The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 John Derbyshire ArchiveBlogview
GOP Pigs (Including Bush Dynasty and Paul Ryan) Vote for Clinton. But Not Me.
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
animalfarmpigsx
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

I guess The Donald should be glad at least that his enemies can’t play the Hitler card. Hitler seems to have been well-nigh sexless—definitely not a ladies’ man.Eva Braun once grumbled that he had never treated her like a woman. Nobody’s quite sure what she meant, and whatever it was died with her in the bunker. But it’s not a thing you can imagine a woman saying about Trump.

Oh, wait—his enemies are playing the Hitler card.[Springtime for Donald | Let’s just say it: Trump sounds more and more like Hitler, By William Saletan [Email him] , Slate, October 14, 2016]

The tape that triggered the most recent fuss was of Donald Trump talking to Billy Bush back in 2005 (!) when both were involved with a TV celebrities show. It was bro talk, guy to guy, and not sensationally dirty. By the standards of our public culture—dialog in movies and novels, what you hear at a poetry slam or a rap concert, what you see at a Superbowl half-time show—it barely moved the needle on the filth dial. So what was all the fuss about?

Answer: the fuss is about Trump’s political enemies figuring to peel a few ten thousands more female votes away from him–and the Main Stream Media of course enthusiastically pumping air into the thing to help them.

So the cry rang out around the nation: “Trump disrespects women!”

Does he? He clearly likes to try seducing beautiful women, including married ones. When rebuffed, however, as he tells us on the offending tape, he lets it go, as a gentleman should.

He is also cynical, when speaking in private to other guys, about how willing women are to let wealthy, powerful men grope them. But this is an area where it is hard not to be cynical. Quote from Tom over at the Radio Free New Jersey blog:

If we were going to measure all the various components of American society by the degree of dishonesty involved, at the very top would be the gap between what women want from men, and what they say they want.

The prophets of the “manosphere,” where male-female relations are discussed in terms inspired by evolutionary biology, tell us that women want swaggering high-status alpha males—bad boys like Trump. What they say they want, on the other hand, is what our current state ideology tells them to say: friendly, well-behaved, non-threatening guys who offer them equality.

Which means the effect of releasing the Trump tape may not be altogether as intended.

ORDER IT NOW

I’m a bit ashamed to say that my first reaction to the fuss was in terms of national stereotypes. Every nation, of course, nurses stereotypes of the other nations it’s familiar with: excitable Italians, hard-drinking Russians, money-grubbing Chinese, pugnacious Irishmen, and so on. Where the U.S. is concerned, the stereotype that my generation of English people grew up with was that American culture vigilantly patrolled by legions of prune-faced old maids who drank vinegar for breakfast.

The prune-faced old maids are still a significant demographic in the U.S.A.—and they are by no means exclusively female, as the scandalized squealing of Republican politicians like Mister Cuck himself, House Speaker and Open-Borders fanatic Paul Ryan, show.

But where were these schoolmarms of our culture when JFK was prowling the White House corridors for his daily lay? Where were they, for that matter, when his brother ran for President, to widespread enthusiasm among media and cultural elites, just a few years after leaving one of his playmates to drown?

Paid off by the Kennedys, that’s where, or shut out by the Kennedy worshippers in the media.

Back to Ryan. I don’t know whether people nowadays still read George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm. It’s a bit of a Cold War piece. The Cold War did happen, though. And, as I’ve remarked elsewhere, it was a very big deal. It has lessons to teach; and Orwell was one of our best teachers.

The story of the novel is that the farm animals, under the leadership of the pigs, stage a revolution against the human owners of the farm. They drive out the owners and take the place over, again under the pigs’ leadership.

In the last chapter, though, an odd thing happens. The pigs start behaving like humans. One day, as the other animals are hard at work weeding the turnip field, the pigs invite a delegation of neighboring farmers—all humans, of course—to inspect the pig-owned farm. Then the pigs and their human guests have a party in the farmhouse.

The other animals hear laughter and singing from the farmhouse. They sneak up to look in through the windows at what’s going on. They see the pigs and the humans in happy concord, making flattering speeches and toasting each other. Last line of the novel:

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again: but already it was impossible to say which was which.

[If you click on the YouTube above, you can see that scene, or click here to watch the film of Animal Farm from the beginning.]

Watching the GOP’s response to this media-manufactured outrage, I’ve feeling a bit like one of those farm animals. Do we really have two political parties, each representing a broad interest? Or is the current party system just a hoax on the rest of us by an Establishment who all fundamentally believe the same things?

Once you get into that frame of mind it’s natural to start wondering whether release of the dirty-talk tape was an operation by the GOP Establishment to discredit Trump.

There has been much speculation along those lines on the internet—see for example our own James Kirkpatrick on Thursday this week.

ORDER IT NOW

And there is considerable circumstantial evidence to support these speculations. A key figure here is Dan Senor, a fierce NeverTrumper who is a senior advisor to Paul Ryan. Senor’s wife was employed at NBC back when the infamous tape was made. It was NBC that produced the show Trump and Billy Bush were working on. Mrs. Senor has herself hinted that she was the conduit for passing the tape from NBC archives to the Washington Post, who then publicized it.

So was digging for that tape Senor’s idea? —or his wife’s idea? —or Paul Ryan’s idea?

All possible, but none of them strikes me as canny enough. I would look higher up the GOP Establishment totem pole.

On a word-association test with the phrase “Republican Establishment,” the Bush dynasty comes to mind immediately. Billy Bush, the guy Trump was talking with on the tape, is a core member of that dynasty. His Dad, Jonathan Bush, is the younger brother of Poppy Bush, Bush 41. Bush 43 and Jeb are his first cousins.

Jeb for one would sacrifice a limb and a couple of major organs to hurt the Trump campaign. It’s easy to imagine Billy, who seems not to be the brightest bush in the shrubbery, being called in to a family conference with these elders.

So after a nice convivial family dinner and a few drinks, Jeb says: “Billy, when you were doing that TV celebrity show a few years ago … what was that show?”

Access Hollywood,” says Billy.

“That’s the one,” says Jeb. “Weren’t you working with Donald Trump there for a while?”

“Oh yeah,” says Billy. “Great guy. We had a lot of fun with him.”

“Doesn’t he have kind of a potty mouth, though?” asks Jeb.

“Well, sure, he talks a lot of bro talk,” says Billy. “When it’s just guys, like. You know, off the set.”

“Well,” says Jeb, “I’d sure like to hear him off the record. Just to, you know, get the measure of the guy. He might be our next President, after all.”

“Hey, I can put out feelers, see who might have access to the show tapes for you, no problem,” says Billy.

“Unedited?” says Jeb. “I’d like to hear Trump talking naturally, what you call bro talk. Just to get inside his head.”

“No problem!” says Billy. “I’ll get on it.”

You think this is far-fetched? I don’t. The Bushes are globalists in the marrow of their bones, especially in regard to our southern neighbor. Poppy Bush was thick as thieves forty years ago with Mexican elite figures like Raul Salinas Lozano, whose son Carlos was President of Mexico in the early 1990s. Jeb himself told us early in this election campaign how he likes Mexicans much better than he likes Americans. Possibly that was a factor in his failure to win the hearts of American voters, I don’t know.

For the Bushes, Trump’s negativity towards Mexico and his promise to build a proper, well-defended national border, must have sounded outrageously shocking. Confronted with evil like that, they may well have concluded that drastic measures were called for.

Sure, it’s all speculation. We’ll have to wait twenty years or so for the memoirs to know for sure. As I look from pig to man, though, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again, it’s definitely getting harder to say which is which.

ORDER IT NOW

In contrast, look at Trump’s Thursday speech in West Palm Beach, Florida. It was a good angry speech—except that, as always, I wish we’d heard more on the National Question. Trump’s mid-August policy paper on immigration, for example, promised that he would end Birthright Citizenship: a popular position with half to two-thirds of voters liking it, depending on how the question is framed. Why can’t we hear more about that?

But there were some gems in the speech—and I thought this came straight from the heart:

This is our moment of reckoning as a society and as a civilization itself. I didn’t need to do this, folks, believe me—believe me. I built a great company, and I had a wonderful life. I could have enjoyed the fruits and benefits of years of successful business deals and businesses for myself and my family. Instead of going through this absolute horror show of lies, deceptions, malicious attacks—who would have thought?

I’m doing it because this country has given me so much, and I feel so strongly that it’s my turn to give back to the country that I love.

I think the guy’s sincere.

And I can’t imagine saying that about Mrs. Clinton, in any context at all.

I voted for Donald Trump in the New York primary in April. I look forward eagerly to voting for him again in November.

John Derbyshire [email him] writes an incredible amount on all sorts of subjectsfor all kinds of outlets. (This no longer includes National Review, whose editors had some kind of tantrum and fired him. ) He is the author of We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism and several other books. He’s had two books published by VDARE.com: FROM THE DISSIDENT RIGHT (also available in Kindle) and From the Dissident Right II: Essays 2013. His writings are archived atJohnDerbyshire.com.

(Republished from VDare.com by permission of author or representative)
 
    []
  1. Voting is for chumps…no matter who gets elected the two most meaningful things remain the same: the Deep State, and the Over State, and that’s where all the power is.

    “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” – Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

    Read More
    • Replies: @Vendetta
    Hmph voting

    Voting is for chumps

    The real politically enlightened sit on our asses and signal on social media

    http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1135735-counter-signal-memes
    , @Mr. Anon
    "Voting is for chumps…"

    Then you should definitely vote.

    Right now voting is all we've got. Right now.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /jderbyshire/gop-pigs-including-bush-dynasty-and-paul-ryan-vote-for-clinton-but-not-me/#comment-1610035
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. I know Mr. Derbyshire is not enthusiastic about pop culture references, but this song by the Beatles, seems to fit. There is some debate as to whether George Harrison, who wrote it, was inspired by Orwell’s Animal Farm.

    Have you seen the little piggies
    Crawling in the dirt?
    And for all the little piggies
    Life is getting worse
    Always having dirt to play around in

    Have you seen the bigger piggies
    In their starched white shirts?
    You will find the bigger piggies
    Stirring up the dirt
    Always have clean shirts to play around in

    In their styes with all their backing
    They don’t care what goes on around
    In their eyes there’s something lacking
    What they need’s a damn good whacking

    Everywhere there’s lots of piggies
    Living piggy lives
    You can see them out for dinner
    With their piggy wives
    Clutching forks and knives to eat their bacon

    Read More
  3. Unfortunately cannot vote, living in Africa.
    However, if I could! Clinton would not be my choice.

    It could end up as a Clinton vote, but only because the voting will be rigged.

    Donald, go man, go!!

    Read More
  4. mcohen says:

    stormcrow warning hurricane nicol is calling on the west wind.calling to crows circling.possible landfall towards 27 the october Pennsylvania coast

    Read More
  5. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    If we were going to measure all the various components of American society by the degree of dishonesty involved, at the very top would be the gap between what women want from men, and what they say they want.

    Add a third layer of consciousness: what they woman believe they want.
    Remove the reference to America. The conflict to actual wishes, conscious wishes and self-representation in the eyes of others is still more marked in less libertarian societies.

    Read More
  6. Richard S says:

    Pugnacious Irish??! Why don’t you come over here and say that, I’ll give you a knuckle sandwich!

    If Trump fails in November, that was your last chance to save America for its founding stock constitutionally. Say, how did your republic get started anyway? My history is a little hazy..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cynic
    Historically, after Britain rescinded the taxes that ostensibly were the cause of the Revolution, a bunch of landed aristocrats who owed money to Britain and didn't want to pay carried it off with the help of a Prussian general who organized Washington's rabble army, and the French Navy.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yorktown_1931_Issue-2c.jpg
  7. Randal says:

    Watching the GOP’s response to this media-manufactured outrage, I’ve feeling a bit like one of those farm animals. Do we really have two political parties, each representing a broad interest? Or is the current party system just a hoax on the rest of us by an Establishment who all fundamentally believe the same things?

    Surely this isn’t the first time you’ve ever experienced that feeling?

    Seems to me this realisation is one of the basic markers of achieving a degree of political maturity and understanding.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Franklin
    The common ground between US Republicans and US Democrats is the same common ground between Israeli Likud and Israeli Labor party.

    US politics is a reflection of Israeli politics, and their shared ideology is both nations have a super-majority of voters that are a government recognized, entitled protected class.


    Diversity By Group: African American, Alternate Lifestyle, Asian, Disabled, Hispanic & Latino, Jewish, Native American, Women

    http://www.mindexchange.com/diversity.htm
  8. Jim Mayer says:

    Pray your homeland prospers, if it does, you shall also prosper-Jeremiah 29:7.

    In this election many are saying both candidates are ‘equally’ bad. They aren’t.
    There’s one who intends to do good for the country, and one who intends it harm.

    Pretend we don’t know either candidate’s past, we Only know what each would do if elected. We know what HC wants to do because we now have access to her private speeches. Now we know why she didn’t want the public to see the transcripts, because in them she expresses her desire for a ‘Borderless Hemispheric Common Market.’ In other words, an end to a sovereign America.

    Folks – The end of America!
    How would one measure the tears in heaven from all the Patriots who died for this country?
    How do you begin to calculate the blood spilled over 240yrs of US history, defending it?
    HC wants to end the US & create a super-state combining N&S America!
    And who’d stop her? Our current crop of yellow-bellied RINOs?

