The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 John Derbyshire ArchiveBlogview
Krauthammer Shows True Colors Over Charlottesville
Laura Ingraham Tosses and Gores Him
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

One of the side-effects of these periodic moral panics that sweep through American society — Trayvon, Ferguson, Charlottesville — is that they unmask people — bring out their inner nature.

Well, two weeks ago on the podcast I said some kind words, or at least not un-kind words, about TV talking head Charles Krauthammer. I said that while I’d written him off for years as a, quote, “cucky neocon Israel-first GOP establishment front man,” more recently I’ve been warming to him because of the mostly sensible things he’s said on Tucker Carlson’s show.

Well, I’m biting my tongue. Last Tuesday on Fox News Krauthammer reverted to cucky type, acting scandalized that Trump dared suggest there is anything wrong with masked anarchists throwing rocks at citizens lawfully demonstrating.

Fortunately Laura Ingraham was there to counter him. I have, as I have often noted, a very soft spot for Ms. Ingraham. Not to be shy about it, I would walk over hot coals for her, leap the ice floes of a swollen river for her, wrestle alligators for her. Heck, I would even sit through a corporate Diversity Awareness seminar for her.

On Tuesday, August 15, she was on great form. She tossed and gored Krauthammer, sample quote:

We have to be honest about the evil of racism and also honest about a far left that is [both] trying to tear down history and intimidate free speech in the country.

That left Krauthammer mumbling about what was in the President’s heart.

So OK, I yield. I got Krauthammer right the first time: cucky neocon shill. Sorry about that.

And Laura, why don’t you answer my emails? …

https://youtu.be/Frgf9H84gFM

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
    []
  1. Anonym says:

    How dare white people exist or govern their countries in the interests of their people. Evil, evil I tell you. They are literally Hitler! I can’t even.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /jderbyshire/krauthammer-shows-true-colors-over-charlottesville/#comment-1982579
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Art Deco says:

    So OK, I yield. I got Krauthammer right the first time: cucky neocon shill.

    “Shill”? A shill is a bogus competitor employed by a casino to promote interest in the blackjack tables. Krauthammer isn’t a shill. He’s had a certain political trajectory over the years: from mainline Democrat to dissenting Democrat to mainline Republican (a trajectory traversed over the period running from about 1979 to 1995). There is no indication he’s ever advocated anything but what he thinks or that he favors the party he’s not formally affiliated with; his antagonism to Trump is an indicator of the crevasse which separates starboard opinion journalists from starboard voters. A real shill would be someone employed by the media to play a Republican. The WaPoo hired David Weigel to do this, but the act wasn’t credible after his private correspondence was published in the Journ-O-List scandal. Tyler Cowen, whose public writings suggest he’s consumed with anxiety about status considerations in faculty settings, might be seen as a manifestation of libertarian pseudo-opposition on the George Mason payroll (since he never critiques any progtrasn sacred cows). Bruce Bartlett, the Republican whose signature is attacking other Republicans, might be considered a shill or a poseur depending on who is paying his bills.

    And, of course, ‘neocon’ is a nonsense term.

    Krauthammer is a Canadian-reared scion of a very prosperous family. He’s lived pretty much all his life in New York, Montreal, Boston, and Washington. His brother spent his adult life in Los Angeles. His son lives in the Bay Area, his niece and her husband in Washington. Between them, his parents lived in a half-dozen countries during the course of their lives before landing in Quebec. He does not have any natural affinity for the Trump constituency. The best he can do is to attempt to appreciate it, and at that he is very hit-and-miss.

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    Krauthammer's "trajectory" has always been fully consistent with his family's sect.

    Charles Krauthammer: Master Of The Art Of Zionist Hasbara
    http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2012/11/charles-krauthammer-master-of-the-art-of-zionist-hasbara-2448342.html

    Charles Krauthammer’s "Those Troublesome Jews"
    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/06/06/kevin-macdonald-charles-krauthammers-those-troublesome-jews/

    HOW THE JEWS KILL: CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER’S LETHAL STRAIN OF ZIONISM
    https://exposedmagus.wordpress.com/2015/12/08/how-the-jews-kill-charles-krauthammers-lethal-strain-of-zionism/


    That includes the usual treasonous bleeding of Americans for his sect's mideast wars.

