The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewJohn Derbyshire Archive
“Immigration Has Consequences”
Byron Roth’s PERILS OF DIVERSITY
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
uzbek-668x372

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The American people are so fed up from being told—when they want immigration laws enacted which they believe will serve their national interest and when they also want the law enforced—that they are being cruel and mean-spirited and racist. They are fed up with efforts to make them feel that Americans do not have that fundamental right of any people—to decide who will join them here and help them form the future country in which they and their posterity will live …

Those are striking words: a true political fact, pithily expressed.

Much more striking is that they were spoken in 1981, half a lifetime ago. The speaker was then-Senator Alan Simpson, in his capacity as co-chair of a joint House and Senate committee holding hearings on reform of the immigration laws.

Senator Simpson’s observation would of course be just as pertinent today. There you see one of the more dismal, more depressing aspects of arguing for patriotic immigration reform: the fog of stasis that hangs over the whole topic. 1981, 1991, 2001, 2011, … It’s like Groundhog Day.

We state the same plain facts and advance the same reasonable arguments; Open-Borders proponents respond with the same threadbare charges—cruel! mean-spirited! racist!—and nothing changes, nothing changes.

I tell you: agitating for patriotic immigration reform is a real test of stamina.

I lifted Senator Simpson’s words from page 196 of Byron Roth’s book Perils of Diversity: Immigration and Human Nature. Thi s is a new edition, published by us, VDARE.com Books. It is an updated and abridged version of Prof. Roth’s 2011 book with a slightly different title: same as this one but with a starting “The …” Steve Sailer reviewed that original edition for us here on February 13th, 2011.

Comparing the two editions, the first thing you notice is the abridgment. The 2011 version had 514 pages of main text, including (by Steve’s count) 993 footnotes at the ends of chapters. This new edition is 344 pages with 777 footnotes, all gathered together at the end of the book—a much more convenient arrangement. Because of format differences (e.g. smaller font), that slightly overstates the degree of abridgment; but this is certainly a handier edition, more concentrated on the United States. The 76 pages on post-WW2 immigration into Europe in the 2011 edition, for example, has been trimmed down to a single chapter of 24 pages.

The updating brings us right into the Trump era, with references to the President’s Executive Orders on immigration from some majority-Muslim nations. Recent research results in the human sciences have been included, too: the Denisovans now get a mention in the section on paleoanthropology.

What is paleoanthropology doing in a book about immigration? Fulfilling the promise of the book’s title, that’s what. Writes the author:

An important contention of this book is that large-scale immigration is bound to have consequences for a nation, not all of which are easily foreseeable.

We can, though, get a clue about those consequences by going to the human sciences. What do they tell us about the likely result of importing great numbers of persons from nation (or race, or culture, or religion) X into nation Y?

And so Prof. Roth gives us chapters titled “The Evolutionary Sources of Group Solidarity and Conflict,” “The Origin of Human Racial Differences,” and “Civilization and the Domestication of Men.”

Some of the science here is perforce speculative; but the speculation is well-reasoned, supported by much evidence, and on a plane of sophistication far above the silly vaporings of the “no such thing as race” ideologues and the cheery assurances of economists that human beings are perfectly fungible units of production and consumption.

So we get, for example, a thoughtful consideration of Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen’s work (IQ and the Wealth of Nations, IQ and Global Inequality, and The Limits of Democratization). Smart Fraction Theory gets a mention in this new edition, too: the notion that, to quote the theory’s anonymous author:

In market economies, per capita GDP is directly proportional to the population fraction with verbal IQ equal to or greater than 106.

This survey of the relevant human sciences is followed by a good historical account—six whole chapters—of U.S. immigration policy from the early colonial settlements through to the present day, with that supplementary chapter on post-WW2 immigration into Europe.