    The US is the Cadillac of the West Hemis. Everyone else is a 10 year-old Yugo. The Yugo drivers would Love the wealth re-distribution. But what happens to Your standard of living if we combine economies? When Leftists say they care about you & all the micro-issues, they mean it only until you vote them in. It’s all talk. They’ll do what THEY want when in power. Proof? Did they care about public opinion when passing Obacare? PubOpin re gender/bathrooms? Care about public’s low priority re Climate Change?

    The Left has contempt for the Constitution & go around it with ‘ExecOrders’. They say it’s a living document, making it malleable instead of inflexible. Not so! It isn’t playdough. But a Leftist SupCrt won’t agree, & will rubber-stamp the Left’s agenda, & will let unconst’l Exec Orders stand. We’ll lose 1st & 2nd amends & many other freedoms. The next Prez may have 3-4 SC appoints. If it’s HC making those choices, America dies.

    MrT, warts & all, wants America 1st. John 8:7 says, Let him who is without sin cast the 1st stone. Trump is a sinner, as are we all, but he won’t dismantle the very nation that enriched him.
    They are not equal.
    .

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lawrence Fitton
    canada has a higher standard of living than america. america's wealth disparity exceeds that of canada's. canada has 3 times the social mobility as america. canada has a much better healthcare system than america. america has an infant mortality rate of third world nations. canada has lower crime rates. canada ranks higher on the happiness index. canada is a more peaceful place to live.
    the american cadillac is a rusted-out, immobile, relic in need of restoration.
    neither presidential candidate has the will or the way to do the job.
    expect 4 more years of neoliberal policies and laughable bombast of america as the exceptional nation.
  9. unit472 says:

    However the election goes the media have totally discredited themselves and, even worse, painted themselves into the Rodhamster’s corner. It is as close as these things can be that amongst all those hacked DNC and Podesta e-mails will be a smoking gun. Evidence not even a Comey can ignore and then comes the special prosecutor. Probably within the first hundred days of the Clinton Administration.

    OTOH, if Trump manages to pull an upset, the media is going to be persona non grata at the White House.

    So no matter who wins the media’s big story next year is going to be one that they are on the wrong side of.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cynic
    "OTOH, if Trump manages to pull an upset, the media is going to be persona non grata at the White House."

    That's OK, the media demonized Reagan too (he was going to start a nuclear war, a la Goldwater, remember?), but the sight of him in a tuxedo surrounded by superstars, after the Jimmy Carter old sweater days (malais, it's all you're fault, it's not mine, remember?), soon found the media kissing ass just to get in, as they always do. It's all about access.
  10. Jason Liu says:

    How did cat ladies get so much political influence in America though? If America really was once a patriarchy ruled by sexist old white men, they did a pretty crappy job of gatekeeping.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    How did cat ladies get so much political influence in America though? If America really was once a patriarchy ruled by sexist old white men, they did a pretty crappy job of gatekeeping.
     
    On a more interesting, if not entirely related, topic, do cat-women put out more than dog-women? Now, don't snort -- this is important psychosexual relationship stuff. In my experience, dog-women put out more than cat-women, yet cat-women seem to have the majority of males predisposed to pursue them than dog-women.
  11. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Of course, if Trump is Hitler then to complete the metaphor, Hillary is Stalin. And Stalin began murdering in earnest long before Adolf’s rise to power, those mass murders being in fact the catalyst for widespread support for Hitler’s message.

    Hitlerism was a reaction to the depredations of criminally insane Soviet (((leadership))) policies–which may have conceivably included William Saletan’s forebears as active agents. There are levels within levels and accusing Hitler is good offense that makes good defense by deflecting blame away from prime movers who would scurry like roaches if when the light of truth were to be shined on them.

    To understand Naziism one must first understand Bolshevism.

    Read More
  12. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    “Do we really have two political parties, each representing a broad interest? Or is the current party system just a hoax on the rest of us by an Establishment who all fundamentally believe the same things?”

    Yes. And the joke is on Liberals. Turning America into one vast Empire stretching from Terra del Fuego to Prudhoe Bay as Hillary envisions and importing masses of scab labor will ultimately result in the destruction of the Welfare State. That’s the long game. As Milton Friedman observed, open borders and welfare state benefits are financially incompatible.

    So, prosperous countries in which government is open and cares for its citizens, e.g. Denmark and Netherlands will face internal bankruptcy. Weaker nations face external bankruptcy, as does Greece today. One way or the other, the Globalist bankers will bring all nations to heel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    Turning America into one vast Empire stretching from Terra del Fuego to Prudhoe Bay as Hillary envisions and importing masses of scab labor will ultimately result in the destruction of the Welfare State. That’s the long game.
     
    Yes, but when has the upper-class of a two-class economic system ever been concerned about the living conditions of the lower-class? Never. There is not enough wealth in the known Universe for one rich man to believe he can get enough.

    The problem really IS the rich -- the pure untempered materialism, the ravening greed, the contemptuous disregard (except as lip-service) for the most basic of humanitarian principles.

    Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy. Later, it would be a good idea to come up with a form of government that is truly capable of permitting a rich class, but preventing the horrors of its excesses.

    That'll be the day.
  13. Miro23 says:

    Which means the effect of releasing the Trump tape may not be altogether as intended.

    That’s an interesting idea + Hillary’s Mrs Outraged Respectable Middle America show is losing viewers. Also there’s the observation from the article that MSM bias is now 100% out in the open, and how the public will react to that.

    If media bias is so obvious, does the public still accept the story or reject the whole thing as lies? My guess is that unfortunately, most of them go on accepting the propaganda, since these media sources used to be quite credible, and they are run by dedicated high stakes players.

    Their weakest link is probably Hillary herself, who is sick, and having to project an image 180º different from what she really is + having to face a different Republican candidate from the one they promised.

    Read More
  14. Rich says:

    There is only one political party and the agenda is clear. Cheap labor and more wealth and power for the elites. Trump may change that if elected, or he might turn out to be phony like every Republican candidate since 1968, but with Hillary you know what you’re getting, Cultural-Marxism to the hilt.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    Trump may change that if elected, or he might turn out to be phony like every Republican candidate since 1968, but with Hillary you know what you’re getting, Cultural-Marxism to the hilt.
     
    I plan to have "The Hilt Stops Here" tattooed on my rump. Unfortunately, I sense the the Hillary Hilt stops at no sphincters -- it plunges through intestines, liver and stomach to rip your heart out. Good-bye, America.
  15. David says:

    The BBC Arts and Culture program In Our Time recently had an episode on Animal Farm. I recommend it.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07wgkz4

    In Our Time is a 45-minute program, usually with three guests, that doesn’t do retakes, so performance is a big part of its appeal, or not, depending on how well it’s pulled off.

    Read More
  16. @Randal

    Watching the GOP’s response to this media-manufactured outrage, I’ve feeling a bit like one of those farm animals. Do we really have two political parties, each representing a broad interest? Or is the current party system just a hoax on the rest of us by an Establishment who all fundamentally believe the same things?
     
    Surely this isn't the first time you've ever experienced that feeling?

    Seems to me this realisation is one of the basic markers of achieving a degree of political maturity and understanding.

    The common ground between US Republicans and US Democrats is the same common ground between Israeli Likud and Israeli Labor party.

    US politics is a reflection of Israeli politics, and their shared ideology is both nations have a super-majority of voters that are a government recognized, entitled protected class.

    Diversity By Group: African American, Alternate Lifestyle, Asian, Disabled, Hispanic & Latino, Jewish, Native American, Women

    http://www.mindexchange.com/diversity.htm

    Read More
    • Replies: @TJM
    BULL SHIT!

    There is ONLY ONE "protected class", Zionist Jews, the rest of the people you mentioned are merely pawns to use in their war of division.

    The idea that blacks, with no jobs, or gays with now the right to marry are "protected" is ridiculous, they are only USED, as a wedge issue to destroy America.
  17. @Jason Liu
    How did cat ladies get so much political influence in America though? If America really was once a patriarchy ruled by sexist old white men, they did a pretty crappy job of gatekeeping.

    How did cat ladies get so much political influence in America though? If America really was once a patriarchy ruled by sexist old white men, they did a pretty crappy job of gatekeeping.

    On a more interesting, if not entirely related, topic, do cat-women put out more than dog-women? Now, don’t snort — this is important psychosexual relationship stuff. In my experience, dog-women put out more than cat-women, yet cat-women seem to have the majority of males predisposed to pursue them than dog-women.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Marcus
    Cat women tend to be spinsters or frigid dykes. Dog women more outgoing.
  18. @Rich
    There is only one political party and the agenda is clear. Cheap labor and more wealth and power for the elites. Trump may change that if elected, or he might turn out to be phony like every Republican candidate since 1968, but with Hillary you know what you're getting, Cultural-Marxism to the hilt.

    Trump may change that if elected, or he might turn out to be phony like every Republican candidate since 1968, but with Hillary you know what you’re getting, Cultural-Marxism to the hilt.

    I plan to have “The Hilt Stops Here” tattooed on my rump. Unfortunately, I sense the the Hillary Hilt stops at no sphincters — it plunges through intestines, liver and stomach to rip your heart out. Good-bye, America.

    Read More
  19. @Anonymous
    "Do we really have two political parties, each representing a broad interest? Or is the current party system just a hoax on the rest of us by an Establishment who all fundamentally believe the same things?"

    Yes. And the joke is on Liberals. Turning America into one vast Empire stretching from Terra del Fuego to Prudhoe Bay as Hillary envisions and importing masses of scab labor will ultimately result in the destruction of the Welfare State. That's the long game. As Milton Friedman observed, open borders and welfare state benefits are financially incompatible.

    So, prosperous countries in which government is open and cares for its citizens, e.g. Denmark and Netherlands will face internal bankruptcy. Weaker nations face external bankruptcy, as does Greece today. One way or the other, the Globalist bankers will bring all nations to heel.

    Turning America into one vast Empire stretching from Terra del Fuego to Prudhoe Bay as Hillary envisions and importing masses of scab labor will ultimately result in the destruction of the Welfare State. That’s the long game.

    Yes, but when has the upper-class of a two-class economic system ever been concerned about the living conditions of the lower-class? Never. There is not enough wealth in the known Universe for one rich man to believe he can get enough.

    The problem really IS the rich — the pure untempered materialism, the ravening greed, the contemptuous disregard (except as lip-service) for the most basic of humanitarian principles.

    Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy. Later, it would be a good idea to come up with a form of government that is truly capable of permitting a rich class, but preventing the horrors of its excesses.

    That’ll be the day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy."

    Who makes that judgement? Under what criteria? Does that mean women and children are also murdered under this purge?

    Your solution is sociopathic in nature. Are you just blowing off steam or you actually serious?
  20. gdpbull says:

    “No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon (the head pig) that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?” – Squealer, the spokesman for Napoleon, George Orwell’s Animal Farm.

    Italics are my insertion

    Read More
  21. Well said John–”pigs” is exactly right.

    For the record, i’ll say my money is on (((Dan Senor))) and Paul Ryan–i swear the guy looks like lucifer in one of those odd meetings of the spiritual and material.

    You covered it in a previous column, but this campaign has just ripped the mask off Jewish atavistic hatreds and anti-nationalism–for everyone but Israel, but especially sticking it to white nations. Trump clearly has nothing against Jews, or even blacks or is particularly interested in race stuff in general, but he actually thinks America belongs to Americans and ought to be run in their interest, so the Jews have wheeled out the Hitler cannon and have been firing away full bore.

    There just isn’t any way around it. It isn’t a “policy” dispute–these folks are evil, wishing to destroy the nation. The “tell” is that i’m not interested in telling these Jews and their fellow travelers how to live. If they want to live in globoland–fine. Let’s split and they can create their globo-utopia. (Good luck with that!) But that’s not what the Jews care about. They have zero interest in it. They simply object to whites–white gentiles–having their own nations. They want to flood my nation with hostile others, “diversify” it to break it as nation so there is no resistance. They want to be the elite on top of “whitish” societies to live off of the prosperity whites create, but not have us in charge of our nations. In other words, they demand that we be serfs\slaves for them. If you won’t let a people go and demand they stay and work for you … i think there’s a name for that–slavery.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Overband

    Trump clearly has nothing against Jews, or even blacks or is particularly interested in race stuff in general, but he actually thinks America belongs to Americans and ought to be run in their interest, so the Jews have wheeled out the Hitler cannon and have been firing away full bore.
     
    Yes, if Trump wasn't an anti-semite at the start of this campaign, he sure as hell will be one by the end of it. Once again, paranoid Jews have conjured into existence the very demons they sought to destroy. It will be interesting to see how Trump deals with these people when he wins.

    For one thing, I was surprised to see Trump being attacked over his taxes a while ago. This was a stupid thing to do, since President Trump will have the IRS at his disposal and will be in a position to repay his enemies tenfold in the same coin. (Indeed, this is how Putin's purge of the Russian 'oligarchs' began: with tax investigations.)

  22. Vendetta says:
    @Anonymous Smith
    Voting is for chumps...no matter who gets elected the two most meaningful things remain the same: the Deep State, and the Over State, and that's where all the power is.

    “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” – Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

    Hmph voting

    Voting is for chumps

    The real politically enlightened sit on our asses and signal on social media

    http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1135735-counter-signal-memes

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith
    I'm not sitting on my ass...as a Prepper/Survivalist I'm constantly on the move; mostly practicing my various skills so that I'm razor-sharp when society breaks down. Plus, I've got the ability to take the fight right to the enemies doorstep...which I frequently do.