    Krauthammer, Charles
    http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Krauthammer_Charles/
  3. hyperbola says:
    @Art Deco
    So OK, I yield. I got Krauthammer right the first time: cucky neocon shill.

    "Shill"? A shill is a bogus competitor employed by a casino to promote interest in the blackjack tables. Krauthammer isn't a shill. He's had a certain political trajectory over the years: from mainline Democrat to dissenting Democrat to mainline Republican (a trajectory traversed over the period running from about 1979 to 1995). There is no indication he's ever advocated anything but what he thinks or that he favors the party he's not formally affiliated with; his antagonism to Trump is an indicator of the crevasse which separates starboard opinion journalists from starboard voters. A real shill would be someone employed by the media to play a Republican. The WaPoo hired David Weigel to do this, but the act wasn't credible after his private correspondence was published in the Journ-O-List scandal. Tyler Cowen, whose public writings suggest he's consumed with anxiety about status considerations in faculty settings, might be seen as a manifestation of libertarian pseudo-opposition on the George Mason payroll (since he never critiques any progtrasn sacred cows). Bruce Bartlett, the Republican whose signature is attacking other Republicans, might be considered a shill or a poseur depending on who is paying his bills.

    And, of course, 'neocon' is a nonsense term.


    Krauthammer is a Canadian-reared scion of a very prosperous family. He's lived pretty much all his life in New York, Montreal, Boston, and Washington. His brother spent his adult life in Los Angeles. His son lives in the Bay Area, his niece and her husband in Washington. Between them, his parents lived in a half-dozen countries during the course of their lives before landing in Quebec. He does not have any natural affinity for the Trump constituency. The best he can do is to attempt to appreciate it, and at that he is very hit-and-miss.

    Krauthammer’s “trajectory” has always been fully consistent with his family’s sect.

    Charles Krauthammer: Master Of The Art Of Zionist Hasbara

    http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2012/11/charles-krauthammer-master-of-the-art-of-zionist-hasbara-2448342.html

    Charles Krauthammer’s “Those Troublesome Jews”

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/06/06/kevin-macdonald-charles-krauthammers-those-troublesome-jews/

    HOW THE JEWS KILL: CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER’S LETHAL STRAIN OF ZIONISM

    https://exposedmagus.wordpress.com/2015/12/08/how-the-jews-kill-charles-krauthammers-lethal-strain-of-zionism/

    That includes the usual treasonous bleeding of Americans for his sect’s mideast wars.

    Krauthammer, Charles

    http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Krauthammer_Charles/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    Krauthammer’s “trajectory” has always been fully consistent with his family’s sect.

    Don't be stupid. Jews vote Democratic by margins of 4 to 1, the Democratic Party manifested little antagonism to Israel between 1980 and 2009, and Krauthammer's most salient concern in critiquing and then departing from the Democratic Party was functional pacifism in the Congressional Democratic caucus (which concerned more activity in Latin America than anything up in the Near East).
  4. Art Deco says:
    @hyperbola
    Krauthammer's "trajectory" has always been fully consistent with his family's sect.

    Charles Krauthammer: Master Of The Art Of Zionist Hasbara
    http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2012/11/charles-krauthammer-master-of-the-art-of-zionist-hasbara-2448342.html

    Charles Krauthammer’s "Those Troublesome Jews"
    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/06/06/kevin-macdonald-charles-krauthammers-those-troublesome-jews/

    HOW THE JEWS KILL: CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER’S LETHAL STRAIN OF ZIONISM
    https://exposedmagus.wordpress.com/2015/12/08/how-the-jews-kill-charles-krauthammers-lethal-strain-of-zionism/


    That includes the usual treasonous bleeding of Americans for his sect's mideast wars.

    Krauthammer, Charles
    http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Krauthammer_Charles/

    Krauthammer’s “trajectory” has always been fully consistent with his family’s sect.

    Don’t be stupid. Jews vote Democratic by margins of 4 to 1, the Democratic Party manifested little antagonism to Israel between 1980 and 2009, and Krauthammer’s most salient concern in critiquing and then departing from the Democratic Party was functional pacifism in the Congressional Democratic caucus (which concerned more activity in Latin America than anything up in the Near East).

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Limbaugh and company certainly entertain. But a steady diet of ideological comfort food is no substitute for hearty intellectual fare.
Once as a colonial project, now as a moral playground, the ancient continent remains the object of Great Power maneuvering