There are some interesting insights here. The insouciance of recent U.S. administrations towards immigration from Latin America, for example, had its origins in the two-tiered system that evolved during the 1930s and 1940s:

European immigration, the first tier, came under the control of the State Department which required immigrants to obtain visas and undergo investigation by consular officials in the home countries …

The second tier of the immigration bureaucracy involved immigration from the Americas, which was administered separately from European immigration by the Immigration Bureau and the Labor Department. This was largely the result of Southern and Western interests who benefited from inexpensive Mexican farm labor.

No kidding.

Later in this historical section Prof. Roth gives caustic accounts of the efforts by cheap-labor lobbies to manipulate our numerous guest-worker programs to the disadvantage of Americans. On the H-2B visa for unskilled, seasonal, non-agricultural workers, for example:

In January 2009 in the midst of the recession, the Department of Labor revised its definition of a labor shortage to merely require an employer to attest, rather than document, that qualified U.S. workers could not be found within his employment area. But that employment area was often ludicrously limited to, say, a small town. Of course, it might be difficult for Aspen Skiing Company to find sufficient ski instructors in the village of Aspen, but w ould it be difficult if the search were nationwide? If they can house a ski instructor from Romania, can they not house one from Denver?

The book’s account of these recent developments reinforces one’s impression that our immigration policy in recent years has been, from top to bottom, a cheap-labor racket—an open conspiracy against American working people.

ORDER IT NOW

Men more frequently require to be reminded than informed,” said Dr. Johnson. For a reader like me, who has been engaged with the National Question for nigh on twenty years, the chief value of Prof. Roth’s book is to remind me of things—of, for example, how appallingly awful, how shamelessly hostile to American working people, was the 2013 “Gang of Eight” bill.

The greater value of Perils of Diversity, though, is as an eye-opener to people less familiar, or not familiar at all, with the issues we discuss here at VDARE.com.

If all you know about the National Question is the blithe vacuities of TV talking heads and newspaper pundits bought and sold by the cheap-labor racketeers, Prof. Roth’s book is essential reading: a comprehensive, well-documented survey of all the issues.

Should you know anyone as innocent as that, but open-minded and keen to be informed, Perils of Diversity would make a great Christmas present.

2010-12-24dl[1]

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjects for all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He has had two books published by VDARE.com com:FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT II: ESSAYS 2013.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Diversity, Immigration 
Hide 25 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The book’s account of these recent developments reinforces one’s impression that our immigration policy in recent years has been, from top to bottom, a cheap-labor racket—an open conspiracy against American working people.

    Except that it wasn’t. At various points in time since the 1960s, immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed to undermine, divide, dilute and ultimately genocide the white race. Cheap labour is just a side benefit. As a matter of fact, cheap labour would have been much more efficient and productive if the “elite” were mass-importing normal/high IQ whites or East Asians. The formula is: the number of worker bees + their desperation (oversupply) * productivity (IQ).

    And you’d have to be blind not to see scarlet red flags when Europe (20% youth unemployment) hoards every rubber-boat, sub-Saharan nig-nog it can find in the Mediterranean – right at the time when automation is wiping out all the jobs they, and their future offspring, could possibly do (except Taharrush, but that’s another story).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "At various points in time since the 1960s, immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed to undermine, divide, dilute and ultimately genocide the white race."

    Corrected for accuracy --> Immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed by the people through their representatives, with no mandate to undermine, divide, dilute, and ultimately genocide the white race.

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. JosephB says:

    I concur that IQ is highly relevant for the wealth of a nation, but wonder about the robustness of verbal performance mattering and a threshold of 106. How much of that result is brewed from Japan, Korea, and China’s performance? China is hard to characterize as they’re still recovering from communism. Japan has a large problem of an aging workforce, presumable unrelated to their high spatial relative to verbal IQ. I don’t know much about Korea. How confident are we that overall IQ isn’t what matters? At present, smart fractions feels like a theory that was tailored to fit a small number of countries. I’m trying to imagine an anti-Oriental race with high verbal and low spatial IQ, and how a country of such people would function. I would expect many lawyers and mangers, which does not seem directly connected to wealth creation.

    Am I missing something?