    If the US Gov keeps screwing around in Syria, you may not get the chance to vote this time 'round. But, hey, more power to ya...get out there and vote! I hope all your dreams come true.
  23. Cynic says:
    @Richard S
    Pugnacious Irish??! Why don't you come over here and say that, I'll give you a knuckle sandwich!

    If Trump fails in November, that was your last chance to save America for its founding stock constitutionally. Say, how did your republic get started anyway? My history is a little hazy..

    Historically, after Britain rescinded the taxes that ostensibly were the cause of the Revolution, a bunch of landed aristocrats who owed money to Britain and didn’t want to pay carried it off with the help of a Prussian general who organized Washington’s rabble army, and the French Navy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Richard S
    Lol why do they call you "cynic"? ;)
    , @King George III
    Don't forget the Whigs, British and American, and also don't forget Lord Howe.
  24. Truth says:

    Hey Guys:

    You have to thank this limey, for kindly synopsizing, for you gauche, unread, practically-illiterate Americans, a 40-page book that you had for a mandatory reading assignment IN THE 8TH GRADE!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    Illiterate? Far from it. I, and likely many others here, are far more literate than you are, quite obviously. You are just an excretion from J-school, who believes ridiculous nonsense. You believe that cars can be fueled with water. You probably believe every single thing you saw on "Ancient Aliens". You are a nitwit.
    , @Wyrd
    Here's Trans-Truth shuckin'-n-jivin' down in South Africa:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9SiRNibD14

    , @Bill
    Every so often, Truth, your shtick is funny.
  25. In contrast, look at Trump’s Thursday speech in West Palm Beach, Florida. It was a good angry speech—except that, as always, I wish we’d heard more on the National Question.

    This.

    Trump seems to be fine–pretty good–at the pep rally ad lib and such.

    Now he’s firing off a good angry speech–the best parts of which you know the media will never highlight. (They’ll be going wall to wall on some alleged pawing from 10, 20, 30 years back … *that’s what’s important.)

    But Trump had two golden opportunities to take his nationalist message directly to the voters without the media able to screen and block … and he made complete hash out of them.

    The first debate probably had 100 million eyeballs–more than any debate in history–the first question out of the gate was an economic one and Trump couldn’t even make the simple econ 101 point that open borders \ mass immigration means American job loss and wage suppression. He let Hillary call him a crook and yap about her dad’s hard work and Trump never could bother to point out that Hillary has never done anything productive, but is nonethelss rich from collecting Wall Street bribes. The whole debate sailed by and Trump never said “immigration” once.

    In the post-debate Machado week Trump yapped and yapped some more incompetently but could never make the basic point that Hillary setup this Machado as everywoman thing for six months and somehow missed *published stories* that Machado drove for a driveby shooting, threatened the life of a judge, had sex on camera while engaged to someone else and is the baby momma of a drug lord, yet Hillary wants to wave in 650000 Syrian “refugees” about whom we know nothing … and claims she’ll vet them and not let in anyone dangerous! How can a sentient human miss this sort of setup?

    Second debate–better but more missed opportunities and pathetic pandering. How about just saying “Islamaphobia” is crap–that Muslims need to fix their community’s problems? Not much on his signature issue of immigration … but we heard a bunch about his DC post office project.

    Trump’s obviously a very energetic and talented business guy, but for a guy challenging the establishment and their disatrous conventional wisdom, he is piss-poor at simple direct articulation of exactly what he’s challenging them on and the nationalism he proposes to turn things around.

    Trump may surprise, but honestly i thought this was always uphill and required a strong clear “national question” campaign to win. (Do you want your kids to inherit America or Brazil?) Trump didn’t deliver the delivery. We finally have a candidate who is not offering the same old mush … but unfortunately the message delivery has been mush.

    Read More
    • Replies: @epebble
    Your post proves beyond any doubt that all that good stuff on Thursday is Steve Bannon Breitbart speach and not DJT original. DJT may not even understand, agree or care with the teleprompted content. So the question is why does Bannon himself not stand for election and advance a credible argument, if the argument is a natural winner?
  26. nsa says:

    Great new softcore porn concept…… “Jooies Gone Wild”. Oh wait, we have it already….it’s called Election 2016.

    Read More
    • Replies: @5371
    It's "Twinks Gone Wild" and nobody could call it softcore.
  27. 5371 says:
    @nsa
    Great new softcore porn concept...... "Jooies Gone Wild". Oh wait, we have it already....it's called Election 2016.

    It’s “Twinks Gone Wild” and nobody could call it softcore.

    Read More
  28. MJMD says:

    My tinfoil hat is firmly on my head now, I’ve abandoned the skepticism that used to give me some optimism about the future, and given over completely to my fears that the two party system in the United States really is a scam. It’s too obvious to ignore. However…

    While I don’t find the imagined conversation between Jeb and Billy Bush to be far-fetched in the slightest, I do have to wonder why it didn’t take place early in the primaries. The idea that Bush would deliberately wait until his own candidacy lay in ruins in order to throw the whole thing to Hillary at the 11th hour is still too conspiratorial for me: you might as well believe in everything depicted on “The X Files”. Conversely, if the Bushes couldn’t uncover this stuff during the primaries then they’re too incompetent to be part of a conspiracy any deeper than the obvious spectacle of Carlos Slim, Haim Saban, and George Soros being in the tank for Hillary. So I don’t think these people are unbeatable. I think America still has a real opportunity to shrug them off.

    Read More
    • Replies: @epebble
    To show how weak a candidate Jeb was (and the redundancy of author's complex scheming), that Trump is a lecher is obvious if anyone reads his ghostwritten biography or has listened to many hours of porn radio banter with Howard Stern. That not one of the 16 primary candidates who could have blown Trump out of water by releasing just one of the broadcast tapes did it shows how week the GOP slate was.
  29. Che Guava says:

    I an a great admirer of Eric Blair, a.k.a. George Orwell.

    Enough to have read the old four-volume set of miscellaneous writings from first cover to last.

    Yet among the pigs you have Snowball (Trotsky), the good pig who is driven out, and Napoleon (Stalin), the bad pig.

    That is false consciousness.

    I learnt much by comparing accounts in A Homage to Catalonia with For Whom the Bell Tolls.

    Both portray the Trots as a mess, though Orwell, being on that side, tries to make it a glamorously tragic mess.

    Will always go for Hemingway’s take on it.

    Whatever happened to Leon Trotsky,

    He got an icepick, baby,

    Right in his plottsky.

    From No More Heroes by The Stranglers.

    I think Mercator had the right idea.

    Read More
    • Replies: @namer
    You start out professing admiration for Orwell but wind up defending Stalin. We all have contradictions, but even Whitman wouldn't stand for one that big! ["Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."]

    Here's a good take on Orwell's anti-totalitarian impulses. Resolutely anti-Stalinist, Mr. Blair's work is also relevant for our "democratic" societies.
    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2010/06/1984-j12.html
  30. nsa says:

    Derb is right….comparing servile Republicans to Hitler is dreadfully unfair……to Hitler. Every decent human owes a debt of gratitude to dear old Adolph for thinning out the jooie herd a little….

    Read More
    • Replies: @AnotherDad

    Derb is right….comparing servile Republicans to Hitler is dreadfully unfair……to Hitler. Every decent human owes a debt of gratitude to dear old Adolph for thinning out the jooie herd a little….
     
    Please, just leave--just go off in a corner and die.

    Jewish anti-nationalism--and all the other associated ideological garbage stuffed down our throats--is a real problem.

    But the psychopathic genocidal imperialist Hitler is perhaps the worst thing to happen to the West--at least until modern "globalism". And yes--an imperialist. Hitler's "national socialism" wasn't very "national", but saw fit to run around invading other nations and slaughtering other people's with reckless abandon. And beyond his immense body count, Hitler did immense damage to the "nationalist" brand, allowing its enemies--Jewish and gentile--to smear normal healthy nationalism with the stench of Hitler's imperial genocidal slaughter. Hitler is a huge part of why the West is in the mess we're in now.

    We don't need Hitler's genocidal "national socialism" imperialism, or British colonial imperialism, or either of the Jews Marxian or Goldman Sachian imperialisms.

    Healthy republican nationalism--responsible self-reliant men making decisions for their own people, defending their own turf and staying out of other people's business beyond mutually beneficial neighborliness--that's the ticket, the only ticket, to freedom, peace and prosperity. Everything else--colonialism, Marxism, national socialism, globalism--is always oppression and tyranny.
  31. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous Smith
    Voting is for chumps...no matter who gets elected the two most meaningful things remain the same: the Deep State, and the Over State, and that's where all the power is.

    “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” – Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

    “Voting is for chumps…”

    Then you should definitely vote.

    Right now voting is all we’ve got. Right now.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith

    Right now voting is all we’ve got. Right now.
     
    No...voting is all you've got right now. I don't have to wait around for some special person to come to rescue me; I have the wherewithal to take the fight to the enemy as I see fit...whenever I choose to do it.

    Good luck to ya on election day, Mr. Anon...I'll keep my fingers crossed for ya!
  32. Mr. Anon says:
    @Truth
    Hey Guys:

    You have to thank this limey, for kindly synopsizing, for you gauche, unread, practically-illiterate Americans, a 40-page book that you had for a mandatory reading assignment IN THE 8TH GRADE!

    Illiterate? Far from it. I, and likely many others here, are far more literate than you are, quite obviously. You are just an excretion from J-school, who believes ridiculous nonsense. You believe that cars can be fueled with water. You probably believe every single thing you saw on “Ancient Aliens”. You are a nitwit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Truth
    Henry Makow believes it and he's smarter'n you!

    http://henrymakow.com/2013/11/Illuminati-Suppress-Water-Powered-Cars.html
  33. Cynic says:
    @unit472
    However the election goes the media have totally discredited themselves and, even worse, painted themselves into the Rodhamster's corner. It is as close as these things can be that amongst all those hacked DNC and Podesta e-mails will be a smoking gun. Evidence not even a Comey can ignore and then comes the special prosecutor. Probably within the first hundred days of the Clinton Administration.

    OTOH, if Trump manages to pull an upset, the media is going to be persona non grata at the White House.

    So no matter who wins the media's big story next year is going to be one that they are on the wrong side of.

    “OTOH, if Trump manages to pull an upset, the media is going to be persona non grata at the White House.”

    That’s OK, the media demonized Reagan too (he was going to start a nuclear war, a la Goldwater, remember?), but the sight of him in a tuxedo surrounded by superstars, after the Jimmy Carter old sweater days (malais, it’s all you’re fault, it’s not mine, remember?), soon found the media kissing ass just to get in, as they always do. It’s all about access.

    Read More
  34. Wyrd says:
    @Truth
    Hey Guys:

    You have to thank this limey, for kindly synopsizing, for you gauche, unread, practically-illiterate Americans, a 40-page book that you had for a mandatory reading assignment IN THE 8TH GRADE!

    Here’s Trans-Truth shuckin’-n-jivin’ down in South Africa:

    Read More
  35. epebble says:
    @AnotherDad

    In contrast, look at Trump’s Thursday speech in West Palm Beach, Florida. It was a good angry speech—except that, as always, I wish we’d heard more on the National Question.
     
    This.

    Trump seems to be fine--pretty good--at the pep rally ad lib and such.

    Now he's firing off a good angry speech--the best parts of which you know the media will never highlight. (They'll be going wall to wall on some alleged pawing from 10, 20, 30 years back ... *that's what's important.)

    But Trump had two golden opportunities to take his nationalist message directly to the voters without the media able to screen and block ... and he made complete hash out of them.

    The first debate probably had 100 million eyeballs--more than any debate in history--the first question out of the gate was an economic one and Trump couldn't even make the simple econ 101 point that open borders \ mass immigration means American job loss and wage suppression. He let Hillary call him a crook and yap about her dad's hard work and Trump never could bother to point out that Hillary has never done anything productive, but is nonethelss rich from collecting Wall Street bribes. The whole debate sailed by and Trump never said "immigration" once.

    In the post-debate Machado week Trump yapped and yapped some more incompetently but could never make the basic point that Hillary setup this Machado as everywoman thing for six months and somehow missed *published stories* that Machado drove for a driveby shooting, threatened the life of a judge, had sex on camera while engaged to someone else and is the baby momma of a drug lord, yet Hillary wants to wave in 650000 Syrian "refugees" about whom we know nothing ... and claims she'll vet them and not let in anyone dangerous! How can a sentient human miss this sort of setup?

    Second debate--better but more missed opportunities and pathetic pandering. How about just saying "Islamaphobia" is crap--that Muslims need to fix their community's problems? Not much on his signature issue of immigration ... but we heard a bunch about his DC post office project.

    Trump's obviously a very energetic and talented business guy, but for a guy challenging the establishment and their disatrous conventional wisdom, he is piss-poor at simple direct articulation of exactly what he's challenging them on and the nationalism he proposes to turn things around.

    Trump may surprise, but honestly i thought this was always uphill and required a strong clear "national question" campaign to win. (Do you want your kids to inherit America or Brazil?) Trump didn't deliver the delivery. We finally have a candidate who is not offering the same old mush ... but unfortunately the message delivery has been mush.

    Your post proves beyond any doubt that all that good stuff on Thursday is Steve Bannon Breitbart speach and not DJT original. DJT may not even understand, agree or care with the teleprompted content. So the question is why does Bannon himself not stand for election and advance a credible argument, if the argument is a natural winner?

