew, Catholic, Hispanic, subsaharan Africans, etc). It is mere obfuscation, when discussing personal likes/dislikes of other groups, as compared to the extremely destructive nature of the afros.

    We may, or may not, have political disagreements, and competing agendas, with other groups, but afros are steadily destroying this nation (economically and physically). I do not hate afros anymore than I hate a predatory animal. But I still recognize the predatory animal as dangerous, and I will not allow it to have the advantage over me. If it tries to kill me, I will kill it first. We should concentrate on our immediate dangers; all else is mere distraction.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. eah says:
    @eah
    It's for their own good.

    https://twitter.com/HarmlessYardDog/status/915561595035688960

    And ours — Tulsa, OK — let me know if you see this covered on CNN.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    And that is the problem with most people: they prefer not to be called racist so they ignore news accounts like the one you just displayed (until it happens to them, or someone they care about... and then they wonder why everyone is ignoring it).

    The Libs tell us that if we are just willing to accept it, pay for more entitlements, and provide never ending pander & praise, that it will all get better (hasn't for the last 50 years ... it only gets worse).
    Radical afro americans want payback for 400 years (even when no one was ever a slave or slave owner today... and only a very small fraction of white ancestors were actually slave owners).
    And the government want the Black vote, and avoid MSM criticism, so they will protect afro misbehavior like they were a precious endangered species.

    And the incident is one of thousands, year after year after year, many of which never gets reported, yet we continue to tolerate it. There is always a saturation point to what can be sustained. And the afro is rapidly approaching the economic carrying capacity of this nation (whether years from now, decades from now, or generations?).

    But most Americans, living in the comfortable suburbs, want to ignore this , and pretend it will all go away. Good luck with that strategy when you suffer from the large scale afro home invasions, when we can no longer pay the extortion fee (in the form of afro entitlements). After all, isn't it more important that the suburbanite can pretend to be a fashionably enlightened limo liberals, than acknowledge that we have an afro problem that refuses to be solved.

    SO there we have it: the afros themselves refuse to stop being adversarial to the civilization that supports them. And reality challenged libs, govt, MSM, academics, millennials, and suburbanites, refuse to acknowledge there is a radical afro american problem. Thus, as of this time, there is no hope of it getting better (and what are we willing to do if it gets worse, which it will?).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. @Corvinus
    "Your rebuttals fail because they don’t address the salient points of my arguments."

    Except you did not make arguments, you offered repeated overblown generalizations like "Blacks resent slavery because it forced them to actually work" and “In Africa they were hunters and warriors. Stoop labor farming was women’s work.”

    Thus, I offered the appropriate response.

    "Slavery was endemic in black Africa. Humans were property and trafficked. Selling slaves to white men was a twofer because it was profitable in that it brought in trade goods which Africans themselves could not produce, e.g. iron and bronze edged tools and it got rid of pesky enemies with whom the slave dealer competed for resources."

    While what you state here is accurate (amazing on your part given your general level of ignorance), you do realize that European slavery and African slavery were markedly different, right? RIGHT?

    http://www.discoveringbristol.org.uk/slavery/people-involved/enslaved-people/enslaved-africans/africa-slavery

    "White slaver owners quickly realized that African blacks were truly, truly primitive–barely human."

    That was an argument proffered by Europeans in light of their own alleged biological superiority.
    Anthropologists, sociologists, and theologians have countered those assertions. Praytell, what criteria constitutes "barely human"? What determining factors show that one group of people are "more human" than another group of people?

    "Which was objectively true as modern genetic research has born out."

    What research has stated that black people are "barely human"? Citations, please.

    "Bantus have genes which they hold uniquely, unshared with the rest of the human race."

    Really, now. What are those genes? What experts in the field have come out and made this claim? Citations, please.

    "Now, the Southern plantation owners were confronted with a conundrum. How to domesticate this creature which was barely half human?"

    There was a false assumption on the part of the northern slave merchants and southern agriculturists. In retrospect, the actions taken by these two groups against their fellow humans was barbaric. Do you justify people today who enslave others in a similar fashion?

    "Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc."