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Yes. You're missing the Faustian spirit that only Caucasians/Europeans have. Asians are second to Caucasians in IQ and creativity. The most intelligent Asians are the Japanese, with the Chinese and Koreans in 2nd and 3rd place. The West has been the most creative and created the most wealth in history. It was the West's Faustian spirit that enabled it to explore and conquer the world. You see this spirit around you in the USA, Europe, certain countries in Latin America.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. It starts with control of the language of the debate: In the UK and Europe, officialdom and the MSM still prefer to use the term ‘refugee’ rather than ‘migrant’ or, worse still for their purposes, ‘economic migrant.’

    And, coming soon to the US, no doubt, in the UK you can no longer round up migrants ‘sleeping rough’ (on the streets with the intent to deport them. No, once you’ve set foot on the Magic Dirt®, you’re in, and ostensibly entitled to benefits or a job, because you’ve gotta do something with them.

    No, Derb, we are indeed doomed, both by our gullibility and the treachery of those we entrusted to govern on our behalf.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Ben Frank says:

    These are not immigrants, they are colonists. They intend to create colonies of their own people and culture within our land, and expand gradually over time. They have the power to do it. It’s a slow-motion invasion.

    They are not here undocumented, but rather are lawbreaking. Illegal colonists.

    The Indians suffered something similar four centuries ago. Let’s learn from their sorrow.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    They intend to create colonies of their own people and culture within our land
     
    It's already a reality in European no-go zones. Anyone who's still naive about their intentions should try living there. The truth is that the current no-go zones are just a soft preview of what's to come. They don't have the numbers yet to really make a wider impact.
    , @Bragadocious
    The difference is that the Native Americans hadn't built anything. No roads, sewers, electrical grids, schools, hospitals, water treatment plants. It was a wilderness. Other than that, yeah, the comparison is perfect.
    , @Corvinus
    Let's take your point one step further. Alt Right leader Vox Day states “We’ve lost our knowledge of and connection to American heritage because many, if not most, US citizens are not Americans by any definition except paperwork. It shouldn’t be surprising that Germans, Irish, Italians, Jews, Mexicans, and Chinese never had any interest or ability to transform themselves into the independent yeomen who historically existed only in England prior to the establishment of the United States by predominantly English settlers.”

    Basically, three-fourths of today’s Americans, the bulwark of the readership on this fine blog, are not “true Americans”.

    You have to back.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Ben Frank
    These are not immigrants, they are colonists. They intend to create colonies of their own people and culture within our land, and expand gradually over time. They have the power to do it. It's a slow-motion invasion.

    They are not here undocumented, but rather are lawbreaking. Illegal colonists.

    The Indians suffered something similar four centuries ago. Let's learn from their sorrow.

    They intend to create colonies of their own people and culture within our land

    It’s already a reality in European no-go zones. Anyone who’s still naive about their intentions should try living there. The truth is that the current no-go zones are just a soft preview of what’s to come. They don’t have the numbers yet to really make a wider impact.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. DWright says:

    What did I get out of all of this? The same I already knew, the country and the West is cooked.
    Nothing will alter the direction of white replacement.
    The Injuns knew this but at least they had an opportunity and will to fight.

    John has always been right even if he keeps up the fight. We Are Doomed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. @Ben Frank
    These are not immigrants, they are colonists. They intend to create colonies of their own people and culture within our land, and expand gradually over time. They have the power to do it. It's a slow-motion invasion.

    They are not here undocumented, but rather are lawbreaking. Illegal colonists.

    The Indians suffered something similar four centuries ago. Let's learn from their sorrow.

    The difference is that the Native Americans hadn’t built anything. No roads, sewers, electrical grids, schools, hospitals, water treatment plants. It was a wilderness. Other than that, yeah, the comparison is perfect.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "The difference is that the Native Americans hadn’t built anything. No roads, sewers, electrical grids, schools, hospitals, water treatment plants. "

    You meant to say that Native Americans hadn't built modern things. They were perfectly content with their own society, however rudimentary in technology compared to outsiders. Remember, innovational prowess is NOT the definitive measure of a successful civilization.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    The book’s account of these recent developments reinforces one’s impression that our immigration policy in recent years has been, from top to bottom, a cheap-labor racket—an open conspiracy against American working people.
     