    Read More
  36. epebble says:
    @MJMD
    My tinfoil hat is firmly on my head now, I've abandoned the skepticism that used to give me some optimism about the future, and given over completely to my fears that the two party system in the United States really is a scam. It's too obvious to ignore. However...

    While I don't find the imagined conversation between Jeb and Billy Bush to be far-fetched in the slightest, I do have to wonder why it didn't take place early in the primaries. The idea that Bush would deliberately wait until his own candidacy lay in ruins in order to throw the whole thing to Hillary at the 11th hour is still too conspiratorial for me: you might as well believe in everything depicted on "The X Files". Conversely, if the Bushes couldn't uncover this stuff during the primaries then they're too incompetent to be part of a conspiracy any deeper than the obvious spectacle of Carlos Slim, Haim Saban, and George Soros being in the tank for Hillary. So I don't think these people are unbeatable. I think America still has a real opportunity to shrug them off.

    To show how weak a candidate Jeb was (and the redundancy of author’s complex scheming), that Trump is a lecher is obvious if anyone reads his ghostwritten biography or has listened to many hours of porn radio banter with Howard Stern. That not one of the 16 primary candidates who could have blown Trump out of water by releasing just one of the broadcast tapes did it shows how week the GOP slate was.

    Read More
  37. Richard S says:
    @Cynic
    Historically, after Britain rescinded the taxes that ostensibly were the cause of the Revolution, a bunch of landed aristocrats who owed money to Britain and didn't want to pay carried it off with the help of a Prussian general who organized Washington's rabble army, and the French Navy.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yorktown_1931_Issue-2c.jpg

    Lol why do they call you “cynic”? ;)

    Read More
  38. @Vendetta
    Hmph voting

    Voting is for chumps

    The real politically enlightened sit on our asses and signal on social media

    http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1135735-counter-signal-memes

    I’m not sitting on my ass…as a Prepper/Survivalist I’m constantly on the move; mostly practicing my various skills so that I’m razor-sharp when society breaks down. Plus, I’ve got the ability to take the fight right to the enemies doorstep…which I frequently do.

    If the US Gov keeps screwing around in Syria, you may not get the chance to vote this time ’round. But, hey, more power to ya…get out there and vote! I hope all your dreams come true.

    Read More
  39. @Mr. Anon
    "Voting is for chumps…"

    Then you should definitely vote.

    Right now voting is all we've got. Right now.

    Right now voting is all we’ve got. Right now.

    No…voting is all you’ve got right now. I don’t have to wait around for some special person to come to rescue me; I have the wherewithal to take the fight to the enemy as I see fit…whenever I choose to do it.

    Good luck to ya on election day, Mr. Anon…I’ll keep my fingers crossed for ya!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    "I have the wherewithal to take the fight to the enemy as I see fit…whenever I choose to do it."

    Oh really? And where is your secret mountain redoubt? Blowhard Pass?
  40. Art says:

    The pig analogy is right on – the establishment right Republicans are all about the authoritarian nature of government. They save us from those bad poor people and those with troubles who are down on their luck. They are more than ready to send out the pigs to further ensnare them. Observe FoxJews and see.

    Read More
  41. Truth says:
    @Mr. Anon
    Illiterate? Far from it. I, and likely many others here, are far more literate than you are, quite obviously. You are just an excretion from J-school, who believes ridiculous nonsense. You believe that cars can be fueled with water. You probably believe every single thing you saw on "Ancient Aliens". You are a nitwit.

    Henry Makow believes it and he’s smarter’n you!

    http://henrymakow.com/2013/11/Illuminati-Suppress-Water-Powered-Cars.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    "Henry Makow believes it and he’s smarter’n you!"

    No, he isn't smarter than me. I concede, however, that he is smarter than you. Henry Makow has a Ph.D. in English Literature (according to some sources anyway), which certainly outranks your ridiculous J-school degree, although it hardly makes him an expert in automotive engineering. But then the credulous, like you, will believe any manner of nonsense.

    Have you ever tried to burn water, "Truth"? Try it sometime.

    Idiot.

  42. @nsa
    Derb is right....comparing servile Republicans to Hitler is dreadfully unfair......to Hitler. Every decent human owes a debt of gratitude to dear old Adolph for thinning out the jooie herd a little....

    Derb is right….comparing servile Republicans to Hitler is dreadfully unfair……to Hitler. Every decent human owes a debt of gratitude to dear old Adolph for thinning out the jooie herd a little….

    Please, just leave–just go off in a corner and die.

    Jewish anti-nationalism–and all the other associated ideological garbage stuffed down our throats–is a real problem.

    But the psychopathic genocidal imperialist Hitler is perhaps the worst thing to happen to the West–at least until modern “globalism”. And yes–an imperialist. Hitler’s “national socialism” wasn’t very “national”, but saw fit to run around invading other nations and slaughtering other people’s with reckless abandon. And beyond his immense body count, Hitler did immense damage to the “nationalist” brand, allowing its enemies–Jewish and gentile–to smear normal healthy nationalism with the stench of Hitler’s imperial genocidal slaughter. Hitler is a huge part of why the West is in the mess we’re in now.

    We don’t need Hitler’s genocidal “national socialism” imperialism, or British colonial imperialism, or either of the Jews Marxian or Goldman Sachian imperialisms.

    Healthy republican nationalism–responsible self-reliant men making decisions for their own people, defending their own turf and staying out of other people’s business beyond mutually beneficial neighborliness–that’s the ticket, the only ticket, to freedom, peace and prosperity. Everything else–colonialism, Marxism, national socialism, globalism–is always oppression and tyranny.

    Read More
    • Agree: geokat62
    • Replies: @Avery
    Very well said.

    In particular, Hitler's evil ghost hovers over pretty much every German today. German people's admirable atonement for the crimes of Nazis and Hitler is being used by Globalists to completely paralyze the normal instincts of any sentient being to threats to its own survival.

    Germans, with an abundance of guilt feeling for Hitler's and Nazis' crimes, are unable to muster the national will to resist being slowly overrun. Even their elected officials are enthusiastically working towards their own national suicide.

    I am no psychologist, but if not for Hitler and Nazis damaging, possibly irreversibly, Germans' psyche, none of what goes on today in Germany would be tolerated by the German people.
  43. Avery says:
    @AnotherDad

    Derb is right….comparing servile Republicans to Hitler is dreadfully unfair……to Hitler. Every decent human owes a debt of gratitude to dear old Adolph for thinning out the jooie herd a little….
     
    Please, just leave--just go off in a corner and die.

    Jewish anti-nationalism--and all the other associated ideological garbage stuffed down our throats--is a real problem.

    But the psychopathic genocidal imperialist Hitler is perhaps the worst thing to happen to the West--at least until modern "globalism". And yes--an imperialist. Hitler's "national socialism" wasn't very "national", but saw fit to run around invading other nations and slaughtering other people's with reckless abandon. And beyond his immense body count, Hitler did immense damage to the "nationalist" brand, allowing its enemies--Jewish and gentile--to smear normal healthy nationalism with the stench of Hitler's imperial genocidal slaughter. Hitler is a huge part of why the West is in the mess we're in now.

    We don't need Hitler's genocidal "national socialism" imperialism, or British colonial imperialism, or either of the Jews Marxian or Goldman Sachian imperialisms.

    Healthy republican nationalism--responsible self-reliant men making decisions for their own people, defending their own turf and staying out of other people's business beyond mutually beneficial neighborliness--that's the ticket, the only ticket, to freedom, peace and prosperity. Everything else--colonialism, Marxism, national socialism, globalism--is always oppression and tyranny.

    Very well said.

    In particular, Hitler’s evil ghost hovers over pretty much every German today. German people’s admirable atonement for the crimes of Nazis and Hitler is being used by Globalists to completely paralyze the normal instincts of any sentient being to threats to its own survival.

    Germans, with an abundance of guilt feeling for Hitler’s and Nazis’ crimes, are unable to muster the national will to resist being slowly overrun. Even their elected officials are enthusiastically working towards their own national suicide.

    I am no psychologist, but if not for Hitler and Nazis damaging, possibly irreversibly, Germans’ psyche, none of what goes on today in Germany would be tolerated by the German people.

    Read More
  44. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous Smith

    Right now voting is all we’ve got. Right now.
     
    No...voting is all you've got right now. I don't have to wait around for some special person to come to rescue me; I have the wherewithal to take the fight to the enemy as I see fit...whenever I choose to do it.

    Good luck to ya on election day, Mr. Anon...I'll keep my fingers crossed for ya!

    “I have the wherewithal to take the fight to the enemy as I see fit…whenever I choose to do it.”

    Oh really? And where is your secret mountain redoubt? Blowhard Pass?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith
    Blah...that wasn't very creative, or entertaining at all! :(
    , @John Jeremiah Smith

    Oh really? And where is your secret mountain redoubt? Blowhard Pass?
     
    LOL. Damn! That was the word I just couldn't remember -- blowhard! Oh, well, there's always a next time.

    I think the preppers don't quite understand that they present no threat to a totalitarian regime that must remain focused on controlling the population and production centers.

    When the preppers run off and camp out in, er, principled defiance, out thar in the pine forests of the frozen north, or the stone canyons of the southwest, The Powers That Be are mostly amused, not threatened.
  45. Mr. Anon says:
    @Truth
    Henry Makow believes it and he's smarter'n you!

    http://henrymakow.com/2013/11/Illuminati-Suppress-Water-Powered-Cars.html

    “Henry Makow believes it and he’s smarter’n you!”

    No, he isn’t smarter than me. I concede, however, that he is smarter than you. Henry Makow has a Ph.D. in English Literature (according to some sources anyway), which certainly outranks your ridiculous J-school degree, although it hardly makes him an expert in automotive engineering. But then the credulous, like you, will believe any manner of nonsense.

    Have you ever tried to burn water, “Truth”? Try it sometime.

    Idiot.

    Read More
  46. @Mr. Anon
    "I have the wherewithal to take the fight to the enemy as I see fit…whenever I choose to do it."

    Oh really? And where is your secret mountain redoubt? Blowhard Pass?

    Blah…that wasn’t very creative, or entertaining at all! :(

    Read More
  47. Barnard says:

    You think this is far-fetched? I don’t. The Bushes are globalists in the marrow of their bones, especially in regard to our southern neighbor. Poppy Bush was thick as thieves forty years ago with Mexican elite figures like Raul Salinas Lozano, whose son Carlos was President of Mexico in the early 1990s. Jeb himself told us early in this election campaign how he likes Mexicans much better than he likes Americans. Possibly that was a factor in his failure to win the hearts of American voters, I don’t know.

    This is all correct, but the theory that Jeb and the Bush family were behind the Access Hollywood tape doesn’t factor in how awful Jeb ran his own campaign. Jeb raised tons of money and Mike Murphy spent most of it bashing Rubio because he was convinced Trump could never win the nomination. It also doesn’t factor in that, as much as these people hate Trump, they still want their cronies, like Paul Ryan, running Congress. Piling on Trump at this point, when he was already behind, makes that much less likely to happen.

    Read More
  48. Marcus says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    How did cat ladies get so much political influence in America though? If America really was once a patriarchy ruled by sexist old white men, they did a pretty crappy job of gatekeeping.
     
    On a more interesting, if not entirely related, topic, do cat-women put out more than dog-women? Now, don't snort -- this is important psychosexual relationship stuff. In my experience, dog-women put out more than cat-women, yet cat-women seem to have the majority of males predisposed to pursue them than dog-women.

    Cat women tend to be spinsters or frigid dykes. Dog women more outgoing.

    Read More
  49. Marcus says:

    I wouldn’t say that Hitl0r was “sexless”: he had a couple of nasty affairs with younger women, his niece Geli Raubal (who killed herself) and the daughter of an SPD leader, Maria Reiter (who almost killed herself).

    Read More
  50. @Mr. Anon
    "I have the wherewithal to take the fight to the enemy as I see fit…whenever I choose to do it."

    Oh really? And where is your secret mountain redoubt? Blowhard Pass?

    Oh really? And where is your secret mountain redoubt? Blowhard Pass?

    LOL. Damn! That was the word I just couldn’t remember — blowhard! Oh, well, there’s always a next time.

    I think the preppers don’t quite understand that they present no threat to a totalitarian regime that must remain focused on controlling the population and production centers.

    When the preppers run off and camp out in, er, principled defiance, out thar in the pine forests of the frozen north, or the stone canyons of the southwest, The Powers That Be are mostly amused, not threatened.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith
    Your mind is totally dominated by the meme of the "All-powerful PTB".

    As long as we have guns, especially long rifles, they are totally vulnerable, and they know it. That's why they have been working mightily to take away our gun rights...if we are fully armed it's not possible for them to have an actual totalitarian control system. But, they are working on that problem now...they are actively attempting to foment a race war in the US. If they are successful, they will then have the perfect excuse to confiscate our guns; if we let them, we will be defeated...game over. But, if we successfully resist (civil war) and slap them down (this may cost millions of lives, but it will be a necessary sacrifice), they will all be dead, or in prison, and we will have our country back. Be advised that up to 50% of the military will be on our side of things.

    There are many potential scenarios that negate your 'All-powerful PTB' argument. For example, what if China, in response to an escalation in US aggression in Syria, dumps all of it's dollar holdings (over $1 Trillion) on the market (which would, in turn, trigger an unstoppable cascade of dollar-selling)? The US economy would collapse within a few days with no means to recover...societal collapse would quickly ensue. Without a commercial grocery store system, how would your totalitarian government feed hundreds of millions of starving people? Even if they could pull off such a massive undertaking (which has never been done in the history of the world), how long could they sustain the effort? Under martial law, they would be able to keep things running for a time, but the people who man the infrastructure would eventually rebel against the forced-labor-without-pay. Then what?