    Clearly, Africans developed civilizations with these characteristics. So what you are saying is a bold face lie.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_African_civilization

    "So the slave owner started by preaching Christianity to them..."

    Invade the world, invite the world.

    "...thinking thereby to wean them of their most atavistic habits i.e. witchcraft, cannibalism etc. This is what gives rise to the notion of the compassionate Master ministering to his miserable flock."

    First, educate yourself on the wide range of religions in Africa at the time of European subjugation.
    Second, there was not anything "compassionate" about one group of people extricating by force another group of people for material gain.

    "And there is no question that the material condition of black slaves was hugely better than had been their prior life in Africa. Stats on freedom from the load of parasitic diseases, life expectancy, human rights, wealth etc all bear this out. From 400,000 imported slaves there are now 42,000,000 in America. They have outbred the native whites who are supposedly engaged in “genociding” them. Hah!"

    Slavery is considered a crime against humanity. It was not up to one group of people to unilaterally decide that another group of people was deemed inferior and thus justifiable to enslave them in order to "improve them". Again, do you justify people today who enslave others in a similar fashion?

    "In your arguments, Corvinus, you presume to speak on behalf of a creature whom you have never encountered and whom you cannot imagine."

    Black people are not creatures, they are people. Certainly a man who claims to be religious such as yourself would recognize the evils that you are supporting.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-peace/pope-urges-united-fight-against-slavery-human-trafficking-idUSKBN0KA1IS20150101

    "I suggest that you travel to the Deep South where you will meet some blacks who are really and truly black, who haven’t interbred with whitey. Interview them. Administer intelligence tests to them. But bear in mind that the people you meet today have been selectively bred for domesticity, they are tame compared to the blacks brought here 250 years ago."

    Now you be trolling.

    “Clearly, Africans developed civilizations with these characteristics. So what you are saying is a bold face lie.”

    I followed your link and read all the linked content as well. None of the peoples referred to were Bantus. None were of the people who became slaves in the Western Hemisphere. Your ploy was a misdirection.

    One of us is indeed a bold-faced liar.

    Again, you have not addressed any point I made. Genetically, Bantus are out in left field, on their own. Any site showing scatter plots or tree diagrams shows this. A ten minute search will prove this, if you can be bothered.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I followed your link and read all the linked content as well. None of the peoples referred to were Bantus."

    Talk about misdirection. You said "Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc."

    I refuted that claim with a simple link to several African civilizations that demonstrated they were other than "primates"; these societies possessed a number of these traits. Try again.

    "Genetically, Bantus are out in left field, on their own."

    Ok, so what are those genes? What experts in the field have come out and made this claim? Citations, please.

    Furthermore, are you going to acknowledge that European slavery and African slavery was markedly different?

    Are you going to offer citations that show how black people are “barely human”?

    Are you going to state whether or not you justify the enslavement of others which is being done today?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. @Truth
    No, I'm African. I think it's rare that we "cuck" more likely we go grab a shotgun.

    Daniel Chieh was your nice, stereotypical Chinese guy when he started here, polite, wouldn't insult anyone, it's terrible what a year on this site has done to the guy.

    In your case, I just find it fascinating that a white woman would receive so much backlash for saying that whites should marry whites on a WN website. That's about it.

    Also, why don't you and Aldey like each other, you seem to have pretty much the same platform and are the only two broads here. I guess it's a chick-vs-chick thing?

    Don’t know who Aldey is.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. @Anon
    You sound exactly like attilathehen. What is wrong?

    I recall Corvinus being something of a cuck so I ignored him. I think he’s RCC and accepts black/Asian priests-popes. Let’s see what he says.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "I recall Corvinus being something of a cuck so I ignored him."

    Cuck is an overused term. It observably means nothing.

    "I think he’s RCC and accepts black/Asian priests-popes."

    The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. joef says:
    @OnlyTheTruth
    Wow, I am totally amazed at the article and comments here, have not seen the like elsewhere, wow!

    This article and most of the comments define what the meaning of the word "racist" is. The phrases and words used here clearly show the essence of racism and white supremacy thinking.

    You do not realize just how racist you truly are because your way of thinking is based entirely on race, which makes it near impossible for you to realize that you're a near perfect example of a thoroughbred racist and white supremacist.