    Except that it wasn't. At various points in time since the 1960s, immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed to undermine, divide, dilute and ultimately genocide the white race. Cheap labour is just a side benefit. As a matter of fact, cheap labour would have been much more efficient and productive if the "elite" were mass-importing normal/high IQ whites or East Asians. The formula is: the number of worker bees + their desperation (oversupply) * productivity (IQ).

    And you'd have to be blind not to see scarlet red flags when Europe (20% youth unemployment) hoards every rubber-boat, sub-Saharan nig-nog it can find in the Mediterranean - right at the time when automation is wiping out all the jobs they, and their future offspring, could possibly do (except Taharrush, but that's another story).

    “At various points in time since the 1960s, immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed to undermine, divide, dilute and ultimately genocide the white race.”

    Corrected for accuracy –> Immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed by the people through their representatives, with no mandate to undermine, divide, dilute, and ultimately genocide the white race.

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sgt. Joe Friday
    "Immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed by the people through their representatives..."

    Since when does Congress represent the people? Oh sure, in high school civics classes that's what they teach, but in many if not most cases that's not how it works. Newly elected members of congress, regardless of party, vote as they're told to by the leadership, and if they don't they get shi**y committee assignments, cramped offices, and no reelection fundraising help. And the leadership of both parties are owned by open borders interests, which basically includes every powerful institution in the country, i.e. big business, big labor, media and entertainment, the education lobby, the trial bar, the "non-profit" sector, and the religious establishment.

    On this, and I would say most other issues, the people have little to no say over how their country is run.

    , @Anonymous

    changed by the people
     
    Which people? Brexit people or MAGA people? Or is it the Visegrad Group people - or even the rest of European people who don't want the EU deciding their immigration policies (link below)? Those people are the democratic majority now. They have overcome absolutely unprecedented levels of pro-immigrant indoctrination and slander just to be ignored and vilified now at the policy level. Where's your democracy now, Corvinus? What should their "representatives" do?

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.
     
    Is your house pro-race? How many Africans have you invited to share your house and inherit it after your death?


    Poll: Europeans Want National Governments, Not EU, to Decide Migration Policies
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/06/17/poll-oppose-eu-migration-policies/

    https://images2.imgbox.com/7b/b5/KvREOUFG_o.jpg
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Corvinus says:
    @Bragadocious
    The difference is that the Native Americans hadn't built anything. No roads, sewers, electrical grids, schools, hospitals, water treatment plants. It was a wilderness. Other than that, yeah, the comparison is perfect.

    “The difference is that the Native Americans hadn’t built anything. No roads, sewers, electrical grids, schools, hospitals, water treatment plants. ”

    You meant to say that Native Americans hadn’t built modern things. They were perfectly content with their own society, however rudimentary in technology compared to outsiders. Remember, innovational prowess is NOT the definitive measure of a successful civilization.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Corvinus says:
    @Ben Frank
    These are not immigrants, they are colonists. They intend to create colonies of their own people and culture within our land, and expand gradually over time. They have the power to do it. It's a slow-motion invasion.

    They are not here undocumented, but rather are lawbreaking. Illegal colonists.

    The Indians suffered something similar four centuries ago. Let's learn from their sorrow.

    Let’s take your point one step further. Alt Right leader Vox Day states “We’ve lost our knowledge of and connection to American heritage because many, if not most, US citizens are not Americans by any definition except paperwork. It shouldn’t be surprising that Germans, Irish, Italians, Jews, Mexicans, and Chinese never had any interest or ability to transform themselves into the independent yeomen who historically existed only in England prior to the establishment of the United States by predominantly English settlers.”

    Basically, three-fourths of today’s Americans, the bulwark of the readership on this fine blog, are not “true Americans”.