    One of the first things they [NWO] will do will be to shut down the internet...without the internet you'll have no way of getting accurate information; they could very easily undertake a program of mass extermination, and you would be completely unaware of it...until they come for you! I have a some excellent communications equipment: HAM HF radio, walky-talkies, surveillance cameras, etc., to keep myself informed of the situation...all you will have the is the TV, which they control.

    Even a totalitarian government can't be everywhere to maintain order...lawlessness WILL manifest everywhere outside of the larger cities. How will you defend yourself after a societal collapse? Kitchen knife? Baseball bat? How? There will be roving bands of starving people who will be intent on getting into your house and eating your food (or you!)...how will you resist them? I won't have to worry about that because I'll be safe underground (and well fed)...and when I do pop my head out a year down the road, I'll be heavily armed; and since I'm already well trained, I'll have no worries there, either.

    If society collapses, for whatever reason, I will live, and you will die. It's as simple as that.

    ps...something that you should know about Preppers/Survivalists is that we have resigned ourselves to the fact that we will most likely have to take human life. I, personally, have no qualms about that whatsoever...indeed, I plan on taking many lives as I exact my revenge on you lazy assholes! In my view, it is people like you, useless internet talkers, who have failed to take any action whatsoever (aside from voting, which is futile) to protect this country from the enemy. Like it or not, I blame you for what's coming. Call me a blowhard on the internet, there's really nothing I can do about it...do it in the real world and my options are wide open!

  51. Bill says:
    @Truth
    Hey Guys:

    You have to thank this limey, for kindly synopsizing, for you gauche, unread, practically-illiterate Americans, a 40-page book that you had for a mandatory reading assignment IN THE 8TH GRADE!

    Every so often, Truth, your shtick is funny.

    Read More
  52. Corvinus says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    Turning America into one vast Empire stretching from Terra del Fuego to Prudhoe Bay as Hillary envisions and importing masses of scab labor will ultimately result in the destruction of the Welfare State. That’s the long game.
     
    Yes, but when has the upper-class of a two-class economic system ever been concerned about the living conditions of the lower-class? Never. There is not enough wealth in the known Universe for one rich man to believe he can get enough.

    The problem really IS the rich -- the pure untempered materialism, the ravening greed, the contemptuous disregard (except as lip-service) for the most basic of humanitarian principles.

    Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy. Later, it would be a good idea to come up with a form of government that is truly capable of permitting a rich class, but preventing the horrors of its excesses.

    That'll be the day.

    “Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy.”

    Who makes that judgement? Under what criteria? Does that mean women and children are also murdered under this purge?

    Your solution is sociopathic in nature. Are you just blowing off steam or you actually serious?

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith
    “Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy.”

    Who makes that judgement? Under what criteria? Does that mean women and children are also murdered under this purge?
     
    Who? That's simple enough: designated representatives of the people. Did you miss the part about "judicious evaluation"?

    Your solution is sociopathic in nature. Are you just blowing off steam or you actually serious?
     
    Uh, no. Best you go look up "sociopathic". I reiterate: many of them have to be killed. As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, so that a once proud and principled nation may be rebuilt. If such is possible -- and it may not be possible. We shall see.
  53. @Corvinus
    "Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy."

    Who makes that judgement? Under what criteria? Does that mean women and children are also murdered under this purge?

    Your solution is sociopathic in nature. Are you just blowing off steam or you actually serious?

    “Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy.”

    Who makes that judgement? Under what criteria? Does that mean women and children are also murdered under this purge?

    Who? That’s simple enough: designated representatives of the people. Did you miss the part about “judicious evaluation”?

    Your solution is sociopathic in nature. Are you just blowing off steam or you actually serious?

    Uh, no. Best you go look up “sociopathic”. I reiterate: many of them have to be killed. As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, so that a once proud and principled nation may be rebuilt. If such is possible — and it may not be possible. We shall see.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "Who? That’s simple enough: designated representatives of the people. Did you miss the part about “judicious evaluation”?"

    You are purposely being vague. Who are these "designated representatives"? What constitutes a "judicious evaluation"? Is there a final arbiter in case of discrepancies?

    "Uh, no. Best you go look up “sociopathic”. I reiterate: many of them have to be killed."

    Irony escapes you here. You and your solution are sociopathic.

    "As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, so that a once proud and principled nation may be rebuilt. If such is possible — and it may not be possible. We shall see."

    You are making this judgement call here, assuming that an entire group of people have completely unredeemable qualities. Does this mean that the pups (children), to use your analogy, will also be killed?
    , @edNels
    JJS, in your comment with Corvinus: Were you talking about the sociopaths who are off the chart in their greed?

    Uh, no. Best you go look up “sociopathic”. I reiterate: many of them have to be killed. As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America,
     
    ]

    Sociopath's a good word that's getting more popular now, no doubt because of increased relevance due to I think, diminished needs to hide the trait. ''The Sociopath Next Door'' kind of explains how that is much more prevalent and also importantly, is not frowned on, but is rewarded, until it goes too far off the beam, as in the cases of serial murderers etc.

    But to the quote, specifically:

    [... marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, ]
     
    I don't see the Sociopaths (those sociopaths who are the greedy ones,) being the members of any marauding packs at anytime. Sociopaths mainly do ''predate'' on others but not like wolves. Wolves are just hungry dogs.

    There might be marauding wolf packs of humans, but they will be from the ranks of the dispossessed larger population, homeless and fugitive any that can move on foot.

    Not that there won't be sociopaths in any group too but those Alpha types, I assume that you mean at the levers, who have made it the mess it is, will be the last to pull stakes from their cushy surroundings to go to maraud.

    I don't think you will catch many with snares. Those type socio's (in the movies,) usually die of their own devices, after they killed off everything else, their the last ones to go, and must suffer a terrible awakening of themselves, thats' sort of the way it goes in the fables and stuff.

    However if the psychs have it right, sociopaths, are reputed to simply not have a faculty for empathy. Beleive that or not. It could be they're just smart asses who don't give Rat's Patoot, and they know they can keep doin' it....

    Better, bury them under. Let them reflect. Then again, Clean house is good policy.
    , @Boris

    I reiterate: many of them have to be killed.
     
    This motherfucker is out of him goddam mind. Not the worst poster on Unz, however.
  54. @Jim Mayer
    Pray your homeland prospers, if it does, you shall also prosper-Jeremiah 29:7.

    In this election many are saying both candidates are 'equally' bad. They aren't.
    There's one who intends to do good for the country, and one who intends it harm.

    Pretend we don't know either candidate's past, we Only know what each would do if elected. We know what HC wants to do because we now have access to her private speeches. Now we know why she didn't want the public to see the transcripts, because in them she expresses her desire for a 'Borderless Hemispheric Common Market.' In other words, an end to a sovereign America.

    Folks - The end of America!
    How would one measure the tears in heaven from all the Patriots who died for this country?
    How do you begin to calculate the blood spilled over 240yrs of US history, defending it?
    HC wants to end the US & create a super-state combining N&S America!
    And who'd stop her? Our current crop of yellow-bellied RINOs?

    The US is the Cadillac of the West Hemis. Everyone else is a 10 year-old Yugo. The Yugo drivers would Love the wealth re-distribution. But what happens to Your standard of living if we combine economies? When Leftists say they care about you & all the micro-issues, they mean it only until you vote them in. It's all talk. They'll do what THEY want when in power. Proof? Did they care about public opinion when passing Obacare? PubOpin re gender/bathrooms? Care about public's low priority re Climate Change?

    The Left has contempt for the Constitution & go around it with 'ExecOrders'. They say it's a living document, making it malleable instead of inflexible. Not so! It isn't playdough. But a Leftist SupCrt won't agree, & will rubber-stamp the Left's agenda, & will let unconst'l Exec Orders stand. We'll lose 1st & 2nd amends & many other freedoms. The next Prez may have 3-4 SC appoints. If it's HC making those choices, America dies.

    MrT, warts & all, wants America 1st. John 8:7 says, Let him who is without sin cast the 1st stone. Trump is a sinner, as are we all, but he won't dismantle the very nation that enriched him.
    They are not equal.
    .

    canada has a higher standard of living than america. america’s wealth disparity exceeds that of canada’s. canada has 3 times the social mobility as america. canada has a much better healthcare system than america. america has an infant mortality rate of third world nations. canada has lower crime rates. canada ranks higher on the happiness index. canada is a more peaceful place to live.
    the american cadillac is a rusted-out, immobile, relic in need of restoration.
    neither presidential candidate has the will or the way to do the job.
    expect 4 more years of neoliberal policies and laughable bombast of america as the exceptional nation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nsa
    Larry is onto something here.....the three countries with the highest potential standard of living are Australia, Canada, and Russia....based on the ratio of natural resources to population. The Canadians, still predominantly white though disgustingly lefty, have somehow managed in their polite way to limit the rapacious jooies. Australia, being overtly white, has also purposely limited jooie subversion. The Russians are barely a white majority, and still suffer severe jooie infiltration....but have the highest potential standard of living on planet earth....but only if they can control their muzzie population and subdue the jooie termites. The JUSA is a sickly clapped out old crone (like its next president) with a huge and growing dependent turd world population...and worst of all...controlled by a severe jooie infestation eating away at the country's white foundation.
    , @AP

    canada has a higher standard of living than america. america’s wealth disparity exceeds that of canada’s. canada has 3 times the social mobility as america. canada has a much better healthcare system than america. america has an infant mortality rate of third world nations. canada has lower crime rates.

     

    Not an apples-apples comparison, because Canada never imported large numbers of slaves and doesn't border Mexico. Canada also has a larger % of Asians (who live longer and are relatively trouble-free).

    If you want to compare the Canadian to American systems, compare northern American states with demographics similar to that of Canada, with Canada.

    So for example, Minnesota has a life expectancy of 81.1 years. It's Canadian neighbor Manitoba has a life expectancy of 77 for males and 82 for females (average 79.5). Minnesota's homicide rate is 1.7, compared to Manitoba's 3.43.

    Or compare Vermont, Maine and NH to the neighboring Canadian Maritime province of New Brunswick. For the US states life expectancy is 80.5, 79.2 and 80.3, respectively. Next-door New Brunswick has 78 for men and 83 for women, for an average of 81. Maine is certainly worse, but little difference with Vermont and NH. Homicide rates in northern New England are 1.1, 1,.0 and 1.8 for Vermont, NH and Maine. In New Brunswick it is .79. A tiny difference in comparison to Vermont and NH.
  55. @John Jeremiah Smith

    Oh really? And where is your secret mountain redoubt? Blowhard Pass?
     
    LOL. Damn! That was the word I just couldn't remember -- blowhard! Oh, well, there's always a next time.

    I think the preppers don't quite understand that they present no threat to a totalitarian regime that must remain focused on controlling the population and production centers.

    When the preppers run off and camp out in, er, principled defiance, out thar in the pine forests of the frozen north, or the stone canyons of the southwest, The Powers That Be are mostly amused, not threatened.

    Your mind is totally dominated by the meme of the “All-powerful PTB”.

    As long as we have guns, especially long rifles, they are totally vulnerable, and they know it. That’s why they have been working mightily to take away our gun rights…if we are fully armed it’s not possible for them to have an actual totalitarian control system. But, they are working on that problem now…they are actively attempting to foment a race war in the US. If they are successful, they will then have the perfect excuse to confiscate our guns; if we let them, we will be defeated…game over. But, if we successfully resist (civil war) and slap them down (this may cost millions of lives, but it will be a necessary sacrifice), they will all be dead, or in prison, and we will have our country back. Be advised that up to 50% of the military will be on our side of things.

    There are many potential scenarios that negate your ‘All-powerful PTB’ argument. For example, what if China, in response to an escalation in US aggression in Syria, dumps all of it’s dollar holdings (over $1 Trillion) on the market (which would, in turn, trigger an unstoppable cascade of dollar-selling)? The US economy would collapse within a few days with no means to recover…societal collapse would quickly ensue. Without a commercial grocery store system, how would your totalitarian government feed hundreds of millions of starving people? Even if they could pull off such a massive undertaking (which has never been done in the history of the world), how long could they sustain the effort? Under martial law, they would be able to keep things running for a time, but the people who man the infrastructure would eventually rebel against the forced-labor-without-pay. Then what?

    One of the first things they [NWO] will do will be to shut down the internet…without the internet you’ll have no way of getting accurate information; they could very easily undertake a program of mass extermination, and you would be completely unaware of it…until they come for you! I have a some excellent communications equipment: HAM HF radio, walky-talkies, surveillance cameras, etc., to keep myself informed of the situation…all you will have the is the TV, which they control.

    Even a totalitarian government can’t be everywhere to maintain order…lawlessness WILL manifest everywhere outside of the larger cities. How will you defend yourself after a societal collapse? Kitchen knife? Baseball bat? How? There will be roving bands of starving people who will be intent on getting into your house and eating your food (or you!)…how will you resist them? I won’t have to worry about that because I’ll be safe underground (and well fed)…and when I do pop my head out a year down the road, I’ll be heavily armed; and since I’m already well trained, I’ll have no worries there, either.

    If society collapses, for whatever reason, I will live, and you will die. It’s as simple as that.

    ps…something that you should know about Preppers/Survivalists is that we have resigned ourselves to the fact that we will most likely have to take human life. I, personally, have no qualms about that whatsoever…indeed, I plan on taking many lives as I exact my revenge on you lazy assholes! In my view, it is people like you, useless internet talkers, who have failed to take any action whatsoever (aside from voting, which is futile) to protect this country from the enemy. Like it or not, I blame you for what’s coming. Call me a blowhard on the internet, there’s really nothing I can do about it…do it in the real world and my options are wide open!

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    Call me a blowhard on the internet, there’s really nothing I can do about it…
     
    Okay. You're a blowhard on the Internet.

    I have no problem with revolution, and I am old enough to have seen two. It's great to have a man-cave with weapons and camo outfits -- lotsa fun. But, I get the feeling that you just don't know how this sort of thing works in real life.
    , @Mr. Anon
    "Your mind is totally dominated by the meme of the “All-powerful PTB”."

    The same PTB that can track you down from your internet posts about revolution?

    The first rule of Fight Club is that you don't talk about Fight Club.

    The second rule of Fight Club is that don't talk about Fight Club.

    etc.

    You sound like an FBI informant fishing for a lead.

  56. nsa says:
    @Lawrence Fitton
    canada has a higher standard of living than america. america's wealth disparity exceeds that of canada's. canada has 3 times the social mobility as america. canada has a much better healthcare system than america. america has an infant mortality rate of third world nations. canada has lower crime rates. canada ranks higher on the happiness index. canada is a more peaceful place to live.
    the american cadillac is a rusted-out, immobile, relic in need of restoration.
    neither presidential candidate has the will or the way to do the job.
    expect 4 more years of neoliberal policies and laughable bombast of america as the exceptional nation.

    Larry is onto something here…..the three countries with the highest potential standard of living are Australia, Canada, and Russia….based on the ratio of natural resources to population. The Canadians, still predominantly white though disgustingly lefty, have somehow managed in their polite way to limit the rapacious jooies. Australia, being overtly white, has also purposely limited jooie subversion. The Russians are barely a white majority, and still suffer severe jooie infiltration….but have the highest potential standard of living on planet earth….but only if they can control their muzzie population and subdue the jooie termites. The JUSA is a sickly clapped out old crone (like its next president) with a huge and growing dependent turd world population…and worst of all…controlled by a severe jooie infestation eating away at the country’s white foundation.

    Read More
  57. Corvinus says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith
    “Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy.”

    Who makes that judgement? Under what criteria? Does that mean women and children are also murdered under this purge?
     
    Who? That's simple enough: designated representatives of the people. Did you miss the part about "judicious evaluation"?

    Your solution is sociopathic in nature. Are you just blowing off steam or you actually serious?
     
    Uh, no. Best you go look up "sociopathic". I reiterate: many of them have to be killed. As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, so that a once proud and principled nation may be rebuilt. If such is possible -- and it may not be possible. We shall see.

    “Who? That’s simple enough: designated representatives of the people. Did you miss the part about “judicious evaluation”?”

    You are purposely being vague. Who are these “designated representatives”? What constitutes a “judicious evaluation”? Is there a final arbiter in case of discrepancies?

    “Uh, no. Best you go look up “sociopathic”. I reiterate: many of them have to be killed.”

    Irony escapes you here. You and your solution are sociopathic.

    “As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, so that a once proud and principled nation may be rebuilt. If such is possible — and it may not be possible. We shall see.”

    You are making this judgement call here, assuming that an entire group of people have completely unredeemable qualities. Does this mean that the pups (children), to use your analogy, will also be killed?

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    You are purposely being vague. Who are these “designated representatives”? What constitutes a “judicious evaluation”? Is there a final arbiter in case of discrepancies?
     
    LOL. Sorry, chum, I know how this works. I've dealt with you jokers for decades. The old "if you can't provide exact details -- and we mean EXACT as in names and phone numbers" -- then you are vague. And sociopathic.

    Pppbbllllxxttzzzttt!!!!
  58. edNels says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith
    “Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy.”

    Who makes that judgement? Under what criteria? Does that mean women and children are also murdered under this purge?
     
    Who? That's simple enough: designated representatives of the people. Did you miss the part about "judicious evaluation"?

    Your solution is sociopathic in nature. Are you just blowing off steam or you actually serious?
     
    Uh, no. Best you go look up "sociopathic". I reiterate: many of them have to be killed. As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, so that a once proud and principled nation may be rebuilt. If such is possible -- and it may not be possible. We shall see.

    JJS, in your comment with Corvinus: Were you talking about the sociopaths who are off the chart in their greed?

    Uh, no. Best you go look up “sociopathic”. I reiterate: many of them have to be killed. As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America,

    ]

    Sociopath’s a good word that’s getting more popular now, no doubt because of increased relevance due to I think, diminished needs to hide the trait. ”The Sociopath Next Door” kind of explains how that is much more prevalent and also importantly, is not frowned on, but is rewarded, until it goes too far off the beam, as in the cases of serial murderers etc.

    But to the quote, specifically:

    [... marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, ]

    I don’t see the Sociopaths (those sociopaths who are the greedy ones,) being the members of any marauding packs at anytime. Sociopaths mainly do ”predate” on others but not like wolves. Wolves are just hungry dogs.

    There might be marauding wolf packs of humans, but they will be from the ranks of the dispossessed larger population, homeless and fugitive any that can move on foot.

    Not that there won’t be sociopaths in any group too but those Alpha types, I assume that you mean at the levers, who have made it the mess it is, will be the last to pull stakes from their cushy surroundings to go to maraud.

    I don’t think you will catch many with snares. Those type socio’s (in the movies,) usually die of their own devices, after they killed off everything else, their the last ones to go, and must suffer a terrible awakening of themselves, thats’ sort of the way it goes in the fables and stuff.

    However if the psychs have it right, sociopaths, are reputed to simply not have a faculty for empathy. Beleive that or not. It could be they’re just smart asses who don’t give Rat’s Patoot, and they know they can keep doin’ it….

    Better, bury them under. Let them reflect. Then again, Clean house is good policy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    I don’t see the Sociopaths (those sociopaths who are the greedy ones,) being the members of any marauding packs at anytime. Sociopaths mainly do ”predate” on others but not like wolves. Wolves are just hungry dogs.
     
    Dear Ed, your post indicates you may have a bad infection of metaphor-perception-impairment, and a tendency to rattle-on about irrelevancies. Have a nice day.
  59. AP says:
    @Lawrence Fitton
    canada has a higher standard of living than america. america's wealth disparity exceeds that of canada's. canada has 3 times the social mobility as america. canada has a much better healthcare system than america. america has an infant mortality rate of third world nations. canada has lower crime rates. canada ranks higher on the happiness index. canada is a more peaceful place to live.
    the american cadillac is a rusted-out, immobile, relic in need of restoration.
    neither presidential candidate has the will or the way to do the job.
    expect 4 more years of neoliberal policies and laughable bombast of america as the exceptional nation.

    canada has a higher standard of living than america. america’s wealth disparity exceeds that of canada’s. canada has 3 times the social mobility as america. canada has a much better healthcare system than america. america has an infant mortality rate of third world nations. canada has lower crime rates.

    Not an apples-apples comparison, because Canada never imported large numbers of slaves and doesn’t border Mexico. Canada also has a larger % of Asians (who live longer and are relatively trouble-free).

    If you want to compare the Canadian to American systems, compare northern American states with demographics similar to that of Canada, with Canada.

    So for example, Minnesota has a life expectancy of 81.1 years. It’s Canadian neighbor Manitoba has a life expectancy of 77 for males and 82 for females (average 79.5). Minnesota’s homicide rate is 1.7, compared to Manitoba’s 3.43.

    Or compare Vermont, Maine and NH to the neighboring Canadian Maritime province of New Brunswick. For the US states life expectancy is 80.5, 79.2 and 80.3, respectively. Next-door New Brunswick has 78 for men and 83 for women, for an average of 81. Maine is certainly worse, but little difference with Vermont and NH. Homicide rates in northern New England are 1.1, 1,.0 and 1.8 for Vermont, NH and Maine. In New Brunswick it is .79. A tiny difference in comparison to Vermont and NH.

    Read More
  60. @Anonymous Smith
    Your mind is totally dominated by the meme of the "All-powerful PTB".

    As long as we have guns, especially long rifles, they are totally vulnerable, and they know it. That's why they have been working mightily to take away our gun rights...if we are fully armed it's not possible for them to have an actual totalitarian control system. But, they are working on that problem now...they are actively attempting to foment a race war in the US. If they are successful, they will then have the perfect excuse to confiscate our guns; if we let them, we will be defeated...game over. But, if we successfully resist (civil war) and slap them down (this may cost millions of lives, but it will be a necessary sacrifice), they will all be dead, or in prison, and we will have our country back. Be advised that up to 50% of the military will be on our side of things.

    There are many potential scenarios that negate your 'All-powerful PTB' argument. For example, what if China, in response to an escalation in US aggression in Syria, dumps all of it's dollar holdings (over $1 Trillion) on the market (which would, in turn, trigger an unstoppable cascade of dollar-selling)? The US economy would collapse within a few days with no means to recover...societal collapse would quickly ensue. Without a commercial grocery store system, how would your totalitarian government feed hundreds of millions of starving people? Even if they could pull off such a massive undertaking (which has never been done in the history of the world), how long could they sustain the effort? Under martial law, they would be able to keep things running for a time, but the people who man the infrastructure would eventually rebel against the forced-labor-without-pay. Then what?

    One of the first things they [NWO] will do will be to shut down the internet...without the internet you'll have no way of getting accurate information; they could very easily undertake a program of mass extermination, and you would be completely unaware of it...until they come for you! I have a some excellent communications equipment: HAM HF radio, walky-talkies, surveillance cameras, etc., to keep myself informed of the situation...all you will have the is the TV, which they control.

    Even a totalitarian government can't be everywhere to maintain order...lawlessness WILL manifest everywhere outside of the larger cities. How will you defend yourself after a societal collapse? Kitchen knife? Baseball bat? How? There will be roving bands of starving people who will be intent on getting into your house and eating your food (or you!)...how will you resist them? I won't have to worry about that because I'll be safe underground (and well fed)...and when I do pop my head out a year down the road, I'll be heavily armed; and since I'm already well trained, I'll have no worries there, either.

    If society collapses, for whatever reason, I will live, and you will die. It's as simple as that.

    ps...something that you should know about Preppers/Survivalists is that we have resigned ourselves to the fact that we will most likely have to take human life. I, personally, have no qualms about that whatsoever...indeed, I plan on taking many lives as I exact my revenge on you lazy assholes! In my view, it is people like you, useless internet talkers, who have failed to take any action whatsoever (aside from voting, which is futile) to protect this country from the enemy. Like it or not, I blame you for what's coming. Call me a blowhard on the internet, there's really nothing I can do about it...do it in the real world and my options are wide open!

    Call me a blowhard on the internet, there’s really nothing I can do about it…

    Okay. You’re a blowhard on the Internet.

    I have no problem with revolution, and I am old enough to have seen two. It’s great to have a man-cave with weapons and camo outfits — lotsa fun. But, I get the feeling that you just don’t know how this sort of thing works in real life.

    Read More
    • LOL: Truth
    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith

    I have no problem with revolution, and I am old enough to have seen two.
     
    lol...what Revolutions are you referring to?
  61. @Corvinus
    "Who? That’s simple enough: designated representatives of the people. Did you miss the part about “judicious evaluation”?"

    You are purposely being vague. Who are these "designated representatives"? What constitutes a "judicious evaluation"? Is there a final arbiter in case of discrepancies?

    "Uh, no. Best you go look up “sociopathic”. I reiterate: many of them have to be killed."

    Irony escapes you here. You and your solution are sociopathic.

    "As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, so that a once proud and principled nation may be rebuilt. If such is possible — and it may not be possible. We shall see."

    You are making this judgement call here, assuming that an entire group of people have completely unredeemable qualities. Does this mean that the pups (children), to use your analogy, will also be killed?

    You are purposely being vague. Who are these “designated representatives”? What constitutes a “judicious evaluation”? Is there a final arbiter in case of discrepancies?

    LOL. Sorry, chum, I know how this works. I’ve dealt with you jokers for decades. The old “if you can’t provide exact details — and we mean EXACT as in names and phone numbers” — then you are vague. And sociopathic.

    Pppbbllllxxttzzzttt!!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    "LOL. Sorry, chum, I know how this works. I’ve dealt with you jokers for decades. The old “if you can’t provide exact details — and we mean EXACT as in names and phone numbers” — then you are vague. And sociopathic."

    You are making a wild generation here and are being called out on it, as you should. You are calling for the murdering of people whom YOU believe are unworthy to live, without any recourse on their part. That is a sociopathic solution.

    Now, does this bloody purge include their offspring? It is a very simple question to answer. Quit stalling.
  62. @edNels
    JJS, in your comment with Corvinus: Were you talking about the sociopaths who are off the chart in their greed?

    Uh, no. Best you go look up “sociopathic”. I reiterate: many of them have to be killed. As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America,
     
    ]

    Sociopath's a good word that's getting more popular now, no doubt because of increased relevance due to I think, diminished needs to hide the trait. ''The Sociopath Next Door'' kind of explains how that is much more prevalent and also importantly, is not frowned on, but is rewarded, until it goes too far off the beam, as in the cases of serial murderers etc.

    But to the quote, specifically:

    [... marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, ]
     
    I don't see the Sociopaths (those sociopaths who are the greedy ones,) being the members of any marauding packs at anytime. Sociopaths mainly do ''predate'' on others but not like wolves. Wolves are just hungry dogs.

    There might be marauding wolf packs of humans, but they will be from the ranks of the dispossessed larger population, homeless and fugitive any that can move on foot.

    Not that there won't be sociopaths in any group too but those Alpha types, I assume that you mean at the levers, who have made it the mess it is, will be the last to pull stakes from their cushy surroundings to go to maraud.

    I don't think you will catch many with snares. Those type socio's (in the movies,) usually die of their own devices, after they killed off everything else, their the last ones to go, and must suffer a terrible awakening of themselves, thats' sort of the way it goes in the fables and stuff.

    However if the psychs have it right, sociopaths, are reputed to simply not have a faculty for empathy. Beleive that or not. It could be they're just smart asses who don't give Rat's Patoot, and they know they can keep doin' it....

    Better, bury them under. Let them reflect. Then again, Clean house is good policy.

    I don’t see the Sociopaths (those sociopaths who are the greedy ones,) being the members of any marauding packs at anytime. Sociopaths mainly do ”predate” on others but not like wolves. Wolves are just hungry dogs.

    Dear Ed, your post indicates you may have a bad infection of metaphor-perception-impairment, and a tendency to rattle-on about irrelevancies. Have a nice day.

    Read More
  63. TJM says:
    @Joe Franklin
    The common ground between US Republicans and US Democrats is the same common ground between Israeli Likud and Israeli Labor party.

    US politics is a reflection of Israeli politics, and their shared ideology is both nations have a super-majority of voters that are a government recognized, entitled protected class.


    Diversity By Group: African American, Alternate Lifestyle, Asian, Disabled, Hispanic & Latino, Jewish, Native American, Women

    http://www.mindexchange.com/diversity.htm

    BULL SHIT!

    There is ONLY ONE “protected class”, Zionist Jews, the rest of the people you mentioned are merely pawns to use in their war of division.

    The idea that blacks, with no jobs, or gays with now the right to marry are “protected” is ridiculous, they are only USED, as a wedge issue to destroy America.

    Read More
  64. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous Smith
    Your mind is totally dominated by the meme of the "All-powerful PTB".

    As long as we have guns, especially long rifles, they are totally vulnerable, and they know it. That's why they have been working mightily to take away our gun rights...if we are fully armed it's not possible for them to have an actual totalitarian control system. But, they are working on that problem now...they are actively attempting to foment a race war in the US. If they are successful, they will then have the perfect excuse to confiscate our guns; if we let them, we will be defeated...game over. But, if we successfully resist (civil war) and slap them down (this may cost millions of lives, but it will be a necessary sacrifice), they will all be dead, or in prison, and we will have our country back. Be advised that up to 50% of the military will be on our side of things.

    There are many potential scenarios that negate your 'All-powerful PTB' argument. For example, what if China, in response to an escalation in US aggression in Syria, dumps all of it's dollar holdings (over $1 Trillion) on the market (which would, in turn, trigger an unstoppable cascade of dollar-selling)? The US economy would collapse within a few days with no means to recover...societal collapse would quickly ensue. Without a commercial grocery store system, how would your totalitarian government feed hundreds of millions of starving people? Even if they could pull off such a massive undertaking (which has never been done in the history of the world), how long could they sustain the effort? Under martial law, they would be able to keep things running for a time, but the people who man the infrastructure would eventually rebel against the forced-labor-without-pay. Then what?

    One of the first things they [NWO] will do will be to shut down the internet...without the internet you'll have no way of getting accurate information; they could very easily undertake a program of mass extermination, and you would be completely unaware of it...until they come for you! I have a some excellent communications equipment: HAM HF radio, walky-talkies, surveillance cameras, etc., to keep myself informed of the situation...all you will have the is the TV, which they control.

    Even a totalitarian government can't be everywhere to maintain order...lawlessness WILL manifest everywhere outside of the larger cities. How will you defend yourself after a societal collapse? Kitchen knife? Baseball bat? How? There will be roving bands of starving people who will be intent on getting into your house and eating your food (or you!)...how will you resist them? I won't have to worry about that because I'll be safe underground (and well fed)...and when I do pop my head out a year down the road, I'll be heavily armed; and since I'm already well trained, I'll have no worries there, either.

    If society collapses, for whatever reason, I will live, and you will die. It's as simple as that.

    ps...something that you should know about Preppers/Survivalists is that we have resigned ourselves to the fact that we will most likely have to take human life. I, personally, have no qualms about that whatsoever...indeed, I plan on taking many lives as I exact my revenge on you lazy assholes! In my view, it is people like you, useless internet talkers, who have failed to take any action whatsoever (aside from voting, which is futile) to protect this country from the enemy. Like it or not, I blame you for what's coming. Call me a blowhard on the internet, there's really nothing I can do about it...do it in the real world and my options are wide open!

    “Your mind is totally dominated by the meme of the “All-powerful PTB”.”

    The same PTB that can track you down from your internet posts about revolution?

    The first rule of Fight Club is that you don’t talk about Fight Club.

    The second rule of Fight Club is that don’t talk about Fight Club.

    etc.

    You sound like an FBI informant fishing for a lead.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith

    The same PTB that can track you down from your internet posts about revolution?
     
    I'm perfectly safe from detection...The IP address that I'm using doesn't belong to my computer. It won't be my door they come knocking on.

    If I were trying to get a lead about some Revolutionary group, I wouldn't come to a website full of useless talkers.

    I'm here just to see if I can get some people involved in prepping...that way, when the SHTF my conscience will be clear.

    Fight Club...great movie!
    , @John Jeremiah Smith

    The second rule of Fight Club is that don’t talk about Fight Club. etc.

    You sound like an FBI informant fishing for a lead.
     
    Yeh. That crossed my mind, but I decided that the delivery was so totally over-the-top, and so all-encompassing of classic "fifth column" 50s-movies schtick that even the greenest FBI or NSA agent wouldn't have used that approach.

    Nah, he's the real thing, I guess. Kinda pathetic, ain't it? ;-)
  65. @John Jeremiah Smith

    Call me a blowhard on the internet, there’s really nothing I can do about it…
     
    Okay. You're a blowhard on the Internet.

    I have no problem with revolution, and I am old enough to have seen two. It's great to have a man-cave with weapons and camo outfits -- lotsa fun. But, I get the feeling that you just don't know how this sort of thing works in real life.

    I have no problem with revolution, and I am old enough to have seen two.

    lol…what Revolutions are you referring to?

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    lol…what Revolutions are you referring to?
     
    Colombia (early FARC) and Brazil in '64.

    Yeah, I know, you never heard of them. Go look it up. Use Wikipedia for "FARC", and "Joao Goulart".
  66. @Mr. Anon
    "Your mind is totally dominated by the meme of the “All-powerful PTB”."

    The same PTB that can track you down from your internet posts about revolution?

    The first rule of Fight Club is that you don't talk about Fight Club.

    The second rule of Fight Club is that don't talk about Fight Club.

    etc.

    You sound like an FBI informant fishing for a lead.

    The same PTB that can track you down from your internet posts about revolution?

    I’m perfectly safe from detection…The IP address that I’m using doesn’t belong to my computer. It won’t be my door they come knocking on.

    If I were trying to get a lead about some Revolutionary group, I wouldn’t come to a website full of useless talkers.

    I’m here just to see if I can get some people involved in prepping…that way, when the SHTF my conscience will be clear.

    Fight Club…great movie!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    "I’m perfectly safe from detection…"

    Yeah, right.

    "If I were trying to get a lead about some Revolutionary group, I wouldn’t come to a website full of useless talkers."

    Sounds like you to a tee.

    "I’m here just to see if I can get some people involved in prepping…"

    Who says people here aren't? Maybe they just aren't posturing gas-bags about it.
  67. @Mr. Anon
    "Your mind is totally dominated by the meme of the “All-powerful PTB”."

    The same PTB that can track you down from your internet posts about revolution?

    The first rule of Fight Club is that you don't talk about Fight Club.

    The second rule of Fight Club is that don't talk about Fight Club.

    etc.

    You sound like an FBI informant fishing for a lead.

    The second rule of Fight Club is that don’t talk about Fight Club. etc.

    You sound like an FBI informant fishing for a lead.

    Yeh. That crossed my mind, but I decided that the delivery was so totally over-the-top, and so all-encompassing of classic “fifth column” 50s-movies schtick that even the greenest FBI or NSA agent wouldn’t have used that approach.

    Nah, he’s the real thing, I guess. Kinda pathetic, ain’t it? ;-)

    Read More
  68. @Anonymous Smith

    I have no problem with revolution, and I am old enough to have seen two.
     
    lol...what Revolutions are you referring to?

    lol…what Revolutions are you referring to?

    Colombia (early FARC) and Brazil in ’64.

    Yeah, I know, you never heard of them. Go look it up. Use Wikipedia for “FARC”, and “Joao Goulart”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith

    Colombia (early FARC) and Brazil in ’64.
     
    HAHAHA! You Third World monkey...you tricked me! I thought I was talking to an actual human being! Goddammit! I gotta admit, you had me going.

    I'll be careful not to respond to you again, you hairy little rascal! :D

  69. Mr. Anon says:
    @Anonymous Smith

    The same PTB that can track you down from your internet posts about revolution?
     
    I'm perfectly safe from detection...The IP address that I'm using doesn't belong to my computer. It won't be my door they come knocking on.

    If I were trying to get a lead about some Revolutionary group, I wouldn't come to a website full of useless talkers.

    I'm here just to see if I can get some people involved in prepping...that way, when the SHTF my conscience will be clear.

    Fight Club...great movie!

    “I’m perfectly safe from detection…”

    Yeah, right.

    “If I were trying to get a lead about some Revolutionary group, I wouldn’t come to a website full of useless talkers.”

    Sounds like you to a tee.

    “I’m here just to see if I can get some people involved in prepping…”

    Who says people here aren’t? Maybe they just aren’t posturing gas-bags about it.

    Read More
  70. Mr. Anon says:

    “Nah, he’s the real thing, I guess. Kinda pathetic, ain’t it?”

    I don’t know. I wouldn’t necessarily expect an internet narc to be subtle either. Either way though, he sounds like a fool.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    I don’t know. I wouldn’t necessarily expect an internet narc to be subtle either. Either way though, he sounds like a fool.
     
    Hmmmm...."I'm just here looking for other people who appreciate really good weed."

    Naaaa....thet thar cognitive dissonance thingamabob is all ringy-dingy with that.
    , @Truth

    Either way though, he sounds like a fool.
     
    Well, I'm glad you've found a kindred spirit.
  71. @John Jeremiah Smith

    lol…what Revolutions are you referring to?
     
    Colombia (early FARC) and Brazil in '64.

    Yeah, I know, you never heard of them. Go look it up. Use Wikipedia for "FARC", and "Joao Goulart".

    Colombia (early FARC) and Brazil in ’64.

    HAHAHA! You Third World monkey…you tricked me! I thought I was talking to an actual human being! Goddammit! I gotta admit, you had me going.

    I’ll be careful not to respond to you again, you hairy little rascal! :D

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    I’ll be careful not to respond to you again, you hairy little rascal!
     
    Suit yourself. I will occasionally remark on what a dumbass you are, but you won't be around for long, so it makes little difference.
  72. @Mr. Anon
    "Nah, he’s the real thing, I guess. Kinda pathetic, ain’t it?"

    I don't know. I wouldn't necessarily expect an internet narc to be subtle either. Either way though, he sounds like a fool.

    I don’t know. I wouldn’t necessarily expect an internet narc to be subtle either. Either way though, he sounds like a fool.

    Hmmmm….”I’m just here looking for other people who appreciate really good weed.”

    Naaaa….thet thar cognitive dissonance thingamabob is all ringy-dingy with that.

    Read More
  73. namer says: • Website
    @Che Guava
    I an a great admirer of Eric Blair, a.k.a. George Orwell.

    Enough to have read the old four-volume set of miscellaneous writings from first cover to last.

    Yet among the pigs you have Snowball (Trotsky), the good pig who is driven out, and Napoleon (Stalin), the bad pig.

    That is false consciousness.

    I learnt much by comparing accounts in A Homage to Catalonia with For Whom the Bell Tolls.

    Both portray the Trots as a mess, though Orwell, being on that side, tries to make it a glamorously tragic mess.

    Will always go for Hemingway's take on it.

    Whatever happened to Leon Trotsky,

    He got an icepick, baby,

    Right in his plottsky.
     
    From No More Heroes by The Stranglers.

    I think Mercator had the right idea.

    You start out professing admiration for Orwell but wind up defending Stalin. We all have contradictions, but even Whitman wouldn’t stand for one that big! ["Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."]

    Here’s a good take on Orwell’s anti-totalitarian impulses. Resolutely anti-Stalinist, Mr. Blair’s work is also relevant for our “democratic” societies.

    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2010/06/1984-j12.html

    Read More
  74. Overband says:
    @AnotherDad
    Well said John--"pigs" is exactly right.

    For the record, i'll say my money is on (((Dan Senor))) and Paul Ryan--i swear the guy looks like lucifer in one of those odd meetings of the spiritual and material.

    You covered it in a previous column, but this campaign has just ripped the mask off Jewish atavistic hatreds and anti-nationalism--for everyone but Israel, but especially sticking it to white nations. Trump clearly has nothing against Jews, or even blacks or is particularly interested in race stuff in general, but he actually thinks America belongs to Americans and ought to be run in their interest, so the Jews have wheeled out the Hitler cannon and have been firing away full bore.

    There just isn't any way around it. It isn't a "policy" dispute--these folks are evil, wishing to destroy the nation. The "tell" is that i'm not interested in telling these Jews and their fellow travelers how to live. If they want to live in globoland--fine. Let's split and they can create their globo-utopia. (Good luck with that!) But that's not what the Jews care about. They have zero interest in it. They simply object to whites--white gentiles--having their own nations. They want to flood my nation with hostile others, "diversify" it to break it as nation so there is no resistance. They want to be the elite on top of "whitish" societies to live off of the prosperity whites create, but not have us in charge of our nations. In other words, they demand that we be serfs\slaves for them. If you won't let a people go and demand they stay and work for you ... i think there's a name for that--slavery.

    Trump clearly has nothing against Jews, or even blacks or is particularly interested in race stuff in general, but he actually thinks America belongs to Americans and ought to be run in their interest, so the Jews have wheeled out the Hitler cannon and have been firing away full bore.

    Yes, if Trump wasn’t an anti-semite at the start of this campaign, he sure as hell will be one by the end of it. Once again, paranoid Jews have conjured into existence the very demons they sought to destroy. It will be interesting to see how Trump deals with these people when he wins.

    For one thing, I was surprised to see Trump being attacked over his taxes a while ago. This was a stupid thing to do, since President Trump will have the IRS at his disposal and will be in a position to repay his enemies tenfold in the same coin. (Indeed, this is how Putin’s purge of the Russian ‘oligarchs’ began: with tax investigations.)

    Read More
  75. Boris says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith
    “Many of them have to be killed. Perhaps not as indiscriminately as during the Reign of Terror, but with judicious evaluation, and without mercy.”

    Who makes that judgement? Under what criteria? Does that mean women and children are also murdered under this purge?
     
    Who? That's simple enough: designated representatives of the people. Did you miss the part about "judicious evaluation"?

    Your solution is sociopathic in nature. Are you just blowing off steam or you actually serious?
     
    Uh, no. Best you go look up "sociopathic". I reiterate: many of them have to be killed. As marauding packs of wolves must be dealt with during a Siberian winter, marauding packs of human wolves must be dealt with in the moldering ruins of America, so that a once proud and principled nation may be rebuilt. If such is possible -- and it may not be possible. We shall see.

    I reiterate: many of them have to be killed.

    This motherfucker is out of him goddam mind. Not the worst poster on Unz, however.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    This motherfucker is out of him goddam mind. Not the worst poster on Unz, however.
     
    "Him goddamn mind"?? Did you intend that as a grammatical error, or more as a "English as a second language" sort of thing?

    Killing the killers is a time-honored human tradition. Effective, too.
  76. @Anonymous Smith

    Colombia (early FARC) and Brazil in ’64.
     
    HAHAHA! You Third World monkey...you tricked me! I thought I was talking to an actual human being! Goddammit! I gotta admit, you had me going.

    I'll be careful not to respond to you again, you hairy little rascal! :D

    I’ll be careful not to respond to you again, you hairy little rascal!

    Suit yourself. I will occasionally remark on what a dumbass you are, but you won’t be around for long, so it makes little difference.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    namer,

    I already stated my doubts.

    You start out professing admiration for Orwell but wind up defending Stalin.
     
    Absolutely, I love Orwell's novels, but not so much Homage to Catalonia, Animal Farm, and even 1984, after reading much more history. Still love them as literature.

    Stalin rode a vicious bunch of animals, to eliminate the far worse Trotsky, sure, forced collectivation under Stalin was wrong, but most of the purges happened below, and as reaction and counter-reaction within the party.

    Stalin himself was almost surely assassinated in the 'Doctor's Plot.'

    Beria was gone within three days.

    Mecador always did the world a favour, to put Bronstein down.
    , @Che Guava
    Since both of the above smiths are a tag-team of the same person, it is a little amusing.
  77. @Boris

    I reiterate: many of them have to be killed.
     
    This motherfucker is out of him goddam mind. Not the worst poster on Unz, however.

    This motherfucker is out of him goddam mind. Not the worst poster on Unz, however.

    “Him goddamn mind”?? Did you intend that as a grammatical error, or more as a “English as a second language” sort of thing?

    Killing the killers is a time-honored human tradition. Effective, too.

    Read More
  78. Corvinus says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    You are purposely being vague. Who are these “designated representatives”? What constitutes a “judicious evaluation”? Is there a final arbiter in case of discrepancies?
     
    LOL. Sorry, chum, I know how this works. I've dealt with you jokers for decades. The old "if you can't provide exact details -- and we mean EXACT as in names and phone numbers" -- then you are vague. And sociopathic.

    Pppbbllllxxttzzzttt!!!!

    “LOL. Sorry, chum, I know how this works. I’ve dealt with you jokers for decades. The old “if you can’t provide exact details — and we mean EXACT as in names and phone numbers” — then you are vague. And sociopathic.”

    You are making a wild generation here and are being called out on it, as you should. You are calling for the murdering of people whom YOU believe are unworthy to live, without any recourse on their part. That is a sociopathic solution.

    Now, does this bloody purge include their offspring? It is a very simple question to answer. Quit stalling.

    Read More
  79. You are making a wild generation here and are being called out on it, as you should. You are calling for the murdering of people whom YOU believe are unworthy to live, without any recourse on their part.

    I believe you may have intended “generalization” versus “generation”?

    No, I did not call for the “murdering of people whom [I] believe are unworthy to live”. Sorry, chum, but that’s just bullshit on your part.

    Further posts from you will be Ignored.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Richard Steele
    John, it would be nice to have Corvinus or Boris trespassing on my property. I would know exactly--without any remorse--what I would do with them. I would force their asses to sit through a Pia Zadora marathon. You wouldn't have to shoot anybody, could save the bullets for more dangerous predators, and they would be neutralized permanently--i.e., no bullshit from them for forever. They would probably ask to be shot after that.
  80. @John Jeremiah Smith

    You are making a wild generation here and are being called out on it, as you should. You are calling for the murdering of people whom YOU believe are unworthy to live, without any recourse on their part.
     
    I believe you may have intended "generalization" versus "generation"?

    No, I did not call for the "murdering of people whom [I] believe are unworthy to live". Sorry, chum, but that's just bullshit on your part.

    Further posts from you will be Ignored.

    John, it would be nice to have Corvinus or Boris trespassing on my property. I would know exactly–without any remorse–what I would do with them. I would force their asses to sit through a Pia Zadora marathon. You wouldn’t have to shoot anybody, could save the bullets for more dangerous predators, and they would be neutralized permanently–i.e., no bullshit from them for forever. They would probably ask to be shot after that.

    Read More
  81. I would force their asses to sit through a Pia Zadora marathon.

    While that is admirably and callously sadistic, I suspect they might enjoy it.

    Read More
  82. Truth says:
    @Mr. Anon
    "Nah, he’s the real thing, I guess. Kinda pathetic, ain’t it?"

    I don't know. I wouldn't necessarily expect an internet narc to be subtle either. Either way though, he sounds like a fool.

    Either way though, he sounds like a fool.

    Well, I’m glad you’ve found a kindred spirit.

    Read More
  83. Che Guava says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    I’ll be careful not to respond to you again, you hairy little rascal!
     
    Suit yourself. I will occasionally remark on what a dumbass you are, but you won't be around for long, so it makes little difference.

    namer,

    I already stated my doubts.

    You start out professing admiration for Orwell but wind up defending Stalin.

    Absolutely, I love Orwell’s novels, but not so much Homage to Catalonia, Animal Farm, and even 1984, after reading much more history. Still love them as literature.

    Stalin rode a vicious bunch of animals, to eliminate the far worse Trotsky, sure, forced collectivation under Stalin was wrong, but most of the purges happened below, and as reaction and counter-reaction within the party.

    Stalin himself was almost surely assassinated in the ‘Doctor’s Plot.’

    Beria was gone within three days.

    Mecador always did the world a favour, to put Bronstein down.

    Read More
  84. Che Guava says:
    @John Jeremiah Smith

    I’ll be careful not to respond to you again, you hairy little rascal!
     
    Suit yourself. I will occasionally remark on what a dumbass you are, but you won't be around for long, so it makes little difference.

    Since both of the above smiths are a tag-team of the same person, it is a little amusing.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    Since both of the above smiths are a tag-team of the same person, it is a little amusing.
     
    What do they win? February vacations in St. Croix, I hope. Sign me up.
  85. @Che Guava
    Since both of the above smiths are a tag-team of the same person, it is a little amusing.

    Since both of the above smiths are a tag-team of the same person, it is a little amusing.

    What do they win? February vacations in St. Croix, I hope. Sign me up.

    Read More
  86. @Cynic
    Historically, after Britain rescinded the taxes that ostensibly were the cause of the Revolution, a bunch of landed aristocrats who owed money to Britain and didn't want to pay carried it off with the help of a Prussian general who organized Washington's rabble army, and the French Navy.

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yorktown_1931_Issue-2c.jpg

    Don’t forget the Whigs, British and American, and also don’t forget Lord Howe.

    Read More
  87. He is also cynical, when speaking in private to other guys, about how willing women are to let wealthy, powerful men grope them.

    If a woman lets a man touch her, it isn’t “groping”. Try not to get taken in by the propaganda, John.

    Read More
  88. rharwell says:

    As interesting as this is about Jeb Bush and his drive to get even (a fair play), I can see how that would play out and might have. That being said, I am more in the camp that this was HRCs doing, and had this ammo (as well as all the other, and what hasn’t come to light as yet) months ago–Just in case it came down to she and Trump–which it has and did rather quickly.

    She needed a win and set out years ago–after her loss to Obama, to win this time at all costs. The election was rigged in part by DWS, but it was rigged for her win. People seem to forget she and Slick Willy urged him to run before she announced her own candidacy They knew him best since they had been friends–close friend, for years. He would guarantee her win when the dirt on him began to surface and he played himself out nationally.

    The only real threat was Sanders who came out of nowhere and could not be planned. Obama ended that threat either by direct threat (in private since we have no idea what was said) or bribe. Whatever was said made Sanders break his promise and he immediate threw us under the bus and got on the HRC train as an ardent admirer and supporter.

    HRC wants this win and would not tolerate another loss. My money is on her to have rigged this race and to have destroyed Trump. He was never going to win: NEVER.

    Read More
    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    The only real threat was Sanders who came out of nowhere and could not be planned. Obama ended that threat either by direct threat (in private since we have no idea what was said) or bribe.
     
    Seems more like the media spiked Sanders. The media is owned by the rich and the Jewish, thus, there lies your answer. They must have sweated a bit over Sanders, whereas Trump was a drop-dead cinch. Trump was destroyed by the media -- never had the slightest chance.
  89. @rharwell
    As interesting as this is about Jeb Bush and his drive to get even (a fair play), I can see how that would play out and might have. That being said, I am more in the camp that this was HRCs doing, and had this ammo (as well as all the other, and what hasn't come to light as yet) months ago--Just in case it came down to she and Trump--which it has and did rather quickly.

    She needed a win and set out years ago--after her loss to Obama, to win this time at all costs. The election was rigged in part by DWS, but it was rigged for her win. People seem to forget she and Slick Willy urged him to run before she announced her own candidacy They knew him best since they had been friends--close friend, for years. He would guarantee her win when the dirt on him began to surface and he played himself out nationally.

    The only real threat was Sanders who came out of nowhere and could not be planned. Obama ended that threat either by direct threat (in private since we have no idea what was said) or bribe. Whatever was said made Sanders break his promise and he immediate threw us under the bus and got on the HRC train as an ardent admirer and supporter.

    HRC wants this win and would not tolerate another loss. My money is on her to have rigged this race and to have destroyed Trump. He was never going to win: NEVER.

    The only real threat was Sanders who came out of nowhere and could not be planned. Obama ended that threat either by direct threat (in private since we have no idea what was said) or bribe.

    Seems more like the media spiked Sanders. The media is owned by the rich and the Jewish, thus, there lies your answer. They must have sweated a bit over Sanders, whereas Trump was a drop-dead cinch. Trump was destroyed by the media — never had the slightest chance.

    Read More
  90. Male1 says:

    Liberals teach homosexual sex to little kids in public schools and want free sex and free love.
    Ever seen a “gay pride” parade? Total obscenity.

    But when a conservative does less far, they blame him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    But when a conservative does less far, they blame him.

     

    For sure...

    O’Keefe Videos Really Are Clinton’s Watergate
    But Corrupt Government Agencies Won’t Investigate
    http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/okeefe-videos-really-are-clintons-watergate/
     
  91. @Male1
    Liberals teach homosexual sex to little kids in public schools and want free sex and free love.
    Ever seen a "gay pride" parade? Total obscenity.

    But when a conservative does less far, they blame him.

    But when a conservative does less far, they blame him.

    For sure…

    O’Keefe Videos Really Are Clinton’s Watergate
    But Corrupt Government Agencies Won’t Investigate
    http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/okeefe-videos-really-are-clintons-watergate/

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Derbyshire Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Limbaugh and company certainly entertain. But a steady diet of ideological comfort food is no substitute for hearty intellectual fare.
Once as a colonial project, now as a moral playground, the ancient continent remains the object of Great Power maneuvering