    Of course, you're entitled to your racist opinions but then don't you dare think of yourself as "not a racist" or a community that is open, fair, and just, to all.

    Fortunately, most Americans do not think like you guys here, so the tide will continue to turn, and the white supremacist, which most of you are, will fade over time because time has a way of setting things right.

    You ask the question "why do they hate us so much", but in truth, you do not wish to hear the answer to that question because it will make you feel uncomfortable and surely you will lash out at the truth and instead choose an answer that you'd prefer.

    They hate you so much because of what your forefathers have done to their forefathers. They hate you so much because of what you are have done to them yesterday and still continue doing it to them today. In the past, the whip, sword, gun, and laws were used to ensure subjugation and today it is by the power of your vote.

    Let me get this straight: Afros commit acts of antisocial violence upon others, and consume more than they produce, yet show no appreciation for it; Yet we are not not suppose to realistically comment about such occurrences. I think you are missing the cause and effect here, so let me spell it out for you: afros perform x acts, and that causes Y reactions (the reaction Y itself does not cause action x, because x precedes Y). I am sorry if you find unacceptable afro behavior acceptable, but that does not remove the obligation for the rest of us to be honest to ourselves about what is actually occurring. We choose not to live in denial. If afros behaved in a socially acceptable manner, most here would not bother to criticize them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. @Corvinus
    "For example, Title VII..."

    **Title VII prohibits INTENTIONAL discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.** For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but NOT testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    In other words, there is a test for BOTH whites and blacks or there is NO test for whites and blacks.

    **You left out this important sentence here. Was it intentional?

    We already have covered this ground in-depth n other threads. Do you have something novel to discuss?

    **Title VII prohibits INTENTIONAL discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.** For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but NOT testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    In other words, there is a test for BOTH whites and blacks or there is NO test for whites and blacks.

    **You left out this important sentence here. Was it intentional?
    —————————-
    The test is allowed for whites but the test is not allowed for blacks. The test for blacks is forbidden. How much more intentional can you get?

    We already have covered this ground in-depth n other threads. Do you have something novel to discuss?
    —————————
    Yes we did and your assertion was that equality means whatever you say it does. You believe in a victim hierarchy but not equality before the law.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The test is allowed for whites but the test is not allowed for blacks. The test for blacks is forbidden. How much more intentional can you get?"

    No. For example, the Criteria Basic Skills Test (CBST) is administered for ALL potential applicants in a wide variety of entry-level jobs.

    According to this source, "76% of organizations with more than 100 employees rely on assessment tools such as aptitude and personality tests for external hiring".

    https://hbr.org/2015/07/ace-the-assessment

    So while legitimate concerns exist, pre-employment tests are legal, and must be administered to EVERY person applying.

    "Yes we did and your assertion was that equality means whatever you say it does. You believe in a victim hierarchy but not equality before the law."

    No, that is not what I said. Try being accurate next time.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. eah says:
    @eah
    mediocre whites

    You miss the point: they aren't "mediocre" -- they are smart enough and have achieved at a level high enough (GPA, SAT, etc) to earn admission to UC -- which is denied them due to a measly few GPA or SAT points -- there is absolutely no significant, practical difference between the average achievement level of Whites and Asians (unlike between eg Whites and Blacks) -- the fact that our civilization and university system draws Asians like flies is more than proof of that -- they need us, we don't need them -- besides, my argument is fundamentally white nationalist, which you did not address at all -- I conceded that Asians are high-achieving -- I don't care -- their presence in large numbers disadvantages bright white kids in the country their ancestors built -- that's the point -- Dummkopf.

    there is absolutely no significant, practical difference between the average achievement level of Whites and Asians

    Some are probably Jewish — but none are Asian.

    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    https://twitter.com/djcashbash/status/914882571468713984
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. Corvinus says:
    @ThreeCranes
    "Clearly, Africans developed civilizations with these characteristics. So what you are saying is a bold face lie."

    I followed your link and read all the linked content as well. None of the peoples referred to were Bantus. None were of the people who became slaves in the Western Hemisphere. Your ploy was a misdirection.

