The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
Negrolatry—the Weird Case of St. Stephen Lawrence
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
ststephen

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Here’s a story from across the pond, a story about negrolatry.

Don’t reach for your dictionary; I just made that word up. And yes, to you pedants: I mixed Latin and Greek together. So sue me.

You get the idea, anyway. Here I’m working the late Larry Auster‘s theme that to guilty white liberals, blacks are sacred objects. The periodic bouts of public weeping and gushing over violent punks like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown make the point.

Over in Britain things are way worse, if you can imagine that. The poster boy here: Stephen Lawrence, a black British man of Jamaican parentage who was murdered in 1993 at age 18. Lawrence was stabbed to death in a London street one evening by a gang of white teenagers.

That is of course awful. You’d want the perps brought to justice and punished. Unfortunately, none of the witnesses could give much identifying information on the perps.

As usual, though, people in the neighborhood knew who among them were rough and dangerous. They gave the police names of some local low-lifes, and arrests were made. They were arrested, but there wasn’t enough evidence to proceed to a trial, so charges were dropped.

That’s sad, but not dramatically unusual. A lot of murders go unsolved for want of evidence strong enough to send someone to jail for life. Lawrence’s parents attempted a private prosecution; but that too went nowhere for lack of evidence.

By this time, though, anti-racist agitators had gotten their teeth into the story and were raising the usual hue and cry about police racism. They got a boost in 1997 when a Labour government was voted in, and long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary (the British equivalent of Interior Minister).

Straw set up a special inquiry into just this one murder. Senior officers of London’s police force snapped into line with the new regime and groveled before the inquiry. A report was published, the Macpherson Report, charging the police with “institutional racism” and recommending that ancient English rights to freedom of speech and assembly be curtailed—further curtailed, as Race Relations Acts of the 1960s and 1970s had already left traditional rights and liberties severely reduced.

Most dramatically, the Macpherson Report recommended dropping the legal principle of double jeopardy, which forbids a person being tried twice for the same crime. The double jeopardy principle goes all the way back to Anglo-Saxon law; it’s enshrined in U.S. law by the Fifth Amendment.

That was in 1999, six years on from the murder. The Macpherson Report was a very big deal. Most of its recommendations were adopted, including the dropping of double jeopardy—a jurisprudential revolution.

All this, just to remind you, was in response to one murder in 1993—just one of the roughly six hundred homicides in England and Wales that year.

Homicide is a dreadful thing; but was this one really so much, so sensationally more dreadful than all the hundreds of others committed in 1993?

It got worse. There were further official reports, newspaper and TV campaigns. At last, at the end of 2011, two of the local roughs originally fingered for the crime were brought to trial. A few weeks later they were found guilty of murder. Both got life sentences.

So that was the end of the story, right? Wrong! The investigation—searching for new evidence, trying to identify new suspects—is still ongoing, using up unknown quantities of police time and manpower.

And Stephen Lawrence has been raised to secular sainthood.

A huge modernist building, the Stephen Lawrence Centre, designed by a prize-winning architect, was opened in 2008 in South-Central London. The purpose of this grand structure, as described on its website, is “deliver innovative and impactful programmes that ‘transform the lives of Young People and achieve real social change.’”

There have been plays performed, TV documentaries, memorials. Doreen Lawrence, Stephen’s mother—a pleasant lower-middle-class lady of no significant abilities or accomplishments—has been elevated to the peerage. She is now Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon. She sits in the House of Lords—for the Labour Party, of course—voting on legislation before Parliament, without ever having to stand for election like a commoner.[ Doreen Lawrence heads Labour fundraising drive, By Matthew Holehouse, Telegraph, June 12, 2014]

Now forward to last weekend. Sunday, April 22nd was the 25th anniversary of St Stephen’s murder, and commemoration was unrestrained. A memorial service was held in London, attended by the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition, members of the Royal Family, London’s police commissioner, and numerous other notables.

At this commemoration service Britain’s clueless, worthless Prime Minister Theresa May told the hushed congregation that April 22nd would henceforth be known as Stephen Lawrence Day.

The following day, April 23rd, is traditionally St George’s Day, honoring the patron saint of England, as Shakespeare fans know. [Clip: Cry God for Harry, England, and St George!]

It’s also taken to be Shakespeare‘s birthday, though no-one knows for sure; and it’s definitely the day on which the Swan of Avon died 52 years later. So April 23rd is a very English date.

Well, no more of that white supremacist nonsense! The 23rd now dwells in the shadow of the 22nd, Stephen Lawrence Day.

Last week, I mentioned the Social Justice Warriors’ campaign to remove Admiral Nelson from his column in Trafalgar Square, Who better to replace him than St. Stephen Lawrence—a real British hero?

I wouldn’t be at all surprised to hear that someone has suggested this, in all earnestness.

Perhaps London will be renamed Lawrence. Or why not the entire nation? “United Kingdom” is kind of clunky; “Lawrencia” is much smoother.

My point here is not to belittle Stephen Lawrence, who seems to have been an amiable and well-behaved young man. I’m only pointing up the preposterous way this one homicide of 25 years ago has been inflated by white race guilt into a colossal national event.

ORDER IT NOW

Homicide is a terrible thing; but there are several hundred instances of it in Britain every year, with black suspects committing way more than their share—about four times more, on government statistics. What on earth is the matter with the Brits, that they have elevated this one regrettable but insignificant killing into a great holy martyrdom?

There is no clearer illustration of the mass psychopathology that has afflicted white people than negrolatry—and no finer example that the canonization of St. Stephen Lawrence.

 

2010-12-24dl[1]John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author ofWe Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by VDARE.com com:FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 240 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Singh says:

    Well, Sati doesn’t seem so bad now does it।।

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Where’s Guy Fawkes when you need him?

    Could German occupation have been worse than this?

    Read More
    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    They have Nazi occupation, albeit with second-rate Nazis.
    , @Svigor
    Of course not.
    , @jason kennedy
    This article ignores so many key details of this story that it has to be considered a wilful misrepresentation of the facts.

    Those described as 'roughs' are linked directly to an underworld boss who paid money to officers of the MPS.

    The police used undercovers to infiltrate the Lawrence family campaign, gathering personal information from them that was used to discredit them.

    Without pressure from right-wing newspaper, The Mail, it is highly unlikely anything like justice would have been achieved.

    That Stephen Lawrence has become a powerful symbol owes much to the dignity of his parents campaign for justice; if only John Derbyshire exhibited a shred of such dignity.

    , @pyrrhus
    Ukistan is rapidly becoming an Orwellian insane asylum...Doing away with the common law prohibition against double jeopardy?
    And Derb, murder may be an awful thing, but it's common as dirt in the third world, which England is rapidly becoming...
    , @ben tillman

    Where’s Guy Fawkes when you need him?

    Could German occupation have been worse than this?
     
    Well, no.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. JackOH says:

    Negrolatry? Yeah, I’ll go with that. I sometimes wonder if negrolatry isn’t an abreaction of sorts to Brits, Europeans, and Euro-Americans being too literate, too historiographic, too rational, too “democratic”. We White folks simply know a lot about ourselves and how we’ve on occasion mucked things up. Toss in the failures of Fascism and Communism for good measure.

    By contrast, Blacks offer for the negrolator . . . simplicity. Origins in a scarcely known Black Africa, two or three centuries of servitude to the wealthiest Whites, then, in the 1960s, legislation that made permanent the legitimacy of collective Black grievances against Whites. Trompe l’oeil political effects, or Gestalt political effects. Politics has made Blacks cooler than they actually are. (There is among many Whites a genuine admiration for aspects of Black culture. But, negrolatry is the amped up, extremist variant, and it ain’t doing any of us any good.) Thanks, Derb.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn’t go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don’t care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It’s because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the ‘white guilt’ element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they’d get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It’s like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It’s like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes… If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and ‘bourgeois’ to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees ‘stayin alive’, a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    Read More
    • Replies: @El Dato
    I hope someone picks this up for a speech in a movie, delivered in a bar in a side-scene.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    You sort of had me till you started talking about dicks, and then, worse yet, the Bee Gees. You could have come up with 1000 English bands and artists ahead of them (I'm not knocking their earlier stuff, like Massachusetts, but Stayin' Alive? Come the f__k on, man!)

    Speaking of music, I'm sorry to do this repeatedly, but everytime I hear of the Home Office Secretary named Jack Straw, who I knew absolutely nothing about, nor cared to, until this column, I have to listen to Jack Straw from Wichita. So do you all now ... or you really should - it's not just the all-American lyrics, great tune sung nicely by Bobby, with back-up by Jerry, great percussion from Mickey and Billy, Phil Lesh's bass, and whatever great keyboardist hadn't overdosed yet at the time of recording, but Jerry's lead guitar makes it beat hell out of any Bee Gees. Bee Gees! What the hell, man!?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAv71VbdkBc
    , @YetAnotherAnon
    "The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc."

    No, they don't "see" anything. They're taught it was "repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness etc".

    Taught in schools, taught in films, books, TV, video, magazines and papers, taught in novels, taught in "comedy". Another word might be 'indoctrinated'.
    , @Svigor

    It’s because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry
     
    Mostly it's black incompetence. Black incompetence is the hill for leftists to die on. Their D-Day. If they can defend the absolute worst, blacks - get whole white populations to put up with these idiots - then they can get away with anything.
    , @unpc downunder
    Not necessarily. It's often the politically incorrect working class whites who like black popular culture the most. For example, working class white women tend to like black pop music but have little time for whinging black SJWs. Ditto for working class white teenagers who love rap. Liberal upper middle class whites pay lip service to black culture but tend to prefer music and movies produced produced by other upper middle class white liberals.

    Svigor is right, liberal white egalitarians look at the social and economic stats, and see blacks are the perennial underachievers. Hence, their intense focus on black rights.

    , @Che Guava
    Well, Priss, always appreciating your comments, but ask again, why always as Anon? Did your attenpts at multiple usernames force you to it?

    Sincere curiosity on that point.
    , @Dr. X

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes… If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and ‘bourgeois’ to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro.
     
    This is essentially the thesis of Norman Mailer's essay The White Negro, published in 1957.
    , @Roger Cliftonville Acton
    "Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?"

    Dead muslim, certainly. Dead Hindu, probably not.

    The home office actually published the inter-racial rates of murder between 2011-2013 a few years back.

    Not surprisingly, blacks kill whites at over 3 times the rates over the opposite. But whites kill asians at marginally higher rates than asians kill whites.

    I put this down to white drug addicts stabbing cornershop owners to death in thefts gone wrong rather than some racial agenda, though. I suspect with all the recent terrorism however, now asians kill more whites than the other way round.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Because of the role of the Negro in modern British cultural imagination, black are now seen as the natural royalty. Afro-royalty or Afroyalty is becoming the new trope in not only UK but in EU. Listen to Macron speak of Eurafrica. It will lead to the Othelloing of Europe without even an Iago to mess things up. If anything, the neo-Iago is there to help the Negro go around yelling ‘where da white women at?’

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    It's all quite curious.
    The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are.

    Must be how they are absurdly promoted in 'the media'.

    , @Old Palo Altan
    If the non-royal called Harry and his blackamoor have a child, then the real royal William and his excellent spouse had better start looking over their collective shoulder.
    They had better keep a protective eye on their children as well.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. David JW says:

    John Derbyshire, in 2011 when two of the original suspects were found guilty, the evidence was a speck of blood on clothing that had been repeatedly forensically examined for over a decade. They claim that forensic techniques weren’t any good in the 1990s — but in fact there is a simple explanation, that the police planted the evidence in order to find them guilty. It doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny to argue that repeated forensic examination of the same item of clothing had finally produced a speck of blood.

    Compare the killing by a negro horde of PC Blakelock in the 1980s and you will see the difference. The suspected killer has been released and the police are not pursuing the matter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    What? The Russians didn't do it?
    , @edward collins
    There were actually two eyewitnesses that one of the perpetrators father (who was a local gangster) admitted to paying off to alter thier eyewitness accounts. All of this is readily available in mainstream newspapers.

    However I can easily see the police loosening its foresnic standards to secure a politically motivated (re)prosecution
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. What on earth is the matter with the Brits, that they have elevated this one regrettable but insignificant killing into a great holy martyrdom?

    Do you really want the root answer to this? Can you handle the truth? I think you can. What is the matter with the Brits is that, even though the Mother Country created the concepts of rule-of-law and not men and the like many centuries before America was born, it’s people failed to keep those noble concepts enshrined in the law of the land. “Wait, whaaaa?” readers will say “what is this kook writing about ‘muh constitution’ and stuff for – this post is about cultural marxism?”

    Let me tell you, then. This is the root cause of what’s going on in formerly-Great formerly-Britain because the British have no basic rights that can be defended. There is no such thing as free speech that can be fought for in court or even among public opinion. If the law says you can’t say certain things, such as that you don’t care for any of this destruction of your culture, well now it’s the law, mate. How far is all this going to go, a Brit may ask? ALL! THE! WAY! because you never had a right to keep, much less bear, arms. When “they” took that away, you had nothing to fight those laws with. They were just commonsense gun laws, mate.

    The British globalist elites probably never had a plan in writing, nor even a verbally-described conspiracy to replace the English. Just like in America, they just mostly want the same thing to happen – they want the middle class white people that make associations, have discretionary income, and can think clearly, dissolved. This way, there’ll be no more competition to their elite status and positions, and things can be run in a better, more-orderly 3rd-world fashion. That will enable a truly centralized global power structure. Again, it’s no big conspiracy, just kinda what they all want.

    When will I answer your question, Mr. Derbyshire? Now. What’s the matter with the British people is history. The question of how they feel about this business DOES NOT MATTER now. I’m sure the British people hate this cultural destruction and replacement with a passion. They just can’t say anything about it without jail time. It’s too late.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    The British do have basic rights, the Bill of Rights of 1689 is much of the basis of the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

    It remains legally valid, but the U.K. legal 'profession' for some reasons, pretends it is not.

    Unwritten constitution, the Bill of Rights and Magna Carta, other documents I do not know about *are* the bases of a written constitution, perhaps a British person, or the Derb himself, can explain to me how British law is avoiding actual laws.

    Would be appreciating.
    , @Anon
    Oh, baloney. The old Jewish trick, "Rely, goyim, on the Sacred Writings!" Of course, said SW's need to interpreted, right? See how much "protection" you get from muh Constitution with a SCOTUS full of Ginzboigs and wise Latinas.
    , @Them Guys
    Now it makes more sense as to why is that younger prince marrying a 1/2 porto rican negress and 1/2 jewess, semi good looking, woman eh.

    Also as per a tv preacher show I saw once about 10-15 yrs ago. The british-israel "Herbert Armstronger" cult leader, since Herbert died. Showed actual sheep skin papyrus docs that are supposed to prove beyond all doubt, that the queen and royals are all jewish and decend from Both sides of the orig Judah of tribe of same name.

    It seems like quite a lot of what we see going on the past 100 yrs in usa and longer yet in uk and eu nations. Is that these major judiazering apostate cult preachers are hard at work preaching almost entirely on OT biblical "Prophetic" events....Then hard at work convinceing their eu-uk-usa-flocks of fellow apostates aka them what fall for being Judaized and are also ziochristians.

    To believe all that pertained as curses and warnings to ONLY the orig 12 tribes of Israel, and ONLY while they still Had a covenant with God. Which they lost 2000 yrs ago.

    Are Now happening in full biblical order as orig written in Leviticus and Deuteronomy as well as the major OT propehts....All because todays Christianity is supposed to work towards a JWO where jewry heads the world, yet will allow "Certain" apostate various denoms of pastors to be thee world rulership on behalf of international ziojewry!

    Every sunday Two main themes are taught on that preacher show on Talmudvision aka that electronic rabbi in your homes.

    On theme is that the cults founder Mr. Armstrong was correct when he himself declared himself to actually be....THE Modern day Re-birth of the ancient prophet Elishia!!!!

    NO foolin!,,,He really said and believed he was Elishia in the flesh and that as such he had to be born and outed as the Real orig Prophet Elishia....Before....Jesus can ever return!

    He had over 8-Million apostates as followers globally and was quite famous for hob knobing with most every global leader and especially those related to England.

    He insisted that that old wooden chair in a british museum, which was used as a Throne to coronate Prince Charles( diannas hubby, is that his name I think?)...

    And an entire "Gospel" surrounding that chair with a huge stone embedded under it as "Jacobs Stone" aka Jacobs Pillow stone used to rest his head on while he slept and had that Dream called, "Jacobs Ladder" etc.

    S0, all That gives the queen and british royals the Right to Davids Biblical Throne as a "Son of David" given a right to rule all 12 tribes plus rule entire world when the "Time is Right".

    And, theme#2= that all those OT curses such as "Go from being the Lender, to being the Borrower" and having Women leaders etc, and "The Least(negroes?) among you, shall Rise Above you and take over"

    And all the rest of too many to list here biblical curses written to befall Israels 12 tribes, then after their split, to befall the two tibes of Judah & Benjamin aka "The Southern nation of Judah" after the 10 Northern tribes were taken captive....

    All we see occure Bad for western nations and white folks, especially USA & UK....Are because We are being punished for not going along with the JWO/NWO agendas etc..

    They teach that Britian and America are modern day Israel tribes of Ephraim(Brits) and Manasseah (America).....Therefore we are being punished by the very bible OT curses as modern day "Israelites" for Not strictly obeying old testement rules etc as written...Especially in those two "Law/Rules' books prior named.

    Sounds to me like perhaps events today and for a long time now are being Engineered and Caused to happen as close as possible to OT events prophesied to happen, then hundreds of apostate pastors go on TV-Talmudvision each week and even every Day!....With mucho fear and awe while telling the zio christo whacko judiazed cultists "LOOK FOLKS!

    Gods prophesies are Happening! Why Just last week....This or that and more to come folks"

    Then as remedy thay always spew some form of state of israel/jewry worship so the curses wil stop and gods blessings can return....EeeeeeHaaaaaa!....So Send that Cash donation to Me Passda Loot at judiazering central, 666-apostate lane, Austin TX or Jerry Fallwall Mountain lands...

    Or send cash direct to the King of judiazering apostate leaders in usa...Haggee!

    And all it took to warp these foolish preachermen, besides their blasphemous scofield biblies, was for Israel state and several huge jewish orgs in america, to Donate a Free Lear Jet to Both Fallwell and Hagee.....Plus enough Cash to buy 1/2 dozen $10 million mansions for pastor and each of 4-5 kids to reside in eh!

    But worst of all I think is them armstrongers and their "British-Israelism" beliefs.

    And it is Only the Main White folk nations this pertains to, usa-brits-canada-NZ-Aussies-etc but NOT to include Germany!( they constantly berate germans and give hollywood and ADL a run for the money when it comes to promoting the evil nazis and hollyHoax agendas).

    This is so wrong on so many counts it aint even funny....Yet in one way or another, most every zio christian church today teaches these issues.

    All we hear now is armegeddon and prophesy happening Daily by these same folks eh. And most all they believe or promote revolves around abject jew worship period...Most refuse to admit it. But many awake ones See it eh.

    Basically allowing selves to split into many hundreds of denominations, where each Pastor is his Own Pope and expert bible interpreter....and becoming more judiaized than most jews are is taking the entire world towards a terrible WWIII-Nukes senario so to make it possible for Edomites poseing as "jews" aka khazars, to Own and Rule a fully kommie Bolshevik world.

    With Zero euro whiteys left, but for perhaps a small few willing to Serve as a slave to jewry.

    And nobody nor nothing is able to even get these apostate fools to at least consider reading or viewing anything contrary to their warped ideals...Indeed they've become like real jews, a stiff necked and stuborn bunch akin to satans own children.

    I believe all this mostly recent promotions of africans as objects of guilted whiteys worship and related PC crapolas is a Direct effect of braindead apostate, so called christian, nation leaders forcing a fullfilment of old testement prophecy, while actually believing they will be royally blessed by God for doing....EVILNESS Globally and totally wrecking their own countires!

    Dare to mention these things, and they with instant kneejerk reaction like trained circus animals, Jump up and scream antisemite and racist evil nazis at you for dareing to awaken them.

    Them which wish to join the apostates can do so easy...Just ignore aprox 1/2 to 2/3rds of entire old testement, and aprox 90%+ ignore New Testement and wallah! You too can get so damn fucking judiaized and worship jewry & israel state till they reveal their soon to arrive jewish antichrist man as real jwo ruler king.....

    Or...Check out their protocols and talmud books and awaken to reality eh.

    No wonder they been booted out of every country they ever infiltrated eh. Help trump MAGA By makeing usa nation#110 and Never Again!
    , @English nationalist
    Part of what's wrong with 'Brits' is that they're English and not 'Brits' at all. No-one calls Scots by this name. No-one applies it to the Irish. Unfortunately the English have a pathological distaste for their right name, though they will enforce the privilege on behalf of others and fiercely call on others to respect it. The Englishman isn't hard to identify. He's the insistently 'British' fellow. He doesn't use his native identity partly because he is a coward and a liar but also because he knows no better. For centuries the priority of 'English' education has been to steer English children toward the shared unionist ideal and away from self-interest, away from the nationalism elites here have monitored carefully for hundreds of years and still fear most of all.

    Similarly immigration here isn't a 'British' problem at all. There are hardly any coloured immigrants in Scotland or Wales and he knows it. Scotland even picks all white national sports teams which the London press ignores. Immigration always was, as it remains, an ENGLISH problem and it's the ENGLISH nation - not Scots, who've used the party system and 1707 to advantage while avoiding any of the responsibilities of the 'shared' identity English people seem to need in order to feel liked - that's quickly disappearing.

    You'd think a thousand years of independent history never happened or the accolade of Europe's oldest nation state meant nothing to hear stupid, useless English people prattling on about the war and traitors like Churchill or quoting Chesterton ('We are the people of England, and we are have yet to speak...'), or sucking up to the very aliens whose politicians rule us and, dominating every aspect of government as they did after Blair was elected in '97, actually opened the inlet valve for a great flood of parasites to enter England while Scottish asylum offices actually went on strike, refusing to process forms and sending all applicants south to England, a flagrant breach of law and civil service employment conditions about which Scottish Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered nothing done.

    Let's get this straight for the benefit of foreign readers: there is no 'British' identity or 'British' culture or 'British' accent (in the sense of one standing for all the others). 'Britain' is NOT a nation. Britain a is a political arrangement, and one designed from the outset to bleed dry and destroy England. A managed extinction is taking place, with everything now being sold off to foreign money men while we ourselves remain tethered to our stall like some great sow, upturned helplessly, teats bared to an army of salivating parasites - including Irish and Scots, of whom the world would have heard little or nothing but for us. If conniving blowhard Alex Salmond, for whom the English are authors of all Scotland's misfortunes, had another reason for making sure his vile people would walk right back into their subsidised unionist feather bed in the event that Europe went sour on them I'd like to hear it.

    When people want to be something other than what they are, when they need to be liked and are too ashamed or too weak to raise a word of protest about being stripped of everything they own by an alien political elite that no longer even recognises their right to exist as a nation, an elite prepared in this case to enforce Brussels regional directives which will sunder England into a dozen and more local fiefdoms, then they deserve all they get. Look at the morons simpering around 'Prince' Harry's race-mixing marriage. The same half-wits will soon worship at the shrine of St Lawrence and think no more about it, treating it as part of national life, like the deplorable shill Peter Hitchens, the fake conservative who thinks we've come to accept Caribbean immigrants as (in his phrase) just 'part of the family'; and so we will accept them rather than defend ourselves, just as we will accept muslim dhimmitude in return for what we mistakenly think will be a quiet life.

    What was it your own Ben Franklin said about exchanging freedom for a little temporary safety deserving neither reward? The English, my people and some of the nicest, most tolerant and well intentioned on earth, must rediscover their pride or go under. They must learn to hate. There is nothing wrong with a perfectly normal human emotion directed at hateful things. Hate is demonised because it is the sole, sustainable impetus to self-defence we have. We must dispense with 'Britishness' for a start. Britishness is the cloak of anonymity oppressors use to divert credit to those in these islands who deserve none, a technique furthermore for diluting English identity and disguising the silent war being waged against her own corner of them.

    Will England awake? Will she ever stir herself? It breaks my heart to say so, but I doubt it.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. UR has a bug in which the 1st(?) comment does not show up anywhere on the article page yet the database has the comment, as the routine that does a comparison check shows any repeat submission as a duplicate. Hopefully, then, this will be a follow-up to my 1st one – it’s not supposed to be a stand-alone comment.

    Anyway, after my comment about England’s lack of a constitution, I know I’m going to get comments to the effect of “oh, yeah, what has America’s Constitution ever done for it!?” Yes, indeed many of the Bill of Rights have been ignored by the legislative branch, the executive branch, and more importantly the justices who refuse to follow it. This has all happened over the last 3 – 5 decades, as before then, common people, in addition to those in government, used to actually bring up this document in a serious manner when discussing the proposal of legislation.

    People don’t like the Constitution as an impediment to their plans, whether they are on the left or right (as defined these days). That’s why most didn’t want to hear from people like Ron Paul. It turns out that the rights enshrined in the US Constitution, and the Bill of Rights especially, are VERY IMPORTANT in the LONG TERM. Guess what, people? We are at the end of the long term right now. Those of us who have defended the 2nd Amendment have done a decent job of it. This is very important as # II is the bulwark of all the rest of it.

    I think the globalist elites are too arrogant and stupid to know this, but if they try to corner the Americans as they have just about finished doing in England, they will find out why wise people recommend not even cornering a little squirrel in the closet.

    In the meantime, plenty of otherwise astute and awoke unz writers and commenters invoke “muh constitution” as a slur on those who understand its value in the long term that is just now expiring. I’m glad Mr. Derbyshire is not one of those people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    "England, they will find out why wise people recommend not even cornering a little squirrel in the closet. "

    I knew two English brothers (both RIP) who brought home a flying squirrel and it got loose; one of them managed to grab it and the squirrel bit into his hand several times, making a terrifying bloody scene in their home.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Stan says:

    long-time hard-left extremist (((Jack Straw))) became Home Secretary (the British equivalent of Interior Minister).

    Critics of negro worship will never get anywhere because they are afraid to confront the enemy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier

    Critics of negro worship will never get anywhere because they are afraid to confront the enemy.
     
    In the case of John Derbyshire he definitely has chosen to ignore the Jewish elephant in the room.

    But he is right in the sense that far too many white people are very eager to go along with the program of Western destruction directed by the Jewish pied pipers.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Great Cuckstain is a joke. My advice to Trump: don’t touch this dump or the grey Witch with a barge pole.

    Lee Rigby, a White soldier killed by a 50IQ dindu thug, many other black-on-White murders added together don’t get the publicity this lanky drug dealing dindu gets. At least in the States you have Fox News. All our media is CultMarx propaganda tools. Appropriate that the colossal tool Harry has been played by a washed-up, divorced, geriatric dindu SJWitch – Personifies Cuckstain.

    Does the frumpy old hag call for National Rugby Day? National Kris’s Donald Day? National Telford or Rotherham Day? No. That’s about as likely as her (((puppet masters))) in MSM pointing out what a laughing stock this dump is. as ridiculous as a frumpy, dumpy grey vicar’s daughter from Middle England pairing hertrouser suit for dumpy old hag’s with leopard print heels for hot models looking to nab a footballer.

    Yeah I get, never refer to Hawking as professor or doctor, but always refer to a black who got a PhD in education from Herschel as doctor MLK. ARSEs – White Men are the dumb ones, amirire, hi 5.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Good post. Or at least I think so. I only understood 40% of it but that 40% was good enough to make me believe the other 60% was solid as well. So, 100% spot on with your comments!
    , @Roger Cliftonville Acton
    That "50IQ dindu thug" was a high caste Nigerian, i'll have you know!

    Thats the real kicker for leftists and civ-nats screaming about integration, deprivation and alienation of these alien hostiles. The mouthy black who killed Rigby screaming into the camera was the model black briton, on paper at least.

    His father was some management level NHS employee. He was bought up in a stable two parent christian family. He had a white girlfriend. He played football with white kids (and presumably had white friends) His family owned two houses. One in multiracial east London (well, multiracial now thanks to his ilk - it was 94% white back in the 1991 census, 49% by 2011, and its schools are now 25% white....looks like Lagos nowadays and smells about how i'd expect Lagos to smell too) and a large family home in still 99% white rural Lincolnshire. But, his hatred for Britain and the British still shone through. Everything we gave him, everything white society had to offer was still not enough. He knew he did not belong, and acted accordingly. I'm only surprised it doesnt happen more often. I suspect the half black thug on westminster bridge - another muslim convert was thinking along the same lines.
    , @SMK
    How many whites have been murdered by blacks and Muslims since the killing of Stephen Lawrence in 1993, 25 years ago? How many of the women and girls were raped and murdered? How many women and girls have been raped and gang-raped? How many of the victims were abducted, enslaved, tortured, mutilated? None of them are sainted and idolized and memorialized. All of heir lives and deaths, untold myriads put together, are far less important, and symbolic and meaningful, than the life and death of Stephen Lawrence. Incredibly, the governing-classes and ruling-elites of the UK are more evil and insane than those of the United States.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. El Dato says:
    @Anon
    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn't go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don't care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It's because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the 'white guilt' element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they'd get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It's like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It's like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes... If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and 'bourgeois' to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees 'stayin alive', a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    I hope someone picks this up for a speech in a movie, delivered in a bar in a side-scene.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. To address the cultural stupidity related by Mr. Derbyshire more specifically:

    It’s come to the point where the globalist elites have taken their masks off. They know that they can’t easily be stopped at this point. They no longer have any hesitation in doing things they know will anger the average white British person. This reverence for the one murdered black kid, and the use of this idolatry to minimize the traditional culture (the new St. Stephen vs. St. George’s day and Shakespeare, per your example) is just a way of rubbing their disgust for the people in their faces.

    At this point, I don’t think it’s even about “virtual signaling” anymore. This stuff is being done to deliberately anger the white people and to say “what are you going to do about it, prole? Speak up? Yeah, we’ll put you away for a few years”.

    #BritainTooFarGone
    #AmericansBuyMoreAmmo

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    At this point, I don’t think it’s even about “virtual signaling” anymore. This stuff is being done to deliberately anger the white people and to say “what are you going to do about it, prole? Speak up? Yeah, we’ll put you away for a few years”.
     
    That is the probable attitude of the elites, but I often wonder who is the dog wagging the tail when it comes to elites, and leftist. I do believe that there does exist a certain amount of unease with elites in regards to the New Left radicals. They seem to be giving in to leftist progressive agenda (especially in regards to afro issues) in order to appease them at the rest of our expense.

    You see it with the Republican party, while cultivating votes from traditionalist, they provide nothing but empty promises in return. They use showman political hacks (like Hannity) to manipulate the traditionalist into believing that voting Republican is there only recourse, while Republicans cooperate with Democrats socialist agenda behind closed doors (again, at our expense). The underlying reason for all this is so the modern Republican can protect their corporatist agenda.

    Additionally by appeasing afro hatred, by keeping their unrestrained animosity focused on the working Non Blacks, they keep them from focusing against the elites. This is a mostly effective strategy with the assistance of the MSM.

    The problem is this will last until it cannot. Money is a means of exchange, mainly developed because the double coincidence of wants from bartering cannot be performed efficiently beyond a certain size. Money itself cannot defy physics, cannot create its own energy (only pay for the means to produce it), and cannot create resources, it can only be used to finance and pay for these items.

    But with worldwide debt levels growing bigger than the money supplies, GDP, and wealth of the elites, this system will have to eventually go through some type of major reset. And when the distribution of goods & services is majorly disrupted, and afro animosity runs completely unchecked, it will be a completely different ballgame.

    I read about how some elites are buying bunkers, with Blackwater type security contractors protecting them, but under the circumstances envisioned, elitist cash will be a lot less valuable to the person holding the gun (and eventually if prolonged, the man with the gun will be the one in charge). The elites will not be able to make themselves completely insulated from this slowly created future crisis. In the long run, time is not on their side, and some may already intuitively know this, and that is why the rhetoric is getting more & more desperate.

    , @animalogic
    Elites could give a shit for minorities...or anyone, for that matter. No, minorities offer the perfect opportunity (under the infinitely flexible rubic of "justice" & "virtue") to manipulate the political, legal & cultural foundations of western society to neuter the freedom & powers of citizens generally.
    Supported by the filth of the msm & the "education" sector they've been very successful.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. unit472 says:

    We don’t much credit George W. Bush with profound observations but his comment ‘The soft bigotry of low expectations’ lies at the heart of negrolatry. It is the cognitive dissonance the negro creates, not in the mind of the racist, but in the minds of the liberal elite. It is what compels them to fill Ivy League institutions with black professors and students and pretend a Cornel West is something more than a verbose blowhard and Michelle Obama’s Princeton thesis academically pitiful but a reminder this is the best ‘these people’ can do.

    So it is with violent crime. Emmett Till could not be expected to realize shooting your mouth off in a rural 1950s Mississippi town was dangerous but, of course, whites are sophisticated enough to know they must not do the same thing around urban blacks today or suffer the consequences. A white criminal could be lynched in San Jose, California in the 1930′s and he got what was coming to him even if mob justice was ‘deplorable’ but every single negro who was ever lynched was a stain on America even if the brute was guilty.

    Read More
    • Agree: joef
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  14. anonymous[313] • Disclaimer says:

    Getting killed in some violent encounter seems to be the pathway to glory for blacks. This is setting the bar ridiculously low (could it be set any lower?) but then it’s the bigotry of low expectations. Here in Chicago we have a park, Hadiya Pendleton Park, named for a fifteen year old who was hanging around with her homies when she fell victim to the bullets of some black gangbangers. The park was named in homage to her and whose wake Michelle Obama attended. That’s it, that’s all that’s required. The park is not named after anyone who may have actually accomplished something, no researchers, doctors, astronauts, writers or even a singer. One might think such a numerically large group would produce some better candidates but apparently not. The mostly white loony-left has been getting quite bold these days, probably because they face little real opposition, and have played a major role in all this.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. @Anon
    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn't go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don't care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It's because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the 'white guilt' element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they'd get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It's like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It's like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes... If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and 'bourgeois' to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees 'stayin alive', a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    You sort of had me till you started talking about dicks, and then, worse yet, the Bee Gees. You could have come up with 1000 English bands and artists ahead of them (I’m not knocking their earlier stuff, like Massachusetts, but Stayin’ Alive? Come the f__k on, man!)

    Speaking of music, I’m sorry to do this repeatedly, but everytime I hear of the Home Office Secretary named Jack Straw, who I knew absolutely nothing about, nor cared to, until this column, I have to listen to Jack Straw from Wichita. So do you all now … or you really should – it’s not just the all-American lyrics, great tune sung nicely by Bobby, with back-up by Jerry, great percussion from Mickey and Billy, Phil Lesh’s bass, and whatever great keyboardist hadn’t overdosed yet at the time of recording, but Jerry’s lead guitar makes it beat hell out of any Bee Gees. Bee Gees! What the hell, man!?

    Read More
    • Replies: @charger
    Mickey Hart didn't play on that tour.
    , @ben tillman

    You sort of had me till you started talking about dicks, and then, worse yet, the Bee Gees. You could have come up with 1000 English bands and artists ahead of them (I’m not knocking their earlier stuff, like Massachusetts, but Stayin’ Alive? Come the f__k on, man!)

    Speaking of music, I’m sorry to do this repeatedly, but everytime I hear of the Home Office Secretary named Jack Straw, who I knew absolutely nothing about, nor cared to, until this column, I have to listen to Jack Straw from Wichita. So do you all now … or you really should – it’s not just the all-American lyrics, great tune sung nicely by Bobby, with back-up by Jerry, great percussion from Mickey and Billy, Phil Lesh’s bass, and whatever great keyboardist hadn’t overdosed yet at the time of recording, but Jerry’s lead guitar makes it beat hell out of any Bee Gees. Bee Gees! What the hell, man!?
     
    Ha ha. As fate would have it, Stayin' Alive came on the radio as I was bringing the kids home from school. That jogged my memory, and I recalled that the Dead teased Stayin' Alive on 4/24/78 at Horton Field House in Normal, Ill. It was mostly Bobby, but Jerry added a little riff. Stayin' Alive > Me & My Uncle. No Jack Straw that night.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. Rich says:

    This is unbelievable. England is no more. Isn’t there one general, one colonel, a sergeant somewhere in that God-forsaken country who can lead some troops into Parliament and save the indigenous people of Britain? Anyone?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    Successful coups tend to be led by colonels , they command the most troops that have any personal knowledge and loyalty to the man.But here company of the SAS would probably do it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. @Diversity Heretic
    Where's Guy Fawkes when you need him?

    Could German occupation have been worse than this?

    They have Nazi occupation, albeit with second-rate Nazis.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Except that the term 'Nazi' is misleading.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    That's better.

    www.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Gordo says:

    They are gaslighting us with this BTSL crap, and no-one speaks out because you would be arrested if you say anything contrary to the narrative.

    Britain is in a very bad way.

    Read More
    • Agree: ben tillman
    • Replies: @Dave2323
    A just reward for allowing yourselves to be convinced to kill the Germans who were ultimately standing up for you.

    What, you thought the Jews would reward you with self-determination for that sacrifice? What a laugh! You were fighting for the privilege to be politically enslaved toward ethnic destruction.

    This situation is no more complicated than this fact.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. bartok says:

    Straw set up a special inquiry into just this one murder.

    A philo-semite, Derbyshire, as he is wont to do, didn’t bother to mention that Jack Straw is a Jew.

    Read More
    • Replies: @shauntrayvious
    He has a Jewish great-grandparent and is a practising Christian you conspiratorial dolt.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    A workdwide phenom.

    In the 30s and 40s, it was the New Deal.

    Now, it’s about the New Feel.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @David JW
    John Derbyshire, in 2011 when two of the original suspects were found guilty, the evidence was a speck of blood on clothing that had been repeatedly forensically examined for over a decade. They claim that forensic techniques weren't any good in the 1990s -- but in fact there is a simple explanation, that the police planted the evidence in order to find them guilty. It doesn't really stand up to scrutiny to argue that repeated forensic examination of the same item of clothing had finally produced a speck of blood.

    Compare the killing by a negro horde of PC Blakelock in the 1980s and you will see the difference. The suspected killer has been released and the police are not pursuing the matter.

    What? The Russians didn’t do it?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. joef says:

    Most dramatically, the Macpherson Report recommended dropping the legal principle of double jeopardy, which forbids a person being tried twice for the same crime. The double jeopardy principle goes all the way back to Anglo-Saxon law; it’s enshrined in U.S. law by the Fifth Amendment.

    Yes another “reasonable” leftist prog solution, just like its only going to be a little tax (well, until it grows bigger). Just what the progs want, to commit the same trial over & over again so us “hateful” Non Blacks can eventually be convicted of hate crimes.

    What has happened to Mr Lawrence, although very tragic, is not typical. What is typical is all the unspoken violent felonies committed against Non Blacks, by afro americans, that is overwhelmingly ubiquitous in this nation. Of course guilt ridden limo libs, leftist radicals, and anarcho libs, all ignored this inconvenient truth (the real one), so they can pontificate from afar with their infantile political fantasies (it must be nice to live in cupcake land).

    While the libs theorize, the rest of us have to deal with the real consequences of all this (in the real world). Gun control won’t solve it, more welfare spending won’t solve it, more praising & pandering won’t solve it, but holding afros accountable for bad behavior is what will correct it; we just do not have any fortitude to do it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. David says:

    These are some of Derb’s best 1200 words yet.

    I think the reason this particular murder has been made such an extreme justification for hating YT is that those native British youth had taken up the only viable tactic for regaining their country, even if they did it with the same level of reasoning as pits ants of different colonies against each other.

    Making Britain a hostile environment, even to the point of death, for foreign interlopers can only be done on the most granular of levels. It will be ugly and immoral if it ever happens.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    This is exactly right. This killing happened in one of the few remaining areas of London which is still overwhelmingly white working class. Strange blacks aren't welcome there, especially after dark. This was also the only part of the city where white people organised citizen's patrols to defend their community during the 2011 riots. (The Muslims did the same but nobody gets indignant about that.) These people are under siege, literally.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. joef says:
    @Achmed E. Newman
    To address the cultural stupidity related by Mr. Derbyshire more specifically:

    It's come to the point where the globalist elites have taken their masks off. They know that they can't easily be stopped at this point. They no longer have any hesitation in doing things they know will anger the average white British person. This reverence for the one murdered black kid, and the use of this idolatry to minimize the traditional culture (the new St. Stephen vs. St. George's day and Shakespeare, per your example) is just a way of rubbing their disgust for the people in their faces.

    At this point, I don't think it's even about "virtual signaling" anymore. This stuff is being done to deliberately anger the white people and to say "what are you going to do about it, prole? Speak up? Yeah, we'll put you away for a few years".

    #BritainTooFarGone
    #AmericansBuyMoreAmmo

    At this point, I don’t think it’s even about “virtual signaling” anymore. This stuff is being done to deliberately anger the white people and to say “what are you going to do about it, prole? Speak up? Yeah, we’ll put you away for a few years”.

    That is the probable attitude of the elites, but I often wonder who is the dog wagging the tail when it comes to elites, and leftist. I do believe that there does exist a certain amount of unease with elites in regards to the New Left radicals. They seem to be giving in to leftist progressive agenda (especially in regards to afro issues) in order to appease them at the rest of our expense.

    You see it with the Republican party, while cultivating votes from traditionalist, they provide nothing but empty promises in return. They use showman political hacks (like Hannity) to manipulate the traditionalist into believing that voting Republican is there only recourse, while Republicans cooperate with Democrats socialist agenda behind closed doors (again, at our expense). The underlying reason for all this is so the modern Republican can protect their corporatist agenda.

    Additionally by appeasing afro hatred, by keeping their unrestrained animosity focused on the working Non Blacks, they keep them from focusing against the elites. This is a mostly effective strategy with the assistance of the MSM.

    The problem is this will last until it cannot. Money is a means of exchange, mainly developed because the double coincidence of wants from bartering cannot be performed efficiently beyond a certain size. Money itself cannot defy physics, cannot create its own energy (only pay for the means to produce it), and cannot create resources, it can only be used to finance and pay for these items.

    But with worldwide debt levels growing bigger than the money supplies, GDP, and wealth of the elites, this system will have to eventually go through some type of major reset. And when the distribution of goods & services is majorly disrupted, and afro animosity runs completely unchecked, it will be a completely different ballgame.

    I read about how some elites are buying bunkers, with Blackwater type security contractors protecting them, but under the circumstances envisioned, elitist cash will be a lot less valuable to the person holding the gun (and eventually if prolonged, the man with the gun will be the one in charge). The elites will not be able to make themselves completely insulated from this slowly created future crisis. In the long run, time is not on their side, and some may already intuitively know this, and that is why the rhetoric is getting more & more desperate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Interesting reply, JoeF. As to the global financial stupidity, and the end of the road for it, you are preaching to the choir (lots of posts on this). I think the elites think they can keep themselves away from the riff-raff that will be slaving away or keeping the automation running, far enough away to be out of reach. During the crash itself? That's probably what the bunkers and high-dollar-prepping are about. I don't think they know how things will really go down, and I wish I did better too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Being Christian and happy in Europe is racist now

    Hungarian city makes nice white people being happy video – fails as applicant for EU-project for being too white, too Christian and too happy:

    But the EU’s jury rejected their submission and instead denounced Székesfehérvár’s debut film: “There are too many happy white people and crosses, and not enough migrants,” the jury declared.

    One of the European Union’s officials complained: “This is the propaganda film for white Christian Europe; everyone is white, happy and dancing in the streets.”

    Tell me it ain’t real, please! – (I promise you to forget wether it is real or not in return – thank you!)

    (Video is charming!)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    I like that Moslem-Mom statue scene at 01:20. I'm pretty sure that's what lost them the contract.

    How are you doing, Dieter?
    , @El Dato
    Luckily, you can still do such movies about Israel.

    Otherwise, if you don't feel the power of third-worldism and diversity rollerball in your very bones and demonstrate it daily, no wins for you (unless you are peddling retarded crap for Eurovision and/or singing about Muh Holodomur or something)

    Here is another propganda film for white Christian Europe. Amazingly it's out of Japan:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXKKEldW5Tk
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Anonymous[196] • Disclaimer says:
    @Curtis Mouser I
    Great Cuckstain is a joke. My advice to Trump: don't touch this dump or the grey Witch with a barge pole.

    Lee Rigby, a White soldier killed by a 50IQ dindu thug, many other black-on-White murders added together don't get the publicity this lanky drug dealing dindu gets. At least in the States you have Fox News. All our media is CultMarx propaganda tools. Appropriate that the colossal tool Harry has been played by a washed-up, divorced, geriatric dindu SJWitch - Personifies Cuckstain.

    Does the frumpy old hag call for National Rugby Day? National Kris's Donald Day? National Telford or Rotherham Day? No. That's about as likely as her (((puppet masters))) in MSM pointing out what a laughing stock this dump is. as ridiculous as a frumpy, dumpy grey vicar's daughter from Middle England pairing hertrouser suit for dumpy old hag's with leopard print heels for hot models looking to nab a footballer.

    Yeah I get, never refer to Hawking as professor or doctor, but always refer to a black who got a PhD in education from Herschel as doctor MLK. ARSEs - White Men are the dumb ones, amirire, hi 5.

    Good post. Or at least I think so. I only understood 40% of it but that 40% was good enough to make me believe the other 60% was solid as well. So, 100% spot on with your comments!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. Ron Unz says:

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary

    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I’ve always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check…

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing…

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as “fascists,” and today’s leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being “Neo-Nazis” and “fascists.” But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the “extreme leftist” label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn’t actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Derb and Ramzpaul are gentile cucks. Derb bitches about the complete multicultural destruction of England but never even hints at the group who has been fostering this for decades. From Frank Soskice to Barbara Roche to Peter Mandelson. Ramzpaul is a awkward giggling nerd who talks about superficial crap. For the real, no-BS scoop you’ve got to go to a brotha, Brother Nathanael.
    , @Svigor
    I frequently put all enemies under the "leftist" aegis, and I can hardly be accused of being soft on the Jews, or refusing to name them. (In fact that's one of my loony litmus tests - if a right-winger calls me soft on the Jews, he's a nut; I ran into a few on Twitter, but rarely see them here)

    But yes, I'd rather call people like straw "Zionists" or Jews than leftists. Speaking of, wasn't Jack Straw a big pusher of Iraq Attaq 2? As you suggest, doesn't sound very "leftist" to me...

    , @lavoisier
    Ron Unz is apparently allergic to lying.

    What a refreshing quality!!
    , @Anonymous

    On the other hand, I’ve always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check…
     
    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a "Jewish activist."
    , @Thorfinnsson
    Economic issues are largely ceasing to matter for the reasons Lee Kwan Yew explained.

    The left-right distinction is now primarily about the white race, Christianity, Western culture, and sex roles.

    With your line of thinking one could to describe Ronald Reagan, Andrew Mellon, or even William Lowndes Yancey as men of the left because they were opposed to monarchy and titled nobility.

    And grated, some legitimist writers actually do this. You might want to look into hosting one of them here. This is the best one I am aware of: https://carlsbad1819.wordpress.com
    , @Rogue
    With regards to Ramzpaul's ire with the ADL, I don't think his description of them as leftist-extremists impacted my mind because they're apparently leftist-extremists, but rather because they are an organization that directly and indirectly promotes Jewish interests above anything else.

    So I think he's largely right and successful in his description of them.

    With regards to Jack Staw, I would make a simple observation about most Leftists: war is fine, depending on circumstances and who you're supporting, but capital punishment, even of the most vile criminal, is utterly verboten.
    , @Pat Hannagan
    Gold! Would love to have been there when "The Derb" read this comment.

    Derbyshire now working on a new theory that Ron Unz is a crypto-Irishman.

    "Bu-bu-but-muh Churchill!"
    , @Randal
    For British conservatives whose memories go back to the 1980s and before, such as myself and John Derbyshire, Jack Straw will always be a "long-time hard-left extremist", because that's how we remember him from those years (or at any rate, perhaps, how we remember him being criticised by the conservatives around us in the 1990s when he had risen to greater prominence....) He was an activist in the Labour Party of the 1970s and 1980s, of the "tax the rich until the pips squeak" and Michael Foot generation - hard left by any reasonable definition.

    Matters are complicated by his subsequent neocon drift, in the original sense of neoconservative meaning an authoritarian former hard leftist in the US or UK - usually Trotskyite - who realised in the late C20th that supporting the old left was not going to give them the power they craved and who therefore shifted to a more rightwing stance in order to be on the winning side. In the US these people became supporters of the Republican Party but in the UK their path to power was via the Blairite neocon takeover of the Labour Party after the political disasters for the old left in the late 1970s and 1980s.

    But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the “extreme leftist” label with equal abandon.
     
    It's a genuinely complicated issue, though, because the neocon hard left basically took their social radicalism and their internationalist anti-patriotism and joined in an unholy alliance with big business that involved dropping the parts of their program that reflected solidarity with the indigenous working class. The said unholy alliance essentially then won everything in the 1990s and 2000s.

    Are they still "leftist extremists"? From my perspective they are, for sure, and the socially radical aspects of their triumph are as up for overturning as the interventionist and globalist parts, in the longer perspective, though it looks pretty hopeless at the moment. They just don't happen to agree completely with old left types who still retain some vestiges of the old socialist bond of support for the working classes in their own country.

    As for Jack Straw, well he's actually fairly complicated. While I defer to no man in my own contempt for the Blairites who enabled the disastrous Iraq War, and he was one of them, I also recall that at a crucial time he stood against further aggression against Iran (and by some reports was consequently removed from his position as Foreign Secretary as a result of US regime pressure). I'd still like to see him locked up next to the likes of Blair and Campbell, but perhaps serving a shorter sentence.
    , @Lot

    I’ve always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist
     
    Except he's not Jewish and sides with the Arabs over Israelis.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Dieter Kief
    Being Christian and happy in Europe is racist now

    Hungarian city makes nice white people being happy video - fails as applicant for EU-project for being too white, too Christian and too happy:

    But the EU’s jury rejected their submission and instead denounced Székesfehérvár’s debut film: “There are too many happy white people and crosses, and not enough migrants,” the jury declared.

    One of the European Union’s officials complained: “This is the propaganda film for white Christian Europe; everyone is white, happy and dancing in the streets.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSp6UBhR2k0

    Tell me it ain't real, please! - (I promise you to forget wether it is real or not in return - thank you!)

    (Video is charming!)

    I like that Moslem-Mom statue scene at 01:20. I’m pretty sure that’s what lost them the contract.

    How are you doing, Dieter?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
    Oh thanks Achmed - your Greatful-Dead clip cheered me up!

    The "Moslem-mom" is a statue of an old catholic women in the Danube-Swabian garb. - But how would beaurocrats in Brussels know anyways, so in the final end, you might as well be right.

    (I thought that the sports-teacher's shorts and legs and the way she moved her hips and all - were just too good. People can't stand it, if others, especially those in backward places - know how to move... and to live.

    I've sat at the sunny terrace of the best hotel in town with a friend today, and we tried to get to grips with what's going on in the world, while having a glimpse at the Lake of Constance and the Austrian and Swiss Alps - just shimmering through the haze.

    This hotel is owned by one of the three best breweries in southern Badenia - Rothaus, which is highly profitable, btw., creates lots of good jobs in the Black Forest and - tatatataaaaa: Is owned by the Badenian people! - Don't tell this story to the hard-core free traders at unz.com, hehe!

    (In this hotel was once an influential monastery of the Dominican brothers. Best writer ever in Constance lived there from 1310 to 1340 appr. - Heinrich Seuse. His motto: Keep going (do things) - but don't you ever worry, wether what you did create was good enough, because God takes care of this part of the story (= don't you ever bother being judged by your fellow humans humans!).

    Seuse was good hearted and very well educated - most prominently by Meister Eckhart (Erich Fromm referred to him - and adored him - quite a lot), who had come to Cologne and Strasbourg via Paris, and Seuse was an incredibly good writer - he invented (=created) quite a chunk of the German language we use today...) - as I now come to think of: I've tried to explain this to T. C. Boyle, who was here a few months back. - Have no idea wether I succeeded. Apropos Greatful Dead and T. C. Boyle: Boyle mentioned, that he had just finished a novel about LSD - and of course he knew about chemist Albert Hofmann from Basel, who discovered this drug. Unfortunately, Boyle knew nothing about the writer Ernst Jünger ("Drugs and Being High" maybe in English - in German: Drogen und Rausch, great book!). That's a pity, because Jünger was the closest intellectual friend of Hofman and was very good at bringing drug experiences into words without sounding silly (which I think is the hardest part of it...).
    And Jünger has taken just any drug - which might have been a reason for his sudden death at the age of - - - 102 (hehe again....).

    Jackson Browne stayed at this hotel too for some sunny days - and loved it a lot! - His Constance-concert with his great band of at least six musicians was one of the best I've ever - - experienced (last hehe).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. @joef

    At this point, I don’t think it’s even about “virtual signaling” anymore. This stuff is being done to deliberately anger the white people and to say “what are you going to do about it, prole? Speak up? Yeah, we’ll put you away for a few years”.
     
    That is the probable attitude of the elites, but I often wonder who is the dog wagging the tail when it comes to elites, and leftist. I do believe that there does exist a certain amount of unease with elites in regards to the New Left radicals. They seem to be giving in to leftist progressive agenda (especially in regards to afro issues) in order to appease them at the rest of our expense.

    You see it with the Republican party, while cultivating votes from traditionalist, they provide nothing but empty promises in return. They use showman political hacks (like Hannity) to manipulate the traditionalist into believing that voting Republican is there only recourse, while Republicans cooperate with Democrats socialist agenda behind closed doors (again, at our expense). The underlying reason for all this is so the modern Republican can protect their corporatist agenda.

    Additionally by appeasing afro hatred, by keeping their unrestrained animosity focused on the working Non Blacks, they keep them from focusing against the elites. This is a mostly effective strategy with the assistance of the MSM.

    The problem is this will last until it cannot. Money is a means of exchange, mainly developed because the double coincidence of wants from bartering cannot be performed efficiently beyond a certain size. Money itself cannot defy physics, cannot create its own energy (only pay for the means to produce it), and cannot create resources, it can only be used to finance and pay for these items.

    But with worldwide debt levels growing bigger than the money supplies, GDP, and wealth of the elites, this system will have to eventually go through some type of major reset. And when the distribution of goods & services is majorly disrupted, and afro animosity runs completely unchecked, it will be a completely different ballgame.

    I read about how some elites are buying bunkers, with Blackwater type security contractors protecting them, but under the circumstances envisioned, elitist cash will be a lot less valuable to the person holding the gun (and eventually if prolonged, the man with the gun will be the one in charge). The elites will not be able to make themselves completely insulated from this slowly created future crisis. In the long run, time is not on their side, and some may already intuitively know this, and that is why the rhetoric is getting more & more desperate.

    Interesting reply, JoeF. As to the global financial stupidity, and the end of the road for it, you are preaching to the choir (lots of posts on this). I think the elites think they can keep themselves away from the riff-raff that will be slaving away or keeping the automation running, far enough away to be out of reach. During the crash itself? That’s probably what the bunkers and high-dollar-prepping are about. I don’t think they know how things will really go down, and I wish I did better too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    I don’t think they know how things will really go down, and I wish I did better too.
     
    None of us have a crystal ball on this. We only can make our best guess on where we are going (if things continue this way, what is our projected final destination?). Kind of reminds me of the movie "Soylent Green" where the elites live in their luxury high rises while the rest of squander for the remaining meager resources. Maybe thats the elites end game; but I do not think it is. Instead I believe they are just kicking the can down the road as long as possible, while their wishful thinking hopes for a favorable outcome.

    Elitist wealth can protect them in modern society during normal times. However when the economy is destabilized, and urban areas resemble failed state like conditions, can money protect them then? After all, the elites may know how to personally manipulate the financial system while it is still functioning normally, but they do not possess many skill sets to do anything else (they purchase the skills they need to survive). Without modern well functioning institutions, most elites will become very helpless.

    Again elites may purchase protection for their bunkers, but what happens when the commodity of security is worth more than the paper money the elites are paying them with? Who becomes in charge of the bunker then? The bunker security team may transform from being mere employees to becoming the elites' masters (for they are the ones holding the guns). [The elites were probably in a similar situation during the end of Rome in 476] I do not believe the elites will be completely unscathed by the future events that they have contributed to.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Anonymous[196] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    Derb and Ramzpaul are gentile cucks. Derb bitches about the complete multicultural destruction of England but never even hints at the group who has been fostering this for decades. From Frank Soskice to Barbara Roche to Peter Mandelson. Ramzpaul is a awkward giggling nerd who talks about superficial crap. For the real, no-BS scoop you’ve got to go to a brotha, Brother Nathanael.

    Read More
    • LOL: Truth
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. It’s not weird at all. It’s a highly effective marketing campaign.

    Ever heard of Kriss Donald?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    I have heard of the murder of Kriss Donald. One of his murderers was on parole for another murder at the time he and his buddies killed Kriss.

    The English media covered it up.
    , @The King is A Fink
    I hadn't heard of him, so thanks for that. The Wiki article is mealy-mouthed as always. Complaints about the murder of white people always bring down accusations of 'inciting racial tensions', and any murder of black people is evidence of enduring racism. Journalists are pure scum.
    , @Truth
    Kriss Donald?

    Yeah he's one of these dudes, isn't he?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAhp17Mp7Xs

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. @Anon
    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn't go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don't care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It's because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the 'white guilt' element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they'd get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It's like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It's like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes... If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and 'bourgeois' to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees 'stayin alive', a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    “The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.”

    No, they don’t “see” anything. They’re taught it was “repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness etc”.

    Taught in schools, taught in films, books, TV, video, magazines and papers, taught in novels, taught in “comedy”. Another word might be ‘indoctrinated’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. Wally says:
    @TomSchmidt
    They have Nazi occupation, albeit with second-rate Nazis.

    Except that the term ‘Nazi’ is misleading.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    That’s better.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. The Lawrence case, for me, manages to sum up all the shitty bits of Britain into one tidy package.

    - Terrible police work (can’t find the killers, but we’ll find Twitter abusers)
    - Worthless government commissions
    - Tabloid media gone wild (Daily Mail’s “sue us” dare)
    - Virtue signalling, mainly to America

    The virtue signalling is pretty extreme here. The Brits like to think of racial violence as an American carnival show, so when it happens to them, the cognitive dissonance hits hard. They wanted to show America how a black victim should be treated, so they spared no expense to lionize Lawrence and spend millions to find his killers. Shame about their incompetent police. But again, this was about wagging their fingers (unsuccessfully) at Americans. Brits compare everything in their miserable country to what the Yanks do.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  35. Hacienda says:

    500 hundred years of slavery. Every white man and woman a master. Every black man and woman an animal.

    Repeat after me. 500 500 500! Years years years. Every white a master, every black an animal. Every colored man the subject of white approval.

    The enormity of the black sacrifice while whites were on a planetary rampage. You’ll get no sympathy from this Asian, Derb. No sympathy at all. Your brittle James Bond wiles have no currency anymore. Thank God!

    Read More
    • Replies: @German_reader

    Every black man and woman an animal.
     
    lol, you mean except those Africans who got rich by selling other Africans to Europeans. You know, without the active participation of Africans the transatlantic slave trade would never have been possible.
    , @SunBakedSuburb
    Well, Mr. Asian commenter, you can look forward to 500 years of a black and brown "planetary rampage". The Chinese, who are incredibly racist towards blacks, think they'll be able to contain and control the coming demographic nightmare. They won't. The barbarians will soon be at your gates. Better hope for an alien intervention.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. I suppose that a central tenet of negrolatry is to celebrate a single person who accomplished little (unless being murdered counts as an accomplishment) , simply for his glorious negritude.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  37. Svigor says:

    Blacks just don’t get murdered by whites very often; politicians need to make hay while the sun is shining, y’know?

    ***

    ((Jack Straw))

    Putting Jews into positions of power in non-Jewish countries is a bad idea.

    The path to good gov’t here wasn’t difficult: round up a few black toughs and convict them of Lawrence’s murder, guilt or no.

    That would send the proper message to the blacks.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. Svigor says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    Where's Guy Fawkes when you need him?

    Could German occupation have been worse than this?

    Of course not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Svigor says:
    @Anon
    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn't go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don't care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It's because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the 'white guilt' element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they'd get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It's like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It's like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes... If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and 'bourgeois' to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees 'stayin alive', a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    It’s because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry

    Mostly it’s black incompetence. Black incompetence is the hill for leftists to die on. Their D-Day. If they can defend the absolute worst, blacks – get whole white populations to put up with these idiots – then they can get away with anything.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Svigor says:
    @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    I frequently put all enemies under the “leftist” aegis, and I can hardly be accused of being soft on the Jews, or refusing to name them. (In fact that’s one of my loony litmus tests – if a right-winger calls me soft on the Jews, he’s a nut; I ran into a few on Twitter, but rarely see them here)

    But yes, I’d rather call people like straw “Zionists” or Jews than leftists. Speaking of, wasn’t Jack Straw a big pusher of Iraq Attaq 2? As you suggest, doesn’t sound very “leftist” to me…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @Hacienda
    500 hundred years of slavery. Every white man and woman a master. Every black man and woman an animal.

    Repeat after me. 500 500 500! Years years years. Every white a master, every black an animal. Every colored man the subject of white approval.

    The enormity of the black sacrifice while whites were on a planetary rampage. You'll get no sympathy from this Asian, Derb. No sympathy at all. Your brittle James Bond wiles have no currency anymore. Thank God!

    Every black man and woman an animal.

    lol, you mean except those Africans who got rich by selling other Africans to Europeans. You know, without the active participation of Africans the transatlantic slave trade would never have been possible.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Bingo!

    African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade
    Nigerian civil rights group says tribal leaders' ancestors sold people to slavers and should say sorry
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade
    "African chiefs were the ones waging war on each other and capturing their own people and selling them. If anyone should apologise it should be the African chiefs. We still have those traitors here even today."

    more inconvenient facts:
    Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let's us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    Dr. Tony Martin - The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ut7I75Q_-zA

    JEWS AND THE SLAVE TRADE
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/jews--the-slave-trade.html

    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/6585841.jpg?296
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/8785931.jpg?277
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/3328022_orig.jpg
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/892816_orig.jpg
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/4/9/53499197/1507471.jpg?717
    , @for-the-record
    lol, you mean except those Africans who got rich by selling other Africans to Europeans.

    And to Arabs. By some estimates more Africans were victims of the Islamic slave trade, albeit over a much longer period of time.
    , @Hacienda
    Hey, I'm not God. But I do have a sense of humour for God-like retribution. And what happened to
    your Schadenfreunde? Don't pretend you've lost it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @Achmed E. Newman
    I like that Moslem-Mom statue scene at 01:20. I'm pretty sure that's what lost them the contract.

    How are you doing, Dieter?

    Oh thanks Achmed – your Greatful-Dead clip cheered me up!

    The “Moslem-mom” is a statue of an old catholic women in the Danube-Swabian garb. – But how would beaurocrats in Brussels know anyways, so in the final end, you might as well be right.

    (I thought that the sports-teacher’s shorts and legs and the way she moved her hips and all – were just too good. People can’t stand it, if others, especially those in backward places – know how to move… and to live.

    I’ve sat at the sunny terrace of the best hotel in town with a friend today, and we tried to get to grips with what’s going on in the world, while having a glimpse at the Lake of Constance and the Austrian and Swiss Alps – just shimmering through the haze.

    This hotel is owned by one of the three best breweries in southern Badenia – Rothaus, which is highly profitable, btw., creates lots of good jobs in the Black Forest and – tatatataaaaa: Is owned by the Badenian people! – Don’t tell this story to the hard-core free traders at unz.com, hehe!

    (In this hotel was once an influential monastery of the Dominican brothers. Best writer ever in Constance lived there from 1310 to 1340 appr. – Heinrich Seuse. His motto: Keep going (do things) – but don’t you ever worry, wether what you did create was good enough, because God takes care of this part of the story (= don’t you ever bother being judged by your fellow humans humans!).

    Seuse was good hearted and very well educated – most prominently by Meister Eckhart (Erich Fromm referred to him – and adored him – quite a lot), who had come to Cologne and Strasbourg via Paris, and Seuse was an incredibly good writer – he invented (=created) quite a chunk of the German language we use today…) – as I now come to think of: I’ve tried to explain this to T. C. Boyle, who was here a few months back. – Have no idea wether I succeeded. Apropos Greatful Dead and T. C. Boyle: Boyle mentioned, that he had just finished a novel about LSD – and of course he knew about chemist Albert Hofmann from Basel, who discovered this drug. Unfortunately, Boyle knew nothing about the writer Ernst Jünger (“Drugs and Being High” maybe in English – in German: Drogen und Rausch, great book!). That’s a pity, because Jünger was the closest intellectual friend of Hofman and was very good at bringing drug experiences into words without sounding silly (which I think is the hardest part of it…).
    And Jünger has taken just any drug – which might have been a reason for his sudden death at the age of – – – 102 (hehe again….).

    Jackson Browne stayed at this hotel too for some sunny days – and loved it a lot! – His Constance-concert with his great band of at least six musicians was one of the best I’ve ever – – experienced (last hehe).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stonehands
    Gotta chime in here... l just finished reading Eumeswil today, it’s an amazing coincidence(?) that you brought up Jünger. It is a lifestyle affirming masterpiece of literature!
    , @willieskull68
    So when I say I sailed to Switzerland and back, you would understand.

    Unz is getting the good vibe that carried Taki's until the British libel lawyers (guessing) killed the comments section. Comments delayed are comments denied. And comments moderated are...

    I'm missing some important details, but I have a German widow friend who says "officials" are pressuring her (or her landlord) to vacate her large flat to turn the place over to immigrants.
    Is this happening?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Stan
    long-time hard-left extremist (((Jack Straw))) became Home Secretary (the British equivalent of Interior Minister).

    Critics of negro worship will never get anywhere because they are afraid to confront the enemy.

    Critics of negro worship will never get anywhere because they are afraid to confront the enemy.

    In the case of John Derbyshire he definitely has chosen to ignore the Jewish elephant in the room.

    But he is right in the sense that far too many white people are very eager to go along with the program of Western destruction directed by the Jewish pied pipers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hamlet's Ghost
    The situation of the West is akin to a commercial jet that's been hijacked by a gang of terrorists who have murdered the flight crew and are flying it into a large building.

    Some passengers may convince themselves that the best coping strategy is to stay quietly in their seats until the whole episode blows over. But a few passengers who get wise to their collective fate must rouse their fellow passengers to rush the cockpit to regain control of the plane before it's too late.

    Each of us is a passenger.

    What is your decision?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    Ron Unz is apparently allergic to lying.

    What a refreshing quality!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @Achmed E. Newman
    UR has a bug in which the 1st(?) comment does not show up anywhere on the article page yet the database has the comment, as the routine that does a comparison check shows any repeat submission as a duplicate. Hopefully, then, this will be a follow-up to my 1st one - it's not supposed to be a stand-alone comment.

    Anyway, after my comment about England's lack of a constitution, I know I'm going to get comments to the effect of "oh, yeah, what has America's Constitution ever done for it!?" Yes, indeed many of the Bill of Rights have been ignored by the legislative branch, the executive branch, and more importantly the justices who refuse to follow it. This has all happened over the last 3 - 5 decades, as before then, common people, in addition to those in government, used to actually bring up this document in a serious manner when discussing the proposal of legislation.

    People don't like the Constitution as an impediment to their plans, whether they are on the left or right (as defined these days). That's why most didn't want to hear from people like Ron Paul. It turns out that the rights enshrined in the US Constitution, and the Bill of Rights especially, are VERY IMPORTANT in the LONG TERM. Guess what, people? We are at the end of the long term right now. Those of us who have defended the 2nd Amendment have done a decent job of it. This is very important as # II is the bulwark of all the rest of it.

    I think the globalist elites are too arrogant and stupid to know this, but if they try to corner the Americans as they have just about finished doing in England, they will find out why wise people recommend not even cornering a little squirrel in the closet.

    In the meantime, plenty of otherwise astute and awoke unz writers and commenters invoke "muh constitution" as a slur on those who understand its value in the long term that is just now expiring. I'm glad Mr. Derbyshire is not one of those people.

    “England, they will find out why wise people recommend not even cornering a little squirrel in the closet. ”

    I knew two English brothers (both RIP) who brought home a flying squirrel and it got loose; one of them managed to grab it and the squirrel bit into his hand several times, making a terrifying bloody scene in their home.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Hacienda
    500 hundred years of slavery. Every white man and woman a master. Every black man and woman an animal.

    Repeat after me. 500 500 500! Years years years. Every white a master, every black an animal. Every colored man the subject of white approval.

    The enormity of the black sacrifice while whites were on a planetary rampage. You'll get no sympathy from this Asian, Derb. No sympathy at all. Your brittle James Bond wiles have no currency anymore. Thank God!

    Well, Mr. Asian commenter, you can look forward to 500 years of a black and brown “planetary rampage”. The Chinese, who are incredibly racist towards blacks, think they’ll be able to contain and control the coming demographic nightmare. They won’t. The barbarians will soon be at your gates. Better hope for an alien intervention.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Do May and the pols believe this stuff? The general public? Or are the May and gang just working the rubes for votes?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  48. Anonymous[679] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    On the other hand, I’ve always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check…

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ron Unz

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”
     
    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I'd guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions "how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!"

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message "You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!" while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message "Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!"

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly "tainted blood"...

    The key factor is not Straw's fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Never allow the death of a black person to go to waste

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  50. Wally says:
    @German_reader

    Every black man and woman an animal.
     
    lol, you mean except those Africans who got rich by selling other Africans to Europeans. You know, without the active participation of Africans the transatlantic slave trade would never have been possible.

    Bingo!

    African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade
    Nigerian civil rights group says tribal leaders’ ancestors sold people to slavers and should say sorry

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade

    “African chiefs were the ones waging war on each other and capturing their own people and selling them. If anyone should apologise it should be the African chiefs. We still have those traitors here even today.”

    more inconvenient facts:
    Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let’s us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. joef says:
    @Achmed E. Newman
    Interesting reply, JoeF. As to the global financial stupidity, and the end of the road for it, you are preaching to the choir (lots of posts on this). I think the elites think they can keep themselves away from the riff-raff that will be slaving away or keeping the automation running, far enough away to be out of reach. During the crash itself? That's probably what the bunkers and high-dollar-prepping are about. I don't think they know how things will really go down, and I wish I did better too.

    I don’t think they know how things will really go down, and I wish I did better too.

    None of us have a crystal ball on this. We only can make our best guess on where we are going (if things continue this way, what is our projected final destination?). Kind of reminds me of the movie “Soylent Green” where the elites live in their luxury high rises while the rest of squander for the remaining meager resources. Maybe thats the elites end game; but I do not think it is. Instead I believe they are just kicking the can down the road as long as possible, while their wishful thinking hopes for a favorable outcome.

    Elitist wealth can protect them in modern society during normal times. However when the economy is destabilized, and urban areas resemble failed state like conditions, can money protect them then? After all, the elites may know how to personally manipulate the financial system while it is still functioning normally, but they do not possess many skill sets to do anything else (they purchase the skills they need to survive). Without modern well functioning institutions, most elites will become very helpless.

    Again elites may purchase protection for their bunkers, but what happens when the commodity of security is worth more than the paper money the elites are paying them with? Who becomes in charge of the bunker then? The bunker security team may transform from being mere employees to becoming the elites’ masters (for they are the ones holding the guns). [The elites were probably in a similar situation during the end of Rome in 476] I do not believe the elites will be completely unscathed by the future events that they have contributed to.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Ron Unz says:
    @Anonymous

    On the other hand, I’ve always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check…
     
    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a "Jewish activist."

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”

    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I’d guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions “how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!”

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message “You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!” while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message “Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!”

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly “tainted blood”…

    The key factor is not Straw’s fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    Read More
    • Agree: JohnnyWalker123, Mishra
    • Replies: @utu
    It seems that at some point, about 10 years after he diligently severed the Empire to start the war with Iraq, he saw the light:

    AIPAC’s ‘unlimited’ funds are greatest obstacle to peace, former British foreign sec’y says
    http://mondoweiss.net/2013/10/unlimited-greatest-obstacle/

    UK’s Jack Straw says Israel has nuclear weapons, steals Palestinian land
    http://www.redressonline.com/2013/06/uks-jack-straw-says-israel-has-nuclear-weapons-steals-palestinian-land/
     
    This was 5 years ago. I wonder if he was disciplined for what he was saying in 2013.
    , @Biff
    Lots of non-Jewish Zionists in politics:
    Rumsfeld
    McCain
    Biden
    Etc....
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    OK, so you were wrong about Jack Straw, but your discussion of Jews and the media is right on the money, especially your last sentence. I'm amazed to see you put this out there.

    That said, most people seem resigned to this state of affairs, or at least believe that all they can do about it is write a bit about it in a blog post or comment. Not true. Every single one of you can do something about it, like 1st thing tomorrow morning. Cancel the TV portion of your cable/internet service and turn off your TV! (in either order). Don't susbscribe to payed services of the Lyin Press print/internet! Read the news the way you want off of unz.com, VDare, ZeroHedge, and anywhere else YOU want to on the internet. It's not 1995 anymore.

    All this complaining on the internet about big media and control thereof isn't going to do anything. Cut off the money, and they'll feel it. Hell, in England don't people pay a significant tax directly to the government to be ALLOWED to get brainwashed by the Beeb on their own Telees?. I wonder what life would be like and how things would change if the Brits would forgo the Telee and hang out at the pubs again, [shudder] discussing things among themselves and shit [/shudder]. No, no, we can't have that!

    , @lavoisier

    The key factor is not Straw’s fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.
     
    Indeed. That is the problem.

    Control by any one ethnic group over such things cannot be good for any so called free society as it will become unbalanced.

    Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    , @Jay Ritchie
    I think thats pretty harsh on Jack Straw. No time for his party but I do know his constituency pretty well (Blackburn). He never denied or diminished having Jewish heritage in a seat and with a constituency party with a sizable Muslim minority (the largest outside London I read somewhere or other). He also outraged the left by criticizing women wearing the veil, and was criticized by supporters of Israeli policy:

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ex-uk-fm-unlimited-jewish-funds-control-us-policy-block-mideast-peace/

    I had to check on wikipedia to confirm how little Jewish ancestry he has - interestingly the same proportion as Stephen Lawrence had.
    , @Anon
    Great comment, I have always been fascinated by your (Ron's) perspective, an amazing website that seems to bring out the {{truth}}, and run by a lansman no less! Anywho, thank god, it and you exist.
    , @Svigor
    I too heard Straw was half-Jewish, long ago (I first heard his name as a shill for Neocon warmongering).

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.
     
    The white half basically adds up to 0, politically and culturally speaking, in the current climate. 0.5 is infinitely more than 0.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. renfro says:

    There are some good cases to be made against sanctifying a black who is killed, especially given the crazy black movement in the US…but this may not be one of them.
    Lets look at the stats on how often the murders of a black by whites goes uncaught, how often the murder of a white by a black goes uncaught before we jump on….that might be the crux of the reason in this case.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  54. @Dieter Kief
    Oh thanks Achmed - your Greatful-Dead clip cheered me up!

    The "Moslem-mom" is a statue of an old catholic women in the Danube-Swabian garb. - But how would beaurocrats in Brussels know anyways, so in the final end, you might as well be right.

    (I thought that the sports-teacher's shorts and legs and the way she moved her hips and all - were just too good. People can't stand it, if others, especially those in backward places - know how to move... and to live.

    I've sat at the sunny terrace of the best hotel in town with a friend today, and we tried to get to grips with what's going on in the world, while having a glimpse at the Lake of Constance and the Austrian and Swiss Alps - just shimmering through the haze.

    This hotel is owned by one of the three best breweries in southern Badenia - Rothaus, which is highly profitable, btw., creates lots of good jobs in the Black Forest and - tatatataaaaa: Is owned by the Badenian people! - Don't tell this story to the hard-core free traders at unz.com, hehe!

    (In this hotel was once an influential monastery of the Dominican brothers. Best writer ever in Constance lived there from 1310 to 1340 appr. - Heinrich Seuse. His motto: Keep going (do things) - but don't you ever worry, wether what you did create was good enough, because God takes care of this part of the story (= don't you ever bother being judged by your fellow humans humans!).

    Seuse was good hearted and very well educated - most prominently by Meister Eckhart (Erich Fromm referred to him - and adored him - quite a lot), who had come to Cologne and Strasbourg via Paris, and Seuse was an incredibly good writer - he invented (=created) quite a chunk of the German language we use today...) - as I now come to think of: I've tried to explain this to T. C. Boyle, who was here a few months back. - Have no idea wether I succeeded. Apropos Greatful Dead and T. C. Boyle: Boyle mentioned, that he had just finished a novel about LSD - and of course he knew about chemist Albert Hofmann from Basel, who discovered this drug. Unfortunately, Boyle knew nothing about the writer Ernst Jünger ("Drugs and Being High" maybe in English - in German: Drogen und Rausch, great book!). That's a pity, because Jünger was the closest intellectual friend of Hofman and was very good at bringing drug experiences into words without sounding silly (which I think is the hardest part of it...).
    And Jünger has taken just any drug - which might have been a reason for his sudden death at the age of - - - 102 (hehe again....).

    Jackson Browne stayed at this hotel too for some sunny days - and loved it a lot! - His Constance-concert with his great band of at least six musicians was one of the best I've ever - - experienced (last hehe).

    Gotta chime in here… l just finished reading Eumeswil today, it’s an amazing coincidence(?) that you brought up Jünger. It is a lifestyle affirming masterpiece of literature!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
    Jünger would have loved this coincidence - not least because of it's absolute and total unlikeliness.

    I gave up on "Eumeswil" (might give it another try now, 40 years later), but lots of other stuff by Jünger, I love: His war diaries of WW II, and "The Worker", "Waldgang", "70ies blown away" (might not be translated) ("Siebzig verweht"), the drug book "Approachings - Drugs and Being High". Jünger is an incredibly good nature writer - I'd put him up there with John Baker (The Perergrine) and Adalbert Stifter (Der Hochwald, Der Nachsommer).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.

    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris’s payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.

    Both sides preferred “institutional racism” to be highlighted and good old police corruption to be downplayed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
    Your comment is so important that it should be repeated in full:

    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.

    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris’s payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.
     

    The policemen guarding one suspect's house allowed his associate to leave with a bin bag full of clothes.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.

    Both sides preferred “institutional racism” to be highlighted and good old police corruption to be downplayed.

     

    Even those of us who disagree with the narrative are suckered into opposing negrolatry instead of looking deeper.
    , @res
    Do you have any supporting references? If true this would be a good thing to emphasize when talking about this case.
    , @Henry's Cat

    For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.
     
    And how, pray tell, do you or more importantly the police know which clothes were worn? How long did it take for the police to identify the suspects? Instead of Clifford Norris going to all the trouble of leaning on this detective to compromise the investigation enough to hold off on a police raid, wouldn't it have just been easier to tell his son and friends to get rid of the clothes pronto (assuming they hadn't so already)?

    There's not the slightest positive evidence that the investigation was compromised by this or any other association.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. utu says:
    @Ron Unz

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”
     
    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I'd guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions "how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!"

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message "You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!" while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message "Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!"

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly "tainted blood"...

    The key factor is not Straw's fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    It seems that at some point, about 10 years after he diligently severed the Empire to start the war with Iraq, he saw the light:

    AIPAC’s ‘unlimited’ funds are greatest obstacle to peace, former British foreign sec’y says

    http://mondoweiss.net/2013/10/unlimited-greatest-obstacle/

    UK’s Jack Straw says Israel has nuclear weapons, steals Palestinian land

    http://www.redressonline.com/2013/06/uks-jack-straw-says-israel-has-nuclear-weapons-steals-palestinian-land/

    This was 5 years ago. I wonder if he was disciplined for what he was saying in 2013.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. Biff says:
    @Ron Unz

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”
     
    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I'd guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions "how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!"

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message "You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!" while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message "Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!"

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly "tainted blood"...

    The key factor is not Straw's fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    Lots of non-Jewish Zionists in politics:
    Rumsfeld
    McCain
    Biden
    Etc….

    Read More
    • Replies: @James Brown
    "non-Jewish Zionists" ?

    means nothing.

    I presume you can also add to your list the well known war criminal Tony Blair who is a member of the church of Christ.

    The Jewish /Zionist/Anti-antisemitism question is just pure nonsense.
    Since Christians became Jewish and as it's well known, "The House of Al Saud" was always Jewish (today they don't even try to hide it anymore), one should stop this rubbish about Jewish/Zionists etc...They are just empty words to distract the proles.

    , @Svigor
    Yes, they turn the lights on and off and fetch coffee on Sabbath, too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @Anon
    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn't go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don't care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It's because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the 'white guilt' element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they'd get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It's like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It's like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes... If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and 'bourgeois' to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees 'stayin alive', a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    Not necessarily. It’s often the politically incorrect working class whites who like black popular culture the most. For example, working class white women tend to like black pop music but have little time for whinging black SJWs. Ditto for working class white teenagers who love rap. Liberal upper middle class whites pay lip service to black culture but tend to prefer music and movies produced produced by other upper middle class white liberals.

    Svigor is right, liberal white egalitarians look at the social and economic stats, and see blacks are the perennial underachievers. Hence, their intense focus on black rights.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    " whinging black SJWs"

    I've wondered about the use of the word "whinging" from time to time. Is it a colloquialism for the word "whining"?
    , @Anon
    The elites like reggae.

    In a poll, elites chose reggae as their favorite music.
    They like chillbilly calypso music for some reason.

    John Boehner's daughter married a reggae guy. Song and dong factor.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. @Achmed E. Newman
    To address the cultural stupidity related by Mr. Derbyshire more specifically:

    It's come to the point where the globalist elites have taken their masks off. They know that they can't easily be stopped at this point. They no longer have any hesitation in doing things they know will anger the average white British person. This reverence for the one murdered black kid, and the use of this idolatry to minimize the traditional culture (the new St. Stephen vs. St. George's day and Shakespeare, per your example) is just a way of rubbing their disgust for the people in their faces.

    At this point, I don't think it's even about "virtual signaling" anymore. This stuff is being done to deliberately anger the white people and to say "what are you going to do about it, prole? Speak up? Yeah, we'll put you away for a few years".

    #BritainTooFarGone
    #AmericansBuyMoreAmmo

    Elites could give a shit for minorities…or anyone, for that matter. No, minorities offer the perfect opportunity (under the infinitely flexible rubic of “justice” & “virtue”) to manipulate the political, legal & cultural foundations of western society to neuter the freedom & powers of citizens generally.
    Supported by the filth of the msm & the “education” sector they’ve been very successful.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Heros says:

    I find it amazing that there is no mention of the Kalergi plan in Cuckysure’s article, or the comments. No mention the Protocols of Zion or the Talmud for that matter. All this naval gazing while refusing to consider the openly discussed plans of the Zionists is beyond pathetic, it is downright cucky.

    What the Zionists have planned for Israel is also no secret, it is called Eretz Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates. This is the reason the Liberty was nearly sunk, and it is the reason for the PNAC Pearl Harbor on September 11, 2001. This is the reason for the never ending destruction and misery of Christian across the middle east at the hands of the Zionist armies.

    But Cuckysure lacks the intellectual curiosity to even evaluate those events because all his jewish and shabbez friends might call him an anti-semite. On Long Island and in New York, that would be a 21st century scarlet letter.

    So Cuckysure should just STFU about England being worse than the US. He has well cucked both countries.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  61. Jack Straw a hard-left extremist? Fire this writer at once. He either doesn’t know what he is talking about or is somewhere to the right of the GenghizKhan Commando of the VFW. Or, possibly, both.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    In an undercover investigation Jack Straw was on video willing to sell his services to change any law in Brussels.
    He's not cheap, in money, morally, he costs nothing.
    As far as I know he's not behind bars.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. After USA slaves were free, they had to compete in the labour market.
    They tried to stop white immigration, immigration lowers wages.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @YetAnotherAnon
    It's not weird at all. It's a highly effective marketing campaign.

    Ever heard of Kriss Donald?

    I have heard of the murder of Kriss Donald. One of his murderers was on parole for another murder at the time he and his buddies killed Kriss.

    The English media covered it up.

    Read More
    • Agree: Che Guava
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. @Ron Unz

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”
     
    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I'd guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions "how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!"

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message "You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!" while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message "Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!"

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly "tainted blood"...

    The key factor is not Straw's fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    OK, so you were wrong about Jack Straw, but your discussion of Jews and the media is right on the money, especially your last sentence. I’m amazed to see you put this out there.

    That said, most people seem resigned to this state of affairs, or at least believe that all they can do about it is write a bit about it in a blog post or comment. Not true. Every single one of you can do something about it, like 1st thing tomorrow morning. Cancel the TV portion of your cable/internet service and turn off your TV! (in either order). Don’t susbscribe to payed services of the Lyin Press print/internet! Read the news the way you want off of unz.com, VDare, ZeroHedge, and anywhere else YOU want to on the internet. It’s not 1995 anymore.

    All this complaining on the internet about big media and control thereof isn’t going to do anything. Cut off the money, and they’ll feel it. Hell, in England don’t people pay a significant tax directly to the government to be ALLOWED to get brainwashed by the Beeb on their own Telees?. I wonder what life would be like and how things would change if the Brits would forgo the Telee and hang out at the pubs again, [shudder] discussing things among themselves and shit [/shudder]. No, no, we can’t have that!

    Read More
    • Replies: @ben tillman

    OK, so you were wrong about Jack Straw . . . .
     
    Not so fast. Proof?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. @Erzincan Rich
    Jack Straw a hard-left extremist? Fire this writer at once. He either doesn't know what he is talking about or is somewhere to the right of the GenghizKhan Commando of the VFW. Or, possibly, both.

    In an undercover investigation Jack Straw was on video willing to sell his services to change any law in Brussels.
    He’s not cheap, in money, morally, he costs nothing.
    As far as I know he’s not behind bars.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Che Guava says:
    @Anon
    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn't go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don't care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It's because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the 'white guilt' element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they'd get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It's like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It's like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes... If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and 'bourgeois' to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees 'stayin alive', a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    Well, Priss, always appreciating your comments, but ask again, why always as Anon? Did your attenpts at multiple usernames force you to it?

    Sincere curiosity on that point.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Che Guava says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    What on earth is the matter with the Brits, that they have elevated this one regrettable but insignificant killing into a great holy martyrdom?
     
    Do you really want the root answer to this? Can you handle the truth? I think you can. What is the matter with the Brits is that, even though the Mother Country created the concepts of rule-of-law and not men and the like many centuries before America was born, it's people failed to keep those noble concepts enshrined in the law of the land. "Wait, whaaaa?" readers will say "what is this kook writing about 'muh constitution' and stuff for - this post is about cultural marxism?"

    Let me tell you, then. This is the root cause of what's going on in formerly-Great formerly-Britain because the British have no basic rights that can be defended. There is no such thing as free speech that can be fought for in court or even among public opinion. If the law says you can't say certain things, such as that you don't care for any of this destruction of your culture, well now it's the law, mate. How far is all this going to go, a Brit may ask? ALL! THE! WAY! because you never had a right to keep, much less bear, arms. When "they" took that away, you had nothing to fight those laws with. They were just commonsense gun laws, mate.

    The British globalist elites probably never had a plan in writing, nor even a verbally-described conspiracy to replace the English. Just like in America, they just mostly want the same thing to happen - they want the middle class white people that make associations, have discretionary income, and can think clearly, dissolved. This way, there'll be no more competition to their elite status and positions, and things can be run in a better, more-orderly 3rd-world fashion. That will enable a truly centralized global power structure. Again, it's no big conspiracy, just kinda what they all want.

    When will I answer your question, Mr. Derbyshire? Now. What's the matter with the British people is history. The question of how they feel about this business DOES NOT MATTER now. I'm sure the British people hate this cultural destruction and replacement with a passion. They just can't say anything about it without jail time. It's too late.

    The British do have basic rights, the Bill of Rights of 1689 is much of the basis of the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

    It remains legally valid, but the U.K. legal ‘profession’ for some reasons, pretends it is not.

    Unwritten constitution, the Bill of Rights and Magna Carta, other documents I do not know about *are* the bases of a written constitution, perhaps a British person, or the Derb himself, can explain to me how British law is avoiding actual laws.

    Would be appreciating.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dr. X
    The English Bill of Rights is merely a law of Parliament that can be changed at any time by a simple majority vote in the Commons.

    It's not like the U.S. Constitution, which places limits on the government itself, and cannot be changed without supermajorities in both houses of Congress and a supermajority of the states ratifying the change.

    The right to keep and bear arms was listed in the English Bill of Rights, but today the UK has got some of the most drastic gun laws in the world. They have even changed the very structure of their government by parliamentary votes -- for example, reducing the power of the monarch and of the House of Lords, and making Commons the supreme authority.

    We have a written constitution because they don't.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. @Biff
    Lots of non-Jewish Zionists in politics:
    Rumsfeld
    McCain
    Biden
    Etc....

    “non-Jewish Zionists” ?

    means nothing.

    I presume you can also add to your list the well known war criminal Tony Blair who is a member of the church of Christ.

    The Jewish /Zionist/Anti-antisemitism question is just pure nonsense.
    Since Christians became Jewish and as it’s well known, “The House of Al Saud” was always Jewish (today they don’t even try to hide it anymore), one should stop this rubbish about Jewish/Zionists etc…They are just empty words to distract the proles.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. @Diversity Heretic
    Where's Guy Fawkes when you need him?

    Could German occupation have been worse than this?

    This article ignores so many key details of this story that it has to be considered a wilful misrepresentation of the facts.

    Those described as ‘roughs’ are linked directly to an underworld boss who paid money to officers of the MPS.

    The police used undercovers to infiltrate the Lawrence family campaign, gathering personal information from them that was used to discredit them.

    Without pressure from right-wing newspaper, The Mail, it is highly unlikely anything like justice would have been achieved.

    That Stephen Lawrence has become a powerful symbol owes much to the dignity of his parents campaign for justice; if only John Derbyshire exhibited a shred of such dignity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James Brown
    "Without pressure from right-wing newspaper, The Mail, it is highly unlikely anything like justice would have been achieved."

    By now, you should know that those who own right wing/left wing newspapers are not interested in "justice" but just in selling papers. The Mail used to support Hitler. Now they are very busy supporting the slaughter of Syrian people in the name of ..."justice".
    I'm afraid they just used this "cause célèbre" to make money while pretending that they are against racism. Bunch of hypocrites!

    "That Stephen Lawrence has become a powerful symbol owes much to the dignity of his parents campaign for justice if only John Derbyshire exhibited a shred of such dignity."

    "Powerful symbol" because they were transformed by the same forces that are now killing thousands of "colored people" in the ME in the name of "democracy...
    If Lawrence's Parents weren't naîve they wouldn't have allowed that happen and Doreen Lawrence wouldn't be sitting in the House of Lords. She is just an empty symbol.
    Were she wise, she wouldn't want nothing with The Establishment.

    You're free to agree/disagree with Mr Derbyshire but you should not attack the man because you disagree with what he wrote.

    , @Mr. Anon
    Assuming what you say is true - and I have no reason to believe you - was it worth overturning the protection against Double Jeopardy? Does that sound like a good bargain to you?
    , @ben tillman

    This article ignores so many key details of this story that it has to be considered a wilful misrepresentation of the facts.
     
    None of the details are relevant, you malevolent moron. No details could justify the beatification of a foreigner for the purpose of exterminating the natives.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Che Guava says:

    Replying to myself to say that I do know of the separation of Scottish and English-Welsh law, but also know that Scotland had a *very* similar docunend to the England-Wales Bill of Rights, passed in the same timeframe.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  71. pyrrhus says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    Where's Guy Fawkes when you need him?

    Could German occupation have been worse than this?

    Ukistan is rapidly becoming an Orwellian insane asylum…Doing away with the common law prohibition against double jeopardy?
    And Derb, murder may be an awful thing, but it’s common as dirt in the third world, which England is rapidly becoming…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Che Guava says:

    No, you are wrong about Blair (and much more).

    However, I had an Irhsh friend (who likely ran off to marry another friend’s wife, so vanished). He gave me a good riddle. ‘Why did Anthony Blair convert to Catholicism?’

    I was attempting one or two replies from Ss. Augistine and Aquinas.

    He was giving me some credit for those, but his answer was much simpler (and, of necessity, paraphrased below, his words were better).

    ‘The Cathnlic Church offers the sacrament of confession, penance, and absolution.
    So, Blair knew that he had comitted hideous crimes, but knew the only place he could receive absolution was as a Catholic.’

    I am still thinking that my friend was making a very apt point. As for the hysteria in your own comment, part valid and of interest, part the opposite.

    To the mods, I deleted my incomplete version of this post well .within the timeout time (cut, save blank, say ‘yes’to ‘Do you wish to delete this post,?’, surprised to see it up.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu

    ‘The Cathnlic Church offers the sacrament of confession, penance, and absolution.
    So, Blair knew that he had comitted hideous crimes, but knew the only place he could receive absolution was as a Catholic.’
     
    It would be nice if true. Did he change his ways? Did he stop selling his services to the Powers of Darkness? Any signs of contrition?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. @jason kennedy
    This article ignores so many key details of this story that it has to be considered a wilful misrepresentation of the facts.

    Those described as 'roughs' are linked directly to an underworld boss who paid money to officers of the MPS.

    The police used undercovers to infiltrate the Lawrence family campaign, gathering personal information from them that was used to discredit them.

    Without pressure from right-wing newspaper, The Mail, it is highly unlikely anything like justice would have been achieved.

    That Stephen Lawrence has become a powerful symbol owes much to the dignity of his parents campaign for justice; if only John Derbyshire exhibited a shred of such dignity.

    “Without pressure from right-wing newspaper, The Mail, it is highly unlikely anything like justice would have been achieved.”

    By now, you should know that those who own right wing/left wing newspapers are not interested in “justice” but just in selling papers. The Mail used to support Hitler. Now they are very busy supporting the slaughter of Syrian people in the name of …”justice”.
    I’m afraid they just used this “cause célèbre” to make money while pretending that they are against racism. Bunch of hypocrites!

    “That Stephen Lawrence has become a powerful symbol owes much to the dignity of his parents campaign for justice if only John Derbyshire exhibited a shred of such dignity.”

    “Powerful symbol” because they were transformed by the same forces that are now killing thousands of “colored people” in the ME in the name of “democracy…
    If Lawrence’s Parents weren’t naîve they wouldn’t have allowed that happen and Doreen Lawrence wouldn’t be sitting in the House of Lords. She is just an empty symbol.
    Were she wise, she wouldn’t want nothing with The Establishment.

    You’re free to agree/disagree with Mr Derbyshire but you should not attack the man because you disagree with what he wrote.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    "The Mail used to support Hitler"

    So what?


    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - fake "holocaust" historian Raul Hilberg
     
    The Schlegelberger Document:
    - http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Schlegelberger/Schlegelberger42.JPG
    says:
    "Mr Reich Minister Lammers informed me that the Führer had repeatedly declared to him that he wants to hear that the Solution of the Jewish Problem has been postponed until after the war is over. That being so, the current discussions are of purely theoretical value, in Mr Reich Minister Lammers' opinion. He will moreover take pains to ensure that, whatever else happens, no fundamental decisions are taken without his knowledge in consequence of a surprise briefing by any third party."

    - In support of the Schlegelberger Document see the Luther Memorandum:
    http://www.codoh.com/library/document/154/
    Hitler, the 'Final Solution,' and the Luther Memorandum
    A Response to Evans and Longerich

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are laughable, scientifically impossible frauds. See the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @unpc downunder
    Not necessarily. It's often the politically incorrect working class whites who like black popular culture the most. For example, working class white women tend to like black pop music but have little time for whinging black SJWs. Ditto for working class white teenagers who love rap. Liberal upper middle class whites pay lip service to black culture but tend to prefer music and movies produced produced by other upper middle class white liberals.

    Svigor is right, liberal white egalitarians look at the social and economic stats, and see blacks are the perennial underachievers. Hence, their intense focus on black rights.

    ” whinging black SJWs”

    I’ve wondered about the use of the word “whinging” from time to time. Is it a colloquialism for the word “whining”?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Dr. X says:
    @Anon
    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn't go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don't care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It's because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the 'white guilt' element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they'd get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It's like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It's like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes... If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and 'bourgeois' to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees 'stayin alive', a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes… If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and ‘bourgeois’ to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro.

    This is essentially the thesis of Norman Mailer’s essay The White Negro, published in 1957.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Dr. X says:
    @Che Guava
    The British do have basic rights, the Bill of Rights of 1689 is much of the basis of the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

    It remains legally valid, but the U.K. legal 'profession' for some reasons, pretends it is not.

    Unwritten constitution, the Bill of Rights and Magna Carta, other documents I do not know about *are* the bases of a written constitution, perhaps a British person, or the Derb himself, can explain to me how British law is avoiding actual laws.

    Would be appreciating.

    The English Bill of Rights is merely a law of Parliament that can be changed at any time by a simple majority vote in the Commons.

    It’s not like the U.S. Constitution, which places limits on the government itself, and cannot be changed without supermajorities in both houses of Congress and a supermajority of the states ratifying the change.

    The right to keep and bear arms was listed in the English Bill of Rights, but today the UK has got some of the most drastic gun laws in the world. They have even changed the very structure of their government by parliamentary votes — for example, reducing the power of the monarch and of the House of Lords, and making Commons the supreme authority.

    We have a written constitution because they don’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Alright, thank you for the reply, but I still cannot see how the old Bill of Rights for England and Wales, and the very siimilar bill in Scotland have ever been repealed, so they remain valid.

    The pretence that neither exists is simply a dirty lie( (and fictioo) on the part of lawyers and judiaiary
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. I said many years ago that we would never hear the end of this Stephen Lawrence business. I said we would wake up and go to bed hearing his name. We are going to have a Stephen Lawrence day and I have no doubt that he will soon be beatified by the Catholic Church. All they need is a miracle and a petition in order to make him a saint. I think the miracle will be when someone manages to walk from one end of Brixton to the other without being mugged by a black man.

    Read More
    • Replies: @europeasant
    "I said many years ago that we would never hear the end of this Stephen Lawrence business. I said we would wake up and go to bed hearing his name"

    We never hear the end of the Emmett Till business. Meanwhile negro crime is nonstop. The latest is the surge of negro carjacking.
    , @Curtis Mouser I
    An outrageous racist slur. I've never been mugged in Brixton. Then again I haven't made it from one end of the High Street to t'other w/o being offered drugs by our melanin enriched betters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. There is no such thing nowadays as “Anglo-Saxon law”! The prohibition of double jeopardy is part of the Common Law, which was introduced by the Normans after their conquest of England in 1066 as a means of consolidating their hold on the country. Britannica defines Anglo-Saxon law as “the body of legal principles that prevailed in England from the 6th century until the Norman Conquest”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  79. KenH says:

    My point here is not to belittle Stephen Lawrence, who seems to have been an amiable and well-behaved young man.

    Stop clutching your pearls, Derb. Who cares about Stephen Lawrence? I’ll guarantee Jamaicans, Africans or Muslims don’t give a rip when one of their own commits an unprovoked act of violence against native white Brits. Only whites get sentimental which is an Achilles heel in a multiracial society.

    …..and recommending that ancient English rights to freedom of speech and assembly be curtailed—further curtailed, as Race Relations Acts of the 1960s and 1970s had already left traditional rights and liberties severely reduced.

    And what has trashing our freedom of speech, expression and assembly rights to curry favor with non-white invaders gained us in terms of better race relations? Nothing and things are actually worse. Not only that but the endless virtue signaling and self repression just sends a message that whites are weak and non-whites correctly divine that they have power over us and therefore will keep demanding more and more sometimes threatening or engaging in violence to obtain what they want.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef

    Stop clutching your pearls, Derb. Who cares about Stephen Lawrence? I’ll guarantee Jamaicans, Africans or Muslims don’t give a rip when one of their own commits an unprovoked act of violence against native white Brits. Only whites get sentimental which is an Achilles heel in a multiracial society.
     
    In all my vast urban living experience, the above statement is generally true (with the exception of church going elderly black ladies, who are sympathetic to any victim of violence, no matter what the race; however they are the rare exception, and definitely not the rule). Non Black victims of afro american unprovoked violence is the real inconvenient truth that limo libs, leftist progs, elites, and anarchos, really want to ignore.

    And it is very easy for them to ignore it because they are not routinely confronted with this existential threat to their lives (& property). But one day they will not have a choice, when afro home invasion incursions increase in cupcake suburbia; then welcome to the party boys (and when this happens, you cupcake afro worshipers will get as much sympathy from me as you gave to us working class Whites living in the rustbelt/boswash cities: none. May you reap what you sow).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. One perspective that is never raised in polite society is whether Lawrence’s murder was the random, unprovoked killing that it’s been portrayed as. Lawrence – who came, it seems, from a respectable two-parent family and had no criminal record – was in the company of Duwayne Brooks, and Brooks’ behaviour when the police arrived on the scene that night was certainly curious, not to say suspicious, and appears to have weighed heavily with the police at the time. Did Brooks or even Lawrence have any prior connection – drug dealing being the obvious candidate – with one or more members of the gang that attacked Lawrence?

    That Brooks – despite various run-ins with the law since that time – has been awarded the title of OBE is a fitting postscript to the whole unsavoury affair.

    Read More
    • Replies: @bookish1
    In the same line of thought what about all those blacks who were hung by ropes in the U.S. and that they are making a memorial to all those poor victims. But how many of them were hung because they killed someone, raped a white women, continuously presented themselves as a threat to whites and made life unbearable for white society on some way? I would say the better than 90% of those blacks that hung were hung for a reason that the MSM never mentions.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Dear Mr. Derbyshire,

    You probably saw this in the news already, but…

    Chinaperson http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=37923

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  82. @YetAnotherAnon
    It's not weird at all. It's a highly effective marketing campaign.

    Ever heard of Kriss Donald?

    I hadn’t heard of him, so thanks for that. The Wiki article is mealy-mouthed as always. Complaints about the murder of white people always bring down accusations of ‘inciting racial tensions’, and any murder of black people is evidence of enduring racism. Journalists are pure scum.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. joef says:
    @KenH

    My point here is not to belittle Stephen Lawrence, who seems to have been an amiable and well-behaved young man.
     
    Stop clutching your pearls, Derb. Who cares about Stephen Lawrence? I'll guarantee Jamaicans, Africans or Muslims don't give a rip when one of their own commits an unprovoked act of violence against native white Brits. Only whites get sentimental which is an Achilles heel in a multiracial society.

    .....and recommending that ancient English rights to freedom of speech and assembly be curtailed—further curtailed, as Race Relations Acts of the 1960s and 1970s had already left traditional rights and liberties severely reduced.
     
    And what has trashing our freedom of speech, expression and assembly rights to curry favor with non-white invaders gained us in terms of better race relations? Nothing and things are actually worse. Not only that but the endless virtue signaling and self repression just sends a message that whites are weak and non-whites correctly divine that they have power over us and therefore will keep demanding more and more sometimes threatening or engaging in violence to obtain what they want.

    Stop clutching your pearls, Derb. Who cares about Stephen Lawrence? I’ll guarantee Jamaicans, Africans or Muslims don’t give a rip when one of their own commits an unprovoked act of violence against native white Brits. Only whites get sentimental which is an Achilles heel in a multiracial society.

    In all my vast urban living experience, the above statement is generally true (with the exception of church going elderly black ladies, who are sympathetic to any victim of violence, no matter what the race; however they are the rare exception, and definitely not the rule). Non Black victims of afro american unprovoked violence is the real inconvenient truth that limo libs, leftist progs, elites, and anarchos, really want to ignore.

    And it is very easy for them to ignore it because they are not routinely confronted with this existential threat to their lives (& property). But one day they will not have a choice, when afro home invasion incursions increase in cupcake suburbia; then welcome to the party boys (and when this happens, you cupcake afro worshipers will get as much sympathy from me as you gave to us working class Whites living in the rustbelt/boswash cities: none. May you reap what you sow).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. The essential thing about Black worship, and the quality that confirms it as nothing but phony sentimentality, is that there is really nothing to worship them for. When was the last time that a Black man overawed you with his intellect, or convicted you with the caliber of his moral fiber, or commanded your honor by the deep and tragic significance of his life? If you think about it honestly, you’ll probably find that this has never happened. But without a tincture of such things there is no ground for genuine veneration, let alone worship.

    Thus the full court press to manufacture such entities where they do not actually exist. The rather benign history of Black slavery is reconceptualized as one long via dolorosa. “Heroes” are made out of dumb thugs like Trayvon Martin or vile and sanctimonious hacks like MLK. And then there are the Black “intellectuals” like Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas, who are nothing but second-rate regurgitators of cranky, movement-conservative bromides.

    It is pathetic watching Whites fall all over themselves to find any reason to venerate Black people. Such displays are shameful to begin with, and doubly so when the object of veneration has no sublime qualities meriting such. So what explains this absurd Hanuman cult? Is it guilt? No, it cannot be, for there is little for White people to feel genuinely guilty about; and in any case, the emotion of guilt, whether genuine or not, has a limited shelf life. People will only feel guilty for so long before having done with it, and pseudo-religious movements based on guilt tend to wind themselves up in the course of a single generation. Should “White guilt” have been responsible for Black worship it would have dissolved itself long ago. The only constant and elemental force in human nature is the desire for power. Negrolatry is explained by pure and simple condescension.

    Nobody fauns and fusses over someone the way Whites do with Blacks unless they feel utterly superior to them—so superior that the ranking is not even in question, i.e. the way you would feel about a pet dog. If Blacks had actually been any good at anything, they would have been resented as rivals or, at best, respected as adversaries. In either case they would have been approached very differently. It is only in regard to pets that one sees such lavish displays of affection, such ironical attempts at humanization, and such shameless crowing about the benefits one has conferred. And this is all done only for power’s sake, as if to say “See how mighty I am with respect to this creature?” It has nothing to do with any attempt to objectively appraise reality. It is a dream-drama generated by, for, and within the ego of the subject.

    How far removed is such an attitude from genuine worship! Literally, as far removed as hell is from heaven. For nobody makes a pet and plaything out of the living God, the all-knowing, all-seeing, and all-powerful ground of being, Who made the world by will alone and can unmake it just as easily, Who is alone the true and fitting object of worship. Human nature rebels against the very existence of this God Who sets a limit to the free play of ego, and we must be received with grace and weaned back by mortification and penance, works of charity, obedience, suffering, and trial. Not willing to endure any of this, the majority of men go running back to their idols.

    Black worship is false religion, bastardized science, vain egotism, phony sentimentality, and hideous pretension. It ought to despised and spat upon wherever it appears. The abominations of MLK Day and Black History Month must be removed, and all altars to this despicable cult broken and left to ruin. Let the Hollywood films be burnt; let all words of Harper Lee and Maya Angelou be shredded and turned to ash. Let it all be expunged and forgotten. The generation is born even now who will do it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
    We should start with by tearing down that Temple to the Cult of Negro Veneration on the National Mall in Washington DC: the Museum of African-American History (slavery, Jim Crow, civil rights, sports, entertainment and peanut butter). But a delay is acceptable while the equally obscene Holocaust Museum is removed.
    , @Truth

    When was the last time that a Black man overawed you with his intellect, or convicted you with the caliber of his moral fiber, or commanded your honor by the deep and tragic significance of his life?
     
    "Or?" Hell, president Camacho had all three qualities in spades.
    , @Svigor
    I have tried to come up with a list of endeavors and qualities at which blacks excel whites, but horses do not excel blacks. All I have so far is basketball, defensive back, and wide receiver (opposing thumb advantage be real yo).
    , @martin2
    "The essential thing about Black worship, and the quality that confirms it as nothing but phony sentimentality, is that there is really nothing to worship them for.

    Thus the full court press to manufacture such entities where they do not actually exist. “Heroes” are made out of dumb thugs like Trayvon Martin or vile and sanctimonious hacks like MLK.

    It is pathetic watching Whites fall all over themselves to find any reason to venerate Black people. Such displays are shameful to begin with, and doubly so when the object of veneration has no sublime qualities meriting such. So what explains this absurd Hanuman cult? The only constant and elemental force in human nature is the desire for power. Negrolatry is explained by pure and simple condescension.

    Nobody fawns and fusses over someone the way Whites do with Blacks unless they feel utterly superior to them—so superior that the ranking is not even in question, i.e. the way you would feel about a pet dog. If Blacks had actually been any good at anything, they would have been resented as rivals or, at best, respected as adversaries. In either case they would have been approached very differently. It is only in regard to pets that one sees such lavish displays of affection, such ironical attempts at humanization, and such shameless crowing about the benefits one has conferred. And this is all done only for power’s sake, as if to say “See how mighty I am with respect to this creature?” It has nothing to do with any attempt to objectively appraise reality. It is a dream-drama generated by, for, and within the ego of the subject.

    Black worship is false religion, bastardized science, vain egotism, phony sentimentality, and hideous pretension. "

    I think these are very insightful observations. On a related theme, Stefan Molyneux in a video presentation touched upon one of the real reasons why many blacks have a visceral hatred of whites, which is the recognition of their own intellectual and cultural inferiority and historical irrelevance and their continual reliance on whites. People don't hate those who they regard as inferior, because inferior people make superior people feel good about themselves, but people do hate those they fear might be superior. Do someone a favour, make an enemy, as the saying goes.

    Another reason I believe - one that only applies to black women - is black women's realisation that they are very physically unattractive relative to white women. This must really hurt.

    These two psychological factors are far more likely drivers of black animosity towards whites than so-called racism, even if such prejudice existed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. Wally says:
    @James Brown
    "Without pressure from right-wing newspaper, The Mail, it is highly unlikely anything like justice would have been achieved."

    By now, you should know that those who own right wing/left wing newspapers are not interested in "justice" but just in selling papers. The Mail used to support Hitler. Now they are very busy supporting the slaughter of Syrian people in the name of ..."justice".
    I'm afraid they just used this "cause célèbre" to make money while pretending that they are against racism. Bunch of hypocrites!

    "That Stephen Lawrence has become a powerful symbol owes much to the dignity of his parents campaign for justice if only John Derbyshire exhibited a shred of such dignity."

    "Powerful symbol" because they were transformed by the same forces that are now killing thousands of "colored people" in the ME in the name of "democracy...
    If Lawrence's Parents weren't naîve they wouldn't have allowed that happen and Doreen Lawrence wouldn't be sitting in the House of Lords. She is just an empty symbol.
    Were she wise, she wouldn't want nothing with The Establishment.

    You're free to agree/disagree with Mr Derbyshire but you should not attack the man because you disagree with what he wrote.

    “The Mail used to support Hitler”

    So what?

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - fake “holocaust” historian Raul Hilberg

    The Schlegelberger Document:
    -says:
    “Mr Reich Minister Lammers informed me that the Führer had repeatedly declared to him that he wants to hear that the Solution of the Jewish Problem has been postponed until after the war is over. That being so, the current discussions are of purely theoretical value, in Mr Reich Minister Lammers’ opinion. He will moreover take pains to ensure that, whatever else happens, no fundamental decisions are taken without his knowledge in consequence of a surprise briefing by any third party.”

    - In support of the Schlegelberger Document see the Luther Memorandum:

    http://www.codoh.com/library/document/154/

    Hitler, the ‘Final Solution,’ and the Luther Memorandum
    A Response to Evans and Longerich

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are laughable, scientifically impossible frauds. See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @James Brown
    I suppose in a "free society" one should be free to support Hitler and all other mass murderers and their propagandists (The Mail, The NYT, The Guardian, BBC, CNN etc...)

    If you have no qualms with mass murderers like Hitler,and he was a mass murderer - independently of the holocaust being fake or having been transformed in an industry to blackmail the gentile-, you should be very happy because Hitler isn't dead.

    In fact, those who are not brain dead know that there is one country that has been committing more crimes than the Nazis, but she has been doing it in the name of "democracy" and "human rights".

    My suggestion to you is that one should not hate. Only the "unnatural and unloved" hate.
    Try to find people that deserve to be admired and respected. Look around you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Wally says:
    @Anon
    Because of the role of the Negro in modern British cultural imagination, black are now seen as the natural royalty. Afro-royalty or Afroyalty is becoming the new trope in not only UK but in EU. Listen to Macron speak of Eurafrica. It will lead to the Othelloing of Europe without even an Iago to mess things up. If anything, the neo-Iago is there to help the Negro go around yelling 'where da white women at?'

    It’s all quite curious.
    The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are.

    Must be how they are absurdly promoted in ‘the media’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are.

    Only 5% of the population or less is into smart stuff. How many people read serious literature? How many people read philosophy? Also, intelligence isn't very exciting to most people. While smart folks might be stimulated by listening to Gore Vidal or Chomsky, most are not. Also, most high IQ people tend to be proggy and anti-white.

    For most people, culture is about fun, thrills, and excitement. They love blockbuster movies, dumb TV shows, music videos. rap music, pornification of mainstream culture, pulp fiction, trash comedy, (look at the success of Stephen King novels and 50 SHADES OF GREY), etc.

    So, for most people, blacks are the natural royalty because black women shake their booties so lasciviously. And there is the song-and-dong factor with black men. They sing rap about 'muh dic*', and most women think about sex than ideas at most times.

    Chelsea Handler is a Jewish comedienne. She may be higher IQ and grew up with privilege, but she's a song-and-dong girl.

    https://zhiphopcleveland.com/3358992/wow-chelsea-handler-talks-about-sex-with-50-cent-why-ciara-broke-them-up/

    Anglo-Saxons are turning into Junglo-Saxons because of these factors.
    It could well be that Jewish power will be destroyed by black dongs. If Chelsea Handler is sign of future Jewishness pooterin passion, it will be junglowizc fever. It's no wonder so many Jewish guys feel dejected and go with Asian girls. But that will lead to Jewish dissipation because of yellow mellow factor. Jewish power grew from high IQ, tribalism, and chutzpah. But if future Jewish kids are yellow-mellowed, they will be obedient than pushy. Look at Sean Lennon. John Lennon had a kid with Yoko, and the result is some dork-ass kibbler. (Incidentally, Cynthia Lennon, who was dumped by John, went off with a Negro).

    Most people prefer to watch TV, movies, and listen to pop music than do heady stuff involving intelligence and ideas. More women talk about inches on puds than calculus of the universe just like most men are more interested in boob measurements than latest physics formulas about black holes.

    This is why there is a real chance of the world turning black. Blacks got all of Sub-Saharan Africa. They will take over Brazil which is already 60% black. They are the majority of Cuba. Blacks are the main idols of US and UK and France. Canada worships Negroes. Jungle Fever is promoted all over EU. Japan promotes half-black kids of black fathers. They will take over sports and will become the 'national heroes' as athletes are the biggest heroes of any nation. Then, Japanese will cheer for black heroes, and more Africans will come and have kids with Japanese women, and Japanese women will be cuck-roaches. Few yrs back, Miss Japan was black child of a black father, and she attacked Japan of being 'racist' and called for open borders. She is now the new voice of Japanese national conscience.

    In France, tons of black babies are being born, and lots from white wombs. And Macron the cuck is calling for 200 million blacks in EU to colonize white wombs.

    Now, this could be stopped with race-ism. It's obvious that nothing more destructive of civilization than black DNA. Too Many Blacks always means social breakdown: Africa, Brazil, Detroit, Baltimore, parts of London, parts of Paris, and etc.
    But, all this Afroyalty mindset has white folks worshiping blacks like the animals worship the lions as natural royalty in THE LION BLING.
    Also, white guilt about blacks have become so sacralized that it's gone universal. So, not only must the West open up to more and more Negroes but Japan too is attacked as 'racist' if it has doubts about the blessing of having too many Negroes.

    Homos and Negroes. There is a universalist cult around those two groups. All societies are expected to 'welcome', 'include', and celebrate them as special. And of course, the two groups have bee promoted mostly by Jews who seek to weaken and break down gentile(especially white and Christian) pride and defenses against globalism.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Indeed, concentrating jews in camps was seen as temporary, the final solution was bringing them to Madagascar, where Hitler wanted them to create a society on their own, without contact with the rest of the world.
    Hans Jansen, ‘Der Madagaskar Plan, Die beabsichtigte Deportation der europäischen Juden nach Madagaskar’, München 1997
    The original dutch was published, if there is an english translation I do not know.
    The writer was connected to the Wiesenthal centre in Brussels.
    Shortly after WWII the British government supported the Madagaskar solution.
    The zionist army had other ideas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    Every May when the end of the WWII is celebrated on the May 8th/9th I wonder whether it is celebrated in Madagascar. If not it should be, because if Hitler won Jewish state would be in Madagascar and Malagasis would be dealt with like Palestinians and all fishes in the Indian Ocean would soon be anti-Semitic.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. utu says:
    @Che Guava
    No, you are wrong about Blair (and much more).

    However, I had an Irhsh friend (who likely ran off to marry another friend's wife, so vanished). He gave me a good riddle. 'Why did Anthony Blair convert to Catholicism?'

    I was attempting one or two replies from Ss. Augistine and Aquinas.

    He was giving me some credit for those, but his answer was much simpler (and, of necessity, paraphrased below, his words were better).

    'The Cathnlic Church offers the sacrament of confession, penance, and absolution.
    So, Blair knew that he had comitted hideous crimes, but knew the only place he could receive absolution was as a Catholic.'

    I am still thinking that my friend was making a very apt point. As for the hysteria in your own comment, part valid and of interest, part the opposite.


    To the mods, I deleted my incomplete version of this post well .within the timeout time (cut, save blank, say 'yes'to 'Do you wish to delete this post,?', surprised to see it up.

    ‘The Cathnlic Church offers the sacrament of confession, penance, and absolution.
    So, Blair knew that he had comitted hideous crimes, but knew the only place he could receive absolution was as a Catholic.’

    It would be nice if true. Did he change his ways? Did he stop selling his services to the Powers of Darkness? Any signs of contrition?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    Thx utu, you are absnlutely correct, but am thinking that my Irish friend also was.
    , @Che Guava
    Clearly not. As I said, my Irirsh friend was, IMHO, perceptive on it.

    As an aside. Bliar was illicitly taking holy communnion many times before his catecchism and first confession.

    When in a Catholic Church, I take the Eucharist because I am baptised by what Canon Law terms 'an irregular priest', meaning one consecrated in the apostolic succession, but not spefically RC. Also have taken Catholic catechism.

    Where I know I go against Canon Law in taking the Eucharist (which, as doughy bread alone most of the time now, is a broken sacrament), is in not having done confession (in Japan, never see anyone in there), and, the key where I am in the wrong under Cath. doctrine, never taken official and ceremonial first communion.

    Even though I do not like this Pope, will probably take the latter two steps.

    Blair, on the other hand, no valid baptism, no catechism.no confession, and no first confirmation, was taking the Eucharist (I would-guess that he was careful to find a church that administers both bread and wine).

    Utu, you are absolutely correct that he has no contrition, his biz habits and customers prove it
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @German_reader

    Every black man and woman an animal.
     
    lol, you mean except those Africans who got rich by selling other Africans to Europeans. You know, without the active participation of Africans the transatlantic slave trade would never have been possible.

    lol, you mean except those Africans who got rich by selling other Africans to Europeans.

    And to Arabs. By some estimates more Africans were victims of the Islamic slave trade, albeit over a much longer period of time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Anonymous[211] • Disclaimer says:
    @David
    These are some of Derb's best 1200 words yet.

    I think the reason this particular murder has been made such an extreme justification for hating YT is that those native British youth had taken up the only viable tactic for regaining their country, even if they did it with the same level of reasoning as pits ants of different colonies against each other.

    Making Britain a hostile environment, even to the point of death, for foreign interlopers can only be done on the most granular of levels. It will be ugly and immoral if it ever happens.

    This is exactly right. This killing happened in one of the few remaining areas of London which is still overwhelmingly white working class. Strange blacks aren’t welcome there, especially after dark. This was also the only part of the city where white people organised citizen’s patrols to defend their community during the 2011 riots. (The Muslims did the same but nobody gets indignant about that.) These people are under siege, literally.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. @St Stephen of Brixton
    I said many years ago that we would never hear the end of this Stephen Lawrence business. I said we would wake up and go to bed hearing his name. We are going to have a Stephen Lawrence day and I have no doubt that he will soon be beatified by the Catholic Church. All they need is a miracle and a petition in order to make him a saint. I think the miracle will be when someone manages to walk from one end of Brixton to the other without being mugged by a black man.

    “I said many years ago that we would never hear the end of this Stephen Lawrence business. I said we would wake up and go to bed hearing his name”

    We never hear the end of the Emmett Till business. Meanwhile negro crime is nonstop. The latest is the surge of negro carjacking.

    Read More
    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    "[We'll] never hear the end of the Emmett Till business."

    Proud Mary, yet another movie about the Till business, will be released this year. And since we can't get enough black idolatry, HBO has green-lighted a mini series about Till from producer and Marina Abramovic pet Jay-Z.

    Black Panther 2: African Dawn, based on characters created by Stan Lee and the great Jack Kirby, will open in theaters May 2020.

    We're in for a real negrofest.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. utu says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Indeed, concentrating jews in camps was seen as temporary, the final solution was bringing them to Madagascar, where Hitler wanted them to create a society on their own, without contact with the rest of the world.
    Hans Jansen, ‘Der Madagaskar Plan, Die beabsichtigte Deportation der europäischen Juden nach Madagaskar’, München 1997
    The original dutch was published, if there is an english translation I do not know.
    The writer was connected to the Wiesenthal centre in Brussels.
    Shortly after WWII the British government supported the Madagaskar solution.
    The zionist army had other ideas.

    Every May when the end of the WWII is celebrated on the May 8th/9th I wonder whether it is celebrated in Madagascar. If not it should be, because if Hitler won Jewish state would be in Madagascar and Malagasis would be dealt with like Palestinians and all fishes in the Indian Ocean would soon be anti-Semitic.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. @St Stephen of Brixton
    I said many years ago that we would never hear the end of this Stephen Lawrence business. I said we would wake up and go to bed hearing his name. We are going to have a Stephen Lawrence day and I have no doubt that he will soon be beatified by the Catholic Church. All they need is a miracle and a petition in order to make him a saint. I think the miracle will be when someone manages to walk from one end of Brixton to the other without being mugged by a black man.

    An outrageous racist slur. I’ve never been mugged in Brixton. Then again I haven’t made it from one end of the High Street to t’other w/o being offered drugs by our melanin enriched betters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @europeasant
    "I said many years ago that we would never hear the end of this Stephen Lawrence business. I said we would wake up and go to bed hearing his name"

    We never hear the end of the Emmett Till business. Meanwhile negro crime is nonstop. The latest is the surge of negro carjacking.

    “[We'll] never hear the end of the Emmett Till business.”

    Proud Mary, yet another movie about the Till business, will be released this year. And since we can’t get enough black idolatry, HBO has green-lighted a mini series about Till from producer and Marina Abramovic pet Jay-Z.

    Black Panther 2: African Dawn, based on characters created by Stan Lee and the great Jack Kirby, will open in theaters May 2020.

    We’re in for a real negrofest.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    Here are true stories about "icons" of the so-called "civil rights" movement . . .

    There is much more to the "Emmett Till" story that is not widely known. Of course, killing him made him into a "martyr" of the black "civil-rights" movement. but--it is not generally known that Emmett Till was a strapping young man of about 160 lbs.--NOT a "little boy" as some media types tried to portray him as. He was a known womanizer and attempted to take his cocky "Chicago ways" in dealing with women to the Deep South. He was sent to live with relatives in the South because his Chicago relatives could not handle him. He had a "cocky attitude" and bragged about "getting it on" with white women--not a good idea in the South. . . According to published accounts, Mr. Till did not just "whistle" at a white woman, but grabbed, manhandled and fondled a married white woman. In Southern culture, this was, and still is, the ultimate form of disrespect. Despite Mr. Till's relatives' attempts to spirit him "out of town" to avoid retribution by the woman's relatives and townspeople, his cocky attitude "got in the way", similar to the way that "young master Trayvon's" attitude got him killed. Despite being given numerous "chances" to apologize for his behavior, he was defiant to the end. IF he had apologized for his behavior, he would still be alive today. In fact, one of his killers was a black man.
    It is interesting to note that Emmett Till's father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes. Maybe "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" . . .

    Rosa Parks was not the "ordinary" black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP and was "planted" in order to advance the cause of black "civil-rights" to which she was successful.
    Approximately a year previous to Rosa Parks' "bus ride" and refusal to vacate her seat, a REAL ordinary black woman did the same thing. This black woman received NO publicity or support from the NAACP or other black "civil-rights" organizations. You see, she was an unmarried black woman with children. According to the black civil-rights crowd, this would not do. They wanted someone who was "squeaky clean" without any "baggage". In fact, the "white guy" sitting behind her was part of the "set-up". He was a UPI reporter, contracted to "stage" the event...not only that, in the photo there is no one else on the bus. Ms. Parks could have sat wherever she wanted.
    Hence, Rosa Parks made (fabricated) history . . .

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he "finally felt like a white man". His own associates have stated as such. He also plagiarized his college papers and doctoral thesis. Of course, this was overlooked because of his status. King was also a communist.

    Jesse Jackson used to brag to his associates on how he would spit in the food of white patrons of the restaurant he worked at.

    There are many more fabrications of history that were used to lend "legitimacy" to the so-called "civil-rights" movement . . .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. El Dato says:
    @Dieter Kief
    Being Christian and happy in Europe is racist now

    Hungarian city makes nice white people being happy video - fails as applicant for EU-project for being too white, too Christian and too happy:

    But the EU’s jury rejected their submission and instead denounced Székesfehérvár’s debut film: “There are too many happy white people and crosses, and not enough migrants,” the jury declared.

    One of the European Union’s officials complained: “This is the propaganda film for white Christian Europe; everyone is white, happy and dancing in the streets.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSp6UBhR2k0

    Tell me it ain't real, please! - (I promise you to forget wether it is real or not in return - thank you!)

    (Video is charming!)

    Luckily, you can still do such movies about Israel.

    Otherwise, if you don’t feel the power of third-worldism and diversity rollerball in your very bones and demonstrate it daily, no wins for you (unless you are peddling retarded crap for Eurovision and/or singing about Muh Holodomur or something)

    Here is another propganda film for white Christian Europe. Amazingly it’s out of Japan:

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. We’re in for a real negrofest.

    … somebody got a gun to your head forcing you into the theater?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  97. bookish1 says:
    @Henry's Cat
    One perspective that is never raised in polite society is whether Lawrence's murder was the random, unprovoked killing that it's been portrayed as. Lawrence - who came, it seems, from a respectable two-parent family and had no criminal record - was in the company of Duwayne Brooks, and Brooks' behaviour when the police arrived on the scene that night was certainly curious, not to say suspicious, and appears to have weighed heavily with the police at the time. Did Brooks or even Lawrence have any prior connection - drug dealing being the obvious candidate - with one or more members of the gang that attacked Lawrence?

    That Brooks - despite various run-ins with the law since that time - has been awarded the title of OBE is a fitting postscript to the whole unsavoury affair.

    In the same line of thought what about all those blacks who were hung by ropes in the U.S. and that they are making a memorial to all those poor victims. But how many of them were hung because they killed someone, raped a white women, continuously presented themselves as a threat to whites and made life unbearable for white society on some way? I would say the better than 90% of those blacks that hung were hung for a reason that the MSM never mentions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    I would say the better than 90% of those blacks that hung were hung for a reason that the MSM never mentions.
     
    Practice?
    , @edward collins
    Actually most lynchings (white and black) were a function of mistrials and/or corrupt juries. Very often local whites would drag a black from the courtroom and lynch them as a way of stopping further violent acts from blacks. Lacking this deterrent effect white civilisation would have ended, just as it has today in mnay of the civil rights era towns in the american south. We imagine (thanks to relentless propaganda) that an impromptu lynching was the worst possible example of the intercommunal violence between white and blacks, but actually it was nowhere near savage enough to act as a deterrent- they literally had to burn blacks alive to get them to stop raping and murdering white children. Read the negro the southerners problems by thomas nelson page.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. Stephen Lawrence Day is a celebration that Police and organised crime can kill who they like and get away with it. As you point out, this case has been singled out by the corrupt elite, corrupt Metropolitan Police & crime bosses that they serve. I am sure pressititues in the Fake News Media know enough to bring this house of card down but they are just as corrupt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  99. @Intelligent Dasein
    The essential thing about Black worship, and the quality that confirms it as nothing but phony sentimentality, is that there is really nothing to worship them for. When was the last time that a Black man overawed you with his intellect, or convicted you with the caliber of his moral fiber, or commanded your honor by the deep and tragic significance of his life? If you think about it honestly, you'll probably find that this has never happened. But without a tincture of such things there is no ground for genuine veneration, let alone worship.

    Thus the full court press to manufacture such entities where they do not actually exist. The rather benign history of Black slavery is reconceptualized as one long via dolorosa. "Heroes" are made out of dumb thugs like Trayvon Martin or vile and sanctimonious hacks like MLK. And then there are the Black "intellectuals" like Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas, who are nothing but second-rate regurgitators of cranky, movement-conservative bromides.

    It is pathetic watching Whites fall all over themselves to find any reason to venerate Black people. Such displays are shameful to begin with, and doubly so when the object of veneration has no sublime qualities meriting such. So what explains this absurd Hanuman cult? Is it guilt? No, it cannot be, for there is little for White people to feel genuinely guilty about; and in any case, the emotion of guilt, whether genuine or not, has a limited shelf life. People will only feel guilty for so long before having done with it, and pseudo-religious movements based on guilt tend to wind themselves up in the course of a single generation. Should "White guilt" have been responsible for Black worship it would have dissolved itself long ago. The only constant and elemental force in human nature is the desire for power. Negrolatry is explained by pure and simple condescension.

    Nobody fauns and fusses over someone the way Whites do with Blacks unless they feel utterly superior to them---so superior that the ranking is not even in question, i.e. the way you would feel about a pet dog. If Blacks had actually been any good at anything, they would have been resented as rivals or, at best, respected as adversaries. In either case they would have been approached very differently. It is only in regard to pets that one sees such lavish displays of affection, such ironical attempts at humanization, and such shameless crowing about the benefits one has conferred. And this is all done only for power's sake, as if to say "See how mighty I am with respect to this creature?" It has nothing to do with any attempt to objectively appraise reality. It is a dream-drama generated by, for, and within the ego of the subject.

    How far removed is such an attitude from genuine worship! Literally, as far removed as hell is from heaven. For nobody makes a pet and plaything out of the living God, the all-knowing, all-seeing, and all-powerful ground of being, Who made the world by will alone and can unmake it just as easily, Who is alone the true and fitting object of worship. Human nature rebels against the very existence of this God Who sets a limit to the free play of ego, and we must be received with grace and weaned back by mortification and penance, works of charity, obedience, suffering, and trial. Not willing to endure any of this, the majority of men go running back to their idols.

    Black worship is false religion, bastardized science, vain egotism, phony sentimentality, and hideous pretension. It ought to despised and spat upon wherever it appears. The abominations of MLK Day and Black History Month must be removed, and all altars to this despicable cult broken and left to ruin. Let the Hollywood films be burnt; let all words of Harper Lee and Maya Angelou be shredded and turned to ash. Let it all be expunged and forgotten. The generation is born even now who will do it.

    We should start with by tearing down that Temple to the Cult of Negro Veneration on the National Mall in Washington DC: the Museum of African-American History (slavery, Jim Crow, civil rights, sports, entertainment and peanut butter). But a delay is acceptable while the equally obscene Holocaust Museum is removed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    We should start with by tearing down that Temple to the Cult of Negro Veneration on the National Mall in Washington DC
     
    Dude, I'm kinda partial to the Lincoln Monument...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Excal says:

    For those who want to do something about all this madness, don’t forget Rosary on the Coast UK was today: https://www.facebook.com/rosaryonthecoast/

    If you couldn’t actually be on a UK beach, you can still say one wherever you are — day’s not over everywhere yet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  101. anarchyst says:
    @SunBakedSuburb
    "[We'll] never hear the end of the Emmett Till business."

    Proud Mary, yet another movie about the Till business, will be released this year. And since we can't get enough black idolatry, HBO has green-lighted a mini series about Till from producer and Marina Abramovic pet Jay-Z.

    Black Panther 2: African Dawn, based on characters created by Stan Lee and the great Jack Kirby, will open in theaters May 2020.

    We're in for a real negrofest.

    Here are true stories about “icons” of the so-called “civil rights” movement . . .

    There is much more to the “Emmett Till” story that is not widely known. Of course, killing him made him into a “martyr” of the black “civil-rights” movement. but–it is not generally known that Emmett Till was a strapping young man of about 160 lbs.–NOT a “little boy” as some media types tried to portray him as. He was a known womanizer and attempted to take his cocky “Chicago ways” in dealing with women to the Deep South. He was sent to live with relatives in the South because his Chicago relatives could not handle him. He had a “cocky attitude” and bragged about “getting it on” with white women–not a good idea in the South. . . According to published accounts, Mr. Till did not just “whistle” at a white woman, but grabbed, manhandled and fondled a married white woman. In Southern culture, this was, and still is, the ultimate form of disrespect. Despite Mr. Till’s relatives’ attempts to spirit him “out of town” to avoid retribution by the woman’s relatives and townspeople, his cocky attitude “got in the way”, similar to the way that “young master Trayvon’s” attitude got him killed. Despite being given numerous “chances” to apologize for his behavior, he was defiant to the end. IF he had apologized for his behavior, he would still be alive today. In fact, one of his killers was a black man.
    It is interesting to note that Emmett Till’s father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes. Maybe “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree” . . .

    Rosa Parks was not the “ordinary” black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP and was “planted” in order to advance the cause of black “civil-rights” to which she was successful.
    Approximately a year previous to Rosa Parks’ “bus ride” and refusal to vacate her seat, a REAL ordinary black woman did the same thing. This black woman received NO publicity or support from the NAACP or other black “civil-rights” organizations. You see, she was an unmarried black woman with children. According to the black civil-rights crowd, this would not do. They wanted someone who was “squeaky clean” without any “baggage”. In fact, the “white guy” sitting behind her was part of the “set-up”. He was a UPI reporter, contracted to “stage” the event…not only that, in the photo there is no one else on the bus. Ms. Parks could have sat wherever she wanted.
    Hence, Rosa Parks made (fabricated) history . . .

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he “finally felt like a white man”. His own associates have stated as such. He also plagiarized his college papers and doctoral thesis. Of course, this was overlooked because of his status. King was also a communist.

    Jesse Jackson used to brag to his associates on how he would spit in the food of white patrons of the restaurant he worked at.

    There are many more fabrications of history that were used to lend “legitimacy” to the so-called “civil-rights” movement . . .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth



    There is much more to the “Emmett Till” story that is not widely known.
     
    Please, share with us your "insider" knowledge, J. Edgar.
    , @KenH

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he “finally felt like a white man”.
     
    I believe during a sex orgy with prostitutes, 1-2 of whom were white, saint Martin was on tape exclaiming "I ain't no nigga tonight". Since he said the N word and was a known wife beater. prostitute abuser, philanderer and probable communist, all statues of MLK must be removed from public spaces immediately as well as repealing his holiday.

    It's time to go nuclear on the plastic gods of the left just like they do to any historical figure associated with the pre-cult Marxist America.
    , @Jonathan Mason

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he “finally felt like a white man”. His own associates have stated as such. He also plagiarized his college papers and doctoral thesis. Of course, this was overlooked because of his status.
     
    Sounds like he might qualify posthumously as a Kennedy.

    He may have been well-known for frequenting prostitutes (Jesus got the same rap), but he is much better known as a civil rights leader.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”
     
    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I'd guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions "how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!"

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message "You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!" while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message "Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!"

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly "tainted blood"...

    The key factor is not Straw's fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    The key factor is not Straw’s fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    Indeed. That is the problem.

    Control by any one ethnic group over such things cannot be good for any so called free society as it will become unbalanced.

    Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. Mr. Anon says:
    @jason kennedy
    This article ignores so many key details of this story that it has to be considered a wilful misrepresentation of the facts.

    Those described as 'roughs' are linked directly to an underworld boss who paid money to officers of the MPS.

    The police used undercovers to infiltrate the Lawrence family campaign, gathering personal information from them that was used to discredit them.

    Without pressure from right-wing newspaper, The Mail, it is highly unlikely anything like justice would have been achieved.

    That Stephen Lawrence has become a powerful symbol owes much to the dignity of his parents campaign for justice; if only John Derbyshire exhibited a shred of such dignity.

    Assuming what you say is true – and I have no reason to believe you – was it worth overturning the protection against Double Jeopardy? Does that sound like a good bargain to you?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Now grasshopper, I can't speak for the above gentleman, but from where I sit; if one more Knee-Grow goes to the electric chair every 20 years, I would say

    Hay'ell Yeah!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @Dieter Kief
    Oh thanks Achmed - your Greatful-Dead clip cheered me up!

    The "Moslem-mom" is a statue of an old catholic women in the Danube-Swabian garb. - But how would beaurocrats in Brussels know anyways, so in the final end, you might as well be right.

    (I thought that the sports-teacher's shorts and legs and the way she moved her hips and all - were just too good. People can't stand it, if others, especially those in backward places - know how to move... and to live.

    I've sat at the sunny terrace of the best hotel in town with a friend today, and we tried to get to grips with what's going on in the world, while having a glimpse at the Lake of Constance and the Austrian and Swiss Alps - just shimmering through the haze.

    This hotel is owned by one of the three best breweries in southern Badenia - Rothaus, which is highly profitable, btw., creates lots of good jobs in the Black Forest and - tatatataaaaa: Is owned by the Badenian people! - Don't tell this story to the hard-core free traders at unz.com, hehe!

    (In this hotel was once an influential monastery of the Dominican brothers. Best writer ever in Constance lived there from 1310 to 1340 appr. - Heinrich Seuse. His motto: Keep going (do things) - but don't you ever worry, wether what you did create was good enough, because God takes care of this part of the story (= don't you ever bother being judged by your fellow humans humans!).

    Seuse was good hearted and very well educated - most prominently by Meister Eckhart (Erich Fromm referred to him - and adored him - quite a lot), who had come to Cologne and Strasbourg via Paris, and Seuse was an incredibly good writer - he invented (=created) quite a chunk of the German language we use today...) - as I now come to think of: I've tried to explain this to T. C. Boyle, who was here a few months back. - Have no idea wether I succeeded. Apropos Greatful Dead and T. C. Boyle: Boyle mentioned, that he had just finished a novel about LSD - and of course he knew about chemist Albert Hofmann from Basel, who discovered this drug. Unfortunately, Boyle knew nothing about the writer Ernst Jünger ("Drugs and Being High" maybe in English - in German: Drogen und Rausch, great book!). That's a pity, because Jünger was the closest intellectual friend of Hofman and was very good at bringing drug experiences into words without sounding silly (which I think is the hardest part of it...).
    And Jünger has taken just any drug - which might have been a reason for his sudden death at the age of - - - 102 (hehe again....).

    Jackson Browne stayed at this hotel too for some sunny days - and loved it a lot! - His Constance-concert with his great band of at least six musicians was one of the best I've ever - - experienced (last hehe).

    So when I say I sailed to Switzerland and back, you would understand.

    Unz is getting the good vibe that carried Taki’s until the British libel lawyers (guessing) killed the comments section. Comments delayed are comments denied. And comments moderated are…

    I’m missing some important details, but I have a German widow friend who says “officials” are pressuring her (or her landlord) to vacate her large flat to turn the place over to immigrants.
    Is this happening?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dieter Kief

    a German widow friend who says “officials” are pressuring her (or her landlord) to vacate her large flat to turn the place over to immigrants.
    Is this happening?
     
    No.


    (There are quite a few home-owners - of run down old hotles, say - who make quite some bucks in the florishing immigrant business. As a matter of fact, this whole affair has lots of crazy outcomes. One I've heard from a friend about a friend of ours last friday: He owned such a place, a run down ex-sanatorium, and wanted to sell it, but nobody wanted to by it. He then told the (conservative) mayor, he would turn this old house into a refugee shelter, and became a a very good offer by the community, which bought the place and tore it down right away. Ah - they believed him, because he is well known for being the leftist radical in this community since 1969... - - All is, as it ever was there: He is still the radical leftist, and the villigers are still the Swabian right wingers, that they always were...It's just that you wouldn't understand at all, what went on there, if you wouldn't see, that what really happened was something else than what you would might have come to believe now...(Ahh, my leftist friend: Did he really want to build an asylum for the immigrants there? No. But he did know, how powerful his image still is, and it turned out, that he was right, and that that was enough...).

    , @anonymous
    The comments at Taki's, like those at ZeroHedge, had become pretty trashy, dominated by witless obsessives who eventually drove off those with something worthwhile to say. Cf., the warning given to "Thomm" in this thread.

    I suspect that the website owners decided to pull the plug out of embarrassment.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  106. Anon[811] • Disclaimer says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    What on earth is the matter with the Brits, that they have elevated this one regrettable but insignificant killing into a great holy martyrdom?
     
    Do you really want the root answer to this? Can you handle the truth? I think you can. What is the matter with the Brits is that, even though the Mother Country created the concepts of rule-of-law and not men and the like many centuries before America was born, it's people failed to keep those noble concepts enshrined in the law of the land. "Wait, whaaaa?" readers will say "what is this kook writing about 'muh constitution' and stuff for - this post is about cultural marxism?"

    Let me tell you, then. This is the root cause of what's going on in formerly-Great formerly-Britain because the British have no basic rights that can be defended. There is no such thing as free speech that can be fought for in court or even among public opinion. If the law says you can't say certain things, such as that you don't care for any of this destruction of your culture, well now it's the law, mate. How far is all this going to go, a Brit may ask? ALL! THE! WAY! because you never had a right to keep, much less bear, arms. When "they" took that away, you had nothing to fight those laws with. They were just commonsense gun laws, mate.

    The British globalist elites probably never had a plan in writing, nor even a verbally-described conspiracy to replace the English. Just like in America, they just mostly want the same thing to happen - they want the middle class white people that make associations, have discretionary income, and can think clearly, dissolved. This way, there'll be no more competition to their elite status and positions, and things can be run in a better, more-orderly 3rd-world fashion. That will enable a truly centralized global power structure. Again, it's no big conspiracy, just kinda what they all want.

    When will I answer your question, Mr. Derbyshire? Now. What's the matter with the British people is history. The question of how they feel about this business DOES NOT MATTER now. I'm sure the British people hate this cultural destruction and replacement with a passion. They just can't say anything about it without jail time. It's too late.

    Oh, baloney. The old Jewish trick, “Rely, goyim, on the Sacred Writings!” Of course, said SW’s need to interpreted, right? See how much “protection” you get from muh Constitution with a SCOTUS full of Ginzboigs and wise Latinas.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  107. Che Guava says:
    @utu

    ‘The Cathnlic Church offers the sacrament of confession, penance, and absolution.
    So, Blair knew that he had comitted hideous crimes, but knew the only place he could receive absolution was as a Catholic.’
     
    It would be nice if true. Did he change his ways? Did he stop selling his services to the Powers of Darkness? Any signs of contrition?

    Thx utu, you are absnlutely correct, but am thinking that my Irish friend also was.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. Truth says:
    @YetAnotherAnon
    It's not weird at all. It's a highly effective marketing campaign.

    Ever heard of Kriss Donald?

    Kriss Donald?

    Yeah he’s one of these dudes, isn’t he?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Them Guys says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    What on earth is the matter with the Brits, that they have elevated this one regrettable but insignificant killing into a great holy martyrdom?
     
    Do you really want the root answer to this? Can you handle the truth? I think you can. What is the matter with the Brits is that, even though the Mother Country created the concepts of rule-of-law and not men and the like many centuries before America was born, it's people failed to keep those noble concepts enshrined in the law of the land. "Wait, whaaaa?" readers will say "what is this kook writing about 'muh constitution' and stuff for - this post is about cultural marxism?"

    Let me tell you, then. This is the root cause of what's going on in formerly-Great formerly-Britain because the British have no basic rights that can be defended. There is no such thing as free speech that can be fought for in court or even among public opinion. If the law says you can't say certain things, such as that you don't care for any of this destruction of your culture, well now it's the law, mate. How far is all this going to go, a Brit may ask? ALL! THE! WAY! because you never had a right to keep, much less bear, arms. When "they" took that away, you had nothing to fight those laws with. They were just commonsense gun laws, mate.

    The British globalist elites probably never had a plan in writing, nor even a verbally-described conspiracy to replace the English. Just like in America, they just mostly want the same thing to happen - they want the middle class white people that make associations, have discretionary income, and can think clearly, dissolved. This way, there'll be no more competition to their elite status and positions, and things can be run in a better, more-orderly 3rd-world fashion. That will enable a truly centralized global power structure. Again, it's no big conspiracy, just kinda what they all want.

    When will I answer your question, Mr. Derbyshire? Now. What's the matter with the British people is history. The question of how they feel about this business DOES NOT MATTER now. I'm sure the British people hate this cultural destruction and replacement with a passion. They just can't say anything about it without jail time. It's too late.

    Now it makes more sense as to why is that younger prince marrying a 1/2 porto rican negress and 1/2 jewess, semi good looking, woman eh.

    Also as per a tv preacher show I saw once about 10-15 yrs ago. The british-israel “Herbert Armstronger” cult leader, since Herbert died. Showed actual sheep skin papyrus docs that are supposed to prove beyond all doubt, that the queen and royals are all jewish and decend from Both sides of the orig Judah of tribe of same name.

    It seems like quite a lot of what we see going on the past 100 yrs in usa and longer yet in uk and eu nations. Is that these major judiazering apostate cult preachers are hard at work preaching almost entirely on OT biblical “Prophetic” events….Then hard at work convinceing their eu-uk-usa-flocks of fellow apostates aka them what fall for being Judaized and are also ziochristians.

    To believe all that pertained as curses and warnings to ONLY the orig 12 tribes of Israel, and ONLY while they still Had a covenant with God. Which they lost 2000 yrs ago.

    Are Now happening in full biblical order as orig written in Leviticus and Deuteronomy as well as the major OT propehts….All because todays Christianity is supposed to work towards a JWO where jewry heads the world, yet will allow “Certain” apostate various denoms of pastors to be thee world rulership on behalf of international ziojewry!

    Every sunday Two main themes are taught on that preacher show on Talmudvision aka that electronic rabbi in your homes.

    On theme is that the cults founder Mr. Armstrong was correct when he himself declared himself to actually be….THE Modern day Re-birth of the ancient prophet Elishia!!!!

    NO foolin!,,,He really said and believed he was Elishia in the flesh and that as such he had to be born and outed as the Real orig Prophet Elishia….Before….Jesus can ever return!

    He had over 8-Million apostates as followers globally and was quite famous for hob knobing with most every global leader and especially those related to England.

    He insisted that that old wooden chair in a british museum, which was used as a Throne to coronate Prince Charles( diannas hubby, is that his name I think?)…

    And an entire “Gospel” surrounding that chair with a huge stone embedded under it as “Jacobs Stone” aka Jacobs Pillow stone used to rest his head on while he slept and had that Dream called, “Jacobs Ladder” etc.

    S0, all That gives the queen and british royals the Right to Davids Biblical Throne as a “Son of David” given a right to rule all 12 tribes plus rule entire world when the “Time is Right”.

    And, theme#2= that all those OT curses such as “Go from being the Lender, to being the Borrower” and having Women leaders etc, and “The Least(negroes?) among you, shall Rise Above you and take over”

    And all the rest of too many to list here biblical curses written to befall Israels 12 tribes, then after their split, to befall the two tibes of Judah & Benjamin aka “The Southern nation of Judah” after the 10 Northern tribes were taken captive….

    All we see occure Bad for western nations and white folks, especially USA & UK….Are because We are being punished for not going along with the JWO/NWO agendas etc..

    They teach that Britian and America are modern day Israel tribes of Ephraim(Brits) and Manasseah (America)…..Therefore we are being punished by the very bible OT curses as modern day “Israelites” for Not strictly obeying old testement rules etc as written…Especially in those two “Law/Rules’ books prior named.

    Sounds to me like perhaps events today and for a long time now are being Engineered and Caused to happen as close as possible to OT events prophesied to happen, then hundreds of apostate pastors go on TV-Talmudvision each week and even every Day!….With mucho fear and awe while telling the zio christo whacko judiazed cultists “LOOK FOLKS!

    Gods prophesies are Happening! Why Just last week….This or that and more to come folks”

    Then as remedy thay always spew some form of state of israel/jewry worship so the curses wil stop and gods blessings can return….EeeeeeHaaaaaa!….So Send that Cash donation to Me Passda Loot at judiazering central, 666-apostate lane, Austin TX or Jerry Fallwall Mountain lands…

    Or send cash direct to the King of judiazering apostate leaders in usa…Haggee!

    And all it took to warp these foolish preachermen, besides their blasphemous scofield biblies, was for Israel state and several huge jewish orgs in america, to Donate a Free Lear Jet to Both Fallwell and Hagee…..Plus enough Cash to buy 1/2 dozen $10 million mansions for pastor and each of 4-5 kids to reside in eh!

    But worst of all I think is them armstrongers and their “British-Israelism” beliefs.

    And it is Only the Main White folk nations this pertains to, usa-brits-canada-NZ-Aussies-etc but NOT to include Germany!( they constantly berate germans and give hollywood and ADL a run for the money when it comes to promoting the evil nazis and hollyHoax agendas).

    This is so wrong on so many counts it aint even funny….Yet in one way or another, most every zio christian church today teaches these issues.

    All we hear now is armegeddon and prophesy happening Daily by these same folks eh. And most all they believe or promote revolves around abject jew worship period…Most refuse to admit it. But many awake ones See it eh.

    Basically allowing selves to split into many hundreds of denominations, where each Pastor is his Own Pope and expert bible interpreter….and becoming more judiaized than most jews are is taking the entire world towards a terrible WWIII-Nukes senario so to make it possible for Edomites poseing as “jews” aka khazars, to Own and Rule a fully kommie Bolshevik world.

    With Zero euro whiteys left, but for perhaps a small few willing to Serve as a slave to jewry.

    And nobody nor nothing is able to even get these apostate fools to at least consider reading or viewing anything contrary to their warped ideals…Indeed they’ve become like real jews, a stiff necked and stuborn bunch akin to satans own children.

    I believe all this mostly recent promotions of africans as objects of guilted whiteys worship and related PC crapolas is a Direct effect of braindead apostate, so called christian, nation leaders forcing a fullfilment of old testement prophecy, while actually believing they will be royally blessed by God for doing….EVILNESS Globally and totally wrecking their own countires!

    Dare to mention these things, and they with instant kneejerk reaction like trained circus animals, Jump up and scream antisemite and racist evil nazis at you for dareing to awaken them.

    Them which wish to join the apostates can do so easy…Just ignore aprox 1/2 to 2/3rds of entire old testement, and aprox 90%+ ignore New Testement and wallah! You too can get so damn fucking judiaized and worship jewry & israel state till they reveal their soon to arrive jewish antichrist man as real jwo ruler king…..

    Or…Check out their protocols and talmud books and awaken to reality eh.

    No wonder they been booted out of every country they ever infiltrated eh. Help trump MAGA By makeing usa nation#110 and Never Again!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. @willieskull68
    So when I say I sailed to Switzerland and back, you would understand.

    Unz is getting the good vibe that carried Taki's until the British libel lawyers (guessing) killed the comments section. Comments delayed are comments denied. And comments moderated are...

    I'm missing some important details, but I have a German widow friend who says "officials" are pressuring her (or her landlord) to vacate her large flat to turn the place over to immigrants.
    Is this happening?

    a German widow friend who says “officials” are pressuring her (or her landlord) to vacate her large flat to turn the place over to immigrants.
    Is this happening?

    No.

    (There are quite a few home-owners – of run down old hotles, say – who make quite some bucks in the florishing immigrant business. As a matter of fact, this whole affair has lots of crazy outcomes. One I’ve heard from a friend about a friend of ours last friday: He owned such a place, a run down ex-sanatorium, and wanted to sell it, but nobody wanted to by it. He then told the (conservative) mayor, he would turn this old house into a refugee shelter, and became a a very good offer by the community, which bought the place and tore it down right away. Ah – they believed him, because he is well known for being the leftist radical in this community since 1969… – – All is, as it ever was there: He is still the radical leftist, and the villigers are still the Swabian right wingers, that they always were…It’s just that you wouldn’t understand at all, what went on there, if you wouldn’t see, that what really happened was something else than what you would might have come to believe now…(Ahh, my leftist friend: Did he really want to build an asylum for the immigrants there? No. But he did know, how powerful his image still is, and it turned out, that he was right, and that that was enough…).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Truth says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    The essential thing about Black worship, and the quality that confirms it as nothing but phony sentimentality, is that there is really nothing to worship them for. When was the last time that a Black man overawed you with his intellect, or convicted you with the caliber of his moral fiber, or commanded your honor by the deep and tragic significance of his life? If you think about it honestly, you'll probably find that this has never happened. But without a tincture of such things there is no ground for genuine veneration, let alone worship.

    Thus the full court press to manufacture such entities where they do not actually exist. The rather benign history of Black slavery is reconceptualized as one long via dolorosa. "Heroes" are made out of dumb thugs like Trayvon Martin or vile and sanctimonious hacks like MLK. And then there are the Black "intellectuals" like Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas, who are nothing but second-rate regurgitators of cranky, movement-conservative bromides.

    It is pathetic watching Whites fall all over themselves to find any reason to venerate Black people. Such displays are shameful to begin with, and doubly so when the object of veneration has no sublime qualities meriting such. So what explains this absurd Hanuman cult? Is it guilt? No, it cannot be, for there is little for White people to feel genuinely guilty about; and in any case, the emotion of guilt, whether genuine or not, has a limited shelf life. People will only feel guilty for so long before having done with it, and pseudo-religious movements based on guilt tend to wind themselves up in the course of a single generation. Should "White guilt" have been responsible for Black worship it would have dissolved itself long ago. The only constant and elemental force in human nature is the desire for power. Negrolatry is explained by pure and simple condescension.

    Nobody fauns and fusses over someone the way Whites do with Blacks unless they feel utterly superior to them---so superior that the ranking is not even in question, i.e. the way you would feel about a pet dog. If Blacks had actually been any good at anything, they would have been resented as rivals or, at best, respected as adversaries. In either case they would have been approached very differently. It is only in regard to pets that one sees such lavish displays of affection, such ironical attempts at humanization, and such shameless crowing about the benefits one has conferred. And this is all done only for power's sake, as if to say "See how mighty I am with respect to this creature?" It has nothing to do with any attempt to objectively appraise reality. It is a dream-drama generated by, for, and within the ego of the subject.

    How far removed is such an attitude from genuine worship! Literally, as far removed as hell is from heaven. For nobody makes a pet and plaything out of the living God, the all-knowing, all-seeing, and all-powerful ground of being, Who made the world by will alone and can unmake it just as easily, Who is alone the true and fitting object of worship. Human nature rebels against the very existence of this God Who sets a limit to the free play of ego, and we must be received with grace and weaned back by mortification and penance, works of charity, obedience, suffering, and trial. Not willing to endure any of this, the majority of men go running back to their idols.

    Black worship is false religion, bastardized science, vain egotism, phony sentimentality, and hideous pretension. It ought to despised and spat upon wherever it appears. The abominations of MLK Day and Black History Month must be removed, and all altars to this despicable cult broken and left to ruin. Let the Hollywood films be burnt; let all words of Harper Lee and Maya Angelou be shredded and turned to ash. Let it all be expunged and forgotten. The generation is born even now who will do it.

    When was the last time that a Black man overawed you with his intellect, or convicted you with the caliber of his moral fiber, or commanded your honor by the deep and tragic significance of his life?

    “Or?” Hell, president Camacho had all three qualities in spades.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. Truth says:
    @bookish1
    In the same line of thought what about all those blacks who were hung by ropes in the U.S. and that they are making a memorial to all those poor victims. But how many of them were hung because they killed someone, raped a white women, continuously presented themselves as a threat to whites and made life unbearable for white society on some way? I would say the better than 90% of those blacks that hung were hung for a reason that the MSM never mentions.

    I would say the better than 90% of those blacks that hung were hung for a reason that the MSM never mentions.

    Practice?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. Truth says:
    @Diversity Heretic
    We should start with by tearing down that Temple to the Cult of Negro Veneration on the National Mall in Washington DC: the Museum of African-American History (slavery, Jim Crow, civil rights, sports, entertainment and peanut butter). But a delay is acceptable while the equally obscene Holocaust Museum is removed.

    We should start with by tearing down that Temple to the Cult of Negro Veneration on the National Mall in Washington DC

    Dude, I’m kinda partial to the Lincoln Monument…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. Truth says:
    @anarchyst
    Here are true stories about "icons" of the so-called "civil rights" movement . . .

    There is much more to the "Emmett Till" story that is not widely known. Of course, killing him made him into a "martyr" of the black "civil-rights" movement. but--it is not generally known that Emmett Till was a strapping young man of about 160 lbs.--NOT a "little boy" as some media types tried to portray him as. He was a known womanizer and attempted to take his cocky "Chicago ways" in dealing with women to the Deep South. He was sent to live with relatives in the South because his Chicago relatives could not handle him. He had a "cocky attitude" and bragged about "getting it on" with white women--not a good idea in the South. . . According to published accounts, Mr. Till did not just "whistle" at a white woman, but grabbed, manhandled and fondled a married white woman. In Southern culture, this was, and still is, the ultimate form of disrespect. Despite Mr. Till's relatives' attempts to spirit him "out of town" to avoid retribution by the woman's relatives and townspeople, his cocky attitude "got in the way", similar to the way that "young master Trayvon's" attitude got him killed. Despite being given numerous "chances" to apologize for his behavior, he was defiant to the end. IF he had apologized for his behavior, he would still be alive today. In fact, one of his killers was a black man.
    It is interesting to note that Emmett Till's father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes. Maybe "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" . . .

    Rosa Parks was not the "ordinary" black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP and was "planted" in order to advance the cause of black "civil-rights" to which she was successful.
    Approximately a year previous to Rosa Parks' "bus ride" and refusal to vacate her seat, a REAL ordinary black woman did the same thing. This black woman received NO publicity or support from the NAACP or other black "civil-rights" organizations. You see, she was an unmarried black woman with children. According to the black civil-rights crowd, this would not do. They wanted someone who was "squeaky clean" without any "baggage". In fact, the "white guy" sitting behind her was part of the "set-up". He was a UPI reporter, contracted to "stage" the event...not only that, in the photo there is no one else on the bus. Ms. Parks could have sat wherever she wanted.
    Hence, Rosa Parks made (fabricated) history . . .

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he "finally felt like a white man". His own associates have stated as such. He also plagiarized his college papers and doctoral thesis. Of course, this was overlooked because of his status. King was also a communist.

    Jesse Jackson used to brag to his associates on how he would spit in the food of white patrons of the restaurant he worked at.

    There are many more fabrications of history that were used to lend "legitimacy" to the so-called "civil-rights" movement . . .

    There is much more to the “Emmett Till” story that is not widely known.

    Please, share with us your “insider” knowledge, J. Edgar.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    This information was part of a LOOK magazine article in the 1960s
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. @Stonehands
    Gotta chime in here... l just finished reading Eumeswil today, it’s an amazing coincidence(?) that you brought up Jünger. It is a lifestyle affirming masterpiece of literature!

    Jünger would have loved this coincidence – not least because of it’s absolute and total unlikeliness.

    I gave up on “Eumeswil” (might give it another try now, 40 years later), but lots of other stuff by Jünger, I love: His war diaries of WW II, and “The Worker”, “Waldgang”, “70ies blown away” (might not be translated) (“Siebzig verweht”), the drug book “Approachings – Drugs and Being High”. Jünger is an incredibly good nature writer – I’d put him up there with John Baker (The Perergrine) and Adalbert Stifter (Der Hochwald, Der Nachsommer).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stonehands
    There is a 90 page set-up in Eumeswil... and then it gets to the gist of the matter. This little piece of literature has given me more succint intellectual firepower to share an already formed unique worldview: that the only serfdom l can acknowledge is the discipline of subordinating the body.
    The individual is to stay as free and clear from the state as possible, and seek freedom in yourselves not the collective.

    I don’t want to spoil it for you- give it another shot. He is an etymologist by trade- there is real craft to his prose.

    Like you said- he lived a magnifescent full life of 102 (103?) ...and wrote Eumeswil in his early 80’s... now thats inspirational!

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. Truth says:
    @Mr. Anon
    Assuming what you say is true - and I have no reason to believe you - was it worth overturning the protection against Double Jeopardy? Does that sound like a good bargain to you?

    Now grasshopper, I can’t speak for the above gentleman, but from where I sit; if one more Knee-Grow goes to the electric chair every 20 years, I would say

    Hay’ell Yeah!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  117. @Anon
    Because of the role of the Negro in modern British cultural imagination, black are now seen as the natural royalty. Afro-royalty or Afroyalty is becoming the new trope in not only UK but in EU. Listen to Macron speak of Eurafrica. It will lead to the Othelloing of Europe without even an Iago to mess things up. If anything, the neo-Iago is there to help the Negro go around yelling 'where da white women at?'

    If the non-royal called Harry and his blackamoor have a child, then the real royal William and his excellent spouse had better start looking over their collective shoulder.
    They had better keep a protective eye on their children as well.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. anarchyst says:
    @Truth



    There is much more to the “Emmett Till” story that is not widely known.
     
    Please, share with us your "insider" knowledge, J. Edgar.

    This information was part of a LOOK magazine article in the 1960s

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Well by all means, utilize your superior 100+ IQ, research skills to find it.

    I for one would love to read an article about "what really happened with Emmit Till."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. anarchyst says:

    Negrolity ranks right up there with holocaustianity ™ …

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  120. Belinous says: • Website

    What a shame you used the MSM photo of St. Stephen Lawrence. In the uncut photo Stephen is proudly doing the racist black power salute.
    He was a known small time drug dealer. His friend also a dealer was with him on the night he died and was questioned as a suspect for the murder.
    The police had their man but the liberals changed that.
    The Liberal Marxists were ecstatic when they decided to make Stephen a much needed icon for blacks and one which would demonise white people was the icing on the cake.
    There has been hundreds of murders in the city of London mostly black on black but there has been a lot of white people who have been murdered in race attacks.
    Two of these murders were notable for their savagery, Google Kriss Donald and Charlene Downes probably names you have never heard. They were 15 and 14 years old when they were killed by non whites.
    Charlene’s killers were recorded talking about raping and murdering her but the Muslim head of public prosecution threw the case out on a technicality and awarded her killers with £250,000
    each.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  121. Truth says:
    @anarchyst
    This information was part of a LOOK magazine article in the 1960s

    Well by all means, utilize your superior 100+ IQ, research skills to find it.

    I for one would love to read an article about “what really happened with Emmit Till.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. @bartok

    Straw set up a special inquiry into just this one murder.
     
    A philo-semite, Derbyshire, as he is wont to do, didn't bother to mention that Jack Straw is a Jew.

    He has a Jewish great-grandparent and is a practising Christian you conspiratorial dolt.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    Bartok is apparently a great deal more stringent in his definition of Jewishness than Hitler.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Wally
    It's all quite curious.
    The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are.

    Must be how they are absurdly promoted in 'the media'.

    The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are.

    Only 5% of the population or less is into smart stuff. How many people read serious literature? How many people read philosophy? Also, intelligence isn’t very exciting to most people. While smart folks might be stimulated by listening to Gore Vidal or Chomsky, most are not. Also, most high IQ people tend to be proggy and anti-white.

    For most people, culture is about fun, thrills, and excitement. They love blockbuster movies, dumb TV shows, music videos. rap music, pornification of mainstream culture, pulp fiction, trash comedy, (look at the success of Stephen King novels and 50 SHADES OF GREY), etc.

    So, for most people, blacks are the natural royalty because black women shake their booties so lasciviously. And there is the song-and-dong factor with black men. They sing rap about ‘muh dic*’, and most women think about sex than ideas at most times.

    Chelsea Handler is a Jewish comedienne. She may be higher IQ and grew up with privilege, but she’s a song-and-dong girl.

    https://zhiphopcleveland.com/3358992/wow-chelsea-handler-talks-about-sex-with-50-cent-why-ciara-broke-them-up/

    Anglo-Saxons are turning into Junglo-Saxons because of these factors.
    It could well be that Jewish power will be destroyed by black dongs. If Chelsea Handler is sign of future Jewishness pooterin passion, it will be junglowizc fever. It’s no wonder so many Jewish guys feel dejected and go with Asian girls. But that will lead to Jewish dissipation because of yellow mellow factor. Jewish power grew from high IQ, tribalism, and chutzpah. But if future Jewish kids are yellow-mellowed, they will be obedient than pushy. Look at Sean Lennon. John Lennon had a kid with Yoko, and the result is some dork-ass kibbler. (Incidentally, Cynthia Lennon, who was dumped by John, went off with a Negro).

    Most people prefer to watch TV, movies, and listen to pop music than do heady stuff involving intelligence and ideas. More women talk about inches on puds than calculus of the universe just like most men are more interested in boob measurements than latest physics formulas about black holes.

    This is why there is a real chance of the world turning black. Blacks got all of Sub-Saharan Africa. They will take over Brazil which is already 60% black. They are the majority of Cuba. Blacks are the main idols of US and UK and France. Canada worships Negroes. Jungle Fever is promoted all over EU. Japan promotes half-black kids of black fathers. They will take over sports and will become the ‘national heroes’ as athletes are the biggest heroes of any nation. Then, Japanese will cheer for black heroes, and more Africans will come and have kids with Japanese women, and Japanese women will be cuck-roaches. Few yrs back, Miss Japan was black child of a black father, and she attacked Japan of being ‘racist’ and called for open borders. She is now the new voice of Japanese national conscience.

    In France, tons of black babies are being born, and lots from white wombs. And Macron the cuck is calling for 200 million blacks in EU to colonize white wombs.

    Now, this could be stopped with race-ism. It’s obvious that nothing more destructive of civilization than black DNA. Too Many Blacks always means social breakdown: Africa, Brazil, Detroit, Baltimore, parts of London, parts of Paris, and etc.
    But, all this Afroyalty mindset has white folks worshiping blacks like the animals worship the lions as natural royalty in THE LION BLING.
    Also, white guilt about blacks have become so sacralized that it’s gone universal. So, not only must the West open up to more and more Negroes but Japan too is attacked as ‘racist’ if it has doubts about the blessing of having too many Negroes.

    Homos and Negroes. There is a universalist cult around those two groups. All societies are expected to ‘welcome’, ‘include’, and celebrate them as special. And of course, the two groups have bee promoted mostly by Jews who seek to weaken and break down gentile(especially white and Christian) pride and defenses against globalism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    You're babbling and not addressing my point, which was:

    "The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are."

    Besides that, 'Chomsky for smart people'? LOL
    and:
    "Also, most high IQ people tend to be proggy and anti-white." No they do not, another LOL.

    , @edward collins
    'While smart folks might be stimulated by listening to Gore Vidal or Chomsky'

    Jesus wept thats embarrasing. I can understand an 18 year old student not being able to see through Chomsky's sophistry but anyone with a little life experience and perspective? Vidal is just an effette upper class gay contrarian and anyone using him as a yardstick of intellectual rigour needs to read more widely.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. Them Guys says:

    Off Topic:…Now that spring is here, and summer soon coming, many folks will host a party at home or in backyards…..Which usually creates a huge problem when the party host and home owners get tired at end of nite and the later partiers remain the more frustrated it becomes.

    Well here is a 100% fool proof gaurenteed method to rid your self and home of every now not so welocme guest. And do so in toot sweet quickness to boot.

    Simply await one of those moments when for some unknown reason, the groups conversations that can number in the many differing topics at same time, come to an abrupt stop and for a few moments all one hears is almost a dead silence.

    This is the exact perfect time to make your move!

    Soon as that inevitable moment of silence happens…Loudly ask the party goers…..

    Something akin to:….”Gee has Anybody else noticed lately how Many Jews have infiltrated into Americas Fed Govnt?..(or can ask of MSM-Hollywood-TV sit coms etc etal.)”

    Even a rather large size group of say, 100+ Party guests and you still get the exact same reactions as if a small half dozen dinner guests.

    This is the sequence such a question will play out in Your favor, and cause a total end of events and an empty house in 3-5 min. Tops!

    #1- You ask question of “Gee Anybody else notice how Many jews have infiltrated into Americas fed Govnt Top main control positions?”

    [MORE]

    #2- Within 2 seconds flat…EVERY guest present will first inhale a very deep huge breath, and…Hold that deep breath in as long as possible!

    #3- While holding deep breath in untill blue in face, all will also just as fast take a stance similar to a statue and remain in same spot, unable to speak, none dareing to even move a mussle.

    #4- The Only thing you shall observe bodily or physically moving from all persons present will be their…..Eye’s….Yep the only movement they will dare make is to slyly dart their eyes as far side to side and as fast as possible. Fervently searching out for even One brave individual willing to dare say something…Say Anything!…..So all can finally exhale and breath normally again after such a huge Systemic Shock at what was asked prior about those sacred….jews.

    #5- Once the very first brave soul stutters a semi quiet voice, others nearby shall notice, begin breathing again, and as per group collective reactionary methods, chime in with their voices. Which mainly will be repeating first quiet voice and inquire as to. “So…Nice party, but its Late and where did ya say our coats were stashed? Because we Must be going now. So sorry to leave but it is rather late.”

    #6- Once very first person asks for their coats so to leave…Everyone there, in a fast flury of loud voices shall chime in to ask for coats and assure you of how swell party was but now its so so late must be going.

    Now keep in mind that in Real time event’s…That entire scenario will all take place in aprrox. 2-3 Min Tops..From moment question on jews in fed govnt was asked….In Fact, one can set their watch or clock by this method it works so well.

    Also keep in mind this is for dire emergency use Only!…For a couple extra benifits will happen too..Benifits that is if you desire this too to happen once all is said and done.

    Besides emptying your house pronto quick fast, None of said many guests will Ever agan attend Your parties!…..And it is also highly likely that You shall Never again get invited to any such guests own peronal parties or events etc…

    However if one is like me and very tired of barley any success in the past 45 yrs attepting to awaken or Red Pill others. And mainly changed their lifestyle to being much closer to life as a Hermit, compared to back prior to self being awakened to such truths….Then this sure fire method is more like a double whammy blessing in disguise…#1= Fast end party/empty house…and extra #2 blessing= never again need feel obligated to go to them many others’ homes or events and parties.

    I for one when weighing both options of remain silent and keep many pals and friends etc…Or speak out and hell with those who cannot handle real truth and facts, and end up with few to fewer yet friends…..Have opted for the latter of far fewer if any friends but much more peace of mind minus all those prior fraud phony so called friends. Why remain unequally Yoked with such fools eh?

    P.S:….This method can be used in Public settings also, and usually recieves far greater responses depending as to what type public venue one is at. Grocery check out Line long and too slow?….Great place to try this out at!…..Waiting in line for movie tickets?….Another great place for use!……Soon as folks get breath back and can move again, several will Insist you move to in front of Them in line….I assume its similar to when I rode Harley Bikes with a few pals and when we went to get in such lines other folks always feard us biker types and insisted We go to in front of them or entire line…So They can be behind us and keep their eyes upon Us eh….They never feel quite proper with such riff raff standing close behind them good avg folk I rekon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  125. KenH says:
    @anarchyst
    Here are true stories about "icons" of the so-called "civil rights" movement . . .

    There is much more to the "Emmett Till" story that is not widely known. Of course, killing him made him into a "martyr" of the black "civil-rights" movement. but--it is not generally known that Emmett Till was a strapping young man of about 160 lbs.--NOT a "little boy" as some media types tried to portray him as. He was a known womanizer and attempted to take his cocky "Chicago ways" in dealing with women to the Deep South. He was sent to live with relatives in the South because his Chicago relatives could not handle him. He had a "cocky attitude" and bragged about "getting it on" with white women--not a good idea in the South. . . According to published accounts, Mr. Till did not just "whistle" at a white woman, but grabbed, manhandled and fondled a married white woman. In Southern culture, this was, and still is, the ultimate form of disrespect. Despite Mr. Till's relatives' attempts to spirit him "out of town" to avoid retribution by the woman's relatives and townspeople, his cocky attitude "got in the way", similar to the way that "young master Trayvon's" attitude got him killed. Despite being given numerous "chances" to apologize for his behavior, he was defiant to the end. IF he had apologized for his behavior, he would still be alive today. In fact, one of his killers was a black man.
    It is interesting to note that Emmett Till's father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes. Maybe "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" . . .

    Rosa Parks was not the "ordinary" black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP and was "planted" in order to advance the cause of black "civil-rights" to which she was successful.
    Approximately a year previous to Rosa Parks' "bus ride" and refusal to vacate her seat, a REAL ordinary black woman did the same thing. This black woman received NO publicity or support from the NAACP or other black "civil-rights" organizations. You see, she was an unmarried black woman with children. According to the black civil-rights crowd, this would not do. They wanted someone who was "squeaky clean" without any "baggage". In fact, the "white guy" sitting behind her was part of the "set-up". He was a UPI reporter, contracted to "stage" the event...not only that, in the photo there is no one else on the bus. Ms. Parks could have sat wherever she wanted.
    Hence, Rosa Parks made (fabricated) history . . .

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he "finally felt like a white man". His own associates have stated as such. He also plagiarized his college papers and doctoral thesis. Of course, this was overlooked because of his status. King was also a communist.

    Jesse Jackson used to brag to his associates on how he would spit in the food of white patrons of the restaurant he worked at.

    There are many more fabrications of history that were used to lend "legitimacy" to the so-called "civil-rights" movement . . .

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he “finally felt like a white man”.

    I believe during a sex orgy with prostitutes, 1-2 of whom were white, saint Martin was on tape exclaiming “I ain’t no nigga tonight”. Since he said the N word and was a known wife beater. prostitute abuser, philanderer and probable communist, all statues of MLK must be removed from public spaces immediately as well as repealing his holiday.

    It’s time to go nuclear on the plastic gods of the left just like they do to any historical figure associated with the pre-cult Marxist America.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @unpc downunder
    Not necessarily. It's often the politically incorrect working class whites who like black popular culture the most. For example, working class white women tend to like black pop music but have little time for whinging black SJWs. Ditto for working class white teenagers who love rap. Liberal upper middle class whites pay lip service to black culture but tend to prefer music and movies produced produced by other upper middle class white liberals.

    Svigor is right, liberal white egalitarians look at the social and economic stats, and see blacks are the perennial underachievers. Hence, their intense focus on black rights.

    The elites like reggae.

    In a poll, elites chose reggae as their favorite music.
    They like chillbilly calypso music for some reason.

    John Boehner’s daughter married a reggae guy. Song and dong factor.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. KenH says:

    Yes, there’s negrolatry and some whites are terminally afflicted with it. But Fred Reed has a bad case of mestizolatry.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss

    Yes, there’s negrolatry and some whites are terminally afflicted with it. But Fred Reed has a bad case of mestizolatry.
     
    And what should Derbyshire’s affliction be called? Sinolatry or yellolatry?

    Or negrohatry?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. @Ron Unz

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”
     
    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I'd guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions "how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!"

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message "You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!" while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message "Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!"

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly "tainted blood"...

    The key factor is not Straw's fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    I think thats pretty harsh on Jack Straw. No time for his party but I do know his constituency pretty well (Blackburn). He never denied or diminished having Jewish heritage in a seat and with a constituency party with a sizable Muslim minority (the largest outside London I read somewhere or other). He also outraged the left by criticizing women wearing the veil, and was criticized by supporters of Israeli policy:

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ex-uk-fm-unlimited-jewish-funds-control-us-policy-block-mideast-peace/

    I had to check on wikipedia to confirm how little Jewish ancestry he has – interestingly the same proportion as Stephen Lawrence had.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    He never denied or diminished having Jewish heritage in a seat and with a constituency party with a sizable Muslim minority
     
    Since Jack Straw shared the same name with one Jack Straw who supposedly led the 1381 Peasants' Revolt, who is mentioned in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, he had a lot of street cred in left wing circles. Unlike his predecessor, he was not beheaded.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Thomm says:

    [You have been frequently warned that your very repetitive and absolutely content-free insults will lead to trashing of all your future comments. You would be much happier at some other website.]

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    Just do it. Trash all his comments. He is Indian from India pretending to be White with exceptional hatred towards Whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. @lavoisier

    Critics of negro worship will never get anywhere because they are afraid to confront the enemy.
     
    In the case of John Derbyshire he definitely has chosen to ignore the Jewish elephant in the room.

    But he is right in the sense that far too many white people are very eager to go along with the program of Western destruction directed by the Jewish pied pipers.

    The situation of the West is akin to a commercial jet that’s been hijacked by a gang of terrorists who have murdered the flight crew and are flying it into a large building.

    Some passengers may convince themselves that the best coping strategy is to stay quietly in their seats until the whole episode blows over. But a few passengers who get wise to their collective fate must rouse their fellow passengers to rush the cockpit to regain control of the plane before it’s too late.

    Each of us is a passenger.

    What is your decision?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    Except that his views have some connection to reality.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    Economic issues are largely ceasing to matter for the reasons Lee Kwan Yew explained.

    The left-right distinction is now primarily about the white race, Christianity, Western culture, and sex roles.

    With your line of thinking one could to describe Ronald Reagan, Andrew Mellon, or even William Lowndes Yancey as men of the left because they were opposed to monarchy and titled nobility.

    And grated, some legitimist writers actually do this. You might want to look into hosting one of them here. This is the best one I am aware of: https://carlsbad1819.wordpress.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. @anarchyst
    Here are true stories about "icons" of the so-called "civil rights" movement . . .

    There is much more to the "Emmett Till" story that is not widely known. Of course, killing him made him into a "martyr" of the black "civil-rights" movement. but--it is not generally known that Emmett Till was a strapping young man of about 160 lbs.--NOT a "little boy" as some media types tried to portray him as. He was a known womanizer and attempted to take his cocky "Chicago ways" in dealing with women to the Deep South. He was sent to live with relatives in the South because his Chicago relatives could not handle him. He had a "cocky attitude" and bragged about "getting it on" with white women--not a good idea in the South. . . According to published accounts, Mr. Till did not just "whistle" at a white woman, but grabbed, manhandled and fondled a married white woman. In Southern culture, this was, and still is, the ultimate form of disrespect. Despite Mr. Till's relatives' attempts to spirit him "out of town" to avoid retribution by the woman's relatives and townspeople, his cocky attitude "got in the way", similar to the way that "young master Trayvon's" attitude got him killed. Despite being given numerous "chances" to apologize for his behavior, he was defiant to the end. IF he had apologized for his behavior, he would still be alive today. In fact, one of his killers was a black man.
    It is interesting to note that Emmett Till's father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes. Maybe "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" . . .

    Rosa Parks was not the "ordinary" black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP and was "planted" in order to advance the cause of black "civil-rights" to which she was successful.
    Approximately a year previous to Rosa Parks' "bus ride" and refusal to vacate her seat, a REAL ordinary black woman did the same thing. This black woman received NO publicity or support from the NAACP or other black "civil-rights" organizations. You see, she was an unmarried black woman with children. According to the black civil-rights crowd, this would not do. They wanted someone who was "squeaky clean" without any "baggage". In fact, the "white guy" sitting behind her was part of the "set-up". He was a UPI reporter, contracted to "stage" the event...not only that, in the photo there is no one else on the bus. Ms. Parks could have sat wherever she wanted.
    Hence, Rosa Parks made (fabricated) history . . .

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he "finally felt like a white man". His own associates have stated as such. He also plagiarized his college papers and doctoral thesis. Of course, this was overlooked because of his status. King was also a communist.

    Jesse Jackson used to brag to his associates on how he would spit in the food of white patrons of the restaurant he worked at.

    There are many more fabrications of history that were used to lend "legitimacy" to the so-called "civil-rights" movement . . .

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he “finally felt like a white man”. His own associates have stated as such. He also plagiarized his college papers and doctoral thesis. Of course, this was overlooked because of his status.

    Sounds like he might qualify posthumously as a Kennedy.

    He may have been well-known for frequenting prostitutes (Jesus got the same rap), but he is much better known as a civil rights leader.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. @Dieter Kief
    Jünger would have loved this coincidence - not least because of it's absolute and total unlikeliness.

    I gave up on "Eumeswil" (might give it another try now, 40 years later), but lots of other stuff by Jünger, I love: His war diaries of WW II, and "The Worker", "Waldgang", "70ies blown away" (might not be translated) ("Siebzig verweht"), the drug book "Approachings - Drugs and Being High". Jünger is an incredibly good nature writer - I'd put him up there with John Baker (The Perergrine) and Adalbert Stifter (Der Hochwald, Der Nachsommer).

    There is a 90 page set-up in Eumeswil… and then it gets to the gist of the matter. This little piece of literature has given me more succint intellectual firepower to share an already formed unique worldview: that the only serfdom l can acknowledge is the discipline of subordinating the body.
    The individual is to stay as free and clear from the state as possible, and seek freedom in yourselves not the collective.

    I don’t want to spoil it for you- give it another shot. He is an etymologist by trade- there is real craft to his prose.

    Like you said- he lived a magnifescent full life of 102 (103?) …and wrote Eumeswil in his early 80’s… now thats inspirational!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. @Jay Ritchie
    I think thats pretty harsh on Jack Straw. No time for his party but I do know his constituency pretty well (Blackburn). He never denied or diminished having Jewish heritage in a seat and with a constituency party with a sizable Muslim minority (the largest outside London I read somewhere or other). He also outraged the left by criticizing women wearing the veil, and was criticized by supporters of Israeli policy:

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ex-uk-fm-unlimited-jewish-funds-control-us-policy-block-mideast-peace/

    I had to check on wikipedia to confirm how little Jewish ancestry he has - interestingly the same proportion as Stephen Lawrence had.

    He never denied or diminished having Jewish heritage in a seat and with a constituency party with a sizable Muslim minority

    Since Jack Straw shared the same name with one Jack Straw who supposedly led the 1381 Peasants’ Revolt, who is mentioned in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, he had a lot of street cred in left wing circles. Unlike his predecessor, he was not beheaded.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    No, but he cut his buddy down, dug for him a shallow grave, and laid his body down ...
    half a mile from Tucson by the morning light.

    Wait, we are talking about Jack Straw from Wichita, aren't we?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @willieskull68
    So when I say I sailed to Switzerland and back, you would understand.

    Unz is getting the good vibe that carried Taki's until the British libel lawyers (guessing) killed the comments section. Comments delayed are comments denied. And comments moderated are...

    I'm missing some important details, but I have a German widow friend who says "officials" are pressuring her (or her landlord) to vacate her large flat to turn the place over to immigrants.
    Is this happening?

    The comments at Taki’s, like those at ZeroHedge, had become pretty trashy, dominated by witless obsessives who eventually drove off those with something worthwhile to say. Cf., the warning given to “Thomm” in this thread.

    I suspect that the website owners decided to pull the plug out of embarrassment.

    Read More
    • Replies: @prusmc
    The comment thread was what free me to Taki. Sure you had to wade through a lot of garbage but that was your choice. When you mine for gold you get a lot more dross than nuggets. When Taki abandoned comments I abandoned Taki.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Derbyshire, you no longer live in England and wrote in another article you don’t care about England. However, you have a Chinese wife and daughter who voted for Obummer. Have you spoken to them about their negrolatry? They are causing trouble in the USA.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  137. @Jonathan Mason

    He never denied or diminished having Jewish heritage in a seat and with a constituency party with a sizable Muslim minority
     
    Since Jack Straw shared the same name with one Jack Straw who supposedly led the 1381 Peasants' Revolt, who is mentioned in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, he had a lot of street cred in left wing circles. Unlike his predecessor, he was not beheaded.

    No, but he cut his buddy down, dug for him a shallow grave, and laid his body down …
    half a mile from Tucson by the morning light.

    Wait, we are talking about Jack Straw from Wichita, aren’t we?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. Hacienda says:
    @German_reader

    Every black man and woman an animal.
     
    lol, you mean except those Africans who got rich by selling other Africans to Europeans. You know, without the active participation of Africans the transatlantic slave trade would never have been possible.

    Hey, I’m not God. But I do have a sense of humour for God-like retribution. And what happened to
    your Schadenfreunde? Don’t pretend you’ve lost it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  139. @Curtis Mouser I
    Great Cuckstain is a joke. My advice to Trump: don't touch this dump or the grey Witch with a barge pole.

    Lee Rigby, a White soldier killed by a 50IQ dindu thug, many other black-on-White murders added together don't get the publicity this lanky drug dealing dindu gets. At least in the States you have Fox News. All our media is CultMarx propaganda tools. Appropriate that the colossal tool Harry has been played by a washed-up, divorced, geriatric dindu SJWitch - Personifies Cuckstain.

    Does the frumpy old hag call for National Rugby Day? National Kris's Donald Day? National Telford or Rotherham Day? No. That's about as likely as her (((puppet masters))) in MSM pointing out what a laughing stock this dump is. as ridiculous as a frumpy, dumpy grey vicar's daughter from Middle England pairing hertrouser suit for dumpy old hag's with leopard print heels for hot models looking to nab a footballer.

    Yeah I get, never refer to Hawking as professor or doctor, but always refer to a black who got a PhD in education from Herschel as doctor MLK. ARSEs - White Men are the dumb ones, amirire, hi 5.

    That “50IQ dindu thug” was a high caste Nigerian, i’ll have you know!

    Thats the real kicker for leftists and civ-nats screaming about integration, deprivation and alienation of these alien hostiles. The mouthy black who killed Rigby screaming into the camera was the model black briton, on paper at least.

    His father was some management level NHS employee. He was bought up in a stable two parent christian family. He had a white girlfriend. He played football with white kids (and presumably had white friends) His family owned two houses. One in multiracial east London (well, multiracial now thanks to his ilk – it was 94% white back in the 1991 census, 49% by 2011, and its schools are now 25% white….looks like Lagos nowadays and smells about how i’d expect Lagos to smell too) and a large family home in still 99% white rural Lincolnshire. But, his hatred for Britain and the British still shone through. Everything we gave him, everything white society had to offer was still not enough. He knew he did not belong, and acted accordingly. I’m only surprised it doesnt happen more often. I suspect the half black thug on westminster bridge – another muslim convert was thinking along the same lines.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Wally says:
    @Anon
    The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are.

    Only 5% of the population or less is into smart stuff. How many people read serious literature? How many people read philosophy? Also, intelligence isn't very exciting to most people. While smart folks might be stimulated by listening to Gore Vidal or Chomsky, most are not. Also, most high IQ people tend to be proggy and anti-white.

    For most people, culture is about fun, thrills, and excitement. They love blockbuster movies, dumb TV shows, music videos. rap music, pornification of mainstream culture, pulp fiction, trash comedy, (look at the success of Stephen King novels and 50 SHADES OF GREY), etc.

    So, for most people, blacks are the natural royalty because black women shake their booties so lasciviously. And there is the song-and-dong factor with black men. They sing rap about 'muh dic*', and most women think about sex than ideas at most times.

    Chelsea Handler is a Jewish comedienne. She may be higher IQ and grew up with privilege, but she's a song-and-dong girl.

    https://zhiphopcleveland.com/3358992/wow-chelsea-handler-talks-about-sex-with-50-cent-why-ciara-broke-them-up/

    Anglo-Saxons are turning into Junglo-Saxons because of these factors.
    It could well be that Jewish power will be destroyed by black dongs. If Chelsea Handler is sign of future Jewishness pooterin passion, it will be junglowizc fever. It's no wonder so many Jewish guys feel dejected and go with Asian girls. But that will lead to Jewish dissipation because of yellow mellow factor. Jewish power grew from high IQ, tribalism, and chutzpah. But if future Jewish kids are yellow-mellowed, they will be obedient than pushy. Look at Sean Lennon. John Lennon had a kid with Yoko, and the result is some dork-ass kibbler. (Incidentally, Cynthia Lennon, who was dumped by John, went off with a Negro).

    Most people prefer to watch TV, movies, and listen to pop music than do heady stuff involving intelligence and ideas. More women talk about inches on puds than calculus of the universe just like most men are more interested in boob measurements than latest physics formulas about black holes.

    This is why there is a real chance of the world turning black. Blacks got all of Sub-Saharan Africa. They will take over Brazil which is already 60% black. They are the majority of Cuba. Blacks are the main idols of US and UK and France. Canada worships Negroes. Jungle Fever is promoted all over EU. Japan promotes half-black kids of black fathers. They will take over sports and will become the 'national heroes' as athletes are the biggest heroes of any nation. Then, Japanese will cheer for black heroes, and more Africans will come and have kids with Japanese women, and Japanese women will be cuck-roaches. Few yrs back, Miss Japan was black child of a black father, and she attacked Japan of being 'racist' and called for open borders. She is now the new voice of Japanese national conscience.

    In France, tons of black babies are being born, and lots from white wombs. And Macron the cuck is calling for 200 million blacks in EU to colonize white wombs.

    Now, this could be stopped with race-ism. It's obvious that nothing more destructive of civilization than black DNA. Too Many Blacks always means social breakdown: Africa, Brazil, Detroit, Baltimore, parts of London, parts of Paris, and etc.
    But, all this Afroyalty mindset has white folks worshiping blacks like the animals worship the lions as natural royalty in THE LION BLING.
    Also, white guilt about blacks have become so sacralized that it's gone universal. So, not only must the West open up to more and more Negroes but Japan too is attacked as 'racist' if it has doubts about the blessing of having too many Negroes.

    Homos and Negroes. There is a universalist cult around those two groups. All societies are expected to 'welcome', 'include', and celebrate them as special. And of course, the two groups have bee promoted mostly by Jews who seek to weaken and break down gentile(especially white and Christian) pride and defenses against globalism.

    You’re babbling and not addressing my point, which was:

    “The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are.”

    Besides that, ‘Chomsky for smart people’? LOL
    and:
    “Also, most high IQ people tend to be proggy and anti-white.” No they do not, another LOL.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. @Wally
    "The Mail used to support Hitler"

    So what?


    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
    - fake "holocaust" historian Raul Hilberg
     
    The Schlegelberger Document:
    - http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Schlegelberger/Schlegelberger42.JPG
    says:
    "Mr Reich Minister Lammers informed me that the Führer had repeatedly declared to him that he wants to hear that the Solution of the Jewish Problem has been postponed until after the war is over. That being so, the current discussions are of purely theoretical value, in Mr Reich Minister Lammers' opinion. He will moreover take pains to ensure that, whatever else happens, no fundamental decisions are taken without his knowledge in consequence of a surprise briefing by any third party."

    - In support of the Schlegelberger Document see the Luther Memorandum:
    http://www.codoh.com/library/document/154/
    Hitler, the 'Final Solution,' and the Luther Memorandum
    A Response to Evans and Longerich

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are laughable, scientifically impossible frauds. See the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    I suppose in a “free society” one should be free to support Hitler and all other mass murderers and their propagandists (The Mail, The NYT, The Guardian, BBC, CNN etc…)

    If you have no qualms with mass murderers like Hitler,and he was a mass murderer – independently of the holocaust being fake or having been transformed in an industry to blackmail the gentile-, you should be very happy because Hitler isn’t dead.

    In fact, those who are not brain dead know that there is one country that has been committing more crimes than the Nazis, but she has been doing it in the name of “democracy” and “human rights”.

    My suggestion to you is that one should not hate. Only the “unnatural and unloved” hate.
    Try to find people that deserve to be admired and respected. Look around you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Yawn.
    It's not a matter of supporting / not supporting anyone.
    The facts are that you have no proof of the impossible '6M Jews 5M others, & gas chambers'.
    The facts are that you have no proof that Hitler was a "mass murderer".
    That's your problem, not mine.
    Simple stuff really.

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”

    - fake "holocaust" historian Raul Hilberg
     

    "Truth is hate to those that hate the truth."

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/img/HHSl.jpg

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. Bill Jones says: • Website
    @Rich
    This is unbelievable. England is no more. Isn't there one general, one colonel, a sergeant somewhere in that God-forsaken country who can lead some troops into Parliament and save the indigenous people of Britain? Anyone?

    Successful coups tend to be led by colonels , they command the most troops that have any personal knowledge and loyalty to the man.But here company of the SAS would probably do it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  143. @Anon
    Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?

    Negrolatry has power because of combination of white cuckery and white guilt. White guilt alone doesn't go very far. Spanish killed tons of natives in South America, but most people don't care because the short brown indigenos are seen as lame.

    It's because Anglos are so taken with black music, black jive, black rhythm, black booty, black dong, black muscle, black sports, and etc. that they go for Negrolatry. In other words, it would exist even without white guilt about blacks though, to be sure, the 'white guilt' element gives it a certain glow.
    Suppose there never was slave trade or imperialism. Suppose some blacks came to the UK and made funky music, won in sports, acted wild and fun, shook their booties, and swung their dongs. In a libertine hedonistic society, they'd get much attention bordering on mammonic love.

    The Brits look back on their history and see repression, rigidity, inhibition, coldness, and etc.
    So, Brit history is seen as ice, fog, and overcast skies. But the Negro comes along with the heat, friction, and warmth. It's like the sun finally broke through, and there is heat generated within the body with all that grinding, bumping, and humping. It was the great liberation from frigidity of cold damp Britain. It's like how the nuns in LILIES OF THE FIELD turn into Lilies of the Field Negro.

    So, why does this Negro kid matter so much? Because of the Negro-as-metaphor of warmth, soulfulness, heat, and radiance brought to Brits. Modern Britain may have been saved militarily by Winston Churchill, but the Narrative is it was finally liberated from its own shackles by the Magic Negro. The subconscious narrative goes... If Anglos ended the slave trade and freed blacks from physical bondage, the Negro soul and rhythm liberated Anglos from the chains of repression, manners, and politesse. And this is why the Beatles and Stones were so significant. Britain, though highly accomplished in literature, had lagged in musical achievements compared to Italians, Germans, French, Russians, etc. Brits were too orderly and 'bourgeois' to have the passion.

    But in pop music inspired by black music, the Brits once exploded all over and dominated the world for a couple of decades. So, in the British Mind, the Negro is holy. Negro is the booty-and-dong-messiah that thawed the white body from repression and made it boogie woogie like a Negro. And one must say it is true enough that black influence did wonders for Brit pop music. Consider Bee Gees 'stayin alive', a great song. And Clash and Sting took a lot from reggae.

    So, to better understand Negrolatry, one has to look to Pop Culture and Sex.

    “Would there be such fuss if it were a dead Muslim or Hindu?”

    Dead muslim, certainly. Dead Hindu, probably not.

    The home office actually published the inter-racial rates of murder between 2011-2013 a few years back.

    Not surprisingly, blacks kill whites at over 3 times the rates over the opposite. But whites kill asians at marginally higher rates than asians kill whites.

    I put this down to white drug addicts stabbing cornershop owners to death in thefts gone wrong rather than some racial agenda, though. I suspect with all the recent terrorism however, now asians kill more whites than the other way round.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  144. utu says:
    @Thomm
    [You have been frequently warned that your very repetitive and absolutely content-free insults will lead to trashing of all your future comments. You would be much happier at some other website.]

    Just do it. Trash all his comments. He is Indian from India pretending to be White with exceptional hatred towards Whites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. @Diversity Heretic
    Where's Guy Fawkes when you need him?

    Could German occupation have been worse than this?

    Where’s Guy Fawkes when you need him?

    Could German occupation have been worse than this?

    Well, no.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  146. @jason kennedy
    This article ignores so many key details of this story that it has to be considered a wilful misrepresentation of the facts.

    Those described as 'roughs' are linked directly to an underworld boss who paid money to officers of the MPS.

    The police used undercovers to infiltrate the Lawrence family campaign, gathering personal information from them that was used to discredit them.

    Without pressure from right-wing newspaper, The Mail, it is highly unlikely anything like justice would have been achieved.

    That Stephen Lawrence has become a powerful symbol owes much to the dignity of his parents campaign for justice; if only John Derbyshire exhibited a shred of such dignity.

    This article ignores so many key details of this story that it has to be considered a wilful misrepresentation of the facts.

    None of the details are relevant, you malevolent moron. No details could justify the beatification of a foreigner for the purpose of exterminating the natives.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Rogue says:
    @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    With regards to Ramzpaul’s ire with the ADL, I don’t think his description of them as leftist-extremists impacted my mind because they’re apparently leftist-extremists, but rather because they are an organization that directly and indirectly promotes Jewish interests above anything else.

    So I think he’s largely right and successful in his description of them.

    With regards to Jack Staw, I would make a simple observation about most Leftists: war is fine, depending on circumstances and who you’re supporting, but capital punishment, even of the most vile criminal, is utterly verboten.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. You people live in a fantasy world. There is no obsession in n Great Britain with the worship of blacks.

    There may be some manner of wrestling with their colonial abuses. As well there should be. But this incident is hardly worship of black people. it’s about a case in which a young man was needlessly killed and there is suspicion that he was killed because he was black. Certainly there are unsolved cases. but this particular cases suggested no personal contact and was socially motivated — hence the park.

    I have no doubt that there are other people killed needlessly in random contacts and would that parks could be named for each of them. But making some kind of nasty epistemological references in the same breath as you claim to recognize this as tragedy.

    This hardly reflects the man of passion and concern the author seems to genuinely espouse for his fellows. I too bemoan England’s losses as she carelessly imports all manner of people without full assimilation — but blacks are low on the list of having no understanding of British history and culture. But ot was Great Britains failure to fully acculturate her black citizens and like spoiled children abandoned them to their own devices instead of pitching in to ensure a smoother transition from outcasts to rulers.

    Her attempts here are commendable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  149. Wally says:
    @James Brown
    I suppose in a "free society" one should be free to support Hitler and all other mass murderers and their propagandists (The Mail, The NYT, The Guardian, BBC, CNN etc...)

    If you have no qualms with mass murderers like Hitler,and he was a mass murderer - independently of the holocaust being fake or having been transformed in an industry to blackmail the gentile-, you should be very happy because Hitler isn't dead.

    In fact, those who are not brain dead know that there is one country that has been committing more crimes than the Nazis, but she has been doing it in the name of "democracy" and "human rights".

    My suggestion to you is that one should not hate. Only the "unnatural and unloved" hate.
    Try to find people that deserve to be admired and respected. Look around you.

    Yawn.
    It’s not a matter of supporting / not supporting anyone.
    The facts are that you have no proof of the impossible ’6M Jews 5M others, & gas chambers’.
    The facts are that you have no proof that Hitler was a “mass murderer”.
    That’s your problem, not mine.
    Simple stuff really.

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”

    - fake “holocaust” historian Raul Hilberg

    “Truth is hate to those that hate the truth.”

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    Read More
    • Replies: @James brown
    Even here, there is something has being "off-topic". You did not understand my point.

    Let me repeat again. I was trying to say that if Lawrence's family knew what "The Mail" stands for (and the English Establishment) they wouldn't have never spoken with a bunch of hypocrites and liars that work for "The Mail". They wouldn't have accepted to be part of "The Establishmlent".

    They wouldn't let themselves be transformed in a "powerful symbol". Empty symbol,in fact.


    Your preferred subject: ...6M. I find this subject boring and useless.
    History is just propaganda. Men is incapable of true.

    I do believe that holocaust -(6 M? or 2 M? or 300.000? etc...) is being used as moral propaganda and moral blackmail.

    It is being used to steal land, natural resources , to kill, to destroy carreers, to enslave, to kill children, women etc...

    Raul Hilberg is just a historian. Supposedly he is an "authority" in the field, but that doesn't mean nothing. And when he writes "We didn’t have the evidence", it doesn't mean that "it" didn't happen.
    He meant that there is no "written order " from Hitler...

    In a free society, people should of course be free, to doubt the official History. In fact, in a free society "official History" wouldn't exist and the "crime of negationism" wouldn't exist.

    Another suggestion: use your time and intelligence to convince your fellow human beings about the crimes that are being committed today and maybe try to do something to stop them, if you can.

    Forget the past. It's a waste of time.

    Use the present to understand the present.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. Anon[283] • Disclaimer says:

    The details are relevant because to ignore them leads to Derbyshire’s false conclusion, that there was nothing noteworthy about this murder and its investigation. Just because you can’t grasp simple argumentation doesn’t make me the moron. Consult a mirror for guidance on the location of your nearest moron.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ben tillman

    The details are relevant because to ignore them leads to Derbyshire’s false conclusion, that there was nothing noteworthy about this murder and its investigation.
     
    Wow, you're thick.

    The point is that the conclusion "that there was nothing noteworthy about this murder and its investigation" is immaterial. There is no degree of noteworthiness that could justify the response.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. @Achmed E. Newman

    What on earth is the matter with the Brits, that they have elevated this one regrettable but insignificant killing into a great holy martyrdom?
     
    Do you really want the root answer to this? Can you handle the truth? I think you can. What is the matter with the Brits is that, even though the Mother Country created the concepts of rule-of-law and not men and the like many centuries before America was born, it's people failed to keep those noble concepts enshrined in the law of the land. "Wait, whaaaa?" readers will say "what is this kook writing about 'muh constitution' and stuff for - this post is about cultural marxism?"

    Let me tell you, then. This is the root cause of what's going on in formerly-Great formerly-Britain because the British have no basic rights that can be defended. There is no such thing as free speech that can be fought for in court or even among public opinion. If the law says you can't say certain things, such as that you don't care for any of this destruction of your culture, well now it's the law, mate. How far is all this going to go, a Brit may ask? ALL! THE! WAY! because you never had a right to keep, much less bear, arms. When "they" took that away, you had nothing to fight those laws with. They were just commonsense gun laws, mate.

    The British globalist elites probably never had a plan in writing, nor even a verbally-described conspiracy to replace the English. Just like in America, they just mostly want the same thing to happen - they want the middle class white people that make associations, have discretionary income, and can think clearly, dissolved. This way, there'll be no more competition to their elite status and positions, and things can be run in a better, more-orderly 3rd-world fashion. That will enable a truly centralized global power structure. Again, it's no big conspiracy, just kinda what they all want.

    When will I answer your question, Mr. Derbyshire? Now. What's the matter with the British people is history. The question of how they feel about this business DOES NOT MATTER now. I'm sure the British people hate this cultural destruction and replacement with a passion. They just can't say anything about it without jail time. It's too late.

    Part of what’s wrong with ‘Brits’ is that they’re English and not ‘Brits’ at all. No-one calls Scots by this name. No-one applies it to the Irish. Unfortunately the English have a pathological distaste for their right name, though they will enforce the privilege on behalf of others and fiercely call on others to respect it. The Englishman isn’t hard to identify. He’s the insistently ‘British’ fellow. He doesn’t use his native identity partly because he is a coward and a liar but also because he knows no better. For centuries the priority of ‘English’ education has been to steer English children toward the shared unionist ideal and away from self-interest, away from the nationalism elites here have monitored carefully for hundreds of years and still fear most of all.

    Similarly immigration here isn’t a ‘British’ problem at all. There are hardly any coloured immigrants in Scotland or Wales and he knows it. Scotland even picks all white national sports teams which the London press ignores. Immigration always was, as it remains, an ENGLISH problem and it’s the ENGLISH nation – not Scots, who’ve used the party system and 1707 to advantage while avoiding any of the responsibilities of the ‘shared’ identity English people seem to need in order to feel liked – that’s quickly disappearing.

    You’d think a thousand years of independent history never happened or the accolade of Europe’s oldest nation state meant nothing to hear stupid, useless English people prattling on about the war and traitors like Churchill or quoting Chesterton (‘We are the people of England, and we are have yet to speak…’), or sucking up to the very aliens whose politicians rule us and, dominating every aspect of government as they did after Blair was elected in ’97, actually opened the inlet valve for a great flood of parasites to enter England while Scottish asylum offices actually went on strike, refusing to process forms and sending all applicants south to England, a flagrant breach of law and civil service employment conditions about which Scottish Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered nothing done.

    Let’s get this straight for the benefit of foreign readers: there is no ‘British’ identity or ‘British’ culture or ‘British’ accent (in the sense of one standing for all the others). ‘Britain’ is NOT a nation. Britain a is a political arrangement, and one designed from the outset to bleed dry and destroy England. A managed extinction is taking place, with everything now being sold off to foreign money men while we ourselves remain tethered to our stall like some great sow, upturned helplessly, teats bared to an army of salivating parasites – including Irish and Scots, of whom the world would have heard little or nothing but for us. If conniving blowhard Alex Salmond, for whom the English are authors of all Scotland’s misfortunes, had another reason for making sure his vile people would walk right back into their subsidised unionist feather bed in the event that Europe went sour on them I’d like to hear it.

    When people want to be something other than what they are, when they need to be liked and are too ashamed or too weak to raise a word of protest about being stripped of everything they own by an alien political elite that no longer even recognises their right to exist as a nation, an elite prepared in this case to enforce Brussels regional directives which will sunder England into a dozen and more local fiefdoms, then they deserve all they get. Look at the morons simpering around ‘Prince’ Harry’s race-mixing marriage. The same half-wits will soon worship at the shrine of St Lawrence and think no more about it, treating it as part of national life, like the deplorable shill Peter Hitchens, the fake conservative who thinks we’ve come to accept Caribbean immigrants as (in his phrase) just ‘part of the family’; and so we will accept them rather than defend ourselves, just as we will accept muslim dhimmitude in return for what we mistakenly think will be a quiet life.

    What was it your own Ben Franklin said about exchanging freedom for a little temporary safety deserving neither reward? The English, my people and some of the nicest, most tolerant and well intentioned on earth, must rediscover their pride or go under. They must learn to hate. There is nothing wrong with a perfectly normal human emotion directed at hateful things. Hate is demonised because it is the sole, sustainable impetus to self-defence we have. We must dispense with ‘Britishness’ for a start. Britishness is the cloak of anonymity oppressors use to divert credit to those in these islands who deserve none, a technique furthermore for diluting English identity and disguising the silent war being waged against her own corner of them.

    Will England awake? Will she ever stir herself? It breaks my heart to say so, but I doubt it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The English calling themselves British mostly began in the WWI era, when England was very glad to have the assistance of various non-English peoples in the British Isles and beyond to fight its big war with Germany.
    , @Pat Hannagan
    800 words bemoaning the scouring of England of the English yet not one mention of Jews.

    Irish and Scots get a scathing mention though.

    Spoken like a true Derbyshite!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Bliss says:

    Here’s a story from across the pond, a story about negrolatry. Don’t reach for your dictionary; I just made that word up.

    Negrolatry? I think Priss Factor used that word first.

    Btw, there are hundreds of black idols of the Madonna with Child worshipped in churches across Europe for centuries. Would you consider them examples of negrolatry?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Svigor
    Haha, love it. Hey, tell us about how much black blood Jews have, pumping through their hearts.
    , @Clyde
    Priss Factor is now anonymous 425 ...seems to me
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  153. Anonymous[211] • Disclaimer says:
    @English nationalist
    Part of what's wrong with 'Brits' is that they're English and not 'Brits' at all. No-one calls Scots by this name. No-one applies it to the Irish. Unfortunately the English have a pathological distaste for their right name, though they will enforce the privilege on behalf of others and fiercely call on others to respect it. The Englishman isn't hard to identify. He's the insistently 'British' fellow. He doesn't use his native identity partly because he is a coward and a liar but also because he knows no better. For centuries the priority of 'English' education has been to steer English children toward the shared unionist ideal and away from self-interest, away from the nationalism elites here have monitored carefully for hundreds of years and still fear most of all.

    Similarly immigration here isn't a 'British' problem at all. There are hardly any coloured immigrants in Scotland or Wales and he knows it. Scotland even picks all white national sports teams which the London press ignores. Immigration always was, as it remains, an ENGLISH problem and it's the ENGLISH nation - not Scots, who've used the party system and 1707 to advantage while avoiding any of the responsibilities of the 'shared' identity English people seem to need in order to feel liked - that's quickly disappearing.

    You'd think a thousand years of independent history never happened or the accolade of Europe's oldest nation state meant nothing to hear stupid, useless English people prattling on about the war and traitors like Churchill or quoting Chesterton ('We are the people of England, and we are have yet to speak...'), or sucking up to the very aliens whose politicians rule us and, dominating every aspect of government as they did after Blair was elected in '97, actually opened the inlet valve for a great flood of parasites to enter England while Scottish asylum offices actually went on strike, refusing to process forms and sending all applicants south to England, a flagrant breach of law and civil service employment conditions about which Scottish Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered nothing done.

    Let's get this straight for the benefit of foreign readers: there is no 'British' identity or 'British' culture or 'British' accent (in the sense of one standing for all the others). 'Britain' is NOT a nation. Britain a is a political arrangement, and one designed from the outset to bleed dry and destroy England. A managed extinction is taking place, with everything now being sold off to foreign money men while we ourselves remain tethered to our stall like some great sow, upturned helplessly, teats bared to an army of salivating parasites - including Irish and Scots, of whom the world would have heard little or nothing but for us. If conniving blowhard Alex Salmond, for whom the English are authors of all Scotland's misfortunes, had another reason for making sure his vile people would walk right back into their subsidised unionist feather bed in the event that Europe went sour on them I'd like to hear it.

    When people want to be something other than what they are, when they need to be liked and are too ashamed or too weak to raise a word of protest about being stripped of everything they own by an alien political elite that no longer even recognises their right to exist as a nation, an elite prepared in this case to enforce Brussels regional directives which will sunder England into a dozen and more local fiefdoms, then they deserve all they get. Look at the morons simpering around 'Prince' Harry's race-mixing marriage. The same half-wits will soon worship at the shrine of St Lawrence and think no more about it, treating it as part of national life, like the deplorable shill Peter Hitchens, the fake conservative who thinks we've come to accept Caribbean immigrants as (in his phrase) just 'part of the family'; and so we will accept them rather than defend ourselves, just as we will accept muslim dhimmitude in return for what we mistakenly think will be a quiet life.

    What was it your own Ben Franklin said about exchanging freedom for a little temporary safety deserving neither reward? The English, my people and some of the nicest, most tolerant and well intentioned on earth, must rediscover their pride or go under. They must learn to hate. There is nothing wrong with a perfectly normal human emotion directed at hateful things. Hate is demonised because it is the sole, sustainable impetus to self-defence we have. We must dispense with 'Britishness' for a start. Britishness is the cloak of anonymity oppressors use to divert credit to those in these islands who deserve none, a technique furthermore for diluting English identity and disguising the silent war being waged against her own corner of them.

    Will England awake? Will she ever stir herself? It breaks my heart to say so, but I doubt it.

    The English calling themselves British mostly began in the WWI era, when England was very glad to have the assistance of various non-English peoples in the British Isles and beyond to fight its big war with Germany.

    Read More
    • Replies: @English nationalist
    I hope I'm using the site correctly (my previous contribution appeared when I pressed 'rely' and I've had to clear it in order to write this).

    @Anonymous

    The process of making us unpersons gathered pace during the 20th century's major wars it's true, but isn't the full explanation. For a better appreciation we need to consider nationwide electronic media, principally the BBC, introduced during the 1920s, from which point we were 'British' and nothing else. What we have today is the culmination of plans laid decades - some would say centuries - ago, for there is always a principal source of revenue in any 'federated' system, a single source to which all bills are accountable for payment. England and the English have been controlled by outside forces a long time. Today that control is visible, its hostility unmistakable, in a way it never was in ages past we are paying dearly for in every sense.

    Like all European legislation regional directives are being implemented in Britain with an eagerness unique in all Europe and Europeans know it. They even laugh about it. European countries tend to be relaxed about their obligations. They commonly sign up to whatever is current and then forget about the matter. Our elite is different. The reason they are different, the reason they're engaged in wrecking Brexit, pushing ever harder to subject us to full and complete European control, is simply the hatred they bear towards England. It's a matter for speculation why they're doing this to so small a country (bureaucratic convenience simply won't wash when we compare English polity to that of, say, France). The word north of our border - more of a coy but self-satisfied whisper really - is simply that 'well, we didn't expel our Jews'.

    What we do know is that foreign politicians in parliament decide 'fairness for England' by digging ever deeper into her pockets. We have no say in the matter, though we should not permit an increasing number of black and asian 'honourable members' (the rise of asians in the professions and their conspicuous presence in Cabinet and in regional politics doesn't bode well) to divert from the caucus of Scots, Welsh and Irish (even members of the IRA would you believe?) which freely votes on English matters 'in Britain's interest', a crowd which seldom bewails implementing law on behalf of a trans-national political elite because of the quiet pleasure they derive from settling a few historical scores. I'm afraid the United Kingdom is what happens when you 'pool' (surrender) sovereignty, and when 'Britons' (Englishmen almost to a man and to a woman) who complain endlessly about losing it remain utterly baffled by the idea that 'Yoo-Kay' is simply the best example there is of what happens when it's taken away.

    England never needed union is the truth of it. We were strong. We had overseas possessions and were independently wealthy. Impoverished Scotland eyed our position greedily, covetously, resentfully. They'd all ready blamed us for the failed Darien project (the consequences of which London warned about three times, just as Scots' anxious pleas for union were twice rejected before they at last got their own way, and they could spend the next few centuries telling the entire world it had all been a plot by the wicked English). Scotland, Wales and Ireland (all of it) did need union and have benefited from it immensely (I'm well armed by the way should any 'Irish-Americans' be tempted to enter the fray).

    Only one thing bruises Scottish vanity and feeds the endlessly bitter, hysterical anti-English rhetoric - readers familiar Sir Arthur Keith will understand the principle of culturally internalising truth-telling and lying through one's teeth to outsiders; we protect privilege by diverting to its absence, as Jews, Irish and Scots know only too well - and that is exclusion from centre stage, a feeling they are not the centre of attention. That the rest is historical invention for the most part unfortunately ignores how we construct perceptions of injustice to justify our own behaviour. Whites seeking to exact vengeance at a time when biological allies are in short supply endanger the race and are not behaving very sensibly at all.

    Have we fought too long among ourselves and is it too late to change? Today I read of a black murderer in London who shouted “fucking Irish cunt” as he wielded two knives to stab an Irishman and his sister, killing one. I was greatly angered by this (not just the absence of a death sentence), though I have no choice but to wonder why when I know that from Connemara to Cork the same story with an English victim would elicit little more a satisfied smirk. Indeed whites careful elsewhere to separate ordinary people from their elites makes no such concession to the English.

    Look at the spiteful, stupid and ill-informed output of 'Irishman' (he isn't) Michael Walsh (McLaughlin) over the years. English born and bred but passing himself off as something he isn't just to part Americans from their money. My contention that to accept immigration - any of it, irrespective of biological source - is to nurture a viper at one's bosom stands all the more secure when I look at identity politics. Fascinating isn't it how the solvent Jewish academics have been pouring on European and American national identities since the 'seventies suddenly proves a convenience for their most implacable enemies?

    There's a cry abroad of 'no more brother wars' that is well judged and needs repeating, and if my 'fellow Britons' (when it suits them to fly under that particular flag of convenience) think they'll escape the fall out from mass immigration they're probably mistaken (though Ireland, like Scotland, operates a skilful news management programme to convince everyone they're taking in 'refugees' they're actually rejecting and sending... guess where?). The sad part for me is that England is probably finished as a home for Englishmen, a fate English political apathy, and English diffidence, are in good measure responsible for.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. Bliss says:
    @KenH
    Yes, there's negrolatry and some whites are terminally afflicted with it. But Fred Reed has a bad case of mestizolatry.

    Yes, there’s negrolatry and some whites are terminally afflicted with it. But Fred Reed has a bad case of mestizolatry.

    And what should Derbyshire’s affliction be called? Sinolatry or yellolatry?

    Or negrohatry?

    Read More
    • Replies: @KenH

    And what should Derbyshire’s affliction be called? Sinolatry or yellolatry?
     
    I suppose but Derb doesn't spend spill tons of ink extolling the virtues of the Chinese and their right immigrate to America en masse as Fred does the Mestizos.

    Or negrohatry?
     
    Except Derb doesn't hate blacks. He expressed sympathy toward Stephen Lawrence in this article. His "hatred" amounts to recognizing that we're different and incompatible races.
    , @Che Guava
    On the www, is commmonly termed ''Yellow fever', mainly applies to gay men with a fetish.

    Would not apply it to the Derb.must have had so many good women throwing themselves at him. Then, in the end, have to say that the result shows a litte yellow fever on the Derb'' side, but it seems, with a very happy ending,
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. @Wally
    Yawn.
    It's not a matter of supporting / not supporting anyone.
    The facts are that you have no proof of the impossible '6M Jews 5M others, & gas chambers'.
    The facts are that you have no proof that Hitler was a "mass murderer".
    That's your problem, not mine.
    Simple stuff really.

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”

    - fake "holocaust" historian Raul Hilberg
     

    "Truth is hate to those that hate the truth."

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/img/HHSl.jpg

    Even here, there is something has being “off-topic”. You did not understand my point.

    Let me repeat again. I was trying to say that if Lawrence’s family knew what “The Mail” stands for (and the English Establishment) they wouldn’t have never spoken with a bunch of hypocrites and liars that work for “The Mail”. They wouldn’t have accepted to be part of “The Establishmlent”.

    They wouldn’t let themselves be transformed in a “powerful symbol”. Empty symbol,in fact.

    Your preferred subject: …6M. I find this subject boring and useless.
    History is just propaganda. Men is incapable of true.

    I do believe that holocaust -(6 M? or 2 M? or 300.000? etc…) is being used as moral propaganda and moral blackmail.

    It is being used to steal land, natural resources , to kill, to destroy carreers, to enslave, to kill children, women etc…

    Raul Hilberg is just a historian. Supposedly he is an “authority” in the field, but that doesn’t mean nothing. And when he writes “We didn’t have the evidence”, it doesn’t mean that “it” didn’t happen.
    He meant that there is no “written order ” from Hitler…

    In a free society, people should of course be free, to doubt the official History. In fact, in a free society “official History” wouldn’t exist and the “crime of negationism” wouldn’t exist.

    Another suggestion: use your time and intelligence to convince your fellow human beings about the crimes that are being committed today and maybe try to do something to stop them, if you can.

    Forget the past. It’s a waste of time.

    Use the present to understand the present.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The Daily Mail's support for Lawrence is because his dad was once an employee of the editor, Dacre. I doubt they were ever friends, but they were at any rate close enough for the killing to become a matter of personal interest of the guy running the paper.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. Bill Jones says: • Website
    @Hamlet's Ghost
    The situation of the West is akin to a commercial jet that's been hijacked by a gang of terrorists who have murdered the flight crew and are flying it into a large building.

    Some passengers may convince themselves that the best coping strategy is to stay quietly in their seats until the whole episode blows over. But a few passengers who get wise to their collective fate must rouse their fellow passengers to rush the cockpit to regain control of the plane before it's too late.

    Each of us is a passenger.

    What is your decision?

    Except that his views have some connection to reality.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    Gold! Would love to have been there when “The Derb” read this comment.

    Derbyshire now working on a new theory that Ron Unz is a crypto-Irishman.

    “Bu-bu-but-muh Churchill!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. @English nationalist
    Part of what's wrong with 'Brits' is that they're English and not 'Brits' at all. No-one calls Scots by this name. No-one applies it to the Irish. Unfortunately the English have a pathological distaste for their right name, though they will enforce the privilege on behalf of others and fiercely call on others to respect it. The Englishman isn't hard to identify. He's the insistently 'British' fellow. He doesn't use his native identity partly because he is a coward and a liar but also because he knows no better. For centuries the priority of 'English' education has been to steer English children toward the shared unionist ideal and away from self-interest, away from the nationalism elites here have monitored carefully for hundreds of years and still fear most of all.

    Similarly immigration here isn't a 'British' problem at all. There are hardly any coloured immigrants in Scotland or Wales and he knows it. Scotland even picks all white national sports teams which the London press ignores. Immigration always was, as it remains, an ENGLISH problem and it's the ENGLISH nation - not Scots, who've used the party system and 1707 to advantage while avoiding any of the responsibilities of the 'shared' identity English people seem to need in order to feel liked - that's quickly disappearing.

    You'd think a thousand years of independent history never happened or the accolade of Europe's oldest nation state meant nothing to hear stupid, useless English people prattling on about the war and traitors like Churchill or quoting Chesterton ('We are the people of England, and we are have yet to speak...'), or sucking up to the very aliens whose politicians rule us and, dominating every aspect of government as they did after Blair was elected in '97, actually opened the inlet valve for a great flood of parasites to enter England while Scottish asylum offices actually went on strike, refusing to process forms and sending all applicants south to England, a flagrant breach of law and civil service employment conditions about which Scottish Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered nothing done.

    Let's get this straight for the benefit of foreign readers: there is no 'British' identity or 'British' culture or 'British' accent (in the sense of one standing for all the others). 'Britain' is NOT a nation. Britain a is a political arrangement, and one designed from the outset to bleed dry and destroy England. A managed extinction is taking place, with everything now being sold off to foreign money men while we ourselves remain tethered to our stall like some great sow, upturned helplessly, teats bared to an army of salivating parasites - including Irish and Scots, of whom the world would have heard little or nothing but for us. If conniving blowhard Alex Salmond, for whom the English are authors of all Scotland's misfortunes, had another reason for making sure his vile people would walk right back into their subsidised unionist feather bed in the event that Europe went sour on them I'd like to hear it.

    When people want to be something other than what they are, when they need to be liked and are too ashamed or too weak to raise a word of protest about being stripped of everything they own by an alien political elite that no longer even recognises their right to exist as a nation, an elite prepared in this case to enforce Brussels regional directives which will sunder England into a dozen and more local fiefdoms, then they deserve all they get. Look at the morons simpering around 'Prince' Harry's race-mixing marriage. The same half-wits will soon worship at the shrine of St Lawrence and think no more about it, treating it as part of national life, like the deplorable shill Peter Hitchens, the fake conservative who thinks we've come to accept Caribbean immigrants as (in his phrase) just 'part of the family'; and so we will accept them rather than defend ourselves, just as we will accept muslim dhimmitude in return for what we mistakenly think will be a quiet life.

    What was it your own Ben Franklin said about exchanging freedom for a little temporary safety deserving neither reward? The English, my people and some of the nicest, most tolerant and well intentioned on earth, must rediscover their pride or go under. They must learn to hate. There is nothing wrong with a perfectly normal human emotion directed at hateful things. Hate is demonised because it is the sole, sustainable impetus to self-defence we have. We must dispense with 'Britishness' for a start. Britishness is the cloak of anonymity oppressors use to divert credit to those in these islands who deserve none, a technique furthermore for diluting English identity and disguising the silent war being waged against her own corner of them.

    Will England awake? Will she ever stir herself? It breaks my heart to say so, but I doubt it.

    800 words bemoaning the scouring of England of the English yet not one mention of Jews.

    Irish and Scots get a scathing mention though.

    Spoken like a true Derbyshite!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. KenH says:
    @Bliss

    Yes, there’s negrolatry and some whites are terminally afflicted with it. But Fred Reed has a bad case of mestizolatry.
     
    And what should Derbyshire’s affliction be called? Sinolatry or yellolatry?

    Or negrohatry?

    And what should Derbyshire’s affliction be called? Sinolatry or yellolatry?

    I suppose but Derb doesn’t spend spill tons of ink extolling the virtues of the Chinese and their right immigrate to America en masse as Fred does the Mestizos.

    Or negrohatry?

    Except Derb doesn’t hate blacks. He expressed sympathy toward Stephen Lawrence in this article. His “hatred” amounts to recognizing that we’re different and incompatible races.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    You are absolutely correct. Why does any criticism of afro actions, and recognizing afro bad behavior, is always equated with hating Blacks. As you correctly pointed out, one has nothing to do with the other. Self preservation against afro aggression is not the same as committing hatred against them. Leftist (and many libs) always seem to have great difficulty in making subtle distinctions (it must be because they are more "open minded" than the rest of us, LOL). When it comes to hatred afro americans are the actors, and we are merely reacting to it... if they stopped doing it, we wouldn't even have to talk about it. [Afros reform yourselves, and say no to your leftist handlers, before you drag this country into irreversible ruin, to which we will all suffer for]
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Carlos32 says:

    Its all about the new religion of the UK.

    Immigration fuelled GDP growth and immigration fuelled house price inflation all backed up by the western elite wanting to de-nationalize and undermine national identity through multicultrualism and dividing society into small groups (its a control thing).

    Anything that goes directly against this is considered Sacrilege by the elite.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  161. Anon[355] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”
     
    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I'd guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions "how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!"

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message "You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!" while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message "Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!"

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly "tainted blood"...

    The key factor is not Straw's fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    Great comment, I have always been fascinated by your (Ron’s) perspective, an amazing website that seems to bring out the {{truth}}, and run by a lansman no less! Anywho, thank god, it and you exist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. @Anon
    The details are relevant because to ignore them leads to Derbyshire's false conclusion, that there was nothing noteworthy about this murder and its investigation. Just because you can't grasp simple argumentation doesn't make me the moron. Consult a mirror for guidance on the location of your nearest moron.

    The details are relevant because to ignore them leads to Derbyshire’s false conclusion, that there was nothing noteworthy about this murder and its investigation.

    Wow, you’re thick.

    The point is that the conclusion “that there was nothing noteworthy about this murder and its investigation” is immaterial. There is no degree of noteworthiness that could justify the response.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Che Guava says:
    @Dr. X
    The English Bill of Rights is merely a law of Parliament that can be changed at any time by a simple majority vote in the Commons.

    It's not like the U.S. Constitution, which places limits on the government itself, and cannot be changed without supermajorities in both houses of Congress and a supermajority of the states ratifying the change.

    The right to keep and bear arms was listed in the English Bill of Rights, but today the UK has got some of the most drastic gun laws in the world. They have even changed the very structure of their government by parliamentary votes -- for example, reducing the power of the monarch and of the House of Lords, and making Commons the supreme authority.

    We have a written constitution because they don't.

    Alright, thank you for the reply, but I still cannot see how the old Bill of Rights for England and Wales, and the very siimilar bill in Scotland have ever been repealed, so they remain valid.

    The pretence that neither exists is simply a dirty lie( (and fictioo) on the part of lawyers and judiaiary

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    I'll reply this time, Mr. Guava. Others would know much better than me whether the Magna Carta, the old Bill of Rights, etc. are supposedly the law of the land in formerly-Great formerly-Britain. However, it really doesn't matter so much that there is a piece of paper somewhere in a musuem, but rather that the people of the country take any interest in defending it.

    In America through the early 1980's at least, though having tailed off since the Socialist Roosevelts's massively unconstitutionaly Raw Deal, you would still hear/read the media and lots of even high-level politcians bring up the Constitution in discussions lawmaking. It's not that long ago (I can remember) when the Supreme Court ruled on cases which involved dilemmas, the pitting of one part of the Bill of Rights against another. Now, it's all just about finding "penumbras", basically loopholes, or just denying that it says what it says.

    Those old parchments are only as good as the people who believe in them. For a long time, the US Constitution mattered because people understood the reasons for it's creation and respected the wise men who created it. Right now, all you read is "muh constitution" as a slur. ... #NotAtAllHelpfulAssholes
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:
    @James brown
    Even here, there is something has being "off-topic". You did not understand my point.

    Let me repeat again. I was trying to say that if Lawrence's family knew what "The Mail" stands for (and the English Establishment) they wouldn't have never spoken with a bunch of hypocrites and liars that work for "The Mail". They wouldn't have accepted to be part of "The Establishmlent".

    They wouldn't let themselves be transformed in a "powerful symbol". Empty symbol,in fact.


    Your preferred subject: ...6M. I find this subject boring and useless.
    History is just propaganda. Men is incapable of true.

    I do believe that holocaust -(6 M? or 2 M? or 300.000? etc...) is being used as moral propaganda and moral blackmail.

    It is being used to steal land, natural resources , to kill, to destroy carreers, to enslave, to kill children, women etc...

    Raul Hilberg is just a historian. Supposedly he is an "authority" in the field, but that doesn't mean nothing. And when he writes "We didn’t have the evidence", it doesn't mean that "it" didn't happen.
    He meant that there is no "written order " from Hitler...

    In a free society, people should of course be free, to doubt the official History. In fact, in a free society "official History" wouldn't exist and the "crime of negationism" wouldn't exist.

    Another suggestion: use your time and intelligence to convince your fellow human beings about the crimes that are being committed today and maybe try to do something to stop them, if you can.

    Forget the past. It's a waste of time.

    Use the present to understand the present.

    The Daily Mail’s support for Lawrence is because his dad was once an employee of the editor, Dacre. I doubt they were ever friends, but they were at any rate close enough for the killing to become a matter of personal interest of the guy running the paper.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James Brown
    Maybe but it's highly unlikely.

    It's not only The Daily Mail that is responsible in transforming this tragedy (for those involved) in a national/international "cause célèbre". All the British Media are involved.

    And the main reason why that happened is because the killing happened at the "right time".

    It allows the Establishment to show that they are not racist.

    It allows the Establishment to talk about "Identity Politics" instead of "bread and butter" issues.

    Identity Politics and "Terrorism" are now the favorite subjects of politicians, journalists and all those who are "fighting" for a "better world".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  165. Che Guava says:
    @Bliss

    Yes, there’s negrolatry and some whites are terminally afflicted with it. But Fred Reed has a bad case of mestizolatry.
     
    And what should Derbyshire’s affliction be called? Sinolatry or yellolatry?

    Or negrohatry?

    On the www, is commmonly termed ”Yellow fever’, mainly applies to gay men with a fetish.

    Would not apply it to the Derb.must have had so many good women throwing themselves at him. Then, in the end, have to say that the result shows a litte yellow fever on the Derb” side, but it seems, with a very happy ending,

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss

    Would not apply it to the Derb.must have had so many good women throwing themselves at him.
     
    Actually it was Derbyshire, when he was a teaching English in China, who was literally throwing himself at his student (the Jeep she was riding away from him in), a Chinese girl half his age, and he is not embarrassed about it either. That’s the definition of yellow fever, of which he is a prime example. Here he is proudly telling the world about the feverishness of his lust:

    http://www.johnderbyshire.com/FamilyAlbum/Marriage/JeepStory/page.html

    In other words this hero of the White Supremacist movement is a hardcore, feverish “yellowlater” who hates “negrolaters” with a pathological passion. Plenty others like him in the WN leadership.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. Svigor says:
    @Ron Unz

    Okay, I checked. Jack Straw is apparently 1/8th (or less) Jewish. This would seem to rather explode your silly thesis that he is a “Jewish activist.”
     
    Well, my impression had been that he was something like half-Jewish, so it appears I was mistaken, though not completely so.

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    Assuming Straw is just your typical weak-willed politician-type, I'd guess he spends a great deal of his time in heavily-Jewish donor-circles, with those Jewish-activist donors probably telling him on numerous occasions "how can you yourself, someone of Jewish ancestry, be unwilling to support XYZ?!"

    Meanwhile, the massive Jewish presence in the British media is constantly bombarding everyone of even fractional Jewish ancestry with the message "You MUST be loyal to your fellow Jews!" while similarly bombarding everyone else with the message "Loyalty to fellow while Gentiles is PURE EVIL and must be eradicated!"

    By contrast, suppose that most major British donors were constantly saying in private how much they disliked Jews and thought they should be kept far away from any political position. And also suppose that British media were constantly trumpeting the massive villainy of Jews, and their totally disgusting and evil habits, to such an extent that denouncing Jews became part of almost every casual conversation.

    Under such circumstances, I strongly suspect that a go-along fellow like Straw would do whatever he could to disassociate all his political positions from the shame of his slightly "tainted blood"...

    The key factor is not Straw's fractional ancestry, but the massive impact coming from widespread control of money and media in a society.

    I too heard Straw was half-Jewish, long ago (I first heard his name as a shill for Neocon warmongering).

    However, his being part-Jewish can still have a considerable impact in a political environment in which both media and money are so heavily dominated by Jewish-activists.

    The white half basically adds up to 0, politically and culturally speaking, in the current climate. 0.5 is infinitely more than 0.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. Svigor says:
    @Biff
    Lots of non-Jewish Zionists in politics:
    Rumsfeld
    McCain
    Biden
    Etc....

    Yes, they turn the lights on and off and fetch coffee on Sabbath, too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. Svigor says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    The essential thing about Black worship, and the quality that confirms it as nothing but phony sentimentality, is that there is really nothing to worship them for. When was the last time that a Black man overawed you with his intellect, or convicted you with the caliber of his moral fiber, or commanded your honor by the deep and tragic significance of his life? If you think about it honestly, you'll probably find that this has never happened. But without a tincture of such things there is no ground for genuine veneration, let alone worship.

    Thus the full court press to manufacture such entities where they do not actually exist. The rather benign history of Black slavery is reconceptualized as one long via dolorosa. "Heroes" are made out of dumb thugs like Trayvon Martin or vile and sanctimonious hacks like MLK. And then there are the Black "intellectuals" like Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas, who are nothing but second-rate regurgitators of cranky, movement-conservative bromides.

    It is pathetic watching Whites fall all over themselves to find any reason to venerate Black people. Such displays are shameful to begin with, and doubly so when the object of veneration has no sublime qualities meriting such. So what explains this absurd Hanuman cult? Is it guilt? No, it cannot be, for there is little for White people to feel genuinely guilty about; and in any case, the emotion of guilt, whether genuine or not, has a limited shelf life. People will only feel guilty for so long before having done with it, and pseudo-religious movements based on guilt tend to wind themselves up in the course of a single generation. Should "White guilt" have been responsible for Black worship it would have dissolved itself long ago. The only constant and elemental force in human nature is the desire for power. Negrolatry is explained by pure and simple condescension.

    Nobody fauns and fusses over someone the way Whites do with Blacks unless they feel utterly superior to them---so superior that the ranking is not even in question, i.e. the way you would feel about a pet dog. If Blacks had actually been any good at anything, they would have been resented as rivals or, at best, respected as adversaries. In either case they would have been approached very differently. It is only in regard to pets that one sees such lavish displays of affection, such ironical attempts at humanization, and such shameless crowing about the benefits one has conferred. And this is all done only for power's sake, as if to say "See how mighty I am with respect to this creature?" It has nothing to do with any attempt to objectively appraise reality. It is a dream-drama generated by, for, and within the ego of the subject.

    How far removed is such an attitude from genuine worship! Literally, as far removed as hell is from heaven. For nobody makes a pet and plaything out of the living God, the all-knowing, all-seeing, and all-powerful ground of being, Who made the world by will alone and can unmake it just as easily, Who is alone the true and fitting object of worship. Human nature rebels against the very existence of this God Who sets a limit to the free play of ego, and we must be received with grace and weaned back by mortification and penance, works of charity, obedience, suffering, and trial. Not willing to endure any of this, the majority of men go running back to their idols.

    Black worship is false religion, bastardized science, vain egotism, phony sentimentality, and hideous pretension. It ought to despised and spat upon wherever it appears. The abominations of MLK Day and Black History Month must be removed, and all altars to this despicable cult broken and left to ruin. Let the Hollywood films be burnt; let all words of Harper Lee and Maya Angelou be shredded and turned to ash. Let it all be expunged and forgotten. The generation is born even now who will do it.

    I have tried to come up with a list of endeavors and qualities at which blacks excel whites, but horses do not excel blacks. All I have so far is basketball, defensive back, and wide receiver (opposing thumb advantage be real yo).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. Svigor says:
    @Bliss

    Here’s a story from across the pond, a story about negrolatry. Don’t reach for your dictionary; I just made that word up.
     
    Negrolatry? I think Priss Factor used that word first.

    Btw, there are hundreds of black idols of the Madonna with Child worshipped in churches across Europe for centuries. Would you consider them examples of negrolatry?

    Haha, love it. Hey, tell us about how much black blood Jews have, pumping through their hearts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. @Anonymous
    The Daily Mail's support for Lawrence is because his dad was once an employee of the editor, Dacre. I doubt they were ever friends, but they were at any rate close enough for the killing to become a matter of personal interest of the guy running the paper.

    Maybe but it’s highly unlikely.

    It’s not only The Daily Mail that is responsible in transforming this tragedy (for those involved) in a national/international “cause célèbre”. All the British Media are involved.

    And the main reason why that happened is because the killing happened at the “right time”.

    It allows the Establishment to show that they are not racist.

    It allows the Establishment to talk about “Identity Politics” instead of “bread and butter” issues.

    Identity Politics and “Terrorism” are now the favorite subjects of politicians, journalists and all those who are “fighting” for a “better world”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. Che Guava says:
    @utu

    ‘The Cathnlic Church offers the sacrament of confession, penance, and absolution.
    So, Blair knew that he had comitted hideous crimes, but knew the only place he could receive absolution was as a Catholic.’
     
    It would be nice if true. Did he change his ways? Did he stop selling his services to the Powers of Darkness? Any signs of contrition?

    Clearly not. As I said, my Irirsh friend was, IMHO, perceptive on it.

    As an aside. Bliar was illicitly taking holy communnion many times before his catecchism and first confession.

    When in a Catholic Church, I take the Eucharist because I am baptised by what Canon Law terms ‘an irregular priest’, meaning one consecrated in the apostolic succession, but not spefically RC. Also have taken Catholic catechism.

    Where I know I go against Canon Law in taking the Eucharist (which, as doughy bread alone most of the time now, is a broken sacrament), is in not having done confession (in Japan, never see anyone in there), and, the key where I am in the wrong under Cath. doctrine, never taken official and ceremonial first communion.

    Even though I do not like this Pope, will probably take the latter two steps.

    Blair, on the other hand, no valid baptism, no catechism.no confession, and no first confirmation, was taking the Eucharist (I would-guess that he was careful to find a church that administers both bread and wine).

    Utu, you are absolutely correct that he has no contrition, his biz habits and customers prove it

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. charger says:
    @Achmed E. Newman
    You sort of had me till you started talking about dicks, and then, worse yet, the Bee Gees. You could have come up with 1000 English bands and artists ahead of them (I'm not knocking their earlier stuff, like Massachusetts, but Stayin' Alive? Come the f__k on, man!)

    Speaking of music, I'm sorry to do this repeatedly, but everytime I hear of the Home Office Secretary named Jack Straw, who I knew absolutely nothing about, nor cared to, until this column, I have to listen to Jack Straw from Wichita. So do you all now ... or you really should - it's not just the all-American lyrics, great tune sung nicely by Bobby, with back-up by Jerry, great percussion from Mickey and Billy, Phil Lesh's bass, and whatever great keyboardist hadn't overdosed yet at the time of recording, but Jerry's lead guitar makes it beat hell out of any Bee Gees. Bee Gees! What the hell, man!?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAv71VbdkBc

    Mickey Hart didn’t play on that tour.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Thanks. Did he not go on the Europe '72 tour?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. @Che Guava
    Alright, thank you for the reply, but I still cannot see how the old Bill of Rights for England and Wales, and the very siimilar bill in Scotland have ever been repealed, so they remain valid.

    The pretence that neither exists is simply a dirty lie( (and fictioo) on the part of lawyers and judiaiary

    I’ll reply this time, Mr. Guava. Others would know much better than me whether the Magna Carta, the old Bill of Rights, etc. are supposedly the law of the land in formerly-Great formerly-Britain. However, it really doesn’t matter so much that there is a piece of paper somewhere in a musuem, but rather that the people of the country take any interest in defending it.

    In America through the early 1980′s at least, though having tailed off since the Socialist Roosevelts’s massively unconstitutionaly Raw Deal, you would still hear/read the media and lots of even high-level politcians bring up the Constitution in discussions lawmaking. It’s not that long ago (I can remember) when the Supreme Court ruled on cases which involved dilemmas, the pitting of one part of the Bill of Rights against another. Now, it’s all just about finding “penumbras”, basically loopholes, or just denying that it says what it says.

    Those old parchments are only as good as the people who believe in them. For a long time, the US Constitution mattered because people understood the reasons for it’s creation and respected the wise men who created it. Right now, all you read is “muh constitution” as a slur. … #NotAtAllHelpfulAssholes

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. @charger
    Mickey Hart didn't play on that tour.

    Thanks. Did he not go on the Europe ’72 tour?

    Read More
    • Replies: @ben tillman
    Mickey didn't rejoin the band until 1975.

    The hilarious thing about Jack Straw *a Barlow composition) is that it is supposed to have been the band's rejoinder to feminist criticism that the band was sexist.

    "We can share the women. . . ." Ha ha.

    , @charger
    He was out of the band from 1971 to 1974 after his dad, who briefly managed The Dead, was accused of embezzling a substantial amount of money from the group.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  175. @Achmed E. Newman
    OK, so you were wrong about Jack Straw, but your discussion of Jews and the media is right on the money, especially your last sentence. I'm amazed to see you put this out there.

    That said, most people seem resigned to this state of affairs, or at least believe that all they can do about it is write a bit about it in a blog post or comment. Not true. Every single one of you can do something about it, like 1st thing tomorrow morning. Cancel the TV portion of your cable/internet service and turn off your TV! (in either order). Don't susbscribe to payed services of the Lyin Press print/internet! Read the news the way you want off of unz.com, VDare, ZeroHedge, and anywhere else YOU want to on the internet. It's not 1995 anymore.

    All this complaining on the internet about big media and control thereof isn't going to do anything. Cut off the money, and they'll feel it. Hell, in England don't people pay a significant tax directly to the government to be ALLOWED to get brainwashed by the Beeb on their own Telees?. I wonder what life would be like and how things would change if the Brits would forgo the Telee and hang out at the pubs again, [shudder] discussing things among themselves and shit [/shudder]. No, no, we can't have that!

    OK, so you were wrong about Jack Straw . . . .

    Not so fast. Proof?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Svigor
    Wikipedia's article cites:

    How Jewish is Jack Straw?The Jewish Chronicle, July 31, 2008
     
    As evidence that Straw is 1/8th Jewish, but the link is dead.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. @Achmed E. Newman
    Thanks. Did he not go on the Europe '72 tour?

    Mickey didn’t rejoin the band until 1975.

    The hilarious thing about Jack Straw *a Barlow composition) is that it is supposed to have been the band’s rejoinder to feminist criticism that the band was sexist.

    “We can share the women. . . .” Ha ha.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. charger says:
    @Achmed E. Newman
    Thanks. Did he not go on the Europe '72 tour?

    He was out of the band from 1971 to 1974 after his dad, who briefly managed The Dead, was accused of embezzling a substantial amount of money from the group.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Thanks, Charger and Mr. Tillman. BTW, I wrote "back-up by Jerry" as I pasted the song in, but this one is really a duet.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. prusmc says: • Website
    @anonymous
    The comments at Taki's, like those at ZeroHedge, had become pretty trashy, dominated by witless obsessives who eventually drove off those with something worthwhile to say. Cf., the warning given to "Thomm" in this thread.

    I suspect that the website owners decided to pull the plug out of embarrassment.

    The comment thread was what free me to Taki. Sure you had to wade through a lot of garbage but that was your choice. When you mine for gold you get a lot more dross than nuggets. When Taki abandoned comments I abandoned Taki.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. Svigor says:
    @ben tillman

    OK, so you were wrong about Jack Straw . . . .
     
    Not so fast. Proof?

    Wikipedia’s article cites:

    How Jewish is Jack Straw?The Jewish Chronicle, July 31, 2008

    As evidence that Straw is 1/8th Jewish, but the link is dead.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    The Internet Archive is good for dead links: https://web.archive.org/web/20091025130620/http://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/how-jewish-is/how-jewish-jack-straw
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. Art Deco says:

    There is no clearer illustration of the mass psychopathology that has afflicted white people than negrolatry—and no finer example that the canonization of St. Stephen Lawrence.

    Except it hasn’t. The pathologies infect what Glenn Reynolds calls ‘the administrative class’ (as well as the media, the bar, and the faculty). The man in the street doesn’t think this way.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  181. SMK says: • Website
    @Curtis Mouser I
    Great Cuckstain is a joke. My advice to Trump: don't touch this dump or the grey Witch with a barge pole.

    Lee Rigby, a White soldier killed by a 50IQ dindu thug, many other black-on-White murders added together don't get the publicity this lanky drug dealing dindu gets. At least in the States you have Fox News. All our media is CultMarx propaganda tools. Appropriate that the colossal tool Harry has been played by a washed-up, divorced, geriatric dindu SJWitch - Personifies Cuckstain.

    Does the frumpy old hag call for National Rugby Day? National Kris's Donald Day? National Telford or Rotherham Day? No. That's about as likely as her (((puppet masters))) in MSM pointing out what a laughing stock this dump is. as ridiculous as a frumpy, dumpy grey vicar's daughter from Middle England pairing hertrouser suit for dumpy old hag's with leopard print heels for hot models looking to nab a footballer.

    Yeah I get, never refer to Hawking as professor or doctor, but always refer to a black who got a PhD in education from Herschel as doctor MLK. ARSEs - White Men are the dumb ones, amirire, hi 5.

    How many whites have been murdered by blacks and Muslims since the killing of Stephen Lawrence in 1993, 25 years ago? How many of the women and girls were raped and murdered? How many women and girls have been raped and gang-raped? How many of the victims were abducted, enslaved, tortured, mutilated? None of them are sainted and idolized and memorialized. All of heir lives and deaths, untold myriads put together, are far less important, and symbolic and meaningful, than the life and death of Stephen Lawrence. Incredibly, the governing-classes and ruling-elites of the UK are more evil and insane than those of the United States.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. @jimmyriddle
    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.

    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris's payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.

    Both sides preferred "institutional racism" to be highlighted and good old police corruption to be downplayed.

    Your comment is so important that it should be repeated in full:

    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.

    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris’s payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    The policemen guarding one suspect’s house allowed his associate to leave with a bin bag full of clothes.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.

    Both sides preferred “institutional racism” to be highlighted and good old police corruption to be downplayed.

    Even those of us who disagree with the narrative are suckered into opposing negrolatry instead of looking deeper.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. anon[119] • Disclaimer says:

    England didn’t just bring this on themselves, they brought this on the whole western world, by allowing the Jews to re-enter England after a 300 year ban. Next thing you know the Jews took over England’s banking system, married into their crumbling aristocracy and the rest, as they say, is history.

    Negolatry is a invention of the Jews, on both sides of the Atlantic.

    Thank Oliver Cromwell for the decline and decadence of the west.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Pity for those around you that you're a kook.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. Crimson2 says:

    John, you and your brain-dead fans aren’t worthy enough to clean James Shaw, Jr.’s toilet.

    Society has moved on. Your daughters and grandaughters will soon be brought to orgasm by all types of minorities. Tough break.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  185. Art Deco says:
    @anon
    England didn't just bring this on themselves, they brought this on the whole western world, by allowing the Jews to re-enter England after a 300 year ban. Next thing you know the Jews took over England's banking system, married into their crumbling aristocracy and the rest, as they say, is history.

    Negolatry is a invention of the Jews, on both sides of the Atlantic.

    Thank Oliver Cromwell for the decline and decadence of the west.

    Pity for those around you that you’re a kook.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. @Achmed E. Newman
    You sort of had me till you started talking about dicks, and then, worse yet, the Bee Gees. You could have come up with 1000 English bands and artists ahead of them (I'm not knocking their earlier stuff, like Massachusetts, but Stayin' Alive? Come the f__k on, man!)

    Speaking of music, I'm sorry to do this repeatedly, but everytime I hear of the Home Office Secretary named Jack Straw, who I knew absolutely nothing about, nor cared to, until this column, I have to listen to Jack Straw from Wichita. So do you all now ... or you really should - it's not just the all-American lyrics, great tune sung nicely by Bobby, with back-up by Jerry, great percussion from Mickey and Billy, Phil Lesh's bass, and whatever great keyboardist hadn't overdosed yet at the time of recording, but Jerry's lead guitar makes it beat hell out of any Bee Gees. Bee Gees! What the hell, man!?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAv71VbdkBc

    You sort of had me till you started talking about dicks, and then, worse yet, the Bee Gees. You could have come up with 1000 English bands and artists ahead of them (I’m not knocking their earlier stuff, like Massachusetts, but Stayin’ Alive? Come the f__k on, man!)

    Speaking of music, I’m sorry to do this repeatedly, but everytime I hear of the Home Office Secretary named Jack Straw, who I knew absolutely nothing about, nor cared to, until this column, I have to listen to Jack Straw from Wichita. So do you all now … or you really should – it’s not just the all-American lyrics, great tune sung nicely by Bobby, with back-up by Jerry, great percussion from Mickey and Billy, Phil Lesh’s bass, and whatever great keyboardist hadn’t overdosed yet at the time of recording, but Jerry’s lead guitar makes it beat hell out of any Bee Gees. Bee Gees! What the hell, man!?

    Ha ha. As fate would have it, Stayin’ Alive came on the radio as I was bringing the kids home from school. That jogged my memory, and I recalled that the Dead teased Stayin’ Alive on 4/24/78 at Horton Field House in Normal, Ill. It was mostly Bobby, but Jerry added a little riff. Stayin’ Alive > Me & My Uncle. No Jack Straw that night.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. @charger
    He was out of the band from 1971 to 1974 after his dad, who briefly managed The Dead, was accused of embezzling a substantial amount of money from the group.

    Thanks, Charger and Mr. Tillman. BTW, I wrote “back-up by Jerry” as I pasted the song in, but this one is really a duet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  188. joef says:
    @KenH

    And what should Derbyshire’s affliction be called? Sinolatry or yellolatry?
     
    I suppose but Derb doesn't spend spill tons of ink extolling the virtues of the Chinese and their right immigrate to America en masse as Fred does the Mestizos.

    Or negrohatry?
     
    Except Derb doesn't hate blacks. He expressed sympathy toward Stephen Lawrence in this article. His "hatred" amounts to recognizing that we're different and incompatible races.

    You are absolutely correct. Why does any criticism of afro actions, and recognizing afro bad behavior, is always equated with hating Blacks. As you correctly pointed out, one has nothing to do with the other. Self preservation against afro aggression is not the same as committing hatred against them. Leftist (and many libs) always seem to have great difficulty in making subtle distinctions (it must be because they are more “open minded” than the rest of us, LOL). When it comes to hatred afro americans are the actors, and we are merely reacting to it… if they stopped doing it, we wouldn’t even have to talk about it. [Afros reform yourselves, and say no to your leftist handlers, before you drag this country into irreversible ruin, to which we will all suffer for]

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth

    You are absolutely correct. Why does any criticism of afro actions, and recognizing afro bad behavior, is always equated with hating Blacks.
     
    Well, now Old Sport; the correlation isn't 100%, but I wouldn't say it's anywhere near nonexistent either.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  189. ‘They were arrested, but there wasn’t enough evidence to proceed to a trial, so charges were dropped’.

    There was more than enough evidence it was just buried on behalf of a local gangster whose son was involved in the murder.

    While they waste no time harping on about the police being ‘institutionally racist’ (an utterly meaningless phrase institutions do not harbour prejudices in and of themselves) the reality is that it was police corruption not racial solidarity that casued the prosecution to fail. I have yet to see evidence of systematic racial bias in the Metropolitan Police (of the real kind not the fake disparate impact kind) but we have seen many, many examples of police corruption the peadophillia scandal being just one example.

    Anyway the upshot is double jeapordy is gone (ah who needs it-its only an ancient safegaurd against political persecution amirite?), The Metropolitan Police was neutered and a few years after the murder operation trident had to be started-look it up. Designed to stop certain sections of the population from shooting one another (in a country which had banned and confiscated handguns in 1995) it too was folded up when it was made clear that it disproportionally targeted blacks.

    Plus ca change

    C’est la vie

    Je suis fou

    Apres moi le deluge

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    the reality is that it was police corruption not racial solidarity that casued the prosecution to fail
     
    Indeed. And although the killers of Stephen Lawrence were clearly racist, London in 1993 was not known for white racist gangs stabbing random blacks. The defining feature of this gang was not their racism, but their well-founded attitude that they were above the law; and they felt that way because Norris's family was bribing the police.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. ‘My point here is not to belittle Stephen Lawrence, who seems to have been an amiable and well-behaved young man’

    There is actually alot of evidence he was involved in drug dealing. Not to speak ill of the dead but his death has been politicised so long it is important to mention.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  191. @David JW
    John Derbyshire, in 2011 when two of the original suspects were found guilty, the evidence was a speck of blood on clothing that had been repeatedly forensically examined for over a decade. They claim that forensic techniques weren't any good in the 1990s -- but in fact there is a simple explanation, that the police planted the evidence in order to find them guilty. It doesn't really stand up to scrutiny to argue that repeated forensic examination of the same item of clothing had finally produced a speck of blood.

    Compare the killing by a negro horde of PC Blakelock in the 1980s and you will see the difference. The suspected killer has been released and the police are not pursuing the matter.

    There were actually two eyewitnesses that one of the perpetrators father (who was a local gangster) admitted to paying off to alter thier eyewitness accounts. All of this is readily available in mainstream newspapers.

    However I can easily see the police loosening its foresnic standards to secure a politically motivated (re)prosecution

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  192. @Anon
    The segment of the population with the absolute lowest IQ is treated like royalty rather than the unproductive buffoons that they generally are.

    Only 5% of the population or less is into smart stuff. How many people read serious literature? How many people read philosophy? Also, intelligence isn't very exciting to most people. While smart folks might be stimulated by listening to Gore Vidal or Chomsky, most are not. Also, most high IQ people tend to be proggy and anti-white.

    For most people, culture is about fun, thrills, and excitement. They love blockbuster movies, dumb TV shows, music videos. rap music, pornification of mainstream culture, pulp fiction, trash comedy, (look at the success of Stephen King novels and 50 SHADES OF GREY), etc.

    So, for most people, blacks are the natural royalty because black women shake their booties so lasciviously. And there is the song-and-dong factor with black men. They sing rap about 'muh dic*', and most women think about sex than ideas at most times.

    Chelsea Handler is a Jewish comedienne. She may be higher IQ and grew up with privilege, but she's a song-and-dong girl.

    https://zhiphopcleveland.com/3358992/wow-chelsea-handler-talks-about-sex-with-50-cent-why-ciara-broke-them-up/

    Anglo-Saxons are turning into Junglo-Saxons because of these factors.
    It could well be that Jewish power will be destroyed by black dongs. If Chelsea Handler is sign of future Jewishness pooterin passion, it will be junglowizc fever. It's no wonder so many Jewish guys feel dejected and go with Asian girls. But that will lead to Jewish dissipation because of yellow mellow factor. Jewish power grew from high IQ, tribalism, and chutzpah. But if future Jewish kids are yellow-mellowed, they will be obedient than pushy. Look at Sean Lennon. John Lennon had a kid with Yoko, and the result is some dork-ass kibbler. (Incidentally, Cynthia Lennon, who was dumped by John, went off with a Negro).

    Most people prefer to watch TV, movies, and listen to pop music than do heady stuff involving intelligence and ideas. More women talk about inches on puds than calculus of the universe just like most men are more interested in boob measurements than latest physics formulas about black holes.

    This is why there is a real chance of the world turning black. Blacks got all of Sub-Saharan Africa. They will take over Brazil which is already 60% black. They are the majority of Cuba. Blacks are the main idols of US and UK and France. Canada worships Negroes. Jungle Fever is promoted all over EU. Japan promotes half-black kids of black fathers. They will take over sports and will become the 'national heroes' as athletes are the biggest heroes of any nation. Then, Japanese will cheer for black heroes, and more Africans will come and have kids with Japanese women, and Japanese women will be cuck-roaches. Few yrs back, Miss Japan was black child of a black father, and she attacked Japan of being 'racist' and called for open borders. She is now the new voice of Japanese national conscience.

    In France, tons of black babies are being born, and lots from white wombs. And Macron the cuck is calling for 200 million blacks in EU to colonize white wombs.

    Now, this could be stopped with race-ism. It's obvious that nothing more destructive of civilization than black DNA. Too Many Blacks always means social breakdown: Africa, Brazil, Detroit, Baltimore, parts of London, parts of Paris, and etc.
    But, all this Afroyalty mindset has white folks worshiping blacks like the animals worship the lions as natural royalty in THE LION BLING.
    Also, white guilt about blacks have become so sacralized that it's gone universal. So, not only must the West open up to more and more Negroes but Japan too is attacked as 'racist' if it has doubts about the blessing of having too many Negroes.

    Homos and Negroes. There is a universalist cult around those two groups. All societies are expected to 'welcome', 'include', and celebrate them as special. And of course, the two groups have bee promoted mostly by Jews who seek to weaken and break down gentile(especially white and Christian) pride and defenses against globalism.

    ‘While smart folks might be stimulated by listening to Gore Vidal or Chomsky’

    Jesus wept thats embarrasing. I can understand an 18 year old student not being able to see through Chomsky’s sophistry but anyone with a little life experience and perspective? Vidal is just an effette upper class gay contrarian and anyone using him as a yardstick of intellectual rigour needs to read more widely.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  193. @bookish1
    In the same line of thought what about all those blacks who were hung by ropes in the U.S. and that they are making a memorial to all those poor victims. But how many of them were hung because they killed someone, raped a white women, continuously presented themselves as a threat to whites and made life unbearable for white society on some way? I would say the better than 90% of those blacks that hung were hung for a reason that the MSM never mentions.

    Actually most lynchings (white and black) were a function of mistrials and/or corrupt juries. Very often local whites would drag a black from the courtroom and lynch them as a way of stopping further violent acts from blacks. Lacking this deterrent effect white civilisation would have ended, just as it has today in mnay of the civil rights era towns in the american south. We imagine (thanks to relentless propaganda) that an impromptu lynching was the worst possible example of the intercommunal violence between white and blacks, but actually it was nowhere near savage enough to act as a deterrent- they literally had to burn blacks alive to get them to stop raping and murdering white children. Read the negro the southerners problems by thomas nelson page.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. @edward collins
    'They were arrested, but there wasn’t enough evidence to proceed to a trial, so charges were dropped'.

    There was more than enough evidence it was just buried on behalf of a local gangster whose son was involved in the murder.

    While they waste no time harping on about the police being 'institutionally racist' (an utterly meaningless phrase institutions do not harbour prejudices in and of themselves) the reality is that it was police corruption not racial solidarity that casued the prosecution to fail. I have yet to see evidence of systematic racial bias in the Metropolitan Police (of the real kind not the fake disparate impact kind) but we have seen many, many examples of police corruption the peadophillia scandal being just one example.

    Anyway the upshot is double jeapordy is gone (ah who needs it-its only an ancient safegaurd against political persecution amirite?), The Metropolitan Police was neutered and a few years after the murder operation trident had to be started-look it up. Designed to stop certain sections of the population from shooting one another (in a country which had banned and confiscated handguns in 1995) it too was folded up when it was made clear that it disproportionally targeted blacks.

    Plus ca change

    C'est la vie

    Je suis fou

    Apres moi le deluge

    the reality is that it was police corruption not racial solidarity that casued the prosecution to fail

    Indeed. And although the killers of Stephen Lawrence were clearly racist, London in 1993 was not known for white racist gangs stabbing random blacks. The defining feature of this gang was not their racism, but their well-founded attitude that they were above the law; and they felt that way because Norris’s family was bribing the police.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. Randal says:
    @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    For British conservatives whose memories go back to the 1980s and before, such as myself and John Derbyshire, Jack Straw will always be a “long-time hard-left extremist”, because that’s how we remember him from those years (or at any rate, perhaps, how we remember him being criticised by the conservatives around us in the 1990s when he had risen to greater prominence….) He was an activist in the Labour Party of the 1970s and 1980s, of the “tax the rich until the pips squeak” and Michael Foot generation – hard left by any reasonable definition.

    Matters are complicated by his subsequent neocon drift, in the original sense of neoconservative meaning an authoritarian former hard leftist in the US or UK – usually Trotskyite – who realised in the late C20th that supporting the old left was not going to give them the power they craved and who therefore shifted to a more rightwing stance in order to be on the winning side. In the US these people became supporters of the Republican Party but in the UK their path to power was via the Blairite neocon takeover of the Labour Party after the political disasters for the old left in the late 1970s and 1980s.

    But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the “extreme leftist” label with equal abandon.

    It’s a genuinely complicated issue, though, because the neocon hard left basically took their social radicalism and their internationalist anti-patriotism and joined in an unholy alliance with big business that involved dropping the parts of their program that reflected solidarity with the indigenous working class. The said unholy alliance essentially then won everything in the 1990s and 2000s.

    Are they still “leftist extremists”? From my perspective they are, for sure, and the socially radical aspects of their triumph are as up for overturning as the interventionist and globalist parts, in the longer perspective, though it looks pretty hopeless at the moment. They just don’t happen to agree completely with old left types who still retain some vestiges of the old socialist bond of support for the working classes in their own country.

    As for Jack Straw, well he’s actually fairly complicated. While I defer to no man in my own contempt for the Blairites who enabled the disastrous Iraq War, and he was one of them, I also recall that at a crucial time he stood against further aggression against Iran (and by some reports was consequently removed from his position as Foreign Secretary as a result of US regime pressure). I’d still like to see him locked up next to the likes of Blair and Campbell, but perhaps serving a shorter sentence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Jack Straw was disliked by Condoleeza Rice for personal reasons I recall. He took her to visit his constituency where she was (predictably) mobbed by angry Muslims. It clearly shocked her and she never forgave him for it.
    , @Dieter Kief
    Interesting!
    , @Anonymous

    As for Jack Straw, well he’s actually fairly complicated. While I defer to no man in my own contempt for the Blairites who enabled the disastrous Iraq War, and he was one of them, I also recall that at a crucial time he stood against further aggression against Iran (and by some reports was consequently removed from his position as Foreign Secretary as a result of US regime pressure).
     
    This certainly did happen to his predecessor, Robin Cook, who was removed under U.S. pressure because of his pro-Palestinian attitudes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  196. Clyde says:
    @Bliss

    Here’s a story from across the pond, a story about negrolatry. Don’t reach for your dictionary; I just made that word up.
     
    Negrolatry? I think Priss Factor used that word first.

    Btw, there are hundreds of black idols of the Madonna with Child worshipped in churches across Europe for centuries. Would you consider them examples of negrolatry?

    Priss Factor is now anonymous 425 …seems to me

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dissident

    Priss Factor is now anonymous 425 …seems to me
     
    Yet, he uses the same "coreeurospherenews" URL that I recall him using when posting as "Priss Factor". Seems to kind of defeat the purpose of posting "anonymously", no? Besides, I often find the writing itself-- style as well as content-- to reveal a common author.

    At any rate, I must say that I've enjoyed many of the comments from the individual-in-question, whomever he may actually be. Whatever his faults, excesses and limitations, he can also be both pretty darn funny as well as more than a little correct in his observations.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. Truth says:
    @joef
    You are absolutely correct. Why does any criticism of afro actions, and recognizing afro bad behavior, is always equated with hating Blacks. As you correctly pointed out, one has nothing to do with the other. Self preservation against afro aggression is not the same as committing hatred against them. Leftist (and many libs) always seem to have great difficulty in making subtle distinctions (it must be because they are more "open minded" than the rest of us, LOL). When it comes to hatred afro americans are the actors, and we are merely reacting to it... if they stopped doing it, we wouldn't even have to talk about it. [Afros reform yourselves, and say no to your leftist handlers, before you drag this country into irreversible ruin, to which we will all suffer for]

    You are absolutely correct. Why does any criticism of afro actions, and recognizing afro bad behavior, is always equated with hating Blacks.

    Well, now Old Sport; the correlation isn’t 100%, but I wouldn’t say it’s anywhere near nonexistent either.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    Maybe you are correct, but not to the New Left Progs, who attempt to destroy any dissenting opinion no matter where the source. Limo libs, and Corporatist, go along to keep themselves off the target list, so they can continue making money from flipping stocks (corporatist have eliminated the primary purpose of Capitalism, which is to provide goods & services from scarce resources; now its all about finance sector of Wall Street etc). Old school liberals are dismissed as not being radical enough. Any former leftist, or other fellow traveler, who questions any of official leftist rhetoric is quickly turned on and destroyed (using the power of the MSM to eat their own).

    Kayne West is a case in point: I am sure he still does not completely love whitey, but he is starting to realize that something is wrong with the corporatist/socialist agenda of our current two party system; thus his support for Trump. Trump is not a perfect candidate by any means, and is not the best choice in history. But compared to our other current political choices, he was the only viable candidate between all of them. Mr West recognizes this fact, and for this the leftist want to destroy him. This is mainly because he is a "bad dog" who is disobeying his leftist masters. I never particularly cared for him before, but I now feel sorry for the smear campaign he will have to endure from this leftist scum (he shows more bravery than most public figures, and I only hope he can hold up against it).

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:
    @Randal
    For British conservatives whose memories go back to the 1980s and before, such as myself and John Derbyshire, Jack Straw will always be a "long-time hard-left extremist", because that's how we remember him from those years (or at any rate, perhaps, how we remember him being criticised by the conservatives around us in the 1990s when he had risen to greater prominence....) He was an activist in the Labour Party of the 1970s and 1980s, of the "tax the rich until the pips squeak" and Michael Foot generation - hard left by any reasonable definition.

    Matters are complicated by his subsequent neocon drift, in the original sense of neoconservative meaning an authoritarian former hard leftist in the US or UK - usually Trotskyite - who realised in the late C20th that supporting the old left was not going to give them the power they craved and who therefore shifted to a more rightwing stance in order to be on the winning side. In the US these people became supporters of the Republican Party but in the UK their path to power was via the Blairite neocon takeover of the Labour Party after the political disasters for the old left in the late 1970s and 1980s.

    But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the “extreme leftist” label with equal abandon.
     
    It's a genuinely complicated issue, though, because the neocon hard left basically took their social radicalism and their internationalist anti-patriotism and joined in an unholy alliance with big business that involved dropping the parts of their program that reflected solidarity with the indigenous working class. The said unholy alliance essentially then won everything in the 1990s and 2000s.

    Are they still "leftist extremists"? From my perspective they are, for sure, and the socially radical aspects of their triumph are as up for overturning as the interventionist and globalist parts, in the longer perspective, though it looks pretty hopeless at the moment. They just don't happen to agree completely with old left types who still retain some vestiges of the old socialist bond of support for the working classes in their own country.

    As for Jack Straw, well he's actually fairly complicated. While I defer to no man in my own contempt for the Blairites who enabled the disastrous Iraq War, and he was one of them, I also recall that at a crucial time he stood against further aggression against Iran (and by some reports was consequently removed from his position as Foreign Secretary as a result of US regime pressure). I'd still like to see him locked up next to the likes of Blair and Campbell, but perhaps serving a shorter sentence.

    Jack Straw was disliked by Condoleeza Rice for personal reasons I recall. He took her to visit his constituency where she was (predictably) mobbed by angry Muslims. It clearly shocked her and she never forgave him for it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  199. joef says:
    @Truth

    You are absolutely correct. Why does any criticism of afro actions, and recognizing afro bad behavior, is always equated with hating Blacks.
     
    Well, now Old Sport; the correlation isn't 100%, but I wouldn't say it's anywhere near nonexistent either.

    Maybe you are correct, but not to the New Left Progs, who attempt to destroy any dissenting opinion no matter where the source. Limo libs, and Corporatist, go along to keep themselves off the target list, so they can continue making money from flipping stocks (corporatist have eliminated the primary purpose of Capitalism, which is to provide goods & services from scarce resources; now its all about finance sector of Wall Street etc). Old school liberals are dismissed as not being radical enough. Any former leftist, or other fellow traveler, who questions any of official leftist rhetoric is quickly turned on and destroyed (using the power of the MSM to eat their own).

    Kayne West is a case in point: I am sure he still does not completely love whitey, but he is starting to realize that something is wrong with the corporatist/socialist agenda of our current two party system; thus his support for Trump. Trump is not a perfect candidate by any means, and is not the best choice in history. But compared to our other current political choices, he was the only viable candidate between all of them. Mr West recognizes this fact, and for this the leftist want to destroy him. This is mainly because he is a “bad dog” who is disobeying his leftist masters. I never particularly cared for him before, but I now feel sorry for the smear campaign he will have to endure from this leftist scum (he shows more bravery than most public figures, and I only hope he can hold up against it).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  200. res says:
    @Svigor
    Wikipedia's article cites:

    How Jewish is Jack Straw?The Jewish Chronicle, July 31, 2008
     
    As evidence that Straw is 1/8th Jewish, but the link is dead.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. res says:
    @jimmyriddle
    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.

    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris's payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.

    Both sides preferred "institutional racism" to be highlighted and good old police corruption to be downplayed.

    Do you have any supporting references? If true this would be a good thing to emphasize when talking about this case.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    Do you have any supporting references? If true this would be a good thing to emphasize when talking about this case.
     
    https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-ellison-review

    There are also connections between the corrupt police officers in the Lawrence case, and the unsolved murder of Daniel Morgan in 1987. A review of the Morgan case is due to report this year. The case is even more disturbing than that of Lawrence, because the police corruption ran so deep that five separate murder investigations failed to make any progress; and also because newspapers owned by Rupert Murdoch played a role.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:

    Kanye West is influenced by his wife’s family, who are Trump supporters. (Some Armenian thing related to Russia I believe.)

    In fact, I remember that during the election campaign Kim Kardashian suggested she might vote for Trump, and immediately received a torrent of abuse which caused her to backtrack, at least publicly (and a few days later, in what I’m sure was a completely unrelated incident, she was attacked, beaten and robbed in Paris.)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  203. @Randal
    For British conservatives whose memories go back to the 1980s and before, such as myself and John Derbyshire, Jack Straw will always be a "long-time hard-left extremist", because that's how we remember him from those years (or at any rate, perhaps, how we remember him being criticised by the conservatives around us in the 1990s when he had risen to greater prominence....) He was an activist in the Labour Party of the 1970s and 1980s, of the "tax the rich until the pips squeak" and Michael Foot generation - hard left by any reasonable definition.

    Matters are complicated by his subsequent neocon drift, in the original sense of neoconservative meaning an authoritarian former hard leftist in the US or UK - usually Trotskyite - who realised in the late C20th that supporting the old left was not going to give them the power they craved and who therefore shifted to a more rightwing stance in order to be on the winning side. In the US these people became supporters of the Republican Party but in the UK their path to power was via the Blairite neocon takeover of the Labour Party after the political disasters for the old left in the late 1970s and 1980s.

    But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the “extreme leftist” label with equal abandon.
     
    It's a genuinely complicated issue, though, because the neocon hard left basically took their social radicalism and their internationalist anti-patriotism and joined in an unholy alliance with big business that involved dropping the parts of their program that reflected solidarity with the indigenous working class. The said unholy alliance essentially then won everything in the 1990s and 2000s.

    Are they still "leftist extremists"? From my perspective they are, for sure, and the socially radical aspects of their triumph are as up for overturning as the interventionist and globalist parts, in the longer perspective, though it looks pretty hopeless at the moment. They just don't happen to agree completely with old left types who still retain some vestiges of the old socialist bond of support for the working classes in their own country.

    As for Jack Straw, well he's actually fairly complicated. While I defer to no man in my own contempt for the Blairites who enabled the disastrous Iraq War, and he was one of them, I also recall that at a crucial time he stood against further aggression against Iran (and by some reports was consequently removed from his position as Foreign Secretary as a result of US regime pressure). I'd still like to see him locked up next to the likes of Blair and Campbell, but perhaps serving a shorter sentence.

    Interesting!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. Che Guava says:

    Thanks, Achmed. Point taken.

    After all, you have homosexual marriage (and by inference from many judges ,and educators, forced tranny ideology) by decree of the Supreme Court.

    Those were very strange and mysterious readings of implicit things in your constitution!

    Also thanks for your defs of ‘dilemna’ and ‘penumbra’ in the sense of U.S. const. law.

    Seen the former a few times, but was only taking it in the literal sense, the latter only once or twice, know the astronomy meaning, but had no idea what these legal morons were meaning by it.

    At least the jerks in the U.S.A. have to twist and squirm on law.

    In England and Wales, and a little later Scotland, the legal professions just decided, at some point, to simply pretend that their Bills of Rights don’t exist.

    I will close with an experiment in the U.S. legal vocab. you have taught me.

    ‘The stated rights to rights to life and the pursuit of happiness create a penumbra of doubt over claimed Second Amendment rights.’

    … blah, blah, blah.

    ‘To our learned selves, the conflict herein creates a true dilemna in Constitutional terms.’

    … more blah, blah.

    Am I having the rough gist of usage in those stupid meanings?

    Do not mistake me, I think your 2nd Amendment is great, among other points of your constitution. In Japan, a law was passed in the late 1860s or 1870s, firearms and sword control law. So you can buy shotguns or single-shot rifles (for hunting or frightening bears, and mainly restricted to rural people).

    You can buy a pistol, but have to leave it in a safe at the range.

    You can buy beautiful damascene.steel swords, under sprict conditions on storage and not having the hilt attached.

    This was all to put down the samurai and their loyalists in the various rebellions.

    Doesn’t stop the Yakuza and Yukio Mishima, among other parties, violating the law in different ways.

    One of the biggest Yakuza gangs even had SAMs, can’t imagine why, perhaps they thought they may be useful for some kind of extortion?

    That was over ten years ago, the other examples well before that.

    In the conditions of severe social disharmony prevailing in much of the USA, I think 2nd Amendment rights are great, be nice to have them even in a more harmonious situation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  205. @res
    Do you have any supporting references? If true this would be a good thing to emphasize when talking about this case.

    Do you have any supporting references? If true this would be a good thing to emphasize when talking about this case.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-ellison-review

    There are also connections between the corrupt police officers in the Lawrence case, and the unsolved murder of Daniel Morgan in 1987. A review of the Morgan case is due to report this year. The case is even more disturbing than that of Lawrence, because the police corruption ran so deep that five separate murder investigations failed to make any progress; and also because newspapers owned by Rupert Murdoch played a role.

    Read More
    • Replies: @res
    Thanks. From my reading that was full of political doubletalk. I think this is the most relevant part:

    On corruption, Ellison finds that specific allegations of corruption were made against 1 of the officers who had worked on the investigation of Stephen Lawrence’s murder, Detective Sergeant John Davidson. The allegations were made by a police officer to his superiors but were not brought to the attention of Macpherson. Ellison finds that this lack of disclosure was a “significant failure” by the Metropolitan Police.

    Ellison has looked at the Independent Police Complaints Commission’s 2006 report into these allegations, as well as the Metropolitan Police‟s own review in 2012. He finds both investigations were inadequate.

    Ellison also finds the MPS’s record-keeping on its own investigations into police corruption a cause of real concern. Key evidence was the subject of mass shredding in 2003. And a hard drive containing some of the relevant data was only discovered in November 2013 after more than a year of the MPS searching for it. As a result of this, Ellison has serious concerns that further relevant material which would show corruption has not been revealed because it cannot be found or has been destroyed.
     
    But as far as I can tell it does not detail the specific forms corruption took in this case. And in particular it says nothing about David or Clifford Norris by name. Does anyone have a reference which clearly substantiates any of the points below?

    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.
    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris's payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. res says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Do you have any supporting references? If true this would be a good thing to emphasize when talking about this case.
     
    https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-ellison-review

    There are also connections between the corrupt police officers in the Lawrence case, and the unsolved murder of Daniel Morgan in 1987. A review of the Morgan case is due to report this year. The case is even more disturbing than that of Lawrence, because the police corruption ran so deep that five separate murder investigations failed to make any progress; and also because newspapers owned by Rupert Murdoch played a role.

    Thanks. From my reading that was full of political doubletalk. I think this is the most relevant part:

    On corruption, Ellison finds that specific allegations of corruption were made against 1 of the officers who had worked on the investigation of Stephen Lawrence’s murder, Detective Sergeant John Davidson. The allegations were made by a police officer to his superiors but were not brought to the attention of Macpherson. Ellison finds that this lack of disclosure was a “significant failure” by the Metropolitan Police.

    Ellison has looked at the Independent Police Complaints Commission’s 2006 report into these allegations, as well as the Metropolitan Police‟s own review in 2012. He finds both investigations were inadequate.

    Ellison also finds the MPS’s record-keeping on its own investigations into police corruption a cause of real concern. Key evidence was the subject of mass shredding in 2003. And a hard drive containing some of the relevant data was only discovered in November 2013 after more than a year of the MPS searching for it. As a result of this, Ellison has serious concerns that further relevant material which would show corruption has not been revealed because it cannot be found or has been destroyed.

    But as far as I can tell it does not detail the specific forms corruption took in this case. And in particular it says nothing about David or Clifford Norris by name. Does anyone have a reference which clearly substantiates any of the points below?

    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.
    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris’s payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
    I'd suggest downloading and searching the Ellison Review documents themselves. Beyond that, we are in the realm of hearsay, because obviously none of these allegations have been tested in court. You will have to do your own research to try to determine the source and/or truth of each allegation. Google is your friend.

    I read this week about the removal of the clothes of one of the suspects, while his house was under police guard - but this was only in a newspaper report.

    There has been a book on the subject:

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Untouchables-justice-racism-Scotland-Bloomsbury/dp/144820903X/
    , @edward collins
    'But as far as I can tell it does not detail the specific forms corruption took in this case. And in particular it says nothing about David or Clifford Norris by name. Does anyone have a reference which clearly substantiates any of the points below?'

    Just look it up on the internet. There was a guardian expose of Clifford Norris (since having lost his fortune) a few years ago detailing how he paid off witnesses. Its all documented. A google search is all you need.
    , @jimmyriddle
    A lot of the investigative reporting on the corruption in the Greenwich CID was done by the Private Eye bi-weekly magazine in the mid to late '90s.

    The Eye didn't have much of a web presence then (or even now). The BBC picked up some of the stories.

    The ranking detective in the initial investigation of the murder was filmed (by Scotland Yard's anti-corruption unit) receiving large brown envelopes from cronies of Cllifford Norris.

    This never came to court. The detective refused to answer questions, ran out the clock and retired to Spain.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  207. ricpic says:

    Negrolatry does not exist in whites who are forced to rub shoulders with blacks, in other words whites without the protection of significant MONEY. Negrolatry is an aspect of the virtue signaling contest among wealthy whites. The great bulk of the white population is NOT afflicted with guilt vis-a-vis negroes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Oh, so you don't watch basketball, boxing, football or MMA?

    Let me guess, you're a synchronized swimming guy?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. Truth says:
    @ricpic
    Negrolatry does not exist in whites who are forced to rub shoulders with blacks, in other words whites without the protection of significant MONEY. Negrolatry is an aspect of the virtue signaling contest among wealthy whites. The great bulk of the white population is NOT afflicted with guilt vis-a-vis negroes.

    Oh, so you don’t watch basketball, boxing, football or MMA?

    Let me guess, you’re a synchronized swimming guy?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. @res
    Thanks. From my reading that was full of political doubletalk. I think this is the most relevant part:

    On corruption, Ellison finds that specific allegations of corruption were made against 1 of the officers who had worked on the investigation of Stephen Lawrence’s murder, Detective Sergeant John Davidson. The allegations were made by a police officer to his superiors but were not brought to the attention of Macpherson. Ellison finds that this lack of disclosure was a “significant failure” by the Metropolitan Police.

    Ellison has looked at the Independent Police Complaints Commission’s 2006 report into these allegations, as well as the Metropolitan Police‟s own review in 2012. He finds both investigations were inadequate.

    Ellison also finds the MPS’s record-keeping on its own investigations into police corruption a cause of real concern. Key evidence was the subject of mass shredding in 2003. And a hard drive containing some of the relevant data was only discovered in November 2013 after more than a year of the MPS searching for it. As a result of this, Ellison has serious concerns that further relevant material which would show corruption has not been revealed because it cannot be found or has been destroyed.
     
    But as far as I can tell it does not detail the specific forms corruption took in this case. And in particular it says nothing about David or Clifford Norris by name. Does anyone have a reference which clearly substantiates any of the points below?

    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.
    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris's payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.
     

    I’d suggest downloading and searching the Ellison Review documents themselves. Beyond that, we are in the realm of hearsay, because obviously none of these allegations have been tested in court. You will have to do your own research to try to determine the source and/or truth of each allegation. Google is your friend.

    I read this week about the removal of the clothes of one of the suspects, while his house was under police guard – but this was only in a newspaper report.

    There has been a book on the subject:

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Untouchables-justice-racism-Scotland-Bloomsbury/dp/144820903X/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. @res
    Thanks. From my reading that was full of political doubletalk. I think this is the most relevant part:

    On corruption, Ellison finds that specific allegations of corruption were made against 1 of the officers who had worked on the investigation of Stephen Lawrence’s murder, Detective Sergeant John Davidson. The allegations were made by a police officer to his superiors but were not brought to the attention of Macpherson. Ellison finds that this lack of disclosure was a “significant failure” by the Metropolitan Police.

    Ellison has looked at the Independent Police Complaints Commission’s 2006 report into these allegations, as well as the Metropolitan Police‟s own review in 2012. He finds both investigations were inadequate.

    Ellison also finds the MPS’s record-keeping on its own investigations into police corruption a cause of real concern. Key evidence was the subject of mass shredding in 2003. And a hard drive containing some of the relevant data was only discovered in November 2013 after more than a year of the MPS searching for it. As a result of this, Ellison has serious concerns that further relevant material which would show corruption has not been revealed because it cannot be found or has been destroyed.
     
    But as far as I can tell it does not detail the specific forms corruption took in this case. And in particular it says nothing about David or Clifford Norris by name. Does anyone have a reference which clearly substantiates any of the points below?

    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.
    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris's payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.
     

    ‘But as far as I can tell it does not detail the specific forms corruption took in this case. And in particular it says nothing about David or Clifford Norris by name. Does anyone have a reference which clearly substantiates any of the points below?’

    Just look it up on the internet. There was a guardian expose of Clifford Norris (since having lost his fortune) a few years ago detailing how he paid off witnesses. Its all documented. A google search is all you need.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. Lot says:
    @Ron Unz

    long-time hard-left extremist Jack Straw became Home Secretary
     
    Ha, ha, ha. With such a description, I guess Jack Straw and his friends must be very enthusiastic supporters of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. On the other hand, I've always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist, which would lead a different prediction. Someone should probably check...

    This reminds me of a recent RamzPaul video in which he denounced YouTube for delegating its censorship decisions to the ADL, which he characterized as ultra-leftist organization. Presumably, the ADL seeks to abolish Capitalism or that sort of thing...

    Back in the 1930s, Stalinist Communists used to describe their Trotskyite rivals as "fascists," and today's leftists similarly accuse all their conservative enemies of being "Neo-Nazis" and "fascists." But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the "extreme leftist" label with equal abandon.

    One problem is that when people check and discover that the ADL isn't actually run by Maoists, your credibility takes a big hit...

    I’ve always had the impression he was just a pro-multiculturalist Jewish-activist

    Except he’s not Jewish and sides with the Arabs over Israelis.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. @res
    Thanks. From my reading that was full of political doubletalk. I think this is the most relevant part:

    On corruption, Ellison finds that specific allegations of corruption were made against 1 of the officers who had worked on the investigation of Stephen Lawrence’s murder, Detective Sergeant John Davidson. The allegations were made by a police officer to his superiors but were not brought to the attention of Macpherson. Ellison finds that this lack of disclosure was a “significant failure” by the Metropolitan Police.

    Ellison has looked at the Independent Police Complaints Commission’s 2006 report into these allegations, as well as the Metropolitan Police‟s own review in 2012. He finds both investigations were inadequate.

    Ellison also finds the MPS’s record-keeping on its own investigations into police corruption a cause of real concern. Key evidence was the subject of mass shredding in 2003. And a hard drive containing some of the relevant data was only discovered in November 2013 after more than a year of the MPS searching for it. As a result of this, Ellison has serious concerns that further relevant material which would show corruption has not been revealed because it cannot be found or has been destroyed.
     
    But as far as I can tell it does not detail the specific forms corruption took in this case. And in particular it says nothing about David or Clifford Norris by name. Does anyone have a reference which clearly substantiates any of the points below?

    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.
    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris's payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.
     

    A lot of the investigative reporting on the corruption in the Greenwich CID was done by the Private Eye bi-weekly magazine in the mid to late ’90s.

    The Eye didn’t have much of a web presence then (or even now). The BBC picked up some of the stories.

    The ranking detective in the initial investigation of the murder was filmed (by Scotland Yard’s anti-corruption unit) receiving large brown envelopes from cronies of Cllifford Norris.

    This never came to court. The detective refused to answer questions, ran out the clock and retired to Spain.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Henry's Cat
    Wouldn't it be helpful to supply the name of this detective?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:
    @Randal
    For British conservatives whose memories go back to the 1980s and before, such as myself and John Derbyshire, Jack Straw will always be a "long-time hard-left extremist", because that's how we remember him from those years (or at any rate, perhaps, how we remember him being criticised by the conservatives around us in the 1990s when he had risen to greater prominence....) He was an activist in the Labour Party of the 1970s and 1980s, of the "tax the rich until the pips squeak" and Michael Foot generation - hard left by any reasonable definition.

    Matters are complicated by his subsequent neocon drift, in the original sense of neoconservative meaning an authoritarian former hard leftist in the US or UK - usually Trotskyite - who realised in the late C20th that supporting the old left was not going to give them the power they craved and who therefore shifted to a more rightwing stance in order to be on the winning side. In the US these people became supporters of the Republican Party but in the UK their path to power was via the Blairite neocon takeover of the Labour Party after the political disasters for the old left in the late 1970s and 1980s.

    But lots of rightwingers similarly throw around the “extreme leftist” label with equal abandon.
     
    It's a genuinely complicated issue, though, because the neocon hard left basically took their social radicalism and their internationalist anti-patriotism and joined in an unholy alliance with big business that involved dropping the parts of their program that reflected solidarity with the indigenous working class. The said unholy alliance essentially then won everything in the 1990s and 2000s.

    Are they still "leftist extremists"? From my perspective they are, for sure, and the socially radical aspects of their triumph are as up for overturning as the interventionist and globalist parts, in the longer perspective, though it looks pretty hopeless at the moment. They just don't happen to agree completely with old left types who still retain some vestiges of the old socialist bond of support for the working classes in their own country.

    As for Jack Straw, well he's actually fairly complicated. While I defer to no man in my own contempt for the Blairites who enabled the disastrous Iraq War, and he was one of them, I also recall that at a crucial time he stood against further aggression against Iran (and by some reports was consequently removed from his position as Foreign Secretary as a result of US regime pressure). I'd still like to see him locked up next to the likes of Blair and Campbell, but perhaps serving a shorter sentence.

    As for Jack Straw, well he’s actually fairly complicated. While I defer to no man in my own contempt for the Blairites who enabled the disastrous Iraq War, and he was one of them, I also recall that at a crucial time he stood against further aggression against Iran (and by some reports was consequently removed from his position as Foreign Secretary as a result of US regime pressure).

    This certainly did happen to his predecessor, Robin Cook, who was removed under U.S. pressure because of his pro-Palestinian attitudes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2001/jun/10/uk.news
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. Logan says:
    @shauntrayvious
    He has a Jewish great-grandparent and is a practising Christian you conspiratorial dolt.

    Bartok is apparently a great deal more stringent in his definition of Jewishness than Hitler.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. @jimmyriddle
    One of the killers, David Norris, was the nephew of a South London gangster, Clifford Norris.

    At least one of the senior detectives working on the case was on Clifford Norris's payroll. He was in a good position to make evidence go away. For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    An interesting thing was that, during the subsequent public enquiry, both the Met and the anti-racist campaigners, conspired to keep this angle out of the report.

    Both sides preferred "institutional racism" to be highlighted and good old police corruption to be downplayed.

    For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.

    And how, pray tell, do you or more importantly the police know which clothes were worn? How long did it take for the police to identify the suspects? Instead of Clifford Norris going to all the trouble of leaning on this detective to compromise the investigation enough to hold off on a police raid, wouldn’t it have just been easier to tell his son and friends to get rid of the clothes pronto (assuming they hadn’t so already)?

    There’s not the slightest positive evidence that the investigation was compromised by this or any other association.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    There’s not the slightest positive evidence that the investigation was compromised by this or any other association.
     
    There was literally a truckload of evidence gathered by Operation Othona, an anti-corruption probe run by the Met itself. When Mark Ellison requested the evidence, he found it had been shredded:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26621322
    , @YetAnotherAnon
    It's odd that the suspects were able to destroy their clothes, because the convictions came from DNA evidence of microscopic bloodstains (also fibres) on clothes - bloodstains which (it was alleged, I'm no expert) previously couldn't be analysed until new techniques were developed.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15735026

    The lab which found this new evidence was (and is) owned by a private equity company. I'm sure the convictions did them no harm at all.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/pharmaceuticalsandchemicals/9001164/How-being-a-private-company-has-helped-LGC-solve-the-murders-of-Stephen-Lawrence-and-Milly-Dowler.html


    "How being a private company has helped LGC solve the murders of Stephen Lawrence and Milly Dowler. Company involved in murder investigations has continued to grow since privatisation."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. @jimmyriddle
    A lot of the investigative reporting on the corruption in the Greenwich CID was done by the Private Eye bi-weekly magazine in the mid to late '90s.

    The Eye didn't have much of a web presence then (or even now). The BBC picked up some of the stories.

    The ranking detective in the initial investigation of the murder was filmed (by Scotland Yard's anti-corruption unit) receiving large brown envelopes from cronies of Cllifford Norris.

    This never came to court. The detective refused to answer questions, ran out the clock and retired to Spain.

    Wouldn’t it be helpful to supply the name of this detective?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. Dissident says:
    @Clyde
    Priss Factor is now anonymous 425 ...seems to me

    Priss Factor is now anonymous 425 …seems to me

    Yet, he uses the same “coreeurospherenews” URL that I recall him using when posting as “Priss Factor”. Seems to kind of defeat the purpose of posting “anonymously”, no? Besides, I often find the writing itself– style as well as content– to reveal a common author.

    At any rate, I must say that I’ve enjoyed many of the comments from the individual-in-question, whomever he may actually be. Whatever his faults, excesses and limitations, he can also be both pretty darn funny as well as more than a little correct in his observations.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss
    He is hilarious. And, like Steve Sailer, he doesn’t come across as mean spirited.
    , @Clyde
    A charmer for sure! Is my summary. He does make some good points. There is a tale that Jack Kerouac wrote Mexico City Blues almost non-stop. He put a roll off teletype paper in his typewriter and took meth. Priss is like this sometimes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. @Henry's Cat

    For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.
     
    And how, pray tell, do you or more importantly the police know which clothes were worn? How long did it take for the police to identify the suspects? Instead of Clifford Norris going to all the trouble of leaning on this detective to compromise the investigation enough to hold off on a police raid, wouldn't it have just been easier to tell his son and friends to get rid of the clothes pronto (assuming they hadn't so already)?

    There's not the slightest positive evidence that the investigation was compromised by this or any other association.

    There’s not the slightest positive evidence that the investigation was compromised by this or any other association.

    There was literally a truckload of evidence gathered by Operation Othona, an anti-corruption probe run by the Met itself. When Mark Ellison requested the evidence, he found it had been shredded:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26621322

    Read More
    • Replies: @Henry's Cat
    Nothing more than handwaving. I still haven't heard any specific claims about police malfeasance in this case. To me the crux of the case is Duwayne Brooks. I would very much like to see his police statements, both on the night and later. Was he able to identify any of the suspects? Were the police and CPS reluctant to prosecute with him as their main witness?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. Bliss says:
    @Che Guava
    On the www, is commmonly termed ''Yellow fever', mainly applies to gay men with a fetish.

    Would not apply it to the Derb.must have had so many good women throwing themselves at him. Then, in the end, have to say that the result shows a litte yellow fever on the Derb'' side, but it seems, with a very happy ending,

    Would not apply it to the Derb.must have had so many good women throwing themselves at him.

    Actually it was Derbyshire, when he was a teaching English in China, who was literally throwing himself at his student (the Jeep she was riding away from him in), a Chinese girl half his age, and he is not embarrassed about it either. That’s the definition of yellow fever, of which he is a prime example. Here he is proudly telling the world about the feverishness of his lust:

    http://www.johnderbyshire.com/FamilyAlbum/Marriage/JeepStory/page.html

    In other words this hero of the White Supremacist movement is a hardcore, feverish “yellowlater” who hates “negrolaters” with a pathological passion. Plenty others like him in the WN leadership.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Darn, I didn't know Derb was a romance writer too. He could make that story longer and publish with Harlequin and contract Fabio to pose for the cover.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. Bliss says:
    @Dissident

    Priss Factor is now anonymous 425 …seems to me
     
    Yet, he uses the same "coreeurospherenews" URL that I recall him using when posting as "Priss Factor". Seems to kind of defeat the purpose of posting "anonymously", no? Besides, I often find the writing itself-- style as well as content-- to reveal a common author.

    At any rate, I must say that I've enjoyed many of the comments from the individual-in-question, whomever he may actually be. Whatever his faults, excesses and limitations, he can also be both pretty darn funny as well as more than a little correct in his observations.

    He is hilarious. And, like Steve Sailer, he doesn’t come across as mean spirited.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. Truth says:
    @Bliss

    Would not apply it to the Derb.must have had so many good women throwing themselves at him.
     
    Actually it was Derbyshire, when he was a teaching English in China, who was literally throwing himself at his student (the Jeep she was riding away from him in), a Chinese girl half his age, and he is not embarrassed about it either. That’s the definition of yellow fever, of which he is a prime example. Here he is proudly telling the world about the feverishness of his lust:

    http://www.johnderbyshire.com/FamilyAlbum/Marriage/JeepStory/page.html

    In other words this hero of the White Supremacist movement is a hardcore, feverish “yellowlater” who hates “negrolaters” with a pathological passion. Plenty others like him in the WN leadership.

    Darn, I didn’t know Derb was a romance writer too. He could make that story longer and publish with Harlequin and contract Fabio to pose for the cover.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bliss
    Derbyshire probably felt like a Fabio when he was prowling the discos of Hong Kong when it was still under British rule.

    His shamelessness is what’s so striking. Even more pathetic is the shamelessness of that other icon of WNs (until he revealed his mestizolatry), Fred Reed. He actually titled one of his books A Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire to Be. Wtf?

    Btw, the little guy who founded The Daily Stormer, Andrew Anglin, used to be a hardcore Filipino fetishist. He even tried to join a jungle tribe in the Philippines. They rejected him. So he became a leader of neo-nazism...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. Bliss says:
    @Truth
    Darn, I didn't know Derb was a romance writer too. He could make that story longer and publish with Harlequin and contract Fabio to pose for the cover.

    Derbyshire probably felt like a Fabio when he was prowling the discos of Hong Kong when it was still under British rule.

    His shamelessness is what’s so striking. Even more pathetic is the shamelessness of that other icon of WNs (until he revealed his mestizolatry), Fred Reed. He actually titled one of his books A Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire to Be. Wtf?

    Btw, the little guy who founded The Daily Stormer, Andrew Anglin, used to be a hardcore Filipino fetishist. He even tried to join a jungle tribe in the Philippines. They rejected him. So he became a leader of neo-nazism…

    Read More
    • LOL: Truth
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. @James N. Kennett

    There’s not the slightest positive evidence that the investigation was compromised by this or any other association.
     
    There was literally a truckload of evidence gathered by Operation Othona, an anti-corruption probe run by the Met itself. When Mark Ellison requested the evidence, he found it had been shredded:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26621322

    Nothing more than handwaving. I still haven’t heard any specific claims about police malfeasance in this case. To me the crux of the case is Duwayne Brooks. I would very much like to see his police statements, both on the night and later. Was he able to identify any of the suspects? Were the police and CPS reluctant to prosecute with him as their main witness?

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
    The Ellison Review's 43-page summary of findings, after describing the destruction of the records of Operation Othona, states:

    Doing the best we can from the limited sources available to us, the intelligence picture that emerges is that the MPS did hold intelligence which suggested that:
    a) there was a strong inference that Clifford Norris was a corruptor of police officers and an intimidator of witnesses;
    b) a possible link from Clifford Norris to Detective Sergeant John Davidson existed through both “Officer XX” and DS Davidson having a common connection with “Officer B”, another officer suspected of corrupt activity; and
    c) there was an enhanced level of suspicion that DS Davidson was corrupt both before and after he worked on the Stephen Lawrence investigation. This was due to:
    ● the sheer number of other officers to whom he was connected who were also suspected of corruption;
    ● the fact that a number of the officers who were/are under suspicion of corruption were connected to the Daniel Morgan murder investigation (on which DS Davidson was identified as having also possibly worked at some stage); and
    ● the detail and implications of Neil Putnam’s debriefing regarding Mr Davidson in mid-1998.

    Yes, it's more hand-waving. The evidence we would all like to see was destroyed by the police themselves. If this had not been done, the corrupt officers would all now be in jail.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. @Henry's Cat
    Nothing more than handwaving. I still haven't heard any specific claims about police malfeasance in this case. To me the crux of the case is Duwayne Brooks. I would very much like to see his police statements, both on the night and later. Was he able to identify any of the suspects? Were the police and CPS reluctant to prosecute with him as their main witness?

    The Ellison Review’s 43-page summary of findings, after describing the destruction of the records of Operation Othona, states:

    Doing the best we can from the limited sources available to us, the intelligence picture that emerges is that the MPS did hold intelligence which suggested that:
    a) there was a strong inference that Clifford Norris was a corruptor of police officers and an intimidator of witnesses;
    b) a possible link from Clifford Norris to Detective Sergeant John Davidson existed through both “Officer XX” and DS Davidson having a common connection with “Officer B”, another officer suspected of corrupt activity; and
    c) there was an enhanced level of suspicion that DS Davidson was corrupt both before and after he worked on the Stephen Lawrence investigation. This was due to:
    ● the sheer number of other officers to whom he was connected who were also suspected of corruption;
    ● the fact that a number of the officers who were/are under suspicion of corruption were connected to the Daniel Morgan murder investigation (on which DS Davidson was identified as having also possibly worked at some stage); and
    ● the detail and implications of Neil Putnam’s debriefing regarding Mr Davidson in mid-1998.

    Yes, it’s more hand-waving. The evidence we would all like to see was destroyed by the police themselves. If this had not been done, the corrupt officers would all now be in jail.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Henry's Cat
    Honestly, I felt a little bad for you reading this. Even you had to admit that your case is nothing more than supposition.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  225. Dave2323 says:
    @Gordo
    They are gaslighting us with this BTSL crap, and no-one speaks out because you would be arrested if you say anything contrary to the narrative.

    Britain is in a very bad way.

    A just reward for allowing yourselves to be convinced to kill the Germans who were ultimately standing up for you.

    What, you thought the Jews would reward you with self-determination for that sacrifice? What a laugh! You were fighting for the privilege to be politically enslaved toward ethnic destruction.

    This situation is no more complicated than this fact.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. The issue with this case is not negrolatry, it was the exposure of the police collusion with the father of one of the murderers, which the author omits/glosses over, and thus the cover up of this shocking crime. The police knew who the murderers were from the outset, but tried to bury it, causing and ethical and moral split in the between officers at the police station tasked with finding his murderers.

    Then you had a Scotland Yard inspired almost COINTELPRO styled investigation into the family, friends and legal team to discredit them in a variety of ways and surprisingly, they were as clean-cut as they were portrayed, with not a skeleton, or past criminal behaviour in the closet. In short?: They were a perfect middle class black family with nice non-criminal friends.

    It laid open for everyone to see, that sections of our much lauded UK police force were racist to the core and policed in that way. This was a side of white Britain that horrified the general public. The cognitive dissonance had to be met head on, and despite our protestations to the contrary, it exposed a level of police racism we routinely denied was so widespread. Stephen Lawrence unfortunately became the poster-child for this ugly reality.

    Is his name used and abused to invoke emotion and rub it in our faces? Yes. But its a subtle reminder of what the UK police force is, because every now and then thanks to mobile phones and YouTube, this reality rears its ugly head.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett

    The issue with this case is not negrolatry, it was the exposure of the police collusion with the father of one of the murderers

     

    True.

    It laid open for everyone to see, that sections of our much lauded UK police force were racist to the core and policed in that way.
     
    A non-sequitur.

    Is his name used and abused to invoke emotion and rub it in our faces? Yes.
     
    Somewhere in this narrative, the original problem of police corruption is forgotten, and what is "rubbed in our faces" instead is the supposed racism of the police and of white people in general.

    Both the police and the public have swallowed the narrative, because the idea of police racism is more familiar and more comforting than the reality of police corruption.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  227. Don’t you now have a black member of the Royal Family? Congratulations…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  228. Pericles says:

    Seems like a good day to make a placard with the photo of a white guy killed by a black, and take a stroll. In memoriam.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  229. @John the Bptist
    The issue with this case is not negrolatry, it was the exposure of the police collusion with the father of one of the murderers, which the author omits/glosses over, and thus the cover up of this shocking crime. The police knew who the murderers were from the outset, but tried to bury it, causing and ethical and moral split in the between officers at the police station tasked with finding his murderers.

    Then you had a Scotland Yard inspired almost COINTELPRO styled investigation into the family, friends and legal team to discredit them in a variety of ways and surprisingly, they were as clean-cut as they were portrayed, with not a skeleton, or past criminal behaviour in the closet. In short?: They were a perfect middle class black family with nice non-criminal friends.

    It laid open for everyone to see, that sections of our much lauded UK police force were racist to the core and policed in that way. This was a side of white Britain that horrified the general public. The cognitive dissonance had to be met head on, and despite our protestations to the contrary, it exposed a level of police racism we routinely denied was so widespread. Stephen Lawrence unfortunately became the poster-child for this ugly reality.

    Is his name used and abused to invoke emotion and rub it in our faces? Yes. But its a subtle reminder of what the UK police force is, because every now and then thanks to mobile phones and YouTube, this reality rears its ugly head.

    The issue with this case is not negrolatry, it was the exposure of the police collusion with the father of one of the murderers

    True.

    It laid open for everyone to see, that sections of our much lauded UK police force were racist to the core and policed in that way.

    A non-sequitur.

    Is his name used and abused to invoke emotion and rub it in our faces? Yes.

    Somewhere in this narrative, the original problem of police corruption is forgotten, and what is “rubbed in our faces” instead is the supposed racism of the police and of white people in general.

    Both the police and the public have swallowed the narrative, because the idea of police racism is more familiar and more comforting than the reality of police corruption.

    Read More
    • Agree: Randal
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  230. @James N. Kennett
    The Ellison Review's 43-page summary of findings, after describing the destruction of the records of Operation Othona, states:

    Doing the best we can from the limited sources available to us, the intelligence picture that emerges is that the MPS did hold intelligence which suggested that:
    a) there was a strong inference that Clifford Norris was a corruptor of police officers and an intimidator of witnesses;
    b) a possible link from Clifford Norris to Detective Sergeant John Davidson existed through both “Officer XX” and DS Davidson having a common connection with “Officer B”, another officer suspected of corrupt activity; and
    c) there was an enhanced level of suspicion that DS Davidson was corrupt both before and after he worked on the Stephen Lawrence investigation. This was due to:
    ● the sheer number of other officers to whom he was connected who were also suspected of corruption;
    ● the fact that a number of the officers who were/are under suspicion of corruption were connected to the Daniel Morgan murder investigation (on which DS Davidson was identified as having also possibly worked at some stage); and
    ● the detail and implications of Neil Putnam’s debriefing regarding Mr Davidson in mid-1998.

    Yes, it's more hand-waving. The evidence we would all like to see was destroyed by the police themselves. If this had not been done, the corrupt officers would all now be in jail.

    Honestly, I felt a little bad for you reading this. Even you had to admit that your case is nothing more than supposition.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
    Have some more supposition:

    http://www.dreamdeferred.org.uk/2014/05/lawrence-killers-dad-tapped-bought-and-paid-for-police-to-shield-gang/

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5638041/Stephen-Lawrence-killers-father-used-corrupt-police-protect-family.html

    https://youtu.be/Abg4bOAMKDA

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2586486/The-Met-corruption-files-A-chilling-investigation-police-links-botched-probe-Stephen-Lawrences-murder-axe-killing-private-eye.html

    https://inforrm.org/2016/03/18/the-news-of-the-world-and-the-daniel-morgan-murder-the-key-reason-for-leveson-2-peter-jukes/
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  231. Art Deco says:
    @Anonymous

    As for Jack Straw, well he’s actually fairly complicated. While I defer to no man in my own contempt for the Blairites who enabled the disastrous Iraq War, and he was one of them, I also recall that at a crucial time he stood against further aggression against Iran (and by some reports was consequently removed from his position as Foreign Secretary as a result of US regime pressure).
     
    This certainly did happen to his predecessor, Robin Cook, who was removed under U.S. pressure because of his pro-Palestinian attitudes.
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  232. @Henry's Cat

    For example, the suspects were allowed to destroy the clothes they were wearing on the night of the murder.
     
    And how, pray tell, do you or more importantly the police know which clothes were worn? How long did it take for the police to identify the suspects? Instead of Clifford Norris going to all the trouble of leaning on this detective to compromise the investigation enough to hold off on a police raid, wouldn't it have just been easier to tell his son and friends to get rid of the clothes pronto (assuming they hadn't so already)?

    There's not the slightest positive evidence that the investigation was compromised by this or any other association.

    It’s odd that the suspects were able to destroy their clothes, because the convictions came from DNA evidence of microscopic bloodstains (also fibres) on clothes – bloodstains which (it was alleged, I’m no expert) previously couldn’t be analysed until new techniques were developed.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15735026

    The lab which found this new evidence was (and is) owned by a private equity company. I’m sure the convictions did them no harm at all.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/pharmaceuticalsandchemicals/9001164/How-being-a-private-company-has-helped-LGC-solve-the-murders-of-Stephen-Lawrence-and-Milly-Dowler.html


    “How being a private company has helped LGC solve the murders of Stephen Lawrence and Milly Dowler. Company involved in murder investigations has continued to grow since privatisation.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  233. 7John I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment of the not surprising overreach in the case of the young man known as Stephen Lawrence.It is happening here across the pond in the good old USA.The government will at appointed times embrace the murder or maltreatment of some so called minority individual and smother the populace with t he news days on end. The individual or in some cases individuals will receive financial compensation and the seal of approval from on high.Of course the compensation is played for by the taxpayer, many of whom have not caused the injury to said individual(s).This is how the ruling class here in America keep people divided against each other while they enjoy the lavish and lush life,while the peasants kill each other physically and mentally.I was not there when the incidents happened with T. Martin and M. Brown from all the information that I could gather; Martin was trying to find a shortcut home( his family lived in the area).By all accounts he was not threatening the man who killed him.(He was not a violent individual).As for M. Brown he had his hands up showing the officer he was not armed.However there are many violent individuals here in America and in England, some are ordinary citizens and some are law enforcement individuals.America has become a police state in name and action and the citizens are on their own to a certain degree when assessing how to provide security for themselves and their families.Our national government is officially run by a collection of psychopathic individuals and clueless and careless representatives.We those of us who see and know what is happening must inform others of the insidious agenda of our respective governments.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    You are wrong about "young master Trayvon". Trayvon was sent to live with his father as his mother could not handle him. He was a thug looking for trouble. He was known for burglarizing residences, being found with stolen jewelry and other items. He was casing houses for future burglaries and ran into George Zimmerman. He thought that Zimmerman was some kind of homosexual and was stalking him, unaware that Zimmerman was part of a neighborhood watch program. The mainstream media consistently lied, showing Trayvon' picture as a twelve-year-old, not his current "thug" picture as well as editing Zimmerman's conversation with the 911 dispatcher.
    "Tray-tray" got what he deserved. Of course, his "parents" cashed in on the ghetto lottery.
    If Zimmerman had been murdered by Trayvon, it would not have made the mainstream media.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  234. Clyde says:
    @Dissident

    Priss Factor is now anonymous 425 …seems to me
     
    Yet, he uses the same "coreeurospherenews" URL that I recall him using when posting as "Priss Factor". Seems to kind of defeat the purpose of posting "anonymously", no? Besides, I often find the writing itself-- style as well as content-- to reveal a common author.

    At any rate, I must say that I've enjoyed many of the comments from the individual-in-question, whomever he may actually be. Whatever his faults, excesses and limitations, he can also be both pretty darn funny as well as more than a little correct in his observations.

    A charmer for sure! Is my summary. He does make some good points. There is a tale that Jack Kerouac wrote Mexico City Blues almost non-stop. He put a roll off teletype paper in his typewriter and took meth. Priss is like this sometimes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  235. @Anonymous
    The English calling themselves British mostly began in the WWI era, when England was very glad to have the assistance of various non-English peoples in the British Isles and beyond to fight its big war with Germany.

    I hope I’m using the site correctly (my previous contribution appeared when I pressed ‘rely’ and I’ve had to clear it in order to write this).

    ymous

    The process of making us unpersons gathered pace during the 20th century’s major wars it’s true, but isn’t the full explanation. For a better appreciation we need to consider nationwide electronic media, principally the BBC, introduced during the 1920s, from which point we were ‘British’ and nothing else. What we have today is the culmination of plans laid decades – some would say centuries – ago, for there is always a principal source of revenue in any ‘federated’ system, a single source to which all bills are accountable for payment. England and the English have been controlled by outside forces a long time. Today that control is visible, its hostility unmistakable, in a way it never was in ages past we are paying dearly for in every sense.

    Like all European legislation regional directives are being implemented in Britain with an eagerness unique in all Europe and Europeans know it. They even laugh about it. European countries tend to be relaxed about their obligations. They commonly sign up to whatever is current and then forget about the matter. Our elite is different. The reason they are different, the reason they’re engaged in wrecking Brexit, pushing ever harder to subject us to full and complete European control, is simply the hatred they bear towards England. It’s a matter for speculation why they’re doing this to so small a country (bureaucratic convenience simply won’t wash when we compare English polity to that of, say, France). The word north of our border – more of a coy but self-satisfied whisper really – is simply that ‘well, we didn’t expel our Jews’.

    What we do know is that foreign politicians in parliament decide ‘fairness for England’ by digging ever deeper into her pockets. We have no say in the matter, though we should not permit an increasing number of black and asian ‘honourable members’ (the rise of asians in the professions and their conspicuous presence in Cabinet and in regional politics doesn’t bode well) to divert from the caucus of Scots, Welsh and Irish (even members of the IRA would you believe?) which freely votes on English matters ‘in Britain’s interest’, a crowd which seldom bewails implementing law on behalf of a trans-national political elite because of the quiet pleasure they derive from settling a few historical scores. I’m afraid the United Kingdom is what happens when you ‘pool’ (surrender) sovereignty, and when ‘Britons’ (Englishmen almost to a man and to a woman) who complain endlessly about losing it remain utterly baffled by the idea that ‘Yoo-Kay’ is simply the best example there is of what happens when it’s taken away.

    England never needed union is the truth of it. We were strong. We had overseas possessions and were independently wealthy. Impoverished Scotland eyed our position greedily, covetously, resentfully. They’d all ready blamed us for the failed Darien project (the consequences of which London warned about three times, just as Scots’ anxious pleas for union were twice rejected before they at last got their own way, and they could spend the next few centuries telling the entire world it had all been a plot by the wicked English). Scotland, Wales and Ireland (all of it) did need union and have benefited from it immensely (I’m well armed by the way should any ‘Irish-Americans’ be tempted to enter the fray).

    Only one thing bruises Scottish vanity and feeds the endlessly bitter, hysterical anti-English rhetoric – readers familiar Sir Arthur Keith will understand the principle of culturally internalising truth-telling and lying through one’s teeth to outsiders; we protect privilege by diverting to its absence, as Jews, Irish and Scots know only too well – and that is exclusion from centre stage, a feeling they are not the centre of attention. That the rest is historical invention for the most part unfortunately ignores how we construct perceptions of injustice to justify our own behaviour. Whites seeking to exact vengeance at a time when biological allies are in short supply endanger the race and are not behaving very sensibly at all.

    Have we fought too long among ourselves and is it too late to change? Today I read of a black murderer in London who shouted “fucking Irish cunt” as he wielded two knives to stab an Irishman and his sister, killing one. I was greatly angered by this (not just the absence of a death sentence), though I have no choice but to wonder why when I know that from Connemara to Cork the same story with an English victim would elicit little more a satisfied smirk. Indeed whites careful elsewhere to separate ordinary people from their elites makes no such concession to the English.

    Look at the spiteful, stupid and ill-informed output of ‘Irishman’ (he isn’t) Michael Walsh (McLaughlin) over the years. English born and bred but passing himself off as something he isn’t just to part Americans from their money. My contention that to accept immigration – any of it, irrespective of biological source – is to nurture a viper at one’s bosom stands all the more secure when I look at identity politics. Fascinating isn’t it how the solvent Jewish academics have been pouring on European and American national identities since the ‘seventies suddenly proves a convenience for their most implacable enemies?

    There’s a cry abroad of ‘no more brother wars’ that is well judged and needs repeating, and if my ‘fellow Britons’ (when it suits them to fly under that particular flag of convenience) think they’ll escape the fall out from mass immigration they’re probably mistaken (though Ireland, like Scotland, operates a skilful news management programme to convince everyone they’re taking in ‘refugees’ they’re actually rejecting and sending… guess where?). The sad part for me is that England is probably finished as a home for Englishmen, a fate English political apathy, and English diffidence, are in good measure responsible for.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  236. Anonymous[380] • Disclaimer says:

    What England wants from the U.K. isn’t monetary profit or the affection of its neighbors, but military security. What the Scots want is financial security. That’s all it’s ever been about.

    Scotland joined the union in the 1700s for the same reason Britain joined the ‘common market’ in the 1970s – because its economy was in ruins due to years of misgovernment and it hoped to profit financially from the new arrangement.

    Scotland stayed in the U.K. in 2014 because the pro-independence camp failed to convince their countrymen that their financial security would be assured in an independent Scotland.

    Britain left the E.U. in 2016 for several reasons, but not least of them was the perception that the association was now a net financial burden on the country, and because the people running the E.U. (i.e. Germany) didn’t value British membership enough to make it worthwhile for Britain to stay.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  237. anarchyst says:
    @Reginald Tyler
    7John I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment of the not surprising overreach in the case of the young man known as Stephen Lawrence.It is happening here across the pond in the good old USA.The government will at appointed times embrace the murder or maltreatment of some so called minority individual and smother the populace with t he news days on end. The individual or in some cases individuals will receive financial compensation and the seal of approval from on high.Of course the compensation is played for by the taxpayer, many of whom have not caused the injury to said individual(s).This is how the ruling class here in America keep people divided against each other while they enjoy the lavish and lush life,while the peasants kill each other physically and mentally.I was not there when the incidents happened with T. Martin and M. Brown from all the information that I could gather; Martin was trying to find a shortcut home( his family lived in the area).By all accounts he was not threatening the man who killed him.(He was not a violent individual).As for M. Brown he had his hands up showing the officer he was not armed.However there are many violent individuals here in America and in England, some are ordinary citizens and some are law enforcement individuals.America has become a police state in name and action and the citizens are on their own to a certain degree when assessing how to provide security for themselves and their families.Our national government is officially run by a collection of psychopathic individuals and clueless and careless representatives.We those of us who see and know what is happening must inform others of the insidious agenda of our respective governments.

    You are wrong about “young master Trayvon”. Trayvon was sent to live with his father as his mother could not handle him. He was a thug looking for trouble. He was known for burglarizing residences, being found with stolen jewelry and other items. He was casing houses for future burglaries and ran into George Zimmerman. He thought that Zimmerman was some kind of homosexual and was stalking him, unaware that Zimmerman was part of a neighborhood watch program. The mainstream media consistently lied, showing Trayvon’ picture as a twelve-year-old, not his current “thug” picture as well as editing Zimmerman’s conversation with the 911 dispatcher.
    “Tray-tray” got what he deserved. Of course, his “parents” cashed in on the ghetto lottery.
    If Zimmerman had been murdered by Trayvon, it would not have made the mainstream media.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  238. martin2 says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    The essential thing about Black worship, and the quality that confirms it as nothing but phony sentimentality, is that there is really nothing to worship them for. When was the last time that a Black man overawed you with his intellect, or convicted you with the caliber of his moral fiber, or commanded your honor by the deep and tragic significance of his life? If you think about it honestly, you'll probably find that this has never happened. But without a tincture of such things there is no ground for genuine veneration, let alone worship.

    Thus the full court press to manufacture such entities where they do not actually exist. The rather benign history of Black slavery is reconceptualized as one long via dolorosa. "Heroes" are made out of dumb thugs like Trayvon Martin or vile and sanctimonious hacks like MLK. And then there are the Black "intellectuals" like Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas, who are nothing but second-rate regurgitators of cranky, movement-conservative bromides.

    It is pathetic watching Whites fall all over themselves to find any reason to venerate Black people. Such displays are shameful to begin with, and doubly so when the object of veneration has no sublime qualities meriting such. So what explains this absurd Hanuman cult? Is it guilt? No, it cannot be, for there is little for White people to feel genuinely guilty about; and in any case, the emotion of guilt, whether genuine or not, has a limited shelf life. People will only feel guilty for so long before having done with it, and pseudo-religious movements based on guilt tend to wind themselves up in the course of a single generation. Should "White guilt" have been responsible for Black worship it would have dissolved itself long ago. The only constant and elemental force in human nature is the desire for power. Negrolatry is explained by pure and simple condescension.

    Nobody fauns and fusses over someone the way Whites do with Blacks unless they feel utterly superior to them---so superior that the ranking is not even in question, i.e. the way you would feel about a pet dog. If Blacks had actually been any good at anything, they would have been resented as rivals or, at best, respected as adversaries. In either case they would have been approached very differently. It is only in regard to pets that one sees such lavish displays of affection, such ironical attempts at humanization, and such shameless crowing about the benefits one has conferred. And this is all done only for power's sake, as if to say "See how mighty I am with respect to this creature?" It has nothing to do with any attempt to objectively appraise reality. It is a dream-drama generated by, for, and within the ego of the subject.

    How far removed is such an attitude from genuine worship! Literally, as far removed as hell is from heaven. For nobody makes a pet and plaything out of the living God, the all-knowing, all-seeing, and all-powerful ground of being, Who made the world by will alone and can unmake it just as easily, Who is alone the true and fitting object of worship. Human nature rebels against the very existence of this God Who sets a limit to the free play of ego, and we must be received with grace and weaned back by mortification and penance, works of charity, obedience, suffering, and trial. Not willing to endure any of this, the majority of men go running back to their idols.

    Black worship is false religion, bastardized science, vain egotism, phony sentimentality, and hideous pretension. It ought to despised and spat upon wherever it appears. The abominations of MLK Day and Black History Month must be removed, and all altars to this despicable cult broken and left to ruin. Let the Hollywood films be burnt; let all words of Harper Lee and Maya Angelou be shredded and turned to ash. Let it all be expunged and forgotten. The generation is born even now who will do it.

    “The essential thing about Black worship, and the quality that confirms it as nothing but phony sentimentality, is that there is really nothing to worship them for.

    Thus the full court press to manufacture such entities where they do not actually exist. “Heroes” are made out of dumb thugs like Trayvon Martin or vile and sanctimonious hacks like MLK.

    It is pathetic watching Whites fall all over themselves to find any reason to venerate Black people. Such displays are shameful to begin with, and doubly so when the object of veneration has no sublime qualities meriting such. So what explains this absurd Hanuman cult? The only constant and elemental force in human nature is the desire for power. Negrolatry is explained by pure and simple condescension.

    Nobody fawns and fusses over someone the way Whites do with Blacks unless they feel utterly superior to them—so superior that the ranking is not even in question, i.e. the way you would feel about a pet dog. If Blacks had actually been any good at anything, they would have been resented as rivals or, at best, respected as adversaries. In either case they would have been approached very differently. It is only in regard to pets that one sees such lavish displays of affection, such ironical attempts at humanization, and such shameless crowing about the benefits one has conferred. And this is all done only for power’s sake, as if to say “See how mighty I am with respect to this creature?” It has nothing to do with any attempt to objectively appraise reality. It is a dream-drama generated by, for, and within the ego of the subject.

    Black worship is false religion, bastardized science, vain egotism, phony sentimentality, and hideous pretension. ”

    I think these are very insightful observations. On a related theme, Stefan Molyneux in a video presentation touched upon one of the real reasons why many blacks have a visceral hatred of whites, which is the recognition of their own intellectual and cultural inferiority and historical irrelevance and their continual reliance on whites. People don’t hate those who they regard as inferior, because inferior people make superior people feel good about themselves, but people do hate those they fear might be superior. Do someone a favour, make an enemy, as the saying goes.

    Another reason I believe – one that only applies to black women – is black women’s realisation that they are very physically unattractive relative to white women. This must really hurt.

    These two psychological factors are far more likely drivers of black animosity towards whites