    You have to back.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Mikel says:

    As John Derbyshire reminds us, the issue was indeed there already in 1981. Hence Reagan’s amnesty in 1986. But one curious thing is that John immigrated to the US in the eighties and, if memory serves, became a US citizen much later, in the 90s or 2000s, by virtue of the very immigration laws he now fights to get abolished. Had they been abolished at time, or never enacted to begin with, one of the most vehement anti-immigration campaigners in the US would have never been allowed to… immigrate to the US. I wonder how he rationalizes this paradox.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    "John immigrated to the US in the eighties and, if memory serves, became a US citizen much later, in the 90s or 2000s, by virtue of the very immigration laws he now fights to get abolished" Yes, and he imported a Chinese woman for a wife and has Chinese offspring. His Chinese wife and daughter were Obummer voters. This man cannot "rationalize this paradox." He is a an evil hypocrite, semitophile and coward. How he got in the USA is a mystery to me. But he is nothing but trouble now. He refuses to deal with the problems of illegal Chinese immigration. Gee, I wonder why?

    https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/04/25/525563818/mexicans-no-longer-make-up-majority-of-immigrants-in-u-s-illegally

    He would never write about how the Chinese steal our military secrets. Gee, I wonder why?

    http://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/chinese-hackers-stole-us-weapons-system-designs

    His book "We are Doomed" is really an autobiography of his life. He noticed Asian people walking around his house - oops, his family. His degeneracy is unbelievable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. @Corvinus
    "At various points in time since the 1960s, immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed to undermine, divide, dilute and ultimately genocide the white race."

    Corrected for accuracy --> Immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed by the people through their representatives, with no mandate to undermine, divide, dilute, and ultimately genocide the white race.

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    “Immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed by the people through their representatives…”

    Since when does Congress represent the people? Oh sure, in high school civics classes that’s what they teach, but in many if not most cases that’s not how it works. Newly elected members of congress, regardless of party, vote as they’re told to by the leadership, and if they don’t they get shi**y committee assignments, cramped offices, and no reelection fundraising help. And the leadership of both parties are owned by open borders interests, which basically includes every powerful institution in the country, i.e. big business, big labor, media and entertainment, the education lobby, the trial bar, the “non-profit” sector, and the religious establishment.

    On this, and I would say most other issues, the people have little to no say over how their country is run.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Since when does Congress represent the people?"

    Since our Constitution was created.

    "Oh sure, in high school civics classes that’s what they teach, but in many if not most cases that’s not how it works."

    Certainly we have major issues in our country. So why not be a sport and run for office?

    "Newly elected members of congress, regardless of party, vote as they’re told to by the leadership, and if they don’t they get shi**y committee assignments, cramped offices, and no reelection fundraising help."

    That's not necessarily the case.

    "And the leadership of both parties are owned by open borders interests, which basically includes every powerful institution in the country, i.e. big business, big labor, media and entertainment, the education lobby, the trial bar, the “non-profit” sector, and the religious establishment."

    Again, run for office. Heed The Donald's call--Make America Great Again.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Corvinus says:
    @Sgt. Joe Friday
    "Immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed by the people through their representatives..."

    Since when does Congress represent the people? Oh sure, in high school civics classes that's what they teach, but in many if not most cases that's not how it works. Newly elected members of congress, regardless of party, vote as they're told to by the leadership, and if they don't they get shi**y committee assignments, cramped offices, and no reelection fundraising help. And the leadership of both parties are owned by open borders interests, which basically includes every powerful institution in the country, i.e. big business, big labor, media and entertainment, the education lobby, the trial bar, the "non-profit" sector, and the religious establishment.

    On this, and I would say most other issues, the people have little to no say over how their country is run.

    “Since when does Congress represent the people?”

    Since our Constitution was created.

    “Oh sure, in high school civics classes that’s what they teach, but in many if not most cases that’s not how it works.”

    Certainly we have major issues in our country. So why not be a sport and run for office?