    One of us is indeed a bold-faced liar.

    Again, you have not addressed any point I made. Genetically, Bantus are out in left field, on their own. Any site showing scatter plots or tree diagrams shows this. A ten minute search will prove this, if you can be bothered.

    “I followed your link and read all the linked content as well. None of the peoples referred to were Bantus.”

    Talk about misdirection. You said “Remember, these were primates who were basically (and still are to this day) incapable of formal, theoretical thinking, having had developed no written language, no number system, no formal logic, no calendar, no map of the world, no astronomy etc.”

    I refuted that claim with a simple link to several African civilizations that demonstrated they were other than “primates”; these societies possessed a number of these traits. Try again.

    “Genetically, Bantus are out in left field, on their own.”

    Ok, so what are those genes? What experts in the field have come out and made this claim? Citations, please.

    Furthermore, are you going to acknowledge that European slavery and African slavery was markedly different?

    Are you going to offer citations that show how black people are “barely human”?

    Are you going to state whether or not you justify the enslavement of others which is being done today?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
    "“Genetically, Bantus are out in left field, on their own.”

    Ok, so what are those genes? What experts in the field have come out and made this claim? Citations, please."

    Virtually every expert in the field has come out and made this claim.

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IS_fRlD7V5k/UJBi-JEMqjI/AAAAAAAAAzs/FWBI9YH6zLU/s1600/treemix.png

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/TQdn4OG62eI/AAAAAAAADCs/oQZVH6Gzeh8/s1600/dendrogram15.png

    http://haygenealogy.com/dankenbring/genome1.jpg

    The most recent maps show western blacks diverging from the rest of the human family tree 150,000 -- 170,000 years ago. More recent research seems to posit 200,000.

    Here's this.

    NYT Sept. 21, Carl Zimmer

    "Africa is where our species evolved at least 300,000 years ago. Previous genetic analysis of living Africans had suggested that their ancestors began splitting into distinct groups over 200,000 years ago. Roughly 70,000 years ago some Africans moved out of Africa, becoming the ancestors of non-Africans.
    In earlier studies, researchers had concluded that the hunter-gatherers who live today in the Kalahari Desert and other parts of southern Africa descend from the branch believed to be the first to have divided from other Africans.
    But the new study suggests that there may be even older branches in the tree. “Something more complicated is going on,” Dr. Reich said.
    Dr. Reich and his colleagues found that some people in West Africa share a unique collection of genetic variants that suggest an even deeper ancestry, raising the possibility that an earlier population of humans in West Africa diverged from rest."

    I have a question for you that I am entitled to ask: when persons such as you posits equality amongst races and from that goes on to extol the virtues of intermarriage I ask, "What's in it for me?" and more broadly, "How do whites benefit?" It's easy to see how blacks benefit. They acquire genes for higher IQ, more civilized behavior etc. But how does it benefit me?

    The cover of Time shows us the mulatto woman towards whom we are supposedly evolving. Further, we are told that we all descended from a mitochondrial "Eve". Her west African descendent looks like this,

    http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/articles/sports/fivering_circus/2016/07/160725_FRC_sports-division-Caster-Semenya.jpg.CROP.promo-xlarge2.jpg

    Why would I want to mix my genes with a person who looks very much as humans did 170,000 years ago?

    What's in it for me and my offspring? To my eyes and way of thinking it is a giant step backwards. Paradoxically, the Liberal Elites tacitly agree with my and our (HBD) viewpoint. That's why they promote race mixing. They know that blacks cannot be "taught" out of their slump. They can only be bred out of it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. Corvinus says:
    @epochehusserl
    **Title VII prohibits INTENTIONAL discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.** For example, Title VII forbids a covered employer from testing the reading ability of African American applicants or employees but NOT testing the reading ability of their white counterparts.

    In other words, there is a test for BOTH whites and blacks or there is NO test for whites and blacks.

    **You left out this important sentence here. Was it intentional?
    ----------------------------
    The test is allowed for whites but the test is not allowed for blacks. The test for blacks is forbidden. How much more intentional can you get?

    We already have covered this ground in-depth n other threads. Do you have something novel to discuss?
    ---------------------------
    Yes we did and your assertion was that equality means whatever you say it does. You believe in a victim hierarchy but not equality before the law.

    “The test is allowed for whites but the test is not allowed for blacks. The test for blacks is forbidden. How much more intentional can you get?”

    No. For example, the Criteria Basic Skills Test (CBST) is administered for ALL potential applicants in a wide variety of entry-level jobs.

    According to this source, “76% of organizations with more than 100 employees rely on assessment tools such as aptitude and personality tests for external hiring”.

    https://hbr.org/2015/07/ace-the-assessment

    So while legitimate concerns exist, pre-employment tests are legal, and must be administered to EVERY person applying.

    “Yes we did and your assertion was that equality means whatever you say it does. You believe in a victim hierarchy but not equality before the law.”

    No, that is not what I said. Try being accurate next time.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Epochehusserl
    The EEOC says on its own website that testing blacks for literacy is not OK but that testing whites for literacy is OK. It doesn't matter what standard practice is for businesses. In all likelihood any business using the results of a non validated test is ripe for a lawsuit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. eah says:
    @eah
    there is absolutely no significant, practical difference between the average achievement level of Whites and Asians

    Some are probably Jewish -- but none are Asian.

    https://www.unzcloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Screenshot-2017-10-04-16.50.46.png
    Read More
    • Replies: @eah
    Is Racial Separation the Answer?

    Yes.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLdPORGUEAEaQNF.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. @Priss Factor
    Yikes.

    Peterson meets Paglia.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-hIVnmUdXM

    222,445 views in 2 days. Wow.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. joef says:
    @eah
    And ours -- Tulsa, OK -- let me know if you see this covered on CNN.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLVbs1TUEAAZPcz.jpg

    And that is the problem with most people: they prefer not to be called racist so they ignore news accounts like the one you just displayed (until it happens to them, or someone they care about… and then they wonder why everyone is ignoring it).

    The Libs tell us that if we are just willing to accept it, pay for more entitlements, and provide never ending pander & praise, that it will all get better (hasn’t for the last 50 years … it only gets worse).
    Radical afro americans want payback for 400 years (even when no one was ever a slave or slave owner today… and only a very small fraction of white ancestors were actually slave owners).
    And the government want the Black vote, and avoid MSM criticism, so they will protect afro misbehavior like they were a precious endangered species.

    And the incident is one of thousands, year after year after year, many of which never gets reported, yet we continue to tolerate it. There is always a saturation point to what can be sustained. And the afro is rapidly approaching the economic carrying capacity of this nation (whether years from now, decades from now, or generations?).

    But most Americans, living in the comfortable suburbs, want to ignore this , and pretend it will all go away. Good luck with that strategy when you suffer from the large scale afro home invasions, when we can no longer pay the extortion fee (in the form of afro entitlements). After all, isn’t it more important that the suburbanite can pretend to be a fashionably enlightened limo liberals, than acknowledge that we have an afro problem that refuses to be solved.

    SO there we have it: the afros themselves refuse to stop being adversarial to the civilization that supports them. And reality challenged libs, govt, MSM, academics, millennials, and suburbanites, refuse to acknowledge there is a radical afro american problem. Thus, as of this time, there is no hope of it getting better (and what are we willing to do if it gets worse, which it will?).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. Corvinus says:
    @attilathehen
    I recall Corvinus being something of a cuck so I ignored him. I think he's RCC and accepts black/Asian priests-popes. Let's see what he says.

    “I recall Corvinus being something of a cuck so I ignored him.”

    Cuck is an overused term. It observably means nothing.

    “I think he’s RCC and accepts black/Asian priests-popes.”

    The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    If you accept black/Asian priests, preachers, popes, you are the problem.
    , @Dan23
    "Cuck is an overused term. It observably means nothing".

    It's fairly new, and thus not over-used. It would be more accurate to say that it annoys you.

    It means one who allows a stranger to fuck his wife, metaphorically or otherwise. That is a concrete meaning.

    "The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God".

    Lol...you have no idea how to read the bible, specifically the coding within. But don't take my word for it. Consult the Kabbalists for enlightenment, if you can figure out where to gain access. Though, my true advice would be for you not to try to figure out religion or the resulting politics. It's going to be over your head, and your self-interest will get in the way of your acknowledgement of the truth that stares you in the face.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. @Corvinus
    "I recall Corvinus being something of a cuck so I ignored him."

    Cuck is an overused term. It observably means nothing.

    "I think he’s RCC and accepts black/Asian priests-popes."

    The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God.

    If you accept black/Asian priests, preachers, popes, you are the problem.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    What makes him the problem and not you? Heaven would be a world where the two of you are locked together.
    , @Truth
    Why would living in conjunction with the bible make one "the problem."

    If God intended to reserve certain positions for certain races, I think he would have said so.
    , @Corvinus
    You are an outlier when insisting that blacks and Asians are prohibited to become church officials in the RCC. Basically, you are proclaiming that you are entirely correct in this particular case, with theologians and Vatican officials being utterly clueless to your absolute authority.

    Redemption of Jesus Christ is available to the entire human family on the conditions God has prescribed. It affirms that God is “no respecter of persons” and emphatically declares that anyone who is righteous—regardless of race—is favored of Him. The teachings of the Church in relation to God’s children are epitomized by a verse in the second book of Nephi: “[The Lord] denieth none that cometh unto him, black and white, bond and free, male and female;...all are alike unto God, both Jew and Gentile.”

    To use today's vernacular, you are "whack" and are not to be taken seriously on this matter.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. @Corvinus
    "The test is allowed for whites but the test is not allowed for blacks. The test for blacks is forbidden. How much more intentional can you get?"

    No. For example, the Criteria Basic Skills Test (CBST) is administered for ALL potential applicants in a wide variety of entry-level jobs.

    According to this source, "76% of organizations with more than 100 employees rely on assessment tools such as aptitude and personality tests for external hiring".

    https://hbr.org/2015/07/ace-the-assessment

    So while legitimate concerns exist, pre-employment tests are legal, and must be administered to EVERY person applying.

    "Yes we did and your assertion was that equality means whatever you say it does. You believe in a victim hierarchy but not equality before the law."

    No, that is not what I said. Try being accurate next time.

    The EEOC says on its own website that testing blacks for literacy is not OK but that testing whites for literacy is OK. It doesn’t matter what standard practice is for businesses. In all likelihood any business using the results of a non validated test is ripe for a lawsuit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    Employers may NOT legally use pre-employment tests, including literacy tests, to discriminate against applicants, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Discrimination based on age, race, sex, religion, national origin or disability violates federal anti-discrimination laws. Employers MUST administer the SAME LITERACY TEST TO ALL APPLICANTS applying for similar employment or promotion. The pre-employment test should be APPROPRIATE for the job or position.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. Dan23 says:
    @Corvinus
    "I recall Corvinus being something of a cuck so I ignored him."

    Cuck is an overused term. It observably means nothing.

    "I think he’s RCC and accepts black/Asian priests-popes."

    The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God.

    “Cuck is an overused term. It observably means nothing”.

    It’s fairly new, and thus not over-used. It would be more accurate to say that it annoys you.

    It means one who allows a stranger to fuck his wife, metaphorically or otherwise. That is a concrete meaning.

    “The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God”.

    Lol…you have no idea how to read the bible, specifically the coding within. But don’t take my word for it. Consult the Kabbalists for enlightenment, if you can figure out where to gain access. Though, my true advice would be for you not to try to figure out religion or the resulting politics. It’s going to be over your head, and your self-interest will get in the way of your acknowledgement of the truth that stares you in the face.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    Lol…you have no idea how to read the bible, specifically the coding within.
     
    By all means, point out verses that say that he is incorrect.
    , @Corvinus
    "It means one who allows a stranger to fuck his wife, metaphorically or otherwise. That is a concrete meaning."

    In that context. But it is overused and observably means nothing when employed in countless situations merely when a person does not act in a particular manner, presumably when a conservative acts other than conservative.

    “The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God”.

    "Lol…you have no idea how to read the bible, specifically the coding within. But don’t take my word for it."

    I won't take your word for it. Why don't you enlighten us all with specific passages that clearly state only white people are able to become Church officials, or specific passages that clearly state that non-white people are barred from becoming Church officials.

    "It’s going to be over your head, and your self-interest will get in the way of your acknowledgement of the truth that stares you in the face."

    Since you seem to know so much about this topic, prove it. Put it layman's terms. You are a (allegedly) intelligent white male. This task should be a breeze for you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. Raj Gupta says:

    South Africa is America’s future…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Not South India?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @attilathehen
    If you accept black/Asian priests, preachers, popes, you are the problem.

    What makes him the problem and not you? Heaven would be a world where the two of you are locked together.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. Truth says:
    @attilathehen
    If you accept black/Asian priests, preachers, popes, you are the problem.

    Why would living in conjunction with the bible make one “the problem.”

    If God intended to reserve certain positions for certain races, I think he would have said so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Since you believe the members of these categories are the servants of Antichrist you ought to be on her side, no?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. Truth says:
    @Dan23
    "Cuck is an overused term. It observably means nothing".

    It's fairly new, and thus not over-used. It would be more accurate to say that it annoys you.

    It means one who allows a stranger to fuck his wife, metaphorically or otherwise. That is a concrete meaning.

    "The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God".

    Lol...you have no idea how to read the bible, specifically the coding within. But don't take my word for it. Consult the Kabbalists for enlightenment, if you can figure out where to gain access. Though, my true advice would be for you not to try to figure out religion or the resulting politics. It's going to be over your head, and your self-interest will get in the way of your acknowledgement of the truth that stares you in the face.

    Lol…you have no idea how to read the bible, specifically the coding within.

    By all means, point out verses that say that he is incorrect.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. Truth says:
    @Raj Gupta
    South Africa is America’s future...

    Not South India?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. Corvinus says:
    @Epochehusserl
    The EEOC says on its own website that testing blacks for literacy is not OK but that testing whites for literacy is OK. It doesn't matter what standard practice is for businesses. In all likelihood any business using the results of a non validated test is ripe for a lawsuit.

    Employers may NOT legally use pre-employment tests, including literacy tests, to discriminate against applicants, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Discrimination based on age, race, sex, religion, national origin or disability violates federal anti-discrimination laws. Employers MUST administer the SAME LITERACY TEST TO ALL APPLICANTS applying for similar employment or promotion. The pre-employment test should be APPROPRIATE for the job or position.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Epochehusserl
    That's not what the EEOC's website says. In a similar fashion female firefighters are given different tests than male firefighters. The practice was called race norming in the 80s. They were more open about such things then. I am not making this up.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. Corvinus says:
    @Dan23
    "Cuck is an overused term. It observably means nothing".

    It's fairly new, and thus not over-used. It would be more accurate to say that it annoys you.

    It means one who allows a stranger to fuck his wife, metaphorically or otherwise. That is a concrete meaning.

    "The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God".

    Lol...you have no idea how to read the bible, specifically the coding within. But don't take my word for it. Consult the Kabbalists for enlightenment, if you can figure out where to gain access. Though, my true advice would be for you not to try to figure out religion or the resulting politics. It's going to be over your head, and your self-interest will get in the way of your acknowledgement of the truth that stares you in the face.

    “It means one who allows a stranger to fuck his wife, metaphorically or otherwise. That is a concrete meaning.”

    In that context. But it is overused and observably means nothing when employed in countless situations merely when a person does not act in a particular manner, presumably when a conservative acts other than conservative.

    “The Bible does not have any racial prohibitions on who is able to be a conveyor of the word of God”.

    “Lol…you have no idea how to read the bible, specifically the coding within. But don’t take my word for it.”

    I won’t take your word for it. Why don’t you enlighten us all with specific passages that clearly state only white people are able to become Church officials, or specific passages that clearly state that non-white people are barred from becoming Church officials.

    “It’s going to be over your head, and your self-interest will get in the way of your acknowledgement of the truth that stares you in the face.”

    Since you seem to know so much about this topic, prove it. Put it layman’s terms. You are a (allegedly) intelligent white male. This task should be a breeze for you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. Corvinus says:
    @attilathehen
    If you accept black/Asian priests, preachers, popes, you are the problem.

    You are an outlier when insisting that blacks and Asians are prohibited to become church officials in the RCC. Basically, you are proclaiming that you are entirely correct in this particular case, with theologians and Vatican officials being utterly clueless to your absolute authority.

    Redemption of Jesus Christ is available to the entire human family on the conditions God has prescribed. It affirms that God is “no respecter of persons” and emphatically declares that anyone who is righteous—regardless of race—is favored of Him. The teachings of the Church in relation to God’s children are epitomized by a verse in the second book of Nephi: “[The Lord] denieth none that cometh unto him, black and white, bond and free, male and female;…all are alike unto God, both Jew and Gentile.”

    To use today’s vernacular, you are “whack” and are not to be taken seriously on this matter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    She's pretty much the stereotype of the low-IQ redneck trash. I wouldn't be surprised if she lives in a trailer. I wouldn't care about her, except that she makes the rest of us look even worse.
    , @attilathehen
    Corvinus, you are illiterate. I know that blacks/Asians can be priests-popes. That's why I left the RCC, because I don't accept black/Asian priests-popes.

    I know what the Bible says, but now biology (IQ) has come up against beliefs. Biology is winning. Blacks/Asians have the lowest IQs. I know the Bible said humans were created in His image, but blacks/Asians are a poor reflection of His image.
    , @joef

    Redemption of Jesus Christ is available to the entire human family on the conditions God has prescribed. It affirms that God is “no respecter of persons” and emphatically declares that anyone who is righteous—regardless of race—is favored of Him. The teachings of the Church in relation to God’s children are epitomized by a verse in the second book of Nephi: “[The Lord] denieth none that cometh unto him, black and white, bond and free, male and female;…all are alike unto God, both Jew and Gentile.”
     
    I concur... Even my own criticisms of afros is based on their own antisocial actions against society... not their unworthiness of redemption before God.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Corvinus
    You are an outlier when insisting that blacks and Asians are prohibited to become church officials in the RCC. Basically, you are proclaiming that you are entirely correct in this particular case, with theologians and Vatican officials being utterly clueless to your absolute authority.

    Redemption of Jesus Christ is available to the entire human family on the conditions God has prescribed. It affirms that God is “no respecter of persons” and emphatically declares that anyone who is righteous—regardless of race—is favored of Him. The teachings of the Church in relation to God’s children are epitomized by a verse in the second book of Nephi: “[The Lord] denieth none that cometh unto him, black and white, bond and free, male and female;...all are alike unto God, both Jew and Gentile.”

    To use today's vernacular, you are "whack" and are not to be taken seriously on this matter.

    She’s pretty much the stereotype of the low-IQ redneck trash. I wouldn’t be surprised if she lives in a trailer. I wouldn’t care about her, except that she makes the rest of us look even worse.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. @Corvinus
    Employers may NOT legally use pre-employment tests, including literacy tests, to discriminate against applicants, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Discrimination based on age, race, sex, religion, national origin or disability violates federal anti-discrimination laws. Employers MUST administer the SAME LITERACY TEST TO ALL APPLICANTS applying for similar employment or promotion. The pre-employment test should be APPROPRIATE for the job or position.

    That’s not what the EEOC’s website says. In a similar fashion female firefighters are given different tests than male firefighters. The practice was called race norming in the 80s. They were more open about such things then. I am not making this up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    “That’s not what the EEOC’s website says.”

    What does the EEOC say about race/color discrimination? Here it is.

    https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/race_color.cfm

    I'm not finding exactly where “testing blacks for literacy is not OK but that testing whites for literacy is OK”. Perhaps you can direct me exactly where this phrase or a similar phrase is found on the EEOC website.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. Corvinus says:

    “That’s not what the EEOC’s website says.”

    Here is what the EEOC says about race/color discrimination. Where specifically does it state “testing blacks for literacy is not OK but that testing whites for literacy is OK”?

    https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/race_color.cfm

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  222. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Truth
    Why would living in conjunction with the bible make one "the problem."

    If God intended to reserve certain positions for certain races, I think he would have said so.

    Since you believe the members of these categories are the servants of Antichrist you ought to be on her side, no?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Members of what categories?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments