The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 John Derbyshire ArchiveBlogview
Milwaukee, Cedar Falls(!), Melbourne: Three Black Riots—Three Explanations
The Cedar Rapids Sweet Corn Festival: When you see these reports, ask "What COLOR boy?"
The Cedar Rapids Sweet Corn Festival: When you see these reports, ask "What COLOR boy?"

This week we saw some more fruits of Midwestern Nice. By a pleasant concinnity, the scene was Wisconsin’s 4th Congressional District, right up against Wisconsin’s 1st, where Paul Ryan, the Dark Lord of Midwestern Nice, crushed his enemies in last week’s primary.

Those two Congressional Districts are considerably different. District 1, Paul Ryan’s, is 91 percent white, less than five percent black. District 4 is only 55 percent white, more than 33 percent black. By contrast with Paul Ryan, whose darkness is entirely spiritual, District 4 actually has a black representative, six-termer Gwen Moore—the first black congresscritter from Wisconsin ever when she was first elected in 2004.

District 4 includes the city of Milwaukee, which is forty percent black. Last weekend an armed black criminal resisting arrest was shot by a (black) cop. A black riot ensued, with cars and businesses burned and, of course, much looting.

Mrs. Clinton and her Social Justice Warriors want to bring in further masses of poor Third Worlders to enhance our nation’s diversity. A thoughtful observer might question the wisdom of this in light of our failure to make any progress coping with the diversity we already have.

Look: Next year is the fiftieth anniversary of the 1967 black riots in Detroit,Newark, and, yes, Milwaukee.

Fifty years—two entire human generations—and still they riot. Fifty years of fretting and fussing, of nagging and shaming, of affirmative action and contracting set-asides; fifty years of jobs programs, food programs, billion-dollar overhauls of school systems. Fifty years of pushing role models, black doctors and detectives in movies and TV, black athletes as culture heroes, black actors playing God. Fifty years of Martin Luther King Day s, Black History Months, and Kwanzaas. Fifty years of black mayors, black police chiefs, black Attorneys General, a black President…And still they riot.

Wouldn’t prudence suggest that we hold off on importing more diversity until we’ve made some progress in getting blacks to stop rioting?

I guess Prudence doesn’t live here any more.

What has the riot got to do with Midwestern Nice? One manifestation of Midwestern Nice has been the Midwest’s pioneering of the welfare state. In the later 20th century Wisconsin had some of the most generous welfare provisions in the country. This was, however, just the point at which low-level factory employment drifted off to Asia; and what didn’t drift off was colonized by immigrants from Mexico and Central America, who were easier to manage than blacks and worked for lower wages. Blacks who’d come up in the Great Migration of mid-century, n ow with no work they could do, fell back on those generous welfare programs. Milwaukee now has this sullen mass of unemployable, disaffected blacks, just waiting for an opportunity to riot.

It wasn’t just Milwaukee where black rioters turned, snarling, on nice Midwesterners last Saturday.

Here’s a report from Cedar Rapids, 200 miles west of Milwaukee: Gang War Erupts at Sweet Corn Festival! Cedar Rapids Defender, August 14, 2016

statefariThis one goes into the file labeled “Why We Can’t Have Nice Things Any More.” The Sweet Corn Festival is an annual state-fair-type event you get all over the Midwest towards the end of the school summer vacation. Farmers and artisans set up stalls selling sweet corn, of course, and paintings and handicrafts and tchotchkes. Mom and Dad take the kids along. You meet neighbors, eat some nice corn on the cob, buy a nice jar of pickles and a nice landscape painting for Grandma, and everyone has a good time soaking in all the niceness.

That’s what’s supposed to happen. What actually happened in Cedar Rapids last Saturday was, to quote from the Cedar Rapids Defender:

… described as a nightmare and pure chaos by those at the scene. The event attracted mass hordes of teenagers, some claiming to be from Black Lives Matter, loitering about, bickering with rival gangs and threatening violence …

A police officer attempting to detain a teenage youth, was subsequently ambushed by dozens of kids, who kicked and stomped, beating him on the ground.

The Defender notes, by the way, that this was “the third year in a row the Sweet Corn Festival has been disrupted by violence.”

The Defender was at least honest enough to mention the blackness of the rioters, if only obliquely. The indispensable Colin Flaherty, writing up the incident for American Thinker, tells us that

The rest of the media in Cedar Rapids stuck to the usual script of “groups of racially ambiguous children doing all sorts of bad things for no reason whatsoever, other than that is just kids blowing off some steam.”

My own favorite headline came from one of the TV stations: [Headline] “St. Jude Sweet Corn Festival Shut Down Due to Reckless Children.”

Forget Milwaukee: Cedar Rapids Had Better Black Mob Violence and Denial, August 18, 2016

Since video clips of these events now show up on YouTube within a couple of hours, making it perfectly plain who’s doing the rioting, you have to wonder why the reporters cling so doggedly to their Narrative about raceless “teens,” “youths,” and, in the case of that TV station, “children.”

But that’s Midwestern Niceness for you. Rampaging Blacks Shut Down Nice White Festival would be a more honest headline. But it wouldn’t be nice.

When these riots happen, you get a lot of thumb-sucking pieces about why they happen, what causes them. Well, what does cause them?

You’re asking me? Well, I’m a race realist, so I’ll give you an answer in that vein. Then, in scrupulous fairness, I’ll give you some of the other hypotheses on offer, and compare and contrast them with mine.

My answer: Different races—different local varieties of Homo sap., that have followed different paths through evolutionary space for many, many generations, end up with different distributions on most heritable traits. That includes traits of intelligence, behavior, and personality.

ORDER IT NOW

So in a multiracial society that rewards certain traits and penalizes others, different races will precipitate out, average-average, at different social levels. American blacks, for example, with low average IQ, low average impulse control, and high average inclinations to antisocial behavior, will tend to pool at the bottom of society, in slums and prisons and criminal gangs.

The blacks thus pooled, being too dimwitted to understand anything about biology or statistics, will attribute their sorry plight to the malice of hostile agents. They’ll develop a lot of anger against those agents, the anger occasionally breaking out in riots.

Their attributing their crappy life outcomes to the machinations of evil agents is itself a hypothesis of course, one that you can set down on the table next to mine. It’s Hypothesis Two.

Here’s one black guy expounding Hypothesis Two last Saturday, one of the Milwaukee rioters.

Clip: It’s sad, because, you know, this what happen because they not helping the black community. They, like, you know … The rich people, they got all this money, and they not, like, you know, trying to give us none …

I’m going to go out on a limb here and speculate that when that man says “rich people” he doesn’t have Oprah Winfrey in mind, or Kanye West, or Magic Johnson, or Barack Obama, or Morgan Freeman… But that’s just me speculating.

Here’s Hypothesis Three, offered by The New York Times. This one must be serious stuff, backed by rock-ribbed deep social analysis, to be aired in such a prestigious outlet. Right?

Reggie Moore, a believer in "root causes"Well, the NYT consults Reggie Moore (email him) Director of Milwaukee’s Office of Violence Prevention:

Tackling the root causes of crime would be the most effective way to make the community safer and calm tensions, [Mr. Moore] said. “I think it’s a matter of having a dual conversation about what justice needs to look like in this particular situation, but also the broader conversation of what a just community looks like,” Mr. Moore said.

Racial Violence in Milwaukee Was Decades in the Making, Residents Say

By John Eligon, August 14, 2016

Brilliant! Tackle the root causes of crime! Have a conversation!—a dualconversation! And then a broader conversation!

With a penetrating intellect like Mr. Moore’s on the job, we should have the problem solved in no time. How can it be that, in these fifty years since the long hot summer of 1967, how can it be that no-one ever thought we need to tackle the root causes of crime? And have a conversation? It’s so simple!

So there you are: three hypotheses about what causes riots.

  • Hypothesis One: cranky old Derb with his stupid, bigoted, so-called “race realism.”
  • Hypothesis Two: It’s the fault of rich people not giving money to the black community.
  • Hypothesis Three: It’s our failure to tackle the root causes of crime and to have conversations.

Take your pick.

The Social Justice Warriors will protest. I haven’t taken account of history, they’ll say, wagging their fingers at me—of the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow. That’swhat underlies the anger, the resentment, the failure.

Is it, though? Let’s look at a different black riot, and see which hypothesis better fits the case, my race-realist one or the one from history.

When scanning the Western world for stories about race and diversity, I always like to take in the Antipodes. For one thing, I have some slight family connections with that zone. For another, the issues they’re having with diversity down under shed interesting light on our own troubles.

And then, I just hate to see the Aussies and Kiwis left out. They were stalwart allies in WW2. One of my very first VDARE.com pieces was about Australia; and I’m pretty sure I’m the only contributor to have written an entire full-length column about diversity in New Zealand, albeit on a different website.

One blogger I follow is the one who calls himself Oz Conservative. He’s very much on my wavelength, or I’m on his.

Well, reading Oz Conservative the other day I caught a reference to the Apex gang, which I’d quite forgotten apexgang about.

Who they? They a criminal gang in Melbourne, Australia, who staged a nasty riot of their own back on March 12 this year, the so-called Moomba riot.[Police charge 34, some with links to Apex, over Moomba riots, The Melbourne Age, April 19, 2016]

There seems not to have been any particular cause for the Moomba riot. The only thing the news reports are all agreed on is that it was nothing to do with race. Absolutely nothing, I tell you! The Melbourne Herald-Sun, April 10th:

A four-week police probe has ruled out race as being a motivation for the violence.

Moomba riots: Police blame mob mentality for Melbourne violence

Again, this one a headline from a different local newspaper, The Age, April 11th, headline: Moomba riots: Police rule out race as a motive.

So if you think the Moomba riots had anything whatever to do with race, you are a very bad person, and you should go wash your mouth out with soap and water.

Strange to say, though, when you look at video clips of the riot, what you see is mostly black guys. Yes, there are white people around here and there in the videos; but that’s because Moomba, like Sweet Corn, is the name of a family festival, with rides and stalls and musicians and floats, and a fireworks display at night.

moombatimeline

Someone better tell the Aussies they can’t have nice things any more either—not if they’re going to climb on the Diversity wagon.

The Moomba riot seems in fact to have been a gang rumble, with the major gang involved being this Apex gang, most of whose members are black.

These are not indigenous Australian blacks, mind. They don’t cause much trouble. Like our own indigenes, they live mostly out of sight on remote reservations, peacefully drinking themselves to death. No, the Apex gang is made up of South Sudanese, who flooded into Australia in quantity in the middle years of the last decade. These are black Africans.

Apex have been fortifying their numbers in recent years by recruiting from “PIs.” That’s Antipodes-slang for “Pacific Islanders“—Polynesian peoples from the islands of the South Pacific, who have settled in Australia and New Zealand in great numbers over the past few decades. I mentioned in that Richard Lynn’s estimate for the mean IQ of PIs is 85, same as the mean IQ of black Americans:

While of course there is much variation, as there is in any large group, Polynesian New Zealanders as a whole are underachievers … Polynesians … are way over-represented among high school dropouts. PIs are unemployed at twice the national rate …

So this mayhem in Melbourne fits pretty well with my race realism hypothesis.

ORDER IT NOW

I can’t see that it fits at all with the historical Hypothesis Three, even if the New York Times does support it. There was no plantation slavery in Australia, and no hundred years of Jim Crow. Practically none of the Sudanese have been in Australia even twenty years. Some of the PIs would have been there longer, but they weren’t there in any quantity before the 1970s.

And of course they arrived voluntarily, as did the Sudanese.

Yet there they are in Melbourne: racially distinct groups with depressed mean IQ and presumably corresponding statistical differences in heritable patterns of behavior and personality.

And they’re doing just what the blacks in Milwaukee and Cedar Rapids do.

I’m going to mark up one for race realism here.

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjectsfor all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He’s had two books published by VDARE.com: FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and From the Dissident Right II: Essays 2013. His writings are archived at JohnDerbyshire.com.

(Reprinted from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
[]
  1. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “Mrs. Clinton and her Social Justice Warriors want to bring in further masses of poor Third Worlders to enhance our nation’s diversity. A thoughtful observer might question the wisdom of this in light of our failure to make any progress coping with the diversity we already have.”

    This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it’s a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) — and if whites cannot get rid of blacks — , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes.

    Look at NY. Yes, too many immigrants. It would be better if it were all white. But NY has lots of blacks, and many are there to stay(even with gentrification and section 8).

    Now, what would be better for whites?

    A NY with only whites and blacks.

    Or

    A NY with whites, blacks, and Diversity(via immigration).

    If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey.
    Also, as white Libs don’t have lots of kids(as they live mainly for career, narcissism, and vanity), and cities cannot go on with whites alone. Buildings will go empty, and then Negroes will use them for drug dens.
    But if you have Mexers and dotkins and Muslims, enough of them will run small businesses and try to keep things up. It may not be up to white standards, but there is at some semblance of civilization. With Negroes, it is descent into hell.

    Or take the suburbs. Where I live, it’s most white. But in the past 15 yrs, many white folks grew older and some died and houses go empty one by one. So, who will fill them? Due to immigration, I got a bunch of dotkin neighbors, and even though they could so easier on the curry, I prefer them to the jivers(some of whom have been placed here via section 8). Jivers are the worst.

    Milwaukee would be a wonderful city if it were all white. But there are too many blacks. From what I hear, these jaffers are even crazier than your average jaffer. These are pitbull jaffers. And there is no way to get rid of them. And these jaffers drive white folks out. But suppose Milwaukee were to fill up with Immigrant Diversity. It would come with a host of problems but as a buffer and economic buzz-generator, they would be much better than Negroes. And since it will no longer be a case of whites vs blacks, blacks will be more confused about whom to hate.
    I mean blacks know what it means to hate whitey. But when they see all these colorful folks from all over the world, they be scratching their heads and be thinking, “who dat? Some mexican dude? Some chinese mothafuc*a? Some raghead mofo? Some weirdass bitch with blanket over her head… dang…” Blacks get a bit disoriented and their politics becomes muddled.

    Milwaukee has 15% that is now Hispanic, but more immigrants will have a dampening effect on black politics and rage.

    So, it’s like this.

    Best choice is All-white society.

    But if whites must choose between white-black-society or white-diversity-black-society, the latter is better.

    I’d rather have a bunch of dotkins and tacoheads between myself and the jaffers.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Utterly disagree. Was with the family yesterday in Union Square Park, Manhattan, and the non-black diversity on display was uniformly hostile, glaring or blank-faced, unfriendly, and menacing. Plenty of non-black immigrants fairly openly if quietly dealing drugs, spitting, fondling themselves publicly, eyeing my wife and her friend for very prolonged rude periods of time, dropping trash on the ground, of course speaking no English whatsoever, and generally making us extremely unwelcome and uneasy.

    Worse than Manhattan or Nyc has been in a long time. Even to visit family or be tourists, we are never going back.

    We can handle Africans without any need to bring in its backwards and/or untrustworthy and/or lazy people's as some kind of buffer.

    The vacant houses you mentioned? Better that they be torn down to make way for small farms / big gardens or for park and forestland, than to bring in Indians, Muslims, Chinese, to forever irrevocably change our culture and way of life,
    , @Jim Bob Lassiter
    Interesting, to say the least.
    , @Connecticut Famer
    "District 4 includes the city of Milwaukee, which is forty percent black."

    F-F-FORTY percent????????????? I had no idea it was that high. Shortly after he started playing pro basketball Milwaukee Buck center Lew Alcindor (who eventually changed his name to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) used to bitch about how Milwaukee was a blue-collar, white ethnic town to which he was unable to relate as a black man.

    Oh well. Good-bye Schlitz and brats, hello Ripple and collared greens.

    , @SteveRogers42
    Problem is, the immivaders soon adopt the manners and mores of our own indigenous vibrants. If the first gen doesn't, the second gen will for sure. Hip-hop gangsta "culture" is magnetically attractive to all of our duskier brethren.

    And then the newcomers won't be between you and the Basketball-Americans, they'll be reinforcing them instead.

    Build the wall and deport 'em all.
    , @Truman
    Thank you for the honest article! And good reply...

    EXACTLY. No one wants to mention that if you take a group of people... who have ANY cosmetic look -- that share the black average IQ of 85 and the 3-19% increase in testosterone will commit the same crimes... then you have removed from the equation of potential solutions the only one that hits the root cause.

    I have 'heard' blacks have smaller heads, and other theories, like blacks being an r-selected group within the r/K paradigm... but it doesn't matter; all we need to look at is the ability of ANY individual to succeed intellectually... as testosterone, in an intelligent person will manifest itself as DRIVE. And in doing so, will provide better results.

    In short, high testosterone exacerbates whichever aptitudes you do -- or don't have.

    The military has found some solutions; give "aptitude" tests which give you the equivalent of "G" for IQ tests, but more importantly, tell you what kinds of jobs will max out your career path. Having given someone a list, let them select those that will make them happy, then, PAY FOR IT. WE, as a nation, pay that bill... instead of welfare. If you're able bodied, you have to take that test. And if not, we offer a "Gift" to allow us to send you to a nation of your choosing with an average IQ close to yours... in which they, in exchange for another "gift"... give you citizenship and lose your US citizenship. You will there be more competitive.

    Who needs a nation of idiots that are aggressive? Just be realists.

    Letting people blame this crap on slavery 200 years later... when countries who never had slavery, and no Jim Crow segregation have the SAME social problems like UK, France and Canada. MoveEmOn.com

    Or blaming COPS for crimes by blacks, because of "institutional racism" which does NO exist. What exists, is systematic black crime... and if we called crimes by blacks against whites hate crimes as often as it applied, they'd be guilty far, far more often.

    Thank you.

    , @Arthur Pierce
    "This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it’s a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) — and if whites cannot get rid of blacks — , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes."

    Only if you live where the immigrants are pushing out the blacks. If you live where the pushed-out blacks are moving to, you just have a bunch of new, embittered negro neighbors, with plenty of Mike Brown-ish "Gentle Giants" mixed in. The immigrants don't cause negroes to commit less crimes, they just cause them to be someone else (typically a White suburbanite or ruralite)'s problem.


    "If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey."

    The ability of blacks to gripe and blame their problems on Whitey is practically infinite. Do blacks gripe more or less now that the country is a little over 60% White than when it was roughly 85% White? All diversity does is create new problems that the blacks can blame on Whitey. Korean shopkeeper shot your homey in the face when your homey was just being a gud boi and shoplifting some swisher sweets? White Supremacy! Gun Culture! Ten billion lynched by White Neo-Nazi KKK Members LIKE YOU!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are only available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also only be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/milwaukee-cedar-falls-melbourne-three-black-riots-three-explanations/#comment-1535521
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    1) The west and only the west, continues this insane and suicidal policy of bringing in so-called refugees from thousands and thousands of miles away. Why are Sudanese living in Australia? There are dozens of countries in Africa right beside them! Why go all the way across the vast Indian ocean? Because they can and Australia is a rich country that will let them in. Japan accepted 11 refugees last year. Correct, eleven. And its population is more then six times greater then Australia’s.

    2) Your point about these blacks suffering no historical ill-treatment in Australia to either explain or justify their atrocious behaviour also apples elsewhere; Canada, the United Kingdom, France, etc. None of these countries had a black population of any numerical importance or historical significance. More evidence in support of hypothesis one!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Santoculto
    The 'west' and only 'west' continue to attack other nations, namely in middle east, period.

    Even it is not a argument to embrace millions of rapefuges, for the masses, any superficial argument + social pressures will be or will look like a BIG argument...
  3. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “American blacks, for example, with low average IQ, low average impulse control, and high average inclinations to antisocial behavior, will tend to pool at the bottom of society, in slums and prisons and criminal gangs.”

    The Derb, like so many ‘race realists’(apparently I’m the only true race-ist), left out #4, namely that blacks are stronger and more muscular.

    I think a lot of white males leave this one out cuz it hurts their white male pride that got used to seeing itself as top alpha male.
    In truth, in raw power and strength, blacks are the toughest dudes.

    [MORE]

    Imagine if blacks are low IQ and low-impulse but were built like Guillermo(of Jimmy Kimmel show). They would cause some trouble but nothing like what they are doing now.
    Blacks run wild and act crazy because they know everyone is afraid of them.
    They can see, feel, and sense the fear among whites and non-blacks. (And PC made it worse by sacralizing blacks. So, blacks not only act like thugs cuz they enjoy acting the thug, but they believe their thuggery is holy and righteous. It’s like Charles Blow be ‘incandescent’ with rage. Sheeeeeiiiiit!!! His lunacy be ‘incandescent’. Even when blacks just feel like bullying sadistic louts, they feel their loutishness is ‘holy’ cuz they suffered so nobly as slaves, daaaaang!!! Look at the thuggery of BLM pretending to be some holy crusade. White Guilt morons have christened the Negro in Uncle Tom’s Cabin, MLK myth, Morgan Freeman, the mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE. Though US calls itself a secular society, there is a kind of worship of the Negro as the path to redemption of the sinful white soul. The upcoming movie “The Birth of a Negro Nation” will do just that. It will sacralize black mayhem. Yes, even black massacres is ‘holy’. Now, what Nat Turner did may be ‘understandable’ given the conditions of slavery. If I were a slave in oppressive conditions, I might wanna kill some folks too. After all, when Pearl Harbor was attacked, US saw fit to drop bombs and kill 100,000s of civilians in Japan. Rage makes people do murderous things. But should such violence be sacralized? US may have rationalized the use of nukes, but it never sacralized it. But black violence gets sacralized.)

    In my city school where I attended from 3rd to 6th grade, there were whites and blacks. Blacks usually did their thing, and whites did their own thing. But there were friends too, and some kids got along. But whenever there was racial violence, it was no contest. It was like Jack Johnson whupping all them honkers. Blacks whupped hispanic kids too. An even black-brown fight was like 5 black kids vs 20 brown ones. Like lions vs hyenas.
    Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went “A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white’. But when you went there, it was all over with white guy all bloodied and traumatized and the Negro cracking up and hollering like Muhammad Ali.

    In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception.

    When ‘race realists’ talk of low IQ and low impulse, they just make blacks out to be objects of pity. Even if Libs were to believe in this ‘race realism’, they would feel, “Oh those poor dumb negroes need extra help. Oh those ill-mannered negroes need extra care to learn to say ‘hello’ and ‘good day’ instead of ‘what’s up ni**a?’”

    To really wake people up, you have to say the fact that blacks are stronger.

    Now, this should be common knowledge without us saying it. After all, we can all see blacks dominating sports. We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white and Asian ones with more fat in flesh. And whole bunch of people saw UNFORGIVABLE BLACKNESS about Jack Johnson the ghastly Negro.

    But PC has such a paralyzing effect on rationality and logic that white folks fear harboring any thoughts or feelings about blacks that may be deemed ‘racist’.
    So, even as they see CucKen Burns documentary and notice Johnson the Negro whup white boys and conquer white female race traitors, their minds are shaped by the narration that interprets black thuggery into black struggle for justice and nobility. Now, given the social context in which Johnson lived in, it is valid to say he his life had larger meanings. He did overcome odds in a discriminatory society that placed all sorts of obstacles in the progression of blacks folks.
    But context or no context, the biological fact is ‘blacks can kick white ass’, and that fact will remain even after all of ‘racism’ is gone. In other words, even if social ‘racism’ is all eradicated, there remains biological ‘racism’, the product of evolution that made the races differently.

    PC is like a chemical that prevents obvious neural connections. So, the only connections made are those allowed by PC. These synthetic-neurons of PC connect the wrong dots.
    For example, a PC-free mind thinks thus when watching blacks in NFL. “Look at that muscled Negro. He is one tough guy. If he was running in the streets, he could beat up a lot of people. Therefore, it’d be risky to live with blacks since they are tougher and some of them could be criminal.”

    Totally logical neural connecting the dots.
    But PC freezes the mind and neurons won’t make logical connections lest they be ‘racist’. So, the mind waits for the PC to offer the permissible Narrative. And the Narrative is “we should admire and respect blacks because they are heroes who win trophies for our team, and by the way, race is just a social construct, and there are no racial differences, and only evil ‘racists’ believe in such.”
    So, the PC mind just goes along with that. PC clogs up the mind and doesn’t allow natural flow of neural information.

    In truth, when it comes to thuggery and physical combat, whites are the inferior race. Therefore, the inferior needs and deserves protection from the superior. It’s like golden retrievers need protection from packs of pitbulls.
    Also, manhood pride is important for male psychology and development. With blacks around, white males cannot be men. They are turned into cuck-ass cunt-pussyboys. What man wants to be a cuckasscuntpussyboy who gets whupped by thugs of another race who also take the women?

    White males need to be like Viet Cong men. When bigger and beefier US soldiers were turning Saigon women into hookers, the Viet men became Viet Congs to kick the Americans out and have their own nation where they can be top dogs.

    In the end, everything is biology. Society is made by men who are animals. Even society is biology. The dichotomy of society and biology is as misleading as one between mind/soul and body. Mind is part of the body.
    Society is part of biology. Culture is part of biology. Everything that takes place in the human mind is biology since the human mind is biological matter.

    White society is white biology, and whites need to have their own ant colony that is safe from black ant invaders.
    Ideas are biological since they can ONLY exist in the biological membrane of the brain-mind. And ideas are used as weapons just like claws or fangs or sticks.
    PC is a biological weapon used by the GLOB against the white race.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Just watch the Mexicans kick the shit out of the blacks in south Los Angeles and then reconsider how superior blacks are in fighting. Most blacks are cowards who are indeed strong but prefer to swarm or attack unarmed or unaware people, old people, women, trapped people, etc.

    White intelligence, organization, weaponry, and bravery has defeated blacks before, and will defeat them again, hopefully permanently if our children are to be safe and somewhat free.

    Even the Mexican quotient of those qualities will defeat Africans much of the time as well.
    , @KenH

    The Derb, like so many ‘race realists’(apparently I’m the only true race-ist), left out #4, namely that blacks are stronger and more muscular.

    I think a lot of white males leave this one out cuz it hurts their white male pride that got used to seeing itself as top alpha male.
    In truth, in raw power and strength, blacks are the toughest dudes.
     

    Maybe in about half the cases and this is due to selective breeding while they were slaves (many plantation owners bred African males for size so they could perform more physically demanding tasks) and the introduction of white DNA through interbreeding. That's why you don't see many blacks from African nations represented in boxing and MMA because in his native and pure state the African is physically unimposing and unspectacular in most cases. Many pure Africans are gangly and dorky and not known for physical prowess.

    True, some blacks are bigger, stronger or just tougher, but I've seen several of white dudes get the best of blacks in physical combat in my life and blacks usually avoid one on one conflict with white males since they are at their best when the odds are in their favor. Even when they are slightly outnumbered by whites they often lose their courage.

    You need to stop overestimating their capabilities as fighters and if white males weren't raised to be sensitive, effeminate and metrosexual things would be very different.

    , @anon
    Do not agree at all that blacks are stronger. They are more inclined to violence but that does not make them stronger. Ever see a strongman contest? The contestants are almost always white. Most blacks can "dish it out, but not take it" like typical bullies. Blacks also tend to have low pain thresholds. I see a lot of blacks at the gym. They concentrate almost exclusively on the "showy' muscles- arms and chest. They do no calf work for instance, and can't squat for S***.
    , @SteveRogers42
    Horse manure, my good sir!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKAS0393EyU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjfioWV4MbE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1nsATz6La4

    What soopa affletes!
    , @Stonehands
    I enjoy your posts but you are superficially wrong here.

    "Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went “A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white’."


    I grew up in a black city in NY, and boxed at Johnny's Gym, Westbury PBC and Bayshore AC.

    The full expression is " fight, fight a ni**er and a white- if the ni**er don't win WE ALL JUMP IN."

    "In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception. "


    In the course of my duties as owner operator of a late night pizzeria in Philly, l have had many opportunities to mix it up with the natives. I listen to smack talk from wise ass, idiot, skinny small-handed blacks...without resorting to violence. The cops expect me to have an ounce of discernment- and stand by me when l dish out what is rightfully deserved to someone who is larger and " problematic."

    You are guilty of mythologizing blacks....they excel in basketball, yes. In the NFL...nah, at the "speed" positions, for sure.

    "We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white ..."


    White body builders throw on a tan before competition, as a darker body shows more highlights.
    Besides, muscle bound athletes don't excel in mma or boxing. Do you remember Fyodor Emelionenko, a pot- bellied ground and pound killer!

    I maintain to a large extent that HS and college is geared towards women, that through PC indoctrination in the pillars of society, men have been relegated to sleeping in a proverbial "cat box" at the foot of the stairs [spinelessness]...I'm thinkin' John Roberts and James Comey!


    I learn a lot here on the Unz...

    But let's not intellectualize everything.

    Give more " sturdy" organs a chance.
  4. [Rampaging Blacks Shut Down Nice White Festival would be a more honest headline. But it wouldn’t be nice.]

    True. Chimpout Caps Cornfed Chowdown would be nicer.

    Read More
  5. I was born in Cedar Rapids, Iowa in 1944. For most of the last 20 years I have been in a majority black city in the deep south. Just this year I relocated to a small town in east Texas. Black riots at the Sweet Corn Festival? This is incomprehensible to me.

    Personal experience with black Americans I have known has proven to me that not all of them are stupid and/or violent. I have no argument with the science of race realism. But the political implications of it are debatable.

    Culturally, black and white are like oil and water. Black Africans have been in this country from the very beginning. Yet they still don’t speak American English. So forget about assimilation. You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him assimilate. But does this mean we cannot co-exist?

    American blacks went from black slavery to Jim Crow and then straight to forced integration and affirmative action. They have been sub equal and super equal but they have never been equal to white Americans under the law. The civil rights movement should have stopped at voting rights and equal protection.

    Now, proles of every color have a common enemy in the police state and modern capitalism which states that .01% will have everything and the rest will have nothing. I say we can hate each other in our off time but our day job is to come together in resistance against our oppressors.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    And just who are our oppressors? Remember Pogo? He had it right when he said, 'I have met the enemy and it is us'.
    , @Anonymous
    May I suggest the World Socialist Website? www.wsws.org?
  6. “He’s very much on my wavelength, or I’m on his.”

    Such wavelengths being a measure of the frequency in the ‘ether’ at which you are communicating, it might be more correct to say you and he are on the same wavelength.

    Read More
  7. The concept of paying troublesome minorities off to behave well via social welfare programs has been around for at least half a century and hasn’t worked by any measure – yet whenever blacks behave badly you can count on some SJW to mention that what’s needed is even more redistribution of resources from law-abiding/working people to those whose lack of adherence to social norms is always pinned on the majority as the product of “oppression.”

    As someone who once lived in Milwaukee, it’s only fair to mention that whites there have a level of hostility to blacks I have not experienced in other cities I have lived in (although I am told Boston is similar)…and that blacks in Milwaukee give whites more justification to feel that way with their behavior than other places I have lived in as well. It might a chicken or the egg sort of proposition, but it does make for a pretty uneasy social environment.

    BLM wants substantially less policing in their neighborhoods as though that would mean less crime in black neighborhoods. Even most lefties understand this would be a disaster (check out liberal TV writer David Simon’s conception of this in the 4th season of his show The Wire, “Hampsterdam”), but at this point I say go right ahead with this experiment for Clinton’s first term.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Police should pull out of all black neighborhoods and let them kill each other. The more the better. Let them eliminate fellow savages who otherwise will be trying to kill, rape, terrorize, SPIT ON (yes it has already happened), and mock my children.
  8. Here he goes again in his insane attempts to prove that whites are superior to everyone else. Derbyshire takes isolated incidents (riots in this case) out of context to demonize an entire population -African Americans and other blacks in this instance- his pet hate. A few hundred or a few thousand blacks rioted (absolutely shocking, no doubt, and the perpetrators must be punished with the full force of law) but what were the other tens of millions of African Americans doing (they form ~14% of the population)? They were doing just what the rest of us were doing, mainly spending time with their family, going to church, worrying about job security, taxes, law and order and their children’s education and future, in short going about their own business and not bothering anyone else. All races and nationalities have a tendency to riot if they feel they have grievances, whether real or imagined. The French have been rioting since their revolution in 1789 and as an English immigrant Derbyshire out to know that no country is more prone to riots in modern times than England. Perhaps he ought to attend an English football match.

    Nowhere in this incitement provoking article does Derbyshire offer a solution. I think he does have some insane ideas but he is too cowardly to openly articulate these. Let me speculate what his ideas may be- apartheid style segregation of races, in-your face racial profiling, allowing businesses to to discriminate on grounds of race, Nuremberg style racial classification and possible laws banning interracial sex. Heck, Derbyshire the hypocrite even has a Chinese wife but lets leave that for a moment.

    The worrying thing is, some of the ill educated people who post comments on these sites -one can infer this from their awful comments, will end up believing this rubbish perpetrated by Derbyshire and others and act accordingly. The history of US is a witness that there is a thin line separating a heart filled with racial hatred and acts of extreme violence. Some of the comments posted on this site scare the living daylight out of me. I hope the FBI is tracking some of these insane individuals. British intelligence have recently said that far right extremist terrorism is as great a danger to the West as Islamist terrorism. They know what they are taking about since they have generally kept London safe unlike their incompetent French and Belgian counterparts.

    Hate filled insinuations directed at African Americans have become something of a trademark for Derbyshire, the main reason one suspects he gets invited to various ‘white nationalist conferences’. The African Americans are among the oldest of the settler communities in the US. They have been here longer than the average Italian American, Irish American and Americans of non British continental ancestry. Their remarkable positive contribution to modern Western culture, especially in music, is way out of proportion to their numbers. How dare Derbyshire, a recent immigrant, demonize this entire venerable community! If there is any justice in this world, the authorities would deport him back to where he came from since he is an extremist hate preacher and a foreigner.

    But not all is lost. It looks like Trump’s campaign has imploded and is in meltdown. Thank Holy Moses! The bastard is not going to be President. Civilization is going to survive after all.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    There's too much drivel here to respond to at the moment.

    Let's say you must not live in or next to a majority-black neighborhood, your kids must not attend a heavily black "school", and last and least, your conception of contributions to "music" and culture is light years away from my own,
    , @Priss Factor
    When the blacks came, there was white flight and Jew Flew.

    Even Liberal Jews fled.

    TMB or too many blacks is a universal problem. Notice a lot of these problems take place in blue cities where people like the Derb have no power and no say.

    And no, most blacks are not decent church-going folks. true, the majority are not criminals, but too many and even many who are not tend to be awful parents, teachers, and loonies.
    Look at black schools. And even many black churches are hate centers like that of J. Wright.

    Also, Trump has gone out on a limb more than any other GOP politician in reaching out to blacks. Trump says Diversity by Immigration adds competitive pressures on blacks. He says we need to focus on Negroes before helping/inviting the rest of the world.

    He is 50% right, 50% wrong.

    True, more immigrants mean more competition for blacks in jobs and schooling.

    But, even if there was no immigration, too many blacks would be good for nothing.

    US spends tons on the schooling of each black kid, but even in places with few immigrants, blacks just mess up. Even where there are opportunities, blacks don't try or fail to achieve requisite standards. Suppose there are 1000 Hindu medical students at a university, and we say that they've taken those positions from blacks!! But suppose those dotter students are removed and sent back to India. Will there be enough blacks willing to study hard enough to take those slots? The answer is NO.

    So yes, immigrants do compete with blacks, but blacks aren't even trying to be competitive in many areas.

    Btw, American blacks are the fault of Whites who bought the slaves and brought them here.
    But what the hell is Australia doing taking blacks from Sudan? Blacks over there just kill and rape and holler and waller. That makes no sense. Israel sure tries to keep out most black Africans.

    And Jews hate Trump because he hates Muslims for white reasons(Muslims kill whites, so keep them out) than for Jewish reasons(whites should fight Wars for Israel and kill those nasty Muslims).

    , @Anonymous
    In surveys over the last 30 years, 92--95% blacks believed:

    O.J. deserved to get off even if he did do it

    Rodney King didn't deserve a good beat down for leading the police at a 100 mph car chase and resisting arrest

    Trayvon was an innocent victim of a white predator

    Michael Brown actually said "hand up, don't shoot".

    And they Vote Democrat irrespective of policy or candidate

    Sure, plenty of blacks just mind their own business, but when push comes to shove, they feel and act along racial fault lines. So don't blame us for noticing and taking steps to protect ourselves from their propensity to demonize and victimize whites.

    Read Ron Unz's archive article on race and crime right here on this site. Then you'll really know whom you should fear.

    http://www.unz.com/article/race-and-crime-in-america/?highlight=race+and+crime
    , @SteveRogers42
    Are you on drugs?
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Ethiopian black Jews recently rioted in Tel Aviv. Why?
  9. Pacific Islanders and many African and Native-American men led truly idyllic lives before the white men came. Surrounded by natural beauty. Lack of disease, except for parts of Africa and the south east of America. Male dominated cultures. Surfing, hunting and fishing all day whilst their women mashed taro or ground acorns and corn and smoked the salmon and venison and buffalo the men brought home. Not having to be around women who were on their periods. Polygamy. Near naked women shaking their hips during feasts and seasonal rituals. Maybe those men from those cultures have a right to be pissed off and drown their sorrows in bottles!

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    Yes, blissful until they died painful deaths in their 30s and 40s from gout, diabetes, and hundreds of other conditions that kill and cripple very few people long-term in the white world. A state of nature is not bliss, it is suffering and death.
    , @Anonymous
    The Black economy in Africa as well as the Polynesian, like most pre-industrial revolution economies, was heavily dependent on slavery. 50% of all Africans were enslaved. Often a slave was slaughtered and eaten.

    Here's the full text of "The Negros in Negroland", a book compiling quotes from accounts written by early explorers, missionaries and traders on the African continent. Speke, Burton, Stanley, Livingston etc.

    Read it and let the scales fall from your eyes.

    https://archive.org/stream/negroesinnegrola00helpiala/negroesinnegrola00helpiala_djvu.txt

    I have led you to the water, now drink. You have no excuse now for not informing yourself and climbing out of the dank cavern of ignorance into the revealing light of Truth.
    , @TheJester
    Thomas Hobbes in his classical work, "The Leviathan", had a few ideas about man in the state of nature; that is, the historical epochs Before the White Man Came:

    “No arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear and danger of violent death; and the life of man solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
     
    The description of life being poor, nasty, brutish, and short continues to describe life in sub-Saharan Africa. Evidence? The daily news works just fine ... covering Mali to Nigeria to South Africa. After the White Man Came, the Western NGOs distributing the basics to sustain life and health in these hell holes temporarily leave when Blacks start behaving badly. They return when the "die offs" are over. In the end, nothing ever changes.

    Before the White Man Came, the Polynesian islands were populated by savages. Their favorite pass time was massacring and looting the inhabitants of neighboring islands. Same for the Amerindians and neighboring tribes.

    The fantasy of man peacefully living in a lush garden of plenty Before the White Man Came is a myth without a historical basis.
    , @anon
    Actually slavery was widespread everywhere throughout black (or sub-Saharan) Africa long before whites arrived. Indians in America and Canada lived short hard, and brutish lives and in Mexico they practiced human sacrifice, as much as 20,00 at a time during 'festivals'.
    , @El Dato
    Excellent. Let's do a Hollywood thing together! We can film in New Zealand.
  10. @Priss Factor
    "Mrs. Clinton and her Social Justice Warriors want to bring in further masses of poor Third Worlders to enhance our nation’s diversity. A thoughtful observer might question the wisdom of this in light of our failure to make any progress coping with the diversity we already have."

    This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it's a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) --- and if whites cannot get rid of blacks --- , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes.

    Look at NY. Yes, too many immigrants. It would be better if it were all white. But NY has lots of blacks, and many are there to stay(even with gentrification and section 8).

    Now, what would be better for whites?

    A NY with only whites and blacks.

    Or

    A NY with whites, blacks, and Diversity(via immigration).

    If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey.
    Also, as white Libs don't have lots of kids(as they live mainly for career, narcissism, and vanity), and cities cannot go on with whites alone. Buildings will go empty, and then Negroes will use them for drug dens.
    But if you have Mexers and dotkins and Muslims, enough of them will run small businesses and try to keep things up. It may not be up to white standards, but there is at some semblance of civilization. With Negroes, it is descent into hell.

    Or take the suburbs. Where I live, it's most white. But in the past 15 yrs, many white folks grew older and some died and houses go empty one by one. So, who will fill them? Due to immigration, I got a bunch of dotkin neighbors, and even though they could so easier on the curry, I prefer them to the jivers(some of whom have been placed here via section 8). Jivers are the worst.

    Milwaukee would be a wonderful city if it were all white. But there are too many blacks. From what I hear, these jaffers are even crazier than your average jaffer. These are pitbull jaffers. And there is no way to get rid of them. And these jaffers drive white folks out. But suppose Milwaukee were to fill up with Immigrant Diversity. It would come with a host of problems but as a buffer and economic buzz-generator, they would be much better than Negroes. And since it will no longer be a case of whites vs blacks, blacks will be more confused about whom to hate.
    I mean blacks know what it means to hate whitey. But when they see all these colorful folks from all over the world, they be scratching their heads and be thinking, "who dat? Some mexican dude? Some chinese mothafuc*a? Some raghead mofo? Some weirdass bitch with blanket over her head... dang..." Blacks get a bit disoriented and their politics becomes muddled.

    Milwaukee has 15% that is now Hispanic, but more immigrants will have a dampening effect on black politics and rage.

    So, it's like this.

    Best choice is All-white society.

    But if whites must choose between white-black-society or white-diversity-black-society, the latter is better.

    I'd rather have a bunch of dotkins and tacoheads between myself and the jaffers.

    Utterly disagree. Was with the family yesterday in Union Square Park, Manhattan, and the non-black diversity on display was uniformly hostile, glaring or blank-faced, unfriendly, and menacing. Plenty of non-black immigrants fairly openly if quietly dealing drugs, spitting, fondling themselves publicly, eyeing my wife and her friend for very prolonged rude periods of time, dropping trash on the ground, of course speaking no English whatsoever, and generally making us extremely unwelcome and uneasy.

    Worse than Manhattan or Nyc has been in a long time. Even to visit family or be tourists, we are never going back.

    We can handle Africans without any need to bring in its backwards and/or untrustworthy and/or lazy people’s as some kind of buffer.

    The vacant houses you mentioned? Better that they be torn down to make way for small farms / big gardens or for park and forestland, than to bring in Indians, Muslims, Chinese, to forever irrevocably change our culture and way of life,

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    P.S. I am white and my wife is Asian/white. Apparently neither one of us was real popular. Only one of the hordes of non-white, non-black immigrants there even smiled or nodded at us and our several small happy children. Please wake up and get out of your white neighborhood more before commending non-black third world immigrants as a buffer or second-best scenario,
    , @Priss Factor
    "Utterly disagree. Was with the family yesterday in Union Square Park, Manhattan, and the non-black diversity on display was uniformly hostile, glaring or blank-faced, unfriendly, and menacing. Plenty of non-black immigrants fairly openly if quietly dealing drugs, spitting, fondling themselves publicly, eyeing my wife and her friend for very prolonged rude periods of time, dropping trash on the ground, of course speaking no English whatsoever, and generally making us extremely unwelcome and uneasy."

    I see your point, and like I said, an all-white society would be ideal in the West.

    But even blank-faced immigrants ogling your woman is better than Negroes running amok, raping, and doing KO game and looting and rioting.

    I mean where is the story about dotkins and Muslims flash-mobbing stores, burning CVS(as in Baltimore),and beating up teachers?

    I'm not saying Diversity is good. Only that it is preferable to Planet of the Jivers.

    Diversity is the man who ran the store that Michael Brown robbed.
    Blackness is Michael Brown.

    Take your pick.
    , @Stonehands
    Your way of life ended with the pill, abortion and suffrage.

    White women don't reproduce. Capische?
  11. @RadicalCenter
    Utterly disagree. Was with the family yesterday in Union Square Park, Manhattan, and the non-black diversity on display was uniformly hostile, glaring or blank-faced, unfriendly, and menacing. Plenty of non-black immigrants fairly openly if quietly dealing drugs, spitting, fondling themselves publicly, eyeing my wife and her friend for very prolonged rude periods of time, dropping trash on the ground, of course speaking no English whatsoever, and generally making us extremely unwelcome and uneasy.

    Worse than Manhattan or Nyc has been in a long time. Even to visit family or be tourists, we are never going back.

    We can handle Africans without any need to bring in its backwards and/or untrustworthy and/or lazy people's as some kind of buffer.

    The vacant houses you mentioned? Better that they be torn down to make way for small farms / big gardens or for park and forestland, than to bring in Indians, Muslims, Chinese, to forever irrevocably change our culture and way of life,

    P.S. I am white and my wife is Asian/white. Apparently neither one of us was real popular. Only one of the hordes of non-white, non-black immigrants there even smiled or nodded at us and our several small happy children. Please wake up and get out of your white neighborhood more before commending non-black third world immigrants as a buffer or second-best scenario,

    Read More
  12. @Priss Factor
    "American blacks, for example, with low average IQ, low average impulse control, and high average inclinations to antisocial behavior, will tend to pool at the bottom of society, in slums and prisons and criminal gangs."

    The Derb, like so many 'race realists'(apparently I'm the only true race-ist), left out #4, namely that blacks are stronger and more muscular.

    I think a lot of white males leave this one out cuz it hurts their white male pride that got used to seeing itself as top alpha male.
    In truth, in raw power and strength, blacks are the toughest dudes.

    Imagine if blacks are low IQ and low-impulse but were built like Guillermo(of Jimmy Kimmel show). They would cause some trouble but nothing like what they are doing now.
    Blacks run wild and act crazy because they know everyone is afraid of them.
    They can see, feel, and sense the fear among whites and non-blacks. (And PC made it worse by sacralizing blacks. So, blacks not only act like thugs cuz they enjoy acting the thug, but they believe their thuggery is holy and righteous. It's like Charles Blow be 'incandescent' with rage. Sheeeeeiiiiit!!! His lunacy be 'incandescent'. Even when blacks just feel like bullying sadistic louts, they feel their loutishness is 'holy' cuz they suffered so nobly as slaves, daaaaang!!! Look at the thuggery of BLM pretending to be some holy crusade. White Guilt morons have christened the Negro in Uncle Tom's Cabin, MLK myth, Morgan Freeman, the mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE. Though US calls itself a secular society, there is a kind of worship of the Negro as the path to redemption of the sinful white soul. The upcoming movie "The Birth of a Negro Nation" will do just that. It will sacralize black mayhem. Yes, even black massacres is 'holy'. Now, what Nat Turner did may be 'understandable' given the conditions of slavery. If I were a slave in oppressive conditions, I might wanna kill some folks too. After all, when Pearl Harbor was attacked, US saw fit to drop bombs and kill 100,000s of civilians in Japan. Rage makes people do murderous things. But should such violence be sacralized? US may have rationalized the use of nukes, but it never sacralized it. But black violence gets sacralized.)

    In my city school where I attended from 3rd to 6th grade, there were whites and blacks. Blacks usually did their thing, and whites did their own thing. But there were friends too, and some kids got along. But whenever there was racial violence, it was no contest. It was like Jack Johnson whupping all them honkers. Blacks whupped hispanic kids too. An even black-brown fight was like 5 black kids vs 20 brown ones. Like lions vs hyenas.
    Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went "A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white'. But when you went there, it was all over with white guy all bloodied and traumatized and the Negro cracking up and hollering like Muhammad Ali.

    In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception.

    When 'race realists' talk of low IQ and low impulse, they just make blacks out to be objects of pity. Even if Libs were to believe in this 'race realism', they would feel, "Oh those poor dumb negroes need extra help. Oh those ill-mannered negroes need extra care to learn to say 'hello' and 'good day' instead of 'what's up ni**a?'"

    To really wake people up, you have to say the fact that blacks are stronger.

    Now, this should be common knowledge without us saying it. After all, we can all see blacks dominating sports. We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white and Asian ones with more fat in flesh. And whole bunch of people saw UNFORGIVABLE BLACKNESS about Jack Johnson the ghastly Negro.

    But PC has such a paralyzing effect on rationality and logic that white folks fear harboring any thoughts or feelings about blacks that may be deemed 'racist'.
    So, even as they see CucKen Burns documentary and notice Johnson the Negro whup white boys and conquer white female race traitors, their minds are shaped by the narration that interprets black thuggery into black struggle for justice and nobility. Now, given the social context in which Johnson lived in, it is valid to say he his life had larger meanings. He did overcome odds in a discriminatory society that placed all sorts of obstacles in the progression of blacks folks.
    But context or no context, the biological fact is 'blacks can kick white ass', and that fact will remain even after all of 'racism' is gone. In other words, even if social 'racism' is all eradicated, there remains biological 'racism', the product of evolution that made the races differently.

    PC is like a chemical that prevents obvious neural connections. So, the only connections made are those allowed by PC. These synthetic-neurons of PC connect the wrong dots.
    For example, a PC-free mind thinks thus when watching blacks in NFL. "Look at that muscled Negro. He is one tough guy. If he was running in the streets, he could beat up a lot of people. Therefore, it'd be risky to live with blacks since they are tougher and some of them could be criminal."

    Totally logical neural connecting the dots.
    But PC freezes the mind and neurons won't make logical connections lest they be 'racist'. So, the mind waits for the PC to offer the permissible Narrative. And the Narrative is "we should admire and respect blacks because they are heroes who win trophies for our team, and by the way, race is just a social construct, and there are no racial differences, and only evil 'racists' believe in such."
    So, the PC mind just goes along with that. PC clogs up the mind and doesn't allow natural flow of neural information.

    In truth, when it comes to thuggery and physical combat, whites are the inferior race. Therefore, the inferior needs and deserves protection from the superior. It's like golden retrievers need protection from packs of pitbulls.
    Also, manhood pride is important for male psychology and development. With blacks around, white males cannot be men. They are turned into cuck-ass cunt-pussyboys. What man wants to be a cuckasscuntpussyboy who gets whupped by thugs of another race who also take the women?

    White males need to be like Viet Cong men. When bigger and beefier US soldiers were turning Saigon women into hookers, the Viet men became Viet Congs to kick the Americans out and have their own nation where they can be top dogs.

    In the end, everything is biology. Society is made by men who are animals. Even society is biology. The dichotomy of society and biology is as misleading as one between mind/soul and body. Mind is part of the body.
    Society is part of biology. Culture is part of biology. Everything that takes place in the human mind is biology since the human mind is biological matter.

    White society is white biology, and whites need to have their own ant colony that is safe from black ant invaders.
    Ideas are biological since they can ONLY exist in the biological membrane of the brain-mind. And ideas are used as weapons just like claws or fangs or sticks.
    PC is a biological weapon used by the GLOB against the white race.

    Just watch the Mexicans kick the shit out of the blacks in south Los Angeles and then reconsider how superior blacks are in fighting. Most blacks are cowards who are indeed strong but prefer to swarm or attack unarmed or unaware people, old people, women, trapped people, etc.

    White intelligence, organization, weaponry, and bravery has defeated blacks before, and will defeat them again, hopefully permanently if our children are to be safe and somewhat free.

    Even the Mexican quotient of those qualities will defeat Africans much of the time as well.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Just watch the Mexicans kick the shit out of the blacks in south Los Angeles and then reconsider how superior blacks are in fighting."

    Numbers. In LA, browns have numerical superiority over the jivers. But one on one, blacks kick brown butt. Look at LA riots. There were so many instances of black on brown violence.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1992/10/blacks-vs-browns/306655/

    Also, Mexican gangs are better organized than the black ones.
  13. @Arclight
    The concept of paying troublesome minorities off to behave well via social welfare programs has been around for at least half a century and hasn't worked by any measure - yet whenever blacks behave badly you can count on some SJW to mention that what's needed is even more redistribution of resources from law-abiding/working people to those whose lack of adherence to social norms is always pinned on the majority as the product of "oppression."

    As someone who once lived in Milwaukee, it's only fair to mention that whites there have a level of hostility to blacks I have not experienced in other cities I have lived in (although I am told Boston is similar)...and that blacks in Milwaukee give whites more justification to feel that way with their behavior than other places I have lived in as well. It might a chicken or the egg sort of proposition, but it does make for a pretty uneasy social environment.

    BLM wants substantially less policing in their neighborhoods as though that would mean less crime in black neighborhoods. Even most lefties understand this would be a disaster (check out liberal TV writer David Simon's conception of this in the 4th season of his show The Wire, "Hampsterdam"), but at this point I say go right ahead with this experiment for Clinton's first term.

    Police should pull out of all black neighborhoods and let them kill each other. The more the better. Let them eliminate fellow savages who otherwise will be trying to kill, rape, terrorize, SPIT ON (yes it has already happened), and mock my children.

    Read More
  14. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @WorkingClass
    I was born in Cedar Rapids, Iowa in 1944. For most of the last 20 years I have been in a majority black city in the deep south. Just this year I relocated to a small town in east Texas. Black riots at the Sweet Corn Festival? This is incomprehensible to me.

    Personal experience with black Americans I have known has proven to me that not all of them are stupid and/or violent. I have no argument with the science of race realism. But the political implications of it are debatable.

    Culturally, black and white are like oil and water. Black Africans have been in this country from the very beginning. Yet they still don't speak American English. So forget about assimilation. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him assimilate. But does this mean we cannot co-exist?

    American blacks went from black slavery to Jim Crow and then straight to forced integration and affirmative action. They have been sub equal and super equal but they have never been equal to white Americans under the law. The civil rights movement should have stopped at voting rights and equal protection.

    Now, proles of every color have a common enemy in the police state and modern capitalism which states that .01% will have everything and the rest will have nothing. I say we can hate each other in our off time but our day job is to come together in resistance against our oppressors.

    And just who are our oppressors? Remember Pogo? He had it right when he said, ‘I have met the enemy and it is us’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stonehands
    Baloney. What are you doing here? Didn't you get the memo about the Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs and their friends in the wonderful system of "checks and balances"?
  15. @Binyamin
    Here he goes again in his insane attempts to prove that whites are superior to everyone else. Derbyshire takes isolated incidents (riots in this case) out of context to demonize an entire population -African Americans and other blacks in this instance- his pet hate. A few hundred or a few thousand blacks rioted (absolutely shocking, no doubt, and the perpetrators must be punished with the full force of law) but what were the other tens of millions of African Americans doing (they form ~14% of the population)? They were doing just what the rest of us were doing, mainly spending time with their family, going to church, worrying about job security, taxes, law and order and their children's education and future, in short going about their own business and not bothering anyone else. All races and nationalities have a tendency to riot if they feel they have grievances, whether real or imagined. The French have been rioting since their revolution in 1789 and as an English immigrant Derbyshire out to know that no country is more prone to riots in modern times than England. Perhaps he ought to attend an English football match.

    Nowhere in this incitement provoking article does Derbyshire offer a solution. I think he does have some insane ideas but he is too cowardly to openly articulate these. Let me speculate what his ideas may be- apartheid style segregation of races, in-your face racial profiling, allowing businesses to to discriminate on grounds of race, Nuremberg style racial classification and possible laws banning interracial sex. Heck, Derbyshire the hypocrite even has a Chinese wife but lets leave that for a moment.

    The worrying thing is, some of the ill educated people who post comments on these sites -one can infer this from their awful comments, will end up believing this rubbish perpetrated by Derbyshire and others and act accordingly. The history of US is a witness that there is a thin line separating a heart filled with racial hatred and acts of extreme violence. Some of the comments posted on this site scare the living daylight out of me. I hope the FBI is tracking some of these insane individuals. British intelligence have recently said that far right extremist terrorism is as great a danger to the West as Islamist terrorism. They know what they are taking about since they have generally kept London safe unlike their incompetent French and Belgian counterparts.

    Hate filled insinuations directed at African Americans have become something of a trademark for Derbyshire, the main reason one suspects he gets invited to various 'white nationalist conferences'. The African Americans are among the oldest of the settler communities in the US. They have been here longer than the average Italian American, Irish American and Americans of non British continental ancestry. Their remarkable positive contribution to modern Western culture, especially in music, is way out of proportion to their numbers. How dare Derbyshire, a recent immigrant, demonize this entire venerable community! If there is any justice in this world, the authorities would deport him back to where he came from since he is an extremist hate preacher and a foreigner.

    But not all is lost. It looks like Trump's campaign has imploded and is in meltdown. Thank Holy Moses! The bastard is not going to be President. Civilization is going to survive after all.

    There’s too much drivel here to respond to at the moment.

    Let’s say you must not live in or next to a majority-black neighborhood, your kids must not attend a heavily black “school”, and last and least, your conception of contributions to “music” and culture is light years away from my own,

    Read More
  16. @Michelle
    Pacific Islanders and many African and Native-American men led truly idyllic lives before the white men came. Surrounded by natural beauty. Lack of disease, except for parts of Africa and the south east of America. Male dominated cultures. Surfing, hunting and fishing all day whilst their women mashed taro or ground acorns and corn and smoked the salmon and venison and buffalo the men brought home. Not having to be around women who were on their periods. Polygamy. Near naked women shaking their hips during feasts and seasonal rituals. Maybe those men from those cultures have a right to be pissed off and drown their sorrows in bottles!

    Yes, blissful until they died painful deaths in their 30s and 40s from gout, diabetes, and hundreds of other conditions that kill and cripple very few people long-term in the white world. A state of nature is not bliss, it is suffering and death.

    Read More
  17. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @RadicalCenter
    Just watch the Mexicans kick the shit out of the blacks in south Los Angeles and then reconsider how superior blacks are in fighting. Most blacks are cowards who are indeed strong but prefer to swarm or attack unarmed or unaware people, old people, women, trapped people, etc.

    White intelligence, organization, weaponry, and bravery has defeated blacks before, and will defeat them again, hopefully permanently if our children are to be safe and somewhat free.

    Even the Mexican quotient of those qualities will defeat Africans much of the time as well.

    “Just watch the Mexicans kick the shit out of the blacks in south Los Angeles and then reconsider how superior blacks are in fighting.”

    Numbers. In LA, browns have numerical superiority over the jivers. But one on one, blacks kick brown butt. Look at LA riots. There were so many instances of black on brown violence.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1992/10/blacks-vs-browns/306655/

    Also, Mexican gangs are better organized than the black ones.

    Read More
    • Replies: @IA

    Also, Mexican gangs are better organized than the black ones.
     
    LOL. They must have taken business management classes from community colleges that forgot to reach out to Negroes.
  18. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @RadicalCenter
    Utterly disagree. Was with the family yesterday in Union Square Park, Manhattan, and the non-black diversity on display was uniformly hostile, glaring or blank-faced, unfriendly, and menacing. Plenty of non-black immigrants fairly openly if quietly dealing drugs, spitting, fondling themselves publicly, eyeing my wife and her friend for very prolonged rude periods of time, dropping trash on the ground, of course speaking no English whatsoever, and generally making us extremely unwelcome and uneasy.

    Worse than Manhattan or Nyc has been in a long time. Even to visit family or be tourists, we are never going back.

    We can handle Africans without any need to bring in its backwards and/or untrustworthy and/or lazy people's as some kind of buffer.

    The vacant houses you mentioned? Better that they be torn down to make way for small farms / big gardens or for park and forestland, than to bring in Indians, Muslims, Chinese, to forever irrevocably change our culture and way of life,

    “Utterly disagree. Was with the family yesterday in Union Square Park, Manhattan, and the non-black diversity on display was uniformly hostile, glaring or blank-faced, unfriendly, and menacing. Plenty of non-black immigrants fairly openly if quietly dealing drugs, spitting, fondling themselves publicly, eyeing my wife and her friend for very prolonged rude periods of time, dropping trash on the ground, of course speaking no English whatsoever, and generally making us extremely unwelcome and uneasy.”

    I see your point, and like I said, an all-white society would be ideal in the West.

    But even blank-faced immigrants ogling your woman is better than Negroes running amok, raping, and doing KO game and looting and rioting.

    I mean where is the story about dotkins and Muslims flash-mobbing stores, burning CVS(as in Baltimore),and beating up teachers?

    I’m not saying Diversity is good. Only that it is preferable to Planet of the Jivers.

    Diversity is the man who ran the store that Michael Brown robbed.
    Blackness is Michael Brown.

    Take your pick.

    Read More
    • Replies: @IA

    Muslims flash-mobbing stores
     
    For Muslims flashmobs are like riding a bike with training wheels.
  19. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Binyamin
    Here he goes again in his insane attempts to prove that whites are superior to everyone else. Derbyshire takes isolated incidents (riots in this case) out of context to demonize an entire population -African Americans and other blacks in this instance- his pet hate. A few hundred or a few thousand blacks rioted (absolutely shocking, no doubt, and the perpetrators must be punished with the full force of law) but what were the other tens of millions of African Americans doing (they form ~14% of the population)? They were doing just what the rest of us were doing, mainly spending time with their family, going to church, worrying about job security, taxes, law and order and their children's education and future, in short going about their own business and not bothering anyone else. All races and nationalities have a tendency to riot if they feel they have grievances, whether real or imagined. The French have been rioting since their revolution in 1789 and as an English immigrant Derbyshire out to know that no country is more prone to riots in modern times than England. Perhaps he ought to attend an English football match.

    Nowhere in this incitement provoking article does Derbyshire offer a solution. I think he does have some insane ideas but he is too cowardly to openly articulate these. Let me speculate what his ideas may be- apartheid style segregation of races, in-your face racial profiling, allowing businesses to to discriminate on grounds of race, Nuremberg style racial classification and possible laws banning interracial sex. Heck, Derbyshire the hypocrite even has a Chinese wife but lets leave that for a moment.

    The worrying thing is, some of the ill educated people who post comments on these sites -one can infer this from their awful comments, will end up believing this rubbish perpetrated by Derbyshire and others and act accordingly. The history of US is a witness that there is a thin line separating a heart filled with racial hatred and acts of extreme violence. Some of the comments posted on this site scare the living daylight out of me. I hope the FBI is tracking some of these insane individuals. British intelligence have recently said that far right extremist terrorism is as great a danger to the West as Islamist terrorism. They know what they are taking about since they have generally kept London safe unlike their incompetent French and Belgian counterparts.

    Hate filled insinuations directed at African Americans have become something of a trademark for Derbyshire, the main reason one suspects he gets invited to various 'white nationalist conferences'. The African Americans are among the oldest of the settler communities in the US. They have been here longer than the average Italian American, Irish American and Americans of non British continental ancestry. Their remarkable positive contribution to modern Western culture, especially in music, is way out of proportion to their numbers. How dare Derbyshire, a recent immigrant, demonize this entire venerable community! If there is any justice in this world, the authorities would deport him back to where he came from since he is an extremist hate preacher and a foreigner.

    But not all is lost. It looks like Trump's campaign has imploded and is in meltdown. Thank Holy Moses! The bastard is not going to be President. Civilization is going to survive after all.

    When the blacks came, there was white flight and Jew Flew.

    Even Liberal Jews fled.

    TMB or too many blacks is a universal problem. Notice a lot of these problems take place in blue cities where people like the Derb have no power and no say.

    And no, most blacks are not decent church-going folks. true, the majority are not criminals, but too many and even many who are not tend to be awful parents, teachers, and loonies.
    Look at black schools. And even many black churches are hate centers like that of J. Wright.

    Also, Trump has gone out on a limb more than any other GOP politician in reaching out to blacks. Trump says Diversity by Immigration adds competitive pressures on blacks. He says we need to focus on Negroes before helping/inviting the rest of the world.

    He is 50% right, 50% wrong.

    True, more immigrants mean more competition for blacks in jobs and schooling.

    But, even if there was no immigration, too many blacks would be good for nothing.

    US spends tons on the schooling of each black kid, but even in places with few immigrants, blacks just mess up. Even where there are opportunities, blacks don’t try or fail to achieve requisite standards. Suppose there are 1000 Hindu medical students at a university, and we say that they’ve taken those positions from blacks!! But suppose those dotter students are removed and sent back to India. Will there be enough blacks willing to study hard enough to take those slots? The answer is NO.

    So yes, immigrants do compete with blacks, but blacks aren’t even trying to be competitive in many areas.

    Btw, American blacks are the fault of Whites who bought the slaves and brought them here.
    But what the hell is Australia doing taking blacks from Sudan? Blacks over there just kill and rape and holler and waller. That makes no sense. Israel sure tries to keep out most black Africans.

    And Jews hate Trump because he hates Muslims for white reasons(Muslims kill whites, so keep them out) than for Jewish reasons(whites should fight Wars for Israel and kill those nasty Muslims).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Stonehands
    "When the blacks came, there was white flight and Jew Flew."


    Whites need to keep and hold ground, especially in the Cities.
    That's where the ports are.

    No more running away.

    Bad schools? Then home school. Sacrifice.Home schooled children out perform
    their government schooled counterparts.
    How else will this malodorous insurgency be countered, except with Godly common sense?

    , @Stonehands
    "But, even if there was no immigration, too many blacks would be good for nothing."

    All the black children in our Bible believing church and school are high achieving, valuable, future
    leaders of whatever system emerges from this unholy mess.
  20. Derb, I’ll one up you on the race realism. In my long experience with the south side of Chicago, the dumber, less civilized blacks riot, loot, and assault people of all colors, sometimes killing them, because they ENJOY doing so. It also makes the riot leaders big men in the community, so they profit from it, like Eldridge Cleaver. In other words, it’s exactly like Africa, as you can see from the violent crime statistics in South Africa.

    Read More
  21. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Binyamin
    Here he goes again in his insane attempts to prove that whites are superior to everyone else. Derbyshire takes isolated incidents (riots in this case) out of context to demonize an entire population -African Americans and other blacks in this instance- his pet hate. A few hundred or a few thousand blacks rioted (absolutely shocking, no doubt, and the perpetrators must be punished with the full force of law) but what were the other tens of millions of African Americans doing (they form ~14% of the population)? They were doing just what the rest of us were doing, mainly spending time with their family, going to church, worrying about job security, taxes, law and order and their children's education and future, in short going about their own business and not bothering anyone else. All races and nationalities have a tendency to riot if they feel they have grievances, whether real or imagined. The French have been rioting since their revolution in 1789 and as an English immigrant Derbyshire out to know that no country is more prone to riots in modern times than England. Perhaps he ought to attend an English football match.

    Nowhere in this incitement provoking article does Derbyshire offer a solution. I think he does have some insane ideas but he is too cowardly to openly articulate these. Let me speculate what his ideas may be- apartheid style segregation of races, in-your face racial profiling, allowing businesses to to discriminate on grounds of race, Nuremberg style racial classification and possible laws banning interracial sex. Heck, Derbyshire the hypocrite even has a Chinese wife but lets leave that for a moment.

    The worrying thing is, some of the ill educated people who post comments on these sites -one can infer this from their awful comments, will end up believing this rubbish perpetrated by Derbyshire and others and act accordingly. The history of US is a witness that there is a thin line separating a heart filled with racial hatred and acts of extreme violence. Some of the comments posted on this site scare the living daylight out of me. I hope the FBI is tracking some of these insane individuals. British intelligence have recently said that far right extremist terrorism is as great a danger to the West as Islamist terrorism. They know what they are taking about since they have generally kept London safe unlike their incompetent French and Belgian counterparts.

    Hate filled insinuations directed at African Americans have become something of a trademark for Derbyshire, the main reason one suspects he gets invited to various 'white nationalist conferences'. The African Americans are among the oldest of the settler communities in the US. They have been here longer than the average Italian American, Irish American and Americans of non British continental ancestry. Their remarkable positive contribution to modern Western culture, especially in music, is way out of proportion to their numbers. How dare Derbyshire, a recent immigrant, demonize this entire venerable community! If there is any justice in this world, the authorities would deport him back to where he came from since he is an extremist hate preacher and a foreigner.

    But not all is lost. It looks like Trump's campaign has imploded and is in meltdown. Thank Holy Moses! The bastard is not going to be President. Civilization is going to survive after all.

    In surveys over the last 30 years, 92–95% blacks believed:

    O.J. deserved to get off even if he did do it

    Rodney King didn’t deserve a good beat down for leading the police at a 100 mph car chase and resisting arrest

    Trayvon was an innocent victim of a white predator

    Michael Brown actually said “hand up, don’t shoot”.

    And they Vote Democrat irrespective of policy or candidate

    Sure, plenty of blacks just mind their own business, but when push comes to shove, they feel and act along racial fault lines. So don’t blame us for noticing and taking steps to protect ourselves from their propensity to demonize and victimize whites.

    Read Ron Unz’s archive article on race and crime right here on this site. Then you’ll really know whom you should fear.

    http://www.unz.com/article/race-and-crime-in-america/?highlight=race+and+crime

    Read More
  22. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Michelle
    Pacific Islanders and many African and Native-American men led truly idyllic lives before the white men came. Surrounded by natural beauty. Lack of disease, except for parts of Africa and the south east of America. Male dominated cultures. Surfing, hunting and fishing all day whilst their women mashed taro or ground acorns and corn and smoked the salmon and venison and buffalo the men brought home. Not having to be around women who were on their periods. Polygamy. Near naked women shaking their hips during feasts and seasonal rituals. Maybe those men from those cultures have a right to be pissed off and drown their sorrows in bottles!

    The Black economy in Africa as well as the Polynesian, like most pre-industrial revolution economies, was heavily dependent on slavery. 50% of all Africans were enslaved. Often a slave was slaughtered and eaten.

    Here’s the full text of “The Negros in Negroland”, a book compiling quotes from accounts written by early explorers, missionaries and traders on the African continent. Speke, Burton, Stanley, Livingston etc.

    Read it and let the scales fall from your eyes.

    https://archive.org/stream/negroesinnegrola00helpiala/negroesinnegrola00helpiala_djvu.txt

    I have led you to the water, now drink. You have no excuse now for not informing yourself and climbing out of the dank cavern of ignorance into the revealing light of Truth.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Here’s the full text of 'The Negros in Negroland', a book compiling quotes from accounts written by early explorers, missionaries and traders on the African continent. Speke, Burton, Stanley, Livingston etc."

    I think blacks rediscovered the art of head-hunting.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JV6d2xCKOo
    , @CCZ
    I doubt that the “reparationists” would acknowledge or accept this, but, this historic documentation does exist, one example:

    Foreign Slave Trade, Abstract of the Information Recently Laid on the Table of the House of Commons on the Subject of the Slave Trade, London, 1821

    “SPAIN. In December, 1817, a decree was issued by his Catholic Majesty, for the restriction and ultimate abolition of the Slave Trade, carried on by subjects of Spain. It is as follows:

    This measure [the introduction of Negro Slaves into America], which did not create slavery, but only took advantage of that which existed through the barbarity of the Africans, by saving from death their prisoners, and alleviating their sad condition, far from being prejudicial to the Negroes transported to America, conferred upon them not only the incomparable blessing of being instructed in the knowledge of the true God, but likewise all the advantages which accompany civilization, without subjecting them, in their state of servitude, to a harder condition than that which they endured in freedom, when free in their native country.” [Pages 24-25].
     
    Full text digitized book at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044021023221;view=1up;seq=5
    , @Michelle
    I am talking about "before" the white man got there, fool. If you can't understand that, you are not a conservative.
  23. @Priss Factor
    "Just watch the Mexicans kick the shit out of the blacks in south Los Angeles and then reconsider how superior blacks are in fighting."

    Numbers. In LA, browns have numerical superiority over the jivers. But one on one, blacks kick brown butt. Look at LA riots. There were so many instances of black on brown violence.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1992/10/blacks-vs-browns/306655/

    Also, Mexican gangs are better organized than the black ones.

    Also, Mexican gangs are better organized than the black ones.

    LOL. They must have taken business management classes from community colleges that forgot to reach out to Negroes.

    Read More
  24. @Priss Factor
    "Utterly disagree. Was with the family yesterday in Union Square Park, Manhattan, and the non-black diversity on display was uniformly hostile, glaring or blank-faced, unfriendly, and menacing. Plenty of non-black immigrants fairly openly if quietly dealing drugs, spitting, fondling themselves publicly, eyeing my wife and her friend for very prolonged rude periods of time, dropping trash on the ground, of course speaking no English whatsoever, and generally making us extremely unwelcome and uneasy."

    I see your point, and like I said, an all-white society would be ideal in the West.

    But even blank-faced immigrants ogling your woman is better than Negroes running amok, raping, and doing KO game and looting and rioting.

    I mean where is the story about dotkins and Muslims flash-mobbing stores, burning CVS(as in Baltimore),and beating up teachers?

    I'm not saying Diversity is good. Only that it is preferable to Planet of the Jivers.

    Diversity is the man who ran the store that Michael Brown robbed.
    Blackness is Michael Brown.

    Take your pick.

    Muslims flash-mobbing stores

    For Muslims flashmobs are like riding a bike with training wheels.

    Read More
  25. @anon
    1) The west and only the west, continues this insane and suicidal policy of bringing in so-called refugees from thousands and thousands of miles away. Why are Sudanese living in Australia? There are dozens of countries in Africa right beside them! Why go all the way across the vast Indian ocean? Because they can and Australia is a rich country that will let them in. Japan accepted 11 refugees last year. Correct, eleven. And its population is more then six times greater then Australia's.

    2) Your point about these blacks suffering no historical ill-treatment in Australia to either explain or justify their atrocious behaviour also apples elsewhere; Canada, the United Kingdom, France, etc. None of these countries had a black population of any numerical importance or historical significance. More evidence in support of hypothesis one!

    The ‘west’ and only ‘west’ continue to attack other nations, namely in middle east, period.

    Even it is not a argument to embrace millions of rapefuges, for the masses, any superficial argument + social pressures will be or will look like a BIG argument…

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    What middle east country did Germany attack? It is taking in 800,000 - 1,000,000 Arabs from Syria. Why?
  26. This column is spot on. I wonder what my hard working, tough, sharp retired Army Afro Americans think of all these black predators.
    In the 50s and 60s I could not walk in Bed Stuy at night. It could be tough during the day if gang members were at the subway station. Whites who think they can walk in Bed Stuy at night- see how fast you can run. Nothing changes except the prices on the brownstones are excessive. I was born and worked in the Bed Stuy neighborhood which was white when my father first got there but changed rapidly (area is that of what the Jackie Gleason -Ed Norton Honeymooners TV show is based on).
    I no longer donate to any missions or other outfits to help poor Haitians. In our Catholic grammar school we had “rice” boxes to put our change in and donate the money to Haiti and other countries. Nothing has changed in Haiti. It seems tha Haitians cannot govern themselves.
    This column is correct- I lived it. I was beaten and along with my father robbed at gunpoint many times. Nothing has changed. This never went on when the neighborhoods were white.

    Read More
  27. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment

    In a nutshell…

    When too many Hindus or Muslims settle in EU, there will be a different civilization.

    When too many blacks/Africans settle in EU, there will be NO civilization.

    Blacks are the #1 threat to civilization itself.

    http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/08/09/there-are-no-successful-black-nations-africa-diginty-racism-pan-africanism/

    Read More
  28. […] morality. Market breakdown. World downfall. Trolsk dominance. Race riots (unrecognized as such). Albion Awakening launches. Sexbots rising. Racial crime-warfare. End […]

    Read More
  29. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anonymous
    The Black economy in Africa as well as the Polynesian, like most pre-industrial revolution economies, was heavily dependent on slavery. 50% of all Africans were enslaved. Often a slave was slaughtered and eaten.

    Here's the full text of "The Negros in Negroland", a book compiling quotes from accounts written by early explorers, missionaries and traders on the African continent. Speke, Burton, Stanley, Livingston etc.

    Read it and let the scales fall from your eyes.

    https://archive.org/stream/negroesinnegrola00helpiala/negroesinnegrola00helpiala_djvu.txt

    I have led you to the water, now drink. You have no excuse now for not informing yourself and climbing out of the dank cavern of ignorance into the revealing light of Truth.

    “Here’s the full text of ‘The Negros in Negroland’, a book compiling quotes from accounts written by early explorers, missionaries and traders on the African continent. Speke, Burton, Stanley, Livingston etc.”

    I think blacks rediscovered the art of head-hunting.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JV6d2xCKOo

    Read More
    • Replies: @george strong
    Whites deserve to be attacked because they support a corrupt welfare / warfare state and don't have the courage to expel unassimilated minorities. Whites actually support taxation when white men are the only net payers. Stupid should hurt.
  30. @Michelle
    Pacific Islanders and many African and Native-American men led truly idyllic lives before the white men came. Surrounded by natural beauty. Lack of disease, except for parts of Africa and the south east of America. Male dominated cultures. Surfing, hunting and fishing all day whilst their women mashed taro or ground acorns and corn and smoked the salmon and venison and buffalo the men brought home. Not having to be around women who were on their periods. Polygamy. Near naked women shaking their hips during feasts and seasonal rituals. Maybe those men from those cultures have a right to be pissed off and drown their sorrows in bottles!

    Thomas Hobbes in his classical work, “The Leviathan”, had a few ideas about man in the state of nature; that is, the historical epochs Before the White Man Came:

    “No arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear and danger of violent death; and the life of man solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”

    The description of life being poor, nasty, brutish, and short continues to describe life in sub-Saharan Africa. Evidence? The daily news works just fine … covering Mali to Nigeria to South Africa. After the White Man Came, the Western NGOs distributing the basics to sustain life and health in these hell holes temporarily leave when Blacks start behaving badly. They return when the “die offs” are over. In the end, nothing ever changes.

    Before the White Man Came, the Polynesian islands were populated by savages. Their favorite pass time was massacring and looting the inhabitants of neighboring islands. Same for the Amerindians and neighboring tribes.

    The fantasy of man peacefully living in a lush garden of plenty Before the White Man Came is a myth without a historical basis.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cowboy Shaw
    There is a very obscure but astonishing short book by the artist Augustus Earle:

    https://www.amazon.com/Narrative-Nine-Months-Residence-Zealand/dp/1406863157

    The portrayal of Maori culture in 1827 is horrific. Wanton violence and lawless cannibalism.

    How much there had already been a breakdown in societal structuure is unclear, and he had more contempt for the hypocrisy of the missionaries.

    Still, it's not a well-known book in NZ, for obvious reasons.
    , @Michelle
    Oh, jeez! Do you have a concept or a clue? Killing guys from other tribes and smoking their severed heads was half of the fun. Taking their daughters and wives as concubines was the other half. Study European history and you will find the very same behavior, especially amongst the Scots. Kill the Lord, kill his children, rape the wife! But the Europen women were dirty, stinky, scared of bathing and covered in strange unattractive clothing! You go on dreaming that the white man and his feminist ladies were a gift to "primitive" peoples. I ain't drinking your Kool Aid.
  31. @Priss Factor
    "Mrs. Clinton and her Social Justice Warriors want to bring in further masses of poor Third Worlders to enhance our nation’s diversity. A thoughtful observer might question the wisdom of this in light of our failure to make any progress coping with the diversity we already have."

    This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it's a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) --- and if whites cannot get rid of blacks --- , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes.

    Look at NY. Yes, too many immigrants. It would be better if it were all white. But NY has lots of blacks, and many are there to stay(even with gentrification and section 8).

    Now, what would be better for whites?

    A NY with only whites and blacks.

    Or

    A NY with whites, blacks, and Diversity(via immigration).

    If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey.
    Also, as white Libs don't have lots of kids(as they live mainly for career, narcissism, and vanity), and cities cannot go on with whites alone. Buildings will go empty, and then Negroes will use them for drug dens.
    But if you have Mexers and dotkins and Muslims, enough of them will run small businesses and try to keep things up. It may not be up to white standards, but there is at some semblance of civilization. With Negroes, it is descent into hell.

    Or take the suburbs. Where I live, it's most white. But in the past 15 yrs, many white folks grew older and some died and houses go empty one by one. So, who will fill them? Due to immigration, I got a bunch of dotkin neighbors, and even though they could so easier on the curry, I prefer them to the jivers(some of whom have been placed here via section 8). Jivers are the worst.

    Milwaukee would be a wonderful city if it were all white. But there are too many blacks. From what I hear, these jaffers are even crazier than your average jaffer. These are pitbull jaffers. And there is no way to get rid of them. And these jaffers drive white folks out. But suppose Milwaukee were to fill up with Immigrant Diversity. It would come with a host of problems but as a buffer and economic buzz-generator, they would be much better than Negroes. And since it will no longer be a case of whites vs blacks, blacks will be more confused about whom to hate.
    I mean blacks know what it means to hate whitey. But when they see all these colorful folks from all over the world, they be scratching their heads and be thinking, "who dat? Some mexican dude? Some chinese mothafuc*a? Some raghead mofo? Some weirdass bitch with blanket over her head... dang..." Blacks get a bit disoriented and their politics becomes muddled.

    Milwaukee has 15% that is now Hispanic, but more immigrants will have a dampening effect on black politics and rage.

    So, it's like this.

    Best choice is All-white society.

    But if whites must choose between white-black-society or white-diversity-black-society, the latter is better.

    I'd rather have a bunch of dotkins and tacoheads between myself and the jaffers.

    Interesting, to say the least.

    Read More
  32. Tbf, white NZers love a good riot every now and again. They’re mostly harmless affairs in beach towns at New Years Even when sparing matches take place between bottle throwng youths and the cops. Every couple of years or so the spoilt upper-middle class none-too-bright university students in Dunedin go on a spree burning couches in the street and throwing stuff around.

    The cops delight in handing out a few beatings and that’s that for a few years. It is motivated by nothing more than boredom and is probably related to the adrenalin sports NZers enjoy. I was in one in 1989 and to be fair it was quite fun as the police dogs cut loose and we were scrambling to get away.

    I was explaining this culture to a Frenchman once and he was impressed by the nihilism of rioting for ‘no reason at all’.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10397227

    The Polynesians don’t riot but are often involved in horrific downtown brawls between each other.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "The Polynesians don’t riot but are often involved in horrific downtown brawls between each other."

    Them fellers fear and admire power and confidence.

    They admired whites more in the Age of Empire.

    Today's whites try to be nice, and figure such niceness will save them from the warring ways of their culture. But these darkies only see white wimpy weakness that they hold in contempt and milk for more free stuff.

    They see white west as just a dairy cow, a whore, a prey to gorge on.

    It's like a herd of sheep saving wolves from violence and putting them among sheep, only to be shocked at wolves feeding on sheep.

    Whites need to take into the physiology, psychology, and temperament of people they take in.

    Blacks are worst. They are stronger, lacking in intellect & understanding, and most arrogant and self-centered.
    Even smart blacks think mainly in jazzy-slick terms of 'how can I fool that white boy and grab everything he's got.'
  33. @TheJester
    Thomas Hobbes in his classical work, "The Leviathan", had a few ideas about man in the state of nature; that is, the historical epochs Before the White Man Came:

    “No arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear and danger of violent death; and the life of man solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
     
    The description of life being poor, nasty, brutish, and short continues to describe life in sub-Saharan Africa. Evidence? The daily news works just fine ... covering Mali to Nigeria to South Africa. After the White Man Came, the Western NGOs distributing the basics to sustain life and health in these hell holes temporarily leave when Blacks start behaving badly. They return when the "die offs" are over. In the end, nothing ever changes.

    Before the White Man Came, the Polynesian islands were populated by savages. Their favorite pass time was massacring and looting the inhabitants of neighboring islands. Same for the Amerindians and neighboring tribes.

    The fantasy of man peacefully living in a lush garden of plenty Before the White Man Came is a myth without a historical basis.

    There is a very obscure but astonishing short book by the artist Augustus Earle:

    https://www.amazon.com/Narrative-Nine-Months-Residence-Zealand/dp/1406863157

    The portrayal of Maori culture in 1827 is horrific. Wanton violence and lawless cannibalism.

    How much there had already been a breakdown in societal structuure is unclear, and he had more contempt for the hypocrisy of the missionaries.

    Still, it’s not a well-known book in NZ, for obvious reasons.

    Read More
  34. Gunnar Myrdal’s famous book The American Dilemma asked an important question. At what age does the negro realize his biology is his destiny? Myrdal, writing in era of de jure segregation, thought it was childhood. Today, owing to phony political and social narratives, it has probably advanced to adolescence but the fact remains, for all but a few, the realization of one’s innate inferiority will arrive. The negro will look out upon a world that neither needs nor wants him. He does,however, have a brief window of opportunity he can exploit

    Mature people measure their success by their accomplishments and social status but few people have much in the way of accomplishments or social status in their teens and early twenties. At this stage the negro can attain a certain status by rejecting the long term in favor of the short term. If you can’t solve an algebra or geometry problem you can compensate and pretend your shortcomings are actually attributes. It will even work for awhile as acquiring status through violence, theft and criminal behavior isn’t severely punished at this stage and Federal law allows the young negro to inflict himself on others regardless of their social status and wishes.

    This brief window of opportunity lasts from about the age of 15 to 25 at which point the negro succumbs to both legal and social sanction. Unless you make it to the NBA or NFL running with a ball no longer matters, police and judges no longer look the other way when you are arrested. If you have no skills your employment status reflects that and attractive females no longer will overlook your poverty. High school is OVER. It is at this point that the negro demands a political solution to what is a biological problem

    Read More
  35. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    “These are not indigenous Australian blacks, mind. They don’t cause much trouble.”

    Wrong. Your hypothesis fits them as well.

    Read More
  36. @Priss Factor
    "Mrs. Clinton and her Social Justice Warriors want to bring in further masses of poor Third Worlders to enhance our nation’s diversity. A thoughtful observer might question the wisdom of this in light of our failure to make any progress coping with the diversity we already have."

    This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it's a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) --- and if whites cannot get rid of blacks --- , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes.

    Look at NY. Yes, too many immigrants. It would be better if it were all white. But NY has lots of blacks, and many are there to stay(even with gentrification and section 8).

    Now, what would be better for whites?

    A NY with only whites and blacks.

    Or

    A NY with whites, blacks, and Diversity(via immigration).

    If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey.
    Also, as white Libs don't have lots of kids(as they live mainly for career, narcissism, and vanity), and cities cannot go on with whites alone. Buildings will go empty, and then Negroes will use them for drug dens.
    But if you have Mexers and dotkins and Muslims, enough of them will run small businesses and try to keep things up. It may not be up to white standards, but there is at some semblance of civilization. With Negroes, it is descent into hell.

    Or take the suburbs. Where I live, it's most white. But in the past 15 yrs, many white folks grew older and some died and houses go empty one by one. So, who will fill them? Due to immigration, I got a bunch of dotkin neighbors, and even though they could so easier on the curry, I prefer them to the jivers(some of whom have been placed here via section 8). Jivers are the worst.

    Milwaukee would be a wonderful city if it were all white. But there are too many blacks. From what I hear, these jaffers are even crazier than your average jaffer. These are pitbull jaffers. And there is no way to get rid of them. And these jaffers drive white folks out. But suppose Milwaukee were to fill up with Immigrant Diversity. It would come with a host of problems but as a buffer and economic buzz-generator, they would be much better than Negroes. And since it will no longer be a case of whites vs blacks, blacks will be more confused about whom to hate.
    I mean blacks know what it means to hate whitey. But when they see all these colorful folks from all over the world, they be scratching their heads and be thinking, "who dat? Some mexican dude? Some chinese mothafuc*a? Some raghead mofo? Some weirdass bitch with blanket over her head... dang..." Blacks get a bit disoriented and their politics becomes muddled.

    Milwaukee has 15% that is now Hispanic, but more immigrants will have a dampening effect on black politics and rage.

    So, it's like this.

    Best choice is All-white society.

    But if whites must choose between white-black-society or white-diversity-black-society, the latter is better.

    I'd rather have a bunch of dotkins and tacoheads between myself and the jaffers.

    “District 4 includes the city of Milwaukee, which is forty percent black.”

    F-F-FORTY percent????????????? I had no idea it was that high. Shortly after he started playing pro basketball Milwaukee Buck center Lew Alcindor (who eventually changed his name to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) used to bitch about how Milwaukee was a blue-collar, white ethnic town to which he was unable to relate as a black man.

    Oh well. Good-bye Schlitz and brats, hello Ripple and collared greens.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cowboy Shaw
    Was there a single black character in happy days? I don't recall one.
    , @Lost american
    Where would Lew Alcindor (Kareem Jabbar) be without the white man setting up a system where Alcindor could be successful. I felt Jabar's dad was success- he had a career as a NY City Transit cop. I see that as an honest , decent way to go in life-protecting people on the subways.
    I could never change my name from my father unless he was a vile, evil man, and this was certainly not the case with the Alcindors.
    Jabbar had a lot of problems. He should have realized that men of all nationalities have trouble with girls. Women have their biases and they exclude men who do not fit their preconceived notions. Of course, in modern times, women marry any color when there is fame , wealth, and power involved.
    The many African American men I knew in the Army had discipline and a good knowledge of themselves. They were trustworthy and then successful. They studied and worked hard. The bad ones, just like bad weights, got tossed out. If anything now, if one is of color they have better chances at promotion.
    If African Americans have what it takes to go med school they have better chances than most whites of getting in.
  37. Australians are extremely big on the ethnic restaurants concept. There’s nothing a liberal Australian likes more than the thought that there is an Eritrean / Chechyn fusion food market down the road.

    It’s Stage 1 of the immigration Delusion.

    NZers are more motivated by moral superiority and extreme Magic Dirt theory. Merely touching foot in new Zealand eliminates all nasty thoughts and ideas that have animated human history.

    Both countries will be over run with extreme prejudice.

    Read More
  38. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Cowboy Shaw
    Tbf, white NZers love a good riot every now and again. They're mostly harmless affairs in beach towns at New Years Even when sparing matches take place between bottle throwng youths and the cops. Every couple of years or so the spoilt upper-middle class none-too-bright university students in Dunedin go on a spree burning couches in the street and throwing stuff around.

    The cops delight in handing out a few beatings and that's that for a few years. It is motivated by nothing more than boredom and is probably related to the adrenalin sports NZers enjoy. I was in one in 1989 and to be fair it was quite fun as the police dogs cut loose and we were scrambling to get away.

    I was explaining this culture to a Frenchman once and he was impressed by the nihilism of rioting for 'no reason at all'.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10397227

    The Polynesians don't riot but are often involved in horrific downtown brawls between each other.

    “The Polynesians don’t riot but are often involved in horrific downtown brawls between each other.”

    Them fellers fear and admire power and confidence.

    They admired whites more in the Age of Empire.

    Today’s whites try to be nice, and figure such niceness will save them from the warring ways of their culture. But these darkies only see white wimpy weakness that they hold in contempt and milk for more free stuff.

    They see white west as just a dairy cow, a whore, a prey to gorge on.

    It’s like a herd of sheep saving wolves from violence and putting them among sheep, only to be shocked at wolves feeding on sheep.

    Whites need to take into the physiology, psychology, and temperament of people they take in.

    Blacks are worst. They are stronger, lacking in intellect & understanding, and most arrogant and self-centered.
    Even smart blacks think mainly in jazzy-slick terms of ‘how can I fool that white boy and grab everything he’s got.’

    Read More
  39. @Connecticut Famer
    "District 4 includes the city of Milwaukee, which is forty percent black."

    F-F-FORTY percent????????????? I had no idea it was that high. Shortly after he started playing pro basketball Milwaukee Buck center Lew Alcindor (who eventually changed his name to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) used to bitch about how Milwaukee was a blue-collar, white ethnic town to which he was unable to relate as a black man.

    Oh well. Good-bye Schlitz and brats, hello Ripple and collared greens.

    Was there a single black character in happy days? I don’t recall one.

    Read More
  40. @Priss Factor
    "Here’s the full text of 'The Negros in Negroland', a book compiling quotes from accounts written by early explorers, missionaries and traders on the African continent. Speke, Burton, Stanley, Livingston etc."

    I think blacks rediscovered the art of head-hunting.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JV6d2xCKOo

    Whites deserve to be attacked because they support a corrupt welfare / warfare state and don’t have the courage to expel unassimilated minorities. Whites actually support taxation when white men are the only net payers. Stupid should hurt.

    Read More
  41. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @WorkingClass
    I was born in Cedar Rapids, Iowa in 1944. For most of the last 20 years I have been in a majority black city in the deep south. Just this year I relocated to a small town in east Texas. Black riots at the Sweet Corn Festival? This is incomprehensible to me.

    Personal experience with black Americans I have known has proven to me that not all of them are stupid and/or violent. I have no argument with the science of race realism. But the political implications of it are debatable.

    Culturally, black and white are like oil and water. Black Africans have been in this country from the very beginning. Yet they still don't speak American English. So forget about assimilation. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him assimilate. But does this mean we cannot co-exist?

    American blacks went from black slavery to Jim Crow and then straight to forced integration and affirmative action. They have been sub equal and super equal but they have never been equal to white Americans under the law. The civil rights movement should have stopped at voting rights and equal protection.

    Now, proles of every color have a common enemy in the police state and modern capitalism which states that .01% will have everything and the rest will have nothing. I say we can hate each other in our off time but our day job is to come together in resistance against our oppressors.

    May I suggest the World Socialist Website? http://www.wsws.org?

    Read More
  42. @Connecticut Famer
    "District 4 includes the city of Milwaukee, which is forty percent black."

    F-F-FORTY percent????????????? I had no idea it was that high. Shortly after he started playing pro basketball Milwaukee Buck center Lew Alcindor (who eventually changed his name to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) used to bitch about how Milwaukee was a blue-collar, white ethnic town to which he was unable to relate as a black man.

    Oh well. Good-bye Schlitz and brats, hello Ripple and collared greens.

    Where would Lew Alcindor (Kareem Jabbar) be without the white man setting up a system where Alcindor could be successful. I felt Jabar’s dad was success- he had a career as a NY City Transit cop. I see that as an honest , decent way to go in life-protecting people on the subways.
    I could never change my name from my father unless he was a vile, evil man, and this was certainly not the case with the Alcindors.
    Jabbar had a lot of problems. He should have realized that men of all nationalities have trouble with girls. Women have their biases and they exclude men who do not fit their preconceived notions. Of course, in modern times, women marry any color when there is fame , wealth, and power involved.
    The many African American men I knew in the Army had discipline and a good knowledge of themselves. They were trustworthy and then successful. They studied and worked hard. The bad ones, just like bad weights, got tossed out. If anything now, if one is of color they have better chances at promotion.
    If African Americans have what it takes to go med school they have better chances than most whites of getting in.

    Read More
  43. @Priss Factor
    "American blacks, for example, with low average IQ, low average impulse control, and high average inclinations to antisocial behavior, will tend to pool at the bottom of society, in slums and prisons and criminal gangs."

    The Derb, like so many 'race realists'(apparently I'm the only true race-ist), left out #4, namely that blacks are stronger and more muscular.

    I think a lot of white males leave this one out cuz it hurts their white male pride that got used to seeing itself as top alpha male.
    In truth, in raw power and strength, blacks are the toughest dudes.

    Imagine if blacks are low IQ and low-impulse but were built like Guillermo(of Jimmy Kimmel show). They would cause some trouble but nothing like what they are doing now.
    Blacks run wild and act crazy because they know everyone is afraid of them.
    They can see, feel, and sense the fear among whites and non-blacks. (And PC made it worse by sacralizing blacks. So, blacks not only act like thugs cuz they enjoy acting the thug, but they believe their thuggery is holy and righteous. It's like Charles Blow be 'incandescent' with rage. Sheeeeeiiiiit!!! His lunacy be 'incandescent'. Even when blacks just feel like bullying sadistic louts, they feel their loutishness is 'holy' cuz they suffered so nobly as slaves, daaaaang!!! Look at the thuggery of BLM pretending to be some holy crusade. White Guilt morons have christened the Negro in Uncle Tom's Cabin, MLK myth, Morgan Freeman, the mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE. Though US calls itself a secular society, there is a kind of worship of the Negro as the path to redemption of the sinful white soul. The upcoming movie "The Birth of a Negro Nation" will do just that. It will sacralize black mayhem. Yes, even black massacres is 'holy'. Now, what Nat Turner did may be 'understandable' given the conditions of slavery. If I were a slave in oppressive conditions, I might wanna kill some folks too. After all, when Pearl Harbor was attacked, US saw fit to drop bombs and kill 100,000s of civilians in Japan. Rage makes people do murderous things. But should such violence be sacralized? US may have rationalized the use of nukes, but it never sacralized it. But black violence gets sacralized.)

    In my city school where I attended from 3rd to 6th grade, there were whites and blacks. Blacks usually did their thing, and whites did their own thing. But there were friends too, and some kids got along. But whenever there was racial violence, it was no contest. It was like Jack Johnson whupping all them honkers. Blacks whupped hispanic kids too. An even black-brown fight was like 5 black kids vs 20 brown ones. Like lions vs hyenas.
    Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went "A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white'. But when you went there, it was all over with white guy all bloodied and traumatized and the Negro cracking up and hollering like Muhammad Ali.

    In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception.

    When 'race realists' talk of low IQ and low impulse, they just make blacks out to be objects of pity. Even if Libs were to believe in this 'race realism', they would feel, "Oh those poor dumb negroes need extra help. Oh those ill-mannered negroes need extra care to learn to say 'hello' and 'good day' instead of 'what's up ni**a?'"

    To really wake people up, you have to say the fact that blacks are stronger.

    Now, this should be common knowledge without us saying it. After all, we can all see blacks dominating sports. We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white and Asian ones with more fat in flesh. And whole bunch of people saw UNFORGIVABLE BLACKNESS about Jack Johnson the ghastly Negro.

    But PC has such a paralyzing effect on rationality and logic that white folks fear harboring any thoughts or feelings about blacks that may be deemed 'racist'.
    So, even as they see CucKen Burns documentary and notice Johnson the Negro whup white boys and conquer white female race traitors, their minds are shaped by the narration that interprets black thuggery into black struggle for justice and nobility. Now, given the social context in which Johnson lived in, it is valid to say he his life had larger meanings. He did overcome odds in a discriminatory society that placed all sorts of obstacles in the progression of blacks folks.
    But context or no context, the biological fact is 'blacks can kick white ass', and that fact will remain even after all of 'racism' is gone. In other words, even if social 'racism' is all eradicated, there remains biological 'racism', the product of evolution that made the races differently.

    PC is like a chemical that prevents obvious neural connections. So, the only connections made are those allowed by PC. These synthetic-neurons of PC connect the wrong dots.
    For example, a PC-free mind thinks thus when watching blacks in NFL. "Look at that muscled Negro. He is one tough guy. If he was running in the streets, he could beat up a lot of people. Therefore, it'd be risky to live with blacks since they are tougher and some of them could be criminal."

    Totally logical neural connecting the dots.
    But PC freezes the mind and neurons won't make logical connections lest they be 'racist'. So, the mind waits for the PC to offer the permissible Narrative. And the Narrative is "we should admire and respect blacks because they are heroes who win trophies for our team, and by the way, race is just a social construct, and there are no racial differences, and only evil 'racists' believe in such."
    So, the PC mind just goes along with that. PC clogs up the mind and doesn't allow natural flow of neural information.

    In truth, when it comes to thuggery and physical combat, whites are the inferior race. Therefore, the inferior needs and deserves protection from the superior. It's like golden retrievers need protection from packs of pitbulls.
    Also, manhood pride is important for male psychology and development. With blacks around, white males cannot be men. They are turned into cuck-ass cunt-pussyboys. What man wants to be a cuckasscuntpussyboy who gets whupped by thugs of another race who also take the women?

    White males need to be like Viet Cong men. When bigger and beefier US soldiers were turning Saigon women into hookers, the Viet men became Viet Congs to kick the Americans out and have their own nation where they can be top dogs.

    In the end, everything is biology. Society is made by men who are animals. Even society is biology. The dichotomy of society and biology is as misleading as one between mind/soul and body. Mind is part of the body.
    Society is part of biology. Culture is part of biology. Everything that takes place in the human mind is biology since the human mind is biological matter.

    White society is white biology, and whites need to have their own ant colony that is safe from black ant invaders.
    Ideas are biological since they can ONLY exist in the biological membrane of the brain-mind. And ideas are used as weapons just like claws or fangs or sticks.
    PC is a biological weapon used by the GLOB against the white race.

    The Derb, like so many ‘race realists’(apparently I’m the only true race-ist), left out #4, namely that blacks are stronger and more muscular.

    I think a lot of white males leave this one out cuz it hurts their white male pride that got used to seeing itself as top alpha male.
    In truth, in raw power and strength, blacks are the toughest dudes.

    Maybe in about half the cases and this is due to selective breeding while they were slaves (many plantation owners bred African males for size so they could perform more physically demanding tasks) and the introduction of white DNA through interbreeding. That’s why you don’t see many blacks from African nations represented in boxing and MMA because in his native and pure state the African is physically unimposing and unspectacular in most cases. Many pure Africans are gangly and dorky and not known for physical prowess.

    True, some blacks are bigger, stronger or just tougher, but I’ve seen several of white dudes get the best of blacks in physical combat in my life and blacks usually avoid one on one conflict with white males since they are at their best when the odds are in their favor. Even when they are slightly outnumbered by whites they often lose their courage.

    You need to stop overestimating their capabilities as fighters and if white males weren’t raised to be sensitive, effeminate and metrosexual things would be very different.

    Read More
  44. […] that “cranky old Derb” (via Vox Day), a long and very interesting piece regarding black riots in general and specifically those most recently occurring in Milwaukee and […]

    Read More
  45. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Priss Factor
    "American blacks, for example, with low average IQ, low average impulse control, and high average inclinations to antisocial behavior, will tend to pool at the bottom of society, in slums and prisons and criminal gangs."

    The Derb, like so many 'race realists'(apparently I'm the only true race-ist), left out #4, namely that blacks are stronger and more muscular.

    I think a lot of white males leave this one out cuz it hurts their white male pride that got used to seeing itself as top alpha male.
    In truth, in raw power and strength, blacks are the toughest dudes.

    Imagine if blacks are low IQ and low-impulse but were built like Guillermo(of Jimmy Kimmel show). They would cause some trouble but nothing like what they are doing now.
    Blacks run wild and act crazy because they know everyone is afraid of them.
    They can see, feel, and sense the fear among whites and non-blacks. (And PC made it worse by sacralizing blacks. So, blacks not only act like thugs cuz they enjoy acting the thug, but they believe their thuggery is holy and righteous. It's like Charles Blow be 'incandescent' with rage. Sheeeeeiiiiit!!! His lunacy be 'incandescent'. Even when blacks just feel like bullying sadistic louts, they feel their loutishness is 'holy' cuz they suffered so nobly as slaves, daaaaang!!! Look at the thuggery of BLM pretending to be some holy crusade. White Guilt morons have christened the Negro in Uncle Tom's Cabin, MLK myth, Morgan Freeman, the mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE. Though US calls itself a secular society, there is a kind of worship of the Negro as the path to redemption of the sinful white soul. The upcoming movie "The Birth of a Negro Nation" will do just that. It will sacralize black mayhem. Yes, even black massacres is 'holy'. Now, what Nat Turner did may be 'understandable' given the conditions of slavery. If I were a slave in oppressive conditions, I might wanna kill some folks too. After all, when Pearl Harbor was attacked, US saw fit to drop bombs and kill 100,000s of civilians in Japan. Rage makes people do murderous things. But should such violence be sacralized? US may have rationalized the use of nukes, but it never sacralized it. But black violence gets sacralized.)

    In my city school where I attended from 3rd to 6th grade, there were whites and blacks. Blacks usually did their thing, and whites did their own thing. But there were friends too, and some kids got along. But whenever there was racial violence, it was no contest. It was like Jack Johnson whupping all them honkers. Blacks whupped hispanic kids too. An even black-brown fight was like 5 black kids vs 20 brown ones. Like lions vs hyenas.
    Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went "A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white'. But when you went there, it was all over with white guy all bloodied and traumatized and the Negro cracking up and hollering like Muhammad Ali.

    In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception.

    When 'race realists' talk of low IQ and low impulse, they just make blacks out to be objects of pity. Even if Libs were to believe in this 'race realism', they would feel, "Oh those poor dumb negroes need extra help. Oh those ill-mannered negroes need extra care to learn to say 'hello' and 'good day' instead of 'what's up ni**a?'"

    To really wake people up, you have to say the fact that blacks are stronger.

    Now, this should be common knowledge without us saying it. After all, we can all see blacks dominating sports. We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white and Asian ones with more fat in flesh. And whole bunch of people saw UNFORGIVABLE BLACKNESS about Jack Johnson the ghastly Negro.

    But PC has such a paralyzing effect on rationality and logic that white folks fear harboring any thoughts or feelings about blacks that may be deemed 'racist'.
    So, even as they see CucKen Burns documentary and notice Johnson the Negro whup white boys and conquer white female race traitors, their minds are shaped by the narration that interprets black thuggery into black struggle for justice and nobility. Now, given the social context in which Johnson lived in, it is valid to say he his life had larger meanings. He did overcome odds in a discriminatory society that placed all sorts of obstacles in the progression of blacks folks.
    But context or no context, the biological fact is 'blacks can kick white ass', and that fact will remain even after all of 'racism' is gone. In other words, even if social 'racism' is all eradicated, there remains biological 'racism', the product of evolution that made the races differently.

    PC is like a chemical that prevents obvious neural connections. So, the only connections made are those allowed by PC. These synthetic-neurons of PC connect the wrong dots.
    For example, a PC-free mind thinks thus when watching blacks in NFL. "Look at that muscled Negro. He is one tough guy. If he was running in the streets, he could beat up a lot of people. Therefore, it'd be risky to live with blacks since they are tougher and some of them could be criminal."

    Totally logical neural connecting the dots.
    But PC freezes the mind and neurons won't make logical connections lest they be 'racist'. So, the mind waits for the PC to offer the permissible Narrative. And the Narrative is "we should admire and respect blacks because they are heroes who win trophies for our team, and by the way, race is just a social construct, and there are no racial differences, and only evil 'racists' believe in such."
    So, the PC mind just goes along with that. PC clogs up the mind and doesn't allow natural flow of neural information.

    In truth, when it comes to thuggery and physical combat, whites are the inferior race. Therefore, the inferior needs and deserves protection from the superior. It's like golden retrievers need protection from packs of pitbulls.
    Also, manhood pride is important for male psychology and development. With blacks around, white males cannot be men. They are turned into cuck-ass cunt-pussyboys. What man wants to be a cuckasscuntpussyboy who gets whupped by thugs of another race who also take the women?

    White males need to be like Viet Cong men. When bigger and beefier US soldiers were turning Saigon women into hookers, the Viet men became Viet Congs to kick the Americans out and have their own nation where they can be top dogs.

    In the end, everything is biology. Society is made by men who are animals. Even society is biology. The dichotomy of society and biology is as misleading as one between mind/soul and body. Mind is part of the body.
    Society is part of biology. Culture is part of biology. Everything that takes place in the human mind is biology since the human mind is biological matter.

    White society is white biology, and whites need to have their own ant colony that is safe from black ant invaders.
    Ideas are biological since they can ONLY exist in the biological membrane of the brain-mind. And ideas are used as weapons just like claws or fangs or sticks.
    PC is a biological weapon used by the GLOB against the white race.

    Do not agree at all that blacks are stronger. They are more inclined to violence but that does not make them stronger. Ever see a strongman contest? The contestants are almost always white. Most blacks can “dish it out, but not take it” like typical bullies. Blacks also tend to have low pain thresholds. I see a lot of blacks at the gym. They concentrate almost exclusively on the “showy’ muscles- arms and chest. They do no calf work for instance, and can’t squat for S***.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    "Ever see a strongman contest?"

    Look... if you're a prospective athlete, would you prefer to train for football or basketball and make 40 million a year or train to pull at tractor to win a measly $100,000?

    Blacks don't enter a lot of sports because there's no money or glory in it.

    But in sports that EVERYONE WANTS TO PLAY for big bucks, blacks dominate.

    The kind of people who go into weight-lifting in the US are those who couldn't make in football or etc. I mean why train to lift all that weight for almost zero money if you can make it in football, make millions a year, and hump every ho?
  46. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Michelle
    Pacific Islanders and many African and Native-American men led truly idyllic lives before the white men came. Surrounded by natural beauty. Lack of disease, except for parts of Africa and the south east of America. Male dominated cultures. Surfing, hunting and fishing all day whilst their women mashed taro or ground acorns and corn and smoked the salmon and venison and buffalo the men brought home. Not having to be around women who were on their periods. Polygamy. Near naked women shaking their hips during feasts and seasonal rituals. Maybe those men from those cultures have a right to be pissed off and drown their sorrows in bottles!

    Actually slavery was widespread everywhere throughout black (or sub-Saharan) Africa long before whites arrived. Indians in America and Canada lived short hard, and brutish lives and in Mexico they practiced human sacrifice, as much as 20,00 at a time during ‘festivals’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Michelle
    It's never been good for the slaves, you nincompoop, but what about for the dominant males??? Chicks who like being taken "forcefully"?? When I say you are gay, I mean it like retarded! Your argument is weak. One of the funnest parts of being a tribal member before white people got to your land, was being able to own slaves! Something the white man took to with relish!!
  47. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Santoculto
    The 'west' and only 'west' continue to attack other nations, namely in middle east, period.

    Even it is not a argument to embrace millions of rapefuges, for the masses, any superficial argument + social pressures will be or will look like a BIG argument...

    What middle east country did Germany attack? It is taking in 800,000 – 1,000,000 Arabs from Syria. Why?

    Read More
  48. Priss Factor [AKA "Anonymny"] says: • Website     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @anon
    Do not agree at all that blacks are stronger. They are more inclined to violence but that does not make them stronger. Ever see a strongman contest? The contestants are almost always white. Most blacks can "dish it out, but not take it" like typical bullies. Blacks also tend to have low pain thresholds. I see a lot of blacks at the gym. They concentrate almost exclusively on the "showy' muscles- arms and chest. They do no calf work for instance, and can't squat for S***.

    “Ever see a strongman contest?”

    Look… if you’re a prospective athlete, would you prefer to train for football or basketball and make 40 million a year or train to pull at tractor to win a measly $100,000?

    Blacks don’t enter a lot of sports because there’s no money or glory in it.

    But in sports that EVERYONE WANTS TO PLAY for big bucks, blacks dominate.

    The kind of people who go into weight-lifting in the US are those who couldn’t make in football or etc. I mean why train to lift all that weight for almost zero money if you can make it in football, make millions a year, and hump every ho?

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    Well, there are blacks in other rich countries now - unfortunately - so the NFL is not an option for them, and yet they too don't distinguish themselves in weightlifting/powerlifting/strongman contests. You can be stronger than anyone else and not have the requisite to become an NFL lineman.And blacks are overerepresented there, but not as much as at other positions.
    , @anon
    Blacks don't dominate professional hockey or tennis, to name just a few sports. You said that blacks are stronger then whites, but now it seems you are saying blacks just go in for sports that pay big money. Possibly true, but doesn't support your first point about them being stronger. You should also remember that athletics and entertainment are the only areas blacks tend to excel in. Neither filed requires intelligence or character by the way.
    , @joef
    It is true that part of the reason for the overrepresentation of afro americans in NFL is because of what Jimmy the Greek described as past selective breeding. But the other part is that afro americans have more down time to play sports that other groups do not have due to work responsibilities. I as mentioned to you before, do not mistaken a pro athlete for the average since a pro athlete does need a measure of discipline that the average does not have. In addition I believe that there is also a measure of politically correct affirmative action involved in draft picks as well.

    Also the average ghetto radical afro american will not fight/attack unless they feel they have some unfair advantage on their opponent (by outnumbering/size/weapon/ambush etc). Afro americans do not completely dominate in hockey/mma/weight lifting/strongman/wrestling ( a 280 lbs Kimbo Slice lost against a 205 lbs Seth P). The average ghetto radical afro american is conditioned for immediate gratification, not adversity, nor do they have much discipline. In the many street fights from the old neighborhood, usually the white or hispanic was the victor when fighting an afro american (who were mostly a lot of show but not as much go).

    Where the ghetto radical afro american has the advantage is his willingness to use extreme violence for the most casual of reasons. That often takes other more civilized minded people by complete surprise. I believe you grew up in the same circumstances as I did (I wonder if you were a Bob Grant radio fan?), and most of us are aware of the current racial tensions with afro americans are reaching increased levels (promoted by the leftist), but do not make the afros mythological in their strengths. That will only increase the libs fear factor, which will make them want to pander even more at our expense.

  49. @Priss Factor
    "Ever see a strongman contest?"

    Look... if you're a prospective athlete, would you prefer to train for football or basketball and make 40 million a year or train to pull at tractor to win a measly $100,000?

    Blacks don't enter a lot of sports because there's no money or glory in it.

    But in sports that EVERYONE WANTS TO PLAY for big bucks, blacks dominate.

    The kind of people who go into weight-lifting in the US are those who couldn't make in football or etc. I mean why train to lift all that weight for almost zero money if you can make it in football, make millions a year, and hump every ho?

    Well, there are blacks in other rich countries now – unfortunately – so the NFL is not an option for them, and yet they too don’t distinguish themselves in weightlifting/powerlifting/strongman contests. You can be stronger than anyone else and not have the requisite to become an NFL lineman.And blacks are overerepresented there, but not as much as at other positions.

    Read More
  50. A word of dissent on the overall view here.

    Example: Cedar Rapids TV station KCRG (the newsdroid shown in Flaherty’s clip) is owned by Gray Television, Inc., in Atlanta.

    Run your eyeballs down its list of licensees:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_Television

    Gray Television owns and/or operates 77 television stations in 44 television markets broadcasting 140 program streams including 76 affiliates of the Big Four networks (ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox). Gray Television’s owned and/or operated stations include 26 channels affiliated with the CBS Network, 24 channels affiliated with the NBC Network, 16 channels affiliated with the ABC Network and 10 channels affiliated with the Fox Network.

    The combined station group owns and operates the number-one ranked television station in 28 of those 44 markets and the number-one or number-two ranked television station operations in 41 of those 44 markets. The combined TV Station Group reaches approximately 8.1 percent of total United States television households.

    Do you think for one nanomoment that Digital News Puppets–on air or behind the cameras–are going to risk their station- or outlet-jumping careers by being anything other than 1,000% politically correct as per the Corporate Office’s HR team?

    Scroll down a ways to see the HR managers in Atlanta:

    http://www.gray.tv/index.php?page=corporate-directory

    Better yet, why not ask those 6 white guys at the top (Howell, Effinger, Latek, Ryan, Smith, Waller) WTF they’re thinking that their outlets make lots of money exploiting and colonizing Midwest Nice while lying about events that harm their own audience members?

    Read More
  51. anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Priss Factor
    "Ever see a strongman contest?"

    Look... if you're a prospective athlete, would you prefer to train for football or basketball and make 40 million a year or train to pull at tractor to win a measly $100,000?

    Blacks don't enter a lot of sports because there's no money or glory in it.

    But in sports that EVERYONE WANTS TO PLAY for big bucks, blacks dominate.

    The kind of people who go into weight-lifting in the US are those who couldn't make in football or etc. I mean why train to lift all that weight for almost zero money if you can make it in football, make millions a year, and hump every ho?

    Blacks don’t dominate professional hockey or tennis, to name just a few sports. You said that blacks are stronger then whites, but now it seems you are saying blacks just go in for sports that pay big money. Possibly true, but doesn’t support your first point about them being stronger. You should also remember that athletics and entertainment are the only areas blacks tend to excel in. Neither filed requires intelligence or character by the way.

    Read More
  52. FWIW, Derb, Cedar Rapids is not Cedar Falls. There’s about fifty miles of distance between them.

    Read More
  53. @Priss Factor
    "Mrs. Clinton and her Social Justice Warriors want to bring in further masses of poor Third Worlders to enhance our nation’s diversity. A thoughtful observer might question the wisdom of this in light of our failure to make any progress coping with the diversity we already have."

    This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it's a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) --- and if whites cannot get rid of blacks --- , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes.

    Look at NY. Yes, too many immigrants. It would be better if it were all white. But NY has lots of blacks, and many are there to stay(even with gentrification and section 8).

    Now, what would be better for whites?

    A NY with only whites and blacks.

    Or

    A NY with whites, blacks, and Diversity(via immigration).

    If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey.
    Also, as white Libs don't have lots of kids(as they live mainly for career, narcissism, and vanity), and cities cannot go on with whites alone. Buildings will go empty, and then Negroes will use them for drug dens.
    But if you have Mexers and dotkins and Muslims, enough of them will run small businesses and try to keep things up. It may not be up to white standards, but there is at some semblance of civilization. With Negroes, it is descent into hell.

    Or take the suburbs. Where I live, it's most white. But in the past 15 yrs, many white folks grew older and some died and houses go empty one by one. So, who will fill them? Due to immigration, I got a bunch of dotkin neighbors, and even though they could so easier on the curry, I prefer them to the jivers(some of whom have been placed here via section 8). Jivers are the worst.

    Milwaukee would be a wonderful city if it were all white. But there are too many blacks. From what I hear, these jaffers are even crazier than your average jaffer. These are pitbull jaffers. And there is no way to get rid of them. And these jaffers drive white folks out. But suppose Milwaukee were to fill up with Immigrant Diversity. It would come with a host of problems but as a buffer and economic buzz-generator, they would be much better than Negroes. And since it will no longer be a case of whites vs blacks, blacks will be more confused about whom to hate.
    I mean blacks know what it means to hate whitey. But when they see all these colorful folks from all over the world, they be scratching their heads and be thinking, "who dat? Some mexican dude? Some chinese mothafuc*a? Some raghead mofo? Some weirdass bitch with blanket over her head... dang..." Blacks get a bit disoriented and their politics becomes muddled.

    Milwaukee has 15% that is now Hispanic, but more immigrants will have a dampening effect on black politics and rage.

    So, it's like this.

    Best choice is All-white society.

    But if whites must choose between white-black-society or white-diversity-black-society, the latter is better.

    I'd rather have a bunch of dotkins and tacoheads between myself and the jaffers.

    Problem is, the immivaders soon adopt the manners and mores of our own indigenous vibrants. If the first gen doesn’t, the second gen will for sure. Hip-hop gangsta “culture” is magnetically attractive to all of our duskier brethren.

    And then the newcomers won’t be between you and the Basketball-Americans, they’ll be reinforcing them instead.

    Build the wall and deport ‘em all.

    Read More
  54. “Once you start paying the Danegeld, you never get rid of the Dane.”

    http://www.poetryloverspage.com/poets/kipling/dane_geld.html

    Wasn’t it PJ O’Rourke who once described the “Federal Department of Paying the Negroes Not To Riot”?

    Read More
  55. @Priss Factor
    "American blacks, for example, with low average IQ, low average impulse control, and high average inclinations to antisocial behavior, will tend to pool at the bottom of society, in slums and prisons and criminal gangs."

    The Derb, like so many 'race realists'(apparently I'm the only true race-ist), left out #4, namely that blacks are stronger and more muscular.

    I think a lot of white males leave this one out cuz it hurts their white male pride that got used to seeing itself as top alpha male.
    In truth, in raw power and strength, blacks are the toughest dudes.

    Imagine if blacks are low IQ and low-impulse but were built like Guillermo(of Jimmy Kimmel show). They would cause some trouble but nothing like what they are doing now.
    Blacks run wild and act crazy because they know everyone is afraid of them.
    They can see, feel, and sense the fear among whites and non-blacks. (And PC made it worse by sacralizing blacks. So, blacks not only act like thugs cuz they enjoy acting the thug, but they believe their thuggery is holy and righteous. It's like Charles Blow be 'incandescent' with rage. Sheeeeeiiiiit!!! His lunacy be 'incandescent'. Even when blacks just feel like bullying sadistic louts, they feel their loutishness is 'holy' cuz they suffered so nobly as slaves, daaaaang!!! Look at the thuggery of BLM pretending to be some holy crusade. White Guilt morons have christened the Negro in Uncle Tom's Cabin, MLK myth, Morgan Freeman, the mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE. Though US calls itself a secular society, there is a kind of worship of the Negro as the path to redemption of the sinful white soul. The upcoming movie "The Birth of a Negro Nation" will do just that. It will sacralize black mayhem. Yes, even black massacres is 'holy'. Now, what Nat Turner did may be 'understandable' given the conditions of slavery. If I were a slave in oppressive conditions, I might wanna kill some folks too. After all, when Pearl Harbor was attacked, US saw fit to drop bombs and kill 100,000s of civilians in Japan. Rage makes people do murderous things. But should such violence be sacralized? US may have rationalized the use of nukes, but it never sacralized it. But black violence gets sacralized.)

    In my city school where I attended from 3rd to 6th grade, there were whites and blacks. Blacks usually did their thing, and whites did their own thing. But there were friends too, and some kids got along. But whenever there was racial violence, it was no contest. It was like Jack Johnson whupping all them honkers. Blacks whupped hispanic kids too. An even black-brown fight was like 5 black kids vs 20 brown ones. Like lions vs hyenas.
    Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went "A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white'. But when you went there, it was all over with white guy all bloodied and traumatized and the Negro cracking up and hollering like Muhammad Ali.

    In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception.

    When 'race realists' talk of low IQ and low impulse, they just make blacks out to be objects of pity. Even if Libs were to believe in this 'race realism', they would feel, "Oh those poor dumb negroes need extra help. Oh those ill-mannered negroes need extra care to learn to say 'hello' and 'good day' instead of 'what's up ni**a?'"

    To really wake people up, you have to say the fact that blacks are stronger.

    Now, this should be common knowledge without us saying it. After all, we can all see blacks dominating sports. We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white and Asian ones with more fat in flesh. And whole bunch of people saw UNFORGIVABLE BLACKNESS about Jack Johnson the ghastly Negro.

    But PC has such a paralyzing effect on rationality and logic that white folks fear harboring any thoughts or feelings about blacks that may be deemed 'racist'.
    So, even as they see CucKen Burns documentary and notice Johnson the Negro whup white boys and conquer white female race traitors, their minds are shaped by the narration that interprets black thuggery into black struggle for justice and nobility. Now, given the social context in which Johnson lived in, it is valid to say he his life had larger meanings. He did overcome odds in a discriminatory society that placed all sorts of obstacles in the progression of blacks folks.
    But context or no context, the biological fact is 'blacks can kick white ass', and that fact will remain even after all of 'racism' is gone. In other words, even if social 'racism' is all eradicated, there remains biological 'racism', the product of evolution that made the races differently.

    PC is like a chemical that prevents obvious neural connections. So, the only connections made are those allowed by PC. These synthetic-neurons of PC connect the wrong dots.
    For example, a PC-free mind thinks thus when watching blacks in NFL. "Look at that muscled Negro. He is one tough guy. If he was running in the streets, he could beat up a lot of people. Therefore, it'd be risky to live with blacks since they are tougher and some of them could be criminal."

    Totally logical neural connecting the dots.
    But PC freezes the mind and neurons won't make logical connections lest they be 'racist'. So, the mind waits for the PC to offer the permissible Narrative. And the Narrative is "we should admire and respect blacks because they are heroes who win trophies for our team, and by the way, race is just a social construct, and there are no racial differences, and only evil 'racists' believe in such."
    So, the PC mind just goes along with that. PC clogs up the mind and doesn't allow natural flow of neural information.

    In truth, when it comes to thuggery and physical combat, whites are the inferior race. Therefore, the inferior needs and deserves protection from the superior. It's like golden retrievers need protection from packs of pitbulls.
    Also, manhood pride is important for male psychology and development. With blacks around, white males cannot be men. They are turned into cuck-ass cunt-pussyboys. What man wants to be a cuckasscuntpussyboy who gets whupped by thugs of another race who also take the women?

    White males need to be like Viet Cong men. When bigger and beefier US soldiers were turning Saigon women into hookers, the Viet men became Viet Congs to kick the Americans out and have their own nation where they can be top dogs.

    In the end, everything is biology. Society is made by men who are animals. Even society is biology. The dichotomy of society and biology is as misleading as one between mind/soul and body. Mind is part of the body.
    Society is part of biology. Culture is part of biology. Everything that takes place in the human mind is biology since the human mind is biological matter.

    White society is white biology, and whites need to have their own ant colony that is safe from black ant invaders.
    Ideas are biological since they can ONLY exist in the biological membrane of the brain-mind. And ideas are used as weapons just like claws or fangs or sticks.
    PC is a biological weapon used by the GLOB against the white race.

    Horse manure, my good sir!

    What soopa affletes!

    Read More
  56. Derb – “O Valiant Hearts” is a very moving story. Thank you for writing it.

    Read More
  57. @Binyamin
    Here he goes again in his insane attempts to prove that whites are superior to everyone else. Derbyshire takes isolated incidents (riots in this case) out of context to demonize an entire population -African Americans and other blacks in this instance- his pet hate. A few hundred or a few thousand blacks rioted (absolutely shocking, no doubt, and the perpetrators must be punished with the full force of law) but what were the other tens of millions of African Americans doing (they form ~14% of the population)? They were doing just what the rest of us were doing, mainly spending time with their family, going to church, worrying about job security, taxes, law and order and their children's education and future, in short going about their own business and not bothering anyone else. All races and nationalities have a tendency to riot if they feel they have grievances, whether real or imagined. The French have been rioting since their revolution in 1789 and as an English immigrant Derbyshire out to know that no country is more prone to riots in modern times than England. Perhaps he ought to attend an English football match.

    Nowhere in this incitement provoking article does Derbyshire offer a solution. I think he does have some insane ideas but he is too cowardly to openly articulate these. Let me speculate what his ideas may be- apartheid style segregation of races, in-your face racial profiling, allowing businesses to to discriminate on grounds of race, Nuremberg style racial classification and possible laws banning interracial sex. Heck, Derbyshire the hypocrite even has a Chinese wife but lets leave that for a moment.

    The worrying thing is, some of the ill educated people who post comments on these sites -one can infer this from their awful comments, will end up believing this rubbish perpetrated by Derbyshire and others and act accordingly. The history of US is a witness that there is a thin line separating a heart filled with racial hatred and acts of extreme violence. Some of the comments posted on this site scare the living daylight out of me. I hope the FBI is tracking some of these insane individuals. British intelligence have recently said that far right extremist terrorism is as great a danger to the West as Islamist terrorism. They know what they are taking about since they have generally kept London safe unlike their incompetent French and Belgian counterparts.

    Hate filled insinuations directed at African Americans have become something of a trademark for Derbyshire, the main reason one suspects he gets invited to various 'white nationalist conferences'. The African Americans are among the oldest of the settler communities in the US. They have been here longer than the average Italian American, Irish American and Americans of non British continental ancestry. Their remarkable positive contribution to modern Western culture, especially in music, is way out of proportion to their numbers. How dare Derbyshire, a recent immigrant, demonize this entire venerable community! If there is any justice in this world, the authorities would deport him back to where he came from since he is an extremist hate preacher and a foreigner.

    But not all is lost. It looks like Trump's campaign has imploded and is in meltdown. Thank Holy Moses! The bastard is not going to be President. Civilization is going to survive after all.

    Are you on drugs?

    Read More
  58. @Priss Factor
    "Ever see a strongman contest?"

    Look... if you're a prospective athlete, would you prefer to train for football or basketball and make 40 million a year or train to pull at tractor to win a measly $100,000?

    Blacks don't enter a lot of sports because there's no money or glory in it.

    But in sports that EVERYONE WANTS TO PLAY for big bucks, blacks dominate.

    The kind of people who go into weight-lifting in the US are those who couldn't make in football or etc. I mean why train to lift all that weight for almost zero money if you can make it in football, make millions a year, and hump every ho?

    It is true that part of the reason for the overrepresentation of afro americans in NFL is because of what Jimmy the Greek described as past selective breeding. But the other part is that afro americans have more down time to play sports that other groups do not have due to work responsibilities. I as mentioned to you before, do not mistaken a pro athlete for the average since a pro athlete does need a measure of discipline that the average does not have. In addition I believe that there is also a measure of politically correct affirmative action involved in draft picks as well.

    Also the average ghetto radical afro american will not fight/attack unless they feel they have some unfair advantage on their opponent (by outnumbering/size/weapon/ambush etc). Afro americans do not completely dominate in hockey/mma/weight lifting/strongman/wrestling ( a 280 lbs Kimbo Slice lost against a 205 lbs Seth P). The average ghetto radical afro american is conditioned for immediate gratification, not adversity, nor do they have much discipline. In the many street fights from the old neighborhood, usually the white or hispanic was the victor when fighting an afro american (who were mostly a lot of show but not as much go).

    Where the ghetto radical afro american has the advantage is his willingness to use extreme violence for the most casual of reasons. That often takes other more civilized minded people by complete surprise. I believe you grew up in the same circumstances as I did (I wonder if you were a Bob Grant radio fan?), and most of us are aware of the current racial tensions with afro americans are reaching increased levels (promoted by the leftist), but do not make the afros mythological in their strengths. That will only increase the libs fear factor, which will make them want to pander even more at our expense.

    Read More
  59. Majority Black Bermuda has the fourth highest GDP per capita in the world, about $85k (CIA, 2013, same as Singapore)

    US is $56k.

    Botswana and Ghana do OK. Botswana has overtaken South Africa in GDP per capita.

    What makes a successful Black country? British colonial history, British laws, English language, lack of ethnic animosity, Christianity, Protestant work ethic.

    American blacks don’t have enough of these attributes. In terms of work ethic, they still have the slave mentality – waiting for the white man to solve their problems, give them money etc.

    Read More
  60. The article started off with some sappy yapping about “Midwestern Nice” so wasn’t worth reading , but scanning the comment thread I must say that it’s as depressing as it is amusing to read people pissing and moaning about pissant “black” violence.

    I’m surprised no one here has claimed it was “blacks” who did the witch burnings, the Gnaddenhutten Massacre, the Sand Creek Massacre, Wounded Knee, the “Civil” War, the Ludlow Massacre, the slaughter of the Philippine freedom fighters, the World Wars, the napalmings of Vietnam, the bombings of Iraq, Afghanistan, etc., etc., etc., ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

    I’m also now pretty well convinced that their black DNA is responsible for the violence of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Pearle, Wolfowitz, Feith, Netanyahu,and Hillary too.

    Yup, dem Whites folks has de lock on peacefulness, fo sho!

    I thought I heard something, once, about first removing the beam out of our own eye, so we could see clearly to remove the speck out of our brother’s eye. But hey, that shit is 2000 year old advice, so it must be obsolete.

    Apparently it’s no big deal that while we’re hysterically stomping the little guy, the big shots are busy robbing us blind, as always.

    And all along I’ve been under the illusion that Australopithecus had become extinct.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    It really is a long time though since employable people went on rampages such as described. Low IQ, low impulse control, drunk football fans may be a white equivalent but, if anything, it rather serves to support Derb's view.
  61. @anon
    What middle east country did Germany attack? It is taking in 800,000 - 1,000,000 Arabs from Syria. Why?

    And the black Sudanese were attacked by Arabs…

    Read More
  62. @Binyamin
    Here he goes again in his insane attempts to prove that whites are superior to everyone else. Derbyshire takes isolated incidents (riots in this case) out of context to demonize an entire population -African Americans and other blacks in this instance- his pet hate. A few hundred or a few thousand blacks rioted (absolutely shocking, no doubt, and the perpetrators must be punished with the full force of law) but what were the other tens of millions of African Americans doing (they form ~14% of the population)? They were doing just what the rest of us were doing, mainly spending time with their family, going to church, worrying about job security, taxes, law and order and their children's education and future, in short going about their own business and not bothering anyone else. All races and nationalities have a tendency to riot if they feel they have grievances, whether real or imagined. The French have been rioting since their revolution in 1789 and as an English immigrant Derbyshire out to know that no country is more prone to riots in modern times than England. Perhaps he ought to attend an English football match.

    Nowhere in this incitement provoking article does Derbyshire offer a solution. I think he does have some insane ideas but he is too cowardly to openly articulate these. Let me speculate what his ideas may be- apartheid style segregation of races, in-your face racial profiling, allowing businesses to to discriminate on grounds of race, Nuremberg style racial classification and possible laws banning interracial sex. Heck, Derbyshire the hypocrite even has a Chinese wife but lets leave that for a moment.

    The worrying thing is, some of the ill educated people who post comments on these sites -one can infer this from their awful comments, will end up believing this rubbish perpetrated by Derbyshire and others and act accordingly. The history of US is a witness that there is a thin line separating a heart filled with racial hatred and acts of extreme violence. Some of the comments posted on this site scare the living daylight out of me. I hope the FBI is tracking some of these insane individuals. British intelligence have recently said that far right extremist terrorism is as great a danger to the West as Islamist terrorism. They know what they are taking about since they have generally kept London safe unlike their incompetent French and Belgian counterparts.

    Hate filled insinuations directed at African Americans have become something of a trademark for Derbyshire, the main reason one suspects he gets invited to various 'white nationalist conferences'. The African Americans are among the oldest of the settler communities in the US. They have been here longer than the average Italian American, Irish American and Americans of non British continental ancestry. Their remarkable positive contribution to modern Western culture, especially in music, is way out of proportion to their numbers. How dare Derbyshire, a recent immigrant, demonize this entire venerable community! If there is any justice in this world, the authorities would deport him back to where he came from since he is an extremist hate preacher and a foreigner.

    But not all is lost. It looks like Trump's campaign has imploded and is in meltdown. Thank Holy Moses! The bastard is not going to be President. Civilization is going to survive after all.

    Ethiopian black Jews recently rioted in Tel Aviv. Why?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    The Ethiopians are generally good people, and I believe they do have a genuine grievance. I have a few Ethiopian friends, and as a community they are decent, interesting or uninteresting as any another can be. They have no interest in social violence and even less in identifying with any global Black activism [I could be terribly wrong, but I think they aren't racially negroid either, which is a silly point perhaps anyway, and nothing to do with anything!].

    Israeli police has treated them in a manner they would not other groups such as the Yemenites, Indians, Moroccans, Egyptians etc. Nevertheless this has to be addressed. I daresay the same sort of thing happened with previous immigrant groups [Yemenites, Indians, and, earlier in Israel's history with the yekke Jews discriminating against some of the other Ashkenazim]. So basically it takes a bit of time for assimilation to occur and I trust the same shall come to pass for the Ethiopians.

  63. A friend who lives within a mile of those Moomba riots by Sudanese in Melbourne and was there at the time tells me he was unaware of them until I mentioned this article. So it is fair to say that Australia has probably just had an inoculating dose of Africans. A pity the Lebanese inoculation in the 70s and early 80s was also an overdose.

    Read More
  64. @Jacques Sheete
    The article started off with some sappy yapping about "Midwestern Nice" so wasn't worth reading , but scanning the comment thread I must say that it's as depressing as it is amusing to read people pissing and moaning about pissant "black" violence.

    I'm surprised no one here has claimed it was "blacks" who did the witch burnings, the Gnaddenhutten Massacre, the Sand Creek Massacre, Wounded Knee, the "Civil" War, the Ludlow Massacre, the slaughter of the Philippine freedom fighters, the World Wars, the napalmings of Vietnam, the bombings of Iraq, Afghanistan, etc., etc., etc., ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

    I'm also now pretty well convinced that their black DNA is responsible for the violence of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Pearle, Wolfowitz, Feith, Netanyahu,and Hillary too.

    Yup, dem Whites folks has de lock on peacefulness, fo sho!

    I thought I heard something, once, about first removing the beam out of our own eye, so we could see clearly to remove the speck out of our brother's eye. But hey, that shit is 2000 year old advice, so it must be obsolete.

    Apparently it's no big deal that while we're hysterically stomping the little guy, the big shots are busy robbing us blind, as always.

    And all along I've been under the illusion that Australopithecus had become extinct.

    It really is a long time though since employable people went on rampages such as described. Low IQ, low impulse control, drunk football fans may be a white equivalent but, if anything, it rather serves to support Derb’s view.

    Read More
  65. @Michelle
    Pacific Islanders and many African and Native-American men led truly idyllic lives before the white men came. Surrounded by natural beauty. Lack of disease, except for parts of Africa and the south east of America. Male dominated cultures. Surfing, hunting and fishing all day whilst their women mashed taro or ground acorns and corn and smoked the salmon and venison and buffalo the men brought home. Not having to be around women who were on their periods. Polygamy. Near naked women shaking their hips during feasts and seasonal rituals. Maybe those men from those cultures have a right to be pissed off and drown their sorrows in bottles!

    Excellent. Let’s do a Hollywood thing together! We can film in New Zealand.

    Read More
  66. Yup, dem black bankers and war profiteers have me fillin my shorts. De white ones, day’z OK.

    Anyway, did something mention rampages? I guess the invasion of Iraq and the Abu Ghraib nightmare weren’t rampages. And of course it was low IQ blacks responsible for all dat sheete.

    Read More
    • Replies: @El Dato
    And you didn't even mention genocide in Guatemala, selling chemical warfare goodness to old pal Saddam, upgrading Afghanistan into a Soviet honeytrap or palling around with archenemy Saudi Arabia.

    Yeah, Self-selecting upperclass mofos are going to do their upperclass mofo stuff. This has to be looked into at some point with extreme prejudice, but it's another problem.

    Except that it's related via central banking of course (pays for the wars, destroys the economy, taxes without appearing to, wealth transfers without anyone being able to do anything about it).
    , @Jane Claire
    Actually I think your right, it was low a IQ black that sold the war to the people and to the UN, he was a secretary of state like Hildebeast Clinton also, yet you don't say nuffin bout him but rightly blame the President who currently is black and destroying country after country in Middle East and destroying the US at the same time right along with his black justice department.
    "Colin Luther Powell (/ˈkoʊlᵻn/; born April 5, 1937)[2] is an American statesman and a retired four-star general in the United States Army.[3] He was the 65th United States Secretary of State, serving under U.S. President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2005, the first African American to serve in that position.[4][5][6][7] During his military career, Powell also served as National Security Advisor (1987–1989), as Commander of the U.S. Army Forces Command (1989) and as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1989–1993), holding the latter position during the Persian Gulf War. Born in Harlem as the son of Jamaican immigrants, Powell was the first, and so far the only, African American to serve on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the first of two consecutive black office-holders to serve as U.S. Secretary of State." Wiki
    And then there was Condoleeza Rice too oh low IQ one yourself, no need to let it shine.
  67. Jim Crow?
    Weren’t blacks enjoying the fruits of the rights fought for by white men who were drafted for war while they weren’t? Blacks weren’t drafted until Vietnam, and they got their rights just like the white folk. hahahaa
    Jim Crow laws, don’t make me giggle, I would bet that was started to get them to want to be part of America, because before that it was always a white mans war and most of them weren’t going to fight it, maybe a few volunteered here and there but they weren’t forced like the white man. They weren’t chased down and put in jail for not wanting to fight some other white mans war.

    Read More
  68. @Jacques Sheete
    Yup, dem black bankers and war profiteers have me fillin my shorts. De white ones, day'z OK.

    Anyway, did something mention rampages? I guess the invasion of Iraq and the Abu Ghraib nightmare weren't rampages. And of course it was low IQ blacks responsible for all dat sheete.

    And you didn’t even mention genocide in Guatemala, selling chemical warfare goodness to old pal Saddam, upgrading Afghanistan into a Soviet honeytrap or palling around with archenemy Saudi Arabia.

    Yeah, Self-selecting upperclass mofos are going to do their upperclass mofo stuff. This has to be looked into at some point with extreme prejudice, but it’s another problem.

    Except that it’s related via central banking of course (pays for the wars, destroys the economy, taxes without appearing to, wealth transfers without anyone being able to do anything about it).

    Read More
  69. @Jacques Sheete
    Yup, dem black bankers and war profiteers have me fillin my shorts. De white ones, day'z OK.

    Anyway, did something mention rampages? I guess the invasion of Iraq and the Abu Ghraib nightmare weren't rampages. And of course it was low IQ blacks responsible for all dat sheete.

    Actually I think your right, it was low a IQ black that sold the war to the people and to the UN, he was a secretary of state like Hildebeast Clinton also, yet you don’t say nuffin bout him but rightly blame the President who currently is black and destroying country after country in Middle East and destroying the US at the same time right along with his black justice department.
    “Colin Luther Powell (/ˈkoʊlᵻn/; born April 5, 1937)[2] is an American statesman and a retired four-star general in the United States Army.[3] He was the 65th United States Secretary of State, serving under U.S. President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2005, the first African American to serve in that position.[4][5][6][7] During his military career, Powell also served as National Security Advisor (1987–1989), as Commander of the U.S. Army Forces Command (1989) and as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1989–1993), holding the latter position during the Persian Gulf War. Born in Harlem as the son of Jamaican immigrants, Powell was the first, and so far the only, African American to serve on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the first of two consecutive black office-holders to serve as U.S. Secretary of State.” Wiki
    And then there was Condoleeza Rice too oh low IQ one yourself, no need to let it shine.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jacques Sheete

    Actually I think your (sic) right, it was low a IQ black that sold the war to the people and to the UN, he was a secretary of state like Hildebeast Clinton also, yet you don’t say nuffin bout him but rightly blame the President who currently is black and destroying country after country in Middle East and destroying the US at the same time right along with his black justice department.
     
    Hey, I meant to write a comment, not a book, so space was limited. Besides Colin Powell wuz some funny kinda black. I bet his ass was whiter than mine and I'm a cracker of European descent! Besides, the devil made 'im do it and no doubt paid 'im too! ;)

    And then there was Condoleeza Rice too oh low IQ one yourself, no need to let it shine.
     
    I readily admit that I'm of low IQ, but at least I'm sharp enough to recognize some stuff correctly. Ever hear of UncleTom?
  70. @Wizard of Oz
    Ethiopian black Jews recently rioted in Tel Aviv. Why?

    The Ethiopians are generally good people, and I believe they do have a genuine grievance. I have a few Ethiopian friends, and as a community they are decent, interesting or uninteresting as any another can be. They have no interest in social violence and even less in identifying with any global Black activism [I could be terribly wrong, but I think they aren't racially negroid either, which is a silly point perhaps anyway, and nothing to do with anything!].

    Israeli police has treated them in a manner they would not other groups such as the Yemenites, Indians, Moroccans, Egyptians etc. Nevertheless this has to be addressed. I daresay the same sort of thing happened with previous immigrant groups [Yemenites, Indians, and, earlier in Israel's history with the yekke Jews discriminating against some of the other Ashkenazim]. So basically it takes a bit of time for assimilation to occur and I trust the same shall come to pass for the Ethiopians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Interesting, thanks. I was of course having a quick jab at the uptight Binyamin...
    , @Jacques Sheete

    "...with the yekke Jews discriminating against some of the other Ashkenazim..."

     

    One of the especially heartwarming characteristics of that group is that they seem to be as perennially disgusted with each other as they are with the goyim, G-d bless 'em!
  71. @Sam Shama
    The Ethiopians are generally good people, and I believe they do have a genuine grievance. I have a few Ethiopian friends, and as a community they are decent, interesting or uninteresting as any another can be. They have no interest in social violence and even less in identifying with any global Black activism [I could be terribly wrong, but I think they aren't racially negroid either, which is a silly point perhaps anyway, and nothing to do with anything!].

    Israeli police has treated them in a manner they would not other groups such as the Yemenites, Indians, Moroccans, Egyptians etc. Nevertheless this has to be addressed. I daresay the same sort of thing happened with previous immigrant groups [Yemenites, Indians, and, earlier in Israel's history with the yekke Jews discriminating against some of the other Ashkenazim]. So basically it takes a bit of time for assimilation to occur and I trust the same shall come to pass for the Ethiopians.

    Interesting, thanks. I was of course having a quick jab at the uptight Binyamin…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    I know you were :-) . Nevertheless it continues to escape me as to why American Blacks are overwhelmingly so far behind with so much actually devoted to their betterment. At times I am tempted to believe that all of these social engineering experiments are misguided and achieves precisely the opposite of what they were intended to. It's a discussion without a conclusion like so many of these misbegotten ideas I'm sure.
  72. @Wizard of Oz
    Interesting, thanks. I was of course having a quick jab at the uptight Binyamin...

    I know you were :-) . Nevertheless it continues to escape me as to why American Blacks are overwhelmingly so far behind with so much actually devoted to their betterment. At times I am tempted to believe that all of these social engineering experiments are misguided and achieves precisely the opposite of what they were intended to. It’s a discussion without a conclusion like so many of these misbegotten ideas I’m sure.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I wonder if a more than superficial analogy can be made with foreign aid schemes which some have plausibly argued have done more harm than good.
  73. @Sam Shama
    I know you were :-) . Nevertheless it continues to escape me as to why American Blacks are overwhelmingly so far behind with so much actually devoted to their betterment. At times I am tempted to believe that all of these social engineering experiments are misguided and achieves precisely the opposite of what they were intended to. It's a discussion without a conclusion like so many of these misbegotten ideas I'm sure.

    I wonder if a more than superficial analogy can be made with foreign aid schemes which some have plausibly argued have done more harm than good.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    I only believe in humanitarian aid during disasters. Billionaires sitting around a table trying to 'do good' are useless, mostly self serving [nurse their own egos and public image piety] or wholly nefarious.

    Economic aid is not aid unless it is actual aid, not a loan as they frequently are, and paired with technology transfers. Even so, countries are better off being self-sufficient in the end.
  74. @Wizard of Oz
    I wonder if a more than superficial analogy can be made with foreign aid schemes which some have plausibly argued have done more harm than good.

    I only believe in humanitarian aid during disasters. Billionaires sitting around a table trying to ‘do good’ are useless, mostly self serving [nurse their own egos and public image piety] or wholly nefarious.

    Economic aid is not aid unless it is actual aid, not a loan as they frequently are, and paired with technology transfers. Even so, countries are better off being self-sufficient in the end.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    It would be interesting to know what civilising effect (less violence from domestic to intertribal including robbery of whatever seems opportunistically available and desirable) the much maligned missionaries had. And perhaps to compare it with the imposition of Sharia law where Muslims conquered.

    Conversions in Polynesia were probably a net plus despite obesity, diabetes and overpopulation. Africa? More complex and perhaps in the end the population explosion will outweigh everything else, for non-Africans not least.
  75. @Sam Shama
    I only believe in humanitarian aid during disasters. Billionaires sitting around a table trying to 'do good' are useless, mostly self serving [nurse their own egos and public image piety] or wholly nefarious.

    Economic aid is not aid unless it is actual aid, not a loan as they frequently are, and paired with technology transfers. Even so, countries are better off being self-sufficient in the end.

    It would be interesting to know what civilising effect (less violence from domestic to intertribal including robbery of whatever seems opportunistically available and desirable) the much maligned missionaries had. And perhaps to compare it with the imposition of Sharia law where Muslims conquered.

    Conversions in Polynesia were probably a net plus despite obesity, diabetes and overpopulation. Africa? More complex and perhaps in the end the population explosion will outweigh everything else, for non-Africans not least.

    Read More
  76. @Jane Claire
    Actually I think your right, it was low a IQ black that sold the war to the people and to the UN, he was a secretary of state like Hildebeast Clinton also, yet you don't say nuffin bout him but rightly blame the President who currently is black and destroying country after country in Middle East and destroying the US at the same time right along with his black justice department.
    "Colin Luther Powell (/ˈkoʊlᵻn/; born April 5, 1937)[2] is an American statesman and a retired four-star general in the United States Army.[3] He was the 65th United States Secretary of State, serving under U.S. President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2005, the first African American to serve in that position.[4][5][6][7] During his military career, Powell also served as National Security Advisor (1987–1989), as Commander of the U.S. Army Forces Command (1989) and as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1989–1993), holding the latter position during the Persian Gulf War. Born in Harlem as the son of Jamaican immigrants, Powell was the first, and so far the only, African American to serve on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the first of two consecutive black office-holders to serve as U.S. Secretary of State." Wiki
    And then there was Condoleeza Rice too oh low IQ one yourself, no need to let it shine.

    Actually I think your (sic) right, it was low a IQ black that sold the war to the people and to the UN, he was a secretary of state like Hildebeast Clinton also, yet you don’t say nuffin bout him but rightly blame the President who currently is black and destroying country after country in Middle East and destroying the US at the same time right along with his black justice department.

    Hey, I meant to write a comment, not a book, so space was limited. Besides Colin Powell wuz some funny kinda black. I bet his ass was whiter than mine and I’m a cracker of European descent! Besides, the devil made ‘im do it and no doubt paid ‘im too! ;)

    And then there was Condoleeza Rice too oh low IQ one yourself, no need to let it shine.

    I readily admit that I’m of low IQ, but at least I’m sharp enough to recognize some stuff correctly. Ever hear of UncleTom?

    Read More
  77. @Sam Shama
    The Ethiopians are generally good people, and I believe they do have a genuine grievance. I have a few Ethiopian friends, and as a community they are decent, interesting or uninteresting as any another can be. They have no interest in social violence and even less in identifying with any global Black activism [I could be terribly wrong, but I think they aren't racially negroid either, which is a silly point perhaps anyway, and nothing to do with anything!].

    Israeli police has treated them in a manner they would not other groups such as the Yemenites, Indians, Moroccans, Egyptians etc. Nevertheless this has to be addressed. I daresay the same sort of thing happened with previous immigrant groups [Yemenites, Indians, and, earlier in Israel's history with the yekke Jews discriminating against some of the other Ashkenazim]. So basically it takes a bit of time for assimilation to occur and I trust the same shall come to pass for the Ethiopians.

    “…with the yekke Jews discriminating against some of the other Ashkenazim…”

    One of the especially heartwarming characteristics of that group is that they seem to be as perennially disgusted with each other as they are with the goyim, G-d bless ‘em!

    Read More
  78. @Anonymous
    The Black economy in Africa as well as the Polynesian, like most pre-industrial revolution economies, was heavily dependent on slavery. 50% of all Africans were enslaved. Often a slave was slaughtered and eaten.

    Here's the full text of "The Negros in Negroland", a book compiling quotes from accounts written by early explorers, missionaries and traders on the African continent. Speke, Burton, Stanley, Livingston etc.

    Read it and let the scales fall from your eyes.

    https://archive.org/stream/negroesinnegrola00helpiala/negroesinnegrola00helpiala_djvu.txt

    I have led you to the water, now drink. You have no excuse now for not informing yourself and climbing out of the dank cavern of ignorance into the revealing light of Truth.

    I doubt that the “reparationists” would acknowledge or accept this, but, this historic documentation does exist, one example:

    Foreign Slave Trade, Abstract of the Information Recently Laid on the Table of the House of Commons on the Subject of the Slave Trade, London, 1821

    “SPAIN. In December, 1817, a decree was issued by his Catholic Majesty, for the restriction and ultimate abolition of the Slave Trade, carried on by subjects of Spain. It is as follows:

    This measure [the introduction of Negro Slaves into America], which did not create slavery, but only took advantage of that which existed through the barbarity of the Africans, by saving from death their prisoners, and alleviating their sad condition, far from being prejudicial to the Negroes transported to America, conferred upon them not only the incomparable blessing of being instructed in the knowledge of the true God, but likewise all the advantages which accompany civilization, without subjecting them, in their state of servitude, to a harder condition than that which they endured in freedom, when free in their native country.” [Pages 24-25].

    Full text digitized book at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044021023221;view=1up;seq=5

    Read More
  79. @RadicalCenter
    Utterly disagree. Was with the family yesterday in Union Square Park, Manhattan, and the non-black diversity on display was uniformly hostile, glaring or blank-faced, unfriendly, and menacing. Plenty of non-black immigrants fairly openly if quietly dealing drugs, spitting, fondling themselves publicly, eyeing my wife and her friend for very prolonged rude periods of time, dropping trash on the ground, of course speaking no English whatsoever, and generally making us extremely unwelcome and uneasy.

    Worse than Manhattan or Nyc has been in a long time. Even to visit family or be tourists, we are never going back.

    We can handle Africans without any need to bring in its backwards and/or untrustworthy and/or lazy people's as some kind of buffer.

    The vacant houses you mentioned? Better that they be torn down to make way for small farms / big gardens or for park and forestland, than to bring in Indians, Muslims, Chinese, to forever irrevocably change our culture and way of life,

    Your way of life ended with the pill, abortion and suffrage.

    White women don’t reproduce. Capische?

    Read More
  80. @Priss Factor
    "American blacks, for example, with low average IQ, low average impulse control, and high average inclinations to antisocial behavior, will tend to pool at the bottom of society, in slums and prisons and criminal gangs."

    The Derb, like so many 'race realists'(apparently I'm the only true race-ist), left out #4, namely that blacks are stronger and more muscular.

    I think a lot of white males leave this one out cuz it hurts their white male pride that got used to seeing itself as top alpha male.
    In truth, in raw power and strength, blacks are the toughest dudes.

    Imagine if blacks are low IQ and low-impulse but were built like Guillermo(of Jimmy Kimmel show). They would cause some trouble but nothing like what they are doing now.
    Blacks run wild and act crazy because they know everyone is afraid of them.
    They can see, feel, and sense the fear among whites and non-blacks. (And PC made it worse by sacralizing blacks. So, blacks not only act like thugs cuz they enjoy acting the thug, but they believe their thuggery is holy and righteous. It's like Charles Blow be 'incandescent' with rage. Sheeeeeiiiiit!!! His lunacy be 'incandescent'. Even when blacks just feel like bullying sadistic louts, they feel their loutishness is 'holy' cuz they suffered so nobly as slaves, daaaaang!!! Look at the thuggery of BLM pretending to be some holy crusade. White Guilt morons have christened the Negro in Uncle Tom's Cabin, MLK myth, Morgan Freeman, the mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE. Though US calls itself a secular society, there is a kind of worship of the Negro as the path to redemption of the sinful white soul. The upcoming movie "The Birth of a Negro Nation" will do just that. It will sacralize black mayhem. Yes, even black massacres is 'holy'. Now, what Nat Turner did may be 'understandable' given the conditions of slavery. If I were a slave in oppressive conditions, I might wanna kill some folks too. After all, when Pearl Harbor was attacked, US saw fit to drop bombs and kill 100,000s of civilians in Japan. Rage makes people do murderous things. But should such violence be sacralized? US may have rationalized the use of nukes, but it never sacralized it. But black violence gets sacralized.)

    In my city school where I attended from 3rd to 6th grade, there were whites and blacks. Blacks usually did their thing, and whites did their own thing. But there were friends too, and some kids got along. But whenever there was racial violence, it was no contest. It was like Jack Johnson whupping all them honkers. Blacks whupped hispanic kids too. An even black-brown fight was like 5 black kids vs 20 brown ones. Like lions vs hyenas.
    Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went "A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white'. But when you went there, it was all over with white guy all bloodied and traumatized and the Negro cracking up and hollering like Muhammad Ali.

    In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception.

    When 'race realists' talk of low IQ and low impulse, they just make blacks out to be objects of pity. Even if Libs were to believe in this 'race realism', they would feel, "Oh those poor dumb negroes need extra help. Oh those ill-mannered negroes need extra care to learn to say 'hello' and 'good day' instead of 'what's up ni**a?'"

    To really wake people up, you have to say the fact that blacks are stronger.

    Now, this should be common knowledge without us saying it. After all, we can all see blacks dominating sports. We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white and Asian ones with more fat in flesh. And whole bunch of people saw UNFORGIVABLE BLACKNESS about Jack Johnson the ghastly Negro.

    But PC has such a paralyzing effect on rationality and logic that white folks fear harboring any thoughts or feelings about blacks that may be deemed 'racist'.
    So, even as they see CucKen Burns documentary and notice Johnson the Negro whup white boys and conquer white female race traitors, their minds are shaped by the narration that interprets black thuggery into black struggle for justice and nobility. Now, given the social context in which Johnson lived in, it is valid to say he his life had larger meanings. He did overcome odds in a discriminatory society that placed all sorts of obstacles in the progression of blacks folks.
    But context or no context, the biological fact is 'blacks can kick white ass', and that fact will remain even after all of 'racism' is gone. In other words, even if social 'racism' is all eradicated, there remains biological 'racism', the product of evolution that made the races differently.

    PC is like a chemical that prevents obvious neural connections. So, the only connections made are those allowed by PC. These synthetic-neurons of PC connect the wrong dots.
    For example, a PC-free mind thinks thus when watching blacks in NFL. "Look at that muscled Negro. He is one tough guy. If he was running in the streets, he could beat up a lot of people. Therefore, it'd be risky to live with blacks since they are tougher and some of them could be criminal."

    Totally logical neural connecting the dots.
    But PC freezes the mind and neurons won't make logical connections lest they be 'racist'. So, the mind waits for the PC to offer the permissible Narrative. And the Narrative is "we should admire and respect blacks because they are heroes who win trophies for our team, and by the way, race is just a social construct, and there are no racial differences, and only evil 'racists' believe in such."
    So, the PC mind just goes along with that. PC clogs up the mind and doesn't allow natural flow of neural information.

    In truth, when it comes to thuggery and physical combat, whites are the inferior race. Therefore, the inferior needs and deserves protection from the superior. It's like golden retrievers need protection from packs of pitbulls.
    Also, manhood pride is important for male psychology and development. With blacks around, white males cannot be men. They are turned into cuck-ass cunt-pussyboys. What man wants to be a cuckasscuntpussyboy who gets whupped by thugs of another race who also take the women?

    White males need to be like Viet Cong men. When bigger and beefier US soldiers were turning Saigon women into hookers, the Viet men became Viet Congs to kick the Americans out and have their own nation where they can be top dogs.

    In the end, everything is biology. Society is made by men who are animals. Even society is biology. The dichotomy of society and biology is as misleading as one between mind/soul and body. Mind is part of the body.
    Society is part of biology. Culture is part of biology. Everything that takes place in the human mind is biology since the human mind is biological matter.

    White society is white biology, and whites need to have their own ant colony that is safe from black ant invaders.
    Ideas are biological since they can ONLY exist in the biological membrane of the brain-mind. And ideas are used as weapons just like claws or fangs or sticks.
    PC is a biological weapon used by the GLOB against the white race.

    I enjoy your posts but you are superficially wrong here.

    “Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went “A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white’.”

    I grew up in a black city in NY, and boxed at Johnny’s Gym, Westbury PBC and Bayshore AC.

    The full expression is ” fight, fight a ni**er and a white- if the ni**er don’t win WE ALL JUMP IN.”

    “In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception. ”

    In the course of my duties as owner operator of a late night pizzeria in Philly, l have had many opportunities to mix it up with the natives. I listen to smack talk from wise ass, idiot, skinny small-handed blacks…without resorting to violence. The cops expect me to have an ounce of discernment- and stand by me when l dish out what is rightfully deserved to someone who is larger and ” problematic.”

    You are guilty of mythologizing blacks….they excel in basketball, yes. In the NFL…nah, at the “speed” positions, for sure.

    “We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white …”

    White body builders throw on a tan before competition, as a darker body shows more highlights.
    Besides, muscle bound athletes don’t excel in mma or boxing. Do you remember Fyodor Emelionenko, a pot- bellied ground and pound killer!

    I maintain to a large extent that HS and college is geared towards women, that through PC indoctrination in the pillars of society, men have been relegated to sleeping in a proverbial “cat box” at the foot of the stairs [spinelessness]…I’m thinkin’ John Roberts and James Comey!

    I learn a lot here on the Unz…

    But let’s not intellectualize everything.

    Give more ” sturdy” organs a chance.

    Read More
    • Replies: @joef
    Many whites believe in mythological strengths of afro americans. Generally there is some truth to it because some Southern slave owners did use selective breeding techniques on afro american slaves, like they would use on any other agricultural livestock.
    However, this is leading to some gross exaggerations, mostly by suburban whites who never went to school with ghetto kids, and never lived among them as an adult. Yes there is an overrepresentation of afro americans in sports but this results from afro americans having much more leisure time to perfect their game, and racial quotas for college sports teams.
    From my personal experiences the ghetto afro american generally liked easy targets that presented them with an unfair advantage (like beating up an old man). They were mostly predatory bullies but when confronted with a tough urban whites (and I do not mean liberal yuppies) or Puerto Ricans they usually lost the fight. One of my old friends, when I was younger, was a constant brawler (and always in and out of jail) said to me that the ghetto afro american never knew how to handle a tough white brawler like himself. I think that is because ghetto afros buy into the same propaganda, that white libs love to profess about the afro american mythological strengths, and grossly underestimate their opponent.
  81. @Priss Factor
    When the blacks came, there was white flight and Jew Flew.

    Even Liberal Jews fled.

    TMB or too many blacks is a universal problem. Notice a lot of these problems take place in blue cities where people like the Derb have no power and no say.

    And no, most blacks are not decent church-going folks. true, the majority are not criminals, but too many and even many who are not tend to be awful parents, teachers, and loonies.
    Look at black schools. And even many black churches are hate centers like that of J. Wright.

    Also, Trump has gone out on a limb more than any other GOP politician in reaching out to blacks. Trump says Diversity by Immigration adds competitive pressures on blacks. He says we need to focus on Negroes before helping/inviting the rest of the world.

    He is 50% right, 50% wrong.

    True, more immigrants mean more competition for blacks in jobs and schooling.

    But, even if there was no immigration, too many blacks would be good for nothing.

    US spends tons on the schooling of each black kid, but even in places with few immigrants, blacks just mess up. Even where there are opportunities, blacks don't try or fail to achieve requisite standards. Suppose there are 1000 Hindu medical students at a university, and we say that they've taken those positions from blacks!! But suppose those dotter students are removed and sent back to India. Will there be enough blacks willing to study hard enough to take those slots? The answer is NO.

    So yes, immigrants do compete with blacks, but blacks aren't even trying to be competitive in many areas.

    Btw, American blacks are the fault of Whites who bought the slaves and brought them here.
    But what the hell is Australia doing taking blacks from Sudan? Blacks over there just kill and rape and holler and waller. That makes no sense. Israel sure tries to keep out most black Africans.

    And Jews hate Trump because he hates Muslims for white reasons(Muslims kill whites, so keep them out) than for Jewish reasons(whites should fight Wars for Israel and kill those nasty Muslims).

    “When the blacks came, there was white flight and Jew Flew.”

    Whites need to keep and hold ground, especially in the Cities.
    That’s where the ports are.

    No more running away.

    Bad schools? Then home school. Sacrifice.Home schooled children out perform
    their government schooled counterparts.
    How else will this malodorous insurgency be countered, except with Godly common sense?

    Read More
  82. @Priss Factor
    When the blacks came, there was white flight and Jew Flew.

    Even Liberal Jews fled.

    TMB or too many blacks is a universal problem. Notice a lot of these problems take place in blue cities where people like the Derb have no power and no say.

    And no, most blacks are not decent church-going folks. true, the majority are not criminals, but too many and even many who are not tend to be awful parents, teachers, and loonies.
    Look at black schools. And even many black churches are hate centers like that of J. Wright.

    Also, Trump has gone out on a limb more than any other GOP politician in reaching out to blacks. Trump says Diversity by Immigration adds competitive pressures on blacks. He says we need to focus on Negroes before helping/inviting the rest of the world.

    He is 50% right, 50% wrong.

    True, more immigrants mean more competition for blacks in jobs and schooling.

    But, even if there was no immigration, too many blacks would be good for nothing.

    US spends tons on the schooling of each black kid, but even in places with few immigrants, blacks just mess up. Even where there are opportunities, blacks don't try or fail to achieve requisite standards. Suppose there are 1000 Hindu medical students at a university, and we say that they've taken those positions from blacks!! But suppose those dotter students are removed and sent back to India. Will there be enough blacks willing to study hard enough to take those slots? The answer is NO.

    So yes, immigrants do compete with blacks, but blacks aren't even trying to be competitive in many areas.

    Btw, American blacks are the fault of Whites who bought the slaves and brought them here.
    But what the hell is Australia doing taking blacks from Sudan? Blacks over there just kill and rape and holler and waller. That makes no sense. Israel sure tries to keep out most black Africans.

    And Jews hate Trump because he hates Muslims for white reasons(Muslims kill whites, so keep them out) than for Jewish reasons(whites should fight Wars for Israel and kill those nasty Muslims).

    “But, even if there was no immigration, too many blacks would be good for nothing.”

    All the black children in our Bible believing church and school are high achieving, valuable, future
    leaders of whatever system emerges from this unholy mess.

    Read More
  83. @Anonymous
    And just who are our oppressors? Remember Pogo? He had it right when he said, 'I have met the enemy and it is us'.

    Baloney. What are you doing here? Didn’t you get the memo about the Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs and their friends in the wonderful system of “checks and balances”?

    Read More
  84. @Stonehands
    I enjoy your posts but you are superficially wrong here.

    "Black kids had a chant whenever there was a racial fight that went “A fight, a fight a ni**er and a white’."


    I grew up in a black city in NY, and boxed at Johnny's Gym, Westbury PBC and Bayshore AC.

    The full expression is " fight, fight a ni**er and a white- if the ni**er don't win WE ALL JUMP IN."

    "In my class, the toughest white kid was no match for the weakest negro with one exception. One half-breed white/Injun kid did at one time manage to whup some Negro kids, but that was the exception. "


    In the course of my duties as owner operator of a late night pizzeria in Philly, l have had many opportunities to mix it up with the natives. I listen to smack talk from wise ass, idiot, skinny small-handed blacks...without resorting to violence. The cops expect me to have an ounce of discernment- and stand by me when l dish out what is rightfully deserved to someone who is larger and " problematic."

    You are guilty of mythologizing blacks....they excel in basketball, yes. In the NFL...nah, at the "speed" positions, for sure.

    "We can see that black athletes are more defined in muscle than white ..."


    White body builders throw on a tan before competition, as a darker body shows more highlights.
    Besides, muscle bound athletes don't excel in mma or boxing. Do you remember Fyodor Emelionenko, a pot- bellied ground and pound killer!

    I maintain to a large extent that HS and college is geared towards women, that through PC indoctrination in the pillars of society, men have been relegated to sleeping in a proverbial "cat box" at the foot of the stairs [spinelessness]...I'm thinkin' John Roberts and James Comey!


    I learn a lot here on the Unz...

    But let's not intellectualize everything.

    Give more " sturdy" organs a chance.

    Many whites believe in mythological strengths of afro americans. Generally there is some truth to it because some Southern slave owners did use selective breeding techniques on afro american slaves, like they would use on any other agricultural livestock.
    However, this is leading to some gross exaggerations, mostly by suburban whites who never went to school with ghetto kids, and never lived among them as an adult. Yes there is an overrepresentation of afro americans in sports but this results from afro americans having much more leisure time to perfect their game, and racial quotas for college sports teams.
    From my personal experiences the ghetto afro american generally liked easy targets that presented them with an unfair advantage (like beating up an old man). They were mostly predatory bullies but when confronted with a tough urban whites (and I do not mean liberal yuppies) or Puerto Ricans they usually lost the fight. One of my old friends, when I was younger, was a constant brawler (and always in and out of jail) said to me that the ghetto afro american never knew how to handle a tough white brawler like himself. I think that is because ghetto afros buy into the same propaganda, that white libs love to profess about the afro american mythological strengths, and grossly underestimate their opponent.

    Read More
  85. @Priss Factor
    "Mrs. Clinton and her Social Justice Warriors want to bring in further masses of poor Third Worlders to enhance our nation’s diversity. A thoughtful observer might question the wisdom of this in light of our failure to make any progress coping with the diversity we already have."

    This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it's a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) --- and if whites cannot get rid of blacks --- , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes.

    Look at NY. Yes, too many immigrants. It would be better if it were all white. But NY has lots of blacks, and many are there to stay(even with gentrification and section 8).

    Now, what would be better for whites?

    A NY with only whites and blacks.

    Or

    A NY with whites, blacks, and Diversity(via immigration).

    If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey.
    Also, as white Libs don't have lots of kids(as they live mainly for career, narcissism, and vanity), and cities cannot go on with whites alone. Buildings will go empty, and then Negroes will use them for drug dens.
    But if you have Mexers and dotkins and Muslims, enough of them will run small businesses and try to keep things up. It may not be up to white standards, but there is at some semblance of civilization. With Negroes, it is descent into hell.

    Or take the suburbs. Where I live, it's most white. But in the past 15 yrs, many white folks grew older and some died and houses go empty one by one. So, who will fill them? Due to immigration, I got a bunch of dotkin neighbors, and even though they could so easier on the curry, I prefer them to the jivers(some of whom have been placed here via section 8). Jivers are the worst.

    Milwaukee would be a wonderful city if it were all white. But there are too many blacks. From what I hear, these jaffers are even crazier than your average jaffer. These are pitbull jaffers. And there is no way to get rid of them. And these jaffers drive white folks out. But suppose Milwaukee were to fill up with Immigrant Diversity. It would come with a host of problems but as a buffer and economic buzz-generator, they would be much better than Negroes. And since it will no longer be a case of whites vs blacks, blacks will be more confused about whom to hate.
    I mean blacks know what it means to hate whitey. But when they see all these colorful folks from all over the world, they be scratching their heads and be thinking, "who dat? Some mexican dude? Some chinese mothafuc*a? Some raghead mofo? Some weirdass bitch with blanket over her head... dang..." Blacks get a bit disoriented and their politics becomes muddled.

    Milwaukee has 15% that is now Hispanic, but more immigrants will have a dampening effect on black politics and rage.

    So, it's like this.

    Best choice is All-white society.

    But if whites must choose between white-black-society or white-diversity-black-society, the latter is better.

    I'd rather have a bunch of dotkins and tacoheads between myself and the jaffers.

    Thank you for the honest article! And good reply…

    EXACTLY. No one wants to mention that if you take a group of people… who have ANY cosmetic look — that share the black average IQ of 85 and the 3-19% increase in testosterone will commit the same crimes… then you have removed from the equation of potential solutions the only one that hits the root cause.

    I have ‘heard’ blacks have smaller heads, and other theories, like blacks being an r-selected group within the r/K paradigm… but it doesn’t matter; all we need to look at is the ability of ANY individual to succeed intellectually… as testosterone, in an intelligent person will manifest itself as DRIVE. And in doing so, will provide better results.

    In short, high testosterone exacerbates whichever aptitudes you do — or don’t have.

    The military has found some solutions; give “aptitude” tests which give you the equivalent of “G” for IQ tests, but more importantly, tell you what kinds of jobs will max out your career path. Having given someone a list, let them select those that will make them happy, then, PAY FOR IT. WE, as a nation, pay that bill… instead of welfare. If you’re able bodied, you have to take that test. And if not, we offer a “Gift” to allow us to send you to a nation of your choosing with an average IQ close to yours… in which they, in exchange for another “gift”… give you citizenship and lose your US citizenship. You will there be more competitive.

    Who needs a nation of idiots that are aggressive? Just be realists.

    Letting people blame this crap on slavery 200 years later… when countries who never had slavery, and no Jim Crow segregation have the SAME social problems like UK, France and Canada. MoveEmOn.com

    Or blaming COPS for crimes by blacks, because of “institutional racism” which does NO exist. What exists, is systematic black crime… and if we called crimes by blacks against whites hate crimes as often as it applied, they’d be guilty far, far more often.

    Thank you.

    Read More
  86. @Priss Factor
    "Mrs. Clinton and her Social Justice Warriors want to bring in further masses of poor Third Worlders to enhance our nation’s diversity. A thoughtful observer might question the wisdom of this in light of our failure to make any progress coping with the diversity we already have."

    This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it's a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) --- and if whites cannot get rid of blacks --- , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes.

    Look at NY. Yes, too many immigrants. It would be better if it were all white. But NY has lots of blacks, and many are there to stay(even with gentrification and section 8).

    Now, what would be better for whites?

    A NY with only whites and blacks.

    Or

    A NY with whites, blacks, and Diversity(via immigration).

    If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey.
    Also, as white Libs don't have lots of kids(as they live mainly for career, narcissism, and vanity), and cities cannot go on with whites alone. Buildings will go empty, and then Negroes will use them for drug dens.
    But if you have Mexers and dotkins and Muslims, enough of them will run small businesses and try to keep things up. It may not be up to white standards, but there is at some semblance of civilization. With Negroes, it is descent into hell.

    Or take the suburbs. Where I live, it's most white. But in the past 15 yrs, many white folks grew older and some died and houses go empty one by one. So, who will fill them? Due to immigration, I got a bunch of dotkin neighbors, and even though they could so easier on the curry, I prefer them to the jivers(some of whom have been placed here via section 8). Jivers are the worst.

    Milwaukee would be a wonderful city if it were all white. But there are too many blacks. From what I hear, these jaffers are even crazier than your average jaffer. These are pitbull jaffers. And there is no way to get rid of them. And these jaffers drive white folks out. But suppose Milwaukee were to fill up with Immigrant Diversity. It would come with a host of problems but as a buffer and economic buzz-generator, they would be much better than Negroes. And since it will no longer be a case of whites vs blacks, blacks will be more confused about whom to hate.
    I mean blacks know what it means to hate whitey. But when they see all these colorful folks from all over the world, they be scratching their heads and be thinking, "who dat? Some mexican dude? Some chinese mothafuc*a? Some raghead mofo? Some weirdass bitch with blanket over her head... dang..." Blacks get a bit disoriented and their politics becomes muddled.

    Milwaukee has 15% that is now Hispanic, but more immigrants will have a dampening effect on black politics and rage.

    So, it's like this.

    Best choice is All-white society.

    But if whites must choose between white-black-society or white-diversity-black-society, the latter is better.

    I'd rather have a bunch of dotkins and tacoheads between myself and the jaffers.

    “This is where Derbkins is wrong. True, a White Society is best. But if it’s a matter of whites and blacks(too many of them) — and if whites cannot get rid of blacks — , Diversity is a welcome relief. Immigrants may cause problems(like ones detailed by Ann Coulter in ADIOS AMERICA), but they serve as buffers against Negroes.”

    Only if you live where the immigrants are pushing out the blacks. If you live where the pushed-out blacks are moving to, you just have a bunch of new, embittered negro neighbors, with plenty of Mike Brown-ish “Gentle Giants” mixed in. The immigrants don’t cause negroes to commit less crimes, they just cause them to be someone else (typically a White suburbanite or ruralite)’s problem.

    “If there are too many Negroes, Diversity offers welcome relief. For one thing, Negroes will be so busy griping about newcomers they will have less time to hate whitey.”

    The ability of blacks to gripe and blame their problems on Whitey is practically infinite. Do blacks gripe more or less now that the country is a little over 60% White than when it was roughly 85% White? All diversity does is create new problems that the blacks can blame on Whitey. Korean shopkeeper shot your homey in the face when your homey was just being a gud boi and shoplifting some swisher sweets? White Supremacy! Gun Culture! Ten billion lynched by White Neo-Nazi KKK Members LIKE YOU!

    Read More
  87. @Anonymous
    The Black economy in Africa as well as the Polynesian, like most pre-industrial revolution economies, was heavily dependent on slavery. 50% of all Africans were enslaved. Often a slave was slaughtered and eaten.

    Here's the full text of "The Negros in Negroland", a book compiling quotes from accounts written by early explorers, missionaries and traders on the African continent. Speke, Burton, Stanley, Livingston etc.

    Read it and let the scales fall from your eyes.

    https://archive.org/stream/negroesinnegrola00helpiala/negroesinnegrola00helpiala_djvu.txt

    I have led you to the water, now drink. You have no excuse now for not informing yourself and climbing out of the dank cavern of ignorance into the revealing light of Truth.

    I am talking about “before” the white man got there, fool. If you can’t understand that, you are not a conservative.

    Read More
  88. @TheJester
    Thomas Hobbes in his classical work, "The Leviathan", had a few ideas about man in the state of nature; that is, the historical epochs Before the White Man Came:

    “No arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear and danger of violent death; and the life of man solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
     
    The description of life being poor, nasty, brutish, and short continues to describe life in sub-Saharan Africa. Evidence? The daily news works just fine ... covering Mali to Nigeria to South Africa. After the White Man Came, the Western NGOs distributing the basics to sustain life and health in these hell holes temporarily leave when Blacks start behaving badly. They return when the "die offs" are over. In the end, nothing ever changes.

    Before the White Man Came, the Polynesian islands were populated by savages. Their favorite pass time was massacring and looting the inhabitants of neighboring islands. Same for the Amerindians and neighboring tribes.

    The fantasy of man peacefully living in a lush garden of plenty Before the White Man Came is a myth without a historical basis.

    Oh, jeez! Do you have a concept or a clue? Killing guys from other tribes and smoking their severed heads was half of the fun. Taking their daughters and wives as concubines was the other half. Study European history and you will find the very same behavior, especially amongst the Scots. Kill the Lord, kill his children, rape the wife! But the Europen women were dirty, stinky, scared of bathing and covered in strange unattractive clothing! You go on dreaming that the white man and his feminist ladies were a gift to “primitive” peoples. I ain’t drinking your Kool Aid.

    Read More
  89. @anon
    Actually slavery was widespread everywhere throughout black (or sub-Saharan) Africa long before whites arrived. Indians in America and Canada lived short hard, and brutish lives and in Mexico they practiced human sacrifice, as much as 20,00 at a time during 'festivals'.

    It’s never been good for the slaves, you nincompoop, but what about for the dominant males??? Chicks who like being taken “forcefully”?? When I say you are gay, I mean it like retarded! Your argument is weak. One of the funnest parts of being a tribal member before white people got to your land, was being able to own slaves! Something the white man took to with relish!!

    Read More
  90. @El Dato
    Excellent. Let's do a Hollywood thing together! We can film in New Zealand.

    Gawd, Dato, you get it, you actually get it!

    Read More
  91. @SteveRogers42
    Horse manure, my good sir!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKAS0393EyU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjfioWV4MbE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1nsATz6La4

    What soopa affletes!

    Oh, man! Snap!!

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Limbaugh and company certainly entertain. But a steady diet of ideological comfort food is no substitute for hearty intellectual fare.
Once as a colonial project, now as a moral playground, the ancient continent remains the object of Great Power maneuvering