    “Newly elected members of congress, regardless of party, vote as they’re told to by the leadership, and if they don’t they get shi**y committee assignments, cramped offices, and no reelection fundraising help.”

    That’s not necessarily the case.

    “And the leadership of both parties are owned by open borders interests, which basically includes every powerful institution in the country, i.e. big business, big labor, media and entertainment, the education lobby, the trial bar, the “non-profit” sector, and the religious establishment.”

    Again, run for office. Heed The Donald’s call–Make America Great Again.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. @JosephB
    I concur that IQ is highly relevant for the wealth of a nation, but wonder about the robustness of verbal performance mattering and a threshold of 106. How much of that result is brewed from Japan, Korea, and China's performance? China is hard to characterize as they're still recovering from communism. Japan has a large problem of an aging workforce, presumable unrelated to their high spatial relative to verbal IQ. I don't know much about Korea. How confident are we that overall IQ isn't what matters? At present, smart fractions feels like a theory that was tailored to fit a small number of countries. I'm trying to imagine an anti-Oriental race with high verbal and low spatial IQ, and how a country of such people would function. I would expect many lawyers and mangers, which does not seem directly connected to wealth creation.

    Am I missing something?

    Yes. You’re missing the Faustian spirit that only Caucasians/Europeans have. Asians are second to Caucasians in IQ and creativity. The most intelligent Asians are the Japanese, with the Chinese and Koreans in 2nd and 3rd place. The West has been the most creative and created the most wealth in history. It was the West’s Faustian spirit that enabled it to explore and conquer the world. You see this spirit around you in the USA, Europe, certain countries in Latin America.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    "Faustian spirit" does not refer to "Caucasians/Europeans". It refers to modern Aryan or Germanic culture. Most "Caucasians/Europeans" have not been "Faustian" but rather "Magian" or "Apollonian".

    You have a Middle Eastern background and are trying to shoehorn yourself into Faustian culture.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. @Mikel
    As John Derbyshire reminds us, the issue was indeed there already in 1981. Hence Reagan's amnesty in 1986. But one curious thing is that John immigrated to the US in the eighties and, if memory serves, became a US citizen much later, in the 90s or 2000s, by virtue of the very immigration laws he now fights to get abolished. Had they been abolished at time, or never enacted to begin with, one of the most vehement anti-immigration campaigners in the US would have never been allowed to... immigrate to the US. I wonder how he rationalizes this paradox.

    “John immigrated to the US in the eighties and, if memory serves, became a US citizen much later, in the 90s or 2000s, by virtue of the very immigration laws he now fights to get abolished” Yes, and he imported a Chinese woman for a wife and has Chinese offspring. His Chinese wife and daughter were Obummer voters. This man cannot “rationalize this paradox.” He is a an evil hypocrite, semitophile and coward. How he got in the USA is a mystery to me. But he is nothing but trouble now. He refuses to deal with the problems of illegal Chinese immigration. Gee, I wonder why?

    https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/04/25/525563818/mexicans-no-longer-make-up-majority-of-immigrants-in-u-s-illegally

    He would never write about how the Chinese steal our military secrets. Gee, I wonder why?

    http://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/chinese-hackers-stole-us-weapons-system-designs

    His book “We are Doomed” is really an autobiography of his life. He noticed Asian people walking around his house – oops, his family. His degeneracy is unbelievable.

    Read More
    • Disagree: RadicalCenter
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    "At various points in time since the 1960s, immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed to undermine, divide, dilute and ultimately genocide the white race."

    Corrected for accuracy --> Immigration policies in many white countries were specifically changed by the people through their representatives, with no mandate to undermine, divide, dilute, and ultimately genocide the white race.

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    changed by the people

    Which people? Brexit people or MAGA people? Or is it the Visegrad Group people – or even the rest of European people who don’t want the EU deciding their immigration policies (link below)? Those people are the democratic majority now. They have overcome absolutely unprecedented levels of pro-immigrant indoctrination and slander just to be ignored and vilified now at the policy level. Where’s your democracy now, Corvinus? What should their “representatives” do?

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.

    Is your house pro-race? How many Africans have you invited to share your house and inherit it after your death?

    Poll: Europeans Want National Governments, Not EU, to Decide Migration Policies

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/06/17/poll-oppose-eu-migration-policies/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    Of course the people of a nation will want their leaders to make immigration decisions over the EU, that isn't news. In fact, it is supporting my contention that the people will ultimately choose through their representatives.

    "They have overcome absolutely unprecedented levels of pro-immigrant indoctrination..."

    As opposed to your anti-immigrant indoctrination?

    "How many Africans have you invited to share your house and inherit it after your death?"

    What an inane argument you make. Just because people support immigration does not mean they are required to house and feed those newcomers. Rather, it means immigration supporters of the mindset that they are given opportunities to make their own life, provided they meet the criteria set forth by a government.

    Again, I have stated that if the people vote to limit immigration to our nation, fine. What I oppose is this notion that certain groups of immigrants are ALL or MOSTLY 1) dangerous, 2) demand "free stuff", and 3) will run roughshod over our nation with their "barbarian ways".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. pyrrhus says:

    Fine column as usual, Derb, although I prefer the term “cheap labor billionaires” for the scum who are selling Americans down the river of 3d world immigration.
    But America doesn’t need to “reform” immigration, it needs to halt immigration. All of it, legal or illegal, and then start doing a Netanyahu on the ones who are already here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  20. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen
    Yes. You're missing the Faustian spirit that only Caucasians/Europeans have. Asians are second to Caucasians in IQ and creativity. The most intelligent Asians are the Japanese, with the Chinese and Koreans in 2nd and 3rd place. The West has been the most creative and created the most wealth in history. It was the West's Faustian spirit that enabled it to explore and conquer the world. You see this spirit around you in the USA, Europe, certain countries in Latin America.

    “Faustian spirit” does not refer to “Caucasians/Europeans”. It refers to modern Aryan or Germanic culture. Most “Caucasians/Europeans” have not been “Faustian” but rather “Magian” or “Apollonian”.

    You have a Middle Eastern background and are trying to shoehorn yourself into Faustian culture.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Well, well, well, the anti-white, Turkish, atheist, jihadi is back. The last time we exchanged comments you were defending Derbyshire and announced you wouldn't care if his wife was an aborigine.

    I've noticed there are other commentators who use the Anonymous name. Rename yourself something like, oh Turkish Delight. It makes it easier to identify you. This way you can't pull that taqiyaa stuff on us. Once again, you're projecting.

    The English are not technically Aryan, but they've done some pretty Aryan stuff. The British Empire, landing on the moon (American WASPs), to name a few.

    However, the Germans (in Germany) are having problems.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    changed by the people
     
    Which people? Brexit people or MAGA people? Or is it the Visegrad Group people - or even the rest of European people who don't want the EU deciding their immigration policies (link below)? Those people are the democratic majority now. They have overcome absolutely unprecedented levels of pro-immigrant indoctrination and slander just to be ignored and vilified now at the policy level. Where's your democracy now, Corvinus? What should their "representatives" do?

    Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.
     
    Is your house pro-race? How many Africans have you invited to share your house and inherit it after your death?


    Poll: Europeans Want National Governments, Not EU, to Decide Migration Policies
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/06/17/poll-oppose-eu-migration-policies/

    https://images2.imgbox.com/7b/b5/KvREOUFG_o.jpg

    Of course the people of a nation will want their leaders to make immigration decisions over the EU, that isn’t news. In fact, it is supporting my contention that the people will ultimately choose through their representatives.

    “They have overcome absolutely unprecedented levels of pro-immigrant indoctrination…”

    As opposed to your anti-immigrant indoctrination?

    “How many Africans have you invited to share your house and inherit it after your death?”

    What an inane argument you make. Just because people support immigration does not mean they are required to house and feed those newcomers. Rather, it means immigration supporters of the mindset that they are given opportunities to make their own life, provided they meet the criteria set forth by a government.

    Again, I have stated that if the people vote to limit immigration to our nation, fine. What I oppose is this notion that certain groups of immigrants are ALL or MOSTLY 1) dangerous, 2) demand “free stuff”, and 3) will run roughshod over our nation with their “barbarian ways”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. @Anonymous
    "Faustian spirit" does not refer to "Caucasians/Europeans". It refers to modern Aryan or Germanic culture. Most "Caucasians/Europeans" have not been "Faustian" but rather "Magian" or "Apollonian".

    You have a Middle Eastern background and are trying to shoehorn yourself into Faustian culture.

    Well, well, well, the anti-white, Turkish, atheist, jihadi is back. The last time we exchanged comments you were defending Derbyshire and announced you wouldn’t care if his wife was an aborigine.

    I’ve noticed there are other commentators who use the Anonymous name. Rename yourself something like, oh Turkish Delight. It makes it easier to identify you. This way you can’t pull that taqiyaa stuff on us. Once again, you’re projecting.

    The English are not technically Aryan, but they’ve done some pretty Aryan stuff. The British Empire, landing on the moon (American WASPs), to name a few.

    However, the Germans (in Germany) are having problems.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    turkey (as in dud) has the cat got your fingers since you've typed no response? So, once again, you have revealed yourself. Your acceptance of an aborigine wife (there's your "negro admixture" as aborigines are consider black/Asian) is also a reflection of the type of woman you like. You're face planted in Asian puntang, a la Derbyshire.

    But I see the bigger picture. I'm seeing this pattern on other websites. This fear of Caucasians uniting. The same stupid comments about Greeks, Italians, Irish, Eastern Europeans. You know you don't belong. Your obsession with Germans makes me think you had problems with Germans and Austrians. I went to school in Austria and have the most pleasant memories of that time. Again, give yourself the name "Turkish delight" so we know who you really are.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. Anon • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Aint this great.

    Read More
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    And this savage beating of an elderly German woman by an African "migrant":

    https://www.rt.com/news/413530-germany-african-beats-elderly-woman/

    But"it will all work out just fine." My German acquaintances tell me so, and we'd be mean "racists" for disagreeing.

    I mean, who are you gonna believe, German pussies hiding under their beds, or your own eyes?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. @Anon
    Aint this great.

    https://twitter.com/TemplarKTI/status/938740030348124161

    And this savage beating of an elderly German woman by an African “migrant”:

    https://www.rt.com/news/413530-germany-african-beats-elderly-woman/

    But”it will all work out just fine.” My German acquaintances tell me so, and we’d be mean “racists” for disagreeing.

    I mean, who are you gonna believe, German pussies hiding under their beds, or your own eyes?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. @attilathehen
    Well, well, well, the anti-white, Turkish, atheist, jihadi is back. The last time we exchanged comments you were defending Derbyshire and announced you wouldn't care if his wife was an aborigine.

    I've noticed there are other commentators who use the Anonymous name. Rename yourself something like, oh Turkish Delight. It makes it easier to identify you. This way you can't pull that taqiyaa stuff on us. Once again, you're projecting.

    The English are not technically Aryan, but they've done some pretty Aryan stuff. The British Empire, landing on the moon (American WASPs), to name a few.

    However, the Germans (in Germany) are having problems.

    turkey (as in dud) has the cat got your fingers since you’ve typed no response? So, once again, you have revealed yourself. Your acceptance of an aborigine wife (there’s your “negro admixture” as aborigines are consider black/Asian) is also a reflection of the type of woman you like. You’re face planted in Asian puntang, a la Derbyshire.

    But I see the bigger picture. I’m seeing this pattern on other websites. This fear of Caucasians uniting. The same stupid comments about Greeks, Italians, Irish, Eastern Europeans. You know you don’t belong. Your obsession with Germans makes me think you had problems with Germans and Austrians. I went to school in Austria and have the most pleasant memories of that time. Again, give yourself the name “Turkish delight” so we know who you really are.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS